Loading...
2008-03-12 PacketCHESTERFIELD COUNTY ,e,,~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA -"{-. h?~iM Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 2.A. Subject: County Administrator's Comments County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: :For the past several years, Training magazine, a 42-year old professional- development publication, has recognized the Top 125 organizations for their ;;,, efforts in connecting learning and development to their business strategy. ..For 2008, Chesterfield County remains the first local government to ever make this list by placing 45th on the list up from 53rd in 2007. This national recognition is a testament to the county's commitment to learning and organizational development for our employees and-our ongoing efforts to be a FIRST CHOICE employer. In order to receive this award, organizations must complete an application detailing their learning offerings and show connection to the organization's business strategy, along with demonstrated measures to validate learning effectiveness. Chesterfield County was also recently recognized by Corporate University Exchange with a Best Practice award in their Alignment category recognizing our alignment of learning in meeting the county's. strategic goals. we were also the first local government ever to be recognized by this organization as well. Preparers Kevin W. Bruns Title: Chief Learning Officer and University Dean Attachments: ^ Yes ® No # ®~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Chesterfield University continues to be a leader and benchmark for both public and private companies in effectively creating and delivering learning. Staff appreciates the support and leadership of the Board and will continue to improve the quality and effectiveness of the County's learning strategy in meeting our strategic goals. o~coaz '~ ~, C ~~RCINI CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 2.6. Subject: County Administrator's Comments County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Ms. Mary Ann Curtin, Director, Intergovernmental Relations, will provide a legislative update to the Board of Supervisors. Preparers Janice Blakley Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: ~ Yes ®No # oC9d3(~fl3 1e,~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA h~,~~ Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 5.A. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Mr. James B. Herring for Receiving a Silver Star County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Mr. Warren requests that the Board of Supervisors adopt this resolution recognizing Mr. James B. Herring for receiving a Silver Star. Summary of Information: This resolution will recognize Lieutenant James B. Herring of Chesterfield County Police Department for receiving a Silver Star for his brave and dedicated service to Chesterfield County and the nation. Preparers Donald J. Kappel Title: Director, Public Affairs Attachments: ^ Yes ~. No # ' ~~~~fl~ RECOGNIZING CHESTERFIELD COUNTY POLICE LIEUTENANT JAMES B. HERRING FOR HIS BRAVE AND DEDICATED SERVICE TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AND THE NATION WHEREAS, James B. Herring is a lieutenant in the Chesterfield County Police Department; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Herring is currently serving as a reserve Chief Warrant Officer 4 with the U. S. Army National Guard; and WHEREAS, as a police officer, Lieutenant Herring served in the Street Drugs section and Support Services Division, as well as serving as a crash team member, Police Emergency .Response Team member, and as Commander of the Special Response Unit; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Herring has earned the Police Star and the Medal of Valor, as well as a combat ribbon, for his service with the Chesterfield County Police Department; and WHEREAS, as a North Carolina National Guardsman serving in Iraq, then CWO-3 Herring was leading a five-vehicle patrol on December 23, 2006 in the village of Tahrir, near Baquabah, Iraq in search of a Sunni-Arab insurgent cell responsible for numerous assaults on coalition forces; and WHEREAS, his patrol came under fierce attack from machine-gun fire from three insurgents initially, .and then was attacked by 20 more insurgents in a well-planned ambush; and WHEREAS, when his driver was shot and wounded, the vehicle in which CWO-3 Herring was riding came to a halt, at which time he exited the vehicle and with his rifle, killed two enemy gunners who had attacked the convoy from another direction; and WHEREAS, returning to the vehicle, CWO-3 Herring, realizing that his driver was critically wounded, exited the relative safety of the vehicle a second time, and was knocked to the ground by the impact of a rocket- propelled grenade; and WHEREAS, recovering, CWO-3 Herring then ran to the driver's side of the vehicle and removed the driver, carrying him to the rear of the vehicle so he could be treated by a medic; and WHEREAS, CWO-3 Herring then drove the damaged vehicle to safety at Forward Operating Base Gabe while keeping higher headquarters apprised of the situation and calling for medical assistance for his crew. WHEREAS, CWO-4 James B. Herring was credited with turning the tide of battle against a well-prepared enemy and saving the lives of 23 American and Iraqi soldiers, for which he was awarded the Silver Star for his courageous and selfless actions while serving his country in Iraq. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 12th day of March 2008, publicly recognizes CWO-4 James B. Herring for the actions that led to his Silver Star, thanks him for his brave and dedicated service both to Chesterfield County and the nation, and extends best wishes to him and his family for well-deserved health, happiness and peace in the years ahead. ~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ,~~,- Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 5.8. ~Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Sergeant A. E. "Lonnie" Ott, Police Department, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Sergeant A. E. "Lonnie" Ott will retire. from the Police Department after having provided 33 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County. Preparers Colonel Thierry G. Dupuis Title: Chief of Police Attachments: Yes ~ No # ~~~~~~ RECOGNIZING SERGEANT A. E. "LONNIE" OTT UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Sergeant A. E. "Lonnie" Ott retired from .the Chesterfield County Police Department on March 1, 2008; after faithfully serving the county in the capacity of patrol officer, investigator, detective, and sergeant; and WHEREAS, Sergeant Ott began his law enforcement career at the age of 18 while serving as a cadet with the City of Richmond Police Department; and WHEREAS, Sergeant Ott has served in law enforcement for 37 years, 33 of which were with the Chesterfield County Police Department; and WHEREAS, Sergeant Ott was selected twice as Police Officer of the Year, first in 1976 and again in 1994; and WHEREAS, Sergeant Ott, during his tenure as a detective, received commendations for his interview, interrogation and investigative skills in the resolution of two homicide cases; namely the Walthall Amoco Station homicide, which was solved in eight hours with the arrest of the three suspects responsible; and the Rosenbluth homicides, where he demonstrated outstanding intelligence by piecing together the evidence of what amounted to an elaborate puzzle that led to the arrest and conviction of two suspects; and WHEREAS, Sergeant Ott distinguished himself through devotion to duty while assisting in a rape case, and due to his superior investigative skills and innovative techniques, a suspect, who was a serial rapist, was identified, arrested and convicted, thereby removing him from society and contributing to making Chesterfield County a safe and secure community; and WHEREAS, Sergeant Ott, during his tenure as a detective, was commended and recognized for his heroic actions during the investigation of a bank robbery suspect; as the suspect was firing shots at two FBI agents, Detective Ott was able to chase and tackle him, and the suspect was quickly subdued and charged with attempted murder and several counts of bank robbery, and for his brave actions, Detective Ott was awarded the Police Department's Medal of Valor; and WHEREAS, in 1996, Sergeant Ott was selected by the County Administrator to serve on the police chief selection committee, whereby, Colonel Carl R. Baker was hired; and WHEREAS, Sergeant Ott has received numerous letters of thanks and appreciation for service rendered to the citizens of Chesterfield County and has provided the Chesterfield County Police Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Sergeant Ott's diligent service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 12th day of March 2008, publicly recognizes Sergeant A. E. "Lonnie" Ott, and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County appreciation for his service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Sergeant Ott, and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County. ~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 =~ ' AGENDA ~RCtNl Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 5.C. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Members of the Public Information Committee Formed by the Department of Real Estate Assessments for their Contributions in Creating an Informational Brochure for Residents of Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: This resolution will recognize the citizens who volunteered to serve on the Public. Information Committee formed by the Department of Real Estate Assessments. Preparers Jonathan Davis Title: Director, Real Estate Assessments Attachments: ®Yes ~ No # ~~®8"~~~ WHEREAS, a Public Information Committee ..formed by the Department of Real Estate Assessments was activated for the purpose of creating an informational brochure for residents of~ Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, it was the goal of the committee to assist citizens in understanding the methods, practices, and procedures of the real estate assessment process; and WHEREAS, there was a desire and need for citizen input and participation on the committee in order to more effectively identify and understand the informational needs of residents; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Dale O. Bishop, a 10-year resident of Chesterfield County; Ms. Dorothy S. Bruno, a 14-year resident of Chesterfield County; Mr. Joseph L. Dotson, III, a 44-year resident of Chesterfield County; Mr. John Maguire, a 12-year resident of Chesterfield County; Mrs. Jean B. Webber, a 42-year resident of Chesterfield County; and Mrs. Sandra Walker, a 33-year resident of Chesterfield County, volunteered to serve on the Public Information Committee; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Bishop, Ms. Bruno, Mr. Dotson, Mr. Maguire, Mrs. Webber and Mrs . Walker freely gave of their time to meet for several months to assist the committee in the development and design of this informational brochure; and WHEREAS, the contributions of Mrs. Bishop, Ms. Bruno, Mr. Dotson, Mr. Maguire, Mrs. Webber and Mrs. Walker to the committee were invaluable in meeting its goal; and WHEREAS, the brochure was completed, printed and distributed January 18, 2008, to residents along with annual real estate assessment notices; and WHEREAS, the brochure was well received and appreciated by residents of Chesterfield County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 12th day of March 2008, publicly recognizes the contributions of Mrs. Dale O. Bishop, Ms. Dorothy S. Bruno, Mr. Joseph L. Dotson, III, Mr. John Maguire, Mrs. Jean B. Webber and Mrs. Sandra Walker, and extends appreciation for their willingness to volunteer their services to the county. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a presented to Mrs. Bishop, Ms. Bruno, Mr. Webber and Mrs. Walker and -that this recorded among the papers of this Board of County, Virginia. copy of this resolution be Dotson, Mr. Maguire, Mrs. resolution be permanently Supervisors of Chesterfield ~~~~~~ ~`~`'~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 -~,N,~ AGENDA Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 6. Subject: Work Session on the County Administrator's Proposed FY2009-FY2010 Budget County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Hold a work session on the County Administrator's Proposed FY2009- FY2010 Budget Summary of Information: This time has been set to continue work sessions on the County Administrator's Proposed FY2009-FY2010 Budget. This work session will include presentations of the Management Services Division and the Police and Fire and EMS budgets. Budget work sessions will continue on April 2nd and a final work session is scheduled for April 9th' At the April 9th work session, changes to the proposed budget will be reviewed prior to adoption. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director Budget and Management Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No #O~Dmf)~~ ~JV O O O O C~ O 0 0 ~'~ O n~~~ o ~J C~ ° ~ ~ o C~J oo ~ ~ Q ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ 0 ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ C~ ~ ~ o0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 L_ ®~~.~ ~~~~~~, Q ,~ ~' ~;~ 1` ~; ,~,.. a~ Maa .'~ ~: c~~~;, ~:~ .~, -. C-~:~:,= ~--,}} ~ t.; ~g~ C ~ 1 4'. rv. ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ A1~1 • rl Eli/ F~~"1 ~~ ~ ~ •~ A~ ~hh/nn ~/~l~l O ~ ~ U •~ O ~ •.~ y o "~ ~~~ ~ ~ N [~ . ,._, ~ r..+ \ . ,.., U O .U ~/ ~ ,--~ O U ~ ~ ~ o .~ a~ ~ --~ .,.., ~ ~ ~~~ F, °~ o ~ o ~ Q t ~ ~~~ V :. ~~ a ~~ a C., . :_ 4~~ ~- ~, ~,: J r ~ ~ U • •~ O ~ . ,-" ~ . ,~ ~ ~ D1 N l~ "'" b4 . ,.., U ,--+ G~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ .~ .~ a~ p.~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o .~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ , ~ ~N ~ ~-' ~`1 c~ ~ O\ ~ ~T w UM M .^, U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M c~ {~ ~ ,._, ~ ~ • .~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ w r~TT~ h~ o • 0 U V .--. O U ~ ~ ~ o .,..~ ~ .,.., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ E-~ °~ o ~ ~ .--a O ~ {, , ~~ ~~~ 0 ~~, .: ~~ ~;~ ~ ~~ ®~~~~~ 1 N ~ d ~ >, ~ O ~ ~ ~ W W N O V ~ •d N .F+ G ~ L 0 v a O ~ L ~d L Z d O ~ ~ ~ ~ N A ~ O ~ ~ d ~ ~' W O ~ N ~ d W •v C ~ ~ ~ O +-' V ~ ~ ~ O i L ..Q Z ~i ' ~~pc' I 9 O I~ - ~~ '~ II -1 - ~ O i c~ z N. - O - ~0 0 C~ ~ - ~~ ~ N ~! _ .., ~ - ~9 6 ~, ~ ~ O H O In O Lf) O Lt7 O ~ ,( tnct~MMNN~~ N N N N N N N N N ~~~~~~ ~~-J C~, J `ta'1{ •t y~ _% + ~ J ,• ,r ;z x, y rk .~ ' T?!1 :'; :3 . ~S f * . F wi- J x a. gj, ~ [~~r_ C ~ I O O O O O 8 ~ © D O Q 8 ~ to ~ M N ~ ~~~~~~ d 8 ~~~~~~ `.,wry, "r; ~4' t~y'ai. ;x,~,, n~.~.. ~ „,*,y.,. ~ , i ,., w °~~ o~ ~~re ~, ~~;, ~,~0 a".. ~ .p~,., 4.-TJ wr,i,, ~~ w:~ ~~ " -'~ ~ ' ~ ~~ ~`~, ' ^~ '.3~,n". ° ~FO~. yip O ~$~ I V.~,; ~ 4 °~ O ~~yd~'~d~ 4.~N„~ {„ ,~ si''. ,, a ~~' ., S S i ., p~,.i ie ~i!., •"~I ~. e' ~ r ~ ' "I'rk' u ' ~ ~' ~ x~ ,. ` ~ ~ ~ Chi _ N ~ ~ ~ .d _ ~ ~ d ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "J g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ® ~ ~ ~,. ~ Q MM W N I IAA W ,. . `~~ ~ I ~V ~ .. ~ ~ I . Q. ® ~' 0 Ln S-/~ ~/ M O el' ~!' ~} ® O ® O . Vl VI.. VJ VT i b u.,, u~~ ~~., 6,~ fir. ',M .~ 4~ I", .:~~r t ~I'. u„ ~'~ ".1: .~;'i~ nS~Iro~~il~W~N ~~r#L .i +r ~ 'v Ir ~ ~/' 1, ' F ~ a i e V ~, b,~a~ .n o~~ .~i .fir~• _~.~~, ~ e._ . ~.''~iuw~im.~auim~ .. 2•n o ~,~. ,.- - ~' ,''~~~ I ~~~~~4 ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~®~~~ 00 .~ a a 0 d a 0 a -~~ ~--~ 0 0 0 0 O ef" 0 N 0 Q ~~®~~~ CG ct N O O O N f6 t0 N ~ N } } } o a Oc K d C V N N ~, 0 W 0 N N d V N C m d t0 C t3 - (V O N O _ ~ ~ CV ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _. n ~ O ~ O ti n~ - ~ G~ a y f V O y~o '1 ty p '' i ~; { p~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ .: ~ r i! ~ ,~ i ~ - 3~ 53 x a .~ y I _ ~ ~, ~ ~ ,Gy Y - : Y ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ :, a ~ - ~ F ~ - _ _ ,~ 't ,: t fn U ~ I- w Z ~ F- W () Z i- W F- W Z ~ cn ~ W O ~ m ~ Z Z Z d W F- U w Z W ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ z m W Q w D 0 ~ w Z U ~ ~ w ~ ~ w ~ ~ w W w w ~ z p z a z U U U J ~ ~ Z ,~ F- U O Z Q ° Q ~ ~ ~ ~ a Z w Z ~ w ~ o ~ ~ O ~ LL Z ~ w Z W U LL ~ ~ ~ d ~ j a ~ ~ can a w = w w ~ z o w w r E- Z o O z O J ~ Q ~ ~ W W W ~ w ~ F- a ^. W tio6a;e~ d U N C O d c ~~~~~~ C~ o~ e c~ O Q ` .. .O O V(<O r ' W -~. _, `. f ~ ~ O u ~' , ~ , < r ~\ : ~ - ` ~' ~4 '~-{ ~ rO 1~. ~ ° O Y `-' `./ ~O ,Y^I ' ~ III ;` `\ - . kF _ _ , ~ ~,~ . .f .A _ .. o S W ",'~ ~ A CY - .~j O '`~ ~ ~ ;5 a„' ~ ~ ~°o ~ ,i y ~ °a ~ Fq •~ " R .Fq .~ '~ ~ ~ ". ~ ~ g , r o ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ : ' }d ....~ A ,y. - ®®aA~V ~~~ ~e~1 N O N ~ ~ ~ C '~ N N ll r» C ~ ~ ~ v d O V N C O O '` a' ~ N O O O O O ~~ L r ~ 00 O ~ N O +~ ' ' ~ " i „< < r ~ i~ _k~ ~' . ~ ~ t ~ ~ a r ~~~~ y ww,, ~ @ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ^ -^. u .i ~; ik%~ ~ ~ ' n k i ~ ;~~ . MM 1.~ 1 aln~Ir~ u ~ . ~.~ ._ ' ww,, W l ~ N~4 i, '~~ ~ k L ~ a ~I ~ ~ 1 `J y 1411 Iry` ~fL h ~ 0. O 5 L O O `O `O I/' I~ Q 0 1 0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ O ~/ ~ Ln O ~/ ~ In O ~/ ~ Ln ~;~~~ M N N ,- r ff3 ff~ {~ Ef3 Ef3~ ffl~ ~:~~ ~z'r ` w - ~ _ r r.x~ y ~. _ ~4 j ,~, iuF Q ~~ r ~I ~: T4,t~ (~~ ~J ~0 ~ ., o0 OCR ~, ~~ V 0 (a o o O ~~; O O L.J u o 0 O 0 ~ p~ ~ O O O ~ ~ ooa a oaco co ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ D ~ ~ -0 ~ ~ ~a° a~ ~ ,a ~ o o ~ o o ~ o ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ g g ~ . ~ o ~~ ~. ~ ~ a a ~~o a ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ oa (/~ (J~) c u o ~ ~ ~ o o o O ~ V1J ~ o~~ o a a o ~~ a ,a O ~ a ~, ~' ~ ~~ o~ a~ ao~ a~° ~~a ~d~ • ~~ 00 ~~ O © a o o a o 0 o a o o a o 0 0 0 o o ~~ a . , C~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ o ~ ~ o O ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ C~ a ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ Q o ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ o a c~ ~ ~ ~ ~° ~l a ~ a ~ ~ ~ o o o~~ o~ ~ o ~ ~ o ac~a ~~ o 0 o ~ a a ~~ ~ o o ~ go ~ ~ o O O o ~ o ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~o~ O ~ °° o o ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ o c~ ~ ~ o O U ~ ~ ~ ~ ° a o ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ o o~ ~ oo ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~--rl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ o o ~ ~ : g ®,, e .~} ;,. © Q ~ ~~~~~~ ~~ c?~ c ~ a a o ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ o o ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °~' U ~ °~ ~ ~ ° ~ a O °° ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o C~ ~' ~ O ~ C~ o o ~ ~ o o~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ o ~~ a~~ O ~~o~~~ ~° ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~aoa~~~ 0 °~ ~ °° C~ ~ ~~~ao ~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ °~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ o a a ~ a u~~~.~s~ ~'~®~a~~ Q~®~~~ ~~®Q~o3~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ®~~~~ b v; s `,J u V, ,,,, 00 0 Q O a a 00 ~ ~ °~ ~ ~ S° ~° ~ ~~° ~~ ~~~ a o~~ ~~~ ~o~ _~ ~~ ~ 00 ~~ ~~ a ~ ~ ~ o~ o~ o ~ ~ ~ a d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °° C~ ~ ~ ~ a ~Q ~~~ ~ ~a C~~ ~ a a ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~a o~ ~~ ~o~~, b ~ oo ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ 000 ~~~ a 00 0 ~~ a~~~ a~ 0 0 0 ~~~.~~z 00 ~ ~o ~~ ~ ~ Q~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ a~ ~ ~ a o0 o 00 ~ ~ ~ p ~ c~ o0 00 ~ o0 ~~ °~ ~c~~ ~~ ~ a~~~ o~ o ~ C~ 00 0 ° ~ ~~ ~ o~ ~~o o~ ~ ~~~~ ~°° moo ova ~~ ~ ~~ ° ~ ~ d o°~ ~o ~ °o~o 0o a ~ ~ ~ a o 00 °o o ~ ~~ a ~~ o~ ~~ ~~~o ~ ~ o off- o ~ ~~ a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ oac~o--, ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ o ~ a ~~ o00 0 ~ o~ ~ ° ~° ~ o a ~ oo ~ 0000. ~~ a~~c~ ~~o ~ o ~~ [o - ~ [o ~ o co o ~ o 0 0 0 ~~~~~~ w ~ O + ~Z Z Z ~Z ~ co 0 m 0 ~° C • `1 O r O O O N O N O to ~ ~ O o N ~ N ~ ~ v ~ °r ~ ~ M fA N ~ O O O ' ~ COO N ~ o O ,~ ao O j ~ ~ N, a0 ~ ~ N M ER N u ~ ~ O O ~ O O O ~ O O ^ ~ O N ~ O M N ~ O ~ O O O f~ M ~ CEO O) N `n o ~ rNi v ~ ~ ui l0 ~ M EA N r O O M O W ONO O O N o O N ~ ~ M N V ~ to ~ ~ ~ N M N ~ ~ O a0 O j N N M ~ o ~ O N ~ ~ O N W M ~ ~ V ~ N fA N ~ •~ Q O O O N O a0 CO N vO ~ o O ~ N a ~ _ N N ~ j C ~ co 'a N fH N ~- C ~ O i O OOi ~'-~ ~ o N ~ a o Q ~ ~i ~ co ~ v ~ r N _ ER N ~ N O M O o O f~ rn ^ M 00 CO r O ~ 00 M ~ N ~ N fA N ~ r O M O O ~ ~ ~ O I~ t0 N ~ ~ ~ o o N ~ N v ~ ~ ~ O ~ . > • ~ N ~ ~ M O M ~ o N i N fl ~ v3i a ~ .Z d N ;; N a '° d W d O U d N V R' (j ~ d N (C ~ v ~ N~ rn i:+ y a C E ~ ~ C d C O O O C V 7 Q t C 7 .+ Y! ~ N ~ O v y ~ . d O ~ i ~ .~+ O O. 10 y l0 m d O z C) C 5° ~ d ° °c3 ~. ~~ { am a U Ua c~ ~a _ ~ F~ v~ m` c~ v ~, m c~ m c~ d `m c~ d m c~ N m c~ O q N y N N N N~ N N N N 1 U U U U U U ~~~~~~ C~ ,~ - ca V o lC~ ~ O_ V O O O O a M V • - . M N CO N M O) ~ N O ~ O 00 O ~ r ~ N CO ~ O N N M O) ~ O O ~ CA 00 ap O ~ 00 r ~ N O N ~ O O CA o 0 ~ N M O r N O ~ r 00 ti O ~ tf') 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N r O_ ~ ~ N ~ N M ~ r N O O ~-- ~ ti O O ~ CNO ~ N ~ ~ CO ~ ~ ~ O N M ~ ~rj ~ N O ~ r p ~ ~ ~ • O t~C) 00 0 ti ~ ~ N to N p ~ N M ~ r N O f~ ~ ~ O 00 • ~' ~ C r ~ M 00 ~ M N M ~ r r ~ lf) ~ CA ~ N M 0 ~ ~ e- r ~ 1 p ~ N 0 I~ ~ p ~ ~ COO ~ f~ O N M I~ O r N O to r C7 r ~ ~ O Ln M M p) O ~ CA O O N M ~ ~' (O ~ O ' O N M I~ ~ ~ N ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ O r ~ ~ ~ O p ~ ~ N O ~ N M ~ r r O r r ~ • , p ~ ~ 000 ~ N ~ O M 000 A O N N ~ p r N O ~ r nj ~ C Cp v E> E> E> ~ d w ' ' ' ~ s i+ ~ v H v ~ v Q L N ~ d) _ _ d aayi ad aayi 1- cNi d ~ O O V A v~ v O ~ c ~ c ~ c O- ~ d N i d y d ~ ~ sy ~ d a°' d L~ F- O >o,~ m 'off o` c` E~ v ~ o ~ c =o o "c o N M OV d p . G fA ~ L L m m 01 ~`> y d 01 ~`> y d 01 ~'> ~ Z vJ O ~ ~ ~ ` 0) ~ ' ~ ! O N ~ 3 d i ~ ~ ~Q ` ~ ` ~Q ` ` ` ~Q ~ ~Q" ~ L r ~ '~ ~ p ~ ~ it ~ ~ LL ~ Q a .0+ ~ Q ~' w ~ Q ~' .~+ F r O• Z~ 7 d Z~ Q. ~ O H V C !,~ . i f0 f0 fC fC f0 fC f0 N s ~} ~~ ~~ m} ~} ~} ~~ ~} ~ ~ U U U U U U U U. ®~Q~~~ ~i b o a 0 o ~ o a a a o 0 p ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~° ~ c~ `~ Q o p o 0 d ~ ~ o a ~~ o Q ~ p (nvhl O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ °° a o0 O 00 4 d o ~ O O CQ ~~ a o ~Q Qo ~nUU (^v~ ~ V 0 0 ~~ C~ Ls~ ° 0 Q O Q 0 ~~®~~ !" a~ c:, ~v _~~ ~, ~ O o . a 0 ~~~~~t~ b i OG~ `~J\ W v U d . L`JiCJ o 00 ~ o Q O a uuuuuuup ~ ~~ CT' I . ; o r r !' O p I u, r c ~-~'® n o ~O '~ o~ y e~ 1® ~O p C:J ~. o ~O 0 A -,. .o ~ '® ~ ~ ~ Q °8 p° ~-~ -~©a 0 o M ~J 00 _^ o o _ o 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 p 0 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G' C~ C~ C~ ~-5~ ~~ o , a 0 0 ~~®~~~ b - c~ `-~1-J 0 ~~ L:CJ a Q oo ~° ~n O UU o oo~ v ~J ~ 00 a oo o O O 4 r--~ ,-~~ O0 ~ : ~~ 0 O OD 0 0 0 0 0 ~~0~~®. o ~ 3~ ° a ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 p ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Q Q a ~ ~ ~ p ao ~ a [~ [,~ ~ U ~ o ~ C~ ~ @~ Q 4 - nO~~ O 00 ~ OO ~ O o ~ ~ ~ p a ~ ~ ~J C~1 U ~ ~z a~ a` o ~ Q ~ ~ p o a ~ c ~ o a ~ a o a a ~ ~ ~ °~ a ~ o ~ ~ o a 00 ~ o Q ~ ~ o o ~ ~ a ~ ~ o~ o o O ~ ~ o0 ~ °~ ~ oo a ~ o' ,a~ o ° ~ o ~° `J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ [~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ oo a ~ ~ o o c ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~®o~~~. o IuM~L U 0 v ~J oo ~1~1 0 O o o a 00 0 Q n~° ~~ a ~J ~ ~ ~~ OD o 0 ~~ 00 -_l ~ b oa 0 0 0 ~~ ~~~~~~ o o Q i b o p ~ o p ~ ~ (^ 1 ~ ~ (^n\ U ~ a o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, o ~~ a a ~ 00 a o ~ o 0 O O a o o~ o , oa ~ ~ a oo ~ d ~ d 0 0 ~ ~ o ~ o ~ oo a o ~ 0 0 0 0 0 1 ; ' ~~~ ~~®~~~ 00 G=1 ~~ ,~ cJ; ti ~~~ ~~; u ~~~ ~ j J O O - 0 Q ~ ' 0 ': -: O ~ m 1, O c 01 _, 0 ~o .~~~ ~o~o~o ,,, y 0 , b{ - - 0 'i ~~;~ ~~r ~~®~~~ 0 c~ o a ~ 0 a ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g o ~ o a ° ~~ ~° ~ o O °~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ a ~ a a ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ o ~~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ a 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ o~ o~ oo ~~ a° ~~ o ~~ ~ a ~ o~ a ~ a o ~ oo ~ ~ o o ~a ~a a ~ ~ o ~ ~ i ~ p a ~ o i ®®~~~~ ~~~~~ `-° i. ooop °O ~t , ,. , } r y p O ~v~..' ~+55s Fir ~~~~ x ~''9 .3, r a.a ~~~ e ~, -I I ~ I ~;~ ~n_~lt ~ ~ ant 1#,~^A~.~k~J~ Y { ~:a: ;a~ ~, r~ I! ~C h ~ ,, o 0 4 ~ ~ ! ~~ -ti~~,~ ~ gym, ~;t ~~ t :s O O 00 0 1~ p ° o ~ ' t ~ ~~~ o ~ L°J _ ~ 4 O ~ Z 't c ~ t # ~~ `4 p C l^1 4 (f(x~~.I 4 loL O Q LL~IJ. '~.i .... ~~~'. O ~~~___~~~ I ~ ~ ., ~ r,~!, O p ~ ~ ~~~ - . ~ ~ y ~~ ~ ° ~~ o ~..J l~ ~ ~ ~ + o o ~~~ O ~ I I ~~; ~ ~ ~~~ O ~~ {~ ~' ~ ~~ -~ o I p ., o ! -~i ! G 1 I ~ ~~~ Q ~ i + ~ ri v ~ ~ +i, ' O ~~ty, O ~--~.~ ~;~ ,~ C~ 1 ~ ° ~ :r ~.. ~~~~~~ ° o l~ l~ p p ~ ~ o ~ ~fi 0 0 ?f 1 }.. g.{. 1' 1 1 ®®\.+'~~ ~~ ~~ ap 0~ ~~ ao a "' :C ~ ~, ~ ~ ~~~ ® ~ ~aO 0 P 4! N ~ CV~'t' _ ~ . N N .(p N ~ V :a J`. ,`, N _ Q ~ ~ r$~ C . ~: ~ ~ _ "a L. ~ :a~~. ~f/l. ~ •N ~j ~~ a- °' ~ :a a ~~- o ~ O .a ~ a ,,,n ~~~~ C~, :~~ ~~ a ~ ' C~ a ~ ~~,. ~ ~ ~ ~~3 (~, ~~~ ~ ~j :1 r- I ._ ~.LTJ ~ . ~ ~ I o , i ~} ~~' r t ' Illl...{rrriii®1 _ .a~. _ ~~~ ~a ~ y i ~.y N ~> . 0~1~~ ~oo_, ~~ °~' a: ti ~ ~`~~~~ :0.~,~ l'Ci,. Q ~.0 ~0:~ 0 h ~~~~5~ L N ~ ~~ L V ~ 'i/~ N; V, O ~ o O ~ ~ ~m ° N ~'' N ~ Ilj N ~ ~ ~ ~.~ 'Vl ~ ~ ,.., o p ~: v,~ L ~'. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~` Z,'y..~ ~ , ~ _ y Qy~ ~ L~~ , , 4-~; ~~ .~ • ;; ' ~7i :{ C~~ L~I 1 d~ . , ti ~ C~,. ~~ • ~~ T/1 N i • ~` ~ ~~~f ~cO~ N 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~_ v ~ "` `~ ~ r l~ . ~ a t,f .0~~. ~ C' fl' , o.,:`n -..,:~ ~~®~~® O D ~l°~ ~ 0 a~l a 0 ~ m 00 o O a~ ~ C ~ ~`. ~ } ~' ~ N ® ~~ u ~`a~ !~~ `, cV o°p;~o ~~ M ~ 'N tix~ _~ k L a~ ~~ ~ ##~~ vi ° ~ ~ 0 ..~~j . +r % o ~ ~~ {. ..= N ~ ~ ~ u - ~j' s .:U °° ~ rte. ` '~~; [~j , ~~~ $;~ .. {~ ~--; . ~~'~ ~~ ~' ~~ .; :a ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 C~~ :! ;{ ~~ ~~' ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ i ', v 1 t y (~j f z ~ •,.. p ~ ,~ I a N ~ O ~ ~,;Ti a,~.,, . ~ ~ i0 .~ .. ~ ~. ti ~~ ~ ~_~ ~ .~ V~ ~p~~ ~. ~` ~ (p. ., r .:, . , ~~'. :,. ~~ ~~ ~~ a~ c~ 8 ~~ ~~ a o~ ~ L C~J C N .~i , 2 ~ ~~ :-.;~ ~' .O O ~" U ,~°: ~~ . N ++ C' ,. ~' ~~~ ~ N tlo~~ °o~ ti M . r C V ~ ~ ` ~ O N. m N,~. ~ N ~ ~_ N N ~ , N t~ O.~ ~~~ ~n C'!J' . •~ ~~J ~ , dpp ~ , .' C~, .; J (p f;; :~ ~n firr~,,, ,~ r .~ , .. i ,.L ~ ~ ,. C S -- ~ £ 'x a .. ~ N , °'~.~ `:~ v N N.. ~ ~ V :,. .~ .~ ~~~ ~ o p, O ~„ ,` ,. ti ~~~~~~ ~~ ®~~~ ~~®Q~~i~ ~~~~~ ®®~~~ 4. ~' ~ ~~ I 0 o _ o~~ga a 0 O ~ ooo~o C~ ° ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ a ~ 0 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ oo ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ °~ ° ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ o oa~~ oaf o~ ~' ~ ~ ~ a ~o o a ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ d o aC~ ~ ~ oc~ a p~ Qo ~J ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~~ ~ ~~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o0 a ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ C.~ Oo C~ Ooh oho 0~~ ~ ~ a~~ 0 o ~n~ o O O s ii ~~ 'l~J' V '~./ Y'7 ~ ~ __ (~~®~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ O OO OQ O OO O ~~ 'i o ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ C~ o ~ ~ ~ a ~: 00 r Oo ~ _ " o Q Q ®~~~~~ ~~®~~"~- ®~~~~ '~ .` =r O o ~'~ o~ O Q a ao /i-.1 a ~ ~v o ~ ~ o O ~ ~0 ~ a oo a ~ ~ ~ ~~ oo ~ ~~tl ~o, O ~°~ O C) ~7 4 O ~ ~ ~ a ~~ ~ Q O o ~ O ~°~.QO a 0 ~ 4 0 ~ c,, ~0 ° d ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ° ~ ~ O ~~ c~ o a~~ d~a o 0 ~ ~~ ~~ o a ~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O C~ ~ o0 0 0 °~ a ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~~~ `I'~~ ,1i.., ~ ~ k ~ F~r~~~ 1 ~ 8~ad7R.`. ~ I q, ~ ~ J11~ d 5` ~~®~~~ ®®~~~ i O o OO ~ a ~ 00 a ~ ~ ~ o a ~ n ~ O ~'~ ~v °~~ a 0 v \J ~. O ~J(/ lV~/.1~~ O ~~ ~ v U ~ ~o v o O O O ~ GJ ~ ~ ~\ wJ U ~ ~ ~ OQ ~ O (~ 1 ~7 ~ J J v ~ v ~- o v O d O 4 O - p p O Q O 0.. . 4 . 0 O 0 4 p 00 O 0 p O O ~ 4 ~ l ~~~~~~ ®Q~~~~ ~~~~~J d J (~'~~~~~ ~~®~~~ ~~~~~~ ;, G~ aa_ u 0 a „- a ~,:1 v~ 0 a ~/ ~~c> f )' , ~~l{ ti's , S7 ,' LqT , ~~~~~ ~ ~r C~ r~i ..'+v,~iln ,, ~ ~•J®~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY `~ ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 h~,Na AGENDA Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 7.A. Subject: Deferred Item - Consideration of Road Impact Fees County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: (1) Adopt Amendment to Comprehensive Plan to add attached "Road Improvement Plan" (2) Adopt impact fee ordinance. Summary of Information: On January 9 and February 13, 2008, this Board held two public hearings to consider a proposed impact fee program, including a draft impact fee ordinance. Staff proposed that the ordinance 1) create impact fees for residential development only, 2) establish a $5,820 impact fee per residential lot payable at the time of the issuance of a building permit, 3) apply the impact fee solely to property already zoned residential but not yet subdivided, 4) exempt cash proffer and CDA lots from the impact fee program, and 5) exempt "work-force housing"(less than $200,000 assessed value) and family subdivisions from impact fees. Based on comments from Board members at the January 9 public hearing, staff subsequently listed the County's top priority road projects to be built with impact fees (attached "Priority County Road Projects") and specified in the attached Comprehensive Plan amendment that impact fees should be used to fund these priority road projects. Preparers Steven L. Micas Title: County Attorney 0425:78101.1 (76653.1; 77193.1; 77192.1; 77177.1; 77176.1) Attachments: ~ Yes No #OOOU90 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA The Board closed the public hearing on February 13 and continued the matter to this meeting. The original impact fee ordinance discussed with the prior Board is attached as Ordinance A. An amended ordinance reflecting all of the changes discussed above is attached as Ordinance B. Staff recommends that the Board amend the Comprehensive Plan to add the attached "Road Improvement Plan" and then adopt Ordinance B. ~~~~~~ Chesterfield County Impact Pee Program Road Improvement Plan First Adopted by the Board of Supervisors [date] ~~®~~~ 0425:76653.1 Chesterfield County Impact Fee Program Road Improvement Plan Pursuant to Article 8, Chapter 22 of Title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia, (Va. Code § § 15.2-2317 - 2327), the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors has adopted an impact fee program to pay, in part, the cost of transportation improvements necessitated by certain residential development. As part of the impact fee program, the Comprehensive Plan of the County must be amended to add a "Road Improvement Plan". The Road Improvement Plan consists of a listing of transportation improvements necessitated by 20 years of development, based on the County's current growth projections. The listing is created by utilizing the County's Thoroughfare Plan and a computer-based transportation model (TP+). The listing of projected transportation improvements and a map showing such projected improvements are included below and constitute the Impact Fee Road Improvement Program. The schedule for the construction of road improvements using impact fees is the same schedule currently used for the construction of road improvements using cash proffer funds. The Transportation Department will review, on a quarterly basis, the impact fees that are collected by the County. When sufficient funds have been collected and/or future collections are anticipated in a timely manner to fund improvements, the Transportation Department will request the Board of Supervisors to make appropriations of the fees and. give approval to proceed with the improvements. The Transportation Department currently prefers approximately $500,000 to be collected before it will proceed with road design and right of way acquisition. The Transportation Department will usually need $1 million or more in order to construct a viable transportation project. The Transportation Department will also consider supplementing VDOT funding on a project with impact fees if the fees will allow the project to be constructed. 0425:76653.1 ~ ~ ~~ DRAFT IMPACT FEE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN "NON-SMOOTHED" 812012007 ROAD FROM TO WIDEN TO # LANES 288 POWHITE PARKWAY ROUTE 10 6 ALVERSER DRIVE MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE HUGUENOT ROAD 4 ARCH ROAD MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE REAMS ROAD 4 ASHBROOK PARKWAY ASHLAKE PKWY OTTERDALE ROAD 2 BAILEY BRIDGE ROAD DEER RUN CLAYPOINTE ROAD 2 BALDWIN CREEK ROAD HULL STREET ROAD ASHLAKE PARKWAY 4 BEACH ROAD NASH ROAD ROUTE 10 6 BEACH ROAD NASH ROAD WOODLAND POND 2 BEACH ROAD BUNDLE ROAD SECOND BRANCH 2 BELMONT ROAD WHITEPINE ROAD JESSUP ROAD 4 BERMUDA HUNDRED ROA[ ENON CHURCH ROAD ALLIED ROAD 2 & 4 BEULAH ROAD SALEM CHURCH ROAD HOPKINS ROAD 6 BEULAH ROAD KINGSLAND ROAD SALEM CHURCH ROAD 2 BEULAH ROAD HOPKINS ROAD MEADOWDALE BLVD 4 BOULDERS BLVD MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE JAHNKE ROAD 6 BUFORD ROAD FOREST HILL AVENUE MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE 4 & 6 CENTERPOINTE PARKWAY OLD HUNDRED ROAD 288 4 & 8 CENTRALIA ROAD ROUTE 10 CHALKLEY ROAD 2 CENTRALIA ROAD CHALKLEY ROAD CHESTER ROAD 4 CHALKLEY ROAD CENTRALIA ROAD ROUTE 10 2 CHARTER COLONY PKWY GENITO ROAD POWHITE PARKWAY 8 CHESTER ROAD JEFFERSON DAVIS NORMANDALE 4 CHESTER ROAD NORMANDALE CENTRALIA ROAD 8 CHESTER ROAD CENTRALIA ROAD RR R/W 6 CHESTER ROAD RR R/W ROUTE 10 4 COURTHOUSE ROAD REAMS ROAD HULL STREET ROAD 8 COURTHOUSE ROAD HULL STREET ROAD GENITO ROAD 6 COURTHOUSE ROAD GENITO ROAD 288 8 COURTHOUSE ROAD 288 ROUTE 10 6 COURTHOUSE ROAD EXT ROUTE 10 SALEM CHURCH ROAD 2 CRANBECK ROAD ROBIOUS ROAD KOGER CENTER BLVD 4 EASTFAIR DRIVE NASH ROAD WOODPECKER ROAD 4 ELKHARDT ROAD PROVIDENCE ROAD HULL STREET ROAD 4 ENON CHURCH ROAD RUFFIN MILL ROAD POINT ROCKS ROAD 4 ENON CHURCH ROAD POINT ROCKS ROAD ROUTE 10 6 EW ARTERIAL MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE OTTERDALE ROAD 2 EW ARTERIAL OTTERDALE ROAD DRY BRIDGE ROAD 4 EW ARTERIAL DRY BRIDGE ROAD OLD HUNDRED ROAD 2 FOREST HILL AVENUE HUGUENOT ROAD COUNTY LINE 4 GENITO ROAD WOOLRIDGE ROAD BRANDERMILL PARKWAY 2 GENITO ROAD BRANDERMILL PARKWAI CHARTER COLONY PKWY. 4 GENITO ROAD CHARTER COLONY PKW HULL STREET ROAD 6 GENITO ROAD HULL STREET ROAD COURTHOUSE ROAD 6 HAPPY HILL ROAD HARROWGATE ROAD JEFFERSON DAVIS 4 HARROWGATE ROAD ROUTE 10 HAPPY HILL ROAD 4 HARROWGATE ROAD JEFFERSON DAVIS EAST WEST FREEWAY 2 HICKORY ROAD NORTH SOUTH FREEWA~ MATOACA ROAD 4 HOPKINS ROAD CHIPPENHAM PKWY BEULAH ROAD 6 ~~®Q~~~ HOPKINS ROAD BEULAH ROAD OLD LANE 4 HOPKINS ROAD CHIPPENHAM PKWY COUNTY LINE (NORTH) 2 HUGUENOT ROAD ROBIOUS ROAD COUNTY LINE 8 HUGUENOT ROAD ROBIOUS ROAD KOGER CENTER BLVD 6 HULL STREET ROAD COUNTY LINE (WEST) POWHITE PARKWAY 6 HULL STREET ROAD OTTERDALE ROAD WOODLAKE PKWY 6 HULL STREET ROAD WOODLAKE PKWY SPRING RUN ROAD 8 HULL STREET ROAD 288 COUNTY LINE 8 JAHNKE ROAD BUFORD ROAD CHIPPENHAM PKWY 4 & 6 JEFFERSON DAVIS COUNTY LINE (NORTH) COUNTY LINE (SOUTH) 8 JESSUP ROAD BELMONT ROAD. ROUTE 10 2 & 4 KINGSLAND ROAD HOPKINS ROAD CHESTER ROAD 4 KINGSLAND ROAD .ROUTE 10 HOPKINS ROAD 2 KINGSLAND ROAD EXT ROUTE 10 BELMONT ROAD 4 LEWIS ROAD CARVER HEIGHTS RR R/W 2 LEWIS ROAD ROUTE 10 CARVER HEIGHTS 4 LUCKS LANE 288 COURTHOUSE ROAD 4 & 6 MATOACA ROAD RIVER ROAD HICKORY ROAD 2 MEADOWDALE BLVD HOPKINS ROAD JEFFERSON DAVIS- 4 MEADOWVILLE ROAD ROUTE 10 I-295 6 MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE COUNTY LINE WOOLRIDGE ROAD 6 MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE WOOLRIDGE ROAD BOULDERS BLVD: 8 MT. HERMON ROAD EXT NORTH SOUTH ARTERIA DUVAL ROAD 2 NASH ROAD BEACH ROAD EASTFAIR DRIVE 4 NASH ROAD WINTERPOCK ROAD EASTFAIR DRIVE 2 NEW ROAD WOOLRIDGE ROAD OLD HUNDRED ROAD 2 NEWBY'S BRIDGE ROAD HULL STREET ROAD COGBILL ROAD 4 NEWBY'S BRIDGE ROAD COGBILL ROAD BELMONT ROAD 2 NEWBY'S BRIDGE ROAD QUALLA ROAD 288 2 NORTH SOUTH ARTERIAL DUVAL ROAD SKINQUARTER ROAD 2 NORTH SOUTH ARTERIAL SKINQUARTER ROAD HULL STREET ROAD 2 OLD BERMUDA HUNDRED JEFFERSON DAVIS ROUTE 10 4 OLD BON AIR ROAD ROBIOUS ROAD BUFORD ROAD 4 OLD BUCKINGHAM ROAD MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE ALVERSER DRIVE 2 OLD CENTRALIA ROAD CHESTER ROAD ROUTE 10 4 OLD HUNDRED ROAD NEW ROAD DRY BRIDGE ROAD 2 OLD LANE HOPKINS ROAD CHESTER ROAD 4 OLD STAGE ROAD ROUTE 10 WARE BOTTOM SPRING 2 OSBORNE ROAD ROUTE 10 JEFFERSON DAVIS 4 OTTERDALE ROAD 288 MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE 2 PICKETT AVENUE RIVER ROAD COUNTY LINE (SOUTH) 4 PINETTA DRIVE MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE BUFORD ROAD 2 POCOSHOCK BLVD MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE HULL STREET ROAD 4 POWHITE PARKWAY COURTHOUSE ROAD CHIPPENHAM PKWY 6 PROVIDENCE ROAD MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE COURTHOUSE ROAD 4 QUALLA ROAD 288 COURTHOUSE ROAD 2 QUALLA ROAD 288 SPRING RUN ROAD 4 REAMS ROAD COURTHOUSE ROAD HULL STREET ROAD 2 & 4 RIVER ROAD HICKORY ROAD COUNTY LINE (EAST) 2 & 4 RIVER ROAD MATOACA ROAD NORTH -SOUTH FREEWAY 2 ROBIOUS ROAD HUGUENOT ROAD COUNTY LINE 6 ROBIOUS ROAD HUGUENOT ROAD MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE 6 ~~®~~~ ROUTE 10 ROUTE 10 ROUTE 10 ROUTE 10 RR R/W RUFFIN MILL ROAD RUFFIN MILL ROAD SALEM CHURCH ROAD SALISBURY ROAD SPRING RUN ROAD TURNER ROAD TURNER ROAD TURNER ROAD WALMSLEY BOULEVARD WHITE PINE ROAD WINTERFIELD ROAD WINTERFIELD ROAD WINTERPOCK ROAD WOODPECKER ROAD WOODPECKER ROAD WOODSEDGE ROAD WOOLRIDGE ROAD WOOLRIDGE ROAD CHIPPENHAM PKWY WHITEPINE ROAD WHITEPINE ROAD CHALKLEY ROAD CHALKLEY ROAD ECOFF ROAD ECOFF ROAD COUNTY LINE (EAST) EAST WEST FREEWAY LEWIS ROAD JEFFERSON DAVIS CONTINENTAL BLVD CONTINENTAL BLVD ENON CHURCH ROAD BEULAH ROAD CENTRALIA ROAD WINTERPOCK ROAD ROBIOUS ROAD QUALLA ROAD. HENSLEY ROAD HULL STREET ROAD MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE HULL STREET ROAD WALMSLEY BOULEVARD WALMSLEY BOULEVARD BELMONT ROAD HULL STREET ROAD COUNTY LINE ROUTE 10 BELMONT ROAD MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE SALISBURY ROAD SALISBURY ROAD COUNTY LINE HULL STREET ROAD SPRINGFORD EASTFAIR DRIVE EAST WEST FREEWAY NORTH SOUTH FREEWA~ LAKEVIEW JEFFERSON DAVIS ASHTON CREEK MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE 288 288 POWHITE PARKWAY 6 8 6 6 6 2 4 2 2 6 8 6 4 6 4 2 2 4 2 4 6&8 6&8 ~~~~~~ _ ~ ii C~ v th n r a ~°' n u n n ~ ~ iTt a d d air ~ a 7 ~' '~'~'~'3~°~m s vvvvv Q ~' ~r~ a a ~ a>>>>>E ~:? ;=~ ~ cccQV O ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ l~ Z U ~ f-- i ~~.