The URL can be used to link to this page

07-25-1968 Packeti .~ ~ ~ ~ ~. VI:GINli~: At an adjourned meeting of the l;oard of Sup`rvisors of Chesterfield County, held at the Courthouse on July 25, 1968 at 2:00 P.i:. Present: riir. Irvin G. HOrnc:r, Chairman I°ir. Lee Gordon, Comm. :atty. i`4r. H. C. Browning, Vice-Chr. Nir. Norris T~:ason, .ysst.Comm.~tty. Nir. J. Ruffin Appc-rson T~:r. Ho~~ard ~~. N1ayo,Jr.Co.Planner Mr. C. J. Purdy ~ T°:r. Robt. ia. Painter, Co. Eng. r1r. :~. R. Tartin P;r. Ni. ~;,i. Burnett, Exec. Secy. Nir. John E. Longmire,Asst.Exec.Sec'y Absent: i`~r. F. F. Dietsch On motion of PIr. Purdy, s condcd by T"ir. Apperson, the minutes of July 10 and 15, 1968 be and they hereby ar: approved, ivir. Robert Slocum, P'ir. Frank Hancock and i`ir. Larry Edwards, come b~_for` the Board and present a chack in the arnount of X13,317.36 being the County's share of the s<!le of timber from the Pocahontas State Park. tiJhereupon the Chairman thanks 'i4r. Slocum for his cooperation with the County and for the sizeable chick presented. l~'ir. R. V. Lancaster, comes before the Board to present i~,r. !-;. R. Davidson who is to replace Nir. Lancaster as the r2esident Engineer of the Highway D~partm~nt of Chestcrf icld County. Nir. Lancaster stat~a tht he is moving to Louisa County dui to the recent death of his father. ~,Jhereupon, the Chairman walcomes I~ir. Davidson and expresses to lir. Lancaster the good Vaishes of the Board of Supervisors. Upon furtha~r consideration and on motion of T..r. Apperson,seconded by T~:r. I~':artin, it is resolv~d that this Board publicly expresses its aT>preciation for the many courtesies shown the County by Nir. Lancaster and thanks him for his cooperation in the past ten years of service in the County. The Board states its best wishes for his continued success in his new position. The Executive Secretary read a resolution from the Sci.ool Board requesting that a water line be extended so that the High School in T~iidlothian could connect to the County's water system and it was cited that this line was in progress and would be bid very shortly. On motion of Nir. Apperson, sc-conded by Pir. Partin, it is resolved that this Board request the Judge of Circuit Court, the Honorable David Ivieade `~ihite, to appoint the following named p<_rsons as Police Gffic~rs for the County of Chesterfield: • Bernard Lo Cowardin, Jr. Robert G, Foster P:arvin L. Starnes Robert K. Harlow John 59 Thomas, Jr. And be it further resolved, th~.it CoI. E.F.Gill be and he hereby is authorized to appoint the follo~.~ring named persons as Dispatchers for the County of Chest;_r i~ld: Steve Arnold Dalton James 1`:iahael Dudley Douglas3ruce tdatson i`:r. `+Iilford H, Ball, comes before the Board speaking in behalf of ~ the ~3a11-Martin Insur=nee Agency who submitted a bid of b5600.00 for accident insurance for the volunteer firemen of the County, and it was cited that his bid was in complete accord with the specifications as written and that a bid from Mutual of Omaha was r lower but did not conform to the specifications desired. Upon consideration whereof and on motion of P'ir. l~±.artin, seconded by P4r. Apperson, it is r-asolvcd ti:r~t this Board accepts the bid of the Bell-Martin Insurance t,gcncy in the amount of `15600.00 for furnishing accident insurance to the Volunte~_r Fire Departments fcr one (1) year. P'lr. Jennings, owner of t~~ro exceptionally deep lots in Rivermont,requests a. Variance to build anothzr residence for a relative on the back portion of one of these lots. Gn motion of P4r. Purdy, seconded by 1:•.r. Bro~aaning, it is r;aolv~d that tizis matter be deferred to the next meeting with the understanding th~.t the Supervisor of the District will meet with Pair. J~:nnings on the site, The natter of acquiring a quit•-claim decd from the Commonwealth Gas Company across ~ o~bill load comes before the Board anti it was cited that the Gas Company had requested rather extensive construction to safe guard the gas line in question. Upon consideration whereof, and on moticn of PAY'. Apperson, seconded by P•~r. Browning, it is resolved that the Executive Secretary be authorized to eJrite a letter to the Ccmmon~a~alth Gas Company offering a V~~riance from the rcatrictions r:~quirad in said quit claim. There was read a letter from the Highway Department stating that the requested 45mph speed limit on Rt. 10, between Jessup Road and Belmont Road had ..een denied. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by l~s.r. Purdy, it is resolved that this Board requests the Highway Department to in~tull a 45 mph speed limit on Rt. 10, bet,•:een Chippenham Parkway and Belmont Road, - 2- r~ u There was read a letter from Nir. J.E.Har~•aood, Deputy Commissioner and Chief Engineer, Virginia Department of Highways, stating that he agreed with the Board's request to defer further improvements on Rt.147, between ~,.ioodmont and Ia.360, and to promote the further improvements on ~ ippenham Parkway. The Highway officially notified the County that North Pinetta Drive, from the end of maintenance of Route 755 at the intersection of Routes 755 and 2070 and running south 0.42 mile to Route 60, in the Brighton Green Subdivision, fictions 6 and 8, had been taken into the State Secondary System of roads. There was read a lettc_r from the Highway Department stating that the Board`s request for sirnal licPubs at the intersection of Rt. 10 and Bryce Lane and Itt.360 and Bryce Lane was denied. On motion of Pir. Broeming, seconded by Pir. Martin, it is resolved that the Engineering Department make a study of Bremo Street and make recommendations to the Bo:~rc9 of Supervisors concerning its improvement. On motion of I~~r. Purdy, seconded by A:r.Broumin;, it is resolved that water contracts AC-315C-Park Lee Apartments in the amount of $12,676,00 and A-432C-Meadowbrook +-ves , Sction "F '° in the amount of b10,153.00 be and they hereby are approved. On motion of I:r. t~.artin, seconded by I~'~r. i=urdy, it is resolved that this Board awards the contract C-492 for the installation of water to the Reams Road School to 5tamie E. Lyttle ~mpany, Inc. who submitted the lo~a ;yid of `v25, 465.00. i~4r. ~apman comes be:fcre the ~~oard in ;~eha.lf of a water line on ;.lmore Lane, Lot 18, i,lock °':,", in ':~endell r arms, _ and ~tat~s that before the house was built on said lot that the County had stated treater was available. The County Engineering Departm~_:nt st«tes that their recommendation to the Building Inspector showed the water line would be 160 feet from said lot. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of I~°:r.N.pperson, seconded by T~-i.r. Browning, it is resolved that water be mach available to Lot 18, on Elmore Lane at a cost of Si300.00 for a water connection. Gn motion of f.ro i~pf~erson, seconded by D~+r. P;artin, it is r.aolved tht the follo+~iing seca:~r ,..grocm~nts b~ and they her~:by are a;>_~roved: 5-68-20CD •- i~.e~~.dr.~adale, Scction~~C~~ 5-68-31D - :t. 60 anti Buford itoad -3- i ~ :.n motion of P'ir. F~urdy, s~condeci b;r i`-ir. ,~ppcrson, the following contracts are awarded: 1. 5-68-3C to the Standardsville Construction Co. for the inst~alation of sewers in the vuail Oaks area in the amount of X65,562.45, based on the use of cecncnt asbestos pipe. 2. 6511-69A (5-68-2CD) to the Roanoke Construction Company for the inst~~.llation of a portion of the Pocoshoclc Creek trunk sewer in the amount of :42,112.00 based on the usa of concrete pipe. 3. 6511-42A to Hollins, toward and Cochrane for the installation of sewers on Covington Road in the anwunt of 55675.80 based on the use of either concrete or C/~~ pipe It was cited to the Boaru th~,.t the bids on the Ivursin~ Home had been received at 2:00 P.t,. this c?ate and the lo~•:~~st apparent was the Bulifant Construction Company in the-~ amount of $1,077,000.00. It was further pointod out th•~~t the utility plannin: at the Courthouse had ch~~ncjed to a small degree which necessitated some ne:,ctiaticns between the lo~a bidder and -the tincjineerin~j Departin~nt. On motion of P4r. Apparson, seccnded by 1``ir. E~rouming, it is resolved that ti~is matter be referred to the Lngine~ring Department and that furthor action cn thy; bic:is for this facility be def erred to :august 14, 1968. Nir ~ Spooner Hull, P•~r .Cecil ~i'urnag2 and I~'irs. Vircinia Gordon come before the Board and iir< Hull presents a le~tcr outlining c,.rtain cha.ng~s in the handling of voter registrations in the County> It was pointed out th;:t the pres:~nt system was expensive and somewhat cumbersome and the office of the Central Registrar should bc_ changed to the office of the General .egistrar and a.ll Precinct Iregistrars would 'b :. classified as ,-assistant -registrars, each would be able to handle all registrations, howevar, transfers ---.nd absentee applications which bare to come through the General Registrar's office. All records would bo kept in the General r.egistrar!s office. H` further outlined a program for mass registrs.tion b=:ginning ijugust 24 ~Cnd ending Sept.28, 1968, using the facilities of the ir:= Department and a Trailer at the Southside Plaza. Upon consideration wher:~of and on motion of ::.,.-, D,artin, seconded by i~-ir. Apperson, it is r~solvcd that the recommendation of the County Electoral Board be approved. The allocation of funds for the inst_..llation of sewer projects cn Covington road, Lancers ,~oulevard, Pocoshock Creek and l,eams lead School were discussed by the County Engineer. It was generally agreed that these projects would be financed by sewer bond funds. -4- • On motion of iar. Apperson, seconded by l~~~r. i`,artin, it is r~:solved that this bard request the Commonwealth's i~.ttorney to advise the Hoard of the County's right to acquire adjacent localities to got pcrrnits before installing utility lines in the County's str~cts. Cn motion of r'ir. Purdy, seconded by [~~r.Browning, the following resolution is adopted: '..H~:itLt.S, the ,~:oard of Supervisors of Chesterfield County has heretofore determined tho necessity for acquiring permanent floodage easements ovor the her:~inaftcr described real estate for the construction of Swift Creek aeservoir as a public water supply for the people of Chesterfield County; ~;JHEF:;~..5, the County heretofore entered upon and took possession of the parcels hercinaf ter described ait~r first determining the- necessity of the project and the necessity of beginning construction of it prorntply; and uft~r giving due notice by rcgist~red mail to the hereinafter named owners of the property and rights of way the County intended to enter upon and take, which no :ice set forth -the compensation and damages offered by the County to each property owner; bJHr:i3~,~5, none of the proporty owners contested the County's taking in such fashion caithin thirty (30) days after receipt of notice- of the County's intention to so enter upon and take the property prior tc; institution of condemnation proceedings, nor haves any of the property owners contested the County's entry and possession as of this date; WHisR.:i1S, the County and the landowners hereinafter named were unable to agree as to the compensation and damages caused by such taking, and the County instituted condemnation proceedings after paying to the Clerk of the Circuit Court of this County for the benefit of the respective lando~rners such sum as this Board estim~aed. to be a fair value of the easements taken and damages done; 6•JHL:R:~i>.S, the condemnation petitions filed against the landowners were each dismissed on the ground that the County did not first make a bona fide effort to ~~urchase the rights sought; ~riH:~R:..15, the Supreme Court of ilppeals of Virginia has denied the County a ~orit of error to the action cf the Circuit Court of this County in dismissing the condemn ation proceedings; _ bv'HEitr 1\.J, the bounty desires to make neoJ offers for the rights sought and to proceed promptly with condemnation if agreem<.nt with the owners cannot be reached. NGt~:++, THLKLFC`,; i3._. IT R~SC'LV,:17 by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: That the perpetual floodage easements to be acquired from the property owners shall provide for the mutual rights set forth in the 'Swift ;reek ~ asem~nt Form` attached hereto and made a part hereof. -5- • That it is the estimate of the Hoard that the following sums represent the fair v~.lue of the easements taken and damages dcne as a result thereof: (1) (:;;2,442.60) for a perpetual flooding Basement in, over, upon and across lands of Dorothy i``:ay Phillips Furman in Clover Hiil District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, containing 8.0 acres, and being more particularly shown on a plat made by LaPrade Bros.,Civil~ngineers, :ichmond, Virginia, dateu P~iay 3, 1965, revised July 22, 1965, together with a perpetual easement for a road across said lands of the landowner as shown on said plat and for damac: es ; (2) (11,381y00) for a perpetual flooding easement in, over, upon and across lands of Howard ~;. and Virginia V. Hancock in Clover mill District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, containing 89.1 acres, and ;.