Loading...
02SN0109-Dec19.pdfx~"e~- 2n, ~OOl ~ December 19, 2001 BS STAFF'S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 02SN0109 Tascon Group, Inc. Midlothian Magisterial District West line of Le Gordon Drive REQUEST: Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential-Multi-family (R-MF) of 34.5 acres with Conditional Use Planned Development to permit exceptions to Zoning Ordinance requirements. PROPOSED LAND USE: A multi-family condominium residential development containing a maximum of 116 dwelling units is planned. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION THE COMMISSION IS SCHEDULED TO CONSIDER THIS CASE ON DECEMBER 18, 2001. STAFF WILL ADVISE OF THE COMMISSION'S ACTION ON DECEMBER 19, 2001. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend denial for the following reasons: mo Although the Midlothian Area Community Plan suggests the property is appropriate for a mix of uses to include office, medium density housing of 7 - 14 dwelling units per acre, personal services and community facility uses, the proposed zoning and land use fail to provide appropriate transition between the commercial development located to the north along Midlothian Turnpike and future commercial development Providing a FIRST CHOICE Community Through Excellence in Public Service to be located south along North Woolridge Road and further depicted on the attached Conceptual Land Use Plan. The application fails to provide for the typical development standards necessary to insure a quality higher density development with amenities. Co Some of the requested exceptions to multi-family development standards would allow greater development flexibility. In particular, the requested exceptions, together with the recommended conditions and proffered conditions, would allow multi-family development that possesses a character more in keeping with area single family residential neighborhoods than would be allowed with typical Residential Multi-family (R-MF) zoning. However, some of the requested exceptions, such as those related to provisions for sidewalks, buffer and building setback reductions from property lines, are inappropriate given the higher density of development and the need to offset the impact on adjacent single family residential development as well as future residents within this development. The proffered conditions do not adequately address the impacts of this development on necessary capital facilities, as outlined in the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the need for schools is identified in the County's adopted Public Facilities Plan and FY 2002-2007 Capital Improvement Program and the impact of this development on these facilities is discussed herein. The proffered conditions do not adequately mitigate the impact on school facilities, thereby insuring adequate service levels are maintained and protecting the health, safety and welfare of County citizens. E. The application fails to comply with the Thoroughfare Plan. Fo The exception to the second public access and the proposed provision of a restricted second means of access does not insure expeditious access during an emergency. (NOTE: CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER MAY PROFFER CONDITIONS. THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.) PROFFERED CONDITIONS The property owners and applicant in this rezoning case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for themselves and their successors or assigns, proffer that the property under consideration will be developed according to the following proffers if, and only if, the rezoning request submitted herewith is granted with only 2 02SN0109/WP~EC 19I those conditions agreed to by the owners and applicant. In the event this request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by the owners and applicant, the proffers shall immediately be null and void and of no further force or effect. Virginia Condominium Act. All dwelling units on the Property shall be condominiums as defined and regulated by the Virginia Condominium Act, and all common areas and improvements therein shall be maintained by a condominium association. (P) Cash Proffer. The applicant, subdivider, or assignee(s) shall pay $4,591.00 per unit to the County of Chesterfield, prior to the time of issuance of a building permit, for each new dwelling unit for infrastructure improvements within the service district for the Property if paid prior to July 1, 2002. At the time of payment, the $4,591.00 will be allocated pro-rata among the facility costs as calculated annually by the County Budget Department as follows: $356 for schools, $805 for parks, $280 for library facilities, $2,838 for roads and $312 for fire stations. Thereafter, such payment shall be the amount approved by the Board of Supervisors not to exceed $4,591.00 per unit (prorated as set forth above) and shall be adjusted upward by any increase in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index between July 1,2001 and July 1 of the fiscal year in which the payment is made if paid after June 30, 2002. If any of the cash proffers are not expended for the purposes designated by the Capital Improvement Program within fifteen (15) years from the date of payment, they