- ~ I I I~ p _ iL GPI' I 1 + 1 1- ~ ~ (~ _ - __ ~ T 1 _ - 4-~-v 7~,J' `~ ~ _ _ t=i _ ~ ``- Y!r- - ~ i t ~`~ _' .: T .r,`' ' ~ ti '~ __-Y' f ~_ _ j i1t - 5 ~'t' +t r f_ ~ 2i i _- __ _ Q ~ LL ~' ~ '~ + ~ _ .~ -~•.-i.--_'~--__-_ iii ~ ~_ _ _ ~ y f - ,Fr '~ y ~ i ~ J~ ~ -i _ f -~~" ~ ~ ,~'~_~ ~ .'--rt-- ff=+-- -,~~j lI= ~ ~:,, -, _ L.L ~~ ;.`: ~~®~:~'~ ORDINANCE A AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING ANEW ARTICLE XVII TO CHAPTER 9 OF THE CODE RELATING TO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES TO FUND AND RECAPTURE THE COST OF PROVIDING REASONABLE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That the Code of the County o Chester geld, 1997, as amended, is amended by adding the following: Chapter 9 FINANCE AND TAXATION 000 ARTICLE XVII. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES Section 9-250. Establishing a system of impact fees. Pursuant to Code of Virginia § 15.2-2322, the county hereby establishes a system of impact fees to fund reasonable road improvements benefiting new residential development. In accordance with Code of Virginia § 15.2-2320, one or more impact fee service areas shall be designated by amendment to the county's comprehensive land use plan.. Such plan amendment may designate the entire county as one impact fee service area. Section 9-251. When impact fees determined and collected. (a) Pursuant to Code of Virginia § 15.2-2323, the amount of impact fees to be imposed on a specific development shall be determined no later than final subdivision or site plan approval. (b) Pursuant to Code of Virginia § 15.2-2323, the impact fee shall be collected for each residential lot or housing unit at the time a building permit is issued for such lot or housing unit. (c) No building permit shall be issued for a lot or housing unit on which an impact fee has been imposed unless the owner of the lot or housing unit, or his agent, has (i) paid the applicable impact fee or (ii) has executed an agreement provided by the county and secured by a bond or a letter of credit approved by the county, to pay the impact fee, in equal installments, over a period of no more than 3 years. If payments are made in installments pursuant to subsection (c) (ii), interest on the unpaid portion shall accrue interest at the rate specified in § 9-6 of this Code. (d) The calculation of an impact fee may be appealed by the owner or his agent to the Chesterfield County Board of Zoning Appeals. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the director of planning within 60 days of the calculation of the impact fee amount by the county. The owner or agent shall submit the substantive basis for his appeal to the director of 0425:77176.1 planning within 60 days of filing a notice of appeal. The decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals maybe appealed in accordance with state law. Section 9-252. Determination of the amount of the impact fee. a) The impact fee for a development shall be determined by dividing (i) the projected road improvement costs within the impact fee service area in which the development is located by (ii) the number of projected housing units within the impact fee service area when such area is fully developed. This calculation shall be based on the number of trips generated by each such housing unit. The projected road improvement costs for each impact fee service area shall be calculated in accordance with the county's road improvement plan as specified in Code of Virginia §15.2-232..1. b) The value of any dedication, contribution or construction from the developer for off-site road or other transportation improvements benefiting the impact fee service area shall be treated as a credit against the impact fees imposed on the developer's project whether by condition of zoning of other written commitment to the county. The county shall also calculate and credit against the impact fees the extent to which (i) other developments have already contributed to the cost of existing roads which will benefit the development, (ii) new development will contribute to the cost of existing roads, and (iii) new development will contribute to the cost of road improvements in the future other than through impacts fees, including any special taxing districts, special assessments, or community development authorities. c) The schedule of impact fees is: Use Impact Fee Residential $5,820 Commercial $ 0 Industrial $ 0 d) Any lot or housing unit which is subject to a transportation cash proffer or to increased taxes, assessments or fees for road improvements pursuant to a community development authority or a transportation service district, shall not be subject to the payment of impact fees. Section 9-254. Updating road improvement plan and amending impact fees. In accordance with Code of Virginia § 15.2- 2325, the Board of Supervisors shall update the impact fee road improvement plan at least every two years. The impact fee schedule shall be amended to reflect substantial changes in the road improvement plan. Any impact fees not yet paid at the time of the amendment to the impact fee schedule shall be assessed at the applicable amended amount. ~~®~~~ 0425:77176.1 Section 9-255. Use of impact fees. A separate road improvement account shall be established for each impact fee service area and all funds collected through impact fees shall be deposited in the appropriate account. Each account shall bear interest which shall become funds of the account. The expenditure of funds from the account shall be only for road improvements benefiting the impact fee service area as set out in the road improvement plan for such impact fee service area. Section 9-256. Refunds. The county shall refund any impact fee in accordance with the requirements of the Code of Virginia § 15.2-2327. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. ~~®~'~~ 0425:77176.1 ORDINANCE B AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING A NEW ARTICLE XVII TO CHAPTER 9 OF THE CODE RELATING TO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES TO FUND AND RECAPTURE THE COST OF PROVIDING REASONABLE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended by adding the following: Chapter 9 FINANCE AND TAXATION 000 ARTICLE XVII. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES Section 9-250. Establishing a system of impact fees. Pursuant to Code of Virginia § 15.2-2322, the county hereby establishes a system of impact fees to fund reasonable road improvements benefiting new residential development. In accordance with Code of Virginia § 15.2-2320, one or more impact fee service areas shall be designated by amendment to the county's comprehensive land use plan. Such plan amendment may designate the entire county as one impact fee service area. Section 9-251. When impact fees determined and collected. (a) Pursuant to Code of Virginia § 15.2-2323, the amount of impact fees to be imposed on a specific development shall be determined no later than final subdivision or site plan approval. No impact fee shall be imposed on a lot that has been created as part of a family subdivision in accordance with § 17-2 of this Code. (b) Pursuant to Code of Virginia § 15.2-2323, the impact fee shall be collected for each residential lot or housing unit at the time a building permit is issued for such lot or housing unit. (c) No building permit shall be issued for a lot or housing unit on which an impact fee has been imposed unless the owner of the lot or housing unit, or his agent, has (i) paid the applicable impact fee or (ii) has executed an agreement provided by the county and secured by a bond or a letter of credit approved by the county, to pay the impact fee, in equal installments, over a period of no more than 3 years. If payments are made in installments pursuant to subsection (c) (ii), interest on the unpaid portion shall accrue interest at the rate specified in § 9-6 of this Code. (d) The .calculation of an impact fee may be appealed by the owner or his agent to the Chesterfield County Board of Zoning Appeals: A notice of appeal shall be filed with the oa2s:~n~~.i ~~~~®1. director of planning within 60 days of the calculation of the impact fee amount by the county. The owner or agent shall submit the substantive basis for his appeal to the director of planning within 60 days of filing a notice of appeal. The decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals maybe appealed in accordance with state law. Section 9-252. Determination of the amount of the impact fee. a) The impact fee for a development shall be determined by dividing (i) the projected road improvement costs within the impact fee service area in which the development is located by (ii) the number of projected housing units within the impact fee service area when such area is fully developed. This calculation shall be based on the number of trips generated by each such housing unit. The projected road improvement costs for each impact fee service area shall be calculated in accordance with the county's road improvement plan as specified in Code of Virginia § 1 s.2-2321. b) The value of any dedication, contribution or construction from the developer for off-site road or other transportation improvements benefiting the impact fee service area shall be treated as a credit against the impact fees imposed on the developer's project whether by condition of zoning of other written commitment to the county. The county shall also calculate and credit against the impact fees the extent to which (i) other developments have already contributed to the cost of existing roads which will benefit the development, (ii) new development will contribute to the cost of existing roads; and (iii) new development will contribute to the cost of road improvements in the future other than through impacts fees, including any special taxing districts, special assessments, or community development authorities. c) The schedule of impact fees is: Use Impact Fee Residential $s,820 Commercial $0 Industrial $0 d) Any lot or housing unit which is subject to a transportation cash proffer or to increased taxes, assessments or fees for road improvements pursuant to a community development authority or a transportation service district, shall not be subject to the payment of impact fees. e) If the total assessed value of a lot and a dwelling constructed on that lot by a non-profit organization is less than $200,000, the lot shall not be subject to the payment of an impact fee. Section 9-254. Updating road improvement plan and amending impact fees. In accordance with Code of Virginia § 1 s.2- 232s, the Board of Supervisors shall update the impact fee road improvement plan at least every two years. The impact fee schedule shall be amended to reflect substantial changes in the road improvement plan. Any impact fees not yet paid at the time of the amendment to the impact fee schedule shall be assessed at the applicable amended amount. Section 9-255. Use of impact fees. A separate road improvement account shall be established for each impact fee service area and all funds collected through impact fees shall be deposited in the appropriate account. Each account shall bear interest which shall become funds of the account. The expenditure of funds from the account shall be only for road improvements benefiting the impact fee service area as set out in the road improvement plan for such impact fee service area. Section 9-256. Refunds. The county shall refund any impact fee in accordance with the requirements of the Code of Virginia § 15.2-2327. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. ~®~~_®3 0425:77177.1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~, '~°'~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA S . -- -- D, IN~p Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 7.B. Subject: Deferred Item - Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along the North Right of Way Line of Watkins Centre Parkway from Watkins Land, L.L.C. County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Accept the conveyance of three parcels of land acres along the north right of way line of Watkins Land, L.L.C, and authorize the County deed. Summary of Information: containing a total of 3.442 Watkins Centre Parkway from Administrator to execute the Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of three parcels of land containing a total of 3.442 acres along the north right of way .line of Watkins Centre Parkway from Watkins Land, L.L.C. for the construction of Watkins Centre Parkway. Construction of Watkins Centre Parkway occurring north of Rt. 60 is being financed by the Developer. Construction of Watkins Centre Parkway occurring south of Rt. 60 is being financed with bonds issued by the Watkins Centre Community Development Authority. One contractor is building both road segments under separate contracts with the Developer. Both the Memorandum of Understanding (between the County, Developer, Property Owners and the Community Development authority) and the Development Agreement (Between the Developer and Community Development Authority) require the Developer to ensure that the road improvements (CDA and non-CDA) are built in accordance with applicable governmental (vDOT) standards. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Right of Way Manager Attachments: Yes No # ,~ VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE ©F PARCELS OF LAND ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT ©F ~~fAY LINE OF RTATKIl~TS CENTRE PARICZVAY FROlVI ~'VATKIlVS LAND LLC N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities S 1 Irol egrda 65Bfi1 Ret ~~~~_®~ \ e> oo; :A m .. m~€ A ~~. ~ ~~ ~ ~ 9 y y Q S P A m Y ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 = ~ ~~ % m iT o ~ ~. ~~ ~b 1 r' .ate \ ~ ~~ °$ S ~ ~g Z ~-- : ~~ ~~ ~. o~ z 0 ~~ 00 N G O ~i N N m N ~ I i O _ A s 8, n. ~ tl E~, ~~. ~ w r°N$~~j DN C ~~~i ~`~' '~'~iu~~~ ~ ~av.~ ''E Qy ~ ~t P.+r. ~O NS0NJ4' 97gpl FNM ~ 'zG ~P~n ~N G N ' 4 . r ~ 7p W ~W~ o,~~~ =fin r~~.~N ~ ~ r $ n '6 ~ Crl. ~ ~ n ~ MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 4 - P ~dpnjywnromr .'~• ~~~~.®~ ' ~CO.pD ~ ~ / s ~~~~ ~tidr~*~ ~ ~~~~ g~v~ ~~c~^~ d A~~~~~ ' ' ?O\y ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ,y ~ . '.~. F { y~lS ~S.j ' . . . y O 22+I In 9 47 S g ~ . c + ,~ ti 44~~ 4 ~ ~ ~a 6~4 ~ ~'~ ~ ^,• a ~ K °~ ~ v x ~ ~ 9o.y m~ M ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ J ~~~ m ~ ~ W~ 4 a4o5 ' • 1 ~~ . Q N ~'~ G ^ X02 S y+' a gym[ Fri ~ titi ~4 ~ y Z < ^e ~~ ~ n0 ~ y r '+ N g~~~~~ ~~ yti z ~ 0~ ~ ~1~~~0 N L~nA mz fir - L19~~ ' t1` `'~ - ~ J .. . U7 L26 yg'1 - - L28 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C l28 !mil a pyCC p ~ °' .e.- ~ a~~ °Ao~ ~ ~ fi'b` W !+, ~ ~b 9 r = di ~ ~ Nj u: A I - ~. - - O ~ - .. Q7 Mq7~ ClgF S fF SM~~ g 4 e ~_ D ~ Z m~= n <~~ `~O~v~ F~ t 8 ~~~~ ~~ U1T~Z o~ 'p r ~ -~ z a ~ 70 W o- ~~u F~~ a ~~ n~~~ °~ o n ~ TI .. T ' ~~~ ~ .: 1gRVq~11AW1-~IDINRgpNCl~1., TO ~11pW10a1M1 . TI~~Oh~IS GROUP - ~.~ ..~«~.W~ ~~~~~~ ~~ a ~ ~ ~ A $ N ?v 9 5~ o~ 4g ~_ 7 4 o~Z }~s$~ <~ 2 y~ g~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ :a ~ ~~~ p~- ~~P~n O ~i 1 C W N I~ ~ (/1 .v~3 ro ~ . ~~ . Zj~ ~~ ~, ~~ ~~ ~~ nz~ ~ ~~ ~o~N ~~ / VN mu ~a ~ ~ o ny ~ ~~~~ ~ 1y~ S7p~ w ~~o° //~~~ ~ •• r b N ^~~ N A oqN r 1 < N _ - T 111 h+l O N S GROUP` .• •' "~• ~~'~°`'°~ ~~° w~ ~ uNE See _. ' ~®®~.®~ ~ I I I I', I , ~, I I I', I I. ~ I, yy,~ 6q I I~~ a~~l~Faa~pk~¢ II II'~ I C~ ..SLr.c•' I II I I~ I~ I ,, 1h~ O~ II Il~li „a,:: I II ~11~i I' 0o II I i rWr I.!^ +~ , ~ ~ '.I ~ . , 4 ~ ~ 7 I I , , g} :qi~ ~ ,I ~'I II ~ ~ ~ it I ~ ! ~~ :• ~y' ~ ~ r r ' I k / Y ~8d=-- „~ ~~ I AW I \ S ~ b p{~ ~~ I ~~ , ..- =: R II f Il~el, I ^ ~ Iri I, I~f I'i ff ~'^ ~ ~ l ~m II I'. I I I, 1 ~ I I' II 1'. ~ e~ I. I'~ I I I I ,, ', I', I I. I' I I', I ,, I I', I I,, I, ~ ' ~, I~ I f / II II 111 lip I I~, I I', I I', I I ~, I I~, 1 I ~, I. I 1 I I. ,,, ' I, I ' i I I . r $~ S I I I ~ e~ ~~ I I l i ' I ~I I 'il '.I I ~I pq 1$ ~os4Z?,~-9c ~ I ~~ I l~ ..r.ty'.. ~ I ~! I SS 9q9 XNF~e 4l:e ' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ..:L .. i I I ra tl I I I I I II ..~.. I p ~j gRqUC ~ I ~~SCIIPii~:i d. '«rem' I I Y ~t~9~l~kaa: I i8~ I I I I I ~ I I, I I I ~ ;I I I I i ~ 'i ., •• _~~ II t ',1'I I I u ~, I .I ~I ,I B ~, I ,, '~,'1i ~1 1111 1 F I it I ~~1 ~~ I IF I { '~ I ~I '~ I ,I ,I 'I 11 a 11 ,I 'I i ' 5 e ;' I I I I I e I 4 ,~ Is I ; . ,; I II I b ~ i I. i it ~ II i~ d I ~ r rdd~~~+~dl jFi7 C aka 'r~:•~.~: I~ ~ I I .. '"r~cr~ rt l of ~ t~ i! r ~ I ~r ' `f / ~ I I% ~' ~ 11 F h it I I; %~~ I~~ yy~~QQS5##}~ j~h'~4ieF'Cdte ~~ ~ ~~ I~ 1. ' ~JM ~ C :"Ft ~: ~ ~ l; ! i I ~ ~ li d ; .I n i /V4 ~ ~ i i; ~; ;i ,; Ir ~; fl ~ ,; T~1 I ~; r ;i 3 ~ li J ~ li ~; !~ l ;i h / / ~ i; ;/ A t~i ~ ° B r~ '~k I / / , ~ / !I .~...~~ /~ i 1~ I ~ i f ~~~, I ~r , ~;% ~ .I 1 1 I li. A I I I ~ I~ '. I I I~ ,I i I I ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ II ~ I I i ~ I ~~~ ~ ` I 11 11 ~r I~' i`i l'1 'I_ ~ i~ ~ i~ I I i ~ i ~\ ~ ~ .~ ;r US H ~' s !A I i r1~I ~ I ~ I I 1'' I ; f ~p~ pO I I ~ ~ ~ \ it O j I _.'..• ~~ i~~p~~ F X000 n °22 I ^~ i ~ °~ ~ ~d9so~. , ~ ~.,.__ 0o + 'eo s~ S~„ , o, a 3 0 ~ ` ~! ~`, \~ \ I \\ \ ~W c ~ \\\ s ~.\ \ \ \ 4" g \ ~\ '\!~ ~a~~~i~~9 i i ~ \ \ ~'•\ ~ ~\ ~ \: \ `~ \ ~ \ ,1`~\~\~ a \`.\S \ I ~~\ I i ~ I •\\'ia'd(~yie~ \~ \ \ i ~ \ Fes' •••~~`~® • _1\ \ ~YB k°" •~ ~ ~•~1 \ \~ 1 ~ .\ ~\c r ~ ~~ ~ II•a 1~9 ~~-a ` \ '~ ` \ ~ M e~; \\ \\ Q~^n ,i ~ \I a t I i\` '~'\ ~~`~~ yO 1 ~ a'`'* ~ ~~ \ ~ "~ p \ \ ._ . . A0._.e6~.`i~ \ - ~2'~ v 4 \ '~~ I = 4 ~~ \~•k \ \. \ t l ~ (\ .\ \ \'\ \ '~a o ~' \ \ \ \ ~ \ f ;' \ \ I \ \ \ \. ~ I 1 ] ~ _ \\ fj~ ~e~1 ~~" v 3j d C8t ~~ \ ~ ~+ \ ~ ~ i bpb S66S ~ 9 ^^ O \ Iii B /1 ~/ I ~r/erll9l i ~ SN~1?M°e~ of ________~; ,, o,,,~ ~, \\ \ ~a \ , G i P CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA .,,,~",~ Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 7.C. Subiect: Deferred Item - Zoning Case 08RW0271 - Michaux Associates, L.L.C., Midlothian Magisterial District County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Consider the request for exception. Summary of Information: At the February 27, 2008 meeting, the Board held a public hearing to consider a request for exception to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act requirements of the Zoning Ordinance to permit encroachment into the Resource Protection Area (RPA). After the public hearing was closed the Board deferred the decision until its March 12, 2008 meeting. Staff's analysis of the request is attached. Staff Recommendations: Staff finds that the project is consistent with the ordinance and the criteria as outlined in Section 19-235 (b)(1) of the Chesterfield County Code for the Board of Supervisors to consider Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance (CBPO) exception requests. Staff, recommends approval of this request as it pertains to the exception to the CBPO for the subject project only. District: Midlothian Magisterial District Preparers Richard M. McElfish Title: Director, Environmental Engineering Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ~®~_~® February 27, 2008 BS ~~ ~~Ay J STAFF' S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 08RW0271 Michaux Associates, L.L.C. Midlothian Magisterial District North of Midlothian Turnpike (State Route 60), East of WWII Veterans Memorial HWY (State Route 288), and Northwest of the intersection of West Winterfield Road (State Route 714) and Norfolk Southern Railroad REQUEST: Board of Supervisors approval of an exception to the requirements of Section 19- .232 of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance relating to Resource Protection Area Regulations. Specifically, the applicant is requesting an exception to encroach into the Resource Protection Area (RPA) as a result of grading to create buildable areas, residential lots, roads, parking lots and supporting infrastructure for the proposed residential subdivision .called Michaux Village -- The Village at Midlothian Town Center. Exceptions to the Resource Protection Area Regulations are permitted pursuant to Section 19-235 (b)(2) of the Ordinance. GENERAL INFORMATION Developer: Shane J. Doran Michaux Associates, L.L.C. Location: The property is located at 1320 West Winterfield Road, which is within the Michaux Creek drainage basin. The project is located north of Midlothian Turnpike (State Route 60), East of WWII Veterans Memorial HWY (State Route 288), and Northwest of the intersection of West Winterfield Road (State Route 714) .and Norfolk Southern Railroad Tax ID 725-711-4912; 725-710-4141; 725-710-6268; 725-710-0461 (Sheet 5). Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service Q~~~;~.~' .~. ~. Existin Zg_ onin~ Townhouse Residential (R-TH) with Conditional Use Planned Development (CUPD) Existing Land Use and Condition of Resource Protection Area: The project area for the proposed 147 lot residential subdivision, Michaux Village -- The Village at Midlothian Town Center, is 24.5 acres. Within the project area, improvements to the property consist of one single-family residence with one outbuilding. To the north of the site is an existing subdivision and the property to the west is a mixed use industrial development. The southern property line runs along Norfolk Southern Railroad and the eastern boundary along West Winterfield Road. The headwaters of Michaux Creek, bisects the western portion of the property. There are approximately 6.13 acres of existing RPA located on-site. The RPA buffers are in good condition consisting of mature mixed hardwood forest and a 0.27 acre forested wetland pocket which is considered connected and contiguous with Michaux Creek. Area of Proposed RPA Encroachment: The area of the encroachment for this proposed development will impact approximately 20,125 sq-ft (0.46 acres) of existing RPA. Of this, 17,490 sq-ft of RPA will be converted into the proposed roads, parking lots and residential buildings. The remaining 2,635 sq-ft (0.06 acres) will be temporary encroachments for the construction of a vertical retaining wall and later reverted back to a natural vegetative buffer. BACKGROUND The proposed residential subdivision Michaux Village is in The Village at Midlothian Town Center and will contain 25 single family home lots and 122 townhome lots. The applicant proposes to build a traditional neighborhood of cottage homes and townhouses creating a transition from the "new urban" setting of Midlothian Town Center to the suburban setting of the adjacent Salisbury community. The developer has requested an exception for potential impacts to lands within designated Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas (CBPAs) and downstream water bodies. CBPAs, which include Resource Protection Areas (RPAs) and Resource Management Areas (RMAs), are present on the subject property. Those stream segments determined to have perennial flow must adhere to the county's Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance (CBPO). The CBPO requirements of the Zoning Ordinance specify that a RPA buffer be established adjacent to perennial water-bodies, to include connected and contiguous wetlands, and consist of an undisturbed 100-foot natural vegetative area. In order to meet the zoning, development and site requirements, the applicant has requested an encroachment into the 100-foot RPA buffer to allow for the development of residential lots, roads, parking lots and supporting infrastructure. A water quality impact assessment (WQIA) and request for exception is required of the applicant 2 08RW0271-FEB27-BOS-RPT regarding the potential impacts to CBPAs and downstream water bodies. A discussion of both documents follows. ANALYSIS A. To approve a Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance (CBPO) exception request, the Board of Supervisors must determine whether the proposed development is consistent with the Ordinance and the applicant satisfies the six (6) findings, outlined below, as required by Section 19-235 (b)(1). The Applicant addressed these findings as part of the application process. The Applicant position can be found attachment Document A. 1. The requested exception is the minimum necessary to afford relief. The applicant purchased the subject property in 2003. The Route 288 Corridor Plan zoning requirement approved the use for residential townhouse subdivision requiring the redesign and relocation of West Winterfield Road and the abandonment of Justice Road. The county's comprehensive plan had required extending Justice Road to cross Michaux Creek. The current road design removes the necessity of a creek crossing and associated encroachments. The initial site plan design proposed 148 units and two stormwater treatment facilities located adjacent to Michaux Creek. In 2006, a site specific perennial flow determination was conducted requiring that a RPA buffer be included in this area along Michaux Creek. The buffer encroachment of the original proposal was 39,204. ft2 (0.90 acres). Additional site designs that complied with the rezoning case and included the reduction of one lot were considered, reducing the buffer encroachment form original proposal to 30,491 ft2 (0.70 acres). Additional reductions came from the proposed use of an alternative stormwater treatment facility in place of traditional. pond designs. The final proposed area of the encroachment will impact approximately 20,125 ft2 (0.46 acres) of existing RPA. Of this, 17,490 ft2 (0.40 acres) of RPA will be converted to the proposed roads, parking lots, and residential buildings. The remaining 2,635 ft2 (0.06 acres) will be temporary encroachments for the construction of a vertical retaining wall and converted back to a natural vegetative buffer. 2. Granting the exception shall not confer any special privileges upon the applicant that are denied by this division to other property owners who are subject to its provisions and who are similarly situated. Most large-scale high density residential townhouse subdivision developments will impact environmental resources. The appropriate and necessary steps must be taken to minimize and mitigate for these impacts. Due to the natural topography (high river terrace) and stream geomorphology (spring and wetland fed systems) in this region of the county, similar developments have had similar impacts on environmental resources. Examples of these impacts are evident in already existing developments along Route 60. 08RW0271-FEB27-B OS-RPT 3. The exception request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this division and will not result in a substantial detriment to water quality. The applicant has agreed to address water quality protection during all phases of development as discussed in the Water Quality Impact Assessment (WQIA) and outlined in the attached Document B. In addition to addressing specific on-site pollutant concerns, the applicant will conduct enhancement and restoration projects of the existing buffer and preserve additional riparian buffer in other areas of the project, providing long-term water quality benefits. 4. The exception request is not based upon conditions or circumstances that are self- created or self-imposed. The roadway design criteria for this type of subdivision as outlined by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has resulted in the need for fill of approximately 8-10 feet at the west limits of the project. Subject to approval from VDOT, the roads were minimized to the greatest extent practicable and still .meet the permitted slope for road construction considering the existing topography for the area. To minimize encroachments the existing plans propose a segmented block retaining wall where graded slopes would encroach into the RPA. S. Reasonable and appropriate conditions are imposed, as warranted, that will ensure that the permitted activity will not cause a degradation of water quality. The proposed development will. meet current CBPO pollutant removal requirements for phosphorus and exceed the minimum standards for Erosion and Sediment Controls. The applicant is proposing to incorporate into the stormwater design an alternative source control measure to reduce typical stormwater pollutants found at high density residential developments. These measures are to include both structural BMPs and the construction of a block wall to include signage to reduce access and provide protection to the remaining buffer. The applicant is proposing additional water quality enhancements including mitigating projects to re-vegetate existing buffers and to set aside vegetative areas to increase stream buffer width. 6. The request is being made because of the particular physical surroundings, use, shape or topographical conditions of the specific property involved or property adjacent to or within 100 feet of the subject property,. or a particular hardship to the owner will occur, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of this division is carried out. The proposed project site is located along the ridgeline between the Michaux Creek Watershed and the Little Tomahawk Creek Watershed. The site drains north to the James River along Michaux Creek. The existing topography of the project site contains gradual, slopes and valley streams. An existing subdivision and Norfolk Southern Railroad currently border the site on two of the four sides. The remaining two sides of the site are bordered by Michaux Creek which has no current proposal for development on the land opposite the site, 08RW0271-FEB27-BOS-RPT and the proposed Winterfield Road realignment. Finally, moderate grading of the site must occur to meet the requirements of development and to accommodate the alignment of Winterfield Road. B. A Water Quality Impact Assessment (WQIA) required pursuant to Section 19-232 (e) prepared by the applicant has been submitted to _and approved by the Department of Environmental Engineering -Water Quality. The' approved document Michaux Village Water Quality Impact Assessment can be found on file with the county. A complete description of the mitigation measures are on pages 7 to 9 of that. document. A summary of those measures can be found in attachment Document B. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff finds that the WQIA and the project are consistent with ,the ordinance and the criteria as outlined in Section 19-235 (b)(1) of the Chesterfield County Code for the Board of Supervisors to consider Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance (CBPO) exception requests. Staff, recommends approval of this request as it pertains to the exception to the CBPO for Michaux Village -the Village at Midlothian Town Center project only. Furthermore, all other recommendations listed therein shall be incorporated into the site plans for the project, which must then receive final approval by Environmental Engineering. Any changes to the Plan of Development that would cause any deviation from the items listed in the WQIA, either in the form of increased impacts to components of the RPA or omissions of mitigation requirements from the submitted Plan of Development must be reviewed and approved by the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors. 5 08RW0271-FEB27-BOS-RPT This page is blank. DOCUMENT A Applicant's response to the six (6 findin squired by Section 19-235 (b REQUEST FOR AN EXCEPTION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE Michaux Village Water Quality Impact Assessment Tax ID# 725-7 ] l -4912; 725-710-4141; 725-710-6268; 725-710-0461 (Sheet 5) A. Provide the justification for the proposed exception and a discussion of how each of the following findings are met: 1. The requested exception is the minimum necessary to afford relief: The James Doran Company purchased the 24.95 acre tract of land in 2003 with a zoning case that approved the project on a set density of 148 units. Since then one unit has been removed yielding a total of 147 units. Throughout the design process of this project, the RPA encroachments have continually been minimized. Originally, two BMP facilities were placed within the RPA as well as portions of lots and roads. Design of this development existed prior to the site specific determination. In August of 2007, Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering designated the forested wetland reach as Resource Protection Area (RPA). This wetland reach was not included in the RPA at the time of the property purchase. Early schematic designs showed encroachments within 100 feet consisting of two BMPs which were required to be in for pollutant removal requirements. The geometry and location of the BMPs were altered to further minimize encroachments. To address the need for avoidance and minimization the Austin Sand filter system has been added and has resulted in the elimination of these encroachments. The RPA designation around the wetland reach has resulted in the proposed encroachments. Encroachments have been minimized to the greatest extent possible while fulfilling the VDOT road design criteria. Approximately 0.90 acres of encroachments were proposed. The lot layout was adjusted and road/lot encroachments were decreased thus lowering the total encroachment amount to approximately 0.70 acres. With the current design and the implementation of the Austin Sand Filter fo replace the two BMP/SWM facilities, encroachments into the RPA now total 0.46 acres. The original two BMP facilities were located in the seaward and landward 50 feet of the RPA and contained large footprints. The utilization of the Austin Sand Filter removes the seaward and landward 50 feet encroachments and large footprints. This alternative design is supported by Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering based on the WQIA meeting with Mr. McElfish, Mr. Pritchard, and Mr. Flanigan (subject to review and approval of the design calculations). The final area of impacts to the RPA has been isolated to road and lot construction within the south western portion of the site. Due to the adjustment of the RPA and the designation around the forested 6 08RW0271-FEB27-BOS-RPT ®®~~_~~ wetland system, encroachments into the landward and seaward 50 feet exist. Permanent impacts to the RPA will consist of road and lot construction and will amount to approximately 20,125 square feet (0.46 ac). Temporary impacts to the RPA will take place for the construction of a vertical segmented block wall. The vertical wall will require approximately 5 feet of temporary encroachment width for construction and will run a length of approximately 527 linear feet (2,635 sq-ft/0.06 ac). This temporary impact is included within the total 0.46 acres of encroachments mentioned above. Within Appendix 3, there are three layouts. The first layout shows the overall project and the areas of preservation and encroachment (with labeled quantities). The second and third layouts show a closer plan view of the encroachments along the edge of development specifically the grading along the proposed vertical retaining wall. The grading plan also shows smaller scale views of the proposed encroachments. Initial assessments of the property revealed areas for storm water management facilities to be placed within the RPA. Originally the wetland reach was not designated as RPA until 2007 when the new guidance was implemented into the county ordinance. With further research the Contech Storm Filter system was suggested and designed. Current proposals after several meetings with Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering recommends the use of the Austin sand filter to be placed just outside of the RPA in the central portion of the site immediately west of the proposed development. This allowed for further revision to the site layout and thus minimized RPA encroachments. A level spreader will be placed and used as the outlet/treatment structure for both Austin sand filters. The pipe outlet is to be located at the limit of the RPA, where it will create a sheet flow through the RPA and into Michaux Creek. This allows for further filtration of water through the natural buffer. The natural topography of the site slopes from east to west leading down to Michaux Creek. The VDOT geometric design standards and restrictions on slopes for road construction dictated the location and length of the road. The required/permitted road slope for VDOT is less than the slope of the existing topography therefore the road placement was dominated by the need to meet the current design standards. The combination of the required slopes for road construction (dictated by VDOT), existing topography, and RPA designation around the forested wetland reach restricted the option and flexibility to remove and reduce encroachments. During the zoning approval process, the Chesterfield County comprehensive plan for this specific area called for Justice Road to be extended through the middle of the site and cross Michaux Village. The client chose to preserve and protect the integrity of the stream and its riparian buffer by proposing the deletion of the Justice Road extension. At the time this was contemplated, the RPA designation did not exist on Michaux Creek. With approval of the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors, the road extension was removed from the comprehensive plan. This led to the ability to avoid a crossing of the creek and all associated encroachments, approximately 0.32 acres (14,000 square feet). 