98SN0221.pdfREQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
· ,-..v .~, l:,:,o CPC
May 27, 1998 BS
98SN0221
Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation
Dale Magisterial District
East line of Iron Bridge Road
REQUEST: Conditional Use to permit golf course use.
PROPOSED LAND USE:
A golf course is planned on undeveloped portions of Iron Bridge Park. Customary
and accessory uses to the golf course, such as a driving range, club house, pro
shop, snack bar/restaurant and other activities are also planned.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND DENIAL.
AYES: Messrs. Marsh, Gulley and Miller.
NAY: Messrs. Shewmake and Cunningham.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval for the following reasons:
The proposed golf course use conforms to the Central Area Plan which suggests the
property is appropriate for Iron Bridge Park.
The proffered conditions ensure that the golf course use will be compatible with
existing and anticipated area residential uses.
(NOTE: CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER MAY PROFFER
CONDITIONS. THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON
BY BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE
RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
(STAFF) 1.
Uses shall be limited to the following: A golf course and driving range,
plus customary accessory uses to include, but not necessarily be limited to
putting greens; a clubhouse; a pro shop; a snack bar/restaurant; an office
for maintenance personnel; maintenance facilities; parking for maintenance
vehicles, golf carts, and emergency vehicles; and other such uses that are
customary accessory and incidental to golf course use.
(STAFF) 2.
The golf course and customary accessory uses to the golf course shall not
be open to the public between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. The
driving range and customary accessory uses to the driving range shall not
be open to the public between the hours of 11:30 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. With
the exception of the driving range and customary accessory uses,
maintenance activities shall not occur between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and
7:00 a.m. Maintenance activities for the driving range and customary
accessory uses shall not occur between the hours of 12:00 midnight and
7:00 a.m.
(STAFF) 3.
With the exception of after-hours security lighting, only the driving range
and customary accessory uses to the driving range shall be lighted. Any
lighting fvctures to accommodate the driving range use shall be designed to
either direct the light away or shield the light source from adjacent
residentially zoned property to the north, south and southeast and away
from agriculturally zoned property to the north and east. Security lighting
may only be permitted by the Planning Commission upon review and
approval of a lighting plan which insures that adjacent properties will not
be adversely affected by such lighting.
(STAFF) 4.
Except as noted herein, all facilities shall be set back a minimum of 100 feet
from property boundaries adjacent to residentially zoned property to the
north, south and southeast and from agriculturally zoned properties to the
north and east. The driving range and customary accessory uses shall be
set back a minimum of 200 feet from adjacent residentially zoned properties
to the north, south and southeast and from agriculturally zoned properties
to the north and east. Within these setbacks, and adjacent to the aforesaid
property boundaries, a fifty (50) foot buffer shall be maintained. Within
this buffer, existing, mature vegetation shall be maintained unless removal
is approved by the_ Planning Commission through site plan review. The
only facilities allowed within this buffer shall be bicycle and walking trails
2
98SN0221/WP/MAY27H
(STAFF)
(STAFF)
(STAFF)
(STAFF)
(STAFF)
(STAFF)
o
o
10.
associated with public park use, but not golf course use; and security
fencing; and utilities which mn generally perpendicular through the buffer.
Facilities shall be designed to minimize the possibility'of balls in play from
entering public rights of way or adjacent properties. The design shall
preclude the use of physical barriers along the public rights of way other
than decorative fencing or walls, topography and/or landscaping. A plan
for achieving this requirement shall be submitted for approval in
conjunction with site plan review.
Except where the requirements of the underlying Agricultural (A) zoning
are more restrictive or conditions of zoning approval address a specific
standard and with the exception of the requirement that the source for
lighting of the driving range and customary accessory uses be shielded from
view from any adjoining A or R District and any public right of way,
development shall conform to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance
and Development Standards Manual for Corporate Office (0-2) Districts in
Emerging Growth Areas.
Use of wells for water supply shall be prohibited.
Any lease negotiated between the County and any other entity to construct,
maintain or operate the golf course shall include a provision that states that
the lessee or its sublessees or assigns shall not permit the sale or
consumption of alcoholic beverages on the property. This Conditional Use
shall be granted for so long as the County, the lessee, its sublessees or
assigns abide by this lease term.
Prior to operation of the golf course, a fertilization plan for the golf course
shall be submitted to the Chesterfield County Extension Agent for approval.
A monitoring program, acceptable to the Extension Agent, shall be
implemented to ensure compliance with the approved fertilization plan.
Except for timbering approved by the Virginia State Department of Forestry
for the purpose of removing dead or diseased trees, there shall be no
timbering on the property until a land disturbance permit has been obtained
from the Environmental Engineering Department and the approved devices
have been installed.
3 98SN0221/WP/MAY27H
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location:
East line of Iron Bridge Road, north line of Route 288, north and south lines of Whitepine
Road, and east and west lines of Hunting Creek Drive. GPIN 770-669-9700 and 774-670-
5199 (Sheet 22).
Existi Z~g_Z_q_~g:
A
Size:
354.6 acres
Existing Land Use:
Iron Bridge Park
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use:
North
South
East
West
- A and R-15; Single family residential or vacant
- A, R-7 and R-9; Single family residential, Route 288 or vacant
- A and R-9; Single family residential or vacant
- A, A with Conditional Use Planned Development and I-1; Single family
residential, public/semi-public (County Airport), commercial or vacant
UTILITIES
Public Water System:
Public
There is an existing twelve (12) inch water line extending along the east side of Hunting
Creek Drive adjacent to the request site. The existing park buildings are served by the
public water system. Use of the public water system is intended by the applicant. Use of
the public water system is required by County Code.
Wastewater System:
There is an existing twenty-one (21) inch wastewater trunk line extending along Reedy
Branch Creek and ending approximately 5,600 feet northeast of the request site. The
public waste,water system is not ayailable to serve the request site.
4
98SN0221/WP/MAY27H
Private Septic Tank and Drainfield System:
The Health Department must approve any new septic systems or expanded usage of any
existing septic system. - ,
Wells:
The use of wells for the golf course would be prohibited. (Proffered Condition 7)
ENVIRONMENTAL
Drainage and Erosion:
The request property drains directly into Reedy Creek. No existing or anticipated on- or
off-site drainage or erosion problems.
To address potential erosion problems that could occur with land disturbing activities, the
applicant has proffered that there will be no timbering of the property until a land
disturbance permit has been issued. (Proffered Condition 10)
Water Quali .ty:
Reedy Creek is a perennial stream and, as such, a 100 foot conservation area must be
established from either a 100-year floodplain or the wetlands if so delineated to preserve
water quality, in accordance with Chesapeake Bay Act requirements.
To further ensure that runoff from the golf course does not affect area water quality, the
applicant has proffered to submit a fertilization plan to the Chesterfield County Extension
Agent for approval, and further has proffered to implement a monitoring program to
ensure compliance with the approved fertilization plan. (Proffered Condition 9)
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Fire Service:
The request property is served by the Airport Fire/Rescue Station, Company Number 15,
and by Rescue 15. The number of hydrants and quantity of water needed for fire
protection will be evaluated during the plans review process.
Transportation:
A twenty-one (21) hole public golf course is planned for part of the property (Iron Bridge
Park). Based on golf course trip rates, development of the golf course is anticipated to
5 98SN0221/WP/MAY27H
generate approximately 750 average daily trips. These vehicles will be distributed via
Whitepine Road to Route 10 which had a 1996 traffic count of 30,602 vehicles per day.
Huntingcreek Hills Subdivision, consisting of approximately 580 lots, is located on the
south and east sides of Iron Bridge Park. Based on single family trip rates, Huntingcreek
Hills Subdivision generates approximately 5,220 average daily trips. As part of the initial
development of Huntingcreek Hills, access was constructed to Salem Church Road. With
the last section of Huntingcreek Hills Subdivision, the County required the developer of
that subdivision to connect the subdivision street (Huntingcreek Drive) with the park road
(Whitepine Road) for additional emergency access to that neighborhood. This connection
provided a road from Route 10 to Salem Church Road.
Huntingcreek Drive had a 1998 traffic count of 3,292 vehicles per day. The current
Planning Commission Stub Road Policy suggests that subdivision streets should carry
approximately 1,500 vehicles per day. Huntingcreek Hills Subdivision was developed
prior to the adoption of the current Stub Road Policy. Any major facilities, such as the
golf course constructed within Iron Bridge Park, will have some traffic impact on
Huntingcreek Hills Drive.
At time of site plan review, specific recommendations will be provided regarding access
and internal circulation for the golf course.
LAND USE
Comprehensive Plan:
Lies within the boundaries of the Central Area Plan which suggests the property is~
appropriate for Iron Bridge Park.
Area Development Trends:
Area properties are zoned agriculturally, residentially and industrially and are occupied by
a mix of single family residences in subdivisions and on acreage parcels, public/semi-
public uses (Iron Bridge Park and the County Airport), offices, commercial uses and
vacant land. Development trends are anticipated to follow the suggested land uses of the
Plan, which suggests office, commercial and industrial uses are appropriate along the Iron
Bridge Road corridor and residential uses are appropriate east of the corridor.
Site Design:
The golf course would be developed on portions of Iron Bridge Park, with access to
Whitepine Road and Huntingcreek Drive.
