01SN0189-Mar27.pdf (2) STAFF' S
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
r~ ....~.~. 1 o 'mn~ CPC
March 27, 2002 BS
01SN0189
(Amended)
Douglas R. Sowers
Matoaca Magisterial District
East line of Otterdale Road, north of Genito Road
REQUEST: Various amendments to Conditional Use Planned Development (Case 88S008), plus
relief to street access requirements for more than 100 lots. (See the following for
details of the requested amendments.)
PROPOSED LAND USE:
This property is part of the original Greenspring mixed use development which
contained approximately 1,313 acres. The applicant wishes to proceed with
developing the subject property, consisting of 282 acres, independent of other
portions of the original Greenspring project and amend specific requirements of the
original Greenspring rezoning. These amendments, which would apply to the subject
282 acres only, are as follows:
AMENDMENT I (Applicant's Amendments 1, 2, 3 and 4)
Amendment to Condition 1 of Case 88S008 to modify the approved Textual Statement to
reflect the requested amendments outlined herein and substitute a new Conceptual Master
Plan for the approved Conceptual Master Plan. The requirement to conform to the
Conceptual Site Development Plan (see attached) would be deleted. This amendment would
allow the request property to be developed as a separate project from that portion of the
remaining acreage originally-zoned and not included in this request.
With respect to land uses, the amended Master Plan deletes a golf course. The requirement
to restore the "Tomahawk" and the "Ellett Hancock" structures would be deleted.
Providing a FIRST CHOICE Community Through Excellence in Public Service
SYNOPSIS OF STAFF'S AND
PLANNING COMMISSION'S P~COMMENDATIONS
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS I THROUGH IV AND VII WITH
IMPOSITION OF CONDITIONS 1 THROUGH 5 AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROFFERED
CONDITIONS 1, 2 AND 5 THROUGH 9. THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDED DENIAL OF
AMENDMENTS V AND VI RELATIVE TO ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND STREET ACCESS
REQUIREMENTS. SINCE THE COMMISSION'S CONSIDERATION OF THIS CASE,
PROFFERED CONDTION 3 RELATWE TO ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, HAS BEEN MODIFIED
AND PROFFERED CONDITION 4 HAS BEEN DELETED. BASED UPON THESE
MODIFCATIONS, STAFF NOW SUPPORTS AMENDMENT V, HAS DISCUSSED HEREIN.
ALSO, SINCE THE COMMISSION'S CONSIDERATION OF THIS CASE, PROFFERED
CONDITION 10 HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND STAFF RECOMMENDS ITS ACCEPTANCE.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (AMENDMENT I)
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT I SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS 1 THROUGH 4
ON PAGES 2 AND 3.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (AMENDMENT I)
Recommend approval of Amendment I for the following reasons:
Conditions of zoning approval for Case 88S008 plus the conditions stated herein
insure land use compatibility and transition between uses developed on the request
property and between uses developed on the request property and existing and
anticipated area development.
Bo
The Tomahawk structure has been destroyed by fire. The Preservation Committee
determined that the Ellett Hancock structure cannot be feasibly restored due to
extensive deterioration.
(NOTE: CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER MAY PROFFER
CONDITIONS. THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY
BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE
RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
CONDITIONS
(STAFF/CPC) 1.
The Textual Statement, titled Greenspring: Conditional Use and
Zoning Application, revised April 1, 1988, including the "Residential
Site Development Criteria" table, Exhibit IV and the conditions of
2 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
zoning for Case 88S008 and the Conceptual Master Plan, prepared by
Timmons, dated April 19, 2001, shall be the Master Plan for the
subject property, except as stated herein. And further, provided that
the subject property shall be permitted to be considered as a separate
project from the remaining portion of that land area covered under
Case 88S008. (P)
(Note: This condition supersedes Condition 1 of Case 88S008 for the
request property only.)
(STAFF/CPC) 2.
All references and requirements relating to golf in the Textual
Statement and conditions of zoning for Case 88S008 shall be deleted.
(P)
(STAFF/CPC) 3.
The requirement to restore the Tomahawk and Ellett Hancock
structures shall be deleted. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 4.
All references and requirements relating to the plan entitled
"Conceptual Site Development Plan - Greenspring - Chesterfield
County, Virginia" in the Textual Statement and conditions of zoning
for Case 88S008 shall be deleted. (P)
AMENDMENT II (Applicant's Request 9)
Amendment to Condition 14 of Case 88S008 to clarify the manner in which the on-site water
line distribution system will be looped with future area water line extensions. This
amendment is discussed in the Utilities section of this "Request Analysis".
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (AMENDMENT ID
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT II AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROFFERED
CONDITIONS 5 AND 6 ON PAGES 3 AND 4.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (AMENDMENT II)
Recommend approval of Amendment II for the following reason:
The requested modification will clarify the manner in which the on-site water line is looped
with future area water line extensions.
3 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
(STAFF/CPC) 5.
Water. In lieu of a water line connection to the Queensmill West
development, the developer shall extend a sixteen (16) inch water line
adjacent to the proposed extension of Woolridge Road from the
southem boundary to the northern boundary of the request site. In
addition, the developer shall extend an appropriately sized water line
to the northwestern boundary of the request site to allow for a future
loop connection to a future water line along Otterdale Road. The
Utilities Department shall approve the size of this extension. (U)
(STAFF/CPC) 6.
Water and Wastewater Plan. The required overall Water and
Wastewater Systems Overall Plan for this development shall be
submitted to the Utilities Department for review and approval at least
thirty (30) days prior to the initial submission of any tentative, site, or
schematic plan. This shall be accompanied by a Phasing Plan which
will establish a schedule for extensions of the required water and
wastewater lines incrementally with each phase of development. (U)
AMENDMENT III (Applicant's Request 7)
Deletion of Conditions 7, 9, 11 and 20 of Case 88S008 relative to the design of a lake
(Condition 7); submission of an overall erosion and sediment control plan (Condition 9);
submission of soil studies prior to construction (Condition 11); and measures designed to
protect the water quality of Swift Creek Reservoir (Condition 20). These amendments are
discussed in the Environmental section of this "Request Analysis."
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (AMENDMENT III)
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT III SUBJECT TO CONDITION 5 AND
ACCEPTANCE OF PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1 AND 2 ON PAGE 5.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (AMENDMENT III)
Recommend approval of Amendment III for the following reasons:
Regulations relative to the design of lakes are part of the County's recently adopted
Upper Swift Creek Stormwater Management Plan. Therefore, deletion of Condition
7 of Case 88S008 is acceptable.
Erosion and sediment control plans must be submitted in accordance with County
requirements. Therefore, deletion of Condition 9 of Case 88S008 is acceptable.
4 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
Current County regulations require submission of soils analysis prior to construction
on the request property. Therefore, deletion of Condition 11 of Case 88S008 is
acceptable.
Do
Since approval of the original zoning, regulations regarding the protection of the
water quality of Swift Creek Reservoir have been adopted. Current State and County
regulations address water quality issues and insure protection of Swift Creek
Reservoir. Therefore, deletion of Condition 20 of Case 88S008 is acceptable.
CONDITION
(STAFF/CPC) 5.
The requirements of Conditions 7, 9, 11 and 20 of Case 88S008 shall
be deleted. (EE)
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
(STAFF/CPC) 1.
Timbering. With the exception of timbering which has been
approved by the Virginia State Department of Forestry for the
purpose of removing dead or diseased trees, there shall be no
timbering until a land disturbance permit has been obtained from the
Environmental Engineering Department and the approved devices
have been installed. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC) 2.
Stormwater. End-of-pipe treatments shall be provided as necessary
and as approved by Environmental Engineering. (EE)
AMENDMENT IV (Applicant's Request 8)
Deletion of Condition 30 requiring the dedication of sixty-five (65) acres and the reservation
for purchase of thirty-five (35) acres for public use. This amendment is discussed in the
Fiscal Impact Section of this "Request Analysis."
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (AMENDMENT IV)
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT IV AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROFFERED
CONDITION 8 ON PAGE 6.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (AMENDMENT IV)
Recommend approval of Amendment IV for the following reason:
The applicant has addressed the impact of this development on capital facilities, as discussed
herein.
5 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
PROFFERED CONDITION
(STAFF/CPC)
8. Cash Proffer
Prior to the time of issuance of a building permit for each of
the first 300 dwelling units, the applicant, subdivider, or its
assignee, shall pay to the County of Chesterfield the following
amounts for infrastructure improvements for schools within
the service district for the Property:
the amount approved by the Board of Supervisors, but
not to exceed $463 per dwelling unit as adjusted
upward by any increase in the Marshall and Swift
Building Cost Index between July 1, 2000 and July 1
of the fiscal year in which the payment is made;
b)
If any of the cash proffers are not expended for the purposes
designated by the Capital Improvement Program within
fifteen (15) years from the date of payment, they shall be
returned in full to the payor. Should Chesterfield County
impose impact fees at any time during the life of the
development that are applicable to the Property, the amount
paid in cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward, but
not be in addition to, any impact fees, in a manner determined
by the County. (B & M)
AMENDMENT V (Applicant's Requests 5, 6 and 10)
Amendment to sections of the approved Textual Statement for Case 88S008 relative to
access and road improvements are requested. Specifically, the following amendments are
requested: deletion of requirements to: (1) dedication of right of way for Genito Road,
Otterdale Road and Powhite Parkway; (2) construct four (4) lanes for sections of Powhite
Parkway Extended; (3) construct four (4) lanes of Woolridge Road Extended and the
Collector Loop Road, if necessary; (4) provide ditch and shoulder improvements along
Genito and Otterdale Roads; (5) construct left and right turn lanes along Otterdale Road,
Genito Road and Powhite Parkway Extended, if required; (6) provide for full cost of
signalization of access onto Otterdale Road, Genito Road and Powhite Parkway Extended, if
warranted; (7) two (2) lanes of pavement for Powhite Parkway Extended and two (2) lanes of
Woolridge Road Extended across adjacent property (Tax ID 719-694-5885); (8) provide a
traffic analysis; (9) provide a phasing plan for these required improvements; and (10) provide
initial access to the development from Powhite Parkway Extended/Old Hundred Road.