shall be returned in full to the payor. Should Chesterfield County impose impact fees at any time during the life of the development that are applicable to the Property, the amount paid in cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward, but not be in addition to, any impact fees in a manner as determined by the County. (B&M) Recreation Area. A minimum of 0.75 acres of open space/recreation area shall be provided on the property in an area adjacent to the entrance road as generally depicted on the Tascon Development Master Plan, prepared by Joseph, Cox & Associates, Inc., revised September 5, 2001 ("Master Plan"), to provide a "focal point" near the entrance to the project. Part of the area shall be "hardscaped" and have benches and other amenities that accommodate and facilitate gatherings. The exact design and location shall be approved by the Planning Department at the time of site plan review. The clubhouse building and its related recreational amenities shall be developed concurrent with the first phase of development. (P) Site Plan and Elevations. Development of the Property shall be in substantial conformance with the architectural appearance shown on the elevations attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B" with respect to the materials depicted, which are brick veneer, composition siding, and 20-year asphalt roof shingles. Development of the Property shall generally conform to the Master Plan with respect to the general location of the clubhouse building, open spaces, the orientation of buildings such that the number of garage doors opening to any individual street are minimized, and the clustering of buildings. The location of roads, access, driveways and parking areas need not be exactly as shown on the Master Plan; however, the 3 02SN0109/WP/DEC 19I concepts of the Plan shall be generally adhered to such as the orientation of dwelling units to one another, to open spaces, and to rights of way. (P) 5. Public Utilities. The public water and waste water systems shall be used. (U) o Restriction on Children's Play Facilities. The common area recreational amenities shall not include playground equipment, play fields or other facilities primarily associated with children's play. Adult facilities including, but not limited to, swimming pools, putting greens, shuffleboard, tennis courts, picnic and barbecue areas and gardens shall be permitted. (P) o Densi _ty. There shall be no more than one hundred sixteen (116) units developed on the Property. (P) o Concrete Curb and Gutter. Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed along the main driveways and cul-de-sacs which provide access to driveways and parking areas serving residences. (EE) Sidewalks and Pedestrian Trails. Sidewalks shall be provided along all interior streets and along the entrance road to LeGordon Drive generally as shown on the Master Plan. Subject to obtaining necessary permits, a pedestrian trail with a footbridge, if necessary, shall be provided through the wetlands area with connections to the adjacent major interior streets, as generally depicted on the Master Plan. The treatment and location of these sidewalks and the pedestrian trail shall be approved by the Planning Department at the time of site plan review. (P) 10. Street Trees. Street trees shall be installed along each side of the interior roads and common driveways to include entrance roads from public roads into the development. If existing trees are maintained, they may be counted toward this requirement. The exact location, spacing, size and species of plantings shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to final site plan approval. (P) 11. Landscaping. Landscaping shall be provided around the perimeter of all buildings, between buildings and driveways, within medians, and within common areas not occupied by recreational facilities or other structures. Landscaping shall comply with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance Sections 19-516 through 19-518(f). Landscaping shall be designed to: minimize the predominance of building mass and paved areas; define private spaces; and enhance the residential character of the development. The Planning Department, at the time of site plan review, shall approve the landscaping plan with respect to the exact numbers, spacing, arrangement and species of plantings. (P) 12. Transportation. ao Right of Way Dedication at LeGordon Drive. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, thirty (3 0) feet of right-of-way on the west side of LeGordon Drive, measured 4 02SN0109/WP/DEC 19I from the centerline of that part of LeGordon Drive immediately adjacent to the Property, shall be dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield County. (T) b0 Access to Roads. Direct access from the Property to LeGordon Drive shall be limited to one (1) entrance/exit each and shall be located generally as shown on the Master Plan. The exact location of this access shall be approved by the Transportation Department. No direct access shall be provided from the Property to or from Aldengate Road except for an emergency access as generally shown on the Master Plan. The location and design of this emergency access shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department in conjunction with site plan approval. Maintenance of this emergency access shall be the responsibility of the condominium association. (T & F) 13. Severance. The unenforceability, elimination, revision or amendment of any proffer set forth herein, in whole or in part, shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the other proffers or the unaffected part of any such proffer. (P) 14. Ponds as Amenities. If a retention pond or any water quality pond is provided, it shall be designed as a wet pond and amenity. The exact design and treatment shall be approved at the time of site plan review. (EE) 15. Timbering. Except for timbering approved by the Virginia Department of Forestry for the purpose of removing dead or diseased trees, there shall be no timbering on the Property until a land disturbance permit has been obtained from the Environmental Engineering Department. (EE) 16. Retention. The development must retain the 1 O-year, post-development runoff and release it at a 1 O-year pre-development rate. (EE) 17. Building Pad Elevation. All building pads must be elevated to provide at least a 1% fall to the nearest drainage conveyance system or wetlands. (EE) GENERAL INFORMATION Location: West line of Le Gordon Drive, south of Midlothian Turnpike and at the eastern terminus of Aldengate Road. Tax IDs 724-706-8093 and 725-707-2669 (Sheet 5). Existing Zoning: A 5 02SN0109/WP~EC 19I Size: 34.5 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North South East West - C-3 with Conditional Use Planned Development; Commercial - 0-2 and A; Vacant and single family residential - R-7 and C-3 with Conditional Use Planned Development; Single family residential or vacant - C-3 and 0-2 with Conditional Use Planned Development and R-15; Vacant or single family residential UTILITIES Public Water System: There is an existing twelve (12) inch water line extending along the west side of Le Gordon Drive that terminates adjacent to the northeast comer of this site. In addition, there is an existing eight (8) inch water line extending along the mutual boundary of the two (2) parcels of the request site and along the western boundary of the northernmost subject parcel (Tax ID 725-707-2669). Use of the public water system is intended and has been proffered. (Proffered Condition 5). Public Wastewater System: There is an existing eight (8) inch wastewater collector extending along the western boundary of the request site. Use of the public wastewater system is intended and has been proffered. (Proffered Condition 5) ENVIRONMENTAL Drainage and Erosion: The property is extremely fiat and sheet flows to the northeast then via storm-sewer systems under Route 60 north to Michaux Creek. There are no on- or off-site drainage or erosion problems; however, the culvert under Route 60 that drains this area is inadequate. All development in the area has retained water to ensure the box culvert under Route 60 6 02SN0109/WP/DEC 19I continues to be adequate. The applicant has addressed the retention of the 1 O-year, post- development runoff and its release at a 10-year pre-development rate to insure that no drainage problems will be associated with development. (Proffered Condition 16) There are large wetland areas on the property. The site is heavily wooded. To insure that proper erosion control devices are in place, the applicant has addressed postponing timbering activity until a land disturbance permit has been issued and the approved devices are installed (Proffered Condition 15). Further, due to the flatness of the area, the applicant has proffered to elevate the building pads of all dwelling units at least two (2) feet above original ground level to provide a one (1) percent fall to the nearest drainage conveyance system or wetlands. (Proffered Condition 17). Water Quality: Proffered conditions address design of any above ground facility required for water quantity and quality control (SWM/BMP). Specifically, these areas will be designed and landscaped so as to become amenities for uses developed on the property. (Proffered Condition 14) PUBLIC FACILITIES The need for fire, school, library, park and transportation facilities is identified in the Public Facilities Plan, the Thoroughfare Plan and the FY 2002-2007 Capital Improvement Program. This development will have an impact on these facilities. Fire Service: The Public Facilities Plan indicates that emergency services calls are expected to increase forty-five (45) percent by the year 2015. Eight (8) new fire/rescue stations are recommended for construction by 2015 in the Plan. Based on 116 dwelling units, this request will generate approximately twenty-one (21) emergency calls for fire and rescue services per year. The applicant has addressed the impact on these facilities. (Proffered Condition 2) The property is currently serviced by the Midlothian Fire Station, Company 5, and the Forest View Volunteer Rescue Squad. When the property is developed, the number of hydrants and quantity of water needed for fire protection will be evaluated during the plans review process. The Zoning Ordinance requires the construction of a second public or private road access prior to the occupancy of more than fifty (50) units. This