04-09-1969 Packet
..-
e
-
VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting of the
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County, held at the Courthouse on
April 9, 1969 at 9:00 A.M.
Present:
Also Present:
Absent: Mr. C. J.
Mr. M. W. Burnett, Exec. Sec'y.
Mr. John E. Longmire,Asst.Exec.Sec'y.
Mr. Howard A. Mayo, Jr. Co.Planner
Mr. Morris Mason,A5$t. Comma Atty.
Mr. Robt. A.Painter, Co. Engineer
Mr. Richard Robertson
Purdy
Mr. Irvin G. Horner, Chairman
Mr. H. a. Browning, Vice-Chr.
Mr. F. F. Dietsch
Mr. J. Ruffin Apperson
Mr. A. R. Martin
Mr. Burnett gives the invocation.
On motion of Mr. Dietsch, seconded by Mr. Martin, it is resolved that
the minutes of March 26, 1969 be and they hereby are approved with
the correction as follows:
(I
\
On motion of Mr. Purdy, seconded by Mr. Martin, it is resolved
that this Board authorizes the condemnation of an easement
across the property owned by Curtis H. and Melva C. Egggleston
in the event that the County's offer of $150.00 be rejected,
since it is hereby declared that an emergency exists and that
this matter should be pursued immediately.
It is here noted that Mr. Apperson votes Nay.
On motion of Mr. Dietsch, seconded by Mr. Martin, it is resolved that
this Board requests the School Board to include Huguenot High School
in the program for the construction of field houses and to add
Huguenot High School to the list of five (5) other schools and with
the same agreements as to financing.
It is here noeed that Mr. Browning votes Nay saying that he would
like to know more about why the school was deleted originally.
Mrs. G.H.Comstock speaking for the Bit and Bridle Club comes before
the Board requesting some improvement and maintenance to the horse
rings at the Courthouse.
It was generally agreed that these be improved by the County forces
and that the Planning Director be requested to submit a suggested
list of charges for the use of these rings, bearing in mind the needed
imprqvements and maintenance.
On motion of Mr. Martin, seconded by Mr. Dietsch, it is resolved that
the following water contracts be and they hereby are approved:
AC-649
A-342F
Thompson Estates, Section "A"
Greenfield, Section G
$12,594.00
5,820.00
.
.
On motion of Mr. Dietsch, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that
contnact No. C-64B for the installation of water in Ampthill Heights
be awarded to the Shropshire Contracting Company, Inc. in the amount of
$4764.50.
On motion of Mr. Browning, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that
the Engineering Department be requested to investigate the request for
a water line extension on General Boulevardg
It was generally agreed that Project 6511-24 for the installation of
sewers in Grantlake Hills.-Dorchester area be deferred for further
consideration.
On motion of Mr. Dietsch, seconded by Mr.Browning, it is resolved that
contract S-69-3CD for the installation of sewer line to the Route 10
Motel Corporation be and it hereby is approved.
It is here noted that Mr. Apperson votes Nay.
On motion of Mr. Dietsch, seconded by Mr. ~lartin, it is resolved that
due to an existing emergency that the Engineering Department be authorized
to condemn the following named people and if they will not settle for
the stated amounts that condemnation suits be instigated:
Haywood o. and Annie L. Denton,Proj2ct S69-lC
$50.00
25.00
~ T. and Christine R. Abercrombie, Project S69-lC
H. Clen and Katherine F. Johnson,Project S6B-ICD
35.00
Mr. Painter cites the fact that contract S-69-8CD and S-69-l0CD have been
bid somewhat higher than expected and this being a marginal project
as to feasibility recommends the rejection of the bids.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Dietsch, seconded by
Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that the bids to install sewer lines on
Lancers Boulevard be and they hereby are rejected.
~
There was read a letter signed by Mr. L. M.Sterling and Mr. H.C.Miller
requesting some relief in the rental of apartments in buildings No. 6
and 7 in hhe Lafayette Apartments which buildings have been held up due
to an agreement concerning the drainage in the area.
Upon consideration of all ~he aspects of this case, it is on motion of
Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dietsch, resolved that buildings No. 6 and
7 in the Lafayette Apartments be kept vacant until the required work
for the drainage ditches in this area be completed.
Notice was given that the following roads have been formally accepted
into the State Secondary System of roads:
Oak Haven Farms Sl1bdiy.i_si_9.lL.=....2..~~...tL<;>lL~'~
Clintwood Road - from a point on Route 360, 0.11 mile west
of its intersection with Route 651, northwardly 0.57 mile
to Route 604
0.57 Mi.
_ 2-
.
.
Gay Farms Subdivision-Section 3:
Blithe Road - from the intersection of Route 1562 and
1573 eastwardly 0.13 mile
0.13 mile
Cameron Hills Subdivision:
Kingston Avenue - from the intersection of Route 10
and Route 696 southwardly 0.20 mile to Okuma Drive
0.20
"
Okuma Drive - from Kingston Avenue, 0.02 mile south of
Route 10, westwardly 0.14 mile
0.14
"
A brief discussion was held concerning the drainage problem on Winfree
Street and Mr. Davidson stated that he would let the County know as
soon as he viewed the property as to what improvements could be made.
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dietsch, it is resolved that
this Board requests the Highway ~partment to pave Folkstone . Drive
in the Land O'Pines Subdivision and charge same to the 3~ Road Fund
of the County.
And be it further resolved, that the Highway Department be requested
to take into the Secondary System of roads Folkstone Drive in the Land
O'Pines Subdivision.
On motion of Mr. Dietsch, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that
this Board requests the Highway Department to furnish two sets of the
latest plan on Rte. 288, between Rte. #1 and Rte. 10 to facilitate
the acquisition of rights of way.
On motion of Mr. Apperson, sedonded by Mr. Dietsch, it is resolved that
a requested sidewalk on the east side of Hopkins Road, from Lake Hills
Road to Corbridge Road be referred to the Sidewalk Committee for
investigation and inclusion into the sidewalk construction program.
On motion of Mr. Martin, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that
this Board requests the Highway Department to include into its next
year's budget the surface-treatment of Rt. 607, from Rt.60 northwardly
to the new Sub-station on the Virginia Electric & Power Company.
On motion of Mr. Dietsch, seoonded by Mr. Browning, it is resolved that
the drainage project to serve Mr. Weinstein and others has been bid
at a cost of approximately $40,000 of which $23,000 has been pledge~
as contrigutions from developers, and the County is authorized to pay
the remaining $18,000, 50% from the 3~ Road Fund illd 50% from the County
Drainage Account.
-3-
.
.
Mr. Patrick Ravo, Director, Capital Regional Park Authority, comes
before the Board explaining the Authority's request for $18,880.00
as Chesterfield's share in the operation of the Authority for the
coming year and cites the fact that some of the proposed new positions
may not be filled and that the Authority will move out of the City of
Richmond.
It was ~nerally agreed that this matter be considered further at a later
date.
This is the time and date advertised for a public hearing on the
following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE to amend Chapter 2, Article 3, by adding thereto
Section 2-5.2 to prohibit vicious or destructive dogs from
running at large and Section 2-5.3 to provide a penalty for
violation thereof.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA:
That Chapter 2, Article 3, of the Code of the County of Chesterfield
be and it is hereby amended and reordained by adding thereto the
sections following:
SECTION 2-5.2 VICIOUS OR DESTRUCTIVE DOGS PROHIBITED FROM RUNNING
AT LARGE
It shall be unlawful to permit any vicious or destructive dog
from running at large within the boundaries of the County, and
any person owning, having control of or h~rboring any such dog
shall be, and they are hereby required to keep the same confined
within their premises.
SECTION 2-5.3 VIOLATION OF SECTION 2-5.2A MISDEMEANOR
Any person found violating Section 2-5.2 shall be guilty of
a misdemeanor and punished by a fine not exceeding three hundred
dollars ($300.00) or by imprisonment in the County Jail not
exceeding thirty days or both such fine and imprisonment. Each
such violation shall constitute a separate offense.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage as provided by law.
There appear SeVi?nteen people speaking in favor of the passage of
this ordinance.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded
by Mr. Dietsdh, it is resolved that said Ordinance be and it hereby
is adopted to be effective immediately.
On motion of Mr. Dietsch, seconded by Mr. Martin, it is resolved that
the following ordinance be and it hereby is adopted:
An Ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 6 ~ticle 5 Section
6-118 by adding thereto Section 6-118.1 providing for prohibition
against parking on County owned property.
-4-
.
.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER-
FIELD, VIRGINIA:
5
That Chapter 6 Articl~ Section 6-118 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield be and it is hereby amended and reenacted to read as
follows:
Section 6-118.1 Parking Prohibited on County owned property;exceptions
and penalties for violation.
(A) It shall be unlawful for any person to park any vehicle on
any County owned property where such parking is prohibited or regulatrld
and said parking is in violation of any such regulation.
(B) For the purpose of this section the Chief of Police is hereby
authorized and directed to make and enforce rules and regulations
for the prohibiting of parking of vehicles upon County owned property,
to classify vehicles with reference to parking, to designate the time,
place and manner in which sych vehicles may be allowed to park; and,
to revoke, alter or amend such rules and regulations at any time when in
his opinion parking conditions require.
(C) Any person, after receiving written notice in a form approved
by the Chief of Police, that such person is in violation of this
section, may waive his right to appear in court and be formally tried
for the offense set forth in the notice, and upon voluntary payment
of $3.00 to the Clerk of the County Court within 72 hours after receipt
of such notice shall not be required to appear before the traffic court
for trial upon the charge set forth in such notice. If said fine is
not paid within the prescribed time then upon conviction he shall be
fined not less than ~.OO nor more than $10.00.
(D) In any prosecution upon this section, pronf that the vehicle
described in the complaint, summons or warrant was parked in violation
of any such rule or regulation, together with proof that the defendant
was at the time of such parking, the registered owner of the vehicle,
as required by Chapter 3 of Title 46 of the Virginia Code, shall
constitute in evidence a prima facie presumption that such registered
owner of the vehicle was the person who parked the vehicle at the place
where and for the time during which such violation occurred.
On motion of Mr. Dietsch, seconded by Mr. Martin, it is resolved that the
proposed Fire Ordinance for the operation of the new Fire Department
be advertised for a pUblic hearing on May 14, 1969 at 5:00 P.M.
69-19
Mr. James Combs, representing Mr. Hugh Hawthorne, comes before the Board
requesting the rezoning from Residential (R-2) to Commercial (C-2)
of a parcel of land of rectangular shape starting at a point 230 feet,
more or less, south of Hull Street Road (Rte. 360) extending southeast-
wardly to a depth of 75 feet more or less being 235 feet more or less
in width, located 625 feet more or less northeast of the intersection
of Hull Street Road (Rte. 360) and Berrywood Road in Manchester Magisteria]
District. Refer to Sec. 30-9 (1) the remainder of parcel 36, and cites
the need for the construction of a fence as proposed on this propertyo
Upon consideration whereof and on motion of Mr.Dietsch, seconded by
Mr. Appedson, it is resolved that this Board denies the request for a
-5-
.
.
C-2 zoning and grants 'a Use Permit for storage purposes on the afore-
described strip of land and grants a ~riance to allow the construction
of a fence up to 10 feet in height.
69-12.
Mr. Harold M. Taylor, Jr. comes before the Board requesting the
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-2) of a parcel of
land of irregular shape containing 10 acres more or less located
450 feet more or less west of Hopkins Road extending_westwardly to a
depth of 1470 feet, being 240 feet more or less northwest of the
intersection of Hopkins Road and Centralia Road (Rteo 145) in ~le
Magisterial ~strict. Refer to Sec. 97-1 (I).
Mr. Miles appears to oppose the layout of lots in Mr. Taylor's Subd.
and to oppose the name of his Subdivision,both of which conflict with
Mr. Miles Subdivision.
Upon consideration whereof,
Mr. Dietsch, it is resolved
and it hereby is rezoned to
and on motion of Mr. Apperson,
that the aforedescribed parcel
Residential-2.
seconded by
of land be
~
On motion of Mr. Dietsch, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved
that the County Planner study the feasibility and necessity of
notifying adjacent land owners when lane is proposed for development
before the Planning Commission and to make a report on such study
to this Board.
69-13
Mr. David F. Freeman comes before the Board, representing himself and
Mr. Eddy L. Pulley, requesting the rezoning from Agricultural (A)
to Commercial (C-2) of a parcel of land of irregular shape fronting
243 feet on Hull Street Road (Rte. 360) extending northwestwardly
to a depth of 370 feet, being 690 feet more or less northeast of the
inbersection of Hull Street Road (Rte. 360) and Pocoshock Boulevard
in Manchester Magisterial District. Refer to Sec. 40-5 (1) lots 1
and 2-1.
Mr. Jensen head a delegation of 11 people from the Longwood Civic
Associ~tion opposing the request and stating that the County should
stick to its present Land Use Map.
Upon consideration whereof and on motion of Mr. Dietsch, seconded by
Mr. Martin, it is resolved that this request be and it hereby is
denied.
69-15
Mro James Hubbard, representing Mr. Clarence W. Johnson, comes before
the Board cequesting the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Commercial
(C) of a parcel of land of irregular shape fronting 330 feet more or
less on ~lmsley Boulevard (Rte. 647) extending northwardly to a
depth of 455 feet more or less being 535 feet west of the intersection
of Walmsley Boulevard (Rte. 647) and Rte. 10 in Manchester Magisterial
District. Refer to Sec. 41-2 (1) par. 22, and states that there is
presently no opposition to this request in the area. There was
-6-
.
.
produced a letter from the Board of Deacons of Branch's Baptist Church
citing the fact that there would be no objections, provided certain
conditions are met.
Upon consideration whereof and on motion of Mr. Dietsch,seconded by
Mr. Martin, it is resolved that the aforedescribed parcel of land
be and it hereby is rezoning for C-2 purposes upon the approval of
a Deed of Trust which would prevent the use of this property as a
filling station site and the Planning Director is hereby authorized
to approve site plans which would include a brick wall not more than
4 feet high on the eastern property line.
69-16
Mr. J. D. Jordan, Jr. comes before the Board requesting the rezoning
from Residential (R-2) to Commercial (C-2) of a parcel of land of
irregular shape, fronting 260 feet more or less on Rtc. 1515 extending
westwardly to a depth of 300 feet more or less being 490 feet more or
less north of the intersection of Route 10 and Chester Road (Rte.144)
in Bermuda Magisterial District. Refer to Sec.115-3& 7 (1) remainder
of par. 17.
There appearing no one in opposition to this requ~st, it is on motion
of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Martin, resolved that the request
of C-2 zoning be denied and that the aforedescribed parcel of land be
and it hereby is rezoned to Local Business.
69-20
Mr. Frederick ~ay, representing Pillow Mobile Homes, Inc. comes before
the Board requesting the rezoning from Agricultural to Commercial (C-2)
of a parcel of land of irregular shape containing 7.39 acres fronting
145.0 feet on U.S.Rt. 1 and extending eastwardly 1808.98 feet, the
first 300 feet presently zoned Commercial (C-2) being 472.30 feet
northwest of the intersection of Rte.l and Rte.10, better known as
12401 Jefferson Davis Highway in Bermuda Magisterial District. Refer
to ~c.116-6 & 7 (1) the remainder of par 28. There appearing no
one in opposition to this request and upon consideration whereof and
on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dietsch, resolved that the
aforedescribed parcel of land be and it hereby is rezoned for C-2
purposes.
69-21
Mr. Charles Armstead comes before the Board representing Mrs. Elma P.
Chandler who requests the rezoning from Agricultural to Commercial
(C-2) of a parcel of land of irregular shape fronting 1200 feet more
or less on Rte. 619 extending northwardly to a depth of 1650 feet more
or less being 1550 feet more or less northeast of the intersection
of Rte. 619 and Rte. 301 in Bermuda Magisterial District. Refer to
Sec. 149-3, 4, 7 & 8 (1) par. 1.
There appearing no one to oppose this request, it is on motion of
Mr. Browning, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the aforedescribed
parcel of land be and it hereby is rezoned for General Commercial (C~2)
-7-
.
.
purposes with the understanding that a widening strip on Rt. 619 will
be granted.
69-22
There was no one here to propose or oppose the request of Mr. Paul E.
Clendenin. Whereupon on motion of Mr. Dietsch, seconded by Mr. Apperson
it is resolved that this matter be deferred for thirty days.
69-23
Mr. Robert Benton comes before the Board representing the Chester Hidden
Valley Corporation requesting the rezoning from Agricultural and
Residential-l (R-l) to Residential-2 (R-2) of a parcel of land of
irregular shape containing 125.26 acres extending 2115 feet more or less
northeast of Blk. B, lot 9 of "Hidden Valley" Subdivision, having a
depth east to west of 2750 feet more or less, being 1600 feet more or
less northeast of the intersection of Rtc. 619 (Happy Hill Road),Rte.
616 (South Chester Road) and Rte. 786 /Baldwin Road) in Bermuda
Magisterial District. Refer to Sec. 32-4 & 8 (1) par. lo
There appearing no one in opposition to this request, it is on motion
of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Browning, resolved that the afore-
described parcel of land be and it hereby is rezoned to Residential-2.
69-24
On motion of Mr. Martin, seconded by l''iro Apperson, it is resolved that
the request of Mr. Preston E. Clark to withdraw the request for rezoning
be and it hereby is approved.
69:"IBU
Mrs. Virginia A; Pinkleton comes before the Board requesting a Use
Permit to operate a beauty shop in her home located on a parcel of land
of rectangular shape, fronting 80 feet, more or 1ess on Halloway Avenue,
extending westwardly to a depth of 200 feet more or less being 480 feet
more or less northwest of the intersection of Halloway Avenue and
Meadowview Drive, and better known as 214 Halloway Avenue in Matoaca
Magisterial District. Refer to Sec. 180-16 (1) par. 60
There appearing no one to oppose this request, on motion of Mr. Browning,
seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that a Use Permit to operate a
Beauty Shop ~n her home on the aforedescribed parcel of land be given
to Mrs. Pinkleton herself with the provision that there be no signs
displayed on the premiseso
69-19U
Mr. Frank Walters comes before the Board requesting a Use Permit to
operate a Mail Order, Antique Refinishing and Sales fusiness located on
a parcel of land of rectangular shape fronting 100 feet more or less
on Hey Road (Rte. l660) extending eastwardly to a depth of 310 feet,
more or less, being 125 feet more or less southeast of the intersection
-8-
""
of Hey Road and ae~well Road and better know~as 2811 Hey Road in
Manchester Magisterial District. Refer to Sec. 40-4 (2) lots 31A & 32,
and presents a petition signed by his neighbors proposing his request.
