2025-01-22 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES JANUARY 22, 2025
1/22/2025 Page 1 of 77
A video recording of this meeting may be viewed
at https://www.chesterfield.gov/244/Agendas-and-
Minutes.
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. James A. Ingle, Jr., Chair
Dr. Mark S. Miller, Vice Chair
Ms. Jessica L. Schneider
Mr. Kevin P. Carroll
Supervisor Absent:
Mr. James M. Holland
Dr. Joseph P. Casey
County Administrator
Mr. Ingle called the meeting to order at 2 p.m. 1. Approval of Minutes
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board approved the minutes of the December 18,
2024, and January 8, 2025, Board of Supervisors
Meetings, as submitted.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
2. Requests to Postpone Agenda Items and Additions, Deletions or Changes in the Order of Presentation
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board removed item 13.G. - Recognizing Supervisor
Holland, Recipient of the 2025 Chester Family YMCA
Martin Luther King, Jr. Service Award for Leadership,
and approved the agenda, as amended.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
3. Everyday Excellence - Intergovernmental Relations
Mr. Matt Harris, Deputy County Administrator,
introduced Ms. Casey Walker, Intergovernmental
Affairs Liaison, to be recognized for her work as the
primary staff member overseeing the county's
compliance with the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA).
He noted that most of the county's peers hired either
a part-time employee or a third party for this
function. He thanked her for her contributions.
Ms. Natalie Spillman, Director of Intergovernmental
Relations, added that Ms. Walker has been a leader in
the ARPA space for not only Chesterfield, but also
the state. She stated Ms. Walker's efforts provided
an opportunity for relationship building, which is
the core function of the work they do in
Intergovernmental Relations. She further stated she
was looking forward to Ms. Walker's work with opioid
recovery services through Opioid Abatement Authority
1/22/2025 Page 2 of 77
(OAA) funds that are distributed. She thanked Ms.
Walker for her behind-the-scenes work that helps the
county now and in the future.
Ms. Walker expressed appreciation for the
recognition.
Board members thanked Ms. Walker for going above and
beyond and expressed appreciation for her work to
save taxpayer dollars and keep the county in
compliance.
4. Work Sessions
A. State Legislative Update
Ms. Spillman provided the Board with a General
Assembly update. She stated the General Assembly 2025
short session got off to a late start due to the
water crisis in Richmond. She provided details of the
calendar and various deadlines. She noted that many
bills have been introduced through both the House and
Senate. She then reviewed several topics relevant to
the county.
Ms. Walker provided the Board with state budget
updates.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
B. FY2026 Budget and Financial Reporting Update
Mr. Brendan Stalely, co-counsel to the Economic
Development Authority (EDA), provided the Board with
an overview of the primary purposes and powers of the
EDA. He provided details of complementary powers of
the county. He defined "authority facilities". He
discussed the EDA's role in county growth and
development; county financing options for public
improvements; and land development and economic
incentives.
Mr. Harris and Dr. Casey alternately reviewed EDA
conduit projects.
Mr. Harris and Mr. Gerard Durkin, Director of Budget
and Management, alternately discussed major projects,
including Meadowville Technology Park;
Cloverleaf/Stonebridge; Upper Magnolia; and
Springline at District 60.
Mr. Harris discussed Chester Arts Center, The Lake,
Southside Speedway, River City Sportsplex, and
Courthouse Landing. He stated this presentation, all
the monthly financial records for these projects, and
all the EDA financial audits would be added to the
Financial Transparency Portal.
Mr. Melvin Bloomfield, Real Estate Assessor,
accompanied by Mr. Harris, provided the Board with a
2025 Real Estate Assessment Summary. He provided
details of percent changes from 2024 to 2025. He
provided several graphs and charts showing changes
1/22/2025 Page 3 of 77
for 2025.
Mr. Harris announced the Schools Superintendent's
proposed budget would be presented on January 23,
2025, and the maximum tax rate would be set by the
Board during the evening session.
C. Tourism and Visitation Update
Ms. Katherine O'Donnell, President and Chief
Executive Officer, accompanied by Ms. Danielle Fitz-
Hugh, Vice President of Community Relations, provided
the Board with an update on activities, initiatives
and outcomes of Richmond Region Tourism (RRT).
Board members expressed appreciation for RRT's
promotion of and collaboration with the county.
D. Community Enhancement Department Update
Mr. Dan Cohen, Director of Community Enhancement,
introduced his co-presenters and other staff present
in the audience for the department's update. He
stated the department's mission is to improve and
increase the value, quality, desirability and
attractiveness of Chesterfield County.
Mr. Rich Billingsley, Assistant Director and License
Inspector, provided the Board with an update on
community clean-ups; community improvements; code
enforcement efforts; and public improvements.
Ms. Jessica Sagara, Real Estate and Housing
Coordinator, discussed addressing the county's
housing and community needs. She reviewed the
Consolidated Plan and its draft goals for FY2026-
FY2030; affordable housing development - both multi-
family (Winchester Forest and Horner Run Apartments)
and single family homeownership; assistance with home
repair; and utilization of HOME-ARP funds for Rady
Street Apartments (SupportWorks Housing).
Mr. Nick Feucht, Real Estate Development and Housing
Coordinator, discussed ARPA-funded housing
development projects (Bermuda Estates, Watermark
Gardens, Lambert Landing, Ettrick Landing, Ashlake
Crossing, and Horner Run). He announced that Ettrick
Landing won 2024 Best Homeownership Development by
the Virginia Governor's Housing Conference (VAGHC).
He provided details of housing assistance programs
(two-year ARPA-funded grants). He announced that an
additional VAGHC award was received for Best Housing
Program, Housing Families First: Bringing Families
Home.
Board members expressed appreciation for the
department's activities and initiatives.
E. Consent Agenda Highlights
Mr. Matt Harris provided details of various consent
agenda items on the evening agenda.
5. Reports
1/22/2025 Page 4 of 77
A. Reports on the Status of District Improvement
Operating and Capital Funds, General Fund Unassigned
Balance and Debt Policy Ratios, and Investments
The Board approved the Reports on the Status of
District Improvement Operating and Capital Funds,
General Fund Unassigned Balance and Debt Policy
Ratios, and Investments.
6. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
Mr. Thomas Burdick addressed the Board relative to
his concerns about the way toilets were installed at
Coalfield Station.
Mr. Greg Allen addressed the Board relative to the
establishment of one new residential zoning district
that allows a mix of residential uses.
7. Closed Session
A. Closed Session 1) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(5), Code
of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss or Consider
Prospective Businesses or Industries or the Expansion
of Existing Businesses or Industries Where no
Previous Announcement Has Been Made of the
Businesses’ or Industries’ Interest in Locating or
Expanding Their Facilities in the Community, 2)
Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(3), Code of Virginia, 1950,
as Amended, to Discuss the Acquisition by the County
of Real Estate for a Public Purpose, or the
Disposition of Publicly Held Real Property, Where
Discussion in an Open Meeting Would Adversely Affect
the Bargaining Position and Negotiating Strategy of
the Public Body, 3) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(29) to
Discuss the Award of a Public Contract Involving the
Expenditure of Public Funds Where Discussion in Open
Session Would Adversely Affect the Bargaining
Position or Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body,
and 4) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(19), Code of
Virginia, 1950, as Amended, for Discussion of Plans
to Protect Public Safety as it Relates to Terrorist
Activity or Specific Cybersecurity Threats or
Vulnerabilities and Briefing by Staff Members, Legal
Counsel, or Law-Enforcement or Emergency Service
Officials Concerning Actions Taken to Respond to Such
Matters or a Related Threat to Public Safety;
Discussion of Information Subject to the Exclusion in
Subdivision 2 or 14 of § 2.2-3705.2, Where Discussion
in an Open Meeting Would Jeopardize the Safety of any
Person or the Security of any Facility, Building,
Structure, Information, Technology System, or
Software Program; or Discussion of Reports or Plans
related to the Security of any Governmental Facility,
Building or Structure, or the Safety of Persons using
such Facility, Building or Structure.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board went into Closed Session 1) Pursuant to § 2.2--
3711(A)(5), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to
Discuss or Consider Prospective Businesses or
Industries or the Expansion of Existing Businesses or
Industries Where no Previous Announcement Has Been
1/22/2025 Page 5 of 77
Made of the Businesses’ or Industries’ Interest in
Locating or Expanding Their Facilities in the
Community, 2) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(3), Code of
Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss the
Acquisition by the County of Real Estate for a Public
Purpose, or the Disposition of Publicly Held Real
Property, Where Discussion in an Open Meeting Would
Adversely Affect the Bargaining Position and
Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body, 3) Pursuant
to § 2.2-3711(A)(29) to Discuss the Award of a Public
Contract Involving the Expenditure of Public Funds
Where Discussion in Open Session Would Adversely
Affect the Bargaining Position or Negotiating
Strategy of the Public Body, and 4) Pursuant to §
2.2-3711(A)(19), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended,
for Discussion of Plans to Protect Public Safety as
it Relates to Terrorist Activity or Specific
Cybersecurity Threats or Vulnerabilities and Briefing
by Staff Members, Legal Counsel, or Law-Enforcement
or Emergency Service Officials Concerning Actions
Taken to Respond to Such Matters or a Related Threat
to Public Safety; Discussion of Information Subject
to the Exclusion in Subdivision 2 or 14 of § 2.2-
3705.2, Where Discussion in an Open Meeting Would
Jeopardize the Safety of any Person or the Security
of any Facility, Building, Structure, Information,
Technology System, or Software Program; or Discussion
of Reports or Plans related to the Security of any
Governmental Facility, Building or Structure, or the
Safety of Persons using such Facility, Building or
Structure.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
Reconvening:
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day
adjourned into Closed Session in accordance with a
formal vote of the Board and in accordance with the
provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information
Act; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act
effective July 1, 1989 provides for certification
that such Closed Session was conducted in conformity
with law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Board of
Supervisors does hereby certify that to the best of
each member’s knowledge, i) only public business
matters lawfully exempted from open meeting
requirements under the Freedom of Information Act
were discussed in Closed Session to which this
certification applies, and ii) only such business
matters were identified in the motion by which the
Closed Session was convened were heard, discussed or
considered by the Board. No member dissents from this
certification.
1/22/2025 Page 6 of 77
Ms. Schneider: Aye.
Mr. Holland: Absent.
Mr. Carroll: Aye.
Dr. Miller: Aye.
Mr. Ingle: Aye.
8. Recess for Dinner
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board recessed for dinner in Room 502.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
Reconvening:
9. Invocation by the Honorable James M. Holland, Dale District Supervisor
The Honorable Kevin P. Carroll, Matoaca District
Supervisor, gave the invocation in Mr. Holland's
absence.
10. Pledge of Allegiance Led by Matt Harris, Deputy County Administrator
Deputy County Administrator Matt Harris led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
11. County Administration Update
The County Administration Update consisted of the
following:
o An update on the county's water system provided by
Mr. George Hayes, Director of Utilities, following
the power outage and subsequent flooding at the
City of Richmond’s water plant on January 6, 2025.
o An update on Virginia State University (VSU)
provided by President Dr. Makola Abdullah.
o An announcement that Chesterfield’s Child Advocacy
Center Administrator Jenelle Beverly was the
recipient of the Janie Dockery Memorial Award for
Dedication to Excellence by the Children’s
Advocacy Centers of Virginia.
o An announcement of Sports, Visitation and
Entertainment's Historical Experience Campaign and
Visitor Guide.
o An announcement that Topsoe’s $400 million
investment in Chesterfield was awarded the Impact
Award in the STEM category in Business Facilities
Magazine's Deal of the Year Awards.
12. Board Member Reports
Board members announced and provided details of
several community meetings and county-related events
they attended recently.
13. Resolutions and Special Recognitions
1/22/2025 Page 7 of 77
A. Resolution Recognizing Mr. David J. Woodward,
Utilities Department, Upon His Retirement
Mr. David J. Woodward, accompanied by members of his
family, was present to receive the recognition.
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, David Woodward retired from the Chesterfield
County Utilities Department on January 1, 2025, after
faithfully serving the county and its citizens for
over 43 years; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Woodward began his service to the
citizens of Chesterfield County in 1981 as an
Operator Trainee at the Falling Creek Wastewater
Treatment Plant; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Woodward earned his Class I Wastewater
Works Operators License in 1985 and was promoted to
principal plant operator in 1986, applying his new
skills to operate Chesterfield County’s wastewater
treatment plants successfully; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Woodward faithfully worked the night
shift for the entirety of his 43-year career; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Woodward was relied upon on many
occasions for his ability to handle all manner of
adverse and challenging conditions to provide
continuous and effective wastewater treatment; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Woodward was known to his coworkers as a
professional with a positive attitude and was a
pleasure to be around; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Woodward was recognized in 2024 for
contributing to the Falling Creek Wastewater
Treatment Plant being awarded the National
Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) Peak
Performance Platinum Award for excellent treatment
with no violations in the preceding five years; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Woodward was known to use his vast
knowledge to train the next generation of operators
to ensure excellent wastewater treatment continue.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 22nd day of January
2025, publicly recognizes David Woodward and extends
on behalf of its members and the residents of
Chesterfield County, appreciation for his service to
the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and
best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mr. Woodward and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers
of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
1/22/2025 Page 8 of 77
Absent: Holland.
Mr. Ingle presented Mr. Woodward with the executed
resolution. He expressed gratitude for his many years
of outstanding service to the community and
congratulated him on his retirement.
Mr. George Hayes, Director of Utilities, thanked Mr.
Woodward for his dedication and wished him much
success in his retirement.
Dr. Casey presented Mr. Woodward with a replica of
the brick that will be placed in the historic
courthouse walkway in his honor.
Mr. Woodward expressed appreciation for the
recognition.
B. Resolution Recognizing Corporal Lawrence Jones Jr.,
Police Department, Upon His Retirement
Corporal Lawrence Jones, Jr., accompanied by members
of his family, was present to receive the
recognition.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Corporal Lawrence Jones Jr., retired from
the Chesterfield County Police Department on January
1, 2025, after providing over 30 years of quality
service to the residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Jones began his career with the
Chesterfield Police Department as a Police Officer
and faithfully served the county as a Police Officer,
Senior Police Officer, Master Police Officer, Career
Police Officer and Corporal; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Jones also served during his tenure
as a Covert Operations Detective, School Resource
Officer, General Instructor and Breathalyzer
Operator; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Jones was presented with a Unit
Citation as a member of the Covert Operations Unit
for displaying exceptional surveillance skills and
techniques and providing essential intelligence on at
least 87 investigations, 3 involving loss of life;
and
WHEREAS, Corporal Jones was presented with a Chief’s
Commendation for his efforts in assisting with a
narcotics investigation involving drug distribution
linked to cartels across multiple states and out of
the country, yielding approximately $1 million seized
US currency, 11 federal arrests, 11 state arrests and
374 pounds of seized narcotics; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Jones was presented a Commendation
Award for his efforts in assisting numerous units in
reference to an organized crime theft group
victimizing multiple jurisdictions, resulting in the
1/22/2025 Page 9 of 77
arrest of 7 individuals and 28 felony charges; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Jones utilized his strong
interpersonal skills during his time as a School
Resource Officer, nurturing the bright minds of those
in his school and maintaining a positive attitude;
and
WHEREAS, Corporal Jones was repeatedly recognized for
his enthusiasm and willingness to make himself
available and remaining flexible despite working hour
fluctuations; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Jones is recognized for his strong
work ethic, thorough investigation skills, his
teamwork, communication, and human relations skills,
in assisting the Police Department and residents of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Jones has received numerous letters
of commendation, thanks and appreciation from
supervisors and residents for services rendered; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Jones has provided the Chesterfield
County Police Department with many years of loyal and
dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Corporal Jones’ diligent
service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 22nd day of January
2025, publicly recognizes Corporal Lawrence Jones Jr.
and extends on behalf of its members and the
residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for
his service to the county, congratulations upon his
retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Corporal Jones and that
this resolution be permanently recorded among the
papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County, Virginia.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
Mr. Ingle presented Corporal Jones with the executed
resolution.
Corporal Jones expressed appreciation for the
recognition.
Lieutenant Colonel Dave Shand thanked Corporal Jones
for his tremendous sacrifice by working nights and
weekends for the latter part of his career.
