09-27-1995 Packet
~
2.
..
.:;.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
September 27 , 1995 Item Number:
Page loLL
Meeting Date:
2.
Subject:
county Administrator ,'s Comments
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~.
BoardAction Requested:
Summary ofInformation:
Mr. Jim congable, Executive Director of Designated Drivers
Association, Incorporated, will be present to share
information about this non-profit organization with the
Board. He will focus on how this group of volunteers is
impacting the quality of life in Chesterfield County and the
entire Richmond metropolitan area.
P"pu'" -b ,S. ~t1"
M ilyn . cole.
li'vP(""ll1t-iuc> llC::!C!;C!t-:::!onT
Attachments:
. Yes
o No
1# OO~
"1
@ _on......,...........,
,~~ -I
..
,
"-
. .
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
P.O. BOX 40
CHESTERFIELD. VIRGINIA 23832
(804) 748-1211
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
J,L. McHALE. III, CHAIRMAN
BERMUDA DISTRICT
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ARTHUR S, WARREN, VICE CHAIRMAN
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
LANE B, RAMSEY
HARRY G. DANIEL
DALE DISTRICT
September 19, 1995
FREDDIE W, NICHOLAS, SR,
MATOACA DISTRICT
EDWARD B, BARBER
MJOLOTHIAN DISTRICT
Mr. Jim Congable
Executive Director
Designated Drivers Association, Inc,
p, 0, Box 36770
Richmond, Virginia 23235
Dear Mr. Congable:
Thank you for your letter to the Board of Supervisors and Mr. Ramsey and the information you sent
concerning the Designated Drivers Association, Inc, Our hats are off to you and the many community
volunteers that provide this valuable service to the community,
Per our telephone conversation, we have arranged for you to speak to the Board at its meeting on
Wednesday, September 27 at 3:00 p,m, Your comments will be made under the County
Administrator comments section of the agenda,
Board meetings are held in the Public Meeting Room at 10031 Iron Bridge Road, If you have
questions or need additional information, please give me a call.
~~c~
Executive Assistant
MEC/le
c: The Honorable Members of the Board of Supervisors
Lane B. Ramsey, County Administrator
Faith Davis, Clerk to Board
002
Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service, @
P"o',",on
P.CyO'e<l~''''''
~
....
.
Designat~d Drivers Association, .
PO Box 36770
Richmond, Virginia 23235
(804) 379-7832
September 08, 1995
Mr. Jack McHale
Chainnan
Chesterfield County Board of Superisors
5641 Teterling Court
Chester, VA 23831
Dear Mr. McHale:
Please take a minute of your valuable time to hear about a wonderful non-profit organization made up
entirely of community volunteers. They provide any impaired drivers,( and their vehicle) who feels that
they are "at risk" of causing harm to themselves or others a free ride home.
I firmly believe this group has the ability to make a significant difference in the Richmond metropolitan
area, as well as elsewhere as it grows. The volunteers have driven home more than 1300 impaired drivers
and passengers in more than 900 vehicles in less than a year.
TItis organization is unique nationwide in several ways. One, it is on call 365 days a year for special
events and private parties as well as covering participating bars and restaurants. Volunteers are on call for
the bars from Tuesday through Saturday evenings, Second, volunteers work in teams of two with one
driving the people home and the other volunteer driving the return vehicle. Third, a donation is made to
each volunteers nonprofit group of choice, TItis way, funds are channeled back into each community. And
fourth, this group is working with impaired drivers - alcohol and other drugs, both illegal and legal (such
as medications) - as well as unsafe drivers - as a result of injuries or medical procedures. Volunteers are
driving people home from clinics, dentists and doctor's offices as well .
In this litigious society, one's first concern might be about liability and insurance. Liability is not an issue
because the volunteers are covered under the vehicle owner's coverage. If uninsured, the uninsured
motorist protection provides coverage. Would an insurance company rather have their impaired client
drive, or a volunteer who sincerely wants to help keep the roads safe? Also, the participating facilities are
not liable because the volunteers are not employees, and they are acting on their own behalf to help protect
the community. They are also protected by the "Good Samaritan" laws in Virginia as well as most other
states.
I believe that as the Chairman, and Supervisor of the BennudaDistrict. you should be aware of this group
and how they are impacting the quality of nfe in Chesterfield County as well as the Richmond area. With
the trend leaning toward more citizen involvement and less government, the DDA presents many
opportunities for your constituents to get involved and make a difference. I would like to set up a meeting
with you to discuss ways for us to work together for the benefit of Chesterfield and Vrrginia I look
forward to hearing from you.
~'.n ~iy.:. r ... 1?Jf'l
." Ut..,u _." lvo t
, \ .~.
/!i}h Congable, I I
, {...ixecutive Director 1..//
Enclosure: DDA Fact Sheet
003
People Helping People Help People
...... ~'. ... -- .mEDAIGNATED DRMRS.CIAi:tONJ.
"'-:':':':,~':,.,.._"_,_,_,_,_,, ,_,' ......' _,..._.___,..d..'."""". .d.."_"'_'.'_.._ "....,...,.......,.. ....,-;'::,:::::::::)<:;::({{:::~:::}::::~:t/?}:::({::
· ...... <>ii,'"..,','...,'.,....',., ,{.,;,.......FACTSHEETi.' ......
_ _______._ .......=..' ,.,., .. ~N......
To keep the roads and highways safe from the needless tragedy of accidents caused by drug and
alcohol impairment; preventing deaths, injuries, and the tremendous costs associated with
individuals who drive while impaired. .'
. Increase awareness of the dangers of driving while impaired.
. Enhance understanding of The Designated Drivers Association - a unique lifesaving and fund-
raising alternative.
. Educate people about positive choices they can make.
The Designated Drivers Association, a non-profit organization, was founded in September
1994. It has built a volunteer network of more than 80 people servicing 20 client establishments
and special events in the Richmond metropolitan area - and more are signing on each month!
The DDA is the only group in the nation offering such comprehensive service, Others
around the country that provide elements of the DDA's services do so on a limited basis, at
limited times of the year.
H(:j'\Yi!,i.j~;N(:jf:Pm:gi(:jr;~w(:j~K5-{fiiill4i~j~l~tl;t#g~~)'{iii'..'....i......................
Our volunteers see the need to help individuals who may have had "one too many," and
who should not drive. Working in pairs, the volunteers cover several establishments in their
neighborhood, generaIIy from 10 p.m. to closing, or they respond to requests from any estab-
lishment or organization where alcohol is served. These include sports bars, bowling alleys, coun-
try clubs, company outings, weddings, and special events. .
One volunteer drives the influenced patron home in the patron's vehicle while the partner
follows in another vehicle to return the team back to the participating establishment. With this
program, everyone is a winner: the patron, the club owner, and all members of the community.
Patrons benefit by avoiding the risk of being stopped for DUI - plus, they get the added
benefit of having their car returned home that night in one piece. Club owners benefit by taking a
generous step to protect their customers. At the same time, they reduce the potential liability of
patrons being involved in a DUI incident after leaving their establishment "under the influence."
Finally, the community benefits because fewer people are behind the wheel with the possibility of
hurting or killing others.
Future locations will be selected based on the highest incidents ofDUI. We plan a second
location in Virginia Beach, after Richmond is brought fully "on-line," to cover the Tidewater area,
Next, Roanoke will come on line, then Northern Virginia. By December 1996, we plan to begin
coverage in Maryland and North Carolina. It is our hope that, before the turn of the century, the
whole country will be able to experience the simplicity and success of the DDA.
004
PO Box 36770 * Richmond, Vuginia 23235 * (804) 379-7832
Name:
Address,
City:
State,
ZipCode
Home Telephone No, <->
Wmx Phone,<->
Pager: <->
Drivers License No,
Slate,
Exp. Date,
Insured By:
Agent Name,
Policy No.
I-~
Name,
Relationship
Phooe No,<->
Character References:
Name:
Phone No,,<->
Name:
Phone No,,<-)
Phone No,,' )
Name,
I Projected Availability: I
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
From
To
Donation up to 5S per hour to be made to:
(This can be for the benefit of any non profit organization, or the DDA. It can be split 50"/.. or any way you choose,)
Volunteer Signature
DDA Representative
Date
volapp,doc 9nm
~
""
j.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page ..Lof~
AGENDA
Meeting Date: September 27, 1995 Item Number: 5.
Subject:
Adoption of Resolution Recognizing Mr. Thomas H. Spence, Fleet/
Communications Manager for Department of General Services, Upon
His Retirement
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator:
&:IfIbt-~
,
BoardAction Requested:
Adoption of resolution,
Summary ofInformation:
Staff requests the Board adopt a resolution recognizing Mr.
Thomas H. Spence, Fleet/Communications Manager for Department of
General Services, upon his retirement.
Mr. Spence will be present to accept the resolution. See
attached.
Preparer:
/-.- L-,~~
Francis M. pitaro
Title:
Director. General S~rvic~s
Attachments:
.,Yes'
D
No
I #
006
@ _on~_
j~,. .
.'. .~....
.
.
RECOGNIZING MR. THOMAS H. SPENCE
UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Mr. Thomas H. Spence will retire on September 29,
1995 after providing eleven years of dedicated and faithful service
to Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Spence began his service in August 1984 as Fleet
Manager; was Acting Director of the Chesterfield County Airport
from March 1990 through May 19~1; Acting Director of the Department
of General Services from August through September 1994; and
Fleet/Communications Manager since 1987; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Spence was instrumental in designing and
implementing a motor pool program to provide rental vehicles for
County departments that did not have access to vehicles; designed
a lease program for County vehicles that allows departments to fund
their vehicle replacements incrementally through the operating
budget; and enhanced the condition of the fleet by improving the
frequency and quality of maintenance and replacing vehicles based
on condition and cost of operation; and
WHEREAS, under Mr. Spence's leadership, fleet maintenance
activities for the County and School System were successfully
consolidated which resulted in reduced costs, improved reliability
of the fleet, and greater efficiency; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Spence directed a self-supporting department of
sixty-two employees and was responsible for over 2,000 vehicles and
pieces of equipment, with a budget of $7 million that provided
vehicle maintenance and support at a cost thirty percent below
prevailing commercial rates; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Spence effectively directed the operation and
modernization of,the County's Radio and Electronic Communications
System; and
WHEREAS, Mr.
workers for his
fairness.
Spence won the respect of his peers and
unfailing honesty, integrity, hard work,
co-
and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Mr. Thomas H. Spence and
extends their appreciation for his eleven years of dedicated
service to the County, their congratulations upon his retirement,
and their ' best wishes for a "long and happy retirement. "
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be
presented to Mr. Spence and that this resolution be permanently
recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County, Virginia.
007
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page ~of~
AGENDA
September 27, 1995 Item N umber: ~. l.
Meeting Date:
Subject:
Nomination and Appointment of a Committee to Recommend the Appointment of a Police
Chief
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
~
BoardAction Relluested:
Summary ofInformation:
The County Charter provides that the Chief of Police will be appointed by the Board of
Supervisors upon the recommendation of a committee appointed by the Board of Supervisors
of not more than five people. The committee is composed of:
1. The County Administrator;
2. A member of the Board of Supervisors; ,
3. A citizen appointed by the Chief Circuit Court Judge who is not an employee
of the police department;
4. a person with police experience; and
5. a fifth member, if desired, who is neither an elected nor an appointed County
Official.
Since the Police Chief is retiring March 31, 1996 the County Administrator recommends that
the Board appoint the committee to begin its recommendation process prior to Chief
Pittman's retirement. (See attached schedule)
Preparer: ~, I/Jv...~ Title:
Steven L. Micas
County Attorney
0814,11375,1
1#
I
Attachments:
. Yes
D
No
@ -""--,
,
1\
.
.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
P.O. BOX 40
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832
(804) 748-1211
J,L. McHALE, III, CHAIRMAN
BERMUDA DISTRICT
ARTHUR S, WARREN, VICE CHAIRMAN
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
LANE B, RAMSEY
HARRY G, DANIEL
DAlE DISTRICT
FREDDIE W, NICHOLAS, SA.
MATOACA DISTRICT
EDWARD B, BARBER
UIOLOTH1AN DISTRICT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Honorable Members of the Board of Supervisors
Lane B. Ramsey,. County Administrator At:.
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Chief of Police Selection Process
DATE:
September 6, 1995
As you are aware, Chief Joseph Pittman, Jr. will be retiring from the Police
Department the end of February, 1996. The County Charter stipulates the appointment of a
committee to recommend a candidate or candidates to the Board of Supervisors who in turn
select and appoint the new chief. The purpose of this memorandum is to alert you to an
agenda item which will be in your Board package for action at your September 27 meeting
and to provide some related information regarding the selection process.
As the Charter provision regarding the committee is relatively brief, I will quote it in
its entirety below:
The chief shall be appointed by the board of supervisors on recommendation of a
committee of not more than five persons. The committee shall consist of the county
administrator and at least one, but not more than one, of the following: (a) one member of
the board of supervisors , (b) one citizen from the community, who is not at the time he serves
on the committee an employee of the Chesteifield County depanment of police, appointed by
the chief circuit coun judge and (c) one member with police experience appointed by the
board. The remaining member, if any, shall be appointed by the board and shall be neither
an elected nor an appointed county official.
It is my understanding that the Charter Committee intended that this committee be
responsible for developing the recruitment and selection process through which they could
make their recommendation to the Board of Supervisors for the final selection decision.
Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service. @
PM'''''''''
Iloc.e,"", "."",
" ,
.
.
,
Honorable Members of the Board of Supervisors, September 6, 1995
Page 2
Given the relatively short time period in which a selection must be made, I offer the
following suggestions to facilitate the process:
1. The board discuss the composition of and the charge to the committee at the
September 27 board meeting. I will contact Judge Hauler so he may begin consideration of
the appointment by the Chief Judge. Chief Pittman has expressed a desire to serve on the
committee and I would recommend that he be appointed to fill the position on the committee
as ....one member with police experience appointed by the board.. Due to time constraints,
the committee should be appointed and hold its first organizational meeting by the second
Board meeting in September.
2. Although the committee has the responsibility for deciding on the process to be used, I
would suggest that at the initial organizational meeting of the committee the following be
addressed:
(a) that a nationwide search be considered utilizing a search firm experienced in chief
of police selections to assist with the process;
(b) that a recruitment package/profIle be developed which would include demographic
information on the county as well as a description of the police department's structure,
current strengths and weaknesses, and challenges to be faced in the future;
(c) that the applicants who successfully complete an initial pre-screening go through
an assessment center to determine the top candidate(s) to be recommended to the board for
their selection. Ideally, the assessment center will be conducted by the same firm who assists
with the initial recruitment indicated above. I anticipate a Request for Proposals will need to
be circulated to select the consulting firm(s);
,(d) that I provide the committee with a specific time line and internal staff support to
coordinate and manage the process once the initial decisions on the approach to the
recruitment process have been made.
3. In order to provide some overlap between the chief's retirement and the beginning of
the new chief's duties, the selection by the board should occur early in January, 1996.
I hope you will consider these suggestions as a means of facilitating the process and
supporting you in this critical selection decision. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have
any questions or if I can provide you with any other information prior to the September 27
Board meeting.
'..- ,I:
.,..."..
r. /,
e
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY Page -L of-L
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date:
September 27, 1995
Item Number:
B.A.l.
Subject:
Streetlight Installation Approval
Countv Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~ r 4.
Board Action Reauested:
This item requests Board approval of a Streetlight Installation in the Bermuda District.
Summary ofInformation:
Streetlight requests from individual CItIzens or CIVIC groups are received in the Department of
Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations from Virginia Power for each request
received. When the quotation is received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next
available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration, Staff provides the Board with
an evaluation of each request based on the following criteria:
1. Streetlights should be located at intersections;
2. There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per day (VPD) passing the requested
location if it is an intersection, or 400 VPD if the requested location is not an intersection;
CONTINUED NEXT PAGE
Preparer:
t'AJ#Je-~
Richard M, !fish, P.E.
Title: Director, EnviTOnmental Engineering
Attachments: II Yes
DNO
1#
008
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ....L of ...1....
Summary of Information: (Continued)
.
3, Petitions are required and should include 75% of residents within 200 feet of the requested
location and if at an intersection, a majority of those residents immediately adjacent to the
intersection.
Cost quotations from Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60 days, The Board, upon presentation
ofthe cost quotation, may approve, defer, or deny the expenditure of funds for the streetlight installation,
If the expenditure is approved, staff authorizes Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial will
cancel the project and staff will so notify the requestor. A deferral will be brought before the Board
again when specified,
BERMUDA DISTRICT:
*
Intersection of Happy Hill Road and Woodsedge Road on the southwest corner
Cost to install light: : $ 880,96
Meets minimum criteria.
Bermuda Streetlight Funds (unaudited)
$29,131.4 I
Requested
Expenditure
$880,96
Effective
Remaining Balance
$28,250.45
Balance Forward
1#
009
I
,
.
STREETLIGHT REQUEST
.
Bermuda District
REQUEST
RECEIVED: August 30, 1994
ESTIMATE
REQUESTED: August 30, 1994
ESTIMATE
RECEIVED: September 7, 1995
DAYS ESTIMATE
OUTSTANDING: 373
COST TO INSTALL STREETLIGHT: $ 880.96
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Harold L. Suter
ADDRESS: 16001 Woods edge Road,
Colonial Heights, VA 23834
PHONE NUMBER: WORK - 520-2913.
[!] REQUEST IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF:
Happy Hill Road and Woodsedge Road, southwest comer
D REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS:
POLICY CRITERIA:
INTERSECTION:
VEHICLES PER DAY:
PETITION:
Qualified
Qualified
Qualified
REQUESTOR OR STAFF COMMENTS:
None
Attachments: Map
010
;
.
"-1
:z:
en
co
rrl
/0
./0
-<
o
"-1
r--
en
,.-1
.-1
"eet Light Request .p
September 27, 1995
.
- _ u . DDf'1rl8I*d prodod at
,. -. jJJ4 c.." GIS 0JIb.
Street light Legend
~ existing Ught
. requested Ught
-
I
~
~<v
WOODS l\)
i
11,,0
/0)-
~
(~
en
:>
<:(
a
2:
o
en
0:::
Lw
lL..
lL..
Lw
-:>
~
.
~
This map shows citizen requested
streetUght installations in relation
to existing streetUghts.
Existing streetlight i1ifomuztion was
obtained from the Cheste1jield County
Environmental Engineering Department.
M1AU': 7lJ1D
..... .
-
I
,.... ...."",
011 @)
~,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ~ of ..L
Meeting Date: September 27, 1995
Item Number:
8.A.2.
Subiect:
Rescission of a Streetlight Installation Approval
Countv Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~ t /.Ill
Board Action Requested:
This item requests Board rescission of an approval of a Streetlight Installation in the Dale District.
Summary of Information:
BACKGROUND:
On April 26, 1995, the Board approved the installation of a streetlight in the cul-de-sac of Greatbridge
Terrace in the Chesswood subdivision. The installation request met the Streetlight Policy's petition
requirement based on a general petition received representing a number of residents in the subdivision,
On September 7, 1995, the Departmeni of Environmental Engineering received a petition signed by nine
of the ten residents living within 200 feet of the approved installation site requesting that this particular
streetlight not be installed, Virginia Power has been notified of this request and futher work on this
project will be held in abeyance until the Board determines if the project should proceed or not.
If the Board approves this item, the funds allocated for this installation will be returned to the Dale
District Streetlight Account.
CONTINUED NEXT PAGE
Preparer:
Jf/JJjJ~
Richard cElfish, P.E.
Title: Director, Environmental Engineering
Attachments: II Yes
DNO
1#
01.2
',"1
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ...l... of l
Summary of Information: (Continued)
DALE DISTRICT:
*
Rescind approval for the installation of a streetlight in the cul-de-sac of Greatbridge Terrace
Dale Streetlight Funds (unaudited)
$8,000.40
Rescission
Approval
($1,238,57)
Effective
Remaining Balance
Balance Forward
$9,238,97
1# 013
. .
