Loading...
11-14-2007 Packet . i. I ' n '.!~fj) CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA Meeting Date: November 14, 2007 Item Number: 2. Subiect: County Administrator'S Comments County Administrator's Comments: Board Action Reauested: w u County Administrator: The Chesterfield Senior Volunteer Hall of Fame Committee has requested to recognize the 2007 induction of Mrs. Blanche Castelow, Dr. Betty Clapp, and Mrs. Shirley Hudson. Summary of Information: Mrs. Castelow was nominated by Sherry Peterson, Chief Executive Officer for the Alzheimer's Association-Greater Richmond Chapter. Mrs. Castelowanswers the Helpline one day a week in the office and also takes phone calls from caregivers at home. She facilitates two support groups and substitutes at others when needed. She represents the Alzheimer's association at community events and health fairs. She served as a Chapter Board member from 1999 to 2002 and was chair of the Public Policy Committee and attended the national Public Policy Forum each year during this period. After leaving the Board, she remained a member of the committee and continues to attend Advocate Day at the General Assembly. She is an active participant in the Chapter's annual Memory Walk and serves as a member of the Speaker's Bureau. Preparer: Debbie leidheiser Title: Chesterfield Senior Advocate Attachments: . Yes DNO 000001 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Mrs. Castelow is extremely dedicated to the senior population of Chesterfield County and beyond. She is particularly passionate about helping those with Alzheimer's, their families and caregivers. She shares her own experiences openly in order to help others. Mrs. Castelow keeps up with advancements in disease research and treatments. She is always willing to go the extra mile to help the Alzheimer's Association and those they serve. Her other volunteer activities include the Lucy Corr Village Auxiliary, The Senior Volunteer Hall of Fame Committee, and Stephen's Ministry. Dr. Clapp was nominated by the Honorable Arthur Warren. Dr. Clapp could have quietly disappeared in the background of retirement 22 years ago. Instead she became involved in one of our communities greatest assets- Swift Creek Reservoir. This is a significant source for drinking water. Her involvement will ensure that the reservoir will remain safe and useable as a resource for years to come. Her other community volunteer activities include Hands Across Lake Citizens, Brandermill Community Association, the 360 Corridor Committee, Chesterfield County Health Center Commission and the Lucy Corr Village Foundation Arts Committee. Mrs. Hudson was nominated by Dona Link, Co-Treasurer for the Chesterfield- Colonial Heights Christmas Mother, Inc. Mrs. Hudson serves as the Co- Treasurer and Vice-Chairman of the Board of the Chesterfield Colonial Heights Christmas Mother. Her duties include paying bills, filing reports with State Consumer Affairs, Better Business Bureau, receiving donations and writing thank you notes, etc. Mrs. Hudson's volunteer activities for the Christmas Mother program helps to provide Christmas gifts of toys, food and clothing to approximately 5,500 needy individuals in more than 1,600 families in our area. She works behind the scenes and at the Christmas Center to foster the mission of the Christmas Mother Uthat no child be without gifts, no elderly person be forgotten, and no family in our area be without food on Christmas." Her other volunteer activities include Docent for the Chesterfield Historical Society and Treasurer and program chairman for the Providence Retired Club. 000002 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: November 14, 2007 Item Number: 2.8. Subiect: County Administrator's Comments County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action ReQuested: Staff and a representative from Wildlife Services will brief the Board regarding the black vulture situation at Dutch Gap Conservation Area. Summary of Information: Dutch Gap Conservation Area is experiencing problems with the substantial numbers of vultures at the site. More than 400 black vultures have been documented there. The vultures are causing significant safety hazards and property damage. They are roosting in forests and on Dominion Power buildings and transmission towers on the north and south sides of the James River. They are also causing property damage to citizen's cars, boats, as well as the boat ramp and boat-landing grounds. The County and Dominion Virginia Power are working cooperatively with the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, the Center for Conservation Biology at the College of William and Mary, and Wildlife Services on a strategy to disperse the birds long-term. Preparer: Rebecca 1. Dickson Title: Deputv County Administrator Attachments: . Yes DNO 1# CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Staff is also hosting a stakeholders meeting within the next week to include wildlife Services, Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, representatives from the Humane Society, Dominion Virginia Power and others to discuss long-term, non-lethal options for managing the vultures. The attached press release went out on Friday, November 9th. '\ Che8tetfield County, Virgitrla Department of Public Mfairs 9901 Lori Road, Room 500 - P.O. Box 40 - Chesterfield, VA 23832 Phone: (804) 748-1161- Fax: (804) 748-7609 - Internet: chesterfield.gov DON J. KAPPEL Director November 9,2007 F or immediate release RESEARCHERS TO TAG, STUDY VULTURES AT DUTCH GAP CONSERVATION AREA CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA-The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Wildlife Services Program is leading vulture-management activities at the Dutch Gap Conservation Area. About 100 birds are being trapped for the purposes of tagging them and studying their movements. Officials will also conduct a 14-day effort to harass the birds from the site. The tagging will enable experts to monitor the vultures in an effort to determine why the birds are roosting and loafing at Dutch Gap. Through the years, the vultures have caused significant property damage and safety hazards at the Dutch Gap public boat landing and on nearby Dominion Virginia Power facilities. The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, the Center for Conservation Biology at the College of William and Mary, Chesterfield County and Dominion Virginia Power are working cooperatively with Wildlife Services on a strategy to disperse the birds long-term. For the past seven years, Wildlife Services has used diverse methods to control the birds, including habitat modification and harassment, as well as trapping and euthanizing. Although the birds left for up to 24 months, they have returned to the Dutch Gap area. More than 400 black vultures have been documented at the site, roosting in , fon~sts and on Dominion faciliti@s on both sid@s of th@ Jam@& River. They are again causing property damage at the boat ramp and the parking area. As part of the research, the birds are being baited into a large funnel trap situated on Dominion property adjacent to the Dutch Gap boat ramp. One hundred vultures will be marked with individually numbered orange wing tags and released. Personnel from the cooperating agencies will then monitor the movements of the tagged birds through surveys and public reports of marked birds. Within a few weeks of releasing the tagged vultures, Wildlife Services will use noise and light devices during evenings and early mornings to harass the vultures from the site. The harassment effort is expected to last up to 14 days, after which the vultures hopefully will discontinue roosting and gathering at the sites. Vultures have been documented at Dutch Gap damaging cars by scratching paint, pulling off windshield wipers and tearing car covers. They also have left fecal matter and vomit on vehicles, boat trailers and the boat-landing grounds. The vultures create safety hazards by roosting and loafing on power-station facilities. Wildlife Services encourages citizens who see the tagged vultures to report them via e-mail to: dgifweb@dgif.virginia.gov. If possible, report the date, time of day, location, activity of the bird and the tag number. ### Note to reporters: Any media interested in observing the trap-and-tag process next week should call Chesterfield County Public Affairs Officer Julie Buchanan at (804) 717-6802. .-=- ~ - -. 9 ~~; CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 5.A. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Midlothian Youth Soccer League's Thirtieth Anniversary County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: g1 Board Action Reauested: Mrs. Humphrey requests that the Board of Supervisors adopt this resolution recognizing the contributions of the Midlothian Youth Soccer League over the past 30 years as a valuable resource for the county, and for providing opportunities for youth recreation in an atmosphere of sportsmanship and respect. Summary of Information: This resolution will recognize Midlothian Youth Soccer League's 30th anniversary. Mr. Jon Addison, Executive Director, and members of the Board of Directors will be present to receive the resolution. Preparer: Donald J. Kappel Title: Director, Public Affairs Attachments: . Yes DNO #000003 RECOGNIZING THE MIDLOTHIAN YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE ON ITS THIRTIETH ANNIVERSARY WHEREAS, in 2007, the Midlothian Youth Soccer League observes its 30-year anniversary; and WHEREAS I for three decades, the Midlothian Youth Soccer League has provided Chesterfield County youths with outstanding recreational opportunities; and WHEREAS, the league has emphasized teamwork and giving all team members an opportunity to play; and WHEREAS, participants have learned not only teamwork, but also respect for one another and for officials and opponents; and WHEREAS, these young athletes also have had excellent opportunities to achieve and maintain physical fitness; and WHEREAS, the Midlothian Youth Soccer League has grown to more than 1,600 players; and WHEREAS, the league is led by a volunteer Board of Directors and many of its field operations are performed by other, equally dedicated volunteers; and WHEREAS, the Midlothian Youth Soccer League is a strong and well- respected asset for Chesterfield County families; and WHEREAS, all Chesterfield County residents benefit from the recreational opportunities and citizenship training provided to the 1,600 young people who participate in the Midlothian Youth Soccer League. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 14th day of November 2007, on behalf of the citizens of Chesterfield County, extends its best wishes to the Midlothian Youth Soccer League 1 thanks its adul t leaders for their commitment to our county's youths 1 and wishes the Midlothian Youth Soccer League continued success. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to the Midlothian Youth Soccer League and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. 000004 8~, '- >-~~r) CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14, 2007 Item Number: 5.8. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Mr. Peter Zaino for His Achievements in the 2007 Special Olympics World Summer Games County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: (}1 o Board Action Reauested: Mr. Sowder requests that the Board of Supervisors adopt this resolution recognizing Mr. Peter Zaino for his achievements in the 2007 Special Olympics World Summer Games. Summary of Information: This resolution will recognize Special Olympics athlete Mr. Peter Zaino for his achievements in earning two gold medals and a 4th-place ribbon at the 2007 Special Olympics World Summer Games in Shanghai, Chinal reflecting great credit on himself, his county and his nation. Preparer: Donald J. Kappel Title: Director. Public Affairs Attachments: . Yes DNo # 000005 RECOGNIZING MR. PETER ZAINO ON HIS OUTSTANDING REPRESENTATION OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AT THE SPECIAL OLYMPICS WORLD SUMMER GAMES WHEREAS, Mr. Peter Zaino is a resident of the Midlothian District of Chesterfield County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, Mr . Zaino joined wi th more than 400 other a thletes to represent Team USA in the 2007 Special Olympics World Summer Games in Shanghai, China; and WHEREAS, Mr. Zaino was one of eight Virginia athletes competing; and WHEREAS, all eight Virginia athletes earned a medal this year, astounding even their staunchest supporters; and WHEREAS/ Mr. Zaino and the other athletes performed in front of more than 80,000 spectators in Shanghai/ and for a global television audience; and WHEREAS/ Mr. Zaino/s training and hard work in preparing for the Special Olympics paid off, as he earned two gold medals; and WHEREAS, the first gold medal was for the 25-meter butterfly swimming event; and WHEREAS, the second was for the 4 by 50-meter relay; and WHEREAS, Mr. Zaino also earned a 4th-place ribbon in the 50-meter freestyle event; and WHEREAS, Mr. Zaino's achievements in the 2007 Special Olympics World Summer Games in Shanghai, China brought credi t to himself / to the United States of America, and to Chesterfield County, Virginia. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 14th day of NQvember 2007 / on behalf of the citizens of Chesterfield County, extends its congratulations to Mr. Peter Zaino for his outstanding athletic achievements, commitment and dedication, and thanks him for his performance in Shanghai, China, which reflected well on him, his community and his nation. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be presented to Mr. Zaino and that it be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. 000006 S:\ I I! :~rJ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: s.c. Subiect: Recognition of Lieutenant Peter C. Svoboda Upon His Retirement on December 1, 2007, After Serving the County for Twenty-Five Years with Dedicated Service County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Q1 u Board Action Reauested: Adoption of resolution Summary of Information: Presentation of resolution Preparer: Paul W. Mauaer Title: Fire Chief Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000007 RECOGNIZING LIEUTENANT PETER C. SVOBODA UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Lieutenant Peter C. Svoboda will retire from the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Chesterfield County, on December 1, 2007; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Svoboda attended Recruit School #13 in 1982 and has faithfully served the county for 25 years in various assignments, as a firefighter at the Wagstaff and Bensley Fire and EMS Stations; and as a lieutenant at the Dale, Matoaca, Airport, Clover Hill and Courthouse Road Fire and EMS Stations; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Svoboda was selected for the key position of Coordinator for Recruit School #18 in 1987; served faithfully as an integral member and leader of the HAZMAT Team; and spearheaded the creation of the Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department's Mediation Team; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Svoboda was recognized in October wi th an Emergency Medical Services Life Save award for his saving the life of a man found in cardiac arrest; and of 1989 role in WHEREAS, Lieutenant Svoboda was recognized in October of 1995 with an Emergency Medical Services Unit Citation for his role in the extrication and rescue of a citizen trapped in a wrecked vehicle; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Svoboda served as the President of Local 2803, Chesterfield Professional Firefighters Association for 15 years, advocating for career firefighters and facilitating positive relations between the workforce and administration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 14th day of November 2007, publicly recognizes the contributions of Lieutenant Peter C. Svoboda, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations upon his retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Lieutenant Svoboda, and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. 000008 .-- I. Ii:: ~ :- ~"," . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of3 Meeting Date: November 14, 2007 Item Number: 8.A. Subject: Approval of Agreements and Financial Designations to Purchase the Ground Lease at Cloverleaf Mall County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: fJ!J Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to take four actions to authorize the purchase of the remaining ground lease at Cloverleaf Mall: 1. Approve and ratify the attached Purchase and Sale Agreement for the purchase of Millmar Partnership, L.P.'s interest in the approximately 43-acre Cloverleaf Mall parcel. 2. Authorize the County Administrator to send Millmar Partnership, L.P. notice of a January 29, 2008 closing date under the Purchase and Sale Agreement. 3. Approve and authorize the County Administrator to execute an assignment of the County's interest in the Purchase and Sale Agreement to the Economic Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield. 4 . Approve a $7.25 million increase in the note between the Economic Development Authority and Wachovia Bank and amend the Support Agreement to reflect this increase. Summary of Information: In 2004, the Economic Development Authority purchased the Cloverleaf Mall buildings together with adjoining parcels of land, including the former "Sears" parcel. Financing for these purchases was provided through a line of credit loan of up to $10,000,000 to the EDA which was backed by a Support Agreement under which the County is obligated, subject to annual appropriations, to make the loan payments. Preparer: Steven L. Micas Title: County Attornev 2723(00):76958.1 Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000009 / CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of3 The land under the mall buildings is owned by Millmar Partnership, L.P. and rented to the EDA pursuant to a ground lease. The current purchase agreement is for the EDA to purchase Millmar's interest, thereby terminating the ground lease and its rental payment and allowing the EDA to hold all of the ownership interests in Cloverleaf Mall. If the Board approves the purchase of the ground lease, the pending lawsuit with Millmar contesting the manner of valuing the leasehold will be dismissed. The monthly rental payment under the ground lease, which will increase in June 2008, is expected to approximate the monthly interest payment on the $7.25 million increase in the note; accordingly, the current appropriation for ground lease payments will be sufficient for making the increased interest payments through the end of FY2008. The EDA anticipates retiring the note from proceeds from the sale of the property to Crosland. In January 2007, the County and the EDA entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Crosland Investments, LLC pursuant to which Crosland will purchase Cloverleaf Mall from the EDA and redevelop it into a mixed use project with commercial, office and residential uses. The completion of the purchase by Crosland is subject to several contingencies, including rezoning of the property, agreement on economic development incentives and the acquisition of Millmar's interest. 00001.0 S1!~~C>i' &' ~i ~~,L~~ i: ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Budaet and Manaaement Comments: The Economic Development Authority (EDA) has financed the acquisition of Cloverleaf Mall through a variable rate line of credit in an amount not to exceed $10 million. The EDA has drawn down $9.225 million on this note. Interest rates are tied to the LIBOR market rate index and reset daily. The maturity date for the existing line of credit is October 2008. The county, through a support agreement with the EDA, has agreed to provide the EDA with funds sufficient to make payments on the line of credit, subject to appropriation. The EDA intends to repay the loan from proceeds from the sale of the mall property to Crosland. This item requests the Board's approval for the EDA to increase the line of credit used to finance the acquisition of the mall by $7.25 million to acquire interest in the ground lease and thus gain complete control of the mall property. Other terms of the existing line of credit are proposed to remain unchanged. Furthermore, the item requests that the Board amend the support agreement for the county to make payments to the EDA to provide funds sufficient to make payments on the increased line of credit. The monthly rental payment for the existing ground lease can be substituted for and is estimated to approximate the cost of interest to borrow an additional $7.25 million. A comparison of the existing monthly ground lease payments and interest expense on an additional $7.25 million is shown below. Ground Lease Interest on $7.25M Current $28,300 $34,740 (at 5.75%) Future $37,000 beginning June 2008 $36,250 (estimated at 6.0%) Based on the above and the recommended January closing date, the cost of the lease is estimated to approximate the increased interest cost on $7.25 million. Sufficient appropriations exist for making the increased interest payments through the end of the fiscal year. Pre parer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budqet and Manaqement 000011 REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AG~EMENT (this "AgreementT1) is made as of October -' 2007 by MILL MAR P ARTNERSIDP, L.P., a Virginia limited partnership ("Sel1erll), and THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision and body politic of the Commonwealth of Virginia ("Purchaser"). RECIT ALS Seller owns certain real property located in the southwest quadrant of the interchange of Midlothian Turnpike and Chippenham Parkway, in the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, which is more particularly described in the Lease which is described below (the "Land"). The Seller's interest in the Land is subject to the GroWld Lease Agreement, dated January 18, 1966, between John H. Marks and Elizabeth R. Marks, predecessors in title to the Seller, as Lessors, and Leonard L. Farber Company, Inc., predecessor in title to The Economic Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield, a political subdivision and body politic of the Commonwealth of Virginia created by and affiliated with Purchaser (the "EDA"), as Lessee (which lease as subsequently amended and modified is the "Lease"). The Land has been improved with retail shopping space, related parking, landscaping and other amenities and improvements and operated as the Cloverleaf Mall. The EDA's interest in the Lease and its ownership of property adjacent to the Land was fmanced through a loan transaction in which debt service payments are contingent upon annual appropriations being made by the Purchaser in amounts sufficient to make such payments. In addition, the Purchaser and the EDA are parties to a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Crosland ~ .-. 00001.2 Investments, LLC (the "Redevelopment Agreement") which contemplates that the EDA will acquire the Seller's interest in the Land. To satisfy the terms of the Redevelopment Agreement, the Purchaser intends to transfer and assign its interest in this Agreement to the EOA and to provide support to the BOA for the financial obligations necessary to complete the purchase transaction hereunder.. The EDA exercised its right to exercise the option to purchase the Land from Seller pursuant to Section 44.02 of the Lease. The Seller exercised its right under Section 44.02 of the Lease to determine the purchase price of the Land pursuant to the appraisal process contained in Article 37 of the Lease. Certain disputes arose between Seller and the EDA concerning the interest in the Land to be valued by the appraisal process (the "Disputes"). Seller filed a Complaint on May 30, 2007 (the "Declaratory Judgment Action") in the Circuit Court of the City ofRichmon~ Virginia (Case No.. CL07002704-00) seeking resolution of the Disputes. By Order ent~ed by the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia, dated August 8, 2007, the Declaratory Judgment Action was transferred to the Circuit Court of the County of Chesterfield~ Virginia. Thereafter; the EDA, Purchaser and Seller engaged in discussions attempting to resolve the Disputes and as a result of such discussions Seller has agreed to sell the Land to Purchaser and Purchaser has agreed to purchase the Land from Seller on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Purchaser intends to transfer and assign its interest in this Agreement to the EDA with the Purchaser providing support to the EDA for the financial obligations necessary to complete the purchase transaction hereunder. ~~ 2 00001.3 AGREEMENT In consideration ofTen Dollars ($10.00) cash in hand paid by Purchaser to Seller, and the mutual covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledge<L Purchaser agrees to purchase the Land from Seller and Seller agrees to sell the Land to Purchaser on the following terms and conditions: 1. PURCHASE PRICE. The purchase price for the Land is Seven Million Two Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($7,250,000.00) which, as adjusted pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, is the "Purchase Price" and shall be payable by wired Federal funds to Seller's exchange intermediary at Closing (as hereinafter defined). The Purchase Price is "in gross" and not by the acre. 2. CONDITIONED UPON BOARD APPROVAL. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the obligations of Purchaser and Seller hereunder are expressly subject to and conditioned upon the following actions being taken by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the "Board of Supervisors"), on or before November 15, 2007 (the "Ratification Date"), time being of the essence: (a) approval and ratification oftms Agreement, (b) assignment of its rights and interests in this Agreement to the ED~ (c) approval of or appropriation of financing for the EDA in an amount sufficient and in a manner legally sufficient to enable the EDA to pay the Purchase Price and other amounts payable hereunder. The obligations of Purchaser and Seller hereunder are also expressly subject to and conditioned upon (d) the EDA's approval and ratification of this Agreement and acceptance of the assignment from the Purchaser by the Ratification Date, time being of the essence. If the actions stated in (a), (b) (c) and (d) do not occur by the Ratification Date, either Seller or Purchaser may terminate ;,..; 3 0000:14 this Agreement by written notice to the other and neither party shall thereafter have any rights or obligations under this Agreement. 3. CLOSING TIME AND PLACE. Provided all conditions in Paragraph 5 of this Agreement have been satisfied, closing of the transactions contemplated under the Agreement (the "Closing") shall occur on or before June 30, 2008, on a date which is a business day (meaning the day which is not a weekend, Federal, state or local holiday and Federally insured financial institutions are open for business) selected by Purchaser pursuant to a written notice given by the Purchaser after timely ratification and approval of this Agreement and timely authorization and approval (and appropriation, if applicable) of Purchaser's financing as provided above and delivered to Seller not less than one hundred twenty (120) days in advance of the date of Closing. Closing shall be held at the office of the County Attorney of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, 9901 Lori Road, Suite 503, Chesterfield, Virginia 23832; provided, however, if Purchaser delivers written notice of the date of Closing in the month of November, 2007, the Closing may be scheduled for a date as early as seventy five (75) days after the date such notice is delivered. 4. SELLER'S RIGHT TO EXTEND THE DATE OF CLOSING. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 3 to the contrary, the Seller shall have the right to extend the date of Closing by written notice delivered to the Purchaser at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled date of Closing for a period of up to ninety (90) days, even if such extension delays the date of Closing to after June 30, 2008; provided, however, if the Closing is scheduled by Purchaser to occur in the month of February, 2008, Seller shall have the right to .extend the date of Closing for up to one hundred thirty five (135) days, even if such extension delays the date of Closing to after June 30, 2008. 4 0000:15 5. CLOSING. (a) Conveyances and Deliveries at Closing. Seller shall convey the Land to Purchaser at Closing by special warranty deed. Seller shall provide the usual affidavit as to mechanics' liens and possession required by the title insurance company and evidence of authority to consummate this transaction. Seller shall execute and deliver at Closing a certification as to nOD- foreign s~tus form, a form sufficient for the closing agent to prepare an IRS Form 1099-8, and a Virginia Department of Taxation Form R-5 or R-5E, as applicable. (b) Possession. Subject to the Lease and the rights of the Lessee under the Lease, and any subtenants, Seller shall deliver the right of possession of the Land to Purchaser at Closing. All risk ofl088 shall be retained by Seller until Closing. (c) Prorations. The Lease is a net lease and all real estate taxes, all utilities, operating expenses and other expenses associated with the Land are payable by the Lessee under the Lease and so shall not be prorated. Rent payable under the Lease, except as otherwise specifically provided hereunder, shall be prorated at settlement. If the date of Closing determined by the Purchaser is after (or if Closing is delayed by the Purchaser beyond) the date set in the Lease for the adjustment of rent, then rent under the Lease shall be adjusted as provided under the Lease, except the fair market value of the Land upon which the adjustment of rent under the Lease is based shall be based upon the value of $7,400,000.00, in lieu of the determination process specified in Article 37 of the Lease. (d) Payment of Closing Costs. The parties shall avail themselves of any applicable exemptions from recording tax on the Deed. If the Deed is not exempt from recordation tax, Seller shall pay at Closing the cost of the grantor's tax on the Deed. Seller shall also pay for the cost of preparation of the Deed and other conveyancing instruments, the cost of 5 0000"1.6 releasing any liens and security interests of record which have been created or caused by Seller and its own legal fees. Purchaser shall pay at Closing, to the extent the Deed is not exempt from recording tax, all recording taxes and fees imposed on recordation of the Deed (except for the grantor's tax), and shall pay all survey costs, title insurance premiums and search fees and other charges related to Purchaser's due diligence and legal fees. Unless othelVlise specified in this Agreement, each party shall pay its own expenses, including attorneys' fees in connection with this transaction. 6. PURCHASE PRICE ADWSTMENT AND EFFECT OF SELLER EXTENSION. Beginning on February 16, 2008, the Purchase Price shall be adjusted and increased to an amount equal to $7,250,000.00, plus an amount equal to interest accruing on a principal amount equal to $7,250,000.00 at an annual rate of six percent (6%), from February 16, 2008 until the date of Closing as selected by Purchaser or such later date upon which Closing actually occurs as a result of any delays caused by Purchaser. The Purchase Price shall not be increased for any period beyond the date scheduled for Closing by Purchaser as a result of the exercise by Seller of its right to extend the date of Closing as provided above. If Seller extends the date of Closing as provided above, Purchaser shall continue to pay rent as and when it becomes due at the rate provided in the Lease (prorated for any partial month) through and until the date of Closing. However, if Seller elects to extend the date of Closing as provided above, Purchaser may elect, on the date originally scheduled by Purchaser as the date of Closing, to deposit the full amount of the Purchase Price, as adjusted, in an escrow account acceptable to the Seller and in a manner which shall assure the Seller that all proceeds in such escrow account shall be eligible for a Section 1 031 tax deferred exchange and which are appropriate for investment by a public authority, with the effective date of Closing for Section 1031 pwposes being the actual date of 6 00001.7 closing following the expiration of Seller's extension period. The Purchase Price deposited in such escrow shall be invested in a manner acceptable to Seller and shall inure to and become part of the Purchase Price and in such event Purchaser shall not be responsible for or liable to pay rent during the pendency ofSeller~s extension period. 7. NOTICES. All notices called for hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been received upon the earlier of (i) the date when actually received, whether by hand delivery, telefax, United States mail or nationally recognized overnight delivery service, or ~:: (ii) the fourth day after deposit with the United States mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or (iii) the first business day after deposit with a nationally recognized overnight delivery service (Federal Express and United Parcel Service, for example), charges prepaid for next day delivery, addressed as follows: If to Seller: Millmar Partnership, L.P. 909 Hockett Road Manakin-Sabot, Virginia 23103 Attn.: Mr. John C. Miller with a copy to: Hirschler Fleischer 2100 East Cary Street Richmond, Virginia 23223 Attn.: Michael H. Terry and John R. Walk If to Purchaser: Chesterfield County Planning Department 9800 Government Center Parkway, Suite 203 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Attn.: Thomas E.. Jacobson, Director of Revitalization and Chairman, Economic Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield c/o Chesterfield County Department of Economic Development P. O. Box 760 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 7 000018 with a copy to: Hunton & Williams LLP 951 East Byrd Street Richmond, Virginia 23219-4974 Attn..: John D. O'Neill, Jr.. with a copy to: Chesterfield County Attorney's Office 9901 Lori Road, Suite 503 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Attn.: Steven L. Micas, COWlty Attorney and Tara A4 McGee, Assistant County Attorney or to such other address as the party to receive such notice may hereafter request by written notice to the other. 8. BROKERS. Seller and Purchaser each represents to the other that it has dealt with no real estate agent or broker in connection with this Agreement. If either party to this Agreement is legally obliged to pay the fees or commissions of a third party real estate agent or consultant, such fees or commissions shall be paid by such obligated party at Closing or as soon thereafter as such obligation is determined.. 9. LIKE KIND EXCHANGE. Purchaser agrees that Seller may assign its interest in the Land under this Agreement to a qualified intermediary designated by Seller for the purpose of effecting an exchange for like-kind property under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Likewise, Seller agrees that Purchaser may assign this Agreement to a qualified intermediary designated by Purchaser for the purpose of effecting an exchange for like- kind property under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Purchaser and Seller shall each cooperate with the other in consummating the exchanges contemplated by this paragraph; provided, however, that neither party shall incur any expense or liability whatsoever in cOIlllection with any exchange by the other party other than would have been 8 00001.9 incurred by such party in a direct purchase as if there had been no exchange. Except as expressly provided herein, there shall be no delay in Closing as a result of any exchange. Neither party shall assume any liability, responsibility or obligation to the other, the Internal Revenue Service or any other person, firm or governmental body or agency in the event all or a portion of the other party's exchange is not tax free. Purchaser and Seller each agree to cooperate with the other's like kind exchange and, subject to their reasonable approval, to execute any necessary documentation, including without limitation, an Exchange and Escrow Agreement, as is necessary to effect the like kind exchange. All costs and expense associated with the like kind exchange shall be borne solely by the party involved in the exchange. 10. CASUALTY AND CONDEMNATION. (a) Casualty. If any loss or damage occurs prior to Closing as a result of fire, wind, storm or other casualty, Purchaser shall be entitled to receive an assignment of insurance proceeds, if any, payable to Seller with respect to such loss or damage to the Land and shall proceed to Closing with no a reduction in the Purchase Price on account thereof (b) Condemnation. It: prior to the Closing, any taking pursuant to the power of eminent domain is proposed or occurs, as to all or any portion. of the Lan~ or a sale occurs in lieu thereof, the Purchaser shall proceed to the Closing, in which event, all proceeds, awards and other payments arising from any such taking or sale shall be paid to the Purchaser, with no adjustment of the Purchase Price paid at Closing being made on account thereof If condemnation proceedings are instituted by the County to acquire title to the Land, it is hereby stipulated by the County and Seller that this Agreement may be introduced in such proceedings as conclusive evidence of the value of the Land taken if offered by the Seller in such proceedings. 9. 00002:0 11. PROVISIONS EFFECTIVE UPON ASSIGNMENT TO EDA. Effective upon assignment of this Agreement to the EDA as evidenced by acceptance of such assignment, the . EDA shall be deemed to covenant and agree: (a) The EDA hereby waives and releases its rights and options to purchase the Land under the Lease, whether lUlder the purchase option contained in Section 44.01 of the Lease or the right of first refusal option under Section 12.01 of the Lease, and agrees that the Purchaser's rights under this Agreement shall be the sole and exclusive source of rights of the Purchaser and/o;r the EDA to purchase the Land from the Seller. (b) Effective immediately upon Closing, the Lease shall merge into the fee simple title and shall be of no further force or effect. 12. MISCELLANEOUS. (a) Entire Aereement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and may not be modified or changed except by written instrument executed by both Seller and Purchaser. All prior negotiations, understandings and agreements are superseded and are merged herein. (b) Successors and Assigns. All provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their successors and assigns. Except as provided herein, this Agreement may not be assigned by Purchaser without the written consent of the Seller. Purchaser shall have the right, without the consent of Seller being required to assign its rights under this Agreement to the EDA; provided, however, the Seller shall not by reason of such assignment be released from its obligations hereunder, and no such assignment shall be effective until such time as the conditions precedent in Paragraph 3 of this Agreement have been satisfied in full.. 10 000021. (c) Gender. All pronouns shall be construed to be of such gender and nwnber as the context may require.. (d) Headings. All headings are for convenience or reference only and do not constitute a part of this Agreement or affect its meaning. (e) Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. (t) Rights and Remedies. Seller and Purchaser each reserve all rights, remedies and powers of enforcement to which they may be entitled under applicable law, and in equity as to this Agreement and all matters arising under this Agreement, including the right of specific performance. (g) Time is of the Essence. Time is strictly of the essence of this Agreement and all dates and time periods contained herein. (h) Dismissal ofDeclaratorv Judgment Action. Upon execution of this Agreement, the parties agree that all legal proceedings concerning the Dispute shall be suspended pending action by the Board of Supervisors and the Purchaser as provided in Paragraph 2. Upon approval and ratification of this Agreement by the Board of Supervisors, the parties will jointly submit an Order dismissing the case without prejudice to the right of either party to recommence the case if the transaction contemplated by this Agreement does not close. Signatures to appear on following pa.ge. ,. ~~~ 11 000022 WITNESS the following duly authorized signatures. SELLER: MILLMAR LINlITED PAR TNERSlllP, L.P., a Virginia limited partnership By: Millmar Corporation, a Virginia corporation Its General Partner By: ~C~~ Pr Ident PURCHASER: THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision and body politic of the Commonwealth of Virginia :~ . ~c~ ounty Attorney #1436728 vI 3 019851.01781 12 000023 S-~ I _. >> fj!<L.- '" CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.B. Subiect: Nomination of Appointment to the Towing Advisory Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Q1 o Board Action Requested: Nominate/Appoint member to serve on the Towing Advisory Board Summary of Information: The members of the Towing Advisory Board serve at the pleasure of the Board and have no set term limits. In accordance with the Code of Virginia ~46.2- 1217 adopted as County Ordinance, 1997, the Towing Advisory Board shall include representatives of local law enforcement, towing and recovery operators, and the general public. Colonel Dupuis has recommended that the Board nominate and appoint Lieutenant Clinton C. Schott to replace Captain David Pritchard on the Towing Advisory Board. Lt. Schott meets all eligibility requirements to fill the vacancy and has indicated his willingness to serve. Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedures are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. Preparer: Thierrv G. Dupuis Title: Chief of Police Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000024 . f1i..f!Q"~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: s.c. Subiect: Streetlight Installation Cost Approvals County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: \~ I ;' L// Board Action Reauested: This item requests Board approval of new streetlight installations in the Bermuda District. Summary of Information: Streetlight requests from individual citizens or civic groups are received in the Department of Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power for each request received. When the quotations are received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Staff provides the Board with an evaluation of each request based on the following criteria: 1. Streetlights should be located at intersections; CONTINUED NEXT PAGE Preparer: Richard M. McElfish Title: Director I Environmental Enoineerinq Attachments: II Yes ONO # 000025 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 Summary of Information: (Continuedl 2. There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per day (VPD) passing the requested location if it is an intersectionl or 400 VPD if the requested location is not an intersection; 3. Petitions are required and should include 75% of residents within 200 feet of the requested location and if at an intersection, a majority of those residents immediately adjacent to the intersection. Cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60 days. The Board, upon presentation of the cost quotation may approve, deferl or deny the expenditure of funds from available District Improvement Funds for the streetlight installation. If the expenditure is approved, staff authorizes Dominion Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial of a project will result in its cancellation and the District Improvement Fund will be charged the design cost shown; staff will notify the requestor of the denial. Projects cannot be deferred for more than 30 days due to quotation expiration. Quotation expiration has the same effect as a denial. BERMUDA DISTRICT: . In the Rayon Park subdivision, on Senate Street, in the vicinity of 7600 Cost to install streetlight: $507.77 (Design Cost: $110.92) Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection or vehicles per day . In the Normandale Terrace subdivision, at the intersection of Arcadia Avenue and Arcadia Court. Cost to install streetlight: $507.77 (Design Cost: $110.92) Does not meet minimum criterion for vehicles per day Continued Next Page 000026 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Summary of Information: (Continued\ BERMUDA DISTRICT (Continued): . In the Chester East subdivision, on Gill Street, in the vicinity of 3635 Cost to install streetlight: $163.70 (Design Cost: $110.92) Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection or vehicles per day . In the Chester East subdivision, on Gill Streetl in the vicinity of 3701 Cost to install streetlight: $163.70 (Design Cost: $110.92) Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection or vehicles per day For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. 