98SN0207.PDFREQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
May 27, 1998 BS
98SN0207
Ron MacAulay/Nextel Communication
Clover Hill Magisterial District
Off the north line of Hull Street Road
REQUEST:
Conditional Use Planned Development to permit a 125 foot communications tower
and exceptions to landscaping, architectural treatment, buffer and setbacks in
Residential (R-7) and General Business (C-5) Districts.
PROPOSED LAND USE:
A 125 foot communications tower and accessory equipment, incorporated into an existing
Virginia Power easement and high tension electrical transmission monopole structure, is
planned on the C-5 portion of the request property. Access is planned via an existing
driveway which serves a church parking lot (Southminster Presbyterian Church) on the
R-7 portion of the request property. The Virginia Power easement and tower site are
located on church property.
Specifically, subject to obtaining Substantial Accord, communications towers of up to 150
feet in height are permitted in C-5 districts, subject to meeting the requirements of the
Development Standards Manual for such structures. The applicant is requesting a ninety
(90) foot exception to the 110 foot setback requirement for the proposed 125 foot tower,
as well as exception to Development Standards Manual landscaping requirements within
this setback. In addition, the Development Standards Manual requires a 100 foot buffer
for uses within C-5 portion of the request property; adjacent to residentially zoned property
to the east, and further requires the tower structure to have an architectural style
compatible with surrounding neighborhoods. As noted herein, the applicant is requesting
exception to these requirements in order to mount cOmmunications antennas on an existing
Virginia Power monopole structure and locate grOUnd'mounted equipment adjacent to the
structure, within the Virginia Power easement.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS ON PAGES 2 AND 3.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval for the following reasons:
The Public Facilities Plan suggests that communications tower locations should
generally be located to minimize the impact on existing or planned areas of
development, and that energy and communications facilities should co-locate
whenever feasible. The tower would be incorporated into the structure of an
existing, permitted Virginia Power electrical transmission structure. The addition
of the communications facilities into the existing transmission structure does not
generate a visual impact on area residences that is significantly greater than the
visual impact of the existing Virginia Power electrical transmission structure and
conforms to the co-location criteria of the plan.
Bo
Incorporating the communications facilities into the structure of an existing Virginia
Power electrical transmission structure and easement will eliminate the need for an
additional fi-eestanding communications tower in the area, thereby minimizing tower
proliferation.
The recommended conditions will further minimize the possibility of any adverse
impact on area development, the Chesterfield County Public Safety Trunked
System or the County Airport.
(NOTE: CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER MAY PROFFER
CONDITIONS. THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON
BY BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE
RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
CONDITIONS
(STAFF/CPC) 1.
(STAFF/CPC) 2.
There shall be no signs permitted to identify this use. (P)
In conjunction with site plan submission, the owner/developer shall
submit documentation as to whether FAA approval is required for
the erection of the tower. If FAA approval is required, a copy of
FAA approval shall be submitted to the Planning Department, prior
to release of a building permit. 0~)
(STAFF/CPC) 3.
The tower and equipment shall be designed and installed so as not
to interfere with the Chesterfield County Public Safety Trunked
System. At the time of site plan review, the owner/developer shall
submit information as deemed necessary by the Chesterfield County
2
98SN0207/WP/MAY27X
Communications and Electronics staff to determine if an engineering
study should be performed to analyze the possibility of radio
frequency interference with the County system, based upon tower
location and height, and upon the frequencies and effective radiated
power generated by tower mounted equipment. Prior to release of
a building permit the study, if required, shall be submitted to, and
approved by, the Chesterfield County Communications and
Electronics staff. (GS)
(STAFF/CPC)
The owner/developer shall be responsible for correcting any
frequency problems which affect the Chesterfield County Public
Safety Tmnked System caused by this use. Such corrections shall be
made immediately upon notification by the Chesterfield County
Communications and Electronics staff. (GS)
(STAFF/CPC)
The treatment, color and lighting system for the tower shall be as
follows:
ao
The tower shall be grey or another neutral color, acceptable
to the Planning Department.
b. The tower shall not be lighted. (P)
(STAFF/CPC)
At such time that the tower ceases to be used for communications
purposes for a period exceeding twelve (12) consecutive months, the
owner/developer shall dismantle and remove the tower and all
associated equipment from the property. 0~)
(STAFF/CPC)
o
In conjunction with the approval of this request, a ninety (90) foot
exception to the 110 foot setback for communications towers in
General Business (C-5) Districts, adjacent to Residential 0~-7)
Districts, shall be granted. 0~)
(NOTE: With the approval of this request, the communications tower and
accessory structures are exempted from setback landscaping, buffering and
architectural treatment requirements.)
