2025-02-26 Minutes BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES FEBRUARY 26, 2025
2/26/2025 Page 1 of 70
A video recording of this meeting may be viewed at
https://www.chesterfield.gov/244/Agendas-and-Minutes.
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. James A. Ingle, Jr., Chair
Dr. Mark S. Miller, Vice Chair
Ms. Jessica L. Schneider
Mr. James M. Holland
Mr. Kevin P. Carroll
Dr. Joseph P. Casey
County Administrator
Mr. Ingle called the meeting to order at 2 p.m.
1. Approval of Minutes
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board approved the minutes of the January 22,
2025, Board of Supervisors meeting, as submitted.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Abstained: Holland.
2. Requests to Postpone Agenda Items and Additions, Deletions or Changes in the Order of Presentation
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board moved Item 13.A., Recognizing Mr. Holland for
Award and Resolution, to occur following the Pledge
of Allegiance and Item 13.B., Resolution Recognizing
Mr. Dallas A. Bradbury, Jr., Environmental
Engineering, Upon His Retirement, to the Consent
Agenda, and approved the agenda, as amended.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
3. Everyday Excellence - Utilities Department
Mr. George Hayes, Director of Utilities, and Mr. Matt
Rembold, Assistant Director, recognized the following
employees for their critical roles in assisting with
the Richmond Water Crisis that began on January 6,
2025: Chris Overby, Dave Sirois, Mike Larson, Tim
Luft, Dan Soracco, and Howard Vaughan.
Senator Glen Sturtevant was also present to recognize
the Utilities Department. He presented a joint
resolution commending the many ways the department
provided support during the Richmond Water Crisis.
Lastly, Mr. Hayes recognized Tara Kelly for being
selected 2024 Employee of the Year.
Board members highly praised Utilities Department
2/26/2025 Page 2 of 70
staff for their commitment to excellent customer
service.
4. Work Sessions
A. Partnership for Housing Affordability Annual Update
Mr. Jovan Burton and Mr. Woody Rogers provided the
Board with an annual update on the activities and
initiatives of the Partnership for Housing
Affordability (PHA).
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
B. Chesterfield Health District: Community Health
Improvement Plan Survey
Chesterfield Health District Director Dr. Alexander
Samuel introduced the work session on the Community
Health Improvement Plan (CHIP) Survey. He was
accompanied by Jana Smith, Population Health Manager,
and Jessica Brennan, Population Health Community
Coordinator, who provided the Board with details of
the Community Health Assessment; priority issues
(access to care, mental health, and knowledge of
resources); CHIP commitments; and policy, systems,
and environmental change strategies.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
C. Registrar's Office Update
General Registrar and Director of Elections Missy
Vera provided the Board with an update on proposed
precinct changes ahead of the June 2025 primary
elections.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
D. Planning Department Update
Director of Planning Andy Gillies provided the Board
with an update on the department's 2025 work program,
which includes various ordinance amendments; ZoMod;
and Comprehensive Plan amendments.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
E. Proposed FY2026 Utilities Operating Budget and
FY2026-2035 Capital Improvement Program Work Session
Deputy County Administrator Matt Harris provided the
Board with a timeline for the FY2026 budget season.
Mr. George Hayes and Ms. Kathy Sobczak, Assistant
Director, presented the proposed FY2026 Utilities
Operating Budget and FY2026-2035 Capital Improvement
Program.
2/26/2025 Page 3 of 70
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
F. State Legislative Update
Intergovernmental Relations Director Natalie Spillman
provided the Board with a General Assembly update and
reviewed several topics relevant to the county.
Legislative Affairs Liaison Casey Walker provided the
Board with state budget highlights.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
G. Consent Agenda Highlights
Mr. Matt Harris provided details of various consent
agenda items on the evening agenda.
5. Reports
A. Reports on the Status of District Improvement
Operating and Capital Funds, General Fund Unassigned
Balance and Debt Policy Ratios, and Investments
The Board approved the Reports on the Status of
District Improvement Operating and Capital Funds,
General Fund Unassigned Balance and Debt Policy
Ratios, and Investments.
6. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
Ms. Amina Kendrick sought advocacy for retaliatory
eviction and issues with the Chesterfield Department
of Social Services and the Division of Child Support.
Mr. Douglas Bradham with Chesterfield Citizens for
Responsible Government (CCRG) discussed county
spending and real estate property tax history.
Mr. Tom Ager with CCRG discussed a cost
reduction/continuous improvement program and
education.
Mr. Thomas Kierl with CCRG discussed what has
improved the past year, what needs improvement, and
economic development.
Ms. Brenda Stewart provided the Board with a summary
of the accomplishments of the late Dr. Margaret
Dabney.
7. Closed Session
A. Closed Session 1) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(5), Code
of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss or Consider
Prospective Businesses or Industries or the Expansion
of Existing Businesses or Industries Where no
Previous Announcement Has Been Made of the
Businesses’ or Industries’ Interest in Locating or
2/26/2025 Page 4 of 70
Expanding Their Facilities in the Community, and 2)
Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(3), Code of Virginia, 1950,
as Amended, to Discuss the Acquisition by the County
of Real Estate for a Public Purpose, or the
Disposition of Publicly Held Real Property, Where
Discussion in an Open Meeting Would Adversely Affect
the Bargaining Position and Negotiating Strategy of
the Public Body
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board went into Closed Session 1) Pursuant to § 2.2--
3711(A)(5), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to
Discuss or Consider Prospective Businesses or
Industries or the Expansion of Existing Businesses or
Industries Where no Previous Announcement Has Been
Made of the Businesses’ or Industries’ Interest in
Locating or Expanding Their Facilities in the
Community, and 2) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(3), Code
of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss the
Acquisition by the County of Real Estate for a Public
Purpose, or the Disposition of Publicly Held Real
Property, Where Discussion in an Open Meeting Would
Adversely Affect the Bargaining Position and
Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Reconvening:
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day
adjourned into Closed Session in accordance with a
formal vote of the Board and in accordance with the
provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information
Act; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act
effective July 1, 1989 provides for certification
that such Closed Session was conducted in conformity
with law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Board of
Supervisors does hereby certify that to the best of
each member’s knowledge, i) only public business
matters lawfully exempted from open meeting
requirements under the Freedom of Information Act
were discussed in Closed Session to which this
certification applies, and ii) only such business
matters were identified in the motion by which the
Closed Session was convened were heard, discussed or
considered by the Board. No member dissents from this
certification.
Ms. Schneider: Aye.
Mr. Holland: Aye.
Mr. Carroll: Aye.
Dr. Miller: Aye.
Mr. Ingle: Aye.
8. Recess for Dinner
2/26/2025 Page 5 of 70
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board recessed for dinner in Room 502.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Reconvening:
9. Invocation by the Honorable James M. Holland, Dale District Supervisor
The Honorable James M. Holland, Dale District
Supervisor, gave the invocation.
10. Pledge of Allegiance Led by Matt Harris, Deputy County Administrator
Deputy County Administrator Matt Harris led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
11. Recognizing Supervisor Holland for Recent Award and Resolution
Senator Ghazala Hashmi and Delegate Carrie Coyner
presented Supervisor Holland, accompanied by his
wife, Judith, with a joint resolution recognizing and
commending him for many outstanding achievements
throughout his longstanding tenure as a member of the
Board of Supervisors.
Greater Richmond YMCA Chief Executive Officer Jody
Alexander was also present to recognize Supervisor
Holland for receiving the 2025 Martin Luther King,
Jr. Service Award for Leadership.
Also in attendance were former Board of Supervisors
members Dorothy Jaekle from the Bermuda District and
Tara Carroll, Leslie Haley, and Dan Gecker from the
Midlothian district and former Clerk to the Board
Janice Ford.
12. County Administration Update
The County Administration Update included the
following:
o Recognition of the Helping Addicts Recover
Progressively (HARP) program by Delegate Coyner;
o Recognition of coverage of the HARP program in
Rolling Stone Magazine by Kerri Rhodes;
o Announcement of Chesterfield County Jail's one-
hundred percent compliance rating following an
unannounced visit from the Board of Local and
Regional Jails (BLRJ) by Major Eric Jones;
o Presentation on the Emergency Communications
Center's Prepared 911 Live software by Director
Tommy Tucker;
o Announcement of Risk Management earning a spot
on the Virginia Workers’ Compensation
Commission's “Dean’s List” for timely electronic
transmission of information;
o Recognition of Economic Development Deputy
Director Matt McLaren for being recently
selected to serve on the Executive Committee of
2/26/2025 Page 6 of 70
Greater Richmond Association for Commercial Real
Estate (GRACRE); and
o Announcement of a special media event to be held
by Competitive Racing Investments, LLC (CRI) on
March 11 to announce the future of Southside
Speedway.
13. Board Member Reports
Board members announced and provided details of
several community meetings and county-related events
they attended recently.
14. Resolutions and Special Recognitions
A. Resolution Recognizing Ms. Pamela A. Goode, Mental
Health Support Services, Upon Her Retirement
Ms. Pamela A. Goode, accompanied by members of her
family, was present to receive the recognition.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Ms. Pamela A. Goode retired from
Chesterfield County Mental Health Support Services on
February 1, 2025, after providing outstanding service
for over 26 years; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Goode was hired as a part-time
Residential Counselor on May 27, 1998 and then as a
Full-Time Residential Counselor on January 23, 1999;
and
WHEREAS, Ms. Goode was promoted to Residential
Supervisor in 2001 and to Residential Senior
Supervisor in 2010; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Goode coached Special Olympics
basketball and volleyball, chaperoning State
tournament games in Richmond and Virginia Beach; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Goode coached THUNDER, a gym-based
special needs cheer team as well as created
Ghirlwinds, a cheerleading group, and Abracadabra’s,
a youth dance team; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Goode served as an advisor to People
First and routinely attended ARC conferences as well
as other events and trainings; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Goode arranged activities for
individuals including day trips to Kings Dominion,
the Spirit of Norfolk and at Massanutten; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Goode was instrumental in developing the
residential program for Mockingbird Group home
specifically to provide supports and services for
individuals on the Autism spectrum; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Goode trained staff in CPR, First Aid
2/26/2025 Page 7 of 70
and CPI; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Goode was MHSS Employee of the Year in
1999 and 2006; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Goode was hired as a Services Supervisor
for Chesterfield Employment Services in 2014 and was
instrumental in obtaining group supported employment
sites in the community; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Goode was awarded the Association of
People Supporting Employment (APSE) Award in 2016;
and
WHEREAS, Ms. Goode played a significant role during
the COVID 19 pandemic by having over 150 masks made
for individuals continuing to work as well as
arranging for CES individuals to receive vaccinations
including arranging and providing transportation; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Goode diligently worked during the
implementation of the new agency Electronic Health
Record and the development of a billing process for
the Department of Aging and Rehabilitative (DARS)
services; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Goode dedicated her career to the
services of others supporting individuals and staff
alike with genuine care and compassion making a
difference in countless lives.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 26th day of
February 2025, publicly recognizes the outstanding
contributions of Ms. Pamela A. Goode and extends
appreciation, on behalf of its members and the
citizens of Chesterfield County, congratulations upon
her retirement, and best wishes for a long, happy,
and healthy retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Ms. Goode and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers
of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Mr. Ingle presented Ms. Goode with the executed
resolution.
Ms. Goode expressed appreciation for the recognition
and stated it has been a joy and honor to work for
the mental health department.
Dr. Casey presented Ms. Goode with a replica of the
brick that will be placed in the historic courthouse
walkway in her honor.
Board members praised Ms. Goode for her many years of
2/26/2025 Page 8 of 70
dedicated service to the residents of the county and
wished her well in her retirement.
15. New Business
A. Approval of a Performance Grant Agreement with Super
Radiator Coils
Deputy Director of Economic Development Matt McLaren
provided the Board with details of the proposed
Performance Grant Agreement with Super Radiator
Coils.
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board approved a Performance Grant Agreement with
Super Radiator Coils, a copy of which is filed with
the papers of this Board.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
B. Consent Items (14.B.1. - 14.B.12.)
1. Adoption of Resolutions
a. Resolution Recognizing Captain Randal J.
Perdue, Fire and Emergency Medical Services
Department, Upon His Retirement
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Captain Randal J. Perdue retired from the
Chesterfield County Fire and Emergency Medical
Services Department on February 1, 2025; and
WHEREAS, Captain Perdue completed Recruit School #19
in 1988 and has faithfully served Chesterfield County
for thirty-six years in various assignments as a
firefighter at the Chester, Bon Air, Buford, and Dale
Fire and EMS Stations, as a lieutenant at the
Manchester Station and as a captain at the Airport,
Midlothian, Enon, Rivers Bend, Staffing Office,
Bensley, Bon Air, and Phillips Fire and EMS Stations;
and
WHEREAS, Captain Perdue served as a Member of the
Hazardous Materials Team from 1990 to 1995; and
WHEREAS, Captain Perdue served as a Resource Unit
Leader of the Central Virginia All Hazards Incident
Management Team from 2011 to 2023; and
WHEREAS, Captain Perdue was awarded a Lifesave Award
for his involvement in the successful outcome of a
patient suffering cardiac arrest on May 1, 1992; and
WHEREAS, Captain Perdue was awarded a Lifesave Award
for his involvement in the successful outcome of a
2/26/2025 Page 9 of 70
patient involved in a motorcycle accident on June 1,
2002; and
WHEREAS, Captain Perdue was awarded a Lifesave Award
for his involvement in the successful outcome of a
patient suffering cardiac arrest at the Atlantic
Coastal Athletic Club(ACAC)on Robious Road on October
9, 2012; and
WHEREAS, Captain Perdue was awarded EMS Unit
Citations for his involvement in the successful
outcome of residents suffering cardiac arrest on
October 6, 2015, and April 4, 2024.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the
contributions of Captain Randal J. Perdue expresses
the appreciation of all residents for his service to
the county and extends their appreciation for his
dedicated service and their congratulations upon his
retirement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
b. Resolution Recognizing Corporal Kate W.