7 08RW0271-FEB27-BOS-RPT ~'~ ~ ~_ With these revisions and adjustments to the project, encroachments in the RPA have continually been reduced thus providing the minimum encroachments necessary for development of the site. 2. GrantinE the exception shall not confer upon the applicant any special privileses that are denied by this division to other property owners who are subject to its provisions and who are similarly situated: The time of which the property was purchased and zoned was before the new CBLAD RPA designation guidance (released in the summer of 2007). The implementation of the new guidance (specifically around the forested wetland pocket) occurred during the design of the project therefore changes had to be made further minimize encroachments. The location of West Winterfield Road and the proposed relocation of Winterfield Rd. (as a requirement of the Chesterfield County Comprehensive Plan) helped influence and dictate the layout and orientation of the site plan. The allowed density of 148 units as a condition of the approved zoning case in tandem with VDOT road design requirements dictated the length, width, and orientation of the road network. The western portion of the site has been dedicated for preservation and areas to remain undeveloped. Due to the nature of topography consisting of Piedmont Terrain with rolling hills, buildable areas require grading. The lay of the land combined with VDOT road geometry requirements dictated the development layout specific to this site. There are four overall circumstances that lead to the exception request for encroachments. The VDOT road geometry requirements, existing topography, county requirements for the development of residential lots, and the wetland reach RPA designation all combined to create a condition in which an exception request had to be made. 3. The exception reauest is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this division and will not result in a substantial detriment to water quality: The request complies with the general performance criteria and the requirements of the Major Water Quality Impact Assessment. The proposed development will establish an overall net improvement in the pollutant load removal with the use of the Austin sand filter and other alternative storm water treatment practices which yield a higher phosphorus removal rate to meet and exceed the Chesapeake Bay Preservation requirements. Chesapeake Bay Preservation pollutant removal standards require a removal rate of 13.2 ]bs/year. The proposed Austin Sand Filter achieves 13.3 ]bs/year of removal and the proposed preservation area on the west side of the project will provide an additional +/- 0.26 Ibs/year of phosphorus removal. Each encroachment into the RPA on the project side (east side of Michaux Creek) will be compensated for through preservation and enhancement of the RPA on the west side of Michaux Creek. In addition, restoration areas along the edge of development will be utilized to further ensure filtration before storm water runoff reaches Michaux Creek. By utilizing vegetated stabilized slopes along the edge of 8 08RW0271-FEB27-BOS-RPT development, encroachments in these areas will be temporary until the slopes become vegetated and filtration occurs. The transition from the original two surface BMP facilities to the Contech Storm filter to at last, the Austin sand filter has eliminated RPA encroachments in association with storm water treatment (approximately 0.39 acres). Michaux Village is providing an elevated level of water quality improvement to the industrial development (which traditionally produces a higher level of pollutant loading to receiving bodies) located on the west side of Michaux Creek by providing a 30' increase to the 100' RPA buffer. More importantly the +/- 2.9 acres located outside of this 130' buffer will be left undeveloped providing further protection to water quality. The existing 100 feet of buffer on the west side of Michaux Creek removes approximately 0.850 lbs of phosphorus per year. With an additional 30 feet added to the buffer the removal rate will increase by 0.26 lbs/yr. to approximately 1.11 lbs/yr. On the east side of Michaux Creek, the existing buffer removes approximately 0.45 lbs/yr. With the proposed encroachments, the pollutant removal rate is reduced to 0.23 lbs/yr. Which will be compensated for by the 30' buffer enhancement area on the west side. The exception request is being made with an in-kind replacement of buffer on the west side of the Creek. The owner has offered a 30-foot enhancement to the 100-foot buffer on the west side of the Creek, providing a net 130-foot RPA buffer. The +/- 2.9 acres of land outside of the 30 foot buffer enhancement will remain undeveloped thus providing a buffer and protection to water quality for the industrial development along Justice Road and to the west. In addition to this, the owner is also providing reforestation areas on the east (development) side of Michaux Creek. A restoration/enhancement/preservation plan is included as part of mitigation and for replacement of the vegetation impacted as a result of the RPA encroachments. 4. The proposed exception is not based anon conditions or circumstances that are self-created or self-imposed: The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) design criteria (as outlined in the VDOT Geometric Design Standards) provided guidance for the design of the road network for this subdivision. Subject to approval from VDOT, the roads were minimized to the greatest extent practicable to ensure minimal RPA encroachments. As previously mentioned in finding #2, the maximum permitted slopes for VDOT road construction is less than the slope of the existing topography thus dictating the road layout. Meeting maximum required road slopes results in a required fill of approximately 8-10 feet at the west limits of the project. To avoid and further minimize RPA encroachments, the segmented block retaining walls were used where graded slopes would encroach into the RPA. 5. Reasonable and appropriate conditions have been imposed, as warranted, to ensure that the permitted activity will not cause a degradation of water quality: This project is adhering to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) which is based on state standards. The two Austin sand filters are located at the edge of the RPA and do not encroach within it. To mitigate for the proposed 0.46 acres of proposed encroachments, preservation and reforestation areas have been dedicated to ensure the level of water quality will be sustained. More specifically 24,555 square feet (0.56 AC) has been dedicated for preservation and enhancement. This provides more than a 1:1 compensation for the 0.46 acres of proposed encroachments. In addition, 6,903 square feet (0.16 ac) has been dedicated for reforestation along the edge of development on the west and east side of the vertical retaining wall. Furthermore the area outside of the 30 foot dedicated preservation area will remain undeveloped and the existing vegetation will be undisturbed. The vertical retaining wall will be constructed first to ensure that a physical barrier between the remaining RPA will be protected during future phases of development. Sediment traps and super silt fence will be utilized throughout the site during construction to ensure pollutants do not enter the undisturbed RPA. The construction of the segmented .block wall will be outlined with super silt fence on the west side to ensure that no sediment or pollutants will impact the RPA or wetland system. The exception request is being made with an in-kind replacement of buffer on the west side of the Creek. The owner has offered to dedicate a 30-foot enhancement to the 100-foot buffer on the west side of the Creek, providing a net 130-foot RPA buffer. The +/- 2.9 acres of land outside of the 30 foot buffer enhancement will remain undeveloped thus providing a buffer and protection to water quality for the industrial development along Justice Road and to the west. In addition to this, the owner is also providing reforestation areas on the east (development) side of Michaux Creek. During the zoning approval process, the Chesterfield County comprehensive plan for this specific area called for Justice Road to be extended through the middle of the site and cross Michaux Village. The client chose to preserve and protect the integrity of the stream and its riparian buffer by proposing the deletion of the Justice Road extension. With approval of the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors, the road extension was removed from the comprehensive plan. This led to the ability to avoid a crossing of the creek and all associated encroachments, approximately 0.32 acres (14,000 square feet). During the first phase of construction, sediment basins will be constructed and placed throughout the site to be utilized as an erosion and control measure. Please review to Appendix I and II for the erosion and sediment control measures that will be utilized onsite. 6. The request is being made because of the particular physical surroundings, use, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved or property adiacent to or within 100 feet of the subject property, or a particular hardship to the owner will occur, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience. if the strict letter of this division is carried out: A combination of five issues dictated the amount and location of the proposed RPA encroachments and they are listed below: 10 08RW0271-FEB27-BOS-RPT 1) Approved zoning case density of 148 units 2) VDOT road geometry requirements 3) Existing topography 4) Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering requirements for the development of residential lots 5) RPA designation of wetland reach (under new RPA guidance effective August 2007) These five issues had to be addressed, fulfilled, and balanced effectively to ensure that the client produced a quality product. The first issue. is the permitted zoning density of 148 units which has been since then decreased to 147 units. The loss of one unit was a product of the combination of the remaining issues listed above. With the existing topography consisting of the Piedmont Terrace, grading was an immediate issue when VDOT road geometry requirements were addressed. The designation of the wetland reach (which occurred far into the design process) into the RPA produced a majority of the proposed encroachments. The combination of these five issues resulted in the proposed 0.46 acres of RPA encroachments. 11 08RW0271-FEB27-BOS-RPT ,v ~4~ ®~. ~ dG DOCUMENT B The outline below summarizes those measures submitted as part of the WQIA for the mitigation of the encroachment and water quality improvement. The following is a list of mitigation measures for the proposed encroachments to the RPA. These measures will provide additional stormwater treatment and water quality benefits/improvements. The remaining environmental features will be protected during construction by maintaining erosion and sediment control standards. After construction the features will be protected by increased buffers and outlet protection which creates sheet flow, promotes infiltration, reduces concentrated flows and reduces down stream erosion. The following will be included as part of the construction plans: 1. Erosion and sediment control standards of the county will be maintained during all phases of the construction process. 2. Additional riparian buffer covering 24,555 sq-ft (0.56 acres) and reforested areas covering 6,903 sq-ft (0.16 acres) will be established adjacent to the undisturbed RPA buffer. 3. Non-traditional Structural (Austin sand filter) BMP will be used onsite to treat stormwater runoff before it enters the remaining RPA buffer. 4. A segmented block wall having an average height of 6 feet tall will be located along the western edge of the proposed development and along the remaining RPA to direct runoff from the development into the stormwater treatment facility and to provide a barrier for the remaining buffer. 5. The remaining forested area 2.9 acres located opposite of the development along the west side of Michaux Creek will remain undeveloped. 6. Educational signs detailing the location of riparian buffer. This page is blank. ~~®,.~~ ,~_, ~: cn 0 0 N (h O _, (7 O ~ C X C N (Q to cD O (~ D m ~ X 0 1-F ~• Q 1 rn O ~{ 00 N ..~, • ^~~~~ D 1 ~~~~.*:' This page is blank. ,o N ? X v o ~ o ~ m x m O Q O N ~ O ~, OO ~C G O N ,, 1 m ~ 1 ~ n 1 X, 'y/ r m ~ ~ ~ ;~ ~ ~~ i ~ ~ i ~1 ~ti `~G ~ 1 ,, ~'~ ~ ,1 ~ i` ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ t '` , ~ ~ ~ ~~ ti 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~~ r: 1 ~, ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 'i ~ ~ ~ 1 r ~ ~ f~ / ' 1 ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ;) ~~.~`~, 0 I ~ ~ ~~ ~ -~i Q+~®~;~~ This page is blank. ~~°~~_~~ ~4~x.. .,r~ ,.. 0 N ~_ O C7 C x Ui O - O ~ D m x A ~~ o ~_ ~ Q ~ fD ~ n N ~z ~, - N ~~®~_~eJ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 - = AGENDA ~/N,61NV` Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 .Item Number: 8.A.1. Subject: Nomination/Appointment of Preservation Committee Members County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Nominate/Appoint the following persons to the Preservation Committee for a three-year term. Summary of Information: The Chesterfield County Preservation Ordinance (Secs. 19-45 through 19-54) calls for a seven-member committee appointed by the Board to serve a three- year term. The ordinance specifically identifies four (4) positions that must have at least one (1) person: - Architect or Landscape Architect (currently Wallace) - Contractor (Emerson, Daniels) - Representative of Historical Society (Walker, Howe) - Professional Expertise in Preservation (Morris) Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Planning Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # d~4~~_3~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA The following members have agreed to be reappointed to serve a three-year term from March 12, 2008 to March 9, 2011: Mary Ellen Howe (resident of the City of Petersburg), James V. Daniels, J. Carl Morris, G. M. "Skip" Wallace, Bryan Walker, John V. Cogbill, and George Emerson. The Preservation Committee is appointed by the Board of Supervisors for a three-year term. The members of this committee assist in the administration of the provisions of the Preservation Ordinance. Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. J Chesterfield County Preservation Committee Meeting Attendance July 2004 through January 2008 Number of Total Meetings Held: 22 -Number of Preservation Meetings Held: 15 -Number of Joint Planning Commission/Preservation Committee Meetings Held: 7 Attendance Record Mary Ellen Howe (1987 -Present) 22 Meetings (100%) Jim Daniels (1987 -Present) 20 Meetings (91 %) John V. Cogbill, III (1995 -Present) 15 Meetings (68%) *Note: does not include 2 meetings where a conflict was declared J. Carl Morris (1987 -Present) 19 Meetings (86%) Bryan Walker (1987 -Present) 21 Meetings (95%) G. M. "Skip" Wallace (1991- Present) 10 Meetings (45%) George Emerson (2005 -Present) 13 Meetings [out of 18 possible] (72%) ~ ^ ~IN10' CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 12,.2008 Item Number: 8.A.2. Subject: Nomination/Appointment to the Committee on the Future County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Nomination/appointment of members to serve on the Committee on the Future. Summary of Information: The Committee on the Future is a citizens committee appointed by the Board of Supervisors for the purpose of identifying, studying and making recommendations on long-range issues impacting the county. The appointees to the Committee on the Future serve at the pleasure of the Board of Supervisors. Mrs. Jaeckle has nominated Mr. Richard M. Jacobs to fill the vacancy representing the Bermuda District. Under the existing Rules of Procedures, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the rules of procedures are suspended by unanimous vote of the board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order that they are nominated. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY -~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA .~C X ~/p~NU. Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 8.A.3. Subiect: Nomination/Appointment of a Member to the Sustain Our Communities Committee County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Request that the Board of Supervisors nominate and appoint Mr. Eric Carroll to serve on the Sustain Our Communities Committee. Summary of Information: The Sustain Our Communities Committee is a Board of Supervisors appointed committee working to sustain and improve Chesterfield's older communities. Mr. Eric Carroll is a resident of the Dale District. Mr. Holland recommends the nomination and appointment of Mr. Carroll. The term will be effective upon approval of the Board of Supervisors and expire on December 31, 2010. If the members of the Board of Supervisors desire to nominate and appoint individuals to this committee at this meeting, they will need to unanimously vote to suspend the Rules of Procedure. Preparers Thomas E. Jacobson Title: Director of Revitalization Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # ®~~~.34 _~ hq~~h~r. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 8.B.1.a. Subject: Resolution Recognizing March 2008, as "Purchasing Month" County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of resolution recognizing March 2008, as "Purchasing Month." Summary of Information: Purchasing associations throughout the world participate in "Purchasing Month" in recognition of the purchasing profession and its value to the economic conditions within all localities, states, and nations. Public purchasing requires: that ethical principles govern all conduct; a working knowledge of a wide range of goods and services; up-to-date knowledge of legalities and regulations; ability to communicate and skills to work with a diversity of users and vendors; and technical knowledge in areas such as purchasing methods, contracting, source selection, bidding, negotiation, evaluation methods, scheduling, and contract administration. It is requested that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors participate in supporting this recognition on a local basis. Preparers H. Edward James Attachments: ~ Yes Title: Director of Purchasing No # 0003.35 RECOGNIZING MARCH 2008, AS "PURCHASING MONTH" WHEREAS, the purchasing and materials management profession has a significant role in the quality, efficiency and profitability of business and government throughout the United States; -and WHEREAS, the purchasing and materials management profession works for private and public, and profit and nonprofit organizations; and WHEREAS, in addition to the purchase of goods and services, the purchasing and materials management profession. engages in or has direct responsibility for functions such as executing, implementing and administering contracts; developing forecast and procurement strategies; supervising and/or monitoring the flow and storage of materials; and developing working relations with suppliers and with other departments within the organization; and WHEREAS, the purchasing and materials management profession has tremendous influence on the economic conditions in the United States, with an accumulative purchasing power running into the billions of dollars; and WHEREAS, purchasing or procurement operations range from departments of one person to several thousand; and WHEREAS, governmental purchasing and other associations around the world are sponsoring activities and special events to further educate and inform the general public on the role of purchasing within business, industry and government. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes the month of March .2008, as "Purchasing Month" in Chesterfield County and encourages all citizens to join in commemorating this observance. ~~~~_~~. ~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 S . _ -. C AGENDA ~,,,~a Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 8.B.1:b. Subiect: Recognizing Mr. Joseph C. Kelly Upon Attaining Rank of Eagle Scout County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff has received a request for the Board to adopt a resolution recognizing Mr. Joseph C. Kelly, Troop 175, sponsored by Second Presbyterian Church, upon attaining the rank of Eagle Scout. Preparers Janice Blakley Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: Yes ^ No # ~~0~.3'7 WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered by Congress in 1916; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build character, provide citizenship training and promote physical fitness; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of skills including. leadership, service and .outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying. out a service project beneficial to their community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law Mr. Joseph C. Kelly,. Troop 175, sponsored by Second Presbyterian Church has accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by only four percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in society, Joseph has distinguished himself as a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. Joseph C. Kelly, and acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such an outstanding young man as its citizen. ~®~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~ ~ AGENDA ~/I~,QA Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 8.6.1.c. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Mr. H. Edward James, Purchasing Department, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing Mr. H. Edward James for over 36 years of dedicated service to Chesterfield County. Preparers Janice Blakley Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: ®Yes ~ No # (D~~~_~~ RECOGNIZING MR. H. EDWARD JAMES UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mr. H. Edward James retired from the Chesterfield County Purchasing Department on March 1, 2008 after providing over 36 years of service to Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Mr. James began his public service with Chesterfield County on June 28, 1971 in the Department of General Services as a buyer who purchased goods, services, and construction for Chesterfield County Government and Chesterfield County Public Schools, and performed numerous other duties within the Department of General Services, including oversight of the Buildings and Grounds Division and the County Garage now known as the Fleet Management Division, and was responsible for various risk management and insurance functions prior to the creation of the Risk Management Department in 1981; and WHEREAS, Mr. James was promoted to the position of administrative assistant in 1973 and was assigned management responsibilities while serving as assistant to the Director of General Services, and was assigned the duties and responsibilities of the Director of General Services position during the director's absence;. and WHEREAS, Mr. James developed in 1974 the first. commodity based mailing list application for vendors to select those goods and services for which they wanted to receive invitation for bids and requests for proposals; and WHEREAS, Mr. James was promoted to the position of Director of Purchasing in January 1978 when the Purchasing Department was established as a separate entity from the Department of General Services, and he assumed responsibility for the consolidated procurement operation for both Chesterfield County Government and Chesterfield County Public Schools, one of only a few consolidated public procurement departments in the Commonwealth of Virginia for political subdivisions; and WHEREAS, Mr. James developed the first comprehensive purchasing manual for the county, which sets forth policies and procedures for centralized procurement for Chesterfield County Government and Chesterfield County Public Schools, and he received the prestigious Certified Public Purchasing Officer (CPPO) designation by the National Institute of Governmental Purchasing on October 29, 1980; and WHEREAS, Mr. James served with honor and distinction in successive offices as Treasurer, Secretary, Vice-President, and President of the Capital Area Purchasing Association, and in so doing brought honor and distinction to Chesterfield County in the execution of his duties; and WHEREAS, Mr. James introduced the concept and managed the implementation of a formal cost avoidance program to capture cost savings of taxpayers' dollars, which was recognized by the National Association of Counties with an achievement award in 1993; and WHEREAS, Mr. James was instrumental in the effort, which led to the Purchasing Department becoming the eighth public procurement entity; within the United States, Canada, Ireland and .England, and the first locality or state agency in Virginia, to receive national accreditation ~~~~~~ for purchasing excellence by the National Institute of Governmental Purchasing; and WHEREAS, during his tenure, Mr. James guided the Purchasing Department as it matured from a transaction-based procurement operation to a value added, contract-based operation, offering numerous cost savings and increased levels of efficiency, and he also developed one of the first departmental customer satisfaction measuring surveys in Chesterfield County Government and used this tool to both measure and improve the delivery of procurement services to customers; and WHEREAS, Mr. James served on the county's first Total Quality Improvement Steering Committee and helped introduce the quality concept to county employees; and WHEREAS, Mr. James has faithfully and effectively discharged his duties in each and every capacity with proficiency, dedication, and an unwavering commitment to provide procurement services which are in full compliance with all applicable laws, policies, and procedures, and has practiced an unwavering commitment to the highest ethical and moral standards while continuing to obtain the best value for the taxpayers of Chesterfield County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that-the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 12th day of March 2008, recognizes Mr. H. Edward James and extends appreciation for his more than 36 years of dedicated service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. ~®Q~~~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY . BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. " AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 8.6.2. Subiect: Revision of Ambulance Fee Schedule for Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Revise the current ambulance fee schedule that Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services currently has in place. Summary of Information: Chesterfield County Fire and Emergency Medical Services is proposing to increase its fees related to emergency ambulance transportation. This does not apply to the volunteer staffed ambulances of the Bensley-Bermuda, Forest View and Manchester Rescue Squads as they presently choose not to participate in the county's revenue recovery program. Preparers Paul W. Mauger L Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No 0~~~:42 Title: Fire Chief CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 -~ ~ AGENDA Vjg4ryNl~ Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board approve proposed increases in emergency medical service revenue recovery fees for ambulance: service. These fees were implemented in 2002 and are used to enhance emergency medical services provided by the county. The change in fees is requested to offset program cost increases. The fees have not been adjusted since the program was first implemented. These fee increases are anticipated to generate an additional .$250,000 annually and will be used to purchase equipment and supplies. Funding will also be used to continue advanced life support training techniques for department personnel. It is anticipated that Medicare, Medicaid, and most private insurance companies will continue to reimburse the county 80-100 percent of the fees billed. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management ®~®~.~~ Attachment # 1 PROPOSED FEE INCREASE CURRENT & PROPOSED FY07 Current Fees oposed Fe - Increase BLS - Emergency $350.00 $~c350.00 ALS- 1 Emergency 385.00 450.00 ALS- 2 Emergency 385.00 57~~ .OU Mileage Fee $7.50 $8.50 ~~~~~~ _ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA hg~pu~ Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 8.B.3. Subject: Award of Annual Requirements Contracts for Architectural Services to Ballou Justice Upton Architects, Crabtree, Rohrbaugh and Associates, HVC Chenault Architectural Corporation, Moseley Architects, and Wiley and Wilson, Incorporated County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the county administrator to execute annual requirements contracts for architectural services with the following firms: Ballou Justice Upton Architects; Crabtree Rohrbaugh and Associates; HVC Chenault Architectural Corporation; Moseley Architects; Wiley and Wilson, Inc. Summary of Information: These five firms were selected from a field of eleven to perform architectural services for selected projects over the next five years. The evaluation committee was unanimous in its determination that these firms were each uniquely qualified and offered the best in professional architectural services for Chesterfield County. Each contract will be awarded for one year with four one-year renewals. Fees associated with these contracts are expected to exceed $2,000,000 over the next five years and will be funded from individual project appropriations. Preparers Robert C. Key Title: Director of General Services Attachments: ~ Yes ~ No # ~0®~_~ r S ~` igc,HU~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY . BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of Z Meeting Date: March 12, 200 Item Number: 8.6.4.a. Subiect: Award a Construction Contract to Raymond Key. Commercial Contracting, LLC for the Chesterfield County Courts Building Addition and Renovation Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the County Administrator to execute a contract with Raymond Key Commercial Contracting, LLC for the Chesterfield County Courts Building Addition and Renovation Project in the amount of $3,876,980. Summary of Information: Raymond Key Commercial Contracting, LLC Company was the low bidder out of six (6) bids received on December 6, 2008. The scope of this project is to construct a 15,000-square foot addition and to renovate 8,000 square feet of the existing courts building. This project will provide much needed office space for the Circuit Court and General District Court clerks' offices and citizen service areas. Preparers Robert C. Key, Jr. Title: Director, General Services Attachments: ~ Yes No # CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Budget and Management Comments: This agenda item is requesting that the Board authorize the county administrator to execute a contract with Raymond Key Commercial Contracting, LLC for the Chesterfield County Courts Building Addition and Renovation Project in the amount of $3,876,980. This project currently has $8,585,000 appropriated, of which $612,196 has already been spent on architectural, construction, engineering, and consultant services. Although this project encompasses both addition and renovation, it has only one phase and was bid as an entire construction project. Bids came in lower than expected. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management ~~~3.4"~ ~ ~v ~'~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 8.B.4.b. Subject: Award a Construction Contract to Gulf Seaboard General Contractors, Incorporated for the Renovation of the Second Floor of the Lane B. Ramsey Administration Building and the Old Police Evidence/Fire Administration Building in the Amount of $1,037,000 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: on Authorize the County Administrator to execute a contract, subject to favorable reference checks, with Gulf Seaboard General Contractors, Inc. in the amount of $1,037,000, for the renovation of the second floor of the Lane B. Ramsey Administration Building and old Police Evidence/Fire Administration Building. Summary of Information: Gulf Seaboard General Contractors, Inc. submitted the low bid out of four (4) companies for the renovation of the second floor of the Lane B. Ramsey Administration Building and the old Police Evidence/Fire Administration Building. This project includes selected interior demolition and construction of new interior drywall and concrete masonry unit partitions as required, installation of new plumbing and new finishes including walls, ceilings and floors. This project is the first phase of a multi-phase project that will improve the use of existing space in the Administration Building. HVAC renovations will be included in a separate contract. Preparers Robert C. Key Title: Director of General Services Attachments: ~ Yes ® No # ~0~~~~ a - CHESTERFIELD COUNTY '~'"'"~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board authorize a construction contract between Chesterfield County and Gulf Seaboard General Contractors, Inc. All costs associated in this contract for phase one are within the original budgeted amount. Sufficient funding is available in the Capital Projects Five Story Administration Building Renovation accounts. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management GJJ~~.49 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA h ,,,.~ Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: s.B.5. Subject: Authorize the County Administrator to Execute Change Order Number One to the Construction Contract for Ettrick Park Walking Trail County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to authorize the County Administrator to execute Change Order Number One to the construction contract with Southern Paving Corporation, in the amount of $43,630 for work at Ettrick Park, for the walking trail. Summary of Information: Several members of the Ettrick Community, including the Civic and Progressive Action Association of the Matoaca Magisterial District (CAPAAMMD), have endorsed the need for a walking trail in Ettrick .Park. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission has heard from these citizens and endorsed this project. CDBG funding for both the base bid and additional trail construction is available due to favorable construction bids. This change order will expand the trail by one-half mile to one mile total length. The work includes light clearing in wooded areas, excavation for base, stockpiling of removed soil, asphalt and stone dust, paving and site restoration. There are few off-street walking routes in the Ettrick area. This project will provide a highly visible and accessible walking venue for residents of the area. District: Preparers Michael S. Golden Title: Director, Parks and Recreation Attachments: S Yes ~ No # Q~~~i.5® N\A CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board approve change order #1 for the Ettrick Park Walking Trail in the amount of $43,630.00 and to authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Sufficient funds are available in the project. budget to cover the cost of the change order request. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management ®®051. ~~~~ Chesterfield County, Virginia Parks and Recreation Department Parks Division t~~. Phone: (804) 748-1624 -Fax: (804) 751-4486 -Internet: chesterfield.gov 9201 Public Works Road - P.O. Box 40 -Chesterfield, VA 23832 Mike Golden Director February 25, 2008 Ms. Cathy Lantz Senior Contract Officer C.P.P.B. Chesterfield County Purchasing Department Re: Bid #07-352911-9593/PO#249163 Ettrick Walking Trail Change Order Number One Subject: Recommendation/Justification Dear Cathy, Due to the very favorable bidding market, the awarded bid for this project was well under the appropriated budget of $100,000.00 funds thru CDBG. There remains $52,786.00 in the account. We have to use these funds or they will be returned to CDBG. We have requested a change order from the awarded contractor, Southern Paving Corporation, copy attached, to increase the trail distance to the grant application/award of 1 mile, adding'/z mile to the project. We have reviewed the proposal and find the quoted prices acceptable and recommend approval of change order #1 as follows: 1. Base bid additional length of trail Unit prices converted to lump sum $ 3,022.00 2. Phase 2 walk (open area) Unit prices converted to lump sum $26,493.00 3. Phase 2 walk (wooded area) Unit prices converted to lump sum $14,115.00 Total change order amount $43,630.00 This will leave $9,156.00 in the account for unforeseen contingency expenses due to poor soils, drainage issues, etc. As this change order exceeds the 20% rule for change order approval, the change order must be approved by the Board of Supervisors. A draft BOS Agenda item is attached. ®~®~_5~ This change order utilizes bid/awarded unit prices for l.a & b ($1,820:00), 2a ($16,120.00) and 3a ($8,645.00) for a total of $26,585.00 or 61 % of change order amount. (see. vendor detailed pricing sheet). The asphalt tonnage pricing is consistent with recent previously quoted trail projects. The stone dust pricing is consistent with recent previously quoted trail projects. The clearing pricing is consistent with recent previously quoted trail projects. Please review all enclosed documentation and advise in writing, if we may proceed to the Board of Supervisors for approval and execution of the change order. Your prompt attention is requested, as we are working with a fixed time period for completion of the project of June 30, 2008 to be in compliance with our grant agreement with CDBG. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me at 804-751-4484. Sincerely, Stuart W. Connock, Jr. Chief of Parks Design and Construction Attachments: Change Order #1 Vendors Quote and Draft BOS Agenda Item Cc: File Tamarah Holmes Mike Golden Bruce Dove Southern Paving Chesterfield County Parks & Recreation Ettrick Park Walking Trail: Revised Layout PO # 249163 Bid # 07-352911-9593 2/1 /08 u/ 1" ,+~ in's'tall bridge~~ .~ ~'~ ~ ,~~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~., I ~. >,, ~ ,t ~y'~ ~ y ~ :,j, ~~ ~ ~!, .~` f. ."'~~_ ~'' v~ ~` t c. 2 * , , ~~,,•~~ ti ~- ~ Phase II Revisedti~~~~ .. ~}``' ~ ~ ) ~~~#~1 ~(b~lack~dashed)••`~` ~'~~ ~` ~ ~,~,~ 1 2574 feet ~~~~ ~~- ~ -~ , ` ~ Q ~ ~ Owner to~~~`, ~` ~ ; ,~ ;~ f~~ "~: .~ ~ ~-,,~ ~ relocate;Kiosk ~ ,~ ~.. '~ > ~ s ~: ~ ~µ ~ ,ter •z; ~~~ 1 . `~' ,..% remove ~iolla d ~ ~ ,: '~ ~ - t ~~ r/ J ~~ ~ t i R ~ ~ l ~ \ y ~~s ~ ~'' `~ . ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ a '~ ~~ ~/ ~ ~~ A \ , ~' r insfalf brid es ~~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~~ 9 wrier to remove• ~ ~~~ er to im ~, ~,~ 4~ ~. '~ ~ ~ieel~'stop~ wyY;S ~~ ~ ,~ b e . ,~ ,, ~~: ; ,. i~ _rtre s ~~, r _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~', ~ ~ ~ ~'` ur1 ~ ~ , b ~ ~ 7 , ~.. 4~'. .f' + T ~, .n ~ i . .. ~ ~. ~/, y, ~ 5V.#~~ rjf y . ,:'' ,Bid.'Layouf (v~life) ~: r , N3 c. !' ,d 1 v" w - ! ~ ' ~V }, c e: rill<.. 9., `~ ~, < <~,~ 4. A ` ~./ // f ,i_ ~ C i ~,; "j .~ f ~ a'' ;~ ,.'~4' , ~~ ,~ ; ~ Phase I .Revised.. _ . , ~ r ,~ , , ,~ ~- ;, _, %~' '~` ~, ~' Base Btid (black sold) ~,:r , S ~. ; ~'.~~ ~ T r .. ... . .: ~ ~ ~+~ ;: a~ ~~ ~ ~ ~,~-.. > - 2830 -feet ' ,, ~!' _;~ J ik ~~ ~ ~~ i ;\ Y, ~ 1, n _ y, 1 ' ~ f j ~~ ~~'~ ~ ~~ ~, +c v `Y ,m ~ ,1~ t y y ~'i, ~ f ~ ~ ~ * o~ ,~ ~~ f- ;_~~ ,_ ,~- ~. 0.50 100 200 300 400 O Feet ~'~ ®~.~~ ~~-_ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~„~,N,P AGENDA Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 8.6.6. Subiect: Authorize the County Administrator or His Designee to Execute a Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Agreement Between Chesterfield County and Hanover County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the County Administrator or his designee be authorized to execute a Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Agreement on behalf of the County Summary of Information: Chesterfield County and Hanover County originally executed a Police Services Mutual Aid Agreement effective December 10, 2003 which created a joint Law Enforcement Agreement. This agreement has been amended to reflect Colonel Thierry G. Dupuis as Chief of Police of Chesterfield County, Virginia. If the Board of Supervisors desires that the agreement continue in effect, it is necessary that the Board authorize the County Administrator or his designee to execute on behalf of the County the Mutual Aid Agreement in a form acceptable to the County Attorney. Preparers Colonel Thierry G. Dupuis Title: Chief of Police Attachments: Yes No # ~®~~.~~ LAW ENFORCEMENT MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this ~ day of ~lln 2008, by the HANOVER COUNTY SHERIFF, COLONEL V. STUART OK (the "Sheriff"), and CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, ("Chesterfield County")' by its duly authorized POLICE CHIEF, COLONEL THIERRY DLTl'LiIS. WHEREAS, Virginia Code ~~ 15.2-1724, 15.2-1730, 15.2-1730.1, and 15.2- 1736, as amended, authorizes sheriffs and local governing bodies to enter into reciprocal agreements for cooperation in the furnishing of certain law enforcement services; and WHEREAS, the Sheriff and Chesterfield County have determined that the provision of law enforcement aid across jurisdictional lines will increase their ability to preserve the safety and welfare of the entire area; and WHEREAS, it is deemed to be mutually beneficial to the counties of Chesterfield and Hanover to enter into an agreement concerning mutual aid with regard to law enforcement; and WHEREAS, the parties desire that the terms and conditions of Law Enforcement Mutual Aid be established. WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by the counties of Chesterfield and Hanover from a Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Agreement (Agreement), the Sheriff of Hanover and the Police Chief of Chesterfield County covenant and agree, each with the other, as follows: 1. The Sheriff of Hanover and the Chief of Police of Chesterfield County will endeavor to provide reciprocal law enforcement support within the capabilities available at the time the request for support is made and within the terms of this Agreement. 2. No party to this Agreement shall be liable to any other party for any loss, damage, personal injury or death to law enforcement personnel or equipment resulting from the performance of this Agreement, whether such occur within or outside the jurisdictional boundaries of the. parties. ~®~~_~~i 3. Requests for assistance pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be made by the Sheriff or his designee, to the Chief of Police of Chesterfield County, or designee. Such designees shall be identified by written notice from each party to the other. 4. The requesting jurisdiction shall be responsible for maintaining a radio communications system for use by the requested jurisdiction. Each jurisdiction shall create and maintain a mutual aid implementation plan as part of their law enforcement or communications standard operation procedure manual. Use of the State Information Radio System (SIRS) as a link channel through the dispatch center for each jurisdiction shall constitute fulfillment of this requirement. 5. The Sheriff and Chesterfield County shall create and maintain a mutual aid implementation plan consistent with this Agreement as part of the law enforcement standard operation procedure manual. 6. The services performed and expenditures made under this Agreement shall be deemed for public and governmental purposes and all immunities from liability enjoyed by the Sheriff and Chesterfield County within their respective jurisdictions within its boundaries shall extend to participation in rendering assistance pursuant to this Agreement. It is understood that, for the purpose of this Agreement, the personnel of the responding party is rendering aid once it has entered the jurisdictional boundaries of the party receiving assistance. 7. Officers responding to this Agreement shall have all necessary authority to enforce the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and to perform the other duties of the law enforcement officer; such authority and all actions pursuant to this Agreement shall be in conformance of the Code of Virginia, §15.2-1724, 15.2-1730, 15.2-1730.1 and 15.2-1736, including future amendments, and all other applicable laws and regulations. 8. This Agreement repeals and supersedes all previous written agreements or oral understandings relating to the provision of mutual law enforcement services. With the exception of those portions of other agreements and documents referred to herein, this Agreement represents the sole document regulating the provision of mutual law enforcement services, between the two parties. 9. This Agreement shall be effective from the date of execution, until terminated at any time by any party giving thirty (30) days written notice to that effect. 10. Any notice required by this Agreement .shall be deemed effective if given by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the other party at the addresses given below. Any notice to Chesterfield County shall be given to: Colonel Thierry Dupuis, Chief of Police Chesterfield County Police Department P. O. Box 148. Chesterfield, VA 23832 Any notice to the Hanover County Sheriff shall be given to: Colonel V. Stuart Cook, Sheriff Hanover County Sheriff's Office P.O. Box 40 Hanover, VA 23069 3 ~~®~_~~ ~~~ ~~ The signatures and seals of the parties are set out below in acknowledgment of this Agreement. ., ~,,~ `.~~~ ,~~;,zti~°~ ~ ry~~,. ~~, ,.~ ~' COLONEL THIERRY DUPUIS Police Chief of Chesterfield County (SEAL) COLONEL V. STUART COOK Sheriff of Hanover County (SEAL) COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, COUNTY /CITY OF , to-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2008, by Colonel Thierry Dupuis, Police Chief of Chesterfield County. My commission expires: Notary Public COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, COUNTY/C'~F-bF ~0.nd,l.~@1~-1 ,. to-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~°~ day of ~0-.nu~ ___ , 2008, by Colonel V. Stuart Cook, Sheriff of Hanover County. My commission expires: OC~I-D ~.IA~ 31 ~ a 00 ~ otar Pu is ~/ya~3 4 ~~~~_~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA Meeting Date: -March 12, 2008 Item Number: 8.6.7. Subject: Set Date for Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendment to Sections 19-181 and 19-30T of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as Amended, Pertaining to Unmanned (Self-service) Motor Vehicle Fueling Facilities in the I-1 Zoning District County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Board of Supervisors set April 9, 2008 for a public hearing to consider amendments to the Code of the County of Chesterfield. Summary of Information: At the request of Commissioner Gulley, staff prepared an ordinance amendment that would allow unmanned motor vehicle fueling facilities in industrial zoning districts. The Commission reviewed and discussed this item at their January work session, and held a public hearing at their February meeting. The current ordinance does not currently allow self-service fueling in the I- 1 (Light Industrial) zoning district. The I-1 district serves as the base district for other industrial zoning districts. Uses permitted in the I-1 district are incorporated in the more intensive I-2 and I-3 districts. There are many supporting retail and services uses permitted with restrictions in the I-1 district - self-service motor vehicle fueling would be consistent with these types of uses. Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Planning Attachments: ®Yes ~ No # ®®®~_~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA The attached draft amendment would include restrictions typical to the I-1 district, limiting such uses to: (1) projects of at, least 25 acres; (2) no more than 300 of project gross floor area; (3) interior project locations, not along peripheral roads; and (4) be primarily for industrial employee convenience. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment on February 19, 2008. No citizens spoke to the proposed amendment during the hearing. The Commission voted 4-0 (Waller, absent), to recommend approval of the proposal. ~~®~_~~. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 19-181 AND 19-301 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO UNMANNED MOTOR VEHICLE FUELING FACILITIES IN I-1 DISTRICTS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 19-181 and 19-301 of the Code o the County o Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 19-181. Uses permitted with certain restrictions. The following uses shall be permitted in the I-1 District subject to compliance with the following conditions and other applicable standards of this chapter. If the following restrictions cannot be met, these uses may be allowed by conditional use, subject to the provisions of section 19-13: 000 (b) Uses. permitted by right with restrictions in the C-1 District, artist material and supply stores, health clubs, messenger or telegraph serviced a~ office supply stores, and unmanned self-service motor vehicle fueling facilities, provided that: (1) Such uses shall only be permitted in projects of 25 acres or more; (2) At no time shall such uses exceed 30 percent- of the gross floor area under construction or occupied by permitted uses in such projects; (3) Such uses are located internally to the project, not along any road on the periphery of the project; and (4) Shall be primarily for the convenience of the employees of the industrial uses. 000 Sec. 19-301. Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings: 000 Unmanned self-service motor vehicle ueling facility: Any establishment having_pumps and storage tanks at which fuels and oils for -motor vehicles are dispensed or sold at retail, where: 1) dispensing is performed by the customer; 2) there is no on-site attendant; and 3) vehicle repair services are not offered. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1923 :77575.1 l ~ ~'~ ~. -~ ri~NUv CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 8.6.8. ~ Subject: State Road Acceptance I County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: II Board Action Requested: ~,~ Summary of Information: IMatoaca: Oak Forest Estates, Section 7 and a portion of Section 1 ~ Midlothian: winterfield Station, Section 1 Preparers Richard M. McElfish Title: Director, Environmental Engineerinq Attachments: Yes No # ®®~.~3 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance -OAK FOREST ESTATES, SEC 7 AND A PORTION OF SEC.1 DISTRICT: MATOACA MEETING DATE: March 12, 2008 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: FERINTOSH CT FERINTOSH LN FERINTOSH PL Vicinity Map: OAK FOREST ESTATES, SEC 7 AND A PORTION OF SEC.1 F ER~ti~ 0 i ~ r z Produced By Chesterfield County GIS ~ll"tJ~~.~~ TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance -WINTERFIELD STATION, SEC 1 DISTRICT: MIDLOTHIAN MEETING DATE: March 12, 2008 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: AMAJESS LN MARYLEBANE LN RIGNEY DR RODERICK CT W WINTERFIELD RD Vicinity Map: WINTERFIELD STATION, SEC 1' J O ~,__ R 1~ ~ Rp ~..~_~- _..__ P~R~ ---..r..~ _. t s ~N ~ ~ AMPJES O RODE141GK ~~c ~ ' I. T ~~ }~ ~~ ~~ ~ Q. ~ ~ RIGN~Y DR Q- .~-----_____ ~~ Produced ey Chestertield County GIS V~®.A.~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY "" ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. Page 1 of 1 - AGENDA D~qG` I~N~A ~' ';.. Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 8.6.9.a. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Iron Bridge Road and for the Extension of Kingsland Glen Drive from Chesterfield Business Partners LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action ReQUested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 6.596 acres along Iron Bridge Road and for the extension of Kingsland Glen Drive from Chesterfield Business Partners LLC, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the county to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of .way costs for road improvements when constructed. On December 19, 2007, the Board of Supervisors. accepted the conveyance of this parcel from Watermark Town Center LLC but Watermark conveyed the property to Chesterfield Business Partners LLC. DIStrICt: Dale Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: Yes ~ No Title: Right of Way Manager- # ~" VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG IRON BRIDGE ROAD AND FOR THE EKTENSION OF KINGSLAND GLEN DRIVE FROM CHESTERFIELD BUSINESS PARTNERS LLC 0 0 6.596 ACRE DEDICATION VGSLAND EEK LN VGSLAND C K T iICKAMAUGA D {IGKAMAUGA GT KE CAROLINE DR KE CA CT IANN~ CDUN ,~ w it m z O TllCKEF2 N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W I~ ~~'E t, . . S 1 hcl egraa 666b7 Ret ~~~~~~~ d o \ Iz x °~oy g ~ ~ _ ~ >. W "Ib m 3~`-c2<~Z ~ ~ Q - OG ~r G;1- o S r aWwz~^~o< O w as ms..w^~a !~® N ~ In a,.V1" vlWw~m vlrm II ~ >' ON-n O Fa QXO- W ~' OmWWwz z a~FwwzFT ~, ~ ~" _~ ~«V2Q pow<: ~~~ ~' ~~+ a ar;s~ GINIA tin g4 >~a~s~N ~~~ ~ m ~ o:m>W <' 4 ~ aWZ oo~N~~y o o ~ ~d' Q,, VIN j ~ jp1 2 ~ tY'J < F ~ vi ,)/`b m O r~ mOOS6~Z 4~ ~ p~C J 2 ~K NU YMW~'a ~~ 4~ j J v ~~IYY-0^Y•J Q~ yoJ F KC Wvm~ ,7 O m amm Z on'~ ~~:.~ Yn~o ~~ v W rc~m¢ ~~ C ~. C C r ~ :. L WW p pp pO w N~ 'y - r Q 0~ ~~ ~ VO1 N N N N W N Uli .'~ _. 3 ° ~ W 9i ^ O I 5 ~`' PII m 001 1~ 0~1 {bD YNl b M ~ .. 1t ~ L~~ ,"G~ ~ tl 0 II A II II 11 I I ^ 1~'/ NGS~'8PW ~ q ~®®C ~I v I g ~ K WWF V1~a ~~5 4 ~N~ o e~b~~s^~ yee H p,,~~~66 pG GE RD 8 ~ 01\0 1~~ 1a / ~~ ~~. m ~ - O ~ < a 8 IY 2 W nNOV 1 U a a u °z C~Nam r 0 0. 0 _ Z m .~... 0(~ 0 77>1I J1On 0110 ~ '; ~~~ (ViW~ Z V m. r.1 c7 O K \ 4a~• Y ©O~nnam e,nw~ ":r \ o~ 61 O W K OD K rn a~ \y e m Wazmo ma v°i n^> ,I 0 J m U ~ _ ` ~ ~~ r it Cl G~ 9J ~f^'. mI %p mr Noi O L D a N W V J ^N -, $ o ~ °~ Z!$~;Qq~~~=W nn ~namam fir nm - ONOm~Z W °znon- ^f S dg i '! ~ h mO / ~~\ 0 ~ r ~~ ~ or nm N( m wo ^~ ~~ / w ~ ... N ^ 2 1J II~ ' YIm `y!~ Sc. n ,^_ b~ =WI y T.) ~.•j 8 "z/ r- ~ ti~ "- ~nw C ~ ~<u$ r.aZam w2~~ \W\ r C\Q N ~ Ill pWWW ~ a \~~ ~ N n IO ~• p~ <~® ~ ® ~® 4 . N ~ Q ~ \\~~ O ~ ~~~ ~,~ 0 N^ r / W ~~ ~^ ~„a~~` p m _° am z 9wm~.., W 21+m^~ wan ~-- aroao Wn; ~u'r. ~{ $ $ ` u `. z Y ~ ~~~~WO ~~m~A Z 8 5'N F ~ V m ~g~ ~~~ a dA"~~~ U ~ a ' d ~~~zz~ o z~ ~ ~` z" ~a~ W ~%~~ g~ ~O O~ ~ Z ~~ r^ ~A V, E W W W ^~ goN. » O O U N 01 6 O ~ Y ~~ q a O ~ ~~~0 ; a a~c ~ ooD way g n~ w w `- + W Q O D U ~ m ^ ^ V L pr. (p(Q~~ Sm -l O am. O < N O _ n O ~ N N ^ d m M O Ni O ^ v ~ r OI n s OI N ~ N N1 ^I, 0 ~ ri 01 0, ri o ^ t ~ Y n m 10 W N N N f N Y] ^ ~n ^ N n n V1 .- + N ^ N ; w ; 3 ; ; ; ~ I..' ~ - W j~ WI w w W W W W O Z1 m N pp11 in P N 00 ~ '~ ^ O n ~^ .- U 0 ~- ,0 d 1G N h - ~ r -' n f d O O ~V ~ n N N ~ 0 N ^ e r N S m^ N Yl p~ O O e ~ ~ ry f J a < ,n m ~ ~ N n rc oo ~ b o h + ;n + In + iv r b m 7o n o+ o n n n n b n m $ tn v c : o ^ ~N m 2 Z VI Z Z f/1 Z ZI G Z ,A N Z N N Z V1 2 2 ~ ~ n ~ N ,gi o n I m . ol i".' o o~ o'~ ° m n w n N n W ro N o N r n p cni ~ N m ~ o : r iO ~N -I ^ e H ~v a r a O ~ $ o % : °V O ° n o ly e ~b' b !o g ± ldy o o RR O N p pppp~~ 1n pp rn O n H ^ ~n ^ 1~,f m OpO m N n ~ I~ ~ f` pNppp JI IV N I~ m N h N h b I~ Y ^ n ^ O ~ O N ~ p n N on V1 n O VmI ;. N aa N b i'Of a ^ -~ m b N m YO1 ' a 'vI N C> O b O b ~ b n ~ N b O a "~ o h :n ; n b m I rn oo ad n l m b rn a o, n d n rn m n m rn m h w ~ ~ u - u N V n V d U n V U U V , V O C: V N Ic~ n u d . sl Y1 v ,0 u n u m u 0~ V N V N u d° ,~ f ~q O r n m^ n ,- ZW m rI z ~o ga~°nN n^ joWm n' iul <d`~'Of e^ 5zo1 n n ~l3 ~Q<n Z I. ~ tta ( _ o iwa ZW o.~ ~ r O ~LL ~. yg! {V4yJ m O b ~ N v ~ J W V r, l/1 V A ~~iR br ;~ ~ . ®0 O r ~~ M~ zwl /;: m~' /.~~ . ~~1. J < W LL L W 6 W ~ m"~O . Oi a VI~ {~ ~ ;~> ry o P m N1 n N O m ® z n '-' ~ io o m ^ m n : oi viOi o n ~ ~a~~~~ <J d iJ ~`.', o ~~I v >I o w ~i o m o, ~ .i m c~ m •,~ lri I o.~n vIN o ° m "v' n m O n d MI o o N ~ N ~ N m ^ ~n ^ d ~.nl •r , I ., . N m .- ^ e I ~ ~ I n i ) W W ; ; 3 ; ; ~ •.I ,.I rt .-I_~ :. ~ W W W III ~: iJ ; . W W W ; W T A Y O, N W N i I^'f m O ~ 1- ~I~ ~w ~, ~d ~ ~+1 M ~ r ~~ Ih r~ i0 1 ~ , n N , O N O N In 01 N N 01 r t. :~~ : n ~~ m l ~ N o v , ~ ~ l~ ,n N O N T n O N m O Z 2 < N F[.,, b ~ ~p p N bl 1(I ^ b O tr O n h m O ~ in O to om in ^ l~'v o ul ~ v, n o on n ~ vi n 'r m o hI m :- o h m iv o in m m Ut m m Z Z VI Y ~ Vl 'J1 I Z I? ~ z In z V) ln, l.) Z 2 VI Z Z N z ^ J ~n J J ~ ~ i ~- r I;~T.. I ~ J~ ~ d In J ~n J r- po lo, N ^ N J N J f J r J J - J I L = ~ Wi v ~ ~_ °O1~~i ~m .- V O ~lal~~lam u~~~m~ w min Sm~ WazoaR i~n J U ^ ~ _-4- -~ N \` pzt'i `° 2 G a mza,m r. a d it ~.'~n O ~ z p a. ~~~ z%m Q a r "I m V a ~ z a O U ~~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY °°'~~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS- Page 1 of 1 - AGENDA ~~ IMP Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 8.B.9.b. Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Waterford Lake Drive from Vanine Holdings, LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Rectuested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.040 acres along Waterford Lake Drive from Vanine Holdings, LLC, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.040 acres along Waterford Lake Drive. This dedication is for the development of Virginia Air Distributors. Approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Right of Way Manager Attachments: ®-Yes ~ No # ~~J~3.~~ VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG VI(ATERFORD LAKE DRIVE FROM VANINE HOLDINGS LLC PKWY ' 0.040 Acre Dedication m z o '~° s -a ~ y r ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ '4 RFORD AY~+ m f, s~~ PAVILIU A ~ C ~ ~ p~~kE °~Nr ~ d ~ p N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W ~.. _ 'E j __.. S 1 Irol egidk 666bT 4et 1 1 4 -- 11 ° ° it i V a3s ~ ~~~~4 ~~~ I ~ .. o,. 16 S ~ I r u ~a-.~ ~' gT '~~ (~ y' `oti ~~~~ . i'~F al Mat aPMMM CCi r I ` °' O T°y fa {~~ ~n A 1a L O ~ I 1 Z~~ ~ amog mo ~~ ~~~ 1 a~+a ~ ° it I ~ aboa ~F> `~ ~~ mho V {~ ~ 4 2 II I r m u av~~ a~ ' r ~ ~u °~v~ WNW ~ I I I ~ mN1 ~~b~ b3 1 O $ I II ,~a 3 a T `O o'~ ~ ~~ I I I ~ ~ "~ A I ~I I a \ J 1 -- ....._ 1 _...__--'----~ _._...._--'- ... ~ \ o y __." mmH.Sa "~ ` ~ ~ ~ 31NL10 3J1V7 0210.~t131dM ~ 4 ~ ~ s ,, _ ~,V, q y ;.L.9L', oi'.~O,V sR~ 44 .. .YL ~54! aW75~ ~~ ~ ~ I I (gL6Z '~ WJ o! , rl r69! ~ a 3 OL'Zr- 90 6 •-ON - - - - _ _ _ _ aoana74M /0 7/N `"_ ~.~~-~- '~ s I I I a ~~" .[8'1'61' ~8261'.tilS I 1 ~___~- e~° / ~~~0 ~FB~l 1 ~ vO°~°_ I I m~ j~ / 1 1 b3 ~i 1 I dal u ~// 1 1 ~ °' y I I ti' `! 7 ~~, 1 1 a I °~^~. /~ /~ 1 1 I m~3 ~ 1 1 ~ I 1 1 q 2 i~ I i y2 /' Isl I~ ° w ~ I I ~ in .1 1~ ti i~ i~' H io m vl 1`i o~,'a,~ I I ~~ / 0 2~ 4 qI ~~' ~ .~ 1 2 I 1 S 4 n ''o~~ `CI I~ ^ 2 2 ~ c~2 1 ~I ~s o~~~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~,~o ~a ~ ; oa 1 "I H~ uby ~ 1 0 1 2 ~ ° Ic. ;~~ i r ~ 1 ~ a2 ~ I`L SiI o~ ~bagi~ 1 l maSnm^+ 11 ~ ~ ~^ I~~,,;I (gL6z 'wy atW51 i u O v~ N ~ to I.,,L .' I e Pppa q,>oaJa7oAl /~ ( ~ 4 ~ b }2 . ~i f . l ~ 0 7~ oN of .tL't691 1 1 `~ 6X ~ 1 •,! c 1 I I i$I ~~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ '~ I '^ °~ /' 1 1 ~ v~~: _j ~a ~: i /' 1 ~ / I 1 oao ~ ~~ ~ ~, g 1 I n=~~ e:i•\ I pry ` ~y °~z.. 2 / C ~ W 2 ~1 901 1~ ~ ~ O ~ I ~ 6 3~ ~a ~ ab~/j ~ I~ 1•"~ ~ N 0 N = ~ C ,,,"`IIICCC( ~`( ~ b I z ~ NpI IAgt ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ,CC y 3 X10 W^~~ a yl ISM w ~ 1 Ny3~ ~~~2 ~~ ~ i~ I ~, ~$ a ~3 N 1_ I ,~ b- x ~ _ -- - , r~ ~zaon ~ Co ,08'L9Z ~H&L0.5'OS ~ ~1~ I I~ yg a^ ~ ~~ ~ ?~ 1 I ~~ y~ n,zle r ° v~ -- 1 1 ~~~ I I UC i' a lb _ m ° o q lJAD,~9 I I mWA ~~n ~ ~ ~,$~~ I I ° ~ ~ ~. ~i ~° I ~ ~1>< M~ a~ ~ ~ °' n Q " PLAT SHOWWG 0.040 ACFF:i i;'~f>I UF.UICATEf~Ii) Ti-IE~ tai °e a 4 a ~d~gLL~ d ~e^° ~• ~g O ~ ~ Q 9 ~ COUNTY OF CHESTEFIELO, :,fH;VATI='JARIABLI: VJiiJTH ~ ~O ~ #~!f 7~l~ ,@ ~s # P ~ Y B DRAINAGE EASEMENT AIVp A t U' Tt:MPORANY' 16! 3 3 i 3 ~ R o N. ~°~, C.ONSTRUCTION EASEMENT CROSSING PROPERTIE.. 1 VINO 6q$g 6 85{ ~A 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ N EAST OF WATERf-URO LAKE DRIVE c [ ~ ~SfI a#~ ~ 6a$~ ~~8 ~'R S CLOvER nn. i.iai, :r..r CMESTERFIElO CGIJI'J?Y VIRidNIA CHESTERFIELD COUNTY "`~`°~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 - AGENDA h _ ~N,r Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 8.8.10. Subject: Request Permission for a Gravel Driveway to Encroach Within a Forty-Foot Unimproved County Right of Way Known as Werth Street to Access Lot 378, Block M, Plan of Chester County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant Richard K. McLaughlin permission for a gravel driveway to encroach within a 40' county right of way known as Werth Street to access Lot 378, Block M, Plan of Chester, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Richard K. McLaughlin has requested permission for a gravel driveway to encroach within a 40' county right of way known as Werth Street to access Lot 378, Block M, Plan of Chester. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Right of Wa~Manager Attachments: ®Yes ~ No # ~~®~'~~ VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST PERMISSION FOR A GRAVEL DRIVEWAY TO ENCROACH WITHIN A 40' UNIMPROVED COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN AS WERTH STREET TO ACCESS LOT 378 BLOCK M PLAN OF CHESTER ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~/ ~ REQUESTED PERMISSION FAR ~ A GRAVEL DRIVEWAY - - / / /~ I~~i ~ ~ ~ ~ % ~ ,~ ~~ L 0~~~ ~ L~ ' ~~+ ~~R31s ~ ti ~o m N Chesterfield County Department of Utildies W L.- `~ ~' E i ~'~ ' S I Ocl a qra a 33333 4e t caw: ~nrwTA e. z si ¢r 379 15' 37 ~ IZ 0 WRNS STREET ss 7 ~p~, ~ asa ~c. a ata u 379 f ~i ~ ~ ~ ~~ i - Richard K. McLaughlin ~, r (~ 4236 Curtis St M""' "s ~''~ DB. 8011 PG. 638 ~ N '~aot~s PIN: 790652094300000 ~ ~ ~ ua~ , ~' taoao' s ,+ w ; ~ ~. ~ ~: ~~ u a . "n r ° """i° a ' 377 ~ , pp ~~ ~~ pp~~ ~ ~ 3g1R113~SRl~T' r a ~ ~ ~ 7~H,OUGHTON ~$~ 1234 OlwifS STi~ET ~) ` +g i r~ I/ 38i «. eo CL~tTIS STREET o' pr~r~towxnr~paRZ~ap ~ar3~8 .~La~r ~~r; ~~r.~vd~~sr~R„ B?~MFyDA AISTRI'CT' ~ C,F~STBIQPIBGD G~OCJIV'lY, VIRG.tMA ~5 AND ~ fRC AERTtNEN7 F~S~ +~ O~ NFIICH A TITLE $$ARCN X~k1' OISQ.OSE ,r,~ 1~TARY~Y'L. PAR1~S,11VC. ' ~ZB 0'7 ~ 43Od W. NUNDRFO ROAD SARV6Y L PARKS ~. CN~STER VA. ~, ~ 1~ ~ ~ 748-864f r~8-05T3 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 AGENDA ~. INCA Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 8.B.~~. Subject: Approval of the Purchase of a Parcel of Land North of West Providence Road County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Approve the purchase of a parcel of land containing 10 acres, more or less, for $32,000, from Courthouse Acres Partnership and authorize the County Administrator to execute the sales contract and deed and approve the transfer of funds from Park Improvements CIP Funding. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve the purchase of a parcel of land containing 10 acres, more or less, PIN: 743693536100000 for $32,000.00, plus closing costs which are estimated to be $8,000.00, from Courthouse Acres Partnership. A substantial accord determination has not been made; however, it adjoins 42 acres already owned by the county for which substantial accord determination for park use has already been approved and a substantial accord determination for the ten acres is currently being considered by the Planning Commission. The contract for purchase of this property was signed by the sellers in February 2006 and they are not willing to extend closing beyond March 2008. Parks and Recreation staff has met several times with citizens from the adjacent community and as a result, a concept plan has been developed to address several citizen concerns and requests. The current substantial accord request before the Planning Commission has been deferred to allow for additional community meetings. Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Right of Way Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA It is the Planning Department's determination that the use of the 10-acre parcel for a park complies with the Plan. The current assessed value for the parcel is $33,900 and purchase of the parcel would be contingent upon an acceptable environmental assessment of the property. The acquisition of the additional 10 acres to the approximately 42-acre site already approved for substantial accord would make the site a more viable community park -site. The draft site master plan calls for needed soccer/lacrosse/football fields in an area of the County where such sizable acquisitions can be difficult. Funds are available for this purchase from the Parks Improvement Account within the Parks and Recreation CIP. Approval is recommended. DIStI'ICt: Clover Hill ®®~.~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~„ejo BOARD OF SUPERVISORS .. Page 3 of 3 AGENDA -~ h~~,~ Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board approve the purchase of 10, more or less, acres at a cost of $32,000 plus an estimated $8,000 in closing costs. This property (in addition to adjacent property already owned by the county) has been identified as a potential park site and staff will be pursuing substantial accord approval for recreational uses. Funds are available in the Park Improvements CIP appropriations for this transfer. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Mana ecL ment ~_'7'7 ®~®~_~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~~ AGENDA _~ .. hgc~N~~.~° Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date.: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 8.8.12. Subject: Authorize the County Administrator to Execute Benefit Consulting Contracts with Mercer LLC and Wachovia Insurance Services, Incorporated County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to authorize the County Administrator to enter into contracts with Mercer LLC and Wachovia Insurance Services, Inc. Summary of Information: County and Schools staff recently completed an extensive RFP process for benefits consulting. Benefits consultants are used by the County and Schools to assist with health and dental care negotiations. and for technical guidance on retirement and other benefit plans. The School Board will consider a similar agenda item on March 11, 2008. Preparers Karla J. Gerner Title: Director, HRM Attachments: ~ Yes ®No # ~ ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 hkc~NU e AGENDA Budget and Management Comments: The Board of Supervisors is requested to authorize the County Administrator to enter into benefit consulting contracts with Mercer LLC and Wachovia Insurance Services, Inc. The consultant services are billed by the hour on an "as needed" basis and cost the county approximately $40,000 per year. Sufficient funding is appropriated annually to cover the cost of the services. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management ~~~~_~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 AGENDA _~-~ h9c~d~~ Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 8.B.13. Subject: Transfer of District Improvement Funds to the Chesterfield County School Board for Post-Prom Celebrations County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: The Board is requested to transfer $1,900 from the Bermuda District Improvement Fund, $2,900 from the Clover Hill District Improvement Fund, $1,900 from the Dale District Improvement Fund, $2,900 from the Matoaca District Improvement Fund, and $2,400 from the Midlothian District Improvement Fund to the Chesterfield County School Board for drug- and alcohol-free post-prom celebrations subject to the conditions described below. Summary of Information: Each Supervisor has requested the Board to transfer funds from their respective District Improvement Fund to the Chesterfield County School Board for drug- and alcohol-freepost-prom celebrations at various local area high schools. The requested amounts from each fund are as follows: Bermuda: $1,000 for Thomas Dale High School, $500 for L.C. Bird High School, $200 for Chesterfield Community High School, $100 for the Maggie L. Walker Governor's School and $100 for the Appomattox Regional Governor's School Total: $1,900 Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management 0425:78149.1 Attachments: Yes ~ No # (~0~~~1 . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Clover Hill: $1,000 for Monacan High School, $1,000 for Clover Hill High School, $500 for Cosby High School, $200 for Chesterfield Community High School, $100 for the Maggie L. Walker Governor's School and $100 for Appomattox Regional Governor's School Total: $2,900 Dale: $1,000 for Meadowbrook High School, $500 for L.C. Bird High School, $200 for Chesterfield Community High School,-$100 for the Maggie L. Walker Governor's School and $100 for Appomattox Regional Governor's School Total: $1,900 Matoaca: $1,000 for Manchester High School, $1,000 for Matoaca High School, $200 for the Chesterfield Community High School, $500 for Cosby High School, $100 for the Maggie L. Walker Governor's School and $100 for Appomattox Regional Governor's School Total: $2,900 Midlothian: $1,000 for Midlothian High School, $.1,000 for James River High School, $200 for the Chesterfield Community High School, $100 for the Maggie L. Walker Governor's School and $100 for Appomattox Regional Governor's School Total: $2,400 A portion of this request is from the Maggie L. Walker Governor's School, which is located in Richmond and includes 234 Chesterfield County students. Since the Governor's School is a regional public school facility and is legally independent of the Chesterfield County School Board, the School Board will have to take action to authorize the transfer of the total $500 payment to the Governor's School. Accordingly, if the Board of Supervisors approves the transfer of the funds to the School Board, the money cannot be given to the Governor's School unless the School Board also takes public action to approve the transfer to the Governor's School. A portion of this request is from the Appomattox Regional Governor's School, which is located in Petersburg and includes 127 Chesterfield County students. Since the Governor's School is a regional public school facility and is legally independent of the Chesterfield County School Board, the School Board will have to take action to authorize the transfer of the total $500 payment to the Governor's School. Accordingly, if the Board of Supervisors approves the transfer of the funds to the School Board, the money cannot be given to the Governor's School unless the School Board also takes public action to approve the transfer to the Governor's School. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 AGENDA The remaining requests for funds originally came from each school's PTSA or Prom Committee. The County is not legally authorized to transfer funds to these organizations or committees. The County is authorized to transfer funds to the School Board but only if the transfer is contingent on the money being placed in capital projects or school operating accounts to be applied to appropriate school-funded post-prom activities. The school system must write checks directly to vendors who will be supplying goods or services to post-prom events and these goods and services must be purchased in accordance with the Virginia Public Procurement Act. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. ~~®~..~~ ,••~ +~•a~ rn.- Ou9 J~J ifUUl E$ $ $ ~ -- DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION ~ 002 This application .must be completed and signed- before the Coun ca consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completi g and signing this form does~not mean that'you will receive funding or that.the Coun can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the autho~lty ~of the County to glue public funds, such as District Improvement . punds, to private persons or. organizations and these restrlctlor,s may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your re uest. q -- ~ .~- "What is the•r~ame of tha applicant request? (person or"organisation) making ails funding ttox Tonal Governor's School PTSA~ 2• If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the onganizatlon? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorpora "pn and/or bylaws to application. The attached bylaws of the AgGS pTSA out~uue the r-:,--:- ses of our organi ~a~ ,~,n Ai~ycle III at the local al levels_ In practical terns, we strive to fulfill these goals in ~~ ~ i e ther thrvu rneanin ful ~ 4 programs at our general m0etings, and by erioouraging both adults and students to become involved (over) . 3• What is the amount of funding you ate seeking? 5500 - $1000 4- Describe in detail the funding request and how fhe money, if approved, will be spent. , weal~su ~sto het us rovide a safe, drug-free, _~pervised~ enterta~.ning celebration following min. re are tlao ttact~ed;-One is an outline fran last.yeaz's party •. overview of the scope of our needs and tasks. ~,• -rne other is a list .of last years expenses. 5• Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which ou are seeking funds? y f L _ - . • _ been made available. for use by high schools fbr celebrations. 63533.1 Page 1 FEB-29-2008 09 ~ 27 8D4 53 8001 nr •, ~ ~ ~ ••g- ~ ~" _. _. .. .....,, .:,., vvy o~~ ouul ESTES SALES ~OC3~ 2. in any number of special events sprnisored by Yl'SA. We honor student acoompListmients in t1~r focus areas by providing extra opportunities fox performance, and by helping to fund aschool-based schr~larship honoring one of our former, much revered administrators. we support the learning environment by seeing that teachers are recognized for their tireless work ~eir respective e~epartrnents are supplemented with much needed monetary support. We strive to :keep 9raw,ing,the involve- ment of our families in our meetings and events because we believe-that this is the way to build a oaamamity of Barents or guardians, teachers and students: a P--T-S A. FEB-29-2008 09 27 804 35,'> BC~01 r ~Y ~c •. - ~ - ~~ ,...~ Ewa ~~'1'~S SdI.ES ~.:~. :~ ~.ie:..r . +'';w ;~i:/"a :.. c;: What is the ~ address of the applicant ~ making this funding request? I 51~ W. Washington St. notoretn,r~_Va ~~Rn3 I. If this request for funding wilt not fully fund .your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? ARCS PZ'SA receives no other financial hel .for ,the st- rom . any organization. We receive some hel . _fro~n` _ P member families by way of in-kind donations. If applicant is ark organi7atibh, ,ahsw~r the follotiving: is the organization a corporation? Yes ________ Is the organization non-profit? Yes No `~x~ Is the organization tax exempt? Yes - (X) No -____ f No ~~ .. -~~ What is the telephone number, fax number, ,e-mail address of the applicant? 604-722-0201 (fax) ----~ . i ~. FEB-29-2008 09~c6 Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must , be the president, .vice-president,. Chairmanbi~ector or vice-chairman of the`organlzation. Signature President Title (If signing are behalf of an organization) ___rr'1~i~]'a MP_rilc Printed Name Date Page 2 804 353 8001 q~~ ~~Q~~~ /' ~~ . ~ ~ ~ +' w DISTRICT g1APROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This applicatlon must be oanpletsd and si8nsd bei~or+e the County can consider s request br funding wlth District Impr+ownwnt Funds. Complstln8 and sipMrp this tbrm does not mean that you wIN rar~iw fWndinp or That the County can ~Ihl ~k~r Y~ req~ Vlnpinia Isw Place substantial rsstrictlons on tla autlrorlly of the County to alw public funds, such as DlstMct Improvenant Fundy ~ P~ pins or orlgnlsatlons and theN rrstridions may produde the Count's Board of 8upenrlsors from even considering your request. 1. What is the n me of the a ~plk;ant (person or organization) nag ~ g request? J v~~ ~ ~,. .~ - P ~ - S ~. a2 lgs.c o~, `„fide C P7-.s ~ 2. ff an or+8arizatiorr is the applk;arrt, why Is the rs~time and purpose of the otbn? (Also attach or8an~ Iatbn's moat recent 1arddes of inootporatlon BrKI/OI'by18W8 to appNcation. ~ 1 eat r Sc+a a- Tt ~ c l,. ~ C p e ~~. 3. 1Nhat is the amount at`funding you are seeking? ~. o a o, vy 4. Deecrlbe ~ detail the fiandkng oast and how the nwney~ if approwed~ will be spent. lee s~«~ ~ y, 5. Is any County invoMed in the project, event or p~gram fa which you are seeking funds? I eG~ ~ S c e ~ ac 4 0~ S . ~ ~ .~ . r 83833.1 Paps 1 ~®~~L~"7 e -u,~ ~~ ~.....~. ,. ~. .~ 4 6. H this request 1bc ltindMg wiN not tuNy fund Your' ao~ty or program. what other indivkiuals or orgenizatiorrs wib Provide the n~nder of the tending? ,_.,r P~~c cee Gc-Z~ac4~ S~e~ ~ 6 7. ff apppcant is an organization, answer the bllowing: Is the organization a c~orporatt~? Yes No N a aganizatlor'r Yes L No Is the organization apt? Yes ~/ ~ ~ No 8. What 1s tine addrriss of the app~nt . n>alc~g ti~ funding request? aun~. ~.,,•il , n,; tlr....~ eN ~ c pTJ /a 3 90 / ~« ~~ctl~~~.~~h~ UA ~3ji2 9. What is tits belepFane ~ fax nurnber~ a-m~p of the appllcani? o y- ~ y y- ~ 5 ~r ~'A x ~e,~ 1 ~ ti ~e cc,vr. CG,t ~. ~ e ~' . Signaturo of applMant. K .you aro signln® on behaN of an o~aniisatlon .you must !se the P~~M. v~prsside~ chalrman/diroctor or airman of the organisation. Q. Signaturo 1- a u ~ e 1'U ew.'I J res, C lo~p~ ~~ ll /~1 S. ~?S ~ Tltls f 1~ si0nil a+ bohaK o1 sue ~pan~atlon~ Prinbd Nams ~ la~~o~ Dab 83533.1 Paps 2 Cl~~~~ l~~ ~I DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS A PLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this Corm does not mean that you will receive funding or that the Coun can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to glue public tunds~ such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. ~~ ~ • What is the name of the applicant _(person or organization) making this fundin request? rFie' g - ~~Fl .S -~1~oai - 2• if an organization is the a Ilcant, Pp what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organizatlon's most recent articles of incorpomtlon and/or bylaws to application. 17~~pr ~,•,,~ ~ubti• S~ k aol ~.,r- 3• What is the amount of funding you are seeking? ~ I pip • ~c, 4• Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. t~ e. i n~ _~ a -b, ~ ....._ _~ _ `4-4- aSP ~' ,~ ~ n^ c ~Y~ rY~jr- -,cin~nr ~Yh ~~ D.n,. 1~n.. .~ TT _ n 5 • Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? ~o 63533.1 Page 1 ~~~~=~~ ,r ~~ ~~~ l 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity: or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the. funding?. (J~~r 4`~u.~lPn'fb f1dUe ~JYlblun~te~~ ~ ~Mrn raters -ro ru~5e+ rnonleS -roc- i~r~r~ . Aold~~h;,val vn_o~nie~ wi II bz rdise~l hu -Picket Sales . ~,s-I-~~~+ ~rnorovernen~F ~~r~ds ill cL~lP~i~n~4~e ~~e ~+dsf ~r s~dP~:f, rnQ~k ~ our S~uc~F~s c~crne ~r~ eeonomic+ctl (~ ~pPr~vpd I~ern~es. 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: ~+ A is the organization a corporatlon? Yes I No Is the organization non-profit? Yes ~, No Is the organizationtax-exempt? Yes No 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? e5~ o ~ '~ ~ k of a o c, t'r.kes~Fer-, ~A a3~31 9. What is the telephone number, fax number, a-mail address of the applicant? phone: ~a~-')cot3'-(9l~l0 T fix ~ scot' -~co I - (o i 7 I ernai(: daw~_lP~tz.<<v~c~a~ne+.net- Signature of applicant. K you are signing on behalf of an organtzatlon you must be the president, vice-president, chalrman/director or vi i n of t rganization. Signannture ~ e~ior (~~QSS ~~50!' --~ Title (K signing on behaN of an organization) IJd~x 1~'~. ~.Prt~Z_ Printed Name a/a~ /~ Date 63533.1 Page 2 C ~et~;v~'!e. ~ C ~~®~_~~ .` ». Fey, 75. 2009 c:59~M SPORTS SU?PLEMENT SOUTH No. 4965 F. 3 . ~- 3. 4. 5. 83533.1 PQge 1 FEB-25-2008 09:1R RAn ~~a r~z~~ „~., DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION Thls application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for landing with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing thls form does not mean that you will receive iunding or that the County can legally consider your request. Vlrglnia law places substantial restrlctions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as Distrlct Improvement Funds, to private persons or organliatlons and these restrictions may preclude thA County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. ~ • What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? C hS ~~ ~~ ~ ~-,.~(;~iQ.n {~c-d ~... 2. If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent artiGes of incorporation and/or bylaws to application. ~~ D~ ~ -p tU.e~ ~~ r~ 11.~r1-o ~ ,- r ~ -f~. n.t`, ,p~ ~.~. r~ ~ l . A What is the amount of funding you are seeking? ~ ~ pet .OC] Describe in d~etpail `the funding request and how the mone~r, if approved, will be spent. _ -~ \ V ` \ a rti ~.~e 1. ~_ `~ h l ` _` A ~ ~l ` ~ V\ Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? ~~~'~.~ FeE.1U. 11103 c:;o~M .r 6. SF'CRTS SU~PLEME~T SOUTH N~~.4955 F. 4 ~ J 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes No ~ Is the organization nonprofit? Yes ~.. No Is the organization tax exempt? Yes 'v No 8. What is the address of the a,,pplicant making this funding n;quest? 9. What is the telephone number, fax number, a-mail address of the applicant? ~Arc~ Z. ~ 9 ~ ~. & 1 ~ c~V1 3S D~ W ~ t.~ ~Mlf~~~ ~i~r ~ o~h~ Q Go c~ c~~ l~.o~ Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-preaidant, chalrmaNdlrector or vico~hairman of the organization. ^~ _ A~1 ~' ignature Qc~ ~ {~cOcY. ~ - C~ a...~..f-• Title (if signing on behalf of an organFsation) Printed Name Date 63533.1 Page 2 ®~®,,4...7c~i FEB-25-2008 09 16 664 378 0351 a~i ° `~" If this request for funding wiN not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? -D n ~ s ~--~- a ]~~ ,. ~ ~r..u ~ d n rte' i c,n~ . ,/ t f. .! V ~~ ~{. F ~ • ~, FB .~ ,~% DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS ~Gtii~, ?6 ~OpB APPLICATION yFs,~?~~,,,.,,_ This application must be completed and signed before the County consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing an signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to glue public funds such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. 1 • What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? ~~~ Ri ~ e,, E.}Zn~,~ 5~~1 ho~fi Prr~w1 (pTS(}~ 2. If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organ(zation's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application. ~e ,~, l,r.~O3 ~ ~ ~~ ar ,~, 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? ~ (Q_nC'~ _ ~ 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. ; ~ ~ q~ Q„c~ "~lc~~-~Q.s -+a-,a.-t` wi II co~-t- u~5 V 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? ~{ ~ . W ~ d.a , ~„~ ~ ~ ~ R ~ o T Q ~~.c~ 1' ~-' ~c 63533.1 Page 1 ®~~_~~ 7cur,,~., ~;,r~~ 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? ~.~.v -4-~+w~~ ccv~no -~+-r.N-,n ~ wnia~ c~.,.cl S ~ far o~na.c.-t's C.orraora~'~'~ rJ~a~.,o~_-~i o,~s a..rel. cL -~ho~na.. - c~ - --}~,r~ a~,al__ fY1cZ.i ~ 1 vto ~ 5 D ~ 1 c_i''" ~.~~v~ 'S 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes No / Is the organization non-profit? Yes /' No Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes Z No 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? Mre . I_; t S~-~F.~-v~~ 1151 N i clnol ~y ~v~.~ C_+- . M i d l cs4-Rr• ~ a.•1 _ Vlac ~ 31 ~ 3 9. What is the telephone number, fax number, a-mail address of the applicant? ~5oul - 5 b0 - 303p ~ C~~-1 - 5 b 0- 3 U 3 a. iro~.x> b ~ c ~--ff~r ci c~ v~ ~ ~- , v~-~ Signature of applicant.. N you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president vice-president, chalrmanldirector or vice-chairmannof the organization. `~t ~p .Y~~oY~ Signatu~ Po~-~ Plr~~ Cana..i ryY,ct,-, Title (If signing on behalf of an organization) l___ i 1 _ ~e-FFe.~s o r1 Printed (dame 63533.1 -Date Page 2 ~. ,~-v o ~ DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLIC_ This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law pieces substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persona or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. ~ • What is the am of the applicant arson or o anization) eking this ndin request? ~ g 2• If an organization is the applicant, what i organization? (Also attach or ani bon's s the nature and purpose of the and/or bylaws to application. ~ t recent articles of into oration ~- 3• What is the amount of funding you are seeking? ~~ 6 (1 4• Describe ins detail a funding request and how the money, if approved, _ will- be spent f~~ n,~. ._L~ 1v e Jt~ -- (o OD 5, 63533.1 Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? ~ r~ Page 1 ®~~.~~ 6 If this request for funding will not fully fund your actlvity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the fundino? yr 7 If applicant is an orb 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? D ~~ ~ 9. Wh t is the tale one n tuber, fax number, a-mail address of the applicant? _ ' ~ ss - ~ y - 69/-.sue ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Y n_ ~ Signature of applicant. 1T you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairman/director or vice-chairman of the organtzatlon. 7 Signatu ~ c ~TitLle (K signing behalf of an organization) ~LIA~'Y ~f QVY 1 f' Printed Name ~-~~ -~~ Date 63533.1 Page 2 ®~~~_~td Is the organization a corporation? Yes No ~/ Is the organization nor~proflt? Yes - No Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes / No nar u~ ~~ UH 5: 35PM MIKE I ~ ' \ 804-360-2851 p.l :. ;, DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPL CATIO Thls appllcatlon must be completed and algned before the County can conalder a request for tunding with OfatNct Improvement Funds. Completing and signing the form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the Coun can legally consider your request. Virginia taw places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to glue public funds, such as District tmprovemen Funds, to prlvaq persons or organizations and these restrictions ma t the County's board of 8upervlsars from even consldertn Y preclude g your request. t • What is the name of the ap~ i~ nt (person or request? 7.¢ b ~ ; ,Q ~ tlZ organization) making this funding ~ ~c'~s ~ d rn i 2. If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of t organization? (Also attach organizadon's most recent articles of incorpq~ and/or bylaws to appticatlon. ~t'li4GCi1C ~ W~L Ic.,tu. a ~ sYl~ ~ S v ~ ~ o-I. Lr~ ~-t hens ~~.~. Rte,. ~~S' Z •U4, u5 3• What is the amount of funding you are seeking? ~~OD 4. Describe in detail the funding requesl and`how the money. if approved, wig ~ spent. wa.. h ~ ~,. b4d ul 50 ~n `t ~ IQ Piss tl ~'~~,~+,.I S . a ~; 5 o v -tu -i'1.~ r-.~ . ~ _ 5. 83533,1 Pepe 1 MAR-03-2008 12 51 804 360 0851 ,~~., ~,n -~ - . l ~, f N%r l1, rf~ ;d 0 t~ 1 N + ~o -aa ~,~j,~) 1 r.~ ~' % pt- W .a. w a ... l 5~.. ~.t. 2 s 9~~ t cQ-l't~ S ~ ~t~ Is any County pepartrnent involved in the seeking funds? ~p project, event or program for which you are ~~~~_~~ Mar 03 2D08 5: ~5F'M r71Kt ~..~ ...,., ~..... r . ~9~ ., t3. If this request for iunding will not sully fund your acthrity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? ~c-oa'. ez ~ ~alluu- 6u~W n~%-s w ~~-~ ~~ ~-r~A 7. If appgcant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a oorporatlon? Yes No Is the orgari~zadon nor}proflt? Yes ~^ No Is the organizaatlon tax-exempt? Yes ~ No 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? t a~ - 3 (~ n~fsl~'i r~ L rJ ~le,s klle~l ~~n Z 30 5 9} 9. What Is the telephone number. fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? ?1.,~nt 3100 - Z it$ ,Eat 3 roc • Z 8 5 ~ Signaturo of applicant. If you are signing on behaM of an organlzatlon you must be the president, vlc~-prosident, chairmanldtrector or vice~halrman of the organization. o--- 3ignaturs f-c~ ~r~ ~ ~ c~--- ~' 2 t~ ~ - z oag Title (K signing on behaM of an organization) ~e.~a r ~µ A . Sp~,~n. Printed Nama 63633.1 3.3-dFl Date Page 2 ®~®~.~~ MAR-03-2008 12 51 804 360 c851 95 P.02 ! ~' ~""~~ DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. ~ . What is the name of the applican (person or organization) making this funding request? ~ ~~ L ~t_ _, l /~~a__ -~. t_ t _ _. . 2. If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and u organization? (Also attach organization's most re nt articles of inocoe ~ the and/or bylaws to application. '~oS~ ~r'U M ~~~ rporaGon 3• What is the amount of funding you are seeking? ~ l ~ IIa ~ - o~ 4 Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. Pay .i,- Pr n w. _ C..r„~ _ .,...a.. ~.u.. ~ - - - - - ~---- - - 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? n~ p 63533.1 Page 1 ~'~®~.~~ .i- . n~ 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes No ~ Is the organization non-profit? Yes / No Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes / No 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? J3~w~~...Jb4..,~0 ~ z5 i8 ~~„~..: ,.~ 12.;s k Lam. V~*-ti~~o~G~,o a•-~. 9. What is the telephone number, fax number, a-mail address of the applicant? Sri 4 -l0 3q'~~t33 SG~1- ~3~t- ia~n b~.~ ~a.u L.r~S O h 1 ~ v~l zoo ,~'- Slgnature of applicant. If you are signing on behaN of an organization you must be the president vice-president, chairman/director or vice-chairman of the organlzatlon. t3Y~ Signature Pv s-t- ~~~ ,.,~ c_.L-~-~ Title (If signing on behalf of an organization) -e.h~-~. Jo 4..~-,SD ~n Printed Name a1a-S~og Date 83533.1 Page 2 ~~~ ~',~~ ~ ~ .. ' DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding wkh District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. ~ • What is the m of the applicant (person r organiz tion) making this funding request? c` 2. If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach o ization's most recent arti~ies f 'ncorporatlon and/or bylaws to application. ~ ° ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~l~ N~'Jo7t_~~~_ 3. What is the a-nount of funding you are seeking? ~2~ o~ _~ 4. Describe in deta'1 the funding request and how the money i approved, will be spent. .o ~ ~Ca. ~ i / 5. Is any County C seeking funds? '~' jt a w 63533.1 the project, event or Page 1 for which you are ®~~~ {~~ f 1~~ 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individual r organizations ill p vide the remainder of~ funding? 'r0 7. If applicant is an organizatlon, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes _ No Is the organization non-profit? Yes ~_ No Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes +~_ No 8. Whams the address of the applicant making this funding request? ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~'~ T. (/~c . 9. What is the telephone number, fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? ~honc - mss- ~/3S ~ core Signature of applicant. tf you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president,. chairman/director or vice-chairman of the org nizatlon. Slgna ~ e ~~ r^inaw- a ~.. ~~ CsN7~ .~,,,~ Title (K si ing n behaM of an organization) ~a7r~e.i c- ~• i~1,1~5 Printed Name ~> y- .?~ .~dv~ Date ' 63533.1 Page 2 ~'~®~~~ ~ s ~~ ~~~~ DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS ~ ICATI This appllcatlon must be completed and sl®nsd before the County can consider a request for fundinO with Dlstrlct Improvement Funds. Completln an slAninQ this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the Co d can legally consider your request. Virplnia law places substantial restrictions o the authority of ~e County to glw public funds, such as District Im rove n Funds, to private persons or organizagons and theas restrictions ma re mart the County's Board of Superylsore from even considerln y P clude g your request. What is th ame of request? ~~a ran, 2• If an organization is the organization? (Also attach and/or bylaws to application. ` ~~ this funding ~. _ applicant, what is the nature and Purpose of the or~nlzatlon's most recent articles of into ~ ~ Q ~~ rporatlon ~a.ta ^ ~rt1M et.._ _ ~ 1 _ •1 3• o~hat is a mount of funding you are seeking? ~~~~_ S b tC l ~c~:~o.6 bu~+~ -~a ca5 ~~u ~ ,~~n. ~~ -ids o~c.~ u~et' laws , s 9"'~9 q s a ~ o c.,,~ 4• Describe in detail the fundln ~ spent. ~, g oast and how the money if approved will be "~ n r~r,~ o r~ J _ ~ W.e, ~ ne a .~ [?~ ~easf~-~~:d-~. SeC~r+~ Gynd lar4-s o-yC 5• Is any County C seeking funds? 63533.1 -~ P~Zes, involved in the project, event or program for which you are Page 1 ~-~. Also ~d- P r,~ ~a v..~ cc ®~~ '~a3 .r !' ~ - ~ l r~u~a~w,c-~-~v~- 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your actlvity or Program, what other individu Is or organizatlo will provide the remainder of the fundin ? 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organizatlon a corporation? Yes Is the organtzadon non-profit? Yes No Is the organization tax exempt? Yes ~ No No 8• What is th~address of the applicant making this funding request? r Zo ~ kr~' 9• What is the telephone number, fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? ~ 7- ,~~ 1 ~m~l ~r A C.e ~' Va ~o, CEO M Signature of applicant. It you are signing on behalf of an organisation you must bs the president, vice-president, chalrmaNdlnactor or vlce~halrman of the organisation. Slg ture ~~ Title Prim 2 Date' M8 k ~S~+A (K signing on behalf of an orgsnization) ~ ~4c Sa red Name ~Z ~ / o~ 83533.1 Page 2 ~~~~~~ Feb 28 p8 1016a Steven Barnard 8043792822 p.2 cons signi can I the a Fund the C 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 63533.1 ' f i DIS ICT! IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This application mu t be completed and signed before the County can der a request for fund ng with District Improvement Funds. Completing and 1g this form does not can that you will receive funding or that the County :gaily consider your quest. vrginia law places substantial restrictions on uthority of the Coun to give public funds such as District Improvement s, to private persons r organizations and these restrictions may preclude ounty's Board of Supe isors from even considering your request. What is the name f e applicant (person r organizatio) making ,this fun~9 request? ~ ~ dom. i tv ~ .. ; ~..,.~- ~~- If an organization is he applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also a ach organization's most recent articles of incorporation andlor bylaws to applic lion. 'TLS , ~ ' . i c.l " ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~' v What is the amount of f nding;you are seeking? ~ % iJ~ U Describe in detail. the i funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. _ - ~ rl~ ~~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~. ~ ~ ~,~ v 1. Is any County Departm nt involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? ) i Page 1 ®~ >02~~ FEB-28-2©08 I©~26 ~Aa~~ga~:r a^v P c~~ reti ltl utS ~u:~tia Steven kiarnard 6043792822 ~l~Q,p~3 J, 6. If this request for fundi g will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organ' lions will provide the remainder of the funding? L, `J' ~~~~ ~~', ~~~ ff , ~ y • ~ 7. If applicant is an organ' ation, answer the following: Is the organization a co orati I n? Yes No ~~_ Is the organization no rofit? Yes ~ No Is the organization tax-e empt? Yes ~ No 8. Wh~a~t ~isA~ the adds s ofJ the ~pplicant making this funding request? -, J ~~' ~- t/~ 3i f I 9. What is the telephone numt~er, fax number, email address of the applicant? I y::)~;~- 63533.1 i Signature of applicant If you are signing on behalf of an organizagon you must be the president, vice-pn~ident, chairman/director or vice~hairman ofthe organir~tion. ~ ~ ~'- ~ ~ 1.: Signature Title (if signing on behalf of an organization) 1 I ~,C~nG~ ~-~G.~1Ctct Printed Name .~i~~/off Date Page 2 FEB-28-2008 10 26 ' 8043792L~~ q^% ~p,p ~~,/!9~~yyp^~ ®iJ 1~A V ~lJ DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to glue public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this .funding request? ~2OM+4G~ffi/ /.f t DTS.4 POST p~,y Cp~Mi77'~-E 2. If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application. ~,iv-r = ~~~ STV» ~1 [' -~~r Lvt=l Ic.4.Q~~ OG '7~-t'F ~OL~TL/ RNb DA.2'ri n i as -.~S /n,/ 1/,u~/O US A~CTI ~/ t ?1 ES Fog '7~.}E ~.+/EFl OF '1~l-E S'CHooL Co~li'-lC,r~t/ITY 3. What is the amount otfunding you are seeking? $ looo, ~ 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. _~ - ~~s ~ C „moo. ,.z ~, .,,,,- -- - - _~ ~ EIl6rtT` . 7~~ o,~vti _ fi- /~,4.Q T V R U .OsIr1~'~v TS / t o~ v l ~-c~ F'c~LOt.~ l,~G PoLt c.~. 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? N~ 63533.1 Page 1 ~~®~~~ ,r .s rh~a~.cW. t 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? PfFi2~i/TS ~4it/D CO/~'!/°l(/iy/T,~ 7~CZ/L/A?7Gr~t/s /~iyl~ ~!/iVb/~4I S/,yC~ E yE..~/`rs 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes No c/ Is the organization non-profit? Yes ~ No Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes No S. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? ~ / S7J ~ SA?O.~CET/LE~ ~ . ~2 ~ C ~ r-,o.~.~ 1/,4 ~.3 23 6 9. What is the telephone number, fax number, a-mail address of the applicant? ~y-37~- ?~fo6 S vim, N -DY ~. ,ya.N o~. cor-r ~i~0 Fi x 3lgnature of applicant. K you are signing on behalf of an organisation you must be the president vice-president, chalrmaNdirector or vice-chairman of the organization. Si~,_ ~ ~ , Signature CEO-effs~-~R Pysr PRor, C~hHl7TL~E -/~?ON/~~~/ TINe (K signing on behalf of an organization) PEA S v~,a~v L. N ~~ y Printed Name z~~sf o8 Date 63533.1 Page 2 i w, uo, cu~o LJ: 4 / db~ ~bH6256 THOMAS DALE HIGH SCH PAGE 02 ,.`. DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICAT p~ This application must be completed end sfe~ned before the County can consider a request For funding with Distract Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County Can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on tl~e authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persona or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the Cowtty's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. 1. What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding ~ Aygp~P,p~N request? ,e~J! LE I~EiI/,~OIV, CNIf/rP1fA,r1 T~M~s Lam. ~~E f~l6H .Sc;NooL ~7.S'~ 2. If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? IAlso attach organization's most recent articles of Incorporation and/or bylaws to application.) •~GMO~~ _ 7i~Ar 3. What is the amount of funding you ere seeking? 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. Fot 3T~~ ~,er~s ~ ~ ~v[~2 5. 19 any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which Vou are seeking funds? ~ /~D ~a=i's1' LG7..4~TionJ ie6 ~Igt,L~~l~ 'D/lN ~loao ~~iHE FUG r</D./~ ,r3~ U.~ -~ idd'~ TO .3'!qy .tIL4 .c1~b il~FTt7~ /VD 6. if this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other `UPS aJ~w Car/E ~pr/ ~,pj~~ individuals or organizativns will provldo ~ It• 7Md~J it ~1 ~~~ the remainder of the funding? ~~ ~,p~ ~z~ ooot;zaaso. ~ Z6'd L6ir9 C~tG b08 'oJ Q13I~'J3153HJ 90:it 8002-~i~~~9 MAR-03-2008 13:1@ @047EEE256 VJI VJI LVVV 1J.M/ OV`-1000L~O £0 ' d 1ti101 IHUMAS llALE HIGHH S~CH~~ ~ PAGE 03 ~. Page 2 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes No Is the organization non-profit? Yes ~^ No Is the organization tax-exempt? Yos / No 8. Whet is the address of the applicant ~"~'81a ~Nrl~ ~%/P.F~T making this funding request? Ei ~ U a?J~3/o 9. What is the telephone number, fax number, gD~ ' `JlaP- (oa~$ X v e-mail address of the applicant? 04U7:273A0,1 SignsiUre of applicant. If you s+re signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chelrrrian/director or vice-chairman of the organization. ) . G~~I,G~-c~,t.o r,.J Signatgre Q~i1.~„,,~ C,t~,i,~....~ Title (if signing on behalf of an aeianixation) ~ l~y~e ~ Printed Name ~?~ 31 zool~ Date ~0'd L6c9 LiL b06 'Q7 Q~31$I81S3H3 MAR-03-2008 13 16 6047686256 96i ~~~K~~~ LO:Zi 8002-£0-adW P.03 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 - AGENDA hM.yr~~ Meetina Date: March 12.2008 Item Number: s•B.14. Subject: Resolution Regarding the Presidential Primary Votes Not Counted County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: One of the Board members has requested that the Board adopt the attached resolution. The resolution urges the State Board of Elections to reconsider its decision not to count the 299 handwritten votes cast in the Presidential Primary on February 12, 2008 so that all citizens who voted may have their vote properly and officially recorded. Preparers Janice Blakley Title: Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Attachments: ~ Yes ~ No # 4 - ..; RESOLUTION REGARDING THE PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY VOTES NOT COUNTED WHEREAS, voters in Chesterfield County participated in Presidential primary on February 12, 2008; and WHEREAS, certain precincts had an insufficient number of official ballots; and WHEREAS, due to the official ballot shortage 299 voters, at the direction of election officials, handwrote their votes on forms other than the official ballots; and WHEREAS, a decision was made by the Chesterfield Electoral Board to allow handwritten ballots to be cast on blank paper by eligible county voters in cases where official ballots were not available; and WHEREAS, the State Board of Elections made the decision not to count the votes of the 299 individuals who voted by handwritten ballots in the primary elections in Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, the right to vote is fundamental to the American people and every consideration should be given to ensuring that every vote counts; and WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors strongly believes that none of its citizens should be disenfranchised by having ballots, cast in accordance with the instructions of those in charge of conducting the election, rejected. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors, this 12th day of March 2008, hereby urges the State Board of Elections to reconsider its decision not to count the 299 handwritten votes cast that day so that all citizens who voted may have their vote properly and officially recorded. ~~ C ~ ACLNV~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meetin Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 9.A. Subject: Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects, District Improvement Funds, and Lease Purchases County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Preparers James J._ L. Stegmaier Title: County Administrator Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL FUND BALANCE March 12, 2008 BOARD MEETING DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 07/01/07 FY2008 Actual Beginning Fund Balance 11/28/07 Schools: Appropriate transfer to Schools for use in ($571,000) FY2008 for trailer purchases 11/28/07 Schools: Designate for non-recurring items in FY2009 ($4,092,800) 11/28/07 County: Appropriate transfer to Parks CIP for ($145,000) FY2008 land purchase BALANCE $65,204,300 $64,633,300 $60,540,500 $60,395,500 11/28/07 County: designate for non-recurring items in FY2009 ($6,900,500) $53,495,000 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS March 12, 2008 Board Meeting Date Description Amount Balance 6/30/2007 FY07 Ending Balance $1,097,798 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2007 4/11/2007 FY08 Budgeted Addition 15,521,300 16,619,098 4/11/2007 FY08 Capital Projects (14,889,300) 1,729,798 10/10/2007 Fire Logistics Facility, Phase II (150,000) ],579,798 2/13/2008 Web streaming hardware, software, services and support (72,240) 1,507,558 ~~®~~a~ ono -- a ° ~n o0 00 00 ~0 0 b ~ ~ M r ~ Q^ C~ ~ ~ .--~ ~ M a 6 9 1 -I ~ ,~ v 'C a ~ e~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ° '~ ° ° ° ° ° ° o o o o o ~ ~ ~ .-~ ~? N ,-~ N N M--i N M A A 0 N O ~ 0 N O W E.r .~ r°+ O ~ _ M O M z a ~, eC ~ N ~ N 0 ~ ~7 ~" ~ O O O O O O ~„ ,i N ~ O O O O O O ~ ~ w ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ U ~ o s. H v~ d A M C~ 7 ~ M ~ N Q O N ~ c0 ~ ' ~n ~O ~n t~ ~--~ i. ~O 00 00 v~ v~ O ~„ 69 69 69 b9 69 a U ;~ .. ° 3 x o ~~ ~ .. s ;~ A ~ U A ~ ~ U ®~®~~.~ Prepared by Accounting Department February 29, 2008 Date Began 04/99 O1/O1 03/03 03/04 10/04 12/04 12/04 OS/OS 05/06 08/07 SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES APPROVED AND EXECUTED Original Description Amount Public Facility Lease -Juvenile Courts Project $16,100,000 Certificates of Participation - Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Certificates of Participation -Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation Certificates of Participation -Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Cloverleaf Mall Redevelopment Project Energy Improvements at County Facilities Energy Improvements at School Facilities Certificates of Participation -Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Certificates of Participation -Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Certificates of Participation -Building Expansion/Renovation, Equipment Acquisition TOTAL APPROVED AND EXECUTED PENDING EXECUTION Description None 13,725,000 6,100,000.. 21,970,000 9,225,000 1,519,567 427,633 14,495,000 11,960,000 22,220,000 $117.742.200 Outstanding Date Balance Ends 2/29/08 11/19 $9,660,000 11/21 8,210,000 11/23 4,820,000 11/24 18,550,000 10/08 9,225,000 12/17 1,335,826 12/10 265,326 11124 12,435,000 11/24 10,350,000 11/27 22,220,000 97.071.15 Approved Amount f~~p,~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA hgGlN'A~ Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item. Number: 9.6. Subject: Roads Accepted-into the State Secondary System County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Preparers Janice Blakley Attachments: Yes Title: Clerk to the Board o O ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'O O N h +.~ N N N N N N N N p ~ ~ [r ~ O II O O N ~ O O O O O q ~ O Q Q pl ~ r O _ i O _ O r O _ O ~_ O ~ r O _ O r O d pq . ~ ~ ~ pj O ~ 0 w ; ._ ` W Q ~ ~ n O n 0 n O n O n O n O n O n O n O a N ~ ~ O ~ N ~ i ~ N V N ~ N V N V N V N ~ N V N ~ ~O b N O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ y ~ V ~ r . ~ .- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ~ I ' y ~ i U ~ UJ ~~ ' ~ O ~ N I O O O O O O O +~. ~ CS O O O O O O O O O 0 ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ 0 1 0 O O o O O O O A " w ~ w i ~ I ~ tt7 ~ o o f0 ~ to ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! C ~ ~s 3 3 M ~ ~ m ~ ~ I N n v ~ ~ CS ai ~ ~ h i ~ O N ~ C v ~ ~ n n U °~ o i , c h CS ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ h ~ i C ~ U C f6 ~ 7. ~ U ~ •y ~' O ~ U N ~ 3 V N N N O Z N W Q y m ~ ~ ,! m m m ~ y a ~.° ~ ~ a ~ ~ 4 i ~ .p ~ U; m U ~ U U m U aEi ~ ~ co U a i F- obi b tl~ o H f o H ~~ o H o F ~ ~ ~ °y' ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M N M N ~ N M N N N ~ N ~ ~ M I N M N h 0 .. ~~ h n I n ~ n n ~ n n ~ n ~ n ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ 'ii ~ ~ U ~ U ~ _ ~ ~ V ti w 7 ~ ?, .~ ~ ~ ~ 3 : / ~, ~ 3 / ~, m ~ 3 € 1 ~ / ~, r 0 ~ _ ~ N ~ a~ II w ~ a~ i y V m o m m ~ ~ 4 01 w ~ S ~ U d U n U ~ U ~ Z ~ U ~ O U U ~ ~ o •~ ~ m o .~ .~ T +~~. p ~ C O J~ O C O G O C O C O C O d O d~ O ~Q ~y "''~~~~IIII ~ p~ C !Q m ti m m ti ~ d ~i ~ m ii ~ u. ~ ~i ~ ti m u= m ~ b S w ~ °~' ~ d m ~ m .~ d .~ d :~ ~' :~ '~ .~ '~ ~ c :~ c .~ ~ A ~ ~ +., ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ N o ~ N € ~ € ~ ~ T € °' € ~ € ~ € o ~ . 'C U a~ ~ H ~ U a~ H ~o U i a ~ U i a H U i a H U i a I- ~ a i F- z a i F- z i a -- •w ao Cpl ~ ~~ m ti s ~ O O L" h,, ~ ~ w ~ Q [~ O ~ '~ o N In N In N R N N N N N N M N O ~ 4~i q ~ Q o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 c h V ~ `~ 4~ o ~ ~ G1 h ~ ~ U ~ c o G ~ a V D = . ~ ~ V ~~ ~ ~~®~1'7 O O N M r o~ w I O N O d a R' 0 v] w brp ''~ Y ~ V V O ~ C O ~ O ~ U O I ~ 0 Q O .~ 4. v ~ ~ ~ ~ +.. '~ ~ ~ i O ~ h O O x x x ~ ." ~ ~ ~ °~ `~ d ~ ~ h ~ I .~ o~ ~ ~ I Y d ~ ~ 'O ~ ~' CS y Q 0 h tl w U ~ N O w ~ ~ '-~ O ~ y N ~ ,~ v U ~ ~q ~~ obi b0 ~ '~ '~° 4 '~ h ~ w tiA . o~i w r? '~ V `v v 'V v y `o, ~+ "~ 0~ 0) ;~ QC d d i +d O O O O N N 0 0 0 O N N O M O O 0 co O O a O 0 0 O N O N O O 0 co O O N 0 O n 0 O N 0 _O O 0 O N N 0 O n 0 O N N O M O O . 0 in O O N N 0 0 n 0 O N O V O Q 0 O O N O 0 0 O N O M O O 0 O O N N 0 0 0 O N V' N O r O 0 °o N O O 0 O N O N N O 0 0 O N O 0 0 O N O M N O v ~ '~, „! ~ C J ~ _ N N ~ ' r N t0 ~ n . 7 N > I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U O e ~' U N ~ N V U tl) ° ~ N ry ' y N O Vl y ~ t s ( T (/J V ~ v a~ ~ ~ U ~ C7 U U ~ ° ~ U ~ I ~ .-. M ~ ~ ~ ~ M H M ~ _ fC _ _ ~ N _ ~ _ _ Q ~' S =_ 5 ~ v ~ a ~ ~ n 3 v v v ~ `~ ~ v ~ > c i I a` m M l d > m a > > ~ T '~ ~ ~ 'C fn C U > fA ~ fn ~ fn ~ U' ~ U ~ (n d E I ~ E ~ E C` E o f ~ E ~ E ~ E ~ E C O~ C O C O ~ O V O J O ..I O J O J O LL ~ LL ~ LL LL .`+ LL r lL ++ LL .+ LL a+ LL 1/) .. ~ N .. ~ N .. ~ ~ ... C 7 .. C 7 .. ~C ~ .. ~C 7 .. ._ 7 .. ~ C I ~ C ~ C C _ ~ _ D ~ 9 ~ C ' a ~ ! a E a ~ ~' € > ~ > ~ > € > ~ > ~ ~ ~ H ~ H ~ H U' F~ N F- N F~ w F- N F~ N F- ~ O i_+ ~ M ~ v v v v ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y Q o i +. C V v m .,~ y ®®~~.~ ~o M O O ti y 0 a N b b Q O rr\ _1 obi '~`' V ~ V r ~ o N ~• N ~ O v C ~ ,h ^C- q w V t d r obi c ~ ~ `~ of o `' ~ y O D .o'' d y O O O N M L 7 O L W O O N. ,O d . 4 m 0~ w ~ w i. ~ ~ ~ ~ V U o ~ C O O ~ U O N Q O .~ N i U ~ ~ ~ ~ +., '~ ~ ~ h ~ O N '~p4 ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ °~ `ti ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ h ~ ~ ,~ ~ h ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ O '~ q w O sy ;~' i CS +~ U ~ N O ~ ~ ~ "~ O ~ ~ •~ U r ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ +~.. y L aq ~~ ~ ~o '~ ~ h ~ w ~I A .OVi W r? '~ V +r v ~ O V O N brp 01 ;~ o~ d V ti O O O O O O N j N N ~,il N N N O ! O O ~ O ~ O O O O ~ O O I. O O O i ~~ O O ~ ~O O O N N N ~ N N ~ N N Ili N N j N ~ N ~ N O. '. I i O I O 1 0 i O O O O 0 O C C ~ °n i ~ °v ~ °v °v °v °v o I n ~, v I a ~ o ~I~ ~ ~, ° I ~~ a I ~ > ! ! ~ v ~ ~ C "!. Oi! l ~ N ti _ ~ i . y I ~. N I ~ m ~ N lD I = _ N N t7 T j ~ s ~ ~ i C C C N -gyp. 7 U o'~ ' ~; a 7 U 7 U of ~ i ~ o !I o c o v N ~ ; O ui I O I ~ rn ~ rn ~ . j ~ O J y ~ ~ ~ a o 0 •o Z ~ I I ~ o~ o 0 0 ~ in ~ °. j a j a a ~ a R E D E~ > E i~ E v E t° E n• o ~ •~ o •~ o ~ •~ o co o y o lL I O ii O ~ ~ t~ d LL H ~i H c ~ ~ 'c_ i ~ 'c ~ c ~ c ~ 'c N > ~' '~ . N ~ y ~ N ~ N ~ ` N N ~ I ti o ~ o a~ o y O m o a~ o ~ o ~ ~ O ~ ~ O o O O o a a ~ U ~ V ; U .~ a, I- 4 ~ M O ti odo 4. O N b O~ b b a O w h O o w ti i• ~ ~ °o N y. ~ N .~ o ~ r o .y. Ss t ~ A 0~~! r v ~ ~ t ~ `1 ~ . r. w y e ti 0 A ~~ h ~~.~~~~. 0 0 N M r O L 0 O N O .~ O OQi w 'S ti bQ r.+ Y ~ V U o ~ C O C ~ U Q N Q O U ~ ~ ~ ~ +.