REQUES~O RESCIND STREETLIGHT APIOV AL
l.:
Dale District
REQUEST RECEIVED:
NAME OF REQUESTOR:
ADDRESS:
September 7, 1995
Mr. and Mrs. Karl Brown (and eight other residents)
5306 Greatbridge Terrace
Richmond, VA
LOCA TION:
In the bulb of the cul-de-sac of Greatbridge Terrace
APPROVED BY THE BOARD: April 26, 1995
A petition has been received, signed by nine of ten residents who reside within 200 feet of
the approved installation site, requesting that this streetlightlight not be installed.
This petition was accompanied with a letter which stated:
"We the residents of Greatbridge Terrace greatly appreciate the quick response for the
need for security lights in the Chesswood Subdivision, The extra lighting will be a comfort
to us all in the future for the added safety of our families, however, we the undersigned feel
that it is unnecessary to have a light installed in the bulb of the cul-de-sac.
"We hope that the light could be used elsewhere and will help keep the expense of
protecting our neighborhood at a reasonable cost for the county."
Staff notes that when meeting with Mr. Brown to receive his petition, he eXplained that
although the same people who are requesting that this streetlight not be installed signed a
general petition for streetlights in the Chesswood subdivsion, their impression was that the
nearest streetlight would be located at the intersection of Greatbridge Road and Greatbridge
Terrace, approximately 450 feet from the bulb of the cul-de-sac, The Board has also approved
a streetlight installation at that location. The one resident within 200 feet of the approved
installation site who did not sign the petition resides where the streetlight is to be installed.
This street light was approved in the amount of $1,238.57. If the Board rescinds its approval
of April 26, 1995, this sum would be returned to the Dale District Streetlight Account.
Those residents signing this petition are:
Mr. & Mrs Karl Brown
5306 Greatbridge Terrace
Mr. & Mrs Richard Hayes
5305 Greatbridge Terrace
Mr. & Mrs Timothy Anderson
5307 Greatbridge Terrace
Mr. Henry Glass
5312 Greatbridge Terrace
Mr. & Mrs Jeffrey Dupke
5300 Greatbridge Terrace
Mr. John Kitts
5304 Greatbridge Terrace
Mr. William Carey
5303 Greatbridge Terrace
MrS. Anthony James
5301 Greatbridge Terrace
Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Kata
5308 Greatbridge Terrace
014
. l ~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
Meeting Date:
September 27, 1995
Item Number:
a.B.l.
Subiect:
Resolution recognlzlng Mr. E.C. Cochran, Jr.
Virginia Department of Transportation
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: /I1d, r 1#.,
Board Action Reauested:
Summary of information:
Mr. E.C. Cochran, Jr., State Location and Design Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation, is retiring from the Department.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached
resolution expressing appreciation for Mr. Cochran's service.
Preparer:
tll! :L1:::::-
Tti~:nirR~tor of Transportation
Attachments:
III Yes
DNO
1#
015
J
.
.
.
~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY: At a regular
meeting of the Board of Supervisors
held at the Courthouse on September
27, 1995, at 3:00 p.m.
WHEREAS, Mr. .E.C. Cochran, Jr. began his career with the
Virginia Department of Transportation in 1956 and has served in
several positions; and
WHEREAS, in 1972, Mr. Cochran, Jr. was promoted to Assistant
Highway Location and Design Engineer; and
WHEREAS, in 1987, Mr. Cochran, Jr. assumed the
responsibilities of State Location and Design Engineer; and
WHEREAS, under Mr. Cochran's leadership, major improvements
have been accomplished in Chesterfield's transportation network;
and
WHEREAS, these accomplishments include, among others, the
widening of Route 10, Chippenham Parkway, Route 60, Courthouse
Road and Route 360, and the construction of the Powhite Parkway
Extension, I-295, and Route 288; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Cochran, Jr. has continuously conducted the
business of the Virginia Department of Transportation in a very
professional, efficient, and effective manner.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby eXpresses its sincere appreciation to
Mr. E.C. Cochran, Jr. for his outstanding service to the citizens
of Chesterfield County.
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board extends to Mr.
Cochran, Jr. its best wishes for a happy and successful
retirement.
Vote:
Certified by:
Faith Davis, Clerk
To the Board of Supervisors
016
.
JA
:,
.
~ il 1.,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2:- of.2..
Meeting Date: September 27 , 1995
Item Number:
8 .B. 2.
Subj ect:
Consideration of an application for a state
the Records Management System (RMS) in
Incident-Based Reporting.
Grant to upgrade
preparation for
County Administrator's Comments:
.
~~
County Administrator: .W h..--//j/
jJ
BoardAction Requested:
The Police Department requests permission to apply for a state
grant which would provide funding for a portion of the upgrade
costs for the Records Management System. Phase I and II of
RMS were approved in the previous two fiscal years.
SummarvofInformation:
To . assist with the implementation of the Incident-Based
Reporting program in Virginia, the Police Department is
restructuring the Records Management System in-house. In
order to complete this project, many hardware, .softwareand'
wiring equipment is necessary. These funds will assist in
meeting the mandated requirement to report to the National
Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) by 1999.
The original business study done in 1992 estimated the cost
for Phase III to be $253,300. The estimated cost today for
Phase III is $465,500. The additional cost is due totne
complexity of the software needed to supplement the hardware
requirements.
Our agency is required to provide a 50% match for funding.
The county match of funds of $50,280 would come from the Phase
III funding in FY97. Approval of this grant would repres~nt
a savings of $50,000 to the County. There are no positions
requested as part of this grant.
Preparer: Title: Chief of Police
C Pittman; Jr. 1#
017
Attachments: DYes . No
((
i
r
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2- o~
\
Summary of Information: (Continued)
Budoet and Manaoement Comments:
During FY93, the Police Department conducted an in-house study of the costs of
complying with the Incident-Based Reporting Program in Virginia. This study led to
the implementation of the Records Management System, which is being phased in
over three years, According to the original study, Phase III of the Records
Management System was expected to cost $253,300.
Since that time, software requirements associated with this system have changed.
The software necessary to run the Records Management System is more complicated
than FY93 estimates indicated. As such, the police department will need to use more
powerful hardware to access and run this software quickly and effectively.
The change in software and hardware requirements have added $212,200 to the
original FY93 estimate, This grant is for a total of $100,000. $50,000 of this will
come from the state of Virginia and $50,000 will represent the local match,
Although this grant will reduce the revised cost to the county for Phase III of Records
Management by $50,000, the funding source for the local match has not been
identified, The Police Department can apply for the grant - and if successful, the local
funding portion and the balance of the cost increase will have to be considered as part
of the FY97 budget,
I # 01.8
o'1e
D t September
Meeting a e:
'll.e...J,'u6
'j, (J, -;,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page
1
2
of_
27, 1995
Item Number:
8.B.3.
Subject:
Medicaid MR Waiver revenue
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: 1Jt;J r ria
BoardAction Requested:
Appropriate $335,000 of Medicaid revenue; and further, authorize the
establishment of five (5) MH/MR/SA Residential Counselor positions.
Summary ofInformation:
The Chesterfield Community services Board requests the appropriation of
$335,000 of additional Medicaid MR Waiver revenue and authorization to
establish five (5) Residential Counselor positions to provide services
to seven (7) consumers with mental retardation. Four of these consumers
will be moving back to Chesterfield from State institutions, and three
individuals are already residents currently being served by a private
provider. However, these three consumers and their families have
requested that service provision be assumed by the Community services
Board.
The match funding required to draw down Medicaid Waiver Revenue is
provided by the state. No' County funds will be required.
Preparer:
dft:. ~OD'
Title:
Executive Director
Department of MH/MR/SA
Attachments:
DYes
. No
1#
01.9
-,
. .)
CHESTERFIELD COUN
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2- oL3-
Summary of Information: (Continued)
Budoet and Manaoement Comments:
This item will appropriate $335,000 of additional Medicaid MR Waiver revenue and
create (5) full-time Residential Counselor positions. These positions will support
services that are provided on a 24 hour, 7 day a week basis.
The revenue estimate from MH/MR/SA assumes that Medicaid will reimburse for
services provided after October 1. There will be no cost to the General Fund
associated with this appropriation due to the fact that IIIIH/MR/SA will bill Medicaid
for all services provided, MH/MR/SA staff estimate that Medicaid fees will exceed the
direct cost of providing these services. Any revenue exceeding the direct cost will
offset unfunded salary increases in the future.
mes , Stegmaeier, Director
Budget and Management
1# 020
'if
'~
",
~STERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
11 g t.}
Page ....L of -L
Meeting Date:
September 27, 1995
Item Number:
8.B.4.
Sub,ject:
Application for and acceptance of a Virginia Department of Aviation
Grant and appropriation of funds for an Airport Improvement Project.
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
~y
~. b.- ~
/J
Board Action Requested:
As outlined below, authorize the County Administrator to apply for and
accept a State Airport Improvement Grant, appropriate the Grant funds,
and award a contract to lowest responsible bidder.
Summary of Information:
This item requests Board approval to apply for and accept a virginia
Department of Aviation (VDA) Grant, enter into necessary contracts and
appropriate funds for a fiscal year 1995/96 Airport Improvement project.
The County has submitted the below project to VDA for funding during the
current fiscal year.
1.
,
Automobile Parking Lot
Construction Phase
Construction observation, testing and
associated engineering services
$160,6B5.00
$ 43,426.00
TOTAL
$204,111,00
(
prep.=~
John R. Lillard
Attachments:
DYes
. No
Title: Director for Aviation Services
1# 021. I
,.\'.
.~I ,......
-,
HESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page---L- of 2
Summary of Information: (Continued)
The County received a tentative allocation of funding from VDA for this
project during the previous fiscal year. A breakdown of project funding
is as follows:
State
Total Appropriation
* Local Match
Total projects
$163,28B.00
$163,28B,OO
$ 40,B23.00
$204,111.00
The balance of the funds are available in the Airport Capital Project
funds to match the State Grant which has a current balance of $132,524.00
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors:
1. Authorize the County Administrator to accept the VDA Grant for this
project and enter into contract with the State government for
expenditure of said funds.
2. Appropriation of all State funds allocated for this project.
3. Authorize the County Administrator to award and enter into
contracts with the lowest responsible bidder.
1#
022
I
MeetiQg <Date:
September 27, 1995
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
,~ ,
(.
Page ...LoCl.
Item Number:
8.B.5.a.
Subject:
Set a public hearing to amend ~ 5-8, Code of the County of Che'sterfield, 1978, as amended,
regarding adoption of animals.
~"
count: Administr~tor's Comments: . _
Re.co. #WId A!~ ~ th.- ~;~' iJ)Ml. ~
aD ~ 17; - ~ P---~, ~ ~
.tt-9- ~.tiU P"-&'U/)d ~ ..la-
ve hJte, ~ ~~ I~ ~
County Administrator: ~
BoardAction Requested:
Set a public hearing for November 8, 1995 to consider adopting the attached ordinance.
Summary ofInformation:
In 1993, the General Assembly enacted legislation that requires people who adopt a dog or
a cat from a local pound to have the animal sterilized.
Like many other localities, Chesterfield has encountered significant administrative difficulties
in attempting to ensure that people who adopt a dog or a cat comply with this law. Staff believes
that the compliance rate will increase significantly if the Animal Control Office collects the
veterinarian's sterilization fee from the adopting owners at the time that the animal is adopted.
Animal Control would then pay the sterilization fee to the veterinarian, on behalf of the owner,
after the veterinarian certifies that the sterilization has been performed,
The ultimate cost to a person who adopts a dog or a cat and complies with the state law
sterilization requirement will not increase as a result of this change in County policy. However,
in order to collect the sterilization fee, it must be made a part of the $10.00 adoption fee, which
requires the attached ordinance change. The sterilization fee for male cats is $15.00. For female
cats and all dogs, the sterilization fee is $30.00.
(continued)
Title:
Chief of Police
0500,11489,1(11488,1) I
#
023
I
J. E. Pittman, J
Attachments: . Yes 0 No
@ -""...."."..,-
y
.,.,,~. "'
..'~~I
,'\
. I
, .-.... i
~(!(q~-< .
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 on
Meeting Date: September 27,1995
Item Number:
Budqet and Manaqement Comments:
The proposed fee will raise the total cost of adopting a pet as follows: from $10 to $30 for a dog; from
$0 to $30 for a female cat; from $0 to $15 for a male cat.
This fee structure would enable the county to issue vouchers to customers for spaying or neutering
adopted pets, The county has locked in rates for these services that are significantly below market
rates, resulting in net savings to prospective pet owners, while at the same time increasing compliance
with spay/neuter regulations,
The new fee may cause a short-term decline in the demand for animals, However, the action has the
potential to prevent some future costs to the county through proactive control of the pet population,
There is no cost to the general fund associated with adoption of the proposed fee schedule,
r4f4-
af. ~-
J rues J,~L Stegmaier
U
Title: Director, Budget and Management
024
"
A
..~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page LoLL
)
Summary of Information: (Continued)
The County Administrator and the Police Department have worked closely with local groups
interested in animal welfare who support the proposed ordinance change, This ordinance
amendment that increases the initial adoption fee by including the cost of sterilization could, in the
short term, decrease adoptions,
0500:11489.1(11488,1)
1#
025
. .."
.
.
-'~
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
~. OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND REENACTING SECTION 5-8 RELATING TO
ADOPTION FEES FOR DOGS AND CATS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 5-8 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as
amended, is amended and reenacted to read as follows:
Sec. 5-8. Confinement and disposition of dogs: pound: redemption by owner:
pound charges: adoption fees for dOl!s and cats,
000
(c) Any person purchasing a dog or cat from the county dog pound shall pay
a fee of ten dollars ($10,00); such money to be disposed of in the same manner as
dog license taxes. Additionallv. anv person purchasinl! an un sterilized dOl! or cat from
the county dOl! pound shall pav a sterilization fee to the county which the county shall
pav over to the veterinarian who performs the sterilization after the veterinarian has
certified to the dOl! warden that the sterilization has been performed. The sterilization
fee for all dOl!s and for female cats shall be thirty dollars $30.00). The sterilization
fee for male cats shall be fifteen dollars ($15.00). If anv veterinarian charl!es an
amount in excess of the sterilization fee for sterilizinl! a dOl! or cat. pavrnent of the
excess amount shall be the responsibility of the person who adopts the dOl! or cat.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section to the contrary, at any time after
the confinement period for such dog expires and the dog has not been claimed, it may
be humanely destroyed or, disposed of by sale' or gift to a federal agency,
state-supported institution, agency of the commonwealth, agency of another state, a
licensed federal dealer or by delivery to any local humane society, shelter or to any
person who is a resident of the county who will pay the required license tax on such
animal. The purchaser of such dogs shall certify to the dog warden on forms furnished
by the county dog warden that the animals shall be used for medical research purposes
only. No provision herein shall prohibit the destruction of a critically injured or
critically ill dog for humane purposes. The pound shall be accessible to the public at
reasonable hours during the week.
000
(2) This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
0500: 11488,1
026
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page -lof-2....
Date:
September 27. 1995
Item Number:
S.B.5.b.
r
Subject:
Set a Public Hearing Date to Consider Amending ~ 8-16 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield
Relating to Tax Relief for the Elderly and Disabled l
County Administrator's Comments:
f~ !I~~ ~ M~ ~3
.~
County Administrator:
BoardAction Requested:
Set a public hearing date on November 8, 1995
Summary ofInformation:
Section 8-16 of the Chesterfield County Code establishes qualifying income and net worth
limitations for the real estate tax relief program. The figures under the current ordinance were
adopted in May, 1991, for .the 1991 tax year. Section 8-16.1 of the Chesterfield County Code
provides for annual increases in the income limitations, based on the increase in the Consumer
Price Index during the fiscal year preceding the tax year. Thus, the qualifying income limitations
have been adjusted each year since 1991 to the following levels for the 1995 tax year:
Income
Exemption %
$0 through $17,100
$17,101 through $28,400
100
50
$28,401 through $40,000
25
Preparer:
~, ~'(ct.C
Title:
County Attorney
0800,11459.1
1#
I
Steven L. Micas
.j
Attachments: . Yes D No
@ ....-""--.
", .~
'J.'
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2.. 0(2.
Summary of Information: (Continued)
Mr. Barber has recommended that the percentage exemption system be revised
to include a 75% exemption level. The revised categories of exemption would be as follows for
the 1996 tax year:
Income
Exemption %
$0 through $17,600
$17,601 through $25,800
$25,801 through $35,100
$35,101 through $40,000
100
75
50
25
The Commissioner of Revenue estimates that these changes will result in an annual revenue loss
of approximately $75,000.
0800:11459.1
1#
--
.
.
"~'I"~
\' .
.,
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNrY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND REENACTING SECTION 8.16 RELATING TO
TAX RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY AND DISABLED
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 8-16 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield. 1978, as
amended, is amended and reenacted to read as follows:
Sec. 8-16. Schedule of exemptions permitted.
(a) When the total combined income from all sources and the net combined
financial worth of the persons qualifying does not exceed the limits prescribed in
section 8-15, the amount of exemption from real estate taxation for the dwelling,
manufactured home, and up to one (1) acre of land upon which it is situated shall be
in accordance with the following schedule:
Income
Percentae:e of Exemption
$9 thrSligB. $11,999
-lOO
$15,999 tltreligB. $21,999
$25,999 tHr6ligB. $37,999
$0 throue:h $17.600
$17.601 through $25.800
$25.801 through $35.100
$35.101 throue:h $40.000
~
~
100
..Jj,
50
25
(b) The tax exemption provided by this article shall not exceed two thousand
dollars ($2,000.00).
(2) This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
0800:11484.1
.',(
~~ :
'iI.II;, I~
'-If.'''~'.;'.. ,
r",,"'>.o ~ -'.1','
r. . I ~,
. ~~ .~~J
~.!~~P'
--.(-\
~lESTERFI~~LD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
.
I
Page ~of-2.
Mceliug Datc:
Scpt;ember---2 7~95--
Item Number:
8 .B. 6.
Subject:
Request To Transfer Value of School Bus Parts Inventory
(
Couuty Administrator's Commcnts:
R~L.L A~
County Administrator:
c/I3R
j
BoardActiou Requested: School Board requests the Board of Supervisors
to approve the proposed changes to the fleet maintenance agreement
(Attachment A); and appropriate $150,000 to the Pupil Transportation
category, reflecting the County's purchase of the spare bus parts
inventory housed at the Walmsley garage.
Summary of luformatiou:
On August 25, 1992, the School Board and Board of Supervisors entered
into a fleet maintenance agreement which included the transfer of
ownership of spare bus parts housed at the Walmsley garage to the
County. During the FY1995 budget process, the County agreed, as part of
a cost saving measure, to purchase the spare parts inventory valued at
approximately $150,000. To date, that transfer has not taken place.
This memorandum is a request to have the transfer processed, thereby
increasing the FY1996 appropriation in the pupil Transportation
category. The School Board's recommendation is to apply this requested
funding to the purchase of replacement buses.
At this time, the contract governing the fleet maintenance function
contains language to address the transfer of inventory only in the event
of termination of the agreement. A transfer by the County to purchase
the inventory from the School Board with the contract remaining in
effect will, of course, require a change in the language relative to the
inventory (see Attachment A) .
!'rel"lI'er:
~" 1.~:--
Tille:
Superintendent
Attachments:
. Ycs
D No
1/1
030
,j
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page _ oL
Summary of Information: (Continued)
Budqet and Manaqement Comments:
The Garage will be able to absorb $125,000 of the cost of this
expense in their current appropriation; however, a $25,000
increase is necessary to ensure that the Garage does not exceed
the FY96 budget. Funds are availabe in Garage retained earnings
for 'appropriation 'to repay the' School' Board for purchase"'of"spare'" "
parts.
The actions needed to be' ta.l~en :~ythe'Board to ,accomplish this
School Board request are: 1) appropriate retained earnings and
increase expenditures in the Garage Fund by $25,000; 2) increase
sale of inventory revenue and increase expenditure appropriations
in the Transportation category 'in' the School operating' Fund,' in
the amount of $150,000; and 3) revise the existing contract to
,reflec~ the agreement that the Walmsley Facility will remain
closed 'for operation and should the facility need to be re-
opened, Schools will bear the cost of restocking the inventory
and that the value of inventory transfer set forth in the
original contract be adjusted by the amount of this action.
s J. L. stegmaier, Director
get and Management Department
1# 031
.
.
.'-.