application proposes provision of a restricted second access (Textual Statement Item 9 and Proffered Condition 12.b.). The Fire Department does not support the use of an emergency access, as shown on the Master Plan, in place of a second unrestricted access. This second means of unrestricted access allows emergency services to expeditiously access the development in an emergency situation as 7 02SN0109/WP/DEC 19I well as provides future residents with an alternative means of ingress/egress should the one (1) access become blocked. Schools: Approximately sixty-two (62) school age children could be generated by this development. This site lies in the Watkins Elementary School attendance zone: capacity - 750, enrollment - 753; Midlothian Middle School zone: capacity - 1,260, enrollment - 1,330; and Midlothian High School zone: capacity - 1,625, enrollment - 1,600. This development will have an impact on the elementary, middle and high schools. There are currently two (2) trailers at Watkins Elementary and four (4) trailers at Midlothian Middle and all three schools continue to experience enrollment growth. The applicant has not addressed the impact of this development by providing for area school needs. (Proffered Condition 2) Libraries: Consistent with the Board of Supervisors' policy, the impact of development on library services is assessed County-wide. Based on projected population growth, The Public Facilities Plan identifies a need for additional library space throughout the County. Taking into account the additional space provided by the two (2) currently funded projects, the new La Prade and Chester Libraries, there is still a projected need for 55,000 additional square feet of library space County-wide by 2015. This development will most likely affect the Midlothian Library. The 1995 Plan indicated a need to provide additional library space in the Clover Hill Library service area. The applicant has offered measures to assist in addressing the impact of this development on these facilities. (Proffered Condition 2) Parks and Recreation: The Public Facilities Plan identifies a deficit of 675 acres of regional park space and a need for 116 acres of community park space by 2015. The north and northwestern area of the County has been targeted for the acquisition of 170 acres for a new regional park and 120 acres for community parks. The applicant has offered measures to assist in addressing the impact of this proposed development on these facilities. (Proffered Condition 2) Transportation: The applicant has proffered that all dwelling units on the property will be developed as condominiums (Proffered Condition 1). The applicant has also proffered a maximum density of 116 units (Proffered Condition 7). Based on condominium trip rates, development could generate approximately 740 average daily trips. These vehicles will be distributed, via Le 8 02SN0109/WP/DEC 19I Gordon Drive, to Midlothian Tumpike (Route 60) and Charter Colony Parkway which had 1999 traffic counts of 47,772 and 8,708 vehicles per day, respectively. The Thoroughfare Plan identifies an east-west collector ("the East/West Collector") with a recommended fight of way width of seventy (70) feet, extending through the property. Staff does not support this zoning request, because the applicant is unwilling to commit to providing the East/West Collector through the subject property. In addition, the applicant has not committed to construction of any road improvements along Le Gordon Drive. The Thoroughfare Plan identifies the need for a parallel road system on the south side of Route 60 from County Line Road to Charter Colony Parkway. This parallel road would relieve Route 60 by providing an alternative means for east-west travel in this area of the County, and by permitting travel between developments without necessitating the use of Route 60. The East/West Collector that is recommended through the subject property is part of that proposed parallel road system. The developers of the zoned properties located on the east side (Charter Colony) and on the west side (Balmore Tract) of the subject property will provide part of the East/West Collector. The East/West Collector should be continued through the subject property. The Master Plan indicates that a large part of the subject property is encumbered by wetlands. The alignment of the East/West Collector may need to be altered within the subject property to avoid these wetlands. Development must adhere to the Development Standards Manual in the Zoning Ordinance, relative to access and internal circulation (Division 5). The applicant has proffered to dedicate thirty (30) feet of right of way measured from the centerline of Le Gordon Drive (Proffered Condition 12.a.). The applicant has also proffered to limit direct access from the property to Le Gordon Drive. (Proffered Condition 12.b.) In conjunction with recordation of the adjacent subdivision to the southwest (Otterdale Subdivision), a stub road right of way (Aldengate Road) was provided to the subject property. Developing the subject property with access via this stub road will increase the traffic volume on that street. Traffic generated from development of the subject property must not increase traffic volumes