~eing more particularly shown on a plat m~:de by LaPrade Bros. ,Civil En~.jine.:rs, 1~Cchmond, ~,lirginia, dated February 9, 1965, revised ;april 1, 1965, together with a perpetual easement for a road across said lands of the landowner as shown on said plat, and for damages. (3) (x12,332.00) for a perpetual flooding easement in, over, upon and across lands of H.'~d.Hancock in Qover Hill District, Chesterfield County, ~II.rginia, containing 31.9 acres, and being more particularly shown on a plat made by LaPrade Bros.,Civil :~n;ineers, r: ichmond,Virginia, dated .t~pril 19, 1965, revised July 22, 1965,together with a perpetual easement for a road across said lands of the landowner as shown cn said plat, and for damages. (~r) 05,645.00) for a perpetual flooding easement in, over, upon and across lands of Howard LJ. Hancock in Clover Hill District, Q`~esterf field County, Virginia, containing 14.2 acres, and being more particularly shown on a plat made by LaPr~sde Bros.,Civil Enginecr~, Richmond, Virginia, dated D=cember 3, 1965,together with a perpetual easement for a road across said l~_nds of the landawn~:.r as shown on said plat, and for damal~es. (5) (b3,450.00) for a perpetual flooding easement in, over, upon and across lands of Ilooaard '~~. and i-Io~,rard Francis Hancock in Clover Hill District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, containing 9.1 ages, and being more particularly shoum on a plat made by LaPrade Bros., Civil Engineers, Richmond, Virginia, datod D~:cernber 3, 1965, and for damages. (6) 0 9,761.00) for a perpetual floodincj easement in, over, upon and across lands of R. H. and R=uth H.Rose in I~:idlothian District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, containing 57.2 acres, and l.~ing rnore particularly shown on a plat made by LaPrade Bros.,Civil Engineers, Richmond, Vir infix, dated ''ebruary 9, 1965, revised I~'iarch 18, 1965 _6_ N ,° and Niarch 25, 1965, together Faith a p~rhetual easement across said lands of the landoGan~rs as shown on said plat, and for damages, (7) (y5,358.00) for a perpetual flooding easement in, over, upon and across lands of ~i'homas T, and Tabitha Patterson 5t. Clair in Clov~:r Hill District, Chesterfi;ld County, Virginia,' containing 21.7 acres, and being rnor~ particularly shoarn on a plat mad c- by LaPrade Bros, ,Civil engineers, Richmond, ~rg~.nia, dated iz~;ril 19, 1965, and for damages. (8) (>2,18~~.00) for a perpetual flooding easement in, over, upon and across lands of Stanley and Elizabeth C. Smith,Jr., in Clover Hill District, Chesterfiead County, Virginia, containing 15.4 acres, and being more particularly shown on a plat made by LaPrade Bros., Civil Engineers, Richmond, Virginia, dried Niarch 26, 1965, revised May 3, 1965, and for damages, (9) ($500.00) for a perpc-tual easement in, over, upon and across the lands of Joseph E. and Iris H.Vaden in Q over Hi1lDistrict, Che:>terfield County, Virginia, containing 0.18 acre, more or less, and bein; more particularly shown on a plat r~adc by LaPrade Bros.,Civil Engineers, Richmond, Virginia, dated December 3, 1965,, and for damages, That the Ex:~cutive Secretary of the Board is directed to make written offers to the abov~_ property owners for the rights taken by the County for the sums above st out; That the County Engineer or his representative is directed to negotiate personally for the purch~.~se of said easements from the landowners for he sums respectively authorized hereby, and if he is unable to acquire the same b,~ purchase, the Commonwealth's attorney and '~~oods, .:ogera, 1~-Suse, tdalker and Thornton, :-attorneys, are authorized to institute the necessary legal procdedings on behalf of the County to acquire said easements by the ~~ccrcise of the right of eminent domain, and to do all things necessary to acquire the easements herein directed to be acquired, That the Cler)c of this Board is authorized, when requested to do~so by the Commonoasalth's Atcorncy, to deposit with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of this .County the following sums, which, when added to the amounts previously paid for the benefit of the property owners, equal to the Board's estimate of the total value of easements taken and damages for each respective parcel: Parcel No. Owner Additional Sum to Be Paid _ ,,,..,., Clerk 2 Dorothy i~iay Ph~.tlips Furman $1, 763.10 3 Howard bb and Jirainia V, Hancock 5,778,00 4 H>tr,1. Hancock 3,022.00 5 Howard UI. Hancock 6 Howard 6J. and Howard Francis 1,143.00 7 R. H, and Rath H.Ftose 3, 326.00 8 Thomas T. ~< Tabith Patterson H;. Clair 3, 270.50 - 7- D • • 9 Stanley and Elizabeth C.Smith, Jr, $ 874,00 Joseph E: and Iris H.Vaden 500,00 On motion of P~.r. Broiming, seconded by A'r. Purdy, it is resolved that the ~h;ine~ring Department be autheriz2d to institute condemnation proceedings against the followinj property own::rs: C. H. Bollinger - Projict 6511-3/5 - Uf~er X39.00 J, I. ,archer - Proj~~c't 6511-3/5A - i;zfer 70,00 Un motion of A•1r. Y.pperson, seconded by Nir. ~'urd.y, it is rresolved that the follo!aing erroneous tax claims b~ and they ler,_':~y ,ire:: ~..;.;-rcv~..;~ for payment: Leslie L. l~•iason, Jr. Land Cc. of Virginia James D. Damcron &: i~~ary L. Dame:ron Constance Narie Earley Edward L, Holcombe E.S.Hague !;~illiam i~. Thomas Jerry M. Spencer Gregory Pierce United States Gypsum Co, for C.L. Hayes `lestlake Hills, Inc. '.:destlake Hi11s,.Inc. ,:>iestlake Mills, Inc. H~.rold Ni. `T'aylor, Jr. Harold 1;. Taylor, Jr. Ercell Barden Shore L""award F. Schmidt, et al Herman L. ~: Audrey E. Mays .isscssm~nt for first half of 1968 $12.40 rssessm~nt for first half of 1968 8,06 r,ssessmcnt first half of 1968 11.47 1968 Co.motor vehicle license plate 10.00 1968 Co. motor vehicle license 10.00 1968 Contractor license 10.13 1968 Trailer Park License 25,00 1968 Co. motor vehicle license plate 10.00 1968 Co. motor vehicle license plate 10.00 1968 Co, motor vehicle license plate 10.00 :.ss~ssment for first half of 1968 13,64 asessment for first half of 1968 13,64 :assessment for first half of 1968 13.64 risscssment for first half of 1968 6.51 Assessment for first half of 1968 6.51 fissessment for first half of 1968 17,36 First and second half of 1968 8,06 iasessment for first half of 1968 6.51 There was a general discussion of a letter from Hubbard Idal Estate Company concerning permission to connect 58-acres of land to the Shenandoah Sewage Pumping Station and it w,~s generally agreed that -8- the Engineering Department would investigate this matter further and make recommendations. It was generally agreed that the Engineering Department would make an estimate of the cost of moving a fire hydrant in front of the home of Mr. Charles Jones on Southmoor I'.oad. T~:r. Robert Bowlin comes before the Board requesting some improvements to the drainage condition presently existing on Aldridge iwnue. T~Ir. Purdy C1te8 she reasons :for the problem and tine necessity far accomplishing some improvements. Upon consideration wharcof, and on motion of Ttr. Purdy, seconded by IuTr. Browning, it is resolved th~:it the Engineering. Department be requested to study the i~ldridge I~enue dr~ainag: problem, to present a plan whereby the problem can be eliminated and to acquire necessary easements for the drain:!.ge of same. A Deed was presented for acceptance of Little R>ad and the Engineering Department requested that acceptance be deferred until further investi- gation could be made concerning cert~.in drainage easements. On motion of lair. Apperson, seconded by i~~ir. Purdy, it is hereby resolved that the Clerk of this Board submit a request to the Virginia i-alcoholic Bevers.ge Control Board to extend the hours for the sale of beer and wine in the County of Che:>terfield from the present hours of 6:00 A.I,. to 11:00 P.P~i. to 6:00 A.T~i. to 12:00 P.Di. Iidnight for each week day except Sunday, It is here noted that Pair. Apperson and Pair. Purdy vote tye. P:r. Martin votes Nay. P~:r. Browning abstains from voting. There was read a letter of commendation for be Fire Marshal of the County, rir. Robert L.Eanes, from the Allied 2~emical Corporation. There was read an exchang^ of letters betcae~~n the ~eriff and the Executive Secretary of the Compense,tion Board concerning the use of the Sheriff's car in the operation of the Sheriff's office. It was generally agreed that the Executive Secretary write to the Sheriff in-L-owning him of the County's policy concerning th~a use of County cars. On motion of Tir. P'iartin, seconded by P~ir. Purdy, it is resolved that the Treaurer of the County be and he hereby is requested to transfer the sum of X2550.00 from 061=102 to 061-400.1. ~`.nd the Treasurer is further requested to transfer the sum of :5000.00 from the unappropriated surplus of the Gener~_1 Fund to 061-400.1 in the budget of the Police Department. On motion of P.r. Apperson, seconded by P.r. i.artin, it is resolved that the Trea_~urer of the County be and he hereby is requested to transfer -9- • • \ the sum of $540.00 from the unappropriated surplus of the General Fund to 104-249 in the County Planner's budget. And be it further resolved, that the sum of $15,000,00 be appropriated from the surplus of the County Planner's budget in order to pay the Richmond P.egional Planning Commission. On motion of Phr. Browning and P~~r. A4artin, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that the following Ordinance be approved for advertising for a public hearing at 7:00 P.P1. on September 9, 1960. AN ORDINANCE to repeal Chapter 2, Article 3, Sections 2-5.2 and 2-5.3 and to amend and reordain Section 2-5 to prohibit dogs from running at large in the County of Chesterfield, and Section 2-5.1 to provide for the i~apoundment of said dogs in violation of Section 2-5, and Section 2-11 to provide foY• a dog license tax, and Section 2_14 to provide for confinement and disposition of dogs. BE IT OP.DAINED BY THE BOAP,D OF 5UFERVISOt.S OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA: 1. That Chapter 2, Article 3, Section 2-5 and Section 2-5.1 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield be and it is Hereby amended and reordained to read as follows: Section 2-5 DOGS RUtJNING AT LARGE It shall be unlawful to permit any dog to run at large within the boundaries of the County at any time during any month of the year, For the purpose of this section, a dog shall be deemed to run at large while roaming, running pr self-hunting off the property of its owner or custodian and not under its owner's or custodian's immediate control. It shall be the duty of the Dog Warden, Deputy Dog 6~?arden or Police Officers to enforce the provisions of this ordinance, and any person who permits his dog to run at large shall be deemed to have violated the provisions of this section, and shall be liable to a fine of not less than five nor .more than twenty-five dollars for each violation. Section 2-5.1 Ih1POUNDNIENT OF DOGS IP7 VIOLATION OF SECTION 2.5 It shall be the duty of the Dog Warden, Deputy Dog V;Tardens or Police Officers of the County of Chesterfield to cause all dogs found running at large in violation of Section 2-5 to be caught and penned up in the County Dog Pound. The Dog TrJarden, Deputy Dog T.