The URL can be used to link to this page

2008-05-28 Packet1~ ~~ ~!NGIN!' CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 2.A. Subject: County Administrator's Comments County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Mr. Daniel Plaugher, Executive Director of Virginians for High Speed Rail, will update the Board of Supervisors on the progress of the organization. Preparers Janice Blakley Attachments: ~ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~-~ ya ~„ AGENDA ~,~ - n Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 2.6. Subject: County Administrator's Comments County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: No action required. Summary of Information: The Board will receive a report from the Youth Services Citizen Board, which was established in 1978. The citizen board was charged with advising the Board of Supervisors regarding planning and policies affecting youth development and with providing opportunities for community discussion focused on youth issues in Chesterfield County. Members of the citizen board will brief the board on the results and recommendations from "WHY? We Hear You," the annual community youth forum. Preparers Jana D. Carter Attachments: ~ Yes Title: Director. Juvenile Services ^ No # 00€Fi10~ a_a~ -~~ ~?kc~rN~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 2.C. Subject: County Administrator's Comments County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Mr. Ricky Elder, Station Director, and Ms. Lisa Moerner, Director of Environmental Policy, will update the Board about significant environmental enhancements at Dominion Resources, Incorporated's Chesterfield Power Station. Preparers Janice Blakley Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No #O+~~C~~~ r- Dominion Chesterfield Power Station Chesterfield Power Station Facts Generation Technologies Four Pulverized Coat-Fired Units > Unit 6 - 680 MW, commissioned 1969 > Unit 5 - 321 MIN, commissioned 1964 > Unit 4 -176 MIN, commissioned 1960 > Unit 3 -105 MIN, commissioned 1952 Two Combined Cycle Gas/Oil-Fired Turbines r Unit 7 - 201 MW, commissioned 1990 ~ Unit 8 - 204 MW, commissioned 1992 Chesterfield Power Station NOx Controls Low-NOx burner technology on Units 3, 4, 5 & 6 • Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) technology on Units 4, 5 and 6 • Controls installed ahead of regulatory deadlines s Chesterfield Power Station Facts • Station started production in July, 1944 • Currently 249 station employees • Largest fossil-fueled power station in the Dominion system • Station bums approximately 10,000 tons of coal daily (100 rail cars) Coal-Fired Boilers: Pollutants Controlled • Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 't~~~ 0 Volatile Organic Compamds(VOC)+NOx+~ ~ =pmne (Smog) .'~l~t • Sulfur Dioxide (802) O Results in the formation of acid rain • Particulate Matter (PM) 9 Ash released during the combustion of coal • Mercury a Chesterfield Power Station NOx Controls -Emissions Impacts • SCRs began operating year-round in 2008 • Results in approximately 11,000 tons of NOx reduced per year tapproximately 90 % reduction during each ozone season (5,000 tons) 4approximately 75% reduction during all other operating months (6,000 tons) s 1 ~oomitniotn Chesterfield Power Station New Unit 6 Environmental Controls • Flue Gas Desulfurization system (scrubber) to control sulfur dioxide - Expelled to control >95% of SO2 - Resulting in approximately 30,000 tons of SO2 removed annually • Fabric filtration (baghouse) to control particulate matter - Expect >99 % PM removal • Combination of scrubber and baghouse expected to reduce air emissions of mercury - Expel >90% Merary removal 9 Chesterfield Power Station PM Controls -Units 3, 4, and 5 • Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) technology • Particulate matter control efficiencies from 96 - 99% ro Chesterfield Power Station Scrubber Support Equipment Limestone/Gypsum barge unloading fadlity Limestone processing and storage equipment Gypsum processing equipment to allow benefidal reuse of scrubber by- product • Proctor's Creek effluent to be utilized as make-up water for scrubber • Waste water treatment faatity • New chimney (approx. 400 ft), new fans 8 ductwork ~: 2 Chesterfield Power Station New Unit 6 Environmental Controls Dominion Virginia Power Record of Reducing Emissions ~~ so -100 7998 2000 2002 P004 2010 2075 SO, NO>< Mercury - Is Don~inion`~ 0 -so eo -eo aa -eo x -80X -g5~ Chesterfield Power Station Future Environmental Projects • Scrubber system for Units 3, 4 and 5 planned for 2011 • Expect >95% S02 removal, resulting in an additional reduction of approximately 30,000 tons of S02 annually to Environmental Expenditures • SCR Installation -Units 4, 5, and 6 • FGD Installation -Units 3, 4, 5, and 6 • Baghouse Installation -Unit 6 -Total Cost =Approximately $750 million -30 Additional Full-Time Employees 16 3 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 . ~~ AGENDA y~~NV~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 7.A. Subject: Award of Annual Requirements Contract for Architectural Services to Moseley Architects County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: . Authorize the county administrator to execute an annual requirements contract with Moseley Architects. Summary of Information: Moseley Architects was chosen with four other firms out of a field of eleven to be awarded annual requirements contracts and an agenda item was presented for the March 12, 2008 Board meeting. The Board of Supervisors elected to defer action due to concerns raised about Moseley Architects' involvement in a School Board contract on the Cosby High School design and construction. On April 2, 2008 the item was again considered by the Board of Supervisors and the Board elected to approve four of the firms and deferred action on Moseley Architects pending receipt and evaluation of additional information concerning the Cosby High School matter. The Board also specifically asked for the Moseley item to be returned for action on May 28, 2008. During the deferral period, Board members were provided a copy of the PPEA contract for the Cosby High School project. Preparers Rob Key Title: Director, Department of General Services Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # (?~~t~~~'~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Moseley Architects was rated by the evaluation committee as one of the top five contenders and was selected to receive a requirements contract along with the other four. Moseley Architects has performed consistently high quality design and study work for over two decades for many clients and have been responsible, reliable and dedicated to local government work as their core business. The potential projects for which Moseley could be chosen as consultants range from general office buildings, specialized public safety facilities, courts facilities, jails, short and long range studies, master planning and because they are a full service firm, projects that would involve the various engineering disciplines on a stand alone basis. ~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~,~~; AGENDA y~~~.*~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.A.1. Subiect: Nomination/Appointment to the SAFE Board of Directors County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Nominate/appoint representative to the SAFE Board of Directors. Summary of Information: SAFE is the county, school and community coalition working to prevent substance abuse in Chesterfield County. The SAFE bylaws allow for some members of the SAFE board to be appointed by the Board of Supervisors. Supervisor Holland recommends that the Board nominate and appoint Mr. Ernest P. Williams to the SAFE Board of Directors, representing the Dale District. His term will be effective June 1, 2008 and will expire May 31, 2011. Mr. Williams meets all eligibility requirements and has indicated his willingness to serve. Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. Preparers Jana D. Carter Title: Director, Juvenile Services Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No ~ ~,-~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 _ ° AGENDA ~ , {FC1Nl~~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.A.2. Subject: Nomination and Appointment to the Sustain Our Communities Committee County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~. Board Action Requested: Request that the Board of Supervisors nominate and appoint Ms. Renae Eldred to serve on the Sustain Our Communities Committee. Summary of Information: The Sustain Our Communities Committee is a Board of Supervisors appointed committee working to sustain and improve Chesterfield's older communities. Ms. Eldred is a resident of the Bermuda District. Ms. Jaeckle recommends the nomination and appointment of Ms. Eldred. The term will be effective upon approval of the Board of Supervisors and expire on December 31, 2010. If the members of the Board of Supervisors desire to nominate and appoint individuals to this committee at this meeting, they will need to unanimously vote to suspend the Rules of Procedure. Preparers Thomas E. Jacobson Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No Title: Director of Revitalization ~~~~~~ ~, «~~~ ~~~~ °~!RCIN~P..~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.A.3. Subject: Nomination/Reappointment to the Richmond First Tee Board of Directors County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Nominate/reappoint an individual to serve as an at-large member on the Richmond First Tee Board of Directors. Summary of Information: The Richmond First Tee is a not-for-profit corporation, which manages and develops the First Tee Chesterfield golf course at Daniel Park at Iron Bridge "to provide affordable and accessible quality golf facilities and programs especially for youth." Parks and Recreation recommends that the Board nominate and re-appoint Mr. Ralph Bolling for an additional term. The term will be effective immediately and expire on May 31, 2011. Under the existing rules of procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the rules of procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. Preparers Michael S. Golden Title: Director, Parks and Recreation Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No ~,~~, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 ~ AGENDA ' =~C i ~/I(~lNl Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8 B Subject: Streetlight Installation Cost Approvals County Administrator's Comments• County Administrator: Board Action Reauested: This item requests Board approval of new streetlight installations in the Midlothian District. Summary of Information: Streetlight requests from individual citizens or civic groups are received in the Department of Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power for each request received. When the quotations are received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Staff provides the Board with an evaluation of each request based on the following criteria: 1. Streetlights should be located at intersections; 2. There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per day (VPD) passing the requested location if it is an intersection, or 400 VPD if the requested location is not an intersection; CONTINUED NEXT PAGE Preparers Richard M. McElfish Title: Director, Environmental Engineering Attachments: Yes No # (~+~~~:~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information: (Continued) 3. Petitions are required and should include 75% of residents within 200 feet of the requested location and if at an intersection, a majority of those residents immediately adjacent to the intersection. Cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60 days. The Board, upon presentation of the cost quotation may approve, defer, or deny the expenditure of funds from available District Improvement Funds for the streetlight installation. If the expenditure is approved, staff authorizes Dominion Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial of a project will result in its cancellation and the District Improvement Fund will be charged the design cost shown; staff will notify the requestor of the denial. Projects cannot be deferred for more than 30 days due to quotation expiration. Quotation expiration has the same effect as a denial. MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT: • At the entrance to the Midlothian Wood community, at the intersection of Le Gordon Road and Midlothian Wood Boulevard Cost to install streetlight: $373.26 (Design Cost: $110.92) Meets minimum criteria • In the Manchester Heights subdivision, upgrade four existing mercury vapor (MV) streetlights to high pressure sodium vapor (HPSV) Three 7,000-lumen MV lights to 8,000-lumen HPSV: Lancers Boulevard and Walmsley Boulevard Lancers Boulevard and Holborn Road Lancers Boulevard and Hendon Way One 3,000-lumen MV light to 8,000-lumen HPSV: Lancers Boulevard and Elk Road Total cost to upgrade all four streetlights: $653.00 (Design Cost: $110.92) Criteria not applicable, replacement of existing facilities • In the Scottmar subdivision, installation of two streetlights, one in the vicinity of 2340/2348 Scarsborough Drive; the second in the vicinity of 2420/2430 Scarsborough Drive Cost to install streetlights: $172.19 (Design Cost: $110.92) Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection nor vehicles per day For information regarding available balances in the County-wide Streetlight Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. ~~~~~ STREETLIGHT REQUEST ' Midlothian District Request Received: November 14, 2007 Estimate Requested: November 15, 2007 Estimate Received: April 29, 2008 Days Estimate Outstanding: 166 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Mr. Fred Moxley ADDRESS: Midlothian Wood Transition Committee 14410 Tanager Wood Trail Midlothian, VA 23114 REQUESTED LOCATION: Intersection of Le Gordon Road and Midlothian Wood Boulevard Cost to install light: $373.26 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Qualified Vehicles Per Day: Qualified Petition: Qualified Requestor Comments: "There is a high volume of traffic that travels Le Gordon Road on a daily basis to the new Kroger store. Drivers have discovered it is more convenient when exiting Highway 288 at Woolridge Road to travel Le Gordon Road to Midlothian Turnpike to cross onto Winterfield Road. There is also increased traffic during the school year from Midlothian High School Students crossing Winterfield Road on to Le Gordon Road to travel to and from school. "The combination of heavy traffic and lack of street lighting on Le Gordon Road is especially dangerous at night making it difficult for residents to safely navigate the turn at the Midlothian Wood Boulevard and Le Gordon Road intersection." Staff Comments: Staff notes that while this installation will be located at the entrance to the Midlothian Wood community. Streetlight Request Map May 28, 2008 MIDLOTHIAN TPKE WINTERF MIDLOTHIAN TPKE ' 1 ~EGpt N MIDLOTHIAN WOOpeC ~O • ~ r~ 9N9 Q O'ER WOOD TRL ~ ~- O U ~ 2 GO ~ r Q Z m ,~Q' o ~ ~,P~ ~ G v 0 z 0 This map is a copyrighted product of the Chesterfield County GIS Office. Streetlight Legend existing light • requested light N This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chestertield County Environmental Engineering Department. 640 320 0 640 Feet V`~~~X STREETLIGHT REQUEST Midlothian District Request Received: July 16, 2007 Estimate Requested: July 17, 2007 Estimate Received: April 16, 2008 Days Estimate Outstanding: 274 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Mr. Vince Settle ADDRESS: President, Marlboro/Manchester Heights Civic Association 6609 Elk Road Richmond, VA 23224 REQUESTED LOCATIONS: Upgrade as noted the existing streetlights at the following locations Lancers Boulevard and Walmsley Boulevard - 7000E MV to 8000E HPSV Lancers Boulevard and Holborn Road - 7000E MV to 8000E HPSV Lancers Boulevard and Hendon Way - 7000E MV to 8000E HPSV Lancers Boulevard and Elk Road - 3000E MV to 8000E HPSV Total cost to upgrade all four streetlights: $653.00 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Qualified Vehicles Per Day: Qualified Petition: Not required, upgrade of existing lights Requestor Comments: "Our civic association has met to discuss the need for an upgrade from the old mercury vapor bulbs to the current sodium bulbs in our neighborhood streetlights. We would request at this time an upgrade to four (4) of our streetlights. "We realize that our neighborhood has matured over the last 40 plus years and due to better technology today, the sodium bulbs afford better illumination that what we currently have. That being said we realize that it provides a safer neighborhood to deter crime and vandalism." Staff Comments: None Streetlight Request Map May 28, 2008 LAN ERS C OyFR( N v C~ UPGRAD z N ~~~o ELK RD ~ 9~~~ ns, ~J~~ ~ ~ ~ ' m2 m GES ~~ ~ w ~~ ~ ~~ O ~ O U ~ ' ~ ~ UPGRADE ~ ~~, ~ ~O O ee ~ 'P UPGRADE ' HDLBpRNR s ~ CDMMgNDERRD PgRUq MENT RD ~' PGRAD W LMSLEY BLVD O 70 This map is a copyrighted product of N the Chesterfield County GIS C!ffice. This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation Streetlight Legend to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was existing light obtained from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department. • requested light 1, 000 500 0 1, 000 Feet STREETLIGHT REQUEST Midlothian District Request Received: December 10, 2007 Estimate Requested: December 10, 2007 Estimate Received: April 23, 2008 Days Estimate Outstanding: 165 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Mr. Thomas F. Schmitt ADDRESS: Neighborhood Watch Chairman Scottmar Subdivision 2316 Scarsborough Drive Richmond, VA 23235 REQUESTED LOCATIONS: Scarsborough Drive, vicinity of 2340/2348 Scarsborough Drive, vicinity of 2420/2430 Cost to install two streetlights: $172.19 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Not Qualified Vehicles Per Day: Not Qualified, less than 600 vehicles per day Petition: Qualified Requestor Comments: "The streetlights installed in the Scottmar subdivision two years ago have been very well received and gratefully appreciated by all of our residents and visitors. "Due to this overwhelming satisfaction with that program we now have the needed approvals to request the last two lights that not received a favorable vote last time." Staff Comments: None. ~®~er~.~ Streetlight Request Map May 28, 2008 W HUGUENOT RD SH BURN RD z O ~ p ~ 2 U ~ O m ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ U m ~" 0 SWATHMORE ~ w Y ~ m 0 3 0 ° ~ 2 ~ U w a STARMONT RD x ~ R~ ~~ STARMONT ' m po ~ . O O O ~ O ~O ' W p RENFRO RD ny ~ ti o ~ \ ~~o R,4 O This map is a copyrighted product of the Chesterfield County GIS Office. Streetlight Legend existing light • requested light ~ 675 337.5 0 N This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department. 