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location:
Off the north line of Hull Street Road, west of McKesson Drive. GPIN 764-696-Part of
0128 and 0172 (Sheet 15).
3 98SN0207/WP/MAY27X
Existing Zoning:
R-7 and C-5
0.70 acre
Existing Land Use:
Public/Semi-Public (Southmmster Presbyterian Church) and a Virginia Power high tension
electrical transmission easement.
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use:
North - C-5; Church, Virginia Power high tension electrical transmission easement
and vacant
South- C-3; Church and Virginia Power high tension electrical transmission
easement
East R-'7 and 0-2; Two-family residential and Virginia Power high tension
electrical transmission easement
West- R-7 and C-5;Church and Virginia Power high tension electrical
transmission easement
UTILITIES
The tower and associated equipment will not be a manned facility; therefore, the use of the public
water and wastewater systems is not: required.
ENV'~RONMENTAL
Drainage and Erosion:
The request property drains west and ultimately to Pocoshock Creek via tributaries. No
existing or anticipated on- or off-site drainage or erosion problems with the development
of the proposed tower. A land disturbance permit will not be required if less than 2,500
square feet of land area is disturbed by the construction of the tower and associated
improvements.
4
98SN0207/WP/MAY27X
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Fire Service:
The proposed tower and associated facilities will have a minimal impact on fire/rescue
services. _
County. Communications.
A preliminary review of this tower proposal has indicated that the facility will not interfere
with the County's communication system; however, as a further precaution, a condition
should be imposed to ensure that the tower is designed and constructed so as not to
interfere with the Chesterfield County Public Safety Tmnked System (Condition 3). Once
the tower is in operation, if interference occurs, the owner/developer should be required
to correct any problems. (Condition 4)
County. Airport:
A preliminary review of this tower proposal has indicated that the facility will not interfere
with the operation of the County Airport; however, as a further precaution, if FAA
approval is required, a copy of such approval should be submitted to the Planning
Department prior to the release of a building permit. (Condition 2)
Transportation:
The proposed tower and associated equipment will have a minimal impact on the existing
transportation network.
LAND USE
Comprehensive Plan:
The request property lies within the boundaries of the Route 360 Corridor Plan which
suggests the property is appropriate for mixed use corridor use. Mixed use corridor
includes residential developments of various densities, corporate office uses, churches,
public facilities and other uses with similar impacts.
Area Development Trends:
The request property and surrounding area are zoned commercially and residentially and
have been developed as a church and a YMCA, fronting on Hull Street Road, and for
5 98SN0207/WP/MAY27X
single family and two-family residences in subdivisions, north of the corridor. The request
property includes part of a Virginia Power high tension electric transmission easement.
Existing area commercial and residential development patterns are anticipated to continue
along this portion of Hull Street Road.
The proposed tower would be incorporated into an existing Virginia Power high tension
electrical monopole structure. Accessory equipment would be mounted on the ground
within the easement. Access is planned via an existing church parking lot driveway to Hull
Street Road.
Architectural Treatment:
The request property lies within an Emerging Growth Area and also within the Hull Street
Road Rural Transition Area. Within Emerging Growth Areas, no building exterior which
would be visible to any residential district or any public right of way may consist of
architectural materials inferior in quality, appearance, or detail to any other exterior of the
same building. There is, however, nothing to preclude the use of different materials on
different building exteriors, but rather, the use of inferior materials on sides which face
adjoining property. No portion of a building constructed of unadorned concrete block or
corrugated and/or sheet metal may be visible from any adjoining residential district or any
public right of way. No building exterior may be constructed of unpainted concrete block
or corrugated and/or sheet met~. Mechanical equipment, whether ground-level or rooftop,
must be shielded and screened from public view and designed to be perceived as an
integral part of the building. It should be noted, however, that mechanical equipment
screening requirements would not require screening of the tower or tower-mounted
equipment.
Within the Route 360 Rural Transition Area, structures in commercial districts, to include
communications towers, must have an architectural style compatible with surrounding
neighborhoods. As noted herein, the applicants are requesting exception to this
requirement.