These amendments are discussed in the Transportation section of this "Request Analysis."
6 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (AMENDMENT V)
RECOMMEND DENIAL OF AMENDMENT V AND THAT PROFFERED CONDITIONS 3 AND
4 NOT BE ACCEPTED ' I
STAFF RECOMMENDATION ('AMENDMENT V)
Recommend approval of Amendment V and acceptance of Proffered Condition 3 provided the Board
supports public funding of the Powhite Parkway Extension, as stated herein. If the Board does not
support the partial public funding of the Powhite Parkway Extension, staff recommends denial of
Amendment V. This recommendation is made for the following reason:
Proffered conditions could adequately address the traffic impact of this request on area roads.
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
(NOTE: PROFFERED CONDITION 3 HAS BEEN MODIFIED AND PROFFERED CONDITION
4 DELETED SUBSEQUENT TO THE COMMISSION'S CONSIDERATION OF THIS REQUEST.
SHOULD THE BOARD WISH TO APPROVE AMENDMENT V, IT WOULD BE
APPROPPdATE TO ACCEPT PROFFERED CONDITION 3, AS MODIFIED AND NOTED AS
RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.)
o
Phasing of Development. Unless otherwise requested by the applicant or his assignee and
approved by the Chesterfield Department of Transportation, the following phasing of the
development shall be permitted:
(a)
A cumulative total of no more than one hundred twenty five (125) residential
lots or dwelling units may be recorded or site plan approved on the property
with sole access via Woolridge Road Extended from the property southward
to Genito Road across the adjacent parcel (Tax ID 7196872732);
(b)
Once the access specified in subparagraph (a) has been provided and two (2)
lanes of Watermill Parkway from Old Hundred Road/Powhite Parkway
Extended to Woolridge Road Extended and two (2) lanes of Woolridge Road
Extended from Watermill Parkway to Genito Road have been constructed
through Tax ID 7196872732, Tax ID 7206898433, and Tax ID 7236922846,
as determined by the Chesterfield Department of Transportation, a
cumulative total of no more than two hundred fifty (250) residential lots or
dwelling units may be recorded or site plan approved on the property using
such portions of Woolridge Road Extended and Watermill Parkway as the
public road access; and
7 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
(c)
Once the access specified in subparagraph (a) has been provided and two (2)
lanes of Woolridge Road Extended have been constructed, as determined by
the Chesterfield Department of Transportation, from the southern property
line of the subject property adjacent to Tax ID 7196872732 to Old Hundred
Road adjacent to Tax ID 7196945885, the property may be fully developed.
(T)
(STAFF)
Road Improvements and Phasing. Unless otherwise requested by the
applicant or his assignee and approved by the Chesterfield Department of
Transportation (CDOT), development of the property shall be phased and
road improvements shall be provided in accordance with one of the two
alternatives specified below in paragraphs 3(a) and 3(b). Unless within
ninety (90) days of the approval of this zoning CDOT notifies the applicant or
his assignee that Alternative B specified in paragraph 3(b) has been selected
by CDOT, improvements shall be provided in accordance with Alternative A
specified in paragraph 3(a):
(a) Altemative A
i)
Phasing of Development. Unless otherwise requested by the
applicant or his assignee and approved by CDOT, the following
phasing of the development shall be permitted:
ao
A cumulative total of no more than one hundred twenty five
(125) residential lots or dwelling units may be recorded or site
plan approved on the property with access via Woolrodge
Road (Proposed), as shown on the Master Plan (hereinafter
"Woolridge Road Extended"), from the property southward to
Genito Road across the adjacent parcel (Tax ID 7196872732);
bo
Once the access specified in subparagraph 3(a)(i)(a) has been
provided and two (2) lanes of Watermill Parkway from Old
Hundred Road~owhite Parkway Extended to Woolridge
Road Extended and two (2) lanes of Woolridge Road
Extended from Watermill Parkway to Genito Road have been
constructed through Tax ID 7196872732, Tax ID
7206898433, and Tax ID 7236922846, as determined by
CDOT, a cumulative total of no more than two hundred fifty
(250) residential lots or dwelling units may be recorded or site
plan approved on the property using such portions of
Woolridge Road Extended and Watermill Parkway as the
public road access; and
8 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
ii)
Once the access specified in subparagraph 3(a)(i)(a) has been
provided and two (2) lanes of Woolridge Road Extended have
been constructed, as determined by CDOT, from the southern
property line of the subject property adjacent to Tax ID
7196872732 to Old Hundred Road adjacent to Tax ID
7196945885, the property may be fully developed.
Road Improvements.
ao
Right-of Way Dedication. Unless otherwise requested by the
applicant or his assignee and approved by CDOT, the
applicant or his assignee shall dedicate to the County, free and
unrestricted, the following rights of way:
(1)
a ninety (90) foot wide right of way for Woolridge
Road Extended from the southem property line
adjacent to Tax ID 7196872732 to the northern
property line adjacent to Tax ID 7186916889. Such
dedication shall be made in conjunction with
recordation of the first subdivision plat or prior to any
site plan approval, whichever occurs first.
(2)
a ninety (90) foot wide right of way for the East/West
Arterial located near the northern comer of the
property that runs from Woolridge Road Extended to
the northwestern property line of the subject property
adjacent to Tax ID 7166914229. Such dedication
shall be made in conjunction with recordation of the
first subdivision plat or prior to any site plan approval,
whichever occurs first.
(3)
an offsite ninety (90) foot wide right of way for
Woolridge Road Extended from the northern property
line of the subject property northward to Old Hundred
Road across Tax ID 7186916889 and Tax ID
7196945885. In the event the developer is unable to
acquire such offsite right of way, the developer may
request, in w~ting, the County to acquire such fight of
way as a public road improvement. All costs
associated with the acquisition of the right of way
shall be borne by the developer. In the event the
County chooses not to assist the developer in
acquisition of the offsite right of way, the developer
9 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
shall be relieved of such obligation to acquire the
offsite right of way, the obligation to construct any
improvements thereon, as would otherwise be
required by paragraph 3(a)(ii)(b)(2), and the
obligation contained in paragraph 3(a)(i)(c) that the
applicant or his assignee complete construction of
Woolridge Road Extended to Old Hundred Road in
order to be able to fully develop the subject property;
provided that, if the applicant is relieved of such
obligations, the development shall be limited to a
cumulative total of no more than two hundred fifty
(250) residential lots or dwelling units until such time
as a second public road access shall be provided;
(4)
any right of way necessary for improvements specified
in paragraph 3(a)(ii)(b).
The exact location of such rights of way shall be approved by
CDOT.
bo
Construction. Unless otherwise requested by the applicant
and approved by CDOT, in order to provide an adequate
roadway system, the applicant or his assignee shall be
responsible for the following:
(1)
Construction of two lanes of Woolridge Road
Extended from the southern property line adjacent to
Tax ID 7196872932 to the northern property line
adjacent to Tax ID 7186916889;
(2)
Construction of two lanes of Woolridge Road
Extended offsite from the northem property line
adjacent to Tax ID 7186916889 to Old Hundred Road
adjacent to Tax ID 7196945885 within the right of
way specified in paragraph 3(a)(ii)(a);
(3)
Construction of two lanes of the East/West Arterial
from Woolridge Road Extended to the northwestern
property line adjacent to Tax ID 7166914229;
(4)
Construction of left and right mm lanes along
Woolridge Road Extended and the East/West Arterial,
if warranted based on Chesterfield Department of
10 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
Transportation standards, as follows: (a) at each
approved access within the subject property; (b) at the
intersection of the East/West Arterial with Woolridge
Road Extended; and (c) at the intersection of
Woolridge Road Extended and Old Hundred Road.
Prior to the first site plan or tentative subdivision plan
approval, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit a
phasing plan for these improvements to CDOT and shall
receive its approval of such plan. Unless otherwise requested
by the applicant o~r his assignee and approved by CDOT, such
phasing plan shall include the phasing requirements specified
in Proffer 3(a)(i).
Prior to recordation or site plan approval for a cumulative
total of more than one hundred twenty five (125) residential
lots or dwelling units, the applicant shall provide a bond,
letter of credit, or other security for the improvements
specified in paragraphs 3(a)(ii)(b)(1) and 3(a)(ii)(b)(2) and for
the right of way required in paragraph 3(a)(ii)(a)(3) in a form
acceptable to the County Attorney and in'an amount
acceptable to CDOT. Such secmSty shall guarantee that such
improvements shall be provided/completed, as determined by
CDOT, either: (a) prior to recordation or site plan approval
for a cumulative total of more than two hundred fifty (250)
residential lots or dwelling units, or (b) within five years of
the initial date of the security, whichever occurs first, unless
the applicant has been relieved of the obligation to provide
such improvements and offsite right of way in accordance
with paragraph 3(a)(ii)(a)(3). This paragraph shall not affect
any obligation to provide a bond or other security required
under the provisions of the subdivision ordinance.
Access. Prior to first site plan or tentative subdivision
approval, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit to
CDOT, and receive its approval of, a plan for access points to
the property from Woolridge Road Extended and the
East/West Arterial.