98SN0221/WP/MAY27H
The request property lies within an Emerging Growth Area. The applicant has proffered
that, except where the requirements of the underlying Agricultural (A) zoning are more
restrictive or conditions of zoning approval address a specific standard, new construction
for golf course use should conform to the development standards of the Zoning Ordinance
for such uses within Emerging Growth Areas which address access, landscaping,
architectural treatment, signs, utilities, lighting and screening of dumpsters and loading
areas. (Proffered Condition 6)
Adjacent properties to the south and southeast are zoned residentially and occupied by
single family residences in Kingsland Meadows, The Park and Huntingcreek Hills
Subdivisions. Adjacent properties to the north and east are zoned residentially and
agriculturally, are designated on the Plan for residential use, and are occupied by single
family residences in Kingsland Meadows Subdivision and on acreage parcels or remain
vacant. Given existing and anticipated residential uses on adjacent properties to the north,
south and east, the applicant has proffered conditions to ensure that the golf course and
associated facilities are designed and operated so as not to adversely impact upon area
residents (Proffered Conditions 2 through 5). Specifically, Proffered Conditions 2 and 3
would limit hours of operation and after-hours lighting, to minimize nighttime noise and
lighting impacts on area neighborhoods. Proffered Condition 4 would require increased
setbacks and buffers for the golf course, driving range and associated facilities. Proffered
Condition 5 would require facilities to be designed to minimize the possibility of golf balls
in play from entering adjacent residential properties or roads.
Proffered Condition 8 is intended to preclude the sale or consumption of alcoholic
beverages in conjunction with golf course use on the property.
Architectural Treatment:
Proffered Condition 6 requires that the architectural treatment of buildings comply with
Emerging Growth standards. Within Emerging Growth Areas, no building exterior which
would be visible to any agricultural or residential district or any public right of way may
consist of architectural materials inferior in quality, appearance, or detail to any other
exterior of the same building. There is, however, nothing to preclude the use of different
materials on different building exteriors, but rather, the use of inferior materials on sides
which face adjoining property. No portion of a building constructed of unadorned concrete
block or corrugated and/or sheet metal may be visible from any adjoining agricultural or
residential district or any public right of way. No building exterior may be constructed of
unpainted concrete block or corrugated and/or sheet metal. Mechanical equipment,
whether ground-level or rooftop, must be shielded and screened from public view and
designed to be perceived as an integral part of the building. Buildings developed in
conjunction with the golf course should conform to these requirements.
7 98SN0221/WP/MAY27H
Buffers & Screening:
Proffered Condition 6 would require that solid waste storage areas (i.e., dumpsters,
garbage cans, trash compactors, etc.) be screened from view of adjacent property and
public rights of way by a solid fence, wall, dense evergreen plantings or architectural
feature, be separated from any residentially zoned property or any property being used for
residential purposes by the principal building, and that such area within 1,000 feet of any
residentially zoned property or property used for residential purposes not be serviced
between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. In addition, sites would have to be designed
and buildings oriented so that loading areas are screened from any property where loading
areas are prohibited and from public rights of way.
Proffered Condition 4 would require a fifty (50) foot buffer along the north, south,
southeast and east property boundaries adjacent to area residentially and agriculturally
zoned properties.
Lighting:
Proffered Condition 3 would prohibit the lighting of facilities other than the driving range
and customary accessory facilities, with the exception that security lighting would be
allowed by the Planning Commission upon a determination that such lighting does not
adversely impact area residents. Lighting for the driVing range and customary accessory
facilities would have to be positioned so that the light source is either directed away or
shielded from area residences. In addition, Proffered Condition 6 would require all
lighting to conform to Development Standards Manual requirements relative to the amount
of light at property boundaries.
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed golf course use conforms to the Central Area Plan which suggests the property is
appropriate for Iron Bridge Park. In addition, the recommended conditions ensure that the golf
course use will be compatible with existing and anticipated area residential uses.
Given these considerations, approval of this request is recommended.
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (4/21/98):
The applica,nt submitted an ame_nded Proffered Condition 8 and withdrew Proffered
Condition 9 in the "Request Analysis and Recommendation", relative to regulating the sale
98SN0221/WP/MAY27H
and consumption of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the proposed golf course use.
These changes are reflected herein. Previously, Proffered Conditions 8 and 9 restricted,
but did not completely preclude, the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages. The
intent of amended Proffered Condition 8 is-to prohibit the sale ~and consumption of
alcoholic beverages in conjunction with golf course use.
At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case to May 19, 1998.
Staff (4/22/98):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information should
be submitted no later than April 27, 1998, for consideration at the Commission's May 19,
1998, public hearing.
Staff(4/30/98):
To date, no new information has been received. The applicant is attempting to arrange a
meeting with concerned citizens and area residents to further discuss the proposal prior to
the Commission's May 19, 1998, public hearing.
Applicant, Citizens, Staff and Dale and Bermuda Magisterial District Planning Commissioners
(5/12/98):
A meeting was held to discuss the proposed project.
Applicant (5/14/98):
Revised Proffered Condition 7 was submitted prohibiting use of wells for the golf course.
Planning Commission Meeting (5/19/98):
The applicant amended Proffered Condition 2, as discussed herein. The applicant did not
accept the Planning Commission's recommendation, but did accept the staff's
recommendation.
There were a number of people present in support of the request. Those in support
indicated that the golf course use would provide a type of recreation activity not currently
9 98SN0221/WP/MAY27H
available to some citizens, especially the youth and elderly; that the proposed facility
would provide character and leadership development for youth; that the golf course use
would provide an opportunity for family activity that is not available with "team type
sports"; and that the use provides a recreational alternative to the typical public park uses
such as ball fields.
Those in opposition questioned the use of public land for private use; the sacrificing of
existing recreational activities at Ironbridge Park for golf course use; the possible violation
of the Federal Grant used to purchase the land for park use; the need for archeological and
environmental studies; the potential cost of the facility for County citizens; traffic impact;
and the pace at which the proposal is moving forward.
On motion of Mr. Miller seconded by Mr. Gulley, the COmmission recommended denial
of this request.
AYES: Messrs. Marsh, Gulley, and Miller.
NAY: Messrs. Shewmake and Cunningham.
The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, May 27, 1998, beginning at 7:00 p.m., will take under
consideration this request.
10
98SN0221/WP/MAY27H
98SN022!i'
C.U.
SH. 22
~/8$NoZZl-I
98SN0221
In Dale Magisterial District, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PARKS AND
RECREATION requested Conditional Use and amendment of zoning
district map to permit a golf course use. The density of
such amendment will be controlled by zoning conditions or
Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for Iron Bridge Park. This request
lies in an Agricultural (A) District on 354.6 acres fronting
approximately 250 feet on the east line of Iron Bridge Road,
also fronting approximately 3,800 feet on the north line of
Route 288 and located in the northeast quadrant of these
roads, also fronting approximately 3,400 feet on the north
line and approximately 3,300 feet on the south line of
Whitepine Road and approximately 900 feet on the east line
and approximately 950 feet on the west line of Hunting Creek
Drive. GPIN 770-669-9700 and 774-670-5199 (Sheet 22).
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 98SN0221 and stated
that staff recommends approval and acceptance of the
proffered conditions and noted that, in staff's opinion, a
golf course is an appropriate use in Iron Bridge Park, which
is a designated as a regional park on the County's Public
Facilities Plan and Parks Master Plan. He further stated
5/27/98 98-385
that the Planning Commission recommended denial by a 3-2
vote. He stated that the proffers include a 100 foot
setback that is inclusive of 50 foot buffer a 200 foot
setback for the driving range; limitations on hours of
operation and lighting; and no wells being permitted on the
property. He noted that the request conforms to the Central
Area Plan.
Mr. Golden briefly reviewed the background of First Tee
partnership proposal with the County regarding constructing
a new golf course. He stated that the course would be
shorter than a regulation course; that the course would be
designed for children to learn to play golf; and that the
course would also well serve senior citizens. He further
stated that several sites in the County were considered for
the facility and it was the conclusion that Iron Bridge
Park would possibly be a good site. He stated that the
original development plan for Iron Bridge Park included an
amphitheater and nature center. He further stated that as
the project began to move forward many issues arose. He
stated that the Parks and Recreation Department feels this
golf course would provide opportunities for County citizens.
He further stated that there will be some existing uses of
the property that will be displaced if the proposal is
approved such as trails for biking and hiking. He stated
that some of those activities can be accomplished in other
places and that staff would look to construct the new two to
three miles of trails within Iron Bridge Park to address
some of the hiking and biking opportunities that would be
lost. He further stated that staff is still proposing to
save trails along the Reedy Branch Creek and some other
trails, if the proposal is approved. He stated that another
concern is that the County will lose the opportunity at this
site for other activities if the golf course is approved.
He further stated that as demands for athletic facilities
increase in the future, the County will need to locate
additional space. He stated that in 1983 the County
accepted a grant of $270,000 for the first phase
construction at Iron Bridge Park and that grant was matched
with County dollars in a similar amount. He further stated
that there are conditions on the use of that grant and
restrictions of what the County can do with the property as
a result of having accepted that grant. He stated that
extensive conservation has taken place with the Department
of Conservation and Recreation, the State agency that
administers these grants. He read a portion of a letter
from Mr. Ronald Hedlund, Director of the Division of
Planning and Recreation Resources with the Department of
Conversation and Recreation, stating that "the expressed
purpose of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act is to
assure that projects are protected in perpetuity for public
outdoor recreational use; a golf course, although a change
of use in current facilities and the original park master
plan, is consistent with the purpose of the Act; a golf
course is an approved outdoor recreational facility under
the Act; there is no evidence that this proposal is a
violation of the original grant agreement; it appears to be
a request for a change of use; this action is permissible
under the Land and Water Conservation Fund Program." He
entered into the record a copy of the letter. He stated the
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission was asked to
consider the merits of this proposal at its April meeting
and voted unanimously to endorse the golf project. He
5/27/98 98-386
suggested that this golf proposal is a new element that
could be incorporated into the County's regional park system
and stated that he hopes that the Board feels this project
is a way of meeting the County's sports facility needs. He
stated that the Parks and Recreation Department recommends
approval of the proposed request. When asked, he stated
that approximately seven or eight members of the Recreation
Commission were present at the meeting when the proposal was
voted unanimously in favor of the golf course and noted that
only six members are necessary for a quorum. He then
introduced John Cogbill, Esquire, representing Richmond
First Tee.
