Loading...
2024-11-13 Minutes BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES NOVEMBER 13, 2024 11/13/2024 Page 1 of 48 A video recording of this meeting may be viewed at https://www.chesterfield.gov/244/Agendas-and-Minutes. Supervisors in Attendance: Mr. James M. Holland, Chair Dr. Mark S. Miller, Vice Chair Mr. James A. Ingle, Jr. Ms. Jessica L. Schneider Mr. Kevin P. Carroll Dr. Joseph P. Casey County Administrator 1. Approval of Minutes On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board approved the minutes of the October 30, 2024, special Board of Supervisors meeting announcing the selection of a Police Chief, October 30, 2024, regular Board of Supervisors meeting, November 7, 2024, Chamber Legislative Breakfast, and November 7, 2024, Powhite Parkway Project Environmental Impact Study (EIS) Public Information Meeting, as submitted. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 2. Requests to Postpone Agenda Items and Additions, Deletions or Changes in the Order of Presentation On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board postponed Item 13.D., Recognizing Mr. Garrett Hart, Recipient of the Virginia Economic Developers Association 2024 Cardinal Award, until its regularly scheduled meeting on December 18, 2024, and approved the agenda, as amended. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 3. Everyday Excellence - Juvenile Detention Home Ms. Marilyn Brown, Director of Juvenile Justice Services, introduced Mr. Willie May, Sr., Assistant Director and retired Master Sergeant with the United States Army. She shared his dedication to the youth he serves in the juvenile detention home and provided many examples of his leadership and willingness to go above and beyond. She provided details of his distinguished military career and other volunteer roles in which he serves. She stated she could not think of someone who embodies the military’s discipline, love for country, and total dedication to the mission more than Mr. May does in his paid and unpaid roles in the community. Mr. May stated it was an honor to represent veterans and families of veterans. He thanked his wife for her 11/13/2024 Page 2 of 48 perseverance throughout his military career, which included multiple deployments. He expressed appreciation to Ms. Brown for her leadership. He thanked the Board for the recognition. Board members thanked Mr. May for being mentor, role model, and leader and acknowledged the county's great fortune to have him. 4. Work Sessions A. Transportation Update - GRTC and VDOT Ms. Sheryl Adams, Chief Executive Officer for Greater Richmond Transit Company (GRTC), provided the Board with an update on transit services in the county. She provided statistics of ridership for existing Chesterfield routes. She provided details of the Route1A extension and Clover Dale LINK. She discussed essential transit infrastructure, Route 82x, Route 3B Extension to Colbrook, 1A to Westchester, and resumption of 95x service to Brightpoint Community College. She reviewed the plan for North-South Pulse. Ms. Rebecca Worley, Resident Engineer for the Chesterfield Residency of Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), provided an update on the residency's operations. She provided details of maintenance services, the 2024 paving program, and snow removal operations. She discussed several VDOT projects. She closed by sharing information about ways to contact VDOT customer service. Discussion and questions ensued relative to the information provided during the presentation. B. External Audit Report Mr. Rob Churchman, Engagement Partner with Cherry Baekart, LLP, presented the county’s FY2024 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) to the Board, as required by the Code of Virginia. Discussion and questions ensued relative to the information provided during the presentation. C. Financial Update Mr. Matt Harris, Deputy County Administrator, and Mr. Gerard Durkin, Director of Budget and Management, provided the Board with a financial update. Mr. Durkin reviewed the budget calendar timeline and FY2026 budget topics. He provided details of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Consolidated Plan. He updated the Board on FY2026 Community Contracts, the status of long-term liabilities, adjustments to the Tax Relief for Elderly and Disabled (Veterans) Program, and a public hearing planned for December to consider reallocation of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) federal funds. Mr. Holland inquired whether the proposed constitutional amendment expanding the current tax 11/13/2024 Page 3 of 48 exemption program passed, and if so, what that would mean for the county from a budgetary standpoint. Ms. Jenefer Hughes, Commissioner of the Revenue, stated the amendment passed by over 90 percent. She further stated it is hard to quantify, but she is hopeful spouses will apply for the relief. Mr. Harris and Mr. Durkin alternately discussed budget trends relating to nominal general fund budget growth, general government merit increases, FY2025 general fund major components, persistent cost pressures (Employment Cost Index: Wages and Salaries), and cost pressures in the capital sphere (Producer Price Index: New School Building Construction). Mr. Harris provided a partial list of items included in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) that are not applicable to local government spending. He discussed a chart measuring state and local government inflation and noted state and local government inflation is higher than the Core CPI 10 out of 17 years. He provided statistics of greater-than-average population growth which necessitates the scaling of certain positions such as teachers. He then provided a chart showing inflation-adjusted, general fund budget per capita, which indicated the rate was essentially unchanged for 13 years. He discussed what the general fund budget would look like today if a three-percent growth policy per year had been enacted in 2008, and the result would be a much higher budget than it is today. He provided percentages of real estate revaluations between 2008 and 2024 and pointed out the long-run average of appreciation is below three percent. He provided a chart showing a $0.17 reduction in the real estate tax rate over the last 20 years. He reviewed the Board's recent emphasis on broad tax relief accomplished by lowering the real estate and personal property tax rates, lowering the vehicle registration fee, and increasing business license tax thresholds. He discussed the percentage of residential versus commercial and concluded that, with no new residential construction, a two percent revaluation rate, and commercial growth of five percent, it would take until the year 2046 to achieve a tax base of 70 percent residential and 30 percent commercial. Mr. Durkin discussed a chart comparing the county's Cumulative Growth in General Fund Budgets (FY2019- FY2025) with its peers and noted the county is in the middle. He also discussed a chart showing Local Revenue Burden Per Capita based on the Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts (APA) Cost Comparative Report and concluded the county is the lowest in terms of revenue generation per capita across the larger localities in the state. Mr. Harris provided a chart of Operating Costs Per Capita, also based on the Virginia APA Cost Comparative Report, and concluded the county is lowest among its peer group in this metric as well. Mr. Durkin announced a Financial Transparency page on 11/13/2024 Page 4 of 48 the county's website, which collates existing financial reports into an easily-accessible and public-friendly site and spans the Finance Administration Division including Accounting, Budget, Constituent and Media Services, Internal Audit, Procurement, and Real Estate Assessments. D. Human Resources Annual Update Ms. Mary Martin Selby, Director of Human Resources, accompanied by assistant directors Ms. Kristi Brittle and Ms. Amanda Pilk, provided the Board with HR's FY2024 annual report. Ms. Martin Selby announced the county has been recognized over the past five years at the national, state and regional level with 20 best-in-class awards for its workplace. She provided details of HR's top priority, which is to attract and retain quality staff by promoting a culture of work/life balance, offering competitive pay and benefits, cultivating a talent pool using succession planning, and implementing innovative recruitment strategies that appeal to high- caliber applicants. Ms. Pilk provided details of HR's enhanced recruitment plan. She discussed statistics relating to recruitment, talent acquisition and career progression, and applicant clearance. Ms. Brittle provided the Board with an overview of ways the county rewards its personnel. She reviewed statistics relating to career development plans and compensation. She gave an update on the employee pay study for both general government employees and sworn public safety employees and provided a chart showing county employee investments between January 2021 and January 2025. She provided a summary of offerings for health and dental benefits, 2025 healthcare rates, and C-Fit events/Hit Refresh classes. She provided details of services provided by the Employee Medical Center to county and schools employees. She introduced Mr. Paul Brasler, who was recently hired as the county's behavioral health clinician and program coordinator. She discussed a chart showing the retirement outlook and provided details of deferred compensation. She reviewed paid parental leave usage and paid parental leave approvals. She summarized voluntary benefits enrollments. Ms. Pilk discussed other ways the county keeps employees satisfied, and she reviewed joint efforts between the county and schools. She provided statistics of turnover and grievances, investigations, and accommodation requests. Ms. Martin Selby provided details of workforce demographics and a breakdown of the workforce by generation. She discussed ways HR continues to align its programs and services with Dr. Casey's workforce priorities. She asked her managers to stand to be recognized. She thanked the Board for its support and making HR's job easier. 11/13/2024 Page 5 of 48 Discussion and questions ensued relative to the information provided during the presentation. E. Consent Agenda Highlights Mr. Jesse Smith provided details of various consent agenda items on the evening agenda. 5. Reports A. Report on Planning Commission's Substantial Accord Determination for the Enon Library (Case 24SA1026) The Board approved the Report on Planning Commission's Substantial Accord Determination for the Enon Library (Case 24SA1026). B. Reports on the Status of District Improvement Operating and Capital Funds, General Fund Unassigned Balance and Debt Policy Ratios, and Investments The Board approved the Reports on the Status of District Improvement Operating and Capital Funds, General Fund Unassigned Balance and Debt Policy Ratios, and Investments. 6. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters Mr. David Stritzinger reviewed communications between himself, Board members, and other county staff. 7. Closed Session A. Closed Session 1) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(5), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss or Consider Prospective Businesses or Industries or the Expansion of Existing Businesses or Industries Where no Previous Announcement has Been Made of the Businesses’ or Industries’ Interest in Locating or Expanding Their Facilities in the Community, 2) Pursuant to § 2.2- 3711(A)(3), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss the Acquisition by the County of Real Estate for a Public Purpose, or the Disposition of Publicly Held Real Property, Where Discussion in an Open Meeting Would Adversely Affect The Bargaining Position and Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body, 3) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(29), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss the Award of a Public Contract Involving the Expenditure of Public Funds Where Discussion in Open Session Would Adversely Affect the Bargaining Position or Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body, and 4) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(1), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, Relating to the Performance of the County Attorney. On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board went into Closed Session 1) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(5), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss or Consider Prospective Businesses or Industries or the Expansion of Existing Businesses or 11/13/2024 Page 6 of 48 Industries Where no Previous Announcement has Been Made of the Businesses’ or Industries’ Interest in Locating or Expanding Their Facilities in the Community, 2) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(3), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss the Acquisition by the County of Real Estate for a Public Purpose, or the Disposition of Publicly Held Real Property, Where Discussion in an Open Meeting Would Adversely Affect The Bargaining Position and Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body, 3) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(29), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss the Award of a Public Contract Involving the Expenditure of Public Funds Where Discussion in Open Session Would Adversely Affect the Bargaining Position or Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body, and 4) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(1), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, Relating to the Performance of the County Attorney. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. Reconvening: On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day adjourned into Closed Session in accordance with a formal vote of the Board and in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act effective July 1, 1989 provides for certification that such Closed Session was conducted in conformity with law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Board of Supervisors does hereby certify that to the best of each member’s knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements under the Freedom of Information Act were discussed in Closed Session to which this certification applies, and ii) only such business matters were identified in the motion by which the Closed Session was convened were heard, discussed or considered by the Board. No member dissents from this certification. Mr. Ingle: Aye. Ms. Schneider: Aye. Mr. Carroll: Aye. Dr. Miller: Aye. Mr. Holland: Aye. 8. Recess for Dinner with the Judges in the Learning and Performance Center On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board recessed for dinner with the Judges in the Learning and Performance Center. 11/13/2024 Page 7 of 48 Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 9. Invocation by the Honorable Kevin P. Carroll, Matoaca District Supervisor The Honorable Kevin P. Carroll, Matoaca District Supervisor, gave the invocation. 10. Pledge of Allegiance Led by Matt Harris, Deputy County Administrator Deputy County Administrator Matt Harris led the Pledge of Allegiance. 11. County Administration Update The County Administration Update consisted of the following: o An update on the Chesterfield Colonial Heights Alliance for Social Ministry (CCHASM) Thanksgiving meal program provided by Interim Chief Executive Officer Shelly Marin; o An announcement of the Treasurer's Office recent reaccreditation; o A reminder of the upcoming real estate tax payment due date on December 5; o An announcement of the Department of Utilities' AAA bond rating reaffirmation by Fitch Ratings; o An announcement of the Department of Utilities' receipt of the 2024 Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies Sustainable Water Utility Management Award; and o An announcement of Lt. Col. Curt Powell as winner of Congresswoman Jennifer McClellan's 2024 Veteran of the Year Award. 12. Board Member Reports Board members announced and provided details of several community meetings and county-related events they attended recently. 13. Resolutions and Special Recognitions A. Resolution Recognizing Ms. Marie G. Lauer, Mental Health Support Services, Upon Her Retirement Ms. Marie Lauer, accompanied by members of her family, was present to receive the recognition. On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, Ms. Marie G. Lauer retired from Chesterfield County Mental Health Support Services on August 1, 2024, after providing outstanding service for 26 years; and WHEREAS, Ms. Lauer was hired by Chesterfield Department of Mental Health Support Services on August 10, 1998 as a Services Supervisor with Chesterfield 11/13/2024 Page 8 of 48 Employment Services (CES); and WHEREAS, Ms. Lauer managed business partnerships and created expansion within employment sites; and WHEREAS, Ms. Lauer managed and analyzed critical services data; and WHEREAS, Ms. Lauer created a new business, Cartridge Connections, to sustain employment for individuals with development disabilities; and WHEREAS, Ms. Lauer tirelessly served on the Environmental Safety Committee; and WHEREAS, Ms. Lauer joined the MHSS Service Coordination Program as a Support Coordinator on September 14, 2009; and WHEREAS, Ms. Lauer provided case management support for individuals with developmental disabilities; and WHEREAS, Ms. Lauer assisted in securing housing vouchers and flexible funding which allowed individuals to live in the homes of their choice; and WHEREAS, Ms. Lauer connected individuals with disabilities to various community resources and activities fostering inclusion and promoting access to essential services and opportunities within the community; and WHEREAS, Ms. Lauer assisted in securing Waiver funding for fifteen individuals; and WHEREAS, Ms. Lauer dedicated her career to the advocacy of individuals with developmental disabilities and was committed to creating and supporting opportunities for individuals to work and live a life of their choosing impacting them and their families. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 13th day of November 2024, publicly recognizes the outstanding contributions of Ms. Marie G. Lauer and extends appreciation, on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, congratulations upon her retirement, and best wishes for a long, happy, and healthy retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Ms. Lauer and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. Mr. Holland presented Ms. Lauer with the executed resolution. He expressed gratitude for her many years of outstanding service to the community and 11/13/2024 Page 9 of 48 congratulated her on her retirement. Ms. Kelly Fried, Executive Director of the Community Services Board, thanked Ms. Lauer for her dedication and wished her much success in her retirement. Dr. Casey presented Ms. Lauer with a replica of the brick that will be placed in the historic courthouse walkway in her honor. Ms. Lauer expressed appreciation for the recognition. B. Resolution Recognizing Ms. Karen S. Bowker, Mental Health Support Services, Upon Her Retirement Ms. Karen Bowker, accompanied by members of her family, was present to receive the recognition. On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, Ms. Karen S. Bowker will retire from Chesterfield County Mental Health Support Services on December 1, 2024, after providing outstanding service for over 33 years; and WHEREAS, Ms. Bowker was hired on June 10, 1991 as a Case Manager with the Service Coordination program; and WHEREAS, Ms. Bowker moved to MHSS Clinical Services in the role of State Hospital Liaison in 1996 where she provided discharge planning to both the civil and forensic populations also serving as NGRI Coordinator; and WHEREAS, Ms. Bowker was promoted to Services Supervisor in 2002 with the Supported Living team assisting individuals with serious mental illness secure and maintain affordable housing; and WHEREAS, Ms. Bowker supervised the Intensive Community Treatment (ICT) Team and later transitioned that program into the Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) Team; and WHEREAS, Ms. Bowker obtained her license as a Professional Counselor in the Commonwealth of Virginia in 2003; and WHEREAS, Ms. Bowker served as a Certified Preadmission Screening Clinician for individuals in acute need of psychiatric hospitalizations; and WHEREAS, Ms. Bowker assisted in the implementation of two electronic health records as well as provided extensive support during an industry-wide shift to Managed Care Organization (MCO) requirements and standards; and WHEREAS, Ms. Bowker was selected as the Mental Health Support Services Employee of the Year in both 2004 and 11/13/2024 Page 10 of 48 2013; and WHEREAS, Ms. Bowker assisted in the MHSS adaptation to the global COVID-19 pandemic by rapidly shifting service delivery ensuring continuing services while maintaining the safety of individuals and their families as well as staff; and WHEREAS, Ms. Bowker was promoted to Manager of the Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services (PRS) program in 2021, becoming responsible for the management of community mental health case management, ACT, and Chester House to name a few; and WHEREAS, Ms. Bowker led the implementation of the Permanent Supportive Housing program in 2022 bringing stable housing as well as additional wrap around services to individuals and leading the expansion of the program in 2024; and WHEREAS, Ms. Bowker in various leadership roles consistently demonstrated integrity, professionalism, compassion, ethical practice, and tirelessly advocated for individuals with mental illness. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 13th day of November 2024, publicly recognizes the outstanding contributions of Ms. Karen S. Bowker and extends appreciation, on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, congratulations upon her retirement, and best wishes for a long, happy, and healthy retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Ms. Bowker and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. Mr. Holland presented Ms. Bowker with the executed resolution. He expressed gratitude for her many years of outstanding service to the community and congratulated her on her retirement. Ms. Fried thanked Ms. Bowker for her dedication and wished her much success in her retirement. Dr. Casey presented Ms. Bowker with a replica of the brick that will be placed in the historic courthouse walkway in her honor. Ms. Bowker expressed appreciation for the recognition. C. Recognizing Retiring Veterans Lt. Robert Bivens, an 18-year employee with the Sheriff's Office, and Career Deputy Michael Davis, a 17-year employee in the Sheriff's Office, both accompanied by family members, were present to be 11/13/2024 Page 11 of 48 recognized for their recent retirements from the United States Marine Corps Reserve and the Virginia Army National Guard, respectively. Lt. Col. Matthew Wilkerson was present to introduce them and provide details of their military careers. Mr. Holland presented each of them with a congratulatory letter and a challenge coin. D. Recognizing Mr. Garrett Hart, Recipient of the Virginia Economic Developers Association 2024 Cardinal Award Item 13.D. Recognizing Mr. Garrett Hart, Recipient of the Virginia Economic Developers Association 2024 Cardinal Award, was postponed to the Board's December 18, 2024, regular meeting. E. Recognizing 2024 Fall Government Citizens Academy Graduates Ms. Kelly Dale, Community Engagement Coordinator, introduced recent graduates of the 2024 Fall Government Citizens Academy, who were present to be recognized and receive their certificates. She stated the academy offers Chesterfield residents the opportunity to learn about their local government through interactive sessions. She further stated during the nine-week program, participants receive a comprehensive look at programs and learn directly from department leaders and members of the Board of Supervisors about local government operations. Mr. Bob Santos, member of the academy class, addressed the Board to give his perspective on what he learned over the course of the academy. 14. New Business A. Approve the First Amendment to the Existing Grant Agreement with DuPont Specialty Products USA, LLC, Entered into on February 21, 2020 Mr. Jake Elder, Deputy Director of Economic Development, provided details of the request for the Board to approve the First Amendment to the Grant Agreement with DuPont Specialty Products USA, LLC. On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board approved the First Amendment to the Grant Agreement with DuPont Specialty Products USA, LLC. (It is noted a copy of the document is filed with the papers of this Board.) Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. B. Appointments 1. Towing Advisory Board On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board nominated/appointed Sgt. Daniel Bowen to serve 11/13/2024 Page 12 of 48 as a law enforcement representative on the Towing Advisory Board, whose term is effective immediately and will expire August 31, 2025. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 2. Citizens’ Budget Advisory Committee On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the Board nominated/appointed Mr. Reginald Warren, Matoaca District, to serve as an at-large representative on the Citizens' Budget Advisory Committee, whose term is effective immediately and will expire September 30, 2026. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. C. Consent Items (14.C.1.-14.C.8.) 1. Adoption of Resolutions a. Recognizing Mr. Paul D. Wilmoth, Department of Parks and Recreation, Upon His Retirement On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, Mr. Paul D. Wilmoth will retire from Chesterfield County on December 1, 2024, after providing 20 years of dedicated service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilmoth began working with the Parks and Recreation Department on August 30, 2004 and was promoted through the department to Sports Tourism Coordinator for Parks and Recreation in March 2019; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilmoth was instrumental in rebuilding many youth sports organizations including the Bensley basketball program, Bermuda/Dale baseball program, and the Bermuda/Dale soccer program; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilmoth was responsible for implementing the summer sports camp in the Bensley/Bellwood area of the county; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilmoth impacted the lives of hundreds of youth while serving as the head girls’ varsity soccer coach at L.C. Bird High School, earning Coach of the Year in 2007; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilmoth has devoted thousands of hours to local recreation and travel leagues through his involvement in soccer, basketball, and baseball, and during his service, he expounded the values of citizenship and sportsmanship being the core of youth sports; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilmoth served as the Employee Spirit Council Chairperson and supported the Work-Based 11/13/2024 Page 13 of 48 Learning initiative by promoting internship opportunities throughout Parks and Recreation; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilmoth’s efforts were recognized by the county with the Celebrating Success Award in November 2024 for providing key transitional support during the development of the county’s Sports, Visitation, and Entertainment Department; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilmoth has been an active member of the Virginia Recreation and Park Society (VRPS), serving as the Central Service Area Chairman, serving as the Athletic Resource Group Chairman, serving on the Awards and Citations Committee, serving on the Annual Conference Committee, and serving as a speaker for several Annual Conferences; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilmoth was instrumental in developing the Front Line Workshop in 2008, which continues to be a popular educational offering; and WHEREAS, in 2009, Mr. Wilmoth was the recipient of the VRPS Distinguished Service Award; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilmoth is also a graduate of VRPS’s undergraduate and graduate Leadership Training Institutes and served as a speaker at the 2023 Institute. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. Paul D. Wilmoth and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his exceptional service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 2. Real Property Requests a. Acceptance of Parcels of Land 1. Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to Bermuda Hundred Road from DD Owner, LLC On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 3.381 acres adjacent to Bermuda Hundred Road from DD Owner, LLC and authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 2. Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to Beulah Road and Kingsland Road from Cstore Iron Bridge LLC On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board accepted the conveyance of parcels of land 11/13/2024 Page 14 of 48 containing a total of 0.015 acres adjacent to Beulah Road and Kingsland Road from Cstore Iron Bridge LLC and authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 3. Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to Village Square Parkway from Cosby Village, LLC On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.038 acres adjacent to Village Square Parkway from Cosby Village, LLC and authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. b. Requests to Quitclaim 1. Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a 16’ Sewer Easement Across the Property Owned by KF Childcare RE, LLC On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to quitclaim a portion of a 16’ sewer easement across the property owned by KF Childcare RE, LLC. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 2. Request to Quitclaim 16’ Drainage Easements (Private) Across the Properties Owned by Cooke’s 60 Land LLC On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to quitclaim 16’ drainage easements (private) across the properties owned by Cooke’s 60 Land LLC. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 3. Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a 50’ Greenway Easement Across the Properties Owned by Kingsland Park, LC, Grace Elizabeth Dillon and Sean Edward Peters, Robert John and Hailey Gorski, Abu Bakarr and Cherry Adlee Jalloh and Kimberly A. Bost On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to quitclaim a portion of a 50’ 11/13/2024 Page 15 of 48 greenway easement across the properties owned by Kingsland Park, LC, Grace Elizabeth Dillon and Sean Edward Peters, Robert John and Hailey Gorski, Abu Bakarr and Cherry Adlee Jalloh and Kimberly A. Bost. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 3. Authorization to Award a Construction Contract for the Fordham Road (Jacobs Road Elementary School to Chatham Grove Lane) Phase A Sidewalk Project On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board authorized the Director of Procurement to award a construction contract to Dickerson Construction, LLC in the amount of $880,456.40 and to execute all necessary change orders up to the full amount budgeted for the Fordham Road (Jacobs Road Elementary School to Chatham Grove Lane) Phase A Sidewalk Project. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 4. Authorization to Award a Design-Build Construction Contract for the Western Area Infrastructure Improvements Project On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board authorized the Director of Procurement to award a best value design-build contract in the amount of $42,619,549 to Shirley Contracting Company, LLC and execute all necessary change orders up to the full amount budgeted for the Western Area Infrastructure Improvements Project. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 5. Appropriation of Funds and Authorization to Award a Construction Contract for the Lakeview Road and Branders Bridge Road Roundabout Project On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board (1) appropriated up to $200,000 of anticipated VDOT reimbursements and (2) authorized the Director of Procurement to award a construction contract, upon authorization from VDOT, to J.R. Caskey, Inc. in the amount of $3,786,300 and to execute all necessary change orders up to the full amount budgeted for the Lakeview Road and Branders Bridge Road Roundabout Project. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 6. Set Public Hearing a. To Consider Revised American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Recovery Plan On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board set December 18, 2024, as the date to hold a public hearing to consider the county's revised 11/13/2024 Page 16 of 48 American Rescue Plan Act recovery plan. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. b. To Consider an Ordinance Granting the Real Estate Tax Exemption Request of Chesterfield Alternatives, Inc. On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board set December 18, 2024, as the date to hold a public hearing to consider an ordinance granting the real estate tax exemption request of Chesterfield Alternatives, Inc. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 7. Acceptance of State Roads On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described below to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2- 705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Project / Subdivision: Palisades Cove at Magnolia Green Section 2 Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Additions Reason for Change: New Streets Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statutes: §33.2-705, 33.2-334 Street Name and/or Route Number ►Palisades Ridge, State Route Number 8479 From: Palisades Cove Drive, (Route 8596) To: 0.01 miles northwest of Palisades Cove Drive, (Route 8596), a distance of 0.01 miles Recordation Reference: Plat Book 301, Page 64 Right of Way width (feet) = 47 11/13/2024 Page 17 of 48 ►Palisades Ridge, State Route Number: 8479 From: Palisades Cove Drive, (Route 8596) To: 0.03 miles northwest of Palisades Avenue, (Route 8478), a distance of 0.13 miles Recordation Reference: Plat Book 301, Page 64 Right of Way width (feet) = 47 ►Palisades Cove Drive, State Route Number: 8596 From: Palisades Ridge, (Route 8479) To: Palisades Cove Court, (Route 8598), a distance of 0.05 miles Recordation Reference: Plat Book 301, Page 64 Right of Way width (feet) = 47 ►Palisades Cove Drive, State Route Number: 8596 From: Magnolia Green Parkway, (Route 7692) To: Palisades Ridge, (Route 8479), a distance of 0.05 miles Recordation Reference: Plat Book 301, Page 64 Right of Way width (feet) = 47 ►Palisades Cove Trail, State Route Number: 8597 From: Palisades Cove Drive, (Route 8596) To: 0.01 miles northwest of Palisades Cove Drive, (Route 8596), a distance of 0.01 miles Recordation Reference: Plat Book 301, Page 64 Right of Way width (feet) = 47 ►Palisades Cove Court, State Route Number: 8598 From: Palisades Cove Drive, (Route 8596) To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.05 miles Recordation Reference: Plat Book 301, Page 64 Right of Way width (feet) = 47 Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 8. Request for Reserves Appropriation on behalf of Appomattox Regional Governor's School On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board appropriated $156,970 of Appomattox Regional Governor's School Maintenance Reserves for the purpose of funding the purchase and installation of new Smart Boards in all instructional spaces. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 15. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters Mr. Doug Bradham expressed concerns relative to the increase in his residential property taxes, county spending, the lack of a formal cost reduction/continuous improvement program, and the amount spent by the county on economic development. Ms. Sandra Schell expressed concerns relative to the increase in her residential property taxes and the county administrator's salary. Mr. Edwuan Whitehead with the Injustice Reform Network expressed concerns relative to how the school 11/13/2024 Page 18 of 48 district, in collaboration with the police department, treats students in disciplinary matters; the memorandum of understanding between Schools and the police department; and First Amendment rights. 16. Deferred Items from Previous Meetings There were no deferred items from previous meetings. 17. Zoning Cases A. Deferrals 1. 24SN1209 - Matoaca - Magnolia Green Tract CC Amendment In Matoaca Magisterial District, Magnolia Green Tract CC Amendment is a request for amendment of zoning approval (Case 89SN0343) relative to phasing requirements and modification of development standards and amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R-9) District for property fronting in three (3) locations for approximately 2,925 feet along the north side of Hull Street Road, 250 feet west of Magnolia Green Parkway. The 88.11 acre property is zoned to permit a residential development of up to 364 multifamily dwelling units. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Community Business, Neighborhood Business and Regional Mixed Uses. Tax IDs 702-667-2068; 703-667-2733; and 705-667- 9038. Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1209. She stated Mr. Carroll is requesting deferral to the Board's first regularly scheduled meeting in January 2025. Mr. Holland called for public comment on the deferral. There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing on the deferral was closed. On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board deferred Case 24SN1209 to its first regularly scheduled Board of Supervisors meeting in January 2025. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. B. Consent Cases 1. 24MH1180 - Bermuda - Temple Manufactured Home Permit Renewal In Bermuda Magisterial District, Temple Manufactured Home Permit Renewal is a request for renewal of manufactured home (Case 17SN0133) to permit a temporary manufactured home and amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R-7) District known as 2701 Shields Road. The 0.69 acre property is developed with 1 temporary manufactured home. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Office/Residential Mixed use. Tax ID 796-659-8191. 11/13/2024 Page 19 of 48 Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24MH1180. She stated staff recommended approval, subject to the conditions in the staff report. Mr. Holland called for public comment. There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board approved Case 24MH1180, subject to the following conditions: Conditions 1. The applicant shall be the owner and occupant of the manufactured home. (P) 2. No permanent type living space may be added to the manufactured home. The manufactured home shall be skirted but shall not be placed on a permanent foundation. (P) 3. Should the applicant cease to reside in the manufactured home, the manufactured home shall be removed from the property. (P) (Note: The Zoning Ordinance limits the maximum period of time for which a manufactured home permit may be granted to seven (7) years. Should the Board wish to approve this request, this approval would be for seven (7) years unless conditioned for less time and then subject to renewal.) Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 2. 22SN044 - Midlothian - Old Otterdale Road Residential Rezoning In Midlothian Magisterial District, Old Otterdale Road Residential Rezoning is a request to rezone from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12) with conditional use planned development to permit exceptions to ordinance requirements and amendment of zoning district map known as 500 Old Otterdale Road. The 16.98 acre property is proposed for a maximum development of 34 dwelling units. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Suburban Residential II use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax ID 719-707-3326. Ms. Wilson introduced Case 22SN0044. She stated the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval, subject to the conditions in the staff report. Mr. Holland called for public comment. There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the 11/13/2024 Page 20 of 48 Board approved Case 22SN0044, subject to the following conditions: Proffered Conditions 1. Master Plan. The Textual Statement dated March 23, 2022, and last revised July 22, 2024, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P) 2. Conceptual Plan. The site shall be designed as generally depicted on the drawing titled “Main Street Homes Old Otterdale Road” last revised July 22, 2024, and attached hereto, to be further referred to as Exhibit A. The site uses shall be as described and shown on the Conceptual Plan. However, the exact location of buildings, drive areas and parking areas may be modified provided that the general intent of the Conceptual Plan is maintained with respect to location of uses, internal road network and pedestrian environment. (P) 3. Utilities. Public water and wastewater shall be used. (U) 4. Access. Direct vehicular access from the Property to Old Otterdale Road shall be limited to two (2) accesses with the exact locations approved by the Transportation Department. (T) 5. Right of Way Dedication. Prior to any site plan approval, in conjunction with the recordation of the initial subdivision plat, or within sixty (60) days of a written request by the Transportation Department, whichever occurs first, thirty-five (35) feet of right-of-way on Old Otterdale Road, measured from the centerline of that part of the road immediately adjacent to the property, shall be dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield County. (T) 6. Road Improvements. In conjunction with initial development, the following road improvements shall be completed with the exact design, length, or modifications approved by the Transportation Department. A. Widening/improving the west side of Old Otterdale Road to a twelve (12) foot wide travel lane, measured from the centerline of the road, with an additional four (4) foot wide paved shoulder plus a four (4) foot wide unpaved shoulder, and overlaying the full width of the road with one and a half (1.5) inches of surface course asphalt, with any modifications approved by the Transportation Department, for the entire property frontage; B. Construction of a VDOT standard shared use path along the Property’s frontage to Old Otterdale Road; and C. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free and unrestricted, of any additional right-of-way (or easements) required for the road improvements 11/13/2024 Page 21 of 48 identified above. (T) 7. Density. A maximum of Thirty-Four (34) units shall be permitted on the property. (Approximately 2.0/acre) (P) 8. Open Space/Pedestrian Areas. o There shall be a minimum of One (1) pocket park as generally shown on the conceptual plan near the entrance to the Property. This open space shall consist of a minimum of two of the following uses: 1) a playground, 2) open game field, 3) gazebo, 4) fire pit, 5) bench(es), or 6) any other outdoor amenities as approved by the Planning Department at the time of Site Plan Review. o A pedestrian trail system shall be provided as generally shown on the Conceptual Plan. The exact design, material and location of such trail system shall be reviewed and approved during the plans review. o An entry monument shall be provided at the entrance of the development from Old Otterdale Road. The exact design, location and size of the monument shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department during plans review. (P) 9. Environmental Engineering. A. Super Silt Fence, or an alternative as approved by the Department of Environmental Engineering, shall be provided as a perimeter control in locations where standard silt fence would have been required. B. Sediment traps and sediment basins sized at least 25% larger than the minimum Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook’s standard shall be provided. C. Anionic PAM, Flexible Growth Medium and/or a County-approved equivalent shall be applied to denuded areas during construction and at final stabilization in the locations shown on plans approved by Environmental Engineering at the time of plans review. D. The maximum post-development discharge rate for the 100-year storm shall be based on the maximum capacity of the existing facilities downstream and shall not increase the recorded and /or established 100-year backwater and /or floodplain. On-Site detention of the post-development 100-year discharge rate to below the pre-development 100-year discharge rate may be provided to satisfy this requirement. E. The Stormwater system serving the property shall be designed to prevent stormwater released from disconnected roof drains, driveways, roads and curb and gutter from sheet flowing onto adjacent lots not located on the property. F. The SWM/BMP along the internal public roadway 11/13/2024 Page 22 of 48 shall have enhanced landscaping, which must be approved by the Department of Environmental Engineering during plans review. (EE) 10. Development Standards. In addition to any other requirements set forth herein, the Applicant shall comply with the following: A. Residential Design Elements. • Driveways and Walks. • Driveways. o Front-loaded driveways and private parking areas shall be brushed concrete, stamped concrete or exposed aggregate concrete. o Gravel driveways shall not be permitted. • Front walks: A minimum of a 3-foot-wide concrete front walk shall be provided to the front entrance of each dwelling unit, to connect to drives, sidewalks or street. • Landscaping. • Front Foundation Planting Beds: Foundation planting is required along the entire front façade of all units and shall extend along all sides facing a street. Foundation Planting Beds shall be a minimum of three (3) feet wide from the unit foundation. Planting beds shall include medium shrubs, spaced a maximum of four (4) feet apart. The plant materials used should visually soften the unit corners and complement the architecture of the home at their mature sizes. Planting bed deviations may be approved by the Planning Department at time of plans review due to unique design circumstances. • Sidewalks: Sidewalks shall generally be provided on both sides of the internal public street in public right-of-way; provided however, deviations may be approved by the Planning Department at time of plans review due to unique design circumstances. • Streetscape. Street trees shall be installed along both sides of the internal public road. Unless otherwise permitted during plans review, street trees shall be large deciduous trees spaced generally 40 feet on center, except where there is a conflict with utilities (above and underground), sightlines, easements, and/or driveway areas. Tree species shall be those species designated for use as a street tree in the Chesterfield County Plant Materials List. • Fences. Chain link fences shall not be permitted. • Lamp Posts. One lamp post shall be provided for each lot. The style and color of the lamp posts shall initially be installed to be consistent throughout the development. 11/13/2024 Page 23 of 48 • Residential Architecture and Materials: • Style and Form. Unless significant deviations are approved by the Planning Commission during subdivision plan review, the architectural treatment of the single-family homes shall be generally compatible and consistent in quality to the architectural standards of the elevations as shown in Exhibit B, entitled Conceptual Design Guidelines, dated April 18, 2023. • Dwelling on Slab. If the dwelling unit is constructed on a slab, brick or stone shall be employed around the base of the dwelling unit along all front and side elevations a minimum eighteen (18) inches above grade so as to give the appearance of a foundation. • Materials. Acceptable siding materials include brick, stone, masonry, fiber cement siding (such as HardiPlank, HardieShingle, and HardieTrim), or engineered wood siding (such as LP SmartSide), or other comparable material as approved by the Planning Director at time of plans review. Dutch lap, vinyl and plywood siding are not permitted. Other materials may be used for trim, architectural decorations, or design elements provided they blend with the architecture of the dwelling. • Repetition. Dwelling units with the same elevations and color palette may not be located adjacent to or directly across from each other on the same street. • Step-down Siding: For dwelling units stepping the siding down below the first floor shall be permitted on the side and rear elevations that do not front on a street, with a maximum of two (2) steps permitted on any elevation. A minimum of 24 inches of exposed brick or stone shall be required, unless a lesser amount is approved by the Planning Department at time of plans review due to unique design circumstances. • Roof Materials: Roofing materials shall be standing seam metal or dimensional architectural shingles or better with a minimum 30-year warranty. • Porches and Stoops. o Front Porches: All dwelling units shall have either a covered front entry stoop or front porch. Where elevated more than sixteen (16) inches, front entry stoops and front porches shall be constructed with continuous masonry foundation walls or with masonry piers to match the foundation of the home. Extended front porches shall be a minimum of five (5) feet deep. Space between piers under porches shall be enclosed with framed lattice panels. Where provided or required by code on elevated porches, handrails and railings shall be finished painted wood, vinyl or metal railing with vertical pickets or sawn 11/13/2024 Page 24 of 48 balusters. Pickets shall be supported on top and bottom rails that span between columns. o Front Porch Flooring: Porch flooring may be concrete, exposed aggregate