11 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
(b) Alternative B
i)
Phasing of Development. Unless otherwise requested by the
applicant or his assignee and approved by CDOT, the following
phasing of the development shall be permitted:
ao
A cumulative total of no more than eighty (80) residential lots
or dwelling units may be recorded or site plan approved on
the property with access via Woolridge Road Extended from
the property southward to Genito Road across the adjacent
parcel (Tax ID 7196872732);
A cumulative total of no more than two hundred fifty (250)
lots or dwelling units may be recorded or site plan approved
on the property with access from the north via two (2) lanes of
Powhite Parkway Extended and two (2) lanes of Woolridge
Road Extended, leading from Old Hundred Road~owhite
Parkway Extended westward along the right of way for
Powhite Parkway Extended and across Tax ID 7196945885 to
the northern property line of Tax ID 7186916889 ("the
Powhite/Woolridge Project");
Once the Powhite/Woolridge Project and two (2) lanes of
Woolridge Road Extended as required in paragraph
3 (b)(ii)(b)(1) have been constructed, as determined by CDOT,
the property may be fully developed; provided that, if the
Powhite/Woolridge Project has not been constructed within
two (2) years from the date on which this zoning is approved,
the property may be fully developed without the limitations
otherwise imposed by paragraphs 3(b)(i)(a) and 3(b)(i)(b),
although, in no event, may more than two hundred fifty (250)
lots be developed off a single public road access.
ii) Road Improvements.
Right-of Way Dedication. Unless otherwise requested by the
applicant or his assignee and approved by CDOT, the
applicant or his assignee shall dedicate to the County, free and
unrestricted, the following rights of way:
(1) a ninety (90) foot wide right of way for Woolridge
Road Extended from the southern property line
12 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
(2)
(3)
(4)
adjacent to Tax ID 7196872732 to the northem
property line of Tax ID 7186916889 adjacent to Tax
ID 7196945885. Such dedication shall be made in
conjunction with recordation of the first subdivision
plat or prior to any site plan approval, whichever
occurs first.
a ninety (90) foot wide right of way for the East/West
Arterial located near the northern comer of the
property that runs from Woolridge Road Extended to
the northwestern property line of the subject property
adjacent to Tax ID 7166914229. Such dedication
shall be made in conjunction with recordation of the
first subdivision plat or prior to any site plan approval,
whichever occurs first.
any right of way necessary for improvements specified
in paragraph 3(b)(ii)(b);
in the event that the applicant or any entity in which
the applicant has an ownership interest acquires Tax
ID 7176945885 prior to the time the right of way is
acquired for the Powhite/Woolridge Project, a ninety
(90) foot wide right of way necessary for both
roadways of such Project across such parcel. Such
dedication shall be made within sixty (60) days of
CDOT requesting in w~ting such dedication.
The exact location of such rights of way shall be approved by
CDOT.
Construction. Unless otherwise requested by the applicant or
his assignee and approved by CDOT, in order to provide an
adequate roadway system, the applicant or his assignee shall
be responsible for the following:
(1)
Construction of two lanes of Woolridge Road
Extended from the southern property line adjacent to
Tax ID 7196872732 to the northern property line of
Tax ID 7186916889 adjacent to Tax ID 7196945885;
13 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
Co
(2)
Construction of two lanes of the East/West Arterial
from Woolridge Road Extended to the northwestern
property line adjacent to Tax ID 7166914229;
(3)
Construction of left and right turn lanes along
Woolridge Road Extended and the East/West Arterial,
if warranted based on Chesterfield Department of
Transportation standards, as follows: (a) at each
approved access within the subject property; and (b) at
the intersection of the East/West Arterial with
Woolridge Road Extended.
Prior to the first site plan or tentative subdivision plan
approval, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit a
phasing plan for these improvements to CDOT and shall
receive its approval of such plan. Unless otherwise requested
by the applicant or his assignee and approved by CDOT, such
phasing plan shall include the applicable phasing
requirements specified in paragraph 3(b)(i) and shall
otherwise generally correlate the phasing of the construction
of Woolridge Road Extended to the phasing of the
development of the various portions of the property.
Cash/Construction Proffer. At any time after CDOT has
notified the applicant or his assignee that Alternative B has
been selected, and upon receipt of sixty (60) days notice from
CDOT, the applicant or his assignee shall provide to
Chesterfield County a payment of four hundred thousand
dollars ($400,000) in cash. At the time that the contract is
advertised for the construction of the Powhite/Woolridge
Project, and upon receipt of sixty (60) days notice from
CDOT, the applicant or his assignee shall provide to
Chesterfield County an additional payment of four hundred
thousand dollars ($400,000) in cash or, if requested by the
applicant or his assignee and approved by CDOT, road
improvements of equivalent value, as determined by CDOT;
Access. Prior to first site plan or tentative subdivision
approval, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit to
CDOT, and receive its approval of, a plan for access points to
the property from Woolridge Road Extended and the
East/West Arterial.
14 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
Security. Prior to recordation or site plan approval for a
cumulative total of more than one hundred twenty five (125)
residential lots or dwelling units, the applicant shall provide a
bond, letter of credit, or other security for the improvements
specified in paragraph 3.(b)ii)b.(1) in a form acceptable to the
County Attorney and in an amount acceptable to CDOT. Such
security shall guarantee that such improvements shall be
provided/completed, as determined by CDOT, either (a) prior
to recordation of site plan approval for a cumulative total of
more than two hundred fifty (250) residential lots or dwelling
units, or (b) within three (3) years of the initial date of
secmSty, whichever occurs first. This paragraph shall not
affect any obligation to provide a bond or other security
required under the provisions of the subdivision ordinance.
(I)
Transportation.
a) Right-of Way Dedication. Unless otherwise requested by the applicant or his assignee
and approved by the Chesterfield Department of Transportation, the applicant or his assignee
shall dedicate to the County, free and unrestricted, the following rights of way:
(i)
a ninety (90) foot wide right of way for Woolridge Road Extended from the
southern property line adjacent to Tax ID 7196872732 to the northern
property line adjacent to Tax ID 7186916889. Such dedication shall be made
in conjunction with recordation of the first subdivision plat or prior to any
site plan approval, whichever occurs first. (T)
(ii)
a ninety (90) foot wide right of way for the East/West Arterial located near
the northern comer of the property that runs from Woolridge Road Extended
to the northwestern property line of the subject property adjacent to Tax ID
7166914229. Such dedication shall be made in conjunction with recordation
of the first subdivision plat or prior to any site plan approval, whichever
occurs first. (T)
(iii)
an offsite ninety (90) foot wide right of way for Woolridge Road Extended
from the northern property line of the subject property northward to Old
Hundred Road across Tax ID 7186916889 and Tax ID 7196945885. In the
event the developer is unable to acquire such offsite right of way, the
developer may request, in writing, the County to acquire such right of way as
a public road improvement. All costs associated with the acquisition of the
right of way shall be borne by the developer. In the event the County chooses
not to assist the developer in acquisition of the offsite right of way, the
15 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
developer shall be relieved of such obligation to acquire the offsite fight of
way, the obligation to construct any improvements thereon, as would
otherwise be required by paragraph 4(b)(ii), and the obligation contained in
paragraph 3(c) that the applicant or his assignee complete construction of
Woolridge Road Extended to Old Hundred Road in order to be able to fully
develop the subject property; provided that, if the applicant is relieved of
such obligations, the development shall be limited to a cumulative total of no
more than two hundred fifty (250) residential lots or dwelling units until such
time as a second public road access shall be provided; (T & F)
(iv) any right of way necessary for improvements specified in paragraph 4(b). (T)
The exact location of such fights of way shall be approved by the Chesterfield Department of
Transportation.
b) Construction. To provide an adequate roadway system, the applicant or his assignee shall
be responsible for the following:
(i)
Construction of two lanes of Woolridge Road Extended from the southern
property line adjacent to Tax ID 7196872932 to the northern property line
adjacent to Tax ID 7186916889;
(ii)
Construction of two lanes of Woolridge Road Extended offsite from the
northern property line adjacent to Tax ID 7186916889 to Old Hundred Road
adjacent to Tax ID 7196945885 within the right of way specified in paragraph
a;
(iii)
Construction of two lanes of the East/West Arterial from Woolridge Road
Extended to the northwestern property line adjacent to Tax ID 7166914229;
(iv)
Construction of left and right mm lanes along Woolridge Road Extended and
the East/West Arterial, if warranted based on Chesterfield Department of
Transportation standards, as follows: (a) at each approved access within the
subject property; at the intersection of the East/West Arterial with Woolridge
Road Extended; and (c) at the intersection of Woolridge Road Extended and
Old Hundred Road.
Prior to the first site plan or tentative subdivision plan approval, whichever occurs first, the
applicant shall submit a phasing plan for these improvements to the Chesterfield Department
of Transportation and shall receive its approval of such plan. Unless otherwise requested by
the applicant or his assignee and approved by the Chesterfield Department of Transportation,
such phasing plan shall include the phasing requirements specified in Proffer 3.
16 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
Prior to recordation or site plan approval for a cumulative total of more than one hundred
twenty five (125) residential lots or dwelling units, the applicant shall provide a bond, letter
of credit, or other security for the improvements specified in paragraphs 4(b)(i) and (ii) and
for the right of way required in paragraph 4(a)(iii) in a form acceptable to the County
Attorney and in an amount acceptable to the Chesterfield Department of Transportation.