Board members shared their gratitude for Corporal
Jones' many years of dedicated service and wished him
well in his retirement.
1/22/2025 Page 10 of 77
Dr. Casey presented Corporal Jones with a replica of
the brick that will be placed in the historic
courthouse walkway in his honor.
C. Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Michele Cobb, Circuit
Court Clerk's Office, Upon Her Retirement
Mrs. Michele Cobb, accompanied by members of her
family, was present to receive the recognition.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mrs. Michele Cobb retired from Chesterfield
County on December 31, 2024, after providing 28 years
of dedicated service to the residents of Chesterfield
County and its Circuit Court Clerk’s Office; and
WHEREAS, the Circuit Court Clerk’s Office provides
professional support to Judges, attorneys, and law
enforcement, as well as other internal and external
customers through operational, administrative, and
records management functions; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Cobb has provided outstanding service
to Chesterfield County, including her diligent and
faithful commitment as Principal Deputy Clerk of the
Circuit Court Clerk’s Office since July 1996; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Cobb has been a highly reliable asset,
consistently arriving to work on time each morning
and demonstrating exceptional time management skills;
and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Cobb possesses extensive knowledge of
all duties incumbent upon a Principal Deputy Clerk,
ensuring that her tasks are completed accurately and
within any applicable deadlines; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Cobb has generously offered assistance
to her team members whenever available, fostering a
spirit of teamwork and collaboration within the
office; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Cobb has consistently brought matters
of concern to her supervisor’s attention,
demonstrating her commitment to maintaining high
standards of work; and
WHEREAS, as a result of her competence and
dedication, Mrs. Cobb’s peers and colleagues consider
her a knowledgeable and dependable resource; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Cobb has always rendered invaluable
service to the Clerk’s Office and Judges with a high
degree of productiveness and professionalism and will
be sorely missed by all who wish her the best as she
enjoys a well-deserved retirement that will be marked
by more time spent with family, friends, and plenty
of embroidery.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
1/22/2025 Page 11 of 77
County Board of Supervisors, this 22nd day of January
2025, publicly recognizes Mrs. Michele Cobb and
extends on behalf of its members and the residents of
Chesterfield County, appreciation for 28 years of
exceptional service to the county.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mrs. Cobb, and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers
of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
Mr. Ingle presented Mrs. Cobb with the executed
resolution.
Mrs. Cobb stated it has been a privilege to work for
the county.
Ms. Lisa Novo, Chief Deputy Clerk, on behalf of Ms.
Amanda Pohl, Circuit Court Clerk, thanked Mrs. Cobb
for her contributions and stated it has been an honor
to work alongside her for over 25 years.
Board members congratulated Mrs. Cobb for an
outstanding career and thanked her for her service to
the citizens of Chesterfield.
Dr. Casey presented Mrs. Cobb with a replica of the
brick that will be placed in the historic courthouse
walkway in her honor.
D. Resolution Recognizing Former County Employees Under
Revised Service Years Program
Mr. Antonio Starke, formerly of the Police
Department, and Mr. Donald Lee, formerly of General
Services Fleet Office, both accompanied by members of
their families, were present to receive the
recognition.
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, one of the county’s strategic goals is to
recruit and retain an empowered, diverse workforce
consisting of individuals who choose a long-term
career with the county; and
WHEREAS, in 2007, the Board of Supervisors began
placing engraved bricks in the walkway outside the
Historic 1917 Courthouse to honor retirees with 25 or
more years of service; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to also recognize
employees with at least 25 years of service,
factoring in service years for both the county and
Chesterfield Public Schools; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to also recognize those
1/22/2025 Page 12 of 77
employees with at least 25 years of service who leave
for another Virginia Retirement System-related job;
and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to also recognize those
employees who pass away while having served the
county for 25 or more years; and
WHEREAS, the recognition policy has been revised to
include these criteria in the eligibility
requirements to receive a brick; and
WHEREAS, under the revised policy, the Board is
pleased to retroactively recognize Betsy Beales for
25 years of service; Kelvin Brown for 27 years of
service; Karen Carr for 27 years of service; William
Cloe III for 28 years of service; Tamera Higgins for
30 years of service; Jamie Hopkins for 25 years of
service; Donald Lee for 26 years of service; Neal
Meyerhoffer for 25 years of service; William Norris
for 25 years of service; the late Beverly Snyder for
28 years of service; and Antonio Starke for 30 years
of service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 22nd day of January
2025, publicly recognizes these individuals for their
service to the county and extends, on behalf of its
members and the citizens of Chesterfield County,
appreciation for the valuable work they performed for
the betterment of the county.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to these individuals and that
this resolution be permanently recorded among the
papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County, Virginia.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that bricks with their
names and service dates be placed in the walkway of
the Historic 1917 Courthouse.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
Mr. Ingle presented Mr. Starke and Mr. Lee with their
own executed resolution.
Both Mr. Starke and Mr. Lee expressed appreciation to
the Board for revising the policy, which then allowed
them to receive a resolution and brick.
Mr. Craig Willingham, Assistant Director of General
Services, expressed appreciation for Mr. Lee's
service with the county.
Lieutenant Colonel Shand thanked Mr. Starke for his
many years of invaluable service to the Police
Department and the county.
Board members expressed appreciation to Mr. Starke
and Mr. Lee for their many years of commendable and
1/22/2025 Page 13 of 77
dedicated service to the community.
Dr. Casey presented Mr. Starke and Mr. Lee with
replicas of their bricks that will be placed in the
historic courthouse walkway in their honor.
E. Recognizing 2025 My Chesterfield Academy Graduates
Ms. Dalila Medrano, Multicultural Engagement
Coordinator for Community Engagement and Resources,
provided details of My Chesterfield Academy. She
stated Chesterfield County, in partnership with the
Asian and Latino Solidarity Alliance of Central
Virginia, hosts My Chesterfield Academy, a months-
long program that empowers residents, particularly
those from multicultural communities, to understand
and navigate county and other community resources.
She introduced Ms. Dilshad Charania to talk about her
experience in the academy. Fifteen graduates from
nine different countries of origin who live or work
in the community were recognized and congratulated.
F. Recognizing Valor Awards Recipients
Deputy Chief Tim McKay introduced Captain Bryce Ford
and Firefighter Greg Potter, who were present to be
recognized for receiving 2024 Valor awards. He
provided a brief synopsis of the event, the 2811
Pavilion Place fire, which led to them being
recognized for their exceptional acts of courage,
putting themselves at risk and personal injury.
14. New Business
A. Claim of Jarred Saba, as Special Trustee of the
Restatement of the Saba Trust dated May 16, 2019,
relating to the Meadowville Cell Tower Adjacent to
the Meadowville Wastewater Pump Station at 1398
Bermuda Hundred Road
County Attorney Jeff Mincks provided the Board with
details of the claim of Jarred Saba, as Special
Trustee of the Restatement of the Saba Trust dated
May 16, 2019, relating to the Meadowville Cell Tower
Adjacent to the Meadowville Wastewater Pump Station
at 1398 Bermuda Hundred Road. He stated staff
recommended denial of the claim.
Attorney Michael Kalish presented Mr. Saba's claim to
the Board.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board denied the claim of Jarred Saba, as Special
Trustee of the Restatement of the Saba Trust dated
May 16, 2019, relating to the Meadowville Cell Tower
Adjacent to the Meadowville Wastewater Pump Station
at 1398 Bermuda Hundred Road.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
1/22/2025 Page 14 of 77
B. Authorization to Advertise 2025 Calendar Year Tax
Rate and Other Required Legal Notices and Public
Hearings related to the Real Estate Tax
Mr. Matt Harris provided the Board with an overview
of the request for authorization to advertise the
2025 calendar year tax rate and other required legal
notices and public hearings related to the real
estate tax.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board authorized the advertisement of the 2025
calendar year tax rate at 90 cents and other required
legal notices and public hearings related to the real
estate tax rate.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
C. Appointments
1. Community Policy and Management Team
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board nominated and reappointed Mr. Chris
Campbell, Clover Hill District, to serve as the
private provider representative on the Community
Policy and Management Team, whose term is effective
January 1, 2025, and will expire December 31, 2027.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
2. Richmond Region Tourism Board
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board nominated and appointed Dr. Mark Miller,
Midlothian District Supervisor, to serve as the Board
of Supervisors' representative on the Richmond Region
Tourism Board, whose term is effective immediately
and will expire December 31, 2026.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
3. Greater Richmond Partnership, Incorporated
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board nominated and appointed Ms. Jessica
Schneider, Clover Hill District Supervisor, to serve
as the Board of Supervisors' representative on the
Greater Richmond Partnership, Incorporated Board of
Directors, whose term is effective immediately and
will expire December 31, 2027.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
D. Consent Items
1. Adoption of Resolutions
1/22/2025 Page 15 of 77
a. Recognizing Ms. Patricia Washington,
Department of Social Services Upon Her
Retirement
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Ms. Patricia Washington will retire from the
Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Department of Social
Services on February 1, 2025, after providing 21
years of dedicated service to the citizens of
Chesterfield County and the City of Colonial Heights;
and
WHEREAS, Ms. Washington began her career at the
Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Department of Social
Services on September 15, 2003 as a foster care
social worker; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Washington transitioned to the Adult
Services team as a Family Services Specialist to form
the Intake Team which provided emergency assistance
to citizens in need assisting with rental and utility
payments, prescription medications, eyeglasses and
other needs; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Washington was instrumental in the
formation of the Integrated Intake Team, currently
called the Assessment and Resource Team (ART), in
2008, which placed both Family Services Specialists
and Benefit Programs Specialists on the same team to
offer a more holistic approach to addressing
customers’ needs; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Washington provided services to external
and internal customers and was an outstanding
resource developer who responded with dedication,
commitment and passion to ensure the needs of
citizens were met; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Washington created the agency’s first
online resource guide to ensure staff in all program
areas were aware of community resources to refer
customers based on their identified needs; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Washington shared her passion for
empowering customers by creating the Money Mindset
program, providing workshops to customers to increase
their financial literacy; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Washington was a member of the
Chesterfield Suicide Prevention Coalition, providing
resource material and conducting workshops for agency
staff and the local community; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Washington served on the Governor’s
Challenge to Prevent Suicide among Service Members,
Veterans, and Their Families, an initiative of
Governor Ralph Northam to increase public awareness
of resources to address suicide and mental health
among veterans and military service members, an
initiative very dear to Ms. Washington as a fellow
veteran; and
1/22/2025 Page 16 of 77
WHEREAS, Ms. Washington was a dedicated member of the
Virginia Alliance of Social Work Practitioners
(VASWP), a professional organization for social
workers in Virginia departments of social services,
serving on various committees as well as Vice
President of the local planning district; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Washington has been a dedicated advocate
for adults, children and families by working
tirelessly to engage all partners of the social
services system in improving and developing programs
designed to promote self-sufficiency; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Washington has dutifully carried out the
department’s mission, for over 21 years, through her
collaborative efforts and the provision of
outstanding customer service and guidance to
vulnerable citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the
outstanding contributions of Ms. Patricia Washington,
expresses the appreciation of all residents for her
service to the County, and offers congratulations
upon her retirement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
b. Recognizing Mr. Michael L. Smallwood,
Utilities Department, Upon His Retirement
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Michael Smallwood retired from the
Chesterfield County Utilities Department on December
1, 2024, after faithfully serving the county and its
citizens for over 39 years; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Smallwood began his service to the
citizens of Chesterfield County in 1985 as a utility
worker at Falling Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant in
the operations section of the Utilities Department;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Smallwood earned his Class I Wastewater
Works Operators License in 2002 and was promoted to
principal plant operator, applying his new skills to
successfully operate Chesterfield County’s wastewater
treatment plants; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Smallwood used his skills to ensure
regulatory compliance at both the Falling Creek and
Proctors Creek Wastewater Treatment Plants while both
plants underwent numerous upgrades to protect public
health and the environment; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Smallwood was known to use his vast
knowledge to train the next generation of operators
to ensure excellent wastewater treatment continued;
and
1/22/2025 Page 17 of 77
WHEREAS, Mr. Smallwood was known by his colleagues
for his dedication and hard work ensuring
Chesterfield County received the most reliable and
efficient wastewater treatment possible.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the
contributions of Michael Smallwood, expresses the
appreciation of all residents for his service to the
county, and extends their appreciation for his
dedicated service and their congratulations upon his
retirement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
c. Authorizing the General Registrar and
Director of Elections of Chesterfield
County to File an Application with the
State Board of Elections for a Waiver to
Administer Split Voting Precincts
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE GENERAL REGISTRAR AND
DIRECTOR OF ELECTIONS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY TO FILE
AN APPLICATION WITH THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS FOR
A WAIVER TO ADMINISTER SPLIT VOTING PRECINCTS
WHEREAS, Section 24.2-307 of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, requires each voting precinct in
the County of Chesterfield to be wholly contained
within a single congressional district, Senate
district, House of Delegates district, and
magisterial district;
WHEREAS, Section 24.2-307 of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, further provides that the Board of
Supervisors may request the State Board of Elections
to grant a waiver from the above-stated requirement
if a congressional, Senate, or House of Delegates
district splits a voting precinct and the Board is
unable to establish a precinct containing at least
100 registered voters that is wholly contained within
a single congressional district, Senate district,
House of Delegates district, and magisterial
district;
WHEREAS, the State’s redistricting of congressional
districts split the following existing voting
precincts in the County:
1) Genito Voting Precinct (402) – split by
Congressional Districts 1 and 4
2) Clover Hill Voting Precinct (412) – split by
Congressional Districts 1 and 4
WHEREAS, the portions of the Genito Voting Precinct
and Clover Hill Voting Precinct that are split by the
1/22/2025 Page 18 of 77
State’s congressional redistricting cannot be merged
into adjacent precincts without creating new splits
between election districts; and
WHEREAS, the number of registered voters in the
portions of the Genito Voting Precinct and Clover
Hill Voting Precinct that are split by the State’s
congressional redistricting is less than 100.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board does
hereby authorize the General Registrar and Director
of Elections of Chesterfield County to submit a
request for a waiver from the State Board of
Elections pursuant to Section 24.2-307 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, to administer the split
precincts listed above for all elections held in
2025.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
d. Supporting Safe Streets for All Action Plan
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, traffic safety is a critical concern for
Chesterfield, and we are committed to ensuring the
safety and well-being of all individuals who travel
on roads in the county, including drivers,
passengers, pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists;
WHEREAS, fatal and serious injury crashes cause
devastating harm to families, communities, and
individuals, and contribute to significant economic
and social costs;
WHEREAS, we recognize that every life lost or
seriously injured on roadways is preventable, and we
must take collective responsibility to address the
factors that contribute to such tragedies, including
but not limited to speeding, impaired driving,
distracted driving, reckless driving, lack of
seatbelt use, unsafe infrastructure, and
environmental conditions;
WHEREAS, there are proven strategies, policies, and
interventions—such as improved road design, stricter
enforcement of traffic laws, public education
campaigns, the promotion of safe driving behaviors,
and the adoption of advanced vehicle technologies—
that can significantly reduce the occurrence and
severity of crashes;
WHEREAS, working collaboratively with regional, state
and federal agencies, community organizations,
advocacy groups, and the general public to implement
solutions can reduce fatalities and serious injuries
on roadways;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, hereby commits to
1/22/2025 Page 19 of 77
undertake efforts to reduce fatal and serious injury
crashes within Chesterfield by 50% by 2035.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we will advocate for
continued support and resources from federal and
state government to enhance the effectiveness of
these efforts and address broader systemic issues
that contribute to fatal and serious injury crashes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we pledge to remain
steadfast in our commitment to reducing fatal and
serious injury crashes and to ensuring that
Chesterfield's roads become safer for all who use
them.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
e. Designating DMO: Virginia Destination
Marketing Organization
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County wishes to increase
tourism opportunities; and
WHEREAS, the State of Virginia’s Tourism Corporation
coordinates marketing activities with Destination
Marketing Organizations (DMO) within the state to
market the Commonwealth as a premier travel
destination; and
WHEREAS, being a Destination Marketing Organization
within the Commonwealth of Virginia allows for
partner opportunities, grant applications, and
further promotion for Chesterfield; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Sports, Visitation,
& Entertainment Department, DBA Experience
Chesterfield, has developed a strategic relationship
with Virginia Tourism Corporation for the betterment
of tourism and marketing promotion and seeks to
become an official DMO to complement other partners
and organizations locally, regionally, and within the
Commonwealth; and
WHEREAS, continuing to promote tourism in
Chesterfield County would serve to support local
business, which may result in increased tax revenue
to Chesterfield and surrounding communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 22nd day of January
2025, that Chesterfield County will petition Virginia
Tourism Corporation (VTC) to recognize Experience
Chesterfield as an official Destination Marketing
Organization (DMO).