~aardens or Police Officers shall rzal;e every effort to determine ownership of tl:e confined dog and notify the owner of its whereabouts. 2. That Chapter 2, Article 3, Section 2-11 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield ;3e and it is hereby amended and reordained to read as follows: Section 2-11 LICENSES ; TERP~i; FEES It shalt be unlawful for any person to o~an a dog four months old or over, unless such dog is licensed, as required by this section, Dog licenses shall run by the calendar year from January first to December thirty-first, inclusive, and the license tax shall be payable -10- • s on or before February 1 of each license year at the office of the County Treasurer and shall be as follows; Male-For a male dog, three dollars Unsexed Female _ For an unsexed female dog, three dollars Female - For a female doq, twee dollars Kennel, for twenty dogs - For a kennel of twenty dogs, fifteen dollars Kennel, for fifty dogs - For a kennel of fifty dogs, twenty five dollars. Funds collected in the enforement of this section shall be disposed of in the same manner as dog license fees, 3. That Chapter 2, Article 3, Section 2-14, paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of the Code of tyre County of Ci~resterfield be and it is hereby amend- ed and reordained to read as follows; Section 2-14 CONFINEhiEPdT AND DISPOSITIOP7 OF DOGS; P,EDEP~'!PTION BY OfJNER; PGUND CHAP.GES . (a) The Dog ?Darden strall cause to be constructed and maintained a pound or enclosure and shall require dogs running at large contrary to the provisions of this chapter to be confined therein. Any doq c:~Y,ich has been so confined for a period of ten days and has not been claimed by the owner thereof may be destroyed by the Dog Warden or otherwise disposed of in accordance with this section; provided, however dogs confined with tags shall not be destroyed until the .owner of such dog has been notified in writing by certif ied mail at least fifteen days prior to the destruction of the dog. Such notice requirement shall be deemed sufficient when mailed to the owner's address as it appears on record in the County Treasurers Office. tb) Any dog found in tyre County not vaccinated or not wearing an authentic vaccination taq or license tag as provided in this chapter shall be impounded by tY'ie Doq Warden, Deputy Dog Warden or Police Officer. (c) Any dog confined under any of the provisions of this Chapter may be redeemed by its owner at any time after confinement, if such dog has not been otherwise disposed of under ttre provisions of this section, upon payment of tyre proper fees, Pdo doq shall be released to any person claiming ownership until proof of current dog license receipt or tag and current valid vaccination certificate are presented, and by payment to tPre Doq FJarden of a fee in the amount of $1.50 if claimed dur- ing the first 24 hours of impoundment and $.50 for each additional day thereof ter . Funds collected under this section shall ?~e disposed of in the same manner as dog license fees. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage as provided by law. It is here noted that Mr. Horner votes No. -11- There was read a letter from Pir. P+I. W. Cosby requesting the right to dump in ttie Chesterfield landfills. It was generally agreed that this matter would be handled in routine fashion and an investigation be made of paying Personal Property Taxes on moving vans in question. There was discussed a proposal for parking spaces upon the completion of the new Court's addition. It was generally ae~reed that approval would be sought from the Hightaay Department. On motion of Pir. Martin, seconded by P.r.Purdy, it is resolved that Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors is in substantial agreement with the proposed alignment and design of: Route 147 - Project 0147-020-101 P.oute 711 - Project 0711-020.140 as presented by the Virginia Department of Highways on July 2, 1968, This resolution is passed to show the Board's support for the projects as presented and does not Change the July 10, 1968 resolution of the Board asking for a lower priority on these projects. A discussion was held concerning the request to purchase Post Office boxes for each Department and a further study caas requested on this matter. On motion of Mr. Browning, seconded by PRr. Purdy, it is resolved that the appointments of the Chairman of P-ir. f~artin and Mr. Apperson as additional members from the Board of Supervisors to the P.ichmond Regional Planning Commission be and it hereby is approved. On motion of tor. Martin, seconded by P9r. Apperson, it is resolved that the Building Inspector be and tae hereby is authorized to issue a bLiilding per- mit to Pair. Trammel who requested the right to construct a dwellinr~ on an unimproved section of Lucks Lane, subject to the granting by Mr. Trammel of sufficient right of taay for the construction of this road. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by N~;:. Purdy, it is resolved that this Board request the Highceay Department to study the intersection of Selwood and Vauxhall roads and to erect a Stop sign to eliminate the traffic hazard presently existing. There was a brief discussion on the Committee to be appointed to promote the establishment of an airport in the County and it was generally agreed that a list of names would be presented by P4r. PRayo at the next meeting of the Board. On motion of PRr. Browning, seconded by Fair. Purdy, it is resolved that this Board adjourn at 7e30 P.bi. until 9:00 A.F7, on August 14, 1968. -12- COj.:;i~.icw~ht 1LTH OF VIRGINIA ~ ' ~ ~ 0 I CO DUPLI ATE 1.68 300M SETS ~ Purchase Order (Name and address of S[a[e Agency receiving goals or service) Itegal$Itian No. r' ^, June, 1968 Date of invoice SOLD VIRGINIA CIVISIOId OF FORESTRY Flaw Shipped ~O p. O. BOX 3 758 Terms and discount ~ CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22903 (Name and address of Vendor) Treasurer, Chesterfield County 13Y C/0 G. W. Dean, State Forester Box 3758, Charlottesville, Virginia L J STATEMENT OF VENDOR'S ACCOUNT CHECK IN PAYMENT ENCLOSED DATE OF SHIPMENT OR DESCRIPTION OF ARTICLES OR SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE gMOUNT LEAVE BLANK SERVICE __ 7/1/67 _ One fourth gross proceeds Berived" from the 6J30/68 Pocahontas Forest in Chesterfield County in 13,317 36 accordance with provision of section 426 of y Michie`s Code. ' J VENDORS SHOULD NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE ~ VENDOR'S TOTAL 13,317 3b Remarks DEDUCTIONS Discounts ~f - ....._......... o -------- -- Other (Specify) June, 1968 .......... . .. ...... . ........................ L.... r. -° -- --- Amount certified for payment 13.317 36 -...-.-~.. r/lv ~..-T IV IJ/J~/•JV The enclosed check is in payment of the account as stated above. Any errors should be brought promptly to the attention of the State Treas- urer Y. O. Box 6 FfOdtr2~nR~1~, Va. and this check returned with the statement. An endorsed check constitutes evidence of payment: no further receipt is tequrred. Chtef Fiscai Officer ~- -- /%~q.151F~17j~> J ~~~~ J~~~ ~~\ ~~~C, 19 ~8 ~ B~a,~ArI~EO :~ 1 c9 NfSI£,~ ,7,psa~l ~~l -~QD~~~~" VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting of the Chesterfield County School Board held Wednesday evening, July 10, 1968, at 8 o'clock, in the county courtroom. PRESENT: Mr. G. L. Crump, Chairman Mr. J. W. Russell, Vice-Chairman Mr. C. C. Wells Mr. C. D. Spencer Mr. W. H. Goodwyn Mr. R. P. Eagles On motion of Mr. Russell, the school board directed that the board of supervisors be respectfully requested to run the water line as far as the high school in Midlothian, Virginia, in order that the school board might connect to the county water system. yl! 4 _ W. C. Dance, Clerk A copy: teste - C , J • E. T. SrnirK CAPTAIN OF DETECTIVES R. W. KOCH CAPTAIN OF POLICE COLON e~ E. P. GaL CNIEF OF POLICE COUNTY O F C H E S T E R F I E L D CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA P O L I C E D E P A R T M E N T July 17, 1968 Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield Chesterfield Courthouse Chesterfield,_Virginia 23832 Gentlemen: I ~Pd.sh to recommend the folloroti.ng persons be appointed as police officers for Chesterfield County: Bernard F. Cowardin, Jr. ~ Robert G. Foster Marvin L. Starnes ti- ' Robert K. Harlow John S..~homas, Jr. Respectfully yours, Colonel E. P. Gill Chief of Police EPG~bsl • E. T. SMlix CAPTAIN OF DETECTIVES R. W. Kocx ' CAPTAIN OF POLICE COLONEL E. P. GILL CHIEF OF POLICE C O U N T Y O F C H E S T E R F I E L D CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA P O L I C E D E P A R T M E N T July 17, 1968 Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield Chesterfield Courthouse Chesterfield,_Virginia Gentlemen: I wish to recommend the following persons be appointed as police dispatchers for the County of Chesterfield: .~ . Steve Arnold Dalton James Michael.Dudley Douglas Bruce Watson ' Respectfully yours, Colonel E. P. Gill Chief of Police EPG/bsl I July 17, 1968 Mr. M, W. Burnett Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: Four of the new police officers I am recommending are the one approved in the 1968-69 budget. The other one is to fill a vacany created by the resignation of E. M. O~Neill. Three of these men are police dispatchers, one is one of our Special Police Officers and the other is a Dog Warden. Very truly yours, ~~s~-~~ Colonel E. P. Gill Chief of Police .J ~~ ~. ... 