Such security shall guarantee that such improvements shall be provided/completed, as
determined by the Chesterfield Department of Transportation, either: (a) prior to recordation
or site plan approval for a cumulative total of more than two hundred fifty (250) residential
lots or dwelling units, or (b) within five years of the initial date of the security, whichever
occurs first, unless the applicant has been relieved of the obligation to provide such
improvements and offsite fight of way in accordance with paragraph 4(a)(iii).
c)
Access.. Prior to first site plan or tentative subdivision approval, whichever occurs
first, the applicant shall submit to the Chesterfield Department of Transportation, and
receive its approval of, a plan for access points to the property from Woolridge Road
Extended and the East/West Arterial. (T)
AMENDMENT VI
Relief to street access requirements.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (AMENDMENT VI)
RECOMMEND DENIAL OF AMENDMENT VI
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (AMENDMENT VI)
Recommend denial of Amendment VI for the following reason:
Without provision of a second access, the accessibility to and from the development in an
emergency situation, should be access be blocked, will be restricted thereby adversely
affecting the health, safety and welfare of citizens in the development.
AMENDMENT VII
The applicant has offered three (3) additional proffered conditions that address the square
footage and restrictive covenants applying to single family detached dwelling unit
development only and a covenant prohibiting manufactured homes.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (AMENDMENT VII')
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT VII AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROFFERED
CONDITIONS 7 AND 9 ON PAGES 10 THROUGH 17. PROFFERED CONDITION 10 WAS
17 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
SUBMITTED SUBSEQUENT TO THE COMMISSION'S CONSIDERATION OF THIS
REQUEST.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (AMENDMENT VII)
Recommend that Proffered Conditions 7, 9 and 10 be accepted with the understanding that the
application of Proffered Conditions 7 and 9 is exclusive to single family detached development.
Conditions of Case 88S008 also permit the construction of attached and semi-detached dwelling
units to which these proffered conditions would not apply. Further, the current Ordinance would not
permit manufactured homes; however, should pending State legislation be adopted, Proffered
Condition 10 may, or may not, have the effect of prohibiting manufactured homes.
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
(STAFF/CPC) 7.
Minimum Square Footage for Single Family Detached Home:;. All
dwellings built as Single Family Detached homes in accordance with
section 4B(4)(B) of the Textual Statement and Exhibit IV thereto
shall have the following minimum gross floor area:
1 story 1,700 square feet;
More than 1 story 2,000 square feet. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 9.
Covenants for Single Family Detached Homes. For all properties
containing Single Family Detached homes in accordance with section
4B(4)(B) of the Textual Statement and Exhibit IV thereto, the
following Declaration of Restrictions shall be recorded in conjunction
with the recordation of any subdivision plat:
THE OWNERS do hereby declare that said property is to be held, owned, conveyed, used
and occupied subject to the following restrictive covenants:
(i)
An Architectural Review Committee, hereinafter called "ARC" shall be
comprised of Douglas R. Sowers, his heirs, personal representatives,
successors, and assigns, any of which may act. The ARC shall coordinate
each residence and lot and shall establish reasonable rules and regulations
relating to the procedure for architectural approvals and general guidelines for
architectural plans according to the following architectural guidelines:
All plans to be approved prior to commencement of construction on each lot.
House location to be approved prior to construction.
Roof
Minimum 7/12 pitch
18
01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
Minimum 12" overhang
No uncolored galvanized flashing
Foundation
Brick foundations
Brick or stone on chimney chases
Dwelling
Main body of house to be a minimum of 30 feet in width
No single story homes adjacent to each other
Stoops and walks
Brick stoops or painted fir (no salt treated stoops except when approved by
ARC)
Minimum 40 sq. fi.
Concrete sidewalks
Painted lattice under front porches - painted risers on steps, painted pickets
and painted band on front porches
Siding
Panel shutters on front windows
Minimum 1 x 6 rake and facia boards
No T1-11 siding
Landscaping
$300 allowance for shrubs
White painted mailbox and lamp post consistent throughout subdivision
Builder to leave as many trees as possible over 6 inches at the base
Base
3 color exterior paint except for 2 colors if painted white
Satellite Dishes and swimming pool design, location and screening to be
approved prior to installation.
The ARC reserves the right to modify the above restrictions or any other
imposed deed restrictions in all or in part without notice. In addition, the
ARC reserves the right to make special exceptions to these conditions on an
individual basis; however, any special exception(s) shall not be deemed as a
waiver of the restriction(s) as they may apply in the future.
The ARC reserves the right to disallow construction of architecturally similar
homes adjacent to each other.
19 01 SN0189-MAR27-BOS
The ARC shall not be liable to any Owner or to any other person on account
of any claim, liability, damage, or expense suffered or incurred by or
threatened against an Owner or such other person arising out of or in any way
relating to the subject matter of any review, acceptances, inspections,
permissions, consents, or required approvals which must be obtained from
the ARC whether given, granted or withheld.
ii)
Repairs, changes in color, excavations, changes in grade, major landscaping,
or other work which in any way alters the exterior appearance of any Lot or
improvement located thereon from its natural or improved state existing on
the date such Lot was first conveyed in fee by Douglas R. Sowers to an owner
(including clearance of trees and vegetation, driveways, entrance ways,
fences, mailboxes, and lamp post structures), shall be made or done until the
plans, specifications, working drawings, and proposals for the same showing
the nature, kind, shape, type, color, materials, and location of the
improvements on the Lot and a landscaping plan shall have been submitted to
and approved in writing as to harmony of external design and location in
relations to surrounding structures, topography, and applicable governmental
requirements by the ARC.
iii)
All easements along road frontage and lot lines as shown on the aforesaid
subdivision plat are hereby reserved unto the developer, his personal
representatives, heirs, assigns, or agents, for the propose of drainage or
furnishing light, telephone or any other utility to the property.
iv) Lots shall be occupied and used as follows:
Lots shall be used for private residential purposes only and no
building of any kind whatsoever shall be erected or
maintained thereon except for:
O)
One private dwelling house with each dwelling being
designated for occupancy by a single family.
(2)
Private garages for the sole use of the respective
owners of the Lots upon which such garages are
erected.
b)
A single building for the storage of non-commercial vehicles,
boats, equipment, and tools used in maintenance of the Lot
upon which erected.
20 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
v)
vi)
vii)
viii)
ix)
x)
xi)
No building shall be located on any Lot nearer to any street or to a
side line than is permitted under the applicable local zoning ordinance
in effect at the time such building is constructed.
No structure of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent, shack,
garage, barn, or other outbuilding shall be used on any Lot at any time
as a residence either temporarily or permanently.
The construction of any structure on a Lot shall be completed within a
period of nine (9) months after the beginning of construction. During
construction, the Lot shall be maintained in a clean and uncluttered
condition, free of unnecessary accumulation of waste and building
debris.
It is the responsibility of each Owner to prevent the development of
any unclean, unsightly, or unkempt condition of buildings or grounds
on his Lot. All improvements on each Lot shall be kept in good repair,
and, where necessary, painted on a regular basis. No portion of the
property shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish.
Outdoor burning of leaves, trash, or other debris shall not be
permitted. All trash, garbage, and other waste shall be kept in sanitary
containers which shall be surrounded by wooden screening with such
screening being approved by the ARC, or otherwise out of sight from
the street.
No nuisance or offensive activity shall be permitted or maintained
upon any Lot, nor shall any poultry, hogs, rabbits, cattle, or other
livestock be kept thereon with the exception of dogs, cats, or other
normal household animals kept as pets thereon in numbers not
exceeding those permitted by the law, provided they are not kept, bred
or maintained for any commercial purposes, and must be kept under
control of their owner when outside owner's premises, nor constitute a
nuisance in the opinion of the ARC, its successors or assigns. No use
shall be made of any Lot which will depreciate or adversely affect the
surrounding Lots or the property.
Each residence constructed on a Lot shall be connected to a public
sewer.
No Lot shall be further subdivided without prior written consent of
the ARC. However, the developer hereby expressly reserves for
itself, its successors, and assigns, the fight to re-subdivide any Lot or
Lots shown on any recorded plan of subdivision of the property prior
21 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
xii)
xiii)
xiv)
xv)
xvi)
to the delivery of a deed to said Lot or Lots without the prior written
consent of any Lot Owner.
Except for emergencies, which emergencies must be proven to the
satisfaction of the ARC, no trees with a diameter of six (6) inches or
more, measured two (2) feet from the ground, flowering trees, shrubs,
or evergreens may be cleared from any Lot without prior written
permission of the ARC. In the event a Lot Owner violates this
covenant, the Lot Owner will be fined $25.00 per inch for every such
tree removed and it shall be assumed that each tree had a diameter of
twelve (12) inches.
No commercially licensed vehicles, motor vehicles, recreational
vehicles, boats, disabled vehicles, vehicles without a current state
license or state inspection sticker, machinery, or other equipment
shall be visible from the street for a period exceeding twenty-four
(24) hours. Any screening of such vehicles must be approved by the
ARC. This covenant shall not apply to vehicles and equipment used
in connection with construction upon Lots, while such construction is
in progress, or in connection w/th the development of the property. It
shall be the responsibility of each Owner to construct and maintain
suitable and adequate parking space on his Lot and all vehicles shall
be parked thereon.
The operation of unlicensed motor bikes, ATV's, and motorcycles on
the lots and entrance area shall be subject to regulation by the Owners
and may be prohibited entirely.
No external illumination on any Lot shall be of such a character or
intensity or so located as to interfere with any other Owner's use or
enjoyment of his Lot. No neon or flashing lights shall be permitted.
All external lighting must be approved as to size and intensity by the
ARC.
Except during construction, no signs of any kind shall be displayed to
the public view on any lot except:
One sign not exceeding four (4) square feet in areas used for
the purpose of advertising the Lot for sale or rent: and
b)
One sign not exceeding four (4) square feet in areas which
identify the resident occupying the Lot, the name of the Lot,
or both.