concrete, or a finished paving material such as stone, tile or brick, finished (stained or painted) wood, or properly trimmed composite decking boards. All front steps shall be masonry to match the foundation. • Garages. o Front loaded garages shall use an upgraded garage door. An upgraded garage door is any door with a minimum of three (3) enhanced features. Enhanced features shall include windows, raised panels, decorative panels, arches, ornamental hardware, or other architectural features on the exterior that enhance the entry (i.e. decorative lintels, shed roof overhangs, arches, columns, keystones, eyebrows, etc.). Flat panel garage doors are prohibited. o Front loaded attached garages shall be permitted to extend a maximum of eight (8) feet forward of the front line of the porch provided that the rooflines of the porch and garage are connected. Where the rooflines are not connected, garages shall be permitted to extend a maximum of two (2) feet forward of the front line of the front porch. Where there is no front porch, garages shall be permitted to extend a maximum of two (2) feet forward of the front line of the main dwelling. • Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Units and Whole House Generators. Units adjacent to public right of way shall be screened from view by landscaping or low maintenance material, as approved by the Planning Department. (P) 11. Perimeter Screening. A minimum six (6) foot tall vinyl or pressure treated wood privacy fence shall be installed along the rear of Lots 1–34, except where accesses are located, as generally shown on the Conceptual Plan. (P) 12. Buffers. A thirty-five (35) foot buffer shall be provided along Old Otterdale Road and Tax IDs 719-707- 7577-00000 and 719-707-7748-00000 with 2 x Perimeter Landscaping C, including existing vegetation. All required buffers shall be recorded in common area or open space. (P) Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 3. 22SN0141 - Bermuda - Eads Two-Chair Salon In Bermuda Magisterial District, Eads Two-Chair Salon is a request for a conditional use to permit a salon from the home and amendment of zoning district map in an Agricultural (A) District on 0.85 acres known as 3706 Louise Drive. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The 11/13/2024 Page 25 of 48 Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Suburban Residential II use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax ID 795-637-1405. Ms. Wilson introduced Case 22SN0141. She stated the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval, subject to the conditions in the staff report. Mr. Holland called for public comment. There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board approved Case 22SN0141 subject to the following conditions: Conditions 1. Hours of operation. The beauty shop hours of operation shall be limited to 8:00 am to 6:00 pm Monday through Friday, except on Tuesday when it may be open until 7:00 pm. (P) 2. Signage. No more than one sign shall be permitted on-site related to the beauty shop. The sign shall not exceed one (1) square foot in area and shall not be illuminated. (P) 3. Expansion. An expansion of no more than 120 square feet to the existing 401 square foot structure may be permitted. Alterations required to meet American with Disabilities Act (ADA) or other building code requirements, can be made to the existing structure used for the beauty shop as illustrated on Exhibit A. (P) Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 4. 23SN0131 - Matoaca - Spring Run Road Apartments Amendment In Matoaca Magisterial District, Spring Run Road Apartments Amendment is a request for amendment zoning approval (Case 16SN0554) to modify the master plan, uses, and development standards and amendment of zoning district map in a Multifamily Residential (R- MF) District for property fronting 740 feet on the east line of North Spring Run Road, 700 feet south of Hull Street Road. The 13.72 acre property is zoned to permit a maximum development of 136 dwelling units. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Medium-High Density Residential (4 to 8 dwellings per acre) and Neighborhood Business uses. Tax ID 725-670-9868. Ms. Wilson introduced Case 23SN0131. She stated the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval, subject to the conditions in the staff report. Mr. Holland called for public comment. 11/13/2024 Page 26 of 48 There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board approved Case 23SN0131 subject to the following conditions: Proffered Conditions The Owner-Applicant in this zoning case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for itself and its successor or assigns, proffers that the development of the property (the "Property") will be developed as set forth below; however, in the event the request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by the Owner- Applicant, these proffers shall be immediately null and voice and of no further force or effect. Proffered Condition 1 of Zoning Case 16SN0554 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following condition: 1. Master Plan. The textual statement dated September 27, 2024, and the following exhibits which are made part of these proffers by this reference thereto, shall be considered the master plan. a. Exhibit A – Conceptual Plan entitled "Spring Run Conceptual Master Plan", prepared by Land Planning Solutions, dated December 15, 2022, and last revised September 25, 2024. b. Exhibit B – Elevations entitled "Spring Run Apartments", prepared by TS3 Architects P.C. dated July 17, 2024. (P) Proffered Condition 8 of Zoning Case 16SN0554 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following condition: 2. Architectural Treatment. The architectural treatment of and exterior materials for the buildings on the Property shall be compatible, with the following provisions: a. Vinyl siding shall be prohibited, provided shake pattern vinyl shall be permitted in gable roof areas only. b. Roof materials shall be architecturally dimensional shingles with a minimum of a thirty (30) year warranty. c. Exterior building materials for the apartment building and pool house shall be a minimum of 30% stone veneer or masonry, excluding window area. The remainder of the exterior facade shall be fiber cement board (Hardiplank) siding. (P) Proffered Condition 9 of Zoning Case 16SN0554 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the 11/13/2024 Page 27 of 48 following condition: 3. Conceptual Plan Requirements. The site shall be designed as generally depicted on the Conceptual Plan (Exhibit A). However, the exact location of building, parking and other improvements may be modified provided that the general intent of the plan is maintained. All dwelling units shall be configured within a single apartment structure and shall be located generally in the area as depicted on Exhibit A. (P) Proffered Condition 11 of Zoning Case 16SN0554 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following condition: 4. Amenities. Prior to the certificate of occupancy for the dwelling units, amenities including, but not limited to, a pool and pool house shall receive a certificate of occupancy. The pool area shall be a minimum of 3,000 square feet to include concrete patio, pool, and pool building. A community garden area, gazebo, seating areas, and walking trail shall also be provided on the Property. Additionally, amenity areas shall be found within the multifamily building. The indoor amenity areas shall include but not be limited to a club room, mail room, leasing office, fitness center, game room, sunroom, and porch. The indoor amenity area shall not be less than 1,000 square feet. (P) Proffered Condition 15 of Zoning Case 16SN0554 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following condition: 5. Buffers and Landscaping. a. A twenty-five (25) foot buffer shall be provided along the northern property line and on adjoining parcels to the north (portion of GPINs 725-672-5911 and 725-671-9022), generally as depicted on Exhibit A. Any portion of the buffer that is located offsite shall be located within a maintenance easement to ensure that the long-term maintenance and preservation of the landscaping by the owner of the Property. Such buffer may be disturbed for the purpose of site grading provided it shall be planted in accordance with the following standards: i. Planting requirements for this buffer shall meet the fifty (50) foot buffer treatment outlined by the Zoning Ordinance where vegetation does not exist or is approved for removal. The following modification to the planting schedule shall be provided: Evergreen trees shall be substituted for one hundred (100) percent of the required small deciduous trees. b. A thirty-five (35) foot buffer shall be required along Spring Run Road, as generally shown on Exhibit A. A variable width undulating berm with an average height of three (3) feet shall be installed within this buffer, as approved by the Planning Department at the time of site plan approval. 11/13/2024 Page 28 of 48 i. Planting requirements for this buffer shall meet the seventy-five (75) foot buffer treatment (two (2) times Perimeter Landscape C) outlined by the Zoning Ordinance. c. A twenty-five (25) foot and fifty (50) foot buffer shall be required along GPIN 725-670-2347, as generally shown on Exhibit A. i. Planting requirements for the 25’ buffer shall meet the fifty (50) foot buffer treatment outlined by the Zoning Ordinance. The following modification to the planting schedule shall be provided: Evergreen trees shall be substituted for one hundred (100) percent of the required small deciduous trees. ii. Planting requirements for the 50’ buffer shall meet buffer treatment outlined by the Zoning Ordinance. (P) Proffered Condition 17 of Zoning Case 16SN0554 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following condition: 6. Lighting. Apartment building sidewalks and parking shall be illuminated with a minimum maintained illumination level of 1.5 foot-candles, as measured at grade. Parking lot lighting for the apartment structure shall not exceed a height of 20 feet. All lighting on the site shall be shielded and designed to orient light in a downward fashion so as not to cause direct view of the light source. (P and Police) Proffered Condition 23 of Zoning Case 16SN0554 is hereby deleted in its entirety. The Applicant proffers the following additional condition: 7. Public Utilities. The public water and wastewater system shall be used. (U) Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 5. 24SN1089 - Bermuda - Enon Corner Townhouse Rezoning In Bermuda Magisterial District, Enon Corner Townhouse Rezoning is a request to rezone from Agricultural (A) and Community Business (C-3) to Residential Townhouse (R-TH) with a conditional use planned development to permit exceptions to ordinance requirements and amendment of zoning district map located at the eastern side of the East Hundred Road and North Enon Church Road intersection, as well as fronting along the north side of Burgess Road and the south side of Enon Station Road. The 29.94 acre property is proposed for a maximum development of 199 dwelling units. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Medium-High Density Residential 11/13/2024 Page 29 of 48 (Minimum of 4 to 8 dwellings per acre), Neighborhood Business and Industrial uses. Tax IDs 824-647-5620 and 9569; 824-648-4009 and 7327. Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1089. She stated the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval, subject to the conditions in the staff report. Mr. Holland called for public comment. Mr. Jerry Turner expressed concerns relative to there being no sidewalks in the project. Mr. Billy Ray Johnson expressed concerns relative to the 50-foot border and asked the Board to consider a larger border. There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Jeff Geiger, representing the applicant, stated in addition to the 50-foot buffer, the applicant will be providing a 6-foot, opaque, board-on-board fence to screen the townhouses from view. He further stated the fence would not be on Mr. Johnson's property, and it will be maintained by the homeowners association. He stated there is no opportunity to provide a sidewalk on Route 10 because of a floodplain. He further stated a sidewalk on Enon Church is not required with the subdivision to the north. Discussion ensued relative to sidewalks. On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board approved Case 24SN1089 subject to the following conditions: Conditions Buffer. A fifty (50) foot buffer, as shown on Exhibit A, shall be provided adjacent to the following GPINs: 825-647-6893, 826-648-0120, and 825-648-2130. Construction of a stub road to the eastern property boundary shall be permitted within this buffer. (P) Proffered Conditions The property owners and applicant in this rezoning case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County (the “Zoning Ordinance”), for themselves and their successors or assigns, proffer that the property under consideration (the “Property”) will be developed according to the following proffers if, and only if, the rezoning request submitted herewith is granted with only those conditions agreed to by the owners and applicant. In the event this request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by the owners and applicant, the proffer shall immediately be null and void and of no further force or effect. 