109 Orange Hill Avenue Ettrick, Virginia July 15, 1968 Colonel Edgar P, Gill, County of Chesterfield, Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Colonel Gill: Chief of Police, I hereby tender my resignation from the Chesterfield County Polic® Department effective August 31. P€y reason for resigning is that I feel my career is limited and 2 have a need for more income and greater opportunity. I have been fortunate in obtaining a position with The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America as a Field Representative. I have enjoyed my position as patrolman with the County Polies Department the past 8-1/2 years and will miss my association with the people of this department. I hope to continue my good relations with the men of the department and all emplogees of the County with whom I have worked during my employment with the County. I hope my service has been satisfactory as I feel I have always tried to represent the Department in its best interest to the public. If I can be of any assistance to the Department in any matter in the future, please do not hesitate to let me know. I would like to take my accumulated vacation and compensatory time during the month of August. Certainly I will be available foz court and/or any other need you may have of my services which may arise between now and August 31. Very truly yours, ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ E, ?~rlin O~Neill ~ , ~ o ! ~ ~ ~ b7 ~ fi ~' ; O O K ~ hi C7 'c i~ ! I ~ N N ~ ! ~ ~ H f..~ ~i~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ I ~ f ~ ~ !ro ~ ( ~p ~ . ~ ~ ' • ~ O ~ ~ H ~~3 I I ~ I I I i~ I I I t - ~ ~ H H H s, ` ~ ~ , j I I ri I ~'~ ~••• JE 't/• N rn ~ ~ ~ p !W G t7 O O H ~ H 'x ~ ~. I f I ~ I j i ~ \ ( I I I `I I"7• a n m n chi ~ n ~ ~ o S i ( ~ a ~ ! i ~ ~'~ , to ~ t`A ! ~ C , N t rr ~ j n w ~ m y y ~ I t ~ ~ ? ' rLa ~ I ! IN ~ I N N 1r• ~ m n ! r• N ~ p' ~ ~ ~ ~ cdo ~ ~ ~o, !~ ~ I i • I I a ~A 'p ~ ~ k~ I ~ N o h, i ~' ~ IG ~ ! i o ; r• j ~ W ir• ~ iw r n j r• IfD f a ~ , ~ fD ~ 'rt' i i N ~ ~ rt t-, r w ~ ~ ~' rn ~ f t r• ~ i ~ IN ~n I~ rn ~ w I , 3 n ~ ~ ~, G I~ ~ I ~~ ~~ ~ o • ; ~ ~~ I ~ i ~ - ~ ^ ~~ vt' i ; •• ~ i a Ball-Martin Ins. Agency Inc, t ~ ' I la ~ ; I ` t ~ ~,~ ~~ 108 Cowardin Ave. i i i I I I o h ; a ~ a n rg Richmond, V ~ I o l +0 ;0 ~ 4 C ~ I ~ I ~''A in, , I ~,u a I Graham H. Bruce Agency ! ' ~ ~„"00 ~~ ( ~ o a ti i P . 0 . Box 1213 , f ` I II o to I , ~ ~ i Richmodd, Virginia 23209 i ~ I ~ o _ j h ~ a ~ i ~ ~ Bulifant Insurance Center ` f i ~ ~~ i°~ ~ i m I i o " ~2 . P.O. Box 35, ' ! i ~ i ~`'~ ~ ~~ i b z ( I ~ ~ j ' ; d " Colonial Heights, Va. i ~ ~ , N I a a!~ '" © ~ ,~ ~~ ` ~Lw ~ ~~ ~' .o ` to a ~ I ~ ( ~ ~~~ o I ~ ~ ~I I „ I I Goddin-Goodridge& Rob o tson Box 422 c c w ~ m. ti ! h ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ P ~ , 910 Mutual Bldg ~; y ' '~ -~ ---~- l ~ I ro ;~ ( "~ h ~ . j ~` ` ~+ ' . , Richmond Vir inia ~ k I i ~ I I Hartford Insurance ~r~any '_ y ~' I ~I i ?~ l i I I j ! ~ ~ ~ Tower Building '~ O Richmond, Virginia ro p t ~ i I , i I I Z C .~~~n3...""" Life Insurance Co. ~~ a. , I ~ ~ I I I ; { I i j ~ ~ 914 Capitol y Richmond, Virginia o ~ Mutua o ma a I I a Ira P. Cromer & Associates ' I ' I I i ~ ` a a 4020 W. Broad St., inia Vir nd h Ri • I b A g , mo c . ~ __t _.__. , i ,:, ,~ • ~ <,~? y 1 ~ ~ i ~ -~ Mutttal~alrisurers:, aznc . Lo . ~, ;a a n ~ ~ Ca { N ~~ b 517 West Grace St. , t ~- ~ ~ • ~ , ~ o L Richmond, Va. ~ ~ ! j .~ ~ 3 ~ Nationwi a Insurance Co. ~. ~ ! 1 I ~ ~ ~~ ~ c/o Leo Myers, Agent ` ~ ! I ( ~1 9: 4232 Old Hundred Road ! i ~ i ~ i Chester, Va. t I I C ! , ~ I o., ~ Prudential Insurance j ~ 50001 W. Broad St., f ~ ~ Richmond, Va. ~ I ( ! r- .i• 1" ~ ., " .:w , 0 it I ~; 6 ~ ( to ~ ~ i ~ IH,,J d + ~..,,~. ~ ~ ~ ~(D -~nr ~ a ~~r in O n .`~ m ,o ro r~ c c • ~ ~i H H ~ ~ , H ~ ( ! ~ ~ rn ~ u FC J '~' Z Y 1 ~ ~ f ~ ( ~ ro (~ S k ~ N M O ~ G ~~ ~r ., H O 7 O H H ~7 ~ ~ I I H ' ' ~ O ~ M m la H Z ~ '~~ '~ ~ ~ I I t ( ~ ~ ( , t ; i ~ t { E r• ~ ~~ ,. ~ o' r (D m n ~ I~ io y [~ ~ b z ~ ~ o ' I ~ ~ ` i I I i ' ID ' ~ i rNr ro ~°• ~ `° H ' } ( f ~+' '~ iN t ~ o ro r• ~ ;w '~ ~ d ! ro ~ ~ ' i ~ r ~ I ~ I ~ n ru n ~ - i ! I ~ ~ ~ I ! ~ . ~M~r• ( ~ ' ~ ~ i~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , N tC , ~ ~N G ~ , p ~ I I >v to _. , j + ~ ~' ~ ~ ~` ( _ r ~ ~ i ~ I { i ( (~~ ~ , I " t~ o ~o I. ~ ~ •• ; i I +~a ~ ~ : ',~~ I~ i ~~ ~ Tabb-Brockenbrough Rayland 1112 E. Main St. , ~ ~ ~ ~ i I I o ~ i ; j V ~ Richmond, Va. 23204 ~ __ ~ ~ .. I ~ I i I ; i I ;o The Travelers Insurance ~. I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ` ` I ~ ! I j ,~ ~' P.O. Box 2430 inia Vir Richmond I ~ I ' ' , g J ) ~ '• i~ i ' i --=--'---ti --r-- i i I i~ i ! ~ i i i j ~ ~ ( I ;.. ~ i i i ! ~ ~ I 1 Cn o ~ i I { 4 I i ~ li ~ y ~ li [[~ ~ y ----1_~_--~-_ f ~ ~ f I ~o ( ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ! '~ ~ ' i ' I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ ~ ~ ~ oy `I l ~ ~ ' I ~ I ~ H I ( ( I I I I i H H ° r 1 i z i i , _ ~ ! ( I I ' ! ~. _.._r_.-.s « 1 ~ .._._.I ~ .___.x ~ `` I _J ~ ~ J ~ ~ ! 1 ' f I~ _ _i__ I ~ ~ ~ ( { ` ~ ~ ( _ -_- ~ ~ _.1 -, _ I ~I . ~ I f I ~! ` 1 i ~ ~ ' ~ ! , F , ~. :. .:.J:i'u F:iIE :':.'.I F"t1n"u:E y:4.V hn 1' i:kC.: :: R.^ :~..-C:GEFi:1+:~+~~~:..C:~:n LAITY ^.O.A.'i.:<V /.>?=pR:, :~ t' tl!6Ji:hn:CE COMPANY ~' i T:.r VY ', i ~~r i` /I~ MS` :~ 4 ,- -~ 3,.y~,Pr CITIZEN6 INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY NEW YORK UNUERWRITER61N6URANCE COMPANY TWIN OITY PIRE INBURANCE COMPANY THE HARTFORD I1~TSURANCE GROUP HA RTFC RD, CONNECTICUT O6fi5 RICHMOND REGIONAL OFFICE 9212 CUTSHAW AVENUE. RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23230 TELEPHONa: 3:.6-433 June 14, 1968 C. G. Manuel -- Purchasing Clerk Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Aear Mr. Manuel: RE: Accident Insurance for Volunteer Fireman County of Chesterfield, Chesterfield, Virgnia In~r~tation r: 63-1ll6-1310 This is to advise you that the bid submitted on behalf of our company by Ball-Martin Insurance A;ency showing as annual premium of $5600. and a preoaid three year premium of $15,000. is correct. For your information the rating information shown on the brochure you received is a guide and does not include sating factors sometimes used ; to reflect credits for large Volunteer Fire Departments. Our bid price indicated above is a firm bid and the coverage will be pro- vided at the bid price in the event you elect to place the coverage with our Company. - -- - Yours truly, - - eff .Wells Manager ~. ~ L~_L/ ,,, JCW:md cc: Ball-Martin Ins. Agcy., Inc. Richmond, Virginia !~ ...; ~' N1 ~ c9ffTfa,F ~ 1g68ca iE~ ,~, ccaciigsi;GOfT ry~ `f.~ .. YEAR IN AND YEAR OUT YOU'LL DO WELL W4TH THE HARTFORD I I .. `.,~ . . - ~pM~pNV~'~ai.a ~- pF VIRGIN ~ ~:;_ ~~~ I ~~ ..- f tits 1 ~ (~~~(~~.\r.~~~tv rt h ~t (t ~ ~~I aj ~1+~- ~ ~~i ;i. ~. - '/ T. NELSON PARKER STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION <OMMIe810NER OF INBURANCC BUREAU OF INSURANCE Perm. i i RICHMOND 23209 June 17, 1968 County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Attention: Mr. C. G. Manuel Purchasing Clerk P.e: Bid For Accident Insurance For Volunteer Firemen By Ball-Martin Insurance Agency, Incorporated, 108 Cowardin Avenue, Richmond, Virginia Dear Mr. Manuel: T•;ith reference to your letter of June 12, 1968 enclosing the bid referred to in caption, we would like to explain first of all that rates for this type insurance are not regulated and there are no filings of such rates in this Bureau. The form and the rate are promulgated by the insurance com- pany concerned and obviously the bid of the successful bidder should agree with the policy issued as a result thereof. In checking the paper you submitted, we notice there is no insurance company named in the bid by Ball-Martin Insurance Agency, Incorporated but there was attached to the bid a brochure pertaining to "The Hartford`s Accident Insur- ance for Volunteer Firemen" which gave the basis for the premium calculations. Ede rechecked this entire matter with regard to the premium calculation and found that the annual rate bid price of $5600.00 and the three year premium bid price of $15,000.00 did not agree with the specific details. Therefore, we contacted The Hartford Insurance Group to determine whether the bid per- tained to some other company in the group rather than Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company. We have been advised by Mr. Bob Wallace, Agency Supervisor of The Hartford Insurance Group, that the insurance company in which this policy would be issued if the bid is accepted would be New Yoric Underwriters Insurance Company. 4lhen we inquired of Mr. Wallace as to the difference between the premium break-down on the Hartford Accident specification and the amount shown in the bid; soe were advised that the premium calculation on the brochure was the basis for premium calculations only and that the pertinent classifi- cation of the business, according to the rules of the New York Underwriters Insurance Company, resulted in a proper premium of $5600.00 for one year. i ~~~ F ~ County of Chesterfield June 17, 1968 Page 2 __ -~ ~~_ Further, Mr. Wallace set forth that the rate of $15,000.00 for the three year premium was proper according to the New York Underwriters Insurance Company rates. We have been advised that The Hartford Insurance Group of which New York Underwriters Insurance Company is a member and/or Ball-Martin Insurance Agency, Incorporated are to confirm the foregoing in writing to you and that this will be done immediately. ', We are returning the material you sent of which we now have photostats in our file in the event there is any further developments in this case. i Yours sincerely, id. G. FLOURNOY ~/~Jy~ Director, License Division WGF: j Enclosures ~ Ccs: Mr. Bob Wallace f Agency Supervisor ~ The Hartford Insurance Group r Tower Building Richmond, Virginia Mr. Wilford H. Ball, Jr. Ball-Martin Insurance Agency, Inc. 108 - Cowardin Avenue Richmond, Virginia _{ I. Appr~rvel of w®t~r can~ac~s c AC-31.~ 'ark Y.oe ~pertm~at~ A-~32~ Z~ada~bra~k ~~et, ~ect~cx~ IT.' A~axd ~~` ~~t~' COTitr~et; CQtatrBCt C-~~~, ~tca. Rath Schaal t¢- Tncarpatate~, e~iso has th8 lain b~ddesr 26,~GS.fl~D. (Confirmation) ~1~,676.tlt~ Cam3.e E. Lyt~l~s CA., the ~tauct of IYY. Considc~rsticaa of le~tex`, Elet~ .Tv~l~r ~2, 19~~, f'rcom 3. 's. ~'~r~usan of ~lendels Asa, Inccar~+r~ratea~ ca~ern3n~; eater liue ox: Elr~re Lane fcir .cat 18, ~locYe '':A", baertdell ~'arms~. I~7. ~~,ppr~al o~ :mar ~+~;reeats. s~~-a~c~ a~l~,. Sacti~ru g~,f . s~~-~l~ , .. Repute ~o at 8uforc~ Ac~ac~. ~. '~I . Awiarei of sewer e;oxdtra¢ts: -3C is Sta~+~are~ville Ca~struet~.s~n Cesr~paaay, ysac4rporate3d .for installetaean of smears Lur ~va31 ~a~e Arse a~x cast siege sf ito~te L and 3~i1 in titer amaimt cif ~65,56Z.~i5 baseel eau ~E~e use of cruet 4sbestaa pies. 65I1-~i~A (~6~-2CI3) to ~c~anake ~o~-st~ue:tic~ Gaffipat~g frrr ineatallat$ast e~f portii~~t n~ 'pocosh©eh C~'e; ~~.a trt~c se~e:~r 3.n thet seuott~t of ~&,2,13.2.~Ci based oxn th4 tine csf ca~eresta P~I~E . 11-d„~A--~47Vi41~j$G7A ~.aAE~ tel' Hall3as, S'3atAl6lri~s aAt~ Cachra~s 7~nucarpaxrstesei ~.n thes ame~t e~ $5,6~~.~3~ baeseri ~ either cancreta or cent asbestte>s ~ ~aipta. Request for all4CStia~ of f for the foli.ca~-ix:g Baer ~ro~c3Gts: 1. Gauin~ts~ae k3~ci 2. 7.,aare Sraulevard ~. ~'oca,she~ck Cs~esek (Arch. Rr~ei to ~gple ~.c~8} G~. Re~ea tosdl 5chc~l (~'~ocosho~h ~raak to tschc~~.