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Executive
Director of the Sports, Visitation, & Entertainment
Department, or their designee, is hereby authorized
1/22/2025 Page 20 of 77
and directed to act as chief liaison for the DMO.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
f. Confirming Appointees Specified by State
Code or Job Title
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors is responsible for
making appointments to boards and commissions; and
WHEREAS, membership on the Community Criminal Justice
Board (CCJB) and the Community Policy and Management
Team for Children’s Services (CPMT) is defined by the
Va. Code; and
WHEREAS, the Board has identified additional boards
and commissions that benefit from having specific job
titles or roles; and
WHEREAS, in the interest of improving the efficiency
of the appointment process, the Board desires to
confirm that persons in specific positions shall be
automatically appointed to the position’s respective
board(s) or commission(s) without further action by
the Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board
designates the Deputy County Administrator for Human
Services to be a member of the CCJB, who shall ensure
membership on the CCJB is in conformance with Va.
Code § 9.1-178, except for the public
defender/defense attorney and at-large citizen
positions, who shall require Board approval.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board designates
the Deputy County Administrator for Human Services to
be a member of the CPMT, who shall ensure membership
on the CPMT is in conformance with Va. Code § 2.2-
5205, except for the private provider representative
and the parent representative, who shall require
Board approval.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby
makes the following appointments by position and/or
department, which shall serve at the pleasure of the
Board:
1. Appeals Panel Pursuant to Virginia Set-off Debt
Collection: one member shall be the Chesterfield
County Treasurer
2. Appomattox River Water Authority: the three
members shall be the County Administrator, Director
of Utilities, and an Assistant Director of Utilities
3. Camp Baker Management Board: one member shall
be the Mental Health Support Services Assistant
Director of Community Support Services
4. Central Virginia Waste Management Authority:
members shall include the Deputy County Administrator
1/22/2025 Page 21 of 77
for Community Operations; Director of General
Services (alternate for Deputy County Administrator
for Community Operations); Operations Manager for
General Services (alternate for citizen member); and
Assistant Operations Manager for General Services
(alternate for citizen member)
5. Chesterfield County Supplemental Retirement
Plan Board: two members shall be the Deputy County
Administrator for Finance and Administration and
Assistant Director of Accounting
6. Crater Planning District Commission: one at-
large position shall be the Director of
Intergovernmental Relations
7. Greater Richmond Partnership Board of
Directors: one staff position shall be the County
Administrator
8. Richmond Region Tourism Board: the staff
alternate shall be the Executive Director of Sports,
Visitation and Entertainment
9. Ridefinders Advisory Board: the member and
alternate member shall be employees of the
Chesterfield Department of Transportation as
designated by the Director of Transportation
10. Riverside Regional Jail Authority: the
Chesterfield Sheriff shall be one appointee; the
member shall be the Deputy County Administrator for
Finance and Administration; and the alternate member
shall be the Deputy County Administrator for
Community Operations
11. The Span Center (formerly Senior Connections):
the member shall be the Deputy County Administrator
for Human Services
12. South Central Wastewater Authority: the three
members shall be the County Administrator, Director
of Utilities, and an Assistant Director of Utilities
13. Towing Advisory Board: one member shall be the
Captain of Internal Affairs for the Chesterfield
Police Department, and one member shall be the
Internal Affairs/Regulatory Functions Sergeant for
the Chesterfield Police Department
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
2. Real Property Requests
a. Acceptance of Parcels of Land
1. Acceptance of a Parcel of Land
Adjacent to Willis Road and Route 1
from Bellwood Commons, LLC
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land
containing 1.239 acres adjacent to Willis Road and
Route 1 from Bellwood Commons, LLC and authorized the
County Administrator to execute the deed.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
b. Conveyance of Easements
1/22/2025 Page 22 of 77
1. Designation of a Temporary
Construction Easement Across
Fernbrook Park for the Fordham
Road Sidewalk Phase D/E Project
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board designated a temporary construction easement
for the Fordham Road Sidewalk Phase D/E Project.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
c. Requests to Quitclaim
1. Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a
Water Easement Across the Property
Owned by PTM, LP
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed to quitclaim a portion of a 16’ water
easement across the property owned by PTM, LP.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
2. Request to Quitclaim a Drainage
Easement Across the Property Owned by
Kevin Randesi
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed to quitclaim a drainage easement
across the property owned by Kevin Randesi.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
3. Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a
Sewer Easement Across the Property
Owned by CFT NV Developments, LLC
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed to quitclaim a portion of a 16’ sewer
easement across the property owned by CFT NV
Developments, LLC.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
3. Set Public Hearing
a. To Consider the Vacation of a Portion of
Gayland Avenue and Lots 11-19 and Portion
of Lot 20, Block E and Lots 17-21 and
Portion of Lot 22, Block F Within Suburban
Property of John L. Patterson
1/22/2025 Page 23 of 77
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board set February 26, 2025, as the date to hold a
public hearing to consider the vacation of a portion
of a 40’ right of way known as Gayland Avenue and
Lots 11-19 and a portion of Lot 20, Block E and Lots
17-21 and a portion of Lot 22, Block F within
Suburban Property of John L. Patterson.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
b. To Consider the Vacation of a Portion of a
Taxiway Easement
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board set February 26, 2025, as the date to hold a
public hearing to consider the vacation of a portion
of a taxiway easement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
4. Acceptance of State Roads
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Harper’s Mill South Section 7 Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Additions Reason for Change: New Streets Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statutes: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
► Grahams Ferry Lane, State Route Number 8513
1/22/2025 Page 24 of 77
From: 0.01 miles north of Blooming Road, (Route
8204)
To: Widthby Road, (Route 8612), a distance of 0.06
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 302, Page 84
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
► Widthby Road, State Route Number 8612
From: Widthby Court, (Route 8613)
To: Grahams Ferry Lane, (Route 8513), a distance of
0.09 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 302, Page 84
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
► Widthby Road, State Route Number 8612
From: 0.01 miles south of Blooming Road, (Route
8204)
To: Widthby Court, (Route 8613), a distance of 0.05
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 302, Page 84
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
► Widthby Road, State Route Number 8612
From: Grahams Ferry Lane, (Route 8513)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.10 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 302, Page 84
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
► Widthby Court, State Route Number 8613
From: Widthby Road, (Route 8612)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.09 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 302, Page 84
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
1/22/2025 Page 25 of 77
Project / Subdivision: Harpers Mill Southwest Section 6 Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Additions Reason for Change: New Streets Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statutes: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
► Haynes Bridge Road, State Route Number 8607
From: Otterdale Road, (Route 667)
To: Deltic Lane, (Route 8608), a distance of 0.06
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 295, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 40 variable width
► Haynes Bridge Road, State Route Number 8607
From: Deltic Lane, (Route 8608)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.10 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 295, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
► Deltic Lane, State Route Number 8608
From: Moldova Road, (Route 8609)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 295, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
► Deltic Lane, State Route Number 8608
From: Haynes Bridge Road, (Route 8607)
To: Moldova Road, (Route 8609) a distance of 0.10
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 295, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
► Moldova Road, State Route Number 8609
From: Deltic Lane, (Route 8608)
To: Minsk Road, (Route 8610) a distance of 0.09
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 295, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
► Moldova Road, State Route Number 8609
From: Minsk Road, (Route 8610)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.13 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 295, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
► Minsk Road, State Route Number 8610
From: Moldova Road, (Route 8609)
To: The end of maintenance, a distance of 0.02 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 295, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
► Verneham Court, State Route Number 8611
From: Otterdale Road, (Route 667)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.14 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 295, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
1/22/2025 Page 26 of 77
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Lake Margaret Section 5 Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Additions Reason for Change: New Streets Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statutes: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
► McKibben Drive, State Route Number 8257
From: Shanley Drive, (Route 8577)
To: 0.01 miles northwest of Shanley Drive, (Route
8577), a distance of 0.01 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 299, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
► McKibben Drive, State Route Number 8257
From: Alsandair Drive, (Route 8578)
To: Shanley Drive, (Route 8577), a distance of 0.17
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 299, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
► McKibben Drive, State Route Number 8257
From: 0.04 miles west of Killycrom Drive, (Route
8256)
To: Alsandair Drive, (Route 8578), a distance of
0.17 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 299, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
► Shanley Drive, State Route Number 8577
From: Woodpecker Road, (Route 626)
To: McKibben Drive, (Route 8257) a distance of 0.12
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 299, Page 62
1/22/2025 Page 27 of 77
Right of Way width (feet) = 85
► Alsandair Drive, State Route Number 8578
From: Abercrombie Drive, (Route 8580)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.17 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 299, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
► Alsandair Drive, State Route Number: 8578
From: McKibben Drive, (Route 8257)
To: Alsandair Terrace, (Route 8579), a distance of
0.18 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 299, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
► Alsandair Drive, State Route Number 8578
From: Alsandair Terrace, (Route 8579)
To: Abercrombie Drive, (Route 8580), a distance of
0.14 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 299, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
► Alsandair Terrace, State Route Number 8579
From: Alsandair Drive, (Route 8578)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.11 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 299, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
► Abercrombie Drive, State Route Number 8580
From: Alsandair Drive, (Route 8578)
To: 0.01 miles west of Alsandair Drive, (Route
8578), a distance of 0.01 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 299, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
► Abercrombie Drive, State Route Number 8580
From: Alsandair Drive, (Route 8578)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.08 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 299, Page 62
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
1/22/2025 Page 28 of 77
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Lake Margaret Section 6 Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Additions Reason for Change: New Streets Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statutes: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
► McKibben Drive, State Route Number 8257
From: McKibben Place, (Route 8581)
To: Abercrombie Drive (Route 8580), a distance of
0.14 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 301, Page 53
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
► McKibben Drive, State Route Number 8257
From: Abercrombie Drive, (Route 8580)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.15 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 301, Page 53
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
► McKibben Drive, State Route Number 8257
From: 0.01 miles northwest of Shanley Drive (Route
8577)
To: McKibben Place (Route 8581), a distance of 0.25
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 301, Page 53
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
► Abercrombie Drive, State Route Number 8580
From: McKibben Drive, (Route 8257)
To: 0.01 miles southeast of McKibben Drive, (Route
8257) a distance of 0.01 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 301, Page 53
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
► McKibben Place, State Route Number 8581
From: McKibben Drive, (Route 8257)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.23 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 301, Page 53
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
5. Request for Reallocation of Available FY2025
School Operating Funds for the Purchase of
School Buses
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board authorized the reallocation of $2 million of
available FY2025 debt service funds for the purchase
of school buses.
1/22/2025 Page 29 of 77
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
6. Approval of Community Engagement and Resources
Title VI Plan
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board approved the Chesterfield County Community
Engagement and Resources Title VI Implementation Plan
2025-2027. (It is noted a copy of the plan is on file
with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
15. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
Ms. Becky Sido addressed the Board relative to
concerns about increasing real estate property
values, real estate taxes, county debt, and
transparency.
Mr. Frank Rau addressed the Board relative to
concerns about significant increases in county taxes
and spending and concerning trends, such as rising
general fund expenses, economic development spending,
escalating county debt service, and insufficient
financial transparency.
Ms. Rachel James addressed the Board relative to
concerns about Dominion's proposed gas plant and
vulnerable populations living closest to the existing
pollution of the Chesterfield power station.
Mr. Glen Besa addressed the Board relative to
concerns about climate change and Dominion's gas-
fired power plant.
Mr. Chris Wiegard addressed the Board relative to the
proposed methane plant at Dutch Gap and losses caused
by climate change.
16. Deferred Items from Previous Meetings
There were no deferred items from previous meetings
at this time.
17. Zoning Requests
A. 22SN0089 - Thackers View Rezoning and Exceptions -
Clover Hill
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Thackers View
Rezoning and Exceptions is a request to rezone from
Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12) with
conditional use to permit neighborhood recreational
facilities and a bed and breakfast facility plus
conditional use planned development to permit
exceptions to ordinance requirements and amendment of
zoning district map known as 4701, 4801 and 4901
Woolridge Road. The 138.52 acre property is proposed
for a maximum development of 260 dwelling units. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
1/22/2025 Page 30 of 77
appropriate for Suburban Residential I use (Maximum
of 2 dwellings per acre). Tax IDs 720-681-0327; 720-
682-0474 and 3924.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 22SN0089. She stated Ms.
Schneider is requesting deferral to the Board's
regularly scheduled meeting on February 26, 2025.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment on the deferral.
Mr. Greg Allen acknowledged the good work that Ms.
Schneider has done getting the case to where it is
and continuing to listen to citizens.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing on the deferral was closed.
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board deferred Case 22SN0089 to its regularly
scheduled meeting on February 26, 2025.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
B. 24SN1209 - Magnolia Green Tract CC Amendment -
Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Magnolia Green Tract
CC Amendment is a request for amendment of zoning
approval (Case 89SN0343) relative to phasing
requirements and modification of development
standards and amendment of zoning district map in a
Residential (R-9) District for property fronting in
three (3) locations for approximately 2,925 feet
along the north side of Hull Street Road, 250 feet
west of Magnolia Green Parkway. The 88.11 acre
property is zoned to permit a residential development
of up to 364 multifamily dwelling units. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Community Business, Neighborhood
Business and Regional Mixed Uses. Tax IDs 702-667-
2068; 703-667-2733; and 705-667-9038.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1209. She stated Mr.
Carroll is requesting deferral to the Board's
regularly scheduled meeting on February 26, 2025.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment on the deferral.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing on the deferral was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board deferred Case 24SN1209 to its regularly
scheduled meeting on February 26, 2025.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
C. 24MH1286 - Ramirez Manufactured Home Permit Renewal -
Bermuda
1/22/2025 Page 31 of 77
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Ramirez Manufactured
Home Permit Renewal is a request for renewal of
manufactured home permit (Case 18SN0106) to permit a
temporary manufactured home and amendment of zoning
district map in a Residential (R-7) District known as
10114 Brightwood Avenue. The 0.16 acre property is
developed with 1 temporary manufactured home. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Suburban Residential II use (2 to 4
dwellings per acre). Tax ID 793-666-9401.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24MH1286. She stated staff
recommended approval, subject to the conditions in
the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
The applicant, Mr. Moises Ramirez, stated renewal of
the permit would help his family.
There being no one else to speak, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board approved Case 24MH1286, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. The applicants shall be the owner and occupant
of the manufactured home. (P)
2. No permanent type living space may be added to
the manufactured home. The manufactured home shall
be skirted but shall not be placed on a permanent
foundation. (P)
3. Should the applicant cease to reside in the
manufactured home, the manufactured home shall be
removed from the property. (P)
(Note: The Zoning Ordinance limits the maximum period
of time for which a manufactured home permit may be
granted to seven (7) years. Should the Board wish to
approve this request, this approval would be for
seven (7) years unless conditioned for less time and
then subject to renewal.)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
D. 22SN0035 - Duval Road Residential Rezoning - Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Duval Road
Residential Rezoning is a request to rezone from
Agricultural (A) and Residential (R-12) to
Residential (R-12) plus conditional use planned
development to permit exceptions to ordinance
requirements, and conditional use to permit
recreational neighborhood facilities and amendment of
zoning district map known as 18101 Duval Road. The
100.1 acre property is proposed for a maximum
1/22/2025 Page 32 of 77
development of 200 dwelling units. The Comprehensive
Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Suburban Residential I use (Maximum of 2 dwellings
per acre). Tax IDs 702-675-0476 and 703-675-1477.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 22SN0035. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
Mr. Greg Allen suggested some additional approaches
to how the case can be effectively reviewed.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board approved Case 22SN0035, subject to the
following conditions:
Proffered Conditions
The property owner and applicant in this rezoning
case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of
Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance
of Chesterfield County, for themselves and their
successors or assigns, proffer that the property
under consideration (the “Property”) will be
developed according to the following proffers if, and
only if, the rezoning request submitted herewith is
granted with only those conditions agreed to by the
owner and applicant. In the event this request is
denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by
the owner and applicant, the proffers shall
immediately be null and void and of no further force
or effect.