22 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
xvii)
xviii)
xix)
xx)
xxi)
xxii)
xxiii)
No temporary, portable, or above-ground swimming pools may be
erected on any Lot that will be visible from the street.
No outside antennas, television or otherwise, shall be permitted;
provided, however, that until cable television becomes available to
the property, exterior television antennas shall be permitted, provided
that they do not extend more than five (5) feet past the roof line of
any dwelling. No satellite dishes shall be visible from the street.
No construction shall be permitted without appropriate erosion
control so as to prevent the discharge of any soil or other materials
onto any other Lot or Common Area. The ARC may establish
reasonable rules and regulations establishing a maximum percentage
of any Lot which may be covered by a building, driveway, or other
structure.
No fences or walls not constituting a part of a building shall be
erected, placed or altered on any Lot nearer to any street than the
minimum exterior setback line, but in no case shall it extend further
forward than the rear of the house except with the approval of the
ARC.
No shrubs, trees, fences or structures of any type shall be erected
which may partially or fully block vehicular sight distance, as set
forth in the Virginia Highway Department regulations, on any
roadway.
No lot owner shall disturb or siltate shoulder, backslopes, ditches,
pavement, curb and gutter, driveway culverts, or any other
improvements within the public right-of-way. Each Lot Owner agrees
to be responsible for disturbances, damages, and/or siltation caused
by themselves, their employees, suppliers, contractors, or others, and
shall have fourteen (14) days from the receipt of a letter from the
developer and/or the ARC to correct the damage. Ifa Lot Owner fails
to correct the damage in a workmanlike manner, then the developer or
its assigns shall have the right to correct the damage and bill the Lot
Owner directly on a cost-plus-fifty-percent (50%) basis. If a Lot
Owner does not make payment within thirty (30) days of presentation
of the bill, a two percent (2%) per month service charge shall be
applied to such bill.
Any one or more of the Covenants and Restrictions imposed in
Paragraphs a through v hereof may be waived, modified, or rescinded,
23 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
in whole or in part, as to all of the property or any Lot, by written
instrument of the ARC.
xxiv)
Invalidation of any of these covenants and conditions, by court
adjudication or otherwise shall in no way modify, affect, or invalidate
any of the other covenants and conditions contained herein which
shall remain in full force and effect.
xxv)
Each and every covenant and condition herein imposed may be
enforced by the undersigned or the owner of any Lot by appropriate
proceedings at law or in equity against any party violating or
attempting or threatening to violate the same to prevent or rectify
such violation and/or recover damages therefore. The failure of an
owner or the undersigned to bring any such proceeding shall not be
considered as a waiver of any rights at law or in equity that any
such party may have for past or future violation of any covenant
herein contained
xxvi)
These covenants and conditions are to run with the land and shall be
binding upon subsequent owner or owners and all parties claiming
through or under such owner or owners for a period of thirty (30)
years from the date these covenants are recorded, after which time
said covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods
of ten (10) years unless an instrument signed by a majority of the
owners of the Lots has been recorded, revoking said covenants, or
agreeing to change said covenants in whole or in part.
(STAFF)
10.
Covenant Prohibiting Manufactured Homes. Prior to recordation of any
subdivision plat or approval of any site plan for residential development, a
restrictive covenant shall be recorded which precludes siting or locating any
manufactured home within such subdivision or residential development and
which precludes the revision of such restrictive covenant to remove such
prohibition unless the zoning is amended to allow removal of such
covenant. (P)
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location:
Off the east line of Otterdale Road and off the north line of Genito Road. Tax ID 716-689-
9201 (Sheet 9).
24 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
Existing Zoning:
R-9 and 0-2 with Conditional Use Planned Development
Size:
282.1 acres
Existing Land Use:
Vacant
Adjacent Zoning and Land Use:
North and East - A, R-9 and 0-2 with Conditional Use Planned Development; Vacant
South - R-9 with Conditional Use Planned Development; Vacant
West - A and R-9; Single family residential or vacant
UTILITIES
Public Water System:
There is an existing sixteen (16) inch water line extending along the north side of Genito
Road, approximately 1,000 feet south of the request site. Extension of an appropriately sized
water line along the right of way of the future North Woolridge Road will be necessary to
serve the request site. Use of the public water system is required by a previous condition for
zoning. (Case 88S008, Condition 13)
To address future development, the applicant has proffered to extend a sixteen (16) inch
water line along the proposed route of North Woolridge Road from the southern boundary to
the northern boundary of the site. To allow for a loop connection to a future water line along
Otterdale Road, the applicant has proffered that an appropriately sized water line will be
extended from the proposed extension of North Woolridge Road to the western boundary of
the request site. (Proffered Condition 5)
The applicant has proffered to submit for review and approval a Water and Wastewater
Systems Overall Plan for this development. That plan shall be accompanied by a phasing
plan which establishes a schedule for incremental water system extensions with each phase
of the development. (Proffered Condition 6)
25 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
Public Wastewater System:
There is an existing sixty (60) inch wastewater trunk line extending along the north side of
Genito Road, approximately 1,000 feet south of the request site. This existing sixty (60) inch
wastewater trunk line is a portion of the Upper Swift Creek Transport System which was a
condition of zoning for extension with development of Greenspring (Case 88S008,
Conditions 15 and 16). Since approval of the Greenspring development, the County has
installed this portion of the Upper Swift Creek Transport System.
The request site is divided into two (2) drainage basins. The eastern one-third (1/3) of the
site drains toward Tomahawk Creek and the western two-thirds (2/3) of the site drains to
Swift Creek. Extension of an appropriately sized wastewater trunk line, along Tomahawk
Creek and Swift Creek, from the existing sixty (60) inch wastewater trunk line to the
northern boundary of this site, will be necessary to provide public wastewater service.
Extension of the Tomahawk Creek and Swift Creek wastewater tnmk lines is required by an
existing condition for zoning. (Case 88S008, Condition 15)
The applicant has proffered to submit for review and approval a Water and Wastewater
Systems Overall Plan for this development. This overall plan is to be accompanied by a
phasing plan which will establish a schedule for incremental extensions of the public
wastewater system with each phase of the development. (Proffered Condition 6)
ENVIRONMENTAL
Drainage and Erosion:
The parcel is located in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed and the southwestem property line
is adjacent to Swift Creek Reservoir where Swift Creek enters the reservoir. Approximately
eighty (80) percent of the property will drain in this direction with the remainder draining to
the northeast through adjacent property to Tomahawk Creek. Currently, there are no on-site
drainage or erosion problems and none are anticipated after development. The property is
heavily wooded and, as such, should not be timbered until the issuance ora land disturbance
permit. This will insure that adequate erosion control measures are in place prior to any land
disturbance. (Proffered Condition 1)
Water Quality:
Both Swift Creek and Swift Creek Reservoir, adjacent to the property, will be subject to the
100 foot conservation area.
The Board of Supervisors recently approved the implementation of the Upper Swift Creek
Watershed Master Plan establishing a pro-rata fee for the management of phosphorus loads
associated with stormwater runoff. A portion of the property that is located downstream of
26 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
any regional facilities drains directly into the reservoir. The application has proffered to treat
this runoff, as determined necessary, by the Department of Environmental Engineering.
(Proffered Condition 2)
PUBLIC FACILITIES
The need for fire, school, library, park and transportation facilities is identified in the Public
Facilities Plan, the Thoroughfare Plan and the FY 2001-2005 Capital Improvement Program This
development will have an impact on these facilities.
Fire Service:
The Public Facilities Plan indicates that emergency services calls are expected to increase
forty-five (45) percent by 2015. Eight (8) new fire/rescue stations are recommended for
construction by 2015 in the Public Facilities Plan. The proposed zoning amendment will not
result in any additional dwelling units over the number of units permitted on this portion of
the request under Case 88S008. Consequently, there is no net increase in the impact on
capital facilities resulting from this request.
This property is currently served by the Swift Creek Fire~escue Station, Company Number
16. When the property is developed, the number of hydrants and quantity of water needed
for fire protection will be evaluated during the plans review process.
To satisfy the requirement of Section 17-76(h) of the Subdivision Ordinance, when the
cumulative total of lots served by a local street in this proposed development exceeds fifty
(50) and/or when the number of lots accessing an arterial street with only one (1) way in and
out exceeds 100 lots, a second public access road to all lots must be provided by the
developer. This requirement is to provide emergency vehicles access to all units should an
entrance become blocked.
According to the applicant's development phasing plan, a maximum of 250 lots may be
recorded on the subject property prior to the provision of a second public road access.
(Proffered Condition 3). The Fire Department opposes granting relieve from providing a
second public road access for more than 100 homes on a no lot frontage arterial road
(Woolridge Road Extended), in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance, until such time
as a second public road access is provided.
Schools:
Approximately 276 school age children will be generated by this development. The site lies
in the Watkins Elementary School attendance zone: capacity - 879, enrollment - 704;
Midlothian Middle School zone: capacity- 1,350, enrollment - 1,353; and Midlothian High
School zone: capacity- 1,750, enrollment - 1,537.
27 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
The applicant has agreed to participate in the cost of providing for area school needs.
(Proffered Condition 8)
Libraries:
Consistent with the Board of Supervisors' policy, the impact of development on library
services is assessed County-wide. Based on projected population growth, the Public
Facilities Plan identifies a need for additional library space throughout the County. Taking
into account the additional space provided by the two (2) currently funded projects, the new
La Prade and Chester Libraries, there is still a projected need for 55,000 additional square
feet of library space County-wide by 2015.