} ~2T. Cat~~tie3er~t3,esu csf letter of .Pulp 1S, 1+68 fres~ i.ara~re ~anstrtactiott Company, Iucarpe~atee3 rec t3se; o~ cement. asb~~taas sewe3r p-ilk ~aa place of conEreCe ~ipa. ~IIZ. Recoe~trns tE Ccnmtq inmer hea seatitorise~d to issue ccs;tatrtlc- . ~ tior- pe~rs-its to then ~c~llt~rin~ {l) Citesape~~ & i'tsteat~tc '~ele~a~+hoae--inaatallatiera of Andes- ~~ ~+ctitate~ telephe-ne cable. (a} Ada~dale Ap~rtment~ fib) Meae3owbrex9ic West, Sedan ~'= DOUGLAS B. FUGATE. COMMISSIONER G. L. BAUGHAN, LURp Y, Vw. W. RANBDELL CHILTON. LANCASTER, VA. W. FRED DU CKWORTH. NORFOLK, VA. F.ARL A. FITZ PATRIC K. ROwNOKE, Vw. GEORGE C. LAN DRITH, ALEXAN ORI q, Vq. LAWRENCE H. MCWANE, LYNCHBURG, Vw. W. M. SCLATE R, JR.. MgRION, Vp. P.UBERT B. WEAVER, JR.. VICTORIA. VA. L. R. TREAT, JR. -0ISTRICT ENGINEER July 12, 1968 A. B. EURE. DIRECTOR OF AGMI NISTR ATION A. K. NUNSBERG ER. DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING J. V. CLARKE. DIRECTOR OF OPERwTIONS W. 5. G. BRITTON. DIRECTOR OF PROGRwM MING wNp PLANNING IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO OFFICE OF DISTRICT ENGINEER PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA 23804 P. 0. BOX 8887 Richmond, Virginia 23225 Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Gentlemen: With reference to your resolution of February 14, 1968, requesting a 5 Mpu ~„ood limit on Route 10 between Jessup Road and Belmont Road. I have been advised by our Traffic and Planning Division that a detailed study was made of this section on March 5th and 6th of this year. This included the geometrics of the road, the accident rate and a speed check. Based on this detailed study and a review of the infor- mation with the State Police, it is recommended by Traffic and Planning that speed limit be retained as a 55/45 mile speed zone. We are sorry however, it is Traffic section be kept under a year. but we cannot concur with your request, and Planning's recommendation that this surveillance and a restudy be made within Ve t my you s, L ~ /~ R. V. Lan aster, III Resident ngineer RVL,III/jms cc: Mr. .L. R. Treat, Jr., District Engineer Mr. F. .L. Isbell, District Traffic Engineer ~ONWEALTH- OF `JIR 1 „IJt,,a. ~~ - JOHN E. HARWOO D, 1. ~""''~4 DEPUTY COMM15910NER & CHIEF ENGINEER 1'{~.A DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS RICHMOND, VA. 23219 O'`.~2~~14~f1~~~j~. uu~ ~ sss ~: RECEIVEll BOIL ~F SRS ~ ; >s' ~NES1E1~iY ,w~,. ~~~~ VI~6tk ~'cZ4,~'~~`. A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT G~r~(ONWEALTH- OF `JIRr.~i~. DOUGLAS B. FUGATE, COMMISSIONER G. L. BAUGHAN, Lu RAV, VA. W. RANSDELL OHILTON. Lw NCgGTER, VA. W. FRED DUCKW ORTH. NORFOLK. VA. EARL A. FITZ PATRIC K, ROANOKE, Vq. GEORGE C. LAN DRITH, ALEXAN ORIq, Vq. LAWRENCE H. McWANE, LY NGH9URG, VA. W. M. SOLATE R, JR., MARION. VA. ROBERT 5. WEAVER, JR.. VICTORIw, Va. JOHN E. HARWOO p, DEPUTY COMM19910NER & CaIEF ENGINEEa A. B. EURE. DIRECTOR OF AOMINISTRATIOrv A. K. HUNSBERGER, pIRECTOR OF ENGIrvEERING J. V. CLAR KE. DIRECTOR OF OPE RgTIONS W, 5. G. BRITTON, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING ANO PLANNING RICHMOND, VA. 23219 July 24, 1968 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO Routes 147 and 150 Chesterfield County 26 ~ ,~,~cL~`~J u21CB~~~o ~ \ L Mr. M, W, Burnett, Executive Secretary ~ ~VLlg$c j\, County of Chesterfield. ~ ®~+® Chesterfield., Virginia 23832 ~O° ~~c~l ~SIJ`' ROA~~~~w Dear Mel: ~'; y~~~~ IJJ/ ,.. J.\~- Thank you very much for your letter of July 12, We quite agree with the Board. of Supervisors of Chesterfield County that the need for upgrading Route 150 in Chesterfield County, Chippenham Parkway, is more urgent than the need for improving the section of Route 147 between Woodmont and Route 60. It is, therefore, our plan to defer-any further projects on Route 147 between Woodmont and Route 60 and proceed with the widening from the Huguenot Bridge out to the vicinity of Woodmont. Studies are now under way on Route 150 and priorities are being established and I am sure the State Highway Commission will give every consideration to the need. on this road in relation to the other needs in the Richmond District, Certainly there is no question but that this need. is urgent. With best personal regards, H-c cc - Mr, Douglas B, Fugate Mr. W, S. G. Britton Mr. A, K. Hunsberger erely, Harwood, Deputy Commissioner Chief Engineer A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT G~TrONWEALTH- OF VIRr_~~~ DOUGLAS H. FUGATE. COm MI5510 NER G. L. BAUGHAN, Ll1RAY, VA. W. RANSDELL OHILTON. LANCASTER, VA. W. FRED DUCKWORT H. NORFOLK, VA. EARL A. FITZPATRIC K, ROANOKE, VA. GEORGE C. LANDRITH. ALExANORI q, YA. LAWRENCE H. MCW AN E, LY NCHRURG, VA. W. M. SCLATE R, JR.. MARION, VA. ROBERT 5. WEAVER, JR.. VICTORIA, VA. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS RICHMOND, VA. 23219 July 17, 1968 JOHN E. HARW000. DEGUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER A. B. EURE. DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING J. V. CLARKE. DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS W. 5. G. BRITTO N, DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Gentlemen: Secondary System Addition - Chesterfield County As requested in resolution by your Board on April 10, 1968, the fol- lowing addition to the Secondary System of Chesterfield County is hereby approved, effective July 1, 1968. ADDITION LENGTH BRIGHTON GREEN SUBDIVISION, SECTIONS 6 & 8: North Pinetta Drive -from end of maintenance of Route 755 at intersections of Routes 755 and 2070 and running south 0,42 mile to Route 60, 0,42 Mi. Sincerely, .~ J. E. Harwood, Deputy Commissioner Copies: Mr. A, S, Mr. P. B. Mr. H. G. Mr, L. R. Mr ., H. R. Mr. R. V. Mattox Coldiron Blundon Treat, Jr. Perkinson Lancaster - Chesterfield A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT r Do UGLas B. FUGATE~ COMMISSIONER G. L. BAUGHAN, LORA V, VA. W. RANSDELL CMILTON, Lw N<ASTER. VA. W. FRED DU CKW ORTH, NOP FOLK, VA. F.ARL. A. FITZ PATRICK, ROANOKE, Vw. GEGRGE C. LAN DRITH, ALEZAN ORIw, VA. LAw RENCE H. Mc WANE, LY NCH aURG, Vw. W. M. SCLATER. JR.. MARION, VA. ROBERT S. WEAVER, JR.. VICTORIA, VA. ~ON~'~'EALT H- OF VIR r ~ 1~ DEPARTMEPlT OF HIGHWAYS RfCHNiOND, VA. 23279 July 22, 1968 L. R. TREAT, JR. DISTRICT ENGINEER JOHN E. HARWOO D, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER p, B. EURE~ DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION A, K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF EN GIrv EERING J, V. CLARK E. DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS W. B. G. BRITTON, DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING ANG PLANNING IN REPLY PLEw SE REFER TO OFFICE OF DISTRICT ENGINEER PE TE R58UR G, VIRGINIA 23804 P. 0, BOX 8587 Richmond, Virginia Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Chesterfield, Virginia Attention: Mr. M. W, Burnett, Exec. Sec. Dear Mr. Burnett: On February 29, 1968 a resolution was passed by you requesting a study to determine the feasibility of installing a signal light at the intersection of Bryce's Lane and route 10 and Bryce:!s Lane and route 360. I am attaching a copy of a letter from Mr. F. L, Isbell, District Traffic Engineer giving a detail report of the study. You will note that a directional count was made on March 18 and 19, 1968. You will also note that police records were reviewed to determine the accident rate,_ After consideration of data available it appears that traffic lights are not warranted at either of the intersections at this time. However, I am sure that the intersection will be kept under surveillance and it will be reconsidered if a study reveals the status has changed. Yours very t 1y, ~~ // (~ iii R. V, Lancaster, II ~ Resident Engineer RVL : lc Att: cc-Mr. L, R. Treat, Jr.Dist.Engr. Mr. F. L. Isbell, Dist. Traffic Engineer A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT J ,~ _ . .: _ . #,~ " Foim No. 22-B ~ ~ - ~ ~ • . DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ` INTER=DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM Petersburg ~ , Virginia .TO Air. ~2. V. Lanca3tar, III • FROM r^^:. L. Isbell July la ; E)~J . SUBJECT':~sol.u~ion - ~'raffic Control Lights Rot~47 prof. Bryce Lane at Intersectionwith Chesterfield County Route '10 and Route'360' Reference is .iade to your ;~emorandum of Dlarch 12,, 1968 relatige -to • ,. .', tiie resolution; from the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors for • traffic signals at the intersections of:P.oute 10 d Route 1647 and. " ;i.out~? -.360 and P~oute 1647. - . 0T. March l8 ari8 19, 1968,•a 12=<hour directional tr c count was made at the intersection of Route 10 and Route 1647. A ir.ilar count was ' mado at Route 360 and Rciute 164T on ilpril and , 6 The summary •• • o.f information•fros these counts is as follows: . . Route 10" and Route 1647•(Bryce. Lane) Vehicles Entering Intersection 7 AM to 7. M * Avg. 8•hours Route l0 from the north ~ ~ 520 'S1fi Route l0 from the south 5 443 • "• Route 1647 from the. west 9 7 82 - Routo 7.647 from the- e~ t ~ 4 13 . 117 ~ 1054 - * Average number o£ ve i les entering intersection for the eight • " highest hours of count. • . As'part'of the s t thi in rsec o ,.delays of vehicles entering Route 10 from B e were c d In the 12--.hour study period, 927 vehicles red outs 10 fro ce Lane. Of these, 664 vehicles • were delayed a average of 9 second. State police co show the 2 accidents occurred at~the intersection ." between January 5 and tuber 31, 1967. •Only 9 of these would possibly have been or cte y a traffic signal. Three of the-angle . ~ crashes in 1966 beeps d u ng snow and ice conditions. Route 360 and Route 1647 (Bryce Lane) ~ . V®hicles Entering Intersection 7 AP1 to 7 Pfd. *AVq. B hours- Route 360 from the east 6542 60? .Route 360. from the west, 6096 539 Route. 1647 from the south 1154 106 13792 1254 * Average number of 'vehicles entering the .intersection for *he eight • highest hours of count. Mr. R: V. Lancaster, IIi•. -2- July 19, 196II k `~ . ~, >r ' In the three year study ,period, January 1, 1965-through December 31, 1967, a total of 7 seven accident3_happened at the intersection of.ROUte 360 _ and Bryce Lane.. Only a;~:o of theca could possibly be prevented by a signal.. ` .. lne general volume warrant for signals at the two intersections studied wary somewhat. At Route l0 and Route 1647 the minimum volume require- ment is an average of 500 vehicles per hour entering the intersection on the major route for at least 8 hours, while at the same time at least 150 vehicles m~.xst enter'on one leg of the minor route.. The volume warrant at the intersection of Route 360 and ,Route 1647 is increased to an average of 600 vehicles per hour for B hours on the major route whiz a aninis~wn of 150'.Vehicles per hour on the minor approach. The . difference is caused by the additional lanes on. Routes60. Accident warrants are satisfied when five or'nwre accidents of the type susceptible to correction by a traffic signal occur at the inter- - section within a 12 month period. Considering the precedir_g .information, traffic signals are not warranted at either intersection) therefore, it is recommended that . the request be denied. If you wish, I will be glad to discuss this study with you. , FLl:bsm cc Mr.. J. P. Mills, Jr. Mr. L. R. Treat, Jr. F.' I;: Isbell District, Traffic Engineer ~;, ON~VEALT H- DOUGLAS B. FUGATE, CoM MISSIONEa G. L. BAUGHAN, LuagY, Vp. W. RANS DE LL CHILTON, Lp NCASTE R, Va. W. FRED DUCKW ORTH. NORFOLK, VA. F.ARL A. FITZ PATRICK, Roa NO KE, Vq. GEORGE C. LAN DRITH, ALE%a NDRIa, Vq. LAWRENCE H. MOWANE, LYNCHBURG, Va. W. M. SCLATE R. JR., MARION, VA. };OBERT 5. WEAVER, JR.. VICTORIA, Va. ~VIR~i~ DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS RICHMOND, VA. 23219 July 22, 1968 L. R. TREAT, JR. DISTRICT ENGINEER JOHN E. HAR WOOD, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CNIEF ENGINEER A. B. EURE. DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION A. K. HUNS BE RGER. DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING J. V. CLARK E. DIRELTOq OF OPERATIONS W. 5. G. BRITTO N. DIRECTOR OF Pq OGRAMMING ANO PLANNING IN REPLY PLEasE REFER TO OFFICE OF DISTRICT ENGINEER PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA 23804 P. 0. BOX 8887 Richmond, Virginia 23225 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Chesterfield County Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr, Burnett; I have a resolution from the Board of Supervisors dated June 27, 1968, requesting the Highway Department to improve a section of Bremer o S~tree~ in Ettrick. I would appreciate it if you would let me have a sketch of the exact location on which the improvements are to be made includ- ing the widths of rights of way and the extent of improvements. This road is not in the State System, therefore,. we would need the authority to charge the County for this work. If this is the desire of the Board, which was not included in the resolution, please let us have this authority. RVL,III/jms ~`~~~'~2232,~~6~\ ~~ .1U1 1968 ~ 'I ~~ w Very tr ly rs, ;' R. V. Lan aster, III Resident ngineer A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ELECTORAL BOARD OFFICE OF GENERAL REGISTRAR CHESTERFIELD. VIRGINIA Ju~2y 11, 1968 BOARD MEMBERS CECIL B. TU RNAG E. CH4IRMAN SPOON ER H. HULL. SECRETARY ROBERT 5. GREER h4r.. M. GI. Bunneit Bxecu,#,i.ve Secretary Board ob Superv,i.6ors Caunty ag Cheater~.be.ed Chedterbte2d, V.iJeg~,n~i.a. ~~~$192~2>~~~ ~~~~968 1 d ~~~~ ~ ~~ 6' c. ~ V1~nHl~A ' CENTRAL REGISTRAR VIRGINIA C. GORDDN dear Mr.. Burnett: The 62eatara2 Baard w.