Mr. Cogbill, representing the developer, stated that First
Tee, a public/private partnership, wishes to make a $3
million investment in the County and provide twenty jobs.
He recognized Mr. Fred Tattersall, President of Richmond
First Tee; Mr. Tim Merry, Executive Director of First Tee
and the only paid member of this organization; Mr. Charles
Pike, a civil engineer from Timmons; Mr. Ron Boyd, with
Williams Environmental; and Mr. Lester George, the golf
course architect with Colonial Golf Design, who were present
at the meeting. He noted that the State of Minnesota and
Nevada have recently committed State resources to the
national First Tee program. He stated that former President
George Bush is honorary Chairman of this organization. He
presented each Board member and entered into the record a
copy of a report regarding Case 98SN0221 and his remarks.
He stated that the proposed request is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan for the Central Area and staff recommends
approval and briefly reviewed the reasons why staff
recommended approval. He displayed a copy of the park and
the proposed golf course. He stated that drainage will be
located to be moved away from the existing natural drainage
and away from course playing areas. He further stated that
this proposal is consistent with the mission and goals of
the County Parks and Recreation Department. He stated that
the proposal also supports draft objectives of the County's
Committee on the Future Report on Youth Issues. He further
stated that the County could be on the forefront and a
leader in this area. He stated that the proposed request is
consistent with the "Guiding Principles" adopted for the
County. He briefly reviewed organizations and private
foundations in support of this effort. He reviewed the
goals of First Tee including teaching kids how to play golf;
offering access to a golf club where they can be taught the
game and be provided equipment, when needed; linking junior
golf programs with other kids' organizations; providing
incentives for kids to do well in school; and encouraging
family togetherness. He then reviewed the programs offered
by First Tee. He briefly reviewed corporate leaders in the
community involved in this project. He stated that the
undeveloped portion of Iron Bridge Park, which is being
considered for the golf course, could be designed to house
up to six ballfield complexes, each baseball complex to
house four ballfield, and two additional soccer complexes.
He further stated that a golf course is a less intrusive use
than ballfields; that the established hiking trails in the
park will remain, including the area adjacent to Reedy
Branch Creek; and that up to 2.5 miles of new bike trails
will be constructed. He presented an overview of the area
reserved for the new bike trails, a possible location of new
ballfields, and the location of the proposed golf
facilities. He reviewed environmental issues and stated
5/27/98 98-387
that materials provided from the United States Golf
Association, indicate that golf courses are ideal habitat
for wildlife, especially birds. He stated that modern golf
courses are planned to be environmentally sensitive and that
no wells shall be permitted in conjunction with the golf
course operation. He then reviewed terms of the lease
including constructing and operating an 18-hole golf course
facility; providing County "satisfactory evidence of the
financial and organizational stability necessary to maintain
the facility and its operations for the term of the lease";
providing appropriate property and liability insurance as
approved by the County's Risk Manager to include naming the
County as additional insured; opening the golf course to the
public, but dedicated for children in accordance with the
goals and standards of the First Tee program; the County
getting use of the course twice each year; the Parks and
Recreation and Chesterfield Public Schools getting use of
facilities at agreed times "free of charge"; County
designating First Tee Board members; no alcohol allowed at
the facility; no wells for irrigation for any other purpose;
the County having the right to inspect the facility and
audit records; the County having the right to take back
property if there is a lease default; the facility reverting
to County "free and clear" at end of the lease term; no
assignment, sublease or subcontract of the facilities
without the County's consent; and no leasehold mortgage of
facilities. He presented an overview of the scorecard that
is designed for the First Tee golf course. He stated that
he feels that the proposed request is a unique opportunity
for Chesterfield County and requested the Board's favorable
consideration of the request.
Mr. Kevin Peyton, a resident of Clover Hill District, stated
that he feels the issue is whether this proposal is a proper
use of 150 acres at Iron Bridge Park. He stated that he
does not feel the golf course is a proper use of the Park.
He requested that the Board listen to County residents and
taxpayers and the Planning Commission, and not the outside
interests when considering the proposal. He requested that
the Board not support the request.
Mr. Joe April, a resident of Salem Woods Subdivision and
President of the Salem Woods Homeowners Association, stated
that he joins the homeowners of The Woods and Afton
Subdivisions in opposition to the golf course at Iron Bridge
Park. He expressed concerns relative to environmental
impacts. He stated that he feels this request is an example
of fleecing of Chesterfield County. He further stated that
any development in Iron Bridge Park should occur according
to the Park Master Plan and in-line with legal requirements.
He requested that the Board deny the request.
Mr. Clayton Rhoade stated that he mountain bikes and plays
golf. He stated that he feels approval of this request will
reduce area property values and will increase crime in the
area. He further stated that there are not many areas in
the County to bike and requested that the Board deny this
request. He stated that the Iron Bridge Park is a good,
safe place to take children. He requested that the Board
consider the consequences of their vote if they approve the
request.
Mr. Brian Write, President of the Local Mountain Bike
5/27/98 98-388
Virginia Chapter, stated that riding in Iron Bridge Park
gave him a start in mountain biking and racing and has given
him the challenge and ability to find his personal and inner
strength. He further stated that he volunteers in
maintaining the trails at Iron Bridge Park; that it has
given him self worth; and that it gave him time to spend
with his son and to teach his son the values and respect of
nature. He requested that the Board deny the proposed
request and recognized approximately thirty mountain bike
supporters who were present at the meeting.
Mr. Michael Gertz stated that he supports the request for a
golf course at Iron Bridge Park. He further stated that he
feels the proposed golf course will give children an
opportunity, not available at privately owned golf courses,
to learn to play golf.
Mr. Jordan Richards stated that he has been mountain biking
for three years and stated that Iron Bridge Park is a good
park to bike and learn to bike. He further stated that he
spends more time with his family mountain biking than with
any other sport.
Ms. Emily Bauer, a student at Manchester High School,
submitted into the record a petition of approximately 111
fellow classmates in support of the First Tee proposal.
Mr. Jeffrey Richard stated that he mountain bikes and plays
some golf. He expressed concerns relative to the proposed
request and relative to what children will do if the bike
trails are taken away from Iron Bridge Park. He stated that
he volunteers his time in maintaining the hiking and biking
trails at Iron Bridge Park and other County parks.
Ms. Kateland Brown, a resident of the Midlothian District,
stated that she is excited about the proposal as she feels
all children should have the opportunity to learn to play
golf. She further stated that First Tee would give her the
opportunity to learn to play golf and that she could play
with her family. She stated that she feels the golf course
will bring many good things to the County.
Mr. Elliott Zavik, a resident of the Midlothian District,
stated that he is a member of the Iron Bridge Mountain Bike
Club of Mountain Bike Virginia, stated that he is strongly
opposed to the constructing a public golf course at Iron
Bridge Park. He further stated he and many of his mountain
bike club members have spent many hours maintaining the
trails at Iron Bridge Park. He stated that Iron Bridge Park
has one of the best biking trails on the east coast.
Mr. Jimmy Reid, a student at Manchester Middle School,
stated that he wants the chance to learn to play golf and
that approval of this proposal would allow him the
opportunity to do so.
Mr. Chris Bishop stated that he resides in the Midlothian
District and that he is opposed to the proposed request. He
5/27/98 98-389
further stated that he is a mountain biker and bikes at Iron
Bridge Park.
Mr. David Brown, a resident of Midlothian District, stated
that his mom and dad plays golf and that he and his sister
want to learn to play golf. He expressed concerns relative
to the high cost of learning to play golf and stated that
approval of the proposed golf course would allow him the
opportunity to learn to play golf, without the high expense
of adult courses.
Mr. Michael Dart, a resident of the Salem Woods Subdivision
and Secretary of the Iron Bridge Chapter of Mountain Bike
Virginia, stated that they feel consideration needs to be
given to those who enjoy passive activities such as hiking,
running, walking, and biking in wooded natural areas. He
further stated that the mission statement of Park and
Recreation clearly states that it is about providing a
comprehensive system of leisure programs, and educational
opportunities, and recreational facilities for all its'
citizens, while conserving and protecting environmental
historical and cultural resources.
Mr. Andrew Cosby stated that he is in the gifted program at
Manchester Middle School stated that he feels the existing
Park serves a good wholesome purpose just the way it is and
that constructing a golf course at Iron Bridge Park is in no
way beneficial to the County. He further stated that he
does not feel a lot of children will use this course. He
read into the record a letter he wrote to the Richmond Times
Dispatch, which
was published in today's paper, opposing the proposed First
Tee proposal.
Ms. Betsy Moorer, Advisor for the Youth Council of the
Chesterfield County Branch of the NAACP, stated that she
feels approval of the request would be a good way to teach
children integrity and responsibility. She requested the
Board's favorable support of the request.