000027 STREETLIGHT REQUEST Bermuda District Request Received: June 30, 2004 Estimate Requested: June 30, 2004 Estimate Received: November 1, 2007 Days Estimate Outstanding: 1219 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Mrs. Shirley J. Joyner ADDRESS: 7600 Senate Street Richmond, VA 23237 REQUESTED LOCATION: Senate Street, vicinity of 7600, on the existing pole Cost to install streetlight: $507.77 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Not Qualified, location is not an intersection Vehicles Per Day: Not Qualified, less than 600 VPD Petition: Qualified Requestor Comments: Staff notes that this request is a residuaJ from the 2005 Rayon Park lighting project for which Dominion did not originally provide an estimate. 000028 Streetlight Request Map November 14, 2007 -n o .&.5 T~ v.:E '( Po. \IE --\ \'fI ~ C. ~ ~ o a:: u.. + 0'0 po.. \IE. L\8\NO + po, \I E. p:,{ c\J fJr o C!I CJ! o 0::: LU S 2 0 ST s~Q '(;.S CO~Gf(.:. Y-- ~O ~ -5- \ ~O tP..-\ This map is a copyrighted product of the Chesterfield County GIS Office. N Streetlight Legend + existing light iii requested light This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department. 550 275 o 550 Feet 000029 STREETLIGHT REQUEST Bermuda District Request Received: September 25, 2005 Estimate Requested: September 25, 2005 Estimate Received: October 18, 2007 Days Estimate Outstanding: 753 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Ms. Estelle G. Dillard ADDRESS: 2211 Arcadia Avenue Chester, VA 23831 REQUESTED LOCATION: Arcadia Avenue and Arcadia Court, on the exiting pole Cost to install streetlight: $507.77 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Qualified Vehicles Per Day: Not Qualified, less than 400 VPD Petition: Qualified Requestor Comments: None 000030 Streetlight Request Map November 14, 2007 ...q~ 040 q Or ~ . t 0~ ~0 & ~ ./ ~ ~ t J ~ ~Q ~ I... "r P ~~ ~~ Qj ~ Iq Q~ ~A 8T This map is a copyrighted product of the Chesterfield County GIS Office. N Streetlight Legend + existing light e requested light This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department. 280 140 o 280 Feet 000031. STREETLIGHT REQUEST Bermuda District Request Received: August 31, 2007 Estimate Requested: August 31, 2007 Estimate Received: November 1, 2007 Days Estimate Outstanding: 62 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Ms. Mildred P. Daffron ADDRESS: 3636 Gill Street Chester, VA 23831 REQUESTED LOCATION: Gill Street, vicinity of 3635, on the exiting pole Cost to install streetlight: $163.70 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Qualified Vehicles Per Day: Not Qualified, less than 400 VPD Petition: Qualified Requestor Comments: "Lack of streetlights causes entire area to be very dark. Unpleasant for residents and a problem for emergency vehicles, if needed. "In reference to 3635 Gill Street: The long time owner/resident was deceased as of July 2007. His house is now vacant and more than likely will remain so for the foreseeable future, thus a safety and security concern." 000032 STREETLIGHT REQUEST Bermuda District Request Received: August 31, 2007 Estimate Requested: August 31, 2007 Estimate Received: November 1, 2007 Days Estimate Outstanding: 62 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Mrs. Mildred P. Daffron ADDRESS: 3636 Gill Street Chester, VA 23831 REQUESTED LOCATION: Gill Street, vicinity of 3701, on the exiting pole Cost to install streetlight: $163.70 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Qualified Vehicles Per Day: Not Qualified, less than 400 VPD Petition: Qualified Requestor Comments: "Lack of streetlights causes entire area to be very dark. Unpleasant for residents and a problem for emergency vehicles, if needed." 000033 Streetlight Request Map November 14, 2007 4.,""1 )-~ ~~ "A1J- ()~ / / e// / // /e / y/ This map is a copyrighted product of the Chesterfield County GIS Office. N Streetlight Legend + existing light e requested light 200 100 o c;- v &' / / // / // // // This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existi ng streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department. 200 Feet 000034 ~~ ~,; . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 4 Meeting Date: November 14, 2007 Item Number: 8.0.1. Subject: Transfer of Additional Funds, Authorization to Acquire Right-of-Way, and Award a Construction Contract for the Chesterwood Drive Sidewalk Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: )\ (/- Board Action Reauested: The Board is requested to take the following actions for the Chesterwood Drive Sidewalk Project: 1) transfer $280,000 in unallocated prior year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to the project; 2) approve the general location and design; 3) authorize staff to acquire right-of-way for the project, including advertising of an eminent domain public hearing if necessary 4) authorize the County Administrator to enter into any documents necessary to complete a conveyance to the county; and 5) authorize the award of a construction contract, up to $370,000, to the lowest responsible bidder. Summary of Information: The Chesterwood Drive Sidewalk Project is Phase I of a longer project to build sidewalk between Meadowdale Library and Meadowbrook High School (Attachment A). The Meadowbrook Area Community Council requested this sidewalk. Phase I entails the construction of approximately 1000 feet of sidewalk beginning at the Meadowdale Library and extending to Cogbill Road. The project includes curb and gutter. The sidewalk is five feet wide, with a three-foot utility space between it and the curb (Attachment B) . (Continued on next page) Preparer: R.J. McCracken agen672 Title: Director of Transportation Attachments: . Yes DNa # 000035 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 4 Summary of Information: (continued) Currently, $315,000 has been appropriated for a project estimated to cost $595,000. Staff is recommending reallocating $280,000 in unused eDGB funds to this project. (Attachment C) . As plans were being developed, staff met with individual property owners impacted by the project and explained the proposed design. Five properties will be directly impacted by the project construction. No families will be relocated. Four of the five property owners support the project. However, there will be a significant impact to one of the properties due to the proposed sidewalk and adjustments to overhead utility easements. A fence and a mature hedge of tall evergreens must be removed from the existing right-of- way to build the project. The owners of this property do not support the project design due to impacts along with concerns about existing drainage problems in the area. Design alternatives were considered to reduce the project impacts, however, disturbing the evergreens could not be avoided in any case. Shifting the sidewalk to the opposite side of Chesterwood Drive was considered; however, this was deemed impractical, as this would require pedestrians to cross the road to get to their destinations. This project will eliminate the roadside ditch and replace it with storm and curb and gutter. This will result in minor improvements to drainage, but this project will not solve the significant drainage issues in the area outside of the project limits. This project can be built within existing right-of-way, however, temporary construction and permanent utility easements are required. Staff will attempt to negotiate a settlement for all of the easement acquisition. If settlements cannot be reached, staff requests authorization to advertise a public hearing for eminent domain proceedings. Staff is also requesting authorization to advertise and award a construction contract, up to $370,000 to the lowest responsible bidder. Upon the Board's approval of the location and design, right-of-way acquisition will begin immediately. Utilities are expected to be relocated in the winter of 2007-2008. Construction is expected to begin in the spring of 2008. 000036 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 4 Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board: 1) Transfer $280,000 in unallocated prior year CDBG funds to the project. 2) Approve the general location and design of the project. 3) Authorize staff to acquire right-of-way for the project, including advertising of an eminent domain public hearing if necessary. 4) Authorize the County Administrator to enter into any documents necessary to complete a conveyance to the county. 5) Authorize the County Administrator to award a construction contract, up to $370,000 to the lowest responsible bidder. District: Dale 000037 Il-~.:~: r:LI'~~ I' ~ -. -- -r);' - ..." ~ :=J -- :l ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 4 of 4 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Budaet and Manaaement Comments: The Chesterwood Drive Sidewalk Project is estimated to cost $595,000. $315,000 In CDGB funds have already been designated for this project and staff recommends reallocating existing CDBG funds to finance the additional $280, 000. This $280,000 comes from two cancelled proj ects, the Ettrick Business Center Expansion and the Lead Based Paint Program, and a contingency fund. The Ettrick Business and Neighborhood Foundation sold the building that was to be expanded to the small businesses that occupied the building. The new owners do not plan to expand the building. The lead based paint program was set up to remediate lead in housing projects funded with CDBG funds. To date, no lead remediation has been needed, and if lead problems arise in the future, other funds are available for this use. Should the Board transfer the $280,000, funding will be available to advertise and award a construction contract up to $370,000. Without the transfer, there is not enough funding in the project to award this contract. Chesterwood Drive Sidewalk Project Previously designated CDBG Funds Ettrick Business Center Expansion Lead Based Paint Program CDBG Contingency Funds Total CDBG Funds CDBG Funding Sources $315,000 $77,800 $120,000 $82,200 $595,000 Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budaet and ManaQement 000038 Chesterwood Drive Sidewalk Project I i I r IIlII 000 OterfOf wnh SIJ-95A I Part rf 2X- STD. CG-6 zx! I FlrJsfrJd.Jrode_ ==:. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1":;;;---- 1------ ------_J ---~" 510.164(1) 102J<<J I I EXIST. PNE. ~ ~ IY fltmfhJ -----l Nor. "'2Z to -44'} x 3:/ Cut/Fill Slope V{fo'I' --..fU ~ S'o. fJ1XJ to St~. {.4. 25 IU I-- 5.0' -+ JU -+2.5;~ I EXIST.R/W Nor.FlJ' - 8O'J TYPICAL SECTION ED. ~ t STIJ"ION 12'5232 TO STATION 2J.39.47 000040 I ATTACHMENT B I Chesterwood Drive Sidewalk Project (Meadowdale Library to Cogbill Road) $62,000 $30,000 $86,000 $307,000 $50 J 000 $60,000 $595,000 Allocation FY07 Budget Community Development Block Grant $215,000 FY08 Budget Community Development Block Grant $100,000 PROPOSED 11/14/2007 Community Development Block Grant $280,000 TOTAL $595,000 000041. I ATTACHMENT C I .~' ~ - - -f#"- 1 \1 - '" ~- ~~ ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.0.2.a. Subiect: Recognition of Firefighter McKinley Meade, Jr. Upon His Retirement on October 1, 2007, After Twenty-Three Years of Dedicated Service to the County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ()) {/ Board Action Reauested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing Firefighter McKinley Meade, Jr. for 23 years of service to the county. Preparer: Paul W. Mauaer Title: Fire Chief Attachments: . Yes DNa # 000042 RECOGNIZING FIREFIGHTER MCKINLEY MEADE,. JR. UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, . Firefighter McKinley Meade, Jr. and Emergency Medical Services Department, October 1, 2007; and retired from the Fire Chesterfield County, on WHEREAS, Firefighter Meade answered his country's call to duty in the service of the United States Air Force from 1972 through 1976, where he completed a tour of duty in combat in South East Asia; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Meade attended Recrui t School #15 and has faithfully served the county for 23 years in assignments as a firefighter at the Bon Air, Wagstaff, Enon, Hill, Manchester, and Buford Fire and EMS Stations; and in 1984 various Clover WHEREAS, Firefighter Meade was recognized compassion in non-emergency duties through appreciation; and for his care many letters and of WHEREAS, Firefighter Meade was ~ecognized as an effective team member at many emergency scenes, such as the traumatic injury scene on Chestnut Bluff Terrace in January 1997, and has served the county with honor, courage, and due diligence in the fulfillment of his duties; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Meade was recognized with Unit Citations for his role in March 1993 on the scene of a drowning at the Chester YMCAj in September 1993 on the accident scene on Ironbridge Road; in May 1995 on the fire ground at Old Buckingham Station; in October 2004 on the accident scene on Jefferson Davis Highway; and in February 2007 on the scene of a choking on South Providence Roadj and WHEREAS, Firefighter Meade was recognized with a Unit Citation for his essential role in the successful rescue of a family from their burning home on Elmart Lane in April 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Firefighter McKinley Meade I Jr., expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations upon his retirement. 000043 .-~ 1 ~ "~~ ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.D.2.b. Subiect: Recognition of Firefighter Roger A. Warden Upon His Retirement on November 1, 2007, After Twenty-Five Years of Dedicated Service to the County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ()J () Board Action Reauested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution recognlzlng Firefighter Roger A. Warden for 25 years of service to the county. Pre parer: Paul W. MauQer Title: Fire Chief Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000044 RECOGNIZING FIREFIGHTER ROGER A. WARDEN UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Firefighter Roger A. Warden retired from the Chesterfield County Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department on November 1, 2007j and WHEREAS, Firefighter Warden attended Recruit School #12 in 1982 and has faithfully served the county for 25 years in various assignments as both an engine and truck company firefighter at the Wagstaff, Manchester, Clover Hill, Midlothian, Dutch Gap, Matoaca, Bon Air and Buford Fire and EMS Stationsj and WHEREAS, Firefighter Warden was active as a Dive Team member, Tactical Medic Team member j Fire Service Instructor, and the first Firefighter Specialist for Chesterfield Fire and EMS; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Warden has helped train many firefighters and paramedics during his career, which will forever benefit Chesterfield Fire and EMSj and WHEREAS, Firefighter Warden was Career Firefighter of the Year for 1998, and recognized by the volunteer firefighters at Company 4 as The Bradley McNeer Firefighter of the Year in 2002j and WHEREAS, Firefighter Warden was awarded the department's Medal of Valor in 2004 and Firehouse Magazine's Valor Award for his actions in a water rescue during Tropical Storm Gastonj and WHEREAS, Firefighter Warden created and taught for the past 12 years an awareness program for new teen drivers called It I S Your Decision, which received a NACo award in 1998; and the program has been delivered to over 25,000 students, including high school students, military personnel, numerous civic groups and Parent-Teacher Associations; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Warden was recognized as an effective team member at many emergency scenes, including key tactical positions at numerous fires that resulted in the saving of lives and reduction of property loss. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Firefighter Roger Warden, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations upon his retirement. 000045 .1 .1iiJl j, !, ~ :: - _;., ,1,1 ~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14, 2007 Item Number: 8.D.2.c. Subject: Recognition of Firefighter Robert "Doug" Corrada Upon His Retirement on July 1, 2007, After Serving the County with Nearly Thirty Years of Dedicated Service County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Ql -- Board Action Reauested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution recognlz1ng Firefighter Robert "Doug" Corrada for nearly 30 years of services to the county. Pre parer: Paul W. Mauaer Title: Fire Chief Attachments: . Yes ONO # 000046 RECOGNIZING FIREFIGHTER ROBERT D. CORRADA UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Firefighter Robert "Doug" Corrada retired from the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department 1 Chesterfield County 1 on July 1, 2007; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Corrada faithfully served the department for nearly 30 years, as a firefighter at the Bon Airl Buford, Bensley, Wagstaff and Ettrick Fire and EMS Stations; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Corrada was recognized with a Unit Citation as a result of his outstanding actions on December 13, 19961 when his unit responded to an apartment fire while under extreme fire conditions, ground ladders were placed at the windows, and two children were rescued from the burning building; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Corrada was involved in a successful extrication of a victim involved in a severe motor vehicle accident on May 14, 1999; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Corrada displayed his dedication to the department by being the only volunteer to be assigned as a Chief's aide. NOW, THEREFORE 1 BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Firefighter Robert "Doug" Corrada, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations upon his retirement. 000047 '. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.D.2.d. Subject: Recognizing Ms. Deanna Ida Storm and Ms. Michelle Eleanor Harper Upon Attaining the Gold Award County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: jJ Board Action Reauested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff has received a request for the Board to adopt resolutions recognlzlng Ms. Deanna Ida Storm and Ms. Michelle Eleanor Harper, both of Troop 569, sponsored by Grace Lutheran Church, upon attaining the Gold Award. Preparer: Janice Blaklev Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000048 WHEREAS, the Girl Scouts of the United States organization serving over 2. 7 million girls and was citizenship training and personal development; and of America is an founded to promote WHEREAS, after earning three interest project patches, earning the Girl Scout Gold Leadership Award, the Girl Scout Gold Career Award, and the Girl Scout Gold 4Bs Challenge Award, and designing and implementing a Girl Scout Gold Award project; and WHEREAS, the Gold Award is the highest achievement award in Girl Scouting and symbolizes outstanding accomplishments in the areas of leadership, community service, career planning, and personal development; and WHEREAS, the Girl Scout Award can only be earned by girls aged 14-18 or in grades 9-12 and is received by less than six percent of those individuals entering the Girl Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, Ms. Deanna Ida Storm ~nd Ms. Michelle Eleanor Harper, both of Troop 569, sponsored by Grace Lutheran Church, have accomplished these high standards and have been honored with the Girl Scouts of America Gold Award by the Girl Scout Commonwealth Council of Virginia, Incorporated; and WHEREAS, growing through their experiences in Girl Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding themselves on the great accomplishments of their country, Deanna and Michelle are indeed members of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Ms. Deanna Ida Storm and Ms. Michelle Eleanor Harper, extends congratulations on their attainment of the Gold Award and acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such outstanding young women as its citizens. 000049 . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.0.2.e. Subject: Resolution Recognizing the Groundbreaking of a Youth Ministries Building at Mount Gilead Full Gospel International Ministries County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: (j) U Board Action Reauested: Mr. Warren requests that the Board of Supervisors adopt this resolution recognizing the groundbreaking of a new youth ministries building at Mt. Gilead Full Gospel International Ministries. Summary of Information: This resolution will recognize the phenomenal growth of this congregation from 25 members to more than 4,800 members over the past 11 years, and extends best wishes to the church for continued growth and success in its service to the residents of Chesterfield CountYr Virginia. Preparer: Donald J. KaDoel Title: Director~ Public Affairs Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000050 RECOGNIZING MOUNT GILEAD FULL GOSPEL INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES ON THE GROUNDBREAKING OF A YOUTH MINISTRIES BUILDING WHEREAS, Mount Gilead Full Gospel International Ministries has been under the leadership of Bishop Daniel Robertson, Jr. for 11 years; and WHEREAS, during that time, under the leadership of Bishop Robertson and his wife, co-pastor Elena Robertson, the church has grown from 25 members to more than 4,800 members; and WHEREAS, the church was founded at 7900 Walmsley Boulevard; and WHEREAS, as the congregation grew, the small church would not hold all the worshippers; and WHEREAS, other locations used by the church over the years have included Manchester High School, Bailey Bridge Middle School and Manchester Middle School; and WHEREAS, since August of 2004, Mount Gilead Full Gospel International Ministries has been located at 2501 Mount Gilead Boulevard; and WHEREAS, to serve its growing church community, Mount Gilead Full Gospel International Ministries is constructing a youth ministries building; and WHEREAS, this facility will serve both the church and the community-at- largej and WHEREAS, the groundbreaking for the new building will be held on Saturday, November 24, 2007 at 11 a.m.; and WHEREAS, this expansion will help to make Mount Gilead Full Gospel International Ministries even more effective in offering its many services and spiritual leadership to the residents of Chesterfield County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors, on behalf of the citizens of Chesterfield County, extends its congratulations to the Mount Gilead Full Gospel International Ministries on the occasion of its expansion, further congratulates Bishop Daniel Robertson, Jr. and co-pastor Elena Robertson on the noteworthy results they have had in building their congregation, and extends sincere best wishes to Mount Gilead Full Gospel International Ministries for continued success. 000051. .--- " II " "~IN~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.D.2.f. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Mr. Wesley B. Butterfield Upon His Retirement January 1, 2008 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: (]) (j Board Action ReQuested: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing Wesley B. Butterfield for 15 years of dedicated service to the Chesterfield County Information Systems Technology Department. Preparer: Barry Condrey Title: Director. 1ST Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000052 RECOGNIZING MR. WESLEY (BERT) BUTTERFIELD UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mr. Wesley (Bert) Butterfield will retire from the Chesterfield County Information Systems Technology Department on January 1, 2008 after providing 15 years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Mr. Butterfield has faithfully served the county in the capacity of production services shift supervisor and senior systems programmer for the Information Systems Technology Departmenti and WHEREAS, Mr. Butterfield has provided exceptional customer service in resolving system software problems and actively participated in researching, planning and the implementation of special projects; and WHEREAS, Mr. Butterfield served as an active member of the IST Quality Council and provided exceptional leadership on the Standards Review Board, Quality Assurance Committee, Chesterfield County Y2K Committee; and WHEREAS, Mr. Butterfield has developed secure mainframe system applications, coordinated system development wi th internal and external developers, updated Chesterfield County School's Automated Scheduling System, and assisted with the preparation of systems documentation and user manualsi and WHEREAS, Mr. Butterfield has demonstrated outstanding teamwork and a high standard of professionalism throughout his tenure at 1ST, and his ability to work in a team environment, promoting an atmosphere of support and assistance, has been essential to the organization's success; and WHEREAS, Mr. Butterfield's actions are a reflection of the unselfishness that his co-workers have come to recognize in him, and his cheerful character, diligence and enthusiasm, and selfless dedication to Chesterfield County are a model for all county employees; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Mr. Butterfield's dedicated service and adherence to high moral principles. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. Wesley (Bert) Butterfield, and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. 000053 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14, 2007 Item Number: 8.D.2.g. Subiect: Adopt a Resolution Requesting that the General Assembly of Virginia Take Action to Prevent Exploitive Payday Lending Practices County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reauested: The Board is requested to adopt the attached resolution to request that the General Assembly and Governor of Virginia take action to prevent exploitive payday lending practices. Summary of Information: Some payday lenders use lending practices which can exploit citizens who may have no other choices for loans. There is concern about the negative financial consequences to payday lender customers due to the exceptionally high interest rates that are charged by these lenders. The Board has been asked to adopt the attached resolution asking that the General Assembly and the Governor of Virginia take action at the next session of the General Assembly to enact an annual interest rate cap for any consumer loans made in the Commonwealth as well as additional consumer credit protections. While no payday lenders are currently located within Chesterfield County, there are several that are accessible to county residents since they are located just outside the county's borders. The City of Staunton has adopted a similar resolution regarding payday lending and has requested that this Board do the same. Mr. Miller has asked that this request be considered by the Board. Preparer: Steven L. Micas Title: County Attornev 2723(00):76841.2(76842.1 ) Attachments: . Yes DNO #000054 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia represents the citizens of the County of Chesterfield; and WHEREAS/ the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield senses from the citizens of the County of Chesterfield significant concern over what are perceived to be some exploitative payday lending practices in the County of Chesterfield and elsewhere in the Commonwealth/ including practices which may exploit dedicated, brave women and men who are called for deployment as part of the armed forces of our Nation both in the United States and various parts of the world in the cause of freedom and security of our Nation; and WHEREAS/ the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia shares these same significant concerns and wishes to express the collective sentiments of the People of the County of Chesterfield/ Virginia/ that the General Assembly and Governor of Virginia ought to take action to prevent further exploitative payday lending practices; and WHEREAS/ it is vital that the General Assembly and the Governor of Virginia give their earnest attention to these matters at the next regular session of the General Assembly and enact laws that will prevent further exploitative payday lending practices. NOW/ THEREFORE/ BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, that the General Assembly and the Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia are requested to take action in connection with the next regular session of the General Assembly of Virginia to enact laws that will prevent further exploitative payday lending practices, including but not limited to: 1. Enactment of an annual interest rate cap for any consumer loans made in the Commonwealth of Virginia; 2. Prohibition of the use of a personal check or other method by a creditor to gain access to a consumer's bank account or method to gain title to a consumer's motor vehicle as collateral for a payday loan; and 3. Enactment of supplementary and complementary provisions which mirror the provisions of what is commonly referred to as the Talent- Nelson Amendment (Senate Amendment 4331), entitled l1Terms Of Consumer Credi t Extended to Servicemember Or Servicemember J s Dependent nand referenced on page 86352 of the June 22, 2006 Congressional Record - Senate, a copy of which is annexed to and incorporated by reference in this Resolution. 000055 2723 :76842.1 AMENDMENT NO. 4331 (Purpose: To establish requirements with respect to the terms of consumer credit ex- tended by a creditor to a servicemember or the dependent of a servicemember, and for other purposes) At the appropriate place, insert the following: SEC. TERMS OF CONSUMER CREDIT EXTENDED TO SERVICEMEMBER OR SERVICEMEMBER'S DEPENDENT. (a) TERMS OF CONSUMER CREDIT.- Title II of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 V.S.C. App. 521 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section: "SEC. 208. TERMS OF CONSUMER CREDIT. "(a) INTEREST.-A creditor who extends consumer credit to a servicemember or a servicemember's dependent shall not require the servicemember or the servicemember's dependent to pay interest with respect to the extension of such credit, except as- "(1) agreed to under the terms of the credit agreement or promissory note; "(2) authorized by applicable State or Federal law; and "(3) not specifically prohibited by this section. "(b) ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE.-A creditor described in subsection (a) shall not impose an annual percentage rate greater than 36 percent with respect to the consumer credit extended to a servicemember or a servicemember's dependent. "(c) MANDATORY LOAN DISCLOSVRES.- "(1) INFORMATION REQUIRED.-With respect to any extension of consumer credit to a servicemember or a servicemember's dependent, a creditor shall provide to the servicemember or the servicemember's dependent the following information in writing, at or before the issuance of the credit: "(A) A statement of the annual percentage rate applicable to the extension of credit. "(B) Any disclosures required under the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq. ) . "(C) A clear description of the payment Db-ligations of the servicemember or the servicemember's dependent, as applicable. "(2) TERMS.-Such disclosures shall be presented in accordance with terms prescribed by the regulations issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to implement the Truth in Lending Act (15 D.S.C. 1601 et seq.). "(d) LIMITATION.-A creditor described in subsection (a) shall not automatically renew, repay, refinance, or consolidate with the proceeds of other credit extended by the same creditor any consumer credit extended to a servicemember or a servicemember's dependent without- 000056 2723 :77056.1 "(1) executing new loan documentation signed by the servicernember or the servicemember's dependent, as applicable; and "(2) providing the loan disclosures described in subsection (c) to the servicemember or the servicemember's dependent. "(e) PREEMPTION.-Except as provided in subsection (f)(2), this section preempts any State or Federal law, rule, or regulation, including any State usury law, to the extent that such laws, rules, or regulations are inconsistent with this section, except that this section shall not preempt any such law, rule, or regulation that provides additional protection to a servicemember or a servicemember's dependent. "(f) PENALTIES.- "(1) MISDEMEANOR.-Any creditor who knowingly violates this section shall be fined as provided in title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both. "(2) PRESERVATION OF OTHER REMEDIES.- The remedies and rights provided under this section are in addition to and do not preclude any remedy otherwise available under law to the person claiming relief under this section, including any award for consequential and punitive damages. "(g) DEFINITION.-For purposes of this section, the term 'interest' includes service charges, renewal charges, fees, or any other charges (except bona fide insurance) with respect to the extension of consumer credit. ' , . (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.- The table of contents of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 V.S.C. App. 501) is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 207 the following new item: "Sec. 208. Terms of consumer credit". 000057 2723 :77056.1 2 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item N urn ber: 8.D.3.a.1. Subject: Transfer of $15,970 in Bermuda District Improvement Funds to the BenSley/Bermuda Volunteer Rescue Squad to Purchase Hydraulic Rescue Tools Used To Extricate People Trapped in Vehicles County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: J Board Action ReQuested: Transfer of $15,970 in Bermuda District Improvement Funds to the BenSley/Bermuda Volunteer Rescue Squad to purchase hydraulic rescue tools used to extricate people trapped in vehicles. Summary of Information: Supervisor King has requested the Board to transfer $15, 970 in Bermuda District Improvement Funds to the BenSley/Bermuda Rescue Squad to purchase hydraulic rescue tools used to extricate people trapped in vehicles. The Board is authorized to transfer these funds pursuant to Section 15.2-953B of the Code of Virginia since the Bensley/Bermuda Volunteer Rescue Squad is a non-profit rescue squad operating within the County. Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budaet & Manaaement 0425:76962.1 Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000058 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 .For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. 000059 \o\w\O~ Page 1 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICA TION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County.s Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. 1. What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? Bensley Bermuda Volunteer Rescue Squad 2 If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization1s most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application. ) To provide emergency medical and rescue services 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? $15,970.00 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. IIGENESIS" brand hydraulic rescue tool used to extricate people trapped in accidents. 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? Chesterfield Fire & EMS Department 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? 000060 Page 2 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes ~ No D Is the organization non-profit? Yes ~ No D Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes ~ No D 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? Bensley Bermuda Volunteer Rescue Squad; P. O. Box 3360; Chester, Virginia, 23831 9. What is the telephone number; fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? Bensley Bermuda Volunteer Rescue Squad; 804-748-5708; 804-530-6122; ima 1 050@aol.com Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairman/director or vice-chairman of the organization. ~-;) Signature CI1.lfF()~ OPerAfw>,,-,S ( U5 brILEc.To~ Title (if signing on behalf of an organization) Printed Name bldLrC'-{ (~lJ/Lu }11he (Le r Date {O II G, ( 2007 000061. .-- I ~ - -. - " !G..!~.. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.0.3.8.2. Subject: Transfer of $15,000 in Bermuda District Improvement Funds to the Chesterfield County School Board to Purchase Equipment and Supplies to Support Programs at the Community High School County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Q:j U Board Action Reauested: Transfer of $15,000 in Bermuda District Improvement Funds to the Chesterfield County School Board to purchase equipment and supplies to support programs at the Community High School. Summary of Information: Supervisor King has requested to transfer $15, 000 in Bermuda District Improvement Funds to the School Board to purchase equipment and supplies to support programs at the Community High School. The programs that will be supported are discussed in detail in the attached application. This request originally came from the Chesterfield Community High School staff. The County is legally permitted to give public funds to the School Board to purchase equipment and supplies to be used by the School Board for public school educational and recreational programs. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts I please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director. Budaet and Manaaement 0425:76964.1 Attachments: . Yes ONO # 000062 Il. \ Page 1 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICA TION 1 . What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? Chesterfield Community High School 2. If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to applicati'on.) Chesterfield County Public School, Grade 9-12 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? $15,000 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. See attached memo with budQet 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? Yes, Chesterfield County Public Schools 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other Communities in Schools, grants, individuals or organizations will provide County appropriated funds, and the remainder of the funding? Fundraisers. 000063 l-- Page 2 7 . If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Is the organization non-profit? Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes Yes X -- Yes_X_ No_X No No 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? 12400 Branders BridQe Rd. Chester, VA 23831 9. What is the telephone number, fax number, 768-6156, (fax) 768-6171, and e-mail addressoftheapplicant?jamie_accashian@ccpsnet.net Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairman/director or vice-chairman of the organization. ~,y: ~~ Signatu PrincioaJ Title (if signing on behalf of an organization) Jamie G.. Accashian Printed Name October 17, 2007 Date 000064 District Improvement Funds attachment, question #4 For Chesterfield Community High School 4. The funding request for $15,000 is to be appropriated accordingly: Catering class 2,000 Building trades 3,500 Art 1,000 Information technology 1,000 SOL remediation supplements 4,000 Boys & Girls Basketball, Golf, Track, and league fees Total 3~500 $15,000 These funds will help to supplement these programs along with county appropriated funds. Our county appropriated funds are based on our student enrollment and since we are a smaller school, the county appropriated funds do not fully cover the life and job teaching skills that these classes require such as catering, building trades, art, and information technology. Since many of our students enter the job market versus furthering their education, these classes offer them career skills. SOL supplements are not normally supplemented through the county. Small grants help support remediation supplements which usually are not sufficient to our supplemental needs. It has been proven that doing "whatever it takes" to remediate our students usually means successful SOL scores, which have been proven in receiving our accreditation. SOL supplements include remediation materials as well as refreshments which are great motivators for learning. OUf athletic program continues to struggle every year. We continue the program because it has been proven to improve attendance and grades with those students who participate in sports. Students have received athletic scholarships to universities which is an opportunity that they would have not been given based solely on their academics. Although we charge admission fees to our home games and sell concessions, our small percentage of parent and community support does not supplement the cost of officials, security, or the necessary equipment to continue our athletic program. Contributions continue to help us support our athletic teams, along with fundraisers that are not very successful but every little bit helps us make it through each season. 00006S ~ - CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.0.3.a.3. Subject: Transfer of $12,318 in Bermuda District Improvement Funds to Enon Volunteer Fire Department to Purchase an Inflatable Boat for Low-Level Water Rescue Operations, Automatic Inflatable PFD Vests, Personnel Safety Equipment for Water Rescues, Winter Work Jackets for Volunteer Firefighters and a Storage Building for Rescue Equipment County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: gJ Board Action Reauested: Transfer of $12,318 in Bermuda District Improvement Funds to Enon Volunteer Fire Department to purchase an inflatable boat for low level water rescue operations, automatic inflatable PFD vests, personnel safety equipment for water rescues, winter work jackets for volunteer firefighters and a storage building to house rescue equipment. Summary of Information: Supervisor King has requested the Board to transfer $12, 318 in Bermuda District Improvement Funds to Enon Volunteer Fire Department to purchase an Preparer: Allan M. Carmody _ Title: Director. Budaet & Manaaement 0825:76862.1 Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000066 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 inflatable boat for low level water rescue operations, automatic inflatable PFD vests, personnel safety equipment for water rescues, winter work jackets for volunteer firefighters and a storage building to house rescue equipment. The Board is authorized to transfer these funds under Section 15.2-953B of the Code of Virginia since the Enon Volunteer Fire. Department is a non-profit volunteer fire department operating in the County. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. 000067 folllDl ~age 1 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICA TION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County . can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. 1. What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? Enon Volunteer Fire Dept,Co. 6 2 If an organization is the applicantl what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application. ) Provide Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Service to County Citizens 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? $12,318.31 4. Describe in detaiJ the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. Inflatable boat for low level water rescue operations. Automatic inflatable PFD vests, personnel safety equipment for water rescue Winter work jackets for volunteer firefighters Storage building for rescue equipment 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? Fire & EMS Department 000068 Page 2 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? This request will fund the activity 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes rgj No o Is the organization non-profit? Yes Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes rgj ~ No No o D 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? 1920 East Hundred Road Chester. VA 2'3838' 9. What is the telephone number; fax number, a-mail address of the applicant? 530-1381 Fire,. Station 6 <m chesterfield.goy Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairman/director or vice-chairman of the organization. Title (if signing on behalf of an organization) Printed Name 000069 Date ~ - CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.0.3.a.4. Subiect: Transfer $10,000 from the Bermuda District Improvement Funds to the Chesterfield County School Board to Purchase a New Public Address System for the Football Stadium at Lloyd C. Bird High School and to Purchase a New Industrial-Grade Washing Machine for the Field House at the Stadium County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ (J Board Action Reauested: Transfer $10,000 from the Bermuda District Improvement Funds to the Chesterfield County School Board to purchase a new public address system for the football stadium at Lloyd C. Bird High School and to purchase a new industrial-grade washing machine for the field house at the stadium. Summary of Information: Supervisor King has requested that $10,000 from the Bermuda District Improvement Funds be transferred to the School Board to purchase and install a new public address system for the football stadium at Lloyd C. Bird High School and the purchase a new industrial-grade washing machine for the field house at the stadium. The County is legally authorized to appropriate funds to the School Board to make capital improvements to County property and to purchase capital items which will be come part of the inventory of School Board property. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accountst please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, BudQet and ManaQement 0425:76980.1 Attachments: . Yes DNO # 0000.70 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. 1 . VVhat is the na request? 2. Jf an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application. C~ f'-l (} ut.:. S'c~ "l1'rVLt 3. VVhat is the amount of funding you are seeking? ~{)j ood , , 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. we fV~tJ ftJ R..I='-PL.Ac€ "H+€ ~ ./l( . Sy rf7A A (),J rM FrJdt1l /11.-'-- S) f'/tP (U/Y1 I ~ lJ. ~?o VIt.S CJ~O! 'me- IrJ O'lJ~/lllk(,., lL'AfIJ~1( fA,t 'Ilk' Hi::L-O ~S"'( t5: Ill:?roA,L) e~4iIt~ (" ~I-b e (le pvt-e re--O -- 0 iJ) l{ - st cJ~ 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking fu,nds? (lit as r OouNf-,.,v <\c.ife~'L /11,4..(4/7. UJ (,' t I It f' f- p i..)..i i, LA (/\.1 S"'t A-t- ,-,/,.-!r c= \ 63533.1 Page 1 000071 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? .+F /'J1UIl!€.. - "jlJ--e () il},J) I~I-~-ri C .+rnL'C,.)C o ~ P A-r01 /f1 r{juT Wi i I c c.vv 9 I? It+~ i9*-~IUC C 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Is the organization non-profit? Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes Yes Yes v ~ ~ No No No 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? I2u j.J' P+e)CUCi:t1c i (; 3 0 I CCU-fl.f tk/U8<? eJ Q He s 1tif k LP II A- :Uf-2.:L 9. What is the telephone number, fax number, a-mail address of the applicant? 8d f.( 7~ --Ct~ f ~ l.f 7fv~ --C il'f Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairman/director or vice-chairman of th anization. Title (if signing on behalf of an organization) fotJ .p A-~ U~"TTt- Printed Name /0 .-- J f ,--() 7 Date 63533.1 Page 2 000072 fI-~~ ~:\ ~ \ ~U; ~!!t~"~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.D.3.b. Subiect: Transfer $25,000 from the Matoaca District Improvement Fund to the School Board to Purchase Books for the Grange Hall Elementary School Library County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: (j; lj" Board Action ReQuested: Transfer $25,000 from the Matoaca District Improvement Fund to the School Board to purchase books for the Grange Hall Elementary School library. Summary of Information: Supervisor Humphrey requests the Board transfer $25,000 from the Matoaca District Improvement Fund to the School Board to purchase books for the Grange Hall Elementary School Library. It is legally appropriate for the County to give money to the School Board to purchase books that will be used in school facilities for public education. The books will be owned by the School Board and will become a part of the School Board's inventory of property. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director. BudQet and ManaQement 0425:76966.1 Attach ments: . Yes DNO #000073 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before 1he County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restr~ctjons on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds. ta private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. 1. What is requ est? 2. ~~51 Q(j<J -$~ '" 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? . 4. 5. I.s any County Departmen involved in the project~ event or program for which you are seeking funds? i\ 63533.1 Page 1 00007/.~ 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program) what other individuals ~rganizatlons will provide the remainder of tM funding? 7. If appUcant is an orga nization t answer the following: 8~ 9, 63~3.1 . ? Is the organization a corporation? Is the organization non-profit? Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes Yes V Yes No No No applicant ~k!n~ _ thiS.. fundin1..9+.eqUest? l)Lneeh fvdi res if 6\~~~~ \Of~O t I \V\.l l _ J\~ ~'- \)UJJe. ~ I ~ 0'3 \;)0 tele ihqfle I fax numb~. e-nlail address of the applicant? - '-\- :> l d- CJ l 0 ~ C). \'1 -""FAX' fY\ _ j.. E2. \Ie. rC 2-0(\ .0 + signing on must be the an/director or ~~d~~ Title (if signing on behalf of an organization) D LYlt'et\ F Aude-t PrInted Name {QjlulCJl Date Page 2 000075 . ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14, 2007 Item Number: 8.0.4. Subiect: Amend Previously-Approved Transfer of $2,500 from the Midlothian District Improvement Fund to the School Board to Purchase a New Grand piano for the Choral Department at Midlothian High School County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action ReQuested: The Board is requested to amend a previously-approved transfer of $2,500 from the Midlothian District Improvement Fund to the School Board so that the funds can be used to purchase a new grand piano for the Choral Department at Midlothian High School. Summary of Information: On September 26, 2007, the Board, at Supervisor Sowder's request, voted to transfer $2,500 from the Midlothian District Improvement Fund to the School Board to make repairs to the grand piano in the Choral Department of Midlothian High School. The Choral Department has since decided that it is necessary to purchase a new grand piano rather than attempt to repair the existing piano. The Board can legally amend the previously-approved transfer of funds since the new piano will be owned by the School Board and will be part of the School Board's capital inventory. The purchase must be made by the School Board itself and must comply with the School Board's purchasing policies. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund. Pre parer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budaet & Manaaement 0425:76992~ 1 Attachments: . Yes DNO # ~.- 0000 1,6 . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14, 2007 Item Number: 8.0.5. Subject: State Road Acceptance County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Reauested. Summary of Information: Bermuda: Cypress Woods, Section 1 Ivystone, Section 1 Dale: Kings Grove, Section 4 Preparer: Richard M. McElfish Title: Director. Environmental EnaineerinQ Attachments: II Yes ONO # 000077 .~ ~r ......... .: Ii ,..t: ~ . 'J. . -.v:. .:(~ .~ .::.;. -I · I. ~ ~_~ I ~ ~ ~~ . ............ r :.. y. tM~ ~~~'~. J , r. : I:! ~ ~.~ 1 ~ J ~ ~I~~ ~~- _:-1 I trJ..~ .... ~~. ... ~ ~ :;:~.--: ~ .~ .. ~~ ~ ~ ~. :- L ~ I --=... II1I":I.... ~ ~ = ~~~~~.~~kt~!~ I' ~,; ~ · f]~ ;~~ ~~ I ~~...~~ ..~.r-:: .... ~ ~ ... S.IId:1- .. II, .. .~ ~ --=. _ ~ ~~-;J ~ 1 ~ t ~_I~~F,. ~ ~.~ ~rJ ~'j ~. ~ ~ ~ .... .. .. ~ :...,} r.. -. 'D' -I~ r. ~ p~... .... III II.. ~f .. :. ~ . -eI! U ..... .J 'i ." ~~ ~ t -, I ," ~ ~... I~ . Wj~~}~.,~,~. ~ ~ .~ .~ ~I' - "1- -.. J · Pr -l. -:~ ..=='L J.::-: "'! , iii .2-:.. -:I ,... · "-.1 )' ~ -- -- .. I'" - _1- ~~ ~ ~.~ "t h ) ~ 't.J. . =1 ..- 1 -;; \~~~ i I 'i' "l:rl'~ ~ ~..~.r.;l.':. ! __~I ~ ,,~.... ..... -.. l- · L= .. ... :i" "L-...-::.:..I ..... J.t. I ~ .. I~':: 1~~ ~ ~' ~ P...::...-.:.J ~ ~)L~ I"'L~ :.,.~, 1 1- L-.:L..... '~I ~ J~ ( · ~ ?-~ ~~ ~j:~ ~~.. - i .:.. ---- ,:-- 11":. .... ~ F".I' ~ ".. '=' . .: ~'. ~ !.Ii;';; ~ ~-~~ ~~ ~- ; ~ !M2J~ U . 'R.: ~ ~I~~I~ ~ ~n .. ~ : 1 ~ '" \ ~ . ~ . ::. -.:.. .~. ~ ~.: ~ r =wo ~ f..": ~ ~. · ... (~ ..L:~ . ~. ~ ~'.t;'J: ... - · ~ ~,,~ .~ ~ ~l ~.tT..~,~€:~~"~~ ~ J'~ i~.:~,~. 1 ~~~~~.i~~~g !f:j ~. -;;" .;:: ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~. l S ~:-k .: ~....:..J · ::i III ~L;;' .-=11 ~ · 11 '-.I ~ wi":!t... I' 1 Ji"l1'".~"'" ~ ~~~;I ~ ~.. :!,.f. . -.. ~ r rfr ~ r:: ~..~ -- !II \~~~ ~ l. '1 - '-~ ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '.~~t .- .....::.;.... I~:.~~. · ~ ,tIjt" :' =>>"1_:::' ~."f.:;. r;..9 - - ..... ~... .. ~i;j:~'"' · ~ ~ ~ ~ · ~~~....' · .:=--=: ~ 1 . ,., ~~~ Y;;;-'}~#~~.. r: ~4 · · lIr""... HI! III ~ .': ,~'-....r:.~-l-" · ! · ~.:.J 1-.r.:'~=i'~ ,;, ..~ ~ ~p-.~." ,"!;" -~ ~ ~ ~ .~.. l~') \~.~). ~ ~ ; ~.. .~),~:.r,.rn -.-.-:~'&1P:-1t I ~I' ~~ ~,,!~ ~~ ~.........~I.. _ _2 _ ~ ~ ~~1: ~- ~ ~~~~I ~ :rti1i:=.t:::?( .-- -... =.... ~ ~~ ~.. .. ~~.... ~!J.. t:::~ i:~ ~...- . .-';t~.- -, ~..-~ :~~...... ~ ~:; ~... ~ _ ... ~ Ii; ~.: ~ ~-.I!I:S ..... _ r ~ ~~.. ~~. ~ 1: ~: ~ ,_. ~~_T:. _"... · . .;. ': ..-.!I= ~ ..:'1:..::; ...:J .....i.1: ... I ~ ~ ... ... ~.. - ~ · r _ ~.. .. r."q n-:u r.~. ::-- ~ ~ . .11 _. · . ~ "'II:-:.-i I. ~ ~. =--:-. I" ~ I - ~.. rY. 1:-1 I i:! ':I: ..-:=. to: ~ =..! ~ _I'... ._ ~ .T....,} .: .. ...-!IIr- -... J: ~ ~ 1 :\.~. -. -;-,. · ~ :1~:fI :; ..."- 1'J7,:~ ..ir.. ~I~ .::ii!.:... ~ ;v;:-~:r{::: :?t""-~..:"i .~-:-. ~:~~~~~:t~1 .~I'. ~.:. · ~ ~" ~~.. ;.'~-r;;,-=::i~\ ?!\ .~~- ---r;" i!.M~~~ ~I@' "'I-~ I:' $._Jj~'~ - '~~~W-.' . ~. -~'l~'~::/: .'; ~'~: · · -==.$ ~ ...... 1.:-. -.... ~..., ... ~- -.:L ~ ilL IIL-. r ~ .. r.':: ~ '-i 1:; . . .: '101 ".W:: ~ ..... ......,}.. .. J:r~;-'-... ...... ... - ~ .~ -.:---: ~ 1.'1 ......-:. ..1 ..T 1"11: .r"~ ;...... .. ~ .-:... .~..._ _'Y-.J'... , .. =7 . · .... ... · .. + · · -: .. "l1li ii- ... ".._ ...... ,- ..... ~:""". r. W--..r.. ...--z-:II-..~....... .-. I... _... .... ..~i ... - .. ...... · .... ,....-..:~. .. .-,:. ..... ..:..".-r: :--.. . ... . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.0.6. Subject: Approval of a Request from Timothy J. and patricia T. Hauler for an Exception to the Use of Public Water for a Proposed Residential Structure Located at 6200 Woodpecker Road County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator:-1 Board Action Reauested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve Timothy J. and patricia T. Hauler's request for an exception to the use of public water. Summary of Information: Staff received a request on October 15, 2007 from Timothy J. and Patricia T. Hauler for an exception to the use of public water for a proposed residence located at 6200 Woodpecker Road. Under Section 18-61 of the Chesterfield County Code, the Board of Supervisors may grant an exception to the requirement to use public water when a new residential structure requires an on-site water service line of more than 1000 feet. The line will be greater than 1000 feet, thereby, qualifying this situation as an exception to the use of public water. District: Matoaca Preparer: William O. Wriaht Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000081 t 'Jt,,;I 01;,: r 1 ~. ,2007 J~ ~( lob F\: umb~~':'": 2u:f7~ :9:;'" 0::-4 .."..." l~t.~" 1':_" C o\'U1~ror:., J:J ':. (])csrct fic'JJ COW) I} t ~ rib [i~s I )(,.partrrh~fH l',(), liox 608 {:n~"-srer6e]d,:o \~l-\ 23832-!,998 o ,')i ~~, .~ ii- ' _r~~~' 1 )(:-~. r \'J r, C:OVU1:gtOfl ~ r~J :"~li,;~ iU to ,h (:" L^ r i}i ric;-; r )cpa r lInen t Rc, -ic".;.:- (:0 tIUt1enf~ of ~ it, $ [cphc:l B blct, bUJ'Il. d~ t cJ 1 0.. t) tf7 ~ r"eqUt..~~ r ;.$ f()rrri~uly suhmirr,,:d fOf :iln c-xct"pnon .0 ,he t'eql~itemen{ thill the abo/\tc f'CfCfetlced pI"O~l!:'-Ct.! ,d\),,"elbng bt~ lorme...'"tL:-J Ii> (:~)U.'l1~1- \lr-:are:t. lltc. Pfop(')~d ~!rucrur~" i~ l<x.aicd m-or-r: tl1an 100(Y from thcpui'lhc .,.,.tnrc:-I{H~:Jf~d t..HI \X/()(x.1.pcckcr R<,);Jd, In addition" 'thC"rt~: ~(e four ,x.i~ring weDs c:ontlguou~ to tn!s properry \vnlcb \.'\om aJt~u~t1eiy :::.er'tlt;l(~ the f(,:".denc(' P1C~1s.1,' pl'escnl fh]~ r(,~"lut::sr for (::(c<.'PU{)t1 ro eht: I~o~:rd t)f Su:pcrvl~Qrs fot' ~PP{O\~] ~LS :-}()on as ~o~}ih]~~~ Shot1.Jd :(,u have-any further qU'r.~~t1ons n~garding ID;S mane%'.. please ,-oDtact -me ~t your c;~rbc:tit t:QnV(~rot..~l(:C '50 th;;it \\re l'r'll_~lu dis~ l.1s.s th~ :.11 greater It;Ugth. 'V ()ilr~>; very tr ul:l,i" , , ',I \... l;! l I) ') ~, ,\ -,.,., !' '~I "!' I ~.J S h ; ';,..iI U (i (~ ". I) i-' t.", C " "i', i~ It i Cl ." 0 000083 . ! I ":'.:;" .;:..: ::.;, D \ ,:'10 .:: ': ;:.; -'.1: i,_ II 7 '7 \ \ ~ \. ~ \~ ~ NlF /\ RUSSELL & JeNIFEA GAUB~ \ GPjN: 778628 1 S27Q<JOOO #630() WOOO~ROA~ \ -\ - / /',\ I ~ ~~Cr\ /' ...,u"S a~ . - f~I\.\~ - / / \ '-.-.,.- ------.. - I -_ NlF I TIMOTHY &: PA.TAICJA HAULER I G?~N:77B6266898QOOOO I,':, 16330 WOODPECKeR ROAO PROPOSED OWELL.ING SEE INS ET \ ,~ .:::: ...... ---... - -- ~ ~-. - -.....:.~ -\ , APPR;X;M~t;\ \ \ llM1TS ot: OSSTURBANCE \ APPROXIMATEJ ~ ::. L1MtTSOF r~' l00-VEAR $' FlOODPLA!N '\ .../~. y-, ~ ~\ N1F TII\+OT!-f'J' 8: PATRICIA HAULER GPI N: 77862682'~OOO.QOO 16100 wOODPECKER ROAO .., L 10 ~~d vh~-~ 9. ?~ ">:0 ~ ~ 1,.>0 - "'1-'~.>: ~)-; o....,...~~ "'~1- ~l<b~ ..0..." ~ ~.. ~~. o~ ~'3 , ~. o ~ ~- ~ ~~ ~~ $~~.J? $<J ~ <<:. 'f iNv'" .n~ ^;; / ~ /' / NfF GPIN;ne:S26689~ #6330 WOODPECKf / / / I I / / l I I j I / I 000084 B'" 'l _ __ ;~~" CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14, 2007 Item Number: 8.0.7.a. Subject: Request to Quitclaim Two Thirty-Foot and Variable Width Storm Water Management System/Best Management Practice Access Easements and a Variable Width Storm Water Management System/Best Management Practice Easement Across the Property of BB Hunt, L.L.C. County Administrator's Comments: Board Action Reauested: ~ County Administrator: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate two 30' and variable width SWM/BMP access easements and a variable width SWM/BMP easement across the property of BB Hunt, L.L.C. Summary of Information: BB Hunt, L.L.C. has requested the quitclaim of two 301 and variable width SWM/BMP access easements and a variable width SWM/BMP easement across its property as shown on the attached plat. Staff has reviewed the request and approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Riaht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000085 ~ i I 6 ,.. ! ... 0- r 00 ~ \\.I I~ t:I...!~ ~~e~ ~ ~~ ~ 1i' ~ I~ ~ iii 0 "- ~ -, 0 ~ 0 It) hf:~~~__ .~QiN- ~ -. II ,,) (\') "~~"\ ~ \~~~ be' ~'o ~ ---.... . ~. ,~ > ~cJ~~~~ .I"!~~ ::&: .J~2I!. :I:5~ 1l_1.J1.~a Id~- 'fi~ >~ 13 ,... "- '- " ", , o c wti . ,~~> 88 !~!i;; lii~ ----- 1/'1 ~~I~I~ ~~i! 1Il.J.!!l~ ~g~~ X ~ .. cu d .... ...-- --- ,...- (l) ..~... ~~ / \\~ /r Q fA> Ii - ~*,....~ ~~i~ ~- s;, .~. "\~ iUt;lt:o~ Qil' i= v" \~. Ij~~~~ ;~~ cr = zA. ai '- \~ ~ - xi..(' &f \ ~- Ii:) ~\ \V' ~~~;;)~~ d . ~)v~~-lf~~\~. i,)~~~ ,) . '. ~~ T.!l3 E~~ ~ '1'/ .'-t7gA": .. ~;~~~~~~~W: ~~~'0.."~' '. 8"~ 4i Po <17, ~qp , l~',,~~Q ~ ~ .. i~ mf.t&~$ t ,/" , ~!. s Q ~h:;! ~"<' n ~- i~ ,w~'J- '", //' ~ >~ /' /~" "-, ./ ~fjjVr(l/ I. ',!l ''\, ~. . . , /<>fI' '.. ~ f / ... , ~ I / to o,~ ,Q "I ~ \ .,~,J'i ~I Ilfl ZJ ffi3 \ {tf ___..- I! \--\---- ~~ a J.3:JHS 338 \ \, -I~ JNM H:)J.Yrt \ \ t:: .",~ . ~ \~o ,,- :-. \ i ~\ \~ ~,,-"" ~ \\ .~ ~.1.' 61 'i-~ ~ t -1 U) 'f..q.-'" \:: >> ~ .... ~ \ . . \.... 1:P ~ ~ \ ~, ......~~ - .'6 .... .i e:..~. C" t~ ~- ,,'" . \ i . l<~ ~ \.. E'i '~il~) b jl~a~ \, __ o ~ .!~~~ ~xi~ ::) ~:t;; is .. ~::s;; t5 ;.l~!~~ tG~i f'" d i:t t'i ~I=tz. >: >-tu !~~l I~i; .. --- ...--- ,.,...- - -... RI '4.1 V) ;$. ~ . "lit ....J I- t ::: :z ,. "- Q M ~ 0.. ~t3 -II '" ~ ~ .....1'-.1 IX _ ~ ..~ ~ ' .J >' Ll1 ~, C-~:~ ~ ~ ...I t; ~~~~3 ~ ~ CII --~B Q:: , (,):r: Q.. Q~"'~ ~ (') ?; C')~:~~ ~ ~ g ~~~~ ~ U Ji." Ct).I-..... I- a.. l4I.O ~ ~ ~iiJ35~ ~.~:$~t; ~ ~~~~~8J . :c: ~ ..... L.J ~ 0 (,1' ;I: . Ct ('l) :t-ctW<rO! I- ~ . . ~,~ ~ q: f.:t oJ ~,~ ~ it~ ~ ~ (I) ~ N .....\0 -...... t;Q M I ~ C\J~I ~V? LlJd"! OeJ 2:>:;;; o z l-1 ~ ..&; rJ) ~ 15 -~- tr..:l..J>-z...Jx ~ ~ w,l::1:> <[ ~ vi' & ~- t5 l.l.. 0::::1 - E~. ~ fI) eJ ~ In 2St:l>offi !i~~wtn w...Joe:t%.~ c::i"...J~:CC;~ 0> ~tn..... Su f2~~ ~ J:Q~ C1. dw :z; o.:~ Q . :I: f2 a. '1 -ii i~ z~ 87 h . i (/ '.; 1 \'\11 < ii.'r'~ .'. "~.' '.' '" .-t;~.'. 'I!~ .1~......~..__ I~I. ) .' .,;; 'Ii '_. .' 1'\4~""~7Q .." ..", 1~'Eiia-"'./ JJ . '.' -~.........,~ \: .' ':; Ii c.i lb. -t~~.~ . ! . -. --~~~\\ - :,' j. 113 Ii' ~ ~~ ' .... . ___ gi~ ~ ,~- . .~\ '~.'. ~~.... /' Vl}'" . II !r--. ~~ M . ~. 1/ 1i-....~.... .. ~.~. ~ f 113 ---..... I -- ~ . . ir--"j/a _, .. - i ~ . . I~ ~j~ ~ --'- , !~,; 11:1 ~\ ~: - ~ -, i~ !~-r~--__ - ,SfIiI..-;15. t IE ~ - . . "'~' . i. sf Ii .. . \~" I.t:>!. af;.rf'i---.-:-- . , . . a 1! --~- ~~. -. L"i~----~ . ~cl(\ .. 111... ..~ . ~~. ..~.... 'ofi: . ~ ~ ~.. .' ~~'I~..~.'t'. ~~.' ~'~."'~"'''' ,.. . . (. ~\ ~":\ ..... . Ii ~ '~I" .;.,.,--......~ t'~'.:"'..'.11 \).' ..... ! ". . ...~...... .:a, li--~''-- . " . ~~~'- . ~ // . 611. ~~ \\ /t !!"~ . Dl~ ;0 \~ ~\~.~~/ lulb "ilis, ii.. ~I.I,;.: I~ ~\1I."~1. . \v."' ,\. ;l:ii !!!i~C;'~. ~ ~ I~!~ i., 'I~" .~, ~ lj"" !.a: \, \ f. i~ Is;'" '?_ ~ . ~ \: ".' ;J:~, \~., :4~ . ." ._~ . ~ ~"'.'. . "~"~,. ""~~." .!\'o~~.V:~.'.~ ~rE. .... . " .' vv. ~~ ;L1U;~ l~.~ ... . !. ~~ ((if'"' lFUJ" ~ ~; w t.1B,#t' it VlJ'l.~"/~~~l~':'~ ~,~ '.3, t,.~ .. ,4l.~ <I' . , ..' Ii <~~j~ ~ .- '. ~, . .ii.' CI'o~m smB r~, // .." 5'! 13 ,.. _~ ';Jl:I '< 53 . . .,. i~ <w~ e)/} . ",,- //' ._ ;:it I "7 bG/.". ../". ",S I' 1. ..,- " !2 ' ,w /' ~,. " '\ . . /~ ... ... fl" \. \. I f . I I ~ \ .. a: {fj ~-------- I wi.. 1 J.23H.~S ps'; \ I '3Nt1 .tr.).l\'N \ \ ~ ~ ~ , - '. ~ \~ - I j ~\ \. ." ..>1 is . '~en ~\\ -I:, . GI <""~ . .)~....? "'"'~~/~l ~~%i'~~ Rf ....... ~ . c'- :-8": ~,: 'I' .....- '4-'2:'~ U , f' .2" . ,r;:li.. a '.', "'::I *.' :'. . '.: . .'.... . .--1. .~: ~ .~' ....:. ~. .. ....,:> '_' , .. -r- . .i.,::.' .~.';I...~I"'...";'i'.'.~' '~'.~..'~'~ . ..... ~ .: , I- (..J "CI! CI) w .,.. ~. '. -',.! (;1. ~~ > >d, d' ell . _'.' c. ,...CJ Ii! ~ ff.', .'b.-:.~~.. -,i'.'I'. -.~. ,('r)"~.' .~.z~.~; ,.. .15 . .,' . I.&J l&. ~.o.. >- ~ - < I- ... ,',. - -, .. w ex > t.. ~ ' ., y. - ~'VoI > l:I "" s. ..ra- '.". .~~ :~ .r<e1'~~2 ~, i~'-':~ W ~~ w:f~ . .' . ~ W s::-~>tJlI .l.2l>~iliE'- 5 ~ I ~ ~ i~. ..'~'~ .' t; a Q'dalJ~r- , ~. ' . ..... - Q 0 > a- U'1 1.._... !.I.":i"~" 'N~. SU ~~"~ f. c=; .' ~ ~ tQ ~ .. w .:t:, c; -<i. CI! Ci . q b -:I.... .- ." "~ 1.&1. ~ CL l =s B olf la~g i . a;: :i . .." i fi - tn !i .'i~l; Ili~ i~ie.~~:' . H.~' : II:~ I~ ,... " 0 CI N CI 0 ! 0 ~. .~ .., ~ 000088 13 .1 ~~. Ii ~. La.I ~ . $. ~ ~ . ~ J.- , " z. · ~ '.!I~.. i::r~ .~.~ -~ _ ~_'~..J..> ~ ~ ~~ ~. ,~ '.z _"\ >' ;J E: . C\J r 1-' ~""~~I- U ....(1.1 w.r'" ,u. . ln .... ,Z en ~ 0.:: 2: ~ .... ~ ,~ .(1) 6 u~ Q!..e ~ ~:t U~~,~Q~e Q..' c:r(..?-.~", ~ M .~--I ~ f5 d > >- Pi, ~. ~ A:i I.&J- La.. CI.. W L6J > ~ !- . ~~ ~ t:J -"v?>~c.? 5, ~ U -...: Q! '"Q 0:: Cl! l.::J ~ C ~ 4P ~ (.1 UJ C';I. ~ L.IJ ~ Q:: Z u- '-" ~ ~-.... 1-' ~~ ~ I.LJ or:[ Lt -...... *,laJ 1:1 ~ - H. - ~ > 5 g _ ~ -..... Cl %'-0 -1/ a,.., I, ~;5 z < z ~ I ~ .' -..., w t.u ...J <E: \J . ! ~;$ 'C ti M ~...Jw'~~~ .....:: ! QC-......... go:;: ~ an:.... . .-., - CU _ M X 'I; Q' ~z~ ..Su ~c~ ~~~.w E;: ~.. ~ ~'- ,.. <r: LIi O!. e" I:l L ~ ......c w' ::l: 0.: ';i . .....' r- CI) U ~ ::::; I: <~oiC~ ffi 0 a ~. t::::! LI.l........;>.. IL ,..-- ~ ~ '" i . . ~ ~ . ~ C) c 0 ~ -0 S lO C ~ If.l nr 1,~~~I~~I~~I~~i~~'~~~~~~il~~,~~i~~~i~IJik~I~~~~~~~='~~~~~~~D~~i~~a,~~~~i~~~.~a~~ 1~~lmJ~i~'~=!il~jiiiii~ill.I'. ~~lliliii~i~iii,~II~il!l!iii~ljiii li~mla~ ~ '1nlllil1lt. ... Ud_S~n u "mUn~SBB .000089 .~~ \ . - - __ )1 ~,~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.D.7.b. Subject: Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a Variable Width Virginia Department of Transportation Sight Distance Easement Across the Property of Tascon-Harvest Glen, L.L.C. County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Reauested: U Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a portion of a variable width VDOT sight distance easement across the property of Tascon-Harvest Glen, L.L.C. Summary of Information: Tascon-Harvest Glen, L.L.C. has requested the quitclaim of a portion of a variable width VDOT sight distance easement across its property as shown on the attached plat. Staff and VDOT have reviewed the request and approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Riaht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000090 .. ~IH JII;I gill ihpi~, Ii li;.-I" , ", ,I-I 11.IJiddit 'III Ali. .. , '....... ,r.' _ _" i .JJII~ ,IJAj~ g" !~ ~J.JJrl, " ~~ . . ~j . ~... ..' ~i~~ ... · ~e~~ i . :I!I d..... i~~ ~ ::;!1~ I- :~~ . ~~tij~' . - ~,~ . ~~i~ ~... ~~i~ . ~~ - U~ o\l~ ~~I'I~~ ~~!~<!;~(io\J~~~ -;:,/7 ~~ ~~I .'.~~' ~'l ~ ~ i t~. '""4 ~""" "/ 'l/ II~ ~~ ,.~ ~~ l~ /7-; //~!~~ . ~~~~ ~ ~;r~ ~~~! i~~;, '.ci " , VlN/$Wl 'AlNfK)O a73U~S3H:J J:)IlIJ.SJO 71JH H3A07:J 03J. ~YA 38 OJ. .J.N31V3S'e 3:JNtoslO J.HQIS .l(7()t H.i.OIM .nMb'tfA .If .10 NoI.J.tIOd If ON~ J.N.11V3SY3 3tJNV1.SIo .J.HfJ/S JOO1 HJ.tiIM" ~78"'JJYA Y- SNIMOHS .J.Y1d 037IdIf0~ I~~~ ~!U Ilgi i~ ~~ il!a ~~ :~tl Ca ~ tii" iIO;~~ IN'"') ~~ "'m . ~ I i ~ i~~~ 'l\S1~~ at;:~' ~ ~l i~~~ ~ "4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ G I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~_t~ ~I . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~. ~ I ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I!i ~~~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~~ I . ~ ~ :~ ~ I II ~I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ! II = I iill ~: ; I ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IR Sg ..~~ ~ ~ ..If l:'i ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !i! ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ ~~ -~ ~~i ~ @J @ @ @ ~ G @ ,8 .Sl! ~. ooomJ "~:JnH;-669~L L99 9d '61>L9 sa (h'{))J ::JsnONJ}J~ g;g ;l..)t:)3Nf 31 "d 3NNOH.1.1IO ;p 'JY A.:1U:I.:Bf' Q i ~ 1\, ~;J::~- ~~ltJ.. ~~ :f; "J~ ~i ~-.113 ~~ ~ ~ "~ I, ~ ~ l=i ~ s.: 8. . S m! i I ~ ~ o o 8 or- ~~ f' . LL C\l. ~ ; ~ :~~ o o . II Q) '0' o tn ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~(3 ~ ~~ ~i ~C: ~~ 00009 ~~ ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14, 2007 Item Number: 8.D.8.a. Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land for the Extension of Oaklake Court from Bigg Ideas, LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Reauested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.012 acres from Bigg Ideas, LLC, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.012 acres for the extension of Oaklake Court. District: Clover Hill Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Riaht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000093 --=- · -.. :. t .1 J ~... k.ti[".. a=.:" ~1 )!IiI ~ ... ~ ~ =-I-=--- · :.....:.. .I( ~ tt i:LW .. .,. ". ... .. . . t-~~ ,i~ I ~ · II...&.. ..~ "I Ir WM . l:!=e w ~I II : ~ I~ ~ ~ II:: -.......w=' · =!fi:I ~ · M J. I ~~ .. ~ f ::Ii ~ r:-i · ~...J:I.. Ii!'~ B~~ ~i!w, :: . ...:- 7L!:~ .tf -i :r.:: -- ~.. r ..Ii...... · + ~ ~~~~~.~ . ..::~~ ~~~ ~~ . -:;. ~r. ~ ~ ~ r. ~ ~ E:.1Ii i~r::. ~ ~ ~.I ~ ~;.:.~ ~ ~' ~ '. f1:ft": ~.~ : ~r , I- .~ I~ ~I ~ ~ -.. j ~I .::)~ II 'd. · ....J ~! \f I. ,. . .. .. ~.~~ .-.. J:ii :: :m ~.. .Ii =- ... i3-i .... .~ /'" - t-J .~ ~ ~ ~ It .:. I .. :i :-i &: I "= i9" f.. -:'I: .... . ~~:r^ G ~~.;: ~ l~~;~~ .~:, ~~;{~ '" ~* ~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1III~'....l ~..... _ '.. ,= _.~...... ..~~~ · , ~~ - ~., . 1 '" :'=:IR ~ :i _ l' ......JLlIi ~ · .... Ka."7 ~ ~ ~ r. " ~ ~ . ~ j · .~~ ~ :.. ;::.. ~... - ......:!..:r... -- ~ !II::::.:.... · po ..... .~.~ :"\ ~. ~: 1"::: · · IJ.~ ..: '1"-." .~~ J ~ · . .:\~~.:,;: · ".-1 ...' .... -~. oM '=L . .,: .......~~ ...... · M ... . 'kt........ .... -..JiI ~. -.r" 1 ~ - · -.. ... - ... ... TI..:J - · ... .. ~ Jj. · f: "...J;':f .-,; ...........: ~_~~~~" .........-: ... 1 ~, _~ ~. ....~ ' .~. · ...... :. ~~~d~'.i~!"" -l:~~~:-.....~~. R..t~~.".fJ&iH";.;~ ~!a1{~~~ :^. .....~~~r - _ '~.:':~-(,~ ~~ "~~N1" ."~.r...~.;r:~. \1{~'::"-~L~ .~~'r:a!l!: :..iIi!:."'?~~ '=' :::,;.a..~ ..... ~j~ ;::''''~.t=;:;:. ~'.=.:--~ r~ ~ .;I.~~: .: . :'._~ ~. .. ....~.tL ...-= -= .y::.."'\.i ~ :"~"I t" . I, ~ ., .. ,. ~~.. ..;-:.~ ...:.1.... . I. II" ~~ ~ ~ -: ~... ~ ..:...... ...:....~ ~ :..- .1. ~":.~ ffi.: · .;........... ... . ~ :-:.:: ~ I -tie ..: .. ....... a.:- · ."1" · ~ ..~.. .. · .. I" .. :6.. =!-: ... ........... .... ~ ~.~ " · ... oL . .: . I I... J ~ : .. ~~ ..... -:. . ~ V.. i: . .:-. -i}" r. ....: ~ -/ ... ~..... :.. · .. L.; ..-:JI-' ~ ~. ..~ ~ .. ... ~ . ~~ )I ~.. ~... :r F-!- t:Q Q,; H-ULLCO ASSOCIA TES, L.L.C. 0.8. 7966~ PC. 808 PIN 734 691 7920 HULLeo ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. 0.8. 7966, PG. 808 PIN 734 691 9922 PLAT SHOWING 0.012 ACRE OF LAND LYING AT THE WESTERN TERMINUS OF OAKLAKE COU RT CLOVER HILL DISTRICT, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA I 0) Fe N=3690987.22 E=11734798.58 J. MARK SOWERS ROD/FO. D.B. 4648, PC. 104 ::w PIN 734 691 7562 I ~~ a~ :-0 ON ~ ROD/SET ~ In"' /_ !.r) .. ("\,J o ' 'I'- U) · f'... 0"0 C/) <D AMR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, LLC 0.8. 3740, PG. 40 PIN 7.35 690 0281 ROD/FD. ..~~ a <rvG,\rv ~ $" o OAKLAKE COURT STATE ROUTE 5904 (60' R/W) 0.8. 2959, PG. 258 0.8. 2362, PG. 960 15' . BELL A TLANT~C EASEMENT 0.8. 2885, PG. 839 0.012 ACRE 506 sq. ft. 851.18' TO THE WEST LINE OF OAKLAKE BOULEVARD E_XTENDED ROD /FD. \\ "\ 310.48' N= 369097 4.1 ~_\,~,~:~~-~~-'~-~~~-~:~-- E=11734847.71 <D SIGG IDEAS, LLC 0.8. 7023, PG. 418 PIN 734 690 9852 12912 GENITO RD. 10' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT J" ......-... 0.8. 2950, PG. 647 TEMPORARY TURNAROUND NOTES: 1.) OWNER, REFERENCE & PIN BIGG IDEAS, LLC D~B. 7023, PG. 418 PIN 7346909852 2.) BASED ON GRAPHIC DETERMINATION THIS PROPERTY IS IN ZONE "c" OF THE HUD DEFINED FLOOD HAZARD AREA AS SHOWN ON F.E.M.A. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL # 510035 0028 B DATED MARCH 16, 1983. 3.) THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE BINDER AND MAY THEREFORE NOT SHOW ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS OR OTHER PERTINENT FACTS ~v 1H OF' WHICH MA Y AFFECT THE PROPERTY. ~~~v ./,L b ~ ~ /(1/"/".., of"" EASEMENT R=60' D.S. 2949, PG. 755 o 20 ~ SCALE IN FEET 40 I THIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THE CORPORATI 0fII!CE YOUR VISION ACHlEVEO THROUGH OURS. 1001 BouIdws Parkway, Suite 300 I Rrd1mand, VA 23225 TEL 804.200.6500 FAX 804.560.1016 www.tfmmons.com SIte Development f Relldentlal I Infnlltrudure , Technology DATE: AUGUST 1,2007 REV: OCTOBER 4, 2007 DRAWN BY: UK SCALE: 111 = 20' J.N.: 67293 _CHECK BY: UK TIMMONS GROUP ....;... 95 -~ UJ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14, 2007 Item Number: S.O.S.b. Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land for the Extension of Holly View Parkway from Crowne at Swift Creek Associates County Administrator's Comments: County A~ministrator: 7 Board Action Reauested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 1.57 acres for the extension of Holly View Parkway from Crowne at Swift Creek Associates, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 1.57 acres for the extension of Holly View Parkway_ This dedication is for the development of Arrowfield. District: Matoaca Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000096 .~ ..... :...- :i3! ~:~ ......~ ~~ ~.~ g;..t[ ;~o-..~ .. : ~ ...... ., y~~'~:-'~~ ~ ..-:~ . :TO -t'. I)."::: .. .!I~ ._.i~:IiI I . .... .I~ · I r. .. ~ 1.'1.... .. ...1 ~ 1 .. \. .;.": }"..: ~ .. . I~ .... II~ -: ... :.: ~: i:... ~ ~. :...... ..... .: I. :J=.i1..... .....:.::.. ...... -.: . I~~~.~. ~ .. I~ ~r~~ ."~~r<~~~. . il:.lllill' ....-.:.... '~I~ ~ ;'::.;r ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ · ~ t ~ . ~ ....."- ~. ~ ~r I .. ..&.11 ::I ~ J .... ~... .... ::I'" _I 1 -..,~ i ' ~~~ III .... .. ... d il'~ -i-I'I!1rf .. .:-2- ........ ~ ~..:~ 1 .- . . I' ~ 1- ~ ).l~. ;: III .'('~ .J ~ ~~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ "iI ~~ .. , ~I~ ~;, ~" . ~~. llil4: · - *~~.~ -'~. ~~ ';'::1 ~ ";'")~.. .. ~ NL ~,. ~ I ~.;III~~~ -D,."LJ I :..:4 ':JI." -. . .. -. r. ~.r: -::a. ~ ," -.... ...... . :LLIII........ -- - ~ .. · ... .!fjp. "-. -. :r:. ~ · ~) ~ ~ ~l. ~:. · ....... II. ........ ..... -=- ~ -... if . --:; I~) ~~-:-. ::& ----= :,i:': ~ ~ !:: ~ .... ~--..!1. ~) ... ~~ .... ............... · ~ 'L"'" ...:? .....'. .~ .. - ~ ~ ~ iI;C::"~..!. 'i':: '-':- - · ~ ': _:t. ,.:-~'III. ~ .. . · ~ ~ - :"I. -1.' iii .: -: ~.j;' :;" J;a: :..': .. ~ .,-S:Jo:. ~~ · ~-~.20:.."tWo -.:::; '.~ '\ ':'l :P';'>> : "~~~- ..-. ~. ~_~.1 · :~j ~ · I · 1.:- ~..".r. ..:..... '!!f tlt.~ f: 'j ~..~~ \.1.!~ ~ :,1. oJ. : ~i-: .. -.. ....:~... i- :t- ~_ =~ · ~ ~ -: :. {~"'i.f) ~.....; ~,-::.;-~~ ~';::i"'::n)J'/'~ ~':~;~~~~- i:.~i..~~i:::. :~:r~:.-t -:i... ~.. .J~ ...;II~~.. . - 1.1r?...,.II: _ : ~.' ...;,;..1 ::. .:. · or. ~ .)::. '!- ~ ~ -D-~'" ---=. .~ -1~ i:. I :- t:. · ~... · ........ .:-=.... "." .t. ..-.:-.-:-...-;) r L -=i . ~ · .:J.. .. ": ..: · ~ · · .:.-- .. r. r I .. ., .. .. -.,.,..;., ..... .:!. ...: · · · .~ ...... -. :-.. . :. · >> · : · · · ... .. .. .. . ...:... .. : :. · ~ I'" . · .. ._ -b . .... · . ... .-.=a.: 'r^(": ..... =. . . .~. _ 1..1. :... ... r ..r :..11'.1. -p. :.I~I ~ ... III L ... ",,-=-1 .. - . ... . --- ....... ~ .. .~ II ~ ~ 1m ." ~J IJIfI. ;: J 'I:.J · '-. .. ~~.=:- .... . ~ .I ~ ~~ I I I ~ ,~~I .[i t~ ~ I ~~~ ~~ . . r. I ~-. .' ~. ',. ~,.~~~!"i!! S j!'")....-;.-.;:.... ~iS - ~J~~~~S; ~;;!;S~~ ~. :::;<"o.lIO)"'''''O ~ ...,a:I~C:lG:ll:i:J .,~ lit-- taJ 8 iE · ~. .~ a., - .~. .t&~ ~ ~Sa~ Cr: jQ iri;; ~ :::. .1 i "'II' ..~enl ;:i .' ~nn' t.U es~. . a ,! .~.. ,-' . . ~1~6~~~ ..~.. .. :~II g,'g.. ~ ~ . f'-o - ?\.i" ~ f- ~ ~ 5 .~ I"" . , ""'4:e ~.--= g s: fj ho.:, J! E~. 'i. ~ ':-- ~I E, i, " ,...1. ~ .. , -i = ;; i .1Il iC ~ ~- ~~~I I:! i:: &..Ja, .'. ~ Eo-t ~ ~ Q ~ ~ "'-'11 ~ fB G'VN- ~~ ~~, ..O'YO&, / ~ 3&//./,. rC?~} , i/4' df / t?;fi~ Od . 'Sf,;-..? /. .~-t~ / /' . ---/ ...I'~ . ;.i'_~.. l;j. ~ ~: .. .J~!; . .. , IS~I:. i.::'~ e~_e.~'a , .5~~~"':;~ .lo .'.I~iet~t - ~ 'i5~ ~rJ~~ :q;: ~ l.ri l;.:a: 4t ~ iS~it~*_l;:; . ~l=t.~.,.::;;f. ~ ~ '"'i ~ ~ &$~c~~J!i ~' ~1~.If~~fil ~~lfsi(es. .1~:Rli~~Ol ctH3~~e l.lJ ~ . -r;! !Ii ~.~ . .~~~-~ llJ. .~~ : ~ ;,;,;.i .- . :oJ~'. . ..,:. . - I.. ~ ~ ~ ~ I ..~. ti ;:: '-. G-' ~ ~' g: .J:: ;?:- ::s <;:::). .G. , . ~.. ..-._.8 fi)] l2~t. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: S.O.S.c. Subiect: Acceptance of Parcels of Land for Watkins Centre Parkway from Gray Land and Development Company, LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Q1 Board Action Requesti Accept the conveyance of four parcels of land containing a total of 2.557 acres along Watkins Centre Parkway from Gray Land and Development Company, LLC, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of four parcels of land containing a total of 2.557 acres for Watkins Centre Parkway. This dedication is for the development of Watkins Centre. District: Midlothian Pre parer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way ManaQer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000099 I?f : J:I~ . ~. - -: I ~ t I. ~ ~ .~ ....... - .r~ - i-. rI' ~ ;-.... ~ - . ::=r-~ I :.. i ~. .......-= .. ~ OC I .... !II... ^ r . ~. ~~ - ...-:t~-"IIIDr .. ::::I 21 ... ., . ~~ _... Q 5 ~ ~ ...=- .~ . .J ~ 'J' rJ -) iii i !.-- ..; 1 .. I ~ 1 ~, ! ~ . ~~ :..:" :;!I; I ~~... J) · . ~ I: .-::..'~ r- --: .... aI : t1~ ~ ~ Qj -~ ~ .. --=:-.... ~ .. ... ~.... i!'- I f -I · - .... ~ ~~ I':;' "!J!I ~ !~~1.~ ~ ~~ -:. ti; ~ ~~ ~~.:1~ ~ J.; ~r 1 . , II.... ~ IL I r V J .-.: ;1111 lJ. r/ '! ~ I J -I iii i;t '_ III. r ~ ~ rI' . ~.E t..:.. 1.1: .,- ~ ,} I ~ .. ... ~ ~ .. rI"."j I .. , · II ...GI . ,,:11.... ~ ~~~ ...-..-:I .. ~ -.--.. __ r III~ I .... ~ .~ ~ "t tJr ~'). ~ II.-: 1"5tel" 11 ~ 0.." r: -..uI1 ~ ~; I ~~ tt.t1 ~- 'n ~ -~ ...~-.. l5 ~e ~ ~ :I" -=- ~ , · -, ... ... ~ ~ .]0 ,r.......... ...... --:r: ~ ~ I~J :. .... · r .... ~ . ~. .-.... ~~... :I....C-. r ..I-r---::.... -. ~ '3I::::III'W!II:I · ....... ....::c....3!r ~. ... 3 ~ · .~ ~J ....,.;. ..: ~ -- ~ ~~ · 1& IY . "11".:--." ~ L::-...-" ~ ~,. ~ ~~... ~y ~ ;.- ~ t · ..... ---- rI' .... 0 s: -.....:-:: II ~ - · . iii ] S. -!lrl' ~ =-....... ~ - L. ;t: ~. ... 1 -- ;f. -: :1I1Ii.~ .... ...... J I:f"I.. -..s .1 M'IH U · ....... f.::.s.:: · I :-. -:......~,}.. I ~ 1_ .. h. ..' "~ ~ z.ti..~. - ~ d.,~ ~T71ii! ..., CJ: · !I.~. ....... . ,of" u-: --I . · _\- ~ ~.;.. ~ ~1. rl'1 __.. ~~. . r.-n .:. ~ ,..-~. ~ r,..-........ II .. -= ~ · ~. ___. I .. r . .:: I. ~p. ~.. --:-:'". -..::1--:.. .~:.! X ~ G · I ~..." ..:.:.=t · - ~ ::.. ... ~ --;" I.' .... ~. II =4..... ~ .... ..'" L .......:... "}:~~ ):-:..~.. 1.!Ii!r. :.:.:& :J!: ~ ~ -;- -:-: · - ~ .;..:.:.:=.... · :.. 11=.1 - .. i:.. ~ 01 :II ~ ~ ::.I ~.. .:: ~ ._ ~ -:':'ij~. ~ I- ~ .. r --1WI L .:""11 ~~... "/W~-:: I. r .2 ~ .ii.!::. r~ I . ... .. ~ "i:"i ~ I .. .=1: · ... .. rI' .....r.J,: -. -J ~... i '-~ '1:...:f.if~ ~.~"'.:-... ~ "!f-' ~ r..:-'" .~ ~ - ,r"3 -- ., ~ iA.. I'" -:1 .~~~+":I L:- :r:: ... · /.~ - ..'" .iI" - ~ . r-=-- · · ...-... ....... -{ I'" ... - 1.: .1.' · ..-.: ~ z...=.. ...:--.:'.. rI'rj :-- .. ~ ~ -: :. .-. ~ I · .. L:..r. ~. r/ .; Il[1o I ......( -.: I . -- ......... ..... .. · - ::.... ...:... ": ~" ;.~... F" -:. .... ... -:. I ..... ~.') ." ~.. _., -;.~.... #tiJi .:II~~...I. ... · ..~ ~ r....... ..4'':' _~. i. ~. ~ . ~..y. ri..; ~ fik:.:. _ .:-r-.=? - ^. rI' ., _.... .:; U~ . ;. -.=; ._.t:: ~::c ('T1l'T'l s;s ~8 co tll I i ~O ke () 9 ~ ~ z ~ ~E~~ ~;'~rrl ~~~~ ~ xxx]: xxxCi) "01J1;)~ iJ-o-o;tJ "D "'D 1) =i m -~~?ii < ~~~n ~~~O 3: g~~c gfr1~~ ~~~~" m '-r-r-~ rrrr.t'l ZZZ?( ~ ZZZ(Il zzz-l pppr- f:>PP~ ppp - ..,...0 .. .. .. ~ S'P ~ -n -! ....,,,.....,0 a ".....'o.Jm ;.~~~ ~ -;CfltnS1ll ~ :; Ln~ 0 ~ :;:l:j':jo j ::=Lj :z .~:j~~ 0 /TI 2~~~ PI r..;.....Nm g slf2 ~ O~Q1> ~ J.' t>.)Ql.f\o(fl 0' ())-...t~ ~ Q:).....'o.J= U) l)J.....,.....,~ ~ .,.CD.... ;:t s: t;g~l) ~ ggg~ lTl 80gm ::1 i~~ 0 z ;z: "oo-l ~ ;:of OOOm .:1 ggg 00 z 000)00 ..... tIl .' 0....- (IJ ~~!\'~ 9:'9 h.) 01 ~ o~..p. C1t o~o C ~.~~m g-...lCXl ~ {r' t:~rn Ul ....0 3:: o.Jo~ "oJ ~ ~f)~ )>. JI':r.-> )0. ~~~ ~ ("} ~~~ () )> ::0:::0;0 ;Q ~ rTJ (rImfl1 fll rn - VI ~ U) VHn '/1 . (I! V1 GJ :;:zj ~ ::c n U) (j > ~ po:;;:: ("'110:2 z ~ ~ ~:~(ii ~ ~r~ ~~~ rn ~~ ~M-I H ~~ ~~~ 00 ):oZ(fl -." Z .< Cl '1) ~ ~ 5~~ ~ R; ~~~ ~ r'l rTl ~ 8 9~: *c:!€ -l ~mx g ~'~.g Z r-i ~ ~~ ~. ...' f,~ ~: I Z '-1 S? ~ "" ~ ~I'>.! ~ P:: ~: rqq ffi ~ ~ 0) fl1 $ ~ ~ ::. ", ~a .2 m ~ (')~... fie;, ,,\? '1) ~i( ~~'~~ .~~ g. . \ ~.~ f'.!~ n~ f~. ~is: Q - 8~1tD I(.j m'z FJ tal ~ ro I S~a! .. :1~ w~o.g ~~ ~r.nz: ~ ~ . - ';I!:';:;1 g~ ::!t~tIlX N '-'f!~i < ~~ 0 :i '< ti~ .'.,.- ~-l-~~-; / ~~'l Eo ~~ :; -- ~..;. ~N~6! ~~2..,...,'1' .................... ~ -~ t-J !: \ \,~p~ _ \0 lii "0 AfllJ(o~I?.,.H :l: 1(} ~.... ~; "_ \ en <on cro m l1l'i ~ Sf'./!' iI.s. ~k^' i~tl.' Ot-'?1c ...., '----"-. \:~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "0 ~. ho.. 'O!ifr /vP1kt ........_", "11. m -t :;10_ ~ ' l:;"1?, . i.,~: .... .... - <': -t ,. 3:: . 0, h--. - c?C9,'8 ,., 4~. -'\' ..... z >- ~,~ , :-~ :.?s); ~.. ~ 2, ~ :;; (Bs- Iii ~O'J-<~ _ , m ~ ......,...... ' . ....~.~,.. -t 8 ~ ~ p ~ :JrJSJJo 1.6$ . . 8. ' ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~<l?;;~i~ . ~<I ~ ~ ~ ~ o,.~. J ' ~ m ~ (t14i?l "f9(t 4?O)'"", -~UQ. (1 no Oc Cz Z~ -1-< -< "U (/)::0 ~O [Tl c... I'TI ZO 0-1 :, Z 09 '-J .. -00 ;00) 01 NO o (,.J . N-....J <..n- -I -~,., ~ ~~~t:. -z:~~ ~~Ui~ -<t;~-u ~"-J"U)Io ;E ~. p ~ ~m~g ~81V~ 8 .0 o ~ x !5 ~z fOPo~ ~~fD;;! S~~~ ~~ c:J): ~~ ~.5 es:!lOr ~o ;:jf) ,,- ~z rrl 'tI )>- ~ ::; ~! 0 '\ ~~.. ~~ < \, (1'4 lOlL . /. _---------~ .---. 1""1 ~ 6t;1 / ~ _~~.-. ...... ~ ").-. ~ 00 ,\ ,. if".' ~ r- ~ "-.J 10 m _ .-. l:D / r.. .. r- -l. eft ...,. . r- I.lJ ..... '-c r- Cil. 0.\>0 ~ LN U'1 to 0 ~ ~e~~ ( ~ 2g:~;!~ :i--< N~O-_- ~~~XN~mr w~~~ 2-~-~~2~ Ul>m:J: 0 -o~:!;jawn-{2 .on>"" fT1 -0"::'" ,,' nO ~~~~ ~:~ ~~g~P 0> ..:-. ! ~ ~ r'~ 1'1 !i;: g' ~ ~ i5 / ~ ~ ru: :2 0 .~ ~ j ~ ~ (/ e' ....... tT'2 ~a. Q- -! -I >- x ~, UlZ ;Z~p~ ~8:-~ 5~....lJl ~~~> ~~~6 8. · ~g~f: ~o....o 'U,..., ~z ~ d 2Qir'iirn~ o l'D ro.,) to.) -A- .' )~~c~~a ~~tO~~,g ~; . ;-- (V) I ~ ~I bb~ g. VI 0) ;ltI .". .....on (J) .~itl~ :l . ;U):oo . 2m . g -//\: "tI m o::D '(:j ~~;; o9'zifii~ I ~ t: \0 ~ :~r~ \ \~ ..,{ ~ g m < r- ~~ (:) (11. (J1 ~ ~ 0 m {-.)\ tot ~ ..p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::q V1'~ ~~. ,.... ~ '-' ~--1 ~ ~. 0 m ,) ~. / ~ .......- 2~O~ ~~~! ~~~> xNmz ~ ~~ ;; ~~ ~ ~~~I ta~~i :1~iQ. ~ ~~ In ::I ~ n (J') o r- '"'0 Z O~r "'O~ " ;p c;ojl::';m~;"; !!JQc:",,)>)>(I) mrftgi2z~:t r-::tl J>CmO Otlo~Os:::e "1:Jm:zm:;gi::iz ~(f)~==?::CCl zO l-CZ-f~ -I-n 0)>::1: OnCi)~~fri~~ iCm ,,:=0 3:~zn:l~3:n ~iu1J:(/)~~ :z mmUl -(- n>~:ZzO ... C :0 m -I ." I=J>~)>:Z nZ-~~u!r3!; C(J') )>OE5 ~, z~... :t: 0 m u;~ 0 g?o~~ ~~~~p 6~p)alU1' ~;~~~ '~~~~~ 2~ulg(/'1 ~ ~~_~ ffi ~ ." I"'l I"::or 'OJ.... ~ . .... QI ~~ -t G) ~~ ~ ~ 1-4 -(. ~!='O j; :t.z 0, n 2 CO. 00 (i') 0 "'J Z > ::a c '-1- F\) -C :2 ~~~~~a o ~.::: ~..-< ~ C/J N. ,'<: "'Oe01F;m is co 0'1 "5 Z~O\ ""t') G)8 ~ UJO m o z o --i ---... ~ _...--- --- /.. ~// /-"" // . .,,/,/- ./ ..,,/.. ~-l G') ~~ ~ 2~o" ~ ~~~8~ 2.. ~::r > ~~~~~ (A ~;.:< ~ ?1 i !i' ~' ~ . ~'"'-JS<;!' ~ (f] ~ 0 ,. 55 ~8' .~ ~g ~ 1"'12 ;~ ~~ ~";"'. ;..~. TIMMONS GROUP .....' 01 '~~~~i~i~~~~~~i~Sii~~5~ii~g~~~r ~~ ~~ r"r ~J::) rr EEi -':"f"" !::!: r-. r- ~ r-r ~~ S)!:j !if;; Z C, ~C~ IV to) ~~ ~tii O;;:n :F:t; N::: ({J0.J0 ":"oj ~ CD..., -2 ZZ ~~ Z (II 2:% if(l ~% ~~ I-~ ~~ ~~ 5~ ~%. S.Z ZZ zZ ~ f',)t.I ~~ 5.~ ",0 ~~ t-:I Nt..) --I me Sa c.n~ 9:3 ~~ ~~ H ~ QIIU1 ~.~ ".J: ~~ i~ ~- . ...r -1, >z ~ V1-" ((JUl ......... ~~ 1{-: ~;: ...../,t.~. ~~' ~: i~ ~~ ~~ ";0; ~,~ ~e t.i .flo_ 1'<.).... g~ ~f: t;:e 10 01~ NUl "'i.~ 1'0,).... :;r~ a~ ~ ..;,~ fTIjTJ 1 p~ rr; ..., rrf ~rj M~ rtf ~. EM 1"1J'T'1 ...,wrrf rriM' ~r-i i.E. ,..:"r ~~' rI1 ---,- r- --. ~g &~ tIoI... ......... 0 tt~ (JlfD co"., "'1\) ~~ Q).,;"J -..... g;~ lt~ m- Cd i:i' Qi Ol, ,f>oVl IOU) ".... :jg 1\)0) ~~ ~~ ~~ N~ NO In :"J ~~ . 0 ~~ ~~ ~~ qo~ ~~ ~~ "!~ ...... (Jl~ ...! "l ~s. ~~ -V! ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ - - ...'- -'-- -.., ..-....-- - r-;...c . roo ~m ~~ ,-,- tj::t -mm .me%. ~..... .....(..lM cn% a;5 ~i ~'~ ~~ ~c ~~ ........,J ~&l ~..t ~~ Sg ~~ !i ~, .....-. O.J>o ~~ ~ti !:if ~- ~! ~~ ~~ !r'1M iJ lr'f. ~ M~ t.)..... 0 ~~ ~~ ~:!I: ~~ o~!!i ~~ ~~ ~~ b,-(n ~~ ~ '! -.II.. U!.<Jt .....cOn . . ro'l - -- ()o og Cz Z-i -1-< -< -0 ~2 rlfr; zo -,9 -i '. z 09 -..J . . -00' ;oO'J 01 1'00 0(,..1 .N '-.J en :;0%1 JTlC"'l s~ ~~- OHO I I ::.io I I 00 -...1-...1 "0 P i !: ~ ~ i~~i5 Im..~ ~"'~5! ..S~~ 3 11'1" !II "'!!i :'1 :5C! ""'Q n~ ~J~ ~8a:s ~~~~ ,.,\. l! m'~.~. .\ .n 'r .;( -< I \ tii ~ _---~-.F/ ). \ \ ~.:c- \\ \ {it 7'; I<A~ /j/ '" ~ ~r l . ~ ... t..../ --- - --- .... --I en .... ...... UI ~ ~ CD -t 1.11 ~ io( e~ ~ 06 c :r.... ~. p 2 C:Po > ~p~~c '~~~~~ ~~~J~ iE~'~i~ 'ii:UJ~~ ~t:ozo zi~~~ ~=p~~ 2, ~I. 6 !i1~f1~ II I m 0\ ~ ~ m ~ m ~ ~o ~ J'T'IZ c 6!:!l ~~ i!= 'r- Nl ~ 0(') n C'".I ()().(')() ~no2 ::: (5 ~o aI -....l 0'1 (JI .... (,.I ~ ... ~ < (,J ----,. ~ , 8 (Jl . z 5<" .. -a tn -a ~ >; c;o-l<mC!;'; ~~~J>>>{J) mm("lC:SztD::t 6~5itgFn~ ~M1:zhi!:!z m~~:s~OC) ~-n(/)C~~~ 8Ci)~~~~~ ~~mn1~~~ )>L~3:(ii>r"':" Z :J- ~ m,2 (f) "'<" Z 11 0 3 ~ 0 .. 0 ~ ~,m ~ " ~~o;o.~<s; C~~c.n02 >0.0 -I Z -I... FJi C - CI ~-~ ~i!: ~r- fY1ti / I / I -\ \.., f: ,\, o S~ ~r- M .. D! /~ I. '- \ \ '~- \ J l ~.c:~- ../ , ,. . ~ ~ ' - -, TIMMONS GROUP....::... j.02 .-=~ , . . '. ..-,] ~~/~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: S.O.S.d. Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along the North Right of Way Line of Midlothian Turnpike from Midlothian Partnership, LLP County Administrator's Comments: Board Action Reauested: JJ County Administrator: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.909 acres from Midlothian Partnership, LLP, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.909 acres along the north right of way line of Midlothian Turnpike from Midlothian Partnership, LLP. This dedication is for the development of Watkins Centre. District: Midlothian Pre parer: John W. Harmon Title: Riaht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 0001.03 'f~ ~q~.~~~f.~ .. .... I.:': rLW- · , ).! Il.i, ":. ~ J.:J~ . ~ ~ .......:.... -= ~ ~ .... JrI': t. ~..... --- t ~ ~~. ~t ~I ~ ~~~ .-'... -: II~ j ~ "~~..:4 ~... ..11.. .... ..... :-j" J!ii~~ :JI: i ~r .. ..J .J. ~:II .. I I ;1 W~3 L. ~ J ... - · I:i ~ .-:-L ... ~ ~ ~~I:J~ ~III E ~ ~ ~.. -;. -: .~ ~ ~llj/ ~~ ~~~ /J~ .-=-. ~ ~\i~1 ~ ::..~ . - ...~. · .. ~ .!-...::r- I rI' r1l. /LG I ~.I ~~r. .'T;"""". --- ., . ---:t ~ - : i! .... ~_'.. ... ~~~ ~- I~~~ ~--- ~~ .- .. ~f , I : , ~ir ~ ;'. I ~~::u ~ -=-- .i ... ml ., r . . ~ r.. · ~ n - !-: -:.."" t:~ ~I II t ~ ~E jl.1 ~ ~ I~E": ... .~ "!{~~ ~~--- 1:"'1 ~ ...... ;,.. B ~L:L ,!. ....1Ii! ~~ ia l,-: -J~":f. ~ . . I~. --=- -I.....:.... - · II n~. ~.I?-- ~":' i:'L ~.: ::.:.,.I! ~Jil :r~"1 f ~ ~")-. ~~ · ~.:....., 'Ii~~ _!~.s.. ~ .. --:. .... ";~7 ~:.""''''. ..~ ~. ...-;. rIT ~ !II -:.~._q.; ":a.~ ~ ,:-~~.. II'~ ...,.... ..) .. f II: riitI , ~ ~ . -- .... \ J~ ~ ~ I ~ 'II ...:..,. ~ t- . -=-= - - II'" r .1.1.: I"",:;': . J" oM . t !.II ...r~.. p. w'iI;J IiIIL ~ ~~ .-IEI:':' '11:1 - ..... .........:....Er J- · ~t'; :.: ~ ~::i= i~ ~ .....\.~.:, ~~ "'~~J~~~ ...~I{.:~!'a. -.. : ;:;~;. :':;~;j ,- r":=l t ~:. :4--- _ ~ ;:I tIi". I - rl" - · .. ~ .... J:....: .. 'J.:.E.iIi ~ ~ ..... -,; ~ ~ ~ ~ -- ... ........... ~ · J.. · ... . · ,- · - :!" 