along that subdivision street in excess of the acceptable level (1,500 vehicles per day) established by the Planning Commission's stub road policy. Development is not anticipated to generate traffic that would cause an increase in the traffic volume on that adjacent subdivision street beyond the acceptable level. Based on citizen concern, the applicant has proffered that no direct access, except for an emergency access, will be provided to Aldengate Road. (Proffered Condition 12.b.) The traffic impact of this development must be addressed. An ultimate four (4) lane undivided typical section is planned for Le Gordon Drive. To assist in addressing the traffic 9 02SN0109/WP/DEC 191 impact of this proposed development, the applicant should provide an additional lane of pavement along Le Gordon Drive for the entire property frontage. The Thoroughfare Plan identifies the need to improve existing roads, as well as construct new roads to accommodate growth. Area roads need to be improved to address safety and accommodate the increase in traffic generated by this development. The applicant has proffered to contribute cash towards mitigating this impact. (Proffered Condition 2) As previously stated, the applicant is unwilling to provide the East/West Collector through the subject property and has not committed to any road improvements along Le Gordon Drive. Without these commitments, the Transportation Department cannot support this request. Financial Impact on Capital Facilities: PER UNIT Potential Number of New Dwelling Units 116* 1.00 Population Increase 316.68 2.73 Number of New Students Elementary 28.30 0.24 Middle 15.08 0.13 High 18.56 0.16 TOTAL 61.94 0.53 Net Cost for Schools 417,136 3,596 Net Cost for Parks 94,192 812 Net Cost for Libraries 32,712 282 Net Cost for Fire Stations 36,540 315 Average Net Cost for Roads 332,108 2,863 TOTAL NET COST 912,688 7,868 *Based on a proffered maximum number of units. As noted, this proposed development will have an impact on capital facilities. Staff has calculated the fiscal impact of every new dwelling unit on schools, roads, parks, libraries and fire stations at 10 02SN0109/WP/DEC 19I $7,868 per unit. The applicant has been advised that a maximum proffer of $7,800 per unit would defray the cost of the capital facilities necessitated by this proposed development. Note that circumstances relevant to this case, as presented by the applicant, have been reviewed and it has been determined that it would be appropriate to accept the maximum cash proffer in this case. The applicant has offered $4,591 per unit to assist in defraying the cost of this proposed development on the schools, roads, parks, library and fire station facilities (Proffered Condition 2). These proffers are insufficient to address the school impacts resulting from the proposed development. Accordingly, the County's ability to provide school facilities to its citizens will be adversely impacted. The Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors, through their consideration of this request, may determine that there are unique circumstances relative to this case that may justify acceptance of proffers below the value of the maximum acceptable amount. LAND USE Comprehensive Plan: Lies within the boundaries of the Midlothian Area Communi _ty Plan which suggests the property and surrounding area are appropriate for a mix of uses to include office, medium density residential housing of 7 - 14 dwelling units per acre, personal services and community facilities. The overall intent of these Planned Transition Areas is to promote decreasing land use intensities in and around the commercial areas located along Midlothian Turnpike. This land use transition ultimately separates and buffers surrounding neighborhoods while providing compatibility in scale and design. Area Development Trends: Property to the north is zoned Community Business (C-3) and is developed as the Ivymont Shopping Center. Properties to the east and west are zoned Community Residential (C-3), Residential (R-7), Corporate Office (0-2) and Residential (R- 15) and are vacant or occupied by single family residences many as part of the Otterdale Subdivision development. Properties to the south are zoned Agricultural (A) and Corporate Office (0-2) and is currently vacant. The Midlothian Area Community Plan suggests that this section along Le Gordon Drive is appropriate for uses that provide transition from the Ivymont Shopping Center south to the Corporate Office (0-2) parcels and ultimately to the established single family residential development along Garrett Lane. The attached Conceptual Land Use Plan depicts the potential development pattern along the Le Gordon Drive Corridor. Specifically, the corridor is bound by two (2) commercial nodes represented by the existing Ivymont Shopping Center to the north and commercial/office tract zoned as part of the Charter Colony Development to the south at Woolridge Road. The overall intent of the "Planned Transition Area" is to promote decreasing land use intensity in and around these commercial notes in an effort to minimize negative impacts on, and promote compatibility with, surrounding 11 02SN0109/WP~EC 19I residential development. This transition has begun south