Mr. Edward Baptist, representing Blue Ridge Mountain Sports,
stated that they feel diminishment of the wooded trails
would constitute a serious curtailment of hiking, biking,
and walking activities. He further stated that if the
course is constructed, one-fifth of the existing trails will
be eliminated. He stated a lot of time and effort has been
made to maintain the bike trails and noted that the work on
the trails is voluntary. He further stated that mountain
biking encourages great attributes and sportsmanship. He
expressed concerns relative to the loss of forested area in
Metro Richmond and the resulting negative impact to the
wetlands. He requested that the Board deny the request.
Mr. Daniel Colmber, President of the State Organization
Mountain Bike Virginia, showed pictures of events held at
the Iron Bridge Park and other areas. He stated that there
have been over 1,500 -2,000 hours of volunteer efforts to
maintain the bike trails at Iron Bridge Park. He further
stated that he understands First Tee's support for a
public/private partnership, however, requested the Board, on
behalf of the twelve Chapters of Mountain Bike Virginia, the
5/27/98 98-390
300 active paid members in Mountain Bike Virginia, 4,500
affiliated event participants throughout the State and from
neighboring States, and volunteers deny the request for this
particular location.
Mr. John McKinney, a resident of Dale District, stated that
he recently moved into the area and one of the reasons for
moving was for its privacy. He further stated that Iron
Bridge Park is the first place in which he has been able to
ride his bike. He stated that he would like to learn values
at the existing park facilities with his family rather than
at a golf course.
Mr. Hark Richard, Treasurer of Mountain Bike Virginia,
Chesterfield Chapter, stated that they have struggled with
their opinion on this request. He further stated that they
attempted to negotiate with First Tee regarding this
proposal, however, he feels they were not cooperative in
their negotiations. He referenced a golf course being
constructed at Robious and Winterfield Roads, which includes
an extensive junior program and access for youth and briefly
reviewed information about the course and expressed concerns
relative to duplicating the effort by constructing two golf
courses. He presented information from the Virginia State
Golf Association and Virginia Golf Magazine regarding a
proposed course to be built near Chesterfield in Powhatan
County.
Mr. Roger McKinney, a resident of The Park Subdivision,
stated that the proposed golf course will be at his
backyard; that he supports mountain bikers; and that he
supports the attitude of First Tee towards children. He
further stated that he supports the golf course, but not at
Iron Bridge Park. He expressed concerns relative to First
Tee and the County not receiving input from citizens
regarding construction of this course and stated that he
opposes the request.
Mr. James Brickhester, Jr. expressed concerns relative to
the current high level of traffic on Huntingtoncreek Drive
and stated that approval of this request will increase
traffic in area neighborhoods. He stated that he will
respect the decision of the Board of Supervisors regarding
the request.
Mr. Hike Stone, a student at Bird High School, stated that
he supports the request and that the course will be
affordable. He further stated that he feels the golf course
will be a positive influence on children and will reduce
area crime. He stated that the course will also offer the
opportunity for jobs and will not waste a lot of woodlands.
He further stated that he feels Iron Bridge Park would be an
appropriate place for this course.
Dr. Frederick Nicholas, a former member of the Board of
Supervisors, representing the Matoaca District, referenced
a similar major request that was before the Board in 1994
regarding construction of a sports complex in Richmond,
which would require the use of County tax dollars and noted
the request was approved. He stated that he supports bikers
and golfers. He further stated that people have referenced
this project as a "social experiment" and stated he feels
"social experiments" can be good or bad. He stated that he
5/27/98 98-391
feels if an unbiased survey was done of the young people for
which this proposal is being projected, the young people
will largely support the proposal. He requested the Board's
favorable consideration of the request in an effort to do
something positive for the young people.
Mr. Frank Schahopka stated that he resides near Hopewell and
expressed concerns relative to the County giving up public
land to a private group for practically free. He inquired
as to the use of the income generated by the golf course, if
constructed. He expressed concerns relative to the
limitations that would be placed on use of the course by
First Tee and inquired about the appointment process of
First Tee's Board of Directors. He expressed concerns
relative to the loss of woodlands if the course is
constructed and stated that he feels the proposal needs to
be further addressed before a decision is made.
Mr. Don Jones, a resident of Matoaca District and Senior
Vice President for the YMCA of Richmond, stated that two
facts are that 4,000 people in Chesterfield live below the
poverty level and thousands more are just above that level.
He further stated that he supports bike trails, however, he
feels this golf course will serve thousands of children. He
further stated that the YMCA will be happy to partner with
First Tee in this endeavor.
Mr. Charlie Smith, a physical education teacher in
Chesterfield and a golf coach, stated that he feels children
need to be given the opportunity to learn the game of golf.
He further stated that First Tee would provide more young
people the chance to learn the game. He stated that he
feels the proposed golf facility would be a great asset to
the County and its youth.
Mr. Robert Harvey, a resident of Ettrick and President of
the Chesterfield Branch of the NAACP, stated that he feels
Chesterfield County has become a leader in the region. He
further stated that he feels approval of this proposal would
be the right thing and now is the right time to do it. He
stated that this is another example of regional cooperation
and requested the Board's favorable consideration of the
request.
Mrs. Marge Bower, a resident of the Matoaca District,
submitted petitions with 114 people in support of the First
Tee proposal, noting that almost half of the signatures are
residents of the Matoaca District. She stated that she
supports the proposal because it is an affordable way for
children to participate in group sports and that she feels
it will keep children out of trouble and give them something
positive to do. She requested the Board to take a positive
step forward and approve the proposal.
Ms. Veronica Templeton, Executive Director of Youth Matters,
presented each Board member with a copy of their annual
report. She stated that Youth Matters is an organization
5/27/98 98-392
comprised of forty individuals from Chesterfield, Henrico,
and Richmond. She further stated that the mission of their
organization is to improve the health and safety of youth in
the region through inclusion and collaboration and to
increasing the number of effective and quality programs for
young people. She stated that she supports the proposed
request and stated that she feels the program is an
excellent example of a prevention program. She further
stated that she feels this program will be an asset to
Chesterfield County. She acknowledged teen crime rates in
the County and stated that more programs, such as the
proposed golf course, need to be in the County. She
requested the Board's favorable consideration of the
request.
It was generally agreed to recess for five minutes.
Reconvening:
A citizen stated that he supports the request and
acknowledged the increase in violence in young people
activities. He further stated that there needs to be more
programs added for children and requested the Board's
favorable consideration of the request.
Mr. David Roache, a resident of Glenwood Subdivision, stated
that he is involved in many sports, including golf, and
that he is opposed to the proposed golf course. He further
stated that he does not feel golf is the answer to curing
young people of their problems. He stated that he feels
people are using the youth in an effort to get this proposal
approved. He entered into the record a petition of fifty-
nine signatures in opposition to the proposal. He requested
the Board to deny the request.
Ms. Pat Rollins, a resident of the Bermuda District, stated
that her son, John, is currently the Virginia State Golf
Amateur Champion and has turned professional. She further
stated that it was very difficult to get her son to this
point and to pursue his dream. He stated that it is very
difficult for children to learn the game of golf, however,
the foundation of First Tee is a great opportunity for many
children to learn the game. She requested the Board's
favorable consideration of the request.
Mr. Skitch Rudy, a County resident, stated that he opposes
the request and that the people who have spoken on behalf of
maintaining the Iron Bridge Park in its existing condition
have spoken with a true concern and a desire to preserve
this Park. He expressed concerns relative to the terms of
the lease. He requested that the Board listen to the
citizens' concerns. He expressed concerns relative to the
First Tee being able to use any of the net income for any
purpose in which they choose, including using it for other
facilities.
Mr. Steve Gualkey, accompanied by his son Daniel, and a
resident of The Park Subdivision, stated that his sons play
several sports and assist in the clean-up at Iron Bridge
Park. He further stated that he consulted six area
5/27/98 98-393
neighbors this afternoon, five of which supported the
request and one in opposition. He stated that he personally
spoke with the owner of Bermuda Golf Course who supports
this endeavor. He further stated that he has attended many
meetings regarding the proposed golf course and even though
there has been a lot of opposition, there has also been much
support. He entered into the record a petition of seventy
signatures in support of the proposal. He then introduced
his son, Daniel.
Mr. Daniel Gaulkey, a student at Lloyd C. Bird High School,
stated that he and many of his friends enjoy playing golf.
He entered into the record a petition of 120 signatures from
students who attend Bird High School, in support of the
proposal.
Mr. Bill Hastings, a resident of the Matoaca District,
stated that he is opposed to First Tee's proposal. He
further stated that he is affiliated with Pocahontas State
Park; that he has gotten to know the Mountain Bike of
Virginia group who have donated over 1,500 hours in building
trails, etc. at the Pocahontas State Park. He stated that
he feels going through a bond referendum for a golf course
is the right direction to go. He further stated that many
people, whether opposing or supporting this request, care
for the children. He stated that he feels the issue is land
use and how the County can most effectively meet the needs
of under-privileged children in the community.
Mr. Ralph Bowling, a resident of the Matoaca District,
stated that he supports the proposal. He further stated
that he has worked with the youth in Chesterfield for the
past ten years. He stated that over those ten years he has
learned that children need to be provided the necessary
resources, which assists them in becoming productive
citizens.
Mr. Tom Sharing, a resident of the Treemont Subdivision,
stated that he regularly hikes the bike trails at Iron
Bridge Park He commended everyone involved for their
efforts in maintaining the trails at the Park. He stated
that he hopes the Board will continue to allow the excellent
development and maintenance of these trails so that everyone
has the opportunity to enjoy this very special area.