Development in this area of the County would likely affect the existing Midlothian and
Clover Hill libraries. The Plan has identified a need for additional library space in these
service areas as well as a need for a new library in the western area of the County in the
vicinity of Genito Road and Powhite Parkway. The proposed zoning amendment will not
result in any additional dwelling units over the number of units permitted on this portion of
the request under Case 88S008. Consequently, there is no net increase in the impact on
capital facilities resulting from this request.
Parks and Recreation:
The Public Facilities Plan identifies the need for four (4) new regional parks. There is
currently a shortage of community park acreage in the County. The Plan identifies a need for
625 acres of regional park space and 116 acres of community park space by 2015. The Plan
also identifies the need for neighborhood parks and special purpose parks and makes
suggestions for their locations. The proposed zoning amendment will not result in any
additional dwelling units over the number of units permitted on this portion of the request
under Case 88S008. Consequently, there is no net increase in the impact on capital facilities
resulting from this request.
Transportation:
Staff recommends approval of the case and acceptance of the applicant's proffers, including
an $800,000 payment to the county for the Powhite Parkway Extension, provided the Board
supports partial public funding of the Powhite Parkway Extension in the area of the property.
If the Board does not support the partial public funding of the Powhite Parkway Extension,
staff recommends denial of the case.
Background
In 1988, the Board of Supervisors approved a Conditional Use Planned Development (Case
88S008, "Original Greenspring Project") on approximately 1,300 acres for a mixed-use
28 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
development that included retail, office and residential land uses. With that approval, the
Board accepted the Textual Statement that includes several transportation conditions
addressing maximum density, right of way dedications, access control and construction of
mitigating road improvements. Conditions of zoning approval for Case 88S008 restricted the
maximum density of the Original Greenspring Project to 2,303 residential units, 193,000
square feet of retail, 1,250,000 square feet of office and a 300-room inn/conference center or
equivalent densities based on traffic generation. Original Greenspring Project was
anticipated to generate approximately 43,360 average daily trips.
The major road improvements required by the Original Greenspring Project include: 1)
construction of four (4) lanes of Powhite Parkway Extended across the Original Greenspring
Project; 2) construction of two (2) additional lanes of Powhite Parkway Extended from the
Original Greenspring Project to Brandermill Parkway; 3) construction of four (4) lanes of
Woolridge Road Extended and Collector Loop Road, if necessary; and 4) construction of two
(2) lanes of Powhite Parkway Extended and two (2) lanes of Woolridge Road Extended
across an adjacent parcel (identified as Parcel 8 on the Master Plan). A condition of the
Original Greenspring Project zoning requires that a phasing plan for these required road
improvements be approved by the Transportation Department.
Another condition of the Original Greenspring Project zoning requires that initial access for
the development will be provided via Powhite Parkway Extended/Old Hundred Road. The
"initial access" condition was provided as part of the original Greenspring zoning to insure
that the major traffic impact generated by the development would be directed towards
Powhite Parkway Extended and not towards the Genito Road area.
In 1995, the Board of Supervisors approved amendments to the Original Greenspring
Conditional Use Planned Development to allow development of approximately 810 acres
("Phase I Greenspring") independently of the Original Greenspring Project. All other
property that was included in the Original Greenspring Project but that was not a part of
Phase I Greenspring, continues to be subject to the Original Greenspring zoning conditions.
Phase I Greenspring includes approximately 1,300 residential units and 110,000 square feet
of retail on the 810 acres. The permissible density for the Original Greenspring Project was
reduced by an amount equivalent to the density in Phase I Greenspring. Phase I Greenspring
could generate 16,560 average daily trips.
Approximately 60 lots of Phase I Greenspring were approved with sole access to Genito
Road. The balance of Phase I Greenspring is required to have sole access to the north via the
Powhite Parkway Extended/Olds Hundred Road intersection, in conformance with the
"initial access" condition.
The 1995 amendment did not relieve the Phase I Greenspring developer of required road
improvements, except for right of way dedications across properties they did not control. In
the Transportation section of the "Request Analysis" for the 1995 amendment, staff
29 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
specifically outlined the road improvements that the Phase I applicant anticipated providing,
and noted that the balance of the ultimate road improvements would be the responsibility of
subsequent phases within Greenspring. Staffs primary reason for including this information
was to inform property owners within Greenspring of the road improvement-phasing plan.
No opposition to the proposed phasing plan was expressed during the public heatings.
As required by a condition of the Original Greenspring Project, the Phase I developer
submitted a phasing plan for the entire Greenspring Project. After evaluating the proposal,
staff agreed to a Phase I consisting of the following road improvements: 1) two (2) lanes of
the required four (4) lanes for Woolridge Road Extended, with adequate mm lanes, from
Genito Road north to its intersection with the Collector Loop Road; and 2) two (2) lanes for
Collector Loop Road, with adequate mm lanes from Woolridge Road Extended to Powhite
Parkway Extended/Old Hundred Road. Staff approved a Phase II, consisting of the
remaining Greenspring densities and road improvements.
Current Request
The subject property, consisting of approximately 280 acres, was included in the Original
Greenspring Project, but not in Phase I Greenspring. Current zoning would allow at least 670
residential units on most of the subject property (parts of Tracts A and E identified on the
Master Plan). The remaining Phase II Greenspring property (part of Tract B identified on the
Master Plan), which is approximately ten (10) acres, could be developed for commercial
uses. Development of Phase II Greenspring could generate approximately 12,800 average
daily trips.
Vehicles generated by the development will be distributed along Powhite Parkway Extended,
Otterdale Road, Genito Road and Woolridge Road, which had 2000 traffic counts of 12,775,
998, 10,838 and 8,062 vehicles per day, respectively, and Old Hundred Road, which had a
1999 traffic count of 4,781 vehicles per day. Roads in this area have narrow pavement
widths, little or no shoulders and poor vertical and horizontal alignments. The traffic
generated by this development will significantly increase the need for transportation
improvements in this area.
No road improvement projects in this area of the County are included in the Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDOT) Six-Year Secondary Road Improvement Plan, except
for a project to construct mm lanes at the Woolridge Road/Genito Road intersection.
Construction on this project is currently on hold.
The applicant is requesting several amendments to the Original Greenspring zoning
conditions that include deletion of the requirement for right of way dedications, road
improvements and initial access being provided via Powhite Parkway Extended/Old Hundred
Road. The applicant's request includes relief of all transportation conditions from the
Original Greenspring zoning. The applicant has submitted a proffer which allows the
30 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
County to choose from two (2) road access altematives; Alternative A and Altemative B.
(Proffered Condition 3)
Alternative A
The applicant has proffered to dedicate a ninety (90) foot wide fight of way and construct two
(2) lanes of Woolridge Road Extended and the East/West Arterial through the subject
property, with mm lanes at each approved access and at the intersection of Woolridge Road
Extended and the East/West Arterial. This alternative would also require the developer to
construct two (2) lanes of Woolridge Road Extended from the subject property line
northward, through two (2) adjacent parcels, to Old Hundred Road with mm lanes at the
Woolridge Road Extended/Old Hundred Road intersection. The section of Woolridge Road
Extended from Powhite Parkway Extended to Old Hundred Road is not part of a required
road improvement in the Original Greenspring zoning. Constructing this roadway from the
northern boundary of the subject property to Old Hundred Road will require acquisition of
"off-site" right of way. According to the proffer, if the developer is unable to acquire the
right of way for Woolridge Road Extended and the turn lanes along Old Hundred Road, the
developer may request the County to acquire the right of way as a public road improvement.
All costs associated with the acquisition will be borne by the developer. If the County
chooses not to assist with the fight of way acquisition, the developer will not be obligated to
acquire the fight of way or construct Woolridge Road Extended from the northern boundary
of the subject property to Old Hundred Road. The applicant would then only be obligated to
construct Woolridge Road Extended and the East/West Arterial with mm lanes through the
subject property.
The applicant's proffered phasing plan, under this alternative, would allow 125 lots to be
developed on the subject property with sole access via Woolridge Road Extended to Genito
Road. Once two (2) lanes of Woolridge Road Extended from Genito Road to Collector Loop
Road (i.e., Watermill Parkway) and two (2) lanes of Watermill Parkway from Woolridge
Road Extended to Powhite Parkway Extended/Old Hundred Road are constructed, and once
the developer has provided a bond, letter of credit or other security for the right of way and
construction of Woolridge Road Extended to Old Hundred Road, 250 lots may be developed.
The amount of the security must provide for the County's cost to acquire right of way,
including possible condemnation, and to build Woolridge Road Extended. The proffer also
requires the developer to construct Woolridge Road Extended to Old Hundred Road prior to
development of more than 250 lots/units or within five (5) years from the initial date of the
security, whichever occurs first.
The proposed phasing plan would allow the subject property to fully develop when
Woolridge Road Extended is constructed to Old Hundred Road, or if the developer cannot
acquire the right of way for constructing Woolridge Road Extended to Old Hundred Road
and the Board of Supervisors elects not to assist with the right of way acquisition. Approval
of this alternative may also cause the developer(s) of Phase I Greenspring to seek similar
31 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
relief to the initial access condition. This altemative will not adequately address the traffic
impact of this development on area roads and is not consistent with the commitments as
outlined in the original Greenspring zoning; therefore, Staff does not support Alternative A.
Altemative B
The applicant has proffered to dedicate a ninety (90) foot wide right of way and construct two
(2) lanes of Woolridge Road Extended and the East/West Arterial through the subject
property, with mm lanes at each approved access and at the intersection of Woolridge Road
Extended and the East/West Arterial. This alternative would also result in the construction of
Powhite Parkway Extended and a section of Woolridge Road Extended from the subject
property to the Powhite Parkway Extended/Old Hundred Road intersection, across two (2)
parcels to the north of the subject property (the Lion Rose Tract and Parcel 8). The
developer has proffered to provide $800,000 toward the construction of this project. The
County would provide the remainder of the funding, which could exceed $1.5 million.