~ '~ ~ ~ I O ~ ~ O ,SaO '.S. ~ ~ ~ ~ tl ~ .., y h ~~ O ~ U h N h h 01 ~ ~ ~ CS y ~ '~ q `, O ;~ i ~ h d U ~ ~ +~.. '~ O ~ y N ~ ~ U v ~ w y ~ ~ ~q ~~ ~~ '~ ~ ti x of ~I A rr W r V `' V y ~ ~ O,p d 3 ~i d L w QC 0 0 N N N O 0 0 N a O O 0 v 0 0 a N O 0 0 N N _~ O 0 0 N N N O n 0 0 N 01 r r O O °o I N N ~_ O n °o N r M O O 0 0 N N N O n 0 0 N N M O O 0 v w ~ N ~ v I ^ n ~ U ~ a> > ° ~ o m m N N ~ (, y ~ tll ~ C ~ U Y Y U. U H ~ Fes- ~ I~- M ~ N ~ ~ M ~ r ~ n n ~ -j _ ~ ~ ~ H U ~ o , ~ 0 0 0 0 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 t' m c ~~, N ~ N d ~ C y ~ C V ~ C ~ Y j~ ~ ,` Y ` Y ~ d Y U E G E o E G E F- E m ~ o o d LL C o LL d G o LL m C o LL m ~ o LL ~. i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H .C ~ H ,cF y .C H .C N ,C Y 1~ ~ Y H Y H Y H Y H A ~ C ~ ~ M M M ~ V ~ 0 0 0 0 0 Q c v V o~ d 4 00 N d C O N b a b Q O ti v u ^' r ~ °v oc N O O, N ~ O ~' o c .~ 'b > Q 0.p "' l d C d ti r d y e 0 Q •o'' v 5 °o N M 0 L O O r d Q d w d ~I w w ~. ~ ~ ~ _ V U o ~ c O O ~ U O ~o q 0 d Q .~ v ~ r ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ jh T O 01 b0~.~ ~ ~ d +.. h ~ r~ ~ C d ~ O h ~ ~, , ~ N ~ ~ h ~ N ~ .~ ~ CS p~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ '~ Q ~ II 0 ~' i ~ 'ti U ~ N O ~ +.~ Q ~ y N ~ ~o q ,~ v v ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~q ~~ ~ ~ ~~ 'ZS ~, '~ h ~ of C ~I 0 ~ w w V ~. V h ~ ~ d tl V 3 d w w o a 0 0 N M N 0 n 0 O N' N O 0 0 O 0 0 N M N O n 0 O N V' O r~ 0 0 O 0 0 N M 0 n 0 O N V O 0 0 O 0 0 N M 0 0 O N V O rn 0 0 O 0 0 N M 0 0 O N el' O 0 0 O ~ i ~ N ti O M n ~: U ~ ~ f/1 ~Y U i U f0// ~ U y O lL N C7 V f~/1 ~ U in O ~ ~ d H ~ M i ~ ~ i H M n H M ~ H ~ n H O v ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N~ ~ O ~ O U y 0 Y a~ ~i I r r ti ~ O O L O N ~ N > > ICO ~ A N ~ ~ " 7 ~ W ` O lL I y ` O LL N ` O LL N ` O LL ; ~ O LL Q O ••~ c O LL ~ > a ,, i .€ ~; 0 LL d > a ., .€ ~ O LL d > a .. .€ ~ O LL d > a .. .€ ~ O L ~ ~ 3 ,. ~ "~ ~ M CO'1 M M d ~ ~ 'a ~ Q N O N O N O N O N O ~° c ~o V y .,~ m ~~ ®®~~~ O 01 c a 0 N b a N b b Q O ti obi v ~' v ti ~ ~ v °o N O C N ~ O Y O C .~ 'Ct ~ t Q oq ~- C ~ ~ O ~' C ~" •\ r/yi ?. 0 A ~~ d y 0 0 N M r rn 0 L O O r Zt ,O o~i O Obi w 4~ b O ~ '~ h ~ ~0 •' ~ ~ U `~ c O °' C O O ~~ V O ,~ O 0 O .~ g. 0. v ~ ~ ~ ~ w '~ ~ i ~p O ~ o 01 bq '+S. ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ +.. ~ I ~ ~ O ~ v •~ y i d ~ .C "~ ~ ~ tl ~ ~ o~i ~ ~ Q a ~ w U ~ O w ~ ~ 'r O ~ m U ~ ~ ~ Q ,~ U v ~ Q ~, obi by '~ ~, '~ of ~~ d .~ W r~ ~ V +.~ ~y o ~ N d tl ;` ;~ 3 ~i oa i w O ai 0 0 N 0 n O O N w 0 0 0 v 0 0 N 0 0 O N a v 0 0 0 v 0 0 N 0 n O O N a M 0 0 0 v °o N 0 n O O N 0 0 0 v 0 0 N 0 n O O N Q7 0 0 0 co 0 0 N 0 n O O N 0 0 0 co ~ ' N n ' ~ ~ N n ~ ~' ~ ~ .. a '~ i O I [p I Fo. '! ~ i n ~ a J c O m o rn ao ~ ~ m N ~ ~ U H n n ~ ~ E ~ m H n n ~ ~ O E F~ ~ i^p n ~ a E o m o H ~ N ~ ~ - a ° J J - d a -p E i ° E E E O I N I m C_ O N O N O ~) O p~ O O O O '~ ~ o~i ~ ° .°~ E m o LL I .. i m ~ a E U o ~ .. m A a E m o LL .. m m a E m o ~ .. y > p. c ° m o LL .. m > p` c ° cn o LL .. ~ C N m ,C I ~ j W m .C fy N m .C F~ y m C ~ C. V C ~ C V .C ~ ,~ ~ Q ~ n o co 0 co 0 co 0 rn 0 rn 0 a~ V v o i .,~ 4` m n N bD ~_ H C 7 O U G .~ C C~ .C U z e~ O ~"~ ®~®~~iOGr eo M 0 a d a C 0 N b a b b Q 0 v '~ e ~ G O N O n N o o ~ •~ t A 0`~i wv__ ~1 w c c ~ o `~ d o ~L y h O .o'' h CHESTERFIELD COUNTY -~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA _~~" h,~NV~ Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 9.C. Subject: Report of Planning Commission Substantial Accord Determination for T-Mobile (Case 08PD0244) to Co-locate an Antenna on a Virginia Power Structure Located on the Northeast Line of Coalfield Road, Across from Gorham Lane County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: On February 1.9, 2008, the Planning Commission found Case 08PD0244 in substantial accord with the Comprehensive Plan, as per the attached. (AYES: Messrs: Gulley, Bass, Hassen and Brown. ABSENT: Mr. Waller.) Staff recommends no action. Summary of Information: State law provides that the Board may overrule the Planning Commission's determination or refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for an additional public hearing and decision. If the Board takes no action, the substantial accord determination will become final. Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Planning Attachments: ®Yes ~ No # ®®~~~ February 19, 2008 CPC ~~ S SUBSTANTIAL ACCORD REVIEW 08PD0244 T-Mobile Midlothian Magisterial District Northeast line of Coalfield Road l~ UEST: Substantial accord determination for a communications tower. PROPOSED LAND USE: A communications tower, incorporated into an existing electrical transmission structure, and associated improvements are planned. RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval for the following reasons: A. The proposal conforms to the Public Facilities Plan and Tower Siting Policy. Incorporation of the communications facilities into an existing electrical transmission tower eliminates the need for an additional freestanding structure in the area, thereby minimizing tower proliferation. B. The Ordinance minimizes the possibility of any adverse impact on the County Communications System or the County Airport. (NOTE: CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED.) CONDITION Access to the site from Coalfield Road shall be provided within the Dominion Virginia Power Easement, provided removal of vegetation outside of the easement is not required by the Virginia Department of Transportation to achieve adequate sight distance. Otherwise access shall be provided along the southern portion of the property. (T & P) Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service ~ ®®~ GENERAL INFORMATION Location: Northeast line of Coalfield Road, across from Gorham Lane. Tax ID 727-700-0239. Existing Zoning: A Size: 3.0 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North, South and West - R-9; Single-family residential or vacant East - A; Single-family residential UTILITIES• PUBLIC FACILITIES; AND TRANSPORTATION The proposed use will have no impact on these facilities. ENVIRONMENTAL If more than 2,500 square feet of land is disturbed, a land disturbance permit must be obtained from the Department of Environmental Engineering. COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS The Zoning Ordinance requires that any structure over eighty (80) feet in height be reviewed by the County's Public Safety Review Team for potential impacts the structure could have on the County's Radio Communications System microwave paths. This determination must be made prior to construction of the communications tower. COUNTY AIRPORT A preliminary review of this proposal indicates that, given the approximate location and elevation of the proposed installation, there will be no adverse affect on the County Airport. 2 08PD0244-FEB19-CPC-RPT ~.~~~~5: LAND USE Comprehensive Plan: Lies within the boundaries of the Midlothian Area Community Plan which suggests properties is appropriate for residential use of 1.01 to 2.5 units per acre lots. The Public Facilities Plan, an element of the Comprehensive Plan, suggests that energy and communications uses should be co-located, whenever feasible, to minimize impacts on existing and future areas of development. Area Development Trends: A Virginia Power high-tension transmission line traverses the property. In addition, area property ischaracterized bysingle-family residential uses in Hawkins Wood, Hartley Village and Hawthorne Village subdivisions and on acreage parcels or is vacant. Residential development is expected to continue in this area for the foreseeable future in accordance with the Plan. Development Standards: The Zoning Ordinance allows communications towers in Agricultural (A) Districts provided that antennae are co-located on electric transmission structures; flush-mount; restricted to a maximum height of twenty (20) feet above the height of the transmission structure; and gray or other neutral color. CONCLUSION The proposed communications tower satisfies the criteria of location, character and extent as specified in the Code of Virginia. Specifically, the Public Facilities Plan suggests that communications towers should be.located to minimize the impact on existing or planned areas of development and that energy and communications facilities should co-locate whenever feasible. The communications tower will be incorporated into an existing electrical transmission structure. The addition of the communications facilities into the existing transmission tower does not generate a visual impact that is significantly greater than the visual impact of the existing electrical transmission tower. This co-location will eliminate the need for an additional freestanding communications tower in the area, thereby minimizing tower proliferation. In addition,, the Ordinance minimizes the possibility of any adverse impact on the County Communications System or the County Airport. Given these considerations, staff recommends the Commission find the proposal consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. 3 08PD0244-FEB19-CPC-RPT `` ~ `S i~" ~) j` ~ ~ -~::. _ ~~~ , z ..f/ N ~ '-L ... _.~ 7. /_ i ," v ~ `~, ~ , ..__._~._..~... ._.~.._ a ` U ~ _~. ¢° \ ~ "y ~ \ , w _1~ ~ ` Q' ~~ \ n ~~ 4 08PD0244-FEB19-CPC-R ®~~`7 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA S hRCIN\~ Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 9.D. Subiect: Report of Planning Commission Substantial Accord Determination for T-Mobile (Case 08PD0245) to Co-locate an Antenna on a Virginia Power Structure Located on the South Line of Kelmarbi Road, West of Branders Bridge Road County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: On February 19, 2008, the Planning Commission found Case 08PD0245 in substantial accord with the Comprehensive Plan, as per the attached. (AYES: Messrs: Gulley, Bass, Hassen and Brown. ABSENT: Mr. .Waller.) Staff recommends no action. Summary of Information: State law provides that the Board may overrule the Planning Commission's determination or refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for an additional public hearing and decision. If the Board takes no action, the substantial accord determination will become final. Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Planning .:Attachments: Yes ~ No # BCD®~~~ February 19, 2008 CPC ~ - `~~ ~~kC~p1P SUBSTANTIAL ACCORD REVIEW 08PD0245 T-Mobile Bermuda Magisterial District South line of Kelmarbi Road RE VEST: Substantial accord determination for a communications tower. PROPOSED LAND USE: A communications tower, incorporated into an existing electrical transmission structure, and associated improvements are planned. RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval for the following reasons: A. The proposal conforms to the Public Facilities Plan and .Tower Siting Polio Incorporation of the communications facilities into an existing electrical transmission tower eliminates the need for an additional freestanding structure in the area, thereby minimizing tower proliferation. B. The Ordinance minimizes the possibility of any adverse impact on the County Communications System or the County Airport. (NOTE: CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED.) GENERAL INFORMATION South line of Kelmarbi Road, west of Branders Bridge Road. Tax ID 792-627- Part of 6471. Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service ~~®~•~~ Existin Zg oning: A Size: 0.1 acres Existing_Land Use: Single-family residential Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North, South, East and West - A; Single-family residential or vacant UTILITIES• PUBLIC FACILITIES; AND TRANSPORTATION The proposed use will have no impact on these facilities. ENVIRONMENTAL If more than 2,500 square feet of land is disturbed, a land disturbance permit must be obtained from the Department of Environmental Engineering. COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS The Zoning Ordinance requires that any structure over eighty (80) feet in height be reviewed by the County's Public Safety Review Team for potential impacts the structure could have on the County's Radio Communications System microwave paths: This determination must be made prior to construction. COUNTY AIRPORT A preliminary review of this proposal indicates that, given the approximate location and elevation of the proposed installation, there will be no adverse affect on the County Airport. T ANTI T TCF Comprehensive Plan: Lies within the boundaries of the Southern And Western Area Plan which suggests the request property is appropriate for residential use of 1-5 acre lots, suited for R-88. 2 08PD0245-FEB19-CPC-RPT~~,~Q ~~„ The Public Facilities Plan, an element of the Comprehensive Plan, suggests that energy and communications uses should be co-located, whenever feasible, to minimize impacts on existing and future areas of development. Area Development Trends: Area property is characterized by single-family residential uses on acreage parcels. In addition, a Virginia Power. high-tension transmission line traverses the property. Single- family residential development is expected to continue in this area for the foreseeable future in accordance with the Plan. Development Standards: The Zoning Ordinance allows communications towers in Agricultural (A) Districts provided that antennae are co-located on electric transmission structures; flush-mount; restricted to a maximum height of twenty (20) feet above the height of the transmission structure; and gray or other neutral color. CONCLUSION The proposed communications tower satisfies the criteria of location, character and extent as specified in the Code of Virginia. Specifically, the Public Facilities Plan suggests that communications towers should be located to minimize the impact on existing or planned areas of development and that energy and communications facilities should co-locate whenever feasible. The communications tower will be incorporated into an existing electrical transmission structure. The addition of the communications facilities into the existing transmission tower does not generate a visual impact that is significantly greater than the visual impact of the existing electrical transmission tower. This co-location will eliminate the need for an additional freestanding communications tower in the area, thereby minimizing tower proliferation. In addition, .the Ordinance minimizes the possibility of any adverse impact on the County Communications System or the County Airport. Given these considerations, staff recommends the Commission find the proposal consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. ~~~~ ~~ 3 08PD0245-FEB19-CPC-RPT 08PD0245-FEB 19-CPC-RPT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ..~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~ AGENDA -~~- ~%kC~N~A~ Meeting Date: March 12, 2008, Item Number: 9.E. Subject: Report of Planning Commission Substantial Accord. Determination for T-Mobile (Case 08PD0255) to Co-locate an Antenna on a Virginia Power Structure Located on the East Line of O'Bisque Road, South of Belmont Road County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: On February 19, 2008, the Planning Commission found Case 08PD0255 in substantial accord with the Comprehensive Plan, as per the attached. (AYES: Messrs: Gulley, Bass, Hassen and Brown. ABSENT: Mr. Waller.) Staff recommends no action. Summary of Information: State law provides that the Board may overrule the Planning Commission's determination or refer the matter back. to the Planning Commission for an additional public hearing and decision. If the Board takes no action, the substantial accord determination will become final. Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Attachments: Yes Title: Director of Planning No #Q®®?33 February 19, 2008 CPC ~aviecv c~ ~~ ~~c~rlu~ SUBSTANTIAL ACCORD REVIEW 08PD0255 T-Mobile Dale Magisterial District East line of O'Bisque Road RE UEST: Substantial accord determination for a communications tower. PROPOSED LAND USE: A communications tower, incorporated into an existing electrical transmission structure, and associated improvements are planned. RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval for the following reasons: A. The proposal conforms to the Public Facilities Plan and Tower Siting Policy. Incorporation of the communications facilities into an existing electrical transmission tower eliminates the need for an additional freestanding structure in the area, thereby minimizing tower proliferation. B. The Ordinance minimizes the possibility of any adverse impact on the County Communications System or the County Airport. (NOTE: CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED.) GENERAL INFORMATION Location: East line of O'Bisque Road, south of Belmont Road. Tax ID 766-682- Part of 0727. Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service ~~®~'~~ Existing Zoning: R-7 Size: 0.1 acre Existing`Land Use: Vacant Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North, South, East and West - R-7; Single-family residential or vacant UTILITIES; PUBLIC FACILITIES; AND TRANSPORTATION The proposed use will have no impact on these facilities. ENVIRONMENTAL If more than 2,500 square feet of land is disturbed, a land disturbance permit must be obtained from the Department of Environmental Engineering. COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS The Zoning Ordinance requires that any structure over eighty (80) feet in height be reviewed by the County's Public Safety Review Team for potential impacts the structure could have on the County's Radio Communications System microwave paths. This determination must be made prior to construction. COUNTY AIRPORT A preliminary review of this proposal indicates that, given the approximate location and elevation of the proposed installation, there will be no adverse affect on the County Airport. LAND USE Comprehensive Plan: Lies within the boundaries of the Central Area Plan which suggests the request property is appropriate for residential use of 1.0 to 2.5 dwelling units per acre. ~®~~3~ 08PD025 5-FEB 19-CPC-RPT The Public Facilities Plan, an element of the Comprehensive Plan, suggests that energy and communications uses should be co-located, whenever feasible, to minimize impacts on existing and future areas of development. Area Development Trends: Area property is characterized by single-family residential uses in the Land-O-Pines Subdivision or vacant parcels. In addition, a Virginia Power high-tension transmission line traverses the property. Single-family residential development is expected to continue in this area for the foreseeable future in accordance with the Plan. Development Standards: The Zoning Ordinance allows communications towers in Residential (R-7) Districts provided that antennae are co-located on electric transmission structures; flush-mount; restricted to a maximum height of twenty (20) feet above the height of the transmission structure; and gray or other neutral color. CONCLUSION The proposed communications tower satisfies the criteria of location, character and extent as specified in the Code of Virginia. Specifically, the Public Facilities Plan suggests that communications towers should be located to minimize the impact on existing or planned areas of development and that energy and communications facilities should co-locate whenever feasible. The communications tower will be incorporated into an existing electrical transmission structure. The addition of the communications facilities into the existing transmission tower does not generate a visual impact that is significantly greater than the visual impact of the existing electrical transmission tower. This co-location will eliminate the need for an additional freestanding communications tower in the area, thereby minimizing tower proliferation. In addition, the Ordinance minimizes the possibility of any adverse impact on the County Communications System or the County Airport. Given these considerations, staff recommends the Commission find the proposal consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. 3 08PD0255-FEB19-CPC-RP'`P °-~ ~ i~ a~~ ~ ' ! a i' l__ ~ i -^--~. v `~ l i ~ ` ~ 1 ___ ' t (~~---- - - _ ~ ~ ,r .-- - ~ ~V~`~_ ~ ~`. ! ~ ~ - r--~-'~ Z ~~.f i N ~ LL gn J _ ~ ,,, ~ Z Q o l a~ ~i ~~. ~ r .. ~ ~ U ;~ aNa ~ i / f ~o r '`, i, r ~~®~~~ 4 08PD0255-FEB19-CPC-RPT March 12, 2008 Speaker's List Afternoon Session 1. 2. ~~r~~~ 4~~.~.~~~ 3. 4. 5. ~~ ~Igf~N\~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 14.A. Subject: Resolutions Recognizing Mrs. Carol Bence Conroy and Mrs. Patricia B. Revere for Their Service as Members of the Health Center Commission of Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolutions. Summary of Information: Mrs. Carol Bence Conroy served as an at large member of the Chesterfield County Health Center Commission from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2001. Mrs. Conroy also represented the Dale District for six years from July 1, 2001 to June 30, 2007. Mrs. Patricia B. Revere served as a member of the Chesterfield County Health Center Commission from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2007, representing the Midlothian District for three years and the Clover Hill District for four years. Preparers Leigh W, Robbins Title: Executive Director, Lucy Corr Village Attachments: ®Yes ~ No # ~~®~~~ RECOGNIZING MRS. CAROL BENCE CONROY FOR HER SERVICE TO THE HEALTH CENTER COMMISSION OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WHEREAS, Mrs. Carol Bence Conroy has served as a volunteer member of the Health Center Commission for the County of Chesterfield for the past seven years, from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2007; and WHEREAS, during her tenure, Mrs. Conroy served in many capacities within the Commission, as a representative at large for her first year and as a representative of the Dale District for the following six years; and WHEREAS, being a dedicated member of the Health Center Commission, Mrs. Conroy actively participated in the meeting discussions and added her perspective to the review process of each business session; and WHEREAS, her leadership as Commission and dedication to the empowered residents to experience purpose; and Vice-Chair of the Health Center mission of Lucy Corr Village has life enriched with wellness and WHEREAS, Mrs. Conroy served with professionalism and distinction as Chair of the Commission's Finance Committee applying her knowledge and skills during the years she served, promoting trustworthy stewardship in the management and development of our resources; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Conroy served as Chair of the Strategic Planning Committee where she dedicated herself to helping Lucy Corr Village build on its legacy of excellence in long-term care in the development of a full continuum campus, providing innovative leadership and a voice of experience; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Conroy's devotion and dedication to Lucy Corr Village is admired by all. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors and the Health Center Commission, this 12th day of March 2008, publicly recognize the outstanding contributions of Mrs. Carol Bence Conroy and extend, on behalf of their members, Lucy Corr Village, and the citizens of Chesterfield County, their sincere appreciation for her exemplary service and dedication to improving the quality of life of the individuals and families we serve. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mrs. Conroy and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,. Virginia. RECOGNIZING MRS. PATRICIA B. REVERE FOR HER SERVICE TO THE HEALTH CENTER COMMISSION OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WHEREAS, Mrs. Patricia B. Revere has served as a volunteer member of the Health Center Commission for the County of Chesterfield for the past seven years, from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2007; and WHEREAS, during her tenure, Mrs. Revere served in many capacities within the Commission, as a representative of the Midlothian District for three years and the Clover Hill District for the four years; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Revere served faithfully and conscientiously to enhance the recognition and benefits of the Lucy Corr Village employees as Chair of the Human Resources Committee of the Commission during her tenure; and WHEREAS, she exhibited dedication to Lucy Corr Village by participating on the Community Service Committee of the Commission for two years and the Strategic Planning Committee of the Commission for four years and showed a special interest in the realization of our geriatric dental clinic and arts programs; and WHEREAS, being a dedicated, active member of the Health Center Commission, Mrs. Revere was always present for the meetings, willing to participate in the discussions and adding her unique perspective to the review process of each business session; and WHEREAS, being a member of the Health Center Commission, Mrs. Revere has participated in the conversion process of the 16 assisted living beds to create a 240 bed Health Care Center, opening of the 48 bed Assisted Living, licensure of the 20 participant Adult Day Center, and the planning stages for the independent living housing to enhance the care continuum at Lucy Corr Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors and the Health Center Commission, this 12th day of March 2008, publicly recognize the outstanding contributions of Mrs. Patricia B. Revere and extend, on behalf of their members, Lucy Corr Village, and the citizens of Chesterfield County, their sincere appreciation for her exemplary service and dedication to improving the quality of life of the individuals and families we serve. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mrs. Revere and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. ~~~~~® ~, h,~„u CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number:. 14.B. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Mr. Harrison C. Gebs, Troop 806, Sponsored by Woodlake United Methodist Church, Mr. Christian Carmichael, Mr. Gregory Sidell, Mr. Andrew Fenlon and Mr. Scott Riley, All of Troop 876, Sponsored by Mount Pisgah United Methodist Church, and Mr. Eric H. Ahles, Troop 2890, Sponsored by The Brandermill Church, Upon Attaining Rank of Eagle Scout County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff has received requests for the Board to adopt resolutions recognizing Mr. Harrison C. Gebs, Troop 806, Mr. Christian Carmichael, Mr. Gregory Sidell, Mr. Andrew Fenlon and Mr. Scott Riley, all of Troop 876, and Mr. Eric H. Ahles, Troop 2890, upon attaining the rank of Eagle Scout. They will be present at the meeting, accompanied by members of their families, to accept their resolutions. . Preparers Janice Blakley Title: Clerk. to the Board Attachments: ® Yes ~ No # ®®.®a~~1 WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered by Congress in 1916; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build character, provide citizenship training and promote physical fitness; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial- to their community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law Mr. Harrison C. Gebs, Troop 806, sponsored by Woodlake United Methodist Church, Mr. Christian Carmichael, Mr. Gregory Sidell, Mr. Andrew Fenlon and Mr. Scott Riley, all of Troop 876, sponsored by Mount Pisgah United Methodist Church, and Mr. Eric H. Ahles, Troop 2890, sponsored by The Brandermill Church, have accomplished those high standards of commitment and have reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by only four percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through their experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and endeavoring to prepare themselves for roles as leaders in society, Harrison, Christian Gregory, Andrew, Scott and Eric have distinguished themselves as members of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 12th day of March 2008, hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. Harrison C. Gebs, Mr. Christian Carmichael, Mr. Gregory Sidell, Mr. Andrew Fenlon, Mr. Scott, Riley, and Mr. Eric H. Ahles, and acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such outstanding young men as its citizens. ®~~~~~ March 12, 2008 Speaker's List Evening Session #1 (Following Presentation of Resolutions) 1. Bob Herndon 2. Tom Tennille 3. rev 4. 5. Evening Session #2 (End of the Evening Agenda) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ^L•• W O W N N r V C O O Q (~ F- U ._ ._ ~• ~--~ 0 U a~ m a~ U 0 c cv 0 a E .~ y.. O .~ ._ O V a~ U Ate`) W 4~ 0 0 .~ .~ ^~ W .~ U L_ ~ ^~ ._ ~ c~ ~ ~~ ~" o L '~ •- ~ ~ •- ~ -~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ s O ^~ W U U C~ U_ (~ b-- 0 U .~ U Ate`) W ii ~~ ~ o a~ ~ O~ 0 c o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •- cL a~ H ~ U V ~ ~Q 7 ~ ~ ~--~ d ~ c m o 0 () N y ~ r C d v d ~ ~ V a 80/ZO 80/60 LO/Z 6 LO/ 6 6 LO/0 6 LO/s0 ~ LO/80 LOILO LO/90 ~ LO/50 I LO/ti0 LO/EO ° I LO/ZO LO/60 ° 90/Z 6 I 90/66 ~ 90/0 6 I 9o/so 90/80 I 90/LO 90/90 90/50 90/0 90/£0 90/ZO 90/60 r..i c 502 6 ~ 50/ 6 6 °o°r ~ °o ~ °n °o u°~ °o ~ °n °o ~ °n °o °n °o ~' ° °o °n o ~ °n °o -°n ° O O ~ t0 OD ti ~ ~O (O ~A ~ st ~ c'7 ch N N ^- ~ r d~y~,ap~a ~ci~ea Bid c ~o 0 o~ N M L w N a"' N ~ C O Q ~ Q O ~ U ~ . c M ~ ~° o a ~~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ N r o N ~ p ~ ~ ~ C 0 0 o~ o~ ~ o~ M N N ~ ~ d~~1~1 /4!~ 6i~ . ~ _ `° ~ ~~~ ~ V LQ ~ z. N 9Q ~ 9Q ~, , ~° o / /l- D /LO C O (~ '~ O Q fa V . - . o ~' a--+ U a~ a~ a~ U 0 c co 0 a E ~•; .V O W s... . ~ ~ ~--+ ~ O ~ ~ 0 ~ ,+.., ~ ~ ~ U U O N U -+--~ .. N~ ~ C - R3 O ~ . ^~ O Q L ~ ~ ~ ~~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ - O ~ O `-~~ ~ ~ N > ~ ~ ~ O cn ~ N (~ ~ to O ~ O ~ ~ ~~ C +r .~U cn .O ~ ~(a ~O (Cf ~L (n ~"r R3 ~,Q ~ ~ O O O 'C ~ ~ U~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ' ~ Q+., U O L C O ~ ~ O cn ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ .~ ~ Q- Q ~ ~ a,,., O ~ ~ C N O~ ~O~ CL U '~ i O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ W O_ J ~ ~ Q .~ ~-=+ 0 Q V .e .~ ~• ~--~ 0 U a~ a~ a~ U 0 .., c cu 0 Q E M .~ ~-+ .~ V ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 't~ ._ ~ .~ ~~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~.~ O ~~~ ~ ~ X o~ U U ~ ~ U ~ O ~ O O ~- . ~ 4- ~ - •- ~~ D O O L p~ i2 to ~ O ~ ~ O 'L= ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ -~ c~ •.., ~ ~ ~ a~ a~~ ~ o•= a~ N ~ j O ~ LL ~ ;~ O ~ O to O (6 C ~ O Q~ ~ ~~O cn~~_~ ~c~.~~ U ~ O ~ O~ N O cn O Cn .~-~ ~ O ~ ~ c6 ~ I I N• L O O ~U ~ o -~ ~. .~ cn 0 ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ V ~ m ~U ~ ~ o .~ ~ °' ~~ ~ ~> U Q a~ ~ ~ 4~ ~~ .~ `~ U 0 ~ ~ -~ ~~ U C~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ cp ~. ~ .,~' oo ~ ~ ~ ._ ~~ ~ c~ o ~ ~ o U ~ .> ~ p .- -~ U p ,V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ • ~-- _ > ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ._ p M ~ -~ O CCS to ® ~ ~ O ~ '*°" O p ~ O . ~ U N ~ ~. ~ LL. U ~ ~ ~. ~ • - C~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ -r--+ ~ U `'' O ~ o -- ~ ~ ~ -F-~ O ~ ~ (~ 4- ~ -~ U ~_ O ~ o~ ~ - m~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ O ~ ~ C ~ ~a ~ . ~ V ~ ~_~ Q~ ~~~ U ~o~ ._ ~ ~~a~ ~ U M~~ ~ ~O~ ~ ~o ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~"'r ~ O o ._ ~ o~ U N a~ ~~ Q ~ ~ O O ~ ~ .~ N ~~~ ,~ o ~ U~° a a .~ ~O U F-- t~ 0 0 .~ a L L U 1 I O O O o ~ ~ ~ a ~ a~ ~ c o c ~, ~~ ~. U ~ O to ~> L N ~O ~ ~ 'cnQ ~~ ~~ o~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ N ~ ~., 4- oo o. o~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ a~ ~~ U~ ~ ~ C O ~ ~ .~ Q }, ~ N , ~ ~~ ~- ~, p ~ .U ~~ ~~ ~~ H ~ c 0 .~ U C O U O O U . W ^~ ^~ W U 0 Ct3 -- 00 O O N -1--+ .~ I-- .U .~ d. •.+ ._ W U .~ ~ ~ O y.. L 0 0 V ^~ W ~^^`` W W •~, o ~ _~ ~ U ~ C~ .O ~ C~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O to ~ ~ -- O ~ ~ ~-- ~ W C~ -i-d W a~ ._ O V O U >N _~ 4- -~--+ ^V W c~ C~ C~5 80120 80/LO LO/Z6 LO/66 3 ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ d ~ o () N N ~ r C t ~ y V ~ N ~ v t ~ 3 V a LO/0 L LO/60 ~ LO/80 LO/LO LO/90 ~ LOl90 LO/b0 LO/EO ~ LO/ZO rn LO/LO 90/ZL 90/ L L ~° 90/0 L I 90/60 oNo 90/80 90/LO 90/90 90/50 90/b0 90/£0 90/ZO 90/LO r c 50/Z L ~ 50/LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Ln O In 0 lA 0 6f) O H O In O to 0 ~A O t!7 O In O O O CO QO I~ ti CO CO ~ ~ ~' ~t M M N N ~'- r- diys~apia ~(~iea Bnd C ~ ~ O A ~ O .~ Q ~ O N ~ ~ }+ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ®'a •- V N 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ~ o ~ o ~n M N N ~- ~ 0 Q ~ Q O (a 00 O .Q 00 ~ O C ~ ~ O U ~ 0 O > ~ Z U t` ~~ ~o rn~ Qo ~ ti -, o L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~-+ ~ ~ ~ 3~ ~~ O ~+ .® co O ,V C\! C'~ CSI i C~ C`~J N ,d'~ N' - -~-^.__._r------ _ .-----,_--_-- ~ ~ ~ O R3 ti O ~ ~ O II ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ti O I C ~ ~ O I _ ~ ~ ~ Cfl ~~ O ~ °° ' - > o N 0 Z 0 j ~ ~, ~ ti ; ~ c~ 0 N :~ O i 1 cfl cn o ', o ~ ~ ~ 0 ~I it ~ II II _ Q ~ O (~ ~ _I_ ' i O O O O O O O O N N ~ O ~ 0 N t _~ 3 c 0 0 v N 00 .~ O ~ LPL ~ ~ = N O ._ ~C .~ W N L ~_ .~ 0 C~ L Q '~ r . ~ C~ , - - - - - r- ° ° ° ° ° ° o r~ o o n M N N ~- r- 0 'i 0 ~ I~ ~ ~ ttf cfl 0 Q ~ o Cf~ it O C ~ ~~ 0 U i 0 II ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ z .~ s e O ^s W ~ ~ ~ n~ ~ +~ a AL++ ~i/ r---__ - - -1----~----- ~_~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I (~ i O 0 I ~- o ~ I' ! Q _ ~ t[f 00 O I ', O N O C O .~ O U ~ O ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ oti Z O I j Ir r t U I` O ti ~ O i _ O ~ ~ O Q ti O 1 ~ I ~ ~ O O O O O O O M N N ~ ~ ~ Li. i.~. L ~_ ^~ L Q N L W N L 0.. Ln ~i-+ NN~ Lei. i I I I N ~ N N M N C ~ ~ O ~~ O L Q Q 0 L O 0 ~ O U ~ ~ O O ~ Z ~ U Cfl Q ~ ~ ~ Q O ~ ~ O Ln O ~ O Ln O L(~ ~- M M N N ~ ~- L .~-+ Ln ~+ ~ ~ ~ LL ® ~ ~ ~ .® ~ .~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ W .® C~ L N M N CO N C ~ ~ O ~ O ~ O N Q I- M ~ L t0 C4 N ~ O M ~ O N ~ O 00 C O N ~ O ti , ~ ~ r- ;; 0 O ~ ~ O r- Z C'7 ~ U O Cn ~ O O O O O O O O O O ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ ~t M M N N ~ r- 00 N ~ ~ ~ ~ O r- ' Q ~ - ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ 966 5 0 4 OZ £ 9Z L 8 L Z ~£ 0 b L6 6ny ~(~iep 8£bZ b ~ ~ 0 9L 8 ~~ 89 6ti5 5Z 69 6 6Z Z ~ Lt~9 ~ 6L 99E del°t ~143u°W 666 9 0 9 Z6 9 bZ 6 8 6 Z Zb 0 £ b6 6Z !~~ 666 b 0 b L6 £ 9Z Z 9 6 b Z£ 6 b 66 8Z n41 Z£6 9 0 b 5Z £ LZ 6 L Z £ b£ 0 b ZZ LZ PaM 6£6 L 0 b bZ £ 6Z Z L 6 £ O£ 0 b bZ 9Z and 0£ 6 L 0 £ 9Z £ 8Z 6 L Z 0 8E 0 0 ZZ SZ uow 0 bZ unS 0 £Z 3aS L66 8 0 6 8l £ 5Z 0 £6 b - 5Z - L £6 ZZ !~~ 6Z6 b 0 6 Z£ £ 6Z 0 6 0 - 0£ - b 6Z 6Z n41 6Z6 8 0 £ 66 b 9Z Z 6 6 - 5£ - £ OZ OZ PaM Obb 8 0 b 8Z £ 6Z £ 6 6 - ££ - 9 bZ 66 and 8b £ 0 0 b6 Z L 0 5 6 - 56 - 0 b 86 lOH 0 L6 unS 0 96 ~eS b06 b 0 0 96 9 9Z 6 8 6 - 6Z - Z 56 56 !~~ 9Z6 5 0 5 6Z b LZ 6 96 Z - Z£ - Z 96 b6 n41 566 £ 0 £ 86 Z 6£ 6 66 Z - 8Z - £ 96 £L PaM LZ 6 9 0 Z 6 6 £ O£ Z 6 6 £ - 6Z - b bZ Z 6 and £Z6 b 0 9 6Z b 5Z 0 5 Z - 6£ - b L6 66 uow 0 06 unS 0 6 3aS 66 L 0 Z Z6 Z 5Z 0 6 Z - bZ - b 66 8 !~~ £66 b 0 6 86 5 8Z Z 0 Z - 8Z - 8 6Z L n41 Z06 5 0 6 6Z 6 ZZ b 6 6 - 6£ - £ 6 9 PaM L66 9 0 £ £Z £ 5Z 6 9 0 - LZ - 5 bZ 5 and 9Z6 9 0 5 £Z £ 6Z 0 8 0 - 6E - 9 £6 b uow 0 £ unS 0 Z leS 806 £ 0 Z 66 Z Ob 6 9 0 - LZ - £ 96 4 !~~ ~elol spa;sued d~ 86 96 d~ 96 d~ d~ 96 d~ d~ 86 96 d~ l~~iep ~(~~ep Wd64~9 Wdb9~4 Wdbl~S Wd60~S WdbZ~b W`dOS~B Wb'06~8 Wb'S9~L W`dZS~L WF/OZ~L W\f96~L Wt/S6~L Wd049 6962 £668 6962 £668 £668 2668 6628 2668 2968 2668 6628 2968 2968 8002 en~ga~ !ysaapia ssaa x~ p~ai}~a~say~` ~g a}nod .~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ Q ~ .® '}+ ~ ® ~ ~ ~ .~-+ O O O O O O O O O CO d' N O 00 Cfl ~F' N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O Q ~ Q O. (6 00 O ~ ~ N LL ~ ~, i C ~ ~ O U ~ ~ ~ > ~ O Z ~ a--• U f` ~ ~~ Q I' ti (n ~ i O~ Q O ~ ti ', '~ O -- r-T-~---- ,- i N N ~ C ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~~ ~ ti N O ~ ~ I O _ fl.. ~ .~ Q O i R~ ® ' - ti ~ ~ ti I ~ ~ '< O , ~ . t~ ! -- ~ N ~ ; I, ~ ~ ~ . ~ O Q ~ i i ~ ~ - ~ " V~ Q ~. r N C ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ L. - ~ ~( ~ • ~ ~ I U CO ® ~ ~ '~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z O ~ '° , ~ ~I ' ~ '~ ~ N ~ U Cfl ~ O ~' ~ I ! ~ CO -' ~ O r i ~ ~ ~ i I c`7 I O , O ® ~ Q O ~'~ ~ !~ I '~ C ~ Cfl O I '7 ,' i -- i O O O O O O O O ; ~' N O 00 Cfl ~' N ' i ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ti' N O 00 C~ '~' N ~ ~ ~ ~, .~ a' ,V,A/ W ~v/ W /~ ill/. ^ il. W~ ~~ ~_ L ^ /~~ ^® W li. 0 ~/~/~ V• ~+ --~ ~-- __ ~__ _ T o 0 ~, ~~ o . o 0 N ch .-- i i O N ~ f f M r -~ ' ~ I' i'_ ;. CD .-- ~ ni ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ . ~. ~~L~ , , - O O ~ O ~ N ~ ~ z ~o Qo ~~ Q° ~~ Qo m o LL z Q O w ~ O f- I` ~ ~ ~ O Q O J ~ ~ O z ~o e ^~ W `~ ,~ ,A qA o W u~ W '- ~.+ N = L •_ ~ W ^e •.+ O Q~ ~ o I.L Q O O W,W W O Z QO W~ ~o Cfl Z Uo O ~~ ~o C~ ~ ~o <t J Cfl ~ O O O O O O O O O O O 00 C~ ~ N O 00 Cfl '~' N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ o .~ t~ t~ V~ O L Q. ~ W '- .~-+ ~ __ ~ ~O ~ ®. ~~ .~ O Q ~ ~o ~~ ~o Q ~~ Qo m ~ ~ o Z Q o U~ Do Oo z ~~ Uo O ~~ ~ o C~ ~ ~o Q J ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O OO Cfl ~ N O 00 C~ ~ N r- ~ ~ r- ~- .