Clark, Police Department, Upon Her
Retirement
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Corporal Kate W. Clark retired from the
Chesterfield County Police Department on February 1,
2025 after providing over 32 years of quality service
to the residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Clark began her career with the
Chesterfield Police Department as a Police Recruit
and faithfully served the county as a Police Officer,
Senior Police Officer, Master Police Officer, Master
Police Detective, Career Police Detective, Career
Police Officer, Corporal Police Officer and Corporal
Police Detective; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Clark also served during her tenure
as a Field Training Officer and Desk Officer; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Clark received a Commendation Award
for her work with the Fugitive and Warrant Task
Force, which had over 1,700 unserved warrants and
aimed to reduce the number by fifty percent in six
months and through effective teamwork, they achieved
a fifty-two percent reduction in just four months and
helped establish a new warrant policy; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Clark was presented with a Chief’s
Commendation Award for her investigative work in
response to a shooting that resulted in the loss of
life, working through the night, gaining the trust of
a witness to the shooting to ensure proper
identification of the suspect and apprehending him
within 24 hours, and
2/26/2025 Page 10 of 70
WHEREAS, Corporal Clark received a Unit Citation for
her role in the Police Personnel Division, which saw
an increase in background interviews for hiring and
despite the COVID-19 pandemic, the division continued
in-person interviews with safety protocols, making
the department fully staffed for the first time in 25
years; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Clark is recognized for her
exceptional communication skills, approachable
demeanor and tenacious work ethic; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Clark has received numerous letters
of commendation, thanks and appreciation from
supervisors and residents for services rendered; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Clark has provided the Chesterfield
County Police Department with many years of loyal and
dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Corporal Clark’s diligent
service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes
Corporal Kate W. Clark and extends on behalf of its
members and the residents of Chesterfield County,
appreciation for her service to the county,
congratulations upon her retirement, and best wishes
for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
c. Resolution Recognizing Mr. Henry E. Gerber,
Utilities Department, Upon His Retirement
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Henry Gerber retired from the Chesterfield
County Utilities Department on February 1, 2025,
after faithfully serving the county and its citizens
for over 28 years; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Gerber began his service to the citizens
of Chesterfield County in 1996 as a meter reader in
the operations section of the Utilities Department;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Gerber transferred to Falling Creek
Wastewater Treatment plant in 1997 as a plant
operator trainee; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Gerber was recognized for multiple plant
achievements in his career, from energy reduction to
digester gas reuse; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Gerber used his skills to play a pivotal
role in Falling Creek obtaining the NACWA Platinum
award in 2024; and
2/26/2025 Page 11 of 70
WHEREAS, Mr. Gerber passed along his knowledge and
passion for his work to many new hires throughout his
career; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Gerber was known by his colleagues for
his dedication and hard work ensuring Chesterfield
County achieved the most reliable and efficient
wastewater treatment possible.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the
contribution of Henry Gerber, expresses the
appreciation of all residents for his service to the
county, and extends their appreciation for his
dedicated service and their congratulations upon his
retirement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
d. Resolution Recognizing Mr. David F. Tesh,
Fire and Emergency Medical Services
Department, Upon His Retirement
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. David F. Tesh retired from the
Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services
Department on December 1, 2024, after faithfully
serving Chesterfield County for 23 years; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Tesh began his career on July 9, 2001,
as the Volunteer Fire & EMS Recruitment and Retention
Officer, recruiting and training volunteer
firefighters and rescue squad members, while also
significantly contributing to the department’s
overall mission; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Tesh is a life member of the Forest View
Volunteer Rescue Squad with twenty-nine years of
service and also graduated from Chesterfield
Volunteer Fire Recruit School #15 in 2004, earning
his firefighter certification; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Tesh was named Squad Member of the Year
for both Forest View Rescue Squad and Chesterfield
Fire and EMS in 2009; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Tesh played a key role in recruiting
both volunteer and career firefighters, co-founding
the Virginia Recruitment and Retention Network in
2002, serving as its chairman, and earning
certifications such as the Virginia Association of
Volunteer Rescue Squads Leadership Challenge and the
International Association of Fire Chiefs’ Recruitment
and Retention Coordinator Certificate; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Tesh developed and instructed
recruitment and retention courses, instructed
Emergency Vehicle Operator Courses, presented at
state conferences, and contributed to multiple
2/26/2025 Page 12 of 70
charity events, including receiving a Certificate of
Commendation for his work on the inaugural Brad
McNeer Memorial Golf Tournament in 2005; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Tesh served on numerous boards and
committees, including the executive board of the
Chesterfield Professional Firefighters Charitable
Foundation, the Chesterfield Fire and EMS Awards
Committee, Quality Council, Memorial Wall Committees,
the EMS Advisory Council, and state-level groups such
as the Virginia Office of EMS Workforce Development
Committee and Standards of Excellence Workgroup; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Tesh has been a central figure at public
events, serving as the master of ceremonies for the
Volunteer Walk of Fame, 21 Chesterfield Fire and EMS
Awards ceremonies, and countless recruit school
graduations, fire station dedications, and
promotional ceremonies.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the
contributions of Mr. David F. Tesh, expresses
appreciation on behalf of all employees and residents
for his service to the County and extends their
appreciation for his dedicated service and their
congratulations upon his retirement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
e. Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Cathy Speidel,
Circuit Court Clerk's Office, Upon Her
Retirement
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mrs. Cathy Speidel retired from Chesterfield
County on January 10, 2025, after providing 22 years
of dedicated service to the residents of Chesterfield
County and its Circuit Court Clerk’s Office; and
WHEREAS, the Circuit Court Clerk’s Office provides
professional support to Judges, attorneys, and law
enforcement, as well as other internal and external
customers through operational, administrative, and
records management functions; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Speidel has provided outstanding
service to Chesterfield County, including her
diligent and faithful commitment as Principal Deputy
Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk’s Office since
September 2002; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Speidel has been a highly reliable
asset, consistently arriving at work on time each
morning and demonstrating exceptional time management
skills; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Speidel possesses extensive knowledge
of all duties incumbent upon a Principal Deputy
Clerk, ensuring that her tasks are completed
2/26/2025 Page 13 of 70
accurately and within any applicable deadlines; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Speidel has generously offered
assistance to her team members whenever available,
fostering a spirit of teamwork and collaboration
within the office; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Speidel has consistently brought
matters of concern to her supervisor’s attention,
demonstrating her commitment to maintaining high
standards of work; and
WHEREAS, as a result of her competence and
dedication, Mrs. Speidel’s peers and colleagues
consider her a knowledgeable and dependable resource;
and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Speidel has always rendered invaluable
service to the Clerk’s Office and Judges with a high
degree of productiveness and professionalism and will
be sorely missed by all who wish her the best as she
enjoys a well-deserved retirement that will be marked
by more time spent with family, friends, and
playdates with her grandchildren.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mrs. Cathy
Speidel and extends on behalf of its members and the
residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for 22
years of exceptional service to the county.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
f. Resolution Recognizing Mr. Roy A. Speidel,
Buildings and Grounds Division of General
Services, Upon His Retirement
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Roy A. Speidel retired from the
Chesterfield County Department of General Services
Buildings and Grounds Division on February 1, 2025;
and
WHEREAS, on March 31, 2003, Mr. Speidel began his
public service career in the Buildings and Grounds
Division as a Maintenance Worker; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Speidel demonstrated his commitment to
the County and contributed to a positive work
environment; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Speidel was recognized on numerous
occasions by his peers and customers for his
professional demeanor; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Speidel completed Level three of the
Maintenance Worker Career Development Plan in 2005
with focus on the electrical path; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Speidel was promoted to an Electrician
2/26/2025 Page 14 of 70
in 2006 as a result of his increased skills and
knowledge in the electrical field; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Speidel had a strong work ethic and
produced high quality work as he was motivated to do
what is takes to get the job done; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Speidel supported the County’s goals,
values and objectives through teamwork and
dependability during his tenure; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Speidel contributed to the completion of
several electrical renovation projects completed in-
house resulting in tremendous cost savings to the
county; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Speidel’s specialized skills helped to
keep generators for critical County facilities
operational during Hurricane Irene; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Speidel took the lead in the development
of formalized fire extinguisher preventative
maintenance and inspection programs; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Speidel was an invaluable member of
Buildings and Grounds during the COVID-19 Pandemic,
contributing greatly to the success of the team
during a period of significant operational
difficulty.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the
outstanding contributions of Roy A. Speidel,
expresses the appreciation of all citizens for his
service to Chesterfield County, and extends
appreciation for his dedicated service to the County,
congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes
for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
g. Resolution Recognizing Firefighter Ray M.
Lester Jr., Fire and Emergency Medical
Services Department, Upon His Retirement
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Firefighter Ray M. Lester Jr. retired from
the Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services
Department on February 1, 2025; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Lester completed Recruit School
#40 in 2007 and has faithfully served the residents
of Chesterfield County for 17 years as a Firefighter
at the Brandermill, Bensley, and Winterpock, Fire and
EMS Stations; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Lester was certified as an
Emergency Medical Technician – Paramedic in 2012, and
has served the county as an Advanced Life Support
(ALS) provider; and
2/26/2025 Page 15 of 70
WHEREAS, Firefighter Lester was awarded an EMS
Lifesave Award for his involvement in the successful
outcome of a patient suffering cardiac arrest on
January 27, 2010; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Lester was awarded an EMS Unit
Citation Award and an EMS Lifesave Award for his
involvement in the successful outcome of a patient
who suffered cardiac arrest after being struck by
lightning on May 30, 2010; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Lester was awarded an EMS Unit
Citation Award for his involvement in the successful
outcome of a patient who was struck by a vehicle on
June 6, 2011; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Lester was awarded an EMS Unit
Citation Award and an EMS Lifesave Award for his
involvement in the successful outcome of a patient
who was ejected from his car and pinned under it on
July 12,2011; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Lester was awarded a Unit
Lifesave Award for his involvement in the successful
outcome of a patient experiencing a prenatal
emergency on March 23, 2019.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the valuable
contributions of Firefighter Ray M. Lester Jr.,
expresses the appreciation of all residents for his
service to the County, and extends appreciation for
his dedicated service and congratulations upon his
retirement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
h. Resolution Expressing the Concurrence with
the Inducement Resolution Adopted by the
Economic Development Authority of Henrico
County and Approving the Issuance of
Revenue Bonds for the Benefit of Bon
Secours Mercy Health, Inc. and St. Francis
Medical Center
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE CONCURRENCE OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WITH THE
INDUCEMENT RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF HENRICO COUNTY, VIRGINIA AND
APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS FOR THE
BENEFIT OF BON SECOURS MERCY HEALTH, INC. AND ST.
FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER
WHEREAS, Bon Secours Mercy Health, Inc. (“BSMH”) is a
Maryland nonstock nonprofit membership corporation,
and which has facilities located in the County of
Chesterfield, Virginia including Bon Secours St.
Francis Medical Center (“St. Francis Medical Center”)
2/26/2025 Page 16 of 70
located at 13710 St. Francis Blvd., Midlothian,
Virginia 23114; and
WHEREAS, on January 16, 2025, the Economic
Development Authority of Henrico County, Virginia
(the “Henrico Authority”) adopted an inducement
resolution (the “Inducement Resolution”) (a copy of
which is attached hereto as Attachment A) relating to
the issuance of its Health Facilities Revenue Bonds
(Bon Secours Mercy Health, Inc.) (the “Bonds”) in one
or more series to, among other things, (i) finance or
refinance the costs of certain capital expenditures,
including the acquisition, construction, equipping,
expansion, enlargement and improvement of certain
hospital facilities, including reimbursement, (ii)
pay a portion of the interest on the Bonds, if deemed
necessary, (iii) establish one or more debt service
reserve funds, if deemed necessary, and (iv) pay
certain expenses incurred in connection with the
issuance of the Bonds (collectively, the “Financing
Purposes”), all pursuant to a master financing plan
for certain health care facilities affiliated with
BSMH, which plan includes the above-described
financing by the Henrico Authority for the benefit of
BSMH and its nonprofit affiliates, including St.
Francis Medical Center; and
WHEREAS, the portion of the Bonds to be issued for
the benefit of the St. Francis Medical Center
facilities shall not exceed $90,000,000; and
WHEREAS, the Bonds will be issued pursuant to the
Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act, Chapter
49, Title 15.2, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended
(the “Act”), and will be limited obligations of the
Henrico Authority payable solely from the revenues
and receipts derived from payments provided by BSMH;
and
WHEREAS, the facilities of St. Francis Medical Center
to be financed or refinanced are located within the
boundaries of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County has created the
Economic Development Authority of the County of
Chesterfield (the “Chesterfield EDA”); and
WHEREAS, Section 15.2-4905 of the Act permits the
issuance of the Bonds by the Henrico Authority for
the benefit of BSMH and its nonprofit affiliates,
including St. Francis Medical Center, if the
governing body of Chesterfield County concurs in the
Inducement Resolution adopted by the Henrico
Authority; and
WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), provides that an
“applicable elected representative” of the
governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area
in which any facility financed or refinanced with the
proceeds of the Bonds is located must approve the
issuance of the Bonds in order for the interest on
2/26/2025 Page 17 of 70
the Bonds to be entitled to certain exemptions from
taxation provided by the Code, and the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, as an elected
legislative body, constitutes such applicable elected
representative within the meaning of the Code; and
WHEREAS, on February 20, 2025, pursuant to the
requirements of Section 147(f) of the Code and the
Act, the Henrico Authority in a joint undertaking
with Chesterfield County held a public hearing
concerning the proposed issuance of the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Notice of Public Hearing and a
summary of the statements expressed at the public
hearing have been filed with the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, at this time, BSMH is requesting that the
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County concur in
the Inducement Resolution of the Henrico Authority
and approve the issuance of the Bonds by the Henrico
Authority to comply with Section 147(f) of the Code
and Section 15.2-4905 of the Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA:
1. The recitals made in the preamble to this
Resolution are hereby adopted as a part of this
resolution.