Attachment A
Fleet Maintenance Agreement
Recommended revision (in bold)
. . . . Upon termination of this Agreement as hereinafter provided, the
County immediately shall transfer the inventory of spare parts from the
Courthouse garage, gasoline and other POL products, equipment and tools,
and service vehicles of the same number and description and with an
equivalent value as the Inventory set forth in Schedule D.
032
.
.
....
VIRGINIA: At a regular
meeting of the
Chesterfield County
School Board held Tuesday
evening, September 12,
1995, at seven-thirty
o'clock in the
Chesterfield county
Courthouse Complex
PRESENT: Marshall W. Trammell, Jr., Chairman
Harry A. Johnson, Ed.D., Vice-Chairman
Elizabeth B. Davis
Dianne Pettitt
James R. Schroeder, D.D.S.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the School Board and the Board of
Supervisors entered into a fleet maintenance agreement' which
included the transfer of ownership of spare bus parts housed at the
Walmsley garage to the County, and WHEREAS, the County agreed,
during the FY1995 budget process, to purchase the spare parts
inventory, valued at approximately $150,000, as part of a cost
savings measure, and WHEREAS, that transfer has not taken place,
and WHEREAS, the School Board is behind in its 12-year bus
replacement schedule by eleven buses;
NOW THEREFORE LET IT BE
RESOLVED, on motion of Mrs. Davis, seconded by Dr. Schroeder, that
the School Board requests the Board of Supervisors to:
1) approve the proposed changes to the fleet maintenance
agreement as shown in the Attachment A; and,
2) appropriate $150,000 to the Pupil Transportation category,
reflecting the County's purchase of the spare bus parts
inventory housed at the Walmsley garage.
Oaf G.., ,-j-<~
Pcmtilerk to
School Board
uperintendent.
033
a copy teste
~,
.
S'-8,1
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page L...oC.l..
AGENDA
September 27,1995 Item Number: 8.B.7.
Meeting Date:
Subject:
State Road Acceptance
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~ Jt- ~
BoardAction Requested:
Summary ofInformation:
MATOACA:
St. James Woods, Section B
Preparer: l/{L/f:rt~, P.E.
Title: Director, Environmental Engineerin
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
1# 034
@ -""Aeq<eied-
1
.
.
i' ;,""
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - St. James Woods, Section B
MEETING DATE: September 27, 1995
Crawford Wood Drive
Crawford Wood Terrace
Wilson Wood Road
Hardwood Drive
Havens Oak Circle
ST. JAMES WOODS
SECTION B
, ""'.., _ t=ou te 7(;
Pou.!.hde r.--
5'ite - ,,-
'hClfiITY I'1IjP Scale = j"-C:OCX:J'
Vicinity Map
035
'"
.;,r.-.c,
If ; b,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page...L of L
Meetin Date:
September 27. 1995
Item Number: 8 .B. B.b.
Subject:
Conveyance of an Easement to Virginia Electric and Power Company
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~. r JM,
Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors
and the County Administrator to execute an easement agreement with Virginia
Electric and Power Company to install underground power to provide service
for the softball/baseball fields under construction at the Clover Hill Sports
Complex. . ,
Summary of Information:
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of the
Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an easement
agreement with Virginia Electric and Power Company to install underground
power to provide seryice for the softball/baseball fields under construction
at the Clover Hill Sports Complex.
District:
Clover Hill
Preparer~, &' -zJ. rr<!..~
J~hn W. Harmon
Attachments:
.. Yes CJ No
Title: Riqht of Wav Manaqer
1# 039
,l
~'....
VICINITY SKETCH
CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
CLOVER HILL SPORTS COMPLEX
---------.-'-- -
"------
r'''A-e
.
I
~
C eel<
.
a
o
Otlerdale
-----------
SIIERUAI E ,..,
PAf1:\_~"1.
040
" . . c:
~ '"
.... E
",'" q
c:'" ~
<ll~ I
Q.OJ
E'"
c'" J III
tl~
I 'i-
"'~ ~
cO i -
....~ . "I
_-c: ~ >
.m.~ m
0..0: >
r-
, IV ~
I 8 (J ,
;)- 'O~
"::,,11 \'
.1 111""
......... .g \r1
;;; c!
a c
-01
..--'I
~-#
_lU S $
J.U ~ -..., ~- ~ QJ
V) ." N r- ..A:r ::::.
,o~ ~-;...oo!,..~ ...;j-~
0-.. .., :r~ nQ 2:' .00-- ,.... ~
I'll ' 0- 0"':;
1) V1 Do!:' l'l 11 tn_
~"N ;- ~ tV rt. rl.. 1/) IQ f.rJ
.n " "," N
-~ -.' ",1'/ VI ", \1l /'- ' ,
o OG I .." --,-
,... r- V, ~ I '"... I
,0. "1 .. ~-_.-- I
\.'."/ ',' \., If
--~" J"--
,U l'\J
~,l f- ...:-.9
_0
\J ..... '2 I
-.::J 0 - 0
<f ~O
~ "" :2 - C
!-Jl"Z;C:>'
Q ~ ~ lJ. q
I) :J: ?
.gCJ-6og
I.L ~-C;
:;- 0 V) I.J I"J r
.,.. .J ~ III
t 53~ <!)
~ +'J1P-
'.J ...J L ..Jl
o :1'-
o.Z4..,9
4:. jl- r6
.d:l
q
,111
'<
"
!!>
n
i!
\l
\:l
o
~
....
'f.,
@
.~
1i
&
()
c.J
r
V
-..J
J
~
'0
~
v
<-
~
~
>
.
~
>;
"
Q
~
~
.
<
Q
~
5
.
<
::J
~
~
s
olI
5
~
.
g
~
J
041.
i
~
~ .13. q,
..
c; ':~->!k~,
rfAII '.
~i~
">1!GJl!-~'
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page...L of L
Meetin Date:
Seotember 27. 1995
Item Number:
8.B.9.
Subject:
Acceptance of a Parcel of Land along Spring Run Road from Charles
E. Bailey Inc., a Virginia Corporation
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: tltp.. t ~
Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept
the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.077 acres along the north
side of Spring Run Road from Charles E. Bailey Inc., a Virginia Corporation,
and to authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed.
Summary of Information:
It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible
through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County
Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and
will decrease the right of way costs .for road improvements when constructed.
District:
Matoaca
Prepare~ ..hJ oor). t?/f, .~.. .._,
:Yohn W. Harmon
Title:
Riqht of Way Manaqer
Attachments:
.. Yes c=J No
I #
042
VICINITY SKETCH
ACCEP~CE OF A PARCEL OF
.
ND ALONG SPRING RUN ROAD FROM C RLES E BAILEY INC
~
r-
';}
~
""
"Dii!
IMAw...,
Rfl: .~'ft..1
''1J~
:''''~~
~'-"'4t" "
~w"t~ }!:
~ ~ ~ ...'.#
~ ~t\\\ %0___ ...::___~__
I :_,,;':;/~ ~~
2.3>1.12-
.l!eedy'__~
I
/
,!
__-p'i(j
"
(
.
- .
~~
~-~
659
f,H
r
--~
-~
Tim ',,,,
'--~-':-
~ ~
'I ..', ~Ill.
--------- - -----,,~
.h
043
:N
985':JO'fpeJL
of8enchnQ
Oat;; Dr. cfl.F;d.
I.
~r- '..
0;--' --~ ..----....------.---
---p
g4CP ,arS '
1Lfinn
<N
SQ'Q,O/O'e_
/0-0.=,
, <'>d
Frame ~
Shed -'T......j ~
"-
C)
...
'lJ
loooac
III
~
t'
l\i
r:::
c::
'~
~
34.0' .
'i-
(\j
~
,~
g
.
~
I
MOl./helU
~
I (\)
\l
~%
~
2
'iPl'co>ao
one Gfonl
rrarT7e
~
,
~
6P/ZlrI{:J
P.l.(fT 5t10JLj//YD TJUO PtjeCbL'5 OF'
L{Jl'/lJ L Y/I"/O 0/'1 THe /'IDeTH L//YE:. Or
5P1C/IYCr eu/Y t=OtjLJ - M<jTOjCtj LJI5TE/CT
cHeSTeer/BUJ COUIfTY, W.e6/I)'~
.ee, Heath, 5h:Jron a..5+eve
balzer and associates, 10(;
,... ,. "...11" 1"'1 I....._'-".'.n....,...
tIIo.........__,u.ot.n......_I........
_10 1_'" .'.'~I....._ ."_1 ,... "",0'""
_...<_It', """.._10 tllkf '-"'1010'0,_1'"
~""r-,:,:.-tTm"~~~~~1 ';r:h::"'~''':~~
II...............
PLANNE"' . ^nCHnECTS . !:NGINEERS . SURVEYORS
400S<lIl,t>llh8"'d
SUIl,J
Rlehmond,VlrglnllU238
o.to: tjuguSI' iOU>, 1'38G
Scalf: /,1::::. 5(]'
Job /Yo' e35/(/o
044
~,
,
,ll ~
o,i. Z,".'"''
,,',"
~~~;:/
, Ji
,J,~~
q/b,a,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page.l of L
Meetin Date:
September 27. 1995
Item Number:
8.B.J.0.a.
Subject:
Request permission for a Deck to Encroach within an Existing 50
Easement
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~. r- m..
Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors grant
Mr. pius Frei permission to have a deck encroach wi thin an existing 50
easement; subject to the execution of a license agreement.
Summary of Information:
Mr. pius Frei has requested permission to have a deck encroach within an
existing 5' easement. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval
is recommended.
District:
Matoaca
preparer:........'./~ -z.J. ~~.,......,
Jot:n'W, Harmon
Title:
Riaht of Way Manaaer
Attachments:
.. Yes c=J No
I *
045
<,'-
t.~ #
VICINITY SKETCH
REQUEST PERMISSION FOR A DECK TO ENCROACH WITHIN AN EXISTING 5' EASEMENT
PIUS FREI
~~
~r
046
,-'.j
"
,.-:c
....
n.a ill fQ l;Itfflty ~.an ~t.1ieItI1IPWY at IfNI ~s.. ~ IMteof'll'\.as tie"" DilflOtmed 11M... m~ tu~S.on: mat: atl ~~L$ and.....,.. 8'Yl48~ 01
.a:samIlNttS ale sMYfC\ ncweon; M'odtr\al ~ .,.IY;I ~..r;II~by trnOI'O...~"11 '''hat" fn)m ~IW'G p"emoM5 ~ from ''''oteet~SI!l'O~'' ""~ 5/'1own""~, P.'t....
$1.1""" WIUi perfgrmfJd wtlnout ftIII o.n.6c: of ~ IItl. "P0l'1 and IS tubled ICI If'Ilatmauon which fl'\&y N ~ ~ such. ThIs CwilllIil'lg i$..... FI;MA defirled 1Iooci lOIta ...J:.....
Irnprovemenfs on
Date: 15-/8-05' t...OT 13, BEC!T/ON 2.
-, BII€.K.OALe.
Scale: /"=-90' 'Chesterfie.Jd Churrfr.;, vf'rqinla
Job No.: /QQiD5'5Z
,
AJr: R'l.J.:5 ~ Da. Ii/a F7-e/ 047
. PLANNERS. ARCHITECTS. ENGINEERS. SURVEYORS.
501 Branchway Road . Suite 100 . Aichmond, Virginia 23~36 . 794-0571 . Fax 794-2635
1514 East Parham Road . Richmond, Virginia 23228 ~ 262-6046 . Fax 264-3037
,
.1
\' p<
vt-
? ~,~/:
^
r ,)it
qe. ,rV
I D ~r(}
{ ()ffj
\
~
~
~~
~Q.
l1J
\)I,
I ~.A,
3'1&,/6 for ~ ..."
-{-he.. fIl/L (/ ~ ~
"""'vrninq ;.ant' 7:. ..J
I~ 'd QQ. /2:34236'
M' , ("Iii)
'2 6/ory FY'drn~
UI/Ga.rCJqe
loa ~Q
4FB1I2
,
I ~ 'I
, 'c:~ I
1 ~ I
L~/ I
o~.95"
AI N6DA.i..E ./ .....
-SO'R/G-<..J ---"fIVe:.
(l,
J;
Nofe:
(/fld en:vvund
Uh/s,
,
111
(\J
~ -----
\S..........- /'
" ..........-
1#5,8'
III J-()..j-
...
(\l
..... /+
,
'\l
";'.8' IN
\i.
~
\0
I
1lI111i:~,",!.CTI~ TOMO_filrO'
a
,
\
,
",,!A.
~8
.
~flJ,n
c,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ..1.. of L
Meetin Date:
Seotember 27. 1995
Item Number: 8.B.lO.B.
Subject:
Request permission for a Paved Driveway to Encroach within an
Existing Unimproved County Right of Way designated as Snead Street
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~. /f.... ~
Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors grant
Leroy A. and Marian C. Huffman permission to have a payed driveway encroach
within an existing unimproved County right of way designated as Snead Street;
subject to the execution of a license agreement.
Summary of Information:
Leroy A. and Marian C. Huffman have requested permission for a paved driveway
to encroach within an unimproved County right of way designated as Snead
Street. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended.
District:
Bermuda
Preparerf'- .f,.f'-zj r5:4",,~
John W. Harmon
Title:
Riqht of Way Manaqer
Attachments:
.. Yes c=I No
1*
048
c....
..,
VICINITY SKETCH
REQUEST PERMISSION FOR A PAVED DRIVEWAY TO ENCROACH WITHIN IN AN EXISTING UNIMPROVED
COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY DESIGNATED AS SNEAD STREET LEROY A & MARIAN C HUFFMAN
049
~'I. ~~-., . .
~
w
w
~
1-
".n
LoT No, I n '
\'Q ) ,J
q' ; u
, ~
-, \lJ
I \()
I <;)
c...
I "
"
Cl(
I i,~
I
,
I
;
I
I t.fg' ,
I ,
,
,
I ,
I ,
i
I
t
(J 2.8 i
..
0
'"
1
t-
, i.u
i 1,)...1
I f)(, I
i
t<Ji \- ~, I
j',
G'"'- ~ 'f1 ~\31
~i , LoT
IN'!) . 116
q 1'>-1
I ~,
',I
.-r:: ' u.. '
U.j ! \
'<: \ '
Vi i
I
I
I
,
----_.__.-~
{:2. +4 8
vV),f\j F:r~..iE
c::.
..JTR.EE. T
050
f?13 !
;;,
"@
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page -L of L
Meetinl! Date:
Seotember 27. 1995
Item Number: 8.B.lO.c.
Subject:
Request permission to Maintain, Improve and Construct Improvements
within an Existing Unimproved County Right of Way Designated as
Snead Street Located between Winfree Street and Railroad Street in
the Village of Chester Subdivision
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~ !rJ./ ~.
f
Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors grant
Emi ly Gibson permission to maintain and improve a driveway, construct a
fence, remove a stump and plant ornamental shrubbery within an existing
unimproved County right of way designated as Snead Street located between
Winfree Street and Railroad Street in the Village of Chester Subdivision;
subject to the execution of a license agreement.
Summary of Information:
Emily Gibson has requested permission to maintain and improve a driyeway,
construct a fence, remove a stump and plant ornamental shrubbery within an
existing unimproved County right of way designated as Snead Street located
between Winfree Street and Railroad Street in the Village of Chester
Subdivision. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is
recommended.
District:
Bermuda
preparer~ -z.J, 01 ~,,/V\
ohn W. Harmon
Title:
Riaht of Way Manaaer
Attachments:
.. Yes c=J No
1*
051
VICINTIY SKETCH
.
REQUEST PERMISSION TO MAINTAIN, IMPROVE AND CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN AN EXISTING
UNIMPROVED COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY DESIGNATED AS SNEAD STREET LOCATED BETWEEN WINFREE
STREET AND RIALROAD STREET IN THE VILLAGE OF CHESTER SUBDIVISION EMILY GIBSON
052
RA LROAD :>r~E~T
~\ 0...\ .
r.."",o.
1",<~e..'t>\rJ., ~j.~e..-
c
!L
I ~I\
(~~""~
I ,.'-
''/"}-.
EMIL.V 61850M
laJlOOWIN~ ......'1
tlTN!liT
~Ol,l.~
~,,'"
. --.
r~ "
~<.."'~
~.;o"w~ '
Wo.\\t...
o
e
00<0>
'- s.J1
~ ,\..., 'tO~
l"" r ~____ \
~ "".Q
VV'vt'
>-f ,.
~J ~~~
L:~~
\N~
M.
Mq
r<",
~v (;~ ')
It 5NE'''D
ST~EeT"
*
.. r'~fl~~
VV' N FR.E.E
8
" ...'(
W,f' .
fa
...,
EJ
o..\lla.~
,"."reA-
\Je.\~\';'
\\"",o;e..
=0
.
)
~
r
_VI 3
c .
o ~
J> --
<-
-".n a
-J
~
SPL.IT R.....L. FENC:E
~ON. C4tNnflu He)
'T"~EE' ST\JM pi
053
'STR.E.E T
~
.
/J
.
8'. fJ./1 '
E'-'
. ~4'd
"""t.<'"
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 2
Meeting Date: September 27,1995
ITEM NUr1BER: 8.B.ll.
Subiect:
Application for Virginia Juvenile Crime Control Act Funds
COU;=:70A;~
Countv Administrator:
~
Board Action Requested:
Authorize the County Administrator to apply for and appropriate funds from the Virginia Juvenile
Community Crime Control Act and authorize the creation of up to 11 positions for the program.
Summary of Information:
In 1995 Virginia General Assembly enacted the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act with an
effective date of January 1, 1996, The Act replaces the block grant system for all community-based
programs and services, except secure detention homes. The purpose of the Act is to establish
balanced, community based systems of sanctions, programs and services for juvenile offenders that will:
- promote adequate services to youth involved with juvenile courts
- ensure local autonomy in addressing juvenile crime
- establish a local planning process for services
- emphasize parental responsibility and provide community based services for juveniles and
families
A required local plan is being developed and will be submitted with the application to the Department
of Youth and Family Services, The amounts allocated to the County of Chesterfield are:
Fiscal Year 1996
Fiscal Year 1997
Fiscal Year 1998
$ 749,055
$1,251,311
$1,251,311
Included in the above amounts is the state funding for the John J, Thomas Group Home of which
$257,300 has been appropriated for FY96, leaving a balance of $491,755 to appropriate this year.
054
",'
'~
8'_""
. . , 1
,.,It" )
.~
,I,\'!:"
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
Meeting Date: September 27,1995
Summary of Information (continued)
The grant funds will enable the County to provide additional services to youth at intake to defer further
entry into the juvenile justice system, as well as enhance supervision services to youth on probation
parole. The focus is to balance the concern of treatment with public safety as a central focus,
The grant requires the County to provide funding for the Juvenile Detention Home and John J. Thomas
Group Home combined at the FY95 level of $700,974.
The local plan developed will ensure that the grant funds will fully fund any new services, including all
direct and administrative costs of the program. The grant revenue will also completely fund the program
in future years including inflationary increases, salary increases and replacement capital items. The
authorized positions and services provided are contingent upon receipt of state revenues. The grant
will fully fund the state share of the John H. Thomas Group Home, There will be no direct or indirect cost
to the County in FY96 or subsequent years,
Preparer: ~ b br/f~ ./ Title: Deputv County Administrator, Human Services
~n
Attachment:
DYes
II No
#
055
\
_j','/ (~f,'~"~"l'tI'~I'l, ,;\~\r'r}t~:i:)i'!li'" ,I' "
. , , .j " '1".'ft. ~i' , ,
.~ .. Ih< n
"I "
. "
" '15, i;:;),
,
I . Meeting Date:
'.'>~7"'f;..r',~~''/'i-.~.r' ....;.....,. .....". ,..,-.-
CHESTERFIELD. COUNT
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
September 27, 1995 Item Number:
,.,.-, f',
.,
1 2
Page _of_
B.B.l2.a.'
Subject:
Donation to Virginia State University Scholarship Program
County Administrator's Comments:
~~.
County Administ~tor: ' , " . '1J1J.f'J-IP"'" "
, I' , : ~ ,~, I "..f!' ....'-, ''1- .., ':, ". I, "t.,,~-
"
,
BoardAction Requested:
Appropriate $1,000 from the Matoaca Three Cent Road Fund for the Virginia State University
Scholarship Fund .