Ms. Ellen Cosslett, a resident of Iron Bridge Road, stated
that her property abuts Iron Bridge Park. She further
stated that she has a pond located in her backyard in which
bird migrate each year. She stated that she cannot accept
the destruction of the wildlife and habitat currently
enjoyed in this area. He further stated that she does not
want a golf course located adjacent to her yard as she feels
it will destroy her pond. She expressed concerns relative
to the loss of her pond and wildlife in the area if this
course is constructed and stated that she feels there are
ample golf courses in the County.
Ms. Diana Parker, representing the Sierra Club of the Falls
of the James Chapter, read into the record a letter from the
Environmental Education Chairman, expressing their support
of the Planning Commission's recommendation to deny the
proposed request and requesting the Board of Supervisors to
deny the request as well. She stated that she is also
5/27/98 98-394
representing herself as a Bermuda District citizen and
expressed concerns relative to the negative environmental
impact to the area if this course is constructed. She
further stated that she feels the old growth hardwood forest
should be preserved in its natural state to buffer future
uses at the Park and to allow multi-use passive activity.
She further stated that she received a certification from
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers stating "that the current
project has a jurisdictional wetland; the property is
planned to be used for a public children's introductory golf
course; no plan of development has been submitted for
review; all of the property is in hardwood forest, laced
with numerous bike trails; surface elevations range from 150
to 194 feet above sea level; surface water drainage is in a
northern direction toward the creek; Reedy Creek is a large
rural system that is quickly becoming urbanized, it
generally drains east to Kingsland Creek which drains into
the James River; a few minor hydrology modifications were
present in the form of man-made ditches excavated in
uplands; and these modifications did not have any apparent
effect on the delineated wetland system." She entered into
the record a copy of the Site Report and pictures showing
the types of hardwood trees located at Iron Bridge Park.
She requested the Board to deny the proposal.
Ms. Patti Edwards stated that she mountain bikes and many
people and families bike at Iron Bridge Park. She further
stated that she is also an active volunteer member with the
inner-city youth. She stated that she deals with children
a lot and that she does not feel golf will solve their
problems. She requested that the Board support another
location for the golf course. She stated that she also
feels there is a lack of mountain bike trails in the County.
She further stated that she is also representing two other
gentlemen this evening, who were unable to attend the
meeting, in opposition of the request,
Ms. Betty Taylor stated that she and her husband have
resided on Ironbridge Road for forty-two years and
requested that the Board deny this request. She further
stated that Iron Bridge Park is a great Park for senior
citizens and commended the maintenance of the Park. She
expressed concerns relative to the environmental impact to
this Park with the construction of a golf course. She
stated that she feels Iron Bridge Park is a very safe Park,
however, she does not feel there will be ample supervision
for the children that will be using the golf course. She
further stated that she does not feel Iron Bridge Park is
the proper location for the proposed golf course. She
expressed concerns relative to the walking trails that will
be eliminated if the request is approved. She stated that
the golf course would be good if it were located somewhere
else.
Ms. Dorsey Oman, a resident of the Midlothian District and
a volunteer with First Tee, stated that she is also a member
of the Planning Committee for the Youth Matters Program and
President of the Community Foundation serving Richmond and
Central Virginia, which financially supports a variety of
public programs serving young people and enhancing public
life in the community. She further stated that she supports
this program from a youth perspective as an economic
development tool for the County and the region and an
5/27/98 98-395
enhancement to publicly owned property that will remain
titled to the County. She stated that there is no
commercial nature to this project. She further stated that
First Tee will receive no personal enumerations for this
project. She stated that in the lease, there is not only a
governance rule, specifically for a member for the Board of
Supervisors to appoint a representative, but the County
currently has volunteers from the region including three
additional members who are Chesterfield County residents,
who are serving in a volunteer capacity. She further stated
that the lease terms provide and require on-site inspections
by representatives from the County, financial
accountability, and independent public audit. She stated
that all public, charitable organizations, which is the
structure of First Tee program, are required to make their
documents as a public charity available for public
inspection. She further stated that in addition to the
enthusiastic financial and volunteer support of Richmond
First Tee Board of Directors, an additional $100,000
commitment has been made from the national First Tee
program, which is a direct cash assistance, in addition to
the technical assistance and support that is being provided
at the national level. She stated that uncompensated
assistance is being provided by Colonial Golf Design; that
golf equipment is being donated by Arnold Palmer, McGuire
Woods and Williams Mullen Christian & Dobbins law firms,
Timmons, PDS, Incorporated, and Williamsburg Environmental.
She further stated that PGA of America confirmed that the
proposed operating plan of the Richmond First Tee Program
would be conservative and attainable. She encouraged the
Board to support the proposed request and stated that she
feels the proposal is an excellent example of public/private
partnership.
Mr. John Early, a resident of Evergreen Subdivision,
indicated concerns as to whether the First Tee organization
has the ability to manage this business and to the County
giving away public property. He stated that he would hate
to see a recreational experiment fail in Chesterfield
County. He requested the Board deny the request.
Ms. Chrissy Apperson, a resident of the Midlothian District,
stated that she is a beginning golfer. She read portions of
a letter in which she wrote to members of the Board stating
that she has worked on a golf course for the past eleven
years and can attest that a golf course can be a haven for
abundant wildlife, such as plants, trees and animals. She
stated that Iron Bridge Park has wonderful trails as well.
She requested the Board's favorable consideration of this
request.
Ms. Sandy Cosby, a resident of Kingsland Road, stated that
her property backs up to Iron Bridge Park at Reedy Branch
Creek. She expressed concerns relative to the legality of
this proposal and noted that matching grant funding received
from the State years ago were given for the purpose of
preserving the Park in its natural state. She stated that
an impact and archeological study are required if requested
by the citizens. She read portions of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 requiring federal
government agencies to address environmental consequences of
proposed actions. She referenced portions and objectives of
past County grant applications. She expressed concerns
5/27/98 98-396
relative to the woodlands that will be eliminated and
buffering that the trees provide. She stated that an
archeological survey was performed in 1984, which stated
that additional archeological surveys would be required for
areas not addressed in this report. She expressed concerns
relative to the preservation of wetlands in this area and to
the RPA.
Mr. Jerome Dodson, a resident of the Midlothian District,
read portions of a letter he sent to members of the Board of
Supervisors expressing the natural wildlife sanctuary that
a golf course can provide, noting that he works at a golf
course maintenance facility. He requested the Board's
favorable consideration of the request.
Ms. Terri Tingen, a resident on Reedy Branch Road, expressed
concerns relative to who would incur the cost of litigation
if citizens take further legal steps against the County if
the request is approved. She expressed concerns relative to
residents of the City of Richmond supporting the proposed
project when they opposed the project in the City of
Richmond. She stated that a child's character is not helped
by playing golf, rather by spending time with them, learning
their needs, and the influence and guidance of loving
parents. She expressed concerns relative to the lease being
thirty years and indicated that she feels an independent
study should have been conducted regarding this project.
Mr. Albert Myers, Jr., a golf course superintendent in
Chesterfield, stated that his son is looking forward to
playing golf. He further stated that he feels the First Tee
program course will provide a safe and affordable option for
him to learn the game of golf. He stated that he feels this
course would be a nice addition to the already fine
recreational facilities in the County. He noted the
benefits of turf grass and requested the Board's favorable
consideration of the request.
Mr. Joe Crockett, a Midlothian District resident, stated
that he has attended many meetings regarding this issue. He
noted that petitions with approximately 400 signatures, in
opposition of the request, was submitted to the Planning
Commission. He expressed concerns relative to the financial
impact to County citizens if the golf course fails. He
requested that the Board support the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and deny this proposal.
Mr. Tom Yeager, a resident of the Clover Hill District and
Commissioner of the Colonial Athletic Association in
Richmond, stated that he feels the County needs to respond
to the diversity which exists in the County. He further
stated that he feels this proposal is a win-win opportunity
in which the golfers and bikers will both be well served.
He noted that the proposed Virginia Golf Association was to
be a high skill level competitive course for the State's
best golfers.
Mr. Brit Ragle, a resident of Winterpock, stated that he
rides motorcycles and plays tennis. He further stated that
he supports the golf course at Iron Bridge Park and that he
feels the course will give children and many others the
opportunity to learn the game of golf. He expressed
concerns relative to the high cost of current country club
5/27/98 98-397
fees. He stated that Chesterfield County should be
commended for being proactive in this venture and that it is
an opportunity the County should not pass up.
Ms. Patricia Lohr, President of Fuqua Farms Civic
Association, expressed concerns relative to giving the Park
away without a vote by County residents. She stated that
they feel First Tee can provide a golf opportunity in
another area and requested that the Board deny the golf
course proposal.
Mr. Mike Felker, a resident of Clover Hill District and a
member of the Professional Golfers Association of America,
Mid-Atlantic Section, for twenty-eight years, stated that he
feels this proposal is an unfair business practice. He
further stated that this project is on too much of a fast
track, deriving from the Tiger Woods Foundation, which is an
effort to get inner-city children involved in golf. He
requested that the Board do the right thing when considering
this request. He expressed concerns relative to inner-city
children being able to play golf for free, but Chesterfield
children having to pay a fee. He stated that if the
proposal is approved, all children should be able to play
for free. He further stated that character and integrity is
not learned by playing the game of golf and urged the Board
not to approve the proposal. He suggested that the County
file for federal and State funds to purchase the old
Pocoshock Golf Course for public use, thereby reaping the
profits. He requested the Board consider citizens' concerns
when considering this request.
Mr. Hollum McCabe stated that he has resided in the County
for thirty-five years. He further stated that when he voted
on the bond issue in 1984, he voted for a park, not a golf
course. He requested that the Board postpone action on the
proposal and place it on a ballot for a citizens' vote. He
stated that he does not feel a golf course is needed in this
area. He further stated that he feels the Iron Bridge Park
would be destroyed if a golf course was constructed. He
stated that he feels the name should be changed to
Chesterfield First Tee if it is located in Chesterfield.