2. The Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County
approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Henrico
Authority for the benefit of BSMH and its nonprofit
affiliates, including St. Francis Medical Center, and
concurs in the Inducement Resolution adopted by the
Henrico Authority for all purposes for which such
concurrence and approval is required, including
without limitation, Section 147(f) of the Code and
Section 15.2-4905 of the Act.
3. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds, as
required by Section 147(f) of the Code, and the
concurrence in the Inducement Resolution adopted by
the Henrico Authority as required by Section 15.2-
4905 of the Act, does not constitute an endorsement
to a prospective purchaser of the Bonds of the
creditworthiness of BSMH, nor does it constitute
indebtedness of or a pledge of contributions from the
County of Chesterfield or the Chesterfield EDA.
Neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of
the County of Chesterfield is pledged to the payment
of the principal or interest on such Bonds or any
other costs related thereto. Neither the Chesterfield
EDA nor the County of Chesterfield nor any of their
representatives, commissioners, officers or employees
shall have any liability for or related to the Bonds.
4. The Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is hereby
instructed to forward a copy of this resolution to
the Chesterfield EDA, the Henrico Authority and
representatives of BSMH.
2/26/2025 Page 18 of 70
5. This Resolution shall take effect on the date
of its adoption.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
(It is noted a copy of Attachment A is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
i. Resolution Recognizing Mr. Dallas A.
Bradbury, Jr., Environmental Engineering,
Upon His Retirement
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Dallas A. Bradbury Jr. retired on January 1,
2025, after 35 cumulative years of service with the
Chesterfield County Department of Environmental
Engineering; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Bradbury started his career September
28, 1987, as a senior environmental construction
inspector; and
WHEREAS Mr. Bradbury was promoted to assistant
drainage superintendent on May 8, 1995; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Bradbury served as part of Environmental
Engineering’s storm response team in September 1996
during Tropical Storm Fran keeping county roads clear
for first responders; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Bradbury was the field inspector for
many stormwater capital improvement projects
throughout his career; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Bradbury was part of Environmental
Engineering’s response team that operated in
September 2003 during Tropical Storm Isabel, working
long shifts for several days in keeping county roads
open by removing downed trees and repairing
infrastructure damaged by the storm; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Bradbury was a valued resource within
Environmental Engineering who took new employees
under his wing to show them safe and efficient
working practices while performing maintenance and
upkeep of stormwater infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Bradbury was part of Environmental
Engineering’s response team that operated in August
2004 during Tropical Storm Gaston, working long hours
in clearing flood debris and repairing infrastructure
damaged by the storm; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Bradbury always displayed a strong work
ethic, and was a hard-working, valued employee of the
department throughout his career; and
WHEREAS Mr. Bradbury was the 2008 Environmental
Engineering Employee of the year; and
2/26/2025 Page 19 of 70
WHEREAS, Mr. Bradbury worked tirelessly as part of
Environmental Engineering’s response team that
operated in August 2011 during Tropical Storm Irene,
removing downed trees and storm debris keeping county
roads open for first responders; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Bradbury received numerous letters of
thanks and appreciation from citizens over the course
of his career for his excellent customer service as
well as from his co-workers for his assistance,
support and teamwork; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Bradbury was a member of the county snow
removal team who worked tirelessly during inclement
weather removing snow and ice from county facilities
so that they were accessible after snow and ice storm
events; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Bradbury performed final inspections on
new subdivisions to ensure new infrastructure met
state standards; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Bradbury provided Chesterfield County
with many years of loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Mr. Bradbury’s diligent
service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 26th day of
February 2025, publicly recognizes Dallas A. Bradbury
Jr. and extends on behalf of its members and the
residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for
his dedicated service to the county.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mr. Bradbury and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers
of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
2. Real Property Requests
a. Acceptance of Parcels of Land
1. Acceptance of a Parcel of Land
Adjacent to Warbro Road From Deerhill
Properties LLC
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land
containing 0.103 acres adjacent to Warbro Road from
Deerhill Properties LLC and authorized the County
Administrator to execute the deed.
2/26/2025 Page 20 of 70
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
b. Conveyance of Easements
1. To Consider the Conveyance of
Easements to Virginia Electric and
Power Company at Proctors Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute
an agreement with Virginia Electric and Power Company
for 15’ and 30’ underground easements at Proctors
Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
2. To Consider the Conveyance of an
Underground Easement to Virginia
Electric and Power Company at Cogbill
Park
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute
an agreement with Virginia Electric and Power Company
for a 15’ underground easement at Cogbill Park.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
3. To Consider the Conveyance of an
Underground Easement to Virginia
Electric and Power Company at A.M.
Davis Elementary School
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute
an agreement with Virginia Electric and Power Company
for a 15’ underground easement across A.M. Davis
Elementary School property.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
c. Requests to Quitclaim
1. Request to Quitclaim SWMBMP Easements,
a SWMBMP Access Easement and VSMP
Easements Across the Property Owned by
Deerhill Properties LLC
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed to quitclaim SWMBMP easements, a
SWMBMP access easement and VSMP easements across the
property owned by Deerhill Properties LLC.
2/26/2025 Page 21 of 70
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
2. Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a
Sewer Easement Across the Property
Owned by CRDR Management Meadowville
LLC
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed to quitclaim a portion of a sewer
easement across the property owned by CRDR Management
Meadowville LLC.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
3. Request to Quitclaim a Sewer Easement
Across the Property Owned by Chester
Land Associates, LLC
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed to quitclaim a sewer easement across
the property owned by Chester Land Associates, LLC.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
4. Request to Quitclaim a Drainage
Easement (Private) and a SWMBMP
Easement Across the Property Owned by
NLT VA, LLC
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed to quitclaim a drainage easement
(private) and a SWMBMP easement across the property
owned by NLT VA, LLC.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
5. Request to Quitclaim a SWMBMP Easement
and a SWMBMP Access Easement Across
Properties Owned by Matthew and
Melissa Carr
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed to quitclaim a SWMBMP easement and a
SWMBMP Access easement across the property owned by
Matthew and Melissa Carr.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
6. Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a
Drainage Easement (Private), a
Temporary Drainage Easement, a
2/26/2025 Page 22 of 70
Drainage Easement and Maintenance
Contract, and a Temporary Construction
Easement Across the Property Owned by
Our Law LLC
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed to quitclaim a portion of a drainage
easement (private), a temporary drainage easement, a
drainage easement and maintenance contract, and a
temporary construction easement across the property
owned by Our Law LLC.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
d. Requests for Permission
1. Request Permission to Allow a Private
Water Service Within a Proposed
Private Water Easement to Serve the
Property at 2301 Sherbourne Road
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board granted permission to allow a private water
service within a new private water easement to serve
property at 2301 Sherbourne Road and authorized the
County Administrator to execute the water connection
agreement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
3. Set Public Hearing
a. For March 12, 2025, to Consider the
Conveyance of Underground Easements to
Virginia Electric And Power Company at
Huguenot Park
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board set March 12, 2025, as the date to hold a
public hearing to consider the conveyance of
underground easements to Virginia Electric and Power
Company at Huguenot Park.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
b. For March 12, 2025, to Consider the
Quitclaim of a Portion of Simonsbath Drive
Right-Of-Way Across the Property Owned by
Daniel L. and Aspen S. Sowers
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board set March 12, 2025, as the date to hold a
public hearing to consider the quitclaim of a portion
of Simonsbath Drive right-of-way across the property
owned by Daniel L. and Aspen S. Sowers.
2/26/2025 Page 23 of 70
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
c. For March 12, 2025, to Consider an
Ordinance to Amend County Code § 7-3
(Precinct Boundaries and Polling Places) to
Relocate Polling Places for Falling Creek
Voting Precinct (205), Falling Creek East
Voting Precinct (220), LaPrade Voting
Precinct (405), Reams Voting Precinct
(408), Beaufont Voting Precinct (513), and
Davis Voting Precinct (515).
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board set March 12, 2025, as the date to hold a
public hearing to consider an ordinance
amending County Code § 7-3 (Precinct Boundaries and
Polling Places) to relocate polling places for
Falling Creek Voting Precinct (205), Falling Creek
East Voting Precinct (220), LaPrade Voting Precinct
(405), Reams Voting Precinct (408), Beaufont Voting
Precinct (513), and Davis Voting Precinct (515).
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
d. For March 12, 2025, to Consider an
Ordinance to Amend County Code Sections 18-
5 (Defacing or Obstructing Utility
Property) and 18-27 (Utility Charges) and
to Enact New County Code Sections 18-12
(Maintaining Unobstructed Access to Water
Meters) and 18-36 (Meter Repair Fee)
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board set March 12, 2025, as the date to hold a
public hearing to consider an ordinance amending
County Code Sections 18-5 (Defacing or Obstructing
Utility Property) and 18-27 (Utility Charges) and
enacting new County Code Sections 18-12 (Maintaining
Unobstructed Access to Water Meters) and 18-36 (Meter
Repair Fee).
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
e. For March 26, 2025, to Consider Proposed
Ordinance Changes for the FY2026 Water and
Wastewater Utility Rates
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board set March 26, 2025, as the date to hold a
public hearing to consider proposed ordinance changes
for the FY2026 water and wastewater utility rates.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
4. Award of Contract to Cherry Bekaert LLP for
Financial Auditing Services
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized the Director of Procurement to
execute a term contract with Cherry Bekaert for
financial auditing services.
2/26/2025 Page 24 of 70
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
5. Award of Construction Contract for Proctors
Creek WWTP Primary Electrical Feeder and
Transformer Relocations
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized the Director of Procurement to
award the construction contract to Triad Electrical
Solutions, Inc., in the amount of $1,577,001.00 and
execute all necessary change orders up to the full
amount budgeted for the Proctors Creek Wastewater
Treatment Plant Primary Electrical Feeder and
Transformer Relocations.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
6. Award of Construction Contract Proctors Creek
WWTP Plant A Secondary Clarifiers 3 and 4
Internal Mechanism Replacement
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized the Director of Procurement to
award the construction contract to Southwood Building
Systems, Inc., in the amount of $3,836,400.00 and
execute all necessary change orders up to the full
amount budgeted for the Proctors Creek WWTP Plant A
Secondary Clarifiers 3 & 4 Internal Mechanism
Replacement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
7. Award of Construction Contract and Potential
Change Orders for the Replacement Animal
Services Facility
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized the Director of Procurement to
(1) award a construction contract in the amount of
$17,800,000 to Rycon Construction Inc., the lowest
responsive and responsible bidder, and (2) approve
all necessary change orders, up to the amount
budgeted for the project.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
8. Approve a Sublease Amendment for the Falling
Creek Police Substation
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized the County Administrator to
execute a sublease amendment for use of the Falling
Creek Police Substation.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
9. Approve a Lease Amendment for the Chesterfield
County General Registrar
2/26/2025 Page 25 of 70
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized the County Administrator to
execute a lease amendment for continued use of office
space for the Chesterfield County General Registrar.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
10. Acceptance of State Roads
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the street described below is shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the street meets the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the street described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Treely Road (Portion) Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addition Reason for Change: New Street Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statutes: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
►Treely Road, State Route Number 1152
From: 0.01 miles northwest of Overridge Drive,
(Route 1199)
To: Treely Road, 0.32 miles northeast of Branders
Bridge Road, (Route 625) a distance of 0.18 miles
Recordation Reference: Deed Book 14225, Page 775
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
2/26/2025 Page 26 of 70
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Cosby Estates at Turner Farm Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Additions Reason for Change: New Streets Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statutes: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
►Bailey Woods Lane, State Route Number 4109
From: 0.03 miles south of Bailey Woods Drive, (Route
4108)
To: Fort Cosby Drive, (Route 8523), a distance of
0.12 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 277, Page 99
Right of Way width (feet) = 47
►Fort Cosby Drive, State Route Number 8523
From: Bailey Woods Lane, (Route 4109)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.06 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 277, Page 99
Right of Way width (feet) = 47
►Fort Cosby Drive, State Route Number 8523
From: Bailey Woods Lane, (Route 4109)
To: The end-of-state-maintenance, a distance of 0.03
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 277, Page 99
Right of Way width (feet) = 47
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
2/26/2025 Page 27 of 70
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Cosby Village Townhomes Section 1 Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Additions Reason for Change: New Streets Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statutes: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
►Leire Drive, State Route Number 8550
From: Village Square Parkway, (Route 3867)
To: Cosby Village Avenue, (Route 8551), a distance
of 0.07 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 280, Page 24
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
►Leire Drive, State Route Number 8550
From: Cosby Village Avenue, (Route 8551)
To: 0.07 miles south of Cosby Village Avenue, (Route
8551), a distance of 0.07 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 280, Page 24
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
►Cosby Village Avenue, State Route Number 8551
From: Leire Drive, (Route 8550)
To: Dunton Road, (Route 8552), a distance of 0.08
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 280, Page 24
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
►Dunton Road, State Route Number 8552
From: Cosby Village Avenue, (Route 8551)
To: 0.04 miles south of Cosby Village Avenue, (Route
8551), a distance of 0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 280, Page 24
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
►Dunton Road, State Route Number 8552
From: Dunton Avenue, (Route 8553)
To: Cosby Village Avenue, (Route 8551), a distance of
0.06 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 280, Page 24
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
2/26/2025 Page 28 of 70
►Dunton Road, State Route Number 8552
From: Village Square Parkway, (Route 3867)
To: Dunton Avenue, (Route 8553), a distance of 0.09
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 280, Page 24
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
►Dunton Avenue, State Route Number 8553
From: Dunton Road, (Route 8552)
To: Leire Lane, (Route 8554), a distance of 0.04
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 280, Page 24
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
►Leire Lane, State Route Number 8554
From: Dunton Avenue, (Route 8553)
To: 0.11 miles south of Dunton Avenue, (Route 8553),
a distance of 0.11 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 280, Page 24
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
►Leire Lane, State Route Number 8554
From: Dunton Avenue, (Route 8553)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.12 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 280, Page 24
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Cosby Village Townhomes Section 2 Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Additions Reason for Change: New Streets Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statutes: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
2/26/2025 Page 29 of 70
Street Name and/or Route Number
►Leire Drive, State Route Number 8550
From: 0.07 miles south of Cosby Village Avenue,
(Route 8551)
To: Leire Lane (Route 8554), a distance of 0.05
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 297, Page 48
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
►Dunton Road, State Route Number 8552
From: 0.04 miles south of Cosby Village Avenue,
(Route 8551)
To: Leire Lane, (Route 8554), a distance of 0.06
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 297, Page 48
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
►Leire Lane, State Route Number 8554
From: 0.11 miles south of Dunton Avenue, (Route
8553)
To: Dunton Road, (Route 8552), a distance of 0.07
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 297, Page 48
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
►Leire Lane, State Route Number 8554
From: Leire Drive, (Route 8550)
To: The end-of-maintenance, a distance of 0.08 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 297, Page 48
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
►Leire Lane, State Route Number 8554
From: Dunton Road, (Route 8552)
To: Leire Drive, (Route 8550), a distance of 0.05
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 297, Page 48
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
2/26/2025 Page 30 of 70
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Harpers Mill Southeast - Section 5A Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Additions Reason for Change: New Streets Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statutes: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
►Holcomb Bridge Drive, State Route Number 8617
From: Scranton Drive, (Route 8618)
To: 0.05 miles east of Scranton Drive, (Route 8618),
a distance of 0.05 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 307, Page 2
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
►Holcomb Bridge Drive, State Route Number 8617
From: Verneham Drive, (Route 8461)
To: Scranton Drive, (Route 8618), a distance of 0.21
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 307, Page 2
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
►Scranton Drive, State Route Number 8618
From: 0.06 miles south of Holcomb Bridge Drive,
(Route 8617)
To: Holcomb Bridge Drive, (Route 8617), a distance
of 0.06 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 307, Page 2
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
►Scranton Drive, State Route Number 8618
From: Holcomb Bridge Drive, (Route 8617)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 307, Page 2
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
2/26/2025 Page 31 of 70
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Davis Pond Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Additions Reason for Change: New Streets Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statutes: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
►Kajenson Drive, State Route Number 8614
From: Delvin Run Court, (Route 8616)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 300, Page 65
Right of Way width (feet) = 47
►Kajenson Drive, State Route Number 8614
From: Kajenson Court, (Route 8615)
To: Delvin Run Court, (Route 8616), a distance of
0.16 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 300, Page 65
Right of Way width (feet) = 47
►Kajenson Drive, State Route Number 8614
From: Turner Road, (Route 650)
To: Kajenson Court, (Route 8615), a distance of 0.07
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 300, Page 65
Right of Way width (feet) = 47
►Kajenson Court, State Route Number 8615
From: Kajenson Drive, (Route 8614)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.05 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 300, Page 65
Right of Way width (feet) = 47
►Delvin Run Court, State Route Number 8616
From: Kajenson Drive, (Route 8614)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.10 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 300, Page 65
Right of Way width (feet) = 47
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
11. Authorize Advertisement of 2025 Calendar Year
Tax Rates and Other Required Legal Notices and
to Set Public Hearings Related to the Proposed
FY2026 Budget
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized advertisement of 2025 calendar
year tax rates and other required legal notices and
to set public hearings for March 26, 2025, related to
2/26/2025 Page 32 of 70
the proposed FY2026 budget.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
12. Proposed FY26 Opioid Abatement Authority (OAA)
Funding Applications
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board approved three proposed FY2026 Opioid
Abatement Authority (OAA) funding applications as
follows: (1) Sub-Grant Proposal for the Use of
$500,000 of Individual Distribution and Gold Standard
Funds; (2) Cooperative Partnership for Pregnant and
Parenting Women Hospital Liaisons for $274,000; and
(3) Cooperative Partnership for DSS Involved Pregnant
and Parenting Women for $520,562.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
16. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
Laura Thompson, accompanied by Benjamin Reeves,
provided the Board with an update on some of the
accomplishments of the James River Soil and Water
Conservation District.