Summary ofInformation:
In recent years the Board of Supervisors has annually approved donations to the Virginia
State University Scholarship Fund, the only public four-year institution of higher learning in the
County. For fiscal year 1996, the Board has approved a donation of $25,000 to the Virginia State
University Scholarship Program. Dr. Nicholas has requested that the Board appropriate $1,000
from the Matoaca Three Cent Road Fund to support its scholarship program. The University has
pledged to raise additional monies from corporate sponsorships. ~ 15,1-22 Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended.
"i' ::^"
Preparer:
Title:
Deputy County Administrator
0800,11531.1
1#
056
I
Attachments:
DYes
. No
@ _on,,-",,_
, .
-,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
2 2
Page_ o!.:..-
Summary of Information: (Continued)
Budqet and Manaqement Comments:
Funds in the amount of $1,000 are available in the Matoaca Three
Cent Road Account. Use of $1,000 for this scholarship fund will
leave an approximate balance of $32,248.
L. stegmaier, Director
Management
I.
I
,
1# 057
~,B,I'Z,b
Meeting Date: September 27, 1995
CHESTERFIELD COUNT
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1-ofL
Item Number:
8.B.l2.b.
Subject:
Appropriation of Three Cent Road Funds to the School Board for the Purchase of a
Monacan/Midlothian Football Trophy
County Administrator's Comments:
R~J. ~
~
County Administrator:
BoardAction Requested:
Appropriate $500.00 from the Midlothian Three Cent Road Funds
Summary ofInformation:
Mr. Barber has requested that the Board appropriate $500.00 from the Midlothian Three
Cent Road Funds to the School Board for the purchase of a Monacan/Midlothian football trophy.
The purpose of the trophy would be to foster sportsmanship and goodwill between the schools.
Preparer:
Title:
0800,11545.1
I #
058
I
Attachments:
DYes
. No
@ ----
3'8 ,g 'Cl '
"
September 27, 1995
CHESTERFIELD. COUNT
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ~of~
Meeting Date:
Item Number:
a.B.l3.a.
Subject:
Refer the attached ordinance concerning giving appropriate credit for reducing construction
costs in a drainage district to the Planning Commission. .
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ,iJI?f.h M
1/
BoardAction Requested:
Refer the attached ordinance to the Planning Commission for its review and recommendation,
Summary ofInformation:
In drainage areas that have been legally designated as drainage "districts", developers
share proportionately the total cost of drainage facilities that serve the entire area, The 1995
General Assembly passed legislation that requires localities to issue credit toward those pro-
rata shares to developers who, through their own management practices construct on-site
facilities that reduce the overall volume of water and, therefore, the construction costs in the
drainage district.
Currently, the County's only drainage district is located at the intersection of Route 60
and Route 147 (i.e, - the Chesterfield Town Center area), The County's current practice is to
issue a developer a credit if they can establish that they have achieved a reduction in the
overall construction costs of stormwater runoff through their efforts. The proposed ordinance
codifies the County's current practice.
Staff recommends that this ordinance be referred to the Planning Commission for a
public hearing and referred back to the Board with a recommendation.
preparer:~ . ~'-~
Steven L. Micas
Title:
County Attorney
''''S,'''''"('''',-" I'
059
I
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
@ ...._oo~_
.
.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND REENACTING SECTION 18.1-27 RELATING TO
IMPROVEMENTS IN DRAINAGE DISTRICTS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 18.1-27 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield. 1978, as
amended, is amended and reenacted to read as follows:
Sec. 18.1-27. Improvements--Required.
(a) The subdivider or developer shall at his expense install, road, drainage
and utility improvements, and other improvements indicated on the approved plan.
(b) The subdivider or developer of land shall payor provide for the payment
of his pro rata share of the cost of providing reasonable and necessary sewage, water
and drainage facilities, located outside the property limits of the land owned or
controlled by him but necessitated or required by the construction or improvement of
his subdivision or development in areas within the county where there has been
established a general sewage and drainage program or district approved by the board
of supervisors having related and common sewer and drainage conditions, and within
which the land owned or controlled by the subdivider or developer is located; and in
which areas a total estimated cost of ultimate sewerage and drainage facilities required
adequately to serve the related and common area has been established, when and if
such area is fully developed in accord with the adopted general program. Such share
shall be limited to the proportion of such total estimated cost which the increased
sewage flow or increased volume of storm water runoff to be actually caused by
his subdivision or development bears to total estimated volume and of such sewage or
runoff from such area in its fully developed state. In calculating . the volume and
velocity of stormwater runoff. the County shall take into account the effect of all on-
site stormwater facilities or best management practices constructed or required to be
constructed bv the subdivider or developer and give appropriate credit therefor. Each
such payment received shall be expended only for the construction of those facilities
for which the payment was required, and until so extended shall be held in an
interest-bearing account for the benefit of the subdivider or developer; however, in lieu
of such payment the board of supervisors may provide for the posting of a bond with
surety satisfactory to it conditioned on payment at commencement of such construction.
(c) Connection to the county water supply system shall be required in any
of the following circumstances:
1205,11458.1
- 1 -
060
.
.
(1) In a proposed subdivision when any lot in the subdivision has an
area of less than one (1) acre,
(2) For any lot or parcel having an area less than one (1) acre.
(3) When an existing water line is less than two hundred (200) feet
from any property line of the lot for which a building permit is
sought.
(4) In a proposed subdivision within the following area of the county
(the Southern and Western Plan area) unless residential zoning was
obtained for such subdivision prior to the effective date of this
subsection [June 23, 1993]:
Beginning at the boundary line between Chesterfield County and Powhatan County at
its point of intersection with the center line of Genito Road; thence extending
eastward along the center' line of Genito Road to its intersection with Moseley
Road; thence extending southward along the center line of Moseley Road to its point
of intersection with the boundary of Tax Map 44; thence extending southward along
the uppermost reaches of the Upper Swift Creek watershed to its point of intersection
with Skinquarter Road; thence extending southward along the center line Skinquarter
Road to its point of intersection with Hull Street Road; thence extending eastward
along the center line of Hull Street Road to its point of intersection With Baldwin
Creek Road; thence extending southward along the center line of Baldwin Creek
Road to its point of intersection with Beach Road; thence extending eastward along
the center line of Beach Road to its intersection with Hensley Road; thence extending
northeastward along the center line of Hensley Road to its intersection with Spring
Run Road; thence extending westward along the center line of Spring Run Road to
its intersection with Bailey Bridge Road; thence extending. northeastward along the
center line of Bailey Bridge Road to the point where it crosses Swift Creek; thence
extending southeastward along the center line of Swift Creek as it meanders to its
point of intersection with Piney Branch Creek; thence extending northeastward
following the center line of said stream into Lake Dale; thence extending
northeastward along the center of Lake Dale and continuing eastward along Piney
Branch Creek as it meanders to its point of beginning; thence extending due eastward
to its point of intersection with Branders Bridge Road; thence extending southeastward
along the center line of Branders Bridge Road to its point of intersection with Happy
Hill Road; thence extending eastward along the center line of Happy Hill Road to
its point of intersection with Baldwin Road; thence extending eastward along the
center line of Baldwin Road to it point of intersection with the western boundary line
of Parcel 9, Tax Map 133-5; thence extending around and including said Parcel 9
to its point of intersection with the western boundary of the Atlantic Coast Line
Railroad right-of-way continuing to its point of intersection with the easternmost corner
of Lot 6, Section 5, Mistwood Forest Subdivision, Tax Map 133-10; thence extending
1205:11458.1
- 2 -
061
, ,
.
.
northeastward across said railroad right-of-way, continuing northeastward along the
southeastern boundary of Parcel 4, Tax Map 133-10 to its point of intersection with
Lot 5, Block B, Mid-City Farms Subdivision, Tax Map 133-11; thence extending
southeastward along said lot boundary to its southernmost corner; thence extending
northeastward along said parcel to its point of intersection with the center line of
Jefferson Davis Highway; thence extending northward along the center line of Jefferson
Davis Highway to its point of intersection with Old Bermuda Hundred Road; thence
extending eastward along the center line of Old Bermuda Hundred Road to its point
of intersection with U.S. Interstate 95; thence extending southward along the center
line of U.S. Interstate 95 to its point of intersection with the boundary line of the City
of Colonial Heights; thence extending along the boundary line between Chesterfield
County and the City of Colonial Heights as it meanders westward and southward to
its point of intersection with Old Town Creek; thence extending southwestward along
the center of Old Town Creek as it meanders to its point of intersection with the
southwestern property line of Lot 34, William E. Gill Estates Subdivision, Tax Map
181-11; thence extending southeastward along the western boundary of the William
E. Gill Subdivision as shown in Plat Book 4, pages 86 and 87, to its point of
intersection with River Road; thence extending eastward along the center line of River
Road to its point of intersection with the Virginia Power Company right-of-way;
thence extending southward along the Virginia Power Company right-of-way to its
point of intersection with the boundary between Chesterfield County and the City of
Petersburg; thence extending westward along the boundary between Chesterfield County
and the City of Petersburg to its point of intersection with the boundary between
Chesterfield County and Dinwiddie County; thence extending westward along the
boundary between Chesterfield County and Dinwiddie County as it meanders to its
point of intersection with the boundary between Chesterfield County and Amelia
County; thence extending northwestward along the boundary between Chesterfield
County and Amelia County as it meanders to its intersection with the boundary
between Chesterfield County and Powhatan County; thence extending northeastward
along the boundary between Chesterfield County and Powhatan County to its point of
intersection with the center line of Genito Road, the point of beginning. (All parcel
boundaries described herein are those appearing on the county tax assessor's maps as
of May 11, 1992.)
(e) Payment sufficient to cover the cost of water line installation shall be
made to the county prior to the issuance of any building permits in any subdivision
proposed within two (2) miles of an existing water line, or within two (2) miles of a
subdivision that will use public water, when lots in the proposed subdivision have an
area greater than one (1) acre but less than five (5) acres. The payment made under
this subsection shall be used solely for the installation of water lines in the proposed
subdivision,
(f) Except where connection to the County water supply system is otherwise
required by law, including the requirements of subsection c above, individual wells may
1205,11458.1
- 3 -
062
, '
.
.
.
be used to provide water for domestic consumption under any of the following
. circumstances:
(1) No lot which is proposed to be served by a well shall have an
area of less than one (1) acre.
(2) In a subdivision where lots are proposed to be served by individual
wells, all lots shall have an area greater than one (1) acre.
(3) Where lots are proposed to be served by individual wells, a
hydrologic study shall be conducted which provides a scientific
determination that there is an adequate quality and quantity of
potable water in the underlying aquifer under both "normal" and
"drought" conditions for the acre under consideration,
(4) Prior to issuance of a building permit, a well shall be installed,
tested and approved on each lot.
(g) Any subdivision granted tentative approval prior to January 27, 1988, shall
be exempt from the requirements of subsections (c), (d), and (e)(l), (2) and (3) of this
section unless tentative approval is not renewed and expires.
1205,11458.1
- 4 -
063
If t3 Ji! b
6)C',,"
" '
~
, ,
CHESTERFIELD, COUNT
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
September 27, 1995 AGENDA
1 1
Page _of_
M~tii1gDate:
Item Number:
8.B.l3.b.
Subject:
Refer the attached ordinance expanding the authority of the Director of Planning to grant
administrative variances to the Planning Commission.
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~ ~ ~
BoardAction Relluested:
Refer the attached ordinance to the Planning Commission for its review and recommendation,
Summary ofInformation:
The 1995 General Assembly passed legislation that allows local governments to give the
Director of Planning the authority to grant administrative variances from any building setback
requirement contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Currently, the Director of Planning is
authorized to grant administrative variances of up to two (2) feet.
The attached ordinance removes the two (2) foot limit and, in a manner similar to the
current ordinance, requires that adjoining property owners be notified of the application for
an administrative variance prior to the granting of such a variance. The proposed ordinance
allows adjoining property owners, after receiving notification of the application, to object to
the granting of an administrative variance and transfer the application to the Board of Zoning
Appeals for a decision.
Planning Staff believes that this ordinance will streamline the review of all variance
applications and, therefore, supports the attached ordinance. Staff recommends that the Board
refer the attached ordinance to the Planning Commission for a public hearing and request that
they return a recommendation back to the Board.
Preparer:
~.'~
Steven L. Micas
Title:
County Attorney
,m;, " '""( "'''.') "
064
I
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
@ -""--
..
'"
.
.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
.J OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND REENACTING SECTION 21.1-15.1 RELATING TO
ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 21.1-15.1 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978,
as amended, is amended and reenacted to read as follows:
Sec. 21.1-15.1. Director of planning; authority to grant administrative
variances.
(a) At the time an application is submitted, the applicant shall elect whether
to seek an administrative variance as set forth in this section or whether to seek a
variance as set forth in section 21.1-14 of this chapter, If the applicant fails to make
such an election, his application will be processed under the procedure set forth in this
section,
(b) The director of plallning may grant an administrative variance 8f Rot mere
thaR tV;8 (2) feet from any building setback requirement contained in this chapter.
No such administrative variance shall be authorized by the director of planning unless
he makes the following findings in writing:
(1) That the strict application of the ordinance requirement would
produce undue hardship;
(2) That such hardship is not shared generally by other properties in
the same zoning district and the same vicinity; and
(3) That the authorization of such administrative variance will not be
of substantial detriment to adjacent property and that the character of the zoning
district will not be changed by the granting of the administrative variance,
(c) Any application for an administrative variance described in this section shall
be made in accordance with the provisions of section 21.1-16.
(d) The director of planning, or his agent, shall, at least seven (7) days before
acting on any application made pursuant to this section, post on the land or building
involved a notice of the application as follows:
(1) The notice shall be posted at reasonable intervals along streets
abutting the subject property or, if there is no abutting street, then at the proposed
1205,11433.1
- 1 -
065
"
'0
.
.
pl'blic street entrance to the property, The notice shall be posted in locations so as
to be reasonably visible from public roads.
(2) The validity of any action on an application shall not be affected
by the unauthorized removal of a notice which has been. duly posted in accordance
with this section,
(e) The director of planning or his agent shall send written notice of an
application made pursuant to this action to adjacent property owners by registered,
certified or first class mail ten (10) days before acting on any application made
pursuant to this section. The notice shall specify that the director of planning will
approve or disapprove the application not less than fourteen (14) days after the date
of submission of the application. If such Written notice is provided by first class mail,
the director of planning or his agent shall make affidavit that such notice has been
sent and filed such affidavit with the application.
(0 If any adjacent property owner objects to the application. in writing. within
ten (10) days of the date of the notice. the application shall be transferred to the
Board of Zoning Apoeals for a decision.
Wig} The director of planning shall approve or disapprove an application made
pursuant to this section not less than fourteen (14) days after the date of submission
of the application.
Will Any appeal of the final decision of the director of planning on an
application for an administrative variance shall be made to the circuit court of the
county within forty-five (45) days after date of final 'decision and shall be in writing
and specify the grounds therefor. .
1205,11433.1
- 2 -
066
~,15, 1:J.e,
Meeting Date:
September 27, 1995
CHESTERFIELD COUNT
BOARD pF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ~of~
Item Number:
8.B.l3.C.
Subject:
Refer the attached ordinance concerning drainage construction projects in drainage districts
to the Planning Commission.
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~ 'f- ,.(/,j2
BoardAction Rel1uested:
Refer the attached ordinance to the Planning Commission for its review and recommendation.
Summary ofInformation:
1
In draiJ,J.age areas that have been designated as drainage districts, developers post money
with the County for their pro-rata share of drainage construction. The 1995 General Assembly
passed legislation that requires local governments to release all bonds, payments, cash escrows,
or performance guarantees when the drainage construction projects in designated drainage
districts have not commenced within twelve (12) years of the posting of the security.
Currently, the County's only designated drainage district is located at the intersection
of Routes 60 and 147 (i.e. - the Chesterfield Town Center area). Since the requisite
construction projects in this district were commenced within twelve (12) years of the posting
of the security, the amended ordinance is not applicable. The practical effects of this
ordinance will only be seen if another drainage district is created in the County some time in
the future,
Staff recommends that this ordinance be referred to the Planning Commission for a
public hearing and referred back to the Board with a recommendation.
preparer:~ ~(~.()
Steven L. Micas
C'WHP.' Attorney
1205,11444(11442.1)
1#
067
I
Attachments:
. Yes
D
No
@ -----
. >,
.
.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND REENACTING SECTION 18.1-27 RELATING TO
IMPROVEMENTS IN DRAINAGE DISTRICTS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 18,1-27 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as
amended, is amended and reenacted to read as follows:
Sec. 18.1-27. Improvements--Required.
(a) The subdivider or developer shall at his expense install, road, drainage
and utility improvements, and other improvements indicated on the approved plan.
(b) The subdivider or developer of land shall pay or provide for the payment
of his pro rata share of the cost of providing reasonable and necessary sewage, water
and drainage facilities, located outside the property limits of the land owned or
controlled by him but necessitated or required by the construction or improvement. of
his subdivision or development in areas within the county where there has been
established a general sewage and drainage program or district approved by the board
of supervisors having related and common sewer and drainage conditions, and within
which the land owned or controlled by the subdivider or developer is located; and in
which areas a total estimated cost of ultimate sewerage and drainage facilities required
adequately to serve the related and common area has been established, when and if
such area is fully developed in accord with the adopted general program, Such share
shall be limited to the proportion of such total estimated cost which the increased
sewage flow or increased volume of storm water runoff to be actually caused by
his subdivision or development bears to total estimated volume and of such sewage or
runoff from such area in its fully developed state. Each such payment received shall
be expended only for the construction of those 'facilities for which the payment was
required, and until so extended shall be held in an interest-bearing account for the
benefit of the subdivider or developer; however, in lieu of such payment the board of
supervisors may provide for the posting of a bond with surety satisfactory to it
conditioned on payment at commencement of such construction,
@ All bonds. payments. cash escrows or other performance lmarantees
hereunder shall be released and used. with anv interest earned. as a tax credit on the
real estate taxes on the property if construction of the improvement is not commenced
within twelve years from the date of the posting of the bond. payment. cash escrow
or other performance lmarantee,
1205,11442.1
- 1 -
6'68
.
.
ft!t@ Connection to the county water supply system shall be required in any
of the following circumstances:
(1) In a proposed subdivision when any lot in the subdivision has an
area of less than one (1) acre,
(2) For any lot or parcel having an area less than one (1) acre.
(3) When an existing water line is less than two hundred (200) feet
from any property line of the lot for which a building permit is
sought.
(4) In a proposed subdivision within the following area of the county
(the Southern and Western Plan area) unless residential zoning was
obtained for such subdivision prior to the effective date of this
subsection [June 23, 1993]:
Beginning at the boundary line between Chesterfield County and Powhatan County at
its point. of intersection with the center line of Genito Road; thence extending
eastward along the center line of Genito Road to its intersection with Moseley
Road; thence extending southward along the center line of Moseley Road to its point
of intersection with the boundary of Tax Map 44; thence extending southward along
the uppermost reaches of the Upper Swift Creek watershed to its point of intersection
with Skinquarter Road; thence extending southward along the center line Skinquarter
Road to its point of intersection with Hull Street Road; thence extending eastward
along the center line of Hull Street Road to its point of intersection with Baldwin
Creek Road; thence extending southward along the center line of Baldwin Creek
Road to its point of intersection with Beach Road; thence extending eastward along
the center line of Beach Road to its intersection with Hensley Road; thence extending
northeastward along the center line of Hensley Road to its intersection with Spring
Run Road; thence extending westward along the center line of Spring Run Road to
its intersection with Bailey Bridge Road; thence extending northeastward along the
center line of Bailey Bridge Road to the point where it crosses Swift Creek; thence
extending southeastward along the center line of Swift Creek as it meanders to its
point of intersection with Piney Branch Creek; thence extending northeastward
following the center line of said stream into Lake Dale; thence extending
northeastward along the center of Lake Dale and continuing eastward along Piney
Branch Creek as it meanders to its point of beginning; thence extending due eastward
to its point of intersection with Branders Bridge Road; thence extending southeastward
along the center line of Branders Bridge Road to its point of intersection with Happy
Hill Road; thence extending eastward along the center line of Happy Hill Road to
its point of intersection with Baldwin Road; thence extending eastward along the
center line of Baldwin Road to it point of intersection with the western boundary line
of Parcel 9, Tax Map 133-5; thence extending around and including said Parcel 9
1205,11442.1
- 2 -
069
.