675 Feet ~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ' BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~- ~.~ r ~ AGENDA ryRCINI'~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.1.a. Subject: Resolution Supporting the County's Application to Become a Preserve America Community County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Approve the resolution as attached. Summary of Information: Preserve America is an initiative created by the White House and in conjunction with various other federal agencies to highlight historical preservation efforts. The Chesterfield County Planning Department is preparing an application for Community designation for Chesterfield, one criteria of which is the adoption by the local governing body of a resolution supporting the designation. The application is due by June 1St to be eligible this year. If designated, the county would be eligible to apply for grants for historic programming, including signage, interpretive history, marketing and publicity. Grants would be due by June 30t''. Staff is currently evaluating grant possibilities in anticipation of the designation. Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Planning Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE DESIGNATION OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AS A PRESERVE AMERICA COMMUNITY WHEREAS, Preserve America is a White House initiative developed in cooperation with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the U.S. Department of the Interior, and the U.S. Department of Commerce; and WHEREAS, the goals of this initiative include a greater shared knowledge about our nation's past, strengthened regional identities and local pride, increased local participation in preserving the country's irreplaceable cultural and natural heritage assets, and support for the economic vitality of communities; and WHEREAS, this initiative is compatible with our community's interests and goals related to historic preservation; and WHEREAS, designation as a Preserve America Community will improve our community's ability to protect and promote its historical resources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia supports the designation of Chesterfield County as a Preserve America Community. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Chesterfield County will protect and celebrate our heritage, use our historic assets for economic development and community revitalization, and encourage people to experience and appreciate local historic resources through education and heritage tourism programs. ~~~~~.~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~r~~ AGENDA Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.1.b. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Ms. Karen D. Kirby, Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Department of Social Services, Upon Her Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing Ms. Karen D. Kirby for 18 years of service to Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Department of Social Services. Preparers Sarah C. Snead Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Director-Social Services # 0~~~~ ~ ~ RECOGNIZING MS. KAREN KIRBY UPON HER RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Ms. Karen Kirby began her career in public social services in 1977 in Mississippi, and in 1988 in Virginia, and has served in Chesterfield County since November 1989; and WHEREAS, in her roles as social worker, senior social worker, and supervisor in the Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Department of Social Services, Ms. Kirby has competently served individuals, families and the community through the agency's social work programs; and WHEREAS, Ms. Kirby has committed her social work education and skills to providing direct services, supervision and leadership in the areas of child protective services, adult services and protective services, and intake services; and WHEREAS, Ms. Kirby has been instrumental in increasing staffing in adult services to help fill the gaps and more effectively serve citizens, including successfully advocating for a social work aide position, upgrading a position to a social worker level, and the innovative addition of a clinician position to provide mental health services for adult services recipients; and WHEREAS, Ms. Kirby has supported staff development by serving on various subcommittees of the Virginia Institute for Social Services Training Activities to help develop curricula to enhance professional knowledge in the field of adult services; and WHEREAS, Ms. Kirby has been a dedicated advocate for the elderly on the steering committee for the Shepherd's Center of Chesterfield to bring programs, education and services to the elderly community, and on the Central Virginia Taskforce on Domestic Violence to highlight the plight of domestic violence victims in the senior population and develop strategies to help reduce the incidence of domestic violence; and WHEREAS, Ms. Kirby has continually worked to improve the social services system through her contributions on agency, community, and state-level workgroups and task forces addressing policy, practice and programs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding contributions of Ms. Karen Kirby, expresses the appreciation of all residents for her service to the county, and offers congratulations upon her retirement. ~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY • ~, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 E ~; AGENDA ~ ~ , hRc~N~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.1.c. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Master Simmons Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Police Officer William E. "Billy" Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Master Police Officer William E. "Billy" Simmons will retire from the Police Department after having provided 30 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County. Preparers Colonel Thierry G. Dupuis Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Chief of Police E~O~~~~ RECOGNIZING MASTER OFFICER WILLIAM E. "BILLY" SIMMONS ~ UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Master Officer William E. "Billy" Simmons will retire from the Chesterfield County Police Department on June 1, 2008, after providing 30 years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Officer Simmons began his career with Chesterfield County on June 1, 1978 as an automotive mechanic; and WHEREAS, Officer Simmons has faithfully served the county for over 23 years in the capacity of patrol officer, senior police officer, and master police officer; and WHEREAS, Officer Simmons has been commended for his teamwork, knowledge, skills, and ability which resulted in the resolution in a series of burglaries from businesses and residences in the Chester area; and WHEREAS, Officer Simmons has received numerous letters of thanks and appreciation for services rendered in all types of situations; and WHEREAS, Officer Simmons has provided the Chesterfield County Police Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Officer Simmons' diligent service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Master Officer William E. "Billy" Simmons, and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. C)®~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _~ ~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 h,~N, AGENDA Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.1.d. Subject: Resolution Supporting the Route 1 at Woods Edge Road Right Turn Lane Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to adopt the attached resolution supporting the proposed Route 1 at Woods Edge Road Right Turn Lane Project. Summary of Information: The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has identified the need for a northbound right turn lane on Route 1 at Woods Edge Road. According to VDOT, there is a heavy volume of traffic turning right onto Woods Edge Road utilizing the through lane on Route 1. This causes delays to both the through traffic and turning traffic. Construction of a northbound right turn lane would alleviate this problem. Statewide access management grant funds have been identified for this project. (Continued on next page) Preparers R.J.McCracken Title: Director of Transportation agen5s5 Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No # ~~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information: continued VDOT has asked that the county adopt a resolution of support so that they can proceed with the project. VDOT will manage the project development, including the customary public involvement procedures. As details of the project are unknown at this time, the proposed resolution of support is contingent on VDOT asking for the Board's support once the project has been designed, prior to the right-of-way phase beginning. The project schedule has not been determined at this time; however, the funding program requires projects to be constructed within two years. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board adopt the attached resolution supporting the proposed Route 1 at Woods Edge Road Right Turn Lane Project. District: Bermuda WHEREAS, Route 1 in the vicinity of Woods Edge Road carries over 20,000 vehicles per day; and WHEREAS, there are over 430 vehicles turning right in the morning peak hour from Route 1 to Woods Edge Road; and WHEREAS, traffic operations on Route 1 at Woods Edge Road should be improved to help ease congestion; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has determined that the construction of a right turn lane on northbound Route 1 would improve the traffic operations; and WHEREAS, $685,000 in funding for the proposed Route 1 at Woods Edge Road Right Turn Lane Project has been identified with VDOT's FY09 Access Management Grant Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors supports the proposed Route 1 at Woods Edge Road Right Turn Lane Project. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board requests VDOT to proceed with the project as quickly as possible, following customary public involvement procedures and seeking the Board's approval of the design plans prior to moving to the right-of-way phase. t~~~~5 Route 1 at Woods Edge Road Right Turn Lane TI LINE CT ~ 2 Q Z O TINSBERRY DR ~ w w w w Ns ~N m t~ WOODS EDGE RD ~' Proposed Right Turn Lane Watson & Watson LLC 7-11 Inc. KAIROS RD Richard E & N ST HOR Phyllis M Sloan MIL ~ ~ ~ Richard E & Q Phyllis M Sloan Z O w w w w G~ O~ .' v:smithbk/hes/routes at WE 150 75 0 150 300 450 600 5-75-OB Feet ~~~~~~ rt ` s~. y~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.1.e. Subject: Resolution Naming the Utilities Operations Center Building the "David H. Welchons Building" County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to adopt a resolution recognizing former county employee and director of utilities, David H. Welchons, posthumously by naming the Utilities Operations Center the "David H. Welchons Building." Summary of Information: This resolution recognizes the leadership and contributions to the county of former director of utilities, David H. Welchons, and authorizes changing the name of the Utilities Operations Center in honor of his services. Preparers Roy E. Covington Title: Director of Utilities Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ~~fl~~~ WHEREAS, Mr. David H. Welchons served the citizens of Chesterfield County as assistant county engineer in 1961, was promoted to director of utilities in 1983, and served in that capacity until his retirement in 1993; and WHEREAS, Mr. Welchons was instrumental in expanding the county's public utility system to meet the growing needs of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, customers of Chesterfield Utilities today can be thankful for Mr. Welchons' vision and planning for utility facilities within the county, as well as negotiating contracts with neighboring jurisdictions to guarantee adequate resources for the future; and WHEREAS, Mr. Welchons led the department's technology implementation and created the basis of a department that is one of the most technologically advanced public utilities in the state; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County Department of Utilities' water and wastewater systems are recognized for operational excellence by industry regulatory agencies; and WHEREAS, customers of Chesterfield Utilities enjoy the lowest rates in the area because of Mr. Welchons' influence in the department; and WHEREAS, Mr. Welchons' professionalism and excellence in public service continues to be the established standard for utilities staff to follow. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby endorses naming the Utilities Operations and Maintenance Building in posthumous honor of Mr. David H. Welchons. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mr. Welchons' family and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. ~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY .~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 r ~ AGENDA hkc~r~t~~ ' May 28, 2008 _ Item Number: 8.C.1.f. Subiect: Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing Financing of Various Capital Improvement Projects Through the Issuance of Tax Exempt Obligations and Declaring an Intent to Reimburse County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests the Board of Supervisors to adopt a resolution 1) authorizing and providing for the issuance, sale and delivery of not more than $24 million principal amount of tax exempt obligations for county capital projects, and 2) declare the official intent of the county (within the meaning of Federal regulations) to reimburse itself from the proceeds of tax exempt obligations for expenditures made with respect to the projects prior to the issuance and receipt of the proceeds to allow critical work to begin. Summary of Information: The FY2008 and FY2009 County Capital Improvement Program includes funding from tax exempt obligations to construct, install and furnish various capital improvement projects, including the Circuit/District Courts Building, Smith- Wagner building, fire logistics warehouse, fleet management facilities, a vehicle management information system and improvements at the Enon Public Safety Training Center. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director, Budget & Mana eq ment ^ No # ~~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Even though funds are appropriated for these projects, approval of the financing is requested prior to the sale of any tax-exempt obligations. The attached resolution authorizes and provides for the issuance, sale, and delivery of not more than $24 million principal amount of tax exempt obligations and declares the official intent of the county (within the meaning of Federal regulations) to reimburse itself from the proceeds of the obligations for expenditures made with respect to the projects prior to the issuance and receipt of the proceeds to allow critical work to begin. From time to time, expenditures may be incurred after funds are appropriated and in advance of receiving proceeds from the financing. As such, the County must declare its intent to reimburse itself. These projects are still in various stages of design or construction and staff will not proceed with the financing prior to addressing any concerns the Board may have on the projects. It is however, important to declare the County's intent to reimburse given the time limitations associated with doing so. The Board is requested to adopt the attached resolution. ~~~~~'~ RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, TO APPROVE THE FINANCING OF THE ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, FURNISHING AND EQUIPPING OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FOR THE COUNTY, INCLUDING THE EXPANSION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT BUILDING, RENOVATIONS TO THE SMITH WAGNER BUILDING, IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ENON PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING CENTER, A FIRE LOGISTICS WAREHOUSE, A VEHICLE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM AND VEHICLE FLEET FACILITIES, THROUGH THE ISSUANCE AND FROM THE PROCEEDS OF NOT TO EXCEED $24,000,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF TAX- EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS OF THE COUNTY, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH TAX- EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS OF EXPENDITURES TO BE MADE BY THE COUNTY IN ADVANCE OF THE ISSUANCE AND RECEIPT OF THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Board of Supervisors (the "Board of Supervisors") of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the "County"), hereby approves the financing of the acquisition, construction, installation, furnishing and equipping of capital improvement projects for the County, including the expansion of the Circuit Court Building, renovations to the Smith Wagner Building, improvements to the Enon Public Safety Training Center, a fire logistics warehouse, a vehicle management information system and vehicle fleet facilities (collectively, the "Projects"), through the issuance and from the proceeds of an issue of not to exceed $24,000,000 principal amount of tax-exempt obligations of the County. The approval hereunder of the financing of the expansion of the Circuit Court Building and renovations to the Smith Wager Building is supplemental to the financing of the expansion of the Circuit Court Building and renovations to the Smith Wagner Building effected through the issuance of certificates of participation on behalf of the County in August 2007. SECTION 2. The Board of Supervisors hereby authorizes the County to make expenditures on the Projects in advance of the issuance and receipt of the proceeds of such tax- exempt obligations of the County and to reimburse such expenditures from the proceeds of such tax-exempt obligations. The adoption of this resolution shall be considered as an "official intent" within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Section 1.150-2 promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. SECTION 3. This resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. ~~~'~ ~. 