Keith Kittinger expressed concerns relative to
excessive spending and explosive growth in the
county.
Dee Yates shared photographs of cracks in the tennis
courts at James River High School and asked the Board
to allocate Capital Improvement Program funding to
make the courts safe again.
Greg Allen provided a presentation on the missing
middle housing and decent affordable housing.
Jason Hasse expressed concerns relative to recent
actions at the federal level and called for action on
the local level to protect residents.
17. Deferred Items from Previous Meetings
There were no deferred items from previous meetings.
18. Zoning Requests
A. 23SN0122 - Dominion Energy Iron Bridge Substation
Expansion - Dale
In Dale Magisterial District, Dominion Energy Iron
Bridge Substation Expansion is a request to rezone
from Light Industrial (I-1) and Agricultural (A) to
Agricultural (A) District plus conditional use to
permit expansion of the existing electric power
transforming station and a telecommunications tower
and amendment of zoning district map on 21.75 acres
known as 7500 Iron Bridge Road. The Comprehensive
2/26/2025 Page 33 of 70
Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Industrial use. Tax IDs 771-673-3573; 772-673-0885;
and 772-674-1811.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 23SN0122. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board approved Case 23SN0122, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Conceptual Plan. The improvement and
expansion of the existing electric power
transforming station (the “Project”) shall
generally conform to the Conceptual Plan
(Exhibit A), titled “Zoning Exhibit Ironbridge
Substation,” prepared by Dominion Energy, and
dated November 25, 2024, with respect to the
general location of improvements on the
Property. The layout of the Conceptual Plan is
conceptual in nature and may vary based on the
site plan depending on final engineering and
environmental studies or as otherwise approved
by the Planning Commission at the time of plans
review. (P)
2. Dedication. Prior to final site plan
approval or within sixty (60) days of a written
request by the Transportation Department,
whichever occurs first, a one hundred (100) feet
of right of way on the west side of Iron Bridge
Road (Route 10), as measured from the centerline
of that part of Route 10 immediately adjacent to
the Property, shall be dedicated free and
unrestricted to and for the benefit of
Chesterfield County. (T)
3. Landscaping. Evergreen landscaping must be
installed between the substation and Route 10 in
the location labelled as “Landscape Screening,
Match Existing Evergreen Trees or Similar” in
Exhibit A. Plantings must be spaced at an
interval necessary to achieve full screening of
the equipment from Route 10, with a height of at
least 6 feet at the time of planting, unless
overhead utilities limit plantings to a smaller
height. Selected plantings must be from the
“Chesterfield County Plant Materials List,” or
as otherwise approved by the Chesterfield County
Planning Department. In conjunction with the
2/26/2025 Page 34 of 70
first site plan submittal, a landscape plan
demonstrating the planting requirements as
stated above must be submitted and approved by
the Planning Department. (P)
4. Communications Tower. A communications
tower using sector array antennas shall be
permitted on GPIN 771-6733-573, currently known
as 7420 Iron Bridge Road.
a. The communications tower shall be co-located
on existing utility structures.
b. The communications tower and equipment shall
be designed and installed so as not to interfere with
the Chesterfield County Communications System.
c. The developer of the communications tower
shall be responsible for correcting any frequency
problems, which affect the Chesterfield County
Communications System caused by the communications
tower.
d. The color and lighting system for the tower
shall be as follows:
i. The tower shall be gray or another
neutral color, acceptable to the Planning Department.
ii. The tower shall not be lighted.
e. At such time that the communications tower
ceases to be used for communications purposes for a
period exceeding twelve (12) consecutive months,
the developer/owner of the communications tower
shall dismantle and remove the tower and all
associated equipment on the property. (P)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
B. 24SN1131 - Buford Road Nursing Home Facility -
Midlothian
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Buford Road
Nursing Home Facility is a request to rezone from
Residential (R-15) to Corporate Office (O-2) with
conditional use planned development to permit
exceptions to ordinance requirements and amendment of
zoning district map on 2.86 acres known as 236 Buford
Road. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Corporate Office/Research &
Development/Light Industrial use. Tax ID 759-707-
4253.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1131. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 24SN1131, subject to the
following conditions:
2/26/2025 Page 35 of 70
Proffered Conditions
1. Master Plan. The Master Plan for the Property
shall consist of the following:
a. The Textual Statement last revised
November 19, 2024.
b. Development of the Property shall
generally conform to the Site Plan Exhibit, prepared
by BOB architecture last revised November 29, 2024,
with respect to the general layout of buildings,
parking, and setbacks. The layout on the Site Plan
Exhibit is conceptual in nature and may vary based on
the final site plan depending on final engineering
and environmental studies or as otherwise approved by
the Planning Department during plans review.
c. Conceptual Elevations (Exhibit B)
prepared by BOB architecture last revised August 28,
2024. (P)
2. Use. The use of the Property shall be limited
to a Nursing Home having a maximum of 105 beds. (P)
3. Utilities.
a. The public water and wastewater systems
shall be used for any future units beyond the
addition to the existing residential structure,
unless VDH determines that connection to the public
wastewater system shall also be required for the
initial building addition.
b. In conjunction with any site plan for
additional units associated with the Nursing Home on
the Property, beyond the initial building addition,
the property owner shall submit a wastewater system
hydraulic analysis to verify that sufficient capacity
is available in the downstream system to accommodate
wastewater flows from the project. Any wastewater
system improvements deemed necessary shall be
incorporated into the site plan, and the property
owner shall be responsible for all associated costs.
(U)
4. Access. Direct vehicular access from the
Property shall be limited to one (1) access to Buford
Road, as generally shown on the Conceptual Plan, with
the exact location approved by the Transportation
Department. (T)
5. Transportation Improvements. The following road
improvements shall be completed, as determined by the
Transportation Department. The Transportation
Department shall approve the exact design, length,
and/or other modifications to the road improvements:
a. Restripe the existing pavement along
Buford Road at the approved access to accommodate a
left turn lane, if approved by VDOT. Improvement
shall be completed in conjunction with initial
2/26/2025 Page 36 of 70
development.
b. Construction of additional pavement
along Buford Road at the approved access to provide a
right turn lane. This improvement shall be provided
in conjunction with development that results in a
cumulative total of more than seventy-five (75) beds.
c. Construction of a VDOT standard sidewalk
along the west side of Buford Road for the entire
Property frontage. This improvement shall be provided
in conjunction with development that results in a
cumulative total of more than seventy-five (75)
beds.
d. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free
and unrestricted, of any additional right-of-way (or
easements) required for the improvements identified
above. (T)
6. Dedication. Prior to any final site plan
approval, or within sixty (60) days from a written
request by the Transportation Department, whichever
occurs first, fifty (50) feet of right-of-way along
the west side of Buford Road, measured from the
centerline of that part of the roadway immediately
adjacent to the Property shall be dedicated, free and
unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield
County. (T)
7. Architecture. Development of the building shall
be consistent (incorporating similar, but not
necessarily identical design elements, style, and
materials) with the images within Exhibit B or
another architectural appearance approved by the
Planning Department at the time of plans review. The
exterior finishes shall be as described in “Buford
Road Exterior Finishes” unless otherwise approved by
the Planning Department at time of plans review. (P)
8. Security.
a. Building access shall be controlled
through installation of an electronic access control
system that utilizes either key cards, key fobs,
smartphones, or biometric readers. An electronic
pushbutton keypad shall be installed at the
building’s main entrance for emergency Police/Fire
access. The unique, Police/Fire-only keypad code
shall be provided to the Chesterfield County
Emergency Communications Center (ECC) prior to the
certificate of occupancy being issued.
b. If present, exterior video surveillance
cameras shall be connected with the Chesterfield
County Police Department’s (CCPD) Community Connect
program. (Police)
9. Lighting. Pole-mounted or building-mounted and
bollard lights, full cut-off, photocell-activated,
minimum 70 CRI-rated LED luminaires shall illuminate
sidewalks, parking, excluding the entrance, and the
trash enclosure with a minimum maintained
2/26/2025 Page 37 of 70
illumination level of 1.0 foot-candle, as measured at
grade. The exact design, location and type of
lighting shall be reviewed and approved during plans
review. (Police)
10. Stormwater.
a. To address potential stormwater runoff
and sheet flows to the northwest of the Property, the
maximum post-development discharge rate for the 100-
year storm shall be based on the maximum capacity of
the existing facilities downstream and shall not
increase the recorded and/or established 100-year
backwater and/or floodplain.
b. On-site detention of the post-
development 10 and/or 100-year discharge rate may be
provided to satisfy this requirement. (EE)
11. Foundation Planting. Foundation planting shall
be provided along the entire front of the building.
Foundation planting beds shall be a minimum of four
(4) feet wide from the building foundation. Planting
beds shall include shrubs spaced a maximum of four
(4) feet apart. The plant materials used should
visually soften the building corners and complement
the architecture of the building at their mature
sizes. (P)
12. Recreational/Common Area. Part of the
recreational/common area as shown on the Site Plan
Exhibit shall be hardscaped and have benches and
other amenities that accommodate and facilitate
gatherings. Other amenities, such as, but not limited
to, garden area(s), bocce ball, or similar pedestrian
scale amenities shall be permitted and may be
provided within this area. The exact design, location
and size of the recreational/common area shall be
reviewed and approved during plans review. (P)
13. Perimeter Screening. A minimum six (6) foot
tall vinyl or pressure treated wood privacy fence
shall be installed within the buffer area adjacent to
Tax ID 759-707-5570-00000 for approximately 190 feet
as generally shown on the Site Plan Exhibit. The
exact location and material of the fence shall be
reviewed and approved during plans review. (P)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
C. 24SN1208 - Coxendale Residential - Bermuda
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Coxendale
Residential is a request to rezone from Agricultural
(A) and Residential (R-7) to Residential (R-12)
District with conditional use to permit neighborhood
recreational facilities plus conditional use planned
development to permit exceptions to ordinance
requirements and amendment of zoning district map on
property known as 2100 Coxendale Road. The 23.61 acre
property is proposed for a maximum development of 55
dwelling units. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
2/26/2025 Page 38 of 70
property is appropriate for Suburban Residential II
use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax IDs 799-661-
6797, 7649, and 8046.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1208. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
Mr. Mike Zervakis stated he does not think there has
been enough research done on the road situation
involving the neighborhood and the location.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board approved Case 24SN1208, subject to the
following conditions:
Proffered Conditions
The applicant hereby offers the following proffered
conditions:
1. Master Plan. The Master Plan for the Property
shall consist of the following:
a. The Textual Statement last revised
November 25, 2024.
b. Development of the Property shall
generally conform to the Conceptual Plan (Exhibit A),
titled “Coxendale Residential” prepared by Balzer and
Associates last revised November 13, 2024, with
respect to the general layout of roads, lots, common
area, and open space. The layout on the Conceptual
Plan is conceptual in nature and may vary based on
the final subdivision/site plan depending on final
engineering and environmental studies or as otherwise
approved by the Planning Director, or assignee, at
the time of plans review.
c. Conceptual Elevations (Exhibit B) dated
July 12, 2024. (P)
2. Utilities. The public water and wastewater
systems shall be used. (U)
3. Density. The maximum density shall be fifty-
five (55) dwelling units. (P)
4. Access. Direct vehicular access from the
Property to Coxendale Road shall be limited to one
(1) entrance/exit. The exact location of the access
shall be approved by the Transportation Department.