from Midlothian Turnpike, with the existing office zoning west and south of the subject property which abuts established low density single family developments. Vacant property to the south of this residential area will eventually provide the transition to the southern commercial node at Woolridge Road. Site Design: A Master Plan has been included in this application (Proffered Condition 4). The Plan depicts building orientation, road configuration and the location of common and recreation spaces and sidewalks; however, as proffered, development will substantially conform with all elements of the Plan. The Plan depicts thirty-three (33) condominium buildings, the mai ority of which are quadplexes. The applicant has proffered a maximum of 116 dwelling units (Proffered Condition 7). Parking spaces are located adjacent to each dwelling unit. Access to the development is provided via one (1) driveway to Le Gordon Drive and one (1) emergency acess to Aldengate Road from Otterdale Subdivision. Architectural Treatment: The applicant has proffered that the architectural appearance of the dwelling units and the clubhouse will be similar to those depicted in the elevations submitted with the application and that materials will be brick veneer, composition siding and asphalt shingles. (Proffered Condition 4) Building Setbacks and Orientation: Except as modified by this request, development must conform to the bulk requirements established in the Zoning Ordinance for the Residential Multi-family (R-MF) District. The applicant has requested exceptions to several of these standards, as noted in the Textual Statement submitted with this application. These Ordinance standards were designed to address a typical, suburban high density residential project. The majority of these exceptions will allow flexibility in site design to accommodate a unique multi-family project that has a character more in keeping with a single family development and are generally consistent with those approved for other similar projects. Exceptions are requested to the setbacks from property lines, thereby permitting structures to be twenty-five (25) feet rather than fifty (50) feet from all property lines except where adjacent to lots within the Otterdale Subdivision. Adjacent to these lots, the fifty (50) foot setback would apply (Textual Statement, Item 4). Properties to the north, northwest and southeast are zoned Community Business (C-3) and Corporate Office (0-2). Reduction in the setback from these property lines will not provide the appropriate separation between uses of varying intensities. Further, property to the north, developed as Ivymont Shopping Center, was approved with only a twenty (20) foot buffer adjacent to the subject property which exacerbates the impact of this commercial development upon the proposed project 12 02SN0109/WP/DEC 19I should an exception to the fifty (50) foot setback be granted. Property to the south is vacant and designated on the Plan for low density single family housing. Therefore, setbacks adjacent to Tax ID 724-706-7852 should be maintained at the required fifty (50) feet to provide the appropriate land use transition to this higher density residential project. Buffers and Screening: The Zoning Ordinance requires that solid waste storage areas (i.e., dumpsters, garbage cans, trash compactors, etc.) be screened from view of adjacent property and public rights of way by a solid fence, wall, dense evergreen plantings or architectural feature, and that such area within 1,000 feet of any residentially-zoned property or property used for residential purposes not be serviced between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. The Zoning Ordinance requires the provision of a fifty (50) foot buffer on (R-MF) property when adjacent to single family residential zoning districts or when adjacent to vacant property zoned Agricultural (A) that is designated for residential development in the Plan. Property to the south meets this criteria thereby requiring the provision of a fifty (50) foot buffer along the southern property line adjacent to Tax ID 724-706-7852. Proffered conditions propose a twenty-five (25) foot buffer adjacent to single family residential districts and the adjacent property to the south (Tax ID 724-706-7852) (Textual Statement, Item 8). The purpose of those buffers is to provide the appropriate separation and gradual transition between the proposed multi-family development and the existing lower density residential development located within Otterdale Subdivision and future residential development to the south. Therefore, the requirement for this fifty (50) foot buffer should be maintained. As previously noted, development to the north (Ivymont Shopping Center) was required to provide a twenty (20) foot buffer adjacent to the subject property, five (5) feet of which was permitted to be cleared. The Zoning Ordinance requires a seventy-five (75) foot buffer between (C-3) and (R-MF) Districts to be provided on the commercially-zoned tract. Therefore, to provide for the appropriate separation between residential and non-residential uses, the provision of a buffer on the northern boundary of the subject property adjacent to this commercially-zoned tract may be