543023.3 031872 RES CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~_Tl ~; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Pa e 1 of 1 9 ~ ~,~ra~ AGENDA Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.2.a. Subject: Set Date for Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to the Upper Swift Creek Plan Relating to: 1) Water Quality, 2) Levels of Service for Roads, Schools and Public Safety, 3) Land Use, and 4) Economic Development County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Set June 25, 2008, for a public hearing to consider amendments to the Upper Swift Creek Plan Relating to: 1) Water Quality, 2) Levels of Service for Roads, Schools and Public Safety, 3) Land Use, and 4) Economic Development. Summary of Information: On April 9, 2008, the Board directed the Planning Commission to consider amendments to the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment. Under state law, the Planning Commission has until June 8, 2008, to hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to the Board. The Commission has scheduled a public hearing on June 3, 2008, at which time it is anticipated the Planning Commission will make recommendations on the Plan amendment. Pursuant to state law, the Board must take action on the Commission's recommendation within 90 days from the Commission's June 3, 2008, public hearing. Preparers Kirk Turner Title: Director of Planning 0800:78412.1 Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No #~~~~~c m«s ~RClti~~ Meeting Date: Su= 2008 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Item Number: 8.C.2.b. Set a Public Hearing to Consider Amending County Code Section 2-45 Related to the Dollar Threshold for Competitive Sealed Bidding and Competitive Negotiation County Administrator: Set a public hearing for June 25, 2008 to approve the requested change to Section 2-45 of the County Code. Summary of Information: The procurement of goods and services by the County is governed by the Virginia Public Procurement Act ("VPPA") The VPPA requires the County to follow state-mandated sealed bidding and competitive negotiations procedures to enter into contracts that exceed a certain dollar amount. The VPPA allows the County to utilize its own "small purchase procedures" for contracts below that amount. Section 2-45 of the County Code adopts the state law threshold amount for small purchases. The County can adopt a lower threshold dollar amount (currently $30,000) but not a higher amount. Every few years, the General Assembly increases the small purchase threshold amount and the Board has traditionally amended the County Code to reflect the new state law amount. The attached ordinance provides that the County's small purchase threshold will be the same as that provided by the General Assembly. If this amendment is adopted, the small purchase threshold amount will change automatically whenever the General Assembly changes the amount. This will eliminate the need to bring changes to the Board every time the General Assembly modifies the threshold figure. Staff recommends that the Board set June 25, 2008 for a public hearing to consider the attached ordinance. Preparers Michael J. Bacile Attachments: Yes ^ No Title: Director of Purchasing 0425:78681.1 (77596.1) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 2-45 RELATING TO PROCUREMENT OF GOODS AND SERVICES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 2-45 of the Code of the Coun of Chesterfield 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 2-45. Competitive purchasing generally; exceptions. All county contracts with nongovernmental contractors for the purchase or lease of goods, for the purchase of services, or for the sale of obsolete or unusable goods, shall be awarded only after competitive sealed bidding or competitive negotiation as provided in this article; provided, however, competitive sealed bidding or competitive negotiation shall not be required: 000 (c) If the contract price is not expected to exceed ~~9;A9&A8 the applicable dollar amount specified in Code of Virginia & 2 2 4303 G or H and the department procuring the goods or services complies with alternate purchasing procedures established in writing by the county purchasing director; (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. ~~~~~~ 0423:77596.1 _ ,~ ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~" _ l'~; BOARD OF SUPERVISOR S Page 1 of 2 ~~,~,Na.~ AGENDA Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number 8.C.2.c. Su_ biect: Set a Public Hearing to Consider Amending Section 14-23 of the County Code Relating to Use of Alcohol on Certain Public Property County Administrator's Comments• County Administrator: Board Action Reauested: The Board is requested to set a public hearing for June 25, 2008 to consider amending § 14-23 of the County Code relating to the use of alcohol on certain public property and to approve (subsequent to the public hearing) the Chesterfield Chamber of Commerce's request to hold its Wine Festival on the grounds of the County Government Complex subject to restrictions per county and state policy. Summary of Information: The County has for many years prohibited by ordinance the use of alcohol in County parks and on all other County property. By ordinance, alcohol may be served only at Henricus, Eppington, Castlewood, Magnolia Grange, and at Huguenot Park if a senior center were ever to be built there, subject to Alcohol and Beverage Control ("ABC") regulations and any restrictions the ABC imposes through its "special events" permits. In addition, the Parks and Recreation Department regulates use of alcohol on County property through an administrative application process similar to that currently used for outdoor music festivals. County regulations address the size of the event, location Preparers Rebecca T. Dickson Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Deputy County Administrator 0623:78793.1(78792.1) NO # t~00Q35 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA of the event within the property, hours of the event, and conduct or behavior at such events. The Chesterfield Chamber of Commerce has requested that the County amend its ordinance in a manner which would allow the Chamber to hold its annual wine festival outside on the grounds of the County Government Complex in 2009 (see attached map indicating the general requested location). The purpose of the festival is to promote Virginia Wineries. The Chamber has held the event for the last two years at Boulevard Flower Gardens, off Ruffin Mill Road. Due to the growing popularity of the event they have outgrown that location. In addition, the Chamber is seeking a location more centrally located in the County. The Chamber expects over 6,000 people to attend the festival in 2009. The festival will feature approximately 10 to 15 Virginia Wineries, wine tastings, educational seminars, live music, local artists and crafts in addition to an array of food. Staff has evaluated logistics related to such an event and determined that the designated location would work well for the request. The Chamber and the county have explored other possible sites for this economic development activity, including Pocahontas State Park and sites which are not as centrally located. The proposed ordinance amendment would allow the Board to approve on a case by case basis special requests like the Chamber's to use parts of the County Government Complex for events involving alcohol. Staff recommends setting a public hearing for June 25, 2008 to consider the ordinance amendment and the Chamber's request to hold the Wine Festival outside on the grounds of the County Government Complex. ~~~~~~ 0623:78793.1(78792.1) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 14-23 RELATING TO BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 14-23 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 14-23. Drinking alcoholic beverages, or tendering same to another, in a county park. (a) No person shall possess opened alcoholic beverage containers or drink an alcoholic beverage or tender a drink of an alcoholic beverage to another in a county park provided, however, that alcoholic beverages may be consumed at an event held at the following locations: Henricus, Eppington, Castlewood, Magnolia Grange1 a~ the senior center at Huguenot Park, and at the county government com lex at s ecific locations a roved and as conditioned b the board of supervisors, and after obtaining a valid banquet license issued by the Virginia Department of Alcohol Beverage Control and agreeing to comply with the terms of a special permit issued by the county administrator. The county department of parks and recreation shall promulgate regulations for the issuance of permits authorized by this section. (b) No person shall possess opened alcoholic beverage containers on any county property used for a school or on any street, road, or highway located in the county. (c) Violation of this section shall constitute a Class 4 misdemeanor. (Code 1978, § 15.1-31; Ord. of 7-27-05(3), § 1) State law references: Similar provisions, Code of Virginia, § 4.1-308. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0623:78792.1 Wine festival -Alcohol Consumption Area Chesterfield Government Center, Virginia May 20, 2008 C pb' Inf e _ N ork dN pe h d pIY 1 d II d'~1 un Copvri8htu200A Ch rRcldC .Vig_-e Lh 1 IdC lepd po 'h'I~ I h f d Ilrrymcn .pee - fW 4- f "Bb, fl 2002 Aer Iph p phY Pbl' U ain Vi d M1 p'Ih. pie h :df lend ' Id B I' h bl f f p leery c r emrel value, primed by FARlrv Ar~frl8r~ 11 Idam isb W nthe VAS ePlene Coord~ etcm. NAU83. r 1'rvedm~ of day flan mfringemrn~ of rbiN putt in411c~rual pmpe~ty riehu Topoprephie Ipjprnipypn iptiexeQpn 19gQpl~pyf¢mmmeln. NAV29. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.2.d. Subject: Set a Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of an Ordinance Creating the Chippenham Place Community Development Authority County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Set a public hearing for June 25, 2008 to consider adoption of an ordinance creating a community development authority to fund public infrastructure improvements at the Cloverleaf Mall site. Summary of Information: The County has received a petition, which is attached, from the Economic Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield (EDA) to create a Community Development Authority (CDA) on an 83 acre site at Chippenham Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike commonly known as Cloverleaf Mall (the "Property"). A map showing the exact location of the Property is attached as Exhibit B of the Petition. The County has been working with nationally-known developer Crosland Investments, LLC ("Crosland") toward the redevelopment of the Property into a mixed-use development known as Chippenham Place which will include residential, office, retail and other commercial space in accordance with the rezoning of the Property approved by the Board on April 23, 2008. Preparers Tom Jacobson Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director of Revitalization N~ # Ofl0~39 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA On October 18, 2004 and December 27, 2004 the EDA acquired approximately 36.9 acres of property at the mall site for an aggregate purchase price of $8,900,001, and it has a contract to purchase the additional 45.75 acres for a purchase price of $7,250,000. The EDA, the County and Crosland entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement in January 2007 for Crosland to purchase the Property from the EDA. That purchase contract is contingent on the County's providing economic incentive to Crosland; the creation of this CDA would satisfy that contractual contingency. The Petition requests that the County create the CDA for the purpose of financing public infrastructure improvements in the amount of $11.3 million. The improvements to be financed are some or all of the items listed on Exhibit C to the Petition, including improvements such as public roads, public utilities, sidewalks, and landscaping. Once created by the County, the CDA becomes a separate public entity. It will be authorized to fund public infrastructure by issuing tax exempt bonds which may be re-paid by revenue which the County receives as a result of increased real estate and sales tax revenues and real estate assessments on the Property. Although the cost of the public infrastructure improvements to be financed through the CDA is limited to $11,315,100, the Petition requests that the CDA be permitted to issue tax exempt bonds in the maximum aggregate amount of $17,250,000, with the difference of $5,934,900 providing for administrative costs for bond issuance, including a reserve fund, administrative expenses, and certain construction period interest on the bonds. The bonds would be re-paid by revenue which the CDA received from the County, as follows: 1. The Petitioner proposes that the CDA infrastructure be funded by a "tax increment" contribution plan, which would designate certain increased tax revenues generated by increasing property values arising from the development of the property within the District, to finance the cost of the infrastructure. The tax increment contribution plan which the Petitioner is proposing would contribute 1000 of the incremental increase in real property tax revenues collected annually by the County within the District beginning in tax year 2011, and 1000 of all sales tax revenues collected annually by the County within the District. 2. The Petitioner requests that the Board of Supervisors also establish a special assessment upon the property within the District as underlying ~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 AGENDA security for the bonds. The amount of the special assessment, which would be a supplemental lien on property within the District, would be determined annually, with the assistance of a professional administrator, based on the amount of revenue needed in addition to the revenue received from the "tax increment" plan. Financial analysis of the proposal indicates that the projected incremental real estate and sales tax revenues will be sufficient to service the debt on the bonds. Since the CDA is a separate political subdivision which will contract for the construction of the infrastructure and issue its own debt, its obligations will not be deemed to be a general obligation of the County. A CDA may only be created by an ordinance of the Board of Supervisors, after the owners of a majority of land in the proposed district petition the Board to create the CDA. In order to adopt such an ordinance, the Board must hold a public hearing. A copy of a proposed ordinance creating the Chippenham Place CDA is attached. If the Board adopts the ordinance and creates the Chippenham Place CDA, it will need to appoint a Board of Directors to operate the CDA. Staff will propose members for such a Board at the public hearing on the ordinance. In October 2005 the Board adopted proposed criteria for considering petitions to create CDAs, which included the requirement that CDAs be created for major redevelopment projects in areas identified by the county as critical. Staff believes that the Chippenham Place CDA adheres to the criteria adopted by the Board. The Board has previously created two CDAs to finance road improvements: the Watkins Centre CDA was created in 2006 and the Lower Magnolia Green CDA was created in 2007. ~~'~~~ PETITION PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA CODE SECTION 15.2-5153 FOR THE CREATION OF THE CHIPPENHAM PLACE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield (the "Petitioner") is a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia (the "Commonwealth"), duly created under the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act (Chapter 49, Title 15.2, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended) (the "IDA Act") with, among others, the power to acquire, improve, maintain, equip, lease and dispose of "Authority Facilities," as defined in the IDA Act; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner and the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the "County"), have undertaken a program involving the redevelopment of all or a portion of certain real property commonly known as Cloverleaf Mall into amixed-use development that may include residential, office, retail and other commercial space (the "Project"), which is in the public interest of the County and its environs and which benefits the Commonwealth and its citizens by facilitating the public purpose of economic development in the County; and WHEREAS, (i) on October 18, 2004 and December 27, 2004, the Petitioner acquired approximately 36.98 acres of real property in connection with the Project for an aggregate purchase price of $8,900,001 and (ii) pursuant to a certain Real Estate Purchase Agreement dated January 24, 2008, the Petitioner has an option to purchase an additional approximately 45.75 acres of real property in connection with the Project for a purchase price of $7,250,000; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner, the County and Crosland Investments, LLC ("Crosland"), have entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 24, 2007, as amended by a First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 31, 2008 (together, the "Crosland Agreement"), pursuant to which the Petitioner will sell the approximately 82.73 acres of real property described above to Crosland in furtherance of the redevelopment of the Project and pursuant to which Crosland will undertake the redevelopment of the Project; and WHEREAS, on November 22, 2005, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the County, adopted an ordinance in accordance with Virginia Code § 15.2-5152 to assume the power to consider petitions for the creation of local community development authorities; and WHEREAS, Petitioner desires to join with the Board to create a mechanism for the funding of certain infrastructure improvements, facilities and services, including, among others, public roads, public parks and plazas, landscaping, public open spaces, public utilities, parking facilities, wetlands mitigation and storm water management in the area in which its property is located that are necessary to meet the increased demands placed on the County as a result of the commercial, residential and retail activity in and around such development; and WHEREAS, as contemplated by the Crosland Agreement, Petitioner, the County and Crosland have determined that a community development authority (the "CDA") affords the best mechanism for providing such infrastructure improvements, facilities and services within the CDA District as defined below and outlined in Exhibits A and B hereto; and ~~~~~~ WHEREAS, the provision of such infrastructure improvements, facilities and services will facilitate the successful expansion of the County's tax base through increased real property tax revenues, personal property tax revenues, retail sales tax revenues and business and license fee revenues from the expansion of the tax base contemplated within the CDA District; and NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned Petitioner, pursuant to Virginia Code § 15.2-5153, does hereby petition the Board to establish, by resolution pursuant to Virginia Code § 15.2-5155, the CDA. In support of this Petition, Petitioner states as follows: 1. Petitioner and District. Petitioner is (i) the fee simple owner of more than fifty-one percent (51%) of the value of, and (ii) either the fee simple owner or the holder of a purchase right to acquire one hundred percent (100%) of the value and acreage of, all of the real property proposed to be included within the geographic boundaries of the CDA (such real property is herein referred to collectively as the "CDA District"). A list of the parcels to be included within the CDA District is attached to this Petition as Exhibit A and is incorporated herein by this reference. All parcels within the CDA District are located in the northeastern part of the County at the intersection of Midlothian Turnpike and Chippenham Parkway and exclusively within Chesterfield County, Virginia. The CDA District boundaries are shown on the map attached to this Petition as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference, but may be expanded by the Board by subsequent resolution upon petition filed pursuant to state statute. Petitioner requests that the CDA be called the "Chippenham Place Community Development Authority." 