(T)
5. Road Improvements. In conjunction with initial
development, the following road improvements shall be
completed, as determined by the Transportation
Department. The Transportation Department shall
2/26/2025 Page 39 of 70
approve the exact design, length, or other
modifications of the improvements.
a. Widening/improving the north side of
Coxendale Road to a twelve (12) foot wide travel
lane, measured from the centerline of the existing
pavement, with an additional four (4) foot wide paved
shoulder plus a four (4) foot wide unpaved shoulder
and overlaying the full width of the road with one
and a half (1.5) inch of compacted bituminous asphalt
concrete, with any modifications approved by the
Transportation Department, for the entire property
frontage.
b. Construction of additional pavement
along Coxendale Road to provide right and left turn
lanes at the approved access.
c. Construction of a VDOT standard sidewalk
along the north side of Coxendale Road for the entire
property frontage.
d. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free
and unrestricted, of any additional right of way (or
easements) required for the improvements identified
above. (T)
6. Dedication. In conjunction with recordation of
the initial subdivision plat, prior to any final site
plan approval, or within sixty (60) days from a
written request by the Transportation Department,
whichever occurs first, thirty-five (35) feet of
right-of-way along the north side of Coxendale Road,
measured from the centerline of the part of the
roadway immediately adjacent to the Property, shall
be dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the
benefit of Chesterfield County. (T)
7. Road Cash Proffers.
a. The applicant, sub-divider, or
assignee(s) shall pay $9,400 for each dwelling unit
to Chesterfield County for road improvements within
the service district for the property (the “Cash
Proffer Payments”).
b. Each payment shall be made prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a dwelling
unit unless state law modifies the timing of the
payment. Should Chesterfield County impose impact
fees at any time during the life of the development
that are applicable to the property, the amount paid
in cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited
toward, but not in addition to, any impact fees, in a
manner determined by the county.
c. At the option of the Transportation
Department, Cash Proffer Payments may be reduced for
the cost of transportation improvements, other than
those improvements identified in the Road
Improvements Proffered Condition, provided by the
applicant, sub-divider, or assignee(s), as determined
by the Transportation Department. (T)
2/26/2025 Page 40 of 70
Subdivision Design Elements
8. Streetscape. Street trees shall be installed
along both sides of internal public roads. Unless
otherwise permitted during plans review, street trees
shall be large deciduous trees spaced generally 40
feet on center, except where there is conflict with
utilities (above and underground), sightlines,
easements and/or driveway areas. Tree species shall
be those species designated for use as a street tree
in the Chesterfield County Plant Materials List. (P)
9. Sidewalks. VDOT standard sidewalks shall
generally be provided on both sides of public streets
in public right-of-way, as determined by the Director
of Planning. (P)
10. Driveways. All private driveways serving
single-family residential uses shall be brushed
concrete, stamped concrete, exposed aggregate
concrete, decorative pavers, or asphalt. (P)
11. Front Walks. A minimum of three (3) foot wide
concrete front walks shall be provided to each
dwelling unit to connect drives, sidewalks, and/or
streets. (P)
12. Front Foundation Planting Beds. Foundation
planting is required along the entire front and
corner side façade(s) of all dwelling units.
Foundation planting beds shall be a minimum of four
(4) feet wide from the unit foundation. Planting beds
shall include medium shrubs spaced a maximum of four
(4) feet apart. The plant materials used should
visually soften the unit corners and complement the
architecture of the home at their mature sizes. (P)
13. Architecture. Development of dwellings shall
be consistent (incorporating similar, but not
necessarily identical design elements, style, and
materials) with the conceptual elevations in Exhibit
B or another architectural appearance approved by the
Director of Planning at the time of plans review. (P)
14. Exterior Facades.
a. Acceptable siding materials include
brick, stone, masonry, fiber cement siding (such as
HardiPlank, HardieShingle, and HardieTrim), or
engineered wood siding (such as LP SmartSiding),
premium quality vinyl siding with a minimum thickness
of 0.044 inches or other comparable material as
approved by the Planning Department at time of plans
review. Plywood and metal siding are not permitted.
Other materials may be used for trim, architectural
decorations, or design elements provided they blend
with the architecture of the dwelling unit. Where a
dwelling borders more than one street, all street-
facing facades shall be finished in the same
materials.
b. If the dwelling is constructed on a
2/26/2025 Page 41 of 70
slab, brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer, or
other masonry material shall be employed around the
base of the dwelling a minimum of twenty-four (24)
inches above grade so as to give the appearance of a
foundation. If not constructed on slab, all exposed
portions of the foundation of each dwelling shall be
faced with brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer,
or other masonry material.
c. Stepping the siding down below the first
floor shall only be permitted in circumstances of
unique topographical conditions. For dwelling units
stepping the siding down below the first floor shall
be permitted on the side and rear elevations that do
not front on a street, with a maximum of two (2)
steps permitted on any elevation. A minimum of
twenty-four (24) inches of exposed brick or stone
shall be required, unless a lesser amount is approved
by the Planning Department at the time of plan review
due to unique design circumstances.
d. Roof materials on pitched roofs shall be
thirty (30) year minimum architectural / dimensional
asphalt composition shingle or standing seam metal.
Each dwelling shall have a minimum of one (1)
enhanced rooftop feature as demonstrated in Exhibit
B, such as a varied roofline, dormer(s), gable(s), or
another architectural feature as approved by the
Planning Department during plans review. (P)
15. Repetition. Dwellings with the same elevations
may not be located adjacent to, directly across from,
or diagonally across from each other on the same
street. This requirement does not apply to units on
different streets backing up to each other. (P)
16. Porches and Stoops. Front stoops and porches
shall be constructed with continuous foundation walls
or with masonry piers to match the foundation of the
home. Extended front porches shall be a minimum of
four (4) feet deep. Handrails and railings, when
required by the building code, shall be finished
painted wood, vinyl rails or metal rail systems with
vertical pickets, sawn balusters, or other products
of equal quality. Pickets shall be supported on top
and bottom rails that span between columns. (P)
17. Garages. If garages are provided, the
following shall be required.
a. Front loaded attached garages shall be
permitted to extend as far forward from the front
line of the main dwelling as the front line of the
front porch provided that the rooflines of the porch
and garage are contiguous. Where the rooflines are
not contiguous, garages shall be permitted to project
a maximum of four (4) feet forward of the front line
of the main dwelling, provided however, a maximum of
twenty-five percent (25%) of homes may have a garage
that projects up to eight (8) feet.
b. Front loaded, and corner side loaded
garages shall use an upgraded garage door. An
2/26/2025 Page 42 of 70
upgraded garage door is any door with a minimum of
three (3) enhanced features. Enhanced features shall
include windows, raised panels, decorative panels,
arches, ornamental hardware, or other architectural
features on the exterior that enhance the entry
(i.e., decorative lintels, shed roof overhangs,
arches, columns, keystones, eyebrows, etc.) Flat
panel garage doors are prohibited. (P)
18. Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning
(HVAC) Units and Whole House Generators. Units shall
initially be screened from view of roads by
landscaping or low maintenance material, as approved
by the Planning Department. (P)
19. Fireplaces, Chimneys and Flues. If provided,
the following shall be required.
a. Masonry fireplace chimney chases shall
be constructed of brick or stone. The width and depth
of chimneys shall be appropriately sized in portion
to the size and height of the unit.
b. Direct vent gas fireplace boxes, which
protrude beyond the exterior face of the unit, are
not permitted on front facades. All the exterior
materials and finishes used to enclose the fireplace
box must match the adjacent façade. (P)
20. Recreational Neighborhood Facilities.
a. A minimum of 0.5-acre shall be provided
within this property as the focal point(s), as
generally shown on Exhibit A. Part of the focal
point(s) shall be hardscaped and have benches and
other amenities that accommodate and facilitate
gatherings.
b. In addition to and separate from the
focal point area, a dog park shall be provided within
the development. Other amenities, such as, but not
limited to, picnic areas, community gardens and fire
pits, shall be permitted within the development.
c. Pedestrian trails shall be provided
throughout the development to provide
interconnectivity between uses, open space, and
common area. The exact location of any pedestrian
trail may be determined by the Owner in connection
with plans review. The exact design, material, and
location of pedestrian trails shall be approved by
the Planning Director or designee in connection with
plan approval. Surface trails or pervious materials
may be constructed and maintained, together with
clearing immediately adjacent thereto, in resource
protection areas in such locations and configurations
as approved by the Environmental Engineering Director
or designee.
d. The recreational neighborhood facilities
described above shall be developed concurrent with
the phase of development that the amenities are
located. The exact design, location and size of all
2/26/2025 Page 43 of 70
recreational neighborhood facilities shall be
reviewed and approved during plans review. (P)
21. Buffers. All buffers shall be recorded within
common area or open space. (P)
22. Entry Monument. An entry monument with signage
shall be provided at the entrance of the development
from Coxendale Road. The exact design, location and
size of the monument shall be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Department during plans review. (P)
23. Road Width. The internal roads for the
subdivision shall have a minimum width of thirty-two
feet (32’) from face-of-curb to face-of-curb. (P)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
D. 24SN1269 - Campbell Recreational Vehicle Parking -
Clover Hill
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Campbell
Recreational Vehicle Parking is a request for
conditional use to permit the parking and storage of
a recreational vehicle outside of the rear yard and
amendment to the zoning district map in a Residential
(R-7) District on 0.31 acre known as 2554 Brookforest
Court. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property
is appropriate for Suburban Residential II use (2-4
dwellings per acres). Tax ID 739-690-2735.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1269. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
Jerry Turner expressed concerns relative to treating
everyone the same and the Board correcting its
restrictions if it is going to let people park
recreational vehicles wherever they want to park
them.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Holland,
the Board approved Case 24SN1269, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Use. This conditional use approval shall be for
the parking of one (1) recreational vehicle no
greater than twenty-three (23) feet in length. (P)
2. Non-Transferable Ownership. This conditional
use approval shall be granted exclusively to Amy
Campbell and shall not be transferrable nor run with
the land. (P)
3. Parking of the Recreational Vehicle. This
2/26/2025 Page 44 of 70
recreational vehicle shall be stored in the side
yard, adjacent to the north elevation of the dwelling
and behind the front plane of the home, as shown on
Exhibit A. (P)
4. Screening. The applicant shall install three,
evenly spaced, shade-tolerant, evergreen trees that
are three (3) feet in height at the time of
installation.
a. Landscaping shall be planted in
accordance with Exhibit A within ninety (90) days of
zoning approval.
b. The species of evergreen trees shall be
approved by Planning prior to installation. (P)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
E. 22SN0089 - Thackers View Rezoning and Exceptions -
Clover Hill
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Thackers View
Rezoning and Exceptions is a request to rezone from
Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12) with
conditional use to permit neighborhood recreational
facilities and a bed and breakfast facility plus
conditional use planned development to permit
exceptions to ordinance requirements and amendment of
zoning district map known as 4701, 4801 and
4901 Woolridge Road. The 138.52 acre property is
proposed for a maximum development of 260 dwelling
units. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property
is appropriate for Suburban Residential I use
(Maximum of 2 dwellings per acre). Tax IDs 720-681-
0327; 720-682-0474 and 3924.
Mr. Ryan Ramsey provided the Board with an overview
of Case 22SN0089. He stated the Planning Commission
and staff recommended approval, subject to the
conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
Anne Miller, representing the applicant, presented a
few additional key points about the case.
Discussion ensued relative to the outdoor public
address system at the pavilion and limitations on the
decibel level.
Paula Gordon with Friends of the Swift Creek
Reservoir expressed appreciation for the work that
has been done on the case thus far, but expressed
lingering concerns.
Lisa Disselkamp raised concerns relative to the
proposed pavilion and noise.
Greg Allen stated the county's residential zoning
districts and zoning processes no longer serve the
development process.
Jerry Turner expressed concerns relative to putting
2/26/2025 Page 45 of 70
drinking water into the system, removal of trees that
would protect the water, exceeding school capacity,
and slowing down development.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
Anne Miller provided responses to concerns raised by
citizen speakers.
Discussion ensued relative to the size and location
of the pavilion; a homeowners association (HOA);
Environmental Engineering's review of the site plan
and inspections that occur during the development;
code enforcement; and school capacity.