1..1'" :-~:~ .;!~ i~ ..:..~.~ .; ~~- ..~....~. ?f~~.... .& ... . · ~~~.. . or. ~ .. · .... .. I ...:. -=... i;L.i .-i ~ =-.. . '1..A""Im...I1 · :~ ~- I · · -~... J~~ 2 .. .. .~ ~. :-: !lit ----.l Y'.::. ~:...; ~ i .) .r-~~ ~ .-r ~~ .. (Io:..r......au'" ~ . .... .~ ~ ~I.:=.t.~...~ ..Y.. ... : ~-:- . ~: .~:=. :~'-~: · · :-.. ...~:.:~. W-1~ ~~~~J.;!i t; ~ ;:~ 1~"-:::-~~~~~. 1'...' t ....:.. ,.......~ '.:I: '.~.r~ ... ~ -: -:. -....:... · .... ~ · _. ..~ ""-. ~ .... ~. -i...., .. ~. -:... ... I ~... .. ~ =:. oil. -=..: - ~""'~ ;1 ~ ..... ~". · Ii--" "':...11-: -...:- .:. ;.:-). I. .J _ ... - _..... - rI' iii. __... .. ~~. ~~:a ~ :.:......:,.. :.I:~... ..n I:: i"':K ~. · - -=: : iIi: .:.... .I~ I _ ~ . .(1..: .--= .)b.' .. ---. -- -. '... j:-" ~ ~ ~I ~ I.' fI::.: rI' rr.J ;t.:';:I~~~~ ,...-( ~ ... -- ..--- ~.:-i...II ...i .. ..---:.r1l:!illZ'" · .. !rs:..... :. . . ~......... rI' .~t~ ~ ~ ~ _'~ I I" ::=t:::~ I · .l- ~ k'/::.i~ t · -{;:~ t ..:.:i:;. .. ....~ Ll'1 .1 -..~ ~:; . " .. ... 11:-"1 · . r A-~L~.. .......L i . -. ~. · -i:-:'- b. I~ :-:- ~I::=::~ i;.~ ....: ::~. II 1/.~ - :;-. " ::I ~ d '~.~ \ , , '; \ , \ \ \ \ / ~ -i-tl. ~-~ .~ . ,,~//:P ~ ~~ 5z~~ ~S3~ ~f?~~ UI r'1 Vi 0 ~ ~ ;;1 ~:P:.:! -1M 0 :." ~'5 vi ::f ~ "1J rn ~~U)~ e:. ~ ... (Xl -i Vt ~~-~ VIe ::u elg ~ '0 'V ",,/////' .. \ '. N \ ...~.~,.,<' ~~'" -, . ;;>~&{'o "//'" t.}: ""of? \.:"""' -P% 'Q. . .. '1V;.t:::. . "1~U'..}' . . ~..~ ----- \. r" Z none t... I'V -. ~ ...-- ~--- .. ..-- - --... '" /' 1-'ti>. - " -0 \.tr. ~(o .~ ~i~~ '" ....1: . ~~~i ~~I;,~ ~ ~.~~ t;~ ~ ~8.g !gii 'i,~i~ .a.'1l! ~CilZ 2e~1 II - ~~. .~ \ I \ . \ \ '", 0..... i:D~ i", (Tf S;;o~ -....JrrlW -o)>:::f ~~5 *~ ) ---........ - ------- ,. "T-.' --. (; !: !: !:: c:. Co; !::; s c: !: ~ r- r r- r- r , r- r r!; i O~~~~W~WN-O~OO~~~~~~-~ ~~ ~a 40 'r.!. NO I I 00 "-J"'" n o n o 5: ~ rrl 2 -l e .:.. 'Q ~o ~~ C'd q) -~,.... ~~ .~ E ~.~ ili 'i ~l ~ ! ~~~&~~ ~~~r6lt:g otn ~ ,,.; ~ i 0-0 3: ,,> ...... C~ 0)>2(1) 5~C5 -~~~~ $:fJ10Z :z~<G') :-am>> ~""Qa!=' ~:aO\O ~~~f6 ,am );t ~~~.n ......-<cn::a "'CJ m "'II om~ ~ .", J: )> m:;a ~n t.npI . -(; -.. ~ \~_.., . ~,-_\ ~" /" . ~ ('.vo' .J' ..> r)'o~ <...~. 1'() () ()9 o . "U .~~ rrl-Fr; z~ f?z 00 '-.J :. "00 :;:001 01 f'.,)O OL.l fo,.)~ U' 2VlO~ s;::J:,....... :E~r!ls Z -. .... el.... ::r ;-$~ti ~~~o :n 100 ~ ~~ r o~ :Ii: "'" \,~ l\": \ l, ~j "'if;!) / ' II (TIiz l..:J ." ::: ..., iJJ }: ...,J"-l t..,-l :t~ E:~~ OjN OJ'l{/; <.. ~ ~ ij; ft ~S ~~G'l I ( <i: z 1..'7-/ 'O~ , " ~ r ~ . I . ...........-"*' Q~Q9 ~~,t;f~ lJ:Il:j"~ :'!':D"":l :J;CXI~9 o ~c e ~ ~ :; :Tl (;") ~ ~ ::It (=) (IJ n >- t""' t:I:j ~; ~!' p. ---i ~ c:~ ~ 2: p x ~o ;;) ~~~~ co. r() 8~ ~ ~ :.~1 8~ ~ o n Co TIMMONS GROUP .~..;... 000:1.05 .~~ I~- __. ~~) fi.~fP CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: S.D.S.e. Subiect: Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along Jefferson Davis Highway from Regal Cinemas, Incorporated County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: 00 Board Action ReQUested:/ Accept the conveyance of two parcels of land containing a total of 0.246 acres along Jefferson Davis Highway from Regal Cinemas, Inc., and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the county to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of these parcels conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Bermuda Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Right of Way ManaQer Attachments: . Yes ONO # 0001.06 · II - -- . ~':. 1 ~ rI :.21":'- -- .... ~ ~- :.:.. "I.-"!I I!;I ~~ I · ,,~ 0'LlIi. .~"I:I' L -:"\ ...' ~ .~~.- ~ ~ ~ _ ':5(. ~~. ':'= i :.. L~ I ~~ .~ ~~ l ~;~.. ~ ~ -1 ~, i. , .... -- - . ., J., ...,~~ ,.. ~ "I l r..-r:.Iii: .. . I . , ;1.. · .. Ii.,,;. ~ · ~ ~. ..~_II:~~ ~ - ... jr...~ ~'. !I ~~... ~ 5... :- - - ~~ .:. ~ -: ... 5 ~~i~5V ... .~'i~ .. II --:1.... r J 1 ;~ :~., ~ ~ ~J;;~ ~ I ~ ; ~~ ~.~~ ~ r :,~ .. . .-::IJ: ~~-= ft~~ . ~. ~.: -:- "I iA : I f. JlI ."11 ~I >=-= . .. .r.. . . ..... .. ~I-.:. - -:...+-:.. .. {~. ':"P.:- -,} . . ~ .:~;~ · ...;:. ......r... .11 .. · ~: - ~ f. ... .i . ...!~...,~ 1: . .. .:. .. .... -::. . I . _... . I.... ~ ,;.r. ,: · .. ...,.."." .. .. · · I' t. ~ · ..::.1. · ... ,.-:::.. -;. .., .. .. · - ..-i. ~ ....:~ :tIi.. ~!.:: ~.~ ... {I ..IIi.. .-...: rI ~ ... ::B t::'. .~ ~ ~.~~I ~~fi1, 13 ~.~ ~: . ~ ~ b~~'~.. :-fi~~_ riif ~)f~ ~ MJ~ · .. fE-. .. ~. . jI, ";II __ I..L.I t ~ ..~ ~- .. ,~ 1~ ~~ ;-. " . II ! ..... -.= 1 I J IIr:!l ~ ,t.. :1:151.. · 1.....1 '1'. ~ ~ .. 'r ~~ .-" - .~.: . - ~I::. :.. it..::.~ I -..; !I ... I . .: L- .-.!!!! 'I : QI .-: I :t.,1.I !..- ' ..,.... - .... -: : ...-:J. ~ ..: ;- ...) ~ i ':'::-:"1 .J ~ ... I!. ~. -'~ .. ... ~ ~~ ~~ '~~ ~F"~ I . "I~ - 1 :=-' .~.",.:J~' .~~; ~. ~:.;:~, - ~. ...P'L" 1..1: -r'.I. .. ':. .. 1"';- .:.... I ~. ~~.;:-~~r: ~~~~i~~;~~ ~);;;1~~==-- ~~fI:.::. I .,;, ......~ "::I";". I - -='IA · -1 :f-.:-~. ~~ez ~~9 ~. J. I ~:.I ..i~j-r;t'J · ..-: ~...r _ ,J ~ _,,=J ..... --....st" ""'If': ; .J3A4.. ~ ........ .-.:r:~ ~. .. .. .. -. ~ v- ... tL ............ ..., · ~~ · · ..:.. ~. .. .. ..: .1 ~ ;n:. "::...II.Iif"" ~ I .. . ....:~ ~.... ..";!AS ~ ~ ~~ i --:...; · I .:.- -... · --= ~ .a.: ~ I.i .:11. ~ -.:.:;:.... .......:- --- - 1""1 - Zi: · I. ~ ...... tl1 ~r:" .-Y:: ..... ~ ~;.~~ f :::.~i:Ji-. ~..-: ~ :.-:.-..~.... - · Jii':~:~.~""t..."I' ~ · -; .... ~. :..- I ~ ~..... ." I ... "-.: · _ "i :. -., ~"".1."1.2..:.. _ .... a. I .. .... . ~ J:r r ~ If-' · I'" ......,} .... -.-.......- I -.. I': _ ~ :r ~.....,.~~~ ~'. .~ .-~ ~I .or. -i or ~~I:b-"I · .o~. ~ ~~.~ ~ ..... ':f. · ~ ." . . ... oU.":Q ""' ~ ~ ~~.. ~~.~... fJ: · II. :-1 ..: i"l ~ I I -. ~ :. :...: · I.. ~ z- I .::: ( ~.. :: .~~":., ':L;:::" ~ ~ · I ..' i ... ~ .7. .~. · ~ :!'lI. ~:::'... · t" ' .. .. I. :y{:Q(.i.. .:H-#-"j... :.. ~ :-.:. ~ ~ · r. I .... ........ I IJ '; · I .. · · :II- .. -a. · -..L -= .~I. I ~ ~.. Yftf .... ~... .~.. II. "I' · .: · · .1.":"'". i: "111''' '" + .: · . .,f ,) - -. -:. . _. · -.- . I IX- · ... · · · ... ~ ";...tI -. ... "::- _I...... · · · ..,.. r. · · ~.:a. -tf7."'"K. ,.:,,~... 'I:I::!. ..:~ · .~..}.!. ..;.: .:. ~~.. · ,(~) ...~ , .~ ~)~~ "'i?~.. .~.;.:. <:s!~ ~ I ~... ... .I . ~.... .;.. : ~. :. I -:.. .r.i: · ( .:..: -: ... . ; ;. .:- 'I t .....:..+- ~ =.:.t ~ .. P: :::- I .~...:...... -:: ~ : -y-. -:. .. -= ~ - ,.. 1:":-,,-.. .. .:: . ....: .- _ I ...- . : : ...:: · _... ~ if.. .~...... .. . ...., ... ..-..: r ... 1::-- 1...-. .. -. -ow,. ...... · I . I _ ~ :... · .... : . ....... I ._ -: .... t..... II .. : . ...... ..... .. ""I: ~ .... -=- "I _. : I. .. -:- · -. ii. .... . ..... . h. _ =-ill. ~ .. rI'i"'. ::.. . · ....... ~ ~ ~ ...~ ~~ ~ !I" .... "II ~ ..... .. ........ _ r:-., ~ ~5Ir.1.:J "rJf,..:..{~" ~ ~ - -;... ..... r~-:F.' .. ~ -= (i.~ "I :. .. II! I)! . - ~ !:1: r- - M -,. I .... :i: ~ ~ - :II ~ -: <<1.1 .- ~ .: lW' ;~~ ;;1'" t ~ . ..# ~ ---~ ~~~ ~ .. =-l" ~ ~L ':~~ r -. -'BIll }lO~ p.jW) . ", t..E WID 161 (VARIAB1195 pG 292 . DB 28,;:3 pG 29.70 . DB . ~ o'\~'t.. . ~14.'!J "r- . . . ~ \ \ \ 10' C&P TELEPHONE \ COMPANY EASEMENT "\ DB 1924 PG 686 \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ ~ ~. ~. ~.~~~. oO~M~. a~ S. aJ ~ AI ~ OJ o. 0' ~~~,~'G.~ m -4~. 0 :...! "&\J~tT\~ o~ \ C") 0 ....s. tIi ""0. o"'~~ . G1~ ~~?J ~. U'~ CQ ............ va f"'Ili. ~ ~ . ~ . ~S ~ ,Ol · , .~ ~. ~. .... ~ \ PARCEL '8' N 3652654.00 E 11799403.77 .~-; PARCEL, 'c' ~ ~ 0.082 ACRE ~.~.. -'~ ~ .'& .~ ~ LINE TABLE BEARING S16.23'36"W 574.54' 49"W 16' WATER ESMT. DB 6885 PG 457 GRAPHIC SCALE ~'\ :'!J7:>' 50 ' 0 25 50 ~ LENGTH , 5.90' 21.33' ( IN FEET ') 1 inch = 50 ft. COUNTY PROJECT NO.'.: .07-0258 COUNTY SITE' Ne.~:' 08PR.0107 PARCEL A-LlTCHFJELD _ THEATRES, L TO. DB ."2009 P"G 626, 08.1746_ PG 848 (PLAT) TAX PARCEL 10.: _7996525...36100000, ZONED-C3 *'3001 JEFF DAVIS. HI~WA Y PARCEL B- LITCHFIELD THEATRES. LTD. DB 2009 PG 626, 08 1746' PG 853 (PLAT) TAX PARCEL 10: 799652654000000, ZONED-C3 #13025 JEFF DAYlS .HIGHWAY \J\R G\to\\ ~ -n.1 Or ~~\.. 'f' 109 0000 co"^W\o~ 9BA- \,G 6502'\610 ""t.. 06 BOO 'j.. f' /l.~Ct.\. i~~t.\) ~~ \-\\G\-\'l4/l. i ,~ JEfr t>~ *' :!> , 0'\ VEPCO POLE/LINE EASEMENT DB 386 PG 158 PLAT SHOWING ,0.,246 ACRE TP BE DEDICATED TO THE COUNlY OF CH.ESTERFIELD . BERMUDA DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD 'COU-NTY, VIRGINIA ~NINGSTEPHENSON,P.C. 10160 S1t';~S1~jLL ROAD ~ . ~~. . GLEN AlLEN, VA 2.:5060 lAND SURVEYORS . PHONE - 804-545-6235 a PLANNERS . FAX - 804-545-6259 DRAWN BY: MJ . SCALE: 1"=50' J.N.: 07..523 CHECK BY: MJ DATE: 7-1"0..07 OOOj.08 . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: S.O.S.f. Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Woolridge Road from Whispering Hope Community Church County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~.. Board Action Reauested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.362 acres along Woolridge Road from Whispering Hope Communi ty Church, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the county to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Matoaca Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Riaht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO # OOOj.09 ~ ~.:. . .. !:-i'~ II ... ] :: .. ~ . .... ~ iU .E , ---- - ..... :II :-NIl ~ ~ "T I~ rj ! ~ ~ ~ , ~ I .. .~ I . :J ~~ ~ ~ i J~ i ~ ..... : i.: = .~~ · ~.. ,-- ~ rw: .1 .. 'J i ~: I ~r..: ..: .. ...~ ~ "n"'IoI'I '~I~ I~ :-: r rr:- I': . :.. ~ "-(0. . :...' . I" -. ~ . :"'1'-I:ctII:.... ... ~I J J~ ~. .. ~ .~ .....--... ~ ":. .. ~ I.... ........ ...... III ~ ~ "t:~ :.-::jj ~ i:':' - ."C'"+ ~ ~ I . .~.....~.... ... ......~~ iC! .~. ~ !.1!Pi,:. :I!~ ~)...~ ~-.j.-: ~ ...".; ~r tl .. .. --=~ ~~- 1 "r":1I"'~"''''-=: ~~~~ I".~I -. ~ ~~:-.... -~~ ~~ .~... :;.:~~ ~ :.J..:. ~ ., ~. ~ ;.~: : =-~ ~:a:~ · ~:J~. .. -,. :::: ~ f.i:1~; :..:-=-'=i - II. :I (:' ~ ~ - ~:s:)- f' I ~~....;:-... I~) : .. I · -::- ~ --=rr~.:. . .:'.. . ...:.. ~ =-:.. i- 1"-.. ~ _ : I:". ~: ... ., -:.. · ... ~ r .. - ...... "'.... 'I" :...1.. III' - ''I ~ ~...... .-~"'I:' --I~. :. -..:- ... ;.. :J:. ~.-:. ~ ~..:.:. ~ ,,,-. :!' ~ - .1 .. "I (..... -:. ~ . .. .(. oJ · KtA: ..Ja .... ::I . ..~ ..~ ~r~~~~:; ~ ~ ~~ ~! I .. -= ::I :l1li ~ :-.~ -: ~.\:"I ~~ ~ r- ~ Co 'fII.i 1:1:... . ~..... -= - :'1 "1,'\ .. . - ...n r- ----.----1 , " li~ : ~~-~--J'" I . ~6' 'I I 2MrT: r.:. - - -I I ~44'i~ ~~ -- --, 18'Wjr -i I I I I I I ! I -I l ,L _ ~:... __ _1__ j_. 1_ _ _ -' '. Iliii ~U n ~ ~!~ ~:~~! ~I~;I ~~~ ~; ~~~~~" ~ l~ ~i<3~ ~~ , ~d~ ., ~~d :~~~ ~l;:! ~"'<~ ~-~ r:::;: (J) () o CD m o u (j) O. f>,) o c: o ~ ; ..... ..... "' ........... .is ~ 't ~I ., .- "" 1 't po. ~il l=l~ .~ ~ J~ I~~I ;::~~~ "Ii~. ~R~ ~ 8 ' ~~~ ::I 18 I ~~ii , I ~~ l=~~ !i~, fl ~~i~ .rIG~~ . 'H ~" ~ ilvJS .. .JA!~ 3JI1gbrtJ1ooM a\j~1:J 3 - ;1; ~~~ .~I ',~ ,~ <S. ~. . ..,.. . ." - ~I: ~,!~ I;'IIII:I!!, 'I',~~n,' -;f,'I'I~r~,~,~lt,ill,fli~~"~I""IJ~I~.i' -,.~.~~ me; ~ s ~~ ~ ~ c. CHEStEl=iEib~UNTV. :.- !' .- "1.-- _.8; il.. n.. . . OJ ~ m. ,MATOMADlsnucr .' .' ..._ ' : .~ - z,' III . I . : cHI!S1'EAFlILO coo",.." YIRGlNIA ,'.. - . -. '. ' 0001-11 .- - ;..-. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 10ft Meeting Date: November 14, 2007 Item Number: 8.0.9. Subiect: Approval of a Wetlands Mitigation Agreement with Coverly Wetlands Mitigation Bank County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested -- Authorize the County Administrator to execute a Wetlands Mitigation Agreement with Coverly Wetlands Mitigation Bank for 0.02 acres of additional wetlands impacts for the construction of hangers, taxiway and parking apron at the County Airport. Summary of Information: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the County Administrator to execute an agreement with Coverly Wetlands Mitigation Bank for the purchase of wetlands mitigation credits for $1,000.00 for 0.02 acres of additional wetlands impacts for the construction of hangers, taxiway and parking apron at the County Airport. Purchase of these credits is accepted by the USACE and DEQ as mitigation for the project. Approval is recommended. District: Dale Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way ManaQer Attachments: [J Yes .NO # ~ - CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Budaet and Manaaement Comments: Sufficient funds are available for the County Administrator to execute a $1,000.00 agreement with Coverly Wetlands Mitigation Bank for 0.02 acres of additional wetlands impacts for the construction of hangars, taxiway and parking apron at the County Airport. Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, BudQet and ManaQement - - CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.D.10.a. Subiect: Request permission for a Proposed Fence to Encroach Within an Eight-Foot Easement Across Lot 32/ Tanner Village/ Section C at Charter Colony County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Q1 Board Action ReQuested: Grant Christopher S. Karwacki and Leia A. Karwacki/ permission for a proposed fence to encroach 3' into an 8' easement across Lot 32/ Tanner Village/ Section C at Charter Colony/ subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Christopher S. Karwacki and Leia A. Karwacki/ have requested permission for a proposed fence to encroach 3' into an 8' easement across Lot 32/ Tanner Village/ Section C at Charter Colony. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 0001.1.4 Lf~ ';IT:' - .IL AI~ - ... ~ I R."P ~l-f)1I '-:-:J. --- __ ~ i ~ ~ r ~L Ir~L1;~~ IT -;r.:a. I . -=- ~ ~~ ~ . - ~. ~1 t~.. ~t ~ ~ '3 -~ - ~4~~ I.~ ~a - ~.- j-.~. LIi - ~ '-I" 1.-" "'.r. ~ ~ :::{ I~~ ~ ~~~ y., j ~ 0 ~ -,..... =-1G'l M~ ~ ..r Ie ..... ~ .... _ .- ~ .F J I~; .:'::~..o_~-rr ~ ... ~~.;: - ~~~- ! - 1Q: ~'Ei: ~ I _;~~:II ... . ...-- . I "~-:... -; ) ~' ~ ':-"-':1~ . ~ :!. ::. -.:L ~ -!:j. _.... - ............ II ..,:1.. ... ..~: ~ '~:. ~~~i ~ ~ I - ~~~. ~I~ L' ~~/ .~ I.~ ~ -: E I\'. ~ ..... ~ . . ~ I )I ~L' .. i ... I - Jo: .. - I' II .... -C ., 1 .,..... -.:.... ~ 1 1~~~Io~( 1 _~ ~; ~]r:':. ,,~ ~~! ~~.~ I ~ J' J E;l" ~,~j ~ ( ~.0~ rrl _ _ .~ ~1?f ~ _ ~~ .i. j ~... II. · ~ 1"..: ..... -=. f:! ~.l _ ""J ::I"Z~~:" ~ ~. ~,~~ ~ :~~ .~. ~ · ~~1~'ili:v.. :.~~: ~ r "?~~~ ... =-~. ~ (_J...~~~ .... .~~l~ ~ ~J~~ ~ "" ~~~~~~~l; J ~Xi~.;.~~ ~ ~! '. I!I ~ . ....~ 1'7........ :'{... f . -l": .... L" t.ioI h':"~ iI I "I1"......:iL.. -....::.: 1- _..... "~ · ~ '~J , ~.t~~: ~ -~..- - .~_.-: ~ - ~ ......~-tN'i:i::~...::;;.: r..;! · "LJ.._~~ F :- .. ~~ (.. .~ ~ ~ ... · ~~ ~.. ~.~~...,.~ .11 -.Ar :.11--=" .~~ - .. 1~"."1I:a-~:.:~r :... .~..; '.~ .:o:~.~~ ~;l':~tP-~~"i~j.~~ri~~ ri-.~Y:':: ..t.l ~ ~~,r. ..~'=:, ~..:~ 19.":~~ (~~ 0t... .. '~~':~~j::}.'~"1~~..I.-r:~ ~""".f-i ~~i.t~~~ · j.. ~ ~.1 r.1 ~~ ~ .... . .. ~. '.: .,:~LI ~~. r.. .~~\~ ~ .L;o 7? 0:; ~ ~.~ ~ ~'.~~ :'~f.~! {'7::; ~ ~~:;;.~~t qri!L ?..~ ~ .;i. ~j ~~~ \~ ~.~ ~.. · .~: · i~:~~: ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ m~ X .~ ~ ~~~. ~ ~ # ..L5.&t~.. . ...xr.. -i ~ . ~ .... ~ . :. ... .. . . I ~#~~ ~ ~~, ~!l.1Fl · ....., .y .. I' ....., "- I. .... :-r:.:I ~ ,J .. -.-. .I 1 . - ~ ~:~ .. .1.1.1. ., _ ~'"1J~.~ f · .t.J. J I L..:. ;~ .; I I~ L i ...I ~ - "51:: Ie? :- iii Ii . ~ .... .. ::. J · : ' :Ii .. II" I ~ . ~ ":"j ~ -- r ... ~:.~. ~ - ..., 0(11 1.~ ~~ ~~ ... ~ _ PINER L l'El..EPIbtE aTlDI tjJ'f['A 1:' .' I :xx - Fence 3' off property line ~ ~1N . it · .. · LICENSED AREA . . . . III .1Ii .\' . ,. 9.4' ....... -"" JIA' tllD' LDT '31 . . RiS: TEL. rED. PRI:FOSD r PRIVATE ~1At,.. ~ I' a EASDlEN'r caY SEPARAtE: _ .. VATER . SMlTMY SEWER EASEIENT AGCIIEGATE ~ · mrc::RETE .uvE It :V~ .... . . ,~ ! Christopher S. Karwaeki .', Leis A. Karwaeki 14318 Jeffries Place DB. 6363 PG. 423 'PIN: 725698422200000 PIfYSJ'DIL · lWWJVDIDITS DR . L.IJT 32 ~ . T~ .VJIJ.AIiE SECt>>.ft C . . .1; CHMtrER ,m ,." "ltiACA' DISTRICT atESTERFIELD COUNTY~ 'VIRGINIA ~ .~M:ICI. CHRIS1IPtEIt ~ s. .. i..EIA' A. .~ . _~. .... iii" ....:.... .. . .. . D=II6-I8-tIl R=536.46# L-s7.47 JEf,.~ I'IJfI% (44f IUW) tt/S 172.79 FT_ TO THE VII. EXTDdIED Jrif.U&:i, \lAY a ml'JllDBi.oo.Q. ".,.. .a . ~,. r.c.. . ". ava: _ ~.. . UJID SIINE1'CI5. '. 73D9 IMIIlVOl fiREEN MiVE . PA .. 517 IIEOMNICSVaJ..E Va. 29JU irE. sa.LE4.- _ 3lI'" - a UN IN" L.S. " . :.... OOOj.16 .-_...... -- - 1 ~~Y;~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.D.1Q.b. Subiect: Request permission for a Proposed Fence to Encroach Within an Eight-Foot Easement Across Lot 31/ Tanner Village, Section C at Charter Colony County Administrator's Comments: Board Action Reauested: Q1 o County Administrator: Grant Isaac W. Wright and Andrea Wright, permission for a proposed fence to encroach 3' into an 8' easement across Lot 31, Tanner Village/ Section C at Charter Colony, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Isaac W. Wright and Andrea Wright/ have requested permission for a proposed fence to encroach 3' into an 81 easement across Lot 31, Tanner Village, Section C at Charter Colony. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Rieht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNo # 000:1.1 7 w:a;1'~\f . . t ~..D. (.~ t ~~: -- ~I ~~ I ~ J. ~. :-.. . 1 I r I I .. 1 1 : .. !II ~~ Ii ~ r t ~) IIRh:. ~ ~ ~ ij I ... tl ~ ~!.... . ) !fi" ~ ~ .. ;~ .. . .1 . . .. .',: ... W 11 ~. . .::: .,;.. I ~fi~~ ~ IiII ~ I r- ~ ..::. ~ ~i ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ I ~ I~;.I:'; ~ ....... .. · J ~ .~..' ~ i ..' ;1 r-:- ~.... ~ ~ iO .. ~ i...: .. II:' r-: il~ ~~~~ ~ -D :-- ~ ::i" n I --: .-... -:~.-. ~ . I~ ... I ~ . [ .~~ ....- ..... - . ....--. __ ::E.~ .. ..:.. ge ... ~ -J". ~ . - ..... II I!" ...... ... ~ ...pI ;w ; ~ .~. ~ I~;. "I 1 - -- -... ~ ~ ift ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' I r- r:. ;; ti:; =-- ~~ ... I .... ~ ~~ r:'~1 ::J M....,., .... -T """K" ~~-r. t .~ ~ ~~ t s~.. .. 1 . ~. ~ ~... ~"'~"7-;.~%~rl. ~ ,7 ~.... ... 1 · 'I.r .;,~; '1 ~ ~......-? 1 ~~. · r.J. .....-: ...:. .. ;S . .. "I · · · · . .... . ... . · ..... \I~~r~ .~ ,} · .. -. .:.. or (- .A". · · .. :Ilol ::I .. ... -aJ ~ QI:I IE .,.:: ~ =- ... .~~1oJ ~. TX . _ ~ ~ .... ~ -:::. i1:;'~ ~:::tll: ::- . ~~ ~.131: ~ · - .... ~ J. . 5" ~ "I 511.. ~~;t~..: .. ....... J -= I · ____.II:u..L' r- .... - ........ ~ i..II..: I ->> y. ~....:.:. :.a. · 1 -"L.,i-=-. . . -.., .. ~ · r:-,hI' .. - ---. .. '1 ~ 1 ",J ...... '.~ ::.:... ~ ~ .... . iI "': ~;.I ~~::...o: ~ 1'.1 ~~ r;;."- .. · ~'I: ~ ...J." ~ ~"... .. ....-:. LJ rr( oJ .. .. .. 1 . ~ ~..,.-::.. _ .. .1'.1 .. · I'IJL":" ... -.: .." -:;:r; .. ... :-. -=-.~ ~ t:: ~.i ~ 1 .~..~ ~. · ~ A: ~ ...:. ~ ~_ ~...1=; -- rs.& ~ -.-. · ::::~: ~ ~ _ -"&)'1.111 1151 ..;:-. ~ ~ ~ r: ::r.>>....ljl.. i'.-i;. ..- ...~,.~ ~~J ~~ __ _ . ~~~ ~~~ n I.(' ~~ ~ :.-... 'I~:.. ~~~ .~ .&;). ?i::"O::"'}: ... ~. ~~ ~...~~~~I.. 'I:z.:i:= .....}. ....~~ ~ ..~~* ~ ,.t~~ · ~ ,M. · ;:;~~ .\..~ . r.1.:u: ~ ~_~. .;,.~;. ..;--:i-. .~; ":-J. S1~"::~ ~ ~.'~ ......-;1~1;-:.: .1'-~. ~j · = .. ~ I... ~..j.1 :-. =- ,} :n.-'.I{!I: =-r . ....ir~ ..~..: ... :=::: l. ~ :. ... ~ i...._ r: ~i ~~~. .. ::.:-.:r1.. I':., ~ : ~ ..-" + =- :~) f"Ii ~ I : i :. :.. :. ., - .; . -. . . ... ~ . !!i=l._'1~~~=L,"~~~~~~.J'-=-= . .Underground "Utilities - xx - Fence 3' off property line · /'00 YEAR LICENSED AREA .-. FLOOD PLAIN . -. COMMON AREA C . . . II . .. . . . . . . . . ~- -- -- -" j. . . . ,- - - \ 'f...8: " ~ I~ ~l}; (,. ,<< - t;ctJ.. " . . CO- ~. .:t ~ t::) ~. "0. ~. ,~, LOT 30 1:~ A Water Meters ----- ----- .... ........... . . . . . ~ ----- -- - -- LOT 31 0.187 ACRE #14324- 2Ji STORY BRICK/FRAME W/BASEMENT ct GARAGE" 100X , ~ ~ ~ ~, LOT 32 ~~ ,.."., .~ ~ Vi. 10. 8' PRIVA TE PEOESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT & 8' WATER ck SANITARY SEWER, EASEMENT ..... . ~. :10.4- 0;)'- 0). O.H. .. .. . : :'. '".' . .:; 1 ':, cone.'. \, ~ ~ .....drlve '. : ~ ~ .... '.:.., Tel. cone. ~ t" '.' ."...... '..,~" Ped. I walk .. ". ..... .."']A u/G <,- --- : ':r.~~ tel. --- '.~" _.- - - . ", . - .....- :__. ,,' ~.~. l .... ,': ... ..... ., .....,,~ -- -- Nai/(s)' ;::J6~:;, f%ng;t~! 2.10.22' TO 'THE JEFFRIES PLACE W/L OF ~EFFRIES 44' R/W WA Y (EXT'D.) / Isaac W. Wright. Andrea Wright 14324 Jeffries PI DB. 6762 PG. 328 PIN: 725698361900000 Improvements on LOT31, SECT/ONC DATE: 10/24/2005 TA,NNER VILLAGE A T CHARTER COLONY SCALE: 1 "=30' Chesterfield County, Virgin/a JOB NO: C0521060 Pur: ISMC ~. &- ANDREA WRIGHT · PLANNERS · ARCHITECTS It ENGINEERS · SURVEYORS- 501 8ranchway Road · Suite 100 'R~chmond, Virginia 23236 .Phone (804) 794-0571 -Fax (804) 794..2635 0001.19 ~, Ii ~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: S.O.10.c. Subiect: Request permission to Construct a Gravel Driveway Within a Fifty-Foot Unimproved County Right of Way County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: _ a1 Board Action Reauested~ Grant Travis Wright and Sherry Wright, permission to construct a gravel driveway within a 50' unimproved county right of way, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Travis Wright and Sherry Wright, have requested permission to construct a gravel driveway within a 50' unimproved county right of way. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Richt of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000j.20 M;}:~.. ). "mt.~:-~_ ----- !I:~. II!]~ B! ~ .~ ... ~ ~~~l: ~ ~~~ ji I ~ ~ ~ .Ii ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ . )~ - :. I~ .:.; ~ ~; ~f ;:~ - . . I~ . -;. ~~ I , ~ I~~ .. :.:.. ... ~ ~~ ~~ ~~. ~ t . ... . . ~, ~ iii .. .~ I~ III ... ~ . ., II ~ ~~ . .J... ~ ..-..Iii -... . ~.... I ...... .:-.:-i~ : -. \I:i I'" ~ ~ ~ iIIiS-)::..-:-... ~~ ~ ...... '-1 ~~ ~~:b:1 ..... ~~ .~~. 'i!WI:.i:=~:. I ~~)a1.~ L I ~ ...., .. "L.... ..... ~ "r1i"=I. _-. :~ .. w. t,~ ~~ ~ - --.' ~ ..;.'~:.) - " .'I~ · +-: ~ . ".... ..- . I . rI' . . ~,., ...i _ .II If ~: "II ; ."."1"1 _;; \....- ~ ~ ~ ,.. .... -.u.:DiI.:\!:i..;. · rI' 1"1 ~ ~ · lI:.~~-. ~... ~ ~ ~ . · .~~ .g---~~~..:.""=",;)7{ ~ ~j ~.~... ",,~."'I~.. ...~~~.... ~~~~ ~ ~~~: -. ).. ~ ~ ~ .~:.:"';l.. ~ -: )% , .:.p,d ~:"..i: - · ...- -,..; .~...~ / i"f:f1,.... · .~I.. ~ ~ ;..~ ~. . !.,.-I=. -:;. · I - !-~ iL"' j1(,. 11.- ~ · =n\ ~ r:. "'t!.'~- .... ..... · ".!. ~ ~... : I -. I.. I ~ ...i ... ~ . ..... ~ i- .. ::.. :.I_~ J.; ,} r.I.. .---- I. ~ :;; I .... ~: . I.. ~:..~ ~ a 1.:...-....... tI . ":..rt -=. "If .. ,. ~.r. .... ... · . . . . ........ Iil if.~ .. II..: II rI' :.-I ~ .r-.... . . .. ...... ~. . i".. I ~ ... · ~ . ~ · .., .. ..... II,; . ... -. r.. ... ~ I ~ I ~ 'I ~ .. -=-1'1 i .. · ~i ! .. .. ..- - ~ I"'II!I: ....... :-: i ..- -,/ ... ............... .. ..I ~ ~ r r . :.:; '~ ~~ 1:..::.l6iG :... .~ .: -%.II:I:J _ r I .:..:r:"I~..-i:...~ ....... ....:=!- ~ .. .~.~~....~ ....rI' *~ \; in . rI'~\-:...1 ~ ,} ~ ~...-:-: ~ll : ~ J . ..I!"........ ~: · ~ ... · ~ ....-:-i ~ Boor,i2J4 rA~E 170 o t 4: 8 13 f( ;; lO""~. ~ 3 t I- =- I+.? 74- , 'bw'" 1 1~ .~1"1_.___...!:O._fY!_1!!6 .J.P.:- __ _.... ,..__ ROliO l~oo'rrO LIlK4. .DALE RDA D ...... ~ ~ ~~ ti':~ ..J V\ 't1 i ~ ~{ LICENSED AREA -I' CI · ~t .. ~ Ot. t' ~'\ I ~"' '1i v' ~. ;l:!~ ~,; 0' t' 7 r/v \ ~ \ - \ ~ (.) t') \S ~ :t:: C( ~ v, ~ " ~ I ~ 'J ~5 ~ r _.~... -~... - ...- .~. -----...... ~.....- ...-~-...- . GeORGE H€/(.13fZ~T \.. --' TAx NJ~P IJ4--/3 (I) Pl9flT OF ,PAR.CEL 2.4- DEED 6(;(;)1( ~B PIfIG€. 2-9 TIN. '- to t:IIf1Ify I11III (J/I ". .,. .. ..-,. ",. ~f, .." tNI 111M ,., tIIItI IHI 1M W". ,... tlIId """.. t1I ,.. Hlldl",. .. ,. MO. till 'III. p/tII. 7Iw IIIIl1dlll'. (I" Wut:l1lfll1y wIIIIIII ". ",. "". tIIItI ",.. tIN 110 ~.,.",. of.. ""/tll1IfIII till 1M. ",..",. IWITCNAItD tIIItI ALTMAN Pi-lIf SJ-Iow/IIG ~/t()Pcl:" T~Y ~.r: clJ9A'7I.!!S L_ P~/e.HFiNl 1.00 'Z'lie" PAl2ceJ. EAsr S'~i:. DF l-ewls !Co"D MATOACA DlsrRlcr {!.)IE. S-7t!!.Ii!.FJE LD C'"', V A. PIIITCN~RD 6/111 MTII~ EnOl""" and Surveyors Hopewell ,Vlralnla . " , I 1# /,:J" SCALE I D j) ILJ/---/!./<I N F.B. A .,.,. 2: ..J.. ~ ~ \W CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.0.11. Subiect: Authorization for Alltel to Apply for Conditional Use or Substantial Accord for Communications Antennae to be Installed on County Property at Mid-Lothian Mines Park County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: (l) Board Action ReQUested:() Authorize All tel to apply for condi tional use or substantial accord for communications antennae to be installed on county property at Mid-Lothian Mines Park. Summary of Information: Alltel has requested permission to install communications antennae on an existing Dominion Virginia Power pole and an equipment shelter on county property at Mid-Lothian Mines Park, PIN 7317045127. If the zoning is approved, leasing the property will require approval by the Board at a Public Hearing. District: Midlothian Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Riaht of Way ManaQer Attachments: . Yes DNa # OOO'ja'23 ........ ........ ....................... '7 I ::;/ ~~ I ' in~ I ; ~ c f--.... ' 8: ~~ ' ~~'"" ~ .. ",,' , -"""1___ /' , ............... " , --- ............... i 'I ...............~ / , ..,............... l.. " "? ~,,~... , 'o,J .............~.......... I' .-.r.......... , .......,.. ....l :..... CI) ... ..... ..... . ~~'" o Q B ~ -wu ~i2 ~i~ ~~~ ~,.tE C ,..: (I) ~ ~ ~ ~.. ~ ....0' ~ s ~~ ~i ;i e- U) iti "'do ~~ ~ ~; JaW ~! ~ ~~ ~~ a:~ · ~ ~Q. t5~ :ill! ~ ~~ iJ~ ill!!: Sl . ~oC ""z oW z~ ~ i~ e~m m :I Z .. i ~ u Ol ~ ::1& ~:S ~ it =UJI= ~.c ~~ .~ ;i asj5 oC ~ ;ia ~ ~o ~s~ Q! g~ tit ~z ~S... I~ i~ ~ i~ ~~~. ~CD I~ Q f:c f~m ~ ~~ I :g b;w! \n I~ ~h ~~~=:n ~ Il!l .' / I~:;l ~ :!i \ ~ .. .:r L.....:, "'__--------, '\: ~ --.-:-:. -.:.;;;;:-'~.. "f, ~\ o:J~~~" 1 ........ 400:;3' --;.. .~~~ ~~t4~ /~ ~~. ~ ~ ~ fit ~ & ; ..... . ...~~6.~ ~"'fI ~ !-d: '&,2 _ ~ ffi ~ ... S I 7' o "'::0(:1,... ,a= \ S' ~z~:8' ~'Ii=t-I l&i~ " w~1.I.lN .1fJ cct:l\. ~~ :.~ ~ r&d.7'C ~~m ~~~~! A~O: ~~~ CI) ~~~ ~~m~~ '~ ~~ 4( lj~~,,- .~. <~ 1Si. i 1:1 f Yen", / > g .. ;p ,," '.c ' ...... ~f! \\~' ~'-,' Vf i f I' ___ ! [--- . , / J--..- : , . , ! r....- l : f l : '^ ! lj\ ! i~-':"\ / .i:---. .~ i" ~ sf ~\ l: ,./ 1/ l:- ii · R! ;..~ ' -1:- I ~I'Ji <. ! ~f jl rjlell i!. I ~ ~ ~ ~ i "t~llr~ r---J 18 zjJ'a .~i I 'a 'a )8 ~ I 'a 'a '5 'a h ,~~~ ~U ! illi~lt!i31 I J ii:r j J I j Ii ~\~ h~ i b!s!-ljri::. i i lid j i i i :! lii~ ~;I \ ~; ~ :IUI tjSi~J 11 ~!;I 1111 ~! ~II" \. a~ li !lfuJ.. !f.ltl l!l Sl U:1lI Sl l!l .Sl l!l !~ ~~... \, ! I Ii litJ~lll ! J icl~l!s 'J!! Ii ~) \ ~~ B d & J 115 ,tB I,~ H.~. i " '.'~ z: J \ HiJ;i'a~~iH i!~' ~lhfB i i ~ i ~ I;} i I~l!JJrl!!~il~ ~j!! hi!' =!~!!!~! ~t'Sf ~: 111 *~~~ 1 5~6~&~1~~ S~~$~~5~ . :! ~J ;. ii~~J~l ~~~J II ! = ~j~j~J~J 18 , . 00:1.24 ~ ~:$ :J: ~z (!) 8~ tit: :5w3!> ~ w (5 I::; 8~ In ~ =>U)~6 5 z I:C z.... r: C sa ~...J ~:E 80.... a: Q.. -....... .. ;-., 3:-''!O'9~ , "90,-~ . / .!..-.!-o,-s............... ~ ,............ I........';;! . ~i i~ ~ ~ ~ . ~(I) ........... .. ~~ ...J. ....w2 z-lS, I~ ~pJ MMIIIl)IIJIU" ~ ..... -- IlIA \IlIltIIIto ~ ~ -n- ~ ....""""- 'I _ 11M I"'l ....... .-...,.. - """ .., ,... .. ,.. ..... ,.. ,... . ...... \'l ~ .. 11M "...,.. olI"llMIIIlIIlM.L ~ .1..... ..- "" .. _ _ ,.. ..... .... (jj ~ :) Ul Ef Iw d a ~ II ! Slill -= I!t~~~ : I' ~ ;I~~ ~ ~ ~ z I i ~I'~ I i ~ I - ~ f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E i i:li ~ ~ 0 ~ - ~ ~i ~ I a g 1-1 ~~~i5~ \. . o J: ~;~~~~~ o - - (\l t'\J (\1(\1 -J ~ ~ .... ~ ~ w -.JC)?~??~~ ~ ~~~tN~~~ I- ~~!;:~,...~~ <C~~~b"'~ W !;::!_...._,....-z,.... t: - rn CfJ "" Z "" -.J W Z-C\JM"U')~ ::i-'...J-'..J..J..J t!? ;:i!: ~ I~ sa ~ ~ ! 0::: z ~ ~ . ..... () ~~ g~ :.-. CD I : ...... . ~~ tll G:' ~ ;!~ o IX . 8~ .1 E:t i ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~i a:= ~ ~~ ~~ ... .... ,. _ ...... ...... Ill) 1fIIoIIlIIo ...... ..- .~ ~ ~.- '" ...... ~ .... __ ......... ........ .... lit .... ~ ... _ _ 1" III . _ " ~ ~ ... ... _ ... IIIOII'Il.l ... 'IMIW ....... .. I. et_ _ _ .... ... (II ~!iln ~i~ ~wW ~ ~ .. :E~~ 8~m mg~ ~~J: ~ <( ~:s :r: a:z l!] ~!i S2w !5 s:~ u1:;8~ :=JU)~~ CC 29 c se ..J ~E o ... ... ~ ::J w u r- :::::> ~ w I- ....... (/) w x ~ tJ w a IX: a.. ::I: ....NOOOOO \.:1_00000 zai1riltSuiviui w--NtUNtU -J .!d><~ ....wB a~ ~i VJr ~ "II UJ )I >: I.J l"J ......1.:11;""........ .. ~ ~~~pI~~~ I- ~~~~~~:r W~!:~~~-~ ~ ,::q ""l: f/H" Z Z ~ ...J w ~:J~~~~~ ............ ............ N ............._"" ... el rD ............ a: ~ 8 ~ ~ ci ............~.... ~ ~ - G. ~ a. ............G. ~<~~ ..~ ~~~~ ct:: ~ cO Q ~iU J~I , .. lIs E f I ~J6 ~ ~ -,_ j ~fjfl o - lalctl , IIIC i! ~..a~ ~ " II ~ ;I!; ~ 9 ~ ; I i ~Ii~ I ~ 21 - m f~ l?; al ~ ~ .. i i1;cb "ca~ Z $x 6 iC Q c:i - g. ~ ; S iiC 1-1 ~~~~~ D' ! . ' IP~\.~,'.~fl l.'. ..""...'.. ~Wt.{'t\\ x "" , , / a:; ~w .. 0 8 ....01 :;~il cnO~NN BQ.~..... ~~ ~ o q) ~ ~ [:j .... ..... ~ OJ.25 "~~.~Ww~_.~.~, I ' <I ~ '~.~! ~ti~'il'i},"",':/) CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.D.1J,.a. Subiect: Set a Public Hearing to Consider a Proposed Amendment to the Ordinance Creating the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: (jJ Board Action Reauest~d: Set a public hearing date for December 19, 2007 to consider adoption of a proposed amendment to the ordinance creating the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority (CDA) Summary of Information: On August 22, 2007 the Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance to create the Lower Magnolia Green CDA for the purpose of financing certain transportation infrastructure improvements related to the Lower Magnolia Green development. On September 26, 2007 the Board adopted an ordinance establishing a special assessment on property within the CDA District for the purpose of financing the infrastructure improvements. Bond counsel has advised that one parcel in the CDA District was incorrectly identified both in the petition and the ordinance which created the CDA. As a result, the landowner has submitted an amendment to the petition (Attachment A) . Preparer: Francis M. Pitaro Title: Actina Deputv County Administrator Attachments: . Yes DNO # OOOj.26 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Summary of Information (continued} Corrective action requires the Board of Supervisors to hold a public hearing and adopt a proposed amendment to the ordinance (Attachment B) . Please note that the ordinance adopted by the Board on September 26th establishing the special assessments included the correct parcel numbers for purposes of levying the assessments. As suchl corrective action is required only to the ordinance which created the Lower Magnolia Green CDA. OOOjw27 Attachment A AMENDMENT TO PETITION DATED JUNE 22, 2007 FOR THE CREATION OF THE LOWER MAGNOLIA GREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND WAIVER The undersigned Petitioner submitted a Petition for the Creation of the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority, dated June 22, 2007 (the "Petition"). Subsequent to the submission of the Petition, and pursuant to paragraph 2A of the Petition, the Golf Course Land (as defined in the Petition) was withdrawn from the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority (the "CDA") by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia (the "Board") at the request of the Petitioner. The remaining parcels of real property embraced by the CDA have been assigned new tax map parcel numbers. In the Petition and in the Ordinance Creating the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority, adopted on August 22, 2007 (the "Ordinance") one of the tax parcels was described by erroneous tax map parcel number. Petitioner hereby seeks to update and correct the description of the tax parcels in the CDA to reflect the new parcels numbers by amending the Petition as follows: Exhibit A to the Petition is amended by substituting the attached Description of Community Development Authority District Boundaries. The Board is respectfully requested to amend the Ordinance to include the changes described above. To the extent the prOVIsIons of Virginia Code Section 15.2-5156B applies to this amendment the undersigned, as sole petitioning landowner, waives mailing of the proposed amendment to the Ordinance, notice of the adoption of such amendment and the 30 day period referred to in Section 15.2-5156B. Respectfully submitted, PETITIONER: MAGNOLIA GREEN DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company By: MAGNOLIA GREEN DEVELOPMENT MEMBER, LLC, a Virginia limited liability cornpany,Manager By: MAGNOLIA GREEN DEVELOPMENT HOLDINGS, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, Manager By: RA YKA T, INC., a Virginia corporation, Manager By: Raymond L. Zimmerman, President Dated: November _,2007 000j.28 \4782836.3 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DISTRICT BOUNDARIES All those certain parcels of land lying and being in Chesterfield County, Virginia, and being designated as follows: Tax Map Parcel Number Owner Acreaf!e 704-672-1535 Magnolia Green Development, LLC 1,428.184 702-667-9566 Magnolia Green Development, LLC 122.733 698-669-6309 Magnolia Green Development, LLC 1 09.33 1 000:1.29 Attachment B AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORDINANCE CREATING THE LOWER MAGNOLIA GREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN ORDER TO UPDATE AND CORRECT THE DESCRIPTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the "Board of Supervisors") authorized the creation of the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority (the "CDA") by ordinance entitled "An Ordinance to Amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, by adding Chapter 9, Article XVII, Sections 9- 240, 9-241, 9-242, 9-243, 9-244, 9-245, 9-246, 9-247, 9-248, and 9-249 Creating the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority", adopted August 22, 2007 (the "Ordinance"); and WHEREAS, Magnolia Green Development, LLC, as the owner of all of the land in the CDA (the "Landowner") submitted a Petition, dated June 22, 2007 (the "Petition") requesting the Board of Supervisors to create the CDA; and WHEREAS, the Landowner has submitted an Amendment to Petition requesting that the Ordinance be updated and corrected to reflect the updated and corrected tax map parcel numbers of the real estate in the CDA after the withdrawal of the Golf Course Land (as defined in the Petition); and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held on December 19, 2007 by the Board of Supervisors on the adoption of this Ordinance and notice has been duly published in accordance with the requirements of SSI5.2-5104 and 15.2-5156 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Act"); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia as follows: 1. Amendment of Ordinance. The Ordinance is hereby amended by substituting the attached Legal Description for Exhibit A to the Ordinance. 2. Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation. The County Administrator is authorized and directed to execute and file Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the State Corporation Commission in substantially the form on file with the County Administrator with such changes or corrections as the County Administrator may approve prior to filing in order to reflect the corrected and updated tax parcels in the CDA. 3. Recordation of Ordinance. In accordance with Section 15.2-5157 of the Act, a copy of this Ordinance, together with the Ordinance, shall be recorded in the land records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Chesterfield for each tax map parcel in the CDA District and the CDA District shall be noted on the land records of the County. 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. 000130 \4782870.2 Adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, held on December 19, 2007. Clerk, Board of Supervisors, County of Chesterfield, Virginia OOOj.31 - 2 - Exhibit A Legal Description All those certain parcels of land lying and being in Chesterfield County, Virginia, and being designated as follows: Tax Map Parcel Number Owner Acreaee 704-672-1535 Magnolia Green Development, LLC 1,428.184 702-667-9566 Magnolia Green Development, LLC 122.733 698-669-6309 Magnolia Green Development, LLC 109.331 OOOj-_32 \4782870.2 AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF LOWER MAGNOLIA GREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY The undersigned, pursuant to Chapter 51, Title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia, adopts the following Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation for the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority and states as follows: Article I Name The name of this Authority is LOWER MAGNOLIA GREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (the "Authority"). Article II Ore:anization Pursuant to an ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia (the "Board of Supervisors") on August 22,2007, as amended by an ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors on December 19,2007 (collectively, the "Ordinance"), the Authority shall be organized by the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the "County") under the Virginia Water and Waste Authorities Act (Chapter 51, Title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended) (the "Act"), as a political subdivision governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Article III Members The affairs of the Authority shall be conducted by an authority board of five members ("CDA Board"). The initial CDA Board members are as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference. All subsequent members shall be appointed by resolution of the Board of Supervisors. Each member shall serve a four year term, except the initial members who shall serve the terms of office set forth in Exhibit A. The election of officers of the Authority shall be as set forth in the By-Laws of the Authority. Qualifications and appointment of members of the CDA Board shall be consistent with the requirements of the Act. \4840096.3 000::1.33 The CDA Board shall have the powers and duties set forth in the Act and in these Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and the By-Laws, to the extent that such powers and duties are not inconsistent with the Act. Article IV PrinciDal Office The Authority's principal office shall be 6700 Otterdale Road, Moseley, Virginia 23120. The Authority may conduct its business and maintain offices for such purposes at such other places within or without the County as may from time to time be deemed advisable by the CDA Board, and not in conflict with the requirements of the Act. Article V Authority District The land initially encompassed within the Authority is set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto (the "Initial Authority District") provided that the Board of Supervisors by amendment of the Ordinance, may release and exclude from the Authority district: (i) at any time before the issuance of the Authority's bonds: . land containing up to fifty-five (55) acres may be released and excluded at the request of the Petitioner, the Petitioner's successors in interest or the CDA Board; and (ii) at any time after the issuance of the Authority's bonds: . de minimis portions of the land containing not more than twenty-five (25) acres may be released and excluded at the request of the Board of Supervisors, the Petitioner, the Petitioner's successors in interest or the CDA Board. Changes in the Initial Authority District shall not be made unless the Petitioner, the Petitioner's successors in interest or the Authority has provided the County with evidence satisfactory to the County from an appropriate economic and financial consultant that such proposed reduction in the size of the Initial Authority District will have a minimal impact on the amount of the assessment necessary to amortize the anticipated bond indebtedness. Article VI PurDoses and Powers -2- 000:1.34 The Authority is organized for the purpose of exercising all powers granted by the Act, including financing, planning, acquiring and constructing the infrastructure improvements generally described in the Petition to create the Authority attached hereto as Exhibit C. The Authority shall have all powers granted to a "community development authority" under the Act. Article VII Not-Cor-Profit The Authority shall not be organized or operated for pecuniary gain or profit. No part of the net earnings of the Authority shall inure to the benefit of, or be distributable to any member, director, officer, or any other private person, except that the Authority shall be authorized and empowered to pay reasonable compensation for services rendered and to make payments in furtherance of the purposes set forth in Article VI. Article VIII Amendment of Articles These Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation may be amended at any time and from time to time by the Board of Supervisors as now or hereafter prescribed by the Act. Article IX Reeistered Office and Reeistered A2ent The address of the initial registered office of the Authority is c/o Edward B. Kidd, Troutman Sanders LLP, 1001 Haxall Point, Riclnnond, Virginia 23219. The initial Registered Agent of the Authority is Edward B. Kidd, whose business address is identical to that of the initial registered office and who is a resident of Virginia and a member of the Virginia State Bar. Article X Initial Members The names and addresses of the initial members of the CDA Board are as set forth on Exhibit A. Article XI -3- 000:1.35 Indemnification (a) For purposes of this Article XI the following definitions shall apply: (i) "expenses" include counsel fees, expert witness fees, and costs of investigation, litigation and appeal, as well as any amounts expended in asserting a claim for indemnification; (ii) "liability" means the obligation to pay a judgment, settlement, penalty, fine, or other such obligation; (iii) "legal entity" means a corporation, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise; and (iv) "proceeding" means any threatened, pending or completed action, suit, proceeding or appeal whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative and whether formal or informal. (b) In every instance in which the Virginia Nonstock Corporation Act, as it exists on the date hereof or may hereafter be amended, permits the limitation or elimination of liability of directors or officers of a corporation to the corporation, the members, directors and officers of the Authority shall not be liable to the Authority. (c) The Authority shall indemnify any individual who is, was or is threatened to be made a party to a proceeding (including a proceeding by or in the right of the Authority) because such individual is or was a member, director or officer of the Authority or because such individual is or was serving the Authority or any other legal entity in any capacity at the request of the Authority while a member, director or officer of the Authority, against all liabilities and reasonable expenses incurred in the proceeding except such liabilities and expenses as are incurred because of such individual's willful misconduct or knowing violation of the criminal law. Service as a member, director or officer of a legal entity controlled by the Authority shall be deemed service at the request of the Authority. The determination that indemnification under this paragraph (c) is permissible and the evaluation as to the reasonableness of expenses in a specific case shall be made, in the case of a member or director, as provided by law, and in the case of an officer, as provided in Section (d) of this Article; provided, however, that if a majority of the members of the Authority has changed after the date of the alleged conduct giving rise to a claim for indemnification, such determination and evaluation shall, at the option of the person claiming indemnification, be made by special legal counsel agreed upon by the CDA Board and such person. Unless a determination has been made that indemnification is not permissible, the Authority shall make advances and reimbursements for expenses incurred by a member, director or officer in a proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking from such member, director