%P.2 appear, bebane .the Baard ab Superv.i~3or.1 at 4:00 p.m., an Thuraday, July 25, 1968, to preaent a reeommendattion that the Obb~.ce o5 CentraX. Keg-us4ican be changed .ta Gener.a~ Reg.i~.t~can'a U b b~.ce. It has been ea.P.eed to our attenfii.an that maze than hak.b ab the ninety-e~.x counti,e6 to V.ucg~,n,i,a have bet up, an are .in .the procesh as ~.n~stae.P,%ng, a generaX reg.ist~car ~syatem to prav~,de mane up-ta-date and accurate r.eg-is~ica~i.on necond~ . Under. a general neg.i~s-th.ah. ~y~~em, a.P,2 pneci.nct neg.v•t~cah~s would be e,2abat,~~.ed ass a~a.i~5tant reg~trans and would be able to handle all neg.i,a~ticczti.avvs; however, tran~gens and abhentee app.P.i.eaii,ows would have to came .through the General Reg-is~iurh.'~ UbS~.ee. I~t wau,2d enab.Ce .them .to reg.i~ter anyone, whether ~.n ar au~~.de o~ the preai.net. All banal tranhacti,ons would come tram .the General Reg.i~strar'h O~b~,ce. This would mean that a.ee recarde would be kept ~,n one og~~.ee. Becauae ab .the growth o~ our county, we recommend that the Cent~cal Reg~.t~car'e USb~,ee be aba.ei.ahed anal .that .the Ugb~.ee ob General Reg.i.atrcvc be eatab.~ished, ebbeati.ve .immed.i.ateey. A.P.aa, we have a program aut,~%ned for mcv~s reg.i,etrat,%aws beg~.nni.ng Auguet 24 and end~,ng September 28, 1968. We plan to ablz .the Fire Depant- menti throughout the eaunty to allow ua the ude aU the.ir buded.i.ngb far ~s~.x eoneee.uti,ve Saturdayh. tVe w.i,P,e have aeven ~5trateg~.c loea~i.aru, throughout the county; plw a trai,e.er at Sauthb~.de Plaza. The ~ca,i,2er would eoet $100.00 to rent bor the h~.x Satwcdayb. (Ue would eugge6t pay~.ng the regtistra~ $15.00 per day 5ram 10:00 a. m., to 5:00 p.m. The - ~ reg.i~strara would a-P.ternate, ho that each reg-i,atica~c cau~Ed cuarfz at .Eea~t =- two Saturdays ~.b they as dea.ired. Page 2 Mn. M. Ul. 8unnext we ~ee~Z .that ~.4 .the County ~aah..th.is neapaws~.b.i.P.ity, we wou.!'.d show the ai~,i.zenb .that we cute da~.ng a.2E to oun powelc to get .them neg-i~s.telced; aZsa, cve wau.ed have a voting mach~.ne at each neg-is~ica~ian peace and wau2d demar~tn.ate .the machine. Th,Ls waukd heQp to educate the pub.P.i.c and maFze the lab ga much emaothen an ekeeti.an day. we ~.inee~ce2y Nape aun plan w.%PC meet with this Boand'~ appn.ava2, as we axe t~cy.ing hand to do a good 106 and wa,tit to aceammodate .the e,itizev~ o~ Che~ten4~.e~d Cauwty and meet the-uc need3 tib poaa.ib.~e. Rey peatSu,P,2y, ~L~C7URAL BUAitD ~gj Spaanen. H. Nu.2l' S ee~eetan y SHH : Fzy 1 ,i ' ~ . ~ . . ~ ,.~. ~~ WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County v has heretofore determined the necessity for acquiring permanent floodage easements over the hereinafter described real estate for the construction of Swift Creek Reservoir as a public water supply for-.the people of Chesterfield County;. ', WHEREAS the County heretofore entered upon and took possession of the parcels hereinafter described after first deter- mining the necessity of the project and the necessity of beginning construction'of it promptly; and after giving due notice by regist ered mail to the hereinafter named owners of the property and rights of way the County intended to enter upon and take, which notice set forth the compensation and damages offered by the Coun to each property owner; WHEREAS none of the property owners contested the County's taking in such fashion within thirty (30) days after receipt of notice of the County's intention to so enter upon and take the property prior to institution of condemnation proceedings, nor have any of the property owners contested the County's entry and possession as of this date; WHEREAS the County and the landowners hereinafter named (were unable to agree as to the compensation and damages caused by such taking, and the County instituted condemnation proceedings after paying to the Clerk of the Circuit Court of this County for the benefit of the respective landowners such sum as .this Board estimated to be'a fair value of the easements taken and damages done; ' WHEREAS the condemnation petitions filed against the landowners were each dismissed on the ground that the County did not first .make a bona fide Affort to purchase the rights sought; ' WHEREAS the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia has denied he t County a writ of error to the action of the Circuit Court of this County in dismissing the condemnation proceedings; „~V WHEREAS the County desires to make new offers for the rights sought and to proceed promptly with condemnation if agree- went with the owners cannot be reached, NOW, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: That the perpetual floodage easements to be acquired from tFne property owners shall provide for the mutual rights set forth in the "Swift Creek Easement Form" attached hereto and made a part hereof. That it is the estimate of the Board that the following sums represent the fair value of the easements taken and damages done as a.result thereof: (1) ($2,442.60) for a perpetual flooding easement in, over, upon and across lands of Dorothy May Phillips Furman in Clover Hill District, Chester- Fiel.d County, Virginia, containing 8.0 acres, and being more particularly shown on a plat made by LaPrade Bros., Civil Engineers, Richmond, Virginia, dated May 3, 1965, revised July 22, 1965, together with a perpetual easement for a road across said lands of the landowner as shown on said plat, and for damages. (2) ($11,381.00) for a perpetual flooding easement in, over, upon and across lands of Howard W. and Virginia V. Hancock in Clover Hill District, Chester- , field County, Virginia, containing 89.1 acres, and being more particularly shown on a plat made by LaPrade Bros., Civil Engineers, Richmond, Virginia, dated February 9, 1965, revised April 1, 1965, together with a perpetual easement for a road across said lands of the landowner as shown on said plat, and for damages. °^~... ,, , ' (3) ($12,832,00) for a perpetual flooding easement in, over, upon and across lands of H, W, Hancock in Clover Hill District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, containing 31.9 acres, and being more particularly shown on a plat made by LaPrade Bros,, Civil Engineers, Richmond, Virginia,'dated April 19, 1965, revised July 22, 1965, together with a perpetual easement for a road across said lands of the landowner as shown on said plat, and for damages. (4) ($5,645.00) for a perpetual flooding easement, in, over, upon and across lands of Howard W. Hancock in Clover Hill. District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, containing 14.2 acres, and being more particularly shown on a plat made by LaPrade Bros., Civil Engineers, Richmond, Virginia, dated December 3,.1965, together with a perpetual easement for a road across said lands of the landowner as shown on. said plat, and for damages. 2 _ ' ~., ~.~: ,r ~ . .~ „ ,. (5) ($3,450.00) for a perpetual flooding easement in, over, upon and across lands of Howard W. and ,.Howard Francis Hancock in Clover Hill District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, containing 9.1 acres,, and being more particularly shown on a plat made by LaPrade Bros., Civil Engineers„ _ Richmond, Virginia, dated December 3, 1965, and for damages. (6) ($9,761.00) for a perpetual flooding easement in, over, upon and across lands of R. H, and Ruth ~, H. Rose in Midlothian District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, containing 57.2 acres, and being more ~. particularly shown on a plat made by LaPrade Bros., Civil Engineers, Richmond, Virginia, dated February 9 „ 1965, revised March 18, 1965 and March 25, 1965, together with a perpetual easement across said lands of the landowners as shown on said plat, and for damages. ,. ~~ (7) ($5.358.00) for a perpetual flooding easement in, over, upon and across lands of Thomas T. and ' Tabitha Patterson St. Clair in Clover Hill District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, containing 21.7 acres, ~. .and being more particularly shown on a plat made by LaPrade Bros., Civil Engineers, Richmond, Virginia, dated April 19, 1965, and for damages. i ~, (8) ($2,184.00) for a perpetual flooding easement in, over, upon and across lands of Stanley and Elizabeth C. Smith, Jr., in Clover Hill District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, containing 15.4' acres, and being more particularly shown on a plat made by LaPrade Bros., Civil Engineers, Rich- e mond, Virginia, dated March 26, 1965, revised May - ;.,___~__.. _-_.___ 3,._,.1965, and. for damages. (9) ($500.00) for a perpetual easement in, over, upon and across the lands of Joseph E. and Iris H. Vaden in Clover Hill District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, containing 0.18 acre, more or less, and being more particularly shown on a . plat made by LaPrade Bros., Civil Engineers, Rich- mond, Virginia, dated December 3, 1965, and for ' damages. That the Executive Secretary of the Board is directed to make written offers to the above property owners for the rights .. taken by the County for the sums above set out; That the County Engineer or his representative is direct ed to negotiate personally for the purchase of said easements from • ~ the landowners for the sums respectively authorized hereby, and if • ~ . , he is unable to acquire the same by purchase, the Commonwealth's ', Attorney and Woods, Rogers, Muse, Walker & Thornton, Attorneys, ' are authorized to institute the necessary legal proceedings on !. hekalf of the County to acquire said easements by the exercise of ;, the right .of eminent,:domain, and to do all things necessary to v" .:,,y ' - - 3 - . ~' I ~ ~ . ::; . : . .i i . j .: i' . ~ i ,' ~: .._ 4.. . ; r' ': , ,y . . ; , ~. ;" i ' S, ~' +~ .