Ms. Myrna Caffrey, a resident of Matoaca District, expressed
concerns regarding the lease as it relates to Section 16.,
which gives Richmond First Tee permission to mortgage the
lease hold property with written consent of the County and
noted that she feels this clause should be deleted. She
expressed concerns relative to Section 10.c. which states
"any operating net surplus may be designated for development
or maintenance of additional facilities" and stated that she
feels that clause should be deleted. She expressed concerns
relative to Section 10.a. which states that "the Facility
will be open to the general public in accordance with the
goals and standards of the First Tee Program" and stated
that she feels the County should be guaranteed a block of
time for general public use. She further stated that,
relating to Section 10.b., that since County taxpayer
dollars are subsidizing the golf course, the lease should
stipulate all Chesterfield County residents are to receive
a substantial discount. She stated that she feels all
senior citizens should be allowed to play free one day per
week. She referenced that Section 10.e., which states that
"the facility, golf course, practice green, and driving
range shall be made reasonably available free of charge for
5/27/98 98-398
County Parks and Recreation instruction programs and to
Chesterfield public schools for physical education classes
and school tournaments during non-peak hours, subject to the
Facility's capacity restrictions and on a schedule to be
agreed upon..." and stated that since the County is
providing the land for free, she feels the County should be
guaranteed a block of time for these programs. She stated
that Section 7. states that "The County shall bear the cost
of extending water utilities to the property line..." and
that, traditionally, developers are required to bear the
expense of utilities' extensions. She stated that she
feels Richmond First Tee should at least pay Chesterfield
County taxes, based on fair market assessed value. She
further stated that she feels that the proposed lease is in
favor of First Tee, not the citizens of Chesterfield County.
She requested the Board to deny the golf course.
Mr. Warren requested a copy of Ms. McCaffrey's remarks.
Mr. Joe Girone, representing the Jefferson Davis Corridor
Association, stated that they support the First Tee Program.
He further stated that he is also a member of the Falling
Creek Middle School Council and quoted a statement by the
Principal of the school stating that "I am glad to have the
opportunity to teach my kids how to play golf. We have
never had this before in Chesterfield County. He stated
that he visited Iron Bridge Park and stated that he feels
the facility could be a win-win situation. He further
stated that he feels if many people in opposition of the
request could get past their first level of thought process,
this could be a win-win situation for the entire County and
its residents. He requested he Board's favorable
consideration of the request.
Mr. George Beadles stated that nothing remains the same over
time. He further stated that he feels there should be a
conditional use governing all parks with a master plan and
it not allowed to be changed without changing the
conditional use. He requested the Board approve the request
and indicated that he also would like to see the bike trails
remain.
Mr. Robert Wrenn stated that he played golf on the PGA tour
and is now a golf announcer on ESPN and grew up in
Chesterfield. He further stated that he was fortunate
enough to have parents who were members of a private golf
club as he was growing up, which gave him unlimited access
to playing golf. He stated that he feels golf teaches a
person a lot about themselves, integrity, and interaction
with each people. He further stated that he feels the First
Tee program would provide a variety of recreational
activities. He stated that he feels lots of children would
like to learn golf, but it is strictly a factor of
accessability and affordability. He further stated that he
is a First Tee Board member and he has never received any
type of payment from First Tee and never will. He stated
that First Tee is "first" because it is "first" for
children.
Mr. Walter Marsh, a Chesterfield resident, stated that he
does not feel this project rises to a level high enough to
place it as a priority on the capital budget. He further
stated that he feels the demands on the taxpayers are too
5/27/98 98-399
high. He expressed concerns relative to proffered condition
number 4, regarding setbacks and to number 5, regarding
design to keep golf balls out of adjacent properties. He
stated that he feels setbacks should be 300 feet, not 100
and that proffered condition number 5 needs to be more
restrictive to minimize balls hitting homes. He further
stated that he feels the County should afford the adjacent
property owners the same protection as public rights-of-way.
Mr. Gary Hadder, a resident of Henrico County, stated that
he feels this is clearly an issue about the choice of the
resources in Iron Bridge Park. He further stated that golf
has many positive impacts on his life.
Mr. Willard Childress stated that he does not feel a golf
course should be located at Iron Bridge Park and expressed
concerns relative to the negative impact the golf course
would have on the environment. He further stated that he
does not feel the plan will work and that the County should
not risk the chance. He referenced the federal grant for
the Park, specifically as it relates to protection of
natural resources; the amount of acreage that is to remain
undisturbed; and to fees relating to activities at the Park.
He stated that Henrico County has a public golf course and
that in June, 1997, 259 rounds of youth golf was played and
in February, 1998 eleven rounds of youth golf was played.
He noted that the cost for youth playing at that golf course
was approximately $10 per round. He stated this entire
proposal needs to be reviewed further. He further stated
that he would like First Tee to have a target regarding the
amount of golf that will be played and if the target is not
reached, the sponsors of the project could be compelled to
make changes. He further stated that as it relates to the
lease, he feels that the proceeds from sale of timber should
be given to the County and that First Tee should also pay
for extending the water lines. He stated that the dirt also
belongs to the County and that if a pond or lake is
constructed, the County should also be given the proceeds
from the sale of any such dirt. He requested that the Board
deny the proposal.
Mr. Jim Blatley, a resident of Huntingcreek Hills
Subdivision and an adjacent property owner for seventeen
years, stated that he opposes the request. He further
stated that County parks need passive recreational areas as
much as they need playing fields, etc. He referenced the
federal grant that would allow 1/3 of Iron Bridge Park to
remain undeveloped. He stated that he does not feel Iron
Bridge Park is the proper place for a privately owned golf
course. He further stated that as far as he is aware, this
is the only public/private partnership that will take park
land and convert it into a privately owned, fee based
facility. He requested that the Board deny this request. He
stated that he hopes that the Board would also consider any
future proposals to develop the few passive recreation areas
left in the County. He suggested that the County give First
Tee some other idle County land, not park land. He
requested that the Board keep this property as a nature
preserve.
Ms. Leigh Spore, a resident of the Clover Hill District,
stated that she opposes the golf course as too much of the
County's natural resources would be taken away. She further
5/27/98 98-400
stated that she feels this property should remain in its
natural state and requested that the Board deny the request.
Mr. Paul Mickian, a resident of Clover Hill District, and
representative of the Professional Golfers' Association and
President of the Southern Chapter, stated that he supports
junior golf. He further stated that he feels this golf
course will be a success.
Mr. Dave Floor, a resident of Plum Creek Subdivision, stated
that he feels the proposal is a bad idea.
Ms. Ruth Kersey stated that she is opposed to the golf
course at Iron Bridge Park.
Mr. David Brown, a resident of Midlothian District, stated
that he feels First Tee is looking to develop the game of
golf for family and kids -- not to reap the benefits of
money. He stated that he plays golf and his family is
learning the game. He further stated that he supports
construction of the golf course.
Ms. Phyllis Latay stated that she opposes the request. She
expressed concerns relative to the loss of the trees if the
course is constructed, noting the age of some of the trees
being 200-300 years old. She requested the Board deny the
request.
Mr. Ruben Waller, a resident of the Midlothian District,
stated that he supports the request and requested that the
Board approve the request. He further stated that he feels
the golf course will add a valuable commodity that is
missing in the quality of life in Chesterfield County.
Ms. Irene Reece stated that she does not feel the golf
course is viable for the community and that she feels the
proposal needs to be further addressed. She expressed
concerns that an impact study has been conducted and stated
that she feels many other types of studies need to be
considered as well before a decision is made regarding this
proposal.
Mr. Barton Vanderherthen stated that no social or scientific
study has guaranteed that this program will work. He
further stated that he feels there has been a lack of
courtesy to those who reside in this area. He stated that
he enjoys Iron Bridge Park and expressed concerns that a
majority of those in support of the request do not reside in
the proximity of the Park. He expressed concerns relative
to the increase in congestion in this area if the golf
course is approved. He stated that other people, not only
children, need to be considered as this proposal is voted
on.
Ms. Nancy Finch, Chairman of the Citizens for Responsible
Government, stated that she does not like to see this
proposal being described an anti-environmental issue. She
further stated that the Citizens for Responsible Government
request the Board's favorable consideration of the request
as they feel this effort will provide a wholesome and
healthy opportunity for outdoor activity for young people
and others in the community. She commended community
members who have made this endeavor possible. She entered
5/27/98 98-401
into the record a copy of her remarks.
A citizen expressed concerns relative to the negative
environmental impact that the golf course will have on the
area; whether the course can be funded next year; and
whether the course will be appropriately staffed. She
requested that the Board further address this proposal
before making a decision and expressed concerns relative to
giving away this Park land.
Mr. Glen Golkey, a student at Lloyd C. Bird High School,
stated that many of his friends support the golf course
proposal and requested that the Board support the request.
Mr. Tom Mathews, a resident of Midlothian District, and one
of the owners of Rockwood Golf Park, stated that he has just
commenced construction of a $2.5 million golf practice
facility on Hull Street Road. He further stated that, like
First Tee, his company is prepared to make a $2.5 million
investment and create approximately twenty jobs in
Chesterfield County. He stated that they did not ask the
County to donate public land to their project and that they
will be paying County taxes. He further stated that they
oppose the golf driving range portion of the First Tee
proposal because it is wrong for Chesterfield County to
subsidize a golf driving range that will compete directly
with privately owned driving ranges. He stated that the
private sector is already fulfilling the need for golf
driving ranges in the County, which provide inexpensive
programs for children to learn to play golf. He stated that
they support First Tee's endeavor, however, are requesting
that the lights be removed from the golf driving range so
that First Tee will not directly compete with existing
ranges. He presented an overview of a map showing the ten
mile radius markets of each respective facility. When
asked, he stated that he anticipates opening of their
facility by Labor Day.