.
to its point of intersection with the western boundary of the Atlantic Coast Line
Railroad right-of-way continuing to its point of intersection with the easternmost corner
of Lot 6, Section 5, Mistwood Forest Subdivision, Tax Map 133-10; thence extending
northeastward across said railroad right-of-way, continuing northeastward along the
southeastern boundary of Parcel 4, Tax Map 133-10 to its point of intersection with
Lot 5, Block B, Mid-City Farms Subdivision, Tax Map 133-11; thence extending
southeastward along said lot boundary to its southernmost corner; thence extending
northeastward along said parcel to its point of intersection with the center line. of
Jefferson Davis Highway; thence extending northward along the center line of Jefferson
Davis Highway to its point of intersection with Old Bermuda Hundred Road; thence
extending eastward along the center line of Old Bermuda Hundred Road to its point
of intersection with U.S. Interstate 95; thence extending southward along the center
line of U.S. Interstate 95 to its point of intersection with the boundary line of the City
of Colonial Heights; thence extending along the boundary line between Chesterfield
County and the City of Colonial Heights as it meanders westward and southward to
its point of intersection with Old Town Creek; thence extending southwestward along
the center of Old Town Creek as it meanders to its point of intersection with the
southwestern property line of Lot 34, William E. Gill Estates Subdivision, Tax Map
181-11; thence extending southeastward along the western boundary of the William
E. Gill Subdivision as shown in Plat Book 4, pages 86 and 87, to its point of
intersection with River Road; thence extending eastward along the center line of River
Road to its point of intersection with the Virginia Power Company right-of-way;
thence extending southward along the Virginia Power Company right-of-way to its
point of intersection with the boundary between Chesterfield County and the City of
Petersburg; thence extending westward along the boundary between Chesterfield County
and the City of Petersburg to its point of intersection with the boundary between
Chesterfield County and Dinwiddie County; thence extending westward along the
boundary between Chesterfield County and Dinwiddie County as it meanders to its
point of intersection with the boundary between Chesterfield County and Amelia
County; thence extending northwestward along the boundary between Chesterfield
County and Amelia County as it meanders to its intersection with the boundary
between Chesterfield County and Powhatan County; thence extending northeastward
along the boundary between Chesterfield County and Powhatan County to its point of
intersection with the center line of Genito Road, the point of beginning. (All parcel
boundaries described herein are those appearing on the county tax assessor's maps as
of May 11, 1992.)
W~ Payment sufficient to cover the cost of water line installation shall be
made to the county prior to the issuance of any building permits in any subdivision
proposed within two (2) miles of an existing water line, or within two (2) miles of a
subdivision that will use public water, when lots in the proposed subdivision have an
area greater than one (1) acre but less than five (5) acres, The payment made under
this subsection shall be used solely for the installation of water lines in the proposed
subdivision.
1205,11442.1
- 3 -
070
. ,
.
.
Will Except where connection to the County water supply system is otherwise
required by law, inc!uding the requirements .of subsection c above, individual wells may
be used to provide water for domestic consumption under any of the following
circumstances:
(1) No lot which is proposed to be served by a well shall have an
area of less than one (1) acre,
(2) In a subdivision where lots are proposed to be served by individual
wells, all lots shall have an area greater than one (1) acre.
(3) Where lots are proposed to be served by individual wells, a
hydrologic study shall be conducted which provides a scientific
determination that there is an adequate quality. and quantity of
potable water in the underlying aquifer under both "normal" and
"drought" conditions for the acre under consideration,
(4) Prior to issuance of a building permit, a well shall be installed,
tested and approved on each lot..
Wig} Any subdivision granted tentative approval prior to January 27, 1988, shall
be exempt from the requirements of subsections (e1, (d)~, and Will(l), (2) and (3)
of this section unless tentative approval is not renewed and expires,
1205,11442.1
- 4 -
071.
'l.A, "3, d.
Meeting Date:
September 27, 1995
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ~of....!...
Item Number:
8.B.l3.d.
Subject:
Refer the attached ordinance concerning manufactured homes in agricultural districts to the
Planning Commission.
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~ r- ~
BoardAction Requested:
,',
Refer the attached ordinance to the Planning Commission for its review and recommendation.
Summary ofInformation:
The 1995 General Assembly passed legislation that requires local governments to
eliminate the minimum width requirement for manufactured homes which may be placed,as
a permitted use, in agricultural districts. The proposed amendment eliminates the minimum
width requirement and maintains the existing requirements that manufactured homes be placed
on a permanent foundation and be restricted to one unit per individual lot. The proposed
amendment adds a minimum street frontage requirement and setback and lot width
requirements. The addition of a minimum street frontage requirement and setback and lot
width requirements assure that manufactured homes are subject to the same development
standards applicable to site-built single family dwellings.
Currently, there are 162 manufactured homes located in agricultural districts which do
not or would not comply with the new restrictions. Therefore, the existing provisions for
special exceptions will remain in the Code, so that these manufactured home owners may
continue to receive special exceptions for seven (7) year periods.
Staff recommends that you refer the attached ordinance to the Planning Commission for
a public he~'ng and request th at they return a recommendation back to the Board,
II j ( . County Attorney
Preparer: ~ . OJ _, V~~ TItle:
Steven L. Micas D 1205,11438(10080.4) I # , 072 I
Attachments: . Yes No . .
@ -""....".,...-
,
.
.
,
\.J'
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 21.1-125 AND 21.1-128
CHAPTER 21.1, ARTICLE III, DIVISION 15.1,
RELATING TO AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICTS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Chapter 21.1 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as
amended, is amended and re-enacted as follows:
DIVISION 15. A AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
Sec. 21.1-125. Uses permitted with certain restrictions.
The following uses shall be permitted in the A District subject to compliance with
the following conditions and other applicable standards of this chapter: .
(a)
(3) acres.
exception.
Stock or dairy farms provided that the lot or parcel has not less than three
If this restriction cannot be met, these uses may be allowed by special
(b)
Manufactured homes, provided that individual homes shall be:
(1) NiReteeR (19) feet or more ill. width; and p Placed on a permanent
foundation;
ill Subiect to the street frontage provisions of sections 18.1-2 and 21.1-
230: and
~ill Placed on a permanent foundation. Placed Subject to one (1)
orinciole detached residential structure on an individual lot or Darcel:
ill Subject to required conditions contained in the provisions of Section
21.1-129,
If these restrictions cannot be met, this use may be allowed by special exception,
subject to the provisions of sections 21.1-14(e) and 21.1-128(b),
000
1205:10080.4
- 1 -
073
.
.r
.
.
i'
'.
,,/
S,ec. 21.1-128. Special exceptions.
The following uses may be allowed by special exception, subject to the provisions
of section 21.1-14:
-l
(a) Same as specified for R-88 District.
(b) Individual manufactured or mobile homes, other than those permitted
pursuant to section 21.1-125(b), for a period not to exceed seven (7) years. At the
expiration of the seven-year period, application may be made for renewal of the special
exception.
(c)
Stock or dairy farms when the lot or parcel has less than three (3) acres.
1205:10080.4
- 2 -
074
Meeting Date:
September 27, 1995
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page L of..L
Item Number:
./4.
Subject:
Donation to the Amateur Athletic Union ("AAU") Girls Fall Basketball League.
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
/(jI(
BoardAction Requested:
Appropriate $587,25 from the Midlothian Three Cent Road Funds
Summary ofInformation:
Mr. Barber has requested that the Board appropriate $587.25 from the Midlothian Three
Cent Road Funds to the AAU Girls Fall Basketball League to pay the cost of building rental fees
for use of the James River High School gymnasium. Section 15,1-25, Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended, permits donations to nonprofit recreational organizations for operating expenses.
Preparer:
~, tlk~
Steven L. Micas
Title:
County Attorney
0800,11588,1
1#
Attachments: .
DYes
. No
@ _O^~_
I"
CHESTERFIELD COUNT
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ...L of2
Meeting Date:
September 27, 1995
Item Number: <6.
Subject:
Authorize the County Administrator to Renew Health Care Contracts for the County's 1996 Health
Care Program with Southern Health Services, CIGNA, Delta Dental and Prudential.
County Administrator's Comments: .
.fi<. ~ ~ (,41/)_ ~
;n4 P?li' ~" ~~J.
R~..1~~.
tMl J.. <P)l. A/~) J.:v.
~.
c##(
County Administrator:
BoardAction Requested:
Summary ofInformation:
Two years ago the County and Schools received proposals from health care providers to
provide health care services to employees over a three-year period. The County and School staff
recently completed the negotiation process for the 1996 Employee Health Care Program, In order to
provide employees with quality health care options within budgetary targets, we recommend that the
County renew its contracts with our current health care providers: Southern Health Services,
CIGNA, PruCare and Delta Dental. A request for proposal (RFP) will be circulated in the Spring of
1996 for a new three-year contract to begin January 1, 1997.
Under the proposed 1996 program, employees will be able to choose from four different
health plans and two dental plans. CIGNA lowered their rates for all tiers by 5%. PruCare offered
the same rates in 1996 as 1995, except for the employee only tier which it lowered by 8.7%.
Southern Health offered the same rates in 1996 as 1995 for its Select plan, but increased their
Premier rates slightly. A two-year rate guarantee for dental care expires December 31, 1995, so
Delta Dental will increase their premiums by 10%. The only significant increase in premiums for
1996 will be for prescription services, a 37% increase by RxPrime that will impact all CIGNA and
Southern Health members.
Preparer:
Title:
Director, Department of
HlIm~n Rpc;:.nnTr:p M~n~gP.mP.nt
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
1#
i)
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page _ oL
Summary of Information: (Continued)
The joint Board of Supervisors and School Board Benefits Committee met on Monday, September
25, 1995, to review the 1996 Health Care Program and recommends approval of this agenda item by
the full Board,
1#
- .
. .- -OCO-.r;f VCOCO CO COO COCON
~u)O-.r;f coo..... co 0 CO NON
c.. . . . aiuiC"'i ""':uiN ..olrio
q....."'N
N~~ "'~N "'~v .....~CO
<( :i:
c ~COCOO COCON NCOCO COCON
~ U)OOO 1.l:!C!U') '" ON "'0'"
<C lri u:i . ~'" ' "";Lritri C"iulai
m..........O N~CO '" ~ ~ v~N oj
CO
..
"
~
U
.. NON NON 000 vNN .!:
g:,,",:-..r:f'-.. COO CO ~ o~ CO Ol Ol ~
>.....M,....: crilri""': dl.riari mojo) .....
0<0 v..... ..... co ~ COCOOl ....."'''' ..,
~ ~ N~ ~ "'~~ VNN ..
~I 'I;;
"
W)C\lON NON 000 v.......... E
cnO"'lt(O ~O~ vOv "'.......... ;: iii
>M M . Olllu) -ilrioj LllNN a..
" "
(J(Ov~ COCO~ CO COOl cov v a: "
~~ N~~ '" ~~ VN N ~
4tl;
-g~
-Cl
"I u c
<< co 0 <Xl 000 co Oco COOlOl c ._
<(a: -."
..J g;:~~co .....0..... "'0'" ~"'''' co ::l
UJ!!:! >OlMLri ""';Lric-.i ,....:t.riN maio) ,,-
~ J: (J~~C\1 COCON "'COOl Olvv 'I;; :l
- zUJ N~~ "'~~ vNN a:UJ
W a: a: <<
w a:: UJa.. << <<
Z J:
::> I-
W ... ::> U')OOo 000 COOco COOlOl
a:: 0 0 Q)MvO) 0l00l 000 "'coco
III > <D M . Lriuid dLriLri ""':00
W ::> (Jll>vN COCO 0 "'coco co"''''
a:: a:: ~~~ N~~ '" ~~ vNN
c( ...
0 en
J: W ~ << NO COO CO NON COVV
... ... ~~ CD'I;f"-.r;fN t--:~f'o.. COOCO NCOCO
..Jc( en . . 0 o..nan ""':MM
>..... M . .....'" '
c(a:: ul.O"lt'CO ",coN N co '" VN N
z...J ~ ~ N~Ol '" ~~ vNN
W ~ a:UJ
J: UJIIl
CD Z
en ::> 0 :g~~o VOV COOCO vNN
en 0 ~~o 000 v..........
III > . '0 (l)uicri crj"";""':
.... '" '" , v'" '
0 Ooq-vO VCOOl o CO'" N~~
>- - ~ ~ N~"'" "'~~ vNN
0
~~;go 000 COOCO CO"''''
~~-.r;f V ov co. co <Xl
> . '0 mLri-.i aj-.i~
'" '" ' v'" '
(JC"')("')O ~COOl ....."'~ "'COCO
~ ~ N~v N~~ "'~ ~ 0
...
'0
I ~C! ...
~'"
"'''' '"
-
:g~~<o 000 cooco co"'''' '1;;:; .,;
~~v vOv COCO CO 110- '0 ...
> . ....,. muioo:i aioo:ioo:i
..... '" , v'" ' c:CI~Q .....
(.)v-.r;f-.r;f ~COOl ....."'~ CO COCO ..;
~ ~ N~v N~_ "'~~ ..oii &II 00
!! E.E It) Q ...
.n!e1l:t
2a!.s1i
-.- C C'I II
U) '$ 0 E.: <<
c.C::::; cu <<
o":::::I!e ;;,
a: UJ :::l;.C:cGJ -
c
0 III ~ 1: 0 .... ::l
.C: 0 _.__
~ ::> .-UC-c 0
~ 0 i .!- 8 .s 4J ()
a.. o C _ 'i: E "
- III ()Ot1:~ ..c
+ UJ + w UJ -
UJ UJ UJ "'31,,8a.. 0
UJ~>- UJ~>- >->- C ~>O>O:; -
UJ 0 1-0 -
~zg 5.2.2=9 co
>-Z...J ' Z...J 0 U1
0::> a.. O::>a.. >-::>a.. () a.. a.. E- u '"
...Jo~ ...Jo~ ::!O~ E E .. "- Ii <Ii
a..()UJ a..()UJ ~()UJ ~UJWLLO - N
~ ~ <( Ol 0 c;;
UJ UJ u.. - I- 0
~Jo. ~.
~i(!:.~r.. ...
- \i~~ll~'l '
. ~ZJ;/)
.!1/lW,1i-
. CHESTERFIELD COUN..e
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
1 2
Page _of_
Meeting Date:
September 27. 1995
Item Number:
l?B,11I
Subj ect:
Resolution Naming the Midlothian Library Building for Joan C, Girone
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~ r./IIV
BoardAction Requested:
Approval of resolution naming the Midlothian Library Building for Joan C. Girone.
Summary of Information :
WHEREAS, Joan C. Girone has been a dedicated supporter and advocate for
excellence in public library service to the citizens of Chesterfield County for over twenty
years; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Girone was a founder of the Friends of the Chesterfield County
Public Library; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Girone represented the Midlothian district as a member of the
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors 1976-1987, serving as Vice-Chairman 1976-1980;
and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Girone represented Chesterfield CountY on the Metropolitan
Economic Development Council, Capital Agency on Aging, Virginia Municipal League, and
the Virginia Association of Counties; and
p"p"ut2~7fr/k .
Robe t L. Masden
Title:
Deputy County Administrator
Attachments:
DYes
. No
I #
I
I"~-
[~...,. ~
di1'
.,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page -1. ot:.1....
Summary of Information: (Continued)
WHEREAS, Mrs. Girone's concern for people led her to selVe on the Social Services
Board, the Chesterfield Transportation Safety Commission and the Cooperative Extension
Service AdvisOlY Board.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors approves designating the Midlothian Branch LibflU)' Building the Joan C. Girone
Building,
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to
Mrs. Girone at the dedication ceremony and that this resolution be permanently recorded
among the papers of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
1#
< ;-a'v~<.,
u
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: September 27,1995
Item Number: 8 .B.l7.
Subiect:
Track Replacement at Matoaca Middle School
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
~
Board Action Requested:
Approve the transfer of $3,000 in Matoaca Three Cent Road Funds to the Parks and Recreation
Department to help cover departmental costs relating to the track replacement at Matoaca Middle
School.
Summary of Information:
Parks and Recreation has agreed to assist the Matoaca Middle School with replacement of the track at
the school.
Parks and Recreation will need additional funding to provide this assistance, Dr, Nicholas has
requested that $3,000 be transferred from the Matoaca Three Cent Road account to assist with this
expense,
Funding is available in the Matoaca Three Cent Road Account for transfer, Use of $3,000 to transfer
to the Parks and Recreation department to help offset the costs associated with replacement of the track
will leave an available balance of approximately $30,248,
Preparer: Q/,..,..,/A, (l '7 ./~/>;0/1/ Title: Director, Budaet and Manaaement
~SJ,L~
Attachments:
DYes
II No
#
>
'.",
ID .//.
CHESTERFIELD COUNT
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page .1 of ~
Meeting Date:
September 27. 1995
Item Number:
10.A.
Report On:
Developer Water and Sewer Contracts
Backl:round:
The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County Administrator to
execute water and/or sewer contracts between the County and the
Developer where there are no County funds involyed.
The report is submitted to the Board members as information.
Summary of Information:
The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County
Administrator:
1.
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor: '
Contract Amount:
District:
93-0195
DSC Logistics New Storage Facility
DSCL, Inc.
General - James N. Gray Construction Co., Inc.
Water Sub-Contractor - VFP Fire Systems
Sewer Sub-Contractor - Castle Equipment Corp.
Water Improvements -
Wastewater Improvements -
$60,000,00
$118,427.2'9
Bermuda
Prepared By:
County Administratort
." ...
Attachments:
. Yes
~tM1.
DNo
1#
075
\.
'.
~
.'.
Agenda Item
September 27, 1995
Page 2
2.
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
3 .
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
4.
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
.
.
.93-0204
Greyfield Place, Section 4 at Stoney Glen
G.B.S. Holding, Ltd.
Coastline Contractors, Inc.
Water Improvements -
Wastewater Improvements -
$20,990.00
$69,245.00
Bermuda
94-0074
Ironbridge Baptist Church Addition
Ironbridge Baptist Church Trustees
Viking Construction Company
Water Improvements -
$10,663.91
Matoaca
95-0130
Water Tower Shopping Center - Ironbridge Road
Water Tower Associates
Bookman Construction Company
Sewer Improvements -
No costs recorded. All
work under this contract
is private.
Matoaca
,
''l.
070
.. :
~
/D,/3
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page ~ofJ:....
~~ENDA
September 27, 1 9 Item Number: lO.B.
Subject:
Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital
Projects, District Road and Street Light Funds, Lease Purchases;
and School Board Agenda
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
~
BoardAction Requested:
Summary ofInformation:
Preparer:
~
Title:
county Administrator
Attachments:
DYes
D No
1#
077
Lane B. Ramsey
@ -"""'"""'*'-
BOAR[)
MEETING
[)ATE
07/01195
09/13/95
.
CHESTERFIEL[) COUNTY
GENERAL FUND BALANCE
September 19,1995
[)ESCRIPTION
FY96 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance"
Continue operation of Winterpock
[)umpster sites ou weekends thru
06/30/96
" Pending outcome of audit.
.
AMOUNT
(71,000)
BALANCE
$22,327,600
$22,256,600
078
.
.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS
TRADITIONALLY FUNDED BY DEBT
September 19, 1995
Boal'd
Meeting
Date Description Amonnt Balance
FY89 Excess revenue $2,119,900 $2,1l9,900
FY90 Budgeted addition $1,881,500 $4,001,400
Designation from June 30, 1989 $1,500,000 $5,501,400
Fund Balauce
11/22/89 Purchase ofland-Coghill Road ($630,000) $4,871,400
12/13/89 PIII'chllse buildiug lIt 6701 West ($400,000) $4,471,400
Krause Road
06/30/90 Budgeted addition of excess $2,100,000 $6,571,400
revenue
06/13/90 Purchase medical building for ($735,000) $5,836,400
future lihnll)' site
06/27/90 Funds to purchase land for park ($600,000) $5,236,400
on Lake Chesdin
06/27/90 Budgeted but not appropriated funds ($2,000,000) $3,236,400
to purchase land for school
aud park sites
FOR FISCAL YEAR '91 BEGINNING ,JIlLY 1. 1990
12/12!90 Fill dirt for cover repair at Fort ($180,000) $3,056,400
[)arling Landfill
06/30/91 Budgeted addition frol11 FY91 $4,000,000 $7,056,400
revenues
079
rfcip,wk4
03/13/91.