`` i r acquire the easements herein directed to be acquired. That the Clerk of .this Board is authorized, when requested 'to do so by the Commonwealth's Attorney, toydeposit with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of this County the following sums, which, when added to the amounts previously paid for the benefit of the property owners, equal the Board's estimate of the total value of easements taken and damages .for each respective parcel: PARCEL N0. OWNER. ADDITIONAL SUM TO BE PAID ' CLERK 2 Dorothy May Phillips Furman -- $1,763.10 3 Howard W. and Virginia V. 5,778.00 ' Hancock 4 H, W. Hancock 3,022.00 5 Howard W. Hancock 6 Howard W. and Howard Francis 1,143.00 7 R.. H, and Ruth H. Rose 3,326.00 8 Thomas T. and Tabith 3,270.50 Patterson St. Clair 9 Stanley and Elizabeth C. Smith, Jr. 874,OC Joseph E. and Iris H. Vaden 500.00 _ 4 - 4 JOHN R. BURTON so: ,~ ~~/~. ,~2hP~ 2' 2 oo~~ ~~ ~ ~? ~ ~0~0 O ~~ . ox ~ 39.32 \~\\\\9 \S~ ~\ c_ O '~" 6 ~ 90 89 <~~~ ~s F~4 ,o~~ ~~ ; ~~ ~~~~~ti~ ro2X F~ . ~~. ~F sF~ 00~ ~'L ti /~G vp O 6`'~Gr >< 5. ~ ~0 ~~ i`h~ ~ H 65+50.2 PLAT SHOWING 16' PERMANENT EASEMENT TO BE ACQUIRED CROSSING THE LAND NOW BELONGING ti TO J.I. ARCHER AND LAURA M. ARCHER IN '' MATOACA DIST., CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA. ~ .. '+ 5CA~E• ;" =IOU' d ~~ "~.'. 4-5 -6b `~ REV. 6-24-68 tray ~ R. 5"i~l.~r=,RT RUYfi'~-Z i /~SSOCIP.TE5 d :~ CONSU(.:(!?'•iG ~ NG?P-LEERS i v r ~~ ~ o ~c ;,• v .~ ~ ~ ~ ~'' ~ o rn ~p ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ N p Z O~ 9 L ARCHER & ~ Ivp,NM ARGHcR GAVFtA J~I~ ~ 5 f BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IRVIN G. HORNER, cHAIgRAn e LOVER HILL DIBTRICT C. J. PURDY BERMUDA DISTRICT J. RUFFIN APPERSON DALE DIST gICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS F. F. DIETSCN MANCHESTER DISTRICT ~- ~ HERBERT O. BROWNING .aroacA msTRICT A NOREW R. MARTIN MIDLOTHIAN DIST RIOT C O U N T Y O F C H E S T E R F I E L D CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA M. W. BURNETT E%ECU TIVE SECRETARY July 22, 1968 JUL 1968 Mr. M. tel. Burnett Executive Secretary Chesterfield County Chesterfield,, Va. 23832 ~ a~i:~.E! YCAJ ~ ~~Q~ ~ ~~ ~~ESTE~fl~~pld ~~~ VIRSI~ ~ \~~b' ~ ~.°~i 1 Dear Mr. Burnett; I have talked with Mr. Charles E. Jones, Jr. on Southmoor Road concerning the off-plan-location of the :. fire plug on his property. Mr. Jones appeared at a recent meeting of the Board of Supervisors complaining that the fire plug was not located according to the plan of the water line. It was stated that Mr. Burnett had indicated that he would have the plug moved. Mr. Welchon had been to Mr. Jones' place and indicated that the plug was improperly located. Mr. Jones told me that Mr. Wallace while building the house was concerned about the location of this fire hydrant and offered to use his back-hoe for relocation of the hydrant. However, no one ever showed to take him up on this offer. Mr. Jones said that he wishes to pave his drive-way and wants to improve entry from the street. The fire plug is at the edge of his drive-way and prevents any such im- provement without being in the drive-way. I do not see Page 2 July 22, 1968 that Mr. Jones has any responsibility for movement of the plug since his builder had offered to do the work required for moving when he had equipment on the location. I recall that it was stated at the Board meeting that the inspector allowed this variation. A resonable explain- ation for this variation from the water line plan has never been. made to my satisfaction. I''ll have to observe, in general, certain fire hydrants in the County present to the public some rather rediculous situations. The firemen have complained o~f this from time to time. Until some system of correcting these errors the County will remain in an awkward spot as to its seriousness concerning fire protection. These situations can be avoided and should be in the future. I,et me know if there is any reason why this fire hydrant should not be moved to a property line as was indicated on the plan for this water line. JRA:ag cc~: Mr. R. A. Painter Mr. D. H. Welchon Yours very truly, `J _ J. Ruf in Apperson Dale District Supervisor ,. _ . ; ~: ~' /,~ ` :. ~• - '' / ~ . ~ /~J7~ c% ~G~ ~ ~ ~ v2 ~~~~ T l '. ~ ~ ~'~e ~ ~ ~° G~ `~r~~ / / /// '_ /~ c ~ ~~ ~ . ~.r/ liv~i ( //G' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~r ~ ~J ~ r ,~e~ ~~ ~° ~~ ~~~ ~ l~ ~s / ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~r~° ~ ~ (~I ~ ~ i~ / ~ ~~~~ .. ~ .. ' ~ • , VIRGINIA: AT a regular ' meeting of-the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, held at the Courthouse on July 25, 1968, at 2:00 P. M. R E S O L U T I O N On motion of , seconded by it is hereby resolved that the Cleric of this Board submit a request to the Virginia Alcoholic. Beverage Control Board to extend the hours for the sale of beer and wine in the County of Chesterfield from the present hours of 6:00 A. M. to 11:00 P. M. to 6:00 A. M. to 12;00 P. M. midnight of each week day except Sunday., ._ i ~ . An Ordinance to amend .and reordain Chapter 7, .Section 7-2, paragraphs 1 and 2 'to prohibit the sale of beer and wine during certain hours, and to provide penalties for violation. BE IT~ORDAINID BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA-: 1. That Chapter 7, Section 7-2, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield be and they are hereby amended and reordained to read as follows: SECTION - 7-2 ' SALE AND CONSUMPTION OF BEER AND WINE PROHIBITED DURING CERTAIN. HOURS; PENALTY FOR VIOLATION. It shall.be unlawful for any person.licensed under the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act or his agents, servants, or employees, to sell beer or wine or permit the consumption thereof on the ~gemises mentioned in such license between the hours of 12:00 o clock midnight and 6:00 o'clock A. M. of each calendar day, except Sunday, and between the. hours of 12:OO,~o'clock midnight of each Saturday and 6:00 o'clock A. M. of each Monday. Each-such offense shall constitute a separate violation punishable by a fine not exceeding five `hundred dollars or by confinement ` in fail not exceeding twelve months, or both, in the discretion of he 3ury ox of the trial justice or of the. court trying the case without a fury. AGRICULTURAL DIVISION Corporation .. P. O. DRAWER G1, HOPEWELL, VIRGINIA 23860 458-7811 July 9, 1968 Mri M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Chesterfield County Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Burnett, p v ~ ;, ~~~~ ~~ The Fire Brigade Training conducted by Fire Marshal, Robert L. Eanes, during the month of June 1968 has enabled us to form the nucleus of a trained group for plant fire protection. The material he used was comprehensive, well thought out and ably presented. Prepared demonstrations aided in stressing important points, actions or operations to be performed or avoided by fire fighting groups. Adequate use of personnel who received this train- ing will permit us to attain our long range objective, "Every man on every job a trained fire fighter." We appreciate your generosity in making Mr. Eanes available for our training program and want you to know that we consider his job well done. May we congratulate you for having such an energetic and able representative as a leader in your county fire office. CC: R. L. Eanes C. L. Jones, Jr. G. G. Megrail T.H. Clements File e ~`=-~ Francis Smith Superintendent of Employee Relation s RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING PURCHASING TELEX 082.7452 TWX 703-458-7233 CENTRAL ACCOUNTING PRODUCTION TWX 703-458.7234 DEPUTIES C. G. WILLIA MS SHERIFF ~ C. T. BOUGHTON RICHMOND PETERSBURG ~ 748-4$11 R. E. PHILLIPS F. H. RIEVES CHESTER (~fficQ of #l~e ~l~Eriff CHESTERFIELD COU NTV CHESTERFIELD C. H., VA. 23532 July 9, 1968 Chesterfield County Board Supervisors Chesterfield, Va. Gentlemen: I want to thank you for all the consideration you have shown me and this office during my first six months as sheriff. We have a feeling of accomplishment in this office, due in large, as a result of your consideration and support. As a result of your support we now have our deputies equipped with revolvers, clothing allowance for the men not furnished uniforms (most have purchased their own uniforms to be worn on special occasions). We have a well equipped station wagon for handling prisoners. Radios in these vehicles have already proven valuable to us as well as the police department. The fence around the jail with an electrically controlled gate will help security immeasureably. I want to thank you gentlemen as well as all agencies at the court house for your consideration having shown this office, especially Co. Gill and the Chesterfield Police Department. We have ~a feeling of oneness. Our jail population has been down considerably lately with the exception of the week-end (19) were arrested at one time, (14) being confined to jail. This caused our population to rise from (28) to (52). In recent weeks we have been down to (22). It will be a pleasure in meeting with you gentlemen':~at your con- venience to visit the jail, see its facilities and operation. Thanking you, I am, ~ ~ /U( Ig~B ~\ i B~q~ ~~'~,~~c~ s ~' '~'f3'tF ~f,;'i.~ bxf7~l. ~~l~s _~ ~~ `/ya'iH~~~~N/Y~ ti~ ~~~9~ ~ G ~ G ~' ~~ ~? ~~~ Very truly yours, ,~ ~fJ~ D E. L. Wingo, riff O. B. GATES SHERIFF RICHMOND PETERSBURG 748-4511 CHESTER Chesterfield County Chesterfield,.Va, Gentlemen: ~~fitE tt{ ~~E ~S~Ext~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY CHESTERFIELD C. H., VA. 23832 July 9, 1968 Board Supervisors DEPUTIES C. G. WILLIA MS C. T. BOUGHTON R. E. PHILLIPS F. H. RIEVES I would appreciate your approval of my using the county owned vehicle, furnished me in the carrying out the duties of the office of sheriff. The state Compensation Board, according to its Executive Secretary, Mr..Rasnick, WILL NOT PAY MILEAGE for the many times the sheriff needs his car, etc., visiting the jail at night, week-ends and meetings. I have been using my own automobile because of this. It is my understanding the Attorney General has ruled that a sheriff is on duty seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day. If this be true the sheriff needs his auto at home to enable him to respond. I serve papers in my neighborhood in order to secure transportation home. If there are no papers in my section I have no way to account for the mileage to and from my office. This has been called to the attention of Mr. Rasnick a number of times and have also been to see him in person, to no avail. Attached is a copy of a letter that I wrote Mr. Rasnick, along with his reply. Any help you can render will be most appreciated. Very truly yours, ~a567 89y1I~ ~ /lr ~ ~~'~'~ i BO~~tC'~ ~9~8 ~P • ~ G(/~.~ / d E. L. Wingo, S~riff ,~ ~ ,, IS I+~ ` ~ ~ ~ O. EDMOND MA881E I,,~ t ~ CHAIRMAN ; JOHN M. RASNICK, JR. E%ECUTIVE SECRETARY '~ I '~~ •{ t I :'i . , ~a,t.:. .~1. ~jl.••11 . I. ~ I j~ ; l3 " Iii ~, :;~ ,..I X • I A) •. ,' ,~: ,° ; ;~ l .ry _~ Y I +~ ~e I }a r ,, :! r.l MpNWEALTH- OF '~ GpNt -~ ,=--~;,- G I ~ ' yW .