Upon consideration whereof and on motion of Mr. Dietsch, seconded by
Mr. Martin, it is resolved that a Use Permit to operate a Mail Order,
Antique Refinishing and Sales Business on the aforedescribed parcel of
land be granted to Mr. Walters only for a period of two years, provided
there be no signs or alterations to the buildings.
69-20U.Dr. J.R.Good comes before the Board requesting a Use Permit to
construct a 2000 sq. ft. shop and office to build working models for
the obtaining of invention patents on a parcel of land of rectangular
shape, fontaining 07.417 acres, fronting 279.93 feet on Hull Street
Road (U.S. Rt.360) extending southwardly to a ~pth of l324~37 feet,
being l300 feet more or less southwest of the intersection of Hull Street
Road and Suncrest Drive (Rteo 906) in Midlothian Magisterial District.
Refer to Sec. 49-10 &11 (1) par. 7 & S.
There appearing no one co oppose this request, it is on motion of
Mr. Martin, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that a Use Permit to
use the existing structure on the aforedescribed parcel of land to
build working models for the obtaining of invention patents.
On motion of Mr. Browning, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that
the following erroneous tax claims be and they hereby are approved:
Edwin E. Pryor
4848 Burtwood Lane
ii,ichmond, Va.
James 00 & Mary W. Perkinson
914 Kensington Ne.
Colonial Heights, Va.
1969 Co. Trailer License
$4.50
1969 Co. Motor Vehicle
license
lO.OO
Robert vi Charles
594l Fairlee Road
Richmond, Vao
Electrical Cant. License
27.00
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Browning, it is resolved
that the following game claim be approved for payment:
Mrs. Forrest "'l Hughes
11 rabbits - 6 lbs. each @$2.00 $22.00
On motion of Mr. Dietsch, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that
the Executive Secretary be authorized to sign an easement to the
Virginia Electric & Power Company for the installation of a power
line to the Nursing Home.
There was presented recommendations from the County Highway Safety
Commission. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Apperson,
seconded by Mr. Browning, it is resolved that:
(l) All operators of County owned vehicles be required
-9-
.
.
to complete the National Safety Council's defensive
driving course and that funds be provided to finance
this training at the cost of approximately $1.40 per
driver.
(2) That funds be provided the Safety Commission for the
above driverls training ( approximately 500 drivers x
$1.40 $700.
For travel of members and youth safety comma 250.
For materials (letter heads, stationery, etc.) 50.
Total amount requested $1000.
There was presented a request from the School Board for the 2nd
Semester of the tuition grant scholarships. Upon consideration
whereof and on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Martin, it is
resolved that the Treasurer of the County be requested to transfer
the sum of $55,734.00 to the Scholarship Fund for the second semester
tuition grant scholar:ships.
It is here noted that Mr. Browning and Mr. Dietsch vote Nay.
There was presented a request of the Bon Air Fire Department for a
new fire station. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr.
Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dietsch, it is resolved that this request
be referred to the are Committee for further consideration.
On motion of Hr. Apperson, seconded by l"lr. Bro\tming, it is resolved
that the salary and expense request for the year ending June 30,19vO
of the Commonwealth's Attorney Office be and it hereby is received.
On motion of Mr. Dietsch, seconded by Mr. Browning, it is resolved
that a letter of complaint involving bus sbhedules for Kindergarten
school children be referred to the School Board for reply.
The Executive Secretary reported that the Police Department had
made several investigations of the conditions alleged in a petition
signed by a number of residents of LaBrook Drive and that most of
the faults had been corrected.
There was presented a budget for the year 1969-'70 by various funds
which totalled approximately $46,500,000. Upon consideration whereof
and on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dietsch', it is resolved
that the budget be advertised for formal adoption on May 14, 1969
at 11:00 o'clock A.M. and also to be publicly discussed by anyone
present on ~ril 23, 1969 at 4:00 P.M.
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dietsch, it is resolved
that this Board adjourns at 4:45 P.M. until April 23, 1969 at
2:00 P.M.
II'"
.. _.....____.'___.J___~.__._...,... e.
c
~- _...- .~.~...:-..---..:.-..~.._~.- "---
... ,._.__._-~"-
J
"
,
!
I
"
I
j'
An Ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 6 Article 5 Section
6-118 by adding thereto Section 6-118.1 providing for prohibi-
tion against parking on County owned property.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNtTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA:
That Chapter 6 Article 5 Section 6-118 of the Code of the
County of Chesterfield be and it is hereby amended and reenact-
ed to read as follows:
Section 6-118.1 Parking Prohibited on County Owned Property;
exceptions and I"~/? tl.lh e:; -{Co.- 1//'.>/41'/<:'/1/,
(A) It shall be unlawful for any person to park any
vehicle on any county owned property where such parking is
prohibited or regulated and said parking is in violation
of any such regulation. .
(B) For the purposes of this section the Chief of
Police is hereby authorized and directed to make and enforce
rules and regulations for the prohibiting of parking of
vehicles upon county owned property, to classify vehicles
with reference to parking, to designate the time,place and
manner in which such vehicles may be allowed to park; and,
to revoke, alter or amend such rules and regulations at any
time when in his opinion parking conditions require.
(C) Any person, after receiving written notice in a
form approved by the Chief of Police, that such person is
in.violationof this section, may waive his right to appear
. in court and be formally tried for the offense set forth in .
the notice, and upon voluntary payment of $3~00 to the Clerk
of the County Court within 72 hours after receipt of such
. notice shall not be required to appear before the traffic court
. for trial upon the charge set forth in such notice. If said
fine is not paid witWPthe prescribed time then upon conviction
he. shall be fined not less than $3.00 nor more than $lO.OO.
. (D) In any prosecution upon this section, proof that
the vehicle described in the complaint, summons or warrant was
parked in violation of any such rule or regulation, together
with proof that the defendant was at the time of such parking
the registered owner of the vehicle, as required by Chapter 3
of Title 46 of the Virginia Code, shall constitute in evidence
a prima facie presumption that such registered owner of the
vehicle was the person who parked the vehicle at the place,
where and for the timedtir~ng which such violation occurred.
c_
-;---\
1---'''-
.r-;"
d ",,- '-l~.j
.
It
March 12, 1969
T 0
WHOM
I T.
MAY
CON C ERN
We, the undersigned PROPERTY OWNERS adjacent to the
property known as 2811 Hey road, Lots 32 and 31, Old
Bangle Property, owned by FRANK W. and MARGARET S.
WALTERS, do approve of a Use Permit for FraMar Enterprises
which will operate as a mall-;~de~ business and the
refinishing and sale of antiques, etc. with the following
provisions:
1) Property or building will not be sold or
rented to anyone for business purposes other than
MR. and MRS. FRANK W. WALTERS.
2) No signs will be erected on the property.
3) There will be no parking on the street or
road.
4) When open, business hours will be from
9:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m.
5) Only two people will be involved in this
business.
:,;',,: -
~/901:/k
Rf (JecA::,~h.tJJ, tn,!:)
/ J
e
Preston E. Clark
8137 Whittington Drive
Richmond, Virginia 23235
APRIL 8, 1969
.
-It c, 1- Z--4c.s
MR. HOWARD A. MAYO, JR., SECRETARY
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY COURTHOUSE
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832
DEAR HOWARD:
THIS WILL CONFIRM OUR TELEPHONE CONVERSATION TODAY DURING WHICH
I REQUESTED THAT APPLICATION FILED BY ME FOR REZONING A PARCEL
OF LAND ON MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE, CASE No. 69-24CS BE WITHDRAWN
FROM THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY SCHEDULED FOR 2:30 P.M. ON APRIL 9, 1969.
IT IS NO LONGER MY DESIRE THAT THIS PIECE OF LAND BE REZONED.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION.
s~~
ESTON E. CLARK
PEC/JP
.
.
VIRGINIA: At a meeting of the
Chesterfield County Planning Commission
held at the Courthouse on Tuesday,
March lB, 1969, at 7:00 PM.
Present:
Mr. J. R. Henshaw, Chairman
~lJ.r. Elbert Howard, Vice Chairman
Mr. Herbert O. Browning
Mr. M. W. Burnett
~lJ.r. M. T. Dubus
Mr. N. A. Vaughan
Mr. Howard A. Mayo, Jr., Sec.
Also Present:
Mr. Stanley R. Balderson, Jr.
Research Technician
Mr. Morris Mason,
Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney
Mr. Thomas Daniel,
Assistant County Engineer
Mr. Maynard Elrod,
Assistant County Engineer
Mr. R. M. Spencer,
Supervisory Sanitarian
Mr. Richard Robertson,
Richmond Regional Planning
Mr. Paul Palkimas
Richmond Regional Planning
Absent:
Mr. Gordon B. Marshall
On motion of Mr. Howard, seconded by Mr. Dubus, it is resolved that
the minutes of lB February 1969, be and they hereby are approved
as corrected on page one.
All vote aye.
69-l2C Mr. Harold Taylor again comes before the Commission, the
matter having been continued from the February meeting, requesting
the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential-2 of a parcel of
land in Dale Magisterial District of irregular shape containing 10 acres
t located 450 ft. ! west of Hopkins Road extending westwardly to a
depth of 1470 ft., being 240 ft. ! northwest of the intersection of
Hopkins Road and Centralia Road (Rte. l45). Refer to Sec. 97-l (1).
Mr. George Whitman, engineer for the Taylor subdivision, states
that Vestry Road was not extended in the preliminary subdivision
plat presented to the Commiasion due to the open ditch and deep
ravine. He goes on to say it was explained in detail over a period
some 45 minutes after which it was given tentative approval.
On motion of Mr. Howard, seconded by Mr. Browning, it is resolved
that the Commission recommends approval to Residential-2 of the
aforedescribed parcel of land as requested by Mr. Harold Taylor.
All vote aye.
69-l3C Mr. David F. Freeman again comes before the Commission, the
matter having been continued from the February meeting, requesting
the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Commercial (C-2) of a parcel
of land in Manchester Magisterial District of irregular shape fronting
243 ft. on Hull Street Road (Rte. 360) extending northwestwardly to
a depth of 370 ft. being 690 ft. ! northeast of the intersection of
Hull Street Road (Rte. 360) and Pocoshock Boulevard. Refer to Sec.
40-5 (1) lots 1 & 2-1. He goes on to ask that the C-2 zoning to the
east be extended westwardly to include the next two brick houses.
m
Page 1
Mr. Dubus asks i)lte would consider a use pe~t, whereupon
"no", going on to say he does not think it would work as he
be able to get a commercial loan. It is his opinion all of
will become business in a short time.
he answers
would not
this area
On motion of Mr. Howard, seconded by Mr. Dubus, it is resolved that the
Commission recommends that the request of Mr. Pulley and Mr. Freeman
for Commercial (C-2) zoning of the aforedescribed parcel of land be
denied.
Mr. Howard, Mr. Dubus, Mr. Browning and Mr. Henshaw vote aye.
Mr. Vaughan votes nay. Mr. Burnett abstains.
69-15C Mr. J. F. Hubbard comes again for Mr. Clarence W. Johnson,
the matter having been continued from the meeting of 18 February,
requesting the rezoning frorn Agircultural (A) to Commercial (C~2) in
Manchester Magisterial District of a parcel of land of irregular
shape fronting 330 ft. i on Walmsley Boulevard (Rte. 647) extending
northwardly to a depth of 455 ft. i being 535 ft. west of the inter-
section of Walmsley Boulevard (Rte. 647) and Route lO. \ Refer to Sec.
41-2 (l) par. 22.
The Secretary reads a letter from the chairman of the Board of Deacons
of Branch's Baptist Church, Mr. N. Leslie Saunders, in which certain
conditions are spelled out which if met would eliminate their
opposition.
On motion of Mr. Burnett, seconded by Mr. Vaughan, it is resolved
that the Commission recommends approval of the requested Commercial
(C-2) zoning with the provision that a four (4) foot high fence and
plantings be placed to the east of the buildings, that no service
stations be permitted in the area, that an easement adjacent to
Walmsley Boulevard be dedicated to the county in accordance with the
Engineering Department standards and that the site layout and plans
be approved by the Planning Director.
All vote aye.
69-16C Mr. J. D. Jordan, Jr. again comes before the Commission, this
matter having been continued from the meeting of l8 February, requesting
the rezoning from Residential (ft-2) to Commercial (C-2) in Bermuda
Magisterial District of a parcel of land of irregular shape, fronting
260 ft. i on Rte. 1515 extending westwardly to a depth of 300 ft. i
being 490 ft. i north of the intersection of Route 10 and Chester Road
(Rte. l44). Refer to Sec. ll5-3 & 7 (1) remainder of par. 17. He
states that he wishes to dispose of his property and with the exception
of this parcel the rest of his land is presently zoned C-2. He also
states that there is a possibility the land will be used for multi-
family purposes.
Mrs. Strickland, a real estate agent, states that she wants it all
commercial in order to market the entire tract.
On motion of Mr. Dubus, seconded by Mr. Howard, it is resolved that
the Commission recommends that the request for Commercial (C-2) zoning
be denied.
Mr. Dubus, P1r. Howard, and Pilr. Burnett vote aye.
Mr. Browning and Mr. Vaughan vote nay.
m
Page 2
Whereupon it is ~!notion of Mr. Browning, s~nded by Mr. Vaughan,
resolved that th~ommission recommends that~e aforementioned parcel
of land owned by Mr. J. D. Jordan, Jr. be rezoned to Local Business
(C-l).
Mr. Browning, Mr. Vaughan, Mr. Burnett and Mr. Howard vote aye.
Mr. Dubus votes nay.
69-20C Mr. Frederick Gray, attorney for Pillow Mobile Homes, Inc.
comes requesting the rezoning from Agricultural to Commercial (C-2)
in Bermuda Magisterial District of a parcel of land of ir~egular
shape containing 7.39 acres fronting 145.0 ft. on U. S. Rte. 1 and
extending eastwardly l808.98 ft., the first 300 ft. presently zoned
Commercial (C-2) being 472.30 ft. northwest of the intersection of
Rte. land Rte. lO, better known as 12401 Jefferson Davis Highway.
Refer to Sec. l16-6 & 7 (1) the remainder of par. 28. .
He states that the purpose of the zoning is to allow an existing
mobile home sales company to extend its sales display area.
On motion of Mr. Dubus, seconded by Mr. Howard, it is resolved that
the Commission recommends approval to Commercial (C-2) of the afore-
described parcel of land as requested by Mr. Gray for Pillow Mobile
Homes, Inc.
All vote aye.
69-21C Mr. Charles Armistead, representing Mrs. Elma P. Chandler,
comes requesting the rezoning from Agriculutral to Commercial (C-2)
of a parcel of land in Bermuda Magisterial District of irregular
shape fronting 1200 ft. t on Rte. 619 extending northwardly to a
depth of 1650 ft. t being 1550 ft. t northeast of the intersection
of Rte. 619 and Rte. 301. Refer to Sec. 149-3, 4, 7 & 8 (1) par. 1.
He states that the proposed use is for a travel trailer camp site
(Arrowhead International, Inc.). He goes on to explain and show
the layout of a typical camp, pointing out that the camping area
will be fenced and there will be a "live-on" manager. The cost
will be about $3.50 per night. It is noted that recreational and
sanitation facilities will be provided.
The Planning Director states that Mr. Browning, Mr. Purdy, Mr. Caldwell
and he have met with ~1r. Armistead, Mr. Charles K. Koller (Arrowhead
International, Inc.) and others to look over the site and go over
the various details of setting up this project.
On motion of Mr. Dubus, seconded by Mr. Browning, it is resolved
that the Commission recommends Commercial (C-2) approval of the
aforementioned parcel as requested by Mrs. Chandler subject to the
site layout and plans being approved by the Planning Director and
further be it recommended that the necessary easement along Rte. 619
for the entire frontage be dedicated to the county.
All vote aye.
69-22C Mr. Warren Chapman, agent for Mr. Paul E. Clendenin, comes
requesting the rezoning from Residential -2 (R-2) to Commercial (C-2)
in Manchester Magisterial District of a parcel of land of irregular
shape fronting 127 ft. on Hull Street Road (Rte. 360) extending
northwardly 967.78 ft., the first 300 ft. being presently zoned
Commercial (C-2), being 969.64 ft. west of the intersection of
Rte. 360 and Warwick Road. Refer to Sec. 30-l, 2 & 6 (1) the remainder
of par. l4.
m
PR~R ~
.
.
He states that Mr. Clendenin will use the rear portion of the land
for a cabinet shop and the front for a carpet company. He points out
that the easement referred to by one of the Commissioners is written
into the deed and is very definitely tied down.
On motion of Mr. Browning, seconded by Mr. Howard, it is resolved
that the Commission recommends approval to Commercial (C-2) of
the aforementioned parcel of land as requested by Mr. Clendenin.
All vote aye.
69-23C Mr. Zane Davis of the Chester Hidden Valley Corporation comes
requesting the rezoning from Agricultural and Residential-l to Resi-
dential-2 (R-2) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, in Bermuda
Magisterial District, containing 125.26 acres extending 2115 ft. t
northeast of Blk. Blot 9 of "Hidden Valley" Subdivision having a
depth east to west of 2750 ft. t being 1600 ft. t northeast of the
intersection of Rte. 619 (Happy Hill Rd.) Rte. 616 (South Chester
Road) and Rte. 786 (Baldwin Road). Refer to Sec. 32-4 & 8 (1) par. 1.