These Proffered Conditions include two (2) Exhibits
attached hereto:
Exhibit A: Conceptual layout entitled “SOWERS PARCELS
18001 & 18101 DUVAL ROAD // CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA”,
dated August 2024 (“Conceptual Layout”).
Exhibit B: Single-family detached elevations dated
November 6, 2023 (the “Elevations”)
1. Master Plan. The Textual Statement dated
December 6, 2024 shall be the Master Plan. (P)
2. Environmental Engineering.
a. Super Silt Fence, or an alternative as
approved by the Department of Environmental
Engineering, shall be provided as a perimeter control
in locations where standard silt fence would have
been required.
b. Sediment traps and sediment basins sized
at least 25% larger than the minimum Virginia Erosion
and Sediment Control Handbook’s Standard shall be
provided.
1/22/2025 Page 33 of 77
c. Application of Anionic PAM, Flexible
Growth Medium and/or a County-approved equivalent
shall be applied to denuded areas during construction
and at final stabilization in the locations shown on
plans approved by Environmental Engineering at the
time of plans review.
d. The maximum post-development discharge
rate for the 100-year storm shall be based on the
maximum capacity of the existing facilities
downstream, and shall not increase the recorded and
/or established 100-year backwater and /or
floodplain. On-Site detention of the post-
development 100-year discharge rate to below the pre-
development 100-year discharge rate may be provided
to satisfy this requirement. (EE)
3. Utilities. The public water and wastewater
systems shall be utilized. (U)
4. Age Restriction. Any lots for age-restricted
dwelling units shall be grouped together on a
particular portion of the Property and shall not be
scattered among other residential units. At the time
of recordation of a subdivision plat or the approval
of any site plan, the lots shall be noted as age-
restricted. Any site plan for age-restricted dwelling
units shall also note the restriction. Except as
otherwise prohibited by the Virginia Fair Housing
Law, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and such other
applicable federal, state or local legal
requirements, dwelling units designated as age-
restricted shall be restricted to “housing for older
persons; as defined in the Virginia Fair Housing Law
and no persons under 19 years of age shall reside
therein. (P)
5. Density. The total number of residential
dwelling units on the Property shall not exceed 200
units. (P)
6. Right-of-Way Dedication. Prior to any site
plan approval, in conjunction with recordation of the
initial subdivision plat, or within sixty (60) days
from a written request by the Transportation
Department, whichever occurs first, fifty-five (55)
feet of right-of-way along the southern side of Duval
Road, measured from the centerline of that part of
Duval Road immediately adjacent to the Property,
shall be dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for
the benefit of the County. (T)
7. Road Improvements. To provide an adequate
roadway system, the developer shall be responsible
for the following improvements with initial
development of the Property:
a. Construction of additional pavement
along Duval Road at each approved access to provide
left and right turn lanes, if warranted, based on
Transportation Department standards.
1/22/2025 Page 34 of 77
b. Widening/improving the south side of
Duval Road to an eleven (11) foot wide travel lane,
measured from the centerline of the road, with an
additional four (4) foot wide paved shoulder plus a
four (4) foot wide unpaved shoulder and overlaying
the full width of the road with one and one half
(1.5) inches of compacted bituminous asphalt
concrete, with modifications approved by the
Transportation Department, for the entire Property
frontage.
c. Dedication to the County, free and
unrestricted, of any additional right-of-way (or
easements) required for the improvements identified
above. In the event the developer is unable to
acquire the “off-site” right-of-way that is necessary
for the road improvements described in Proffered
Condition 7.a., the developer may request, in
writing, that the County acquire such right-of-way as
a public road improvement. All costs associated with
the acquisition of the right-of-way shall be borne by
the developer. In the event the County chooses not to
assist the developer in acquisition of the “off-site”
right-of-way, the developer shall be relieved of the
obligation to acquire the “off-site” right-of-way and
shall provide the road improvements within available
right-of-way as determined by the Transportation
Department. (T)
8. Road Cash Proffers.
a. The applicant, sub-divider, or
assignee(s) (“Developer”) shall pay $9,400 for each
single family detached dwelling unit and $4,324 for
each age-restricted dwelling unit to Chesterfield
County for road improvements within the service
district for the property (“Road Cash Proffer
Payment”). Each Road Cash Proffer Payment shall be
made prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for a dwelling unit unless state law
modifies the timing of the payment. Should
Chesterfield County impose impact fees at any time
during the life of the development that are
applicable to the property, the amount paid in cash
proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward, but
not be in addition to, any impact fees, in a manner
determined by the County.
b. If the Developer provides widening
improvements along Duval Road (“Off-Site Road
Improvement”), as specified in the Proffered
Condition 8.b., then the Road Cash Proffer Payment
shall be reduced by a minimum of $890.15 multiplied
by the amount of linear feet widened by the Developer
(the “Reduction”), unless a higher amount is approved
by the Transportation Department. In addition, if
the Developer provides the shared use path along
Duval Road within dedicated right-of-way (“Pedestrian
Improvement”), as specified in Proffered Condition
10.D.d., then the Road Cash Proffer Payment shall be
reduced an additional $223.00 per linear feet of
shared use path provided within the Duval Road right-
of-way, unless a higher amount is approved by the
1/22/2025 Page 35 of 77
Transportation Department (also included in the
“Reduction”). The Reduction amount shall be approved
by the Transportation Department prior to
construction plan approval for the portion of the
Off-Site Road and Pedestrian Improvement(s) addressed
by the construction plan. Reduction shall only be
applicable to the part of the Off-Site Road and
Pedestrian Improvement(s) provided by the Developer,
as determined by the Transportation Department. If a
Reduction is applicable to the property as determined
by the Transportation Department, no Road Cash
Proffer Payment shall be required until the full
amount of the Reduction is applied. (T)
9. Access. Direct vehicular access from the
Property to Duval Road shall be limited to not more
than two (2) public roads. The exact location(s) of
the(se) access point(s) shall be approved by the
Transportation Department in accordance with VDOT
requirements. (T)
10. Additional Development Requirements.
A. Conceptual Layout.
a. The site shall be developed in
general conformance with Conceptual Layout. The
Conceptual Layout is conceptual in nature and may
vary based on the preliminary plat/construction plat
depending on the final soil studies, RPA lines, road
and alley design, lot locations, lot line locations,
amenity locations, building footprints, parking area
design and location, BMP design and location,
pedestrian way design and location, VDOT
requirements, requirements of other federal and state
approvals and permits, and other design or
engineering reasons. Any substantive changes that do
not relate to the prior sentence shall be approved by
the Planning Commission at the time of plans review.
In the event of any conflict between information
shown on the Conceptual Layout and these Proffered
Conditions, these Proffered Conditions shall
control.
b. Lots 11, 30 and 31 shall be
designed with no lots fronting on the road segment
colored yellow on the Conceptual Layout (“Road
Segment”). The road layout from the southern end of
this Road Segment to the connection to the adjacent
undeveloped parcel (and planned stub per plans for
the undeveloped parcel) in the southeast corner of
the Property (“Circuitous Route”) shall provide a
circuitous route as shown on the Conceptual Layout to
discourage use of internal roads and encourage use of
the collector road to be constructed off-site and
abutting the Property’s eastern boundary line. In
the accompanying Textual Statement, the front yard of
certain lots along the Circuitous Route were
increased to 25’. The front yard of additional lots
may be increased to 25’ as well if needed for lot
frontage approval by the Planning Director under the
Stub Road policy.
1/22/2025 Page 36 of 77
c. The owner may elect to relocate
the stub road located between Lots 175 and 176 (the
“Stub Road”), as shown on the Conceptual Layout,
further south along the parcel identified as County
GPIN 701-675-0876 (the “Neighbor Parcel”) at time of
plans review. With the relocation, the owner may
adjust the location and orientation of Lots 164 – 176
(including the common area between Lots 169 and 170),
as shown on the Conceptual Layout, to allow for the
Stub Road relocation and ensure that the owner does
not lose lots in such relocation.
B. Western Buffer. A landscaped buffer, a
minimum of 20’ wide, planted to a minimum of
Perimeter Landscaping B, Option 1, with credit for
existing trees and shrubs, shall be provided between
the western Property line and the on-site rear lot
lines adjacent to the western Property line (the
“Western Buffer”). In the event that (i) the owner of
the Neighbor Parcel, files a rezoning application for
the Neighbor Parcel, or (ii) the owner of the
Neighbor Parcel sells the land to another individual
or entity (as evidenced by a recorded deed for the
Neighbor Parcel), then, upon confirmation by the
Planning Director following the occurrence of either
of the foregoing, the Western Buffer shall no longer
be required. If the Western Buffer is no longer
required, then the land to be used for the Western
Buffer may be integrated into the adjoining internal
lots or left as common area.
C. Street Trees. Street trees shall be
planted along both sides of public roads spaced on
the basis of one tree per lot. In the event of
conflicts with utilities, easements, sightlines,
entrances and other conflicts, the required spacing
shall be adjusted at the time of plans
review. Street trees may be located between the road
and the sidewalk or in a lot. Street trees shall not
be required where a landscaped buffer is required
along a street section.
D. Amenities.
a. The area identified as “1” on
the Conceptual Layout shall be a focal point for the
community, and shall be created with: (i)
landscaping, (ii) a minimum of two benches with
hardscape below each bench (the hardscape area shall
be two times the sitting area of the bench), and
(iii) either a pavilion, firepit, or multipurpose
lawn, unless alternative improvements are approved
for the focal point at plans review. The final
location, design and improvements to be used shall be
submitted by the owner and approved at the time of
plans review or a separate landscape plan submittal.
b. In addition to the above, the
following amenity areas shall be provided. The final
location, design and improvements to be used in each
amenity area shall be submitted by the owner and
approved at the time of plans review or a separate
landscape plan submittal.
1/22/2025 Page 37 of 77
i. The area identified as
“2” on the Conceptual Layout (the “SW Amenity Area”)
shall be designed as an unstructured playing field
with a playground (appropriate for ages 5-12), unless
alternative improvements are approved at plans
review. A minimum of two benches with hardscape below
each bench (the hardscape area shall be two times the
sitting area of the bench) will be located in either
the northeast or northwest corner of the amenity
area.
ii. The areas identified as
“3” on the Conceptual Layout shall be designed as
“Focal Parks.” These areas shall be improved with (i)
landscaping or gardens, and (ii) benches, hammocks,
pergolas, picnic tables, or other similar seating
areas, unless alternative improvements are approved
at plans review.
iii. The area identified as
“4” on the Conceptual Layout shall be designed as a
tot lot with a playground (appropriate for ages 2-4),
with a minimum of two benches with hardscape below
each bench (the hardscape area shall be two times the
sitting area of the bench), unless alternative
improvements are approved at plans review.
iv. The area identified as
“5” on the Conceptual Layout shall be designed as a
“Nature Pocket Park” which shall consist of (i)
benches or other seating areas, and (ii) landscaping
around the seating areas or around the nearby
pond(s), unless alternative improvements are approved
at plans review. The focus of this park shall be on
viewing the wildlife generated by the mature trees
that will remain, and the wetlands in the vicinity of
the park.
v. The area identified as
“6” on the Conceptual Layout shall be designed as a
“Dog Park” that shall be improved with two or more of
the following amenities: (i) benches or other seating
areas, (ii) dog play equipment, and (iii) a shade
structure, unless alternative improvements are
approved at plans review. Notwithstanding what is
shown on the Conceptual Layout, the location of the
“Dog Park” may be relocated to elsewhere within the
Property at the time of plans review.
c. Pedestrian paths will be
provided within the Property as generally shown on by
the “Trail” notation on the Conceptual Layout.
d. A shared use path, a minimum of
10’ wide, shall be provided in a linear alignment
along the Property’s frontage to Duval Road within
the right-of-way for Duval Road in furtherance of the
Bikeways section in the Zoning Ordinance, unless an
alternative location agreed to by the Developer and
otherwise approved by the Planning and Transportation
Departments.
1/22/2025 Page 38 of 77
e. Sidewalks shall be provided on
both sides of all public roads, unless otherwise
approved by the Planning Department and the
Transportation Department. The owner of the Property
may elect not to include a sidewalk segment where the
removal of the sidewalk segment will reduce the
impact on steep slopes as determined and approved at
the time of plans review. The sidewalks shall be
constructed within the right-of-way, unless otherwise
approved by the Planning Department. In the event a
sidewalk along a public road is located outside the
public right-of-way, then the length of all driveways
intersecting with such sidewalk located outside the
public right-of-way shall be a minimum of twenty feet
(20’) as measured from the back of such sidewalk and
the face of a front-loaded garage door.
E. Pedestrian Paths. In all Common
Areas, pedestrian paths may be natural or hard
surface or a combination. In Resource Protection
Areas, pedestrian paths may be located in a
meandering manner through the Resource Protection
Areas in accordance with the Department of
Environmental Quality’s Riparian Buffers Modification
and Mitigation Guidance Manual (2006), with the final
location, design and material to be approved by the
Director of Environmental Engineering at the time of
plans review and approval. A multi-use trail may be
located within sewer easements located in resource
protection areas. The exact location, width, design
and material(s) to be used for this trail shall be
shown on the site plan or subdivision plat submitted
and is subject to review and approval by the
Directors of Environmental Engineering and Utilities,
or their designee.
F. Architecture/Design Requirements.
a. Architecture Generally.
i. The architectural
appearance of single family detached dwellings
constructed on the Property shall generally conform
with (i) the architectural appearance of the
Elevations, or (ii) another architectural appearance
approved by the Planning Commission at the time of
plans review and approval. The owner of the Property
may also ask the Planning Commission to approve
another architectural appearance after plans review
and approval.
ii. The same architectural
style of dwelling unit frontal elevations shall not
be located on either side of or directly across from
each other, but this requirement shall not prevent a
dwelling unit from having the same frontal elevations
as a dwelling unit located diagonally across from
said dwelling unit.
iii. No single story home
shall be located on either side of or directly across
from another single story home, but this requirement
shall not prevent a single story home from being
1/22/2025 Page 39 of 77
located diagonally across from another single story
home.
b. Exterior Facades.
i. Façade Materials. At
least 50% (5 in 10) dwelling units constructed shall
have brick, stone or masonry fronts that cover a
minimum of 20% of the front façade (which façade
shall exclude gables, windows, trim, and
doors). Other acceptable siding materials include
brick, stone, masonry, fiber cement siding (such as
HardiPlank, HardieShingle, and HardieTrim),
engineered wood siding (such as LP SmartSide), or
high-grade vinyl (a minimum of .044” nominal
thickness as evidenced by manufacturer’s printed
literature). Dutch lap, plywood, and metal siding
are not permitted. Other materials may be used for
parapets, cornices, surrounds, trim, architectural
decorations, and design elements.
ii. Color. Elements of
exterior facades (which include cladding, trim, and
doors) shall include a minimum of three (3) colors,
except a minimum of two (2) colors shall be included
if the cladding is white.
c. Foundations. There shall be a
minimum vertical height of eighteen (18) inches of
brick, stone or stone veneer above grade utilized on
slab-on-grade foundations on all front, side, and
rear elevations. All foundations shall be faced
entirely of brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer,
cultured stone, and/or other masonry
materials. Synthetic or natural stucco foundations
may be permitted for facades constructed entirely of
stucco.
d. Roof Materials. Slanted
roofing material shall be dimensional architectural
shingles with a minimum thirty (30) year warranty or
standing seam metal.
e. Porches, Stoops and Decks.
i. Front
Porches. Individual porches and porticos shall be
one-story in height or taller. Extended front
porches shall be a minimum of 5’ deep. Handrails and
railings, when required by building code, shall be
finished painted wood or metal railing with vertical
pickets, sawn balusters or other products of equal
quality. Pickets shall be supported on top and
bottom rails that span between columns. Columns
supporting roofs of porches, porticos and covered
stoops on street facing facades, shall be masonry
piers, tapered round (Tuscan or Doric) column, or
square box columns a minimum of 6” square as
appropriate to the character of the unit. Other high
quality columns may be approved. Wooden front
porches shall include painted pickets, a painted
band, and painted or vinyl lattice underneath such
porches.