~ {, 1 r~ t - i J~ - v ,~ :f \ ~ C EMIC0.IYMI~ ~C 5 , 3 7, a -~` d COMPENSATION BOARD P. O. BOX 7777 ..RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23209 June 21, 1968 Mr. E. L. Wingo Sheriff Chesterfield County Chesterfield C. H., Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Wingo: ~. JOSEPH 5. JAMES C. H. MORRISS ETT [X-OIIICIO Nfi MDER[ 'Please pardon the delay in my reply to your letter of May 29 concerning the use of County awned vechicles assigned to you and your deputies. The State will participate only in the mileage traveled on official business. If you attend meetings for personal reasons, this would not be considered official business and the State would not participate in the mileage; however, when you file your annual mileage report, the mileage used for this type of meeting would be included in the total mileage traveled and deducted as non-reimburs- able mileage on the report. Since the vechicles are titled in the name of the County, it ~~ would be up to the county Board of Supervisors to give you permission ' 1 to use the vechicles for other than official business. ~: ,. I { i ~I ;, jr i ~.11{ . Il I~I~11. ;;~ y i ~ .. JMRJr :mk ,. i:~,, .. :., ;,~ f „~. 7 r I f 'ji. ~ ;. 7, ~. 1~ ` ' ^~J ruly ycurs, --~ . /f ~l/ // h .~ ~/.}Y. LLJ/ ZV~: tw ~. Y.r .::~~f f- - - - - k ~ / _~.. t a '~~I! ~'' ~ ,.y. l ~., .~ ..{ %;> ~~ r ~ .. i;. , ~ ~ .~ ~~ ~ . , ~ e , '~ ' ;~ ._ i. •.,~ . PFey 29, Y468 ' Fah. John Rasnfck . . Executive Secretary: ~• State Compensmtion Eotucd ' ''' P. 0. l?ox 1177 Richgsend, Vs. ' IDaar Par. Resnick; • ~ Yam writing in ref~renc;c+ to the ~:u+;nty ouvn,~~ vr~z_~~_: ~..~s3gryed . to m@ for my use fn c~t~ying out my vuu:fes a?::i ~-e{,ny,,~ y€__'..~ _z~a as ah@riff of Ch@starfi@id County. • ' Yt is my and@rsttanding this car r _:.~nly 5~:;, c~ (~I:'' u~?.~.~;;g~ ~« . claimed) in s@rving pspers, trsr:v.,.:rt:ng ,~s~•ner~;, c.~~,~r ~~„_* accompanied by courx ~_ders. A car is o: n vs.luc ~~ -- rL ~~: hav@ t0 perform sl.:_ :~c th@s@ duti~~; e.;:n aLa;.zro.mi?,~~`,g~.0.,` • Having been @lec:.;>d s?~@riff of this r_nunty, I feel I shcu;ld be in a Y,ositior. txs use this vehie:" .: _ >_ all ?:ir,*~s, regarcizng s*_gte and county dr»ties. Several w°eetas a ~o I ~:9aa invited t<: ~.t:::~ac~ i the dedicatiara o€ 3~ake Che~~c~~: fry ~~st@ri'_o'Ed County. Ouz .~ gov@rnor was principal spoa~{er, "~ r,~rtend~:~ ~`~his •dedication in a pick-up-tY>nck, beca°.:se it wss nTJ% urders::s.~~ting the State Compensation Bosrd would not allow cy mileace, for this type driving, ' I ar ~ member c`' the RIC~i4P7D ALA 'Nat:'P3TAT. ~=Y,~ ASSOC}:e-~Y'~.t"~, IAC., locbtod, 1817-Pionua~nt Avenue, Riclernr,::?. Yest@re~tay- ,~ mat, and again I drove my privet:- •{~h.?cls. ~chaols havL ,:. ready requested tCac~t I mddr@ss Cs`.~tz>iN9 3t Q•he cloeing e~,<r ~+.:;- school tern. 'Chi'p, =~ehicio is ne~::.~c,~ to mice tripe to ,:... at night, rya w4"t.l ;-:; several tim~•s ;iur€ng the week-ena. . order for a sY:.e-°..E~ ro perform all his duties his vehiclc'~.? ne@ded, etnd s?~W>>-.; ;r :~ svailable. • 9 , > .~,c.~ ~t~%..~ C '. ~ -~- ~ / ~ ~~r, . ' _. ---, ~~ ~; Paga 2 • cont'd ~~~'` 44r. Joha Resnick , %•i' Executive Secretary ~. f ~ . State Compensat~on.Board . ~ , . P. 0. Box 1177 ~' .= Richmond, Va. ,:~; Sheriffs in other counties hove inforned r~ they do not turn :~ ~~• ' in mileage but oncQ a yeas x"hey state no pragers are served in order t , o acouire :u~geage. '~~ I would apprecie*~ greatly' ~ letter insr.xuci=.ng revs in.the use of my count oGr C h y :~e ve icle, xs to ~~~L~t,~ t:%~,~ st°:te will or will not pay mileage on, a. Ling to hear from you coon, Y em, very t~:.y y~t~r.' . i' r ~. ,.. .! y F ~n s ters ~ - ---Q - - ~.oti, - - - - -~S ODQ- --~~ _- _ /~ /D~ .~c~-e _ -- - ------- --- -- -------- - - --- --- --- - - ~a ~/~ ~ _~ Yin-.J~ -~ --- - -- - - -- - -4 ~'-'"`------ 7-~ --- - -- ---- - ------ ~(O ~ ' /D Z- -- -- o `/ ADO, / -- --~S-So.-~ -_ ----- -- - Fin' -- ~ G/_~oo.-~ --- So 0 0, 0 0 8053 Sykes Boad Bon Air, Virginia 23235 22 July 1968 Mr. M. W, Burnett, fixecutive Secretary Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: We would like to express our strong support for the dog control ordinance sponsored by Mr. A. R. Martin. We feel that this ordinance is in the best interests of the county residents, and urge the Supervisors to vote in favor of it. Sin-cp~e-re ly,{~ f ~ ~ n - 4~'~~ Gl ~CC2 `~GZ~~ Mr. and Mrs. Peter B, Bahler 3710 Cheyenne Road Richmond, Virginia 23235 June 17, 1968 Honorable A. R. R7artin Member--Chesterfie~:d County Board of Supervisors Midlothian Magisterial District Bon Air, Virginia 23235 My dear Mr. Alartin: ~ .• In the local newspaper a week or so ago, I read a report that the Chesterfield County Board of supervisors was considering a "leash" law for county dogs. This letter is to add my voice to the scores upon scores of aggravated citizens who know that such a law--enforced--is needed. I heartily encourage you to favorably consider such legislation and respectfully suggest that advance thought be given to means of implementation and enforcement. iMithout the latter there seems to belittle merit in adding this piece of legislation. It seems to me the time has come when a dog owner must be active~.y encouraged•'to, with respect to his dog(s), exercise at least as much responsibility and control as he does over his children's activities as they•affect other people and their property. Very truly yours, Richard B. Zorn /~'~~~~~1~~19~D?~ ~ ~ JUIV 1958 ~_~ ~,~ ~'~FS~EPff~i ~.1~` ~~ Z_~'~ OOMEST/C M. (?/. COBBY COMPANY, /NC. /O E. BELT BOULEVAHO ~ P. O. BOX BS76 q/CNMONO. V/qG/N/A 23225 ~ PNONE 233-5467 AGENT FOq NOg7N AMEq/CAN VAN UNE6 E NAVPI.IC. /NC. July 23, 1968 Mr. M. W. Burnett Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County Chesterfield Courthouse, Va. Dear Mr. Burnett: ~14VPAC /NTEgNAT/ONAL This refers to 'phone conversation the writer had this date with Mrs. Wills, -relative to our firm using Chester- field County dump. We have occasion to use the dump approximately twice a month. Our firm is loacted in Chesterfield county, and we pay all assessed county taxes. It would be greatly appreciated if you would take this up with the Board of Supervisors at its next meeting on Thursday, Dluly 25th. A.ny consideration giving our firm permission to use the dump will be greatly appreciated. Cordially yours, M. W:. Cosby Company, Inc. °iox~`is W. Cosby r~C/d -=---_ 1 __ LOCAL. NATIONAL 6 OVERSEAS PACKING & SHIPPING ~~'~~,,`' '} "~+r, p¢r~ ~ ~-i ~ ~I OVER 750.000 CUBIC FEET OF STORAGE SPACE rin ~-- ~ ~ J _ PRIVATE RAILROAD SIDING POOL CAR 1431 LOW INSURANCE TREATED ROOMS-PALETIZED STORAGE 9N (~ Fay r~ee ~~ , ~;C~~c,rror~c~, von. z3z~-r ~t3a~~ ~ ~~~.~;so~s C~s~.~1 e`~1~ L'ow~~ C~~.~"a_,.vv, v ~.tio,,vv~.c. ~ ~ ~:.~ ', ~~~1`~171879~~ *~~ ~ ~~~~ `1% 968 ` ~' .;Utd 1 •~ ~' REC~IVEDOS ~~, s BOA{ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~, ~9 vias~~ ~ti ~~ . s ~~ ~, . .~ I I ~ ~ I I i ~ I ~ ~ I i I ~- I ~ r~ / „___. I I i I i I ' I ~~ i ~ I l f l I~ ~ ~ I I !I~ l i i 1 ~ Ili ~ I ,I i ~ ' ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ' I I I y~ ' i ~ ~~ Iii Ip~.~ I ,C~ I ~~~i I ~ i ~ ~ 4 \ I I X` 0 i ! ~ ~ I I I ~ I ~ ~ O I I ~ a . I I I ~ I ~ I el I~ i i I ' ~ ~ i I ~ I i I i , i I ~ I I f i i f i i I I ~ i I I i i ~ ~ ' I ~ I I i ~ I I f ' I I ~ ~ I I ~r I r °.. I -'h ~~ i ~ , ~ . ~, y.. ham: 'a .._t. _ c ;~ ~ ~ 4 0 C 4 1 s ~ _~ ~ n 1 A ~ I~ n o P I_. _ ii ~' ~~ II~ ,, I y. ,Ix I~~ I~ I;~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~~ ~ II n p ~~`` ~~ ~e~~; a I~ ~~~ ~ ~~ i , r - i-=a-- ; I I l.~- ~~r~-, „~ ~ I tb '1 ~ ~ ~~ . ~ _~ r+l \ ~~ ~ if ?j __ _~_ _ _. - ----- _ 1 ~ ~.-- _ i I ~ ~ t ~ I i ~ I ~ ~ ' I • C~ i • On motion of Dr. Martin, seconded by Mr. p.er5s~ it is resolved that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors i~in~ag`feemen~ with the proposed alignment and design of: Route 147 Proj. 0147-020-101 Route 711 Proj. 0711-020-140 --- -~ as presented by the Virginia Department of Highways on July 2, 1968. This resolution is passed to show the Board's support for the projects as presented and does not change the July 10, 1968 resolution of the Board asking for a lower priority on these projects. a.' r UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT Sus~ECT: Separation of Iviail DATE: July 24, 1968 FROM: POStmaSter IN REPLY Chesterfield, Virginia 2332 REFER TO: ~1~~~~b2~2~?y~o~ ~ ~ To: M. Lxl. Burnett, Executive Secretary C,sil~~" ~'~S Chesterfield, Court House Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 ~ ~~~` ~~~~~~~ 0~~~ This Post Office for some time has been separating the county's mail according to departments. As of Auvust 1, 1968, this Trill be discontinued except for those offices having F'ost Office boxes. General delivery mail to all county offices must be combined. P!e have been reprimanded on several occasions by our Postal Service Officer • for rendering this service, which should be offered to box patrons only. Various sizes of boxes are available. Those offices desiring their mail separated here may have this done by renting a box. ~«~ ~ . ~ Plta,rion A. 1'laldmon POD Form 31A Mar. 1959 GPO : 1962 OF-W300. \JNITED STATES GOVERNMENT \ Memorandum • POST OFFICE DEP Sus~ECT: Separation of P~Iail FROM: postmaster ' Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 r ro: Chesterfield Chesterfield Chesterfield, L County Police Department Court FIouse Virginia 23832 - 11^his Post Office-for some time, has according to departments. As of ~1u except for those offices having Pos to all county offices must be comb,i ~Ve have been reprimanded on for rendering this service, 1~ie have various sizes of b may have this done by rent POD Form 31A Mar. 1959 DATE: Jlzl:,~24, 1 IN .REPLY REFER TO: j, 'een separatinx~the county's mail / st 1, 1g6~ th"~s will be discontinued Office 1 occasions should be o ~. 'T'hose offi a box. ~ :es~ General delivery ~^il . ~. y the Post Office Department 'ered to box patrons~`only. • i desiring their mail separated i `~ ~„~ ~,J C~ . ~ ~.P~-~ Marior_ A. ;Waldron i / GP0:19620F-W3006 c/' -m-r•_D, t-~-s ~ a ~,~c r. ~. c7~~ /r 2 s,_l96 8 ~ON~ /wirC .~- -_ IN ~., /~es o ~ Te~l~ l0 ~ /~ O~ ~ ~oi.. ~er _ - -/.j'~oG/~ t~,rat-c»~ C ~i.~lc f-rY~3 _3/ 7.3C ~~r.~e ~~ _ ~ -/27r.~••~.c-ti ~ - ~~,cs-~.. ~ - l71}- ~•,~iP f.Zcr.~rv+. - ~/-.~.rry,~-r -(~jp. - ~%Llcow.l -~w v~ ~f o.~. - .Scl~.•~ ~~ - Yt ~.I , /~~ /~ y d_.tYrii-G.a.~ h_Ih-s..rra.eG T+/ YO/• ~/iGM±~!q_~ Oi~.r• ~ - / ' _~h S2lJt~~r VI_/o¢~/l~cs Covt~~_~i/T'J`~f,!'~~.1~- _~°' ~ / ,E dC C cj/ T !cam ~' lI ~~ir~r //~I f Gl / r~ v ~ L ~-t~ , . -~. . _ _•~iY. ~fll-d _~i~~ /N rGl~ fI x~ ~,~ ~~~ ,4 ( ~ . 4sg-l sv8~ f- - d~- ~v~.~~ ,/ ~-c ~~t.-f o~, /_9Z~ ~ Asa ~(.~~~ci a~,, ~ c~,....~ ~ /a .~ 3co .~r ~riza~ ~~3_/jid_Kr,_/JJr /j'~ ~,. ~ ~..~, ~.!': -~i~ J_ht •c ~-e a J" ~ ~ 0 T' Q. c ~..o .T ~ 4 .~ ~ /lrrc ~c /_ ~0 /. /~~' ~oY_Tk- k~c~P-s. /?fir .~h- .~ .~~1f /~ (- ~ '~ ~ , Cy!!ih J.~ ~~ ~~'''rCJ -- ~/.s f si ~i..e t f_h_~/~.+o-re o ~w,.. _/_yfr_~i~c -`,,....._~ - ~o/,y o_~/'Gs~._~does_~lof Gsrr~ G~ c G'~s ~~/ O_Q °1 ~/ _S_G_~' - ~ ~,~ sew- ~,.~~.~~ -- _~G ~ 3/ D / ~~/ _ s' L8-.3 G ~ f~.~...~ .~~le ~ s S~ z .45 _ _ A ~ ,r lilt ~r m.c ..~ G ~ ~~' '~ 1-B h /r d rs /:. ~ ~, ' •~+~ r __ __ _ _ ~L_//_ Iv rt---- C-~sy ~a7.3o ~. .~ l~ CmJ ~ a%i//O /~ / .~ 0 0. _ • • `~ ,~[,[ JJ ~ ~ VVV ~- - f p ~y~ ~ c~~+L~~ r ~"' "' ~it~s-r ~ 'y~ '~`r~ ~~ ~ ~~ / / // // // 22// _~J~ p~ /_~4~ ~ Es ~Srl. 7~l .ffC~yp.~ ~pa ~ --~ari!~_c ~ -J.;7?~.- a~~ 1 ~/ _B~ L%Niy~-~fscts .. ~ ~ ~~'~~''~„`' P~~C,,, ~e~ ale- --- ~.- /~ _ - ~~'p-`~ ~~ pia " - -~-4z..-.~ ~i~_ _G_e~ - ~ ~ • • -~/c~v ~ - - - ' ~D~ _S_ ~9 ~ .~i~ A ~~ ----~ _Pos ~ ~~~ - s_ - - 60 ~c -~~ ~-~.•- s~,,_,~~,, y_,~,:~ - nom- P~~j _~' A c~-o, _1_e_~ ~. - , ~°'"`~ ~~ -~ t t ~ - ~~ a l-~/-w~/ .,~ ~- ~ `-- c ~ ~ -- ~ 3a ~ ? ~. • + o s~~ /n o . r - - - - - - - - - - -- -' . ,/ -~/_la~~ _ /l_u/t1,e_S /.~•_ - ~(llck ~ ifi~r~c~ "~ _~BN/J!cJ`x ~G7sr~rr J 7 3 . ~ ~