On motion of Mr. Howard, seconded by Mr. Vaughan, it is resolved that
the Commission recommends approval to Residential-2 of the aforedescribed
parcel of land as requested by the Chester Hidden Valley Corp.
All vote aye.
69-24C Mr. Preston E. Clark comes requesting the rezoning from
Agricultural to Commercial (C-2) of a parcel of land of irregular
Shape in Midlothian Magisterial District fronting 200 ft. on Rte. 60
(Midlothian Turnpike) extending southwestwardly to a depth of 395 ft.,
being 1250 ft. t southeast of the intersection of Rte. 60 (Midlothian
Turnpike) and Robious Road. Ref~r to Sec. 17-12 & 16 (1) par. 3.
He states that he intends to/~Rn8tf~8~ and warehouse and printing
business on the property if zoned. He also cites that he has an
option to purchase subject to the zoning.
A letter from E. S. Hague notes that the property was sold to a
Mr. & Mrs. Porter with the understanding that only a home would be
built on it.
Another letter bearing the signature of Garland E. Farnsworth, president
of the Shenandoah Community Association indicates their opposition
to this zoning request.
Petitions bearing approximately 150 signatures are presented requesting
the zoning of Preston Clark be denied.
On motion of Mr. Dubus, seconded by Mr. Howard, it is resolved that
the Commission recommends that Commercial (C-2) zoning of the aforede-
scribed parcel of land be denied Mr. Preston Clark.
All vote~aye.
m
Page 4
.
.
69-25C Mr. Frederick Gray, attorney, comes representing Mr. H. A.
Knabe requesting the rezoning from Agricultural to Industrial (M)
in Midlothian Magisterial District of a parcel of land of irregular
shape fron ting 1400 ft. :!: on the right of way of the Southern Railway,
extending northwardly 2260 ft. :!: being 230 ft. :!: northeast of the
intersection of Southern Railway and Rte. 60 (Midlothian Turnpike).
Refer to Sec. 15 (1) part of parcel 4.
The Secretary reads letters of opposition from Mrs. George Geissinger,
Sr. and Jr. and another from Rosie and Arthur Titcomb.
Mr. G~ay continues by showing an aerial photograph of the property in
question and the surrounding area. He points out that there are
approximately 60 acres in the tract with a buffer zone of 13~ acres
along Michaux Creek. A pre-cast concrete manufacturing plant plans
to use approximately 9 acres and there will be no dust, smoke or noise.
Gas will be piped to the site and a ~tmple spur will be brought from
the Southern Railroad over which two or three cars per week will use.
There will be five or six trucks per day bringing in sand and steel
and carrying out products. Twelve to fifteen persons will be employed.
A well and septic system will be provided for an equipment building
costing a total of l~ million. Commonwealth Natural Gas will bring
in gas at about $50,000.
Mr. Burnett states that he has been working with these people for
several weeks and that it is difficult to locate industrial site$.
While there are nice subdivisions in the area good screening separates
them from this tract and it is his opinion that it will not hurt them.
He points out that this is not a smoke stack industry.
Mr. J. J. Jewett speaking in behalf of the Salisbury Corporation states
that the applicants are good friends; however, he points out that the
Commission has just recommended, adjoining this tract, the very highest
type development of $50,000 to $100,000 home sites on 3 to 5 acre
parcels. He calls attention to the R-A Salisbury district and points
out that this and Salisbury West were created after years of study.
He speaks of the fact that future residential development will be
inferior to any present day subdivisions of industry comes into this
community. He asks that the greatest study possible be made and that
while he does not wish to tell Mr. Knabe what to do with his land he
questions if this is truly the highest and best use.
Mr. Henshaw cites that last month Mr. SharD of J. K. Timmons & Assoc.
did not wish to extend streets to cross the creek as the land was
too steep.
Mr. Jewett raises the question as to how the railroad could be crossed
at this point when others have been denied this privilege.
Upon a question from Mr. Burnett, Mr. Jewett states that industrial
zoning would not be good for Midlothian; there would be a few people
e~ployed and the rest would be a truck industry throwing rocks; they
w1ll have to haul aggregate in and out.
Mr. Bob Porter states that he has been working on this four or five
years and that he is not telling Mr. Jewett everything, just what
we want him to know.
m
Page 5
.
.
Mr. Porter Vaughan, Vice
realtor, shows a plat of
tract in question.
Mr. Browning asks for a continuance in order that all concerned might
get together whereupon Mr. Porter Vaughan agrees to work with such
a group.
President of the Salisbury Corp. and a
Salisbury West and its relationship to the
On motion of fvlr. Browning, seconded by Mr. Dubus, it is resolved that
case #69-25C be continued to the Tuesday, 15 April 1969 maeting and to
view the site with others.
All vote aye.
Mr. Bob Porter states that they have studied the Justus property;
the gas company will serve the entire tract: the block comp~ny will
occupy 8 acres and Mr. Casey of Southern Railroad is present. Further,
that he cannot divulge lldmes of people who are going to use the tract.
He asks the Commission to go along and that he will not put anything
in that will be detrimental to others.
Mr. Henshaw asks if the easement objected to in the letters read
could not be shifted eastwardly to the Knabe property.
Mr. Porter states they tried to center the Knabe tract and Mr. Knabe
makes it known that he would not consider this.
The matter is concluded with an agreement that 3:00 PM Tuesday,
1 April 1969 at the Courthouse be set aside for a meeting to review
this case.
On motion of Mr. Dubus, seconded by Mr. Browning, it is resolved that
renewal of tentative approval of LORA LYNN HEIGHTS be and it hereby is
granted subject to the following conditions:
(1) All provisions of the subdivision regulations are complied with
and subject to all proposed street names being shown on the
tentative plat. Subject to all names for recordation being ap-
proved by Richmond Regional Planning Commission. (When the
"tentative final" is submitted, a letter from R.R.P.C. indicating
their approval of specific names will accompany plat.)
(2) All previous conditions are complied with.
(3) Public (county) water is used.
(4) Public (county) sewer is used, if and when available.
On motion of Mr. Dubus, seconded by Mr. Howard, it is resolved that
renewal of tentative approval of rJIEADOWDALE SEe. E & F be and it hereby
is granted subject to the following conditions:
(1)
All provisions of the subdivision regulations are complied with
and subject to all proposed street names being shown on the
tentative plat. SUbject to all names for recordation being ap-
proved by Richmond Regional Planning Commission. (When the
"tentative final" is submitted, a letter from R.R.P.C. indicating
their approval of specific names will accompany plat.)
All previous conditions are complied with.
A scale of I" = 2000' is used on vicinity sketch.
Areas held in reserve are marked as to future use.
(2)
(3 )
( 4 )
m
Page 6
.
.
In discussing the subdivision of SALISBURY, Mr. Paul-Sharp of' J ~- K.
Timmons & Assoc. states that no part of it will be recorded until
it is brought back for corrections (such as roads and cul-de-sacs
being longer than permitted by the Code).
Whereupon it is on motion of Mr. Dubus, seconded by Mr. Burnett, resolved
that renewal of tentative approval be and it hereby is granted subject
to the following conditions:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8 )
(9)
All provisions of the subdivision regulations are complied with
and subject to all proposed street names being shown on the tentative
plat. Subject to all names for recordation being approved by
Richmond Regional Planning Commission. (When the "tentative final"
is submitted, a letter from R.R.P.C. indicating their approval
of specific names will accompany plat.)
All road names being used on plat.
Those cul-de-sacs in the southwest part of Sec. "J" as well as
the cul-de-sacs in the northeast~part of Sec. "B" be tied into
adjacent "Salisbury West" Subdivision or tied together.
Lots 1 & 2 of Block "XX" in Sec. "B" be eliminated as "through
lots".
Stub roads are used to connect "Salisbury" to adjacent property.
Area marked "church" in Sec. "H" be clarified as to 60 ft. strip
adjoining church property.
Developer files a written report with the County Engineering
Department (copy to Planning Department) outlining proposed
method of sewerage treatment for multi-family development.
Long blocks to be reduced to comply with Code.
Planning Commission reserved right to require correction of any
other errors to be found.
On motion of Mr. Dubus, seconded by Mr. Howard, it is resolved that
renewal of tentative approval of the subdivision of BROOKBURY be and
it hereby is denied in that previous conditions, such as landscaping,
have not been satisfactorily met.
All vote aye.
Mr. W. S. Pinchbeck and Mr. Sharp appear to speak concerning the sub-
division of BROOKFIELD.
On motion of Mr. Howard, seconded by Mr. Browning, it is resolved that
renewal of tentative approval of BROOKFIELD be and it hereby is granted
subject to the following conditions:
(1) All provisions of the subdivision regulations are complied with
and subject to all proposed street names being shown on the
tentative plat. Subject to all names for recordation being ap-
proved by Richmond Regional Planning Commission. (When the
"tentative final" is submitted, a letter from R.R.P.C. indicating
their approval of specific names will accompany plat.)
(2) All previous conditions are complied with.
(3) A recorded building line is used on all cul-de-sacs.
(4) Public (county or central system) sewer is used. Where public
sewer is not used, lot sizes be maintained at a minimum of
l5,OOO square feet.
m Page 7
On motion of Mr. tt,ward, seconded by Mr. Br~_ng, it is resolved
that tentative approval of BUXTON be and it hereby is granted aubject
to the following conditions:
All provisions of the subdivision regulations are complied with
and subject to all proposed street names being shown on the
tentative plat. Subject to all names for recordation being
approved by Richmond Regional Planning Commission. (When the
"tentative final" is submitted, a letter from R.R.P.C. indicating
their approval of specific names will accompany plat.)
Cul-de-sac at end of Lunswood Drive is shortened so that lots
on lake will have some use able soil and enough area for drain-
fields or other suitable arrangements subject to approval of
Health Department.
That lots l-lO, l4-22 of Block "B" and lots 1-9 of
Block "C" not be recorded until fUDther evaluation can be made
(doubtful soil conditions).
Public (county) water is used.
Buxton Road is extended to meet with proposed roads in
"Lakewood Farms" subdivision.
Hanbury Drive extension is eliminated to "Lakewood Farms"
subdivision.
Mr. Longest appears concerning LAKEWOOD FARMS and cites that item 4
would require a road across property not owned by the.developers of
this subdivision and if permitted would require a fourteen foot fill.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Whereupon on motion of Mr. Browning, seconded by Mr. Dubus, it is
resolved that tentative approval of LAKEWOOD FARMS be and it hereby
is granted subject to the following conditions:
(l) All provisions of the subdivision regulations are complied with
and subject to all proposed street names being shown on the
tentative plat. Subject to all names for recordation being
approved by Richmond Regional Planning Commission. (When the
"tentative final" is submitted, a letter from R.R.P.C. indica-
ting their approval of specific names will accompany plat.)
(2) Public (county) water is used.
(3) The principles in the "Chester Fishing Club" are names on
the plat.
(4) That it be the responsibility of the developer to secure a
quit claim from the gas company as a prerequisite to recordation.
Mr. K. L. Barton states that they would like to record Section A,
road loop at south, in Rolling HIlls.
Mr. Daniel cites that water service is being worked towards this
subdivision and there are projected lines in the area.
Whereupon on motion of Mr. Dubus, seconded by Mr. Howard. it is
resolved that tentative approval of ROLLING HILLS be and it hereby
is granted subject to the following conditions:
(1) All provisions of the subdivision regulations are complied
with and subject to all proposed street names being shown on
the tentative plat. Subject to all names for recordation being
approved by Richmond Regional Planning Commission. (When the
"tentative final" is submitted. a letter from R.R.P.C. indica-
ting their approval of specific names will accompany plat.)
m Page 8
(2)
(3)
(4 )
(S)
(6)
(7)
(8 )
(9)
A scale of ~= 2000' be used on ViCin~ sketch.
Charlie Cou~cul-de-sac is shortened to meet the county code
requirements.
West Belmont Road is extended and realigned to eliminate 900 c~V~
That the developers check with Virginia State Highway Depar_tment -
to determine exact location of proposed Rte. 288.
Show proposed Rte. 288 right of way on vicinity sketch.
A study be made and presented to the County Engineering
Department on feasibility of central well system and that such
a system be used if approved by County Engineer.
That the lots on Echo Road not be recorded due to poor soil
conditions.
The owner be made aware of the very difficult soil conditions
in remainder of the subdivision.
On motion of Mr. Dubus, seconded by Mr. Browning, it is resolved that
tentative approval of PEDERSEN SUBDIVISION be and it hereby is granted
subject to the following conditions:
(l) All provisions of the subdivision regulations are complied with
and subject to all proposed street names being shown on the
tentative plat. Subject to all names for recordation being ap-
proved by Richmond Regional Planning Commission. (When the
"tentative final" is submitted, a letter from R.R.P.C. indica-
ting their approval of specific names will accompany plat.)
(2) An overall plan is submitted showing the developers complete
holdings (in relation to this plat) and his future intentions
for development.
(3) All street names are used on the plat.
(4) A rndius curve be shown at intersection of unnamed road and
Point of Rock Road.
(S) Subdivision engineer has obtained all necessary state certification
for work on this subdivision layout.
NOTE: Mrs. Spencer calls attention to the soils, especially that
found in lots 4 and S.
r~. Karpus, developer of LaRA LYNN HEIGHTS, comes requesting
permission to construct two (2) houses to front on Silver Crest Road.
Upon consideration whereof and on motion of Mr. Dubus, seconded by
Mr. Howard, it 1s resolved that the Commission recommends to the
Board of Supervisors that the recorded building line of lots 6 and 7
in Block C in the subdivision of LaRA LYNN HEIGHTS be reversed.
All vote aye.
Mr. Dubus suggests that the Planning Director and staff prepare a
list of requirements to be met by the surveyors presenting plat~.
Same to be mailed out with the notation that after 60 days from
receipt plats will be returned which do not comply.
Mr. Howard adds that they be put on notice.
Mr. Burnett points out that the Code does not call for all these
things such as recorded building lines.
m
Page 9
.
.
Mr. Balderson points out that when subdivision plats aRe sent in for
renewal at six (6) month intervals, the engineers with few exceptions
make the necessary changes to comply with the conditions imposed by
the Commission.
Mr. Mason advises the Commission that it has the right to adopt certain
rules and regulations.
Mr. Henshaw states that it may be best to start working on suggestions
for a new subdivision ordinance.
A discussion ensues concerning trash and other debris along Robious Road
and Old Bon Air Road off Route 60. It is pointed out that much of it
is caused by open trucks. Mr. Burnett cites that there is a County
Ordinance which requires trucks to be covered. He suggests that
whenever an uncovered truck is seen on the roads you should get the
license number and call the courthouse.
Upon being asked if the county police could check on this Mr. Burnett
states that he will get the county police to check it out and will ask
the Highway Department to see what they can do about the present
situation.
On motion of Mr. Henshaw, seconded by Mr. Browning, it is resolved
that the Planning Commission of Chesterfield County requests the
Virginia Department of Highways to clean up Robious Road and Old Bon
Air Road beginning at a point near Route 60 by removing trash, debris
and litter from the right of way.
All vote aye.
On motion of Mr. Burnett, seconded by Mr. Howard, the meeting is
adjourned at 12:05 AM Wednesday 19 March 1969.
m
Page 10
r)
rrn.
'(ffi
~
Yl
., . j
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD'
--
CHESTERFIELD. VIRGINIA
"
hw"G:mrn:::U1~D D&:ID UTltI'RlBS ll)Bl?An'l1.2mn
AGiliJDl! UOD. '.mE t-)(.:'~mJG OF 'EI:B OOl\PJ:) 00' -roY'~aVIGOl:'~
. Al1.UIL 9. 1~G9
I.
&\>i}l'OVcl of. wator COilt:K'ltctO:
&C-ei49 Th.OliJi.)soa 2otDtco, ~GCtion A
A-~ts,2l? -Greenfiold, Gcctioo @
~12,S~4.C@
5,$20.00
. &..crd of '\'later contract::
lh'oject C-G~i3, A:::Q~t.!11 !latches, t;@ Sl.-;:ro1>shi~o ~onf2t:ct:tn~
Com:?CllY, Inc. .in' the c::no:.mt of $4,7M.S@
111. P.equest for ~78ter l:iJJ,o CEtenGion General !:;oal~d 00 cOnsicerea.
II.
IV.. . [Ward of acuer contreet: .'
Project G511-U,. Grantlffioo Bills, ll)orch~tor ~ tiiehool.
lle:i..ebts, etc. j to &'. L. Showalter :in the -~ant of
$232,uCG.OO. .
v.
P...esolution oothoril:}ing - condemnation t>rocee~U.n8s 00 fol4r,19:
1. 3. T. and Cl;Jriat1noU. L!1bercro~hie, Project B69..1C
. ~5C.OQ. .
2. . n~;ood O. Ol@ t~ie L.ncntoo, mjcct S69-1C 025.il}~.
3. ~. elc:m l]ftd Imtlberino if. J'oWDOO, Project 860-100
$3.5.00
jl
. Doban A. Paintor
Comty ~inoo'l'
~rU 0, 19~9
I \---
I
,
1/
'-
,-~ . . ~ ..
f:ollowi,ll~tP~()petty owriet.'s. have
proposGlo ~we2?~ _ _ - -::.. _'C, .'
}---~ ~~ ~/ ' .
\
"
J
c
-.
'---.
---'-....;.
April O. 1969
,----
";,;- ~
I -
/'
Mr. RObert A.\~~int~r- .
County Englnee~ :, .
County_ of Ches~er~ield
Ciiesterf.feld.-'-V,l.'t., '
./0-0. - '''-. ;.. .'
Dea't Bo,?: """,-:::', ' .;
..~.-i~~;'tt~~.i.;~.~:~b:
,~JECT NO~
I -,- . "", ' /' -..!' I
s69..1C p~lat.d'--l~i
;
I
<-
-----;:--.-
,
O'WNER
, .