.
Designated but not appropriated
funds to cover construction
contract for MH/MR/SA building
if bonds are not sold in
fall, 1991
.
($1,806,800)
$5,249,600
FOR FISCAL YEAR '92 BEGINNING .\lJLY I. 1991
07/01191 Regional .Iail Authority as ($1,000,000) $4,249,600
approved in the FY92 Adopted
Budget (which will be reimbursed)
08/28/91 Provide fundiug for improvements ($315,000) $3,934,600
at Northern Area Landfill
to llllow reallocation of
Genel'lll Fund dolhlrs to recycling
programs
08/28/91 Additional funding for Bon Air ($275,500) $3,659, I 00
Libral)' expansion
08/28/91 Add back MH/MR building funds $1,806,800 $5,465,900
which were previously deducted
for nlllstruction
11/27/91 Appropriated funds for T. V. ($115,000) $5,350,900
a....aignment equipmeut but holding
in reserve account until prices
and all costs are confirmed
03/27/92 Add back funds previously deducted $2,000,000 $7,350,900
to purchase land for school
and park sites
03/27/92 Funds designated for interest ($1,400,000) $5,950,900
cost in FY94 due to accelerated
1988 School hond issue
04/08/92 Designated funds for Center- ($2,314,800) $3,636,100
12114/94 l'ointe Fire Station construction
in FY95
080
rfcip.wk4
. .
FOR FISCAL YEAR '93 BEGINNING ,IIJLY I. 1992
04/08/92 FY93 budget addition $2,600,000 $6,236,100
04/08/92 FY93 Capital Projects (revenue ($1,000,000) $5,236,100
sharing roads $500,000; indus-
trial access $300,000; drainage
$200,000)
04/08/92 Fnuds to couver.t Meadowdale ($1,386,500) $3,849,600
Boulevard buildiug into Hopkins
Road Library
04/08/92 Funds to construct ligbts along. ($500,000) $3,349,600
porlions of .Iefferson Davis Hwy
05/13/92 Funding for emergency access for ($80,000) $3,269,600
Millside subdivision contingent
upon necessary right-of-way
acquisitioll
07/22/92 Funding for design phase of .Iail ($500,000) $2,769,600
Annex
07/22/92 Funds to purchase Castlewood ($315,000) $2,454,600
08/31/92 Budget Change Request to fund ($14,000) $2,440,600
weIland stndy of property on
Cogbill Road
09/09/92 Supplement to finish improvements ($13,400) $2,427,200
to intersection of River and
Walkes Quarter roads
09/09/92 Funds for Charter Colony Parkway ($140,000) $2,287,200
09/09/92 Sidewalk at Enon Library ($20,000) $2,267,200
11/12/92 Oesign:tted and appropri:tted, if ($326,000) $1,941,200
needed, funds to cover shortfall
in construction of Public Safety
Training Huilding
11/24/92 Increase frolll FY92 Results of $661,550 $2,602,750
Operations
rfcip,wk4
081.
.
.
12/09/92
Unappropriated funding for TV
arraignment
$115,000
$2,717,750
12/09/92 Appropriated $1,941,200 balance ($2,717,750) $0
plus $661,550 addition from FY92
ending fund balance and use of funds
previonsly appropriated for TV
arraignment $115,000 for .rail Annex
12/09/92 Unappl'Opriated funds from 11/12/92 $139,980 $139,980
appropriation for construction
of Public Safety Training
Building
12/09/92 Appl'Opriated to covel' shortfall ($139,980) $0
in construction of .rail Annex
06/30/93 Enon Library Sidewlllk- $13,401 $13,401
projcct complete
06/30/93 Funds which were not needed for the $186,020 $199,421
I'nblic Safety Traiuing Building.
Interest on the bonds was
suflicienl 10 cover this appro-
priation.
FOR FISCAL YEAR '94 HEGINNING ,JULY I. 1993
05/12/93 Approprialed FY94 fnnds for Cedar ($35,000) $164,421
Springs Rural Road addition (FY94
Sccondal)' Road Improvement)
07/01/93 FV94 BlIllgeh.d Addition $3,500,000 $3,664,421
07/01/93 FV94 Capital Projccts ($2,793,000) $871,421
07128/93 Appl'Opriatcd funds to covcr cntire ($80,700) $790,721
enst of Kcithwood/llylton Park
Drainage pro,ject.
08/25/93 Supplemcntal rcvcnne sha,"ing match ($200,000) $590,721
for FY93 to fnnd Lcdo ROllll
082
rfcip.wk4
. .
09/08/93- Supplemental appropriation for ($91,000) $499,721
Charter Colony Parkway
10/13/93 Transfer for Northern Area ($370,000) $129,721
Landfill
11123/93 Transfer from fund balance $2,800,000 $2,929,721
as per Section 18 of the
FY94 Appropriations Resolution
11/23/93 Transfer for Phase 1 development ($660,000) $2,269,721
of the Warbro Road Athletic
Complex
12/15/93 Designation for John Tyler ($2,269,721 ) $0
commitment pending decision
on Bond Referendum date.
04127/94 Reduce designation for John $49,400 $49,400
Tyler" Community College by
$49,4()() to $2,220,321
04/27/94 Designate funds in order to ($49,400) $0
hegin advance work needed to con-
struct the Christmas Mother and
County Warehouse (These funds
will he retumed after July 1)
05125/94 Reduce designation for John $500,000 $500,000
Tyler' Community College by
$5()(l,000 to $1,720,321
OS/25/94 Transfer funds to begin repairs ($500,000) $0
on the Ettrick/Matoaca 'HId
LaPr-ade bnlnch libnll"ies
06/08/94 Release funds designated for $1,720,321 $1,720,321
,John Tyler Community College
06/08/94 Health Center Commission for ($1,000,000) $720,321
06/14/95 new nursing home facility
06122/94 TnHlsfer to Midlothian Branch
Lihnrry to fully fund pmject ($490,100) $230,221
083
rfcipwk4
. .
FOR FISCAL YEAR '95 BEGINNING ,JULY 1. 1994
07/01/94 FY95 Budgeted Additiou $4,850,000 $5,080,221
07/01/94 FY95 Capital Projects ($3,675,000) $1,405,221
07101/94 Return funds advanced $49,400 $1,454,621
to begin construction on
Cbristmas Motber
Warehonse.
07/27/94 Transfer to Clover Hill Sports ($200,000) $1,254,621
Complex
09/20/94 Return unused funds from $12,361 $1,266,982
Melldowdale Library Project
09/28/94 Transfer foo' LaP,'ade, Ettrick- ($160,000) $1,106,982
Matoaca Branch Libraries
Renovation
11/22/94 Tnlllsfer from Fund Balance as $3,100,000 $4,206,982
per Section 18 of the FY95
Appropriations Resolutiou
02/22/95 Transfer 10 purchase laud aud ($152,000) $4,054,982
aud building within the county
complex
03/22/95 Transfer fo,' preparation of ($300,000) $3,754,982
construction plans to rebnild
Woolridge Road
04/12/95 Tbird ballfield at Warbro Complex ($150,000) $3,604,982
04/12/95 Ilealtb Center Commission for
06/14/95 new nursing bome facility (1,500,000) $2,104,982
06/30/95 Return of funds from capital 3,631 $2,108,612
projects which are finished
FOR FISCAL YEAR '96 HEGINNING ,'ULY I. 1995
04/12/95 Additional Transfer to Schools (1,205,600) $903,012
04/12/95 For Use by County (475,700) $427,312
rfcip.wk4
084
. .
04;'12/95 Addition to Fnnd Balance (230,000) $197,312
04/12/95 FY96 Budgeted Addition 6,400,000 $6,597 ,312
04/[2/95 FY96 Capital Projects (5,494,700) $ [, [02,612
04/12/95 County uses for capital purchases (400,000) $702,612
05/ [0/95 Return of unnsed fnnds from Fair 10,425 $713,037
Exhibition Warehonse (project complete)
07/0[/95 Snpplemental revenue sharing (50,000) $663,037
mlllch for road projects np to
a maximum of $50,000
07/26/95 Right-of-way acquisition for (200,000) $463,037
Coalbol'll/Otterdale connector road
(coutingent on Vulcan commitment)
07/26/95 Fi,"e supp,'ession system for (25,000) $438,037
Eppington
09/08/95 Closure of Ramblewood/Enon 39,66[ $477,697
Drainage project; "eturn of excess
$ to funding sOlll'ce
09/[3/95 Uenricns Visitor's Center, Phase [ ([ 00,000) $377,697
085
rfcipwk4
.
..
'"
-
0 '"
u
;;
~
'" '" ~ '" '" '"
'" ~ ~ ~ '"
'" ~ ~ '" '"
M '" '"
" M
." ."
0 0
= .
"" ::0
l/l
I-
J: '" '" '" .. '" '"
'" '" ~ M '" '"
(:l .n .n '" ~ .n ~ ..:
'" '" vi 0 '" ::i
." C>
....I '" " >-
l/l ~ .C U.
~ "" e:
0 I- "" C
Z "" "tl
"" 0
::::l W -( - '"
u.. W to Q.
I- .... E
0:: It)
J: .. ~ ;;: M ~ '" - Ql
I- ,., ~ '" ~ ~.o
(:l " M ~ ~ ..
Ii) - vi 0 ,.: ,.: -T -
en l/l " . M - - '"
....I 0 ;--. e: .~
en ~ C ::l
I- ...... - " ~ 0 III
W .: u c <J "tl
W en <J e:
...... - '" ::l
0:: .... - -
I- .c: Ql
Q) Cl
l/l .c III
Ql
0 E - .c:
Ql f-
Z Q) Ql
<l: - ~ ....
a. M .r- - ,;
Q) ~ '.:Q % Vl '"
0 ,., .~
<l: l/l 0 M .,r ~ 0
~ M "",; '" 0::
0 l/l " Cl Ql
0:: 0 Ql :I::
.c: Ql
I- - ::l
U Z "tl C"
....
0:: ::::l -( Ql '"
'" '" '" '" '" e: ::E
I- u.. '" '" '" %, '"
~ '" ,., .2
l/l , ,.: ,c e:
." 0
0 0 5 0 -
,,!~ e: e:
<l: 0.;: ::l 0
0 .,
0 <J .!!!
<J
0:: '" '" -( '" '"
'" '2 e ;? - -
'" '" '" '" '" .c: III
I- .r; Ir; v; Ir) .n .~.!::
'" .- -
Z ~ 2- - .c:
~ Ql Cl
W "" Ql
2- ....
"" - ....
() -( Vl 0
-
'" -
<J III
W M M ~ ~ ~ ~ '" 0
~ ~ X M .. '" z '"' 0 <J
W " .. on '" ~ '" '5 -
0 ;--. -i vi M ,.: 0 '" Ql
0:: .~ M .. '" ::l ::E .c:
- u '"
" 6 -
J: u .... Ql -
0 .c: Ql
I- - Ql - III
E It) :::
C> 0
0 -
U M .?-
- ~
Ql ::l CO ... '"
"tl 0 0 t: '"
e: ~
... J: .!!! Ole: '" 3:
- '" .SO Q.
U "tl <J .c: ", <f>
::l .... '" - - 'tJ ID
.;: E Ql 0 e: '"
- > ~ 0 Ql ~
III .... 0 - '0 ::l Ql -
Ql '" ... 0 a. 0 v;
0 lD U Cl ::E ::E u . Z
<J
086
.
.
Prepared by
Accounting Department
August 31,1995
SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES
..
Outstanding
Date Original Date Balance
Ikgan D=riptian Amount J. Ends 08/1 1/95
APPROVED AND EXECUTED
12/88 Airport State Police
Hangar Additions 128,800 73,190
County Warehouse 111 200 12100 188,201
Total 460,000 261,393
03/89 Geographic Information
System ("GIS") -
Automated Mapping
System 3,095,000 3/98 1,320,000
10/92 School Copier 22,797 9/97 10,290
10/92 School Copier 23,322 10/97 11,833
10/92 School Copier 18,750 10/97 9,585
09/93 School Copier 36,605 8/98 24,792
12/93 Real Property Leasel
Purchase 17,5]0000 12/01 14575000
TOTAL APPROVED $7.1166474 $16212891
AND EXECUTED
PENDING APPROVAL ANDIOR EXECUTION
None
087
.
.
.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
September 26, 1995
School Administration Building
. The Public Meeting Room
990 I Lori Road
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
.j.'
SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS
Marshall W. Trammell, Jr.- Chairman, Bermuda
Harry A. Johnson, Ed.D.- Vice-Chairman, Matoaca
Elizabeth B. Davis, Dale
Dianne E. Pettitt, Clover Hill
James R. Schroeder, D.D.S., Midlothian
Thomas R. Fulghum, Superintendent
AGENDA
5:00 P.M.
DINNER FOR SCHOOL BOARD AND STAFF
5:30 P.M.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
SUPERINTENDENT'S CONFERENCE ROOM
7:30 P.M. ".
PUBLIC HEARING ON BUDGET
REGULAR SCHOOL BOARD MEETING
THE PUBLIC MEETING ROOM
A. Call to Order, Roll Call, Flag Salute - Mr. Trammell, presiding
B.
Acceptance of Minutes
September 12, 1995 (Regular Meeting)
C. Agenda Approval
D. Awards and Recognitions
#13 Recognition of Donation from HCA Columbia
#14 Resolution to Honor J. P. "Polly" Spinner
E. Superintendent's Report
5:00 p.m.
7:30 p.m.
'-....
'"
088
.
.
#5 Capital Projects Status Report
#16 Superintendent's Response to W. Terry Doughtery
F. Action Items
1. Consent Agenda
Human Resources
#12 Recommended Personnel Action for 1995-96
Operations and Finance
#15 1996 Health Dental, Prescription Drug Contract Renewals (to be delivered)
G. Non-Agenda Items
H. Discussion Agenda. (No public testimony will be accepted on discussion agenda items.)
1. Announcements, Communications, School Board Comments
J. Executive Session (personnel, legal, land/property acquisition, discipline)
K. Adjournment
General Information
The Chesterfield County School Board will meet as follows for the 1995-1996 school year:
July 11, 1995; August 8, 1995; September 12 and 26, 1995; October 10 and 24, 1995; November 14,
1995; December 12, 1995; January 9 and 23, 1996; February 13 and 27, 1996; March 12 and 26,
1996; April 18, 1996; May 14 and 28, 1996; and June 11 and 25, 1996. The executive
sessions/work sessions will begin at 5:00 p.m. and will be held at the School Administration Building,
9900 Krause Road, Chesterfield, Virginia. The regular meetings will begin at 7:30 p.m. and will be
held at the Public Meeting Room, 9901, Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia. If the place or time is
changed, the public will be notified.
Following is the procedure by which the public may speak before the School Board at any of
the above meetings:
1. Persons wishing to be heard on action items must notify the Superintendent's office by
2:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting.
2. Persons who have requested to offer public testimony will be heard when each item is
considered.
3. Persons to be heard on non-agenda items will be heard during the specified section of
the meeting.
089
2
.
.
4. It is requested that an individual conduct his/her presentation in three minutes;
representatives of a group may speak for five minutes.
5. Public delegations. Public delegations or their representatives are required to submit
in writing their request for hearing and their proposals to the Superintendent at least
five days prior to the meeting at which they wish to be heard.
3
Oso
'-.
t:~!lI;!"-~
Meeting Date:
Subject:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
September 27, 1995
10, t.
1 1
Page _of_
Item Number: lO.C.
Roads Accepted into the State Secondary System
County Administrator's Comments:
R~UtJ
County Administrator:
II~
~
BoardAction Requested:
Summary ofInformation:
Preparer:
~
B. Ramsey
Title:
County Administrator
Lane
Attachments:
DYes
D
No
1#
091.
@ -"""--
1.
.t;. ... .
\!l -
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date:
SeDtember 27. 1995
Item Number:
Subject:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: /'UJJ. tv L/it
BoardAction Requested:
Summary ofInformation:
/I,ll
Page 2-of~
1l.A.
Executive session, pursuant to ~ 2.1-344(A)(7), Code of Virginia. 1950, as amended, for
consultation with legal counsel regarding Holcombe v. Hollingshead.
Preparer: ~. ~
Steven L. Micas
Title:
County Attorney
0800:11286.1
Attachments:
. Yes
.'No
1#
095
I
@ _on__
1
'-lI
...
I
.
.
MOTION:
DATE:
SECOND:
RE:
CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
HELD IN CONFORMANCE HITH LAW
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day adjourned
into Executive Session in accordance with a formal vote of the
Board, and .in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia
Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act effective
July 1, 1989, provides for certification that such Executive
Session was conducted in conformity with law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the. Board of County
Supervisors does hereby certify that to the best of each
member's knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully
exempted from open meeting requirements under the Freedom of
Information Act were discussed in the Executive Session to
which this certification' applies, and ii) only such public
husiness matters as were identified in the Motion by which the
Executive Session was convened were heard, discus sed or
considered by the Board. No member dissents from this certifi-
cation.
Vote:
(by roll call)
The Board being polled, the vote was as follows:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT DURING VOTE:
ABSENT DURING MEETING:
**CERTIFIED**
CLERK TO TilE BOARD
096
:J".
CHESTERFIELD COUNT
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page LofL
AGENDA
September 27, 1995 Item Number: n. c.
Meeting Date:
Subject:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
J(II(
BoardAction Requested:
Summary ofInformation:
Executive session, pursuant to ~ 2.1-344A.5., Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, for the
discussion of the location of a prospective business in the County in the Bermuda Magisterial
District where no previous announcement has been made of the business' interest.
Preparer:
~,~,~
Title:
~ounty Attorney
0800:11586.1
1#
I
Steven L. Micas
Attachments: 0 Yes . No
@ ----
I
~
v
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS . Page 10f3
AGENDA
Meeting Date:
-
September 27, 1995 Item Number:
Subject:
River's Bend Business Center
Request for Industrial Access Funding
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
~
Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to adopt the attached
resolution asking the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to
approve industrial access funds for the construction of a new access road
off of Kingston Avenue to serve the River's Bend Business Center.
Summary of information:
BACKGROUND: Liberty Property Development Corporation ("Liberty") has
advised the County of its intention to construct a new industrial park at
1-295 and Route 10 (see Attachment 'A'). Liberty has asked the County to
seek VDOT industrial access funds so that an access road can be constructed
to the park.
Under the VDOT Industrial Access program, the County can receive up to
$300,000 in unmatched VDOT funds (10% of the qualifying capital investment
up to $3,000,000) for the construction of industrial access roads. The
County may request up to $150,000 in supplemental funds (5% of the capital
investment above $3,000,000) provided the funds are matched
(Continued on next page)
Preparer:
ill/V /
~ J. McCracken
Title: Director of Transportation
Attachments:
_Yes
DNO
I'
.
.
8'S
i
. . I
.!~~'"
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of3
Summary ofInformation: (Continued)
on a dollar-for-dollar basis from other than VDOT funds. Before VDOT will
authorize the industrial access funds, the qualifying capital investment
must be under construction or the County must provide VDOT a surety bond
guaranteeing that the investment will occur within three years of the
Commonwealth Transportation Board's allocation of the industrial access
funds. VDOT funds can only be used for engineering and access road
construction. Right-of-way acquisition and utility adjustment must be
financed from other than industrial access funds.
The County usually requests industrial park developers/companies to prepare
construction plans and environmental studies, donate right-of-way, and
provide surety bonds for new industrial access roads. The County usually
pays the cost for utility adjustments and provides the matching funds.
Either VDOT or the County will construct the road depending on the
specifics of each request.
The preliminary cost estimate for constructing the Liberty access road is
$600,000. Liberty has indicated it expects to develop sufficient
qualifying capital investment within three years to justify the maximum
VDOT industrial access fund allocation. Liberty has asked that the County
share equally with it the $450,000 surety obligation guaranteeing the
capital investment will be made within VDOT's three year time limit.