or officer to repay the same if it is ultimately determined that such member, director or officer is not entitled to indemnification. Such undertaking shall be an unlimited, unsecured general -4- 0001.36 obligation of the member, director or officer and shall be accepted without reference to such member's, director's or officer's ability to make repayment. The termination of a proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent shall not of itself create a presumption that a member, director or officer acted in such a manner as to make such member, director or officer ineligible for indemnification. The Authority is authorized to contract in advance to indemnify and make advances and reimbursements for expenses to any of its members, directors or officers to the same extent provided in this paragraph (c). (d) The Authority may, to a lesser extent or to the same extent that it is required to provide indemnification and make advances and reimbursements for expenses to its members, directors and officers pursuant to paragraph (c) of this Article, provide indemnification and make advances and reimbursements for expenses to its employees and agents, the members, directors, officers, employees and agents of its subsidiaries and predecessor entities, and any person serving any other legal entity in any capacity at the request of the Authority, and may contract in advance to do so. The determination that indemnification under this paragraph (d) is permissible, the authorization of such indemnification and the evaluation as to the reasonableness of expenses in a specific case shall be made as authorized from time to time by general or specific action of the CDA Board, which action may be taken before or after a claim for indemnification is made, or as otherwise provided by law. No person's rights under paragraph (c) of this Article shall be limited by the provisions of this paragraph (d). ( e) The rights of each person entitled to indemnification under this Article shall inure to the benefit of such person's heirs, executors and administrators. Special legal counsel selected to make determinations under this Article may be counsel for the Authority. Indemnification pursuant to this Article shall not be exclusive of any other right of indemnification to which any person may be entitled, including indemnification pursuant to a valid contract, indemnification by legal entities other than the Authority and indemnification under policies of insurance purchased and maintained by the Authority or others. No person, however, shall be entitled to indemnification by the Authority to the extent such person is indemnified by another, including an insurer. The Authority is authorized to purchase and maintain insurance against any liability it may have under this Article or to protect any of the persons named above against any liability arising from their service to the Authority or any other legal entity at the request of the Authority regardless of the Authority's power to indemnify against such liability. The provisions of this Article shall not be deemed to preclude the Authority from entering into contracts otherwise permitted by law with any individuals or legal entities, including those named above. If any provision of this Article or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Article, and to this end the provisions of this Article are severable. (t) No amendment, modification or repeal of this Article shall diminish the rights provided hereunder to any person arising from conduct or events occurring before the adoption of such amendment, modification or repeal. -5- 0001.37 [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTION ALL Y LEFT BLANK] -6- 000:1.38 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned incorporator has executed these Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation as of the _ day of December, 2007, as duly authorized by Ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia on August 22,2007, as amended on December 19,2007. By: County Administrator, County of Chesterfield, Virginia -7- 000:1.39 Exhibit A Names and Addresses of Initial Members Art Heinz President Heinz Insurance Inc. 9321 Waterfowl Flyway Chesterfield, Virginia 23838 (804) 216-1442 Dale Residence Debra Girvin Vice President of Human Resources Shamin Hotels 11300 Taylor Road Chesterfield, Virginia 23838 (804) 777-9000 x124 Matoaca District Robert M. (Mac) Bullock Director of Operations Getloaded.com 14221 Chepstow Road Midlothian, Virginia 23113 (804) 521-1718 Midlothian District Worth (Buddy) Whitfield IBM 3223 Regatta Point Court Midlothian, Virginia 23112 (804) 651-3521 Clover Hill District Manuel Flores Brig. General U.S. Army (Retired) 2348 Coxendale Road Chester, Virginia 23831 (804) 748-6912 -8- Term of Office Commenced Expires August 22, 2007 August 22, 2007 August 22, 2007 August 22, 2007 August 22, 2007 June 30, 2011 June 30, 2011 June 30,2011 June 30, 2011 June 30, 2011 OOOj_40 Bermuda District -9- 0001.ll1. Exhibit B Description of Initial Authority District All those certain parcels of land lying and being in Chesterfield County, Virginia, and being designated as follows: Tax MaD Parcel Number Owner Acreae:e 704-672-1535 Magnolia Green Development, LLC 1,428.184 702-667-9566 Magnolia Green Development, LLC 122.733 698-669-6309 Magnolia Green Development, LLC 109.331 -10- OOOj.42 Exhibit C PETITION FOR THE CREATION OF THE LOWER MAGNOLIA GREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD~ VIRGINIA JUNE :i 2 , 2007 WHEREAS, the undersigned (the "Petitioner") is the owner of certain parcels of land located in the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, (the "County"), Matoaca Magisterial District, containing 1,896.59 acres, more or less, in the aggregate, and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Lower Magnolia Green Property"); and WHEREAS, the Petitioner intends to develop the Lower Magnolia Green Property as a mixed-use development consisting of residential, commercial and office components, with recreation facilities and other amenities, generally consistent with the Conceptual Plan for the Lower Magnolia Green Property dated February 1, 2007, prepared by Timmons Group, entitled "Lower Magnolia Green Conceptual Plan" (the '~Conceptual Plan"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B as a part hereof, all of which will provide additional residential, business and recreational opportunities for the citizens of the County, as well as infrastructure improvements benefiting the citizens of the County, and which will increase employment opportunities and expand the tax base of the COWlty; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner proposes to create a community development authority as permitted under Sections 15.2-5152, et seq _, and other applicable provisions of Chapter 51, Title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Act") to provide fmancing for certain infrastructure improvements necessary to meet the increased demands placed upon the County as a result of development within the community development authority district; NOW, THEREFORE, the Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board of Supervisors of the County (the "Board") adopt an ordinance (the "Ordinance") creating the Lower Magnolia 0505:75585.3 1 000:1.43 Green Community Development Authority pursuant to the provisions of the Act, and in support of such request, the Petitioner represents and states as follows: 1. Standin2 and Jurisdiction. The Petitioner is the owner of all of the Lower Magnolia Green Property to be included in the community development authority district All such real estate is located wholly within the County. 2. Name and Boundaries of the Proposed District. The Petitioner requests that the Board create the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority (the "CDA") pursuant to the authority granted in the Act~ The initial boundaries of the CDA district (the "District") will be as described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof~ The boundaries of the CDA may be changed only in one of the following ways: A. Before Creation of the CDA. Before the CDA is created, the Petitioner may, at its sole option, withdraw from this Petition, and from the CDA, up to 270 acres of land to be used for construction of the proposed golf course as shown generally on the Conceptual Plan (the "Golf Course Land"). B. After Creation of the CDA But Before Bonds Are Issued. If the Petitioner does not withdraw the Golf Course Land from the CDA prior to the CDA's creation in accordance with paragraph A above, the Board of Supervisors may, after the CDA is created but before bonds are issued, adopt an ordinance removing up to 270 acres from the CDA for the Golf Course Land if requested to do so by the Petitioner, the Petitioner's successor(s) in interest, or the Board of the CDA. Additionally, the Board of Supervisors may, after the CDA is created but before bonds are issued, adopt an ordinance removing up to 55 additional acres from the CDA if requested to do so by the Petitioner, the Petitioner's successor(s) in interest, or the Board of Directors of the CDA. 0505:75585.3 2 000:144 C. After Creation of the CDA and After Bonds Are Issued. After the CDA has been created and bonds have been issued, the Board of Supervisors may, on its own initiative or at the request of the Petitioner, the Petitioner's successor(s) in interest, or the Board of Directors of the CDA, remove from the district de minimis portions of land not to exceed twenty-five (25) acres. Changes in District boundaries, other than to exclude the Golf Course Land, shall not be made unless the Petitioner, its successor(s) in interest or the CDA has provided the County with evidence satisfactory to the County from an appropriate economic and financial consultant that such proposed reduction in the size of the CDA will have a minimal impact on the amount of the assessments necessary to amortize the anticipated Bond indebtedness. 3. Services and Facilities to be Undertaken bv the CDAa The CDA will undertake to finance, design and construct certain infrastructure improvements pursuant to Section 15.2-5158 of the Act, which infrastructure improvements shall consist of the infrastructure improvements described on Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part hereof (collectively:! the "Improvements"). All Improvements will be constructed in accordance with applicable governmental standards after all necessary permits and approvals therefor have been obtained. 4. Conditions. This Petition and the obligations of the Petitioner are contingent upon: (a) the Improvements being deemed to be in-kind contributions pursuant to the zoning conditions applicable to the Lower Magnolia Green Property, the cost of which will be applied to the $1,600 per residential lot cash proffer for road improvements as provided in the zoning conditions; (b) the Improvements being accepted by the County in satisfaction of all 0505:75585.3 3 oOOj,~45 requirements, if any, applicable to the Lower Magnolia Green Property relating to the construction of (i) any portion of the extension of the Powhite Parkway and (ii) any off site improvements other than those improvements specifically described in Section 3C(4) of the 1991 Textual Statement approved by the County in connection with the rezoning of the Lower Magnolia Green Property in 1991 ; (c) the Department of Transportation having concluded that no further traffic studies will be required in connection with the development of the Lower Magnolia Green Property and the County confirming that no reduction in densities will be permitted or required under the zoning conditions within the Lower Magnolia Green Property as a result of traffic conditions; (d) subject to the condition set forth in the letter dated June 21, 2007 from the County's Director of Planning regarding subdivision and zoning requirements applicable to the Lower Magnolia Green Property, the County having confirmed that development within the Lower Magnolia Green Property and the application of conditions of zoning applicable to the Lower Magnolia Green Property will not require any information from or action by Goint or othenvise) the owner or owners of any other property; (e) the County having confirmed that the obligations of the CDA will be independent from the obligations regarding the development of the Lower Magnolia Green Property and that none of the work to be performed by the CDA will be conditions to the development of Lower Magnolia Green Property or the issuance of any approvals required for development of the Lower Magnolia Green Property; (f) the dedication of land required from the Lower Magnolia Green Property for school, park, library, frre station/rescue squad and public transportation purposes being limited to (i) an elementary school site containing approximately 22 acres at the location shown on the Conceptual Plan (with the boundaries to be adjusted and the size of the site increased if a standard elementary school consistent with the requirements described on Exhibit D attached 0505:75585.3 4 0001.46 hereto cannot be accommodated within the 22 acre site), (ii) a site for a library and a fire station containing approximately 10 acres within Parcel M as shown on the Conceptual Plan, (iii) a park site containing approximately 15.8 acres within the northern portion of Parcel CA as shown on the Conceptual Plan, and (iv) in the event public transportation is available in the area prior to 2010) a site for pickup and discharge of passengers that includes parking, at a location and in a size to be agreed upon by the Petitioner and the County, in accordance with paragraph 3C(7) of the 1991 Textual Statement, it being agreed that the obligation to provide a pickup/discharge site would be satisfied by the execution of an agreement with the County for the joint use of commercial property along Route 360 providing for "park and ride" parking; (g) the amount paid in assessments to the CDA being in lieu of or credited toward, but not be in addition to, any impact fees which might be imposed by the County applicable to the Lower Magnolia Green Property; (h) the County having confirmed that it is the intent of the current Board of Supervisors that the CDA be in lieu of any service district which might otherwise be imposed on the Lower Magnolia Green Property and that if a service district is to be considered by the Board of Supervisors that will affect the Lower Magnolia Green property, the County Administrator shall recommend to the Board of Supervisors that the amount paid in assessments to the CDA be credited on a pro-rata basis toward any assessment imposed pursuant to such a service district; and (i) the inclusion of items (a), (b), (c), (d), (e)) (f), (g) and (h) above in the Ordinance creating the CDA. No later than July 1, 2014 the Petitioner shall provide road access to the 15.8 acre park site by a road accepted into the state highway system for maintenance. 5. Proposed Plan for ProvidiD! and Financin2 the Improvements. A. The Petitioner proposes that the CDA issue bonds (the "Bonds"), which may be taxable or tax-exempt, to pay the costs associated with the design and construction of the 0505:75585.3 5 000:1.47 Improvements under the authority of the Act, specifically Sections 15.2-5158 and 15.2-5125 of the Act, as those Sections may be amended. The Bonds shall be issued as soon as can practically be achieved (anticipated to be during the first quarter of 2008) and shall be in a maximum aggregate amount sufficient to pay the costs of the Improvements, to fund certain reserves and capitalized interest and to pay the costs of issuing the Bonds, not to exceed a total of $357000,000. It is estimated that approximately $27,100,000 of Bond proceeds will be available for construction of the Improvements. The proceeds of the Bonds shall be used to pay the cost of the Improvements described in this Petition, the cost of issuing the Bonds and funding any required reserves, and paying capitalized interest on the Bonds for a period of up to thirty -six (36) months after issuance of the Bonds. If the cost of designing and constructing the Improvements exceeds the funds available from the proceeds of the Bonds, the Petitioner shall be solely responsible for paying such excess, subject to the limitations contained in Exhibit C hereto. B. If the CDA encounters problems in issuing the Bonds due to adverse market conditions, the CDA shall give notice to the Petitioner and provide the Petitioner with an opportunity to assist in issuance of the Bonds. C. The Petitioner proposes that the CDA request the Board to establish a special assessment upon the property within the District to finance the cost of the Improvements as provided in Section 15.2-5158(A)(5) of the Act. Portions of the Lower Magnolia Green Property which are dedicated for public purposes or which are conveyed to an owners association as open space or common areas shall not be subject to assessment. D. The CDA or its designee will contract for the design and construction of the Improvements which shall be dedicated to the County or VDOT upon completion. Certain 0505:75585.3 6 OOOj.48 responsibilities of the County with respect to the development of the Improvements and certain responsibilities of the Petitioner, are summarized in Exhibit C hereto. 6. Benefits from CDA Construction oflmnrovements. The following benefits are expected to be derived from the design and construction of the Improvements by the CDA: A. The establishment of the CDA will provide for needed infrastructure improvements to serve the residents and businesses in the District, as well as residents and businesses in the surrounding community as necessary to meet the increased demands placed upon the County as a result of development within the Lower Magnolia Green Property, and will permit these infrastructure improvements to be constructed more expeditiously than would otherwise be possible. B. The Improvements will provide residential, commercial, office and recreational opportunities for County residents and will promote economic development in the County by attracting commercial and office projects that will generate substantial tax revenues for the County and create new jobs. 7. CDA Board Members. The board members of the CDA shall be selected under the applicable provisions of Virginia Code Section 15.2-5113. 8. Countemarts. This Petition may be executed in counterparts all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 9. Waivera The undersigned is the sole petitioning landowner for the CDA and the owner of 100% of the land contained within the District. By submitting this Petition to the Board~ the Petitioner waives its right to withdraw this Petition or its signature thereto at any time after its submission except as specifically provided in Paragraph 2A of the Petition. Additionally, pursuant to Section 15.2-S156B of the Code of Virginia of 1950, the Petitioner 0505:75585.3 7 OOOj.49 hereby waives mailing of the proposed Ordinance to be considered by the Board entitled "AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING CHAPTER 9, ARTICLE XVII, SECTIONS 9-240, 9-241, 9-242, 9- 243, 9-244, 9-245, 9-246, 9-247, 9-248 AND 9-249 CREATING THE LOWER MAGNOLIA GREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY", notice of the adoption of such Ordinance and the thirty (30) day period to withdraw its signature from this Petition, as referred to in Section 15.2-5156B of the Code of Virginia of 1950. 10. Time for Action on Petition. This Petition is submitted subject to the condition that if the Board has not voted to authorize establishment of the CDA within four (4) months from the date of this Petition, this Petition shall automatically expire and be of no further force or effect. 11. Determinations of Director of Planniol!. Petitioner acknowledges receipt of two written determinations by the County's Director of Planning, (i) one dated April 16, 2007 relating to vested rights (the ''"Vesting Determination") as further explained by letters dated May 25, 2007 from the Director of Environmental Engineering and June 21, 2007 from the Director of Planning, and (ii) one dated June 21, 2007 relating to requirements of the subdivision ordinance and interpretations of the 1991 zoning case approval for the Lower Magnolia Green Property (the "Waiver and Requirements Determination"). Petitioner waives any right that it might have to appeal the Vesting Determination and the Waiver and Requirements Detenninati on. 12. Petitioner's Obli2ations Reesrdin2 Water Facilities. Petitioner agrees to design and construct (i) a 24" public water line along the northern side of Route 360 from Foxclub Parkway to Otterdale Road, (ii) a 30" public water line along the northern side of Route 0505:75585.3 8 000:1,.59 360 from Otterdale Road to Grange Hall School and (iii) a 2~O mg elevated water tank and all piping and appurtenances necessary to connect to the 30" water line to be constructed along the northern side of Route 360 on a site to be identified as provided herein to serve the Lower Magnolia Green Property. The water tank shall be constructed in accordance with the County's standard plans and specifications in effect as of the date of this Petition. The County shall use diligent efforts to acquire a site for the water tank. at an appropriate location in the vicinity of Route 360 and Otterdale Road; provided, however, if the County is unable to acquire such a site on terms acceptable to the County, Petitioner agrees to dedicate a site within the Lower Magnolia Green Property or within other property which may be acquired by Petitioner of sufficient size to accommodate the water tank, not to exceed 3.0 acres, at a location to be mutually agreed upon by Petitioner and the County, it being understood that, in all events, a site located within the northern portion of Parcel S as shown on the Conceptual Plan shall be acceptable to the County~ The location of the site for the water tank shall be agreed upon no later than October 31, 2008 and the water tank shall be completed no later than May 1, 2010, subject to extension for reasons beyond the control of Petitioner. Petitioner's construction of the 24" and 30" water lines shall be subject to payment by the COWlty of cost rebates in accordance with standard COWlty policies; provided~ however, cost rebates for oversizing of the water line extension west of Otterdale Road shall, in all events, be provided for line size in excess of 24". Respectfully submitted, PETITIONER: MAGNOLIA GREEN DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company By: MAGNOLIA GREEN DEVELOPMENT MEMBER, LLC, a Virginia limited liability cornpany,~anager 0505:75585.3 9 0001.51. OSOS:1SS8S3 By: MAGNOLIA GREEN DEVELOPMENT HOLDINGS, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, Manager By: RA YKAT, INC., a Virginia corporation, Manager B~ / 10 000:152 fC\ . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.D.12,.b.1. Subiect: Set a Public Hearing to Consider the Tax Exemption Request of The Eppington Foundation County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Reauested: Set a public hearing for December 19/ 2007 to consider the tax exemption request of The Eppington Foundation. Summary of Information: Under Virginia law, real and personal property used for charitable/ patriotic, historical, benevolent/ cultural or playground purposes may be exempted from taxation by the Supervisors. religious, park and Board of The Eppington Foundation/ a historical/ non-profit organization located in Chesterfield County, has requested a tax exemption on a 63 -acre parcel (Parcel No. 709635067600000) adjacent to Eppington Foundation. The Eppington Foundation owns and operates the historic Eppington Plantation/ which has been made a National Historic Landmark by the National Park Service. In 2005, the Foundation began the process of acquiring additional land adjacent to and near the plantation site in order to protect the Preparer: Steven L. Micas Title: County Attornev 0505:76856.1 Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000:1.53 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 plantation site against development encroachment and to protect the property's view shed. For budgetary reasons, these acquisitions have been limited to approximately 60 acres per year and will continue over a total of six years. The Foundation is placing conservation easements on these properties as they acquire them. The Foundation plans to incorporate these property acquisitions into the entrance to the Plantation, which will insure a scenic entrance way and a substantial buffer between the plantation site and future development. Each year, the Foundation intends to request a tax exemption on the parcel newly acquired during that year. In 2005, the Board approved a request from Eppington for tax exemption for the first of the six parcels, and last year the Board approved a request for the second of the six parcels (see the property identified on the attached map). This year's tax exemption request is for a parcel to the east of the si tes for which the exemptions have already been granted (see the property identified as 14501 Eppes Falls Road) . The location for the remaining three parcels is also shown on the map. The 63 acre parcel for which the exemption is requested has an assessed value of $184,800, leading to an annual tax of $1,792.56. This assessment is well below the $5,000 cap for the granting of a real estate tax exemption pursuant to the Board's policy. Staff has reviewed the Eppington Foundation's application and finds that it is consistent with the policy established by the Board for granting tax exemptions. Additionally! staff has reviewed the information which state law requires the Board to consider before granting an exemption and finds that the information is consistent with Eppington's status as a historical organization that is eligible for the tax exemption. The criteria which the Board must consider under state law! are attached. In order to consider this request! the Board must schedule a public hearing for December 19, 2007. OOOj.54 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERING TAX EXEMPTION REQUESTS UNDER STATE LAW 1. The Eppington Foundation is exempt from taxation pursuant to sSGl (c) of the Internal Revenue Code. 2. The Eppington Foundation does not possess a current annual alcoholic beverage license for serving alcoholic beverages for use on the property, although individuals who rent the Plantation for wedding receptions may obtain an ABC license and serve alcoholic beverages during the reception. 3. No director of the Foundation is paid any compensation for service to the corporation and its salaries are not in excess of reasonable salaries for services performed by the employees. 4. No part of the net earnings of the Foundation inures to the benefit of any individual. 5. The Foundation provides services for the common good of the public. 6. The Foundation does not attempt to influence legislation or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office. 0505:76856.1 OOOj..55 VICINITY S H The Eppington F n ti n 1 501 Eppes II d \\ \ "~ Future ACqUiSition,. '\ .~ Eppington Foundation ~ // ,f I Eppington Fou ndation // ~> 14501 Eppes Falls Road / /1 / ) /~ /....,0 r- ;..... o I Eppington j ~ Tax Exemptions Obtained 2005 -2006 1 tlcl ~ qR~' ~ -11OO:J ti~ t C h e5ter1ie Id C 0 lJ nty D.,:e p a rtm ent of Uti! aies OOO'j~6 81 ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: November 14, 2007 Item Number: S.O.11.b.2. Subiect: Set a Public Hearing to Consider the Tax Exemption Request of Chesterfield Alternatives, Incorporated County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: M {j Board Action Reauested: Set a public hearing for December 19, 2007 to consider the tax exemption request of Chesterfield Alternatives, Inc. Summary of Information: Under Virginia law, real and personal property used for religious, charitable, patriotic, historical, benevolent, cultural, or park and playground purposes may be exempted from taxation by the Board of Supervisors. This year Chesterfield Alternatives, Inc. ("CAI"), a benevolent, non-profit organization located in Chesterfield County, has requested a tax exemption on a parcel located at 6301 Mockingbird Lane in Dale Magisterial District and acquired in 2005 (Parcel No. 731673318700000). CAI is a non-profit Virginia corporation created in 1986 to assist the Community Services Board in integrating mentally handicapped people into the community by operating group homes. CAI operates eight group homes for the mentally handicapped in Chesterfield County. The group home for which CAr seeks this exemption will be used for adults with mental retardation. It Preparer: Steven L. Micas Title: County Attornev 0505:76875.1 Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000::1,.57 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 will be licensed by the Virginia Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse. Residential support services will be provided by Chesterfield Community Services Board beginning in November 2007. The parcel has an assessed value of $200,500. The annual real estate tax on the parcel is $1,944.85. This is significantly below the $5,000 cap which the Board's policy permits for the consideration of tax exemptions. Staff has reviewed CAI's application and finds that it is consistent with the policy established by the Board for granting tax exemptions. Additionally, staff has reviewed the information which state law requires the Board to consider before granting an exemption and finds that the information is consistent with CAI's status as a benevolent organization that is eligible for the tax exemption. The criteria which the Board must consider under state law, are attached. In order to consider this request, the Board must schedule a public hearing for December 19, 2007. 0001.58 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERING TAX EXEMPTION REQUESTS UNDER STATE LAW 1. CAI is exempt from taxation pursuant to ~501 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code. 2. CAI does not possess a current annual alcoholic beverage license for serving alcoholic beverages for use on either of the properties. 3 . No director of CAI is paid any compensation for service to the corporation and its salaries are not in excess of reasonable salaries for services performed by the employees. 4. No part of the net earnings of CAI inures to the benefit of any individual 5. CAI provides services for the common good of the public. 6 . CAI does not attempt to influence legislation or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office. 0505:76875.1 000:2.59 VICINITY SKETCH 01 Mo in bird \~ / /'" '-.. ',,- / ~/ / / / / / / / I Harbour Point \'d/ I \\ Chesterfield County D@partment of Utilities ~ llW' ~ qt'a~ Z5i23 ~t OOOj~60 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF S..UPERVISORS GEND Page 1 of 3 Meeting D.ate: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.D.1~b.3w Subiect: Set a Public Hearing to Consider the Tax Exemption Request of Patient Services, Incorporated County Administrator's Comments: County Administra.tor: /fJ Board Action-ReQuested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to set a public hearing for December 19, 2007 to consider the tax exemption requests of Patient Services, Inc. Summary of Information: Under Virginia law1 real and personal property used for charitable and benevolent purposes may be classified as exempt from taxation by the Board of Supervisors. This year Patient Services, Inc., a benevolent, non-profit organization with an office in Chesterfield County, has requested a tax exemption for a 1.037 acre parcel (Parcel No. 731687113600000), a 1.003 acre parcel (Parcel No. 730681527000000), and a 1.247 acre parcel (Parcel No. 730687964700000). Maps of the parcels are attached. Patient Services, Inc. is a benevolent, non-profit Virginia corporation incorporated in 1991, which was developed to support persons with specific chronic medical illnesses by assisting them with health insurance premiums and pharmacy co-payments in order to help improve their quality of life. They are seeking exemption for their offices, which are located on the three parcels, which are at 3104 and 3106 East Boundary Court, Midlothian, and Preparer: Steven L.Micas Title: County Attornev 0505:76991.1 Attachments: . Yes DNO # OOOj~61 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPER ISORS AGEND Pag.e 2 of 3 13541 East Boundary Road as part of the Branderrnill Trade Center. The 1.. 037 acre parcel (Parcel Now 731687113600000) is assessed at $365,400, leading to an annual real estate tax of approximately $3,544.38. The 1.003 acre parcel (Parcel No. 730687527000000) is assessed at $704,4001 leading to an annual tax of $6,832w68.. The 1.247 acre parcel (Parcel No. 730687964700000) is assessed at $1,354, 100, leading to an annual tax of $13, 134 .. 77 . The collective amount of the assessmentl $23,511..83 exceeds the $5,000 cap which the Board's policy permits for the consideration of tax exemptions. AccordinglYr to consider this request above $5,0001 the Board would have to waive its policy by unanimous vote. Staff has reviewed the information which state law requires the Board to consider before granting an exemption and finds that the information is consistent with Patient Services, Ine./s status as a benevolent, non-profit organization that is eligible for the tax exemption. The criteria which the Board must consider under state law are attached. In order to consider this request, the Board must schedule a public hearing for December 191 2007. Staff recommends that the Board only consider this request, after a public hearing, in an amount not to exceed $5,000. 000:1&62 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 CRITERJ:APOR CONSIDERING TAX EXEMPTION REQUESTS mmE:a STATE LAW 1~ Patient Services, Inc. is exempt from taxation pursuant to ~501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code; 2 .. Patient .Services, Ine IP does not possess a current annual alcoholic beverage license for serving alcoholic beverages for use on the property; 3. No director of Patient Services I Inc~ is paid any compensation for service to the corpopa.tion and it~ salaries are not in excess of reasonable salaries for services performed by the employeesi 4.. No part of the net earnings of Patient Services, Inc. inures to the benefit of any individual; 5. Patient Services, Inc. provide services for the common good of the public; and 6. Patient Services, Inc. does not attempt to influence legislation or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office. 0505:76991.1 0001~63 VICINITY SKETCH Patient Services, Inc. / ~ ...."-.,~--------- t lie. eqf~t m.t1 teet Chesterfield County Dep.artment of Utilities 61 ~~,!!}J'~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.D.11.b.4. Subiect: Set a Public Hearing to Consider the Tax Exemption Request of Community Based Services, Incorporated County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ f Board Action Reauested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to set a public hearing for December 19, 2007 to consider the tax exemption request of Community Based Services, Inc. Summary of Information: Under Virginia law, real and personal property used for religious, charitable, patriotic, historical, benevolent, or cultural purposes may be classified as exempt from taxation by the Board of Supervisors. This year Community Based Services, Inc. ("CBSI"), a benevolent, non-profit organization located in Chesterfield County, has requested a tax exemption on a 0.346 parcel located at 5132 Gravelbrook Drive in Dale Magisterial District and which it acquired in 2005 (Parcel No. 776687002900000). A map of the parcel is attached. CBSI provides residential support and services to adults with mental retardation and other disabling conditions. The property for which CBSI is requesting an exemption is being used as a residential group home for five Pre parer: Steven L. Micas Title: County Attornev 0505:76858.1 Attachments: . Yes DNO # OOOj.65 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 4 AGENDA adults with a primary diagnosis of mental retardation. This property is the primary residence for these five individuals. The parcel has an assessed value of $233/700 and an annual real estate tax of $2/266.89. This amount is significantly below the $5,000 cap which the Board's policy permits for the consideration of tax exemptions. Staff has reviewed CBSI's application and finds that it is consistent with the policy established by the Board for granting tax exemptions. Additionally, staff has reviewed the information which state law requires the Board to consider before granting an exemption and finds that the information is consistent wi th CBSI' s status as a benevolent organization that is eligible for the tax exemption. The criteria which the Board must consider under state law are attached. In order to consider this request/ the Board must schedule a public hearing for December 19/ 2007. 000::1.66 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 4 CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERING TAX EXEMPTION REQUESTS UNDER STATE LAW 1. Community Based Services, Inc. is exempt from taxation pursuant to ~501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code; 2. Community Based Services, Inc. does not possess a current annual alcoholic beverage license for serving alcoholic beverages for use on the property; 3. No director of Community Based Services, Inc. is paid any compensation for service to the corporation and its salaries are not in excess of reasonable salaries for services performed by the employees; 4 . No part of the net earnings of Communi ty Based Services, Inc. inures to the benefit of any individual; 5. Community Based Services, Inc. provide services for the common good of the public; and 6. Community Based Services, Inc. does not attempt to influence legislation or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office. 0505:76858.1 0001.67 VICINITY SKETH 5 Gr Ibrook Drive \ \,,~,~ ~ .f, r/~ \~ I -"-. ~ ~\ \ "- / " " \ N .#f+~ l/'~.' L'''' '\ j '~~ W'llt:~ ;~~E t~";,l ~."f:'~~' S Chesterfield COlJn~ Department of Utilities 'I i.c. :eq'~~ .;;se.JJ ~!t OOOj~6 I-~ 611 ri!lc!"~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.D.12..b.5. Subiect: Set a Public Hearing to Consider the Tax Exemption Request of Johns Foundation County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator:1 Board Action Reauested: Set a public hearing for December 19, 2007 to consider the tax exemption request of Johns Foundation. Summary of Information: Under Virginia law, real and personal property used for charitable, patriotic, historical, benevolent, or cultural purposes may be exempted from taxation by the Board of Supervisors. This year Johns Foundation, a benevolent, non-profit organization located in Chesterfield County, has requested a tax exemption on furniture and fixtures located at the Hawthorne Cancer Resource Center at 1459 Johnston-Willis Drive in Midlothian Magisterial District. Johns Foundation is a non-profit Virginia corporation created in 1988 to provide assistance to cancer patients by providing grants, underwriting education for oncology professionals, and supporting the programs of the Hawthorne Cancer Resource Center. All furniture and fixtures are located at the Hawthorne Cancer Resource Center (~The Hawthorne"). The Hawthorne is a Preparer: Steven L. Micas Title: County Attornev 0505:76860.1 Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000:1.69 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 non-clinical environment where cancer patients and their families participate in educational, recreational and support activities. The personal property tax on the furniture and fixtures for which Johns seeks this exemption is approximately $500.00. Staff has reviewed Johns Foundation's application and finds that it is consistent with the policy established by the Board for granting tax exemptions. Additionally, staff has reviewed the information which state law requires the Board to consider before granting an exemption and finds that the information is consistent with Johns Foundation status as a benevolent organization that is eligible for the tax exemption. The criteria which the Board must consider under state law, are attached. In order to consider this request, the Board must schedule a public hearing for December 19, 2007. 0001.70 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of3 CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERING TAX EXEMPTION REQUESTS UNDER STATE LAW 1. Johns Foundation is exempt from taxation pursuant to ~501 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code. 2. Johns Foundation does not have an annual alcoholic beverage license. 3. The officers and directors of the Johns Foundation are volunteers and do not receive any compensation. The one employee of the organization receives a reasonable salary. 4. A significant portion of the Johns Foundation's earning are received by donations, contributionst and local grants. The Johns Foundation gives grants to needy cancer patients as a part of its Hope for Cancer Patients Program. None of its net earnings inures to the benefit of any individual. 5. The Johns Foundation provides a Cancer Resource Center for the community and awards grants to needy cancer patients. We believe these services are for the common good of the public. 6. The Johns Foundation is not involved in carrying on propaganda, influencing legislationt or political campaigns. 7. The revenue impact to the locality and its taxpayers of exempting the property of the Johns Foundation from taxes is currently a loss of approximately $500 per year in property taxes. 8. The Johns Foundations has not been informed by the governing body of any other criteriat facts and circumstances that are deemed pertinent. 0505:76860.1 000:1.71. ~\ II~~._.- ~I! ~ ~~~IN~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.D.11.b.S. Subiect: Set a Public Hearing to Consider the Tax Exemption Request of Richmond Goodwill Industries, Incorporated County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: 01 if Board Action Reauested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to set a public hearing for December 19, 2007 to consider the tax exemption requests of Richmond Goodwill Industries, Inc. Summary of Information: Under Virginia law, real and personal property used for charitable and benevolent purposes may be classified as exempt from taxation by the Board of Supervisors. This year Richmond Goodwill Industries, Ine. ( "RGI"), a benevolent, non-profit organization with an office in Chesterfield County, has requested a tax exemption for a 2.062 acre parcel (Parcel No. 739709205300000), located at 1211 Alverser Drive. A map of the parcel is attached. RGI is a benevolent, and charitable, non-profit virginia corporation, which was developed to help people with obstacles to employment achieve the highest possible degree of economic and personal independence. The parcel is assessed at $1,741,300, leading to an annual real estate tax of $16,890.61. The assessment exceeds the $5,000 cap which the Board's policy permits for Preparer: Steven L. Micas Title: County Attornev 0505:77076.1 Attachments: . Yes DNO # 0001.72 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 the consideration of tax exemptions. Accordingly, to consider this request above $5/000, the Board would have to waive its policy by unanimous vote. Staff has reviewed the information which state law requires the Board to consider before granting an exemption and finds that the information is consistent with RGI's status as a benevolent, charitable, non-profit organization that is eligible for the tax exemption. The criteria which the Board must consider under state law are attached. In order to consider this request, the Board must schedule a public hearing for December 19, 2007. Staff recommends that the Board only consider this request, after a public hearing, in an amount not to exceed $5/000. 