1/22/2025 Page 40 of 77
ii. Rear Porches. All rear
porches visible from public rights of way shall have
lattice or higher quality screening spanning between
columns. Handrails and railings, when required by
building code, shall be finished painted wood or
metal railing with vertical pickets, sawn balusters
or other products of equal quality.
f. Direct Vent Fireplaces. Direct
vent gas fireplace boxes which protrude beyond the
exterior plane of the unit, are not permitted on
front facades. All the exterior materials and
finishes used to enclose the fireplace box must match
the adjacent façade.
g. Front Walks/Driveways.
i. All private driveways
serving residential uses shall be constructed of
either concrete or asphalt or other hardscape
material. This may include pavers as well as stamped
concrete driveways. Private driveways shall not
require curb and gutter.
ii. A minimum of a three
(3) foot wide concrete front walk shall be provided
to the front entrance of each dwelling unit, to
connect to drives, sidewalks or street.
iii. One (1) lamp post
shall be provided in the front yard of each dwelling
unit. The design of such lamp posts shall be
consistent throughout the Property.
h. Planting Beds. Foundation
planting beds shall be provided along the front
façades of dwelling units. Foundation planting beds
shall be a minimum of four (4) feet wide as measured
from the foundation. Planting beds shall be defined
with a trenched edge or suitable landscape edging
material. Planting beds shall include medium shrubs
spaced a maximum of four (4) feet apart. Corners
shall be visually softened with vertical accent
shrubs (2-4’ in height) or small evergreen trees (5-
7’ in height) at the time of planting.
i. Garages. Any garage door
visible from a public street shall use an upgraded
garage door. An upgraded garage door is any door
with a minimum of three (3) enhanced
features. Enhanced features shall include windows,
raised panels, decorative panels, arches, hinge
straps or other architectural features on the
exterior that enhance the entry (i.e. decorative
lintels, shed roof overhangs arches, columns,
keystones, eyebrows, etc.) Flat panel garage doors
shall be prohibited.
j. Heating, Ventilation and Air
Conditioning (HVAC) Units and Generators. HVAC units
and generators affixed to the ground shall be
screened from view by landscaping or low maintenance
1/22/2025 Page 41 of 77
material. If an HVAC unit or generator affixed to
the ground is located between two driveways, the HVAC
unit and generator need only be screened on the side
that faces the alley, drive or street that provide
access to the driveways. (P)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
E. 24SN1009 - Hopkins Road Rezoning - Dale
In Dale Magisterial District, Hopkins Road Rezoning
is a request to rezone from Agricultural (A) to
Residential (R-12) plus conditional use planned
development to permit exceptions to ordinance
requirements and amendment of zoning district map on
5.43 acres known as 8319 Hopkins Road. The 5.43 acre
property is developed with one single family dwelling
and one church. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for Suburban Residential II
use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax ID 784-673-6551.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1009. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 24SN1009, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Setbacks. The front yard setback for the
existing dwelling shall be no less than fifteen
(15) feet. The interior side yard setback for
the existing church parking area shall be no
less than five (5) feet. (P)
2. Screening. An opaque fence not to exceed
six (6) feet in height, in the areas generally
shown in Exhibit A, shall be erected within
ninety (90) days of zoning approval. (P)
3. Permitted Uses within a Buffer. The portion
of the paved parking area that extends twenty-
five (25) feet into the buffer shall be
permitted as shown on concept plan. This area
shall not be expanded, but general maintenance
and upkeep of the area shall be allowed. (P)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
F. 24SN1146 - Dry Bridge Battery Storage Amendment -
Midlothian
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Dry Bridge
Battery Storage Amendment is a request for amendment
1/22/2025 Page 42 of 77
of zoning approval (Case 06SN0191) to modify uses
plus conditional use to permit a battery energy
storage facility and amendment of zoning district map
in a General Industrial (I-2) District on 32.61 acres
fronting 275 feet on the east side of Dry Bridge
Road, 1,250 feet south of Midlothian Turnpike. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Corporate Office/Research &
Development/Light Industrial use. Tax IDs 713-708-
4574 and 714-707-9182.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1146. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 24SN1146, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
The condition approved in Zoning Case 06SN0191 is
hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following condition:
1. Master Plan. The Textual Statement dated
February 17, 2006, as amended per the Textual
Statement dated October 8, 2024, shall be considered
the Master Plan for the subject property. (P)
Staff Note: All other conditions approved with Case
06SN0191 shall remain in force and effect.
Staff recommends the following additional conditions
for this request:
2. Conceptual Plan. Development of the Property
shall generally conform to the Conceptual Plan
(Exhibit A), titled “Conceptual Plan - Dry Bridge
Battery Storage Amendment”, prepared by East Point
Energy and last revised September 5, 2024, with
respect to the general layout of access points,
anticipated location of transmission lines and other
utility connections, general location of battery
equipment and supplementary facilities to be placed
on site, and setbacks. The layout on the Conceptual
Plan is conceptual in nature and may vary based on
the site plan depending on final engineering and
environmental studies or as otherwise approved by the
Planning Commission at the time of plans review. (P)
3. Access. Access to the property shall be
provided for Chesterfield County Fire Department, and
where necessary Environmental Engineering, in a
manner satisfactory to each department as determined
at time of plan review. (P, F & EE)
4. Vegetation within Required Setbacks. Vegetation
1/22/2025 Page 43 of 77
within required setbacks shall be preserved to the
maximum extent practical. Dead, dying, or diseased
trees inside setbacks may be removed with the
approval of the Director of Planning. (P)
5. Enhanced Landscaping at Facility Entrance.
Installation of Perimeter Landscape A within a thirty
(30) foot wide planting area shall be provided at the
facility entrance, as generally shown on the
Conceptual Plan. The small deciduous tree requirement
shall be replaced with an additional evergreen tree
for every 50 linear feet. (P)
6. Decommissioning Plan. A decommissioning plan
shall be submitted for review with the initial site
plan. A decommissioning plan shall include the
following:
a. Contact information for the party
responsible for site decommissioning.
b. Timeline for, and written description
of, decommissioning procedures which shall include,
but not be limited to, removal of any above and below
ground tanks, cables, fencing, debris, buildings,
structures or equipment, to include foundations and
pads, related to the facility and the restoration of
battery storage facility land and related disturbed
areas to a natural condition or other approved
state.
c. “Natural condition” shall be taken to
mean the stabilization of soil to a depth of 3 feet
and restoration of site vegetation and topography to
pre-existing condition, provided that the exact
method and final site restoration plan shall be
subject to site plan review giving, among other
things, consideration to impacts upon future site
use, environmental and adjacent property impacts. The
director of planning may approve a request by the
landowner for alternatives to site restoration to
allow roads, pads or other items which will serve a
future permitted site use to remain.
d. A detailed estimate of the cost of
decommissioning, which may include net salvage value
of such equipment, facilities or devices, and site
restoration. If decommissioning is phased then such
costs shall be so described and calculated to match
phased plan. An estimate shall be prepared by an
engineer licensed in the state of Virginia, having
expertise in the removal of battery storage
facilities (or a similar use) and site restoration as
applicable to request.
e. Decommissioning plan, accompanying
estimates and surety shall be updated every five
years and provided to the director of planning.
f. Landowner, applicant or facility owner
shall provide the county with a surety, acceptable to
the director of planning, equal to the estimated
costs of the decommissioning and site restoration or
1/22/2025 Page 44 of 77
redevelopment as applicable. Any such surety shall be
provided prior to site plan approval for the facility
and shall include the ability for automatic
adjustment for inflation or as necessary based upon
decommissioning and/or restoration plan update.
g. The decommissioning plan shall be
approved in tandem with site plan approval. (P)
7. Facility Operation and Design.
a. Prior to the start of electrical power
storage, documentation shall be provided to the
director of planning verifying interconnection
agreement or similar agreement with the applicable
public utility pursuant to a Power Purchase Agreement
(PPA) or other off-taker as permitted by state law or
the State Corporation Commission, and notification of
when electricity transmission is to begin. The
director of planning shall be notified certified mail
within 30 days of cessation of such agreement. Where
such power distribution is permitted by law,
agreements for power distribution which do not
require a PPA shall also comply with the above
documentation and notification.
b. Onsite lighting shall be the minimum
necessary for security or onsite maintenance and
shall comply with Ordinance requirements.
c. Except for initial construction or
decommissioning activity, maintenance periods or
emergency conditions which require temporary use of
onsite generator, noise generated by the facility
shall not exceed seventy-five (75) decibels as
measured at property line with any adjacent property
not part of facility. (P)
8. Height. Excluding transmission utility poles
serving the site and any improvements in the
electrical substation facility, no buildings,
structures or other equipment utilized on the site
shall exceed twenty-five (25) feet in height. The
director of planning may approve the permitted height
to be exceeded where due to terrain, screening or
other mitigation of a structure's visibility is
minimized. (P)
9. Transmission Lines. Except for lines that are
solely subject to State Corporation Commission
jurisdiction, and where necessary for lines to
directly connect to existing transmission lines, new
transmission lines are subject to site plan review
and shall not be located above ground. The director
of planning may approve use of above ground
transmission lines where determined during plan
review that such action would mitigate impact upon
protected environmental features or there exist other
site-specific features where underground placement of
lines is not feasible. (P)
10. Health and Safety. Security fencing or walls
shall be provided for areas of the facility operation
a minimum of six (6) feet in height, having barbed
wire or similar along top and providing secured
gates. Alternative method of security may be approved
at time of site plan approval where demonstrated that
1/22/2025 Page 45 of 77
such method meets or exceeds intended security
fencing or walls. (P)
11. Change of Facility Owner. The Director of
Planning shall be notified by certified mail of any
change in ownership and, if different, the party
responsible for decommissioning of facility within
sixty (60) days of such change. (P)
12. Decommission, Abandonment and Maintenance
Compliance.
a. Planning shall be notified by
certified mail thirty (30) days prior to the intended
decommissioning of the facility.
b. Damaged or unusable battery equipment
shall be removed from site within sixty (60) days of
removal from service.
c. The facility, or any portion thereof,
shall be considered abandoned where not utilized for
the storage of electricity for a continuous period of
six (6) months. The director of planning may extend
such time period where evidence is provided by the
facility owner or operator demonstrating that the
failure to utilize the facility for power storage is
beyond the reasonable control of owner or operator,
the facility is operationally capable of power
storage and has not been abandoned.
d. Decommissioning procedures shall be
completed within one (1) year of decommissioning
notice, abandonment of the facility, or a shorter
time period where in writing building official or
other county official determines the facility or some
aspect thereof to be unsafe. If facility owner fails
to meet decommissioning requirements or comply with a
request for removal or repair, the county may at its
option:
i. remove and salvage facility
equipment and structures and perform related
restoration using provided surety. If the
decommissioning surety and salvage recompense is
insufficient, the county shall have the right to
recover such costs from facility owner to include
legal fees, expenses and fines; or
ii. pursue legal recourse to have
the facility, or portion thereof as applicable,
removed at owner’s expense. The county may seek to
recover its costs, legal fees and legal expenses
incurred to have the facility decommissioned in
compliance with approved plan. (P)
13. Environmental Standards.
a. Super Silt Fence, or an alternative as
approved by the Department of Environmental
Engineering, shall be provided as a perimeter control
in locations where standard silt fence would have
been required.
b. Sediment traps and sediment basins
sized at least 25% larger than the minimum Virginia
Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook’s standard
shall be provided.
c. Anionic PAM, Flexible Growth Medium
and/or a County-approved equivalent shall be applied
to denuded areas during construction and at final
1/22/2025 Page 46 of 77
stabilization in the locations shown on plans
approved by Environmental Engineering at the time of
plans review. (EE)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
G. 24SN1185 - Weir Road Mini-Storage - Bermuda
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Weir Road Mini-
Storage is a request to rezone from Community
Business (C-3) to Regional Business (C-4) plus
conditional use planned development to permit
exceptions to ordinance requirements with conditional
use to permit mini-storage/mini-warehouse facility
and amendment of zoning district map on 2.05 acres
located in the southeast corner of Weir and Briggs
Road, and fronting approximately 745 feet along the
SW side of Weir Rd. The Comprehensive Plan suggests
the property is appropriate for Community Business
use. Tax IDs 800-652-Part of 1292, 800-652-Part of
4578; and 800-653-Part of 2911.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1185. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 24SN1185, subject to the
following conditions:
Proffered Condition
The Owner-Applicant in this rezoning Case 24SN1185,
pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia
(1950, as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of
Chesterfield County, Virginia, for itself and its
successors or assigns, proffers the development of
the approximately 2.05 acres with Chesterfield
County, Virginia (“County”) Tax Identification
Numbers 800652129200000 (0.00838 acres, 13001 Briggs
Road), 800652457800000 (1.798 acres,12701 Lindenwood
Way), and 800653291100000 (0.241 acres, 12700
Willowview Grove)(collectively, the “Property”) under
consideration will be developed according to the
following conditions; however, in the event this
request is denied or approved with conditions not
agreed to by the Owner-Applicant, these proffers
shall be immediately null and void and of no further
force or effect.
1. Master Plan. The Textual Statement dated
October 28, 2024 shall be considered the Master Plan
for the Property.(P)
2. Exhibits. These proffers shall include the
following exhibits which by this reference are made a
1/22/2025 Page 47 of 77
part hereof:
a. Exhibit A - conceptual plan entitled, “CRESCENT
SELF STORAGE CONCEPT PLAN, CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA”
prepared by RK&K dated October 29, 2024 and attached
hereto as Exhibit A (“Conceptual Plan”).
b. Exhibit B- conceptual renderings entitled,
“ELEVATIONS A2.1, WEIR ROAD SELF STORAGE,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, CHESTER, VA 23831” prepared by
Kevin J. Maher AIA, dated October 25, 2024 and
attached hereto as Exhibit B (“Conceptual
Renderings”).(P)
3. Utilities. Public water and wastewater systems
shall be used. (U)
4. Permitted Use. The Property shall be zoned C-4
Regional Business District, however, only Mini-
storage/mini-warehouse facility use shall be
permitted, and those uses permitted by right, as
accessory uses, or with restriction in the C-3
Community Business District shall be permitted on the
Property. (P)
5. Architectural Style and Building Materials. The
mini storage/mini-warehouse facility shall be subject
to the following:
a. Generally compatible with respect to
building materials and architectural style with the
Conceptual Renderings attached hereto as Exhibit B,
with the appearance of fenestration and architectural
articulation as shown on such renderings.
b. The exterior portions of the wall
surfaces that can be seen from any public rights-of-
way of any such building, excluding windows, doors,
gables and architectural design features, shall
consist of 70% masonry material (brick, stone, or
brick veneer). Other materials may include
architectural metal wall panels (excluding corrugated
or unfinished metal panels) and EIFS, however,
architectural metal wall panels may only be used on
facades not visible to public rights-of-way and EIFS
shall consist of no more than 15% of the exposed
portion of any wall of any building, shall not be
located less than six (6) feet from the ground
adjoining the building, and is to be used only as an
accent material.(P)
6. Mechanical Unit; Screening. Any mechanical
units shall be ground mounted or roof mounted. Any
mechanical units that are ground mounted shall be
screened with landscaping or a low maintenance
material fence designed to complement the
architecture. Screening shall be designed so as to
block such mechanical units from view by persons on
any public streets. The specific method of screening
shall be approved at the time of plan review. (P)
7. Security.
a. Electronic pushbutton keypads shall be
installed at electronically access controlled
building entrances for emergency Police/Fire access.