~--, \
I'
, ' , J. T. AbercrombiEf{ ,
/" Cb:rtstine R . Abern!,mbie "
(his wife) '~
S69-1C Plat ''H''
H8ytiood O. Denton &
Ann'te L. Denton (Wife)
H. Clen Johnson &
Katherine F. Johnson (Wife)
S68-1C plat "s"
,-
--~
. \
_AMOUNr
\ ,
$ 5,O~ OQ
. ,$ 2~loo
..,- \ .,'. -- .
$ 35.00
'\ \:
.,'\'....--
" ..." ,
"
"''-..
"
I feel that further negotiations wilt be useles6~ therefore,
it is recommended that condemnation proceedings be 1nstitu~ed if
this easement is to be acquired.
Sb\cerely,
\ '
A. J.Bridges
Right of t\1ay Engineer
AJB/mb
Copies to: J. Ruffin Apperson. Supervisor - DaleDi~trict .
F. F. Dietsch. supervisor - Manchester District . .
~M. W. Burnett, EXecutive Secreta~
J. T. Rose. County Assessor
.~,,-
/
/
/
I
I
,
I
,
/
"--
\,;
! ;"
(i
i,
,
t
1
I
I
I'
I
:' ~.
'I'
l
!
\.
I
I
:, r,,' "
I I ~ :
1"; .
. li.~', ~ .
I.
~ :
:::'i
;::1'
,;; \ .
~ ;
, ~ .
.
\.
,
:r:
I-
a:
o
:z:
[
r
i.
1
,
"
83 746.52
94,085.12
t
r
r
I
f
\
I
f
I.
;,
;1"
c
o~ .
, ~1'.
~(y~~
~'il};( ,
-<;?- ~ ~ "-<;
,~~1/
(,' >,PO
'" '~
~c:
" ~~
, 0
;;(.
PLAT
, "
NOTE
-sEARING a COORDINATES SHOWN
ON THIS PLAT REFER TO, THE . STATE
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM-
SOUTH ZONE
PLAT' 'J'
J. K. TIMMONS & ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERS ec SURVEYORS
1314 W. MAIN ST. RICHMOND. VA.
CO. CON. NO. S 69-IC
RE SEARCHED GWR.
CHECKED K.M.C.
DATE:- 1/28/69 SCAL-E: r" = 100'
DRAWN BY- G W R
CHECKeD nY. P N S
JOrl No. 11,371
: :0-':;':;; ";1::.:.:5' ..>::5 ."":0..
; "
..~-,~~'.-.. - .~.-...~.-..............-~-,.
..
T
I
,
:I,..;)\.,
""."
~x\_,i
;"',)/"':-
.' ;~'",,-.'~';~;':~~,;;i '.-
'-:,::.
0')
,I,
"I
I
;;,
'I'
,
:t:
l-
n:
o
z
~
);
i:
~ r
, '
I'
r
'\
"
i
"
"
Ii
,;
'I
,
(1, '
"
~ ,y~;9,
~b ilt4~
() ~Or. ~b
i!
Ji
~: .
i\'-
H
;.i'
';
!t'
~ I
l!
"
,',
n
I!
r
IL
II,
, 'lli .
I..!
(';
('
U'
'I;'
, '
" l
r
I'
: ~ i
~
~!J((J
"V",o,
~~^'
:;f 0; .
Q;-' "V' ~.....
~J::/f?~
o "" "<
:;f 0 C;J' q:
~#Q'
":)
:;::
;'"
C\l
'm
tl
o
o
z
PLAT SHOWING 25'
DALE
-. CHESTERFIELD
PERMANENT EASEMENT
DISTRICT
COUNTY, VIRGINIA
.,.
, t'\
:i
NOTE
BEARINGS 8 COORDINATES SHOWN
ON THIS PLAT REFER TO THE STATE
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM-
SOUTH ZONE.
PLAT 'H'
J. K. TIMMONS & ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERS 8< SURVEYORS
13104 W. MAIN ST. RICHMOND. VA.
I
I
,.
~
ACROSS
HAYWOOD O. DENTON
a ANNIE L. DENTON
0.8.788 Pg.Z89
CO. CON. NO. S69-IC
RESEARCHED
I'_,_~..,~_~.~ c.~:: ~.~
, . " ,," ,;. t, ..,I.... .~. - ,-.;.:0 .........
i'
D...TE- 1/26/69 SCA!..:;:: I" . 100'
D:<AWN ElY. G W R
C;-I::CKCD aY. P N S
Jor> NQ. 11,371
," ,<.' .,'v",':~r,
_ '< : l '. ,,~;: ;; ':' ,
, I'i'" :;tj;"i.:: ~ is!;;;': (,":~'y~;',~:i,.'t'.'t':l~W~ ,;,;!; t:ri';' '::. '.~. > ~.~:"
, ';, ;.t , ~ I' . '"' "., ;",' 'j:,';,.: ';-,;. '~;..:.,
I.
I
\.:
.
:
I
I
I'.
I'
I
, /,c.-..'f,J ~ ~~~~R~E~~O:I~I[E~LE a .1
/;" lffr':. D.B.354-PG.1l2 -
:1)'" it ~J""/ PLAT'To"
~o ~ .--y , .$"' I
1 6" ,.., I OS-Q ..r - , ' "
/ I, V I ;.;-...........0:;;"-: ..e"'c' ~~,' , '
I Iv'" ~ ;c; - 0"",.0 ..A
// ~..' I , <<8.-<: -<;"r j No...,....,
: / '\ '\' (.~~::;:::' .P",,~ . P '-\
I ~ /??h(
\ \ ~~
~\ \.\\<Jl-z
'0.' \ \ -07 0
~ \~ ,~
~, ~ \ \ \ ~ OJ ~ ~
. ~ \.\ \~ r Z ~
~ ~ \\ rn g r
~ \ \~ ^ l>'
~~I\ ,\. ~ ~
It, I \-_ fTl
IJ~ '\ - r:::
^~ ~ I \ \ ......
~'tl' -:J: r
~. ~ \ \ 0_ r= r
.~ 1 \ Y r ',m, I
~ I \ ~ \~ en
~'l \ ~ \w, 6 l' ~
~ \ \ ~, ,~ ' -
~ ' \ \z ' <
'\ I \ \) , ~ rr1
~ I r . ~
: ~ I .\, \ J--l~~' I
~. J 84... \::/1' . . ~ --- , I '
I .t5;.\\ ' \ ___ -- --- ~'r-- II
I \ \ - -- ~,()o' (; 1 ~
\' \ ~ .," ,NNEI?,{If/"lJr,vr ~ ~ ' '
~\ \ _. </.-;/ :t/'~()'~ cor11.91'1$:C: --0 ~~-
~ '.J:.1 :/.</'''' ~~ l"""a GI?S ~'il '
'.- 1 \ rI ~.()o:"~.~., r()'.&!!-!,;e,qJ.- ~ ',"~
~ I ~ $V ..~' "'.'/'1' l/ ---- ~... ~ ~
IV MARVIN L. HARRISON a ~ \). ~ I
J ~.:.,"")\ ,::.:,..~:!--- ---- M~'tiEi~~~~t:~"O' f5 ~~
r'1?$\.df PLAT SHOWING 251 PERMANENT EASEMENT
, J-:::: ---- MANCHESTER DISTRICT
1: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGiNIA
PLAT'S'
J. K. TIMMONS & ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEE:RS e. SURVEYORS,
1314 W. MAIN ST. RICHMOND. VA. '
l:
I
!,
I
I
..
I
i
.:
ACROSS
H, CLEN JOHNSON a
KAT HERINE F. JOHNSON
D. B. 681 - PG. ~3
NOTE
---sEARINGS a COORDINATES
SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REFER
TO THE STATE PLANE COOR.-
DINATE SYSTEM - SOUTH ZONE.
DATE. SEPT. 27, 1968
DRAWN BY. R L 0
CHECi<ED BY. P N S
SCALE: I" : 40'
RESE ARCHED
CHECKED
Joe No.
11,17/;
I.
f:::!!Vl=~~:S ...t,:,s NC'.
,
"
- - _..~ --~-'~-*~----- -----....,... - - -
-' -.---....-.- -_._--....,..~~-
~~~~~-:.
~,/.!, . .:-:,~ .t.;-." ~<~.l ;.;"ll:"m.~,,;:,,(:t '~~,~,,;-:.i.j:;<:'i:: ":';.,;: .~:~./.>,;- ~... .
....'.. ",", .
" '.: . . ... . ',,_,\, lt :....'~-,
.';"
.
.
VIRGINIA: At an adjourned meeting of
the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County, lheld at the Courthouse on
March 26, 1969 at 2:00 P.M.
On motion uf rJir. Purdy, seconded by !'ir. Nartin, it is
resolved th~t this Board authorizes the condemnation of an
easement across \:he property o\i/ned by Curtis H. and Nelva C.
Eggleston in the event that the County's offer of $150.00
be rejected, s~1ce it is hereby declared that an emergency
exists ant! thdt ;.hi;.; mattEr should be pursued immediat\::ly.
It is her,:; noted that j'1r. Apperson votes Nay.
. .
Ste't[in9 f):)EJJe[Oj2mEnt Co'tj2o'tation
17 SOUTH BELMONT AVENUE. 359-5018
RICHMOND. VIRGINIA 23221
April 2, 1969
Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Director
Chesterfield County
Chesterfield, Virginia
Dear Mr. Burnett, Re: Lafayette Apts.
This is to advise you that we have made arrangements
with J. K. Timmons & Associates to proceed with the
engineering and design for the drainage ditch.
They are writing you today verifying the above and
have agreed to start immediately.
As per our conversation in your office, we hope you
will permit us to proceed to rent the apartments in
Buildings #6 and #7 while the above work is being done
in order to help and give us relief from the financial
difficulty we find ourselves in.
Thanking you for your kind co-operation, we remain,
Very truly yours,
o(Cu'~ '-/), Jz-.M.L~'1>
,SX:LJ2fIA___V" C 'T'nJ ? /.,,,,)
C~~,
Larry N. Sterling
Henry C. Miller
LNS/sg
I,
"
GOM.NWE~LIlt,;Qf:VI RG I_I\-
JOHN E. HARWOOD,
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER 8: CHIEF ENGINEER
DOUGLAS 8. FUGATE. COMMISSION.R
G. L. BAUGHAN, LURAY, VA.
W. RANSDELL CHILTON. LANCASTIER, VA.
W. FRED DUCKWORTH. NORFOLK, V....
EARL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOIU:. 'VA. .
A. B. EURE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION
A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
J. V. CLARKE, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS
THOMAS R. GLASS. LYNCHBURG. VA.
RUFUS T. HAIRSTON, BRISTOL. VA.
GEORGI!: C. LANDRITH. ALEXANDRIA, VA.
ROBERT 9. WEAVER, JR.. VICTORIA. VA.
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND, VA. 23219
W. S. G. BRITTON,
DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING
IN REPLY PI-EASE REFER TO
March 25, 1969
SecondarynSystem
Addition -
Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County
Chesterfield Court House, Virginia 23832
Gentlemen:
As requested in resolution by your Board on June 27, 1968, the following
addition to the Secondary System of Chesterfield County is hereby approved
effective March 25, 1969.
ADDITION
LENGTH
OAK HAVEN FARMS SUBDIVISION - SECTION "A":
Clintwood Road - From a point on Route 360, 0.11 mile west
of its intersection with Route 651, northwardly 0.57 mile
to Route 604.
0.57 Mi.
Copies:
Mr. A. S. Mattox
Mr. P. B. Coldiron
Mr. H. G. Blundon
Mr. L. R. Treat, Jr.
Mr. H. R. Perkinson
Mr. W. R. Davidson
'l'"
, ~~~OyflO.8<#~
/ i;;;W MAR 1 ~
! ~ R 969.->'
!~. N,;t,~~'!VED ~
\ ~ . .L':;';);~f,~~ )fJ1fr:mrms ~
\ ~"(d!Vf~~tJii8Nii 0-,~
\ ~/ ) Ilt'l. \ _/
~}:I(/I i Il';' ~ 1,'
"'-!: .,. b '::'
A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT
d
DOUGLAS B. FUGATE. CONN)S.IOHIER
JOHN E. HARWOOD,
DEPUTY COMMISISIONER e. CHIEF ENGINEER
G. L. BAUGHAN, LURAV, VA.
W. RANSDELL CHILTON. LANC....TER. VA.
W. FRED DUCKWORTH, NORFOLK, VA.
EARL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOKE, VA.
THOMAS R. GLASS. LYNCHBURG; VA.
RUFUS T. HAIRSTON. BRISTOL.. VA.
GEORGE C. LANORITH. ALEXAND"''''. VA.
ROBERT S. WEAVER, 'JR~. VICTOltlA. VA.
A. B. EURE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION
A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
J. V. CLARKE. DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND, VA. 23219
W. S. G. BRITTON,
DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING
March 25, 1969
IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO
Secondary System
Addition -
Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County
Chesterfield Court House, Virginia 23832
Gentlemen:
As requested in resolution by your Board on November 26, 1968,
lowing addition to the Secondary System of Chesterfield County
approved effective January 27, 1969.
the fol-
is hereby
ADDITION
LENGTH
GAY FARMS SUBDIVISION - SECTION 3:
Blithe Road - From intersection of Routes 1562 and 1573
eastwardly 0.13 mile.
o . 13 Mi.
Copies:
Mr. A. S. Mattox
Mr. P. B. Coldiron
Mr. H. G. Blundon
Mr. L. R. Treat, Jr.
Mr. H. R. Perkinson
Mr. W. R. Davidson
A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT
JI~i&$~"
/A-~ fltr." ~
i tr .RE '4/f 1969 ~
! $'i;.. If].'i.7' -Ctl..J1J... 'J/:t.'/)
\""'" 'J,i \,,'" CJ ~
~'&; .i'i!"ii ,..,J,p" ".;""';1} 'J.J.
~: .'.'ifa . .,1 !'~/j(:~'jS ,1\
~, iIIltI!JlI'"'"
~ "'f, -'."/
~qitBt 0 ~S~/'
--... ;-'-'''''
c(
.'
~NWE~LTH-OF 'nl .
GOM~.~... ." .... .,.,YJ,~GlmJ\-
JOHN E. .HARWOOD,
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER 8c CHIEF ENGINEER
DOUGLAS B. FUGATE. COMMISSIO',,:R
G. L. BAUGHAN, LUAAY, VA.
W. RANSDELL CHILTON, L...NC....TER. VA.
W. FRED DUCKWORTH. NORFOLK, VA.,
EARL A. FITZPATRICK. RO,.NOKE. VA.
THOM'A$' R. GLASS. LYNCHBURG, VA.
RUFUS T. HAIRSTON. BRISTOL. VA.
A. B. EURE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION
A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
J. V. CLARKE, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS
ROBERT 9. WEAVER, JR.. VICTORI.... VA.
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND, VA. 23219
W. S. G. BRITTON,
DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING
GEORGE C. LANDRITH. ALEXA-NO..IA. VA.
March 25, 1969
IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO
Secondary System
Additions -
Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County
Chesterfield Court House, Virginia 23832
Gentlemen:
As requested in resolution by your Board on September 26, 1968, the fol-
lowing additions to the Secondary System of Chesterfield County are hereby
approved, effective January 24, 1969.
ADDITIONS
LENGTH
CAMERON HILLS SUBDIVISION:
Kingston Avenue - From intersection of Route 10 and
Route 696 southwardly 0.20 mile to Okuma Drive.
0.20 Mi.
Okuma Drive - From Kingston Avenue, 0.02 mile south
of Route 10, westwardly 0.14 mile.
0.14 Mi.
Copies:
Mr. A. S. Mattox
Mr. P. B. Coldiron
Mr. H. G. Blundon
Mr. L. R. Treat, Jr.
Mr. H. R. Perkinson
Mr. W. R. Davidson
A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT
~ <)~lU;tJCO(/ d,;:.;,
~~1}U ~ ~g
~ fVJ, ~'.
.~. f111/{;1 'A./f 1969 \
= lJ,~ K'f.GC~lJb ->-
I r:; 1J!J,4Cij 'IK (,J~ ~ ED ~
\ ~ t,wESlJ J(fflJ.,,<, .~.
\~ .~,.
~~t#
GO~ONWEALTlF OF,,,YII~. ~If\-
..
JOHN E. HARWOOD.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Be CHIEF ENGINEER,
DOUGLAS B. FUGATE. COMMISSIONER
G. L. BAUGHAN, LURAY, VA.
W. RANSDELL CHILTON, LANCASTER, VA,
W. FRED DUCKWORTH, NORFOI..K. V.....
EARL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOKE, VA,
G~ORGE C. LANDRITH, ALEXANDRIA, VA.
LAWRENCE H. MCWANE, LYNCHBURG. VA.
W. M. SCLATER, JR.. MARION, VA.
ROBERT S. WEAVER,"JR., VICTORIA, VA.
A. B. EURE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION
A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
J. V. CLARKE. DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS
DEPARTMENT. OF . HIGHWAYS
RICHMQNQ;VA~23219
W. S. G. BRITTON,
DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING
April 2, 1969
IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO
L. R. TREAT, JR.
DISTRICT ENGINEER
OFFICE OF DISTRICT ENGINEER
PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA 23804
P.O. Box 3036
Bon Air, Virginia 23235
Mr. M. W. Burnett;.'
Chesterfield County Courthouse
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
Dear Mr. Burnett,
We briefly discussed the matter of an annual meeting of the Board of
Supervisors and a representative of the highway department to hear requests
for road improvements to the secondary system from interested citizens at the
Board meeting of March 26, 1969. From this discussion it was my understanding
that I was to check into the matter and advise you of my findings. After
checking into the subject I find that it is the county governing bodies
prerogative as to whether or not they desire such a meeting.
Therefore, should you elect not to hold such a meeting you have my
concurrence. The matter can behhandled as it has been in years past.
Should you wish to discuss the subject further I will be most happy to do
so.
Sincerely yours,
<U/ x:;.&~
.""
w. R. Davidson
Resident Engineer
WRD:eem
A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT
GO.~J'lWEALTH- OF V/I{'Ir\
DOUGLAS B. FUGATE, COMMISSIONER
G. L. BAUGHAN, LURAY. VA.
W. RANSDELL CHIt.. TON, LANCASTER, VA,
W. FRED DUCKWORTH, NORFOLK, VA.
EARL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOKE, VA.