000:1.73 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERING TAX EXEMPTION REQUESTS UNDER STATE LAW 1. Richmond Goodwill Industries, Inc. is exempt from taxation pursuant to ~501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code; 2 . Richmond Goodwill Industries, Inc. does not possess a current annual alcoholic beverage license for serving alcoholic beverages for use on the property; 3. No director of Patient Services, Inc. is paid any compensation for service to the corporation and its salaries are not in excess of reasonable salaries for services performed by the employees; 4. No part of the net earnings of Richmond Goodwill Industries, Inc. inures to the benefit of any individual; 5. Richmond Goodwill Industries, Inc. provide services for the common good of the public; and 6. Richmond Goodwill Industries, Inc. does not attempt to influence legislation or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office. 0505:77076.1 000j.74 RICHMOND GOODWILL I U 1211ALVER RI IE , IN . ~ /~," "- ----1 fll.. ~.... ... .. ..... · / ""'''-, // // "~ ".,',"" .-....." I / -""',-" ~ .~" I~ I 'A~ i. . . .' '. ~.' ~.~ ' '/ ~'"" //." //'''-'''' ,/,,-'''''', ,.~_, / I r VA 'I? ~ ,. // ','....,.., / / '..."" / ""-.", ",<.. I J".., .'. / ,/;' , "'--.... I / . , / "'" ~ . ~ " . '/ ~ I ~l '''' ,--",,--_! ,~~ / '/ ~ ~ '...... # / ~, ........., // Q'.// "'- '/ ~ ~/ / ,~ I / ~I/', //' ~//I "- (/"~ . YJ. . ~ ;/ " r,. II "-. ~-' ! '" -y. 71 .....'" I' .... '... // // J/ ) ,/ 1/ t// /1 / II / / /1 I N , .~~~\ w ,qv'~.:"., .~ ~~'~i'" E I ;~~I' T'-'. s ! 1&.;& i! qmJt lz ::u:e:;J3 .iJI t "'-^ C h e$t~r fie ld C I) lJ nty. D e p a rtm ~nt of Uti! it ;ez OOOj~75 I~ ~,\ I. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.D~ 11. Subiect: Approval of Assignment of Purchase Contract from Dempsey L. Bradley, Sr. to BMECH, LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator:--z91 Board Action Reauested: The Board is requested to approve the assignment of a purchase contract to BMECH, LLC. Summary of Information: On February 8, 2006, the Board authorized the sale of approximately 2 acres located on Virginia Pine Court in the Airport Industrial Park to Dempsey L. Bradley, Sr. Mr. Bradley wishes to develop the site as a Limited Liability Corporation rather than in his individual capaci ty. Therefore, staff recommends that the Board authorize the assignment of the purchase contract to BMECH, LLC, of which Mr. Bradley is a member. Preparer: Steven L. Micas Title: County Attornev 0623:77020.1 Attachments: DYes .NO #000:1.76 -"'- - CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: November 14, 2007 Item Number: 8.0.14. Subiect: Award of a Contract for Management Consulting Services to Conduct a Management Study for Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: -!jJ Board Action Reauested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to award a contract for management services to TATC Consulting in the amount of $135,000, authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents, and transfer funding from debt service to the General Government Appropriation category Summary of Information: In August 2007, the Board of Supervisors approved for staff to proceed with advertising a Request for Proposal (RFP) for an independent evaluation of county management practices and procedures, contracting procedures and processes, and to identify opportunities and make recommendations to make the county more efficient in spending taxpayers' money. Staff was asked to prepare a timeline for completing such an analysis concurrent with the change in leadership, and in time to be available as soon as feasible for the Board's review in spring 2008. As a result of the Competitive Negotiation Process, staff herein recommends award of the contract to TATC Consulting for a fee of $135,000. Preparer: Lou Lassiter Title: Internal Audit Director Attachments: . Yes DNa # 61\ I :: ~~if} CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Budaet and Manaaement Comments: This request is to transfer funds and award a contract to TATe Consulting in the amount of $135,000. Funds are available in the debt service budget due to the favorable interest rate received in the lease/purchase sale completed in August 2007. Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budaet and Manaaement 000:1.78 Mana2:ement Study Services: Countv Mana2:ement Dractices and Drocedures - Compile and review all necessary information, present conclusions and make recommendations for improvement as needed for the following areas: . Meet with each department director and review the County wide administrative procedures they are primarily responsible for as well as others to determine areas of improvement. This review should also identify areas where gaps and opportunities exist in County Administrative procedures according to best practices. . Meet with each leadership team member to review County wide administrative procedures, or other organizational improvements they state are needed. This may include organizational changes they feel would improve and streamline the organization. . Review most recent State of Virginia AP A data to benchmark the county's cost of services against other localities with populations in excess of 100,000. This should be done on a summary basis as well as by major functional area on a per capita basis. Data should also be presented on a per student basis for educational expenses. Identify service areas that are higher cost than average that provide opportunity for cost savings. Contractine Dractices and Drocedures - Compile and review all necessary information, present conclusions and make recommendations for improvement as needed for the following areas: . Review all County and School Board contracting and procurement policies and procedures and determine if they are in compliance with the Code of Virginia Public Procurement Act. Identify where policies and procedures have any deficiencies or are in need of improvement. Determine if current procurement policies, procedures and practices are designed to achieve the best value in spending taxpayer money while maintaining compliance, efficiency and effectiveness in the procurement process. . Review and test a sampling of FY2007 or 2008 procurements, including School Board procurements. The sample should be across a wide variety of types of procurements (Construction Projects, Goods, and Services) as well as a varied sample by dollar values. The sample tested should be large enough for the team to draw conclusion if practices are following policies and procedures and if they are in compliance with the Code of Virginia Public Procurement Act. 000:179 . Survey other localities in Virginia and best practices localities to determine innovative ideas for procurement that are not being used in Chesterfield that are permitted by the Code of Virginia. Cost savine: and efficiency - Compile and review all necessary information, present conclusions and make recommendations for improvement as needed for the following areas: . Review each department's budget and performance plans and indicators and compare key performance measures to industry standards. Identify opportunities for cost savings, or efficiency or effectiveness by department that could be achieved. Documented evidence on how cost savings could be achieved should be presented. . Review areas for potential consolidation or privatization that have been implemented by other comparable local governments and proven to save taxpayer resources. Documented evidence on how cost savings could be achieved should be presented. Community Contracts and Non-Profits - Compile and review all necessary information, present conclusions and make recommendations for improvement as needed for the following areas: . Compare county contributions to community contracts and non-profits and determine if the percentage of county's overall budget contributed is comparable to its county and city peers in Virginia with populations over 100,000. . Review data for all community contracts and non-profits for most recent year with Budget Director. Make overall determination if the county is receiving good value for funding provided. Determine if there are any specific community contracts where it does not appear County is receiving good value in terms of services to the community for the funding invested. Review the overall process that is in place to ensure accountability. OOOj.SO .--~ ~- ~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 8.0. Ii. Subiect: Approval of Design/ Authorization to Proceed with Right-of-Way Acquisition and Construction/ and Authorization to Award Construction Contracts for the Chalkley Road Shoulder (Route 10 to Beckinham Drive) and Curve Realignment (Autumn Oaks) Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Reauested: The Board is requested to: 1) approve the design for the Chalkley Road Shoulder (Route 10 to Beckinham Drive) and Curve Realignment (Autumn Oaks) Project; 2) authorize staff to proceed with right- of-way acquisition, including advertising of an eminent domain public hearing if necessary/ and construction of the project; and 3) award construction contract(s)/ up to $530,000, to the lowest responsible bidder(s). Summary of Information: In May 2005/ the Board appropriated road cash proffers and authorized staff to proceed with the Chalkley Road Shoulder project. The purpose of the project was to provide adequate shoulders on Chalkley Road between Route 10 and Centralia Road. After preliminary engineering was completed/ the cost of adjusting utilities and the associated impacts on adjoining landowners were judged too severe to proceed with the original project. The scope of the original project has now been reduced to address two of the more cri tical needs on Chalkley Road: the lack of shoulders between Route 10 and Beckinham Drive and the realignment of the curve at Autumn Oaks. The design for the reduced scope project has now been completed. The reduced project is estimated to cost $1.4 million. Pre parer: R.J.McCracken agen672 Title: Director of Transoortation Attachments: . Yes DNO 1foOO~'-81. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 Summary of Information: (Continued) Six parcels will be directly impacted by the shoulder construction between Route 10 and Beckinham Drive. No families will be relocated. Right-of-way will need to be acquired across the road frontage of the parcels in order to construct the project and adjust utilities. Eleven parcels will be directly impacted by the realignment of the curve at Autumn Oaks. No families will be relocated. At least three parcels will have significant right of way acquisition impacts. Staff met with the individual property owners directly impacted by the project during the plan development and explained the proposed design. Minor design revisions were made to address owner requests. As a result of the meetingsr staff concluded the customary formal citizen information meeting would provide no additional information and was unnecessary. A letter has been sent to each landowner advising them that Board approval of the design was being requested at this Board meeting. All owners would prefer that none of their property be acquired. Most were aware of the accidents along the road and understood the need for the proposed improvements. A few believe the improvements will only increase speeds along the road and will not be beneficial. If the Board approves the designr right-of-way acquisition will begin immediately with construction expected to begin in Spring/Summer 2008. Staff should also be authorized to advertise and award a construction contractr up to a combined $530,000 total, to the lowest responsible bidder. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board: 1. Approve the design for the Chalkley Road Shoulder (Route 10 to Beckinham Drive) and Curve Realignment (Autumn Oaks) Project; 2. Authorize staff to acquire right-of -way for the proj ect I including advertising of an eminent domain public hearing if necessary; and 3. Award a construction contract(s)r up to a combined $530,000 totalr to the lowest responsible bidder(s) . District: Bermuda 000:182 ~ ~e ~ : -. ;; 1'i!J.iJrI!fJ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Budaet and Manaaement Comments: Sufficient cash proffer appropriations are available for staff to award construction contracts up to $530,000 for the Chalkley Road Shoulder project. Pre parer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director. Budaet and Manaaement 000:183 CHALKLEY ROAD SHOULDER & CURVE REALIGNMENT PROJECT REVENUE DATE TRANSFER SOURCE May 25, 2005 $1,427,466 Traffic Shed 13 Road Cash Proffer CHALKLEY ROAD SHOULDER & CURVE REALIGNMENT PROJECT ESTIMATE Preliminary Engineering $157,466 Right of Way $650,000 Construction $620,000 Total $1,427,466 000j.84 c.u 0 ~ I\) ...... " Fe-, ') :c r !:: S z G) 0 ,-) f'Tl -l ~ 1'1 r Ii' ~ t."':.~: '~ ~. o < m :IJ )> If)1 ~I (1J =i m ,I , ~r;)"V G , (~}~.? i?/ , ~' ,..;:-y- ,,\ , -:t'" .~ (~) 1\" '" ~~' ' ('~\.1>, - ~.,) / ~ '~l :r::: ;~\, \~ \ ~', ~ c-:: ~J ~ ~ ~~8 ~~, ~~ ~ ~ ~ tf) 8 ):>- -laC 0)>-1 Z7":.C (/lg: Z '.,- ','i' "f.' ~ ..i."._ ~- .............. OVERALL SITE CHALKLEY ROAD PHASE 2 - AUTUMN OAKS CURVE ROAD AND SHOULDER IMPROVEMENTS ~ AUSTIN BROCKENBROUGH & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P. '_ (>I'i C'; U It.' I-'l~ 1::. ~ c ire'? 'c 2 UPOA TE.D INFORMATION CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, V!R.Gr~lA .{;./r -71.1-:~:1~ r'.; SN-'7...E-7?+~ 5 1";1 h n () II." ;::.. c:> ~ ---l (", CDLg:~~ ~~~ ---t -1"1 ':1 ~ .:, I"~I ~ ~f ~ )~ ~ (/):::0 -10 On s<?^ (/)0 \)I rrlrrl 00 ^ (.NO . )> N3:: o :'F',.~,: ':".~ F n 1,5' WJ:_ ~'.~~~a =:~I ',~. l'i:~ , ~'II I ~ ~ ~ ':;;:,11 I<I~ :i'r"~1 r=;=j LI , . ~~ I ' ~~ '"' '" r'l I j 'II I: : II ,., ~ j ;ft~~;~; f~ I 6 ~~ /~.r~." ,;/:',11---1 I;!~ m; p c ~ 3:: C~ r -; !:: rr z c G) ;;:: 0 ~ (': -:.! fT1 -I ~ '-i T r v.l (J) -I o ;0 (J)~ -10 0;0 R>~ z ~~z ctrlr !':; (") rr1 -I VI . -u 0;0 "'o.Jo 1-1 ....... rr1 (") --l o Z -I -< ~ n )> r (J) rr1 n :::! o z o ~.~~ r>C>-u OA%O ."......OUl 3:::UlCfTl ~ >0 ~ FT' :,pU:;[[' -c' ------L!~._'- '-, Vl ."~~-~/,, iQ~ ~~_ ::0 ~ '-, ('" l/l '- .~-~ <..., ~~ o z i.__ .. 10108 ,or ,;a~1 ]18 31 ViS JflNJI1 ~ :I.fOJJ - ----l Ulf"Tl ----l~ 0-0 R:>~ :t> ()Ul;:o :J ~-< h(){/l tN' .-1 o (J1'l 1f"Tl NZ () fTl ~ IIJ F,'_ ~':'A[' N m OVERALL SITE CHALKLEY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1 - BECKINHAM ~ AUSTIN BROCKENBROUGH & ASSOCIATES. L.L.P. CHESTERJ."JEill COUNTY, VIRGINIA Jf ,,' REVISED PER COMMENTS ADD ED TEST KDlE QAT A i.-,_'l-, l."._"U.ll'~ I', ,',- ,-!,c'.::V;h '~'XlT-'- R, '0 . IRO /'vBRIO C(' R040 VI ~ ~ ;u VI o :<- Vl z o o d >- n ~ ~ --1 o (/) o p o z >- o c ~ Cl )> o o )> ~ )> o (/) o ........ s:: n I Vl C Vl AJ Z o (/) G~. ~~I ,- O()01~c. 55~ :<>:<>0 "< "fTl T o o ""D ;0 ~ ~ ~ Z o ?: 0 Z ~ ~ ~ : )> AJ AJ o ~ o ~ ()()-f TI;o rr1 (T1 rrl () (") (T1 ^^If) ~~~ (f) C ~~~ ~~~ {f)--10 -I{f)c: ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ Or:;:;:z: ~~ ~;o ~25 ~~ ~i :;;0 o J> Z o o V'l ~ ~ ~~ Ii CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 AGENDA Meeting Date: November 14, 2007 Item Number: 9.A. Subiect: Developer Water and Sewer Contracts County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: (}J (J Board Action Reauested: The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County Administrator to execute water and/or sewer contracts between County and Developer where there are no County funds involved. The report is submitted to Board members as information. Summary of Information: The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County Administrator: 1. Contract Number: Project Name: 04-0518 Belle Spring Townes Developer: Contractor: Belle Spring Townes, LC Groundsman, Incorporated Contract Amount: Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - $115,385.00 $122,936.50 District: Dale Preparer: William O. Wriaht Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: DYes .NO # OOOj.87 Agenda Item November 14, 2007 Page 2 2. Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 3 . Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 4 . Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 5 . Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 05-0205 Belfair Townhouses Section 3 & 4, Stage 1 Belfair Associates, LLC Perkinson Construction Company Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Dale 05-0351 Clay Pointer Section C W. G. Speeks/H. A. Posey, Trustees Excalibur Construction Corporation Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Clover Hill 06-0022 HP-2 Truck Court at Rivers Bend Center $150,555.90 $67,308.99 $122,780.00 $176,180.00 FP 500 and 600 HP Way LLC Johnson and Glazier Construction Company, Inc. Water Improvements - Bermuda 06-0292 Belvedere Retail Center The Shoppes at Belvedere, LLC Godsey and Son, Incorporated Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Midlothian $5,000.00 $46,000.00 Private OOOj.88 Agenda Item November 14, 2007 Page 3 6 . Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 07-0008 Silverleaf Sales and Recreation Center Terra-Forge, Incorporated Castle Equipment Corporation Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Dale $44,140.00 $41,862.00 000:1.89 e~, I ' il ~~rJ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 9.8. Subiect: Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects, District Improvement Fund, and Lease Purchases County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: 2J (j Board Action Reauested: Summary of Information: Preparer: James J. L. Steamaier Title: County Administrator Attachments: . Yes DNO I # 000j.90 I BOARD MEETING DATE 07/01/07 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY UNDESIGNA TED GENERAL FUND BALANCE November 14, 2007 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT FY2008 Beginning Budgeted Balance *Pending outcome of FY2007 Audit Results BALANCE $49,945,000 * 0001.91. Board Meeting Date 6/30/2007 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS November 14, 2007 Description Amount FY07 Ending Balance FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 BEGINNING JULY 1,2007 4/11/2007 4/11/2007 10/10/2007 FY08 Budgeted Addition 15,521,300 FY08 Capital Projects (14,889,300) Fire Logistics Facility, Phase II ( 150,000) *Pending outcome of FY2007 Audit Results Balance $1,097,798 16,619,098 1,729,798 1,579,798 000:1.92 ~lIIIIIIIl ::I ~ .- ~ "'C = ::I - ~ ':< ~"'C ::I _ ~ ~ lIIIIIIIl 0 ~= ::I ~ o "'C 1;1} ::I E ~ ~< ~~ ~ .......... ~ ~ 00 Q Z ~ ~ ~l'- Z= ~= ~N ~..; >~ o t ~,.Q ~ E ~ ~ ~ 6 ~z u ~ ~ ~ 00. ~ Q "'C ~ ~ ~ 1;1} ~ ~Q 1;1} 0 "'C~ ::I - = ~ ~ ~ > QC) ::I = 0 = .- N~ > .- ~ - 1;1} - ~ u M QC) = ~ N fA ~ ("'f") \0" ""'" V) f.I:t V) N 0\ ~ N f.I:t o o 1Il 00 ""'" f.I:t o ~ ~ 0\" V) f.I:t QC) ~ QC) ~ ,..-I ,..-I o o o 00 "'1" ~ o o V) 00 ~ 00 ~ ~ V) 00 Yj- M 0'\ tn ~ N ~ o N o ~ "'1"" o o V) 00 ""'" If) 0\ ~ ""'" " 00 V1- N ~ M ~ l'- tn ~ ~ Q QC) = = '11 M ~ o o 0" V) N o o o o 0" ('r) ('r) ~ o 0" N o o o 1Il 00 ""'" o o 1Il 00 ""'" o o V) ('r) ~ N ~ 00 V) If) ~ r--.. N 0\" ~ V) ~ ~ lIIIIIIIl "'C == .- lIIIIIIIl ~ ~ .- ~ = ~ .- ~ "'C ~ ~ ~ ~ = - ~ ~ .- E ~ 0 0 == - ~ ~ lIIIIIIIl ~ ~ "'C = 1;1} - 0 lIIIIIIIl ~ ~ ~ .- 0 .- lIIIIIIIl ~ ~ Q = U Q U 0001.93 Prepared by Accounting Department October 31, 2007 SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES APPROVED AND EXECUTED Outstanding Date Original Date Balance Began Descriotion Amount Ends 10/31/07 04/99 Public Facility Lease - Juvenile Courts Project $16,100,000 11/19 $10,465,000 01/01 Certificates of Participation - Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems 13,725,000 11/21 8,210,000 03/03 Certificates of Participation - Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation 6,100,000 11/23 4,820,000 03/04 Certificates of Participation - Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems 21,970,000 11/24 18,550,000 10/04 Cloverleaf Mall Redevelopment Project 9,225,000 10/08 9,225,000 11/04 School ArchivallRetrieval System Lease 21,639 01/08 2,520 12/04 Energy Improvements at County Facilities 1,519,567 12/1 7 1,383,317 12/04 Energy Improvements at School Facilities 427,633 12/10 306,953 05/05 Certificates of Participation - Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems 14,495,000 11/24 12,435,000 05/06 Certificates of Participation - Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems 11,960,000 11/24 10,350,000 08/07 Certificates of Participation - Building Expansion/Renovation, Equipment Acquisition 22~220~OOO 11/27 22~220~OOO TOTAL APPROVED $117.763.839 $97.967.790 AND EXECUTED PENDING EXECUTION Approved Descriotion Amount None 000:2.94 November 14, 2007 Speaker's List Afternoon Session 1. Mr. Quenton Lee 2. Ms. Karen Bagley 3. Ms. Brenda Stewart 4. 5. l- t) W J o 0::: c.. o W I- W ....J c.. ~ o () l- t) W J o 0::: c.. o W I- W ....J c.. ~ o () W 0::: o l.L. W co z o I- ....J o ~ UJ o w 0::: o l.L. W co z o - I- .....J o ~ w o ZI- 0- -Z ~::) ....Js ....Jw ~Z C/)u.. ~o l- t) W J o 0::: a.. o w I- W ....J c.. ~ o l- t) W J o a: c.. o W I- W ..J 0.. ~ o () w 0::: o u.. w co l- t) W J o 0::: c.. o W I- W ....J c.. ~ o () ."". . I "{ , , .. . ." ~ / (9 z - c.. w W ....J C/) c:: o u.. o w C/) ::) w t) <( c.. C/) ....J ~ () () I- ~ "'f . . t ...~ z o - I- - o o <( u.. o S w - > W o C/) z o - I- - o o <( (9 ~. Z o ...J ::) CO BRENDA L. STEWART 5911 Woodpecker Road Chesterfield, VA 23838 Phone/Fax: (804) 590-2309 E-mail: bl-stewart@.comcast.net November 14, 2007 REMARKS TO CHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DURING CITIZENS' COMMENT PERIOD AFTERNOON SESSION I have been before you previously to talk about some of the county's more interesting land purchases. Today I present my latest discovery. It certainly competes with Henrico's reported activity when it comes to the smell test. Let's review the facts for one of the parcels purchased for the new Clover Hill High School. The deal closed February 2,2005. 1. Acreage: 12.4 at 3549 South Old Hundred Road Chesterfield County assessed value: $37,200 2. Price on December 15, 2004, when Board voted to exercise option to purchase parcel: approximately $249,000 3. Price on January 12, 2005, one month later, when Board voted to approve amended option: $496,400 What happened? Well, it seems as if the developer who owned the land did not receive the December option payment, so he notified the county that the option had expired as of December 1st. Notwithstanding that notification, this Board voted on December 15 to exercise that expired option. Then the shakedown apparently occurred. This Board not only agreed to amend an expired option to double the price of the land, it agreed to paying the developer another $5000 to cover the option fees for December and January after the option had expired. If the developer agreed to reinstate the option, thus justifying the additional $5000 in option payments, then the obvious question is why wasn't the option reinstated with the original terms and price of $248,900? If the developer refused to reinstate the option unless it was amended to double the price, then why didn't the county take the land under eminent domain? Chesterfield took my neighbor to court over land for the Matoaca High School and I believe the amount in question was less than $50,000. But then he was not a developer, just a mere taxpaying citizen. 2 Is this the first time such a questionable land deal occurred in this county? NO Is this the first time questionable actions have been taken with respect to options? NO (See below for more.) Check out the option exercised to buy the land for Cosby High. Part of that land was deeded away before the option was exercised. The county later purchased unneeded land to fill in the missing acreage not delivered by the developer. (Cost: about $252,000) Is acreage in wetlands this valuable when it is owned by mere citizens and not developers? NO Check out the current activity with land being purchased for the new Bermuda schools close to Interstate 295 off Route 10. A certain landowner (apparently a mere citizen) might be interested in knowing that the $1000 per acre he was offered for land encumbered by Resource Protection Area designation does not apply across the board in this county. That management consulting contract you considered today is designed to exclude review of these questionable land deals. Maybe there's some housecleaning to be done before the new Board takes their seats. Here's a list of a few more interesting land deals: Centerpointe: Chesterfield pays developer $118,000 per acre for land for a middle school, including more than five acres of wetlands the developer could not build on. This land was inferior to nearby land the developer had under contract for $58,000 per acre. Cosby Road: Chesterfield pays almost $38,000 per acre for land that a developer had recently purchased for approximately $5900 per acre ($5937). It involves wetlands and according to notes in official files was not needed for the Cosby High School. Cosby Road: Chesterfield pays almost $38,000 per acre for land assessed at $3508 per acre. . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 14.A. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Mr. Brian Thomas Pool I Troop 8111 Sponsored by Episcopal Church of the Redeemerl and Mr. Michael Houston Harpe and Mr. Matthew Keith Murdock I Both of Troop 800 I Sponsored by Bethel Baptist Churchl Upon Attaining Rank of Eagle Scout County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: .m Board Action ReqUested?! Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff has received requests for the Board to adopt resolutions recognlz1ng Mr. Brian Thomas Pool, Troop 811, and Mr. Michael Houston Harpe and Mr. Matthew Keith Murdock, both of Troop 800, upon attaining the rank of Eagle Scout. They will be present at the meeting, accompanied by members of their families, to accept their resolutions. Preparer: Janice Blakley Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: . Yes DNO I #000:1.95 WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered by Congress in 1916; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build character, provide citizenship training and promote physical fitness; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to their community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law Mr. Brian Thomas Pool, Troop 811, sponsored by the Episcopal Church of the Redeemer, and Mr. Michael Houston Harpe and Mr. Matthew Keith Murdock, both of Troop 800, sponsored by Bethel Baptist Church, have accomplished those high standards of commitment and have reached the long- sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by only four percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through their experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible ci tizenship, and endeavoring to prepare themselves for roles as leaders in society, Brian, Michael and Matthew have distinguished themselves as members of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 14th day of November 2007, hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. Brian Thomas Pool, Mr. Michael Houston Harpe and Mr. Matthew Keith Murdock, and acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such outstanding young men as its citizens. 000:1.96 .~ I :: ..JJ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 15.A. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to County Code Sections 19- 65 and 19-124 Relating to the Operation of Motorcyclest ATVs and Go-Carts on Agricultural and Residential Property County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator:~ Board Action Reauested: The Board is requested to consider the proposed amendments to County Code SS 19-65 and 19-124. Summary of Information: On September 18, 2007, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the attached amendments with modifications. The word "improved" was added in front of "pathtl in 19-65 (g) (1) and 19-124 (f) (1) . In the past year, several situations have occurred where county citizens have made improvements to their residential or agriculturally zoned property to create tracks for the operation of motorcycles, go-carts or all-terrain vehicles. The use of these tracks has created detrimental conditions for neighbors with respect to the increased noiset light and dust that they generate. The proposed amendments to the zoning code permit the operation of motorcycles, go-carts or ATVs on propertYt but prohibit the creation of a track or path for the vehicles and prohibit physical improvements such as lights, grading or pavement. County planning staff has sought to balance the rights of individuals to enjoy recreational activities on their property against the rights of neighboring property owners to be able to enjoy their own property without excessive noiset lights or dust. If this ordinance is adopted it will only apply to tracks created after the effective date of the ordinance. Preparer: Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of PlanninQ 2723:75869.1 (75569.1) Attachments: II Yes DNO I #0001.97 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 19-65 AND 19-124 RELATING TO USES PERMITTED WITH CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS IN RESIDENTIAL AND AGRICULTURAL DISTRICTS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 19-65 and 19-124 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 19-65. Uses permitted with certain restrictions. The following uses shall be permitted in the R-88 District subject to compliance with the following conditions and other applicable standards of this chapter. If these restrictions cannot be met, these uses may be allowed by conditional use, subject to section 19-13: (a) Model homes, provided that: (1) In addition to its permanent use as a dwelling, such home may be used as a temporary real estate office. (2) The temporary real estate office is only used to market the development in which the dwelling is located and is not used for the sale of lots or houses outside of the platted subdivision in which it is located. (3) The temporary real estate office is incidental to construction activity taking place in the development. (4) The dwelling is not the primary real estate office for the company marketing the subdivision. (5) The dwelling is not used as a construction office or for the storage of construction equipment and/or materials. (b) Family day-care homes, provided that no more than five children exclusive of the provider's own children and any children who reside in the home receive care at anyone time during a 24-hour day. (c ) Yard sales, provided that the sale: (1) Is accessory to a principal use on the same property. (2) Does not exceed two days in duration. (3) Is conducted by the owner or lessee of the property on which it occurs and includes only personal property owned by the seller and usual to a household. (4) Does not occur on the same property more than four times in anyone calendar year and not more than twice within a 3D-day period. (d) Communications towers, provided that: (1) Antennae are co-located on electric transmission structures. 2723 :75569.1 Revised 07/12/07 @ 12:58 p.m. 000j.98 (2) Antennae are a flush-mount design and do not exceed a height of 20 feet above the height of the electric transmission structure and such height does not exceed the limitations of sections 19-507 and 19-507.2. (3) Antennae shall be gray or another neutral color acceptable to the planning department. (4) Any building or mechanical equipment shall comply with Emerging Growth Area Development Standards relative to architectural treatment and screening of mechanical equipment. (5) At such time as the antennae ceases to be used for communications purposes for a period exceeding 12 consecutive months, such antennae shall be dismantled and it and all associated equipment removed from the property. ( e) Home occupation, provided that: (1) No employees shall be permitted to work on the premises other than family member employees that live on the premises, (2) The use is within a dwelling, accessory structure or both provided that the total area for the use does not exceed 25 percent of the floor of the dwelling or 250 square feet, whichever is greater, (3) The use is clearly incidental and secondary to the use of the property for dwelling purposes and no external alterations, which would cause the premises to differ from its residential character by the use of colors, materials, lighting, or construction, are permitted, (4) No commodity is stored or sold on the premises except for light inventory, ( 5) No more' than one vehicle and one single axle trailer not exceeding 13 feet in length and 3,200 pounds used in conjunction with the home occupation may be parked on the premises. No equipment shall be stored outside the dwelling or accessory structure that would indicate that a business is being conducted on site except for equipment stored on the vehicle or trailer used in conjunction with the business. The vehicle and equipment for a home occupation shall be parked on the premises where the home occupation is conducted, but a trailer must be parked, except for loading or unloading, either in the rear yard or so that its view is screened from adjacent properties or public roads, and (6) No assembly or group instruction shall be permitted with a home occupation. Individual instruction on a one to one basis is permitted. Only two clients may be on the property at anyone time. (f) Parking and storage of any commercial truck, commercial vehicle or public service vehicle provided that no such vehicle shall exceed 10,000 pounds, have more than two axles, or be a commercial vehicle which tows or hauls disabled, wrecked or junked vehicles. The restrictions in this subsection shall not apply to (i) trucks or vehicles on the premises while loading or unloading; or (ii) trucks or vehicles parked on a farm where the parking is incidental to the farming use being conducted on the property. 2723 :75569.1 Revised 07/12/07 @ 12:58 p.m. 2 000:1.99 (g) as follows: Motorcvcle'l go-cart'l all-terrain vehicle or similar type vehicle operation~ provided ill the operation of the vehicle is not on an improved track or improved path~ and ill no physical improvements are provided related to the operation of the vehicle including lights'l pavement'l grading~ grandstand or other improvements. 000 Sec. 19-124. Uses permitted with certain restrictions. The following uses shall be permitted in the A District subject to compliance with the following conditions and other applicable standards of this chapter. If the following restrictions cannot be met, these uses may be allowed by conditional use, subject to section 19-13: (a) Access to any land located in an office, business or industrial district or used for an office, business or industrial purpose, provided that the property is designated for office, business or industrial use on the comprehensive plan. (b) Family day-care homes provided that no more than five children exclusive of the provider's own children and children who reside in the home receive care at anyone time during a 24-hour day. (c) Stock or dairy farms, including all buildings and structures necessary to such use and the keeping, storage or operation of any vehicle or machinery necessary to such use, provided that the lot or parcel has at least three acres. (d) Communications towers, provided that: (1) Antennae are co-located on electric transmission structures. (2) Antennae are a flush-mount design and do not exceed a height of 20 feet above the height of the electric transmission structure and such height does not exceed the limitations of sections 19-507 and 19-507.2. (3) Antennae shall be gray or another neutral color acceptable to the planning department. (4) Any building or mechanical equipment shall comply with Emerging Growth Area Development Standards relative to architectural treatment and screening of mechanical equipment. (5) At such time as the antennae ceases to be used for communications purposes for a period exceeding 12 consecutive months, such antennae shall be dismantled and it and all associated equipment removed from the property. (e) Home occupation, provided that: (1) No employees shall be permitted to work on the premises other than family member employees that live on the premises, 2723 :75569.1 Revised 07/12/07 @ 12:58 p.m. 3 000200 (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) ill as follows: ill ill The use is within a dwelling, accessory structure or both provided that the total area for the use does not exceed 25 percent of the floor of the dwelling or 250 square feet, whichever is greater, The use is clearly incidental and secondary to the use of the property for dwelling purposes and no external alterations, which would cause the premises to differ from its residential character by the use of colors, materials, lighting, or construction, are permitted, No commodity is stored or sold on the premises except for light inventory, No more than one vehicle and one single axle trailer not. exceeding 13 feet in length and 3,200 pounds used in conjunction with the home occupation may be parked on the premises. No equipment shall be stored outside the dwelling or accessory structure that would indicate that a business is being conducted on site except for equipment stored on the vehicle or trailer used in conjunction with the business. The vehicle and equipment for a home occupation shall be parked on the premises where the home occupation is conducted, but a trailer must be parked, except for loading or unloading, either in the rear yard or so that its view is screened from adjacent properties or public roads, and No assembly or group instruction shall be permitted with.a home occupation. Individual instruction on a one to one basis is permitted. Only two clients may be on the property at anyone time. Motorcycle., go-cart., all-terrain vehicle or similar type vehicle operation., provided the operation of the vehicle is not on an improved track or improved path located within 1000 feet of residentially zoned property~ and no physical improvements are provided related to the operation of the vehicle including lights., pavement., grading~ grandstand or other improvements. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 2723 :75569.1 Revised 07/12/07 @ 12:58 p.m. 4 00020:1 Ills Your Community Newspaper Since 1995 P.O. Box 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 23113. Phone: (804) 545-7500. Fax: (804) 744-3269 . Email: news@chesterficidobscrver.com . Internet: www.chcstcrficidobserver.com Client Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors PUBLIC NOTICE Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at a regular scheduled meeting on November 14. 2007, at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building, Rt. 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia, will hold a public hearing where persons affected may appear and present their views to consider: An Ordinance to amend the ~ the County of Chest~.field. 1997, as amended, by amending and re-enacting Section s 19-65 and 19-124 relating to Uses Permitted with Certain Restrictions in Residential and Agricultural Districts. The proposed amendment would 1) permit the operation of motorcycles, go-carts or all-terrain vehicles on agriculturally and residentially zoned property; 2) prohibit the creation of an improved track or path for the vehicles on residentially zoned property; 3) restrict improved tracks and improved paths on agriculturally zoned property to no closer .than 1,000 feet to residentially zoned property; 4) prohibit physical improvements such as lights, grading pavement and grandstands for the operation of motorcycles. go-carts or all-terrain vehicles on agriculturally or residentially zoned property. After the public hearing, appropriate changes or corrections may be made to the proposed amendments. ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Motorcyc1es- A TV s 1 col x 7" $226.90 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 10/31/2007 & 11/07/2007 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ,+h day of Nove'f"Yt:rr ,2007. W2~ ) Legal Affiant JOa~liC My commission expires: November 30,2010 Commission LD. 7040138 * (SEAL) \.\'1 II 11111", \,,\ L. "I'i \", ~ I:t- .. ('" ...,\ +"P ...,.".... < ~'##. l ~ '<botHY~:',. ~\ ! C',) /~. '9( ". 0 ~ ~ ~",.o-- .;\~ ~ : :u Of :.f.~ ~ .; : : : . ~ . - :. .... J_ lot. / 1 ~ ...."1 ' \,\:T.. ~ , (J.. .. \. ~ 1\ ""'" >. ....".., \'0'v ....",... "" 4RY?'" \"" '1" 11\\ //'11/111111\, THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. o ~ ~ ~ Q") -!.. C t cc-OQ) :::J :;::; <( c.. o JQ CJ)~ ~ e t)Q)Q)COa.. OO::c:;t)- ~ ~ I CO CJ)~t)O:;::; ~ N I- In C c~ O\.J Q) Q) I ~-o E(j)Oc~ ~~coen -g-o'+-CJ)2 Q)COQ)LL.. ECOcc:;-o <( L() 0 .- c c.o:;::;..cco -od>~~ro Q)~Q) I- en c.C:J o ~ 0 .- ~ c..~ co- '- :J o Q) Q) '- () '- -0 ..c Q) .C a.. 0 ......., J- Q") t) <( ... ... "0 CD ~ > >o~ o I.- I I.- e. (j) e.E~ e. -- 0> CO ~ -~ CD c E ~ -C -- "0 0 -C ........CCD:>........ C"O>CO 01'- ,CO C ", e. ^ - CD \,LI~ ~ oQ.E-c,+-,-" N~ I-o~ ........... E -........ ~ cocoenc~ ~::JUCON I.-OCDO~~ ..e(]) () "- ~ C m "0 C U -- ~ E-o~"O CD -~ -en -- CD "0 ........ten"O"Oc e. CD -- 0 "0 CO CD........EEco~ (1)~E..cCl):S oB8~~~ - - co > o l.- e. e. CO en "0 c CD E E o U CD I.- :1 CO ........ CI) . . -E' (l) 0.. -o<D 0 ..c <DC,,) "-<D-- en ~ ~ E .~ ~ o _.- en o..ro6'<Do>~::J e .0 .-' E .~ <D -0 0..2 a5 cU c-g (l) coo ro ~ ro ..c <D__en 0..0 ~ E en .92 .~ ~ 1: ro-o--- "-0> ..c c ro .S; ~ <D == __<D~~<D0..~ en E -_ C,,) > 0 <D > ro -- "- en <D ro -- 10 0...- a:; <D -0 co 0> 0> 0 == C,,) .~ c <D c c <D c '+- 0 C .- <D .0 ro 0 ~ -- 0 .~ ~cenro::J.oen ro:.c1:@o..cen __ "- C,,) ..c 0> <D C/) 0 .g> @ :s .CD ~ . > C <D (l) ..c ......., 0) ~ - c - c .- co 0 - C ~ "_ ~ ___ o C +-J \,J \,JI N ~ m"oo"~ ~ (; "~ "00 u ..E' ~ \U 1'1\ ~ I.- +-JCI.-\UCD~O) o 0 CD I.- .c:t: ~ +-J .- +-J -C +-J ..c ,^ +-J I ,... \II en CO - ~.:t: .;:: 1= +-JI.--roCO..c-'--'- C CD ,-.;:: e .Q) CD c.. I.- ~ ~ Eoo=oc..~ CO I.- ~ \II -CCDC/)I.-c..\,J(O c.c'L2+-Jc.c CD+-JCO-::JCOU E~YB..ccn::J CO E 0 .C ----::5 en . 1JI.-O)O)~coen+-J CD CD -co~ c..1: a3 en c.. en c.. I.- OCD~a oCDE c..uu ecnECD o C ~en c..~ CD > I.-COUCD~U>CO c...~ 0 ~ CD CO e c.. Q) "0 +.J ..c c ~ c..""C ..c",-OCDO'-Ec I- 0 E > N 0 ._ CO . .