The unique, Police/Fire-only keypad code shall be
1/22/2025 Page 48 of 77
provided to the Chesterfield County Emergency
Communications Center prior to any certificate(s) of
occupancy being issued.
b. Evergreen shrubs and trees with mature
natural growth habits greater than three (3) feet in
height shall not be planted within a 10-foot radius
of common building entrances or exits.
c. Owner/developer shall install full cut-
off, pole-mounted, minimum 70 CRI-rated LED
luminaires to illuminate surface parking areas with a
minimum maintained illumination level of 0.5 foot-
candles, as measured at grade. (POLICE)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
H. 24SN1192 - Ivymont Square Signage - Midlothian
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Ivymont Square
Signage is a request for conditional use planned
development to permit additional monument signage and
amendment of zoning district map in the Community
Business (C-3) District on 17 acres known as 14101
Midlothian Turnpike. The Comprehensive Plan suggests
the property is appropriate for Community Mixed use.
Tax IDs 724-708-9449 and 725-708-5246.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1192. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 24SN1192, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
No more than four (4) freestanding signs shall be
permitted along the Midlothian Turnpike frontage of
the subject properties. This includes the three (3)
freestanding signs permitted with this zoning request
as generally shown in Exhibit A, and one (1) existing
“Kroger” freestanding sign as shown on Exhibit A,
Page 3. (Note: All signs will meet the Ordinance
requirements for setbacks, size and height at time of
permit review.) (P)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
I. 24SN1226 - Perrymont Road Single Family Dwelling -
Bermuda
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Perrymont Road
Single Family Dwelling is a request for a conditional
1/22/2025 Page 49 of 77
use to permit a single family dwelling in a Community
Business (C-3) district and amendment of zoning
district map on property known as 9016 Perrymont
Road. The 0.28 acre property is developed with one
single family dwelling. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Corporate
Office, Research & Development, Light Industrial use.
Tax ID 792-671-7132.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1226. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board approved Case 24SN1226, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Use & Setback Requirements. One (1) single-
family dwelling shall be permitted on the Property.
The dwelling shall meet the following standards:
a. Front Yard. The structure shall adhere
to a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback.
b. Side Yard. The structure shall adhere to
a ten (10) foot side yard setback.
c. Rear Yard. The structure shall adhere to
a twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback. (P)
2. Principal Building Heights. The dwelling shall
not exceed the lesser of three stories or forty (40)
feet. (P)
3. Accessory Building Requirements.
a. All existing accessory structures shall
be demolished within in ninety (90) days of approval
this case as shown on Exhibit A.
b. Any accessory building constructed for
the single-family dwelling use on the property shall
conform to the standards outlined in Exhibit B. (P)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
J. 24SN1205 - Avery Warehouse South - Bermuda
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Avery Warehouse
South is a request for an exception to Section 18-60
of the Utility Ordinance for connection to the public
wastewater systems (Sanitary Sewer) and amendment of
zoning district map in General Business (C-5)
District on 1.34 acres on property fronting 185 feet
along the east side of Route 1, 525 feet north of
Happy Hill Road, known as 16637 Route 1. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Corporate Office/Research &
Development/Light Industrial use. Tax ID 799-632-
1/22/2025 Page 50 of 77
9411.
Mr. Harold Ellis provided the Board with an overview
of Case 24SN1205. He stated the Planning Commission
recommended approval, but the Utilities Department
recommended denial.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
Mr. Dean Hawkins, representing the applicant,
encouraged approval of the request.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
Discussion ensued relative to what would be
warehoused and the number of employees that would
work there.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 24SN1205, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. The proposed office/warehouse shall connect to
the public water system. (U)
2. If the public wastewater system is extended to
within 200 feet of the property, the property owner
shall extend a public sanitary sewer line to the
property and connect all buildings generating
domestic wastewater to the public wastewater system.
(U)
3. At time of site plan review for the subject
parcel, applicant shall provide for public utility
easement on the property in a location acceptable to
and at a time requested by the Utilities Department
to accommodate the future extension of the public
wastewater system. (U)
4. This Utilities exception shall only apply to
the 1.34 acres site use proposed, e.g. an
Office/Warehouse. (U)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
K. 24SN1262 - Walthall Drive Wastewater Exception -
Bermuda
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Walthall Drive
Wastewater Exception is a request for an exception to
Section 18-60 of the Utility Ordinance for connection
to the public wastewater system to accommodate a two
lot subdivision and amendment of zoning district map
in a Residential (R-15) District on 2.21 acres known
as 14600 Walthall Drive. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Suburban
Residential II use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax
ID 811-644-7184.
Mr. Harold Ellis provided the Board with an overview
of Case 24SN1262. He stated the Planning Commission
1/22/2025 Page 51 of 77
recommended approval, but the Utilities Department
recommended denial.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
Mr. Bryant Gammon, representing the applicant,
encouraged approval of the request.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 24SN1262, subject to the
following conditions:
Condition
1. The proposed dwellings on both lots shall connect
to the public water system. (U)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
L. 24SN1086 - Escobar Sawmill Services - Bermuda
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Escobar Sawmill
Services is a request for conditional use to permit a
sawmill and amendment of zoning district map in
Agricultural (A) District on 1.64 acres known as 1300
Point of Rocks Road. The Comprehensive Plan suggests
the property is appropriate for Suburban Residential
II use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax ID 822-642-
4638.
Ms. Haley Gibson provided the Board with an overview
of Case 24SN1086. She stated the Planning Commission
and staff both recommended approval of Request I. She
further stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of Request II, but staff recommended denial.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
The applicant, Mr. Julio Escobar, asked the Board to
approve his request.
The following individuals all spoke in favor of the
request: Mr. David Sabula, Mr. and Mrs. Donnie and
Cheryl Bowers, Mr. Steven Laveri, and Ms. Blandina
Escobar.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board approved Case 24SN1086, Requests I and II,
subject to the following conditions:
Conditions
Request I
1. Setbacks. The interior side yard setback for
the existing dwelling shall be no less than fourteen
1/22/2025 Page 52 of 77
(14) feet. (P)
Request II
1. Non-Transferable Ownership. This conditional
use shall be granted to Julio Escobar exclusively and
shall not be transferable nor run with the land. (P)
2. Use Limitation. This conditional use shall be
for a sawmill business. The sawmill use shall only be
located within the structures as generally shown on
Exhibit A. (P)
3. Hours of Operation. The business shall operate
from Monday through Friday from 9:00 A.M. to 5:00
P.M. only. (P)
4. Employees. Employees working on the premises
shall be limited to the applicant and one family
member who lives in the dwelling. (P)
5. Site Improvements. No exterior improvements or
alterations shall be performed to serve the sawmill
business. (P)
6. Equipment. All equipment must be stored and
operated within the existing accessory structures.
Types of equipment permitted on site shall be limited
to one portable (1) sawmill and (1) one skid steer.
(P)
7. Outside Storage. Outside storage of lumber
shall be located in the general area as shown in
Exhibit A. The outside storage area shall not exceed
2,500 square feet. This area shall be screened by six
(6) foot tall opaque fence that shall be erected
within sixty (60) days of zoning approval. (P)
8. Signage. No signage shall be permitted to
identify this use. (P)
9. Time Limitation. Approval of this conditional
use shall be granted until December 31, 2027. (P)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
M. 23SN0041 - North Hallsley - Midlothian
In Midlothian Magisterial District, North Hallsley is
a request to rezone from Residential Townhouse (R-TH)
to Residential (R-15) and amendment of zoning
district map fronting approximately 450 feet on the
west side of Old Hundred Road, 2,350 feet north of
Scottwood Road, also fronting approximately 650 feet
on the east and west sides of Scottwood Road, 2,250
feet west of Old Hundred Road, as well as fronting
the eastern terminus of Allsdell Road, Brightwalton
Road, Dunleer Way, Saville Chase Road, and Saville
Chase Trail. The 301.96 acre property is proposed for
a maximum development of 340 dwelling units. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Suburban Residential I use (Maximum
1/22/2025 Page 53 of 77
of 2 dwellings per acre). Tax IDs 709-700-8908; 709-
701-7328; 710-700-7596; 710-703-3345; 711-699-Part of
3470; 711-700-1144; 711-701-5180; and 712-699-7663.
Mr. Ryan Ramsey provided the Board with an overview
of Case 23SN0041. He stated the Planning Commission
and staff recommended approval, subject to the
conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
Mr. John Hauserman, the applicant, requested approval
of the case.
Ms. Patty Friedman spoke in support of the case.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 23SN0041, subject to the
following conditions:
Proffered Conditions
The property owner and applicant in this case,
Riverstone Properties, LLC, (the “Applicant”),
pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia
(1950, as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of
Chesterfield County, for itself and its successors or
assigns, proffers that the use of the properties
known as Chesterfield County Map ID Numbers 710-703-
3345-00000, 709-701-7328-00000, 710-700-7596-00000,
711-700-1144-00000, 711-699-3470-00000 (part of),
712-699-7663-00000, 711-701-5180-00000, and 709-700-
8908-00000 (the “Property”) as a single family
residential community will be developed according to
the following conditions if, and only if, the
rezoning request submitted herewith is granted with
only those conditions agreed to by the Applicant. In
the event this request is denied or approved with
conditions not agreed to by the Applicant, the
proffers shall immediately be null and void and of no
further force or effect.
1. Master Plan. The plan titled “North Hallsley
Zoning Exhibit” dated March 20th, 2023 with revisions
dated June 19th, 2024, shall be considered the
“Master Plan”. (P)
2. Conceptual Layout. The site shall be developed
in general conformance with the layout depicted on
the Master Plan attached as Exhibit A. The layout on
the Master Plan is conceptual in nature and may be
modified dependent on final engineering,
environmental requirements, government requirements,
subdivision/lot layout, road layout, connecting
roads, connecting road locations, open space, BMP
locations, amenity location at the time of
Preliminary Plat, or as otherwise approved at the
time of plans review. (P)
3. Architectural/Design Elements. All
1/22/2025 Page 54 of 77
Architectural/Design Elements below are considered
minimum standards for the Development of the
Property.
a. Style and Form. The architectural styles
shall be interpretations of traditional Richmond
architecture, using forms and elements compatible
with those in Hallsley subdivision such as Georgian,
Classical Revival Colonial, Greek Revival, Queen
Anne, Tudor, and Craftsman Styles.
b. Elevation Repetition. The same dwelling
unit elevations shall not be located adjacent to or
directly across from each other along the same road.
This concept does not apply to units on different
streets backing up to each other. Variation in the
front elevation to address this restriction may not
be achieved by simply mirroring the façade but may be
accomplished by providing at least three (3) of the
following architectural changes.
i. Adding or removing a porch or
covered entry or increasing or decreasing the length
of the porch or entry.
ii. Varying the location and/or
style of a front facing gable(s).
iii. Alternating the location of a
garage.
iv. Providing different materials
and/or siding types on at least fifty (50) percent of
the elevation.
v. Providing a different roof
type/roof line.
vi. Providing a different
architectural style.
c. Façade Materials. Acceptable siding
materials include brick, stone, masonry, horizontal
lap siding, vertical siding, or a combination
thereof. Siding shall be limited to cement fiber
board only (such as but not limited to HardiePlank).
Vinyl siding shall be prohibited.
d. Foundation Materials. Foundations shall
be brick or stone and shall extend a minimum of
twenty-four (24) inches above final grade, but in no
event shall brick or stone be required to extend
above the bottom trim of the first-floor windows.
e. Roofs. Roof materials shall be standing
seam metal or architectural dimensional shingles with
algae protection and having a minimum thirty (30)
year warranty. Roofs or roof lines shall be varied
in color, height, or by a visual/material break
between roofs.
f. Front Porches. All front entry stoops
and front porches shall be constructed with a
continuous masonry foundation wall or on twelve (12)
inch x twelve (12) inch masonry piers. Extended front
porches shall be a minimum of six (6) feet deep.
Space between piers under porches shall be enclosed
(screened) with framed lattice, or vertical or
horizontal panels. Handrails and railings shall be
finished painted wood or metal railing with vertical
or horizontal pickets or sawn balusters. Pickets and
balusters shall have top and bottom rails that span
between columns.
g. Front Porch Flooring. Porch flooring may
1/22/2025 Page 55 of 77
be concrete, exposed aggregate concrete, or a
finished paving material such as stone, tile or
brick, finished (stained) wood, or properly trimmed
composite decking boards. Unfinished treated wood
decking is not permitted. All front steps shall be
masonry or stained/painted wood.
h. Front Walks. A minimum of a three (3)
foot hardscaped front walk shall be provided to the
front entrance of each dwelling unit, to connect to
drives, sidewalks, or street.
i. Garage Doors. Front loaded and corner
side loaded garages shall use an upgraded garage
door. An upgraded garage door is any door with a
minimum of three (3) enhanced features. Enhanced
features shall include windows, raised panels,
decorative panels, arches, ornamental hardware or
other architectural features on the exterior that
enhance the entry (e.g., decorative lintels, shed
roof overhangs, arches, columns, keystones, eyebrows,
etc.) Flat panel garage doors are prohibited.
j. Direct Vent Fireplace. Direct vent gas
fireplace boxes, which protrude beyond the exterior
face of the dwelling unit, are not permitted on front
façades. All the exterior materials and finishes used
to enclose the fireplace box must match the adjacent
façade. (P)
4. Road Cash Proffer, Transportation Contribution,
and Utility Cash Proffer.
a. Transportation Contribution. A
Transportation Contribution payment equal to
$2,440.00 for each primary dwelling unit shall be
paid to the County of Chesterfield to cover the
impact of the development’s needed
transportation/road improvements consistent with the
Roseland Overlay District requirements. Specifically,
the Transportation Contribution is for the
development’s portion of drainage crossing of
Tomahawk Creek for the East/West Major Arterial
(“Roseland Avenue”). Each payment shall be made
prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy
unless state law modifies the timing of the payment.
The Transportation Contribution shall
be adjusted annually on July 1st consistent with the
Marshall Valuation Services by CoreLogic, or its
successor, to account for cost adjustments caused by
various economic factors. Specifically, the
Comparative Cost Multiplier for the Building Class of
Wood Frame in the Southeast portion of the Eastern
District shall be used. The January factor for the
current calendar year of April update shall be used
to determine the factor that will be applied for the
next 12-month period. Adjustments will begin on July
1st following the approval of this request by the
Board of Supervisors until the Transportation
Contribution payment is made. Transportation
Contributions shall be spent for the purposes
proffered or as otherwise permitted by law.
b. Utility Cash Proffer. In addition to
connection fees and utility system extension costs as
required by the County Code, a Utility Cash Proffer
(UCP) payment equal to $3,200.00 per equivalent
1/22/2025 Page 56 of 77
residential unit (ERU) shall be paid to the Utilities
Department to cover the impact of the development’s
needed water storage and supply on the County’s
public water system consistent with the Roseland
Overlay District requirements. Specifically, the UCP
is for the development’s portion of the overall cost
of a two-million-gallon elevated water tank and
approximately 7,300 linear feet of 16-inch waterline
and a flow control valve along Old Hundred Road as
programmed in the Utilities Department’s Capital
Improvement Project Program. Each payment shall be
made prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy unless state law modifies the timing of the
payment. For residential development, ERUs shall be
consistent with the Utilities Department’s
application of Water Capital Cost Recovery Charges
applied to new residential dwelling units per County
Code Chapter 18. Non-residential structures with
water service shall pay a UCP to the Utilities
Department and shall be assessed one ERU for every
8,000 square foot of gross building floor square
footage or portion thereof. Each building floor will
be counted separately and the non-residential ERUs
will be determined from the building permit
application’s plan gross square footage. Where
buildings have multiple water service connections,
there shall be a minimum UCP of one ERU made for each
individually served non-residential space under 8,000
square feet. The Utility Cash Proffer payments as
defined herein shall not apply to any residential,
non-residential, or common area/open space irrigation
water services.