Gr::ORGE C. LANDRI"rH, AL.EXANDRIA, VA.
LAWRENCE H. McWANE, LYNCHBURG. VA.
W. M. S~LATER. JR" MARION. VA.
ROBERT S. WEAVER, JR.. VICTORIA. VA.
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND, VA. 23219
L. R. TREAT, JR.
g!HR!~T ENGINEER
April 4, 1969
Mr. M. W. Burnett, Exec. Sec.
Chesterfield County
Chesterfield, Virginia
Dear Mr. Burnett:
JOHN E. HARWOOD,
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER 8: CHIEF ENGINEER.
A. B. EURE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION
A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
J. V. CLARKE, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS
W. S. G. BRITTON.
DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING
IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO
OFFICE OF DISTRICT ENGINEER
PETe:RSBURG, VIRGINIA 23804
p. O. Box 3036
Bon Air, Virginia 23235
For your information I have attached a copy of a "Public Notice",
concerning route 678 (Buford Road) in Chesterfield County.
If you feel there is a need for such a hearing please contact
my office.
lc
Att:
A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT
Yours truly,
/#~
W. R. Davidson ~
Resident Engineer
/~ c.t 1"";1';1 '" ;"'/
j
-,
PUBLIC NOTICE
All interested persons are advised that the construction of
Route 678
, (Buford Road)
from Intersection Route 60 (Midlothian Turnpike)
to Intersection Route 686 (Jahnke Road)
is being planned by the State Highway Commission.
Information concerning the tentative location and design of
the route is available at the office of the Resident Engineer of the
State Highway Department in Chesterfield ,Virginia. Any interested
persons from the communities affected by this route may request that
a public hearing be held by sending a written request to the Resident
Engineer, State Highway Department, Bon Air
, Virginia on or
before 4/24/69
In the event such request is received, a further
notice of the time and the place of the.hearing will be published.
State Highway Commission of Virginia
By W. R. Davidson
Resident Engineer
'>
-(....,1
.
--
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
..
~~~ 16910/;\
~ .. ~':\
~ APR 1969 (~\
, RECEIVED 2'0 '.
~ BlJAfIlJ~; ;?'5 1
\ ~ CHfS1flfiiiJI,)'tJRS;;; i
~~, --~'
~6€StV2Y6~~~
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23209
April 7, 1969
Mr. M. W. Burnett
Executive Secretary
Chesterfield County
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
Dear Mr. Burnett:
This is to request that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors take the necessary action to have
'" Route 607 improved from Route 60 south to the Southern
Railroad, a distance of 0.8 miles.
Vepco has recently purchased a 60 acre site at
Dry Bridge in the Midlothian District of Chesterfield
County. The exact location is outlined on the attached
sketch, which shows that it is approximately 1900 feet
south of Route 60, and is bounded on the north by our 115 KV
transmission line Right-of-Way; on the south by the Southern
Railroad, and on the west by Route 607. .
Our intention is to develop this property as a
major distribution substation in 1969 to meet the growing
electrical requirements in Chesterfield and Powhatan Counties,
and to ~urther develop it over a period of years as a major
transmission switching station for the bulk power require-
ments of the Richmond Metropolitan area. The initial con-
struction planned for 1969 consists of a ~15-34.5 KV distri-
bution substation at a cost of approximately $200,000.
Additions will be made to this distribution station at inter-
vals of one or two years for the next five or ten years.
The transmission switching station will be established with-
in six or seven years at a cost exceeding $1,000,000.
The construction contemplated will require heavy
vehicle traffic on Route 607 from Route 60 south to Southern
Railroad; including tractor-trailers for transportation of
heavy substation apparatus. . This section of road is narrow
and unpaved, and, in our 9pinion, will not bear such heavy
. .. '" ///
., ',:' \,,">/~~]~~::",~;/
.'. ~//I ,<.' ...:, .,,/
8. ' \ 'Ii/t:~/y::' <~::~':- .,~ '
'. ~ ~y -,,:, "r ,
. -/,,<:, ---. r .
- l J :O-/_~" "-:..,.-c' " ~
If Ji1>>c;/'f50 . \
.. ... ;'~<<ir~"
' 2.fC'<~~~~;;~~'\';. ,('.l1~ '.
..~.:. ---'
:~<~'~~./.' .:,,7...;,/ \i;\ .
~:C- .. .' . . W.
. . ... \:
. l:;'
t-:,
.,' \~,'
..\-0. "
\:. .
. "\:'
'-.Y. \j
-;:;:.,
v--\ ,
'- t>" , \ .
\"
. "~
.,
'-;"hi jJ \ I, ,.
~---'" 3vO
..~..
-'
'..
.!
f!J'!)
\(i;7
/
~. .
\/
;/"
/
/
./
'.:..
~'.7_...
.,;;;."
i
i
.
.f
, ..
,i~~
I _\
\
20
..
,
.,
.\
,
\
\
\
\
,
\
. '\
'?\ ,
'\.
. "'",
o
(:i
23
;,
.~
! .
i
\--
\
\
.....
~ .
~
:J
iJ
I _
~': ,
"f\)
SO\,t,,::;;.
....-:.-,;/'"
~:]'-23-1
'-:' .,'.-
e
-,
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY TO Mr. .M. W. Burnett
traffic. We believe that surfacing and widening this section
of road would be more economical than the maintenance costs
which will be incurred if it is not improved. We will be
glad to furnish any additional information required.
Very truly yours,
tf ~ ;3~
T. T. Brady
District Manager
Attachment
SHEET No. 2
~~Cl
.' - '.,~,'.... '
',_.. "..-'" ':--,.:-
.~_~ ~~2~ '~':'~_~~ ')
\
.1
ItNOTlC .-- '.
Boord Of~ul$ I1crcby gIven by thel
- Cou.nty, Vjrgf~~~IS~hSotOf,tChesterfl~'d '
tent JOn of th B' fs the In-
adOPtion on e Ap~W~ t~9~:oPose for
A.M., Which was th' of 11 :30
vert/sed on Morc~U lrllgZ9~o be ad-
AN ORDINANCE t .
ter 2, Article 3 b 0 amend Chap_
Section 2-5 2 f' v addIng thereto
destructive doogf~~~rbrt vicious or I
I,orge and S ff III runnIng of
o penolty 'O:~jO~~d..5n.3thto provide
ereof.
at 0 regular m tI
Supervjsors to g; h~~do~/hthe Boord. of
room of the e meeting
Courthouse, v,~~~~ at ~heSferfjerd
of April, '~9 at 11 ;~n A ~ 9th day
I na~c;OfsY oaf the full text of the ord/_
I' of the CIr~urt'eC~~r~he Cd'erk's Office
of the Exec f an the Office
Chesterfield cou~;~e Secretory of
I All persons f .,
the adOPtion of t~~~r n9. or OPPosing
i vltcd to attend thIs m~~t;~g.nce are In.
BDord Of SupervIsors of
B~~e%erf~ldBcounty, VIrgInIa
. . . URNETT, Clerk.
XM
.:
L.,.
RICHMOND NEWSPAPERS, INC.
. Publisher of .
THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH
. , April 2, 1969
Hlt.l) rJ)(.nd, \ a...........~.........................
This is to eertih that the attached...~~~.~~...~~~.~.~~.................
was published in' Th,. Richmond Times-Uispateh. a newspaper
published in the City of Richmond. State of Virginia.
March 26, and April 2, 1969
.........................................................................................................
" . .. March 26, 1969
The fust msertlOn bemg given..........................................................
Sworn to and Subt9~~ed before me
t.~...~..~~:z3 . . ...(:.z.~~.
Notary Public
State of Virgi a. City of Richmond:
My commission expires 7/22i12
,,=,-.~~~.
.....~...............................................
MANAGER,
BUSINESS OFFICE
TITLE
("
I ,
'....
.e'"
'J
~.,
I
:i
i I
, J
, I
II
I
. -,'--".........----_.......->---~._-------'-
.
----'->_.--..-.._---,~..._*...
AN ORDINANCE to amend Chapter 2, Article 3, by adding thereto
Section 2-5.2 to prohibit vicious or destructive dogs from
running at large and Section 2-5.3 to provide a penalty for
violation thereof.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF iI
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA: 11
"
I
That Chapter 2, Article 3, of the Code of the County of Chester- 1
field be and it is hereby amended and reordained by adding thereto I'
the sections following: ::
SECTION 2-5.2 VICIOUS OR DESTRUCTIVE DOGS PROHIBITED FROM RUNNING
AT lARGE
It shall be unlawful to permit any vicious or destructive
dog from running at large within the boundaries of the County
and any person owning, having control of or harboring any such
dog shall be, and they are hereby required to keep the same
confined within their premises.
, :!
, I
, I
, I
I
;!
SECTION 2-5.3 VIOLATION OF SECTION 2-5.2A MISDEMEANOR
Any person found violating Section 2-5.2 shall be guilty of
a misdemeanor and punished ,by a fine not exceeding three hundred
dollars ($300.00) or by imprisonment in the County Jail not
exceeding thirty days or both such fine and imprisonment. Each
such violation shall constitute a separate pffense.
i
I
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage as provided by law.
Passed by Board of Supervisors
i I
, ,
. i I
, '
~----
I
------'-
I
.-.--
, ,
!
--" "~
,-
i
:;. t ..
-
.
~;;tt"-:.. i,f"-"
NOTICE is hereby given by the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia, that it is the intention
of the Board ,to prop~ for adoption on April 9, 1969 at
11:30 A.M.,which was authorized to be advertised on March 12,
1969:
AN ORDINANCE to ,amend Chapter 2, Article 3, by
adding thereto Section 2~5.2 to prohibit vicious
o~ destructive dogs from running at large and
S.ection 2-5.3 to provide: a penalty for violation
thereof,
at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors to be held
at the meeting room of the Board at Chesterfield Courthouse,
Virginia, on the 9th day of April,1969 at 11:30 P.M.
,
A copy of the full text of the ordinance is on
file in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court and the
Office of the'Executive Secretary of Chesterfield County.
All persons favoring or opposing the adoption of
this ordinance 'are invited to attend this meeting.
'BOARD OF SUPERVIsoRS OF
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
BY
M. W. Burnett, Clerk
~
!?:~t~T~~;~:~. '~~-~--:~;
"I-NO'rlce -is hereby given by tni"~\
, ,Board,Of Supervisors Of Chesterfield"';:
County, VirginIa, thot It Is the in-I'
"tention of the 'Board to propose for
'adoption on March 26, 1969 at 2:00 P.
M., which was authorized to be ad...)
vertlsed on February 26, 1969: "
AN ORDINANCE to amend and reo
enact Chapter 6, Article 5, Section
6-118, by adding thereto Section
6-118.1 providing for prohibition
ogalnst parking on County owned
property, at an adlourned meeting of
the Board of SupervIsors to be held at
the meeting room of the Board at
Chesterfield Courthouse, VirginIa, on
the 26th day of March 1969 at 2:00
P.M. .
A copy of the full text of the ordi-
nance is on file In the Clerk's Office
of the Circuit Court and the offfce of
the E x e cut, v e Secretary of
Chesterfield County. .
All persons favoring or opposing 'I
the adoption of this ordinance are In.
vlted to attend this meeting.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY,
VIRGINIA I
By M. W. B.urnett, Clerk XM
~
RICHMOND NEWSPAPERS. INC.
T~
e
RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH
.' .. March 19, 1969
,Rich mond.. "a. ..... .... .,.. ........................
Legal Notice
This is to certifv that the attached...............................................
was published in' The Ri';hmond Times-Dispatch. a newspaper
published in the City of Richmond. State of Virginia,
. ,
March 12, 19, 1969
Publisher of
The first insertion being given:...:......~g.y,l},..l?....J.9.R9.....,..............
Sworn to and subscribed before me
t.&~~AR S.d!..~~..'.
. ' Notary Public
State 0 Virginia, City of ~ichmond:
My commission expires 7/22il2
c;::;:->. ~ ~ ~
....~.......................................
. MANAGER,
BUSINESS OFFJCE.
TITLE
'1'-
,~~..,,, <
.;/'
,."
'rrn
(OJ
'-~'
~Y/
~....
l!!i '" l~:- '
~'
'. :-
~ CQUNTY ,OF CHESTERFIELD
CHESTE'RFIELD, VIRGINIA
. - ~';.~
March 6,'19.69
., .'I".'f
Richmond Times-Dispatch
Richmond, ' Virginia
Gentlemen:
have published the 'attached
reenact Chapter 6, Article 5,
Times-Dispatch only, "on
Will you please
Ordinance to amend and
'Section 6..,.118, in 'the
March l2 and 19, 1969.,
, Please send bill to the' County' of Ch~sterfield"
Office 'of '~xecutive Secretary, Chesterfield, Virginia~
,\ery truly yours,
I'IWB: w
EnclosUre
M. t17. Burnett
Executive , ~cretary
" ,
,J
:.-r
/'
.
".
NOTICE is hereby given by the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia, that it is the intention
of the Board to propose for adoption on March 26, 1969 at
2:00 P.M., which was authorized to be, advertised on February.26,
1969:
AN ORDINANCE to amend and reenact Chapter 6,
ArticleS, Section 6-118, by adding thereto
Section 6-118.1" providing for prohibition against
parking on County owned. property, . .
at an adjourned 'meeting of the Board of Supervisors to be ,held
at the meeting room of the Board at Chesterfield Courthouse"
Virginia,: on the 26th day of March ,1969 at 2:00 P.M..,
A copy of the full text of the ordinance is on file
in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court and the office of
the Executive Secretary of Chesterfield County.
All persons favoring or opposing the adoption of
this ordinance are invited to attend this meeting.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
CHES'l'ERFIELD COUNTY s VIRGINIA
By
M. w. Burnett~ Clerk
.
~'"
- .-_..........-.-....~-~-"'"~.....~ - -_..;....-
.
.-..-----...---------:-....---. '.-
. ...._~ ._--~.."----~~~---_. --
('
\~_.
.,)
An Ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 6 Article 5 Section
6-ll8 by adding thereto Section 6-118.1 providing for prohibi-
tion against parking on County owned property.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA:
That Chapter 6 Article 5 Section 6-118 of the Code of the
County of Chesterfield be and it is hereby amended and reenact-
ed to read as follows:
Section 6-118.1 Parking prohibited on County Owned Property;
exceptions and ;o~/7,",lh2:; -(Co'- !//()/.a.f>c/'./,
(A) It shall be unlawful for any person to park any
vehicle on any county owned property where such parking is
prohibited or regulated and said parking is in violation
of any such regulation.
(B) For the purposes of this section the Chief of
Police is hereby authorized and directed to make and enforce
rules and regulations for the prohibiting of parking of
vehicles upon county owned property, to classify vehicles
with reference to parking, to designate the time, place and
manner in which such vehicles may be allowed to park; and,
to revoke, alter or amend such rules and regulations at any
time when in his opinion parking conditions require.
(C) Any person, after receiving written notice in a
form approved by the Chief of Police, that such person is
in violation of this section, may waive his right to appear
. in court and be formally tried for the offense set forth in
the notice, and upon voluntary payment of $3~00 to the Clerk'
of the County Court within 72 hours after receipt of such
'notice shall not be required to appear before the traffic court
. for trial upon the charge set forth in such notice. If said
fine is not paid witWnthe prescribed time then upon conviction
he shall be fined not less than $3.00 nor more than $10.00.
(D) In any prosecution upon this section, proof that
the vehicle described in the complaint, summons or warrant was
parked in violation of any such rule or regulation, together
with proof that the defendant was at the time of such parking
the registered owner of the vehicle, as required by Chapter 3
of Title 46 of the Virginia Code, shall constitute in evidence
a prima facie presumption that such registered owner of the
vehicle was the person who parked the vehicle at the place,
where and for the time dur~ng which such violation occurred.
.---'.---
~--
I
('-.
It 556.20
.
.
, ' .....
STATE OF VIRGINIA l
__...._._m____________. af .mm_mm_m.m.__mm.m. J
Ta-wit:
I, ___'_000000__000000___
City aforesaid,
County aforesaid,
__.___000_. a Notary Public 111 and far the State of Virginia at Large,
who.se commissian expires an them____mm_mmday af..
______000_____000. 19_____000' do. hereby certify that
_______000__ and
whase names are signed to. the fo.rego.ing writing dated the____ __m__m_______day of...___
19________. as_mm________mm
__________ and
- _________000_____' respectively, o.f
ackno.wledged the same befare me
in the__________,__m_mm_______________mm____afaresaid this___________ ________day af__.-------m-m
-_______________.____, 19_________
Natary Public.
.~ .-...." ,
.
.-
~
t.
." :;0 ... ." ;S 00
0> '" 0 ..., ~
OQ (") ..., '"
'" 0 '" en
3. (") '" ~ ~
0 ::s :::c
'" ..., " ~~ tr:l
p. p. p.
~ "%j 0> 1-1 O~ 0
0> '" t! ... S'
_>i !' '" C1 ~~ "1j
'" 0
-(fl r' p. ::B ::c <:
tl:I (") ~> ....
'" ::c
g ~
p;- ~. tfj C')
... ....
;:l" ~~ ~ z
0 0
~ n- (') Otfj 0 >
0' '"
p. ..., "I:J ==~
n ...
p;- ;;;
(")
0> ~ ~es
,..,.
'"
0>
::s > Z~
p.
(') 0> ~ ~~
p. -
(b a :-0
...,
?'" ::;'
~ '" ~
p.
-I,
.
.
BOARD OF Su PERVISORS
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
F. F. DIETSCH
IRVIN G. HORNER, CHAIRMAN
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
MANCHESTER DISTRICT
C.J. PURDY
BERMUDA DISTRICT
HERBERT O. BROWNING
MATOACA DISTRICT
J. RUFFIN ApPERSON
DALE DISTRICT
ANDREW R. MARTIN
M1DLOTHlAN DISTRICT
COUNTY
OF
CHESTERFIELD
CHESTERFIELD. VIRGINIA
M. W. BURNEn
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
March 31, 1969
Subject: Highway Safety
Commission Requests
To: Board of Supervisors
Gentlemen:
On March 27, 1969, The Highway. Safety Commission met
resulting in the two following requests:
(1) That all operators of county owned vehicles be required
to complete the National Safety Council's defensive
driving course and that funds be provided to finance
this training at the cost of approximately $1.40 per
driver.