appropriate. Recreation and Open Space: The Zoning Ordinance requires that not less than ten (10) percent of the gross acreage of a multi-family project be devoted to recreational use, with a minimum provision of 1.5 acres. The Schematic Site Plan submitted with the application depicts several acres of open space throughout the development, the majority of which is located within wetlands. In addition, the applicant has proffered the provision of a clubhouse and associated recreational amenities and that a portion of this area will be hardscaped with benches and other amenities to facilitate the gathering of residents. (Proffered Condition 3) 13 02SN0109/WP~EC 19I Typical standards for higher density development provide for a minimum of.75 acres for the purpose of establishing a focal point for the development (Proffered Condition 3). However, the Master Plan does not depict an area that would meet the typical standard for the establishment of a focal point location. Generally, focal points should be located so as to visually announce the project upon entry and to create green space at the entrance. As depicted on the Plan, the focal point becomes an isolated land area within a travel circle, noted as a "Main Entrance Feature". In addition, the proposed active recreational amenities are not centrally located within the project so as to be equally accessible to all residents. The applicant has proffered that these common recreational areas will not include amenities primarily associated with children's play. (Proffered Condition 6) Sidewalks and Pedestrian Paths: The Zoning Ordinance requires that sidewalks be provided within a residential multi-family project. Higher density developments warrant the provision of sidewalks on both sides of all internal rights of way to provide a form of passive recreation as well as safe and convenient access to open space areas within the development. While the applicant's Plan depicts the provision of sidewalks along both sides of some streets, several streets are proposed with sidewalks on only one (1) side. Sidewalks are also proposed to connect residential pockets of development across wetlands that bisect the property, if permitted. (Proffered Condition 9) An area south of the Le Gordon Drive entrance is labeled on the Plan for sidewalk development; however, it is unclear as to the purpose of this pedestrian segment and its linkage to the proposed sidewalk system. Garages and Driveways: To address concerns relative to the appearance of garage doors facing adjoining streets, the Master Plan depicts the orientation of the condominium buildings such that the number of garage doors opening to any individual street is minimized and that such units are generally clustered in groups around parking areas. (Proffered Condition 4) Landscaping: Street trees and landscaping should be provided to enhance the residential appeal of the townhouse development, define private spaces and minimize the predominance of building mass and paved areas. The applicant proposes that street trees be planted along each side of interior roads and common driveways to include any entrance roads from public roads into the townhouse development. Landscaping is to be installed around the perimeter of all buildings, between buildings and driveways, within medians and within common spaces not occupied by recreational facilities. (Proffered Conditions 10 and 11) 14 02SN0109/WP/DEC 19I CONCLUSIONS Although the Midlothian Area Community Plan suggests the property is appropriate for a mix of uses to include office, medium density housing of 7 - 14 dwelling units per acre, personal services and community facility uses, the proposed zoning and land use fail to provide appropriate transition between the commercial development located to the north along Midlothian Turnpike and the furore commercial development located south along Woolridge Road. The attached Conceptual Plan Use Plan identifies two (2) commercial nodes that border the northern and southern limits of the Le Gordon Drive corridor. Uses need to be of decreasing intensity moving north and south of these commercial centers to minimize negative impacts on, and promote compatibility with, surrounding residential development. Consistent with the goals of the Plan, this land use transition would best be achieved with office uses on the subject as opposed to the alternate layering of non-residential and residential uses from Midlothian Turnpike south on Le Gordon Drive. The proffered conditions fail to provide for some of the typical amenities that will enhance the project and guarantee a quality development. Although some of the requested exceptions to multi- family development standards would allow greater development flexibility, several requested exceptions, such as those related to provisions for sidewalks, buffer and building setback reductions from property lines are inappropriate given the higher density of development and the need to offset its impact from adjacent single family residential development. In addition, the exception to the second public access and the proposed provision of a restricted second means of access does not permit emergency services to expeditiously access the proposed development in an