2. Description of Infrastructure Facilities and Services. The CDA shall be formed for the purposes of, among other things, acquiring, financing, demolition, constructing, equipping and providing the installation, operation, maintenance (unless dedicated to and accepted by the appropriate governmental entity), replacement, relocation and alteration of all or portions of the infrastructure, facilities and services identified on Exhibit C, including, without limitation, (a) sanitary sewer mains and lines; (b) water mains and lines, pump stations and water storage facilities; (c) storm sewer mains and lines; (d) landscaping and related site improvements; (e) parking facilities; (f) sidewalks and walkway paths; (g) storm water management and retention systems (including best management practices, water quality devices and erosion and sediment control); (h) lighting (including street and decorative lights in public rights of way); (i) street and directional signage; (j) wetlands mitigation; (k) roads, curbs and gutters; (1) public park and plaza facilities; (m) open space areas; and (n) any and all facilities and services appurtenant to the above including the acquisition of land (collectively, all such existing and new public roads, utilities, facilities and services hereinafter, the "Infrastructure"). The CDA may contract for and incur all necessary expenses to accomplish the above and all related purposes, and all such operating expenses of the CDA, including, without limitation, administrative, underwriting, accounting, engineering and legal (all collectively hereinafter "the Operation of the CDA"), shall be included within the scope of any bonds issued by the CDA. The CDA may perform or cause to be performed all work necessary to accomplish these purposes, including, without limitation, right-of--way and easement acquisition, permitting, and/or relocation of existing utilities. 3. Description of Provision and Financin¢ of Infrastructure and Operation of the CDA. The Infrastructure shall be constructed by the CDA upon availability of funding. As set forth in Paragraph 2 above, the CDA may contract for all services required for the Operation of the CDA and providing of the Infrastructure. The County and the CDA may contract with each other and with other parties necessary or desirable for the Operation of the CDA and providing of the Infrastructure or services directly related to the Operation of the CDA. The proposed plan for the Operation of the CDA and for the provision of the Infrastructure within the CDA District is as follows: (a) The CDA may issue revenue bonds for the Operation of the CDA and for the provision of the Infrastructure or any portion thereof, and for the administrative and other authorized costs and expenses of issuing such bonds and performing the work necessary to provide the Infrastructure or any portion thereof. The bonds shall be payable solely from revenues received by the CDA and shall be in an estimated maximum amount of $17,250,000. (b) Petitioner proposes that the CDA request the Board to establish a special assessment upon the CDA District to finance the Infrastructure and the Operation of the CDA as provided in § 15.2-5158(A)(5). (c) Petitioner proposes that the CDA request the Board approve a tax increment contribution plan, using certain increased tax revenues generated by the development of the property within the CDA District, to finance all or a portion of the cost of the Infrastructure and the Operation of the CDA, with such tax increment contribution plan expiring following the repayment of the proposed bonds. 4. Expected Benefits from the Provision of Proposed Infrastructure and the Operation of the CDA. The provision of the Infrastructure and the Operation of the CDA will facilitate the County's efforts to attract new business and economic development to the County in furtherance of the County's business development strategy. The Infrastructure and the Operation of the CDA are necessary to meet the increased demands placed upon the County as a result of the development within the CDA District. The development of the area within the CDA District, which would be enabled by the Infrastructure and the Operation of the CDA, will enhance the County's tax base by increasing tax revenues and by increasing the value of the real property within the CDA District. 5. Members of the CDA. The CDA shall have five members appointed by the Board pursuant to Virginia Code § 15.2-5113. Members shall serve four-year staggered terms. 6. Duration/Abolition of the CDA. The CDA may be abolished at any time by appropriate action of the Board, provided that no such abolition shall occur while any CDA obligation remains outstanding. Furthermore, it is contemplated that the CDA shall continue to exist beyond the retirement of all of its obligations to the extent necessary and/or appropriate for the continued operation of the CDA. 7. Waiver. The Petitioner intends to provide a waiver of the thirty (30) day period to withdraw its signature from this Petition as provided in Virginia Code § 15.2-5156B. ACCORDINGLY, for the reasons above, and in reliance upon the assurances and covenants set out herein, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board establish the Chippenham Place Community Development Authority for the purposes set forth in this Petition. IN WITNESS HEREOF, Petitioner has executed this Petition pursuant to due authority this day day of , 2008. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD By:_ Name: Title: The foregoing Petition was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2008 by as of the Economic Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield. My Commission expires: Notary Public Exhibits: Exhibit A -List of Parcels by Tax Map Number Exhibit B -Map of CDA District Exhibit C -Description of Proposed Infrastructure -4- ~~®~~~ EXHIBIT A LIST OF PARCELS BY TAX MAP NUMBER 764-705-8227-00000 764-706-8861-00001 765-706-4170-00000 765-706-1010-00001 764-706-3159-00001 764-707-6112-00001 765-705-5781-00000 765-705-4651-00000 765-705-7651-00000 765-705-7962-00000 765-706-8068-00000 765-707-6600-00000 765-706-8842-00000 765-706-6964-00000 764-706-3159-00002 764-705-6668-00000 764-705-3864-00000 764-706-8861-00002 765-706-1010-00002 764-707-6112-00002 765-704-2693-00000 A-1 ~~'~~°"~~i EXHIBIT B MAP B-1 EXHIBIT C DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE Water lines and fire hydrants Sanitary sewer lines Storm sewer lines, stormwater detention basins, water quality best management practice facilities, erosion and sediment control and water quality devices Public roads, curb and gutter Sidewalks, walking paths Street trees on public right of way Landscaping on public right of way and public property (BMPs, etc). Street lights and decorative lights on public right of way Public plaza Public parks Public open spaces Land acquisition Preliminary total cost including contingencies $17,546,455.00 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY ENACTING SECTIONS 9-250, 9-251, 9-252, 9-253, 9-254, 9-255, 9-256, AND 9-257 RELATING TO THE CREATION OF THE CHIPPENHAM PLACE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia (the "Board"), has received a petition (the "petition") from the Economic Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield (the "Petitioner") for the creation of the Chippenham Place Community Development Authority (the "CDA"), and the Petitioner has represented that it owns more than 51 % of the value of all of the land within the proposed CDA district; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held on June 25, 2008 by the Board on the adoption of this Ordinance and notice has been duly provided as set forth in §15.2-1427 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and §§15.2-5104 and 15.2-5156 of the Virginia Water and Waste Authorities Act, Chapter 51, Title 15.2, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, the Board proposes to create the CDA in order to provide the infrastructure improvements, facilities and services described in the Petition; and WHEREAS, the creation of the CDA to assist in financing the infrastructure, improvements and services in connection with the redevelopment of all or a portion of certain real property commonly known as Cloverleaf Mall into a mixed use development that may include residential, office, retail and other commercial space (the "project") which will benefit the citizens of the County by promoting increased employment opportunities, strengthening the economic base and increasing tax revenues, and will meet the demands placed on the County as a result of the commercial, residential and retail activity in and around the project; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner has waived in writing the right to withdraw its signature from the Petition in accordance with § 15.2-5156 of the Act. (1) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY that Sections 9-250, 9-251, 9-252, 9-253, 9-254, 9-255, 9-256, and 9-257 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are enacted to read as follows: Section 9-250. Creation of Authority. The Chippenham Place Community Development Authority is hereby created as a political subdivision in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Virginia Water and Waste Authorities Act, Chapter 51, Title 15.2, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended (the "Act"). The CDA shall have the powers set forth in the Act. Section 9-251. Boundaries of the CDA. The CDA boundaries shall initially include the property containing 82.73 acres, more or less, identified in Exhibit A, attached hereto and presented to the Board of Supervisors (the "CDA district"). In accordance with § 15.2-5157 of ~Q~~°~~ 2723:78855.1 the Act, a copy of this Ordinance shall be recorded in the land records of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County for each tax map parcel within the CDA district as such CDA district exists at the time of issuance of the CDA's bonds (the "bonds") and the CDA district shall be noted on the land records of the county. The Board of Supervisors may release or exclude from the CDA District before or after the issuance of the Bonds certain de minimis portions of land not to exceed approximately two acres. The CDA may release and exclude from the CDA District parcels of land with respect to which all special assessments have been paid or prepaid. Section 9-252. Facilities and Services. The CDA is created for the purpose of exercising the powers set forth in the Act, including acquiring, financing, constructing and developing, and owning and maintaining, if necessary, certain infrastructure improvements, facilities and services in connection with the development of a mixed-used development that may include residential, office, retail, and other commercial space (the "project") as described in the petition and the articles of incorporation described below. The CDA shall not provide services which are provided by, or obligated to be provided by, any authority already in existence pursuant to the Act unless such authority provides the certification required by § 15.2- 5155 of the Act. Section 9-253. Articles of Incorporation. Attached hereto as Exhibit B and presented to the Board of Supervisors at the time of the adoption of this Ordinance are the proposed articles of incorporation of the CDA. The county administrator is authorized and directed to execute and file such articles of incorporation on behalf of the Board with the State Corporation Commission in substantially the form attached as Exhibit B with such changes, including insubstantial changes to the boundary description of the CDA district described therein, as the county administrator may approve. The county administrator is authorized to approve such other changes or corrections to the articles of incorporation prior to filing with the State Corporation Commission as do not change the purpose or function of the CDA as set forth in this article and in the petition. Section 9-254. Capital Cost Estimates. The Board hereby finds, in accordance with § 15.2-5103(B) of the Act, that it is impracticable to include capital cost estimates, project proposals, and project service rates, except as preliminarily summarized in the petition. Section 9-255. Membership of the Authority. (a) The powers of the CDA shall be exercised by an authority board consisting of five (5) members. (b) All members of the CDA board shall be appointed by the Board of Supervisors in accordance with the provisions of § 15.2-5113 of the Act. (c) The initial members of the CDA board shall be as set forth in the articles of incorporation for the terms set forth herein. (d) Each CDA board member shall receive such compensation for his or her services as a CDA board member as may be authorized from time to time by resolution of the CDA board, provided that no member shall receive compensation in excess of $300 per meeting attended unless authorized by resolution of the Board. 2723:78855.1 2 ~' ~ ~ ~J`~ Section 9-256. Plan of Finance; Issuance of Bonds. (a) The infrastructure improvements, facilities, services and operations to be undertaken by the CDA as described herein and in the petition shall be funded from all or some of the following sources: (i) bonds to be issued by the CDA; (ii) special assessments to be levied pursuant to § 15.2-5158(A)(5) of the Act, (iii) contributions made by the County of certain incremental tax revenues generated within the CDA district as more particularly described in the petition and as shall be more specifically identified in a memorandum of understanding to be entered into by the CDA, the county, the petitioners and the initial developer or developers, as the case may be, of the project and (iv) any other source of funding available to the CDA including rates, fees and charges to be levied by the CDA for the services and facilities provided or funded by the CDA and any other appropriations, grants, contributions or financial assistance that the CDA receives from other governmental entities. (b) The CDA shall engage a professional administrator to prepare, with the assistance of the county, an assessment roll for all parcels of land within the CDA district. Such administrator will annually prepare a report which details the amount of the special assessment owed by the owner of each parcel of land within the CDA district. (c) The bonds to be issued by the CDA will not exceed a maximum aggregate amount of $17,250,000, and will have a final maturity not later than December 31, 2039. The bonds shall be issued as soon as can practically be achieved and the proceeds from the sale of bonds will be used to pay the costs, all or a portion as funds will allow, of the infrastructure improvements, facilities and services as described herein and in the petition, the costs of issuing the bonds, any required reserves and the interest on the bonds for a period of up to thirty (30) months after the issuance of the bonds. (d) Any bonds issued by the CDA or any other financing arrangements entered into by the CDA will be debt of the CDA, will not be a debt or other obligation of the county and will not constitute a pledge of the faith and credit of the county. Section 9-257. Recordation of Ordinance. In accordance with § 15.2-5157 of the Act, the board hereby directs the clerk of the circuit court of the county to record a copy of this Ordinance in its land records for each tax map parcel included in the CDA district and to note the existence of the CDA district on the land records of the county. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. ~~~~~~. 2723:78855.1 3 ~_«~~, .~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.3. Subject: Award a Consulting Contract to Moseley Architects for a Feasibility and Programming Study for the Future Chesterfield County Public Safety Headquarters Building County Administrator's Comments: minis Board Action Requested: Authorize the County Administrator to execute a contract with Moseley Architects in the amount of $163,765 for a feasibility and programming study for a future public safety headquarters building. Summary of Information: Moseley Architects was unanimously chosen out of a field of nine firms by the evaluation committee consisting of members of the Police and Fire Departments and Capital Projects Management to perform a feasibility and programming study leading to the future construction of a public safety headquarters building on the Chesterfield County Government Complex. It is envisioned that this facility will house the headquarters staffs of the Police, Fire and Sheriff's Departments. The study will determine overall size of the building, space requirements per department and ancillary functions, land necessary for the building and parking, adjacencies within the facility, potential space for a county emergency operations center and provide budget estimates for inclusion in future Capital Improvement Programs. This fee consists of a base contract of $146,003 plus an additional $17,762 allocated for follow-up interviews if necessary. Should more than one full site evaluation be necessary, an appropriate change order will be executed based on the fixed price for site evaluations in the base contract. Preparers Rob Key Title: Director Department of General Services Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No # ~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _-~.~ ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 r~ AGENDA ~~ y ~h_.~ Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board award a consulting contract to Moseley Architects for a programming study for a public safety building in the amount of $163,765. The FY2008 Amended Capital Improvement Program appropriated $250,000 to address a feasibility study for this facility. Therefore, funds are available for this award. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management 00~0~~ Y ~.;~; hRc~NU±~ Meeting Date: Subject: 28, 2008 Page 1 of 2 Item Number: 8.C.4. Transfer $5,000 from the Midlothian District Improvement Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to Purchase and Install Landscaping in Virginia Department of Transportation Right-of-Way Along West Winterfield Road County Administrator's Comments• County Administrator: Board Action Requested- The Board is requested to transfer $5,000 from the Midlothian District Improvement Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to purchase and install landscaping in VDOT right-of-way along West Winterfield Road. Summary of Information- Mr. Gecker has requested the Board to transfer $5,000 from the Midlothian District Improvement Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to purchase and install landscaping in VDOT right-of-way along West Winterfield Road. The southern portion of Winterfield Road, which now contains two severe 90° turns, has recently been redesigned to eliminate those turns. To straighten the road, however, it will need to connect with an existing subdivision road known as West Winterfield Road. This connection will significantly increase the volume of traffic on West Winterfield Road. Area neighbors have requested assistance from the County to install landscaping within the West Winterfield Road right of way to act as a buffer from this increased traffic. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title:_ Director, Budget and Management 0425(00):78496.1 Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA This request was initially made by Winterfield Station Homeowners' Association. The County cannot transfer public funds to homeowners' associations. The County may use public funds for landscaping which improves public property and benefits the driving public generally. Under this proposal, landscaping will be installed on VDOT property along the roadway (see attached plat) and all proposed materials will meet VDOT's Clear Zone Criteria. Since the County cannot make donations to a homeowners' association, the $5,000 must be transferred to the Parks and Recreation Department and the Department must hire a landscaping contractor pursuant to the Virginia Public Procurement Act and pay the contractor directly. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. ~ ~. DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLJCATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. 1. What is the name f the applicant (person o org nization) making this funding req`u'est? CRi~ ~R`~t"2 - ova b~~~~ ~' l ~c.~•rt~cz-~:e ~C~. ~.Tf 2. If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application. I~o,nk; O~vv~ts. ~-ssor ; are o-.~ ~~ 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? ~ 5 :~ 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. 1 1L`~sL S~ r~L1C6~n ~`~Gh,~3~T- T 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? NO 63533.1 Page 1 ~ j~ ~~ 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes ~ No Is the organization non-profit? Yes ~ No Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes No 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? t`'lZ3 (v ~ M~S~ !'-A-N 9. What is the telephone number, fax number, a-mail address of the applicant? ~-a ~ S rSLt 3'Z C~ 3zt~ Gc; ~L g~-{ y 3 z. S ~ -i.. ~ r- Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairman/director or vice-chairman of the organization. ~~~~ ~~ Signature Title (if signing on behalf of an organization) Printed Name _ ~ A~tZc-~ ~o ~ Z.OD Date 63533.1 Page 2 ~~^~ ~~ ~1~~~~ EXHIBIT I DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION Question #4 The existing Winterfield Road will be re-directed through Winterfield Station sometime this year. The road will run North to South through our community. In addition to the sidewalks that have been approved for our community, the residents are funding a $68,000 capital improvement program. The funds that we are requesting will be applied to a landscaping budget that currently stands at $31,000. The budget for this item has been expanded since we received the enclosed quotation from Stockner's Nurseries. The funds will be applied to landscaping needs that will not be placed on private property. The plantings will be in the VDOT right of way, behind the sidewalks. ~l~l ~~~~~~~ ~~, i' ~~ ' ~~ I I i 1 I ~.. . _ ,~~ I ~~ ~~ ~l 1 1 1~ I ~N I ! I I [~nn 1 Cy N I W cv ' ~& I 1 i I ~-. ~, ~ ~ ~~/ ~ ./ 1 ~~ i I i I N 1 ~I i i I I ~r"~ I I J ~ I ~ I N I I I ~\ I I i I 1 I ~_~_. ------ I 1 ~ I ~ ,, ~ O ~ ~~'~fY ~ ~« I yy __ / ^\ I~N ice' \~~ I _~ I 1 I ~I CCl' f I~1 ~I F,I M~~ II 1i ~. ,_~ .' I ., JJ M I J~ I J~ i A VI I N~ I o I Y I I a~I I ~, `.~~, .,\`\ _ t} \~ ` i / ~' I ~ i _J /% 1 I ,~ . I ~.~ I ~ I ~ i I ~ j I ~' ~ i I / ~ i ~ i ~/' ~ ~ ~ i ~~/~ i ~ ~' 4 ~. I ~,/ J 1 ., ~ I I ~.I --~---' ~ ~~ \ ~ ~ I\ \ 1 1 \ \ 1 ` \ ~ ~~ I ~ \ Q I \ J I i 1 . \ 1 ~ \ I 1 \ I \ i 1 I I 1 \ I \ 1 I \ \ I \ I \ I 1 I \ \ \ \ I \ e r ~ \ I ~ A I ~ \ 4 I~ . ^ \ I 1 \ 1 1 \ I ~ \ A' 1 ~ I ' \ t}' i f 1 1 , 1 I I \ / // / ~~ ~ ~J •\`~ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ \ ~ '\\ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ~ ~~' -~!NGINU'~ . Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.5. Subject: Initiate Conditional Use Planned Development Application for Millside Subdivision to Omit Required Setbacks for Structures Open on Three Sides County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Initiate a Conditional Use Planned Development relative to setback requirements for structures open on three sides for Millside Subdivision (See attached list of Tax IDs). Additionally, waive the disclosure requirements and appoint Joe Feest, Planning Administrator, as the Board's Agent. Summary of Information: Ms. Jaeckle has requested that the Board initiate this application. Recently, it was discovered that many residents in the Millside subdivision placed structures on their properties that are in violation of Ordinance required setbacks. Staff visited the project to determine the nature and frequency of the placement of these structures. Staff, found no clear detriment to the community by allowing structures open on three sides to continue to be located or placed on these lots without meeting the required setbacks. Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Planning Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ~~ ~~-~~ Attachment Properties in Millside Property Inquiry # GPIN OWNERNAME ADDRESS 1 ' ...801`6295969 E & L PROPERTIES LLC 17106 LANSMILL DR 2 8016295975 BEVILLE ROY C & BEVILLE C B 17104 LANSMILL DR 3 801B~95980 B~t.L Lt3t1fS H JR 8 BARBARA G 1'7102 LANSMILL DR 4 8016296087 BLACKISTON KELLY A & J F JR 17100 LANSMILL DR 5 I3E}6296094 <5ULLIVAN MICHAEL S SR 17012 LANSMILL DR 6 8016297686 MALAK MAGDI M & SHIRLEY F 17101 LANSMILL DR 7 80182'98170 DAVIDSON HAZEL D 17105 LANSMILL DR 8 8016298175 KUEHN COURTNEY RENE 17103 LANSMILL DR 9 80.16298385 LANHAM GROUP. LLC 2309 SVtifIF7 BLUFF DR 10 8016298984 OWEN BRENDA L 2307 SWIFT BLUFF DR 11 801629155 GRAY JOt~IN LAROCHE SR & CAROL D 17108 S SW1FT BLUFF CT 12 8016299162 OVERBEY ALBERT E 17106 S SWIFT BLUFF CT 13 8018299483 KIDD CHARLES E ESTATE 2305 SWIFT BLUFF DR 14 8016299546 KING ARTHUR L & BRIGETTE M 17110 S SWIFT BLUFF CT 15 8016299669 BRANNON ROSE B 17104 S SWIFT BLUFF CT 16 8016299675 ALKIRE MILDRED V 17102 S SWIFT BLUFF CT 1T' 8016306104 PFfSTER GARY L i~ MARION E 17010 LANSMILL DR 18 8016306213 TYLER PATRICIA B 17006 LANSMILL DR 19 801fi306318 ASTON LINDA K 17004 LANSMILL DR 20 8016306325 BECK GLORIA J 17002 LANSMILL DR 21 80tfi306330 ELLfS L W JR 17000 LANSMILL DF2 22 8016306337 HOWLETT SYLVIA S 16908 LANSMILL DR 23 8(116306#43 GAGLIANO MARION 16906 LANSMILL DR 24 8016306449 PALMQUIST COLLEEN F 16904 LANSMILL DR 25 80'f630fi555 GREGORY DAVID W 16902 LANSMILL DR 26 8016306565 KARGER RONALD C 16900 LANSMILL DR 27 801`."6308101 BUCHANAN MONTGOMERY L & D L 17011 LANSMILL 13R 28 8016308205 PHILBRICK ANNABELLE B & JOHN S 17009 LANSMILL DR 29 801`63(18211 ~3UNf~ RALPH L JR & JOYCE H 17007 LANSMILL DR 30 8016308317 FERGUSON MICHAEL W & P B 17005 LANSMILL DR 31 8016308324 CASBEER ANNE G TRUSTEE 17003 LANSMILL DR 32 8016308429 SMITH RICHARD W & BRENDA J 17001 LANSMILL DR 33 8018308435 STIrADMAN JOSEPH L 16909 LANSMILL Dft 34 8016308442 TATE DAVID M & ROBERTA E 16907 LANSMILL DR 35 •80163086~t8 BOGAN JAMES JR 16905 LANSMILL DR 36 8016308554 LEBEL ROBERT G & JUDITH R 16903 LANSMILL DR 37 8016308660 GOC)LSBY BONNIE M & TONEY R L 6901 LANSMILL DR 38 8016309104 GARDNER JOHN T 2306 SWIFT BLUFF DR 39 8016309414 POWELL ROBERT J & MARIAN S 17006 N SWIFT BLUFF CT 40 8016309421 HENSON JAMES W & KRAMER EDNA M 17004 N SWIFT BLUFF CT 41 8016309529 HALL PATRICIA B 17002 N SWIFT BLUFF CT 42 8016309543 LEPELLEY JOHN L & PATRICIA L 2215 CIRCLESTONE CT 43 8016309552 HAYES SHEILA M 2214 CIRCLESTONE CT 44 8016309703 DAHLVIG RANDALL D & TERESA 2304 SWIFT BLUFF DR 45 I~0262901&4 HOWARD FRED E JR 2303 SWtfT BLUFF DR 46 8026290343 RANDOLPH JERRY L JR & C D 17112 S SWIFT BLUFF CT 47 8026290782 TYLER HAROLD J 2301 SWIFT BLUFF' DR 48 8026291147 JOHNSON CONNIE E & MICHAEL D 17111 S SWIFT BLUFF CT 50 8026291660 TRUMP JAMES D 17107 S SWIFT BLUFF CT 51 8026291867 GWALTNEY EDITH G 17105..5 SWIFT BLUFF CT 52 8028291$82 TRACKER MARTHA E 2207 SWIFT BLUFF DR 53 8026291997 DANIEL JAMES E JR & HELEN A 17009 N SWIFT BLUFF CT -54 ` - 8026292D72 CLARK JOSEPH E & ANNA M 17103 S SWIFT $LUFI= GT 55 8026292381 CUTHRELL JACK L & ELISABETH 2205 SWIFT BLUFF DR . :56 ~ 802924.96 FRAIL ,,tOHN D ~ CAROL A 2204 SWIFT BLUFF DR 57 8026292981 WATKINS FRANCIS T & BEVERLY F 2203 SWIFT BLUFF DR 58! 84262~J3196 MCCUNE ,JEFFREY A ' 2202 S~11/IFT BLUFF DR 59 8026293580 BERRY MICHAEL KEITH 2201 SWIFT BLUFF DR 60; 8428293696 SEAY ETHER M 17014 FIALA DR ' 61 8026294779 RIPCHICK ANTHONY PHILLIP 2105 SWIFT BLUFF DR 62 8026295194 WH1TT RAYMOND 17015 FIALA DR 63 8026295379 DEANS ROBERT E SR & DELORES D 2103 SWIFT BLUFF DR 84 8E195979 ~ C1ENNiS MAM1E EARLINE 2101 SWIFT BLUFF DR 65 8026296576 ROBINSON BILLY F & PATRICIA M 2017 SWIFT BLUFF DR 86 8026296770 HOA~lt~N~1 MICHAEL C & MARY .JANE 2015 SWIFT BLUFF DR 67 8026296792 MCINTYRE LORI A 2001 CIRCLESTONE CT 68 8028296997 SUTTON JEANETTE C 2005 CIRCLESTONE CT 69 8026297064 NESTER NANCY B 2013 SWIFT BLUFF DR 70 8(}26297359 HAYES MARY S 2011 SWIFT BLUFF t3R 71 8026297553 WHITLOCK HAROLD W & JOAN M 2009 SWIFT BLUFF DR 72 8~26298't82 S"IDELL C A & HACKLEYA D 2018 SWIFT BLUFf DR 73 8026298778 SEYMOUR GEORGE R & ALVERDA A 2014 SWIFT BLUFF DR 74 8f326Z98$72 ~#NS ANDREW F 8~ MARY P 2012 SWIFT BLUFF DR 75 8026298889 POWERS DONALD E 2002 CIRCLESTONE CT 78 $028298,995 QRIMO VW H 8~ ORiNO JANE C TRS 2004 CIRCLESTONE CT 77 8026299066 DEANS ROBERT E SR TRUSTEE 2010 SWIFT BLUFF DR 78 802829936/ WALL DANIEL E 2008 SWIFT BLUFF DR 79 8026300238 LOVE MILTON E JR & SHERRY K 2213 CIRCLESTONE CT 80 8026300303 ADKINS SHIRLEY D 2302SWIFT BLUFF DR 81 8026300358 PRUITT JIMMY M & MARGIE A 2212 CIRCLESTONE CT 82 8026300511 - PORTER JAMES B 17008 N SWIFT BLUFF CT 83 8026300827 TOMLINSON FRANKLIN K & JENNY S 17000 N SWIFT BLUFF CT 84' 81326303 St~CK1STON JAMES F JR 8 K A' 17010 N SWIFT BLUFF CT 85 8026300938 BEROT ROBERT N 2211 CIRCLESTONE CT 86 8026301055 LEW#~ NORMAN L 8~ DORIS C 2210 CIRCLESTONE CT 87 8026301526 ROCKETT REBA K 17001 N SWIFT BLUFF CT 8$ 802830.1.637 TYLER JOSEPH H JR 8~ PAYE L 2209 CIRCLESTONE CT 89 8026301654 LEWIS NORMAN L & DORIS C 2208 CIRCLESTONE CT - -90 8028302215 DEAS MARJORIE L 17005 N SWIFT BLUFF CT 91 8026302237 JOHNSON WANDA E 2207 CIRCLESTONE CT 92 "8026302254' WALES GARY 2206 CIRCLESTONE CT 93 8026302309 BARKER HUGH L &PATRICIA 17007 N SWIFT BLUFF CT 94 80263x2423 WALES DENNIS M SR 17003 N SWIFT BLUFF CT. 95 8026302736 BASHAM ELLEN S 2205 CIRCLESTONE CT 96 80283{12852 MARKEL THOMAS R & PETERS W M 2204 CIRCLESTONE CT 97 8026303336 STELL LURAY W 2203 CIRCLESTONE CT 98 - 80263032 BOLTON JOSEPW 2202 CIRCLESTONE CT 99 8026303508 KISER WILLIAM 17010 FIALA DR 101 8026303520 EDENS MARTIN D & UTE 17006 FIALA DR 102 8026303$28 SMITH JACKIE H & NADA L 17004 FIALA f3R 103 8026304035 STIGALL ROBERT E JR 2201 CIRCLESTONE GT 104 8026304052 PEARSON JUDITH 2200 CIRCLESTONE CT -105 ~ 8425304551 ~ HAWKS TIFFANY MARIE 2118 CIRCLESTONE CT 106 8026305101 HARRIS DANIEL 17013 FIALA DR 107 8026305160 PEARSON LOUIS L & BETTY C 2107 PINE FOREST DR 108 8026305206 FORD ARTHUR W & DEBRA F 17011 FIALA DR 109 8026305251 RIDGEWAY DOUGLAS W JR & TERRI 2116 CIRCLESTONE CT 110 8026305312 BLAND JAMES V JR & JUNE J 17009 FIALA DR 111 8x26305318 PEEPER DUNCAN C 17007 FIALA DR 112 8026305324 KELLY JAMES G JR & RUBY J 17005 FIALA DR 113 8026305430 THOMAS HARVEY L JR & MARY M 17003 FIALA DR 114 8026305436 PARKER JOYCE M 17001 FIALA DR 115` 80283Q5851 NEATROUR VINCENT E 2114 CIRCLESTONE CT 116 8026306550 BROOKS EILEEN C 2112 CIRCLESTONE CT 117`" 8426306711 KEGLEY DOROTHY M 2009 CIRCLEST~NIr CT 118 8026306731 WENDT CAROL L 2107 CIRCLESTONE CT 1925:72175.1 119 80253068~?5 120 8026306816 '#~21 80263iJ6823 122 8026307248 1F23 80~63t37744 124 8026308239 125 8{3263U9733 126 8026308826 127 80263Q89C31 128 8026308907 -129 802686913 130 8026308919 LANDERS MICHAEL J PELLETIER ALICIA M BARNES GEORGE C HICKS RUTH F SHUTT ,LAMES I SR $ SHIRLEY M MARSHALL R M TRUSTEE ROBINSON JENNIFER L BREEDEN JAMES E & HAWKES P A O#~Vb 1~-1i 8~ ORINC3 JANE C TRS NELMS LESLIE J ANTfS ANDREA ET AL TRAIL PARLEY E SR & MARGARET L 2007 CfRCL1=STONE CT 2011 CIRCLESTONE CT 2101 CIRCIESTONE CT 2110 CIRCLESTONE CT 2108 CIRCLESTONE CT 2106 CIRCLESTONE CT 2104 CIRCLESTONE CT 2102 CIRCLESTONE CT 2006 CIRCLESTONE CT 2008 CIRCLESTONE CT 2010 CIRCLESTONE CT 2100 CIRCLESTONE CT 1925:72175.1 ~~~ N .~ Q I ~--+ U Q a~ ~L f+ L N c N G = .~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ N ~ ~ N m .a o J N M r -. i ~~ tI ~, .f ~/ ~{ -~ ! ~ o a~ -a ~ t ~_ • ~ O ~N ~ Q N CZC C (~~~~~~ - CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~r,~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 10 y~RCle/~~'~ AGENDA Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.6. Subiect: Request for a Music/Entertainment Festival Permit for the Audra M. Green Music For A Cause Foundation Event on May 31, 2008 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to grant a request for a music/entertainment festival permit for the Audra M. Green Music For A Cause Foundation event on May 31, 2008. Summary of Information: Audra M. Green Music For A Cause Foundation ("Foundation") proposes to conduct an outdoor music concert event ("Concert") on the grounds of the Dale Ruritan Club which is located on Ironbridge Road near Chippenham Parkway. The Concert will open at 11:00 a.m. Music will begin at 12:00 p.m. and end at 8:30 p.m. The list of artists scheduled to perform is attached. It is anticipated that approximately 500 people will attend the Concert. Preparers Steven L. Micas Title: County Attorney 0505(00):78306.1 Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No QO~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 10 AGENDA The Foundation is both the applicant and event promoter. The Concert is a fundraiser for the Foundation which focuses on three program areas: youth with HIV/AIDS, youth-on-youth violence and teen pregnancy. The Foundation will make food, water and soft drinks available by mobile vendors who have been issued permits by the Health Department. The Dale Ruritan Club has adequate restroom facilities. The Foundation has proposed sufficienet clean-up and trash disposal. There is ample parking and off-duty police officers will assist with parking, crowd control and other security needs. Emergency medical and fire department officials are aware of the event and will be available to render service. The music/entertainment arrangements have been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and meet the substantive requirements of the ordinance. These arrangements provide adequate measures to insure public safety, fire prevention, medical protection, sanitation, traffic control, insurance coverage, relevant permits and security. Although the Board of Supervisors may require a bond to insure compliance with the permit, the Board traditionally has not required a bond except when the event occurs on County property. Staff recommends that the Board not require a bond. 0505(00): 78772.1 ~+D~~~G ~i' Audra 9K. green JKusic For.,4l Cause Foundation 11824 Brentwood Arbor Ct. Chester, Virginia 23831 (804) 852-1624 May 6, 2008 Stylian P. Parthemos Senior Assistant County Attorney Chesterfield County Admistration Building, Room 503 P. O. Box 40 Chesterfield, VA 23832 Dear Mr. Parthemos: The Audra M. Green Music For A Cause Foundation, which is located at 11824 Brentwood Arbor Ct, Chester, VA is both the applicant and the event promoter. We will receive all net proceeds generated by the concert event. The concert event is a fundraiser for the Foundation which focuses on three program areas: youth with HIV/AIDS, youth- on-youth violence and teen pregnancy. We plan to hold aone-day family-oriented event on May 31, 2008 on the grounds of the Dale Ruritan Club, located on Ironbridge Rd at Chippenham Pkwy. The property is owned by the Dale Ruritan Club. Gates will open at 11:00 with music beginning at 12:00 PM and ending at 8:30 PM. Music For A Cause is assuming full financial responsibility for the Concert. A list of the artists that are scheduled to appear and perform during the series is attached along with a copy of the ticket of admission. We anticipate being able to admit 500 individuals into the concert area. Admission will be $5.00 for all attendees if purchased in advance and $10 if purchased at the gate. The Dale Ruritan Club has adequate male and female restroom facilities. Clean-up and post-concert trash disposal will be provided by volunteers of the Music For A Cause Foundation under the supervision of Lewis Anderson. We have 8 volunteers who will remove trash bags from the on-site receptacles every 90 minutes and loaded on to the volunteer trash pickup trucks. Two disposal runs will occur during the event. Trash will be taken to the Chesterfield Waste Convenience Center on Landfill Rd off Ironbridge Rd. prior to the 6:00 pm closing of the center. The final disposal will occur the morning following the event. Volunteers will be on-site and assigned to trash detail through-out the entire event. Lodging will not be a necessity for this event. Food, water and soft drinks will be provided by mobile vendors who have been issued a permit to offer such products. We have alerted the Chesterfield County Fire Department of our event and we are in the process of alerting the Bensely-Bermuda Rescue