(2) That funds be provided the Safety Commission for the
above drivers training (approximately 500 drivers x
$1.40) $ 700.
for travel of members and youth safety com-
mittee 250.
for materials (letterhead stationery, etc.) 50.
for a total amount requested of $1000.
The Safety Commission is thankful for your interest in
placing a safety training center in the Courthouse area. The
area near the proposed Technical High School seems to be a
very good location provided this fits into the plan for the
Courthouse area.
. <)~iim -1 ? ct.
,(1\'" 9'
~ MMI '969 ~
~ tiCilVED -i
~_I~~
\~-8 ClltSlE\tfftU_m ~ .
\~ ~.-~
' 2761jL9t~~W~
Respectfully submitted,
(];
,--\
............,~
\
i'
~~--.
~....;..._.~~~.~
('.,
~~
~ t,
March 27, 1969
3 P.M.
! j
I
HIGHWAY SAFETY COMMISSION
MEETING
Present:
Lt. John Simmons, Vice-Chairman
Dr. W. P. Wagner
Mr. James T. Wadkins
Mr. Richard A. Hollander
Judge D. W. Murphey
Dr. R. M. Phillips
Mr. C. J. Purdy
Mr. John E. Longmire, Acting
Secretary
Absent:
Mr. C. Lynn Newcomb
Lt. Simmons, Vice-Chairman, calls meeting to order and tells of pro-
gress and outside interest in developing a Safety Training Center at
Chesterfield Courthouse.
The secretary tells of a proposed location for this center on the
courthouse property but advises that this property is to be planned
for all development in the near future. The Commission generally
agrees that the proposed location would be desirable if it fits in
with the land planner's program.
I
i'
I
i
)
Lt. Simmons advises the Commission that the Youth Committee is begin-
ning to develop (5 schools have appointed representatives) and that
the appointees would attend a safety commission meeting soon.
I
~d'Scussion arises concerning the expenditure of funds in the fiscal
ear 1969-70. It is generally agreed that the Commission's Chairman
and Secretary should prepare a reasonable budget and submit same to
the Board of Supervisors within one week.
,
I
!
I
It is announced that a state-wide meeting of the Advisory Safety Com-
mittee (all city and county commission chairmen) is to be held in
Richmond at the John Marshall Hotel on April 23rd. Two members present
indicate their intention to attend.
The Annual Conference of the Virginia Safety Association on May 8 and 9
at the John Marshall Hotel is also announced.
"
"
!
,
,
i
I
On motion of Mr. Murphey, seconded by Mr. Hollander, it is resolved
. t~this Commission respectfully request the Board of Supervisors to
~~uire all operators of county owned vehicles to complete the National
Safety Council's defensive driving course and that funds be provided
to finance this training at the cost of approximately $1.40 per driver.
-----
I
1,
This Commission adjourns at
1969.
~
---
! "
---'""--..,
I '
.
.
VIRGINIA: At the reguiLar meeting of the
Chesterfield C01lllty School Board held
Wednesday evening, March 26, 1969,
at 8 oldock in the board room of the
School' Administration Building.
. PRESENT: . Mr. G. L. Crump, Chairman
Mr. J. W. Russell, Vice-chairman
Mr. R. P. Eagles
Mr. C. D. Spencer
Mr. C. C. Wells
Mr. W. H. Goodwyn
On motion of Mr. Spencer, seconded by Mr. Russell, the
School Board approved tuition grant scholarships for the second semester
of the current school year in the am01lllt of $(55, 734.00, subject to
approval of all applications by the State Department of Education.
The board further directed that the Board of Supervisors be respectfully
requested to deposit said sum referred to above in a special f1llld for the
payment of these scholarships.
~) /1/ (l /l
lJ'-.- . ~. ~~~_.
W.. C. Dance, Clerk
C. B. Form 4-8 (Revised)
REQUEST FOR SALARIES AND EXPENSES
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1970
IMPORTANT
Read instructions on back of this form BEFORE
preparing- your request
__ CO\,!~~g_i'!_~h~~~~~~l!!______
City or CDunty
___c..Q!I!1.I!9~~~!!l~h~U~~~~!!~_____
Title or Office
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) ,(F)
CLASSIFICATION Annual Rate Supplements TDta\ Annual Rate Increase LEAVE
Approved By Appropriated (Col. A plus Requested For or (Decrease) THIS
. Compensation
by Locality Col. B) Fiscal Year End- --- ----- -- ----- SPACE
Length Hours Per Board for Fiscal Ing June 30, 1970 (Difference BLANK
1. SALARIES, Week For Fiscal Year Year Ending
Age or Ending Excluding between Col. A
Service Devoted 6/30/69 Supplements and Col. D)
Principal: To Duties June 30, 1969
$ $ $ $ $ $
Lee R. Gordon. Commonwealth's 39 L5 mo s. 40 13.500. 13.500. 17.500. 4.000.0.0
Name At: t:or9i&l
Employees: (Permanent)
Name Title
Marvin L. Garner. Asst. C. A. 35 L6 mo s. ~~ 8.000. 8.000. 9.500. 1.500.00
.
Morr is E. Mason Asst. C A uO lu mnl'l uO 10 'i00 10_ 'i00. 11 "i00. 1.000.00
Cecile C. Tavlor. Secretary 32 3vr s. 40 5 300 5 300. 6 000 700.00
** See Mr. Garner's sheet
attached.
-.-
.
Total Permanent (lnduding principal) (Use st'parate form (C. B. 14 Revised) provided herewith $ 37,300. $ $37,300. $ 44 , 500. $ 7,200. $
for information with respect to proposed increase in salaries-Item 1)
Extra lIelp: ~acra~S1riSll - h..7n . ..,hi1~
-. secretSlrv is nn n"',."'f-~...... ~'=9nn ?nn
Total Temporary $ $ $ $ 200. $ 200. $
2. OFFICE EXPENSES: (C) (D) I ncrease or LEAVE
SUPPLIES AND CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: Amount Approved Amount (Decrease) THIS
By Compensatio!1 Requested For - - - - -- - _.- SPACE
Board For Fiscal Y ear End~ (Difference be~ IlL\NK
Fiscal Year End- ing June 30, 1970 tween Col. C
ing 6/30/69 and Col. D)
$ $ $ $
Stationery, Office Supplies, Printing 200.00 390.00 100.00
Postage and P. O. Box Rent 50.00 75.00 25.00
Travel - Legal Conferences 700.00 700.00
Repairs (Typewriter, etc.) 100.00 100.00
Telephone 650.00 650.00
-.-
Total Offiee Expenses $ 250.00 1,825.00 $ 1, 575. 00 $
8. REASON FOR PROPOSED INCREASE IN OFFICE EXPENSES REQUESTED IN ITEM NO.2
Increase in volumn of work, some items were omitted in last years budget and also the telephone
expense of this office has been paid entirely by the County.
.
Given under my hand this 2nd day of Apr 11 ,1969; and I hereby eertify that on the
request for Salaries and Expenses to the governing body of my political subdivision.
1rd
day Dr
Ti tie Dr OfIiee
"
,
w
!
r:
III
<.i
bll
0::
'Z
...,
's
<II ..c
::s
l:l en ;..<
~ Sol .S ....
>. 0"
~ !l ..c: ci ~
U !E ~;f! ..... E--
~ 0 ~o <ii r- <
0 <"" ., a-
q - ~ ...... ....
0 0 Cl
" co~ 0:: o'
S 8 0 ~
0 '" ::dE=< ~ S M ::s
U ~ .,
0:: S 0:: ::s
~ 0 0 ::s
i. ~ U ~ ....
C\1 II. bll "0
., ....
<II c( I- ..c: 0:: 'to
~ ..., ;; 0
(/) .... 0:: ;:Q
Z 1IJ c:J 0 .,
l- I ::l en 0::
CO - Z ., .... 0
III C) () 'Z to 'Z
<II C .... 1 .,
III It: 1IJ Cl U ;., to
..c: 0:: 1 en
:J U U 0:: Z <ii 0::
> c( 1 "0 .,
a ~ 0:: '" 0.
0 1IJ 0 1 en
to Cl:: S
III LL m (/) ~ r- 1
0\ en 0
It: 0 C Z < .1 ., ., u
...... 'Z ..c:
Z Z 1IJ ~ 1 ...,
0:: ."
It: J: 0 0 D. ;:... o^ 1 ::s .... ..c:
0
c( I- i= ~ X M 1 0 .... .....
1IJ ...:l U en ..c:
III .J c( :r -< ~ 1 ., ., ,.....
z '" .:;;
>- c( (/) u c u I ..c: 0::
III Z rfJ ::J 1 ..., to
.J 0:: Z .... ....., 1 .... ~ ,"0
== 1IJ c( ... 0 .,
c( D. 1 ..c: ..s <;:i
U Z ~ >- ~ 1 ..., <ii "0
III 0 0 0:: ::r: 1 <ii ., 0::
E-- ., en to
~ U c( 1 ~ 0:: "lI:l
LL .J 1 0:: .,
~ 0. .,
~ c( 0 ~ .....
0 s ., ::s
0 (/) ... s '"
"0 .,
U .J 0 0:: X
U to .,
c(
8 ., 1:> ~
~ U ..c:
~ ..., to ...,
.21 II. <ii en
.... ::s
~ ~ II. 0 en S
00 .... ....
"0 ~ 0 en 0 S
Eo< '" >, ....
... ~ ., ..., ....
z " 0:: en oS
~ '" .. .... .,
", ~ ::s
c 'C 0 en
!:l:: ..... r:r :.a
0 !. ..... .,
it 00 -< .... l
~ ~
~ .9 '" .,
~ " ..c:
- " ~ ..... ~
~ ~ E--
.b ;.,
00 " ..c 0
.S ",
'" z
.", en
'" ;:l
~ ....
0
...
-
i >. a; "
~
'" 'c:l ! ~
0 " >.
i:Q ~ ",
c
..3 - ~ >.
0 -;;
'" >. '" >
00 'g .;;;
~ ~ ~
" ", 0
'" ~ <3
8 .. ~ ~
~ "
0 '8 ;E "
u ~ 0 ~
--5 " ~
> -5 0
0 ",
.c .. "
~ " ~ .a
'.- ~
~ ~ .3
" .c 'v .",
8 .,; "0 "
'" ~ ~
00 'S
.. ~ >.
~ '"
..5 0 "
"' .: -;; ~
" , 00
0 " ~ "
00
. ~ !E ~
~ 0 ~
.~ -2 .- ~
:; " ~
"C S ~ ~
~ ,
'" 0 " '"
" ~ "
.- '" .5 '" 00
~ ~
-;; " ~
.a ~ ~
.c ~ 1! ~
00 " "
00 " "
8 !E ~ "
.. ~ 0 " .- !E
z ~ " " ~ 0
~ ~ !E "C .S
0 00 0 "
" "'
~ .- -;; ~
... '" ~ '" .21
"
u ~ .~ '"
" .c
::>> 00 S 'C a:; "
~ 0 Q, ~ "C
'" " " ~ "
'" " " 00
... ~ " .c " 0
" .c ~ ~ '"
.. ~ "
"C "0 0
z ~ "0 >. ~
" ;; Q,
'" >. 00 >.
>. ~ "C
~ --g ~ E ~
'" '"
-;; .a ~ ~
.. ~
00 ~ ~
-;; ~ -,."
'2 .- , 00
'c:l ~ ~ ~ ~
!E " ~ ~
0 " 1! , '"
0
. e " .. , ~
'2 " "C ~ "
~ ~ ~ ,; ~
0 ~
.. ~
1; ~ ~ c ~ ,,; c
. ..!! '; 2 ~ "
0 "
... >. ~ .21 .~ '" ,-.;;
. '.a 00 '"
'" "C " 2 00 "
~ "C ]
. ~ '" " " .S
- " , <3
c -,; ~ ';::: 1! >; .S
. '" " "
G- " .c .; !:l:: -;; ..1:
. ~ ~ 00
.. 00 " ;:!: ~ 'c:l
~ - " ~
." " 0 !E " ~
c " >. 0 ~ 00 0 g
!E '" "
0 Q, $ ~ ~ "C
.. 0 0 u
" .~ ~ ;;
~ $ '0; ",
0 '" 0
.. -c:l " '" c b .c
~ ;; 00
.. "C '2 " Z . :2
.. ~ .c ..: . $
'" >. ~ c U
'u >. ';:l " ~ E . "
:t " ~ " f ... ~ ~
~ !E , . 0
0 ~ 0 . '" " ... "
0 ~ . '" ~ 00 >.
- U ~ " ~ J; '" . " ~
0 " ~ 0 :l: Q c
~ .. ~ ~
.. 0 0 0
~ " .- .. .;!; U
ii: .: ..
'~:'-~.~--'":,,"::;.-
C. H. Form J 4- (Revised 19:>8)
~ COMMONWEALTH OF
COMPENSATION
RICHMOND
INSTRUCTIONS
VIRGINI.4!t
BOARD
Officers Compensation on Salary Basis-
1. Prepare this fo.rm in triplicate-original to acco.mpany request filed with Co.mpensation Board; carbo.n to. accompany
copy af request filed with local governing bo.dy.
2. It is not necessary for the principal officer to. prepare this form in instances where the Compensation Board is
requested to. allo.w a sum for temporary positions.
3. Thi s fo.rm shauld be filed in all instances where an incr case in salary or new position is requested.
Officers Compensated on Fee Basis-Prepare this form in duplicate, original to accompany estimate o.f expenses filed with th~
Campensation Board. Also. fo.lIaw instructians 2 and 3.
THE COMPENSATION BOARD:
~
Request is made for the allowance of the follawing increased
Lee R. Gordon
rate of pay effective (date)
July 1
, 19--6..2...
I. Name of employee:
2 Present rate of compensation
$13,500.LQO
$ 17, 500. 00
3. Proposed salary
Full Time
4. State whether this employee works full o.r part time: _-
S. State number of hours this emplayee works each week : __--.F-'>_~,
6. Briefly describe the duties of this employee:
All the duties imposed by law as Commonwealth's Attorney for the County___
of Chesterfield.
7. Give length o.f service o.f this employee: 1 yr. 3 months as Commonwealth's
b. Date and amount of last increase received: Date _.
July 1. 1968
Attorney
$ 11, 500. 00
Amount $ 2.000 .j)J>
$
a. Entrance rate af pay:
c. If employee receives additional compensatio.n from city o.r caunty state amount:
8. If employee is to. replace ano.ther, state name and salary of farmer employee:
------
Name Amount $
9. Give reasans for increasing salary o.f employee ar creating new pasitio.n, as the case may be:
As Commonwealth's Attorney of Chesterfield County,my present
is $13,500.00, which is $3,000.00 above the min~ and $5,000.00
the maximum. Therefore, I am asking for an increase of $4,000.00
$17,500.00.
At the present time I
sala!)7_
below
or
(see attached sheet)
.,
have two assistants, oU time and
~~n ~. ~
Signature of principal officer
Commonwealth's Attorney
one part
Title of officer
Chesterfield County
County or Ciry
April 2, 1969
Dare
Cancel whichever word is not applicable.
... ...~ . -
. ~-.' Jr
Lee R. Gordon ~ontinUed
.
time, both of which I am very much satisfied with their services
and feel that the dtties of this office can be taken care of with
this staff, with my giving to this position a minimum of forty
hours per week, which I have been giving an excess of forty hours
and intend to do so in the future.
In Chesterfield County, at the present t~e, we have two Circuit
Court Judges, two County Court Judges; the County Court meets four
days per week and our Circuit Court' s Cr~inal Court meets two and
a half weeks every second month. With the volume of criminal cases
and the technicalities involved, it is most t~e consuming on
weekends and nights, as well as during the regular work week.
As to the civil part of our duties, we have a volumn of County
civil cases of which I participate, as well as the present annexa-
tion suit.
The Commonwealth's Attorney of Richmond and Henrico County,
two of our neighboring jurisdictions, are receiving salaries at
approximately the same as my request, with a work load considering
the help from their assistants, of a much lesser degree.
C..B. Form 14 (Revised. 1958)
. COMMONWEALTH OF
COMPENSATION
RICHMOND
VIRGINIA.
BOARD
INSTRUCTIONS
Officers Compensation on Salary Basis-
1. Prepare this farm in triplicate-original to accampany request filed with Compensatio.n Baard; carbon to. accampany
,copy of request filed with lacal go.verning bady.
- 2_ It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare this farm in instances where the Co.mpensation Bo.ard is
ret!liested to allo.w a 'sum far temporary positions.
3. This farm should be filed in all iilstances where an increase in salary o.r new positian is requested.
- Officers Compensated on Fee Basis-Prepare this form in duplicate. original to accompany estimate af expenses filed with the
COI~lpensation Board. Also follow instructions 2 and 3.
THE COMPENSATION BOARD:
. . ~~
Request is made for the allo.wance of the following increased rate of pay effective (elate)
J.. Name of employee: Ma,.Vi" L. ~rne"
2 Present rate of compensation,
. 3. Proposed salary
4. State whether this employee wo.rks full or part time:
S. State numberof hours this employee works each week:
July 1
,19 69
$ 8, 000. 00
$ 9, 500 . 00
Par t Time
Forty
6_ Brieflv describe the duties of this employee:
Priinary responsibilities for the criminal opinions in cases and second~rgy_
responsibilities for legal opinions in civil cases when requested by tq~____
Commonwealth's Attorney, which duties inc1ud.e--c-ont"~ ~ppe#lr.qncAR.