11/13/2024 Page 30 of 48 These Proffered Conditions include two (2) Exhibits attached hereto: Exhibit A: Exhibit, Enon Corner, prepared by Townes Site Engineering, dated September 25, 2024. (“Conceptual Plan”). Exhibit B: Townhome Elevations dated May 20, 2024. 1. Master Plan. The Textual Statement dated September 26, 2024, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P) 2. Conceptual Plan. The Property shall be developed in general conformance with the Conceptual Plan. The Conceptual Plan is conceptual in nature and may vary based on the final site plan depending on the final soil studies, RPA lines, road and alley design, lot locations, lot line locations, amenity locations, building locations, building footprints, parking area design and location, BMP design and location, access locations, VDOT requirements, pedestrian way design and location, other engineering reasons, and requirements to obtain permits and approvals from county departments and state departments and agencies. Any substantive changes that do not relate to the prior sentence shall be approved by the Planning Commission at the time of plans review. In the event of any conflict between information shown on the Conceptual Plan and these Proffered Conditions, these Proffered Conditions shall control. (P) 3. Density. Residential density shall be limited to a maximum of 199 townhome dwellings. (P) 4. Utilities. a. Public water and wastewater shall be used. b. Any wastewater improvements identified with the sanitary sewer hydraulic analysis submitted to support the proposed development shall be reflected on the site plan and all associated costs of those improvements shall be the responsibility of the owner/developer; unless otherwise approved at the time of plans review or approval. This analysis shall be updated to reflect final density. (U) 5. Amenities. The improvements listed below shall be provided, unless otherwise approved at the time of plans review and approval. These amenities shall be available for use by all residents. The common areas may also be improved with one or more of the following: dog park, outdoor game area, benches, or other amenity improvements. a. One or more covered pavilions, with a minimum aggregate square footage of 300 11/13/2024 Page 31 of 48 square feet of covered roof area. One of the covered pavilions will be provided with a landscaped patio area for grilling, seating and with a firepit. b. A minimum of two (2) pickleball courts. c. A playground. d. A walking path around the stormwater basin. (P) 6. Pedestrian Paths in Common Area. In all Common Areas, pedestrian paths shall be hard surfaced, unless otherwise approved at the time of plans review. In Resource Protection Areas, pedestrian paths may be located in a meandering manner through the Resource Protection Areas in accordance with the Department of Environmental Quality’s Riparian Buffers Modification and Mitigation Guidance Manual, with the final location, design and material to be approved by the Director of Environmental Engineering at the time of plans review and approval. (P) 7. Eastern Boundary Fence. Where townhome lots are adjacent to the Property’s eastern property line shared with off-site parcels with an existing dwelling, a privacy fence approximately six feet (6’) tall shall be provided along the shared property line, unless a different location is approved at the times of plans review and approval. This privacy fence shall be constructed as a wood or vinyl board on board fence. Tree and shrub removal shall be permitted to facilitate the installation of the fence. The general location for this privacy fence shall be established by the plans submitted at plans review. No fencing will be required within Resource Protection Areas, Perennial Stream Protection Areas, floodplain, wetlands and right- of-way if not allowed by VDOT. This fence shall be installed in sections as lots are developed with installation occurring after completion of erosion and sediment control work and prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a particular lot. (P) 8. CBU Lighting. Full cut-off, photocell-activated, minimum 70 CRI-rated LED luminaires shall illuminate areas within 20 feet of the cluster mailbox units (CBUs) with a minimum maintained illumination level of 0.5 foot-candles, as measured at grade, but this requirement may be modified to meet VDOT requirements. (Police) 9. Access. a. There shall be no direct vehicular access to/from East Hundred Road (Route 10). b. Direct vehicular access from the Property to North Enon Church Road shall be limited to 11/13/2024 Page 32 of 48 one (1) access with the exact location approved by the Transportation Department. c. The Owner/Developer may elect to construct direct vehicular access to Burgess Road in the event the North Enon Church Road access is limited to right-in/right-out access. d. The Owner/Developer may also elect to construct the entrance onto Burgess Road as an emergency access (gated). (T) 10. Dedication. In conjunction with recordation of the initial subdivision plat, prior to any final site plan approval, or within sixty (60) days after a written request by the County, whichever occurs first, the following shall be dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield County measured from the centerline of that part of the road immediately adjacent to the Property: a. Forty-five (45) feet of right-of-way along the east side of North Enon Church Road; b. One hundred (100) feet of right-of-way along the north side of East Hundred Road (Route 10); and, c. Thirty (30) feet of right-of-way along the west side of Burgess Road. (T) 11. Future Dedication. Only after the adjacent properties to the east (2040 Burgess Road, GPIN 825-647-4856 and 2050 Burgess Road GPIN 825-647- 6893) are rezoned to permit construction of a townhome or single family detached subdivision and thereafter the County sends a written request to the then owner, the then owner shall, within sixty (60) days after a written request, shall dedicate, free and unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield County the extension of the right of way from its eastern terminus at the hammerhead intersection, as generally shown on the Conceptual Plan (Exhibit A), through the buffer area to the eastern property line. This proffer shall not limit the placement of a fence through the area to be dedicated in the future. (T) 12. Transportation Improvements. The following road improvements shall be completed by the Owner/Developer of the Property as specified below. Any modification to the design and lengths specified below shall be approved by the Transportation Department in accordance with VDOT approvals. If any of the road improvements identified below are provided by others, as determined by the Transportation Department, then the specific road improvement shall no longer be required. a. Construction of additional pavement and/or 11/13/2024 Page 33 of 48 pavement striping modifications along North Enon Church Road to provide left and right turn lanes at the approved access only if warranted per VDOT requirements. A left turn lane already exists. This improvement shall be completed in conjunction with the North Enon Church vehicular access. b. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free and unrestricted, of any additional right-of- way (or easements) located on the Property and required for the improvement identified above. (T) 13. Internal Road Standards. a. The internal roads shall have a minimum width of thirty-two feet (32’) from face-of- curb to face-of-curb. b. Sidewalks shall be provided on both sides of internal streets, unless otherwise required by VDOT. Unless otherwise approved by the Director of Planning at time of plans review, sidewalks shall be located within dedicated right-of-way. (T) 14. Road Cash Proffer. a. The Applicant, sub-divider or assignee(s) (“Developer”) shall pay $5,922 for each dwelling unit (the “Road Cash Proffer Payment”) to the County for road improvements within the service district for the Property. b. Each payment shall be made prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a dwelling unit built as part of the development. Should the County impose impact fees at any time during the life of the Development that are applicable to the Property, the amount paid in cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward, but not in addition to, any impact fees, in a manner determined by the County. c. The Developer may elect to pay the Road Cash Proffer Payment or provide the Off-Site Road Improvement Option below. If the Off-Site Road Improvement Option is provided, then the Road Cash Proffer Payment will no longer be required of the Developer. The Off-Site Road Improvement Option determination shall be made by the Developer prior to any construction plan approval for residential development. i. Off-Site Road Improvement Option: In conjunction with initial development, the following road improvements shall be completed, as determined by the Transportation Department in accordance with VDOT approvals. The exact 11/13/2024 Page 34 of 48 alignment, design and length of these road improvements shall be approved by the Transportation Department. 1. Overlaying the full width of Burgess Road with one and a half (1.5) inch surface course asphalt, with any other modifications approved by the Transportation Department, for a length determined by the amount of length the Road Cash Proffer Payment value will pay for at the time this improvement is contracted for with a contractor. For clarity, the total value of the Road Cash Proffer Payment must be used to overlay as much of Burgess Road as that value will fund. As approved by the Transportation Department these improvements may be modified to minimize or eliminate impacts to environmentally sensitive areas, such as jurisdictional wetlands and streams. These improvement requirements will be modified at plans review if there is not enough existing right of way for the improvements. Applicant will not be responsible for any improvements along Burgess Road that involve environmentally sensitive areas including jurisdictional wetlands and streams. Applicant will not be responsible for any improvements to the existing culverts. d. At the option of the Developer and approved by the Transportation Department, the Road Cash Proffer payments may be reduced for the cost of road improvements, other than those improvements identified in the Transportation Improvements Proffered Condition, provided by the Developer, as determined by the Transportation Department. (Budget and T) 15. Architecture. a. Construction of townhome buildings shall be in general conformance with the architectural appearance shown on the illustrative elevations in Exhibit B or another architectural appearance approved by the Planning Director at the time of plans review. Subsequent to plans approval, the owner may also request approval of another architectural appearance by the Planning Director. The illustrative elevations are conceptual in nature and may vary in detail at the time of plans review. For example, 11/13/2024 Page 35 of 48 the location of materials, types of material, use of stoops, use of covered porches, and other architectural detailing may change from building to building. b. No more than three (3) 16’ wide townhome units shall be allowed in a townhome building. No townhome building shall contain all 16’ wide townhome units. One or more 16’ wide units may be mixed with other unit width types in a townhome building as a means of achieving the variation required in Proffer 16 below. (P) 16. Variation in Unit Front Elevations. Townhouse