-- I . .1 - ~~IN~~ I CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 15.8. Subiect: Public Hearing on Proposed Adjustments to Planning Department Subdivision Review Fees County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator:~ Board Action Reauested: Adopt adjustments to Planning Department subdivision review fees. Staff recommends a fee adjustment that would bring subdivision fee revenues to the County's 80 percent cost "coverage" target. At their August 21, 2007 public hearing, the Chesterfield County Planning Commission recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt subdivision fee adjustments that would generate fee revenues that would cover about 63 percent of projected subdivision review costs. Summary of Information: Each year, as part of the County's annual budget process, Planning Department staff reviews and makes recommendations to the County Administrator on potential adjustments to Planning Department fees. Since 2002, it has been County policy that fee revenues received through the Planning Department review of residential rezoning and subdivision development proposals should equal at least 80 percent of the Planning Department's cost to undertake those reviews. Staff projects that for FY 2007-08, without adjustments, the amount of revenue received for subdivision review will be about 45 percent of Pre parer: Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Plannino Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000202 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 Summary of Information: (continued) projected subdivision review costs. In the spring of 2007, the County Administrator requested that the Planning Commission review and make recommendations to the Board of Supervisors on potential subdivision fee adjustments. The Commission, as it has done with past fee adjustment proposals, established a committee (Dan Gecker, Scott Camp, Dick Collier, Andy Scherzer, Tyler Craddock and Bob Schrum) to assist in their review. On July 10, 2007, staff met with the Subdivision Review Committee, and reviewed a series of proposed subdivision fee adjustments that, based on FY 2007-08 subdivision application projections, would bring fee revenues to the County's 80 percent cost "coverage" target for the remainder of FY 2007-08. The Committee suggested to staff an alternative fee proposal that would only cover the increased cost of the two new subdivision review positions approved as part of the County's FY 2007-08 budget. Staff projects that this alternative would generate fee revenues that would cover about 63 percent of projected subdivision review costs for the remainder of FY 2007-08. At their August 21, 2007 public hearing, the Chesterfield County Planning Commission recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt Planning Department subdivision fee adjustments as suggested by the Subdivision Fee Committee. Both the staff fee adjustment proposal and the proposal recommended by the Planning Commission are outlined in Attachment A. Attachment B is the proposed ordinance amendment as advertised for the Planning Commission's August 21, 2007 public hearing. 000203 ..~ I 'I \ -:. .:;: - ~ II ff~fjJ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Budaet and Manaaement Comments: This agenda item requests that the Board hold a public hearing to consider proposed adjustments to Planning Department subdivision review fees. It is estimated that the Planning Department/s current fee structure recovers 45% of the costs associated with the subdivision review process. This estimate includes the costs associated with two new Planning Department positions approved by the Board with the adoption of the FY2008 Budget. These positions are currently vacant. A decision on whether or not to fill these two positions will be made after the Board's decision on subdivision review fees. The Subdivision Fee Committee proposal recommended by the Planning Commission would generate an estimated $100,000 in additional subdivision fee revenue on an annual basis. The additional revenue would cover the costs associated with the two new Planning Department positions approved in the FY2008 budget. The fee changes in the committee 1 s proposal would enable the Planning Department to recoup approximately 63% of the total costs associated with subdivision review. Planning Department staff 1 s subdivision fee proposal would generate an estimated $190/000 in additional subdivision fee revenue on an annual basis. Planning staff/s proposal would enable the department to recoup approximately 80% of the total costs associated with subdivision review. Pre parer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director. Budaet and Manaaement 000204 Attachment A Planning Dept. Fees Current Fee* Adjustment As Recommended By Staff Adjustment As Recommended By Fee Committee and the Planning Commission Subdivision - Tentative subdivision approval 1. Original submittal, including up to two resubmittals $ 330 $ 800 $ 500 a. Plus, per lot $ 20 $ 30 $ 25 2. Renewal of previously approved tentative, $ 330 $ 800 $ 500 including up to 2 resubmittals a. Plus, per lot $ 20 $ 30 $ 25 3. Third and subsequent submittal $ 220 $ 700 $ 300 4. Substitute to approved tentative, per submittal $ 60 $ 100 $ 80 5. Adjusted tentative for previously approved tentative, including up to 2 resubmittals $ 330 $ 800 $ 500 a. Plus, per lot (within 12 months of approval) $ 20 $ 30 $ 25 b. Third and subsequent, per submittal $ 220 $ 700 $ 300 Subdivision - Final check, amended and resubdivision plat review 1. Final check subdivision plat $ 720 $ 1 ,100 $ 1,000 a. Plus, per lot $ 10 $ 20 $ 15 2. Final check resubdivision plat $ 560 $ 900 $ 900 a. Plus, per lot $ 10 $ 20 $ 15 3. Final check amended plat $ 330 $ 900 $ 500 a. Plus, per lot $ 10 $ 20 $ 15 4. Residential parcel subdivision (per parcel) $ 35 $ 60 $ 50 5. Parcel line modification (per parcel) $ 25 $ 50 $ 30 6. Appeal administrative subdivision decision $ 290 $ 400 $ 400 7. Minor subdivision $ 330 $ 400 $ 400 8. Onsite sewage disposal system soils analysis $ 155 $ 155 $ 155 review (per lot/parcel) 9. Recordation Plat - Per sheet $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 10. Electronic format transfer $ 75 $ 80 $ 80 11. Alternatives to chapter per section 17-8 $ 380 $ 700 $ 600 *As of September 2007 000205 Attachment B AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 17-11 OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RELATING TO FEES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 17-11 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield. 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read aslollows: Sec. 17-11. Fees. In addition to any other fees required by the county, fees shall be payable to the county treasurer and submitted to the planning department upon filing the following applications: (a) Alternatives to chapter per S 17-8 . . . $ 380.00 700.00 Plus any.applicable plat review fee (b) Appeal of decision of director of planning. . . 290.00 400.00 (c) Deferral request by applicant for planning commission consideration of plat, per request: (1) 40 or fewer days. . . 250.00 (2) More than 40 days. . . 150.00 (d) Final check, amended and resubdivision plat review: (1) Final check subdivision plat review. . . 720.00 $1~100.00 (Only one base fee will be required for final check plats required to be submitted in multiple sections per S 17-42.) Plus, per lot. . . +G-:OO $20.00 (2) Final check resubdivision plat review. . . 560.00 $900.00 Plus, per lot. . . ~$20.00 (3) Final check amended plat review. . . 330.00 $900.00 Plus, per lot. . . ~$20.00 (e) Minor subdivision plat review. . . 330.00 $400.00 1925 :75983.1 000206 Attachment B (f) Onsite sewage disposal system soils analysis review, per lot/parcel. . . 155.00 (g) Parcel line modification review, per parcel. . . ~ $50.00 (h) Residential parcel subdivision, per parcel. . . ~$60.00 (i) Tentative subdivision approval, or resubmittal of an expired previously approved tentative: (1) Original submittal, renewal of previously approved tentative plat or adjusted tentative plat for previously approved tentative plat, including up to two resubmittals . . . 330.00 $800.00 Plus, per lot. . . ~ $30.00 (2) Third and subsequent submittal, per submittal. . . 220.00 $700.00 (3) Substitute to approved tentative, per submittal. . . ~ $100.00 (j) Townhouse plan transfer to electronic format per ~ 17-32(d) . . . ~ $80.00 (k) Written verification of subdivision or written subdivision interpretation. . . 75.00 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1925:75983.1 000207 -- Your Community Newspaper Since 1995 P.O. Box 1616, Midlothilln, Virgin ill 231 13 . Phone: (804) 545-7500 . Fax: (804) 744-3269 . Email: news@chesterfieJdobscrver.com . Internet: www.chcsterficldobscrvcr.mm ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors TAKE NOTICE Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at a regular scheduled meeting on November 14, 2007, at 6:30 p.m. in the County Pub.lic Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building, Rt. 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia, will hold a public hearing where persons affected may appear and present their views to consider: An Ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, by amending and re-enacting Section 17- 11 of the subdivision ordinance relating to subdivision fees. The legal authority for enactment of these fees, levies and increases includes the County Charter and Va. Code ~15.2-2241(9). No other new or increased fees are proposed with .this ordinance amendment. In addition to any other fees required by the County under other ordinances, the proposed ordinance would increase current subdivision fees as set forth below. (a) Alternatives to chapter per H 7- 8 would increase from $380.00 to $700.00, plus any applicable plat review fee. (b) Appeal of decision of director of planning would increase from $290.00 to $400.00. (c) Deferral request by app.licant for planning commission consideration of plat would remain the same, per request, at: (1) 40 or fewer days: $250; (2) More than 40 _<l~Ys: $150. 0.,,'00-<:.1(. J}- Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Planning Fee 1 col x 11" $453.75 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 10/31/2007 & 11/07/2007 Sworn to and subscribed before me this l+h day of Nov:mt:Py ,2007. tJd~ Legal Affiant J oa My commission expires: November 30,2010 Commission J.D. 7040138 (SEbL) /"~;;\lIIU""//11 <~\\\~... L. ;""" ~... i~ ........... ~ ~ t,,,.. I ~...~;..O>>W-"':... e()--. .. '" . \,;:.>> "'1'" . ~ w I ~ ~..A..... ~ .. ":l'Q __:: ~ i 0 Of '*' ~ : ~ . ~ .. J ~ ".. '7 '... : 9... ,."'- ..... '. o~ "'P., ~v ,.' "1., /"4RY 9\)V.," ~f,." ~, _, If I ""',\\\\ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. I~ .~ -. - -. ~ ~ -- '"' ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 15.C. Subiect: PUBLIC HEARING: To Solicit Comment on Illegal Immigration in Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: )6 o Board Action Reauested: The Board is requested to hold a public hearing to solicit public comment on the recommendations contained in the Illegal Immigration Report. Additionally, the public is encouraged to articulate other potential options and opinions with respect to illegal immigration in the county. Summary of Information: On August 16, 2007 the Board was sent a report with staff's estimation of the local cost of providing services to illegal immigrants. The report included staff recommendations for County actions that could be implemented under existing County authority. On September 26th the Board held a work session to review the report, and identified other potential options to pursue. The Board is requested to hold a public hearing to solicit comments on the findings and recommendations outlined in the Illegal Immigration Report as well as general community comments regarding illegal immigration within the county. The presentation made to the Board on September 26, 2007 is attached for your reference. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Deputv County Administrator Attachments: . Yes DNa 1&00208 en (D -c r+- eD 3 0- eD .., I\) 0) '-- I\) o o -..J ~ o ~ " en (I) t/) t/) -- o :1 DJ o D) .., C- O .... en c -c (I) < -- tJ) o .., tn . . . "'.'.. r ....~.. ell,::,_ /" 1..~. "";'~.... .: '~ ....... ~, , "-'" :t', , " .~ C".,e:,... '.' I, .i'lo..;; ',~~ -'" ,'~ ...... ..' lilt '" '$i. .'i' ::::; '" 711' .,'0' '" ,'," .,- \~" ""U ('") m -C m ..., 0 >< ..., C/J 0 ::J -C 0 r"+ < ('") < -- - 3 -- CD 0 -- 0. 0. .., 0) CD .., CD CD ::J r"+ C C/J 0 (j) (I) CD -C -C CD r"+ 0 0. r"+ .., :::r -- < CD Q) 0) 0 -- r"+ ::J ('") -- ..., CD CIJ CD 3 C- o 0' en -C ::J r"+ 0) ;c .., 0 ('") - CD 0) -C r"+ CD co 0. CD 0 .0 -- c. 0 :J en - .., -C r"+ C 0) CD - :::r CD r"+ en CD CD -- < en :::r CIJ CD -- () ::J CD r-+ Q) c.c ..., 0 (') ('") CD C r"+ ::J -- 0 - 0 r"+ 3 CD '< ::J en 3 co r"+ Q) 0 c - - ::J '< r"+ '< t::: 0) 5'" . . . =.:J........ sO)"> -i -----. m 1) o=.:JO ~ m CD a 0 ~en~ C/J 0 C/J r-+- "'0 r-+- :::::- r-+- ~:::::t0 Q) 0) -. (). :3 ..~ -. 3 CD 3 0) 0.. .. CD\) m ::::!'\ Q) ~ Q) 0..::J- en =.:J' r-+- r-+- CD CD 0) CD m () CD r-+- en - o ~ -. .. c.. S c. 3 en en CD -. =.:J .. ........;, Q) 0.. 11 \) 11 r-+- o -. -. -< -- ~~ r-+- co 0 -< 3 ~o.. CD CD t::: ~C/) c.. =.:J I\) ft I\) ..0 () ........ 0 0 Q) ~::J- T1 ::J- 0 0) 0 0 ::J r-+- 00 -< f5 (j) 0') CD (00 0.. - I\) "'0 en -. - t- O a. CD en 0 or :J 0) ..... CD - c.. ::::.: -. 0 () 0) ., en < 0) -- CD r 0') ., ca t:CD ca CD (') 0 0..0.. - '-.:,.. (') :3 r-+- CD I\.) 3 () =.:J .. r-+- ~ - ........~ "'C - o' 3 Q) ~o 3 ~ t::: 01 Q) ......: "'C - (') "'C '< Q) :3 111 0 - o--(/) r-+- Q) ~ (') 3 CD r- (') () ..-+ ..... en r-+- 0 o t: en ""C ........ ;f5- ~ Q) =.:J =.:J {fl () g-c; (fl C') I'V ~ r-+- t::: ... ... :3 0 ~ w CD CD ~ ~ =.:J I\.) (j) 01 ........ CD ... ... 0.. ~ ex> CD I ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 y -u o y- (') CD -10))> ..., c CJ) 0) ,-+ 0 """I: ::T CD -I 0 ;:l.. :J :::::!. 0) CO ~ _. :J o -. ~ :J -. CO o CD ..., en o :J a. o o c 3 CD :J ,-+ 0) ,-+ o :J Q) C ,-+ ::T CD :J ,-+ o ,-+ '< CD CO 0) CJ) ,-+ 0) ,-+ c CJ) 0) :J a. ,-+ 0) " :J CO 0) "'C "'C ..., o "'C :::::!. Q) ,-+ CD 0) (") ,-+ o :J ~ ,-+ ::T :J . . ~-u - . ..., '-+0 V :r < 0. -. wo. (J) ~ CD -. '< - ~ ~3 o ~3 .-+ 0 co. CD ~..., ::1 \-. W ..,.-o(W!::!': CD ~ 0 o -.::1 -c :J w -3::1 CD W Co -c ,-+ -. CD 0 (') en C " en CD .-+ 0. 0 C 3 "'C en 3 m o ::1 ::1 ~ r-+ ..., :r (') '< CD ~ 3 ..., CD ::1 .-+ 0. CD "'C o ::1 w r-+ o ::1 OJ C ..., CD W c ..-. o m --- . (')""(J) oCDr-+ V V ~ 3. * ___0- Co ...,..., en _. CD3 3 -. CD ::::J ::1w ::)> o~ ...,CD '::J"::1 0)> Cen ~.en ::::J - . co~ C ~ ::1(') Co CD g-u C ..., 3~ CD"" ::1W 0;3 Co ..-. "'COO CDO en~ g-u en--- I -c 0 0 Coo en C C C :J :J CDr-+r-+ '< '< W:r:r 0. w w 0. en en !::!': ..., ..., o CD CD ::1 ..c (') w C CD (J) m C6 00;0. )>0.0 )>0< -uo~ Q):J.y:, -c co ~ -c CD ~ ..., en CJ'1 o en - ~ 0 g w. ::1 0 ::t. Q) (J) o - -- ::1 0. ::1 en ~ (') CD CD co "i1 ~-< -.0 o W :::J .-+ o ..-. -c CD ..., en o ::1 ::1 CD ~ ~ OJ r-+ -- en () o C ::J r-+ '< () C .., .., CD ::l r-+ - '< o o -- :::J to -v I 0 c orAl '5:. . en 0)> en 3 co O~ ..., :': -- -co a.(C ::J _.n 9t::J -. co :,:0 ::J::J co 3 -.CO 0) OJ - - 0.-+ en 3 ::J::T ::J C m en co ("") - . Qco COo: ::::J ::J r Q) ::J (J) .-+ -. (J) c.. o ::l ""C 0) COCO C 0 ""CO) 0- ..., () co ::J -. ::JO CD ~co - en 0 Q.) -. .-+ "0>< '< Co.. (j) - COCO ., ("") .-+ Q.) 0 oCO 0 en "0 ...., ("")"0 co 0) a CD-c co~ ::J enO cY CD'< r-+,.-+. CfJ:::J ,.-to. -. '< -. ...., '< ~. I 0 "0 ("") 0) 0 ., co :J 0 ::J ::J 0 < 0 a. en en -. < .0 ~. C en co -. tu 0 ., C'-+ ::J ('") O):::r - ., -- 0 :':N r-+ cY '< :iE ~o ., a. :J 0 o -. 0) -. """':J :J ...., ., CO :': c.c c.c CD' r co -- ., ct VW- .,::::J _. ~ CD Q.. ::J -. (J) C 0= e.. CD 3 5-co Q) Q) \",,;;.,. cn~COW (DCDne: O"""'e.. o ,...... _. SO,...... ~W~ (') C 0 g 0.< ...... - . ., ;:::+: (J) Q) -. aWO)> en """'::::J 3 W ,...... c Q ::::J ::J 0- CD '< Q) ::+ CD,......,...... >< -.< ~3co ~ CO ::::J <' e.. CD 0 ., (J) ........... (") o ::::J ,...... ., Q) (") ,...... o ., (J) CD en ~ 3 Q) ...... CD a. -Jo. J\.) '(f2. "" W- ::::J::::J c..Q.. C (J)e.. COco < _.(") 00 CD::::J (J)(J) ,...... ., C (") ,...... -. o ::::J (") o ::::J ,...... .., W (") ,...... (J) W (J) ~ CO - - W (J) c.c o o c.. (J) -,...... )> 0):::T3 :iE~CD (J) < ::::J CO e.. aO OOC) ., C 0 (J) ::::J ...........,......:::J (") '< r-+ o ..., ::::J (") Q) q-O('") W::::Jr-+ (")~() ,......w o (") CD CiJ,......~ a8-=h o (") o. 3 C Q) ~3~ '<coo ~3.:J ;:::+:(J) ::J ,...... -. 0 3 ., 3~ -. c c.c _. ., ., Q) CD ,...... -. o ::::J r o CJ tu - o -C r-+ -- o :J en . Ol(f)-u ce Q......, ...., CD 0 CD -ce CD '< ...., 3 r-+ Ol CD03 :::J -()...., r-+ CD ~..c _c CD :::; - ::J CD (03 :TCD '<::J r-+ r-+(f) ...., -- Ol -- :J-C --CD ::J ...., ceen o 3 ::J CD:J 3~ 00.. ...., CD Olo.. ::J -- 0.0 C Q) r-+ 3 CD 0.. o -., -....J . (10 00 ~_ c C ::J ::Jr-+ (1'< ~(J) O::r ::JCD ~~ - - ----toi r-+ ..... :::ren -0 ()~ m (5- CD 0.. o CD en r-+ :::r -- en ::J o ~ ::J . -o~- OloO -ocm CD --0 :E Q. Q) 0:::r;:1. ...., Ol ::J ,,<([) r-+CD...., o --h en CD:::r c- 0.. -- CDCD-o ce""'3 --0) ::J - CD o..OlOl CD C ::J -0 r-+ en O:::rr-+ o ..., ::1 ~_ Q) Ol r-+ -- r-+ '< ::J -- CD or-+o.. ::JO -c1JO ...., ...., 0 o 0 c (1 (1 ::J CDCDr-+ CDen'< 0.. en en r-+ -- Q) ~ ~ en lJ Q) ;:4- :J - CD 3 Ci1 3 ::r -- r -- to 0 -c 03 () ~!:!:Q) """"--... 0 _ (5::J 0 mm-c :J r"+ ~ ......, - . ~oo OO"":J ~C1CJ) en ~ lJeo a a to ..., Q) 3 "'-""" ,...,p r :::r0) 0) :J ,...,pc. ,...,p - :::rO CD ..., ,<a. 00 0) """- ..., ::0 CD CD ::::J ::::J o ,...,p ,...,pO) """0 CD ..., :J 0 ~"O :J CD (C ..., ,...,p ,...,p '< o I c ::::J :T 0.0) o < ('") CD c - 3 0) CD a 3.0- CD ..., 0.0. 00 "0 ('") co co o ..., "O~ - -n CO,< QQ . · en ,...,p Q) ,...,p CD )> c 00 00 ,...,p 00 00 :::r c r Q -- -- -- :J ('") ,...,p COeD rr::::J c 00 00 CD :5" I CD ..., 00 CD oo.Q _c -. rrOJ CD c """00 o _. .., ::J CD CD ('") ..., CD CD :J C'") (J) CD CD ..., ,...,p -. ::h ('") Q) ,...,p -. o :J o ....., CD (C Q) - 00 ,...,p Q) ,...,p c 00 . )>b 0.('") o Q) -0- ,...,po m :J ~ (Co ==:J 00 ::J"" Q) 00 o I: -. ('") -. Q) Q) :J c.c C 0) (C CD o r"'+ ::::T CD ~ -u o en en -- CT -- - -- r"'+ -- CD en r"'+ o -U c ..., en c CD . . C/):b ~ 0 ~ < .., () ('I)Q.. Ct5 .............. . _ _ CD 0 o .......ca ...... \:jS o ~....... {Q 0' :J -... en. 3 co ~. -- (Q ('I) 0 :J ...... g.-< 3 Q) Q) -- 3 ...... Q) CD -.... ('I)() CD ...... . C/) c CIJ ::J3Qi G) :J CIJ r ...... 0 Q..3-'" -- ~3 CD - 0 CD ~ ...... . ('I) -- :J " :J S3 c.co () CD CD OJ CO ::J QJ :::! . - .... ...... . .., '< - -- --n~ ('J) :::t :3 OJ )> CIJ Q..O('l) - C ...... . ...... . - ::J 0 t:: ::J )> :J n Q) Q) ::J ('I)O() r-+- CIJ r-+- -- r-+ -- -- 0 :::00 Q)::JO CIJ -- ('I) ::J -"'03 CD OJ :J < \:j-- o ~.:3 3 . I. I CD o :3 o Ci). c- CD () ~:3 -... ...... . en ...... C O::J - ...... 0- Q) o. '< I\J 0 Q.. co . t: Q1 CD .......::J I 03 -C ...... "-.. . ('I)~ t:: I\J 0-0 c.. ...... ....... . 3~~ CX>...... ::J.O Q) ",::J ('I) ........en () CD CD ('I)O~ 0 ::r r-+ 01 - -....('1) CD CD CD o~ ...... . ." 3 ::JCI)o ('") ::J (Q ~. CQ~~ 3 r-+- CIJ C/j -- -... C1 0 -- (1)('1) -- < 3 CIJ :J :3 I en CD ([) -- ([) .... . 0 3. :::!' :J ::J. "'0 en c.a Q) . . C) -... {Q < < Q) -- - ..., -- co a. -. :J (fJ -. r-+Q) C a.::r CD -. ::JCO r-+::r (t) ..., < -- en CD Q) a. C ('") W r-+ -- o ::J ::J ::J ~ en < r-+ -- ;::+ a. C C ,-fa Q) o - ::J en en ........ ..., C 0 :J 3 - CD Q) en r-+ en r-+ CD ::J a. -- ::J co r-+ ::r CD '< ::r Q) < CD Q) ..... r""l . . ::J co C :J a. o ('") ('") C CD 3 ::J CD en :J CD r-+ __ CD ........ a.::r ::J Q) ~CB ~- Q) a....., C CD Q) a. -CD en ..., Q) . C m ::J ::J a. en CD C ., """'" ........CD CD 0 a.::J ~ CD ~-c NCD ex>w --..Jo ...-... ::J co '-'" 0 Q) :J 5-a. ::rC o r-+ ...,'< ;::+Q) '< r-+ Q) - - r-+ 3 CD -- :J '--- Q) en ('") CD ::4. -- ........ -- CD a. . . -s:: OQ) m::J a. a. W Q) r-+ r-+ Q) CD C'" - Q) 0 en ('") CD Ol - en ::r CD ..., -. I: en r-+ o ('") o ::J ........ -- ..., 3 CD co Q) - -c ..., CD en CD ::J ('") CD C en -- ::J co I o c en CD ;0 CD "'0 C 0- - -- () Q) :J () Q) c (") c en -U ..., o "'0 o en Q) - en . o o :J ,...... ::J e CD ,...... o 3 o :J ,...... o .., 3 "'C 0) o ,...... o ::J 0) -h -- 00 o 0) - '< CD 0) -. 0- 0) 00 -- 00 ....... . =g-oo CD _.e 0 co - 00 :J n'\ '< ,......,...... WJ 0-- :7~3~ 0."""'00 CD CD 9, m "'C "'C -.:J 0) o:J-h;::+ ::1.3o:J atO)nCD - - ,...... CD -. OCD3OO :Joo :J'" CD -. ~:J\J -. ,...... :E 0) OJ;:::+: "'Ce:J'" "'C-._ a ~ 3 ~c3 05.~cC- CD 001 n'\ m ~ WJ"-"'O o ,...... ::J ~o o "'C 0) :J -. :J enoc.. -.< -h __ 0. CD . :J"')>o 0000 ~ ~_:J _.00 ~ ::J t'""'t" ::J coO)e ~~co mCO"'C co -0 Q) tu...,2: -00 -.co -- 3-."'C 30)Q) 3~ cO. 0 -.,-..::::J Q) en-. 3. 0 ::::J oo)>en - . )> ,...... ::::J-oat ~-~ CD Q) ~oo -. -. -. ~_3 3 5. c-Q.) ~); en=-: COco -h :J o -. ;0 CD () o 3 3 CD ::J C- O) r-+ -- o ::J en . CD a co 0 -. ::J en r-+ Q) :j" !:!:C o CD :::J r-+ Q) 0 ::3 CD 0 o.::J CD r-+ "'-' 0 Q) "'-' - Q) Q) ::J ::J a.Q. en en r-+C Q)"O r-+"O CD 0 CD ;4. < Q) ~"O en "0 "'-' o "0 "'-' -. Q) r-+ CD ~ I\.) . =0-0 ~~a Q) -"0 -co 0 -. 0 CIJ 3 < CD 3 CD ::J cO. :3 ~ "'-' 3 <: Q)CD- !:!: CD o:::Jco ::J en 00. - r-+Q) o r-+ -. Q) 0 Q.:J o.r-+ "'-' 0 ~ CD en >< C")"O o Q) :::J ::J C") 0. CD r-+ "'-' :::T ::J CD en Q) "'-' C CD r-+ CO:::T Q) 0 "'-' "'-' 0. ;::::+ -. '< ::J co 0 ...., . ao - Q) "'-' C ~ en r-+ CD en r-+ Q) ~ r-+ o 3 "0 - CD 3 CD :J r-+ r-+ :::T CD o o :::J r-+ "'-' Q) C") r-+ () CD "'-' r-+ -. =::n C") Q) r-+ -. o :::J CDO)> ::J C") 3 en C") CD C C "'-' "0 ::J CDQ)o. CIJ::Jr-+ Q)C"):::T CD'~CD r-+ -. N '<30 Q) ;::::+ ::J ::J Q) -. ,..... r-+ ::J ll...C.. -. co .c 0 c ::J Q) CIJ - -. -. ::J o "'-' 0. -. ::J Q) ::J C") CD r-+ o Q) ::J == tete ():::J o ~ 0.;::::+ CD :::T r-+ r-+ o =r CD ....... '<r-+ o :::T ....,CD OJ CD'c -. - 0. . ;0 CD C1 o 3 3 CD :J c- O) ,...... -. o :J en Your Community Newspaper Since 1995 P.O. Box 1616. Midlothian, Virginia 23113. Phone: (804) 545-7500. Fax: (804) 744-3269' Email: news@chcsrcrficldobserver.com . Internet: www.chesrerficldobserver.com Client Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Illegal Immigration 1 col x 3" $100.00 PUBLIC NOTICE Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, VIrginia, at a regular scheduled meeting on November 14, 2007, at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building, Rt. 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia, will hold a public hearing where persons may appear and present their concerns with respect to illegal immigration in Chesterfield County. If further information is needed, please contact Ms. Rebecca Dickson, Deputy County Administrator for Human Services at 748-1350 between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The hearing is held at a public facility designed to be accessible to persons with disabilities. Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or need for reasonable accommodations should contact Tanke Blakley, Clerk to the Board, at 748-1200. Persons needing interpreter services for the deaf must notify the Clerk to the Board no later than Friday, November 9, 2007. The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 11/07/2007 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ,+h day of No.;e~ r ,2007. ~cflcJ!W;: JO~~C My commission expires: November 30, 20 I 0 Commission J.D. 7040138 (S~~> ..<<:'''~\\llImll''''111 / \\\\... L < ,,~/ "...' ..\.... . ~ ~ ~, .,....~ ~. ...&:,.W...... v^~''.. ~' ~.'~Ou~ E4 ... 'Y, ~ ! 0 ...~. (~..~ 0 ~ ~"";I:o' -::G~ ~ , ~ : '-> ()~ : c: - .~ . .. ,.. . ... ., . . .. ::.. "-" -:, .", J,.~f__,...\\...' t'.. ,:::- "'". ,,"L r.. \ \;J .... "'-.... ......."., '1'0,. '~"''''i''l'. l\<:!)V ......... '~I;I 4 RY \,v ......'... 1111,., ffl U" \\\\\\ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. Z\ ? ~ 0\ ) c, \0 0> .....') -, ~ S> ~ :r: ~ gJ j ('" C) r ~ ~ ;u '- V\ "";s. ~ \> ~ CL CI ,..-. 2 ~ '- ~ (\) ~ -+- ""\ <)' ~ ~ ....,. r' ~, ("" r- j ,--~ >;;: '0 V ~ "'-J' (\ t ~ ""0 = =- - .... ~ - ~ ~ ~ = "0 i;" ~ -- ~ = ~ Ctl ~ "'l ; = Q. i ~ .... '" .... ""I .... ~ .... == ~ =- .... ~ =- ~'< == Q Q = $l "'l , ~ .... '" =- .... f'Cl Q. Q.~ .... Q ~ "'l ::S. ~ ~ Q. ....Q. "'l f'Cl '" '" .... ""l '< = = Q. Q == Q .... ~ .... '" .... "'l 1-1. ~ .... .... ~ ~ a ~ ~ s. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ gZto .... n 0 0 ! ~ ~ ~ ~ m3o..(J) e ~C"o- ... 5' CD '"'" ,..,. ~ te ~ en \II So ~~c:2 ~ CD ~-"C I .. CD- ~ =~~z ~. CD 0 -. (J) ::t CQ..... en ~. m I ~ ;I; ..... _cnenm S. ~ ~ !: m 3 oCD-f -. "0 CD CO. tt. Dl 3 ~ -. CQ cr ~ ~ :::- ~. :::- ~ ~ ::: ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ S' ~ '. '-- " ~ r 0 =- = rv ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ -e = & ~ C" r - -. ~ RJ .>- ~; /") ~ N , - .... c:' ~ ~ - ... ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .- ~ e ~ 1\ -= :z ~ G ~ ~ t ~ i;" ~ - e ~ ~. r 0- ~. \) t/ ~ r ~ ::: ~ :!> '\ } ~ $ ~ IG ~ "U ~ :: c V'. ~ C" ,,/\ 0 \).. ~ :ZOJ ~ n 0 0 ~ :I:<D) (I) -, ~ (1)30..(1) l::l ~ C" 0 - ~ ;' (t) ~ G) ~ cc-'cnZ So -, ~ l: I (J).. "g - ~ .. (I) Z ~ 0= ~ b _N;! ~ ~ ~ -0 _. CD 0 Cii' (I) "VJ ""l rI.l ~. CJ e ..... cc.....o::I: ~, ""l ~ fl "\ = -. D)I-'m ~ ;:;. ~ ~ Q. ..... - tn (V ~ ~ _. ..... -0') ......- V 0 =:I s. 3(;)3:m "2 ~ ~ -. ~ 3 0 ~ -I ~ "" =- ~ \\\ ..... ce'" !:!: c: ""l -. -. ~ -, 3 ::l ~ ~ ct ~ =- ;:;. D) cc ..... !:!:" \f 5 ~<< ::::- "- C:l 0 g ,~ ");:. l o = ~ ::l ~~ ~ ""l ~ ~ :: ..... rI.l ~ =- -. ~ Q. ~ ~ Q.~ .... -. 0 ~ ~. ""l :::!. ~ ~ ~ Q. ~ ..... Q. S' ""l ~ ~ rI.l rI.l .. -. """l << 0 = Q. 0 = 0 ..... ~\ -r '\ '\ \.....--l q <: t f lZ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ r :'t ,.-- .tV'- ..--' ~ '~y ~ o .=- ()) ~9 ~ ~ <:<." :: OJ I".l ~ ~ ~ \13 .r- c- y> So ?-- r- ~ ~ (" r. ~ ", - .... "'l 't-- [ F-- ~I ? ~ ~ = (D ~ .... ", .... "'l .... I".l .... :r ~ =- .... I".l =- ~~ = 0 = = ~ ~ ....", =- .... ~ Q.. ~ Q.." ....0 ~ "'l :l. ~ I".l Q.. ....Q.. "'l ~ ", ", .... ""l ~ o = Q.. o = o .... ~ ~ a ~ ~ l!OoO. ~ ~ ~ :::: .., ~ :: ~ ~ ~ s. ~ ~ ~. ::;- ~. '" s. ~ ;::.. ~. ;::.. ~ C =: ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ S' ~ .. "'tJ C C" ::Zm (') 0 0 ...<0) .....CD... CD3c.en ~ a" 0 - :;. CD -It C') cc'(J):! ... :: r:: I CD" "'C - .. CD Z -I\)., -0< CD 0 Ci), en cc ...... 0 ::E: O)I"'m - tn - en 3ws:m 3 0 ~ -t cc' "'C !:!: ... 3' ::J 0) co !:!:. o ~ , '-- -= = C" - -. ~ -- ~ ]J ~ :.< ~ ~ ,..c;; .... = ~ -'- 3 "= ~ A\ ;;- ~ ~ ~ '-' ~ "') ~ = (0 S. ""to. ~ "tJ :: "": c ~ tT ::21XJ ~ 0 0 ::: :I:<ll) ~ CD CD ... t3 ll)3Q.en ::: .. [j 0 - ~ :;' CD ~ G') co"'cn co So ...~cz ~ ~ CD~ "C I .. CD- tt ~ _N~ Z "'l -. a rI.l =e ) ..... ~. CD 0 -, en a:! "'l ., :;- co ..... tn Q. ~ mlo:::t ~ ..... ~. - ., c _. " _mtn m 0 = ~ J -. ~ s. 3ws:m rIl c-- ~ ..... =- ~, 0 m -I "'l ~ -. _. ~ ~ ::- co "C .... ~-- ..... =- ~. DJ 3 :i' < ~<< ::- ..... to \:; = 0 -. o == ~ 0 )> ~ "'l C :s 1ft. ..... ~ :: " ~ =- -. "": nl Q. '""I'.. Q. "nl ~ ;. 0 .... ..... "'l ~ ~. ~ ~ Q. c:::- .....Q. ~ "'l S' tt rI.l ~ rI.l .. ~r~ - 0 ::" = ~ , ~ ~ "0 = ~, 0- - .... ~ ~ - ro ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ :3 ('l:, 'C :z ~ ;;- = - ;; ""-. p ~ ~ ~ ~ t"' ~ 7)' ::: "tJ "'Il C ~ ~ 0" ::Zm ~ (") 0 0 ~ :I: < II) ~ , (\) .., ('l:, ~3Q.en ~ .., C" 0 - :i' (\) ..... G') ~ (Q"cnZ ~ .., ~ C I ('l:, m. "tI_ .. (\) Z ~ :0 ~ ~ _N~ ~ ~ .... -0 "'l ~ ~. CD 0 Cii" en :3 ...... "'l ~ cc.......o:I: ~ = .... ~ ~. II) I .., h- Q. ...... - Ul m , = .... ..... -0') 0 = .... 3 .. i: m -., .... ~ ;: 3 ~ ~ -I 1:1> CZ> ...... =- ~ ;f: "'l .... ii' l' ~ .... ~ ;::.. .., 3 ~ I ~ Q" ..... ...... ~ ~. to ~~ = 0 (5' - o = ~ ~ S\ ,- ~ "'l ~ ~ ::: \- ...... ~ =- .... "'Il \ ~ Q. ~ ~ Q.... ..... ....0 ~ ~ "'i ::3. = ~ ~ Q. ('l:, ......Q. ~ "'l ~ ~ ~ ~ '. .... ~ ~ 0 = Q. 0 = 0 ...... "0: I: Q" - ;;. 02-. ~ .... [I.l ..... "'l .... ~ ..... .... = ~ =- .... ~ =- ~<< = 0 o = ~ "'l ..... ~ =- .... l'll Q. Q.~ ~. 0 ..... "'l ::!. ~ ~ Q. ....."" "'l l'll [I.l [I.l ~ (tl ~ ~ ~ ~. ;:: ~ ~ ~ .., ~ ~ ~ ~ ::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ::t ~. ...... s. " t: C" =:ZQJ (')00 :::I:<D) _ CD .. ;30..cn ::::!. C" 0 - jCD....,.... ~ .., en \II .. ~ c 2 CD ~ 't:l I .. CD- =~~ Z ~~tircn !. I ~ ::I: _ en U) m 3w3:m ;; 0 CD -f -. ([) fQ 't:l .... ..' -. A) 3 j ,..... to o' j ~ :::- ~. :::- ~ ~ =: ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ " ~. , ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~"V ~,~ ~~ \, ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~j ~, . v C r! [ / D o -, 4- r N (\ .~, ~ ~. r ~ fj ~ - D- :.., " :r = 10 ""C = r:r - .... r:; - ~ ~ ~ a ";l z ~ a ~ - ~ -- co ~ ""'l a = Q. ~ o .... [IJ ...... ""'l .... r:; ...... o .... [IJ ...... ""'l .... r; ...... 5i" ~ :r .... r:; :r ~~ = " " = ~ ~ .. ~. :rQ. ~ ~ Q.." .... " ~ ""'l ::3. ~ r:; Q. ......Q. ""'l ~ [IJ [IJ .... ...., ~ Q = Q. " = " ...... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ::: ~ ~ ::: "'t ~ 1! ~ ~ ::: ~ So ~ ~ .... C'-l ::;- .... ~ ...... "'tJ c 2:zOJ -'0 0 (") < I) i C1) a. en 1)30_ -.C" r\ -. CI) .... \II ::S-.cnz ee _ C I -. ~ "C _ (1)~ CI) z .. N.., -0< = 0 -. en CI) ..... en ... ee 0..... ~ I iil m 3~s:m 3 ~ ~ -I -..... P+- ee ~ :i" DJ3ee c:' o ::s .... ::: ~ .... ~ ~ ~ ::: ~ r"j ""'. ~ ~ ~ ~ '. ~ ~ 0 =- 0 = ~ 9 '2:_ -= = !j) ~ - c -. ~ ~ ~ - l'l) ~ ~ ~ a = ~ "C ~ ~ ;- ~ 'y' ~ """. l'l) :: ~ ~ "'C :::: .., s::: C" ~ ::ZOJ (') 0 0 :: :J:<II) CD ., ~ m~Q.fn ~ ., C"o- s' CD .... G') ~ co-'C/)z ~ ~s::: a ~ 'T3 .!.. co ~ .. CD Z ): ~ ~ _N~ l'l) .... -0 - ., 'I'- ~. (j) 0 (ii' en CJ = ...... ., ::;- (Q.....O :I: ~ .... ~ n .... II) I ., Q. ...... ~ - (I) m ~ .... .... -en e = s. 3..s:m .... ~ 3 ~ t8 -I ."...r fIJ 'P ...... I:r ~ _. CD ., .... ;:r. CQ '0 !:!: t .... f':I "" 3 ~ ~ =- ~. ...... ~. (Q ~<-< :::- o. = 0 ~ <:I = j ~ ., ~ tt> :::: ...... 'I'- I:r .... ., tt> Q. ~ tt> Q.~ .... ....0 ~ ~ ., ::!. ~ ~ n Q. ~ ......Q. S" ., tt> ~ 'I'- 'l'- '. .... ..., <-< 0 = Q. 0 = 0 ...... &" D .D C & .6 ~ .~ c; c. p 3 - l"D ~ = a "t:l ~ ;:r = -- a ~ "'t: = e- - -. ~ c= ~ "'l 8 = c. = o -. '" f""!> ""! -. ~ - sr ~ ='" ... ~ ='" ~~ = c c = ~ ~ - ~. ="'c. ~ ~ c.~ _. c ~ "'l "'I ~ ... c. ::a.c. "'l ~ '" '" .. """l ~ o = C. C = C ..... o _. '" ..... 1Ij -. ~ ..... ~ ~ S ~ ~ .... . ;: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ So ~ ~ ..... 1;] ~ ..... ~ ..... "1J Iii 2:zm -. 0 0 o < D) ::I: (\) a. en (\)3 _ D) C" 0 ,..,. :::::!. (\) .... \II ::s ", (I) :! ~ ~ c: I ", oI::ao "C _ (\)~ CD 2 ION<! = 0 -. en (\) Om T ....., 0 ..L. '21Ci1m ~~s:m 3 ~ ~ -I -. "C =: CO. :s "'3cc ~. o' ::s ..... ::: ~ ..... ~ ~ =: "'Il ~ ..... ~ /:::0 ~ ~ ~ '. fYlCty. rt~ '1~ (, I , ! Good Evening: My name is Mary Lou Marple and I am an active member of St. Augustine Church where I have ministered to and with my Latino brothers and sisters for almost 8 years. I do not know whether they are documented or undocumented. I-d(}rno~"&pe:a~S)3anisft; I am here today to ask you, as servants of this county, to approach the subject of illegal immigrants using PEOPLE FIRST LANGUAGE. These immigrants are human beings, children of God, the same as you and I. While I don't condone breaking the law, I can acknowledge that extenuating circumstances bring these immigrants to us; circumstances neither you nor I can understand because our life experience is so radically different. The guess-timated cost to the county compared to the overall budget is negligible. And, no report has been made to compare the cost to the contributiQtl~ made by these hardworking people. According to Jeffrey Passel, a demographer at the Pew Hispanic Center, in 2005 unauthorized immigrants made up only ahout...4,:,9o/O'"eft~lab.Q,tl.f.Qrce..(in,,;,. '""" I . \ 111 I r.t.;~<, 1..,,,, ",t!t~~ about 7.2 million workers out of 148 million. However, in 2005, legal and illegal immigrants accounted for 24% of farm workers, 17% of cleaning workers and 14% of construction workers. Undocumented immigrants are concentrated in strenuous or hazardous jobs: they made up more than J;4 of roofers, insulation installers and meatpacking factory workers. ....~.. Wl1ois..preaki11g..the..la"\N''? We all know this is not just a Chesterfield County issue. Thi.,s..is..a",lJ.fl'i~' ~f*meFiett tSStl0. We nnot adequately address the immigration issue on a local level. Our current immigration system is terribly broken. Comprehensive immigration reform is long overdue. However, immigration reform should be looked at in two parts; lrnrnlgt;at!Oningeneral and a~oJj~aplesQl~tl{)l1 for the estimated 12 million undocumented immigrants who have become the foundation of the service industry, agriculture and construction in this country; possibly a guest worker visa where criteria can be developed giving these tried and true workers an opportunity to become U.S. Citizens. Chief of Police Depuis made it very clear at the September 26 Board of Supervisors' meeting when Mr. Miller, Chair of the Board, asked "isn't there any way we can be more aggressive against these illegalsT' ChiefDepuis said, in part, "we can't arrest the problem away." Mr. Miller, Members of the Board, Mr. Stegmayer, rtlyr~quest as a long-time resident of Chesterfield County is that voting on your proposaLconceming .'-...... ..;:: ... ) ""l'O!"_,~A,:.4 illegal i1ll111igl'a.ntsBeputonhold;please donotvote. Don't let your frustration at the Federal government's inability to timely enact new legislation for immigration reform take you away from the priorities you have set for Chesterfield County. Let citizens like me, like us, who have done our homework, be part of a new initiative. An initiative that enables board members and residents to work together for change. Let,us.~naHgeo,,{mF'" appreaGh'itf"assessing.the, impact of'undocumented-residents.,o.u,Ghestedield"''''l ; ..,.J, ['l'"; .,~~ ~. Let us not be led by fear. Let~ formfif. Chesterfield County ~;i,,\;:J Coalition for Change"'work with state and federal legislators toward a.~ solution to assure that comprehensive immigration reform becomes a reality. Let us work together to create laws that honor and respect the human dignity of each person. Let us work together as one human family. Thank you. Mary Lou Marple 2823 Stanwix Lane Richmond, VA 23234 804/275-8294 il~lW~~ Good Evening Mr. Chairman, Board of Supervisors, Mr. Stegemeyer. My name is Katharine Anderson. I moved from Minnesota to Chesterfield County in 1983. I am the Coordinator for Outreach, Justice, and Peace at St. Augustine's Catholic Church. I have spent the majority of my adult life and raised 4 daughters here in Chesterfield. I know in the Old South that makes me a newcomer, yet this county has become my home. Let me start with saying I am not a proponent of breaking the law. That said, I can and do recognize that for the most part, the Federal Government has not done an adequate job enforcing current immigration laws. After all these years of having failed to do so, criminalizing undocumented individuals for breaking civil law becomes a social justice issue. The remedy for breaking civil law by undocumented presence in this country is deportation. Arguably, most of us would agree that deporting 12 million plus people is not a workable solution to the immigration issue. Local dissatisfaction with Federal and State officials failure to enact comprehensive immigration reforms must not lead Chesterfield County to reacting from a place of fear and misinformation. It is has become a commonly accepted misconception that "most" immigrants are Hispanic and here illegally, they take jobs away from Americans, they don't pay taxes, they don't want to learn English, when in fact economic impact studies have found just the opposite to be true. On June 20th, the Council of Economics Advisors report to the White House concluded that the overall economic impact of immigration is likely to benefit the US. The report states immigrants are a critical part of the US workforce and contribute to productivity, growth, and technological advancement. I am here this evening to ask this Board to delay any vote in response to the report presented Sept 26th. Instead, I ask the Board to explore comparing the guess-timated costs of illegal immigrants, or better said, undocumented or unauthorized immigrants to the contributions made, by these hard working, struggling human beings. The fact that hard figures from all Chesterfield County departments were not reported render the costs quoted not particularly useful, even as estimates and the savings are miniscule when compared to the overall county budget. Local governments cannot solve this issue on their own, but local governments can make proposals to the state legislature. You, the County Board of Supervisors are the elected servant voice for all county residents. Working together, we could become a catalyst for change. I suggest that now is a time when Chesterfield Country could become a leader and an example to other localities struggling with this complex issue as we work with state and federal legislators toward forming new laws that create a solution that is comprehensive, just, peace inducing, and respectful to the humanity of all God's children. Thank you. St. -91ugustine Cat!io{u church http://stallgustineparish.net J Katharine ~nderson Coordinator for OQtreach"d Justice & Peace ~;: AAM C^,dn'" n..._..I ,\i.~ r\rf jY ~ ~. J \J ~...~ J ''f~ ~~~ '{J ~ l(ll.JJ .UI J~'). ~ck/'L~ uWtv VV--l{;. , EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS WASHINGTON, DC 20502 Immigration's Economic Impact June 20, 2001 "Our review of economic research finds immigrants not only help fuel the Nation's economic growth, but also have an overall positive effect on the income of native-born workers." -Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Edward P. Lazear Introduction In 2006, foreign-born workers accounted for 15% of the D.S.labor force, and over the last decade they have accounted for about half of the growth in the labor force. That immigration has fueled U.S. macroeconomic growth is both uncontroversial and unsurprising - more total workers yield more total output. That immigrant workers benefit from working in the United States is also uncontroversial and unsurprising - few would come here otherwise. I Assessing how immigration affects the well-being of U.S. natives is more complicated. This is because immigration's economic impact is complex and may play out over generations, and because not all natives are alike in terms of their economic characteristics. Even in retrospect it is not easy to distinguish the influence of immigration from that of other economic forces at work at the same time. Nor is it easy to project costs and benefits far into the future. Nonetheless, economists and demographers have made headway on many of the measurement problems. This white paper assesses immigration's economic impact based on the professional literature and concludes that immigration has a positive effect on the American economy as a whole and on the income of native-born American workers. Key Findings 1. On average, US natives benefit from immigration. Immigrants tend to complement (not substitute for) natives, raising natives' productivity and income. 2. Careful studies of the long-run fiscal effects of immigration conclude that it is likely to have a modest, positive influence. 3. Skilled immigrants are likely to be especially beneficial to natives. In addition to contributions to innovation, they have a significant positive fiscal impact. t This document will use "immigrant" and "foreign born" interchangeably. The terms encompass both legal and illegal migrants. Because it is difficult to determine the legal status of migrants in standard data sets, the economics literature generally assesses all foreign-born workers together. General Points . Immigrants are a critical part of the U.S. workforce and contribute to productivity growth and technological advancement. They make up 15% of all workers and even larger shares of certain occupations such as construction, food services and health care. Approximately 40% of Ph.D. scientists working in the United States were born abroad. (Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; American Community Survey) . Many immigrants are entrepreneurs. The Kauffman Foundation's index of entrepreneurial activity is nearly 40% higher for immigrants than for natives. (Source: Kauffman Foundation) . Immigrants and their children assimilate into U.S. culture. For example, although 72% of first-generation Latino immigrants use Spanish as their predominant language. only 7% of the second generation are Spanish-dominant. (Source: Pew Hispanic Center/Kaiser Family Foundation) . Immigrants have lower crime rates than natives. Among men aged 18 to 40, immigrants are much less likely to be incarcerated than natives. (Source: Butcher and Piehl) . Immigrants slightly improve the solvency of pay-as-you-go entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare. The 2007 OASDI Trustees Report indicates that an additional 100,000 net immigrants per year would increase the long-range actuarial balance by about 0.07% of taxable payroll. (Source: Social Security Administration) . The long-run impact of immigration on public budgets is likely to be positive. Projections of future taxes and government spending are subject to uncertainty, but a careful study published by the National Research Council estimated that immigrants and their descendants would contribute about $80,000 more in taxes (in 1996 dollars) than they would receive in public services. (Source: Smith and Edmonston) ..., 1. Evaluating the Effect of Immigration on the Income of Natives Immigrants not only change the size of the labor force, they change the relative supplies of factors such as unskilled labor, skilled labor, and capital in the economy. US natives tend to benefit from immigration precisely because immigrants are not exactly like natives in terms of their productive characteristics and factor endowments. For example, Chart 1 shows that in contrast to their 15% share in the total labor force, foreign-born workers accounted for much higher proportions of workers without high school degrees and of those with Ph.D. degrees (especially for those working in scientific occupations). Differences between natives and immigrants lead to production complementarities that benefit natives. Example: . The presence of unskilled foreign-born construction laborers allows skilled US craftsmen and contractors to build more homes at lower cost than otherwise - therefore the US natives' productivity and income rise. . Thus, when immigrants are added to the US labor force, they increase the economy's total output, which is split between immigrants (who receive wages) and natives (who receive wages and also earn income from their ownership of physical and human capital). Natives may also gain from having a wider variety of goods and services to consume and from lower prices for the goods and services produced by industries with high concentrations of foreign-born workers. The "immigration surplus" is a simple and frequently cited metric of natives' total gains from immigration. The surplus accrues to native factors of production that are complemented by immigrant workers - that is, to factors whose productivity is enhanced by the presence of immigrants. In a simple model withjust capital and labor (not differentiated by skill), similar in structure to that presented in the National Research Council (NRC) analysis, one can estimate this surplus as the area of a triangle defined by a downward sloping labor demand curve and the shift in labor supply attributed to immigration. Using a standard estimate of labor demand elasticity (0.3) and measures of the foreign-born share of the labor force, the current immigration surplus is about 0.28% of GDP, or roughly $37 billion per year.2 Although the simplicity of the "immigration surplus" approach is attractive, the implicit assumptions are numerous, and it is well-understood by economists that this is not a full reckoning of immigration's influence on the economy. For example, the approach does not differentiate between different kinds of workers (by skill, experience or nativity) and does not allow for an endogenous and positive capital market response to the change in labor supply. Because immigration changes the mix of factors in the economy, it may influence the pattern of factor prices, which in turn may induce endogenous changes in other factor supplies. Moreover, 2 Arithmetically, as a share of GDP the surplus is approximated by one-half times labor's share of income times the proportional increase in employment times the estimated wage adjustment to a supply shift of that size. Varying the assumed elasticity of labor demand changes the estimated surplus proportionally. An elasticity of 0.1 yields a surplus estimate of $12 billion, whereas an elasticity of 0.5 yields surplus estimate of $62 billion. The approach is discussed at some length in chapter 4 of]. Smith and B. Edmonston (eds.), The New Americans: Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Effects of Immigration. Washington DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press, 1997. The NRC's rough immigration surplus estimate was $14 billion in 1996. The larger 2006 figure here is due to a larger economy, inflation to 2006 dollars, and growth in the immigrant share of the workforce. implicit in the surplus calculation is an assumed negative effect on average wages for natives - an effect that is difficult to detect in empirical studies of the U.S. wage structure.3 A more complex approach to measuring the influence of immigration on natives' income differentiates workers by skill, nativity, and experience and also allows for a capital accumulation response to changes in the supply of labor. In this scenario complementarities from immigrant workers are allowed to accrue to native workers. A recent paper by Ottaviano and Peri (2006) takes such an approach to measuring the wage effects of immigration and concludes that immigration since 1990 has boosted the average wage of natives by between 0.7% and 1.8% depending on the assessment's timeframe - the effect is more positive when the capital stock has had time to adjust. 