Mr. Darren Gardner, representing Kingsland Meadows
Subdivision and three property owners whose agriculturally
zoned property surround Kingsland Meadows Subdivision,
submitted into the record a copy of a petition with nine
signatures out of eleven homeowners in the Subdivision,
supporting the golf course proposal. He commended First Tee
for this endeavor and all the investors who are willing to
put their money back into the community. He stated that he
feels that it is time that Chesterfield embarks on new
territories and requested the Board's favorable
consideration of this request.
Mr. David Cosby, adjoining property owner to Iron Bridge
Park, entered into the record a copy of the Application to
the Commonwealth of Virginia Commission of Outdoor
Recreation for Matching Grant Funding (recommendation for
recreation access funding for Dale Park Phase I
Development). He commended Mr. Daniel for his efforts
regarding this proposal. He briefly reviewed sections of
the Application. He expressed concerns relative to
constructing a golf course at Iron Bridge Park and to
issues surrounding the irrigation of Iron Bridge Park. He
stated that the County agreed to leave one-third of this
property in a natural passive state. He also entered into
the record copy of information from The Contract Bond Book
5/27/98 98-402
relating to Owner-Building Bonds to Lender. He expressed
concerns relative to the lease agreement and stated that the
lease is very vague. He requested that the Board deny this
request.
Mr. Fred Tattersall, President of the National First Tee
Chapter in Richmond, stated that First Tee will not benefit
financially from this program. He further stated that the
organization is youth-oriented. He stated that their goal
is to address the major problems of affordability and
accessibility as it relates to children and golf. He
further stated that a driving range is necessary to teach
children the game of golf and that they do want lights
available at the range to help raise revenues because they
want to subsidize the programs for children. He stated that
the Virginia State Golf Association hopes to construct a
golf facility in the future, however, the focus will not be
children. He further stated that one of their purposes is
to try to locate in a moderate income area. He further
stated that he feels this program will be a great project
for everyone in the County.
Mr. Woody Edwards, a resident of Kingsland Woods
Subdivision, stated that he feels a main issue is that the
project is being forced without all the details being
addressed. He presented a 1983 Master Plan of Iron Bridge
Park, showing a number of nature trails.
Mr. Mike Thomas, a resident of the Dale District, stated
that public/private partnerships are good, however, he feels
it is different in this situation because this proposal will
disrupt the interest of many citizens. He further stated
that he does not feel people are opposing the request
because they are opposed to change, but are opposing change
without input. He acknowledged that it was the citizens'
votes that enabled the bond referendum to pass and provided
the funds for Iron Bridge Park to be constructed. He
inquired as to the County's unwillingness to abide by the
conditions.
Mr. Jim Murphy, a partner in the Rockwood Golf Park on Hull
Street Road, acknowledged the taxes that their business pay
to the County. He stated that First Tee has much less costs
and that lights at their driving range are not necessary.
Mr. Tim Merry, a resident of the Midlothian District and
Executive Director of Richmond First Tee, stated that this
is a win-win situation for everyone. He further stated that
he is the only First Tee member that is paid. He stated
that they are currently in open discussions with the City of
Richmond to also construct a golf course in the City. He
briefly reviewed the process that took place in the City of
Richmond which eventually led First Tee to seek a site in
Chesterfield. He stated that there are hundreds of requests
being made to the National First Tee in an effort to become
part of the First Tee program. He requested that the Board
give the First Tee Program a chance to prove its benefits.
When asked, he stated that the National First Tee currently
has projects at five existing golf facilities in other
States where they are refurbishing existing courses.
There being no one else to address this issue, the public
5/27/98 98-403
hearing was closed.
Mr. Cogbill stated that the issue raised is that this
project would be good "somewhere else" and that putting a
project "somewhere else" always seems to be a good idea.
He further stated that life holds no guarantees. He stated
that mountain bike people have been good stewards of the
land and that he believes in what they are doing and have
done. He stated, however, that the petition submitted by
the mountain bikers, in opposition to the request, had 186
of the 390 signatures by residents of the City of Richmond.
He further stated that the applicant is trying to build a
new facility that benefits the County. He stated that he
feels the mountain bikers have legitimate concerns, however,
he feels the concerns are being addressed by staff. He
requested that the Board be a leader in local government and
support this request. He read portions of a letter from
former President George Bush supporting this request.
Mr. Daniel expressed appreciation to everyone for their
input. He stated that many meetings have been held
regarding this request which is very complicated. He
further stated that the issue of golfing for children is not
the only issue. He stated that the core issues relate to,
in his judgement, a trust in government; whether taxpayers
give large blocks of acreage to a private organization for
only $800 per year; whether the Parks and Recreation
Department, with the Board's concurrence, take away existing
uses at parks for the benefit of a private venture. He
inquired as to what process has changed that allowed the
County to move in this direction so quickly. He stated that
he supported his colleagues in moving forward because of the
opportunity. He further stated that he feels the Board
failed, along the line, in dealing with the public regarding
the entire venture. He stated that the Planning Commission
has recommended denial of the proposal. He further stated
that he has reviewed the transcripts and videos of the
Planning Commission meeting in an attempt to gain public
comment on both sides of the issue. He stated that at the
Planning Commission meeting there were twenty-two speakers
in opposition and sixteen in support. He further stated
that there were approximately 60-70 speakers this evening
with the ratio in support and opposition almost equal. He
stated that the facts are that in 1978 a bond referendum was
held and there was no provisions for a central area park.
He further stated that from that bond referendum, the County
made technical adjustments for lighting and secured some
funds. He stated that using those funds, approved by County
voters, Iron Bridge Park has been blessed with a continuous
and orderly development. He further stated that as far as
the strategy to deal with young people, the County has a
long-range planning committee which is dealing with
involvement and opportunities for children and that
recommendations will be brought before the Board of
Supervisors by this committee in the future. He stated that
the lease originally was for twenty years and now it is for
thirty years. He stated that the original concept for this
particular tract included an amphitheatre, which the Board
has never taken any action on, it included nature centers,
entrances from Kingsland Road, biking and hiking trails, but
no golf course. He stated that there was a survey conducted
which concluded that golf was not even in the top ten sports
desired by County citizens. He further stated that at no
5/27/98 98-404
time was a golf course earmarked for this property. He
further stated that at no time has the Board of Supervisors
ever agreed to, or suggested, partnership, ownership, or
having its own municipal course. He expressed concerns
relative to the lease and stated that the County has never
given any public property away without securing a
significant return on investment for the public. He stated
that he contacted Mr. Tod Leiweke, Executive Director of
First Tee, regarding this request. He further stated that
conversations revolved around naming the organization
Chesterfield First Tee and the market boundaries of the
facilities. He stated that he does not feel this is a lease
of value, but one of convenience. He expressed concerns
relative to the language in the lease relating to land lease
fees and stated that there is a heavy price for land
disturbance. He expressed concerns relative to the burden
to the taxpayers at the end of the thirty years. He
indicated the lease is not restrictive enough.
There was brief discussion relative to the cost of extending
the water lines.
Mr. Daniel stated that First Tee has appropriate liability,
however, if any lawsuits result from the facility, citizens
will go after the deep pocket theory because the
organization is not self-insured. He further stated that he
did not see anything in the lease that would require First
Tee to cover all costs, fees, awards, or any other legal
bills that may come forward from such lawsuits. He stated
that if the facility defaults, the County will be held
responsible. He further stated that he feels First Tee is
truly sincere in helping young people, however, the
organization is new, has a limited staff, and that their
funds are available for only three years. He stated that
First Tee will sanction a three or nine hole course,
therefore, the County has the option of doing much less than
an eighteen hole golf course. He further stated that he
does not feel this project is the public's will. He
expressed concerns relative to First Tee, during the
approval process, requiring alcohol and lacking a business
plan. He stated that he feels traffic will increase in this
area if the golf course is constructed and that
environmental issues need to be addressed. He referenced
the comment of Dr. Nicholas regarding the Natitorium, which
was to be a regional effort to bring the Olympic Festival to
the metropolitan area and that after the Olympic Festival,
it was to be marketed for children. He stated that area
localities did not support the County in this endeavor,
therefore, the facility was not constructed. He further
stated that he would prefer a referendum regarding the
project. He stated that the County still has the
opportunity to compromise and an opportunity to still move
forward. He further stated that he would suggest working
with the private sector in an effort to look for another
location. He stated that the Board has been exposed to a
lot of information regarding this project. He further
stated that he was made aware that the bike trails at Iron
Bridge Park are currently used for community policing
efforts. He further stated that he feels there are too many
unresolved issues that need to be further addressed. He
stated that he does not feel the Board has heard from the
will of the people to assure that there is total support for
this project. He further stated that no business plan has
5/27/98 98-405
ever been submitted and that the lease does not give long-
term protection to the County. He stated that there is no
reference to public use of golf in the current Capital
Improvement Program. He further stated that he plans to
make a motion for denial at the appropriate time, however,
he would support a long-term deferral. He stated that he
does not feel the paper before the Board is ready for a
public affirmative vote at this time.