Squad as well. We will work with our Security officers in the event of an emergency to notify the proper emergency medical personnel. Adequate parking facilities are available on the grounds of the Ruritan Club. Arrangements have also been made with J.G. Henning Elementary School for any overflow parking. Our event is on Saturday and will not interfere with parking space that would be used by school staff and visitors during their regular hours. Outdoor lighting will be utilized only on the stage area to accommodate the needs of the performers. Said lights will be under the direct control of Louis Smith of LAJ Entertainment, Inc. The illumination will not extend beyond the property boundaries. Music, both taped and live, will be played in such a manner that the sound emanating will not constitute a nuisance to adjacent property owners. All sound issues are under the direct control of our sound engineer and staging director, Louis Smith of LAJ Entertainment Inc. We have contacted the Chesterfield County Police Department to employ off-duty officers who will oversee parking, crowd control and all other security components of our event. Music For A Cause is obtaining a $1,000,000 liability insurance policy to insure against injury or damage. The policy will be in place two weeks prior to the event. Statements authorizing Chesterfield County principals to enter the property during our concert event are attached herewith. Our application fee is attached. ~~~~~~ I trust that the above information is adequate to meet the county's requirements for approval of our Entertainment Festival Permit. Please do not hesitate to call with any questions. Sincerely, Myron R. Green Community Relations Director (~®~~~~ Performers for the Music For A Cause Outdoor Concert Audra Ellis Uniques Brandon Waller DeFakto Ladel McNair GMGB The Scholars Mike and MacKenzie Lou E Millz Prophet Bruce Waller Kevin Holt Truth City Lew Anderson Kashe Ulito Trew Aron Jefferson Toine Virgil Brown Mic Jordan Nickelus F LoveJoi 4 Brothers ®~0~~~ Dale Ruritan Club Route 10, Ironbridge Rd C~ Chippenham Rd Chesterfield, VA (804) 852-1624 Food & Merchandise Vendors on Site General Admission No. 039+0 MD Management and Audra -DIVA of wlrginia present... Music For A Cause An Outdoor Concert Saturday, May 31, 2008 Concert Time:12 - 8 PM PROCEEDS BENEFYT TfdE Gate opens at 11:OOAM Music For A Cause Foundation 65.00 in advance, 3~o at the gate Audra JK. green 9Kuric ForA Cause Foundation 11824 Brentwood Arbor Ct. Chester, Virginia 23831 (804) 852-1624 May 6, 2008 Stylian P. Parthemos Senior Assistant County Attorney Cheste~eld County Admistration Building, Room 503 P. O. Box 40 Chesterfield, VA 23832 Dear Mr. Parthemos: The Audra M. Green Music For A Cause Foundation (MFAC), which is located at 11824 Brentwood Arbor Ct, Chester, VA has lease The Dale Ruritan Foundation, Inc property located at 5101 Ruritan Place, Richmond, VA 23234 for a fundraiser event. The event is a family oriented event. The MFAC Foundation provides programs and services in support of youth with HIV/AIDS, teen pregnancy and training and programs promoting youth non-violence. The police, including Alcoholic Beverage Control Officers have the right to enter the property during this event. No alcohol will be served during this event. The event is scheduled from 12:OOpm - 8:30 pm. Sincerely, t ~~ ~/~` Myron R. Green Community Relations Director ~~~~'~ LEASE/AGREEMENT OF THE DALE RURITAN FOUNDATION, INC. PROPERTY ADDRESS OF BUII.DING IS: 5101 Raritan Place, Richmond, Virginia 23234 (the property) DIRECT ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: 5101 Raritan Place, Richmond, Virginia 23234 Telephone: 271-0159 RULES REGARDING LEASING AND THE POSSESSION AND USE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AREAS FOLLOWS: Lessee agrees to oav S35 00 for a check returned foram reason and agrees to pgy all costs incurred includine all le a fees to Collect am amOllilt due t0 the Dale Rnntan Fr. na * r v a s au w w .c~atx: ann 1 "S SI i em 1 ee. a to forever release di and t to hold harmless the Dale Raritan Foundation Inc The tsoam of utrectors and/or am of the members from am and a1] claims demanrlc n,ce and rlam~ of anv kind sustained or that may hereafter be sustained by the undersiened in consequence of the Lease 1. Payment for use of the property will be S ~~~~ ~ d U 2. Non-refimdable fee to reserve property for on a specific date is S sd 0 ~ ~ ~ and must be paid wiU~in 24 hours after call for reservations. 3. All users must remove their ersonal ro ert an a ate remises the ro ert b 2:00 A. - A Muat! 4. Do not tack or tace or otherwise attach anv decorations to walls or ceiling! 5. The bandstand in the building will not be moved under anv ci stanch. 6. Misuse of the property in any way, or removing a~ items will not be tolerated. 7. Ice in the 2 machines is for lessee's use, but not guaranteed. 8. Lessor does not furnish table cloths, toilet paper, pager towels or cleaning materials. 9. All vehicles must be parked on Dale Raritan Foundation, Inc. property. Vehicles not Raritan property are subject to be towed at owner's expense. 10. Police, including Alcoholic Beverage Control Officers and Raritan Officials have the right to enter the property (the property) during the term of your lease. 11. #10 above will~rarely mc,,r tin. if rn,....1.,:..... w nm ~___-_~ -- - .. right of eviction for non-compl' nre 12. When functions are primarily for young people, special rules regarding responsibilities of Lessee and Requirement for presence of adequate, responsible chaperones apply. U e of facilities for youth activities must be broueht to the attention of a Dale Ruri a Foundation Inc official when making a reservation for Lease Failure to do so wdl insult in forfeiture of all fees said immediate eviction from the oremrses (the _ _l, or other actions as cL*rnTMistanres wanarit. 13. When leaving, please lock all doors. For additional information call_ SO ~ 3 ~]- -S/ 9S 14. Fire Arena of any kind are not allowed. 15. Pyrotechnics of any kind are not allowed. 16. Arty form of Babble making is not allowed. 17. Misrepresentation of lease for any reason will forfeit Lease with no refund of any rents Hard. I8. Insurance in the nn.nn s nei., n..._.__ ..____ ~ - .. _ undersigned in consequence of this i.ease/A ~ ment. 19. RULES REGARDING THE POSSESSION AND USE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ARE AS FOLLOWS: A. IT IS THF. i.F.CCi!~!+C vpcunvcinn .T., .n...........~.. -... ---- -- . _-- _ _ ~~~~ PREMISES MUST OBTAIN THE APPROPRIATE PERMIT REQUIRED BY GTHE V RG~IIHIA ACOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTRAr. Rnsnn ~rme rc ~ ~..... „~..,.~....~ ..~..._ - ~,~~ ,r~, ?'~~~~G ~ ( CS h , ~ 9 `+ i 1 (\1 BEFORE A KEY IS ISSUED, LESSEE MUST PROVIDE DALE RURITAN FOUNDATION, INC. WITH A COPY OF THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE PERMIT FOR THE FUNCTION OR LESSEE SIGNS THE STATEMENT THAT ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE WILL NOT BE SERVED. " (SEE CERTIFICATION AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS AGREEMENT) B. PERSONS UNDER 21 YEARS OF AGE ARE NEVER TO BE SERVED ANY TYPE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES. C. DRINKING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES OUTSIDE THE MAIN BUII.DING IS PROHDITTED EXCEPT WHEN FUNCTION IS AN OUTSIDE FUNCTION AND A COPY OF THE ABC PERMTT HAS BEEN PRESENTED TO DALE RURITAN FOUNDATION, INC. AT THE T1tME OF THE RENTAL. IN SUCH CASES. DRDYIZaTG WILL BE RESTRICTED TO THE DESI NATED ARE FOR USE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES. D. ANY ALCOHOL ON THE PREMISES WITHOUT A PERMTT WILL BE REPORTED TO LOCAL POLICE AND/OR ABC AGENTS FOR 1NVESTI ATION. E. CERTAIN FUNCTIONS MAY REQUIItE POLICE SECURITY SERVICES FROM LOCAL AUTHORITIES. Dread. understand and accent my resnonaibiliri for Alcoholic Beve Lessee NAM$ OF COMPANY OR ORGANIZATION ~~~c~sr> (/~PN~op,S ~V r~ ~~~''1S~'Q /C. i ~~~' S1CiNAT1JRE ID REQUIRED LESSEE DRESS f~~~'7'~-R ~ ~ fl , a 3831 ~lTl' ~-STATE ZIP CODE This lease made this ~' day of ~ t'~1 ~ 20 ~ C}, Date of use: ~(,,~'~ ( y" Msio Building 0 ti ~' ~~. () Pavilion () Both Deposit of $~,~~{~ ~received ~ 20 ~. Q By: Paae 2 of 2 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 '"F'e`° AGENDA _ _~~~-- ~hR_GIN~'- Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.7.a. Subject: Authorize the Receipt and Appropriation of Grant Funds from the 2007 State Homeland Security Program Grant County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Authorize the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department to receive and appropriate $15,000 in grant funds from the 2007 State Homeland Security Program Grant (SHSP). Summary of Information: The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve the acceptance and appropriation of $15,000 in grant funds from the 2007 State Homeland Security Program Grant (SHSP). These funds are restricted to the purchasing of Heavy Tactical Rescue (HTR) equipment, exercises and training. They are to be used for the purchase, upgrade and sustainment of HTR teams. The Division 1-Regional Technical Rescue Team, comprised of personnel and equipment resources from Chesterfield County Fire and Emergency Medical Services and Henrico County Division of Fire will use the funds to purchase personal protective equipment for technical rescue team personnel assigned to the Division 1-Regional Technical Rescue Team. The purchase of this valuable, life saving equipment is necessary to support the state Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) program for training and response, and on site management for public safety and security. Preparers Paul W. Mauger Title: Fire Chief Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # ~~~ ~__, • ~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _`~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS h~,ra~ Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Chesterfield County Fire and Emergency Medical Services will be responsible for the documentation and process for following the SHSP grant guidelines and requirements. Matching funds are not required by the receiving agency. ~+'~°~~.3~e CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ` ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 • 8 r~`; AGENDA h~r~a~ Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board authorize receipt and appropriation of $15,000 in a grant award from State Homeland Security Program funds to purchase and upgrade heavy tactical rescue equipment and materials for training and response of public safety and security. No matching funds are required. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 f ~'~ AGENDA hRC~e+ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.7.b. Subject: Authorize the Receipt and Appropriation of Grant Funds from the 2007 State Homeland Security Program Grant County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Regu ed: Authorize the Fire and Emergency and appropriate $30,000 in grant Security Program Grant (SHSP). Medical Services Department to receive funds from the 2007. State Homeland Summary of Information: The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve the acceptance and appropriation of $30,000 in grant funds from the 2007 State Homeland Security Program Grant (SHSP). These funds are restricted to the purchasing of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) equipment and training. They are to be used for the purchase, upgrade and sustainment of hazardous material teams. The Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Hazardous Materials Team will use the funds to purchase detection equipment, medical supplies and limited types of pharmaceuticals, and CBRNE reference materials. The purchase of this valuable, life saving equipment is necessary to support the state CBRNE program for training and response, and on site management for public safety and security. Matching funds are not required by the receiving agency. Preparers Paul W. Mauger Title: Fire Chief Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # O~~-~3'~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _ ,,~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 ~, AGENDA _ - _,, ~,~ .; Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board authorize receipt and appropriation of $30,000 in a grant award from State Homeland Security Program funds to purchase and upgrade equipment and materials for training and response of public safety and security. No matching funds are required. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management 00'~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~_ ~, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~ AGENDA hRciM* Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.8. Subject: Donation of Surplus Boat Trailer and Mirrorcraft Boat Back to the Phillips Volunteer Fire Station 13 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to approve the donation of a surplus boat trailer and Mirrorcraft boat back to the Phillips Volunteer Fire Station 13. Summary of Information: The Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department (CFEMS) currently has in its possession a 1998 Long boat trailer and a 2000 18' Mirrorcraft boat that were originally purchased by and solely utilized by the volunteer firefighters at the Phillips Volunteer Fire Station 13. The trailer and boat were titled to CFEMS for the purposes of insurance. The volunteers have purchased a new boat and trailer to upgrade and replace this equipment. The volunteers would like the old equipment returned to them to offset the cost of the new boat and trailer. Typically, the county, through the Purchasing Department, auctions surplus equipment to the highest bidder pursuant to public auction. Under Virginia law, the Board may choose to donate the equipment to volunteer fire departments rather than auction the equipment since the volunteer fire department is a non-profit organization eligible to receive donations from the county under VA Code Section 15.2-953(B). Staff recommends approval of this donation. Preparers Paul W. Mauger Attachments: ~ Yes Title: Chief, Chesterfield Fire and EMS ;~~, ~~ ~.'{R~NI~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: s.C.9. Subject: State Road Acceptance County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: i Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Dale: Qualla Farms, Section H Matoaca: Cameron Bay, Section D amended Foxfield Preparers Richard M. McElfish Title: Director, Environmental Engineering Attachments: Yes No #~~;y~~~ TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - QUALLA FARMS, SEC H DISTRICT: DALE MEETING DATE: May 28, 2008 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: QUALLA FARMS CT QUALLA FARMS DR QUALLA FARMS PL QUALLA FARMS TER Vicinity Map: QUALLA FARMS, SEC H yd ~q ~ D ~ W IV ~~ Q U ~, ~'' 1 v ,` J~ STOCKPORT DR p~ O' Q ~- Qv pV H Produced By Chestertield County GIS TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance -CAMERON BAY, SEC D AMENDED DISTRICT: MATOACA MEETING DATE: May 28, 2008 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: CAMERON BAY DR SUMMERHOUSE CT SUMMERHOUSELN VILLAGE SCHOOL LN Vicinity Map: CAMERON BAY, SEC D AMENDED SUMMERHOUSE z ~ LN J J ~ J O O ~~ v QP V w ~~` CANER p N Q ~~~G J ~, Produced By Chestertield County GIS ~,~~~~~~ TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - FOXFIELD DISTRICT: MATOACA MEETING DATE: May 28, 2008 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: QUARTER HORSE LN SWIFT FOX DR TRAIL RIDE CT TRAIL RIDE DR Vicinity Map: FOXFIELD ~ v ~P~ ~°+ o o Q~ ''qR v_ `SyDR Mess F/R ~ FCT ~ p ~ M P~ ~ G v x ~w~ Q ~,~Q O = ~ 6~\G m C? ~ Mp5 ~~Q- Z d ~ ~G~~ v C.gkROY TRAM RID~~~ ~,'( PL ~v5 C~ J W N OG ~ ~ T~ ~ T O P FaXGP'tEPL ~.cC ~ CL ~ ~ G~ ~ ~ Produced By Chestertield County GIS ~~~yi~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ' __ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 r~~, AGENDA gpd Y/RCIN\~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.10. Subject: Authorize the County Administrator t Number One for the Construction Football/Soccer Field Expansion and o Transfer Funds and Execute Change Order Contract for Chester Middle School Softball Field Relocation County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to authorize the County Administrator to transfer $144,593.30 from the Goyne Park Project Account to the Park Improvements account and execute Change Order Number One for the construction contract with Interstate Construction Company in the amount of $144,593.30, for additional work at Chester Middle School for the football/soccer field expansion and softball field relocation. Summary of Information: The Change Order will amend the contract to add temporary safety fencing, add lighting to the soccer field, add hard surface pedestrian and vehicle circulation system and enlarge the Mustang baseball field to accommodate School Physical Education and youth athletic programs. Funds are available from the Goyne Park project account center to transfer to the Chester project Parks Improvements account center. Both sites serve the same cosponsored youth sports groups administered by the Parks and Recreation Department. Parks and Recreation staff has met with effected user groups and they have supported this change. Staff recommends approval. Preparers Michael S. Golden Title: Director, Parks and Recreation Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # C~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 ,,r,,~ AGENDA Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board approve change order number one to the construction contract for the Chester Middle School Football/Soccer Field Expansion and Softball Field Relocation project in the amount of $144,593.30 and to authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. This request also includes transferring funds from the Goyne Park Project to the Park Improvements/Athletic Field Construction account to cover the cost of this project. Once the transfer is complete, sufficient funds will be available in the project budget to cover the cost of the change order request. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management ~ ®~~~~ _ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA ~!R_CIN~' Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.11. Subject: Authorize the County Administrator to Execute a Construction Contract for Midlothian Middle School Roadway Paving and Track Improvements County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: The Board of Supervisors is requested to authorize the County Administrator to execute a construction contract with Shoosmith Brothers, Inc. for Midlothian Middle School roadway, paving and track improvements in the amount of $550,000. Summary of Information: The scope of this project will add a new access driveway, parking and asphalt paving of the existing track. The School Board is providing funds for the track improvements, a project administered by the Parks and Recreation at the request of the School Board. The parking will provide convenient and expanded parking to serve recreational programs and those programs for Midlothian Middle School. This complex serves several recreational athletic associations for football, soccer, baseball and lacrosse. Other recently completed improvements to the athletic complex have included expanded irrigation systems for sports fields and renovation of the grandstands. Planned in the future is the renovation of the field house restrooms and concession. This project is scheduled to start this summer and be completed by the fall of 2008. The award is for the base bid and alternate one. The low bidder, Murcielago Enterprises, withdrew their bid of $602,247 and staff negotiated the cantract amount and scope of work with the second low bidder, Shoosmith Brothers, whose original bid was $603,995. The negotiated contract amount of $550,000 is within the engineer's cost estimate and within available project funding. This is a 2004 Parks and Recreation Bond Referendum project. Staff recommends approval. Preparers Michael S. Golden Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director, Parks and Recreation No # ~~008'7 _~`° v~RCIN\ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board authorize the County Administrator to execute a construction contract with Shoosmith Brothers, Inc. in the amount of $550,000. This contract is for the construction of a new access driveway, parking and asphalt paving of the existing track for Midlothian Middle School. The complex serves several recreational athletic associations for football, soccer, baseball and lacrosse. Sufficient funds are available in the capital improvement program to award this contract. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management 0~~~~~ 'I fly. tin cn _ c,~ w w ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~,~Ap~~WA~W ~ ~~ww II ~' ~ ~/~ ~ r ~ ~A I ~ `~I N Eg" A C S ~ ~ w I ~ ~ I - __ -- - -_ ~ 8„w A W80-fd~ ~ _ ---~ ~~ ~ ~ ~_ ~6za> _ ___----- ~ ~'-. __ ~ _ ~"__ _ ~ I o /- - - - - ~ +/ k~k ~ ~ I ~ I.Z7 ~'r ~ \ I ~ ~. Aim ~- ~~~ ~ ~' UJ'' ~~_ ~ ~ ~ O ~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ k 1 Q ~~ g¢ ~,~ - -- -~ x ^ ~ ~ ~ ,, , ,~~ ~~o.. i ~ I ~~' i p ;m;,'v~r i ~ I /k ~'~~~ Aq 'q ~~~ 6 W CA _ 6.,6 r^Y R ~ i x i ri `• .~ x <~4~a; I n i~ I I ~ ~~ ~ ~~ aLa: ~ ~ t ~ '~ I 1YC $ ~ F r~ i Q Im j ~ ~ ~ I~, b'p ~g ~' 8 f o ~ "EGA i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~R ~; i i €^ ~ a $~ ' i ~~ i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ' i . ~ - n.~ ~ i o~ i ~~ I L f _ F~" a` ~ t~•b ~ I ~ ~Il VIARWC SOKE6._ 50~ESSWN ~ ~~~ ~ ~Zy ' I _ ~~ ' I 3.3 tx ~ ~ ~ _ __ __ __ ____ _ - - -Y' ~:;~ ~ 1~35G~ACE~,6Wl!<CS _ 11 I 9p .. ~_- "M~ s ~ - -1 ,.. ___ x-x-x_x -x-x- - - 9 . - \ ~ I 1 1 ~ r I 0 X128) ~ '~~~ I I I~ I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I I ~ ' -o I I _ _ - I LL ~ I R I ~ ~~ 1`t . fig ~ x ~ ~, ~ E 1 ~ w ~ ~ - ___ ,1 - - - _ i ___ z ,~ ~ ~ -k~~ "~ 30"wDT ~ so ~ ~ ~ 'C6-02~ ,TANK ~~ ~~ ~.~ ~- MT~]L~T pHA~ ~'~ ~ ~r6-0~~ - _ ~~ ~~ -~ W 122 ~ ~~ ~- ~ '~ ~ ~ W99 ~~ - I 1 '; ~, _- _ ~ ,, - i ~ ~ Aso a~ I __ - ~. ~ ^ DI ~ - - ., - 'I d N I 0 I y R ~~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MIDLOTHIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL ~ i ~ I~ ~ ° ~ a RECREATION IMPROVEMENTS ~ f ,~ s CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN ~ j ~ ® I' Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OF IMPROVEMENTS II CHESTERFIELD COUNTY 8 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 ~~~ ~ AGENDA y~,~a Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.0.12. Subject: Appropriation of Additional Road Cash Proffer Funds and Authorization to Proceed with the Branders Bridge Road (Stoney Glen) Reconstruction Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to appropriate an additional $917,000 in road cash proffers (Traffic Shed 18) and authorize the County Administrator to proceed with the Branders Bridge Road (Stoney Glen) Reconstruction project. Summary of Information: In May 2007, the Board appropriated $100,000 in road cash proffers for the Branders Bridge Road (Stoney Glen) project. The section of Branders Bridge Road just north of Stoney Glen South subdivision has a narrow pavement width, no shoulders, undersized drainage structure and poor vertical and horizontal alignment. The section currently carries 1,600 vehicles per day. This volume is expected to grow to 14,000 vehicles per day over the next twenty years. The section needs to be reconstructed to acceptable standards. (Continued on next page) Preparers R.J.McCracken agen682 Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director of Transportation ^ No # ~" ~ ~ ~~® CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Summary continued: Engineering for the reconstruction project is nearly complete. The current estimated cost of the project is approximately $1.7 million. The estimate exceeds available funding. The project scope can be reduced to only improve the worst sections of Branders Bridge Road and provide adequate drainage facilities and stay within budget. Current market conditions are favorable for advertising the project at this time. Staff recommends the Board appropriate an additional $917,000 for the project in road cash proffers currently available in Traffic Shed 18. To expedite the construction, the County Administrator should be authorized to award a contract up to $656,000 to the lowest responsible bidder. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board: 1. Appropriate $917,000 in additional road cash proffers from Traffic Shed 18 for the Branders Bridge Road (Stoney Glen) Reconstruction Project; 2. Authorize the County Administrator to award a construction contract, up to $656,000, to the lowest responsible bidder. District: Bermuda ~~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _ ~. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 r ~ AGENDA ~ - , hRc~M'~^ Budget and Management Comments: The Board is requested to appropriate an additional $917,000 in road cash proffers (Traffic Shed 18) and authorize the County Administrator to proceed with the Branders Bridge Road (Stoney Glen) Reconstruction project. The Board is also requested to award a construction contract up to $656,000 to the lowest responsible bidder. There are sufficient cash proffer funds in Traffic Shed 18 to appropriate for the Branders Bridge Road Reconstruction project. The cash proffer monies would need to be appropriated in order to fund the construction contract. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management ~~ ~ ~'a~~ BRANDERS BRIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE Ori final Reduced Prelimina En ineerin $ 70,000 $ 70,000 Ri ht-of-Wa $ 30,000 $ 40,000 Construction To Be Determined $ 783,000 Mitigation To Be Determined $ 124,000 Total To Be Determined $1,017,00.0 REVENUE May, 2007 Appropriation $ 100,000 May, 2008 Proposed A ro riation $ 917,000 Total $1, 017, 000 C~ ~U~~-~ BRANDERS BRIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT ~~, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY v « ~~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 AGENDA h~~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.0.13. Subject: Appropriation of Funds and Authorization to Proceed with the Old Hundred Road Corridor Study County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to appropriate $66,450 from the General Road Improvement Account and authorize staff to proceed with the Old Hundred Road Corridor Study. Summary of Information: During community meetings on the Cheatham zoning case (Case #05SN0239) at Route 360 and Old Hundred Road, Mr. warren was requested by citizens to conduct a broader traffic study of the Old Hundred Road corridor from Route 360 to Genito Road. Neighborhood representatives provided tasks to be included in the study. The tasks include, among other things, the need for (Continued on next page) Preparers R.J.McCracken Title: Director of Transportation Agen685 Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No # ~~®~+~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Summary of Information: (continued) road improvements at neighborhood entrances along Old Hundred Road, improvements at Millridge Parkway and Market Square Lane, future traffic demands along Old Hundred Road, and pedestrian accommodations on Old Hundred Road to the new Clover Hill High School. Staff has negotiated a fee with one of our consultants to perform the study. All of the requested tasks cannot be addressed due to cost and feasibility considerations. Noise abatement and additional pedestrian studies could not be included. If the Board wishes to pursue the study, $66,450 should be appropriated from the General Road Improvement Account and staff should be authorized to proceed with the study. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board: 1. Appropriate $66,450 from the General Old Hundred Road Corridor study; 2. Authorize staff to proceed with the District: Clover Hill Road Improvement Account for the study. ~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ' _-a BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 AGENDA ~~[GIN~ Budget and Management Comments: The Board is requested to appropriate $66,450 from the General Road Improvement Account and authorize staff to proceed with the Old Hundred Road Corridor Study. There is sufficient funding in the General Road Improvement Account to fund the cost of this study. Appropriations in this account are used to improve traffic operations in the county. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management ~~~~~~ OLD HUNDRED ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY STUDY AREA N W E S NOT TO SCALE _-@~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 y~N~: ~ ~ AGENDA Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.0.14. Subject: Appropriation of Road Cash Proffers and Authorization to Proceed with the Design of the Chalkley Road Realignment Project North of Ecoff Avenue County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to appropriate $100,000 in road cash proffers from Traffic Shed 13 for the Chalkley Road realignment project north of Ecoff Avenue. Summary of Information: The alignment of Chalkley Road north of Ecoff Avenue at the unnamed stream crossing is poor. Several accidents, including a fatality, have occurred in the area of the curves. The road can be made safer by realigning the curves. Until detailed engineering is completed it is difficult to determine precise costs for realigning the curves because significant drainage and environmental impacts may be encountered. Staff believes the curves can be realigned with the approximately $900,000 in road cash proffers currently available in Shed 13. (Continued next page) Preparers R.J.McCracken Agen683 Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director of Transportation D No 000~:~9 ' CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Summary of Information: (continued) Staff recommends the Board appropriate $100,000 in road cash proffers for the project from Traffic Shed 13 and authorize staff to proceed with the engineering for the project. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board: 1) Appropriate $100,000 in road cash proffers from Traffic Shed 13 for the Chalkley Road Realignment Project north of Ecoff Avenue; and 2) Authorize staff to proceed with the design of the project. DIStrICt: Bermuda ~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 r~; AGENDA ~ ~~ h~~ Budget and Management Comments: The Board is requested to appropriate $100,000 in road cash proffers from Traffic Shed 13 for the Chalkley Road realignment project north of Ecoff Avenue. There are sufficient cash proffer funds in Traffic Shed 13 to appropriate for the Chalkley Road realignment project. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management 0~~~_~~ CHALKLEY ROAD REALIGNMENT NORTH OF ECOFF AVENUE APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF REALIGNMENT D O: W J J V EC~~F AVE 300 150 0 300 Feet ~~~~_~~ ~_-~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY a ~„ ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 h~~N`*_ ' AGENDA Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.0.15. Subiect: Transfer of Funds and Authorization to Proceed with the Magnolia Green Community Development Authority (CDA) Road Widening Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to authorize the transfer of $2,000,000 from the Route 360 West Project to the Magnolia Green Community Development Authority (CDA) Road Widening Project, and authorize staff to proceed with right-of-way acquisition and environmental permitting activities. Summary of Information: In August 2007, the Board of Supervisors approved the establishment of the Magnolia Green Community Development Authority. The Authority was established to widen to four lanes Otterdale Road, from Route 360 to Woolridge Road, and Woolridge Road, from Otterdale Road to the western limit of the Swift Creek Reservoir. Additionally at the August 2007 meeting, the Board was advised that part of the funding source for the County's obligation for infrastructure improvements at Magnolia would be the state reimbursement for the Route 360 West Project. (Continued on next page) Preparers R.J.McCracken agen687 Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director of Transportation ^ No # 000103 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Summary of Information: continued A landowner's petition requesting establishment of the district was approved defining the county's obligations in the project. The primary obligations are to acquire the right-of-way and environmental permits. In accordance with the petition, the developers of Magnolia Green are currently proceeding with the design of the project, including preliminary environmental design. Public meetings/hearings for the project design are anticipated later this year. Upon completion of the meetings/hearings, the Board will be asked to approve the design. Right-of-way acquisition will begin upon the Board's approval. Under the terms of the petition, the county has up to 18 months to acquire the right-of-way for the project. The CDA has not yet sold bonds for the project. To keep the project moving forward, the Board should approve the transfer of funds for the county's right-of-way acquisition and environmental permitting activities. The preliminary estimated cost for these activities is $2,000,000. County costs over the next few months are expected to be less than $100,000 and will be limited to environmental permitting activities and preliminary right-of-way design functions. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board: 1. Authorize the transfer of $2,000,000 from the Route 360 West Project for the Magnolia Green CDA right-of-way acquisition and environmental permitting activities; 2. Authorize staff to proceed with the preliminary right-of-way and environmental permitting activities. District: Matoaca C>i~-O~_®4 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~_ ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS r AGENDA y~~~~~ Page 3 of 3 Budget and Management Comments: The Board is being requested to authorize transfer of $2 million from the Route 360 west Project to cover right-of-way acquisition and preliminary permitting associated with the Magnolia Green development road improvements. The Route 360 West Project is completed and was funded with the 2004 bond referendum. At the onset of the Route 360 widening project, the County's intention was to attempt to secure reimbursement from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). The County's Transportation staff successfully secured an agreement with VDOT to reimburse the County for up to $18.391 million. All but $2.9 million of that reimbursement has been received to date, with the balance to be paid by VDOT after July 1, 2008. This cash reimbursement is being used as the source of the requested transfer for the Magnolia Green development right-of-way acquisition and associated costs. The Board was advised on August 22, 2007 (when considering creation of the Magnolia Green CDA) that part of the funding source for the county's obligation for infrastructure improvements at Magnolia would be the anticipated state reimbursement for the Route 360 West road project. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management (3t~U-~_~5 MAGNOLIA GREEN CDA RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING PROJECT ESTIMATE Preliminary Right-of--Way and Environmental Permittin Activities $100,000 Ri ht-of--Way and Environmental En ineerin $350,000 Right-of--Way Acquisition and Environmental Miti ation $1,550,000 TOTAL $2,000,000 REVENUE Proposed Transfer from Route 360 West Pro' ect $2,000,000 TOTAL $2,000,000 ~u13~~6 ,% ~,~-: ~ ., LOWE MAGNO~1 R ~ _~ ~ ~. ~=-- .. ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~a~ b~ ~ ~~~ UPPER ~/ ~• I ~~\ ~' "'--~`~ \ G 288 ~ . MAGNOLIA GREEN ~~ /~ ~ COUNTY \7 ~ WIDENING ~I ~ ~ F- 1 ~ t ~:-~ K ~ f '° LOWER I\ ~~ "`'~ ~< MAGNOLIA GREEN ~<~~~p IMPROVEMENTS ~ ~ ;r" •~~~ J,. , ~ e,, o- y~ ;, ~ pX.. ~ ,r-~ ~~~ (// V \ Y ~ I G / . .. .\ CDA \ a ~ 1~_~ 2 ~ ~ IMPROVEMENTS ~ II I~~_~,~.~`--j~ i09 ~0i. 0 2,800 5,600 11,200 16,800 22,400 ~ ~ ~_ ~"-'~~~ Feet/ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~`°` BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~~~ AGENDA S ,~„r ~`" Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.16.a. Subject: Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along West Hundred Road, Dale Lane and Thompson Avenue from WBB Development Company, LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Accept the conveyance of two parcels of land containing a total of 0.146 acres along West Hundred Road, Dale Lane and Thompson Avenue from WBB Development Company, LLC, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of two parcels of land containing a total of 0.146 acres along West Hundred Road, Dale Lane and Thompson Avenue from WBB Development Company, LLC. This dedication is for the Gregory Place commercial development. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #~~g~~_~~ VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along West Hundred Road, Dale Lane and Thompson Arenue from WBB Derelopment Company, LLC N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W ',}-E S ~j luct egiak stlb74et F.A~~~.V~.1 817070 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON I MADE AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE PREMISES SHOWN HEREON AND THAT THERE ARE NO EASEMENTS OR ENCROACHMENTS VISIBLE ON THE GROUND OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN HEREON. THIS PROPERTY IN A H.V.D. DEFINED FLOOD HA2AR0 AREA. BYfYa' c t. P) o.uv.