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board approved Case 22SN0089, subject to the
following conditions and one imposed condition:
Proffered Conditions
1. Master Plan. The Master Plan for the Property
shall consist of the following, which are made a part
of these proffered conditions by this reference
thereto, and shall be considered the Master Plan:
a. The Textual Statement last revised
January 31, 2025.
b. The Conceptual Plan, Exhibit A, last
revised September 30, 2024, prepared by Balzer and
Associates. Development of the Property shall
generally conform to the Conceptual Plan. The layout
on the Conceptual Plan is conceptual in nature and
may vary based on the final site plan depending on
the final soil studies, RPA lines, lot design, and
other engineering reasons or as otherwise approved by
the Planning Commission at the time of plans review.
c. Conceptual Elevations, Exhibit B (Single
Family) dated June 21, 2022, and Exhibit C
(Townhouse) last revised August 27, 2024. (P)
2. Existing Structures. There are existing
structures, including homes and accessory structures,
on GPINs 720-682-0474 and 720-682-3924. These
structures shall be able to remain in their current
configuration, subject to the proffered conditions in
this request. If removed or altered, the new
construction shall meet the requirements and
proffered conditions in this request. (P)
3. Density. The maximum density on the Property
shall not exceed 260 dwelling units. (P)
4. Road Cash Proffers.
a. The applicant, sub-divider, or
assignee(s) shall pay $9,400 for each single-family
unit and $5,922 for each townhouse unit, to
Chesterfield County for road improvements within the
service district for the property (the “Cash Proffer
2/26/2025 Page 46 of 70
Payments”).
b. Each payment shall be made prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a dwelling
unit unless state law modifies the timing of the
payment. Should Chesterfield County impose impact
fees at any time during the life of the development
that are applicable to the property, the amount paid
in cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited
toward, but not in addition to, any impact fees, in a
manner determined by the County.
c. At the option of the Transportation
Department, Cash Proffer Payments may be reduced for
the cost of transportation improvements, other than
those identified in the Road Improvements proffered
condition, provided by the applicant, sub-divider, or
assignee(s), as determined by the Transportation
Department. (B&M and T)
5. Vehicular Access. Direct vehicular access from
the property to Woolridge Road shall be limited to
two (2) public accesses and one (1) existing driveway
that only serves the existing residential dwellings
on Tax ID 720-682-0474-00000 and 720-682-3924-00000.
One public access shall align with the Crown Point
Road intersection, and the other public access shall
align with the Hidden Falls Drive intersection, as
shown on Exhibit A. The Transportation Department
shall approve the exact location of these accesses.
In conjunction with development of Tax ID 720-682-
0474-00000 and/or 720-682-3924-00000 as determined by
the Transportation Department, the existing driveway
to Woolridge Road shall be removed. (T)
6. Road Improvements. In conjunction with initial
development, the following road improvements shall be
completed, as determined by the Transportation
Department. The Transportation Department shall
approve the exact design, length, or other
modifications of the improvements.
a. Construction of additional pavement
along Woolridge Road to provide a separate right turn
lane at each approved access.
b. Construction of a VDOT standard sidewalk
along Woolridge Road for the entire property
frontage.
c. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free
and unrestricted, of any additional right-of-way (or
easements) required for the improvements identified
above. (T)
7. Utilities. Public water and wastewater systems
shall be used for all new residential and non-
residential structures, and for existing non-
residential structures. Existing residential
structures on the property may continue to utilize
existing well and septic systems as long as those
private systems continue to function as approved by
the Virginia Department of Health. Public water and
2/26/2025 Page 47 of 70
wastewater easements and service connections shall be
provided for those existing residential structures
with construction of water and wastewater lines to
serve the development. (U)
8. Licensing of Improvements Within Swift Creek
Reservoir Impoundment Easement. Prior to approval of
any site or subdivision construction plan for the
development, the applicant shall obtain, subject to
approval by the County, a license for the existing
and proposed improvements and structures within the
development that encroach upon the Swift Creek
Reservoir impoundment easement and any other County
easements. (U)
9. Environmental Standards. The following
environmental standards shall be provided. The
Department of Environmental Engineering shall approve
the exact design and implementation of these
standards.
a. Super silt fence, or an alternative as
approved by the Department of Environmental
Engineering, shall be provided as a perimeter
control.
b. Sediment traps and basins sized at least
25% larger than the minimum Virginia Erosion and
Sediment Control Handbook’s standard.
c. Application of Anionic PAM to denuded
areas during construction and final stabilization.
(EE)
10. Sheet Flow. No impervious areas shall sheet
flow through the Highberry Woods Phase II
Subdivision. (EE)
11. Buffers.
a. A minimum sixty-five (65) foot
undisturbed buffer, exclusive of easements generally
running parallel, in accordance with the landscape
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, shall be
provided along the southern property line adjacent to
Tax ID’s 718-680-1818 and 719-680-0969.
b. A one hundred (100) foot undisturbed
buffer, exclusive of easements generally running
parallel, in accordance with the landscape
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, shall be
provided along Woolridge Road for the entire property
frontage.
c. All healthy existing vegetation within
the buffers shall be retained. In the event
supplemental or replacement landscaping is required
per ordinance for any buffers, the vegetation used
shall consist of native species only. Buffers shall
be designated on construction plans and orange safety
fencing shall be used along buffers within twenty-
five (25) feet of land disturbance activities. Prior
to any land disturbance on the Property, all buffers
2/26/2025 Page 48 of 70
shall be marked with tree protection tape. All
buffers shall be recorded within common area or open
space. (P)
12. Overall Design Standards.
a. Townhouses. The townhouse dwelling units
shall be located as generally shown on the Conceptual
Plan and shall not be located along the waterfront or
the perimeter of the Property.
b. Sidewalks. VDOT standard sidewalks shall
generally be provided on both sides of public streets
in public right-of-way, unless otherwise approved by
the Planning Director at the time of plans review.
c. Streetscape. Street trees shall be
installed along both sides of internal public roads.
Unless otherwise permitted during plan review, street
trees shall be large deciduous trees spaced generally
forty (40) feet on center, except where there is a
conflict with utilities (above or underground),
sightlines, easements and/or driveway areas. Tree
species shall be those species designated for use as
a street tree in the Chesterfield County Plant
Materials List.
d. Driveways. All private driveways serving
single family residential uses and townhouse
residential uses shall be brushed concrete, stamped
concrete, exposed aggregate concrete, decorative
pavers, or asphalt. Gravel driveways shall not be
permitted.
e. Front Walks. A minimum of three (3) foot
wide concrete, or decorative pavers, front walk shall
be provided to the front entrance of each dwelling
unit, to connect to drives, sidewalks, or streets.
f. Front Foundation Planting Beds.
Foundation planting is required along the entire
front façade of all dwelling units and shall extend
along all sides facing a public street. Foundation
planting beds shall be a minimum of four (4) feet
wide from the unit foundation. Planting beds shall
include medium shrubs spaced a maximum of four (4)
feet apart. The plant materials used should visually
soften the unit corners and complement the
architecture of the home at their mature sizes.
g. Garages.
i. Front loaded attached garages on
single family dwelling units shall be permitted to
extend as far forward from the front line of the main
dwelling as the front line of the front porch
provided that the rooflines of the porch and garage
are contiguous. Where the rooflines are not
contiguous, garages shall be permitted to project a
maximum of two (2) feet forward of the front line of
the main dwelling. Garage projections past the front
line of the main dwelling shall not be permitted for
townhouse dwellings.
2/26/2025 Page 49 of 70
ii. Front loaded, and corner side
loaded garages, shall use an upgraded garage door. An
upgraded garage door is any door with a minimum of
three (3) enhanced features. Enhanced features shall
include windows, decorative panels, arches,
ornamental hardware or other architectural features
on the exterior that enhance the entry (i.e.,
decorative lintels, shed roof overhangs, arches,
columns, keystones, eyebrows, etc.). Flat panel
garage doors are prohibited.
iii. Townhouse dwellings shall
employ garage doors with neutral colors to minimize
their appearance on the front elevation as shown in
Exhibit C.
h. Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning
(HVAC) Units and Whole House Generators. Units shall
initially be screened from view of roads by
landscaping or low maintenance material, as approved
by the Planning Department.
i. Homeowner’s Association. In addition to
the requirements of the zoning ordinance, the
homeowner’s association shall be responsible for
properly maintaining and repairing on-site
improvements including, but not limited to, all
common areas, open space, and private roads.
j. Lamp Posts. One lamp post shall be
provided for each single-family lot and shall
generally be located where the driveway intersects
the sidewalk. A minimum of two (2) lamp posts shall
be provided for each group or building of townhomes
and shall generally be located where the driveway
intersects the sidewalk. The design of such lamp
posts shall be consistent throughout the development
and the exact locations shall be determined during
plans review.
k. Building Height. The maximum principal
building height of any residential structure shall be
lesser of three (3) stories or 40 feet. (P)
13. Single Family Dwelling Units Design Standards.
The following design standards shall apply to all
newly constructed single family dwelling units:
a. Elevations. Unless significant
deviations are approved by the Planning Commission
during subdivision plan review, the architectural
treatment of the single-family dwelling units shall
be consistent (incorporating similar, but not
necessarily identical design elements, stye and
materials) with the elevations shown in Exhibit B.
b. Materials. Acceptable siding materials
include stone, brick, masonry, fiber cement siding,
or engineered wood siding, or other comparable
material as approved by the Planning Department at
time of plans review. Vinyl, plywood, and metal
siding are not permitted. Where a dwelling borders
2/26/2025 Page 50 of 70
more than one street, all street-facing facades shall
be finished in the same materials. Other materials
may be used for trim, architectural decorations, or
design elements provided they blend with the
architecture of the dwelling.
c. Foundations. All exposed portions of the
foundation, except for exposed piers supporting front
porches, of each new dwelling unit shall be faced
with brick or stone veneer. If the dwelling unit is
constructed on a slab, brick, brick veneer, stone,
stone veneer, or other masonry material shall be
employed around the base of the front of the dwelling
unit a minimum of twenty-four (24) inches and on the
sides and rear of the dwelling unit a minimum sixteen
(16) inches above grade so as to give the appearance
of a foundation.
d. Elevation Repetition. The same dwelling
unit elevations shall not be located adjacent to or
directly across from each other along the same road.
This requirement does not apply to units on different
streets backing up to each other. Variation in the
front elevation shall not be achieved by simply
mirroring the façade but may be accomplished by
providing at least three (3) of the following
architectural changes.
i. Adding or removing a porch or
covered entry or increasing or decreasing the length
of the porch or entry.
ii. Adding masonry on the front
façade elevation of the first floor.
iii. Varying the location and/or
style of roof type, roof line, front facing gable(s)
and/or dormers.
iv. Providing varied siding
application using horizontal siding, shake siding,
and/or board and batten siding.
v. Adding projections such as bay
windows, second floor balconies, and accent roofs.
vi. Alternating the location of a
garage, if provided.
vii. Providing a different
architectural style.
viii. Any other element of
architectural variation as approved by the Director
of Planning.
e. Roofing. Roofing material shall be
dimensional architectural shingles or better with a
minimum 30-year warranty.
f. Porches and Stoops. Where provided, all
front entry stoops and front porches shall be
constructed with continuous masonry foundation wall
or on 12” x 12” masonry piers. Front porches shall be
a minimum of five (5) feet deep. Space between piers
under porches shall be enclosed with framed lattice
panels or screened with evergreen shrubs. Handrails
and railings shall be finished painted wood, vinyl
rails or metal rail systems with vertical pickets or
sawn balusters. Pickets shall be supported on top and
2/26/2025 Page 51 of 70
bottom rails that span between columns.
g. Garage Doors. In addition to the garage
conditions noted above, width of garage doors on
single-family dwelling units shall not exceed 60
percent of the width of the dwelling unit’s front
façade or corner side façade, as applicable. (P)
14. Townhouse Dwelling Units Design Standards.
a. Elevations. Unless significant
deviations are approved by the Planning Commission
during subdivision plan review, the architectural
treatment of the townhouse dwelling units shall be
consistent (incorporating similar, but not
necessarily identical design elements, stye and
materials) with the elevations shown in Exhibit C.
b. High Visibility Side Elevations. For any
townhouse dwelling unit with a side elevation that
faces a public road, private off-lot parking, and/or
a single-family lot as shown on Exhibit A, a high
visibility side elevation shall be used for that
side. A high visibility side elevation shall employ
design features to embellish the side facade. The
design features employed shall include at least two
of the following design elements: two different
siding styles, gables, dormers, shutters, windows and
other architectural features used on the front
elevation or the use of enhanced landscaping to
reinforce the streetscape and minimize the view of
the side of the units with shade trees, fences,
hedges, shrubs, or other acceptable landscape feature
to help define the side yard and street edge.
c. Materials. Acceptable siding materials
include stone, brick, masonry, fiber cement siding,
or engineered wood siding, or other comparable
material as approved by the Planning Department at
time of plans review. Vinyl, plywood, and metal
siding are not permitted. Where a dwelling borders
more than one street, all street-facing facades shall
be finished in the same materials. Other materials
may be used for trim, architectural decorations, or
design elements provided they blend with the
architecture of the dwelling.
d. Slab Construction. If the dwelling unit
is constructed on a slab, brick or stone shall be
employed around the base of the dwelling unit a
minimum twenty-four (24) inches above grade as to
give the appearance of a foundation. If not
constructed on slab, all exposed portions of the
foundation of each dwelling unit shall be faced with
brick or stone veneer.
e. Variation in Unit Front Elevations.
Townhouse units within the same building with the
exact same front elevation may not be attached to
each other. Variation in the front elevation may not
be achieved by simply mirroring the façade, but may
be accomplished by providing at least three (3) of
the following architectural changes:
2/26/2025 Page 52 of 70
i. Adding masonry on the front
façade elevation of the first floor.
ii. Varying the location of roof
type, roof line, front facing gable(s) and/or
dormers.
iii. Varying the style of roof type,
roof line, front facing gable(s) and/or dormers.
iv. Providing varied siding
application using horizontal siding, shake siding,
and/or board and batten siding.
v. Providing varied color
application.
vi. Adding or removing a porch.
vii. Adding or removing a covered
stoop.
viii. Adding projections such as bay
windows, second floor balconies, and accent roofs.
ix. Changing the width of the unit.
x. Any other element of
architectural variation as approved by the Director
of Planning.