Liberty has also agreed to share, equally with the County, the required
$150,000 local match. Liberty has agreed to prepare the road construction
plans, dedicate the right-of-way necessary for the access road, and be
responsible for the wetland mitigation for the project. Adjustments to
existing utilities are not anticipated.
(Continued on next page)
.
.
I)
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 3 of3
Summary of Information: (Continued)
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board take the following actions:
1. Adopt the attached resolution requestingVDOT to approve industrial
access funds for the River's Bend Business Center. The resolution also
guarantees VDOT that the County will provide the necessary right-of-
way, utility adjustments, and surety for the project.
2. Transfer $75,000 from the County's Industrial Access Road Account for
the project for matching funds.
3. Transfer $225,000 from the County's Industrial Access Road Account for
the County's share of the capital investment surety.
4. Set October 11, 1995, as a public hearing date to consider the
appropriation of $450,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements and
$75,000 in anticipated developer reimbursements for the construction
of the access road.
5. Authorize the County Administrator to enter into the necessary
County/VDOT/Developer construction agreements/contracts, permits, and
surety agreements, acceptable to the County Attorney, in order to have
the access road constructed.
6. Authorize staff to advertise a road construction contract for the
-
access road.
District:
Bermuda
.
.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY: At a regular
meeting of the Board of Supervisors,
held at the Courthouse on
September 27, 1995, at 3:00 p;m.
WHEREAS, Liberty Property Development Corporation
("Liberty") plans to construct a new industrial park near 1-295
and Route 10; and
WHEREAS, Liberty intends to construct an initial 150,000
square foot building with a capital investment of $5.4M for
qualifying manufacturing/processing users; and
WHEREAS, the property on which the initial building will be
located has no access to a public street or highway and requires
the' construction of a new road connecting to Kingston Avenue
(Route 2434); and
WHEREAS, the construction of the initial building and
subsequent qualifying building is expected to occur within three
(3) years of the Commonwealth Transportation Board's allocation
of funds for the construction of an access road to the property;
and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County hereby guarantees that the
necessary right-of-way and utility adjustments for the new access
road will be provided at no cost to the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby requests the Commonwealth
Transportation Board to provide industrial access funding to
construct an adequate road to the industrial park.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield Board of
Supervisors hereby agrees to provide a surety acceptable to VDOT,
to guarantee sufficient qualifying capital investment will occur
within three years of the Commonwealth Transportation Board's
allocation of industrial access funds for the access road.
.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the
of Supervisors hereby agrees that the
will be added to and become a part of
Highways.
Vote:
Certified by:
.
Chesterfield County Board
new roadway so constructed
the Secondary System of
Faith Davis, Clerk
to the Board of Supervisors
. \ ~
I;
.
.
N
~",,'I'I.t'
I
:
!
!
:
."''''~'' i
"'';
..,
..,
till
,,1'"
",
...,'11
,tltl
,1.1
..,.,..
I
.-
....'
I
ATTACHMENT A
.
.
RIVER'S BEND BUSINESS CENTER
BUDGET
ACCESS ROAD
ESTIMATED COST
Preliminary Engineering
Environmental/cultural Recourse Studies
Right-of-way
Utility Adjustments
Access Road Construction
Construction Contingency
Construction Engineering
Mitigation
$0*
0*
0*
0*
475,000
100,000
25,000
0*
$600,000
1
* Developer Responsibility
CAPITAL INVESTMENT SURETY
Developer
County (IAF)
$225,000
$225,000
$450,000
REVENUE
ACCESS ROAD
VDOT Unmatched
VDOT Match
County Match (IAF)
Liberty Match
$300,000
150,000
75,000
75,000
$600,000
16.A.
6)
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Seotember 27. 1995 Item Number:
Page ...Lof-L
Meeting Date:
l5.A.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Presbytery of The James and Mr. David Tyree For
Their Donation of Land to Chesterfield County
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
CountyAdministrator: ~. ~ .J-/il
BoardAction Requested:
The Board of Supervisors is requested to officially commend and
recognize Presbytery of The James and Mr. David Tyree for their donation
of land for the extension of Wentworth Street at Bensley Park.
Summary ofInformation:
On June 8, 1994, the Board of Supervisors authorized the County
Administrator to execute a Deed of Dedication with Presbytery of The
James for donation of property. The Deed of Dedication was recorded on
June 10, 1994, for this property. Staff recommends that the Board of
Supervisors officially commend and recognize Presbytery of The James and
Mr. David Tyree for their generous donation.
Preparer: ~~_
M1C ae. en
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
Title: Director of Parks and Recreation
1# 105 I
@ ...._00....,..,..,_
.:", .\
r" \-"\1--"
~, .
.
.
WHEREAS, Presbytery of The James and Mr. David Tyree, have donated.
land for the extension of Wentworth Street at Bensley Park; and
WHEREAS, Presbytery of The James and Mr. David Tyree, through their
donation are helping to significantly provide safer access to Bensley
Park and the Bensley Community; and
WHEREAS, Presbytery of The James and Mr. David Tyree are helping to
significantly advance development of Bensley Park and the Bensley
Community.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors does hereby recognize Presbytery of The James and Mr. David
Tyree for their general donation of land to Chesterfield County, thereby
ensuring a place for all in the future to enjoy.
1.06
e.,,(~'
/5.fj
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
September 27. 1995 Item Number:
Page ..2..of~
IS.B.
Subject:
Resolution for pacy Oletsky for Donation of Land in Bermuda District to
Chesterfield County
County Administrator's Comments:
'.~~
County Administrator: ~ r- ~
BoardAction Requested:
Summary ofInformation:
Mr. McHale has requested the presentation of a resolution recognizing
pacy Oletsky for his contribution to Chesterfield County with the
donation of the Falling Creek Ironworks site for a park.
P,~."" -!:!,.<J2~
Title:
Director of Planning ,
mY> m ". ""f""" 'v, 107
I
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
@ -""--
:~ .!1!
i
.
.
.
RECOGNIZING PACY OLETSKY FOR HIS OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTION TO
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY IN THE PRESERVATION OF HISTORIC RESOURCES
WHEREAS, Mr. Oletsky and the Property Capital Group have agreed to preserve a site
of not only focal and regional significance, but national significance in his generous
donation of the site of the Falling Creek Ironworks, the first successful, integrated iron
production facility in English North America;
WHEREAS, Mr. Oletsky is helping to significantly advance historic preservation efforts
in Chesterfield County through the donation of this site;
WHEREAS, Mr. Oletsky exhibited tremendous diligence and patience throughout a
difficult, time consuming process.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
/ Supervisors does hereby recognize Pacy Oletsky for his dedication to preserving the
rich heritage of Chesterfield County and ensuring a place for all in the future to enjoy.
,
1-'
108
, .
,;,t,
~
j
c.
3il
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page .1..... of..l:....
Meeting Date: September 27,1995
Item Number: 15. C.
Subject:
Resolution Honoring J. P. "Polly" Spinner for his commitment and dedication to Thomas
Dale High School.
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
~~
~?rv//l.-.
II
BoardAction Requested:
Approve attached resolution
SummaryofInformation:
The Honorable lL. "Jack" McHale, III, Bermuda District Supervisor has, requested that
the Board of Supervisors honor Mr. J.P. "Polly" Spinner for his many years of unselfish
dedication and service to the school and coaches at Thomas Dale High School.
,
j]
i1
-~
.~
p",,,,,,, I;r~ M,{&
M.D. e 1, .
Title:
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
Do"" em"" Admmf,m
109
:~
~
~,
',~
.
.
.
.,.
Resolution Honoring J.P. "Polly" Spinner
Whereas, J.P. "Polly" Spinner supported Thomas Dale High School football from 1953
to present. Missing only 2 out of approximately 350 games; and
Whereas, Mr. Spinner always supported coaches through wins and losses; and
Whereas, Polly was always a positive influence on football players with his weekly
practice and game visits; and
Whereas, he always displayed a positive, uplifting attitude with many praises; and
Whereas, Polly gave unselfishly materials and donations to improve Thomas Dale High
School; and
Whereas, he worked unselfishly in the community and government in improving
Thomas Dale High School's athletic facilities; and
Whereas, he hired athletes from Thomas Dale High School to work during summer
breaks; and
Whereas, he helped former Thomas Dale High School athletes in emergency situations at
college; and
Whereas, he worked unselfishly in helping graduated athletes obtain positions in the
community; and
Whereas, he displayed an unselfish love for the sport of football at Thomas Dale High
School; and
Now, Therefore Be It Resolved, that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County
hereby commend and congratulate Mr. Spinner on his unselfish dedication and service to
Chesterfield County and school and coaches at Thomas Dale High School; and
Be It Further Resolved, that the Board of Supervisors make this a permanent record in
its files.
11.0
I:;;'
{;.D.
I E~~'
.1 '\
i,- 'I
'~~i
~/.
Meeting Date: september 13, 1995
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
1 1
Page _of_
Item Number: 15. D.
Subject:
Resolution to recognize the 55th anniversary of the James
River Soil and Water Conservation District.
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
~
BoardAction Rel1uested:
The Board is requested to approve this resolution.
SummaryofInformation:
The James River Soil and Water Conservation District was one of the
earliest forms of regional government having been formed in
September 1940. This partnership originally included Chesterfield,
Henrico and Prince George counties. Today Chesterfield and Prince
George still work together to protect and preserve the soil and
water resources of the Commonwealth.
This resolution recognizes the 55th anniversary of regional
cooperation between the two counties.
Preparer: .~~d/f~Rfu(
:O~f'M',e.D 4. A/UI,A/A/-9;t~ Y - tr""
Director, Extension Services
O/aFcred..
1#
1.11.
I
Attachments:
. Yes
f"."':'
o No
.
.
.. ,,1'. ..
.
Recognizing the 55th Anniversary
of the
James River Soil & Water Conservation District
WHEREAS, the James River Soil Conservation District comprising Chesterfield,
Henrico, and Prince George Counties, was established on September 26,
1940, as the 12th district in Virginia, with Alvin Mistr of Henrico, H.L.
Gill of Chesterfield, and Gustave T. Swertferger of Prince George
elected as the first directors (then called supervisors), and
WHEREAS, The enabling legislation changed in 1962 adding responsibilities for
"water" conservation, and
WHEREAS, Henrico formed their own district in 1975, leaving Chesterfield and
Prince George Counties as the boundaries of the James River Soil &
Water Conservation District, and
WHEREAS, the James River Soil & Water Conservation District directors serve as
focal point for coordinating the local conservation efforts of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service and the Department of Conservation and
Recreation, and
WHEREAS, the James River Soil & Water Conservation District is charged with
developing agricultural conservation plans under the Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Act,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors recognizes September 26, 1995 as the 55th Anniversary of
the James River Soil and Water Conservation District,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors commends the
directors for their dedicated volunteer service in protecting and preserving
the soil and water resources of Chesterfield County and the
Commonwealth of Virginia.
,.
1.1.2
l!i,i.
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
September 27, 1995 Item Number:
Page --.L. of ....L.
15.E.
Subject:
Resolution recognizing the E. 1. Du Pont De Nemours & Company for their contribution to
Chesterfield County by naming them the Chesterfield County Large Industry of the Year.
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
~~
~Jzt-Mt-
II
Board Action Requested:
Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors confirm the selection committee's designation of the
DuPont as the Large Industry of 1995 and adopt the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Based upon the Board's approved Business Appreciation Award criteria, the Board gives four
awards a year, one each to Large, Medium and Small Business, and one to the Developer of the
year. The committee submits DuPont for your approval as the recipient of Chesterfield's 1995
Large Business Appreciation Award. Du Pont, as one of the County's top ten taxpayers and
employers, has been an outstanding contributor to the County for decades. However, during the
past few years DuPont has invested heavily in expansions and process improvements. The
completion ofTyve@Line 4, the relocation of the Kevlar~arketing Division and the location of
the new Zytef'lproduction facility on the site of the former nylon operation, combine include an
investment in Chesterfield County of over $150 million dollars within the last 3 years. DuPont's
commitment to the area is substantial in terms of their being one of the County's largest private
employers and their continued growth at the location they established in 1929.
AG5SI0/jal
Pnp.nr. ~~
/ G R.cLen '
Title:
Director
Attachments: . Yes
DNo
1#
113
,
1,-
......../..
.
.
RECOGNIZING DU PONT COMPANY AS THE 1995 LARGE BUSINESS
RECIPIENT OF THE "CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BUSINESS APPRECIATION AND RECOGNITION AWARD"
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
established a Business Appreciation and Recognition Award to
recognize existing businesses within the County that contribute to
the County's economy and its citizens; and
WHEREAS, the Du Pont company has recently celebrated 65 years
in the County; and
WHEREAS, the Du Pont Company is the County's largest private
employer, providing more than 2,700 jobs to County and surround
area citizens; and
WHEREAS,
modernization
investment of
the Du Pont company has recently completed a
of their Tyvek production facilities, resulting in an
nearly $100 million; and
WHEREAS, the Du Pont company has
commitment to the County by announcing a $30
produce Zytel, resulting in the addition of
shown its continuing
million investment to
60 jobs; and
WHEREAS, the recent move of the Kevlar Marketing Division to
the Chesterfield facilities positions the company to provide more
investment and job opportunities for the County; and
WHEREAS, the Du Pont company is community minded and has
sponsored the Tour Du Pont, the winter Lecture Series, and other
events which help citizens as well as generate a positive image for
Chesterfield County and surrounding areas.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield county
Board of Supervisors hereby expresses its gratitude, on behalf of
the County, to the Du Pont company for their contributions over the
many years.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board expresses its
appreciation to the Du Pont company for their contributions by
recognizing them as the 1995 Large Business recipient of the
"Chesterfield county Business Appreciation and Recognition Award".
1.14
",
15,r
'.
"
,
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page ~of~
AGENDA
September 27, 1995 Item Number: 15.F.
Subject:
Adoption of Resolution Recognizing Participants In The Dwight D.
Eisenhower Foundation People To People Student Ambassador Program
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
r:Id(
BoardAction Requested:
Summary ofInformation:
Ms. Leigh Williams, accompanied by Ms. Barbara Farmer, Mr.
Stephen Farmer, and Ms. Rita Boykins, Delegation Leaders; and
student participants will be present'to accept the resolution.
See attached.
Preparer: ~ "f:'ru) V:>
Faith L. Davis
Title: Clerk to theBoard of Supervisors
Attachments:
. Yes
'.-'''1
o No
1#
1........
~J\_J
@ ----
.
...
.
.
.-
RECOGNIZING CHESTERFIELD PARTICIPANTS IN THE DWIGHT D.
EISENHOWER FOUNDATION PEOPLE TO PEOPLE STUDENT AMBASSADOR PROGRAM
WHEREAS, a delegation of twelve Chesterfield junior high school students
participated in the Dwight D. Eisenhower Foundation People to People Student
Ambassador Program to visit Austria, Hungary, and Italy; and
WHEREAS, the aim of the People to people Student Ambassador Program is
to give student ambassadors a greater understanding of people throughout the
world, through varied educational activities that acquaint students with the
political, economic, and cultural characteristics of the countries visited;
and
WHEREAS, this Program widens the students' global perspective and offers
an opportunity for personal growth and development to the youth within our
County; and
WHEREAS, Delegation Leader Barbara Farmer held orientation meetings with
the students to prepare them with travel guidelines, basic language skills,
and cultural information that would enhance the students I interpersonal
skills when communicating with Austria, Hungary, and Italy citizens; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Farmer was responsible for the logistical and support
activities necessary to enable the group to participate in this project; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Farmer was assisted by Delegation Leaders Stephen Farmer
and Rita Boykin to organize and implement the itinerary prepared for the
student ambassadors throughout the trip, to ensure that all requirements were
met so that students could receive high school credit for this educational
event; and
WHEREAS, the student ambassadors represented American youth and had a
collected impact on human relationships and international relations.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors hereby recognizes and extends its gratitude to Delegation Leaders
Barbara Farmer, Stephen Farmer, and Rita Boykin for their assistance in
making this Program a reality.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors acknowledges
the participation of the following student ambassadors who represented the
united States of America and Chesterfield County while participating in this
event: Ana Bobber, Midlothian Middle School; Amber Burton, RObious Middle
School; Tony Morin, Providence Middle School; Jason Francisco and Janna
Stewart, Salem Middle School; Arthur Grant and Kim Krause, Chester Middle
School, Alaina Sanders, Carver Middle School; Adam Webb, Clover Hill
Renaissance High School; Chris Williams and Dee Criner, Bailey Bridge Middle
School; and cortney Richardson, Grove Avenue Baptist School.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented
to each of these citizens and that this resolution be permanently recorded
among the papers of this Board of supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia.
116
<
l[;t.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page ~of~
AGENDA
September 27,1995 Item Number: 15.G.
Meeting Date:
Subject:
Adoption Resolution Recognizing Ms. Heather F. Sahli Upon
Attaining the Girl Scout Gold Award
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
~
BoardAction Relluested:
Summary ofInformation:
Staff has received a request for the Board to adopt a
resolution recognizing Ms. Heather F. Sahli; Troop 32, sponsored
by Redeemer Lutheran Church, upon attaining the Girl Scout Gold
Award.
She will be present, accompanied by members of her family,
to receive the resolution.
Resides in: Clover Hill
Preparer:
~cR:kw~
T'\ Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
It e:
Faith L. Davis
1#
Attachments:
. Yes.
D No
1:17
@ -.-,....
,\
~4
.
.
RECOGNIZING MISS HEATHER F. SAHLI UPON
ATTAINING THE GOLD AWARD
WHEREAS, the Girl Scouts of the united States of America is an
organization serving over 2.6 million girls and was founded to
promote citizenship training and personal development; and
WHEREAS, after earning four interest project patches, the
Career Exploration pin, the Senior Girl Scout Leadership Award, the
Senior Girl Scout Challenge, and designing and implementing a Girl
Scout Gold Award project; and
WHEREAS, the Gold Award is the highest achievement award in
Girl scouting and symbolizes outstanding accomplishments in the
areas of leadership, community service, career planning, and
personal development; and
WHEREAS, the Girl Scout Gold Award can only be earned by girls
aged 14-17 or in grades 9-12 and is received by less than 6 percent
of those individuals entering the Girl Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, Miss Heather F. Sahli, Troop 32, sponsored by
Redeemer Lutheran Church, has accomplished these high standards and
has been honored with the Girl Scouts of the united States of
America Gold Award by the Commonwealth Girl Scout Council of
Virginia; and
WHEREAS, growing through her experiences in Girl Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding
herself on the great accomplishments of her County, Heather is
indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of
whom we can all be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Miss
Heather F. Sahli and acknowledges the good fortune of the County to
have such an outstanding young woman as one of its citizens.
1.:1.8
IG,J.j ,
....6)'.-..
'; .,' .''-- ~
'.
"
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ~of~
Meeting Date: September 27,1995
Item Number:
IS.H.
Subject:
Resolution Honoring Dr. C.C. Lewis for his many Government, Education and Civic
accomplishments.
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
l ~
~. f J/lJv
BoardAction Requested:
Approve Resolution
Summary ofInformation:
Dr. Freddie W. Nicholas, Sr., Matoaca District Supervisor, has requested that the Board of
Supervisors approve the attached resolution honoring Dr. Cornelius C. Lewis for his service
to Chesterfield County.
".,,"" ~ ~.
Wl. . e ill, Jr.
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
Title: .
""'my CO""" M~l;''"'
1.1.9
c
.
'"'c'"
.
.
.