The UCP shall be adjusted annually on
July 1st consistent with the Marshall Valuation
Services by CoreLogic, or its successor, to account
for cost adjustments caused by various economic
factors. Specifically, the Comparative Cost
Multiplier for the Building Class of Wood Frame in
the Southeast portion of the Eastern District shall
be used. The January factor for the current calendar
year of April update shall be used to determine the
factor that will be applied for the next 12-month
period. Adjustments will begin on July 1st following
the approval of this request by the Board of
Supervisors until the UCP payment is made. UCPs
shall be spent for the purposes proffered or as
otherwise permitted by law. (B&M & U)
5. Utilities.
a. The proposed development will utilize
public water and wastewater systems.
b. Overall Water and Wastewater Plan. An
Overall Water and Wastewater Plan [Overall Plan] for
all acreage within the Roseland Overlay District
shall be submitted to the Utilities Department prior
to, or in conjunction with the first tentative or
preliminary plat and/or site or construction plan for
the request property. The Overall Plan shall include
a recommended location of a minimum 2-acre site for
the placement of a 2-million-gallon elevated water
tank acceptable to the Utilities Department. A water
1/22/2025 Page 57 of 77
and wastewater system hydraulic analysis will also be
submitted with the Overall Plan to determine water
and wastewater infrastructure sizing, points of
connection and interconnection, and to verify the
downstream sanitary sewer capacity. The Phased
construction of the Overall Plan improvements shall
be allowed to meet the phased demands of the Property
provided they will meet the demands and needed fire
flow of the proposed phased development of the
Property.
c. Construction of any capacity-related
improvements necessary for the public water and/or
wastewater systems to support the demands of the
development shall be the responsibility of the
developer and included in the Overall Plan.
d. Following approval of the Overall Plan,
upon request of the County, access to the property
and easements shall be provided, at no cost on
standard County documents, in the location of
improvements shown on the Overall Plan, for the
construction of public water and/or wastewater lines
independent of the timing of this development.
e. The developer shall design the on-site
water and wastewater systems to provide water and
wastewater service to properties outside the
development. The applicable utility lines and
easements shall be shown on the Overall Plan.
Easements, water and wastewater extensions, or a
combination thereof shall be provided consistent with
the Utilities Department’s standards and policies in
place at the time of the construction plan design.
f. The trunk wastewater line extension, as
shown on Exhibit A, shall be designed to minimize
tree removal on the Property. Any existing trees
within this area shall be preserved to the maximum
extent practical, unless otherwise approved by the
Director of Utilities. (U)
6. Access.
a. Direct vehicular access from the
property to Old Hundred Road shall be limited to one
(1) entrance/exit.
b. There shall be no direct vehicular
access from the property to Scottwood Road, except
for emergency access only if required and as approved
by the Fire Department and Transportation
Departments. (T)
7. Road Improvements.
a. In conjunction with development of the
property that includes access to Old Hundred Road or
the development of lots adjacent to Old Hundred Road,
the following road improvements shall be completed,
as determined by the Transportation Department. The
Transportation Department shall approve the exact
design, length, or other modifications of the
improvements.
i. Construction/installation of
1/22/2025 Page 58 of 77
intersection control (roundabout, traffic signal, or
alternative design) at the Old Hundred Road
intersection, as approved by the Transportation
Department.
ii. Construction of additional
pavement along Old Hundred Road at the approved
public road access to provide left and right turn
lanes. If the intersection control design will
adequately address the turning movements (i.e.
roundabout or alternative design), then turn lanes
will not be required, as determined by the
Transportation Department.
iii. Off-Site: Widening/improving
the west side of Old Hundred Road to a twelve (12)
foot wide travel lane, measured from the centerline
of the existing pavement, with an additional four (4)
foot wide paved shoulder and overlaying the full
width of the road with one and a half (1.5) inch of
compacted bituminous asphalt concrete, with any
modifications approved by the Transportation
Department, for the property’s frontage
(approximately 350 feet).
iv. Dedication to Chesterfield
County, free and unrestricted, of any additional
right of way and/or easements required for the
improvements identified above.
b. In conjunction with development of the
property that includes access to Brightwalton Road,
construction of additional pavement along
Brightwalton Road at the approved public road access
to provide left and right turn lanes shall be
completed, as determined by the Transportation
Department, and dedication to Chesterfield County,
free and unrestricted, of any additional right of way
and/or easements required for the improvement. The
Transportation Department shall approve the exact
design and length of the improvements.
c. In conjunction with initial development
of the Property, but subject to the Condition
Precedent (defined below), the Developer shall
construct intersection control, consisting of a
roundabout, at the Old Hundred Road and Brightwalton
Road intersection with associated pedestrian
accommodations as a part of the roundabout design, if
applicable (collectively, the “Off-Site Road
Improvement”) with final design approved by the
Virginia Department of Transportation (“VDOT”). The
Off-Site Road Improvement plan shall be approved for
construction prior to or in conjunction with any
initial residential subdivision construction plan
approval on the Property. Prior to the issuance of
building permits for more than a cumulative total of
thirty (30) dwelling units on the Property, the Off-
Site Road Improvement shall be substantially
completed. The obligation(s) in this paragraph shall
be referred to collectively as the “Roundabout
Obligation.”
i. The Developer’s obligation to
perform the Roundabout Obligation shall be
conditioned upon the satisfaction of one (1) of the
following two (2) conditions precedent (collectively
1/22/2025 Page 59 of 77
the “Condition Precedent”).
1. The owner of the land
identified by GPIN 716-701-4130, as such land is
identified as of the date of these proffered
conditions, dedicates to Chesterfield County, free
and unrestricted, any additional right-of-way and/or
easements required for the Off-Site Improvement based
on the Off-Site Improvement plan (the “Needed
Roundabout Right-of-Way”), at no cost to Chesterfield
County or the Developer.
2. Chesterfield County Board
of Supervisors shall have initiated and recorded a
Certificate of Take for the Needed Roundabout Right-
of-Way as a public road improvement, including any
additional easements required for the Off-Site Road
Improvement based on the Off-Site Road Improvement
Plan.
ii. In the event neither of the two
(2) options within the Condition Precedent are
satisfied within one hundred fifty (150) days after
the issuance of a land disturbance permit for the
initial residential development of the Property, then
the Developer shall be relieved of both the
obligation to pay the Transportation Contribution and
the obligation to perform the Roundabout Obligation
and, instead, shall pay $8,484.00 for each primary
dwelling unit (the “Road Cash Proffer”) to the County
of Chesterfield for road improvements within the
service district for the property. Each payment
shall be made prior to the issuance of a certificate
of occupancy for a dwelling unit, unless state law
modifies the timing of payment. Should Chesterfield
County impose impact fees at any time during the life
of the Development that are applicable to the
Property, the amount paid in cash proffers shall be
in lieu of or credited toward, but not in addition
to, any impact fees, in a manner determined by the
County. At the option of the Applicant, or
assignee(s), the Road Cash Proffer payments may be
reduced for the cost of off-site road improvements,
as determined by the Transportation Department. (T)
8. Amenity. Recreational neighborhood area shall
be located on the Property as generally illustrated
on Exhibit A and shall include an open or enclosed
structure with a pool, and at least one (1) of the
following recreational amenities: sport court, play
area, fire pit, outdoor game area, walking trails,
sitting area, or other similar
improvements. Construction of the recreational
neighborhood area shall commence prior to the
issuance of the 100th building permit for a dwelling
unit. Other recreational neighborhood facilities and
uses accessory to residential uses may be located
elsewhere on the Property. The Recreational
neighborhood area shown on Exhibit A shall prohibit
the construction of any buildings, vehicle parking,
or hardscape areas within a designated FEMA
floodplain. The term “hardscape areas” shall not
prohibit construction of neighborhood trails, pathway
improvements, and/or retaining walls, if approved by
1/22/2025 Page 60 of 77
Environmental Engineering. (P & EE)
9. Steep Slopes. Steep slopes equal to or greater
than twenty (20) percent shall remain in their
natural, undisturbed state to the maximum extent
practicable, unless otherwise approved by the
Department of Environmental Engineering. In
locations where the disturbance of slopes greater
than twenty (20) percent is unavoidable, enhanced
erosion and sediment control measures, such as super
silt fence (or alternative as approved by the
Department of Environmental Engineering) and the
application of anionic PAM to denuded areas during
construction and final stabilization, will be
provided as directed by the Department of
Environmental Engineering at the time of site plan
review. The Department of Environmental Engineering
shall approve the exact design and implementation of
these standards. (EE)
10. Flood Plain. Post Development Discharge
Rates, the maximum post-development discharge rate
for the 100- year storm shall be based on the maximum
capacity of the existing facilities downstream, and
the recorded 100-year backwater and/or floodplain
shall not be increased. On-site detention of the
post-development 100-year discharge rate to below the
pre-development 100-year discharge rate may be
provided to satisfy this requirement. (EE)
11. Upper Swift Creek Watershed. During
construction of the development, Applicant shall
endeavor to minimize the impacts of the Upper Swift
Creek Watershed with the use of the following
enhanced erosion and sediment control measures, and
such other measures as may otherwise be approved by
the Director of Environmental Engineering at the time
of plans review:
a. Super Silt Fence, or an alternative as
approved by the Department of Environmental
Engineering, shall be provided as a perimeter control
in locations where standard silt fence would have
been required;
b. Sediment traps and basins sized at least
twenty five percent (25%) larger than the minimum
Virginia Erosion Control Handbook’s standard shall be
provided; and
c. Anionic PAM, Flexible Growth Medium
and/or a County-approved equivalent shall be applied
to denuded areas during construction and at final
stabilization in the locations shown on plans
approved by Environmental Engineering at the time of
plans review. (EE)
12. Geotechnical Report. A geotechnical
engineering report prepared by a consultant who has
had previous mining/geotechnical experience in
reclamation of mine shafts shall be submitted to the
Environmental Engineering Department prior to or in
conjunction with any subdivision submission. Upon
review by Environmental Engineering, or its designee,
1/22/2025 Page 61 of 77
the report may either be accepted, or revisions
requested and, if revisions are requested, the report
shall be resubmitted in the same manner for review
and acceptance by Environmental Engineering, or its
designee. The report shall include, but not be
limited to the following:
a. The location and analysis to include,
but not be limited to, type (e.g. mine entrance
shaft, air vents, unsuccessful exploratory pits,
etc.), size and depth of any mining pits or tailing
heaps;
b. Fill-in/reclamation procedures; setback
between the perimeter of any shaft; and any other
measures intended to protect the health, safety, and
welfare of people and structures.
c. The impact of any horizontal shafts on
construction and future health, safety and welfare
issues;
d. The location and number of soil borings
and depth necessary to confirm that building sites
are not impacted by any horizontal shafts; and
e. The allowable building envelopes and
location based on the geotechnical recommendations.
All development on the Property shall
comply with the recommendations of the accepted
report. Prior to final subdivision approval, the
developer shall submit to Environmental Engineering
evidence of compliance with the recommendation of the
geotechnical report. (EE)
13. Subdivision Phasing. Construction plan
approval for any future subdivision section with
access to either (i) Saville Chase Trail and/or (ii)
adjoining GPIN 708-700-4546 shall not be granted
before January 1, 2031. (P)
14. Construction Access & Signage for the Saville
Chase Trail Extension.
a. There shall be no construction vehicular
access to/from existing Saville Chase Trail until the
road and infrastructure construction activity is
complete, as determined by the Planning Department.
No construction vehicular access for the construction
of future dwellings shall be permitted if a through
road design is selected. Nothing herein shall
preclude vehicular construction access from Saville
Chase Trail for the construction of future dwellings
on the Property if the extended cul-de-sac design is
provided.
b. Prior to any land disturbance on the
property, temporary barricade(s) and sign(s) shall be
installed by the Owner/Developer at the Saville Chase
Trail stub-out terminus at the Property line to deter
and prevent construction traffic, as defined in
14.a., from using the stub-out. Sign(s) shall be
1/22/2025 Page 62 of 77
posted in English and Spanish that is clearly legible
from the public right of way. Sign(s) shall be
maintained by the Owner/Developer and shall remain
until road and infrastructure construction activity
is complete, as determined by the Planning
Department. The temporary barricade(s) shall remain
in place until removal of the barrier is required by
VDOT or the Transportation Department for public
street acceptance. (P)
15. Waiver Request for Saville Chase Trail
Extension. Prior to preliminary plat or construction
plan approval for that portion of the Property
adjacent to the Saville Chase Trail, whichever comes
first, the Developer shall submit a request to VDOT
for a waiver to allow the extended cul-de-sac design
shown on Exhibit A. If this waiver is granted, the
Developer shall provide the extended cul-de-sac
design. (P and T)
16. Vacation of Temporary Turnaround for Saville
Chase Trail. Upon vacation of the temporary
turnaround easement for Saville Chase Trail in
Hallsley, Section 25, the existing improvements
within the vacated easement area shall be graded and
restored with equal or better lawn/sod, irrigation,
stormwater/dwelling underdrains, and driveway
materials. (P)
17. Drainage for Individual Dwellings. A
certification for individual dwellings shall be
provided before the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy that certifies there is positive drainage
away from the foundation, and that grading on the lot
and drainage infrastructure conforms to the approved
plans. (EE)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
18. Public Hearings
A. To Consider Amendments to County Ordinance Regarding
Control of Animals and Leash Requirements
Lt. Col. Shand introduced the public hearing to
consider amendments to county ordinance regarding
control of animals and leash requirements.
Discussion ensued relative to the information
presented.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
Ms. Renae Eldred suggested a public service
announcement regarding the changes.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following ordinance:
1/22/2025 Page 63 of 77
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
REENACTING SECTIONS 4-2, 4-23, 4-26, 4-27, 4-29, AND
4-53 RELATIVE TO CONTROL OF ANIMALS AND LEASH
REQUIREMENTS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 4-2, 4-23, 4-26, 4-27, 4-29, and 4-
53 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997,
as amended, are amended and re-enacted, to read as
follows:
Chapter 4 ANIMALS AND POULTRY
ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS
O O O
Sec. 4-2. Boundary lines considered as lawful fences for certain animals.
The boundary line of each lot or tract of land within
the county shall be a lawful fence as to any
livestock or poultry, as defined in Sec. 4-21, infra.
It shall be unlawful for the owner or manager to
permit any livestock or poultry to run at large
beyond the boundaries of the tract of land where the
livestock or poultry is regularly confined.
O O O
ARTICLE III. ANIMALS
DIVISION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
O O O
Sec. 4-23. Running at large prohibited.
O O O
(c) For purposes of this section, a dog shall
be deemed to run at large while roaming or running
off the property of its owner or custodian and not
under its owner's or custodian's immediate control.
"Immediate control” is defined as a physical leash
directly connecting the dog to the owner/custodian or
under the direct control of the owner/custodian in
which the dog is clearly obedient to commands and
remains in close proximity to that person. While
on county-owned land, a physical leash directly
connecting the dog to its owner/custodian is required
unless in a designated and posted dog exercise/off
leash area. This section does not apply to dogs off
leash in privately owned designated and posted dog
exercise/off leash areas.K-9 working dogs, search and
rescue dogs, and dogs that are engaged with the owner
in lawful hunting, training for hunting or field
trials in conjunction with a hunting, training or
field trial seasons authorized by the Virginia
1/22/2025 Page 64 of 77
Department of Wildlife Resources as long as the dog
is wearing a collar with a tag showing the owner's
name, address and telephone number are exempt from
this section. Violation of this section constitutes
a class 4 misdemeanor punishable by a maximum fine of
$250.00. The owner or custodian of any dog found
running at large in a pack of other dogs running at
large shall be subject to a civil penalty of $100.00
per dog so found.
O O O
Sec. 4-26. When warden or officer may take charge of animals; notice and hearing to determine whether owner is fit person to care for animal; disposition of animal; disposition of proceeds upon sale.
O O O
(g) If the court finds that an agricultural
animal has been abandoned or cruelly treated, the
court may prohibit the possession or ownership of any
other agricultural animal by the owner of the
agricultural animal if the owner has exhibited a
pattern of abandoning or cruelly treating
agricultural animals as evidenced by previous
convictions of violating Code of Virginia, 3.2-6504,
or Code of Virginia, § 3.2-6570. In making a
determination to prohibit the possession or ownership
of agricultural animals, the court may take into
consideration the owner's mental and physical
condition.
O O O
Sec. 4-27. Compensation for livestock or poultry killed by dogs.
Any person who has any livestock or poultry killed or
injured by any dog not his own, while the dog is off
its owner's property, shall be entitled to receive
the fair market value of the livestock or poultry,
not to exceed $750.00 per livestock animal or $10.00
per poultry, provided, that: (i) the claimant has
furnished evidence within 60 days of discovery of the
quantity and value of the dead or injured livestock
or poultry and the reasons the claimant believes that
a dog caused the death or injury; (ii) that the
animal warden or other officer has been notified of
the incident within 72 hours of its discovery; and
(iii) the claimant has exhausted his legal remedies
against the dog's owner, if known. Exhaustion shall
mean a judgment against the dog's owner upon which an
execution has been returned unsatisfied.