In addition, this variation obligation may be
achieved on a building-by-building basis only if
approved by the Director of Planning at the time of
plans review and approval. If the Planning Director
does not approve, then the owner may submit the
proposed building-by-building variation to the
Planning Commission for approval and satisfaction of
this variation obligation.
f. Roofing. Roofing material shall be a
material consisting of, but not limited to,
architectural dimensional shingles, metal, or rubber
membrane, and having a minimum 30-year warranty.
g. Front Porches and Stoops. Every
townhouse unit shall have either a covered front
porch or a covered or recessed front stoop. All stoop
and porch floors shall be concrete or exposed
aggregate concrete, or a finished paving material
such as stone, tile, or brick, or properly trimmed
composite decking boards. All front steps shall be
concrete. Wooden steps, stoops, or porches will not
be permitted.
h. Exterior Maintenance. The homeowner’s
association for the development shall be responsible
for properly maintaining townhouse dwelling unit
exteriors to exclude windows and doors. Dwelling unit
interiors are expressly excluded from the homeowner’s
association’s maintenance and repair obligations.
i. Road Width. The internal roads within
the Townhouse Lots Tract shall have a minimum width
of thirty-two feet (32’) from face-of-curb to face-
of-curb. (P)
15. Restaurant Standards.
a. Hours of Operation. The restaurant shall
not be open to the public between the hours of 11:00
2/26/2025 Page 53 of 70
p.m. and 7:00 a.m., except that it may be open until
1:00 a.m. on New Years Day.
b. Loading and Deliveries. There shall be
no loading or deliveries between the hours of 9:00
p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
c. Architecture. In addition to the
requirements of the Emerging Growth Design District
standards, the architectural treatment of the sit-
down restaurant shall incorporate equal 4-sided
architecture such that no façade shall consist of
inferior materials, or be of inferior quality,
appearance or detail to any other exterior of the
same building. Acceptable siding materials include
stone, brick, masonry, fiber cement siding, or
engineered wood siding, or other comparable material
as approved by the Planning Department at time of
plans review. Vinyl, plywood, and metal siding are
not permitted. (P)
16. Lighting. Within the restaurant tract, pole-
mounted, full cut-off, photocell-activated, minimum
70 CRI-rated LED luminaires shall illuminate
sidewalks and parking with a minimum maintained
illumination level of 1.0 foot-candle for parking,
excluding drive aisles, and 0.75 foot-candle for
sidewalks, as measured at grade; provided, however,
these criteria shall not exceed levels required by
VDOT at entrances and/or property lines. (Police)
17. Development Phasing. No more than a cumulative
total of 130 lots shall be recorded on the Property
until the “Woolridge Road Extension (Route 288 - Old
Hundred Road)” and “Woolridge Road Widening (Lacoc
Road - Genito Road)” projects have been accepted by
the Transportation Department or after December 1,
2027, whichever occurs first. (T)
18. Construction Activity.
a. Construction activity shall be limited
to between the hours of 7:00am and 7:00pm Monday
through Friday; 7:00am to 6:00pm on Saturday; and
8:00am to 5:00pm on Sunday. For this condition,
construction activity shall be considered land
clearing; grading; installation of infrastructure
(such as roads, utilities and storm drainage); and
construction of a dwelling on a vacant lot. This
condition is not intended to restrict the hours of
home construction (such as with additions or
alterations) once a dwelling is occupied as a
residence.
b. Prior to the issuance of the initial
land disturbance permit, the Developer shall notify
all adjacent property owners in writing of the
anticipated date construction activity will commence.
(P)
19. Tree Canopy. Within the residential
subdivision, excluding the acreage for the restaurant
tract and acreage under Swift Creek Reservoir, a
2/26/2025 Page 54 of 70
minimum of thirty percent (30%) of the existing tree
canopy, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, shall be
preserved and located in recorded open space or
common area. (EE)
20. Tree Preservation Areas. Construction and
installation of sanitary sewer and pedestrian trails
shall adhere to the Zoning Ordinance, including, to
the degree possible, the location of such utilities
and facilities should be outside resource protection
areas. In the event encroachments into resource
protection areas do occur, as approved by the
Department of Environmental Engineering, the width of
existing trees that must be removed for the permanent
easement(s) shall be preserved in an area outside the
resource protection area adjacent to such
encroachment. Such tree preservation areas may be on
individual lots or in recorded open space or common
area and shall be reviewed and approved during plans
review. At least one (1) sign for every two (2) lots
where a tree preservation area is located on the
lots, shall be provided, and maintained to delineate
the location of such tree preservation area. (EE, U,
and P)
21. Enforcement. Any un-permitted tree removal
shall be subject to penalties and/or enforcement
action as identified in the County Code. (P)
IMPOSED CONDITION
1. Recreational Neighborhood Facilities / Pavilion.
An open-air pavilion with a roof shall be provided
outside the RPA as generally shown on the Conceptual
Plan within the focal point. The pavilion shall not
exceed 500 square feet, and the use of outside public
address systems shall be prohibited. Pedestrian-scale
lighting may be used to provide safety and security
for the structure and surrounding area.(P)
And, further, Ms. Schneider directed staff to send
written notification to the Woodlake Community
Association and the residents of Red Fern Station,
Rock Harbour, Highberry Woods, Chestnut Bluff,
Standing Oak, Clipper Cove, and The Landing at Swift
Creek when the preliminary plat and construction
plans are submitted.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider and Holland.
Nays: Carroll.
F. 24SN1209 - Magnolia Green Tract CC Amendment -
Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Magnolia Green Tract
CC Amendment is a request for amendment of zoning
approval (Case 89SN0343) relative to phasing
requirements and modification of development
standards and amendment of zoning district map in a
Residential (R-9) District for property fronting in
three (3) locations for approximately 2,925 feet
along the north side of Hull Street Road, 250 feet
west of Magnolia Green Parkway. The 88.11 acre
2/26/2025 Page 55 of 70
property is zoned to permit a residential development
of up to 364 multifamily dwelling units. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Community Business, Neighborhood
Business and Regional Mixed Uses. Tax IDs 702-667-
2068; 703-667-2733; and 705-667-9038.
Mr. Ryan Ramsey provided the Board with an overview
of Case 24SN1209. He stated the Planning Commission
and staff recommended approval, subject to the
conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Carroll provided additional context relative to
the zoning request.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
Jerry Turner asked the Board to put the burden of
building sidewalks along Hull Street Road on
developers instead of taxpayers.
Phyllis Quest expressed concerns relative to school
capacity.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
Jeff Geiger, representing the applicant, addressed
concerns raised by citizen speakers.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board approved Case 24SN1209, subject to the
following conditions:
Condition
1. The Textual Statement dated February 11, 2025
and attached hereto replaces and amends the
following* in the approved Textual Statement of Case
89SN0343. All other conditions of Case 89SN0343 shall
remain in force and effect. (P)
*Condition 5.D (Specifically titled “5.
USE/BULK/EXCEPTIONS AND SPECIFIC CONDITIONS, D.
Activity Centers and Community Centers: Uses and
Conditions, Amend Conditions 1, 2, 3 and 12 – See
Case 89SN0343 Approved Textual Statement for
Community Center)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
19. Public Hearings
A. To Consider Request to Vacate a Portion of a Taxiway
Easement Across the Property Owned by Uphoff
Investments, LLC
Ms. Lynn Snow, Real Property Manager, introduced the
public hearing to consider a request to vacate a
portion of a taxiway easement across the property
owned by Uphoff Investments, LLC.
2/26/2025 Page 56 of 70
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
vacation ordinance to vacate a portion of a taxiway
easement across the property Owned by Uphoff
Investments, LLC.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
B. To Consider Request to Vacate a Portion of Gayland
Avenue and Lots 11-19 and Portion of Lot 20, Block E
and Lots 17-21 and Portion of Lot 22, Block F Within
Suburban Property of John L. Patterson
Ms. Lynn Snow, Real Property Manager, introduced the
public hearing to consider a request to vacate a
portion of Gayland Avenue and Lots 11-19 and Portion
of Lot 20, Block E and Lots 17-21 and Portion of Lot
22, Block F Within Suburban Property of John L.
Patterson.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
Dean Hawkins, representing the owner of the property,
provided a brief summary of the request.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE whereby the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
VIRGINIA ("GRANTOR") vacates to WDV LLC, a Virginia
limited liability company and CSX TRANSPORTATION,
INC., a Virginia corporation ("GRANTEE") a portion of
Gayland Avenue, also known as Fourth Avenue, lots 11-
19 and a portion of lot 20, Block E, lots 17-21 and a
portion of lot 22, Block F, within Suburban Property
of John L. Patterson, BERMUDA Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on a plat
thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's Office, Circuit
Court, Chesterfield County, Virginia in Plat Book 3,
at Pages 216-217.
WHEREAS, WDV LLC petitioned the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia to vacate a portion
of a 40’ unimproved right of way known as Gayland
Avenue, also known as Fourth Avenue, lots 11-19 and a
portion of lot 20, Block E, lots 17-21 and a portion
of lot 22, Block F, within Suburban Property of John
L. Patterson, BERMUDA Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia more particularly shown
on a plat of record in the Clerk’s Office, Plat Book
3, Pages 216-217. The portion of right of way and
lots petitioned to be vacated are more fully
described as follows:
2/26/2025 Page 57 of 70
A portion of Gayland Avenue, also known as Fourth
Avenue, lots 11-19 and a portion of lot 20, Block E,
lots 17-21 and a portion of lot 22, Block F, within
Suburban Property of John L. Patterson, the location
of which is more fully shown on the attached exhibit,
a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of
this Ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section
15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended,
by advertising; and,
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the
continuance of the portion of right of way, lots, and
portions of lots sought to be vacated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid portion of
right of way, lots and portions of lots are hereby
vacated.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a certified copy of
this Ordinance, together with the exhibit attached
hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days
hereafter in the Clerk's Office, Circuit Court,
Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant to Section
15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section
15.2-2274 is to destroy the force and effect of the
recording of the portion of the plat vacated. This
Ordinance shall vest fee simple title to the portion
of Gayland Avenue, also known as Fourth Avenue, lots
11-19 and a portion of lot 20, Block E, lots 17-21
and a portion of lot 22, Block F, within Suburban
Property of John L. Patterson, free and clear of any
rights of public use.
GRANTOR hereby reserves a 40’ sewer and water
easement over the portion of Gayland Avenue, also
known as Fourth Avenue, to be vacated.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the
names of the GRANTOR and GRANTEE, or their successors
in title.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
20. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
There were no speakers on unscheduled matters at this
time.
21. Adjournment
2/26/2025 Page 58 of 70
A. Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of
the Board of Supervisors
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board adjourned at 9:15 p.m. to a press
conference on March 11, 2025, at 2:30 p.m. at 12800
Genito Road to announce plans for the future of
Southside Speedway, to then adjourn to its regularly
scheduled meeting on March 12, 2025, at 2 p.m. in
Room 502 of the County Administration Building.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Holland and Carroll.
Nays: None.
__________________________ ___________________________
Joseph P. Casey Jim A. Ingle
County Administrator Chairman
2/26/2025 Page 59 of 70
Citizen Comments Received Through the Comment Portal February 26, 2025, Board of Supervisors Meeting
Comment Type Comment Name District
Zoning
case -
24SN1209
(Deferred
from
1/22/2025)
- Magnolia
Green
Tract CC
Amendment
- Matoaca
As a resident of Magnolia
Green, I support the
proposed amendment related
to the Magnolia Green
commercial parcels. It
provides three key
components earning my
support: 1) ensuring that
current Magnolia Green
amenities (which are already
overcrowded) are not
accessible by any
residential built on the
properties 2) requires a
"village green" to allow for
a community gathering spot
3) it allows for more
commercial square footage to
be built. I think that we
severely lack commercial
options without having to
drive down severely
congested hull street and it
would be great if we had
more options to go to
connected to the community.
Arthur
Reeves
Matoaca
Unschedule
d matter
Could Chesterfield County
ask the developer of the
Chesterfield Mega Site data
centers to proffer turning
the former Tidewater and
Western Narrow Gauge
Railroad into a rail trail
between the Chesterfield
County Line with Powhatan
County and the Richmond Zoo.
The former railroad bed
originally had a 40 foot
wide easement back in 1917
but they could give it a 100
foot wide easement and have
the easement become a mini
park. Also could
Chesterfield County add the
former Tidewater and Western
Railroad to Chesterfield
County's Trails Master Plan
to become a spur of the Fall
Line Trail in Chesterfield.
Also since Chesterfield
County is talking about
property tax season. Could
Chesterfield County have
conversations about taxing
humanoid robots and self d
riving cars and drones like
the Tesla Optimus Robot and
Carl
Schwendema
n
Midlothian
2/26/2025 Page 60 of 70
Comment Type Comment Name District
self driving taxes at a 5 or
6 dollar personal property
rate to make up for lost
revenue in the future. In
that there are proposals for
companies to build 10,000 of
thousands of these humanoid
robots and self flying
drones and driving cars
cars. And Chesterfield
should prep to use these
things make up revenue lost
from humans losing their
jobs.
Zoning
case -
22SN0089
(Deferred
from
1/22/2025)
- Thackers
View
Rezoning
and
Exceptions
- Clover
Hill
Thank you for the work you
have already done. As a
Brandermill resident, I
understand the importance of
ensuring that the trees,
green space for the
ecosystem and the the
reservoir are well protected
when development occurs. We
have Bald Eagles, deer, and
many other species that live
near our reservoir and the
current neighborhoods
(Brandermill and Woodlake
specifically) have done
their part to make sure
there habitat is maintained.
Please ensure that the
Thacker's view project will
do the same. If you look at
the the tiny tree buffer
left on the project at the
corner of 288/Hull Street
(Cloverleigh project) and
all the new communities that
have been striped of trees,
you can see why the citizens
are concerned. Please
include clearly written
instructions in this project
to make sure those things do
not happen to our last
beautiful piece of property
on the reservoir. Please do
not vote to approve this
project unless everything is
written into the plan before
voting. Thank you.
Christy
Spence
Clover
Hill
Zoning
case -
22SN0089
(Deferred
from
1/22/2025)
- Thackers
View
Rezoning
I’m writing to ask that the
zoning case for Thackers
View be deferred
indefinitely. Continued
approval for rezoning to
clear cut for residential
developments is inconsistent
with the County’s own
comprehensive plan, which
Angel Reed Clover
Hill
2/26/2025 Page 61 of 70
Comment Type Comment Name District
and
Exceptions
- Clover
Hill
promotes orderly and
fiscally responsible growth
through adequate public
facilities and
infrastructure provision.
