08SN0178
March 18, 2008 CPC
April 23, 2008 BS
STAFF’S
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
08SN0178
Cynthia A. Burke
Dale Magisterial District
10101 Krause Road
REQUEST:Amendment of Conditional Use Planned Developments (Cases 84S021 and
84S150) to delete conditions relative to architecture and signage.
PROPOSED LAND USE:
Architecture and signage in compliance with Ordinance standards is proposed.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval for the following reason:
Proposal conforms to Ordinance requirements.
(NOTE: CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER MAY PROFFER
CONDITIONS.)
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location:
Southeast quadrant of Iron Bridge and Krause Roads, and better known as 10101 Krause
Road. Tax ID 772-661-1648.
Ю±ª·¼·²¹ ¿ Ú×ÎÍÌ ÝØÑ×ÝÛ ½±³³«²·¬§ ¬¸®±«¹¸ »¨½»´´»²½» ·² °«¾´·½ »®ª·½»
Existing Zoning:
C-2 with Conditional Use Planned Development
Size:
1.2 acres
Existing Land Use:
Commercial
Adjacent Zoning and Land Use:
North – A; Public/semi-public (County Government facilities)
South – C-2 with Conditional Use Planned Development; Office
East - C-3 with Conditional Use; Vacant (vacant residence)
West – O-2 and C-2 with Conditional Use Planned Development; Office
UTILITIES;ENVIRONMENTAL; AND PUBLIC FACILITIES
This amendment will have no impact on these facilities.
LAND USE
Comprehensive Plan:
Lies within the boundaries of the Central Area Plan which suggests the property is
appropriate for community mixed use.
Area Development Trends:
Surrounding properties to the north, south andwest are zoned Agricultural (A), Corporate
Office (O-2) and Neighborhood Business (C-2)and are developed for office uses to include
governmental offices. Property to the east is zoned Community Business (C-3) and is
occupied by a vacant residence.
Zoning History:
On February 27, 1980, the Board of Supervisors, upon a favorable recommendation by the
Planning Commission, approved rezoning to Convenience Business (B-1) with Conditional
Use Planned Development to permit a mix of uses on property including the request site
(Case 79S079). With the approval of this request, conditions were imposed relative to,
among other requirements,architecture and signage.
î ðèÍÒðïéèóßÐÎîíóÞÑÍóÎÐÌ
On April 25, 1984, the Board of Supervisors, upon a favorable recommendation from the
Planning Commission, approved amendments to Case 79S079 which included an
amendment to allow a fast food restaurant on the request site and an amendment to
architectural requirements (Case 84S021). Conditions of approval required architecture as
depicted in plans submitted with the application. (see attached)
On October 24, 1984, the Board of Supervisors, upon a favorable recommendation from the
Planning Commission, approved an amendment to Case 79S079 relative to sign
requirements for the fast food restaurant (Case 84S150). Conditions ofapproval required
signage as depicted in a sign package approved with the application which is more
restrictive than signage currently allowed by Ordinance. (see attached)
Architecture:
Architectural style for this site is currently regulated by a conditions of Case 84S021 which
requires that the building be consistent with the attached elevations (Attachment A). The
applicant has requested that these conditions be deleted so as to allow architectural style to
comply with current Zoning Ordinance requirements. Currently, Courthouse Area Design
District standards would require buildings to be compatible with Federalist and Colonial
architecture as exemplified by the historic Chesterfield Courthouse, Castlewood and
Magnolia Grange; include articulation of doors and windows, architectural ornamentation
and use of materials such as brick and/or siding for walls and standing seam metal or
simulated slate for roofs.
Signs:
Signs for this site are currently regulated by a condition of Case 84S150 which requires that
the signs be consistent with the attachedrendering (Attachment B). The applicant has
requested that this condition be deleted so as to allow signage to comply with current
Zoning Ordinance requirements. The subject property is part of a shopping center or similar
group of buildings. Currently, the Ordinance would permit individual businesses within such
a development one (1) freestandingsign not to exceed an area of twenty (20) square feet and
a height of eight (8) feet. The area of the sign could be increased with the incorporation of
changeable copy (reader board). Other allowable signage would be as regulated by the
current Ordinance as well.
CONCLUSION
Deletion of these conditions would allow architecture and signage to conform to Zoning
Ordinance standards.
Given these considerations, approval of this request is recommended.
CASE HISTORY
í ðèÍÒðïéèóßÐÎîíóÞÑÍóÎÐÌ
Planning Commission Meeting (3/18/08):
The applicant accepted the recommendation. There was no opposition present.
On motion of Dr. Brown, seconded by Mr. Bass, the Commission recommended approval
of this request.
AYES: Messrs. Gulley, Bass, Brown, Hassen and Waller.
The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, April 23, 2008, beginning at 6:30 p.m., will take
under consideration this request.
ì ðèÍÒðïéèóßÐÎîíóÞÑÍóÎÐÌ
This page is blank.
éî
This page is blank.
ûÌÌÊÍÆ×Ø éÓÕÎÛÕ×
ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ ú
éî