When asked, Ms. Joan Salvati, of Environmental Engineering,
stated that with golf courses, there is always a potential
for nutrient, as well as pesticide and herbicide runoff.
She further stated that her comfort level for this project
is elevated because of proffered condition number 9
requiring a nutrient management plan and proffered condition
number 4 requiring buffering which will filter nutrient or
pesticides run-off from the golf course.
Discussion, comments, and questions ensued relative to the
site plan approval process as it relates to this request;
the site plan process being a public process; the adequacy
of the environmental assessment; the appeal process on a
site plan decision; environmental requirements; and the
timing of the Corps of Engineers and DEQ approvals.
Mr. Warren stated that he feels it is normal for the Board
to take action prior to detailed plans and studies being
finalized. He further stated that he does not feel it would
be normal to wait for the necessary permits and then take
action on the proposal.
There was brief discussion relative to what activity can
occur without having a land disturbance permit; the
timeframe in receiving a land disturbance permit; and to
County staff ensuring appropriate approval is obtained
before the project moves forward.
When asked, Mr. Micas stated that there are no indications
that there are any legal barriers that would prohibit or
preclude the State from approving this golf course use.
Discussion, comments, and questions ensued relative to the
mountain biking community working closely with Pocahontas
State Park on the construction of a new bike trail; there
being approximately ten miles of new bike trails being
completed soon at Pocahontas State Park; and to the
difference between this proposal and that of the Sam Snead
Golf organization to start a Virginia golf trail.
Mr. Cogbill stated that the applicant did attempt to
initiate discussions with the County regarding First Tee
assisting in the funding of the new trails at Western Area
Park, however, was unsuccessful. He further stated that he
would be willing to recommend to his client to begin that
dialogue again, however, he does not feel he could make a
commitment tonight regarding this issue.
Mrs. Humphrey stated that there are several mountain bike
groups who should be part of the discussions with First Tee
and County staff regarding the construction and funding
5/27/98 98-406
issue for the new trails.
Discussion, comments, and questions ensued relative to the
efforts that the mountain bike group has put into the
construction/ maintenance of the trails at Iron Bridge Park;
whether a permitting process was followed as it relates to
trail construction; there being no formal agreement that the
trails would never be eliminated; the types and location of
trails at Iron Bridge Park; approximately six miles of
trails being eliminated at Iron Bridge Park if the course
was constructed; the construction of two to three miles of
trails, which would be more along the beginner type trails;
bikers being able to use the trails at the same time as
golfing is taking place; cart paths being constructed on the
course; citizens being able to walk the course so long as
there is no golf activity taking place; and the length of
the cart paths for this golf course being approximately
three miles.
Mr. Warren stated that he feels the mountain bikers need to
be included in future recreational committees to assist in
decision- making processes.
Mr. Golden stated that County staff work with and will
continue to work with the Mountain Bike Association.
Mr. Daniel stated that it appears that he does not have
enough votes to sustain his position, but requested that the
Board not consider the lease at this time because it has
many judiciary issues that need to be further addressed.
Mr. Warren concurred with the request regarding the lease
made by Mr. Daniel.
Mrs. Humphrey also concurred with the comments expressed by
Mr. Daniel.
Mr. McHale stated that he was prepared to make a motion. He
further stated that he has very mixed emotions about this
request. He stated that he feels it is difficult to act
upon a case such as this, particularly, when it is located
in another Board member's District. He further stated that
he has enormous respect for Mr. Daniel. He stated that this
is a land use issue and that he feels the zoning is keeping
with the Plan. He further stated that he feels there are
reasonable alternatives for the mountain bikers; that the
golf course will allow young children the opportunity to
play golf; and that he feels this proposal is a worthwhile
project. He further stated that he is alarmed and feels
that it is very dangerous that there is a use in the County
parks that has become, in some peoples eyes, vested without
any action by the Board of Supervisors. He stated that he
feels the County needs to be careful about who is using
County parks and how they are using them. He further stated
that he is comfortable that the environmental issues will be
addressed at the appropriate time and place. He commended
everyone for their input.
Mr. McHale then made a motion, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey,
for the Board to approve Case 98SN0221 and accept the
proffered conditions.
Mrs. Humphrey stated that the site plan process is where
5/27/98 98-407
many environmental issues will be addressed. She referenced
a letter from the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of
Conservation and Recreation, regarding there possibly being
a protocol challenge to whether Friends of Pocahontas State
Park can actually issue an official position on a zoning
request in Chesterfield County.
Mr. Daniel offered an amendment to the motion to add a
proffered condition that states that no trees or land
disturbance will occur until all necessary permits have been
secured. He stated that he feels this amendment would raise
the comfort level of many people.
Mr. Warren stated that he feels Mr. Daniel's amendment is a
legitimate request.
Mr. Ramsey stated that the County's normal process is that
the land disturbance permit is issued once they meet the
County's requirement and notifications are sent to DEQ,
while some of the other approvals are being reviewed. He
further stated he understands Mr. Daniel's amendment to
prohibit any construction/activity until all permits were
secured, which would be outside the normal process.
Mr. Daniel stated that the fears of citizens are that
something will fall through the cracks and this amendment to
the motion would show that the Board is going the extra mile
and restore some faith in the Board of Supervisors.
No one seconded Mr. Daniel's proposed amendment to the
motion.
Mr. Barber stated that he was unaware that mountain bikers
were using Iron Bridge Park and that he now has a new
respect for mountain bikers. He further stated that as
appointments come forward on the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Commission, it would be good for mountain bikers to
be considered to serve. He stated that last year
Chesterfield County secured 800 acres of wildlife refuge at
Dutch Gap and the Board concurred with the need to secure
that wildlife refuge, on behalf of County citizens. He
further stated that the County has done some good, creative
things, not duplicated anywhere else in the country, in
order to preserve its natural resources. He stated that for
those reasons he is comfortable with supporting the motion.
Mrs. Humphrey called for the vote on the motion made by Mr.
McHale, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, for the Board to approve
Case 98SN0221 and accept the following proffered conditions:
Uses shall be limited to the following: A golf course
and driving range, plus customary accessory uses to
include, but not necessarily be limited to putting
greens; a clubhouse; a pro shop; a snack
bar/restaurant; an office for maintenance personnel;
maintenance facilities; parking for maintenance
vehicles, golf carts, and emergency vehicles; and
other such uses that are customary accessory and
incidental to golf course use.
The golf course and customary accessory uses to the
golf course shall not be open to the public between
the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. The driving
5/27/98 98-408
range and customary accessory uses to the driving
range shall not be open to the public between the
hours of 11:30 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. With the exception
of the driving range and customary accessory uses,
maintenance activities shall not occur between the
hours of 9:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Maintenance
activities for the driving range and customary
accessory uses shall not occur between the hours of
12:00 midnight and 7:00 a.m.
With the exception of after-hours security lighting,
only the driving range and customary accessory uses to
the driving range shall be lighted. Any lighting
fixtures to accommodate the driving range use shall be
designed to either direct the light away or shield the
light source from adjacent residentially zoned
property to the north, south and southeast and away
from agriculturally zoned property to the north and
east. Security lighting may only be permitted by the
Planning Commission upon review and approval of a
lighting plan which insures that adjacent properties
will not be adversely affected by such lighting.
Except as noted herein, all facilities shall be set
back a minimum of 100 feet from property boundaries
adjacent to residentially zoned property to the north,
south and southeast and from agriculturally zoned
properties to the north and east. The driving range
and customary accessory uses shall be set back a
minimum of 200 feet from adjacent residentially zoned
properties to the north, south and southeast and from
agriculturally zoned properties to the north and east.
Within these setbacks, and adjacent to the aforesaid
property boundaries, a fifty (50) foot buffer shall be
maintained. Within this buffer, existing, mature
vegetation shall be maintained unless removal is
approved by the Planning Commission through site plan
review. The only facilities allowed within this
buffer shall be bicycle and walking trails associated
with public park use, but not golf course use; and
security fencing; and utilities which run generally
perpendicular through the buffer.
Facilities shall be designed to minimize the
possibility of balls in play from entering public
rights of way or adjacent properties. The design
shall preclude the use of physical barriers along the
public rights of way other than decorative fencing or
walls, topography and/or landscaping. A plan for
achieving this requirement shall be submitted for
approval in conjunction with site plan review.
Except where the requirements of the underlying
Agricultural (A) zoning are more restrictive or
conditions of zoning approval address a specific
standard and with the exception of the requirement
that the source for lighting of the driving range and
customary accessory uses be shielded from view from
any adjoining A or R District and any public right of
way, development shall conform to the requirements of
the Zoning Ordinance and Development Standards Manual
for Corporate Office (0-2) Districts in Emerging
Growth Areas.
5/27/98 98-409
Use of wells for water supply shall be prohibited.
Any lease negotiated between the County and any other
entity to construct, maintain or operate the golf
course shall include a provision that states that the
lessee or its sublessees or assigns shall not permit
the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages on the
property. This Conditional Use shall be granted for
so long as the County, the lessee, its sublessees or
assigns abide by this lease term.
Prior to operation of the golf course, a fertilization
plan for the golf course shall be submitted to the
Chesterfield County Extension Agent for approval. A
monitoring program, acceptable to the Extension Agent,
shall be implemented to ensure compliance with the
approved fertilization plan.
10.
Ayes:
Nays:
Except for timbering approved by the Virginia State
Department of Forestry for the purpose of removing
dead or diseased trees, there shall be no timbering on
the property until a land disturbance permit has been
obtained from the Environmental Engineering Department
and the approved devices have been installed.
Humphrey, Warren, Barber, and McHale.
Daniel.
5/27/98 98-410