With additional strain being
put on public schools and
local roads especially, the
Board cannot in good faith
allow this rezoning case to
proceed. Children attending
elementary schools in
trailers and seeing the
queue to get to Tomahawk
Creek Middle each weekday
with no relief are a couple
of indicators that
infrastructure is not
keeping pace with
development. Please put
citizens first and defer
indefinitely.
Zoning
case -
22SN0089
(Deferred
from
1/22/2025)
- Thackers
View
Rezoning
and
Exceptions
- Clover
Hill
I am opposed to the
Townhomes and proposed
density in this development.
The % of townhomes to
residences is more than 3x
the ratio in adjoining
Woodlake.
The planned pavilion along
Rock Harbor is too large and
is not in keeping with the
pavilions in Woodlake and
nearby areas. It is too
large and too close to
existing and planned homes
creating a likely nuisance
for residents. A smaller
neighborhood pavilion is in
keeping with “a family
gathering place” and has
been the standard for years
along the reservoir.
Reference the much smaller
15’x15’ size of nearby Rock
Harbor pavilion.
Thackers View ALREADY has
several gathering place
structures on the property.
I’m opposed to adding a
traffic light for the new
development. Prefer instead
for there to be merging
lanes built for incoming and
outgoing traffic along
Woolridge Road. “Michigan
left turns” could be added
to Woolridge Road to assist
residents of Thacker View
Lisa
Disselkamp
Clover
Hill
2/26/2025 Page 62 of 70
Comment Type Comment Name District
making a left-hand turn onto
Woolridge or into the new
development. Woolridge Road
is already over capacity and
traffic along this curve
makes a light and
traditional Left turns
dangerous.
The county Department of
transportation should add a
roundabout at the
intersection of Timber Bluff
and Lake Bluff Parkways to
accommodate greater traffic
coming through Woodlake to
reach Hull St Rd. The bulk
of traffic comes from Timber
Bluff, but is currently
blocked for left turns and
backed up by the lesser,
sporadic traffic along Lake
Bluff Pkwy.
Zoning
case -
22SN0089
(Deferred
from
1/22/2025)
- Thackers
View
Rezoning
and
Exceptions
- Clover
Hill
Thank you to Jessica
Schneider and the rest of
the BOS for your engagement
and willingness to listen.
I am a core member of the
Friends of Swift Creek
Reservoir and we would like
to see a few additional
environmental protections
before the case is approved:
1) Ensure that all
undisturbed buffer areas be
documented in legal
descriptions 2) Wetlands,
RPAs, buffers, 40% green
space, and 30% tree canopy
clearly identified on Scaled
Drawings with BOS
review/approval of
preliminary plat 3) BOS or
Planning Commission final
approval over any utility
placement in RPAs 4) FOSCR
should receive official
notification as required for
notifications to adjacent
property owners 5) We would
like to see mats used to
protect tree roots (if not
everywhere then at least
around the RPA) and we
believe that the developer
should be required to hire a
certified arborist to advise
throughout 6) Environmental
engineers should monitor all
tree protection and
replanting efforts 7) If the
Gregory
Herceg
Clover
Hill
2/26/2025 Page 63 of 70
Comment Type Comment Name District
40% greenspace commitment is
real, it should be proffered
and clearly discernable on
the scaled drawings. 8) We
would like assurances that
the Army Corps of Engineers
will not override the
wetland protections in this
project.
Zoning
case -
22SN0089
(Deferred
from
1/22/2025)
- Thackers
View
Rezoning
and
Exceptions
- Clover
Hill
I support the
recommendations made by
Friends of Swift Creek
Reservoir to clarify
additional elements of the
project before the official
vote is taken.
Jay Meyer Clover
Hill
Zoning
case -
22SN0089
(Deferred
from
1/22/2025)
- Thackers
View
Rezoning
and
Exceptions
- Clover
Hill
1. Protection of Buffers –
We request that all
undisturbed buffer areas be
documented in legal
descriptions to ensure long-
term protections are
achieved, due to lax
oversight for other SCR
properties (and elsewhere).
Proffers should be included
to state needed oversight to
protect trees in designated
buffers.
2. Clarity in Conceptual
Plan & Approval of
Preliminary Plat – Wetlands,
RPAs, buffers, 40% green
space, and the 30% tree
canopy composition must be
clearly identified on the
Conceptual Plan and/or in
to-scale drawings made
available to the public for
transparency and
accountability. We further
request a proffer be
included requiring BOS
review and approval of the
preliminary plat.
3. Utility Placement
Oversight – Given the
environmental sensitivity of
this site, the Board or
Planning Commission—not just
County staff—should have
final approval authority
over utility placements in
Stephen
Meeley
Clover
Hill
2/26/2025 Page 64 of 70
Comment Type Comment Name District
RPAs.
4. Community Notification –
FOSCR is a gateway to the
public's line of site on
this project and we ask that
FOSCR receive written notice
of any material changes or
updates at various phases,
just as adjacent property
owners do.
5. Tree Root Protections –
More must be done to prevent
long-term tree loss, such as
requiring protective mats in
RPAs. FOSCR has offered an
arborist's formal opinion
and onsite tours to
underscore the potential
tree failure issues.
Similarly, we recommend that
the developer include a
proffer to hire a certified
arborist to provide best
practices for tree and root
protection, as well as for
the assessment of replanting
efforts. Additionally, we
request that a thorough tree
survey be conducted to hold
all parties accountable and
ensure the number of trees
in the development is
preserved as promised.
6. Stronger Tree
Preservation & Replanting
Commitments – The Planning
Commission should have
oversight of replanting
efforts to ensure meaningful
restoration. One way to
achieve this would be a
proffer for Environmental
Engineering inspectors to
monitor all tree protection
and ensure that they remain
in place as shown on the
plans throughout
construction.
7. 40% Greenspace Commitment
– If this is a true
commitment as the community
heard from the
developer/applicant in
community meetings, it
should be explicitly
proffered and mapped before
any yes vote occurs.
2/26/2025 Page 65 of 70
Comment Type Comment Name District
We ask the Board - the only
5 people able to ensure
long-term protections of
this development - act to
ensure that all needed
protections are addressed
fully before any approval.
Zoning
case -
24SN1209
(Deferred
from
1/22/2025)
- Magnolia
Green
Tract CC
Amendment
- Matoaca
Can they ask them to build a
new trail along Route 360
and build a right turning
lane for Beaver Bridge Road.
Carl
Schwendema
n
Midlothian
Zoning
case -
22SN0089
(Deferred
from
1/22/2025)
- Thackers
View
Rezoning
and
Exceptions
- Clover
Hill
Chesterfield County needs to
ask the developer to build a
trail or sidewalk that
crosses the Swift Creek
Reservoir along the
Woolridge Road causeway to
link up to the proposed new
sidewalks being built as
part of the Woolridge Road
widening.
Carl
Schwendema
n
Midlothian
Zoning
case -
22SN0089
(Deferred
from
1/22/2025)
- Thackers
View
Rezoning
and
Exceptions
- Clover
Hill
I’m a resident in Woodlake.
I’m asking the Board to
carefully consider and abide
by the restrictions set
forth in the white letter
from the Woodlake Board of
Directors.
I have previously opposed
development near the
reservoir because of
environmental concerns. I’m
opposed to the development
of the Thacker property
primarily for that reason.
I’m also concerned that the
overdevelopment that is
taking place in Chesterfield
County is too taxing on our
schools, roads and water and
energy resources.
Supervisor Schneider has
worked diligently with
representatives from
Woodlake to address these
concerns. Please adopt the
recommendations outlined in
the letter.
Sincerely,
Candace
Graham
Clover
Hill
2/26/2025 Page 66 of 70
Comment Type Comment Name District
Candace Graham
6316 Walnut Bend Ter
Midlothian, VA 23112
22SN0089
(Deferred
from
1/22/2025)
- Thackers
View
Rezoning
and
Exceptions
- Clover
Hill
On behalf of the Friends of
Swift Creek Reservoir, we
ask the BOS require the
following protections be
added:
1. Protection of Buffers –
proffer that undisturbed
buffer areas should be
documented in legal
descriptions to ensure long-
term protections.
2. Conceptual Plan &
Approval of Preliminary Plat
– wetlands, RPAs+depths,
buffers+depths, 40% green
space, and the 30% tree
canopy composition should be
identified on the Conceptual
Plan and/or in to-scale
drawings made available to
the public. Furthermore, a
proffer should be included
requiring BOS review and
approval of the preliminary
plat.
3. Utility Placement
Oversight – given the
environmental sensitivity of
this site, the Board or
Planning Commission—not just
County staff—should have
final approval authority
over utility placements in
RPAs. Given that the Army
Corps of Engineers may
override local decisions, we
ask for confirmation that
wetland protections
proffered will remain
intact.
4. Community Notification –
we request a proffer that
specifies that the County
notify FOSCR with a set of
plans at each review phase
to help provide the gateway
to community engagement.
5. Tree Root Protections –
more must be done to prevent
long-term tree loss such as
requiring protective mats in
RPAs. We request a tree
survey be conducted to
Kathleen
Medaries
Clover
Hill
2/26/2025 Page 67 of 70
Comment Type Comment Name District
ensure protections and
preservations. A plan for
maintaining the health of
the trees post-construction
should also be included.
6. Stronger Tree
Preservation & Replanting
Commitments – require a
proffer for Environmental
Engineering inspectors to
monitor all tree protection
and ensure that they remain
in place as shown on the
plans throughout
construction.
7. 40% Greenspace Commitment
– the developer's promise to
the community of 40%
greenspace should be
included in proffers.
Supervisor Schneider has
worked tirelessly and heard
our concerns. We ask that
the BOS not approve an
application that doesn't
fully address the needed
protections to ensure a
final development we all can
be very proud of. Thank you.
22SN0089
(Deferred
from
1/22/2025)
- Thackers
View
Rezoning
and
Exceptions
- Clover
Hill
I support the Friends of the
Swift Creek Reservoir
comments made.
I want to reinforce while
certain standards may be
allowed today, they may not
necessarily be the most
appropriate for this site
and this legacy waterfront
development in an
environmentally sensitive
area. We have the
opportunity to pursue higher
standards that would better
benefit the project and the
surrounding environment. For
instance, placing sewer and
utility lines under the
pavement in the street ways
may not be required, but if
deemed appropriate by the
environmental engineering
team, it would be a
desirable approach rather
than through the RPA. FOSCR
does not want this project
to be remembered as a time
when exceptions were made at
the expense of the Swift
Creek Reservoir and the
Paula
Gordon
Clover
Hill
2/26/2025 Page 68 of 70
Comment Type Comment Name District
surrounding environment. Our
goal is to prevent any
future missteps or lack of
oversight that could arise
from what the developer is
allowed to disturb in the
resource-protected area
governed by the Chesapeake
Bay Act.
I strongly recommend that
the developer hire a
certified arborist to ensure
that best practices are
followed for tree and root
protection, as well as for
the assessment of replanting
efforts. Additionally, we
request that a thorough tree
survey be conducted to hold
all parties accountable and
ensure the number of trees
in the development is
preserved as promised. This
survey should also include a
plan for maintaining the
health of the trees post-
construction and outline the
expected duration of their
viability.
It's important that the
community receives
assurances starting at the
local level that the
wetlands will be preserved,
regardless of federal or
state protections. This
ensures that the site's
unique environmental
features are safeguarded
throughout the development
process. Given that the Army
Corps of Engineers has the
authority to override local
decisions, we need
confirmation that wetland
protections will remain
intact throughout this
application, ensuring that
the wetlands are properly
safeguarded at all levels.
22SN0089
(Deferred
from
1/22/2025)
- Thackers
View
Rezoning
and
Exceptions
The Friends of the Swift
Creek Reservoir (FOSCR)
thanks the Board of
Supervisors, planning staff,
the developer/applicant, and
Supervisor Schneider for
their engagement and
willingness to listen to
Kim Owens Matoaca
2/26/2025 Page 69 of 70
Comment Type Comment Name District
- Clover
Hill
citizen concerns throughout
this process.
While we recognize
significant progress has
been made, key environmental
protections still need to be
included to make this a
complete application all
stakeholders can support. We
ask the Board of Supervisors
to request these protections
before the vote. Doing so
ensures these protections
are given enhanced oversight
during the planning and
construction phases –
without which oversight rest
solely on County Staff who
are not elected officials.
The Need Protections We See
1. Protection of Buffers –
We request that all
undisturbed buffer areas be
documented in legal
descriptions to ensure long-
term protections are
achieved. 2. Clarity in
Conceptual Plan & Approval
of Preliminary Plat –
Wetlands, RPAs, buffers, 40%
green space, and the 30%
tree canopy composition must
be clearly identified on the
Conceptual Plan and/or in
to-scale drawings made
available to the public for
transparency and
accountability. 3. Utility
Placement Oversight – Given
the environmental
sensitivity of this site,
the Board or Planning
Commission—not just County
staff—should have final
approval authority over
utility placements in RPAs.
4. Community Notification –
FOSCR is a gateway to the
public's line of site on
this project and we ask that
FOSCR receive written notice
of any material changes or
updates at various phases,
just as adjacent property
owners do. 5. Tree Root
Protections – More must be
done to prevent long-term
tree loss, such as requiring
protective mats in RPAs.
FOSCR has offered an
arborist's formal opinion
2/26/2025 Page 70 of 70
Comment Type Comment Name District
and onsite tours to
underscore the potential
tree failure issues. 6.
Stronger Tree Preservation &
Replanting Commitments – The
Planning Commission should
have oversight of replanting
efforts to ensure meaningful
restoration. 7. 40%
Greenspace Commitment – If
this is a true commitment as
the community heard from the
developer/applicant in
community meetings, it
should be explicitly
proffered and mapped before
any vote occurs.8. Wetland
Protections & Oversight –
Given that the Army Corps of
Engineers has the authority
to override local decisions,
we need confirmation that
wetland protections will
remain intact throughout
this application, ensuring
that the wetlands are
properly safeguarded at all
levels.