Resolution Honoring Dr. c.c. Lewis
Whereas, Dr. Cornelius C. Lewis has been a community leader in Ettrick since 1963; and
Whereas,Dr. Lewis eamed a Bachelor of Science from Virginia State University; a Master
of Science from Michigan State University; a Doctorate degree from the University of Massachetts
as well as having done Post Doctorate work at the Ohio State University and the University of
Maryland; and
Whereas, Dr. Lewis was a professor of Agronomy and Chemistry at West Virginia State
College, Fort Valley State College, Maryland State College and North Carolina A&T University,
Grumbling State University and Virginia State University; and
Whereas, Dr. Lewis played a major role in the founding of CAP AAMMD; and
Whereas, he played a major role as a member of the group which developed the Ettrick
eVillage Plans which included a community center now under construction at Ettrick Park; and
Whereas, Dr. Lewis has served since 1984 to present, chairman of the Community Advisory
Committee for Ettrick on the Community Services Board, monitoring program utilization and
development strategies to strengthen programs; and
Whereas,he is a founding member of the Southlawn Neighborhood Watch program and is
a longtime precinct leader for voter registration serving as an election official; and
Whereas, he has served as a board member of CARES, Inc. in the Tri-Cities Area since
1987; and
Whereas, he is a dedicated member of the Chesterfield Democratic Committee; and
Whereas,he is highly respected and recognized in the Ettrick Community as a leader, Par
excellence; and
Now, Therefore Be It Resolved, that the Board of Supervisors do hereby honor Dr.
Cornelius "C.C." Lewis for his many accomplishments to the community of Ettrick and the County
at large; and
Therefore Be It Further Resolved, that this resolution be made a permanent record of the
Board's files.
1.20
-j:.
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page ~of~
AGENDA
September 27, 1995 Item Number: 15.1.
Subject:
Adoption of Resolution Recognizing October 7-8, 1995 as "Richmond
Metropolitan Youth Soccer League Columbus Day Soccer Tournament
Weekend"
County Administrator's Comments:
R,~J 4~
County Administrator: . ~~.
BoardAction Re~uested:
Summary ofInformation:
Ms. Bet Ludden, Columbus Day Tournament Administrator,
requests the Board adopt a resolution recognizing October 7-8,
1995 as "Richmond Metropolitan Youth Soccer League Columbus Day
Soccer Tournament Weekend".
Ms. Ludden and Ms. Debi Evans, Co-Administrators; Mr. Avis
Gates and Ms. Pam Phillips, Co-Directors; Mr. Dan Dalton,
Supports Services Director; and Mr. Lee Minadakis, Commissioner
of Pocoshock Soccer League will be present to accept the
resolution. See attached.
Preparer: ~ I<:::XUJI il
Faith L. Davis
Title:
Clp.rk to thp. Board
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
1#
121.
@ ----
~, '! .,!...
.
..
.J",
RECOGNIZING OCTOBER 7-8, 1995 AS "RICHMOND
METROPOLITAN YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE COLUMBUS DAY
SOCCER TOURNAMENT WEEKEND"
WHEREAS, Christopher Columbus discovered the New World on
October 12, 1492 and we since have celebrated that date as an
important American holiday; and
WHEREAS, a holiday weekend in the Fall is a wonderful time to
hold a sporting event; and
WHEREAS, the sport of soccer is the fastest growing sport
played by American youth, with thousands of boys and girls playing
in all 50 states across the Nation; and
WHEREAS, the Richmond Metropolitan Youth Soccer League,
consisting of 19 clubs with a total of 140 select teams fielding
2,100 or more players (and an additional 14,000 in recreational
programs} representing the cities of Richmond, Colonial Heights,
Charlottesville, and Hopewell, and the Counties of Chesterfield,
Henrico, Hanover, Orange, Powhatan, and Spotsylvania, is sponsoring
the 13th Annual Columbus Day Tournament on October 7-8, 1995; and
WHEREAS, the Pocoshock Valley Youth Soccer League, a
Chesterfield County soccer club, is hosting said event for the
eleventh consecutive year, utilizing 33 soccer fields at 11
complexes in Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, 220 soccer teams (each with 15 or more players and
two or more coaching staff and numerous parents, siblings and
friends} have been invited to play in the Richmond Metropolitan
Youth Soccer League ColumbUS Day Tournament, coming from Virginia,
North Carolina, South Carolina, Delaware, Maryland, West virginia,
Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and other states; and
WHEREAS, these tournament participants will be renting
approximately 1,800 rooms in more than 14 hotels in Chesterfield
County and purchasing food and other items during the weekend in
County restaurants and businesses; and
WHEREAS, the revenue generated for Chesterfield County by this
one event should be appreciable.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby declares the weekend of October 7-8,
1995 as "Richmond Metropolitan Youth Soccer League Columbus Day
Soccer Tournament weekend" in chesterfield county, Virginia.
122
lID. ,
1.8'.
Meeting Date:
September 27, 1995
CHESTERFIELD. COUNT
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ~of~
Item Number:
16.A.
Subject: .
Public Hearing to consider an amendment to the Code of Chesterfield Countv relating to the
County's removal procedure for unsafe buildings and structures.
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: m p_ ~
BoardAction Requested:
Adopt the attached ordinance changing the 'procedure for removing unsafe buildings and
structures.
Summary ofInformation:
The 1995 General Assembly passed legislation that removed the requirement that a
locality file a lawsuit in Circuit, Court requesting that an owner remove or repair an unsafe
building or structure as a precondition to removal of the house by the County. The 1995
legislation reversed ill-advised legislation from the 1994 General Assembly requiring localities
to file these unnecessary lawsuits.
The proposed ordinance eliminates the lawsuit requirement and returns the Code to its
pre-1994 position. In the proposed ordinance, if a building or structure located within the
County endangers the public health and safety of residents, the County may arrange for the
removal or repair of the unsafe building or structure provided that either (i) actual notice is
given by the County to the owner requiring the repair of the unsafe building or structure, (ii)
notice is sent to the owner by certified mail at his last known address, and (iii) notice is posted
on unsafe building or structure,
Staff recommends that the Board adopt this ordinance because it would allow
County to remove dangerous buildings and structures at less cost and with shorter delay.
er.' . 1'1 County Attorney
Preparer: 'f:::::.~, \JVvLc ~ Title:
Steven L. Micas
the
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
1205:11448.1(11399.1) I
#
1.23
I
@ _00"""""""_
.
.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND REENACTING SECTION 6-2.1 RELATING TO
REMOVAL AUTHORITY AS TO UNSAFE STRUCTURES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 6-2.1 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield. 1978, as amended,
is amended and reenacted to read as follows:
(a) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, the building official shall
have the authority to require the owners of any property within the county to remove, repair
or secure any building, wall or other structure located on such property, which the building
official shall determine endangers the public health or safety of other county residents.
(b) If a building, wall or other structure located in the county is determined by the
building official to endanger the public health or safety of residents, the building official
shall cause notice to be served on the owner of the property upon which such building, wall
or other structure is located, requiring the owner to remove, repair or secure such building,
wall or other structure. If the owner named in the notice cannot be found after a diligent
search, such notice shall be sent, by registered or certified mail, to the owner at his last
known address. A copv of the notice shall also be posted in a conspicuous place on the
property upon which such building. wall or other structure is located.
(e) l. bill iH ettHity shaH be filed iH the eircl:Iit eElurt askiag tHe El'.v-Hers Elf saell
buildiHg, wall or other structure to remO'le, repair Elf seeure as rettHires. ..-\fly party vlho is
Hot otherwise served shall be served by publicatioH pllfOllant tEl Virgima CElEle, ~ &.91 316.
W~ The owner of the property upon which such building, wall or other structure
is located shall remove, repair or secure the same, as specified in the notice, within thirty
(30) days of the delivery by hand of the notice to the owner, within thirty (30) days of the
mailing of the notice to the owner, or within thirty (30) days of the date on which the notice
was posted tHe eirellit eourt eflters jusgemeflt af tHe bill iH equity, as provided herein,
whichever is later. If the owner shall fail to take the action required by the building official
and specified in the notice within this time period, the building official may arrange for such
building, wall or other structure to be removed, repaired or secured, as specified in the
notice, and the costs and expenses of such removal, repair or securement shall be chargeable
to and paid by the owner of such property and may be collected by the county as taxes and
levies are collected.
,
/'
1205,11399.1
- 1 -
1.24
.
.
..'
.
tej@ Every charge authorized by this section with which the owner of such property
. shall have been assessed and which remains unpaid shall constitute a lien against such
property.
(2)
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
1205:11399.1
- 2 -
1.25
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO
TH ~5 ~~~~e~E~~ B!~PEX
Petersburg, Va. 23804.0071
Phone. 732.3456
001852
,
Chester'field, Board of ~uperv
F'~O~ Bo>:: 4.0
A#261
Ches'terfield, Va.
2:38:32-0040
>>TAKE NOTICE
Take notice that the
Board of Supervisors of
Chestepfield County, Vi~-
9inia, at a re9ularl'y
N.O. t (H)34
WOR, TIMES
11::. ::
INVOICE fOR
CLASSifiED ADVERTISING
AMOUNT
$'::1.00
YOUR CLASSIFIED INVOICE IS
NOW DUE. IF NOT PAID WITHIN 1A
DAYS AMOUNT DUE WILL BE
PHONE
74:3-1200
INDEXING TERMS:
$31.00
I ~L~RK
TAKENOTI
AD GIVEN BY CLASSIFICATION
Bo.3.r'd of SUP 001
CODE SOLICITED BY OPERATOR
b 4..2 a
START DATE STOP DATE SKIP SCHEDULE
>=:
09/1:3/9!=i 09/20/95 SMTWTF:3
PLEASE PAY PROMPTLY
.
.
AFFIDAVIT OF
PUBLISHED ADVERTISING
State of Virginia
City of Petersburg
I~ RUSSELL TURNER, being duly swo~n, do, upon my oath, depose
and 5a'~ that I am Classified Manager of The
Pro9pess-!ndex, a newspaper' printed in said City and state,
and that the advertisement of: TAkENOTI
was published by: Chester'field
P.O, B,)>, 40
Af,261
Chesterfield, Va.
, Board of Supervi
2:;:::::32
was published in said paper on: Sept~ 13, 20/95
i~Lj{_~_________
Classified Manaser
r
.
r TAKE NOTICE
~Takc notice that the
Board of Supervisors of
'Chesterfield County, Vir- I
gioia, at a re~ularly I
ischeduled meeung on,
'September 27, 1995 at'
:7:00 p.m. in the County I
Public Meeting Room at I
Chesterfield Courthouse.
;Chesterfield, Virginia, I
i~ill hold 3. public hear- j
109 to consider:
An ordinance amending'
'the code of ChesterfeiId I
,County, Section 6-2.1,'
: relatin~ to procedures for
!removmg, repairing, or I
securing any unsafe!
lbUilding or structure. ,
I^ copy of the ordinance I
I is on file in the Clerk to
the Board of Supervisors'
Office, Room 504, 9901
I Lori Road, Chesterfield,
iVirginia, and may be ex-
I amined by all interested.
I persons between the,
I hours of 8:30 3.m. to)
15:00 p.m., Monday
Ithrough Friday. ,
~Sep~eE1ber J11_~~
.
Richmond .
Newspapers, Inc.
.
An Affiliate of Media General
P.O. BOX 85333
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23293-0001
(804) 649-6000
^rf'~~~O~~'DER
220806
DAH
09/20/95
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ATTN: TAMMY HASKINS
POBOX 40
CHESTERFIELD VA
23832
DATE
CODE
DESCRIPTION
RATE
CHARGES
LI NES RUNS
CREDITS
TOTAL
INCHES AMOUNT
09/13/95 121
LEGAL NOn CE
PUBLIC HEARING TO
CONSIDER
21
2
168.00
Richmond Newspapers, Inc.
Publisher of
THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH
This is to certify that the attached LEGAL NOTICE
was p~tblished by Richme,y,d Newspapers, Iy,c., in the City
of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates:
Take notice thrt the Board of SUo
pervisors of Chesterfield County.
Virginia, at a regularly SCheduled
meeting on September 27,1995
at 7;00 p.m. in the County Public
Meeting Room at ,Chesterfield
Courthouse, Chesterfield, VA, WIll
hold a public hearing to consider:
An ordinance amending the code
of Chesterfield County, Seclion 6-
2.1, relating to procedures for re-
rnoving, repairing, or securing any
unsafe building or structure.
A copy 01 the ordinance is on file
in the Clerk to the Board of Super-
visors Office, Room 504, 9901lori
Rd., Chesterfield, Virginia, and
, may be examined by all interested
persons between tlte hours of 8:30 .'
a.m. to 5:00p.m., Monday through :
Fridav.
09/13/95
09/20/95
The first insertion being given....
09/13/95
HERE
before
Ne,t ary
State of Virginia
City of Richmond
My Commi ss i O!", expi res My Commission Expires June 30,1996
,
'-I,![\: 0 ~ C) R(O -?BJ. 0 fr ij
c,::' r"/;,,, .<r\~/::::r0<,'r(h ;', frJlUl "
~~2~ v~ i.:~~"SJ v0Llc @yl1umJit~ Q' rr~{fIl ~ rr
WHEN REMITTING PLEASE REFER TO YOUR CUSTOMER # 220806
,
IIIIIIIII:I::I 168. 00
./'"'
,
,
.
.
I /P. j},
~"\-
,"",.r. ";
i. ~...
I' ":;
.>
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
September 27, 1995
Page ~ of..L
Meeting Date:
Item Number:
16.B.
Subject:
Hold a public hearing to consider Chesterfield County's application for a second Enterprise Zone.
County Administrator's Comments: ar.' r.,. "
~ B'A, J .....;uI t,..Il~ I ~ o.-(t,? ~
PLfIVV-\- ~ k. ~ ~ ~/..,.~.
~ 1- ,L#b
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors hold a public hearing on the application for a second
Enterprise Zone in the County, otherwise referred to as the Walthall Area Enterprise Zone, and
authorize staff to make the application.
Summary of Information:
The 1995 Legislative Session modified the existing state Enterprise Zone regulations. Beginning
July 1 ofthis year, Chesterfield became eligible for multiple zone designations. Economic Devel-
opment proposes the application for a second zone which would include portions of the Jefferson
Davis Highway south of the existing zone, and incorporating those industrial areas within close
proximity to the Walthall Interchange on 1-95. Our existing zone has been successful, but is
limited in available industrial acreage sought by many of our prospective industries. A new zone
would further the marketing opportunities available to the County for industrial recruitment, and
provide a competitive advantage over other localities. The majority of the land area proposed for
the new zone is either already zoned or planned for industrial uses. In as much as the existing
zone has already been successful in attracting primarily commercial development, and is planned
for these uses, we do not believe the new zone will appreciably compete with our present Enter-
prise Zone.
AG5S19/jal
Preparer: ~?'2~~
ary R. Me aren
Attachments: . Yes 0 No
Title: Director
1#
126/
,.I'-~
c .
,
"
, ,,.;,a
'~" ,.,
r
.
.
;,
Chesterfield County
Proposed Walthall Area Enterprise Zone
Boundary & Census Tracts
'.
1.27
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO
','. ..' "I\' .
. 'l't'-"'~~~~;'> "..-t i.,~
t TIrtE"'P&oGRESS ,iNDEX
1 I, 15 Fra.n Street P.O.'Box 71
f l...~u" Petersburg, Va. 23804,0071;
\.,....- Phone, 732,3456 '
.\
001854
,.
Cheste~fj,eld, Boapd of Supepy
P~Oa Bo>~ 40
1)1;2<':.1
Chest:.:.'r'fiel d, V';i..
2:3:3:32-004.0
>Yi'AKE NOTICE
Take notice that the
Boal~d of Supervisors of
Ctlesterfi~ld County~ Vi~-
9 j, n i ,';l , a. t a '-~r~? 1;:1 u i ,a r. 1 'y
,
,. O. 70005
wo _ TIMES
14::: . 1
INVOICE FOR
CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING
A~OUNT
$49.50
YOUR CLASSifiED INVOICE IS
NOW DUE. If NOT PAID WITHIN 11
DAYS AMOUNT DUE Wlll8E
"$49..50'
CLERK
PHONE
74::':::-1. 200
INDEXING TERMS:
1 )
TAI<ENOTI
AD GIVEN BY CLASSIFICATION
Boar'd of SUP' 001
CODE SOLICITED BY OPERATOR
b ~ t;." .3-
....l ~ ,_I
START DATE STOP DATE SKIP SCHEDULE
-. )(--
0'3"1/20 I '::/~5 09/20/';:!'5 SMT~JTFS
PLEASE PAY PROMPTlY
/'''~'''''''''~--'' .
-. ,
,
.
.
>
AFFIDAVIT OF
PUBLISHED ADVERTISING
State of Virsinia
City of Petersburg
I, RUSSELL. TURNER, being duly sworn, do, UPon mY oath, depose
and say that I am Classified Manaser of The
Progress-Index, a newspaper pf'inted in said City and State,
and that the advertisement of: TAKENOTI
was published by: Chesterfield
P.O. Bo>:: 40
A#:261
Chesterfield, Va.
, Board of Supervi
2:38:32
was published in said paper on: Sept. 20/95
l~ll_~____----
Clas51tled Manaser
.
.
r==:-~
I TAKE NOTICE :
,
Take notice that thel
~ Board of Supervisors ofi
\ Chesterfield County. Vir-,
gioia. at a regularlY'
Ischeduled meeting on'
September 27, 1995 at
\7:00 p.m. in the County\
public meeting room at,
I the Chesterfield Court- \
\ house. Chesterfield, Vir- i
\ gioia. will hold a public'
: hearing to consider: I
; Chesterfield county's'
,application for a second,
\ Enterprise Zone in the,
I County. including prop-I
erty along Jefferson Da-
l.viS Highway corridor.\
'(Route 1/301) from
'Route 10 south to the \
:corporate limits of Colo-
,nial Heights and east-'
I ward along Woods Edge \
Road acroSS 1-95 and
; then including properties
along 1-95 Soutb of Old:
I Bermuda Hundred Road,
,to Swift Creek. I
I
'The purpose of the prop- ,
\ ased zone is to stimulate I
,area economic growth as .
, part of the ongoing com-\
I munity revitalization
I effort.
\ If further infonnation is!
I desired. contact Mr.
,Gary R. McLaren. Di-I
\rcctor of Economic De~
velopment at 7.4.8.3963,\
between the hours ofl
8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
September 20/95
~-:::- ------'
.
Richmond. .
Newspapers,1911('
.
An Affiliate of Media General
P.O. BOX 85333
RICHMOND, VIRGli\JIA 23293-0001
(8041 649-6000
CUS ~~~~l;II;~
220806
"
DATE
09/20/95
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ATTN: TAMMY HASKINS
POBOX 40
CHESTERFIELD VA
23832
DATE
CODE
DESCRIPTION
RATE
CHARGES
LI NES RUNS
CREDITS
TOTAL
INCHES AMOUNT
0'3/20/'35 121
LEGAL NOTICE
MEETING SEPTEMBER
27,1995
31
1
124.00
Richmond Newspapers, Inc.
Pub 1 i she,' of
THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH
\ . TAKE ~OT1CE .
Take notice that the Board ofSu-
pervisors of Chesterfield County,
I Virginia, at a regularly sch,;.:l:.Jled
meetmg on September 27,1995
at 7:00 p.m. in the County public
meeting room at the Chesterfield
Courthouse, Chesterfield, Vlrginla~
will hold a public hearing to consid.J
ar:
Chesterfield County's application
for a second Enterprise Zone in
the County, including property
along Jefferson Davis Highway cor
rldor (Route 1/301) from Route 10
south 10 the corporate limits of)
Colonial Heights and eastward!
along Woods Edge Road across I- ,
9sandthenincrudi'8lproperties[.
~~~8r:J~~a~~~ ~~ift ~:~~uda
The purpose of the proposed zone
is to stimulate area economic
growth es I:lartof the ongoing com-
rnunityrevltalizationeffort.
"further information is desired,
contact Mr. Gary R. McLaren, Di-
rector of Economic Development
at748-3963,betweenthehoursof
8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
throuQhFriday.
This is to certify that the attached LEGAL NOTICE
was published by Richrllol",d Newspapers, Il"'c., in the: City
of Richmond, State of Virginia, o~ the fOllowihg dates:
09/20/95
The first insertion being given~...
09/20/95
andotTbu1rfu~5d before
Notary
State of Virginia
City of Richmond
My CO<llmi ssi on ex pi rbs My COll1lT113sion Exoirps June 30.1996
WHEN REMITTING PLEASE REFER TO YOUR CUSTOMER # 220806
'7-<\0 (' "" :-~'- <> ~o ~
(.; f' ''', .j:;.';0~ (-1 (r<Y" '
2~Lr; u11@1~ JULl!) '< ~uulJ[r~" l1~Wi~Rrr
~
124.00