emergency situation nor allow residents an alternative means of ingress/egress should the one (1) public access become blocked. The proffered conditions do not address the impacts of this development on necessary capital facilities, as outlined in the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the need for schools is identified in the County's adopted Public Facilities Plan and FY 2002-2007 Capital Improvement Program and the impact of this development is discussed herein. The proffered conditions do not adequately mitigate the impact on capital facilities, thereby insuring adequate service levels are maintained and protecting the health, safety and welfare of County citizens. The Commission and Board may, however, determine that there are unique circumstances relative to this development which may justify acceptance of a proffer below the maximum amount. The application fails to comply with the Thoroughfare Plan with respect to an east/west collector road extending through the property. FreSher, the applicant has not committed to any road improvements along Le Gordon Drive, which is ultimately planned for four (4) lanes. Given these considerations, denial of this request is recommended. 15 02SN0109/WP~EC 19I CASE HISTORY Applicant (9/10/01): Revised proffered conditions, Textual Statement and Master Plan were submitted. Planning Commission Meeting (9/18/01): On their own motion, the Commission deferred this case to October 16, 2001, to allow staff and area residents time to review the revised proffered conditions, Textual Statement and Master Plan, submitted September 10, 2001. Staff (9/19/01): The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information should be submitted no later than September 21, 2001, for consideration at the Commission's October 16, 2001, meeting. Applicant (10/01/01): Revised proffered conditions and Textual Statement were submitted. Planning Commission Meeting (10/16/01 ): On their own motion, the Commission deferred this case to November 20, 2001, to allow the applicant, area property owners and members of the Midlothian Volunteer Coalition time to meet and discuss the proposal. Staff (10/17/01): The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information should be submitted no later than October 19, 2001, for consideration at the Commission's November 20, 2001, meeting. 16 02SN0109/WP/DEC 19I Staff (10/28/01): To date, no additional information has been submitted. Planning Commission Meeting (11/20/01): On their own motion, the Commission deferred this case to December 18, 2001. Staff(11/21/01): The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information should be submitted no later than November 26, 2001, for consideration at the Commission's December 18, 2001, meeting. Staff (11/27/01): To date, no additional information has been submitted. If the Planning Commission acts on this case on December 18, 2001, it will be considered by the Board of Supervisors on December 19, 2001. The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, December 19, 2001, beginning at 7:00 p.m. will take under consideration this request. 17 02SN0109/WP/DEC 191 Revised Bulk Exceptions This request is to rezone from A to R-MF with proffered conditions and CUPD to permit bulk exceptions to modify the following requirements: 1. a twenty-three (23) foot exception to the twenty-five (25) foot setback requirement for structures from driveways providing access exclusively to parking areas; 2. a fifteen (15) foot exception to the twenty-five (25) foot setback requirement for structures from driveways other than those providing access exclusively to parking areas; 3. a fifteen (15) foot exception to the fifteen (15) foot setback requirement for structures from parking spaces; 4. a twenty-five (25) foot exception to the fifo/(50) setback requirement for structures from property lines, except adjacent to Tax ID 7247064194, Tax ID 7247063783, Tax ID 7247063772, Tax ID 7247063762, and Tax ID 7247074117; necessity of providing sidewalks except as proffered herewith; an exception to the requirement that driveways and parking areas have concrete curbs and gutters; the following pavement width exceptions: a. a two (2) foot exception (one (1) foot for each lane of a boulevard entrance) to the thirty (30) foot pavement width requirement for access roads (at LeGordon Drive); b. a one (1) foot exception to the twenty-four (24) foot pavement width requirement for interior streets; and c. a seven (7) foot exception to the twenty-four (24) foot pavement width requirement for private driveways. a twenty-five (25) foot exception to the fifty (50) foot buffer requirement for R-MF adjacent to .property zoned single family residential and to vacant agriculturally zoned property that is designated as residential on the comprehensive plan; and an exception to the necessity of a second road access other than for emergency vehicle purposes. #338812 v2 19108.00527 N ~ LE GORDON DR COLO! $ I I N ~7 , II 30~ btdg '1;o bl, dg rain, C= Ct,', sslC o z 5/'40 lC) ct_/ o~. $,NO/o c/-. Conceptual Land Use Plan MIDLOTHIAN TPKE Ill 0 t3 0 Commercial ~Office Low Density Residential High Density Residential ~Vacant lq ozSN o/o ~-4- I II \ E 02SN0109 -5 LE GORDON DI~VE 02SN0109 - 6