If this zoning request is approved, staff will immediately submit an Agenda Item to the Board
identifying the source of the public funding to be combined with the $800,000 proffered by
the applicant for the extension of the Powhite Parkway. Action by the Board on that Agenda
Item will direct staff as to which alternative is to be followed. If the Board approves the
public funding, staffwill approach the property owner of Parcel 8 for the necessary Powhite
Parkway Extension right of way. If the cost of the right of way appears to be reasonable,
staff will proceed with engineering and acquisition of the right of way. Staff will advise the
applicant to develop under Alternative B and proceed with the advertisement and
construction of the project. If the anticipated cost of the extension exceeds the available
funding, the Board would need to decide to provide additional funding or elect not to
construct the project. If the Powhite Parkway Extension is not constructed, 250 lots could be
developed on the property with access only to Genito Road. The remainder of the property
could be fully developed only if an additional public road access was provided. Staff
supports this alternative, provided the Board supports partial public funding of the Powhite
Parkway Extension.
Unless the Transportation Department notifies the applicant within ninety (90) days from the
approval of this rezoning request that the County wants the development to occur under
Alternative B conditions, the applicant is permitted to develop the property in accordance
with Alternative A conditions. Alternative A could be a better access plan for the subject
property if the Powhite Parkway Extension is not constructed, with less impact on Genito
Road.
There are approximately 210 acres, consisting of two (2) parcels (labeled on the Master Plan
as Lion Rose Tract and Winston Tract), remaining in the Original Greenspring Project that
are not included in Phase I Greenspring or in this rezoning request. Approval of this request
would allow the developer(s) of the remaining 210 acres to seek, and would probably justify,
32 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
similar relief from the original required road improvements. If this request is approved, and
similar rezoning request(s) are submitted on the Lion Rose and Winston Tracts, staff will
support the elimination of some of the remaining road improvements as required in the
Original Greenspring zoning, including the four (4) lanes of Powhite Parkway Extended and
the four (4) lanes of Woolridge Road Extended. Of the remaining major road improvements,
staff will recommend that the developer of the Lion Rose Tract be required to dedicate the
right of way for and build two (2) lanes of Powhite Parkway Extended across that parcel and
that the developer of the Winston Tract be required to dedicate the right of way for and
construct two (2) lanes of East/West Arterial, with adequate mm lanes, across that parcel.
Financial Impact on Capital Facilities:
The proposed zoning amendment will not result in any additional dwelling units over the
number of units permitted on this portion of the originally planned residential community
governed by zoning Case 88S088. Accordingly, there is no net increase in the impact on
capital facilities resulting from this request. However under the conditions of Case 88S008,
the dedication of sixty-five (65) acres and the reservation for purchase of an additional thirty-
five (35) acres was proffered for use by County Schools. The requirement for the reservation
of land for purchase is no longer applicable. The time has expired to exercise that option.
Under the proposed requested amendment, the applicant has proffered the payment of cash in
lieu of dedicating a proportionate amount of the sixty-five (65) acres of land to the County.
The proportionate amount of land being proffered for conversion to cash is approximately
foreseen (14) acres. The amount of cash proffered, to be paid on a per dwelling unit basis,
equates to $138,900 or $9,940 per acre. The cash proffer states that the payments will be
made on the first 300 dwelling units (Proffered Condition 8). Staff finds this proffer
acceptable.
LAND USE
Comprehensive Plan:
Lies within the boundaries of the Upper Swift Creek Plan which suggests the property is
appropriate for single family residential use of 2.0 units per acre or less.
Area Development Trends:
Properties to the northwest and west are zoned Agricultural (A) and Residential (R-9) and are
occupied by a single family dwelling or are vacant. Properties to the northeast, east and
south are zoned Residential (R-9) and Corporate Office (0-2) and are part of the original
Greenspring I development not included in this request. These parcels are currently occupied
by community recreational uses or are vacant. A portion of this property to the south and
33 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
southeast was previously approved for development independent of the original Greenspring
I Project (Case 95SN0307).
Zoning History:
On May 25, 1988, the Board of Supervisors, upon a favorable recommendation by the
Planning Commission, approved rezoning on the request property and adjacent property to
the north, east and south from Agricultural (A) and Residential (R-15) to Residential (R-9)
and Office Business (O) with Conditional Use Planned Development to permit a mix of
residential, office, commercial and recreational uses (Case 88S008), subject to a number of
conditions. This project, which contained approximately 1,313 acres, was commonly known
as Greenspring.
On September 27, 1995, the Board of Supervisors, upon a favorable recommendation by the
Planning Commission, approved various amendments to Case 88S008, affecting an 809 acre
portion of the original Greenspring development, adjacent to, east and south of the subject
property (Case 95SN0307). These amendments were relative to the approved Master Plan;
restoration of two (2) single family structures (Ellett and Tomahawk dwellings); provision of
a golf course; road improvements and access; land uses; land dedications and reservations;
utilities; drainage; erosion and water quality. Specifically, approval of this case permitted the
development of the request property to proceed independent of the adjacent portions of the
original Greenspring I Project and modified specific requirements of the original Greenspring
I rezoning.
Master Plan:
The applicant is requesting that Condition 1 of Case 88S008 be modified to reflect the
amendments discussed herein, substitute a new conceptual Master Plan and delete the
requirement to conform to the Conceptual Site Development Plan. This amendment would
also allow this 282 acre parcel to be developed independent of the remaining 1031 acres
originally zoned. As previously noted, in 1995, an adjacent 503 acre tract representing a
portion of the original Greenspring I development, was approved for development
independent of the originally zoned acreage (Case 95SN0307). Therefore, with approval of
this request, 528 acres of the original Greenspring I property will remain under the conditions
of the original Master Plan.
The revised Master Plan also deletes the golf course.
Restoration of the Tomahawk and Ellett Hancock Structures:
Conditions of zoning require that the Tomahawk and Ellett Hancock structures be restored.
The Tomahawk structure has been destroyed by fire. The Preservation Committee
determined that restoration of the Ellett Hancock structure is not feasible.
34 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
Dwelling Unit Sizes and Restrictive Covenants:
Proffered Condition 7 requires a minimum gross floor area of 1,700 square feet for one-story
and 2,000 square feet for more than one-story single family detached dwelling units.
Conditions of Case 88S008 permit a variety of housing types on the subject property to
include estate, cluster, villa, single family attached, multi-family and retirement units. This
proffered condition, which is specific to single family detached units, would not apply to any
other type of dwelling unit constructed on the property.
Proffered conditions would also require recordation of restrictive covenants for the subject
property, applicable to single family detached dwelling units and a prohibition on
manufactured homes (Proffered Condition 9). As previously noted, Proffered Condition 9
would not apply to any other type of dwelling unit constructed on the property. Further, the
current Ordinance would not allow manufactured homes; however, there is pending State
legislation which proposes to mandate that localities allow manufactured homes in those
districts which allow single family dwellings constructed to the Uniform Statewide Building
Code. Should these be State legislation adopted, depending upon the final language,
Proffered Condition 10 may, or may not, have the effect of prohibiting manufactured homes.
The County will only insure the recordation of the covenants and will not be responsible for
their enforcement. Once the covenants are recorded, they can be changed.
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed amendments relative to the approved Master Plan, restoration of the Ellett and
Tomahawk dwellings and provision of a golf course (Amendment I); utilities (Amendment II);
drainage and erosion and water quality (Amendment III); and dedication and reservations (Part of
Amendment IV) are consistent with amendments previously approved for an adjacent portion of the
Greenspring I Project (Case 95SN0307). Further, such amendments would permit the applicant to
proceed with developing the subject property independent of adjacent portions of the original
Greenspring I Project. In conjunction with these amendments, it is recommended that Proffered
Conditions 1, 2, 5, 6 and 8 be accepted and that Conditions 1 through 5 be imposed. It is also
recommended that Proffered Conditions 7, 9 and 10 be accepted, addressing square footage and
restrictive covenants (Amendment VII) with the understanding that these proffers apply to single
family detached development only.
It is recommended that Amendment V, requesting relief to all transportation conditions of the
original Greenspring I (Case 88S008), be denied. Proffered Conditions 3 and 4 do not adequately
address the traffic impact of this portion of the development on area roads and are not consistent with
the commitments as outlined in the original Greenspring zoning. Ft~her, with approval of
Amendment V, a precedent could be established for developer(s) of the remaining portions of the
original Greenspring project to seek relief to these required road improvements. In conjunction with
this recommendation, Proffered Conditions 3 and 4 should not be accepted.
35 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
Further, it is recommended that Amendment VI, requesting relief to the provision of a second public
road access, be denied. Without provision of a second access, the accessibility to and from the
development in an emergency situation, should access be blocked, will be restricted thereby
adversely affecting the health, safety and welfare of citizens in the development.
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (7/17/01):
At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case to September 18, 2001.
Staff(7/18/01):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information should
be submitted no later than July 23, 2001, for consideration at the Commission's September
public hearing. Also, the applicant was advised that a $150.00 deferral fee must be paid prior
to the Commission's September public heating.
Applicant (8/3/01):
The $150.00 deferral fee was paid.
Staff (8/28/01):
To date, no new information has been submitted.
Applicant (9/17/01 and 9/18/01):
The application was amended to request deletion of a condition of Case 88S008 relative to
access and to seek relief to street access requirements. Revised and new proffered conditions
were submitted.