-° . Public Transportation in Chestertield County November 2005 -February 2008 Presented to Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors March 12, 2008 Bus Routes Month 82 64 69 81 95 Total 11 /05 93 134 114 - 180 521 12/05 100 131 93 - 174 498 01/06 140 154 126 - 228 648 02/06 165 112 140 - 230 647 03/06 185 120 129 - 233 667 04/06 206 132 121 - 230 689 05/06 213 141 128 - 263 745 06/06 227 145 135 - 282 789 07/06 232 141 113 - 266 752 08/06 250 134 123 - 283 790 09/06 273 167 116 - 314 870 10/06 247 160 124 - 282 813 11/06 208 127 101 - 222 658 12/06 185 112 92 - 215 604 01/07 240 130 121 - 248 739 02/07 248 143 122 - 243 756 03/07 233 141 117 - 254 745 04/07 232 130 109 - 263 734 05/07 232 136 124 - 270 762 06/07 233 151 122 - 278 784 07/07 216 142 123 - 261 742 08/07 198 134 118 - 255 705 09/07 244 141 125 - 267 777 10/07 220 116 120 - 261 717 11/07 209 123 100 - 253 685 12/07 186 120 100 - 223 629 01/08 266 153 143 - 272 834 02/08 250 201 - 116 262 829 Average 212 138 118 116 250 719 Rt. 82 - Matoaca & Clover Hill Districts - Lowe's @ Winterpock & Rt 360 and Commonwealth 20 Theater Rt. 64 - Midlothian District - Stony Pt Shopping Center - approx 75% of riders are Chesterfield citizens Rt. 69 - Midlothian District - Chesterfield Town Center area -added due to capacity & issues on Rt. 64. Rt. 81 -Midlothian District - Lowe's @ Chesterfield Town Center -replacement of Rt. 69 by GRTC Rt. 95 -Bermuda ~ Dale Districts -John Tyler CC area -added in 2005 by MPO of RRPDC. Good evening Mr. Chairman, Mr. Stegmaier, Ladies and Gentleman, March 12, 2008 I'm Tom Tennille, of Centralia I come before you tonight to present a long over due suggestion and request to recognize an outstanding citizen of Chesterfield County, who died September 20, 2005. Many of you knew, respected and will fondly remember, David Hutcheson Welchons. He was born may 8~', 1933 at Morotock Plantation in Charlotte County Va. Where they farmed. In 1940 the family moved to Drewry's Bluff and then in 1946 the family moved to the village of Centralia. David graduated from Thomas Dale High School in 1951. That same year he joined the United States Army, and served as a medic in the Koran War. After Army service he attended Richmond Professional Institute (now VCU) , then transferred to Va. Tech earning a degree in civil engineering and graduated in 1961. That same year, David was employed by Chesterfield Utility dept. as Assistant county engineer, served as Assistant Director of Utilities, and became the Director of Utilities from 1983 to until his retirement in May 1992. He married Mary Elizabeth Dodson of Colonial Heights in 1963 and has one daughter, Marian Welchons George. At the time of his retirement, the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors presented him with a Resolution that told the history of his 32 years helping bring Chesterfield Utilities Department to the forefront of statewide utilities. Another resolution by BOS in June 2004, speaks of his humanitarian attitude and a common sense approach to his work on the Social Services Board. He served on that board from 1994 unti12004 and was Chairman for three years. I've been told repeatedly about his deep compassion and profound interests in that work. David was a member of the following organizations and clubs: Va. Tech Alumni Va. Canals and Navigation Society, Chester Lions Club, Chesterfield Historic Society, Chesterfield Bateau Committee & Crew of the Lord Chesterfield Chesterfield Tractor Club, Appomattox State Scenic River Advisory Board, (app. By Governor Allen in 1994, ) Chesterfield Fair Association Served on the Appomattox River Water Authority, Attended; Centralia Presbyterian Church and ST. Augustine Catholic Church. During the past six or seven months of thinking about this idea, I've spoken to many people around our county who knew him, they agree, this down- to- earth man deservers more public recognition .The unanimous conclusion is ; Whether he was fishing, sharing vegetables and" helping his friends, or dealing with county business-----his repetition is one of Dignity, intelligence, exceptional moral character and good humor. Therefore Mr. Warren, Because of David's consistent devotion to his family, his passion for the Children and Elderly of Chesterfield, and Colonial Heights, His superior "people skills", His significant contributions to Chesterfield utilities, We humbly recommend that the Board of Supervisors, rename either; Gov. Center Parkway, or perhaps Public Works Rd. or some other suitable County facility to honor Mr. David H. Welchons. Thank you for your time and consideration of this proposal. I'd be more than happy to answer any questions, ~ Tom Tennille ~ /i .~ 748-4019 ttennille e,Comcast.net CC ~~~ ~~gciNU~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 17.A. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider Amending Section 19-48 of the Zoning Ordinance Relating to Responsibilities of the Planning Commission and Preservation Committee County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Rectuested: Hold a public hearing to consider the attached Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Section 19-48. Summary of Information: On January 15, 2008, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this ordinance amendment. Currently, the Preservation Committee and the Planning Commission are required to have a joint meeting. This amendment would separate the meetings of the Planning Commission and Preservation Committee, with both occurring on the same date and same location, but the Planning Commission's meeting will immediately follow the Preservation Committee's meeting. Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Planning Attachments: ®' Yes.. ~ No 00243 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 19-48 RELATING TO RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND PRESERVATION COMMITTEE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 19-48 of the Code of the Count~of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 19-48. Responsibilities of the planning commission and preservation committee. (a) Upon receipt of an application, the director of planning shall refer such application to the planning commission and the preservation committee for their respective review and reports. (b) The planning commission and the preservation committee shall each hold a t public hearing pursuant to section 19-26(a), (c)= a~ (d) and e to review such application. The respective public hearings of the planning commission and the preservation committee shall be held on the same date and at the same location. The planning commission's public hearing shall immediately follow the public hearin og f the preservation committee. Within 60 days after the up blic hearings ~~~* ~°~~*'~°~r~~'- ~~°~ ,the commission and committee shall forward their independent reports to the board of supervisors. (c) In their reports, the planning commission and the preservation committee shall address the effect of the designation of the proposed district or building on the fixture development of the county and may address such other matters as they shall deem appropriate. The commission and committee shall recommend to the board of supervisors that the proposed district or landmark either be designated, be designated with altered boundaries or not be designated. (d) An application to withdraw the creation of an historic district, or the designation of a landmark or landmark site, may be made when the original reason for the designation no longer exists. An application for withdrawal shall be processed in the same manner as an application for approval. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1923:75072.3 ~~®~~~ ~, _ ~ es~e ~e ~ server your Cornmunrty Newspaper Srnce 199.5 P.O. Box 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 231 l3 • Phone: (804) 545-7500 • Fax: (8(k1) 744-3269 • Email: news@chesterfieldobserver.com • Intcmet: www.chesterfieldobscrver.com Aryl ~ ~ ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT ~ ~ ~~ `~ ~ ~o SoQeN~s~ ~ Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors LN: Preservation Com 1 col x 4.5" $145.90 The Observer, Inc. TAKE NOTICE Take notice that the Boazd of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at -a regular scheduled meeting on Mazch 12, 2008, at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building, Rt.10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield, V'uginia, will hold a public heazing where persons affected may appear and present their views to consider: An Ordinance to amend the a of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, by amending and re-enacting Section 19-48 of the Zoning Ordinance relating to responsibilities of the Planning Commission and Preservation Committee. The proposed amendment would delete the current ordinance requirement that the Planning Commission and Preservation Committee hold a joint public heazing to review applications for. designation of historical landmazks or landmark sites and allow the Planning Commission and Preservation Committee to hold separate public hearings on such applications. Questions should be directed to Steve Haasch at 796-7192. The hearing is held at a public facility designed to be accessible to persons with disabilities. Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or need for reasonable accommodations should contact Janice Blakley, Clerk to the Board, at-748-1200. Persons needing interpreter services for the deaf must notify the Clerk to the Board no later than Friday, March 7, 2008. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 2/27/2008 & 3/5/2008 Sworn to and subscribed before me this 5+h ~.YC~1 , 2008. Legal Affiant My commission expires: November 30, 2010 Commission I.D. 7040138 day of Jo a p ,Notary Public (SEAL) ,```A,1~INf111~1~rr r .. a. ptiw~• G,~ ; Q'. •*~ •' "~~~~~ ` ~~~0 • ~ ~~ ;• O ,,~ "~T •......Q~a~, `••, .4F2Y ~r,,,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,, ,, THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA .~~ h~~a~ Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 17.8. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider a Proposed Amendment to the County Code Relating to Creation of the Traditional Neighborhood ..Development (TND) Zoning District, and County-wide Standards for Off-street Parking, Parallel Parking, Tree Planting Within Sidewalk Areas, and Signs Projecting from Buildings, and a Proposed Amendment to the Introduction to the Plan For Chesterfield to Provide for Opportunities for TND Development County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board of Supervisors hold a public hearing at their March 12, 2008 meeting to consider amendments to the Code of the County of Chesterfield and the Plan For Chesterfield. Summary of Information: Traditional neighborhood development (TND) provides opportunities for creating new mixed-use, pedestrian-oriented, activity centers containing a variety of uses, including, business, retail, residential, cultural, educational, and other public and private uses. Traditional neighborhood development encourages physical community building at the neighborhood scale, while providing a range of housing choice. Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Planning Attachments: ® Yes ^ No # ®~J®~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of Z AGENDA The proposed ordinance amendment embraces the principles of neotraditional or new urbanism development. Neotraditional development reverses the trend towards sprawl by promoting compact mixed-use neighborhoods that include residential blocks with a variety of densities and housing types within a neighborhood distinguished by many activities .within comfortable walking distances of most homes. The proposed ordinance would establish a TND zoning district, development procedures, and unique development standards. The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment would .allow designation of TND districts, subject to Board of Supervisors approval, for areas with the following Comprehensive Plan land use designations: Community Mixed Use; Community Mixed Use Center; Community Mixed Use Node; Regional Mixed Use; Regional Mixed Use Center; and Regional Mixed Use Node. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment on January 15, 2008. No citizens spoke in opposition to the proposed amendment during the hearing. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposal. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 19-41, 19-301, 19-508.3, 19-509, 19-510; 19-512, 19-518, 19-644 AND 19- 645 AND ADDING SECTIONS 19-200.1 THROUGH 19-200.11, 19-508.4, 19-509.1, AND 19-514.1 TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO CREATION OF THE TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT AND REQUIREMENTS THEREOF BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 19-41, 19-301, 19-508.3, 19-509, 19-S1 q 19-512, 19-518, 19-644 and 19-645 of the Code of the County o Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted and Sections 19-200.1 through 19-200.11, 19-508.4, 19-509.1 and 19- 514.1 are added and enacted to read as follows: ARTICLE III. DISTRICTS DIVISION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 19-41. Districts enumerated. (a) For the purpose of this chapter the county is hereby divided into districts as follows: 000 TND Traditional Neighborhood Development 000 DIVISION 26: TND TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Section 19-200.1. Purposes and Intent of District ~) The purpose of the Traditional Neighborhood Development District (TND) is to allow development of mixed-use, pedestrian-oriented, activity centers containing a variety of uses including business retail residential, cultural, educational, and other~ublic and private uses. The TND district incorporates publicly accessible community open space areas encoura eg s high quality development and redevelopment that stimulates investment :venerates jobs increases available housing options, and expands the county's tax base. The TND district also permits a compatible mix of uses in a single structure or a group of structures on a parcel or group of parcels and is intended to discourage piecemeal development The TND district will facilitate investment by increasing the number of permitted principal and accessoryuses in a single district and will encourage high Quality redevelopment by permitting_greater.re'ug latory flexibility, and innovative and creative design. 1925:77691.1 ~~®~~~. 1 _ . (b) This district is meant to allow the optional development and redevelopment of land consistent with the design principles of traditional neighborhoods, which are referred to as neotraditional, and new urbanism. Generally, the following design principles are associated with TND development. Compact development patterns that promote efficient use of land and lower costs of providingpublic infrastructure and services; Development is designed for the human scale such that close attention is paid to walking distances, the height of buildings, and the design of streetlights, sidewalks, signs, and other features; Nonresidential land uses, civic and open space, are mixed with residential land uses. The TND district also Qrovides a community center and focus to establish a strong neighborhood identity. Traditional neighborhood incomes. (~ In-fill residential and/or nonresidential development and redevelopment is encouraged. Development incorporates a system of relatively narrow, interconnected streets with sidewalks, bikeways, and transit that offer multiple routes for motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists and provides for the connection of those streets to existing and future developments. The following is an illustrative example only, depicting characteristics and elements o~ TND development. None of the notations shown on this illustration are meant to be re~u~ory. ~~, Street Pattern Open Spaces Larger open spaces at edge ~ ~~ `` oa..w ``\' o ~ ~ ~ ~~ - Interconnected, walkable streets o r '~~ Formal open space at ' ' + , t ^ ~ ` Community Cente Neighborhood Center Small formal open spaces ;~ ~O ' 0 ~ ' More intense residential and should be within a 3-minute O~~ ti ~ - commerriat walk of residences ; OD^ ~ " OO ~. O^ development, civic sites Lots should face formal open spaces ~ Ti i 0 ~F "_~ I~~ `~ ^ ~ ^~ OO ~ i ( ~a a0 a ~ Devefoprnent Pattern _ 1/4 mile radius from Neighborhood Center _ ~ ~~ `` ^~a ~~~ Neighborhood Cerder ll i l Generally, the neighborhood ane (a ey) Serv ce network encouraged center should be within a S- ~ a~ _ minute walk (1/4 mile) of the edge of the neighborhood 1 Least intense Transition to different building ~~ residential should occur at the edge of types should occur at alley or a neighborhood interior of block, not the corner 1925:77691.1 ®~ ®~ Sec. 19-200.2. Uses Permitted By-RiEht The following uses are permitted subject to Board of Supervisor approval of a TND district. ~, Access to any land located in an A, O, C, or I district or used for A, O, C, or I purposes. Automobile self-service stations. ~ Bed and breakfast establishments. Boarding houses. ~ Catering establishments. ~ Churches and other places of worship. ~ Clubs and lodges: civic, fraternal, non-profit, private, public, or social. Cocktail lounges and nightclubs. Colleges, public or private. Communication antennas integrated into the desi ng of a permitted building. ~k,~ Communication offices, studios, and stations; not including towers. ~1,~ Conference centers. ~ Convenience store. ~ Dwelling_s: attached detached live/work, multiple-family, single-family, townhouse, two-family. ~ Fire stations and emergency rescue squads, buildin sg and rog unds• ~ Fraternities (in conjunction with school or college). ~ Funeral homes. ~ Galleries, art. ~ Government buildings. ~ Group homes. 1925:77691.1 ~, 3 ~ Hospitals and other medical facilities. ~, Hotels. ~w,~ Laboratories: dental, medical, and optical. ~ Libraries, public or private. ~ Meal preparation and delivery services. ~ Messenger services. ~ Model homes. Mortuaries. cc Museums, public or private. Offices: dental, general, medical, property management, temporary real estate. ee Parking lots: commercial, non-commercial, park and ride. Personal service establishments. Post offices. Public utility service buildin:;s. ii Recreational establishments, commercial-indoor. Restaurants and cafes: carryout, fast food, or sit-down. Retail, eg neral. Schools, public or private. mm Schools, specialty. ~ Sororities (in conjunction with school or colle>;e). 0o Telephone exchanges. ~ Theaters (except drive-in theaters). 1925 :77691.1 ~ ~ ®~ y 4 ~ Utility uses located underground or not requiring a structure ~ The Director of Plannin~as per Section 19-19.1(a), may approve those uses that. are not specifically enumerated .in this chapter and. that are of the same eg neral character as the specifically enumerated uses allowed in this district. The Director of Planning shall consider among other things, the following: the size and proposed configuration of the site• the size, height and exterior architectural appearance of any proposed structure(s)• noise• light• glare• odors• dust• outdoor activities• traffic• parking• signag_e• and hours of operation Based on these considerations he shall determine that the proposed .use's operating characteristics are substantially similar to, and its impact on neighboring properties no greater than the operating characteristics.. and impacts of the specifically enumerated uses allowed in the district. Sec. 19-200.3. Uses Permitted With Certain Restrictions . The following uses shall be permitted in the TND District subject to compliance with the following conditions aad other applicable standards of this chapter. If these restrictions cannot be met these uses maw be allowed by conditional use, subject to Section 19-13. ~ Check cashing incidental subject to the limitations of Section 19-145(h). Christmas tree sales temporary outdoor subject to the limitations of Section 19- 152h. ~ Construction buildings/trailers temporary subject to the limitations of Section 19-131 e . Group care facilities provided that facilities in excess of 10,000 square feet of floor area shall be limited to the Community Center: Group care facilities in the Community Center. shall have at least fifty (50) percent of the ground-floor frontage that faces adjoining streets include tenant spaces for commercial uses with primaryentrances facin tg he ad~oinin stg_reet. ~ Home occupations subject to the limitations of Section 19-65(e). ~f Intercoms accessory to permitted uses not audible to any residential use. ~ Motor vehicle rental service and r~air subject to the limitations of Section 19- 159 Outside di~laYor storage subject to the limitations of Section 19-159(i). 1925:77691.1 ~ ~ ~ fr,; ~ ~, . 5 Parking and storage of any commercial truck, commercial vehicle, or service vehicle, in co>~unction with any residential use, subject to the limitations of Section 19-65(f). ~j,~ "Parks, public or private, not exceeding five acres of active recreational uses. -Pet rog oming shops, subject to the limitations of Section 19-145(d). Plant nurseries not exceeding 10,000 square feet of total floor area. ~ Public address systems outside), not audible to any residential use. ~ Recreational establishments or facilities, outdoor (public, private, or commercial), not exceeding five acres. ~ Satellite dishes, subject to the limitations of Section 19-131(h). ~ Utility uses requiring a structure, public or private, subject to the limitations of Section 19-1310). ~ Veterinary clinics or offices, subject to the limitations of Section 19-131(f). ~ Warehouses, subject to the limitations of Section 19-138(i). Sec. 19-200.4. Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures The following_accessory uses, buildings and structures shall be permitted in the TND district. ~ Boathouses, private. Docks, private. ~ Equipment storage buildin>s. Garages private, subject to the provisions of Section 19-66(a). ~ Gardens and garden buildings, private, subject to the provisions of Section 19- 66(a)• ~ Grounds keeping buildings, subject to the provisions of Section 19-66(a). ~ Hothouses, residential. In-law dwelling_units. 1925:77691.1 ~ ~ ®~ ~ ~ . Maintenance buildings, subject to the provisions of Section 19-66(a). Microbreweries. Piers, private. Plant propa>;ation and cultivation (not for sale): crow, flower, tree, and shrub. ~ Signs• ~ Storage buildings, .private; subject to the provisions of Section 19-66(a). ~ Swimming_pools and adjoining deck areas. ~ Tennis courts, and similar recreational facilities. ~ Tool buildings, private, subject to the provisions of Section 19-66(a). (r) Yard sales. (s) Other accessory uses, building not otherwise prohibited, customarily accessory and incidental to ant permitted use. Sec. 19-200.5. Conditional Uses The following uses may be allowed in the TND district by conditional use subject to the provisions of Section 19-13. ~ Communication towers. Halfway houses. ~ Liquor stores. Mini warehouse facilities. Sec. 19-200.6. Special Exceptions The following uses may be allowed in the TND district b~pecial exception, subject to the provisions of Section 19-21. ~ Kennel, private. ,~ Yard sales in excess of two (2) dates. ~~®a''~'~m'3' 1925:77691.1 7 Sec. 19-200.7. Application-Procedures and Approval Process The TND district becomes part of the zoning map upon approval of an application to rezone property accordin to specified criteria contained in Section 19-200.9. The process to create a TND district consists of two parts; rezoning the property to TND, and, as part of the rezoning_process, approval of a Master Plan and a Design Guidelines Manual. The Master Plan consists of a generalized graphic description of the project's proposed mix of land uses, densities, open space and other amenities accordin tg o the provisions of section 19-14(dZ(1). The Design Guidelines Manual will govern the site- specific design features associated with the project throughout its development. The standards for development that- are submitted by an applicant and approved by the board of supervisors for a particular TND district, as well as any other applicable provisions of the County Code, shall be the standards by which the project will be developed. Sec. 19-200.8. Rezoning Application Requirements; Required Documents and Information ' The following documents and information shall be submitted to the planning department and any other information required by the director of planning necessary to evaluate a rezoning application and its associated plans for development. ~ Master Plan. In addition to the requirements of section 19-14(d)(1), the following items shall be shown in the Master Plan. (1) The location of existing property lines, watercourses or lakes, wooded areas, and existing roads within or adjoining_the property (2) The maximum residential densities and the maximum number of residential units for individual residential land use categories and mixed- use categories, delineating at least two housing types. (3) The maximum non-residential square footage by use type and function. (4) The amount of land devoted to open space and amenities, including conservation areas or preservation areas, etc. ~, Desi.~n Guidelines Manual. The design guidelines manual shall address the following components of the built environment within a proposed TND district: The form, massing, and proportions of structures; ~2,) Vertical separation between streets and single-family residential uses; Architectural styles; Front porches for single-family residential uses; 1925:77691.1 ~ ~ ®: ~ 8 Materials, colors, and textures; Roof form and pitch; Architectural elements and ornamentation; Facade treatments, including window and door openings; Landscape treatments; Sidewalks and pathway treatments and other pedestrian amenities; 11 Preservation of historic structures, sites, -and archeological sites identified by the Virginia Department of Historic Resources and those designated by the county; Si_gnage. Section 19-200.9. Development Plan Review Process: Overall Development Plan Upon approval of the rezoning. application, the development plan review process for a TND project shall include an Overall Development Plan (ODP) that describes the layout uses, and other pertinent information for the entire development, or for individual tracts of development as may be approved with the Master Plan. However, for areas within the project that are not read~to be submitted for site plan review, the layout of buildin sg and parking lots shall not be required to be shown except as required by the director of planning to complete reviews on other development areas. Layout of roads shall be shown as required to accomplish road construction per section 200.11(b)(3). Once an ODP is approved, site plans and/or subdivision plans may be submitted that document the actual construction of the development. ~ An ODP shall be submitted for any TND development. The ODP may be approved administratively the planning commission and shall be updated and revised as the project evolves over time, as required by the director of planning. Overall Development Plans shall include information deemed necessary by the director of planning to insure compliance with zoning conditions and the zoning ordinance's purposes, including but not limited to: The horizontal layout of the project based upon a metes and bounds survey with two points tied to the Virginia State Coordinate System. The designation of public and private roads including alleys; 1925:77691.1 ~ ') A list of residential and non-residential products and the maximum building height within each block of the TND; A layout of single-family lots in each block; Build to lines establishing required distances between road rights of ways and principal. buildings; Densit~y block and overall density; Sidewalk and pedestrian path locations; Areas of common. open space that achieve a minimum . of 20% common ,omen space within the entire TND project and the spacing requirements ~ecified in section 19-200.11 (e); Conceptual layout of sewer and water service; 1~0,) Conceptual landscaping_plans for streets and buffers; (11) A traffic impact analysis if deemed necessary by the director of transportation; and Sign package for community identification and announcements. ~ For the purposes of subsequent site plan and subdivision review, the ODP shall identify the blocks. and/or areas, including adjoining roads and common open space areas that shall be reviewed using_ the site plan or subdivision review process. Determination of which review process shall be used for each .block and/or area shall be made by the planning department based upon input from participating_review departments. Overall Development Plans shall be reviewed to ensure compliance with TND requirements zoning- conditions and the goals and. policies of the comprehensive plan• to ensure land use compatibility and transition, and to miti at~y adverse impact on public health safety and welfare. The planning commission or the director of planning may impose conditions to accomplish these pumoses. An administrative decision on an ODP may be appealed in conformity. with section 19-268(4). The planning commission's decision on an ODP .may be appealed in conformity with section 19-269(e). ~ If the applicant requests administrative review of the ODP, the director of plannin sg hall post a notice of the ODP submission to adjacent property owners by first class mail as soon after plan submission as practicable, but in no event less than 21 days prior to approval or disapproval of the ODP. The director of 1925:77691.1 ~ ~~ ®~ ~~ 10 planning shall make affidavit that such notice has been sent and shall file the affidavit with the application. ~ If the applicant requests a planning commission review- of the ODP, the director of plannin sg hall post a notice of an ODP hearing by the planning commission in accordance with section 19-26(b). ~ Review of the ODP shall be in accordance with section 19-268(c). Section 19-200.10. Site Plan and Subdivision Plans Based upon approval of the Overall Development Plan for the TND project, the applicant may file for site plan review/approval or subdivision plan review/approval. Section 19-200.11. General Design Standards and Guidelines The following design standards and guidelines shall be applicable for all development within the TND district. ~ Minimum Area: A TND project must contain a minimum of sixty (60~acres. For infill and redevelopment projects, a minimum of twenty=(20) acres are allowed if asphere-of-influence is established into existing and/or future neighborhoods and commercial areas equaling sixty (60) acres at time of rezoning. However, -any subsequent TND request to expand a TND or infill TND shall not have a minimum size as long as the area of expansion conforms to the requirements of the original TND it adjoins. (~ Mix of Uses in Project Design: To achieve the compact design necessary to make the TND fully pedestrian oriented, residential and non-residential land uses must be sufficiently mixed- horizontally across the project and vertically within buildings. The non-residential development serving the TND shall progress with the residential development. The project should be organized so that higher density residential blocks are located within one-quarter '/4) mile of the community center. Lower density residential blocks may be located beyond one- guarter mile from the community center. Because existing uses surround an in- fill TND project, lower residential densities adjacent to the community center should be evaluated at time of zoning with regards to transition of uses. Within a TND project, a minimum of thirty~30) percent of the acreage shall be used for non-residential development, and at least 40 percent of the total square footage of ground floor non-residential development shall have over shop housing. The percentage of project acreage for non- residential buildings shall include the buildings and all parking, sidewalks, streets, and open space directly associated with these buildin>s. 1925:77691.1 11 Within an infill TND project including the area within its desi ng ated where of influence, a minimum of thirty (30) percent of the acrea eg shall be used for non-residential development. This. may include existing and/or proposed retail development within the TND sphere of influence as long as pedestrian pathways and streets are provided to the proposed infill TND area. At least 40 percent of the total square footage of ground floor non-residential development shall have over .shop housing.. This may be reduced to the extent that existing non-residential development exceeds the remaining 60 percent of ground floor rion-residential square footage. Within a TND project, no more than 40 percent of residential building permits in residential areas shall be released until 75 percent of all public and private roads serving non-residential development are constructed. No more than 75 percent of residential building_permits shall be released least 40 percent of the land area designated for non-residential development. Thee board of supervisors mawapprove alternate phasing at time of zoning. TND and in-fill TND projects should incorporate as many categories of residential uses as possible but at least three categories of residential uses shall be included. Infill TND projects may include existing residential use categories that exist within the sphere of influence to achieve at .least three categories of residential use Cate o ~ Residential Uses. The following residential categories are allowed within the residential areas of a TND ~ to the maximum density levels established below. Density for each residential category shall be calculated based upon the developable acreage identified within each block in the overall development plan. Single-family detached dwellings - Up to eight (8) dwelling units per acre. A maximum of sixty (60~percent of the residential development area may be used for single-family detached dwellings. Single family attached dwellings - Up to sixteen (16) dwelling units per acre A maximum of fort~(40~percent of the residential development area may be used for single-family attached dwellings. Live/work units - Up to sixteen (16) dwelling units per acre. No more than ten (10) percent of the residential development area shall be used for live/work dwellings and these units shall be located within the same block or across the street from non-residential development areas. Multi-family dwellings - Up to 25 dwelling units per acre. No more than twenty (20~percent of the residential development area shall be used for multi-family dwellings. Multi-family dwellin sg incorporated into upper 1925:77691.1 12 stories of non-residential buildings may exceed 25 dwelling units per acre as long as parking requirements for additional dwellings are provided through multi-storYparking facilities (parking_garages). Community Center: The community center of a TND project shall consist of a mix of office, commercial, residential, civic or institutional, and open space uses as identified below. (~ Office and Commercial uses in the community center. Except as maybe approved at time of zoning or for government buildings, no individual building shall exceed 10,000 square feet in ground. floor area until buildings are under construction for the minimum percentage of r~ ound floor building square' footage with overshoe housing. For each story of overshoe housing, the 10,000 square feet ground floor area limit may be increased by ri hg t by fifty (50) percent above the base limit. Once buildin>; construction has started for the minimum area of buildings with overshoe housing, individual buildings may increase in ground floor area to a maximum of 30,000 square feet. Residential uses in the community center: The following residential uses are permitted in the comm}~nity center: a. Residential dwellings, as over shop housin~y exceed 25 dwelling units per acre as long as parking requirements for dwellings beyond 25 units per acre are provided through multi- stor~earkin~ facilities (parking_garages). b. Senior apartments, assisted living facilities, and nursing homes as long as each use is designed within a single building; with a minimum of three stories and the area for all of these uses does not exceed 25 percent of the .total acreage in the community center. c. Work/live units -Community center may include up to ten percent of -the developable area of .the entire community center with work/live units. Civic or institutional uses in the community center: The community center shall provide locations that serve as focal points for civic, reli ig ous, and/or institutional uses. These focal points shall be at ends of sight lines such as may occur at a tee intersection of two streets, at a sudden road -bend or at one end of a central commons area, and these buildings shall be designed with a strong architectural appearance in character with the project's theme. Such uses include but are not limited to the followin>;: 1925:77691.1 a. Municipal offices, fire stations, libraries, museums, community meeting facilities, and post offices; ~Q,®~a`c~~~ 13 b. Places of worship; c. Public schools. Common open space uses in the community center: Common open space is a significant part of the design of a traditional neighborhood development. Formal and informal non-linear spaces are required with a formally designed central square or commons of 40,000 square feet minimum established as the primary common open space near the center of the community. center. A smaller informally designed common open space area shall serve as a children's park of 20,000 square feet minimum.. and shall be located within two blocks of the community center and adjacent to a primary pedestrian path or sidewalk., This park shall be furnished with a variety of children's pla~quipment and with seating areas for adults. (e) Common Open Space: At least 20 percent of the gross acreage of the entire TND proiect shall consist of common open space for the common use "and enLyment of residents, visitors and employees within the TND and shall be clearly delineated in the overall development plan. A minimum of 85 percent of the residential units within the TND project devoted to residential uses shall be within '/a mile of an improved common open space area such as a park or plaza having a minimum area of 20,000 square feet that includes, at a minimum, improvements "such as benches, activity areas, and .landscaping. Internal bikeways and pedestrian walkways shall connect between all improved common open space areas. Within an inf ll TND, the percentage of common open space, -the distance to common 'open space areas, and the connectivity between common open space areas for infill TND projects may be modified by the director of planning based upon available common open space and pathways within the sphere of influence and the amount of land available within the infill TND. ~f Building Height: Within a TND project, building height shall not exceed four (4) stories or fift~50) feet, whichever is less, except within the community center where building height shall not exceed eigh~8) stories or one hundred (100 feet, whichever is less. However, within any block,_no structures shall exceed a height of twenty-five (25) feet taller than any other adjacent buildings within the same block. ~ Minimum Lot Requirements and Block Standards: There shall be no minimum lot area or yard front, rear, and side) requirements except as defined in the Overall Development Plan for the project. A build-to-line along the street front of each block shall be established that defines the maximum distance between the street right-of--way and the face of the principal building on each lot. 1925:77691.1 ~~~~ ~~ 14 Motor Vehicle Circulation: Motor vehicle .circulation shall be desi ng ed to promote pedestrian and bicycle activity. Streets within the TND shall include All transportation, shall be constructed to state standards and accepted for maintenance by the Vir ing_ is Department of Transportation. Street Layout. Development in the TND district shall. maintain a street grid pattern of generallyparallel interconnecting streets with no cul-de-sacs except as maybe approved during the review of the Overall Developmert Plan due to topo>;raphic or site design constraints. Each proposal's topographic and other physical site impacts will be considered regarding this standard. Intersections should be at ri hg t ans;les whenever possible. (2) Curb cuts for driveways to individual residential lots shall be prohibited along all roads identified on the county's Thorous;hfare Plan. Modifications of fire prevention code. During the design of TND developments, all structures are required to meet the provisions of the Statewide Fire Prevention Code as amended by .Chesterfield County. Modification of the fire prevention code as permitted by the Statewide Fire Prevention Code, will be considered by the fire code official upon request bathe designer or developer when there are practical difficulties involved in meeting the provisions of this code. Parking spaces required: Parking within TND districts shall be in accordance with Sections 19-509 through 19-514. Landscaping and Buffering: Landscaping within TND districts shall be in accordance with Sections 19-516 through 19-519. ~ Exterior Ling: Exterior lighting_general requirements for. T'ND districts shall be in accordance with section 19-508.3. ~ Exterior Lighting within a TND: Exterior lighting requirements for TND districts shall be in accordance with 19-508.4. ~ Off- Street Parking: Off street parking_requirements for TND districts shall be in accordance with section 19-509. ~ On -Street Parking in a TND: On- street parking requirements for TND districts shall be in accordance with section 19-509.1. 