If there are not sufficient funds in the dog license
tax fund to pay these claims, they shall be paid in
the order they are received when moneys become
available. Upon payment under this section, the board
of supervisors shall be subrogated to the livestock
or poultry owner's right of action against the dog's
owner to the extent of compensation paid and may
enforce this right in an action at law.
O O O
1/22/2025 Page 65 of 77
Sec. 4-29. Unlawful acts; penalties.
(a) The following shall be unlawful acts and
constitute class 4 misdemeanors:
O O O
(3) Running at large: For any dog
owner to allow his dog to run at large in violation
of sections 4-23(a) and 4-33; however, the minimum
fine for such violation shall be $50.00.
O O O
(9) For any person to violate the
provisions of article IV relating to rabies control.
However, the minimum fine for a violation of the
provisions of article IV shall be $75.00.
(10) For any person to permit any
livestock or poultry to run at large beyond the
boundaries of the tract of land where the livestock
is regularly confined, in violation of section 4-2.
O O O
ARTICLE IV. RABIES CONTROL
O O O
Sec. 4-53. Rabid animals.
O O O
(d) Any dog or cat for which no proof of
current rabies vaccination is available and which is
exposed to rabies through a bite, or through saliva
or central nervous system tissue, in a fresh open
wound or mucous membrane, by an animal believed to be
afflicted with rabies, shall be immediately confined
in a shelter, kennel or enclosure approved by the
director of the county health department for a period
not to exceed six months, at the expense of the
owner, at a cost of $12.00 per day for dogs and $6.00
per day for cats, provided that prior to release a
rabies vaccination shall be administered. Inactivated
rabies vaccine may be administered at the beginning
of confinement. If confinement is not feasible, the
dog or cat shall be euthanized by one of the methods
approved by the state veterinarian. If the dog or cat
exposed to rabies through saliva or central nervous
system tissue has proof of a valid rabies
vaccination, the dog or cat shall be revaccinated and
confined to the owner's premises for 45 days.
OOO
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon adoption.
1/22/2025 Page 66 of 77
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
B. To Consider Claim of Susan Bellanca for Surplus Tax
Sale Funds
Mr. Mincks introduced the public hearing to consider
the claim of Susan Bellanca for surplus tax sale
funds.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board approved the claim of Susan Bellanca for
surplus tax funds in the amount of $3,536.51.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
C. To Consider Conveyance of an Underground/Overhead
Easement to Virginia Electric and Power Company at
Point of Rocks Park
Ms. Lynn Snow, Real Property Manager, introduced the
public hearing to consider the conveyance of an
underground/overhead easement to Virginia Electric
and Power Company at Point of Rocks Park.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute
an agreement with Virginia Electric and Power Company
for an underground/overhead easement across property
in Point of Rocks Park.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
19. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
There were no speakers on unscheduled matters at this
time.
20. Adjournment
A. Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of
the Board of Supervisors
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adjourned at 10:05 p.m. to its regularly
scheduled meeting on February 26, 2025, at 2 p.m. in
Room 502 of the County Administration Building.
1/22/2025 Page 67 of 77
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Absent: Holland.
__________________________ ___________________________
Joseph P. Casey Jim A. Ingle
County Administrator Chairman
1/22/2025 Page 68 of 77
Citizen Comments Received Through the Comment Portal January 22, 2025 Board of Supervisors Meeting
Comment Type Comment Name District
Unscheduled
matter
I would like to hear an
update on the status of
county high school fields
being upgraded to artificial
turf
Nick
Nestlerode
Clover Hill
22SN0089 -
Thackers
View
Rezoning and
Exceptions -
Clover Hill
Please vote to DEFER the
Thacker Rezoing case to the
February 2025 Board of
Supervisor meeting.
This application remains
incomplete and inconsistent
per the community advocacy
group FOSCR - Friends of
Swift Creek Reservoir, and
myself.
Jessica Schneider-We NEED you
on this.
Tom Baker Clover Hill
24SN1209 -
Magnolia
Green Tract
CC Amendment
- Matoaca
This proposed Zoning
Amendment to the original MG
development plan would
dramatically alter the
originally intended
integrated vehicular and
pedestrian design approach of
a singular Town Square. This
holistic design approach can
be maintained while still
allowing for the construction
of the development in phases
consistent with the developer
requests.
The Amendment would allow for
the development of individual
phased projects with no
correlation to each other,
absolutely not the
requirements of the original
Development Plan.
The requested Amendment
should be denied and the
process restarted to much
more closely represent the
original requirements in a
much more inclusive and
transparent process allowing
for the participation of all
Magnolia Green residents.
Amado
Fernandez
Matoaca
24SN1209 -
Magnolia
Green Tract
CC Amendment
- Matoaca
I have been of strong belief
Tom Page and iStar’s end game
is to accelerate their exit
and expand their profits at
the expense of Magnolia Green
home owners. There are many
already existing examples of
this. Tom has dragged his
Paul Rowson Matoaca
1/22/2025 Page 69 of 77
Comment Type Comment Name District
feet on the maintenance of
community amenities. The HVAC
system at the Grille and Pro
Shop is woefully undersized
in tonnage to maintain even
OSHA ambient work temperature
standards for employees, let
alone community patrons. The
Pirate Playground at our
Aquatic Center is a child
safety issue and has become
an eyesore. The pool
furniture is insufficient
when at capacity and is in
disrepair. This will only
become worse as new homes and
resident families are added
to existing Magnolia Green
homeowners. The Farmers
Market is non-existent yet
still appears as a community
amenity in iStar’s online
marketing materials (see link
below):
https://magnoliagreen.com/the
-market/
We have no walking trails as
advertised (sidewalks along
major roads and in owner
maintained neighborhoods do
not constitute “nature
walking trails). We have no
health/gym facility as
advertised. And having been
an owner/general manager of a
restaurant and worked at
Marriott Corporate
Headquarters, I can tell you
that the iStar leased space
to The Cardinal is a flawed
business model that will most
likely fail before Tom Page
and iStar exit Magnolia Green
with their profits and leave
us residents with expenses.
The proposed plan for multi-
family housing exceeds the
residential zoning density
plan. The singular “Town
Center” design for the
commercial amenity iStar
advertised to attract
Magnolia Green home owners
under the new proposed plan
would allow iStar develop an
1/22/2025 Page 70 of 77
Comment Type Comment Name District
architecturally non-cohesive
460,000 square feet of
commercial property with
little-to-no concern for
resident’s needs.
These proposal on the table
is solely in iStar’s
financial interests. iStar is
relying on
Magnolia Green residents
being uninformed and unaware
of the extent of the negative
impact this land use and
development plan will have on
the quality of life and
property values of their
community. For public record,
the Board of Supervisors
should however be able to
discern the impact of the
proposed plan to Magnolia
Green residents and hold
iStar to plan.
24SN1209 -
Magnolia
Green Tract
CC Amendment
- Matoaca
While I support lifting
restrictions on retail/office
space square footage, I don’t
support waiving the
requirement for 50% of
retail/office space to be
under construction before
residential uses are
permitted. I also don’t
support elimination of the
requirement for an
“integrated schematic plan”
for the entire project.
This developer has a track
record of not delivering
promised amenities. The
developer marketed the
neighborhood as a resort-
style neighborhood complete
with a residents’ club and
fitness center coming in
2021. In late 2020, they
quietly removed the clubhouse
from the amenities list – not
because they couldn’t afford
it, but because they weren’t
required to build it – houses
were selling without it and
they had record sales in
2020.
If you allow the developer to
Richard
Latham
Matoaca
1/22/2025 Page 71 of 77
Comment Type Comment Name District
build apartments without
additional retail/office
space in an area that was
billed as “The Marketplace at
Magnolia Green,” the
marketplace will consist of
apartments and a daycare
center, that’s it. Not much
of a marketplace.
The developer wants to build
a 224-unit apartment complex
in an area totaling about
12.4 acres. This would exceed
current zoning restrictions
of 14 units per acre, which
would allow a maximum of 173
units for that one parcel.
They’re relying on the total
acreage for ALL parcels to
stay within density limits
for ONE parcel, but they want
to remove the requirement to
submit an integrated plan for
ALL parcels
You can’t have it both ways;
you can’t include all parcels
to stay within residential
density limits on one parcel
while ignoring how the
remaining parcels might
eventually be developed.
Also, allowing the parcels to
be developed in a piecemeal
fashion will lead to a
disjointed end product; think
Westchester Commons – part
strip mall, part town center,
not very walkable,
dysfunctional traffic flows,
and looks ridiculous!
Removing the requirement for
an integrated plan increases
the potential for housing
density limits to be
exceeded. The existing
daycare center was planned,
approved and expanded without
an integrated plan and in
violation of current zoning
restrictions regarding
retail/office square footage,
and nobody caught it.
Please do not allow (1)
1/22/2025 Page 72 of 77
Comment Type Comment Name District
residential uses on ANY
parcel without requiring
construction of additional
retail/office space, or (2)
individual parcels to be
developed without an
integrated plan for ALL
parcels.
24SN1209 -
Magnolia
Green Tract
CC Amendment
- Matoaca
Please do not expand the
amount of residence in the
planned apartments in
magnolia green near the
children's center. Magnolia
green is quickly becoming
overpopulated as it is And
that area specifically is
already too dense with the
apartments, aquatic center
and children's center all
within a mile of each other.
The increase in traffic will
probably already overwhelm
the plan infrastructure and
roads that are already built.
William Cole Matoaca
24SN1209 -
Magnolia
Green Tract
CC Amendment
- Matoaca
I am concerned that the space
is not sufficient for the
proposed 224 unit apartment
and will have negative impact
to the environment and public
safety.
Sanish Rai Midlothian
24SN1209 -
Magnolia
Green Tract
CC Amendment
- Matoaca
Please do not allow rezoning
for higher density apartment
units. Every resident of the
existing community I have
spoken to is strongly opposed
to it. Most citizens do not
have the time or awareness of
how their voice can be heard
and actually make a
difference, but I suspect if
you actually surveyed
residents, you would find an
overwhelming opposition to
this amendment and the
developer's intention. Please
listen to community members
instead of developers in this
instance. We do not believe
it is in the best interest of
Chesterfield County to allow
this type of development to
be built in the intended
location.
Trevor
Badorrek
Matoaca
1/22/2025 Page 73 of 77
Comment Type Comment Name District
Unscheduled
matter
Chairman Ingle, Members of
the Chesterfield Board of
Supervisors,
As you may know, on October
29th, 2024, the Friends of
Chesterfield conducted at
People's Hearing on Dominion
Energy's gas-fired power
plant after the Board
declined hear from its
residents on this major
electricity generation
facility. As the Board's
comment portal does not
provide for the submission of
attachments, I will be
sending an email to each of
you with the transcripts of
the testimony shared at that
October hearing attached. I
will reference that testimony
in my public comments to the
Board at your Wednesday,
January 22, 2025 meeting.
Sincerely,
Glen Besa
Glen Besa Dale
22SN0089 -
Thackers
View
Rezoning and
Exceptions -
Clover Hill
Please include file emailed
to Ryan Ramsey and
distributed to the Board of
Supervisors on January 21,
2025.
Kathleen
Medaries
Clover Hill
24SN1209 -
Magnolia
Green Tract
CC Amendment
- Matoaca
We live in the Magnolia Green
Townhomes, close to the
existing Glenmoore Oaks
apartments. Adding another
224 units across the street
will lower the value of our
homes and the quality of our
life. The tract should be
developed as planned. Even
another 173 rental units is
too much. Please deny this
zoning request. Thanks!
Terry
Finazzo
Matoaca
24SN1192 -
Ivymont
Square
Signage -
Dale
The Board of Supervisors need
to ask the Ivymount Shopping
Center to build a new
sidewalk along LeGorden Drive
and build a new 10 foot wide
path or sidewalk along Route
60.
Carl
Schwendeman
Midlothian
1/22/2025 Page 74 of 77
Comment Type Comment Name District
22SN0089 -
Thackers
View
Rezoning and
Exceptions -
Clover Hill
Board of Supervisors:
Thank you for your continued
hard work and dedication to
this zoning case for
Thacker's View. I truly
appreciate the progress made
with the additional proffered
conditions that support the
tree canopy, even though it's
not as much as initially
hoped. Your efforts regarding
the ordinances for RPA
violations are also
commendable.
However, I do feel that these
recent updates have come
through a bit too quickly. I
haven’t had sufficient time
to fully review the changes,
and there doesn’t appear to
be a clear solution presented
for the utility line issue.
Additionally, there seems to
be insufficient attention
being given to the wetlands
adjacent to Red Fern, and I’m
concerned about their
protection from potential
destruction, particularly for
a utility connector or any
other reason.
Given these concerns, I
respectfully request that you
consider deferring this
decision until more
stakeholders can come
together to reach a
consensus. This would ensure
that the plans are as
thoughtful and thorough as
possible before moving
forward, especially for a
project that will leave a
lasting legacy on the
reservoir.
I’m confident that by doing
this, you’ll be in a strong
position with the public to
ensure the best outcome for
everyone involved.
Once again, thank you for all
that you do on behalf of our
Paula Gordon Clover Hill
1/22/2025 Page 75 of 77
Comment Type Comment Name District
community. I understand these
decisions are not made
lightly, and I trust you will
continue to do everything
necessary to get this right
for all parties involved.
I urge you to defer.
Consider
Amendments
to County
Ordinance
Regarding
Control of
Animals and
Leash
Requirements
To ensure public safety and
prevent harm, I support a
significant increase in fines
for those who fail to comply
with leash laws. I have
neighbors in my area who let
their unfriendly dogs roam, I
ran into an off-leash dog
while running at Point of
Rocks Park just last week
whose owner was down by the
water birding and not within
100 yards of the dog. I was
also at a Chesterfield
playground with an owner with
two off-leash dogs over
Christmas break. I hope the
increased fines act as a
deterrent.
Jacilyn
Lipford
Dale
22SN0089 -
Thackers
View
Rezoning and
Exceptions -
Clover Hill
This case should be deferred
or voted No. The citizen
comments have not fully been
addressed. Additional
proffers were added on
January 17 2025 but the
community has not had a
chance to engage the
community on these. The
community needs more time for
engagement.
Kim Owens Matoaca
22SN0089 -
Thackers
View
Rezoning and
Exceptions -
Clover Hill
We are not interested in any
mthing but a potential
restaurant, the constant
reasoning and building of
high density homes, the
extension of 76 and the
congestion you all are
creating in our schools with
zero plans to accommodate the
population growth are
disgusting. We don’t want any
of this.
Kyle
Zawadzki
Clover Hill
1/22/2025 Page 76 of 77
Comment Type Comment Name District
22SN0089 -
Thackers
View
Rezoning and
Exceptions -
Clover Hill
Dr. Mr Ingle,
I tried to contribute a
public comment via the web
site earlier today but got an
error when trying on my
iPhone. (I can send a
screenshot if you need proof
I attempted this before the
deadline).
Here are my comments about
the Thacker View development.
I live on a lot adjacent to
Thacker View on the reservoir
on Clipper Cove Ct across the
small Rock Harbor inlet. This
development will directly
affect every household on
Clipper Cove Ct. as well as
the larger community.
Therefore, as an adjacent
property owner, I believe our
voice holds greater power.
The vote on the 22nd needs to
be to defer. There is not
enough clarity on recent
changes, not enough time for
the community to comment, and
several issues have still not
been addressed.
Townhouses do not meet the
requirements in the
countywide plan to be allowed
as an exception. In addition,
their height will exceed the
canopy and will violate a
standard of development on
the reservoir that developers
have maintained for 40 years.
Do not show rooftops above
the tree canopy.
If all of the other
developments that are on
Swift Creek Reservoir could
build on their land WITHOUT
townhomes, why can’t this
development follow suit?
Whether a board member sits
in Clover hill or not, this
development in Chesterfield
County is high visibility and
will be remembered by the
voting public.
Lisa
Disselkamp
Clover Hill
1/22/2025 Page 77 of 77
Comment Type Comment Name District
Please…..Defer and get this
Plan right.
Regards, Lisa Disselkamp