units within the same building with the same front elevation may not be attached to each other. Variation in the front elevation may not be achieved by simply mirroring the façade, but may be accomplished by providing at least three (3) of the following architectural changes: a. Adding masonry elements above the masonry required in proffer 16 below. b. Changing the location of roof type, roof line, front facing gable(s) and/or dormers. c. Changing the style of roof type, roof line, front facing gable(s) and/or dormers. d. Providing varied siding application using horizontal siding, shake siding or board and batten siding. e. Providing varied color application. f. Adding or removing a porch. g. Adding or removing a covered stoop. h. Adding projections such as bay/box windows, second floor balconies, or accent roofs. i. Changing the unit width. j. Adding a third (3rd) enhanced feature to a garage door. k. Any other element of architectural variation as approved by the Director of Planning. In addition, this variation obligation may be achieved on a building by building basis only if approved by the Director of Planning at the time of plans review and approval. If the Planning Director does not approve, then the owner may submit the proposed building by building variation to the Planning Commission for approval and satisfaction of this variation obligation. (P) 17. High Visibility Side Elevations. The Conceptual Plan identifies certain townhome building side elevations that are required to have a high visibility side elevation. A high visibility side elevation shall employ design features to embellish the side facade. The design features employed shall include at least two of the following design elements: two different siding styles, gables, dormers, shutters, windows and other architectural features used on the front elevation or the use of enhanced landscaping to 11/13/2024 Page 36 of 48 reinforce the streetscape and minimize the view of the side of the units with shade trees, fences, hedges, shrubs, or other acceptable landscape feature to help define the side yard and street edge. (P) 18. Minimum Size. Townhome dwellings shall have a minimum finished floor area of 1,200 square feet. (P) 19. Lead Walks. A lead walk a minimum of a three (3) feet in width, and constructed with hardscaped materials (i.e. brushed concrete, stamped concrete, or pavers), shall be provided to the front entrance of each townhome dwelling unit, to connect to alleys, sidewalks or streets. For clarity, these lead walks shall be provided to the front door for any townhome dwelling fronting on common area. (P) 20. Pedestrian Lighting in the Townhome Area. For all dwelling units with front load garages, a post light will be placed in the front yard or a carriage light shall be placed on the dwelling near the garage. (P) 21. Exterior Facades and Roofs. a. Roof materials shall be 30 year (minimum) architectural/dimensional asphalt composition shingle or standing seam metal. Material used on flat roofs shall have a minimum 30-year warranty. b. Acceptable siding materials include brick, stone, masonry, fiber cement siding (such as HardiePlank, HardieShingle, and HardieTrim), engineered wood siding (such as LP SmartSide), or high-grade vinyl (a minimum of .044” nominal thickness as evidenced by manufacturer’s printed literature). Dutch lap, plywood, and metal siding are not permitted. Other materials may be used for parapets, cornices, surrounds, trim, architectural decorations, and design elements. (P) 22. Driveways. All private driveways shall be “hardscaped” (brushed concrete, stamped concrete, asphalt or pavers). Double-wide driveways may serve single-loaded garages. If a driveway connects to a sidewalk located outside of the public right of way, then the length of the driveway shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20’) as measured from the back of such sidewalk and the face of a front-loaded garage door. (P) 23. Foundation Treatment. All exposed portions of the foundation, with the exception of the rear elevation on a rear loaded townhome dwelling unit, shall be faced with brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer or cast stone measured to a minimum of twelve (12”) inches above grade. Any 11/13/2024 Page 37 of 48 exposed piers supporting front porches shall be wrapped with brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer or cast stone. (P) 24. Foundation Plantings. Foundation planting beds shall be required along the entire façade of townhome buildings which face a road, excluding stoops, walkways, and garages, and shall contain a minimum of fifty (50) percent evergreen material and have one shrub per four linear feet of building frontage within a minimum planting bed depth of four feet (4’), unless modified at the time of plans review. (P) 25. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Units and Generators. HVAC units and generators installed as fixtures shall be screened initially from view of roads by landscaping or low maintenance material, as approved by the Planning Department. If an HVAC unit and/or generator is located between two driveways that access an Alley, the HVAC unit and/or generator need only be screened on the side that faces the Alley that provides access to the driveways. (P) 26. Direct Vent Fireplace. Direct vent gas fireplace boxes, which protrude beyond the exterior face of the townhome dwelling unit, are not permitted on front façades. All the exterior materials and finishes used to enclose the fireplace box must match the adjacent façade. (P) 27. Garage Door. Any front-loaded garage door shall use an upgraded garage door. An upgraded garage door is any door that meets one of the following two (2) requirements: a. A minimum of two (2) enhanced features are provided on the garage door. Enhanced features shall include windows, raised panels, decorative panels, arches, ornamental hardware or other architectural features on the exterior that enhance the entry (i.e. decorative lintels, shed roof overhangs arches, columns, keystones, eyebrows, etc.) b. The garage door provides an enhanced architectural style that relates to the architecture of the dwelling the garage serves. Enhanced architectural style shall mean the use of color, panels and/or windows to reflect an architectural style such as contemporary, modern, modern farmhouse, mediterranean, colonial, and tudor. The architectural style may be evidenced by manufacturer printed material. (P) Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 6. 24SN1124 - Clover Hill - Craver Setback Reduction 11/13/2024 Page 38 of 48 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Craver Setback Reduction is a request for a conditional use planned development to permit exceptions to ordinance requirements and amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R-7) District on 1.05 acres known as 2324 Pocoshock Boulevard. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Suburban Residential II use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax ID 762-696- 5950. Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1124. She stated the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval, subject to the conditions in the staff report. Mr. Holland called for public comment. Mr. Jerry Turner expressed concerns relative to contractors subdividing small lots in older neighborhoods There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board approved Case 24SN1124subject to the following conditions: Conditions 1. Front Yard Setback. The minimum front yard setback for the existing dwelling on Lot one (1) shall be no less than three (3) feet. The setback shall be measured from the internal edge of the buffer, as shown on Exhibit A. (P) 2. Buffer. A thirty five (35) foot buffer with 0.5 times Perimeter Landscape C shall be provided along the Pocoshock Boulevard frontage for Lot one (1). Buffer on Lot two (2) shall be planted according to Zoning Ordinance standards. (P) Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 7. 24SN1130 - Dale - Iron Bridge Heating and Air In Dale Magisterial District, Iron Bridge Heating and Air is a request for conditional use to permit a contractor’s office plus conditional use planned development to permit exceptions to ordinance requirements and amendment of zoning district map in an Agricultural (A) District on 1.28 acres known as 5512 Iron Bridge Road. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Neighborhood Business and Neighborhood Office uses. Tax ID 776-685-1845. Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1130. She stated the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval, subject to the conditions in the staff report. Mr. Holland called for public comment. There being no one to speak to the issue, the public 11/13/2024 Page 39 of 48 hearing was closed. On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board approved Case 24SN1130 subject to the following conditions: Conditions 1. Non-Transferable Ownership. This conditional use shall be limited to Iron Bridge Heating and Air or any business entity for which Anthony DePhillip is a controlling member for their use only and shall not be transferable nor run with the land. (P) 2. Outside Storage. There shall be no outside storage. (P) 3. Deliveries. There shall be no deliveries by any vehicle exceeding 4,000 pounds net weight and more than two (2) axels. (P) 4. Hours of Operation. This use shall not be open to the public or employees between the house of 5:00 PM and 7:00 AM Monday through Friday, nor between 5:00 PM on Friday and 7:00 AM on Monday. This condition would not preclude individual employees from performing office work, such as paperwork and phone calls during other hours. (P) 5. Lighting. Except for security lighting, there shall be no exterior lighting. (P) 6. Improvements. With the exception of normal maintenance and improvements necessary to meet the building code there shall be no additions or exterior alterations to the structure or detached garage to accommodate this use, as shown on the Exhibit titled, “Exhibit A” dated July 28th, 2014. (P) 7. Surface Treatment. Driveways and parking areas shall have a minimum surface of six (6) inches of Number 21 or 21A stone. The perimeter of driveways and parking areas shall be delineated by permanent means such as bumper blocks, railroad ties, timbers or similar such treatment as required by the Planning Department. (P) 8. Right of Way Dedication. Within ninety (90) days of a written request by the Transportation Department, sixty (60) feet of right of way, measured from the centerline of Iron Bridge Road adjacent to the property, shall be dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield County. (T) 9. Access. Direct access from the property to Iron Bridge Road shall be limited to one (1) entrance/exit. The exact location of this access shall be approved by the Transportation Department. (T) 10. Solid Waste Storage. A solid waste storage area shall be permitted on the property as follows: a. The area shall be screened from view by a solid 11/13/2024 Page 40 of 48 vinyl fence. b. The area shall be located to the rear of the existing detached garage/storage building located along the southern portion of the property line (as shown in Exhibit A). c. The area shall not be serviced between the hours of 8:00 PM and 7:00 AM. Such area shall be prominently posted with a sign not to exceed six (6) square feet designating the hours in which the solid waste storage area may be serviced. (P) 11. Signage. One (1) freestanding sign shall be permitted subject to a maximum of twenty four (24) square feet in area and a maximum of eight (8) feet in height. The sign shall be a monument-styled sign. (P) Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 8. 24SN1195 - Midlothian - Home Away from Home Care Services In Midlothian Magisterial District, Home Away from Home Care Services is a request for conditional use to permit group care facility and amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R-7) District on 0.21 acre known as 6539 North Stevens Hollow Drive. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Medium-High Density Residential use (Minimum of 4 to 8 dwellings per acre). Tax ID 768- 693-1987. Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1195. She stated the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval, subject to the conditions in the staff report. Mr. Holland called for public comment. There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board approved Case 24SN1195, subject to the following conditions: Conditions 1. Non-Transferable Ownership. This conditional use approval shall be granted to and for Debra Wright, exclusively, and shall not be transferable nor run with the land. (P) 2. Group Care Facility Residents. This conditional use approval shall be limited to providing group care services to a maximum of four (4) adolescent youths, ages 13 to 17, who reside on the premises. (P) 3. Occupancy. The applicant, Debra Wright, must occupy the property as her full time residence while the group care facility is in operation. (P) 4. Expansion of Use. There shall be no exterior additions or alterations to the existing structure to 11/13/2024 Page 41 of 48 accommodate this use, except alternations to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), building code requirements, or regulatory requirements pertaining to the operation of a group care facility and the four (4) residents receiving group care in the dwelling. (P) 5. Signage. There shall be no signs permitted to identify this use. (P) 6. Time Limitation. This conditional use approval shall be granted for a period not to exceed three (3) years from date of approval. (P) 7. Employees. No more than four (4) employees shall be permitted to work on the premises at any given time. Except for on-site training required by the Virginia Department of Social Services, staff meetings shall not take place on the premises. (P) Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 9. 24SN1200 - Bermuda - Henshaw Greyledge Boulevard 2 Lot Subdivision In Bermuda Magisterial District, Henshaw Greyledge Boulevard 2 Lot Subdivision is a request to rezone from Residential (R-12) and Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12) and amendment of zoning district map known as 706 Greyledge Boulevard. The 2.09 acre property is proposed for a maximum development of 2 dwelling units. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Suburban Residential II use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax ID 816-647-2846. Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1200. She stated the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval, subject to the conditions in the staff report. Mr. Holland called for public comment. There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board approved Case 24SN1200 subject to the following conditions: Proffered Conditions 1. Utilities. The public water and wastewater systems shall be used. (U) 2. Road Cash Proffer. There shall be no road cash proffer required for the initial dwelling lot. For each subsequent dwelling lot, the owner/developer shall pay $9,400 to the County of Chesterfield for road improvements within the service district to the Property. Payment shall be made prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a dwelling unit unless state law modifies the timing of the payment. (T) 11/13/2024 Page 42 of 48 3. Number of Lots. The number of lots permitted on the Property shall be limited to two (2). (P) Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 10. 24SN1229 - Midlothian - Andrennas Parlor Tattoo Shop In Midlothian Magisterial District, Andrennas Parlor Tattoo Shop is a request for conditional use to permit a tattoo shop and amendment of zoning district map in a Community Business (C-3) District on 0.51 acre known as 911 North Courthouse Road. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Community Business use. Tax ID 740-708-8536. Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1229. She stated the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval, subject to the conditions in the staff report. Mr. Holland called for public comment. There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board approved Case 24SN1229, subject to the following conditions: Conditions 1. This conditional use shall be limited to Andrennas Parlor Tattoo Shop or any business entity for which Robert Biggs is a controlling member for their use only and shall not be transferable nor run with the land. (P) 2. The tattoo shop shall be conducted in compliance with all laws regulating such use. (P) Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. 18. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters There were no requests to address the Board at this time. 19. Adjournment A. Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Supervisors On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the Board adjourned at 7:45 p.m. to the Police Chief Swearing-In Ceremony on November 19, 2024, at 5 p.m. at the Beulah Recreation Center, to then adjourn to the County/Schools Joint Legislative Meeting on December 3, 2024, at 8:30 a.m. at the Beulah Recreation Center, to then adjourn to the regularly scheduled Board of Supervisors meeting on December 18, 11/13/2024 Page 43 of 48 2024, at 2 p.m. in Room 502 of the County Administration Building. Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll. Nays: None. __________________________ ___________________________ Joseph P. Casey James M. Holland County Administrator Chairman 11/13/2024 Page 44 of 48 Citizen Comments Received Through the Comment Portal November 13, 2024 Board of Supervisors Meeting Comment Type Comment Name District 24SN1209 - Magnolia Green Tract CC Amendment - Matoaca While I support lifting restrictions on retail/office space square footage, I don’t support waiving the requirement for 50% of retail/office space to be under construction before residential uses are permitted. I also don’t support elimination of the requirement for an “integrated schematic plan” for the entire project. This developer has a track record of not delivering promised amenities. The developer marketed the neighborhood as a resort- style neighborhood complete with a residents’ club and fitness center coming in 2021. In late 2020, they quietly removed the clubhouse from the amenities list – not because they couldn’t afford it, but because they weren’t required to build it – houses were selling without it and they had record sales in 2020. If you allow the developer to build apartments without additional retail/office space in an area that was billed as “The Marketplace at Magnolia Green,” the marketplace will consist of apartments and a daycare center, that’s it. Not much of a marketplace. The developer wants to build a 224-unit apartment complex in an area totaling about 12.4 acres. This would exceed current zoning restrictions of 14 units per acre, which would allow a maximum of 173 units for that one parcel. They’re relying on the total acreage for ALL parcels to stay within density limits for ONE parcel, but they want to remove the requirement to submit an integrated plan for ALL parcels. Richard Latham Matoaca 11/13/2024 Page 45 of 48 Comment Type Comment Name District You can’t have it both ways; you can’t include all parcels to stay within residential density limits on one parcel while ignoring how the remaining parcels might eventually be developed. Also, allowing the parcels to be developed in a piecemeal fashion will lead to a disjointed end product; think Westchester Commons – part strip mall, part town center, not very walkable, dysfunctional vehicular traffic flows, and looks ridiculous! Removing the requirement for an integrated plan increases the potential for housing density limits to be exceeded. The existing daycare center was planned, approved and expanded without an integrated plan and in violation of current zoning restrictions regarding retail/office square footage, and nobody caught it. Please do not allow (1) residential uses on ANY parcel without requiring construction of additional retail/office space, or (2) individual parcels to be developed without an integrated plan for ALL parcels. 24SN1209 - Magnolia Green Tract CC Amendment - Matoaca Issues: 1) inaccurate justification for the building of apartments on Parcel 7. 2) too many dwelling units per zoning on Parcel 7. 3) the use of multiple site plans vice one integrated site plan for the CC district. 4) inadequate amenities for the apartments to be built on Parcel 7. 5) lack of communication with residents of Magnolia Green regarding design changes of the CC district and impact to Magnolia Green amenities by Robert Altland Matoaca 11/13/2024 Page 46 of 48 Comment Type Comment Name District the residential dwelling units. The land is broken into five parcels; Parcel 1 where the Cardinal is located, Parcels 4, 5, a new Parcel 7 that are currently vacant and Parcel 6 where the Magnolia Green Academy is located. The CC was identified in the original Magnolia Green development plan to have a “town square” design with pedestrian walkways. The CC was to have a singular site plan that could have created an integrated set of businesses, residences, open space and pedestrian walkways in a “village” type of development. Now there will be a site plan for each Parcel approved at different times resulting in a disjointed strip mall style development. The original zoning restricted business to 5,000 square feet maximum, Chesterfield County approved the Magnolia Green Academy, a 12,000 square foot building. The Magnolia Green Academy on Parcel 6 is not included in the rezoning amendment. There is no business/retail development on Parcel 7. It appears that a Parcel 7 was carved out of Parcel 6. The developer has a site plan to build 224 apartments as "Magnolia Green Apartments" on 12.36 acres. This would result in 18.1 dwelling units per acre. This is more dwelling units than allowed by current zoning that restricts the parcels to 14 dwelling units per acre. It is unknown where the developer will build the other 140 dwelling units (apartments or rental townhomes) in this CC district. 11/13/2024 Page 47 of 48 Comment Type Comment Name District For comparison purposes, the 248 Glenmoor Apartments are on 20.4 acres so 12.1 dwelling units (apartments) per acre. The amenities for the Magnolia Apartments on Parcel 7 appear to have a pool and clubhouse. The type/number of amenities are insufficient for this development. Only property owners within 1,500 feet of this impacted rezoning are notified although this rezoning impacts the entire Magnolia Green community. This rezoning amendment is not ready for approval, it should be denied and sent back to the planning staff to correct the deficiencies identified. 24SN1209 - Magnolia Green Tract CC Amendment - Matoaca Rezoning Case 24SN1209 - Magnolia Green Tract CC Amendment I have two main issues with this case and I urge you to vote against it. First the process was not transparent. This change to the zoning impacts all the residents of Magnolia Green directly and none received notice of this case. . Myself and many others who purchased homes in Magnolia Green were told this space was to be developed as mastered planned community center. Something that is non-existent in the Moseley area and would be a significant asset to the community. The fact that there was no community notice should be more than enough to vote against this case and send it back to the Planning Commission. My second concern is for all the citizens in the Moseley area that surrounds this land. The Magnolia Green development was approved years ago after much debate Wayne Carbiener Matoaca 11/13/2024 Page 48 of 48 Comment Type Comment Name District and resistance from landowners in Moseley. To their credit the leaders at the time at least recognized some of the impacts of such a large development and included provisions to address them. A CDA was created to address road impacts by assessing property owners in the community for improvements to Woolridge Road and a portion of Otterdale. To address the lack of any true community center in the Moseley area the approved plan also included a community center (a town square as it was described to many) that would be a mix of commercial, residential and open space. Something closer to a true village rather than a strip mall masquerading as a village. If the Chesterfield County BOS approves this case we will have just one more multifamily/townhouse project, behind a big box store, with parking lot in front and fast food joints and gas stations fronting Hull Street. We already have Cosby Village, Hancock Village and who knows how many other "villages" all the way to the City of Richmond and Chesterfield does not need another. The Planning Commission has already approved abandoning the original plan and agreed to divide the parcel into 7 different parcels all with their own plan rather than a single unified plan. Please do not accept their recommendation and vote against approval of this case. Thank you.