1 ,~ 4 mos as ~ssistant Commonwealth's Attorney
7. Give 'length of service of this employee: J-' .
, a. Entrance rate af pay: $ 4,200. GO
h. Date and amount o.f last increase received: Date __'_..Iu1 y 1, 1968 Amount $ --.lJLOO. gJ>
.----c::t-
: c. If employee receives additional compensation from city o.r county state amount:
8. If eniployeeis to. replace another, state name and salary of fo.rmer employee:
',,' Name ------------ Amount $
',9.- Give :.'reasons, far increasing salary af employee o.r creating new pasition, as the case may be:
:: Mr. Garner has done an exceptional job as an assistant, devoting much
more time' than is expected which obviously cuts into his income as a part-
time privata practitioner. With Mr. Garner's experience, devotion and sincere
interest L. Chesterfield County, I_~ee1 like it would be of great ~terest__
to the Commonwealth of Virginia to consider the incr~
~//~
~ SIgnature of pnncipal officer
Commonwealth's Attorney
$
Tide of officer
Chesterfield County
County or Ci ty
April 2, 1969
Date
Cancel whichever word is not applicable.
C. B. Fllfm 14 (Revised 1958)
. COMMONWEALTH OF
COMPENSATION
RICHMOND
VIRGINI'-
BOARD
INSTRUCTIONS
Officers Compensation on Salary Basis--
1. Prepare this form in triplicate-original to. accompany request filed with Compensation Board; carbo.n to. accampany
copy of request filed with local governing body.
2. It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare this farm in instances where the Co.mpensation Board is
requested to allo.w a sum for temporary positions.
3. This form shauld be filed in all instances where an increase in salary ar new position is requested.
Officers Compensated on Fee Basis-Prepare this form in dupl icate. original to accampany estimate of expenses filed with the
Campensation Bo.ard. Also follow instructians 2 and 3.
THE COMPENSATION BOARD:
Request is made for thc allowance of the following ~rate of pay effective (date) July 1
1. Name o.f employee: Morris E. MaEton
,19~
2 Present rate of compensation
$10.500 !_OO
$11,500.00
3. Proposed salary
4. State whether this employee works full or part time : __Full Time
. Forty Hours
5. Statc number of hours tins employee works each week:
6. Briefly describe the duties of this employee:
Prililarily responsible for the civil opinions in cases and secondarily ______
responsible for criminal opinions in cases when requested by the Common~____
wealth ' s Attorney, which duties include Court appearances.
-
as Assistant Commonwealth's Attorne
$ 10.000.00
--Soo:OO
Am6i.1i1t $
July 1, 1968
7. Give length of service of this employee:
a. Entrance rate of pay:
1 yr. 2 months
b_ Date and amount af last increase received: Date
c. If employee receives additional co.mpensation from city or county state amount:
8. I f employee is to replace another, state name and salary o.f former employee:
Name ------- A1110unt $
$
--------
9. Give reaso.ns far increasing salary o.f emplo.yee or creating new pasition, as the case may be:
Mr. Mason is a full time assistant who for the past year has given a
mimtmum of 50 hours per week to this office. He is devoted to his work and
has a sincere interest which has benefited our County and State tremendously.
Mr. Mason has no time for private p:.:actice and depends on his present interest
~~ :~~P~~~i::;e~d his family, which I ~~~ ;;t:;J;;::;t'tto~,,-ey
Ignature 0 prmCJp 0 Icer
Commonwealth's Attorney
Tide of officer
Chesterfield County
County or City
April 2, 1969
Dare
Cancel whichever word is not applicable.
r,
C~rB. form ] 4 (Revised 1958)
I~-.
- COMMONWEALTH OF
COMPENSATION
RICHMOND
VIRGINI'-
BOARD
INSTRUCTIONS
Officers Compensation on Salary Basis-
1. Prepare this form in triplicate-original to accompany request filed with Compensation Board; carbon to accompany
copy of request filed with lacal governing body.
2_ It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare this farm in instances where the Compensation Board is
requested to. allow a sum for temporary positians.
3. This farm should be filed in all instances where an increase in salary or new position is requested.
Officers Compensated on Fce Basis-Prepare this form in dupl icate, original to accompany estimate of expenses filed with the
Co.mpensation Board. Also fallow instructions 2 and 3.
THE COMPENSATION BOARD:
f .~
Request is made for the allowance 0 the follow111g increased rate of pay effective (date)
1. Name of employee: Cecile__G..---.Tay1or
July 1
,1969
2 Present rate o.f co.mpensation
3. Proposed salary
4. State whether this emplo.yee works full or part time:
5. State number of hours this employee works each week:
$5,300.00
$6,000.00
Full Time
Forty Hours
6. Briefly describe the duties of this employee:
General secretarial duties; preparation of indictments. court orders. mat~ers
involvid in the prosecution of criminals and County litigation; taking ______
dictation and transcribing legal documents for the Board of Superviso~~____
and other County departments.
7. Give length of service of this employee:
a. Entrance rate of pay:
b. Date and amo.unt af last increase received: Date
3 years
April 1, 1968
$ 3,600.00
Amount $ 1,000.00
c. If employee receives additional compensation from city ar county state amount:
8. If emplayee is to replace another, state name and salary o.f farmer employee:
Name ------- .l\mount $
$
----
9. Give reasans for increasing salary of emplayee or creating new pasitian, as the case may be;
MrS. Taylor did not receive an increase last July due to the fact she
received an increase April 1, 1968. Mrs. Taylor is a devoted secretary.
giving whatever time necessary to take care of all of the secretarial work
in this office without any secretar~a1 assistance. This necessitates her
working frem time to time on nights a.nd Saturda is a person of
exceptional abilities, and conSidering t an e e to t s
County or City
April 2. 1969
Date
Cancel whichever word is not applicable.
.
;.'
.
~
office, I feel that an increase of $700.00 is certainly not
unreasonable.
,
- -~
.
.
642 La Brook Drive
Richmond, Virginia
March 22, 1969
Mr. F. F. Dietsch
7678 Yarmouth Drive
Richmond, Virginia
Dear Mr. Dietsch:
Enclosed you will find petition which I would appreciate your
acting upon immediately with regards to the dilapidated property located
at the end of La Brook Drive consisting of 2.25 acres owned by Fred
A. Muse a/k/a Mickey Muse.
Copies of same have been directed to other officials of the
County of Chesterfield for their consideration.
Very truly yours,
J~C'.-.J~
Harry C. Harding
Spokesman for Petitioners
Enc.
cc: Chairman, Board of Health
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Executive Secretary
H. C. Mayo, Planning Director
State Board of Health
~+C~"~J
- "c.')' <: 'l-;-,
A~- ~'''-~~L;r.li'':''irji'..:...
~IJ A .~.
~ 'T "fih'..
.~!S) MAR 1969 ~J.
\~ RECEIVED ~.
\~ ~rt~~c.:n
\ <;:;. .' 'UiiiJ..:, "~.N1Y. ~
\ ~. Vl~;;iitlA '+''v
~~~'t~~ ~\.~\,\) ~
-~ ---------
"
- -..-'
,
.
,
.
.
..
P LI'ITION
We, the undersigned tax payers, property owners and residents of
Manchester Magisterial District, do hereby petition the County of Chesterfield
to have condemned the rental property owned by one "Mickey" Muse whose rental
property severely depreciates the value of the surrounding and adjoining pro-
perties, due to unsanitary conditions, unlicensed dogs without rabies inoculations
which in itself is detrimental to the welfare of children in the neighborhood
(which has been brought to the attention of the County Game Warden on numerous
occasions without avail), debris such as garbage and trash disseminated there-
abouts, junked automobiles, and 'rats .
In view of the aforementioned nuisances and complaints, we demand imme-
diate action bY said County to act upon our petition.
, ---
NAME ~~~~2728?9riR. .
:fjo.~.(l'J..k,~ / ~~ .. ~\
II fT I~ MAR 1969 /' \
m. eMI r~~ RECEIVED ~I
~ y' (J - . . .,- B9Ajfl,~ -L':>.i
.7. I ~"""'.vM-~ CIIlY1fII1ij~NS~)
J.J \ ~ VlReriVUWY1' 9
;;t~u-~-,-};/..4z{~/,l<)l~ "~fir,?/tt\\~~~ 1
.. .... (J ;n ).J
'. '/{N'\:..~_ (' 1'--' v-C-<"-'~''''-
, '(??/U?<7 c;: /h~
~~~4 ~v~-
>V ~^/ t(Ie";i!~,-
>h~ "J11-~VCV J;;, ~~-t:/
lfirfvfjq ,/&r9-~
'- ~/~ ct2~~}Y.-tC~~'
f;!/llJ ? E. Jd C-L-J-?? ~l~-~
ADDRESS
.(... L{"l lJ1. 6.c:c. K: U..;....e..
b:3 b L.IJ,ooK 'or, ~L
G3~ J../J 8P.DC k 01'''' lie
"
Ie-':?" (/ cX;; /3,..-o,oL /).1'-'.
0:,.; B ~'- 8--7_c-t.,< .{/(,
(" / ;( ~~,--".~/'l.:;~
/ /' '--Po ./ /::;. /. Ll
(~ CJ (eo ;(."--- ---- ~
.C
/_' /.1' 0 ..---/ a /. 9::J
(:: c..... ~_/..:/"7..-0~'G-?'-'1^-7"'-:-
,;,c:'. / !)
{;J ;L. I A'~~ ~I'\
h5/~/f&-;~53t ~~ '/~
SS31Ji/~~"""v' A"'~
~~ )' CJ 0 -;//k/ BL
;; ~ rA'Jj~~-?~ 0:1-.
/j J/'-7
6o?.tj&-L.-/)-?-~....:../ ...td-t!:-/1~ /{-
,"-,- . a 12
./7 Ii." '1 4 , . /. '1
1tHmv./.. J, . :vvr./~'7I"C . k ()L..2 .8'hH'/.!~ _AP".h. ::t '
rYLrt ~/Y'Vl/J ~, t ,/Yl.~ k. 7 O){ li~~ .t c.Jl,~ rRJ!.
'Pl/e ()f )-?;?2<J ([uc.e4y?( -I" /l!:;L.r~, 7C::)<< ~~t;.;r~cvn /lelu~ .f?;.f
~ "
1 ,/1 ~ '
( ~ fer . p''7....-v.J-
iv/rll ?
, / I j) '2 / t,i
--", 1 !. . ." /./ I
/ /,. . (">: /- ;J, _ . I t:' ~1:.. ,"-_"
//I/~;"-I .<'~. (/_l_ <- t..,..{__
'''l~'~
/t
. ~.-
.
.
COLONEL E. P. GILL
CHIEf Of POLlCE
E. T. SMITH
CAPTAIN Of DETECTIVES
R, W. KOCH
CAPTAIN OF POLlCE
COUNTY
OF
CHESTERFIELD
CHESTERFIELD. VIRGINIA
POLICE DEPARTMENT
April 4, 1969
Colonel E. P. Gill
Chief of Police
Chesterfield, Virginia
Re:Junk Yard
LaB rook Drille
Dear Sir:
As requested,:,;I have conducted the following investigation of the above
situation and found the following~conditions to exist.
At the end of LaB rook Drive there is a turn around for the dead end of
the street. ~re is a short dirt drive that continues on between two
small houses comes out on German School Road. Surrounding these two
small houses is a large quanity of garbage, trash etc. There are also
several junk cars at bbth houses.
A Mr. and Mrs. Robert Hall, 700 C German School Road-husband employed
at William Mail Service in Richmond; lives in one of these houses and I
warned them of the violation and the petition and gave them ten working
days to comply with the law. They advised they would comply.
The other house is vacant with information that they moved out on a Sunday,
whereabouts unknown and name unknown.
Both of these houses are property of Fred A. Muse, 704 German School Road.
Mr. Muse advised that he did not know of the situation there until just
recently and has been out there and talked to the people. Has sent a
worker out to clean up the place and will move the junk cars etc. from the
noted property. He is trying to get the place cleaned up and seems to be
making progress.
Continuing on further on a northerly line from the end of La Brook Drive
I found another large violation of paper, garbage, metal etc. scattered
over quite a large area. This is about 100 yards from La Brook and is on
Deter Street extended (dirt part) at the point where the underground cable'"
~~j.
-,
.~.,,-
.
.
Junk Yard
Page 2,
crosses Deter St. This property belongs to Mr. Charles H. Rush- 3202
Chesham St. Richmond, Virginia.
Mr. Rush advises he has posted this property numerous times in the past
and people tear down the signs. The property is woods and is being used
as dump with no one close around to see them when they dump. He has called
police numerous times and they have traced owners of trash and made them
clean it up. No' one has been brought to court. It has gotten too big now
and Mr. Rush stated he just isn't going to haul any more trash away, at his
expense. Has taken four truck loads away in the past. Can't guard the
property all the time to keep them from dumping. Advised he would come to
the Courthouse and try to work out this situation.
I also talked to a tenant of Mrs. Mason 707 German School Road, who lives
behind Mrs. Mason and next to the dirt street extended of Deter St. He has
five old truck cabs parked on his property that he is storing for a friend.
They are commerical vehicles and I advised him to move them or he may get
in trouble by not having a business license to store commerical vehicles
in a residential area. He said he would have them moved. He wasn't getting
any money, etc. just doing a favor. Would get rid of them.
I will keep check on this situation and follow it through.
Respectfully,
~alkl"
Detective Sgt.
.
.
1969 - 1970 BUDGET
Each fiscal year, the Board of Supervisors must make
a decision on how to provide the highest level of service to
citizens of Chesterfield County and yet retain a reasonable
tax rate. We believe the budget for 1969-'70 reflects the
ability of the Supervisors to fulfill this important obliga-
tion. To finance the goals of the 1969-'70 budget, it will
be necessary to draw modestly on the reserved surplus to avoid
an increase in the tax rate. In this era of ever increasing
costs, it is believed that our citizens will appreciate not
having an increase in taxes to finance their local government.
There has been some criticism of the increase in assess-
ments. It should be stated that the percentage of assessments
to sales dropped from 32.2% to 30.3% in the last two years.
This clearly indicates that Chesterfield's assessments are not
keeping up with the increase in the value of property.
The budget for 1967-'68 allowed a reduction in tax
rates and last year's budget saw an increase in taxes. This
budget for the year of 1969-'70 calls for no tax increase, in
fact the Board of Supervisors is eliminating the personal prop-
erty tax on farm machinery and livestock. It has been demon-
strated that the effort to bill, collect and account for this
tax makes it marginal in feasibility.
No tax increase next year does not indicate that Ches-
terfield has no financial problems. The reverse is true to
some extent. Our salary scale is somewhat lower than some of
those in the area. In tllis time of high costs, it will be
necessary to continue to build schools for our growing popula-
tion. Our base of taxation is growing but not as fast as the
cost of operation. Finally the costs of fighting annexation
are still with us and the specter of operating a diminished
county after annexation continues to badger the imagination.
The Board has spent revenues wisely and has tried to
keep costs from an inordinate escalation. It is hoped that
the citizens of the County will again approve the planned fis-
cal program for 1969-'70.
Briefly the budget provides for a salary increase of
10% for most of the County employees, which includes a cost of
living increase of 5% and a merit increase of 5%. The Police
Department will get a 10% increase plus a 5% merit increase.
Four new patrolmen will be hired next year~ The policy of
furnishing a fully equipped police car to each police officer
will be continued.
A-I
.
.
For the first time in Chesterfield a skeleton force
of paid firemen will be provided for two fire departments,
Bon Air and Manchester. There is little doubt that this
will be an ever expanding program. However, it is hoped
that the volunteers who have served so well so long will
continue to serve so that our citizens can be protected
from the ravages of fire. There are provided funds for
four new fire trucks, three of which have been ordered. A
Fire Chief, a Battalion Chief and a Fire Inspector will be
appointed.
The Health Department continues to expand its ser-
vices. Five new nurses will be hired mainly for work in
the schools. The Welfare Department is expanding to keep
pace with the demands of new Federal programs. Funds are
provided for starting the Nursing Home in 1970. It is hoped
that this facility will be self sustaining when in full ope-
ration.
$1,000,000 is taken from surplus to start planning a
possible hospital or other projects at the Courthouse complex.
The Board agreed to reduce the request of the School
Board but the amount allocated to public education is still
approximately $2,000,000 more than last year. It is believed
that while this amount does not meet the entire needs of the
school system, it is sufficient to allow education in the
County to progress in a systematic manner.
The assistance of each and everyone participating in
the preparation of this budget is gratefully acknowledged with
sincere appreciation.
A-2
.
ANNUAL FISCAL PLAN - 1969-70
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
Year ending June 30, 1970
General County Fund
EXPENDITURE ESTIMATES:
1. County Administration
2. Assessment of Taxable Property
3. Collection and Disbursement of Taxes &
Other Receipts
4. Recording of Documents
5. Administration of Justice
6. Crime Prevention & Detection
7. Fire Prevention & F.~~inction
8. Public Welfare
9. Public Health
10. Public Works
11. Advancement of Agriculture & Home Economics
12. Game Claims and Dog Wardens
13. Elections
14. Maintenance of Buildings & Grounds
15. Highway and Street Lighting
18. Miscellaneous Operating Functions
19. Capital Outlay
Transfers to other Funds:
Appropriations to School Boare
Scholarship
Library
Welfare
Road Fund
Street Sign Fund
Nursing Horne
Recreation Program
Unappropriated Surplus
REVENUE ESTII1ATES:
Anticipated Surplus at beginning of year
Current Taxes
Delinquent Taxes
Revenue from Local Sources
From the State & Federal Government
From sale of auto licenses
From Business Licenses & Trailers
C-l
.
1968-69
84,501
189,770
288,334
32,350
104,810
697,752
476,216
49,235
197,964
284,144
16,915
21,319
41,000
189,515
16,000
511,000
1,760,000
11,021,722
140,000
129,452
190,595
40,000
-1,000
13,247
$16,499,841
1,960,000
9 7116 125
" ,
140,000
1,594,450
2,073,266
570,000
416,000
$16,499,841
1969-70
307,778
229,037
123,577
38,650
122,094
838,319
524,038
47,235
234,923
345,553
19,450
41,581
59,845
198,960
16,500
397,650
1,790,000
12,814,706
o
239,372
207,9411
40,000
4,000
44,000
200,000
11,1,270
$18,926,482
2,500,000
10,891,063
152,000
1, 960 , 260
2,388,159
625,000
410,000
$18,926,482
.