36 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
Planning Commission Meeting (9/18/01):
The Commission deferred this case to November 20, 2001, thirty (30) days on their own
motion and thirty (30) days on the applicant's motion, to readvertize the request based upon
amendments made to the application and to allow staff time to review the revised and new
proffered conditions.
Staff (9/19/01):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information should
be submitted no later than September 24, 2001, for consideration at the Commission's
November public hearing. Also, the applicant was advised that a $250.00 deferral fee must
be paid prior to the Commission's November public hearing.
Applicant (10/4/01):
The $250.00 deferral fee was paid.
Applicant (10/22/01 and 11 / 1/01 ):
Revised proffered conditions and Textual Statement were submitted.
Applicant (11/20/01):
Revised proffers were submitted.
Planning Commission Meeting (11/20/01):
On their own motion, the Commission deferred this case to December 18, 2001, to allow
staff time to review the revised proffered conditions.
Staff(11/26/01):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information should
be submitted no later than November 29, 2001, for consideration at the Commission's
December 18, 2001, meeting.
37 01 SN0189-MAR27-BOS
Applicant (11/30/01 and 12/3/01):
Revised proffered conditions were submitted.
Planning Commission Recommendation (12/18/01):
The applicant accepted the recommendation with respect to Amendments I through IV and
VII. The applicant did not accept the recommendation with respect to Amendments V and
VI relative to road improvements and street access requirements. There was no opposition
present.
Mr. Gulley expressed concern with respect to the traffic impact of the proposed development
on Genito Road and the completion of the Collector Loop Road (Watermill Parkway)
through Phase I of the original Greenspring project; that if the north/south road connection
was not completed to provide access to Powhite Parkway and Route 288, Genito Road could
not handle all the traffic from this development; and that his preference would be for the
Board of Supervisors to fund and build the Powhite Parkway Extension and pursue some
form of revenue recovery.
Messrs. Gulley, Gecker and Cunningham agreed that the original owners and future
purchasers of the original Greenspring tract knew of the obligations for road improvements.
Mr. Gecker indicated that the Commission's responsibility was to insure the County's best
interest with respect to road improvements and fire safety access rather than the economic
feasibility of the development.
Mr. Litton noted that the County should have required the Phase I developer to construct
Powhite Parkway through the property limits of Phase I; that the construction of Woolridge
Road Extended to Otterdale Road would help considerably; that if Powhite Parkway is
constructed, a portion may be tom out with the interchange; and that he had fire safety access
concerns.
Mr. Marsh noted that there was a benefit to constructing Woolridge Road Extended; that the
financial burden for road improvements was too great for this development; however, he
could not recommend approval of Amendments V and VI.
In response to a question from Mr. Marsh, the applicant agreed to allow the remaining
proffered conditions to stand, should the Commission not recommend acceptance of those
related to transportation and access.
On motion of Mr. Marsh, seconded by Mr. Gulley, the Commission recommended approval
of Amendments I through IV and VII with the imposition of Conditions 1 through 5 and
38 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
acceptance of Proffered Conditions 1, 2 and 5 through 8. The Commission recommended
denial of Amendments V and VI relative to road improvements and street access
requirements and that Proffered Conditions 3 and 4 not be accepted.
AYES: Unanimous
Applicant (1/23/02):
An additional proffered condition was submitted. (Proffered Condition 10)
Board of Supervisors Meeting (1/23/02):
On their motion, the Board deferred this case to February 27, 2002, to allow the Board time
to further evaluate Amendments V and VI relative to road improvements and street access
requirements.
Staff (1/24/02):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information should
be submitted no later than January 29, 2002, for consideration at the Board's February 27,
2002, public heating.
Staff (2/8/02):
To date, no new information has been submitted.
Applicant (2/12/02 and 2/21/02):
Revised proffered conditions were submitted. Specifically, Proffered Condition 3 relative to
road improvements was modified and Proffered Condition 4 was deleted.
Board of Supervisors Meeting (2/27/02):
Staff recommended that this case be remanded to the Commission due to the modifications
to Request V.
39 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
On their own motion, the Board deferred this case to March 27, 2002, to allow the Board
time to evaluate the revised proffers relative to road improvements. (Amendment V)
Staff (2/28/02):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information should
be submitted no later than March 4, 2002, for consideration at the Board's March 27, 2002,
meeting.
Staff (3 / 19/02):
To date, no new information has been submitted.
The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, February 27, 2002, beginning at 7:00 p.m., will take under
consideration of this request.
40 01SN0189-MAR27-BOS
11/01/2001
TEXTUAL STATEMENT
01SN0189
(AMENDMENT TO CASE 88S008)
1_. The Textual Statement, titled Greenspring: Conditional Use and Zoning.
Application, revised April 1, 1988, including the "Residential Site
Development Criteria" table, Exhibit IV and the conditions of zoning for Case
88S008 and Conceptual Master Plan, prepared by J. K. Timmons and
Associates, dated April 19, 2001, shall be the Master Plan for the subject
property, except as stated herein. And further, provided that the subject
property shall be permitted to be considered as a separate project from the
remaining portion of that land area covered under 88S008.
2. All references and requirements relating to golf in the Textual Statement and
conditions of zoning for Case 88S008 shall be deleted.
o
The requirement to restore Tomahawk and the Ellett and Hancock structures
shall be deleted.
All references and requirements relating to the plan entitled "Conceptual Site
Development Plan -- Greenspring -- Chesterfield County, Virginia" in the
Textual Statement and conditions of zoning for Case 88S008 shall be deleted.
5. The requirements to dedicate right of way along Otterdale Road and that portion
of Powhite Parkway Extended, Conditions 14 and 15 of the Textual
Statement Case 88S008 which are not within the bruits of the subject
property, shall be deleted.
6. The requirements of conditions 20 A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and 21, 22 of the Textual
Statement for Case 88S008 shall be deleted. Two lanes of Woolridge Road
will be built as a requirement of this case.
7. The requirements of Conditions 7, 9, 11, and 20 of Case 88S008 shall be deleted.
8. The requirements of Condition 30 of Case 88S008 shall be deleted.
9. The requirements of Condition 14 of Case 88S008 shall be deleted.
10. The requirements of Condition 17 of the Textual Statement for Case 88S008
shall be deleted.
!
o
I
I
,/
IBJECT
Tract
11(,.2
APPROVED MASTER PLAN
Greenspring
O/5/VO/¢~-I
Greenspring
APPROVED
CONCEPTUAL SITE DEVELOPMENT
LEGEND
illale
Si.lie 'Famil~
Allacbed '
PLAN
OISNO / 8 q -Z
AMENDED MASTER PLAN
01SN0189-3
mmmmmmmm
Powhite
I
I
Remainder
of Greenspdng
!
I
I
I
I
I
Phase II
Case #01SN0189
N
Greenspring
Boundaries of Original Greenspring,
Phase I, Phase II, and Remaining Parcels
01 SN0189 - 4
Comparison of Road Construction Commitments
for Components of Former
Greensprings Development
Linear Feet Feet of Road
Project Acreage. of Road Location Per Acre
Watermill Prop. 549 5,800 onsite 10.6'
Reservoir Devel. 272 3,200 onsite 11.8
Sowers Proposal
Current Tract 282
Howard Tract 136
Total Acreage 418 7,750 onsite 18.5
4,000 offsite 9.6
11,750 TOTAL 28.1
#375645 v4 17292.00825
Motion to approve Case 01 SN0189, subject to the imposition of Conditions 1 and 2 and
the acceptance of Proffered Conditions 1 and 2 and 5 through 9 as recommended by the
Planning Commission and Proffered Conditions 3 and 10 as recommended by staff.
ASK MR. EASTER IF HE STILL OFFERS THE PROFFERS WITH THE
IMPOSITION OF CONDITIONS 1 AND 2.
Conditions: Case 01SN0189, Doug Sowers
A maximum of 100 lots may be developed on a single public road provided such road is
a collector or arterial street. Until such time as Woolridge Road has been extended to
provide access from the property to Genito Road and to either Powhite Parkway
extended or Old Hundred Road, more than 100 lots, but a maximum of 250 lots, may
be developed on a single public road provided such road is a collector or arterial street,
in combination with an emergency access. Any emergency access shall be designed to
support 75,000 pound apparatus. A geotechnical report or a report from a registered
professional engineer shall be submitted to verify the carrying capacity of any such
emergency access materials and design. The exact location, design and provisions for
maintenance of such emergency access shall be submitted to the Fire Department for
review and approval.
This condition supersedes those portions of Proffered Condition 3 that would otherwise
permit up to 250 lots to be developed off a single access. (F)
No lots or dwelling units shall be recorded or site plan approved on the property that
have access southward to Genito Road until one (1) of the following conditions has
been met:
(a)
Woolridge Road Extended has been constructed, as determined by the
Transportation Department, across the property and connected with Old
Hundred Road/Powhite Parkway Extended, as provided in Alternative B of
Proffered Condition 3, or with Old Hundred Road, as provided in Alternative A
of Proffered Condition 3; or
Woolridge Road Extended and Watermill Parkway have been constructed, as
determined by the Transportation Department, from Genito Road to Old
Hundred Road/Powhite Parkway Extended, to provide through access from
Genito Road to Old Hundred Road/Powhite Parkway Extended, as specified in
Proffered Condition 3(a)(i)(b).
This condition supersedes any portion of the proffered conditions that would otherwise
permit lots or dwellings units on the property with access southward to Genito Road
prior to completion, as determined by the Transportation Department, of either thei
Woolridge Road Extended/Watermill Parkway connection, or the connection of
Woolridge Road Extended from the property to Old Hundred Road/Powhite Parkway
Extended or the connection of Woolridge Road Extended from the property to Old
Itundred Road. (?)