4 Fully 90% of US native-born workers are estimated to have gained from immigration. Multiplying the average percentage gains by the total wages of US natives suggests that annual wage gains from immigration are between $30 billion and $80 billion.5 In both approaches described above, natives benefit from immigration because the complementarities associated with immigrants outweigh any losses from added labor market competition. Rather than focusing on average effects, special attention could be paid to the well- being of the least-skilled natives. The number of natives with less than a high school degree has declined over time, which is one reason less-skilled immigrants have been drawn into the US labor force to fill relatively low-paying jobs. Even so, based on Chart 1, one might expect the remaining least-skilled natives to face labor market competition from immigrants.6 Evidence on this issue is mixed. Studies often find small negative effects of immigration on the wages of low-skilled natives, and even the comparatively large estimate reported in Borjas (2003) is under 10% for immigration over a 20 year period.7 The difficulties faced by high school dropouts are a serious policy concern, but it is safe to conclude that immigration is not a central cause of those difficulties, nor is reducing immigration a well-targeted way to help these low-wage natives. . Conclusion: Immigrants increase the economy's total output, and natives share in part of that increase because of complementarities in production. Different approaches to estimating natives' total income gains from immigration yield figures over $30 billion per year. Sharply reducing immigration would be a poorly-targeted and inefficient way to assist low-wage Americans. :! See, for instance, D. Card, "Is the New Immigration Really So Bad?" NBER Working Paper 11547 (2005) or R. Friedberg and]. Hunt. "The Impact of Immigration on Host Country Wages, Employment and Growth," Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (1995): 23-44. 4 The 1.8% figure is based on Ottaviano and Peri's "median" value for the elasticity of substitution between native and foreign-born workers within education-experience groups (6.6). Varying the parameter from 5 to 10 yields long-run average wage gains ranging from 2.3% to 1.2%. See G. Ottaviano and G. Peri, "Rethinking the Effects of Immigration on Wages," NBER Working Paper 12497 (2006). ~ Total wages earned by US natives were calculated using the 2005 American Community Survey. 6 Note that even within categories defined by education and experience levels, natives may have language skills and local knowledge that substantially differentiate them from immigrants. 7 G. Borjas, "The Labor Demand Curve Is Downward Sloping: Reexamining the Impact of Immigration on the Labor Market." Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (2003): 1335-1374. The figure cited in the text appears on p. 1369. G. Ottaviano and G. Peri (2006), using an approach that builds directly on BOIjas (2003), estimate a negative effect of only 1 % to 2% for the least-skilled natives. A key methodological difference is that Ottaviano and Peri allow for imperfect substitution between immigrants and natives within education-experience cells. Card (2005) also questions whether immigrants substantially lower the wages of unskilled natives. A 2. Evaluating the Fiscal Benefits and Costs To assess the fiscal implications of immigration, it is important to take a long-term view of the process and its interaction with projected demographic and economic trends. The National Research Council (NRC) published a landmark study of immigration in 1997, including an assessment of the overall fiscal impact (incorporating taxes and benefits at all levels of government).8 Although 10 years have passed since its publication, the volume's basic methodological lessons and empirical results are worth repeating.9 One key point is that "snapshot" views of immigration's fiscal impact, particularly when based on analysis of households headed by immigrants, are insufficient and potentially misleading guides to immigration's long-run fiscal impact.1O Instead, "Only a forward-looking projection of taxes and government spending can offer an accurate picture of the long-run fiscal consequences of admitting new immigrants" (Smith and Edmonston 1997, p. 10). This approach captures the full costs and benefits of the children of immigrants. Of course, such projections must rely on assumptions about the future path of taxes and government spending as well as economic and demographic trends. From this long-run point of view, the NRC study estimated that immigrants (including their descendants) would have a positive fiscal impact - a present discounted value of $80,000 per immigrant on average in their baseline model (in 1996 dollars) .11 The surplus is larger for high-skilled immigrants ($198,000) and slightly negative for those with less than a high school degree (-$13,000). It is worth noting that the NRC's estimated fiscal cost from less- skilled workers is far smaller than some commentators have recently suggested based on less satisfactory methods. The long-term fiscal approach imparts four main lessons: 1) although subject to uncertainty, it appears that immigration has a slightly positive long-run fiscal impact; 2) skilled immigrants have a more positive impact than others; 3) the positive fiscal impact tends to accrue at the federal level, but net costs tend to be concentrated at the state and local level; and 4) the overall fiscal effect of immigration is not large relative to the volume of total tax revenues - immigration is unlikely to cure or cause significant fiscal imbalances. . Conclusion: Although subject to the uncertainties inherent to long-run projections, careful forward-looking estimates of immigration's fiscal effects, accounting for all levels of government spending and tax revenue, suggest a modest positive influence on average. The fiscal impact of skilled immigrants is more strongly positive. 8 J. Smith and B. Edmonston (eds.), The New Americans: Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Effects of Immigration, Washington DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press. 1997. 9 For a more recent but parallel investigation, see R. Lee and T. Miller, "Immigration, Social Security, and Broader Fiscal Impacts," American Economic Review 90, 2 (May 2000): 350-354. 1O For example, see R. Rector and C. Kim, "The Fiscal Cost of Low-Skill Immigrants to the U.S. Taxpayer." Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation, 2007. II The NRC volume estimated that the limitations on public benefits in the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act would raise the fiscal impact by an additional $8,000 on average. The NRC baseline model assumed that the debt-COP ratio would be stabilized after 20 years by a 50-50 combination off aIling government spending and rising taxes. The report discusses alternative scenarios and concludes that the basic results are not strongly affected by the assumed mix of adjustment of benefits versus taxes (Smith and Edmonston 1997, p. 338). 5 3. Immigrants in the U.S. Labor Force From the perspective of workers in many countries today, the potential income gains from migration are large. For example, Hanson (2006) measured average wages for Mexican-born men who had recently moved to the United States and compared them to the wages of similar men who were still working in Mexico.12 The real wage ratios (that is, wages adjusted for international differences in prices) ranged from about 6-to-1 to 2-to-1 in favor of the U.s.-based workers, depending on the age and education group. Facing such large international wage differences, a worker might hope to move to the U.S. permanently or with the expectation of returning home after accumulating some savings. In this scenario the opportunity to work abroad temporarily can help finance large purchases or investments (like a house, car. or new business) in home countries where credit markets are underdeveloped and where wealth accumulation is difficult due to low wages. Migration might also allow households to expand and diversify their income sources. thereby serving as a lifeline to a higher and more stable income level for family members who remain based in a less-developed economy. In short, the economic gains to immigrants and their families are typically quite large. These immigrants, like those in the past, work hard to improve their lot and that of their children. Their labor force participation rate, reflecting their concentration in prime working ages, is somewhat higher than that of natives (69% versus 66% in 2006), and conditional on being in the labor force their unemployment rate is somewhat lower than that of natives (4.0% versus 4.1% in 2006) .13 Although their average income level is lower than natives', Table 1 shows that they do fairly well in comparison with natives who have similar levels of education. Immigrants have low rates of incarceration compared to natives.14 And they are more likely to engage in entrepreneurial activity.ls Children of Latino immigrants overwhelmingly learn English.16 Finally, relative to natives, the children of low-education immigrants narrow much of the educational and income gap that their parents faced.17 . Conclusion: As in the past, immigrants evince a strong work ethic, and the children of immigrants tend to assimilate in terms of language acquisition and educational attainment. 12 G. Hanson. "Illegal Migration from Mexico to the United States," Journal of Eeo/Jomie Literature, 44 (2006): 869-924. I:J http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/forbrn.pdf. 14 See Anne Morrison Piehl's testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law (May 17, 2007). available at http:/(judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/PiehI070517.pdf. Piehl, an economist at Rutgers University, testified that " . . . there is no empirical evidence that immigrants pose a particular crime threat. In contrast, the evidence points to immigrants having lower involvement in crime than natives. The direct evidence on crime rates shows that localities that receive large numbers of immigrants do not experience increases in relative crime rates." 15 See the Kauffman Foundation's index of entrepreneurial activity (available at www.kauffman.org). 16 See the Pew Hispanic Center/Kaiser Family Foundation 2002 National Survey of Latinos, summary results are available at: http://pewhispanic.org/files/execsum/15.pdf. 17 See D. Card. "Is the New Immigration Really So Bad?" NBER Working Paper 11547 (2005). Also See D. Card. ]. DiNardo. and E. Estes. "The More Things Change: Immigrants and the Children of Immigrants in the 1940s. 1970s. and the 1990s." in G. Bmjas (ed.). Issues in the Economics of Immigration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2000. 6 Additional Reading G. Borjas, Heaven's Door: ImJIligration Policy and the American Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999. D. Card, "Is the New Immigration Really So Bad?" NBER Working Paper 11547 (2005). IH.ll1.:1/www.nbel'.org/papers/1N1154 7. D. Card, J. DiNardo, and E. Estes, "The More Things Change: Immigrants and the Children of Immigrants in the 1940s, 1970s, and 1990s," NBER Working Paper 6519 (1998). IHW:l/www.nbel'.org/papers/wG519. Council of Economic Advisers, Economic Report of the President, Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office, 2007. Chapter 9, "Immigration." III IlljL~^!w\y~vh itehQuse .gOY I eeal eh9~rI]QLQdr. Council of Economic Advisers, Economic Report of the President, Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office, 2005. Chapter 4, "Immigration." IHWj/V\~WIN .gpo(lccess.gov/eop/2005/2005 erpJldt. G. Hanson, "Illegal Migration from Mexico to the United States," Journal of Economic Literature, 44 (2006): 869-924. iUI!~:Hl!:ushDllle.u esd. edu/f aeul ty / goh~U~olllJ1..:J~l{'_x i CClJLJ1m II igra t i () n 0306 lillI. R. Lee and T. Miller, "Immigration, Social Security, and Broader Fiscal Impacts," American Economic Review 90 (May 2000): 350-354. III W:! I~yvw j~or .org/v i eIN /000282 82/a p000009/00illlQZmlLQ. G. Ottaviano and G. Peri, "Rethinking the Effects of Immigration on Wages," NBER Working Paper 12497 (2006). http://papers.nbel'.org/papers!wI249~~. J. Passel, "The Size and Characteristics of the Unauthorized Migrant Population in the U.S.," Pew Hispanic Center, 2006. http://pewhispall ic.org/fi les/reports/f) l.pd r. J. Smith and B. Edmonston (eds.), The New Americans: Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Effects of Immigration, Washington DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press, 1997. 7 Chart 1 Foreign-Born Proportion of U.S. Workers by Education Level, 2005 Foreign-bom workers are concentrated at the top and bottom of the education distribution relative to nalive- bom workers. Percent of employed workers 45 41% 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 o Overall Less than H.S. grad! Some college BA degree Adv. degree Ph.D. Science H.S. GEO Ph.D. Note: The sample includes all employed persons overthe age of 15. 'Adv. Degree", ..Ph.D.... and "Science Ph.D." are not mutually exclusive categories. The "Science Ph.D." group inCludes workers in computer. mathematical. architectural. engineering, and life, physical and social science occupations. Source: American Community Survey. Table I.-Median Weekl Educational Attainment, 2006 Native- Foreign- Foreign earnings born born as % of native earnin s earnin s earnin s Educational Attainment All Less than a high school diploma High school graduates, no college Some coJJege, no degree $575 396 50'/ 61~~ 77 86 84 87 Foreign-born unemployment rate 3.6 5.1 3.5 3.4 8 GOOD EVENING! I AM~R MIKE ;C~~ASTOR OF ST AUGUSTINE CATHOLIC CHURCH HERE IN CHESTERFIELD FOR THE PAST 111/2 YEARS. ST AUGUSTINE BEGAN ITS HISPANIC MINISTRY IN 1999. ONE HALF OF OUR 1600 REGISTERED FAMILIES ARE HISPANIC, THE MAJORITY OF THEM FROM MEXICO AND EL SAL V ADOR. TONIGHT I WANT TO THANK THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY POLICE AND HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE COUNTY FOR THE PROACTIVE AND SUSTAINED EFFORTS THEY HA VEMADE TO BUILD BRIDGES WITH THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY. THROUGHOUT THE YEARS SINCE ,1999, COUNTY POLICE, HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICE REPRESENTATIVES HAVE FREQUENTLY BEEN AT ST AUGUSTINE'S MEETING WITH HISPANIC LEADERS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS. PRIVATE SECTOR REPRESENTATIVES FROM 2 THE BANKING, HOUSING, FUNERAL INDUSTRIES, AND MANY OTHERS, HAVE OFTEN BEEN PRESENT AS WELL. ESL, VOTER REGISTRTATION, THE BON SECOURS HEAL TH CAREV AN AND CLINICS .ARE REGULAR STAPLES AT OUR PARISH. I URGE YOU OUR COUNTY REPRESENTATIVES TO CONTINUE TO FOSTER THIS COLLABORATION BETWEEN OUR COUNTY AGENCIES, THE IMMIGRANT COMMUNITY AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR-WHICH IS THE ESSENTIAL SPADEWORK FOR THE INTEGRATION, ASSIMILATION AND P A THW A Y TO CITIZENSHIP FOR THE IMMIGRANT COMMUNITY. THE HIGHLY NEGATIVE ANTI- IMMIGRANT ATTITUDES AND ACTIVITIES THAT HA VB EMERGED WITHIN SOME VIRGINIA LOCALITIES I HOPE WILL NOT OCCUR HERE IN CHESTERFIELD-WHICH IS THE REASON I SPEAK AGAINST TONIGHT'S PROPOSALS. FRUSTRATION WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S 3 REFUSAL TO FIND A JUST AND HUMANE SOLUTION TO THE IMMIGRATION ISSUE MUST NOT BECOME JUSTIFICATION FOR FEAR- DRIVEN AND UNJUST RECRIMINATONS AGAINST A LARGE SEGMENT OF OUR POPULATION TRA TAT HEART, AND STATISTICALLY, IS HARD WORKING, PUTTING FOOD ON OUR TABLES, CONSTRUCTING OUR HOMES AND OFFICES, MINDING OlJR CHILDREN, MANICURING OUR LAWNS, GOING TO SCHOOL, LEARNING ENGLISH, LAW ABIDING, CHURCH GOING, AND TAX PAYING. OUR OWN COMMONWEALTH'S TREATMENT OF THE ORIGINAL AND ONL Y LEGAL VIRGINIANS (i.e., AMERICAN INDIANS), OF AFRICAN SLAVES, AND THE NATION'S HARSH TREATMENT OF MANY EUROPEAN JEWISH AND CATHOLIC IMMIGRANTS IN THE EAST, AND MEXICAN, JAPANESE AND CHINESE IMMIGRANTS IN THE WEST, ARE N"OT PROUD 4 MOMENTS OF AMERICAN HISTORY. THEY MUST NOT BE REPEATED! IN CHURCH WE SAY "THEY MUST BE REPENTED." GOD USED MOSES OF OLD TO CHALLENGE THE CHOSEN PEOPLE, NEWLY SETTLED IN THEIR PROMISED LAND: "YOU SHALL NOT MOLEST OR OPPRESS AN ALIEN, FOR YOU YOURSELVES WERE ONCE ALIENS IN THE LAND OF EGYPT" Ex22, 20. JESUS THE NAZARENE PROCLAIMED THAT IN WELCOMING THE STRANGER WE WERE WELCOMING HIM! Mt25. AS CITIZENS WHOSE CITIZENSHIP IS NOT ONLY CHESTERFIELD AND THE USA, BUT THE KINGDOM OF GOD, WE CANNOT DO LESS. WE MUST DO MUCH MORE! WE MUST CAMPAIGN AND POLITIC FOR COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM NOW, FOR COMPASSION AND JUSTICE FOR ALL IMMIGRANTS NOW! I URGE YOU TO JOIN IN THAT EFFORT NOW! D~~ References Concerning The Economic Impact Of Immigration Economic Growth & Immigration: Bridging the Demographic Divide, Immigration Policy Center, American Immigration Law Foundation, November 2005. http://www.ailf.org/ipc/special_ report/2005 _ bridging.pdf Special Report: UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS IN TEXAS: A Financial Analysis of the Impact to the State Budget and Economy, The Office of the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, December 2006. http://www.ailf.org/ipc/spotlight/spotlight_122206.pdf How Immigrants Affect California Employment and Wages, by Giovanni Peri, California Counts, Population Trends and Profiles, Public Policy Institute of California, Volume 8 Number 3, February 2007. http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/cacounts/CC_207GPCC.pdf Immigration's Economic Impact, Council of Economic Advisers, Edward P. Lazear, Chairman, June 20, 2007. http://www.whitehouse.gov/cea/cea_immigration_062007.html Good Evening, My name is Fidel Rubio I am a member of the Hispanic community Immigration is one of the most important social issues facing our country today. It impacts not only a few states along the border or our big cities. It impacts virtually every community in our nation. The immigration issue is primarily a hUlnanitarian one because it impacts millions of human beings; it has moral implications and must be viewed through a moral lens. A comprehensive immigration reform would make us all more secure by requiring the undocumented people to come out of the shadows. Often "The debate goes from illegal aliens taking up taxpayer's services to illegal aliens being criminals to illegal aliens hanging around on street corners and drinking. Since no one can look at an Hispanic person and see whether he / she is a legal resident / citizen or illegal alien, these complaints start to sound racist to me. They sound more like "we don't like Hispanics" rather than "we want to enforce immigration law" I have been a citizen of the United States for about twenty five years and all my family cherishes the best values of this country, but when I see discrimination against my people I will say in the name of God and of the people that have no voice that we are created in the image of God. I urge the board of supervisors to reflect deeply on this issue and reject these proposals. Thank you and !God Bless America! J-JK... ~J MILLll Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Public Hearing on Immigration Issues Let me open by Thanking the Board of Supervisors for the opportunity to address the topic of Undocumented County Residents and the proposed actions set forth in a previous County Board of Supervisors meeting. I am calling to mind the popular bumper sticker \\What Would Jesus Do?" and wondering exactly that as I weigh the proposals set forth by the County Board of Supervisors and the reason we are here for a public discussion on the issue. Would He be fearful of people who didn't speak His language? Would He support actions to Root them out of his neighborhood? Would He encourage the Police to seek out undocumented immigrant aggressively for deportation even if they had American born children living in the home? I Really Don't Think that He would! It was interesting to read excerpts from the September 26, 2007 Board of supervisors meeting that estimated the local impact of providing services to illegal immigrants was just $2,092,740 in FY 2006. If that amount were to remain the same in FY2007 the impact would be less than .20/0 of the FY2007 f{'..:: budget of $1.1 Billion posted on Board of Supervisors web page. Thel\was No effort made to offset the Cost of providing services to undocumented immigrants with the benefit of tax revenues collected from these immigrants. Also this estimate did not extrapolate the cost by line item or point at any trend that shows this amount has increased, remained flat or even decreased in relation to county fiscal budget. I read the County intends to measure the continued impact of illegal immigration for the future. I am surprised the Board of Supervisors would consider acting on items that might negatively affect the lives of these people without fully knowing the future impact or positive benefits these people provide to the County. The Report on Illegal Immigration submitted to the Honorable Members of the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors on August 16, 2007 estimated that using Davis-Bacon wage criteria County construction costs could rise by as much as 12% per project should Contractor Certification under consideration here this evening be implemented. Given the County's Composition of the Capital Improvement Program for FY2008-FY2012 totaling $624,262,900 as outlined in the FY2007 & FY2008 Biennial Financial Plan, cost for construction could rise by as much as $74,911,000. This is an amount that dwarfs the expected impact of providing services to undocumented immigrants for the same period. Tonight you are seeking Public Opinion a proposal to Implement Housing Occupancy Limitations. This speaker's humble opinion is that the entire item in either subproposal (limiting the number of unrelated occupants within a residence or allocating the number of resident's permitted to legally occupy the premise by square foot of the property) is discriminatory and has a reach far beyond the targeted group. The Board should consider how many individual housing units the County has available for rent at or under $692.00 per month. This is the rent a wage earner spending 30% of their gross wage if earning $8 per hour would need of adequate size to support themselves and any family members living off that income. The county's shortage of affordable housing makes any proposal to limit the number of resident that can occupy a dwelling unpalatable. a~, . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 15.0. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider the FY09 Foxcroft Landscaping Enhancement Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: oj U Board Action Reauested: Hold a public hearing to consider FY09 Foxcroft Landscaping Enhancement Project; adopt the resolution of support for the project; and authorize the County Administrator to enter into agreements for the project. Summary of Information: The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Enhancement Program is intended to creatively integrate transportation facili ties into the surrounding communi ties and the natural environment. proj ects eligible for funding include pedestrian and bicycle facili ties; pedestrian and bicycle educational/safety activities; scenic easement/ historic site acquisition; scenic/historic highway programs; landscaping; historic preservation; rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings or facilities; preservation of abandoned railroad corridors/conversion to trails; inventory/control/removal of outdoor advertising; archaeological planning and research; mitigation of water pollution and wildlife protection; and establishment of transportation museums. In FY08, $17 million was available statewide for VDOT to carry out the program. The county did not receive any Enhancement funding for FY08. Transportation Enhancement Projects are financed with 80% VDOT funds and a (Continued) Preparer: R.J. McCracken Agen671 Title: Director of Transportation Attachments: . Yes DNa # 000221. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Summary of Information: (continued) minimum 20% local match. The local match is usually provided from county funds, from other sources, and/or by in-kind contributions. VDOT staff will evaluate project applications and make a recommendation to the Commonwealth Transportation Board for inclusion in the FY09-FY14 Virginia Transportation Six-Year Improvement Program. The Board took action at the October 10, 2007, meeting to endorse the FY09 Enhancement Projects. We have been requested to submit an additional application for $150,000 in Enhancement funds for the Foxcroft Landscaping Project. The Board is requested to confirm support for the project by adopting a resolution of support, which guarantees the county will provide the local match. If approved and funded by VDOT, staff will prepare another agenda item requesting appropriation of the required match. The match amount for the Foxcroft Landscaping Project is $30,000. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board take the following actions: 1. Adopt the attached resolution requesting VDOT approval and guaranteeing the local match for the Foxcroft Landscaping Project. NOTE: If the project is approved and funded by VDOT, staff will return to the Board with an identified source for the required match ($30,000). 2. Authorize the County Administrator to enter into agreements between VDOT/county/consultant/contractor, for design, environmental permit, right-of-way acquisition, and/or construction agreements, acceptable to the County Attorney, for projects approved by VDOT. District: Matoaca 000222 ;~~"p:~.: :...: .:~........,.... ~ f;:... _t: · .-.; ~ ~ r. .\-l'!~ ~ /: ~.....(~. ~ ~ . ~9~~:I.'::1 .~~ _r-i"l iII~ r- . -. I ..... ~ ~ _ I" .. ~ 1 : ~ -. 1.:;:"- ~. ~\~;~ ~ -..... .. . -:I..?J. ~i 1 ~. .~ ~ -i ~ ~.III;. =--- \, i . ~...~ IL-=WJ. 1~~Ji-~1 ~.~.-J :(~.I ~9-.~" ... ~~ . . .., III- .l1li .c ~ !~ . ..... pi I "CP.. - ... I ::-:;:.::. Ii! ..... . ~ . I~ .. ~ ~I ~ -;: ... I ~ ~ I~ ~ ..~. . "4i~~ ~., J1~ '!I= .:cr . ::;..~~ II F ...:~.: ~~ ~ ~ .~ '} a mtr ,. ~ I I I I ~ .I: ., "I . . I · ~ ~ ~ ~~ i .l1li __.,..:-: I ....... ~ ~I .~-ii-; _~ ~.Ai.~~. ~ l~:~~; ~. I _: . . ~ :-. -. ...- ~h ~~~K ~'h~W~. ~f.:s.~ ~:.I: · iii' ";!!I~ h I ~ ~~~.~ .. ~ ..... ..~.. ~ ! ~~~~ ) .: .... .... ~ ;- ,- ,~"' ir~ ~ fj~~. ~ ~ I · / ~ ..- }::... ~ · .~. ~:~ if,h ..).. ;~ ~ ~~.W : :~'-.!' i ..,.:.i-~~~.~. _:~6 A ~ ~ ...; ~ · · "=f1~ 'I VI:II I -~~ ~ \ . 'I..t~-S"'~/~ ~~~. ),\~I _ ~ ......i... .:~ } ~.;o... ~ :. .:;. .. ~.. . :HI _If .. .,.. I ' 1.j ~ (~ _ ... · -.,. rl ... ~ -:- I .,. III .il1I["" =---- ..,. rI or. ~.. ~....... I ~ ilia: ~ ~~.-..-:. -....~.... . a ~.~ -~ ~ · · -::f~~~ *,-:..~_!~ ~:.~-:~.. ~!I I iIii[..~:"!~ ~ ~ ~ ;~~~~ · · · .~. r ....i.:L .....-.. - ~ ~ _ ~ _ Ii'" ~ ~ h" a... · :It :iI ':A.I: .....-..:: ~ -:>... ~. n I ~~ :2: ... "I -: ..... ... .) ~ -- -. .,..~.a. .......'..:::=-~b---:-~_.I~:::;r: or__ - . ~.~........, ~ ~ "'~-;&":JIIIE I ~ .~t, E ~. ........ 1-:1.r;:i ~ ~t.;:..~ - .?~~ -. ~. ~ {~~~? ~.-~ ~7 i-l.~...-' )"'~I . 'i~..~I::!I.&~.~ ~{ !. ( ...-. ~.~ II t ~ ;. ~~-: ~ I ;; ~ ~! r.. -s:l~~iJ -_... ::- rll ~ rti Jt~ · · \..... C' .}.... -~...... I I - .. -.. f.: .. r = r -:"II 'I ~ ~ ....... .Y · .;~ ... · -:. · , ... .:~I - ~ ~ 1 .... ...:: .~ -. "~.A I - I ... I. · .....,..._......... -..:-~.. ~:~ -:1 1 ~. .... 1.1- - .. I~~ ~' ............. .. 1--.,,: .... E · -. "J!-~ "-.:~I: - .: r=. .: - .., =--:,li, -~ _-:: ~ ~~ ;....:: .: ~ I · I .'::';.1'1 i ~ ,,,,:~;~~ r ~: .~"::t ~.~ ~ ~. . ~ ~ ~~. J.. - ~.~.. .~. · r i? ":~I ... -;....-=r~. r..~,~ - 'L::r.!.i1~ ~i · ~.....~ - ....- -.II: - ...:,1.\1..... :-L~lr.l- . . r. .,,:~..-. I :... .1 .r -.:y~ . I. _ ~.. -,~ ~- -'. · ."PII". .r... 'I i:h. .. . ..... r/ ... I -..... I" - I-=~ · I ::' · ... I · · ~...~ · · · - ..:. ..... · .. ... ~ - .~ · \I:: ~ :..r:"'-' 'I · J'.:. · · !:W, ~~. -~ - I - -: III: .......:-.:.: · - .:. ... I;' ....- · · ~ ~.:.. · 'Ir · · r .. .:.. ...u:'" "?::I. ~ -:-. ..... :I."-'!'-=.":. -= .. ...: -:;.- .. ... :J:t= · ... ~ v. 1- · 'I ( ~ .. ~ ~: · -:.AI- - I. · I ~ "'" ~ -:' or .......... ~ -...:..... .- · "II y;r. ....:: II · .. : · . I ~ ~... · i" .:. ~. ": .. -; :"... /. =- ~~.... .. _ .-.. · .. :....... -:." · ~.~.:-:.... .1 ..: . i I · .-. ~ .. 11'1~:; ~ I.)' ..~ I ,.. :-.QI. . ~~ ~~ ~~ .... I II .. WHEREAS, in accordance with the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that the local governing body request, by resolution, approval of a proposed enhancement project. NOW, THEREFORE I BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County requests the eTB establish a project for Foxcroft Landscaping. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board hereby agrees to pay 20 percent of the total estimated cost of $150,000 for planning, design, right-of-way, and construction of the Foxcroft Landscaping Enhancement Project, and that, if the Board subsequently elects to unreasonably cancel this project, the County of Chesterfield hereby agrees that the Virginia Department of Transportation will be reimbursed for the total amount of the costs expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. 000224 Your Community New.\paper Since 1995 P.O. Box 1616, Midlotl1ian, Virginia 23113. Phone: (804) 545-7500. Fax: (804) 744-3269. Email: news@chesterfieldobserver.com . Internet: www.ehesterficidobserver.t'o[]J Client Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors PUBLIC NOTICE Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, VIrginia, at a regular scheduled meeting on November 14, 2007, at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building, Rt.lO and Lori Road, Chesterfield. Vrrginia, will hold a public hearing where persons affected may appear and present their views to consider: An addition to the adopted FY09 Enhancement Priority Projects: the Foxcroft Landscaping Enhancement Project. The County has applied for funds allocated by the Vrrginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) for the project. A copy of the above proposal is on file in the Transportation Department, at the Community Development Building, 3rd floor, 9800 Government Center Parkway; Chesterfield, VA 23832 and may be examined by all interested persons between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. For further information, please call 748-1037, The hearing is held at a public facility designed to be accessible to persons with disabilities. Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or need for reasonable accommodations should contact Janice Blakley, Clerk to the Board. at 748-1200. Persons needing interpreter services for the deaf must notify the Clerk to the Board no later than Friday, November 9, 2007. ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Foxcroft 1 col x 4" $143.65 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 11/07/2007 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ,+h day of NOv'erY"trv- ,2007. (1;J~ Legal Affiant My commission expires: November 30,2010 Commission LD. 7040138 (SE~L) ...-~\\\\\1I1 Ii 111111 ~\\\ .... l "," /;t,\ ...\...... . ~ " /~li. ~1p ........ "~J",, I ~...i\.0I1Wi4... K> \ / ~ ...~ ,(~.. (;) ~ .: -:t) :r;..~: i : '0 OF :: :: ; : :: :. ~ : .: ~ . 1.. ......: ~ -.. y. ~r .- ~ , ,f'.. ."'..... """... Or ........ ~y ...... "1" -4 RY pu \\\\..... II" \,\ "It"'U'''~ r THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 15.E. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider an Amendment to the Tax Relief for the Elderly and Disabled Ordinance Concerning Property Owned as Tenants in Common by Both Qualifying and Non-Qualifying Persons County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~/ () Board Action Reauested: Adopt the attached amendment to tax relief for the elderly and permanently disabled ordinance permitting the County to grant pro-rata relief to qualifying elderly and disabled owners of property owned, as tenants in common, with non-qualifying owners. Summary of Information: On June 27, 2007, the Board considered legi.slation enacted by the 2007 General Assembly and directed staff to set this ordinance amendment for a public hearing. Since the Board first adopted the County's program granting real estate tax relief for the elderly and handicapped, the Commissioner of the Revenue has granted full tax relief for residences so long as they are owned, at least in part, by a qualifying individual and all income and net worth requirements are satisfied. Thus, even if a residence is owned, in Preparer: Steven L. Micas Title: County Attorney 0400:76715.1 Attachments: . Yes DNa # 000225 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 part, by a non-qualifying individual (often, a son or daughter), that fact does not disqualify the property. State law does not prohibit this approach to the tax relief program. However, other Virginia jurisdictions have taken the position that a residence has to be owned solely by qualifying individuals (Usolely-owned jurisdictionsn) to be eligible for tax relief. The 2007 legislation was designed to address tax relief in "solely-owned jurisdictions." It provides that if qualifying and non-qualifying persons each have a percentage ownership of a residence, the qualifying person can receive prorated tax relief based on his percentage ownership. However, in granting this "additionaln tax relief, the General Assembly also provided that only prorated relief was available in such ownership situations and only if a locality adopted a proration amendment to their existing tax relief program. wi thout such amendment, locali ties are now prohibi ted from granting any tax relief to the qualifying percentage owner if any other owner is non-qualifying. This legislation only affects property .that is owned by qualifying and non- qualifying owners who are legally referred to as "tenants in common,n that is, each owner owns a specified percentage of the residence. The Commissioner of the Revenue has determined that only 2 of the 2,500 residences currently in the tax relief program fall into this category. The Commissioner has sent notices to each of these residences to inform the owners that, if they choose, they can record a new deed to convert their ownership status from "tenants in common" to "joint tenants" which will take them outside the scope of the new legislation and will enable them to qualify for tax relief in the same way they had qualified before the legislative change. Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached ordinance. If it is not adopted, those qualifying individuals who own their residences as tenants in common along with non-qualifying persons will not be eligible for even pro- rata relief but will have to be removed from the program or change their deeds to satisfy the new legislative requirements. 0425:76715.1 000226 ~ .. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Budaet and Manaaement Comments: This item requests that the Board hold a public hearing to consider FY09 Foxcroft Landscaping Enhancement Project; adopt the resolution of support for the project; and authorize the County Administrator to enter into agreements for the project. If project funds are approved from VDOT, staff will present a subsequent agenda item to identify a source of funds for the required local match. Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director. Budaet and Manaoement OOO?~7 rtl,iI 'w AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 9-24 OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION (b) RELATING TO TAX RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY AND PERMANENTLY DISABLED BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 9-24 of the Code of the Countv of Chesterfield. 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted by adding a new subsection (b) to read as follows: Sec. 9-24. Restrictions and conditions. .@1. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a dwelling or manufactured home, and up to one acre of land upon which either is situated may be temporarily exempted from taxation when any such property is owned by and occupied as the sole residence of a person at least 65 years old or a person who is determined to be permanently and totally disabled as defined by Code of Virginia, 9 58.1-3217. The exemption shall be subject to the following restrictions and conditions: (1) During the preceding calendar year, the total combined income from all sources of the owners and owners' relatives living in the dwelling or manufactured home must not exceed $52,000.00; without including in the total the first $6,500.00 of each relative's income, other than the owner's spouse who is living in the dwelling or manufactured home. (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), if a person qualifies for an exemption under this section, and can prove by clear and convincing evidence that the person's physical or mental health has deteriorated such that the only alternative to permanently residing in a hospital, nursing home, convalescent home or other facility for physical or mental care is to have a relative move in and provide care for the person, and if a relative does move in for that purpose, then none of the income of that relative or that relative's spouse shall be included in calculating the income limit; however, if the residence's owner has, within a three-year period prior to or after the relative moves into the residence, transferred to the care giving relative assets in excess of $5,000.00 without adequate consideration then the income of the caregiver relative or that relative's spouse shall be included in calculating the income limit. (3) As of December 31 of the immediately preceding calendar year, the net combined financial worth, including interest of the owners and of the spouse of any owner, excluding the value of the property for which the exemption is sought, and the value of up to an additional nine acres of real estate if such additional nine acres of real estate are contiguous to and a part of the parcel for which the exemption is sought, must not exc~ed $169, 1 00.00. 0425:76406.1 000228 ilil If the property described in (a) above is iointly held by an owner: 1) who is not the spouse of a Qualifying owner'l 2) who would not qualify for an exemption by age or disability and 3) whose ownership interest can legally be calculated as a percentage interest in the propertv'l the qualifying owners will continue to qualify for an exemption'l as calculated in the next sentence of this subsection (b)'I if all of the joint owners occupy the property as their sole dwelling and the combined financial worth of all such loint owners 'I including the present value of all equitable interests (and computed without exclusion for the dwelling or any other asset notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a)) does not exceed $324'1075 as of December 31 of the immediately preceding calendar year. The tax exemption for this subsection (b) shall be calculated by multiplying the amount of the exemption by a fraction that has as a numerator the percentage of ownership interest in the property held by all loint owners who qualify by age or disability and their spouses and'l as a denominator 'I 100%. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 000229 0425:76406.1 Your Community Newspaper Since 1995 P.O. Box 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 23113. Phone: (804) 545-7500 . Fax: (804) 744-3269 . Email: news@chesterficldobscrver.com . Internet: www.chesterficldobserver.com ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Tax Relief 1 col x 4.5" $166.15 PUBliC NOTICE Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Vrrginia, at a regular scheduled meeting on November 14, 2007, at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building. Rt. 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield. Virginia, will hold a public hearing where persons affected may appear and present their views to consider: An Ordinance to amend Section 9-24 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended. by adding a new subsection (b) relating to Tax Relief for the Elderly and Perman~ntly Disabled relating to property owned Jointly by qualifying and non- qualifying persons as tenants in common. Copies of the above proposal and related information are on file in the County Administrator's Office (Room 505) at the Chesterfield County Administration Building. for public examination between the hours of 8:30 a. m. and 5:00 p. m. of each regular business day. If further information is needed. please contact the County Attorney's Office at 748-1491 between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Th~ hearing is held at a public facility deslg?~d to be accessible to persons with dIsabilItIes. Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or need for reasonable accommodations should contact Janice Blakley. Clerk to the Board, at 748-1200. Persons needing interpreter serVIces for the deaf must notify the Clerk to the Board no later than Friday, November 9, 2007. The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date( s): 10/31/2007 & 11/0712007 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ,+h day of NCJ./Ery}'a:-Y'" ,2007. a~ir@b:i:JO~iC My commission expires: November 30,2010 Commission LD. 7040138 (SEAL) " \\\\\\\\lllllI" ,\\' L "" 1\\\' ...\. ~ . ("" ~ ~'.~".."."9'!'. ~ ".f.. IO~ ,"~'ptlH W t4(T ". .eo. "~_ \ ~ . .. ~~ ... ."A.'t~ "":. ~ ~ ! r;:i :t:/t-; ::: '0 1"11": .. - = t vr : ~ . . ~ ., : ~ ". J"'J~". i\'\'\':>>'" r . ~ "l.t oJ. ~ ." ~-... '" 0...... f'....,....~,s~ ..,,\..... ......... '''''I,~ .1.4 R Y ?\). ,.....'... 11111' 1ft I' """ \\\\ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. November 14,2007 Speaker's List Evening Session 1. Ms. Dawn Wilson 2. Ms. Nicole Jordan 3. Mr. Mike Wilson 4. Dr. Jane DiCocco 5. Dr. Mark DiCocco ~ "" CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 14,2007 Item Number: 17. Subiect: Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Supervisors County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Q} U- Board Action Reauested: Summary of Information: Motion of adjournment and notice of the Board of Supervisors meeting to be held on November 28, 2007 at 3:00 p.m. in the Public Meeting Room. Preparer: Janice Blaklev Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: DYes .NO # OOO~~, (>I.;~ 0..) .0