LIBRARY FUND
EXPENDITURE ESTIMATES:
Operation of Library
REVENUE ESTHlATES:
From State Government
From County Government
.
1968-69
1969-70
225,649
259,372
71,197
20,000
154,452
225,649
239,372
259,372
LM'l LIBRARY FUND
EXPENDITURE ESTIMATES:
Maintenance of Law Library
REVENUE ESTIMATES:
Anticipated Surplus
From Court Fees
1,700
3,500
1,500
1,700
2,000
3,500
COUNTY ROAD FUND
EXPENDITURE ESTIMATES:
Reserve for contingencies
REVENUE ESTIMATES:
Anticipated Surplus
Appropriation from Local Funds
C-2
80,000
100,000
40,000
40,000
60,000
40,000
100,000
.
STREET SIGN FUND
EXPENDITURE ESTIMATES:
Replacement of Street Signs
Purchase of New Street Signs
REVENUE ESTIMATES:
Anticipated Surplus
Transfer from General Fund
Estimated Revenue from Subdividers
.
1968-69
1969-70
3,500
2,300
5,800
6,000
5,000
11 ,000
300
4,000
1,500
5,800
5,000
4,000
2,000
.11,000
COUNTY GARAGE FUND
EXPENDITURE ESTIMATES:
Operational Expenses
Reserve for contingencies
REVENUE ESTIMATES:
Anticipated Surplus
From sale of goods and services
106,768
13,232
120,000
123,470
46,530
170,000
15,000
105,000
120,000
45,000
125,000
170,000
COUNTY RECREATION FUND
EXPENDITURE ESTI~1ATES:
Operation of Recreational Program
REVENUE ESTI~ATES:
Contribution from General Fund
C-3
200,000
200 . Q.OO
.
.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
EXPENDITURE ESTIt4ATES:
1968-69
1969-70
Old Age Assistance
163,306
114,312
194,055
120,740
Administration
Aid to the Blind
12,480
11,880
Aid to Dependent Children
131,000
191,240
Aid to Permanently & Totally Disabled
77,400
75,600
8,000
General Relief
13,000
Foster Care
92,040
1,500
106,260
1,500
Non-Marching Funds
Medical Assistance to the Aged
21,000
626,038
8,000
717,275
REVENUE ESTIMATES:
From Federal Government 194,579 247,132
From State Government 240,864 262,199
From County Government 190,595 207,944
626,038 717,275
COUNTY NURSING HOME
EXPENDITURE ESTI~~TES:
Operation of Nursing Home
179,000
REVENUE ESTIMATES:
Income from Nursing Home
135,000
44,000
179,000
Contribution from General Fund
C-4
.
.
ETTRICK SANITARY DISTnICT
EXPENDITURE ESTIMATES:
1968-69
Administration of Public Works
Appropriation for Debt Fund
Appropriation for New Construction Fund
Reserved for Contingencies
23,497
5,100
5,000
28,903
62,500
REVENUE ESTIMATES:
Anticipated Surplus
Revenue from sale of water and
sewer services & connections
33,500
29,000
62,500
1969-70
2.<2,006
o
o
48,994
73,000
43,000
30,000
73,000
COUNTY SCHOOL FUNDS
EXPENDITURE ESTIMATES:
Administration
Instruction
Auxiliary Agencies
Operation & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
255,668
11,681,083
1,350,363
1,700,100
5,166,200
4,066,047
140,000
Debt Service
Scholarship Fund
24,359,461
REVENUE ESTI~~TES:
From sale of bonds
From Commonwealth of Virginia
From Federal Funds
From miscellaneous local sources
Appropriation from local funds
5,600,000
5,875,656
986,996
735,087
11,161,722
211,359,471
C-5
o
27,138,361
5,420,000
7,026,181
823,1124
1,054,050
l2,B14,706
27,138,361
",
. ,
.
-
SUMMARY OF UTILITY BUDGETS
WATER DEPARTMENT
REVENUE:
From Sale of Water
From Meter Connections
From Contractors & Subdividers
From Bond Sales
From Interest on Investments
From Miscellaneous Surplus
EXPENDITURES:
Operation of Water System
Debt Retirement
Installation of Meters
Installation of Water Lines &
Other Inprovements
1968-69
$1,383,000.00
333,000.00
124,542.00
4,000,000.00
5,000.00
o
$5,845,542.00
$ 679,643.00
3,120,793.00
333,000.00
1,712,106.00
$5,845,542.00
SEWER DEPARTMENT
REVENUE:
From Service Charges
From Sewer Connections
From Sale Bonds
From Federal Aid
From Contractors & Developers
From Interest on Investments
From Miscellaneous Surpluses
EXPENDITURES:
Operation of Sewer System
Debt Retirement
Sewer Canna. & Construction
Installation of Sewer Lines
Other Improvements
Reserve for Special Projects
$ 530,400.00
733,900.00
4 , 732 ,841. 00
279,000.00
5,000.00
247,500.00
2,718,000.00
$ 9 ,246,641. 00
$ 228,418.00
743,274.00
Cont. 193,303.00
&
3,883,926.00
4,197,720.00
$9,246,641. 00
C-6
1969-70
$1,953,000.00
460,000.00
65,000.00
o
80,045.00
2,711,000.00
$5,269,045.00
$ 901,854.00
581,193.00
1,230,000.00
2,555,998.00
$5,269,045.00
$ 650,000.00
1,260,000.00
o
200,000.00
5,000.00
90,000.00
4,882,000.00
$7,087,000.00
$ 210,235.00
795,400.00
3,305,000.00
2,776,365.00
o
$7,087,000.00
.
e
CD
(Y\'f' PUl'..L ~e:t b.J-~+.. L; /9, /?6 l'
~-I \ 11)" Vr ~o":1~'''''
. . (r\.r, [3",,,,,,,,,-\.-+ 'I ,,-<<'s 77'~ I ~ " O'-t2~ - Pa~ .
t B~~
(V1y-, P,ehtt.-L. Mov-Lr, A1,../il~ S~: ,. '
, . ...... . [),ek, IfpJ,n.""
/' lh U~ ,j -f.e. S" - C' 0 .,.. .. ~ --h <:J "" -f1ff~ - ~ ~ .
.- f1.r~f~- ~O - .V\.O e........~~C7 - . fA.Sr.GJ_
IYl V,. D I ~ -h c- L.. ru DV~f, ffr". Vha..1-:. ~~. ~J.J'::
/ W~ '~c:.. (\oJ J -e. Hv J,/-e "'-. 4- 1I..r. -h Y' h ; 1./ It 0 1/ ~ eo, -
. aclJ 10.//1 t7f 6'~r5 ~.s-Loh ... f~.
, "rrw~~, - /1/" ,- w...tI /,k-h, 1-"'7 ~ ' ..
- ~ - --- - --- - - --- - - - +
,j ~,.s. G. J./. eo,..Lj,~, -t1-~.BJ../ !!/.i-.tJ.....-!r j_~y,.'j ,
p~~U - . G-e"+ f&<l- +....l - 5c/j" }.c..s...f~"" ~' .
/ /!Iv 1114.: ~, ,It iJJe:tvl ~-t: .
y: w~.{...... 1:- j.c. ~ q. f ,.f JI/ 3 4-;.F ~
I ;J1o". D'~h~L i'h~. fir 41'4d'-S~k. '
:rc: c t<19 4-r-IR:/1 ~Lh. .. ,~
. . ,'- - (/
~/ M(. /3....,,,, "'..4.S, /11/ ~rr.n-< ~.t(; . /J
r/ j.J~ '~..sl-rk I~f l1I-r'1 /.-I..4- ....,....-1 ~ r~
~ / H./J
t' ~11-:Z4
. ~ @
. ;4tv.{),'&kt ~s, A1v ~ s. .(,
V .5cj?-3cD /?! /0 /l1.,k! 0-
. m _ _ - A-p~ vo-/-4s -,J/o - ~
. .' .
.;/Jy ,.lfrf-~ J-'Vt& ve.s/ /J1y Ole f-.:c-t.., J - ~ d.r A_ __
./ ~/Jewa( /:.. ~~ fkfk~:"s - ~~Je h, i is R~j. ~ .
. -- Cob~~<: R.L . r~.{y-fp ~ ~J' __ _ ~
@)
, tf1v', N'~\r~ ~ I /t; rfp/~~ ~/,- .
V w~ (U" k lit -J" /i<L /"1'.:.. h 01 id; e- -J ,
((peo re~~shrw ~/~t'o7-' .b~
/ jJ1r/ D,'e.-h<- I.. ,Pu~v4, A..- ~Jl<.. _ "": . /
\/ Dr-A(: "-J~ c!1e/r -(~y' fJl?,~r4,~ - he a-;~J 4~7/fz4~.
Ibl r ~ 1/ r / ' . / *
- fz,ot,.llM U.J -/- / s 1-v~ 000 - IYIV nS'/G/ 11 /IL.Ot-J jy<e(!?d /D /7 2.3,<Pdle;,_
,FJf/,Ooo ~ &-,,' - .50 /b 2f; svZ~- f=L
(11" fAI R""'D - "::;'L~::"'P.~k 4./to",'J.,:. r~jJ,.J 4.- /~i ?~y- .
.J C~r;+-"" h -f, ;"hHe /~ 0 r~A !-,o:' - .3 ~ew flo.u~du.s-
+0 CtANi DJ,c. /Jork- ".hll J4-tDVe.. t!)Jf. d.f ('1:7 _ /,AJOIA f ~-<. tJ..JeJ
U l-t1eS5 VteeJeJ-
D ;e-J-sc h- how a-J"vf 'J~5;70 - ho /J ~V&:.VfS/J-e-vC1 ~
I V" , 'I I ,8 . QiAcI
J I C 10 ().So ~Oj VV VI \l'\1~.J a -r 4..tr3e. - 300.~ -er;: 30 d.4.jS -
/7 !~r/~ atI!M .' ' l;"~d
;Uv ~ ~(/J1v - ~J[:
E.f-f<...~ /",,__.L~.k 0 - f....<<-L ~
fV\v. P ~ - H-,'(f ~ Ott (e - ~I'J t-t9 t f'~ k IIf j'J-
Ww-s. CI/[{1!7 -lee sl .
fnf~ Jr<,~ RJ-
. . (fJ
1!f1" /J,:-LL /Hd1-<s, /!r /114:. ~..h<
. .. fP-rl~W- f/vs-/-owtj-f .. r=-f.
- - -
__ _ J11 i. D [r e.-fs c.- t.. /11 <f'v-L:s I /J1 Y r 4lt:l-r /r:. ~ is ;: _ _
J tJe- 0 (v t !:c . A~:-' "j-- /h"j ~?---: ",-r "1'''''' -- .
1Y1~. ~ l v I.'c- C-el"\. .{.~rr - J ~ - cl7 J <- ~/.e 1YI""k ~ It-o-h'lj-
~ F\;-e. DvJ_ (D~
I
~? -If - !I<lJhe I/..dtwo€ A/., da"''''1 c,,_b -j~
- J- YJ11/. D,efrc.L /'i1&Jv-e-~ /lIy-!lfr:~ soc.-'q~ -:. - u.
_ ,/.->e __C'1. - (/~.~~
-K<-<- ~~+ 1: 1 ~ f~-
- ~- v~ Ie, 'i fo 10~. - cF-~
t f;..('2,.. ~ /J1.~/c.r-;J;,~ -/;ere, - .
- ~/n//~r ~lfos-es Y1al'ke. e-f I!<.nok/I 4..-e-.r-4'lt.J _ 1;;_0<.1+ 0+
J 10 -I-:s - ~Jlot" Ca.. cl..<"'-7-e NU"'~ - - -
- mY. 4/~~" /It: !J/e.Ir~< ~j./~'
t.>-e- . ~ p-...e- 1-0 If-k--' /p~
I. f6ddf l f,,/ I e /: /}1--- ~~v;.lr:hee h<a.. -Le.<-
J ./tlvD/uI~J.mrr<s, A dj(~ ~.J,:
Go, P (~ s-4;7 - n..h7'7 --cf.ta<_-I/.r~ Jow"""
/Ji.4t. /q~J /~ cJ~V''G-{.,,~J -k 9/ve ;v,,-4~~
rryY;,J,...~eH. J ACAJS ./4-Ie;jA/".;"j $.{: /1 fH-o~1,l OI'I'''.u~- .s-hC:/<-fo '-.."./ cJ.u~Jtc,r- A O~OI!JJ
- /Yl v. DIe. i- s {:. h. tYz 0 v e S I /J1 r: /f1q ~ .L.--.t4 -... ,022:. ~~
jJe del11 ~7.
~
.
@
tf-;S (}~Y~ACe AI. ..L.hI1S0rl- Yef:.~ J;~!Iu'j44"j
. .. M V .D,ekc/.. IY)f:J II~J" /l1v /?Ia y!r:-.... ~c-'>"-~ ; ..
) .. .we!<,f de.eJ ~-f'~/.a.cc7~/1e 10 ;fo-rJ~,
. //;','/ 4v.e-<.- ~ 1-' ~ S'd6J"er-f ~ /:7!JJ-I je~
.-~r/y()~t:-j I; ar/~"~e" 'l~
"(- / b ;;r. D. JO rJ".. ,X. tJ; It Yh=. -:.;.,.,: /J.J
j. rnv;lIr~ ~OV42Sr' /}1",-; /J4~4:.-.~k; .
.... . .. ... f".rC.. CZ-t ~ y-<-~ ~.,t' ~ C" ~ 4 ~-I ..
p~
/
- - - - - - - - . ~ --
.
tffi<~ P . Eyed 6-1 Y~r-' P,/Iow /J1o,''','/e. JJ'H,~eJ. .
y ;nY.ltrf~o~ 1"1"""'<, . ~Y. p,,,-hre L ~.h:
. w--<!.- -If""''''''< ~ }-<~, . fi!'.~ ..
r
. -
~r ~2.1 ck"'J- ~;rjcA)_ /v...:(cr cti...,. .
/ 11Jy, /Jy~Yl~ ~dV<-.r: 41~~~ s-ec~.f-:'
,- tJ't! . _a.-/~ /,.J,II tJ,J~/~ s7 - . f~
-- -'-
IIf - J.- ~ m v' D~ e/-e- L VIA Ov-tZ. s; r' MY' ~t ~
/ /u tJ.e. ../ .e-k-.-- .f'...-- s eo ../ '7 r -"/,, t> Me I. e.-c. - f- 0_'../ _
'f - 2-3 tn". Bo h f3~-J.,,, - ). e..<- ."
~ m, A-rl-4'f~ \M.~, f//lv ~~ ~;>
. ')1-, f~ , R,V L~
tr:) In; 1J1;:!itJ::::' 41v ~
~
. . (D
. r
.;J!, ~i1{VL-J /k6l/~ /t ;rrf~~~..L~-; .
j trJ<' fr . ~ ~ C/..__s -. . r--/
) /11/ ilf~~erY71 )44.n-~5~ ~r ~P1t; ~.r7
. - . - /1 r~6p/ is- . 2-r ~~i- . 'r~
~&Ht.tI' OK Q."Jt.r""j~s
j ,,41r D/qs,-'- tu.~/ ~",1-rf'~~ .s:e-../[)
.. . _ v-GfvD ea-.5~~~f O~_ ~.
- . -
J /fJ..' 4rf~ ....~, /f1v f3,",,-,I4';~. l
m._ -. .tI-U.r~' S-t-~-7. DK., - ,. .. t?-~
.,J A..'lfq-> 1''''''1....... /11~, #/I1...A..:. :;;:-.....e: .
. . J'S~731- .. . ..
~ - ~ /11" 1)/~~ c I t~
. .
. . .
J 1Y1v; /1,~ ~, ~, lJ/~!sc.i ~:
.. n Fl;e 'Y~3v~Jf- -!-v F,~~, . /?~
. -
ti-IJJ Iq; P~;;/~h -~
j /J'hr ~ h<-~, /y!v 4t~ .~ ~
. .W< ~ -h /hri f/;~/~4 ~Jd-/ ~(-I-t.
{Vo ~ .. ,f~
~
~ . CZ)
c9-_/r_-,;:r~#11 P~(~- ~--~ f<-/.""4 -/}y- -
... / /1M" JJ/~~~tm~,/ /J?y~ ~ ~. .
.L__ t><-~ !-o tJ~(~-f;v ~~ - h-e~/ '4 .
d___ ~ 10 b/.lJs- -?~ _
~
- ,
. J JH" 4(t~~, . /11", ~"...:, ~;
u_, j,J.e rec~vv<- / ~e ~ S' . ~ ~ n - f&,Q"/ _.
~- -----. -- . . - - -.- -
.. ,tJ1,r j)/~~.l fJ16)rC-s, - 41", B~ ~~
- J Sd_,l bus /~I-~ -k, S'__tool f3o--f- rt~
. !- ~~.J & ,{ 1- ~,~, n--s L_.- h~-
~ f-zo j)y, ;;: R. &.001 -Ae.,.e - f<~G.c lvo.,tsi./, -?- /,4w:k..
j W.~h hu.-I-:-' b /J7. af~. 'J. -h_c.. -. "
. '-- My /J1ay~ /4A.~ / /ltv ~;P~ rfr:n-... ~J' -; _ ,
we /y~-f t/s:.e I~:f. I(:',~/..j, ~~'.sL~
/
J ;1!,( ;!f'f'~ /1t~JI1'/" f)/b"-kc.L ~;
. f3vl;~f - /J1~ 1<1- I~ "'" ~;r;z.3 ~ .
{,A. t:t~ tn1 IH~ I~ J-1/#1- ~/-:/
~
, - - @
. ft!,/-!t r'" Hu>~>, Ar D,e-h-",~ .eY~.~...I.r.'
... 'j-: f b- r- f- k "f,:h j a.,L :2 r""
....... .. .~~
'-
.