Given the height of the tower and its proximity to residential neighborhoods, the tower
should not be lighted. (Condition 5b)
Consistent with past actions on similar facilities the tower should be removed at such time
that it ceases to be used for communications purposes, to ensure that the tower does not
become a maintenance problem or an eyesore. (Condition 6)
6
98SN0207/WP/MAY27X
CONCLUSIONS
The Public Facilities Plan suggests that communications tower locations should generally be
located to minimize the impact on existing or planned areas of development, and that energy and
communications facilities should co-locate whenever feasible. The tower would be incorporated
into the structure of an existing, permitted Virginia Power electrical transmission structure. The
addition of the communications facilities into the existing transmission structure does not generate
a visual impact on area residences that is significantly greater than the visual impact of the existing
Virginia Power electrical transmission structure and conforms to the co-location criteria of the
Plan. Also by incorporating the communications facilities into the structure of an existing Virginia
Power electrical transmission structure and easement, the need for an additional freestanding
communications tower in the area is eliminated, thereby minimizing tower proliferation. The
recommended conditions will further minimize the possibility of any adverse impact on area
development, the Chesterfield County Public Safety Tmnked System or the County Airport.
Given these considerations, staff recommends approval of this request.
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (4/21/98):
The applicam accepted the recommendation. There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Gulley, seconded by Mr. Marsh, the Commission recommended
approval of this request subject to the conditions on pages 2 and 3.
AYES: Unanimous.
Further, the Commission found the facility to be in Substantial Accord with the
Comprehensive Plan.
The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, May 27, 1998, beginning at 7:00 p.m., will take under
consideration this request.
7 98SNO207/WP/MAY27X
/
/' //
J
?
P.O.B.
I
,l
/!
/I
$37' 23'37"E
9'x16'
9'x16'-- ~
EQUIPMENT
PROPOSED ICE
BRIDGE
EXISTING VEPCO
LATTICE TOWER-
vEPCO
MONOPOLE
PROPOSED 20'
ACCESS EASEMENT
I EXISTING PARKING
LOT
~e, SNOZ0 7-1
POCOSHOCK HILLS
Y.M.C.A.
,.~?IVIANCHESTER
'MIDDLE SCHOOL
98SI
U. PD.
~. 15
98SN0207
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, RON MACAULAY/NEXTEL
COMMUNICATIONS requested Conditional Use Planned Development
and amendment of zoning district map to permit a 125 foot
communications tower and buffer, landscaping, architectural
treatment and setback exceptions in Residential (R-7) and
General Business (C-5) Districts. A communications tower
incorporated into a Virginia Power structure is planned. The
density of such amendment will be controlled by zoning
conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for mixed use corridor
use. This request lies on 0.7 acre known as 7500 Hull Street
Road. GPIN 764-696-Part of 0128 and 0172 (Sheet 15) .
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 98SN0207 and stated
that the Planning Commission and staff recommend approval,
subject to conditions.
Mr. Howard Martin, representing the applicant, stated that
the recommendation is acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
Mr. Warren commended the applicant for co-location with the
Virginia Power Transmission Line and expressed appreciation
to the Planning Commission and staff for supporting this
request.
Mr. Warren then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Barber, for
the Board to approve Case 98SN0207, subject to the following
conditions:
There shall be no signs permitted to identify this use.
(P)
In conjunction with site plan submission, the
owner/developer shall submit documentation as to
whether FAA approval is required for the erection of
the tower. If FAA approval is required, a copy of FAA
approval shall be submitted to the Planning Department,
prior to release of a building permit. (P)
The tower and equipment shall be designed and installed
so as not to interfere with the Chesterfield County
Public Safety Trunked System. At the time of site plan
review, the owner/developer shall submit information as
deemed necessary by the Chesterfield County
Communications and Electronics staff to determine if an
engineering study should be performed to analyze the
possibility of radio frequency interference with the
County system, based upon tower location and height,
and upon the frequencies and effective radiated power
generated by tower mounted equipment. Prior to release
of a building permit the study, if required, shall be
submitted to, and approved by, the Chesterfield County
Communications and Electronics staff. (GS)
The owner/developer shall be responsible for correcting
any frequency problems which affect the Chesterfield
County Public Safety Trunked System caused by this use.
Such corrections shall be made immediately upon
5/27/98 98-367
notification by the Chesterfield County Communications
and Electronics staff. (GS)
The treatment, color and lighting system for the tower
shall be as follows:
The tower shall be grey or another neutral
color, acceptable to the Planning Department.
The tower shall not be lighted. (P)
At such time that the tower ceases to be used for
communications purposes for a period exceeding twelve
(12) consecutive months, the owner/developer shall
dismantle and remove the tower and all associated
equipment from the property. (P)
In conjunction with the approval of this request, a
ninety (90) foot exception to the 110 foot setback for
communications towers in General Business (C-5)
Districts, adjacent to Residential (R-7) Districts,
shall be granted. (P)
(NOTE: With the approval of this request, the communications
tower and accessory structures are exempted from setback
landscaping, buffering and architectural treatment
requirements.)
Ayes:
Nays:
Humphrey, Warren, Barber, Daniel, and HcHale.
None.
5/27/98 98-368