1925:77691.1 ~ ~ ®~ ~ ~ . . 15 ~ Restrictions and Limitations: Agricultural, residential,-residential townhouse, multi-family "residential, manufactured homes. ~ -Restrictions and limitations applicable to TND districts shall be in accordance with section 19-510. ~ Interpretation o~Speci~c requirements: Interpretation of certain .specific requirements for TND districts shall be in accordance with section 19-512. ~ Design Standards for Parallel Parking~~n standards for parallel arking in TND districts shall be in accordance with section 19-514.1. ~t,~ Plant Material Specif cations: Plant material specifications for TND districts shall be in accordance with section 19-518. ~ Other Restrictions or Building Mounted Signs: Restrictions for building mounted signs in TND districts shall be in accordance with 19-644. ~ Freestanding Sign Design: Free standing si n design in TND districts shall be in accordance with section 19-645. 000 Section 19-301. Definitions For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings: 000 Acreage, developable: The total land area within a zonins lot, or within a block for a TND project, minus ."areas that are not developable including ,but not limited to resource protection areas, wetlands, perennial stream protection areas, lakes, railroad rights of ways, and cemeteries. Within a TND, common open space as approved in the overall development plan shall be included as developable acreage within each block. The total land area within a zoning lot or a block shall be measured from existing_public rights of way, from .the center of nronosed street rights of way. and from the edge of any land or water area not developable. 000 Infill TND proiect: The intent of the in-fill TND proiect is to establish a complete TND with a blend of residential types .and densities that relate to a commercial community center and that is interconnected with streets for vehicular access and with pedestrian pathways and common open space. By inserting- residential or commercial components of a TND project that are missing in an area with existing development or redevelopment,. an infill TND project begins establishing a network of pedestrian pathways with areas of common open space and opportunities for economic development 1925:77691.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ . 16 within walking distance of existing neighborhoods. The extent that an in-fill TND, combined with other properties within its sphere of influence to ec1ua160 acres minimum, accomplishes the general characteristics of a TND project shall be established at time of zonin . 000 Live/Work Units: A building, or a unit space within a portion of a building. that combines a commercial use allowed in the zoning district with a residential living space for the owner of the business, or the owner's employee, and that person's household. The residence occurs on upper floors and the business occurs on the first floor. Live/work units shall be located only in residential areas of a TND. Architecture generally emphasizes a residential townhome character, but the first floor for the business shall be on-grade with the adjoining street and shall have a minimum of a 12 feet high ceiling. A business in a live/work unit shall not be open to the public between the hours of 9 pm and 7 am. 000 Omen space, common: Any area within the TND project area as shown on the overall Development Plan (sectiori 19-200.9) that may be used by residents and the eg neral public that is maintained for any of the following_purposes: as natural ve etg ation or landscaped areas; aesthetic and accessible ponds and BMPs; active or passive recreational uses including but not limited to sidewalks, walking and biking`paths, playgrounds, swimming_pools, and tennis courts; outside public atg hering areas set aside for temporary activities and events such as, but not limited to, art shows, annual celebrations, and special" outings that support the recreational nature of open space; and related parking lots and buildings accessory to any of these uses. Resource protection areas, wetlands, perennial stream protection areas, -and storm water management and "best mana eg ment practices" (BMP) areas are excluded from minimum common open mace area requirements except for those areas used as a design feature or recreational amenity or reenwa~ 000 Over shop housing: Residential units in upper stories of commercial and office development. 000 Personal service establishments: Primarily non-industrial establishments which provide various service functions to residents and businesses, including; banks; barber shops; beauty shops; brokerages; child care centers; clinics (massage, medical or optical credit unions; daY care (familyday care homes, day care centers, adult or child); dress making shops, dry cleaning (pick-up, drop-off, coin-operated); laundries and Laundromats (not including dry cleaning_plants); locksmith operations; mailing services; printin shops, photography studios; rental establishments (small home hardware, tools and equipment, health and party equipments repair services; sewing machine sales, service and instruction; savings and loans institutions; shoe repair; tailoring telegraph 1925:77691.1 17 services; travel agencies; tutoring centers; and other uses of similar intensity and nature as determined by the director of planning, 000 Recreational establishments, commercial indoor: Primarily non-industrial establishments which provide commercial indoor recreational services, including: billiard parlors; dance studios; exercise studios; fitness centers; health clubs; martial arts studios; pool halls; and other uses of similar intensity and nature as determined by the director of plannin>;. 000 Retail, general: Non-industrial establishments characterized by the offering for sale of goods and related services to the eg neral public; including: antiques not including pawnbrokers, flea markets, or second-hand stores); appliances; artist materials and supplies; bakery foods; beer and wine; bicycles; books; cameras, candy, clothing;, consignment stores (excluding motor vehicles); curios; department stores; home electronics; eye wear; drub stores; flowers, food (prepared); .fruit; furniture; gasoline; groceries; gifts; hardware; hobby supplies; home entertainment items; jewelry magazines; meat; motor vehicle accessories; musical products and instruments; newspapers; office supplies; packaging=paint; pets; pharmacies; seafood; shopping centers; sporting_goods; stationer.~telephones; toys; videos ,rental and sales); vegetables; wallpaper; and other uses of similar intensity and nature as determined by the director of plannin>;. 000 School, specialty: Educational facilities offering specialized instruction for art, business; commerce; dance; music; trades; training_purposes; or vocational education; and other uses of similar intensity and nature as determined by the director of planning_ This definition includes kindergarten and nursery schools. 000 where o~nfluence: The sphere of influence of an in-fill TND project includes the developed and/or undeveloped areas outside of and adjacent to the boundaries of the in-fill TND that ph s~y connect with the inflll TND via streets, bicycle paths, and pedestrian paths and sidewalks in order to establish a lamer TND community area of at least 60 acres. Streets, bicycle paths, and pedestrian paths and sidewalks shall extend and connect from the proposed TND project to access locations in adjoinin dg evelopments, as required by the board of supervisors at time of zoning, 000 Work/live units: A building, or a unit space within a portion of a building that combines a commercial use allowed in the zoning district with a residential living space 1925:77691.1 ~~®~~~~ 18 for the owner of the business, or the owner's employee, and that person's household. The residence occurs on upper floors and the business occurs on the first floor. Work/live units shall be located only in the community center of a TND. Architecture e~y emphasizes the commercial character of the TND community center, and the first floor for the business shall be on-grade with the adjoining street and shall have a minimum of a 12 feet high ceiling. There is no limit to the hours that the business use ma~pen to thepublic. 000 Sec. 19-508.3. Exterior lighting. With the exception of single family residential uses, all exterior lights shall be arranged and installed so that the direct or reflected illumination does not exceed five- tenths foot candle above background, measured at the lot line of any adjoining A, R, R- TH, MH, TND, or R-MF district. Except in village and TND districts where light standards may be required to be compatible with unique architectural. styles or developments having ornamental pedestrian style lighting, lighting standards shall be of a directional type capable of shielding the light source from direct view from any adjoining A, R, R-TH, MH, TND, or R-MF district or public right-of way. 000 Sec. 19-508.4. Exterior lightin>i within a TND nroiect. Within a TND, pedestrian environments require lighting to provide visibility safety along streets and within public parking areas while minimizing the effects of li>hting on residential uses. ~ Lighting Level Standards. Streets with on-street parking and all sidewalks within public ri>;hts-of--way shall maintain a minimum illumination level of 0.5- foot candle. Parking_areas for all uses other than single-family residential uses shall maintain a minimum illumination level of 1.0 foot-candle. However, ad1acent to single-family residential uses, parkin lg of or business security lighting; shall not exceed the 1.0 foot-candle illumination level beyond the propert l Light Fixture Mounting Heights. 1925:77691.1 Street lighting shall not exceed a mounting height of twenty five (25) feet above the closest street rg ade. (~~3~~~:~'i~ 19 Parkin ag rea lighting, whether pole or building mounted, shall not exceed a hei>;ht of twenty (20) feet above the. grade of the parking area closest to the light source. 000 Sec. 19-509. Off-street parking. 000 ~) For residential uses, parkins; within a garage or an enclosed or covered space may be counted toward meeting parking requirements. Conversion of such a garage or enclosure to another use is prohibited unless sufficient off-street parking is provided. (d) Within the community center of a TND project, public parking facilities may be constructed to provide sufficient required parking for uses within 1000 feet of the facility. However parking decks shall be screened from view from public and private roads by locating other buildings around their perimeter. Sec. 19-509.1. On-street parking in a TND. Except along roads identified on the county's Thoroughfare Plan, improved, designated parking spaces in a public right-of--way may be counted toward the required number of parking spaces for each use within a TND District when more than one-half of each such mace resides in front of the use. However parking spaces in a public right-of-wav shall not be designated in any wav for a use. On-street parking spaces not in front of a use may be counted toward the required number of parking spaces within an overall block. 000 Sec. 19-510. Restrictions and limitations-Agricultural, residential, residential townhouse, multi-family residential, manufactured homes. (a) Parking and storing recreational equipment in R, R-TH, MH, TND and R- MF Districts: 000 (3) In R-TH, R-MF, and TND Districts, parking and storing recreational equipment shall be prohibited unless a common storage area(s) is (are) provided for the parking. Parking spaces for recreational equipment and/or vehicles shall be in addition to that required for parking private vehicles. The storage area(s) shall be effectively screened from view. 000 ~~J®~~~ 1925:77691.1 20 Sec. 19-512. Interpretation of specific requirements. 000 ~) Within a TND district, the minimum requirements for on and off-street parking spaces for each use shall be calculated based on the lesser of either section 19- 513 or four (4 parking spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area. Required parkins? for live/work units shall be based on the residential use and parking for work/live units shall be based upon the commercial use. (~}~ When fractional space results, the required number of parking spaces shall be rounded to the next highest whole number. 000 Sec. 19-514.1. Design standards for parallel narking. Parallel parking may be used for required parkins; off-street, and on-street in villaf;e districts and the TND zoning district. Spaces shall be legibly striped to be seven (7) feet wide and twenty-two 22) feet long with 4 inch white lines perpendicular to the curb or edge of pavement. Sec. 19-518. Plant material specifications. 000 (b) Minimum size standards: 000 (2) Large deciduous trees: Large deciduous trees shall be of a species that reach a minimum crown spread of greater than 30 feet within 20 years. At a time of planting, a minimum caliper of at least two and one-half inches shall be required except for street trees within a TND project when three and one-half inches shall be required. If a native species is selected from the Chesterfield County Plant Materials List, the minimum caliper shall be reduced *° +~~~° ~~°'~°~ ~ a half inch. Multi-stem plants shall be minimum of 10 feet tall except that large deciduous street trees in a TND project shall not be allowed to be multi-stem. 000 (h) Street trees: During the site and subdivision construction plan review processes and for a TND project during the overall development plan review process, required street trees shall be shown „'~^ ~''°~~~~~'- +''° ~ °a +"°°'""°+'~__~, 1925:77691.1 ~~®~~.~~ 21 including species and caliper, and submitted to and approved by the director of planning and VDOT. T~ ~ ++ i,,., ~i.,,i~ i.° ~„i..,..;~°a ., r.,,.~ „~+i.° c~n~~~„^~;,,~ ,.i,,.,~ ~. ~.,,..,.. r.w..... Unless otherwise approved bathe director of planning and VDOT durin the review of the overall development flan for a TND project, all public and private streets except alleys shall be planted with large maturin sg treet trees on an avera e~ of forty (40) feet on center: within the street right-of- wav of each block. either within a sidewalk area or within a planting strip between the curb and sidewalk having a minimum width of six (6) feet: When small maturing ornamental street trees are proposed, spacing shall average twent -f~25) feet on center. Within a TND project the minimum clear zone shall be established for proposed trees within the~ublic street right-of--way busing six (6) inch vertical curbin fg or all public streets. Within a TND project planting_strips within a street right-of--way shall be planted with turf gasses or other low rg owing plants as approved by VDOT. For all trees planted in tree wells in a sidewalk area within or adjacent to a public or private street a minimum of seventy-five (75~quare feet by three (3 feet deep beneath the sidewalk shall contain an uncompacted soil mix favorable to healthy tree growth, irrigation, and a subdrain tied to the storm drains stem. (~~ Unless otherwise required during subdivision review, trees shall be lp anted at a maximum spacing of 40 feet on center and ~'~~"''°'^^~+°a no g~e~ter more than fives feet outside of the right-of--way in an easement granted to the homeowners association or within the right-of--way if approved by VDOT. For single trunk trees the minimum allowable caliper measured four feet above grade shall be two and one half inches. Multistem trees shall have a minimum of three canes and be a minimum of ten feet in height. Species selected for planting shall be suitable for growing in this vegetative zone and shall be drought tolerant. {~}~ The subdivider or developer shall at their expense install all required street trees identified on the approved plans prior to recordation or surety shall be provided in the amount approved by the director of planning and in a form accepted by the county attorney's office, sufficient to guarantee installation. Any surety shall be held by the director of planning. Installation within a subdivision shall be completed prior to state acceptance of the subdivision's streets. (~-}~ Required. street trees shall be guaranteed by the installer for a period of not less than one year. Replacement of dead trees is required in accordance 1925:77691.1 ~ ~ ~, 22 ,- with section 19-518(d). Maintenance responsibilities of the required street trees within a subdivision shall be specified on the final check plan and record plat to be the responsibility of the homeowners association. Street trees shall not be removed during or after residences are constructed. Trees removed shall be replaced with a like species and in a size comparable to the original planting. 000 19-644. Other restrictions for building mounted signs. 000 (b) Signs may be mounted perpendicular to a building provided that no sign shall project more than 36 inches from the building, roof or canopy, exceed a face to face thickness of eight inches or exceed the height of the fascia or parapet wall. All projecting sis?ns shall maintain a minimum clearance of eight (8) feet above grade below the sign. Within a Traditional Neighborhood Development (TNDh buildin signs projectin og ver a sidewalk may extend up to eight (8) feet from the buildin a~g as the sign is no closer than four (4) feet from the face of curb at the street. 000 Sec. 19-645. Freestanding sign design. (b) Any freestanding sign in an TND, O-1 or C-1 District shall conform to village district standards, with the exception that uses in a TND District. that front on a major arterial outside of a village district may use countywide size restrictions for area and height for signs located on the major arterial. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1925:77691.] 23 NEIGHBORHOODS Neighborhoods are the building blocks of Chesterfield County and the County's quality of life is determined; by their. livability and character. The Plan for Chesterfield works toward assisting the County's .established neighborhoods-and commercial areas to remain healthy or regain lost health by • Raising citizen awareness of critical issuesfacing. their neighborhoods. • Assisting. neighborhoods to become proactive in their efforts to keep their neighborhoods healthy. • Recommending actions That stabilize and improve fhe vitality and' health. of established communities. Affordable housing opportunities for homeowners and renters shauld be available to all who live and work in Chesterfield County. There should:be an opportunity for people of various income levels to live in economically integrated neighborhoods..Affordable housing. may be integrated. into high density and mixed-use development projects and should be encouraged through more flexible zoning wherever possible. • Community Mixed Use. • Communes Mixed Use 'Cenfer • Community Mixed Use Node • Regional Mixed Use • Regional Mixed Use Center • Regional Mixed Use .Node. ~~®~ ~, t '~ server Your Community Newspaper Since 1995 l'.O. Box 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 231. l3 • Phone: (804) 545-75(x) • Fax: (8O4) 744-3269 • Email: ^cws(~chesterfieldobserveccom • Internet: www.chesterfieldobscrver.com ~abb~ ss ~o\ Ati ~~ ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT ~ ~~~-~~~ MP ~e~~~`~eNMS~;s Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors LN: TND Zoning %z Page + 1" The Observer, Inc. 'FA1CB NOTICE Take ~eglce that the Board of Supervisors of Clieaterfteld County, Virginia, at a regtilar scheduled meeting on ch 12, 2008, at '6:30 p.ni. iti the County Pnblic Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration i3uilding, Rt. I O andlori Road, Chesterfield,. Virginia, will hold. a -public heating. where persona affected may appear and present their views to consider: Amendments to the County's , Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance that would establish a Traditioaal Neighborhood Devel*pmsrtt (TND) zoning distrtCt and which , provide. standards for tl}t TI~fH ~ district as well u a number of daiga standards that will be applicable County-wide. No property will be rezoned by these amendmems but, if adopted by tfie Board a~f Suyervisors the TND district would be available to landowners and the County for pocsibh future rezoning actions. The proposed amendments are described below: An amendment to the Introduction to the Plan Por C(t!e>ietfidd (`Plan"); T'lae amendment would- ~ the language to the discussion of neighborh development gosh and policies: T>titdttional neighborhood devdoptnent .(TND) provides opportunities for orating t~v ranted-use, pedestrian-orientteed~. aetivity centers containing a variety of trees, tnduding, business, retail, residerrttial; citlGtual, educational> and other nblic and' .private u1es. Traditional nelg~borhood p~cat tc beii~q(~~ nel6hbK_ hood P a ratye of housing :choice. Tl~ districts maybe appropriate,. , ~ ~,e~~- Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 2/27/2008 & 3/5/2008 Sworn to and subscribed before me this 5`~ day of May" , 2008. Legal Affiant a . Lup ,Notary Public My commission expires: November 30, 2010 Commission I.D. 7040138 G,o~, ., O v pF ~. A }~ y ~` THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. ~~ ~: h$a~N~~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of ~. Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 17.C. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider a New Lease Agreement with A. T. Massey Energy Company for Rental of a Corporate Hangar County Administrator's Comments: . County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests the Board to authorize the County Administrator to enter into a new lease agreement with A. T. Massey Energy Company for rental of a corporate hangar and the associated office space located at 7431 Airfield Drive. Summary of Information: The county entered into a five-year lease agreement with A. T. Massey Energy Company in 2003, which expires June 30, 2008. The terms for the new lease have been amended based on staff negotiations with A. T. Massey Energy. The new lease will be for a five-year period. Staff recommends approval. Preparers Robert C. Key Title: Director, General Services Attachments: Yes No # ~ ~ ®'~'~~ l~k„ es~e ~ a e ever P.O. Box 1616, Midkrthiun, Virginia 231.1.3 • Phone: (8(}4) >45-75IX) • Fax: (8O4) 7=#4-3269 • Email: news@chcsterfieldobservcccom ~~ ~ ~' Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Your Community Newspaper Sinee 1995 MAk Cle{ Su ar`nso;s Board o p' LN: Massey Energy 1 col x 4"" $143.65 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of TAKE NOTICE Take notice that the Boazd of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at a regulaz scheduled meeting on March 12, 2008, at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building, Rt.10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia, will hold a public hearing where persons affected may appear and present their views to consider: A newlease agreement between Chesterfield County and A. T. Massey Energy Company for rental of a corporate hangar (including office azea) with a total of 11,000 squaze feet, more or less, and designated as 7431 Airfield Drive at the Chesterfield County Airport. If further information is desired, please contact Mr. Rob Key, Director of General Services, at 748-1399, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. The hearing is held at a public facility designed to be accessible to persons with disabilities. Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or need for reasonable accommodations should contact Janice Blakley, Clerk to the Board, at 748-1200. Persons needing interpreter services for the deaf must notify the Clerk to the Boazd no later than Firiday, Mazch 7, 2008. ADVERTISING AFFIDA CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 3/5/2008 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~~ MCC ~l , 2008. Legal Affiant day of Joa L. up ,Notary Public My commission expires: November 30, 2010 Commission I.D. 7040138 (4sE`~L) .~. ,;'r' ``1rt~utnipitr~ ~. , ,., ~~a....,,•tG •,. OF ~ ~rA~~,.~~~v THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~C p BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 ~p,~ AG E N D,4 Meeting Date: March 12,,2008 Item Number: 17.D. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Restriction of Through Truck Traffic on Cranbeck Road County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: A public hearing is scheduled for this date to consider the restriction of through truck traffic on Cranbeck Road from Huguenot Road to Robious Road. Summary of Information: The county has received a request from residents to restrict any through truck or truck and trailer or semi-trailer combination, except pickup or panel trucks, from using Cranbeck Road (Route 674) from Huguenot Road (Route 147) to Robious Road (Route 675). The recommended alternate route is Huguenot Road (Route 147) and Robious Road (Route 675). The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has four criteria it considers when a restriction is requested. A requested restriction must meet the first two criteria, in that: 1) a reasonable alternate route is provided; and 2) the character or frequency of truck traffic .on the route proposed for restriction is not compatible with the affected area. Evaluation of the second criterion will include safety issues, accident history, engineering of the roadway, vehicle composition, and other traffic engineering related issues. (Continued next page) Preparers R.J. McCracken Title: Director of Transportation Agen677 Attachments: Yes ~ No # CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information: (continued) In addition, a requested restriction must meet either of the last two criteria, in that: 1) the roadway is residential in nature, with at least 12 dwellings on both sides within 150 feet of the roadway centerline per 1,000 feet of roadway; or 2) the roadway must be functionally classified as either a local or collector road. Staff recommends approval of the restriction. Recommendation: If the Board wishes to pursue this request, the attached resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to restrict through truck traffic on Cranbeck Road from Huguenot Road to Robious Road should be adopted. District: Midlothian ~~~~~~ Cranbeck. Road Through 't'ruck Traffic Restriction Request ~ , ~ ~ ®®v a Recommended Restricted Route Recommended Alternate Route V.~®~~~ Printed by GIS Aerial Imagery -Copyright ®2002 Comnronwealth of Virginia copyngm ~ zvoo ~,nescartieia ~ounry WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors received a request to restrict any through truck or truck and trailer or semi- trailer combination except pickup or panel trucks from using Cranbeck Road from Huguenot Road to Robious Road; and WHEREAS, the recommended alternate route is Huguenot Road (Route 147) and Robious Road (Route 675); and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County will use its good offices for enforcement of the proposed restriction; and WHEREAS, the Board has conducted a public hearing on the restriction. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to restrict through truck traffic on Cranbeck Road from Huguenot Road to Robious Road. ~~~~~J P.O. B J-- ~ ~~ ~ Your Community Newspaper Since 1995 ~e _ ... ~ . r.com ..',~, ~ nr„~~„rtrinn Vir4 inia 23I 13 • Phone: (804) >45-7500 • Fax: (8(ki) 744-'i~69 • Email: news@chesterfieldohserveccom • Internet. www.chcstcrfi~ldobserve Ary- i ~ R ~Eo AFFIDAVI R~~ ~ ADVERTISING A MG\e~to~e. goad or SuPe~tsocs Chesterfield County LN: Cranbeck Road Board of Supervisors 1 col x 4" $198.50 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of TAKg NOTICE Take notice that the Boazd of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at a regular scheduled meeting on March 12, 2008, at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building, Rt.10 and Lori Road> Chesterfield, Virginia, will hold a public hearing where persons affected may appeaz and present their views to consider: The restriction of through truck or truck and trailer or semi-trailer combination, except pickup or panel trucks from using Cranbeck Road (Route 674) from Huguenot Road (Route 147) to Robious Road (Route 675). The recommended alternate route is Huguenot Road (Route 147) and Robious Road (Route 675). If further information is desired, please contact Mr. RJ. McCracken, Director of Transportation, at 748-1037, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. The hearing is held at a public facility designed to be accessible to persons with disabilities. Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or need for reasonable accommodations should contact Janice Blakley> Clerk to the board, at 748-1200. Persons needing interpreter services for the deaf must notify the Clerk to the Boazd no later than Friday, Mazch 7, 2008. sre LEGAL, page 25 ~..<~~pNWF~~~ :~ F y` _ 0 . ~Jn„ta~~.`~'t. pert' ~~ e~ °~~~~ ~~'~ ~ eura i ~ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 3/5/2008 Sworn to and subscribed before me this 5~h day of Mou'GI~ , 2008. Legal Affiant Joa a .Lupo, Notary Public My commission expires: November 30, 2010 Commission I.D. 7040138 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY "" ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 - AGENDA ~I ~q~A Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 .Item Number: 17.E. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of a Plan of Cosby's Lake County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adopt an ordinance to vacate a portion of a Plan of Cosby's Lake. Summary of Information: Watermark Partners, LLC, has submitted an application requesting the vacation of Lots 1, 2, 14, 15, and 16, Block B and Lot 16, Block C, Plan of Cosby's Lake as shown on the attached plat. The remainder of Cosby's Lake was vacated in 1957. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. DIStrICt: Dale Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Right of Way Manager Attachments: ~ Yes ~ No # (7~®~"~~ VICINITY SKETCH PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE TO VACATE A PORTION OF A PLAN OF COSBY'S LAKE ~ G 2. KINGSLAND EEK W TUCKEF2 3. KINGSLAND C K T 4. GHIGKAMAUGA D S. GHIGKAMAUGA CT 6. LAKE CAROLINE DR 7. LAKE GAR T 8.5HANN0 COU O '~' m z o T ORDINANCETO VACATEA PORTION OF A PLAN OF COSBY'S LAKE // kl G ~'° f ~ ~\ Q~RJ~~ ZA! ~ ~~ ,~ J ~fi~ c~4 QUAIFF LN \ bsy N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W ~_ '- E S 1 kcl a qId k 833J3 Re t V ®Ma~~ ~s ~~~z o ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ U ~~ v ,, • ~ a ~ ~~ ~ :~ C~ . , ii~j~ i ~ O 1 ~~ ~a s p O ® `+~7 p © ~ O ~ O ~ O p O m p ,;, p s ©• © o o ©o 0 0 0 . ,.~~ © o 0 0 ® o . .o ~ ®• ® '~ o ® ~. ® ~ • ~ ® w•5 O © ® , ® © ® © O O O ^ ® O O V/ p ® ® p ~ ~' l= `©/ s, j. OO t ; `y a e 27 ~ T ~ i •+ ~~ , ~y~ ~ ~~~~'~~ ~~ °~~ .~~ ~~ ~~artr[~iirratnta.gtit',~'['~+!.Fx~(r[r 4~tacr• F9v~ F'l), R,>~ ! (rl r,, ltidla~thiaa,'~i~,tinSa 2?I1 z • P!E"inr: j~tIF11 i~15-',i{M} • F.a~: ~~IFJI 7d•i•??t.9 • Fas~ail: ncu~,L:chcs9crfielftrrk~c£n~r.c<?m • 1.^,l.mst, u-~'tv.~hcsserdatlohzrn'eci~~nt ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT C"Bent T7escri}~tiarr Ad Site ('cyst tncr issue) Chesterfield County Cosby Lake Right cyI'1~4`ay t col x 2.5" S l f)C7.[7C) The ()bscrvcr, Inc. puhfisher of C.HF,STFRFiFLD OBSFR~'ER This is to certify that the attached legal naticc ~~~at published by jrc~m C.E~GAta,Pctge 2 Chesterfield Obsen~er in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on ~~ ~ . tllc: follar~ving elate{s): X2127?Zt)t}8 ~ 3r5f2Qt)S Tnt~E lvcmcl That on March t3, 2(MO$, at Cx34 g.rn, or as .soon theraafttr as may bG heard, the Board ai 5apervisors of Ghesterfectd County at iu regular mating place in the Fabric Mooting Room of Chesterfield Courit}~ '-t3r~ita, will consider the followityg ordinaner for adt~l»~nn: AN ORDIIIAT3CE to vacate a parrioa of a Plan of C:osb}' a Lake, a~ uhawra on a plat I- ki. ingc. dated Jury 20. I9~$> ar~drorordtd in the gcrk's s, Circuit Govrt, i:hexterfickl Gouty Virgirtta, in Plat Rook a. Pages tsa throat t9t1. 7}iccomPleteteztaftht ordlnancc is on file in the odice of c Right of Wap Manager In Grueaterfield CouatV, Virgtaia, and map bn caarnined by aI! uytet^rsted parties bety~+ee7y the bows of ¢:30 a:m. xnd 5:04 pm., Map ht+uuugh pndav S«a~orn t© and subscribed before nle this ._...__,~`___ day of Leal ~tTant _.. Joa a up , >totary~ Public My commission expires: November 3C1, 2()l U Commissiuri I.D. 70417138 ~SFr~L) t` ~~ OF ~. ~-`~c :z..~Q~.{a FA q v ^'.1 " TI-IiS IS NdT .~1 BILL. PLEASE I~AY FR(~l~'i IN4(?ICF. TIi.'1NK YOU. e,,n°o,~ hq~NU~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Item Number: 20. Subject: Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Supervisors County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Motion of adjournment and notice of the Board of Supervisors meeting to be held on April 2, 2008 at 3:00 p.m. in the Public Meeting Room. Preparers Janice Blakley Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board ® No # (~0~~'~~