~ ~~•l.~'u. `PAR E O ~ ;,6yb,o83.97 LvaRTeNUN~ ~ E ~ orp48~`~ wEsr~r~ ~ 11,79f,26D.i5 ~ ~, ~,e56,iaJ. ra ~_ a ~i :r ~ s vo 2 J~g q~ ~F ^ N o RQ ~ I~ ~ ~~olu ;~~ }-NmK oo ~ sw Uvm~ ~ ~ ~ Q..Np o ~:ti kni D 8~t~ UM1 W ~ N Nr Q~mN ~ ° ••~ ~ ~ 3 in M ~~~3 K~C03 en .I O +~? ~ 3z mo N'r ~ ~D t~ . wnc°$ 0` ~ ~I° co ~v p 71~4rr 0.~pM ~ ~ i~ N~$ ~. ~~ ~ 0 ~ x_779 ~_._~--- -~ ~ ~~M,y o , ~ _ - p p F° ~ M vt o In~M j ~ N ~MM Q 9 Qu~i0.0~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ , V Ff ~ aF ja+ g MI ~ m m 0 N0.mm o ~ N 4 ~~C ~ ~ ~ ~, 0 J J T I~~'Md; ~~~C Ea. om~~ o~~` Q?° o azm3 300.1 ---_ _ r13 656 5 7 E !1 n~ n ~~ /S.o2' ~~ u :' ~~ ., 0 ,' Wl"V° 2 a u~ z N ~~ti ~p~U Tnti~ F. O ~4Q~ 0 M VO O 0 ~ ~M 0 t;= 803.94' 0' 2•-50• p2" L = 39.00' T Ig.91' GN a 3980' CN SQG 5 61°' 11'~ 0]~W O R°8o 8.9406., d : 3°- 03'- cH.a3.og' CH g~G. N 60°-51'-48"E ~E THOMFSON fjVENUE Bti CoU2T ORi7e¢ CASE CH 69'i2S0 DN g(24/90 Rr![7 PLRT eooK 2 ,PAGES 2464247 ~' d ba' ~ I ALTH OF ~~ ~ Gt I 'Z 2 ,~ 3-2-08 c~ ~ ~ HARVEY L. PARKS x \ 3 3 ~ No.124~ ~ / y , °~ i ~ l ~~ ~rV " A~ I ~ ~ 9~obSVav~ N sr7'FPR0.1. NO.: ogP,¢p257 \ urrur~~sve0.i.rva.: og-oeb¢ 5 77•-2/'-33"4Y... ~_ ,_ isa. 7'NUMPSp ~ re.o.w.) C~MC~~ Rvt1 ~ - - C ~ PLD) ~ Z ~ m ~ ~ Wh~TER 6. N S. 656 RoBB P/ ~ ~ R.U.W. ' R E ~~ p~ ~~S ~`~ o~"`v4444i111 -o ooo C7 g. 046 rr602 OAG~ ~~ 505 Plat Showin a , 8~41~ ~ ~Qm O1 I ` ~ ~ ~4P ANY EASEMENTS OF TO RECORD AND OTHER PERTINENT FACTS WHICH I Z~~p g , ~! ~ ~ A TITLE SEARCH ~ 7 W~~o U.U048 Ac. Dedication 1.m~~ ~ MIGHT DISCLOSE. wZ M ~ 3'-- along the Northern Line of West Hundred Road (State Route 10) W e~? °~° °~~m ~ HARVEY L. PARKS INC. and a 0.1412 Ac. Dedication ~ ~z o 0 4508 W. HUNbREb Rb. along the Eastern Line of ~ i ~ ~ ~ CHESTER, VA. ~,,, ,.~. Dale Lane (State Route 1519) and the Southern Line of Thompson Avenue Located in the Bermuda District Cheste~eld County, Virginia -~N 7l°• 52-'1g'~ ' N ey ~ O 5.00 ~$ w e 4 ,q 3 H ~.,. VV m w N to ~ , N 2 O r W N vaC ~N 4 6. O J~4= ~~ ~ Wp ~Q~^ "'~ z ure°o3 ~ 1 J mz~o CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _'. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~ AGENDA Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.16.b. Subiect: Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along Iron Bridge Road and for the Extension of Kingsland Glen Drive from Chesterfield Business Partners LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Boa Accept the conveyance of six parcels of land containing a total of 6.678 acres along Iron Bridge Road and for-the extension of Kingsland Glen Drive from Chesterfield Business Partners LLC, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: On March 12, 2008, the Board of Supervisors accepted the conveyance of 6.596 acres along Iron Bridge Road and for the extension of Kingsland Glen Drive. The acreage has increased because the Virginia Department of Transportation has required additional right of way for Kingsland Glen Drive. Approval is recommended. DlstrlCt: Dale Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title Real Property Manager 0~~~_1~ VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along Iron Bridge Road and for the Extension of Kingsland Glen Drire from Chesterfield Business Partners LLC N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities w ; ~`~/- e s t hcl egrak 565b7 tet {? n/' .~ t i ~a ~$ t ~ ~~~ loa ~I ~ h rnip1••. ~ ~ R. ~ ~g~~& f 310r• ~ ~. 1 I ~! ~"-----r7Sa i ~,,, o~ ~ _ ~,_ a.L _ _ _ l ..~, J ~QQQQo `~oO~ ~a~~~~±±~ a n ~ Lp ~ x~~~ a e ~~~~ rc~ __ N QyQyQy~~ a- W mp ~ ~~ a fi~$'n~ ~r.~ tf Z~~ ftl 4`~ -- - - - \\ ~"" > ~ ~ mW ~ ~~y~~ y \`` O~y6.m~ yon on a ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~l~ ~ .-.~ ~~ ~~~~b8 ^ j ~ ~~ ~ a ^ n 0. ~I 4. n o~ 0.oa ~~' o vt d ,~' <yorc a ^ ~~~e ^ ~ ~o pp ~ ~ ~ ^! ffWp w ~ ~ n F ~ :~ ' n ~ ' W~ ~ ~~0. S a4: 'a ^ ~W.. +j' ~ i ~ ~ Ci 1 4 Y1 ~~~y ~` 8 y ~ „ C O Qr wW~a~Y ¢~f n u4m~rh yamm ~ °a~' u n 11 l`` {1 1~ 1' I I ~~~ 4 ~~ ~~ V ~~ ~~ 0 ~~~ ~~, ~o `-' ~ ~1 ~ ~ $ ~ ~ z~ ~ ~~ a ~ `~ a ~H ~ ~~ ~ ~o~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ a ~~~ ~. - ~~yy . N ~ P ~ Qp~ O A D V U K Q ~ = o Ey ~ pq a ~' ~ ~ a~~z ao Q R GjplA ,ti4 ~O R~~ °i ~ ~ ~`N ~ :~ - ~_ ® ~ ~ ~~ ®~~ ~~~~ O ^ IY ~y ~ O ,spy y ® ~~~ ~~C~~~q~u~~n$ ,JOJo ~,~•^O O~y~ W~Y^fab~ w~S ~00n9 R~'~ca ~~~ "a o~~j~au$4r-.$ ~ o p __ ' ~ ~ ~ W ~i is ~ rn °. CI ~ g0 4 ~ e q y p~ F • ~ u ~6~M1 K+I~ ^^ `` m .. ~naoQ ~n: r Kn a a`~9i H ~ ~ d ~ d e ~ ZIJ n ~ ~ oo a gm ^ u ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ` ~ c~~ ~ ~ I r,. ~y m °' ~F° (';~\ / anti ~Vm ~i (a~ ~ r1.: ~ wW yap %'~'~ ~~a N~ , \~` wKNp r. Y m qq L ++~~1.44 4 m y O g ~y _O~ gO o ~a ~\~ o ~Jq~ z ~ m$ \ ~I ~ ~N O ~S! Q se it dm~~iu n° "p•p 4 l\ ~~~ ~ R z~ n 3 ~~ ® _ `~ ~ 0. ~O ~ F7 m .~~'.~. < ^m n^ a~ oW aJ 0 vin J ~~ '~~ ~ro~~ a 8t` 0 g n ~~~ yy~~ ~IY Y _~ 5°~~~m '~ :W z~ fi ~ ~ ~ z` ~ o maiOO~~ ~ gg mn co " ~~~~__ O ~g~ w8c n~ ~ ~ni ~ ~m6 CI ~~~COw z ~y m1 ~ ~ ~ Oi DI 2 c~ tame ~ ~ 7 3 ~~• Q • a = 6~` ~a ~~ m 4 ~R J J J .`•t• j O~ K ~~ n2 r9i~ny m~ ~JJ O _o F(~ 40aa~1' ~a Od~~ ~ ~Qg '~I~N~o ~~® n ~ b3 ~ m~- g~ _ ,, _. ,, m ~~ o ,,, ~~~~_ ~.~ a ~ tl•o mm ~ ~~ ~~ ~~a s ~ a~ ~~ ,,,., ~l ~ $ ~ a°i 6• u ~ ~ ~ F~~ ~ Z ~ a 5 ~I `S li ~ .,go ES ~ Z t a ti l"~~ ~ n O ~ 4J~~1(1 F W ~ ~6~it~i~7~~ ~ /~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S 9 C yl 2'n ins Q YVIJ~ ~i V ~ y PY Z Z ~V~~iitl~ r1 M ~ 7~Y ~ {r{ w pC~,~ ; G9-y~s~ ~ F Warm amm~~ ~tinr ~~5~~~~i 'lW.a'~i~ w ~} a ~ g ~9 gQ r s ~' ~/~J G K~.C~EK (A ~ ~ 4ci ~~O~s }}ti..!! W ~ ?~]~~o S'~ ~^ O Q ~ \°! m~ K &~ 1 Cp~~ ~ 7 ~ g --~--~ 3 ~ `~~°p ~ ~ ~ ooN-~ H ~W ao d8 -• se e ~~ ~~az p ~ ~ $y$ ~ f[~~ IFS mm (((~~~ mm I/+I~I ~ R~FIOm ~ ~ `d ~cf Q •YiN ~~ ai4 ~i1 ~jW ~w~.--. ~ ~I p FFF VVii 11711 ~t^^ii F ~ ~m4~~o ~o o~ off, ~ ov ~~,,o.. .. .. y ~ ~ ~~ s a.n V! ~ ~ h Ny .0.. vi 6 ~ '' a h ? a > q Ys11 ,,BB.. ~ a 1. t~ (n. t~ n !~ w 3 J 4}~ ® ® ® rl Ia% h r hr A1. ~Ayhlpp~,, '`rte a ~~ ~ _ 6C 00000000 W~~?I-OJ op ufn ~~ p Y 2¢ 0 o N ~Id.7m"d~ F pp7~ s opZ~ O CO 75 M ~ ~~~Ym~~~ ~G ~~ ~ ~~~ ~4 ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ a.dV~~<~~ ~ e~ e~ ~a ggy ve$ ~ e~ ~ ~` e."a`~' ee ee ` evQ g~ q .mN.~ ,~~ ~ ~F~ q e~ ±~P' ~~~~~~e~~ ~ ~ ~.e~,~-'~~e~~s 1 }`'F a O G v OD d yq C °_' ip o ~. C .^. .q -~ b [~ tl O C [) a q6f pp~Np pN F' OCOOdod oGC u ~,.:~"~'/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~tl PTO O O~ ~o ~ II II Il II II U N N tl II ~ / q d G C O 0 0 C O C I, ~ m~ ~~. \ a ammaaaaww ~ oa r~l~tl~a'~ H r m^ ./: l~ or ~^ ~.. 1, ~.-~' ~n',$ ~ T I IV N. + o _ 1p _ ~ ~S9p ~ s e. 6~~ ~~i ~ ~~ N? ~ ~ N n~ 11 01 ,s~I y 3 Z 'h~y~J7 ~y1 i 4Y Q a~~~ ~ 0~ 1 ti x~g~ ~ ~~+$ro ~=o~ ~~ {'~~~~~ ~1~m ~~ 4'$ ~ m p n ~~n f IK~~b Cri1^ 4 _ nm y, ,y~Qy8Qp{5j to ~ p~ > 4. ~ }~. YW1 Q~j ~ ~ n6~ fA I. V1~~~1~`~'1' ,, `w-/~OI`I~ ~NFI~Q~~'H mp~ Nm ~naa _Q cj7 pp g$ ^P°~m0e a ~~ god a8i e~ ao°~lY+°+ '~^~ ~ ~;. ~~~aaa ~ ~~~ ~ `~ a"a J ~~1 ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ©~% l ~ XQ V`iK L4 4y \ `~•~ nw~ ~ ~i~ x a ~ ~m o ~ / ®Q q ~ a ®i~ N~~ m~g$~ n ~ o - l ~ r` ~ Nn ~ n e L i ~,0 ®li V e ~ ? - y l l y ~ ~ # ~ ~ ~ ~ O z /~ _ ~ of°a~~ ~ Into` / ~~~~z a H Cn u -- r! J SS Y ° ~ ° f gaa~~ ~ w » °_ ~ _ _ it ~nm rc~Qgnn ~~ fir. h~ •F `` ~` , ~m7 F o J r ~ .}~iom~2j L ~la'Vx ~~~~i+Si ~eh0~ bl~~^ 11 ~f ~~~ ~ ~'~® ~ x n fI e•- i3Wd ,'~ os. zW o u , W'wawo gpAlyrw/ltWCaobOO-ttNNM/s\a ~~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~,~a~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 {~ AGENDA S ~<~~N,a~6. Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.1s.c. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land along Ecoff Avenue from Laverne C. Cole and Mary W. Cole County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.233 acres along Ecoff Avenue from Laverne C. Cole and Mary W. Cole, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.233 acres of land along Ecoff Avenue from Laverne C. Cole and Mary W. Cole. This dedication is for the development of Hillendale Day Care. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager # ~~~~.'~ ' VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of a Parcel of Land along Ecoff Avenue from Laverne C. Cole and 141ary W. Cole ~ ~,t, "~ .CHESTER VILLAGE DR ~~b 2. FOUNTAIN SQUARE ~ tn~ .FESTIVAL DR 4. RATION AVE 5 AI UAR WAY ~, ~ T VILLA a 4~ ~ff ~~I~ 0.233 Acre Qedicadion 1. GRAND GAKS FOREST CIR 2. GRAND GAKS FOREST CT rs 3. CHESTER SQUARE AVE 2 N Chesterfield County Department of Utildies i_ ~ 1 Ircl eyrax 656b7 Ret ~~~~ ~~ - ~: U; C) c V c ~j ~~ o ~~ Q • L ~ti~r Jy^ '%, Tun': `~° ~ ., ~~ r I, ~ o N o ~9 4;~ \ ~ ~ ` ~~ ~ 'bF O ~~~j~ k t 1, ~"~ ~~\ ,u\ ` \ O / . 4 ~ /' ~1L r. ~56E•J607 £ ~ I / 8Rf1 r sy ~ ~ ~ ~ ~E' ~ i `7 .~ i \~..r~. a~{~ ~4 ~'~~On „~Hr ~ " ~~~A °~4w~~~ 6 a x c ~~~~ goo ~`~n ~~~~ +a ~4;5~ s r ~~~~8~ ~~~~ y~i M Cn a ~. G 40. _. f~ „^ ~ ~ V ,~ . -. ,~ s . `.' 'eeN14~rO~Y r _._.,f 1607r~ QQid 4e~kb Y9I~)' fQOiF Ai•EWf1VC ~r -- --------- - - -^~ o. ,~ ~ ~I ~~ OI I IqA ~. ~s_ ~ lil fvr 4 ~ I jGe $a~ I __ .. ~ ~ .~~ y X1 6 ` 4 4 `~\ ~~ U ~. T i S ~ '{ ~ ~ 4 ,~~a. I-- - , ~n ,- - ~- ~ ~ a ~o~ a---- - -~ ~ a ~; - ~ O n ~a~~ Mti~~o~ n° v U "~'~a~~ ~{: ~~~~ a ~G d 4 P ~ a $ ~~ ~ m~a a., O :,~~: ~ a nk ~ ,~ _. j ~~ U j ^b V ~._. n ~ g ~'a n ~ i I % 6 G j b a 1 _ ~ CI _ S66'SF 02E JOI.l _ _ __.. -- -- -- c ; ++~u'La7 Sa __ p ai~1o ECOF7~' AVFiVUE ~ ~ ~ STq lf Rl. l501 4 ~ t~ . 30' R/W ~ 0 ~, ~~ ~~ of $o v as Q ~~ ~~ N6'6'16.f~° w ~%! w ~ zss3a' ~~ ~, ~~ r~ i o ~'' f ~ ~- ' n °~ ~ PLAT 5NOWING 0.29f AClif: OF JIND TO D~ ~ f p F DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF CHESi'ERPIEI.D, -~ ~ ~ ` ~ g ~ ' AND 0.140 ACAS Of LAND 70 8E DECLARED AS f5 RIGHT OF WAY, LYING NORiH OF SCOFF AVENUE 01 1 ~. C:I I[:: I:HFIFI.i] . . ~~ ro(~ 4 'b1O ~ ~\ {~ ~ 4 N 5 s a ~ o,~ ~ --- -- -.. - .. . v -- ~~ 3i~J ~ a ti `^ 4 `11 :y f ~ 1 j----;-....--- j .. „~ ~S r C` • h ((~ ~, ~' 1~ / ~~ j _- -~( . ~~ 4 --r-. ro m\' `' j I A I: G!~"+ 2 c>CI'1~ G~W: ~i LO~~U bin <y~~ °d;i.. n W .. ~ n ~~~_:~u "'zc:^ ~~a~~ ~y~~a '' $ cS t 2~0 ~~a~-, ~~a~ a ~~: f c: a 4 P 0 i O ~ ,. n ,~~ i~ ~6 1~ ~ i J ~ ' . ~ ~ . U U n r ~y9 f 70 __ ~ ..; ~.. ~~ ~ ~; r U j I • `ts. I t ~ I ~. ' ._,>.' j l~ i I L f ( ~ SV I i ° I ~ i ~~ I s; T $I ~~ ` 4' ~ ~ i'~ le ~ . _ t ,~•~ L~~' t ~ Leo ~ ~O e . 1 .. .L f ' wY ;~ `Ij` NL OOQ1.~.`~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY a~_ . BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~d~' AGENDA _~~1 tP~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.16.d. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Cross Street from Cross Street Property, LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.100 acres along Cross Street from Cross Street Property, LLC, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.100 acres along Cross Street from Cross Street Property, LLC. This dedication is a requirement for site plan approval for the renovation of the existing warehouse at 1911 Cross Street. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No # 000.18 VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Cross Street from Cross Street Property, LLC N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities S 1 hoY egiak %5.67 fart 0®~~.~~ 1 ~ ~~ S ~~ d~ ~~ ~~ Y , 6 -- g-- ~ '~ ~---- ~---+ i ~ ~ t ~ t ~ ~ j W6 t 1 ~gs y~-`~n 6f~ -yld ~ t r ~~ivM^ WMQ¢ ~ id ~ ~J ~~~r$~wlp ±6` 4 ~ ~ s~• ~~~ d ~ t {FRS ~~ ~ ~ _S~ { ~ ~~° i i ~ i ^,~ Jlac X i 8 a ~ ^~ o -w-e;`r- 3.N~fr6YN ~~ IDLY N $~ __~5! _~ a ~ ~ ~ ~~ { 3:r~e~tl e 9 i t ~t~8w ~ z~ G { `J~i ~ rJ 6~x.~ ~G e~i ~ ~ ~~ ys ~ ~ i do 8 $'+~~~~''~• $3lb oe ~ ~ } ~ ~g~a~ ~ ~'"~~~~ ~~a~p~~ I'~~6~~a ~ssj~ I I ~,~ ~s~~ gang ~~'g ~: ~~~o f~ 01'1 m~~~i ~~ ~~' ~ ,~ ~~~ ~=N~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ a 1~ / ~ ~~ /~ ~ ~. ~, / ' ®o~,_~® CHESTERFIELD COUNTY e BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~ AGENDA hRCIN1P~~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.16.e. Subject: Acceptance of Parcels of Land along River Road from Jack B. Hicks and Evelyn B. Hicks County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Accept the conveyance of two parcels of land containing a total of 0.128 acres along the east right of way line of River Road (State Route 602) from Jack B. Hicks and Evelyn B. Hicks, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of two parcels of land containing a total of 0.128 acres. This dedication is a requirement for the development of Peacefield, Section 1. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager OO~a_~ 1 ~-/ICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of Parcels of Land along Rirer Road from Jack B. Hicks and Erelyn B. Hicks HESDIN PARK ~~~ ~0 C rn 0 0.017 acre parcel to be dedicated `„'~.__~ --~~ ~`~ 0.111 acre parcel to be dedicated N Chesterfield County Department of lJtilities ' l.~ W i/•E S ~ I~cY a qua x 49 ffi 4 et ~~~~~~~ t7LF ANAI£--~ J~iC?DO41CGI~ppf$I, P£AC£fIELDSSURVEY CDIOODI6.Gb~diq~CD~0GD4bFA.dp ~~ l ~~ 8~3a~.uti^ I ~ 7 ~a °~ ``~~b o ~ ~ v m ~ 4 ~r o +bb ww ~ ~ n '~ b ~k~~ ~ ~~ a i ~ ~g .~ `' Nti o~.°iN ~~; ~~ q Q~ ~i*ii it / A~~ ~~ 6~~ ~q Q~ # y C ~ A ~ O V V ,~ ! " y o w n ~ !d ~~ H x H xy ~~ f ~a ~~ ~~ ~~ ~i~w g ~I ~B nt9rr 70 aY'o~~ .vv ' ~ 7 " ~ ~' ~t yr ~; ni ~; ~ ti?+ ~'~~, ~ J n ~, 2 ~ ~v ~yJ?i ~it~ ?S.r 6f 4 w w k b b 7 N~ ~ !v H ~~~.~ ~~s !r ~ v A O A U ~ V ti ~ wQ4 ~~R$~ tiQ ~ a~yuc,pgy /7 0`+ 4r Nw~V ^pil ~"S` ~, p ~b.4 CC 4~~t4L ~. ~~ 7 r~~~~~1 g - -. ... .I f I '2,~cQgb~, 1 ~ x jll ~' : 'Yb f ~ Yw a ~~•~e'ro'~ss~.D1• 7 u ~ "4 nnnnn~n ~ ti ~ a Ayl V 7n7~ .~'ib v ;cr F a ~ " ~~ "~ r, ~' A~ f. p ~ ~vd'.~~ J r a chi nS f ~~~ y y 7 # I D~~ 2ti2 ., A a /~ Q xx~ O a 4 wc~UCn f ~ %~ 4~ rb~G Ob m r1 ^7 ^~~~~~~ ~I w~ f ~ nz i °~~~ ..w X 4 4 v °~ n ~ Q KONG rt OF ~ ~ 4 b ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ 1 c`n ~ `8 ~~ CREEK S09t i $ `G i"u ~w ~ O `o; ti o, .. = I I ;b~~q4# a 4 L6 ~~~ ~u ~ I~ ,~~, ^!' U ~~~~ ~~ O hb ~~ ~ p O L/J 4 ~ p ; H ~ x ~_ o -. YI i v r A CD ~~~ s~~ ~ifo ~#~ ~1 ~~ ~~~ rrryry ~' ~/rE e3 ~ ~ 1 -~ ~ ~ ~ ^'i N9R'ABCf WmTH F'/ty ,wi ~ ~ V 3~V ~n ~ I off ~.~ O 'in~ ~~ u"' I ~yti _ ' ~~~ o '~ $~ ~~$ o ~ 8 ~~"' _ + rqs ~ ,~~ ~ v~ qy ~~ o~mr. M a p~ ~-o ~" a a N 1Ny r f .y ~ ' ' ~ f ~wnrlrawE ~ ~ R. n ~ gg. e ~ L pp~~ ~ 'g p s'~E e ~ k ^8 ~~ pn~ ~ ~ ~ ~;~ .~ x ~ PLAT SNOWING 2.284ACRE50F ~Ix s~ ' g~lla ~~~r $ ag s -mJo°°° Q & ~~~°~, = B B ~ LAND TO BE DEDICATED 70 THE ~ ~ t~~~ ~i $ .~~I #_ N~ ~'I ~ a r ? ~ COLINTYOFCHfSTERFIEID $~ ~ ~~~~ ~'% 3 ~`~g ~~ ~~ u, ~ N E n NuioACa olsmlcr a ~ f; ~ . s o i q _ ~ ~ 1 - CHE9TEBFIELO GOUNry, VN101NG CHESTERFIELD COUNTY -_ Y= Y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 __ ._ ~~ AGENDA Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.16.f. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Iron Bridge Road from the Myers Family Partnership, L. P. County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested' Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.130 acres along Iron Bridge Road from the Myers Family Partnership, L.P., and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the county to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. Approval is recommended. District: Dale Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # 000~.~~ VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Iron Bridge Road from the Myers Family Partnership, L.P. N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W t ~' E S 1 hci eq~ak 666.6 Eet ®~®~~~~ CURVE TAB1E ~ Luc r~oi r CURVE LENGTH RADYUS TM/GENI` fi40rPD BEAR/ CMOdRD DELTA N a•.... .~..~. BEARING LENGTH C1 C2 1,,3 1.28 178!!.86' 1767.86' 191.42' S50'33'46'~ 216.7?' N49'42'06''1V .64 .21 12'16'11 " C 1 1.3'58'40" L2 S44'3B'018 ~ 5.3.26' S4fi57'0771' 75.47' 100 0 100 r _~ E Scale 1 " = 100' Nqp ~8,~ ~~~ ~1 ~~ 10~~ ~ ~° ~~ ~ ,~ P~~ ~5~, ~~ Rp D,~,~ RI 15 ,~~~g3 Ppg,2 ~R~~ 51P~ ~ ~~ ~~ 81 ~6gU ~r° S~ rya ,$1 of e~,al ~ sl`'~oa t ~ 1~%~ 11, 772„311. 1 BUR<A'E/P K/NPG G171R1°bYPA71POW A°YN {777-661-1648-OgA7k7 D.B 1699, Pp.588 ~f0101 KR4GCSE' Rq~D O. f30 Acrs To bs d'sdioatad to the Counfy of Che•~tsrfisAd SRS FA~cr C~1fN 772-66t-4C~?4- • D.~3184 P~4?0 ,~f02?0 ARnYV 6~-DIGE RD y~i~~ ysg o~ p+ r rk Heal! ~' s No. 1613 4/22/2448 j ~~ ~a •j0. =~. HENRY E AIEYERS JR. R/N 772-661-6210--OA010~ O.B.418 P~ 106 r'/ ,102.30 /R4N BR1aGE I~ ~ ~I ~ ~ /~~I -~ s1a•47's ~ ~'8z ~ Og10~00 I .. •`O~~i DR411WGE EASEMENT p VARWBLE WIOTH I • D.B.2447 P~ 961 I APPROX. LO~G'i4T10N NEPaG~p E5'MT D.B.2127 P~ 9.33 NOTE THIS PLOT IS COMPILED FROM PLAT5 AND. DEEDS OF RECORD. ALSO, TN/S PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT AND IS SUBJECT TO INFORMATION WHICH MfA Y BE DISCLOSED BY SUCH. NO /MPROVZrMENTS AND NOT ALL EASEMENTS A~G4 Y BE SHOWN SHOWN. COMPILED PLAT SHOWING 0.130 ACRE OF LAND, LYING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF DATE:4/22/2408 IRON BRIDGE ROAD, TO BE DEDICATED SCALE: 1 =10o TO THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD JOB NO: Ga0500585 DALE DISTRICT I ~° CHESTERFIELD CQUNTY, VIRGINIA ~~ '~ • PLANNERS • ARCHITECTS • ENGIN8ER3 • SURVEYORS• 601 BrsnChway Road SuiEa 100 •Rlchmond, Virginia 23238 •Phone (804) 794-0671 •Fax (804} 794-2835 Gb Pbf - 07-Ot389 S1Jber - A~PRl020t 16~ S`~E~ EM ~B'g6 ~ t'q• OV O~_~V CHESTERFIELD COUNTY a~`~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ~~, Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.16.g. Subject: Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along River Road and Graves Road from Peacefield Development Corporation County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Accept the conveyance of two parcels of land containing 1.679 acres along east right of way line of River Road (State Route 602) and 0.477 acres along the north right of way line of Graves Road (State Route 630) from Peacefield Development Corporation, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of two parcels of land containing a total of 2.156 acres. This dedication is a requirement for the development of Peacefield, Section 1. Approval is recommended. DIStrICt: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager ®~~a_~~ VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of Parcels of Land along Rirer Road and Grares Road from Peacefield Derelopment Corporation S 1 K 1D E p 1.679 acre parcel to be dedicated r' ~r r rr` ~{ f r' r` ~' 70 C 70 '~ v 0.477 acre parcel to be dedicated 'titi , ,~'~ti / 'QQ ~~ ~~~~~~GRAVES RD N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W ~~ E S 1 Irci a qra k~ I A: to t ~V~~.~~ C ~ V~Kay~iti 1 ~ + ~a ~~~~ O ~ '- O V ti O ~~ $ ' ~ ~ N ~ ~~ f~~ ~ ~ ~'l ~'a ~, i ~~~ ~f ~ ~~ r p~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ .; ~ ~~ ! ~~~ ~ ~~A ~ ~~A4 V • ~ ~ f ~ I ~AYleyp'f ~ .~ a ' 7 p~~ y ~r ~ ~~ ~ +5.4~ ' ' r ~ g~~ ~~n~n~~ ~ j ~ p v g44GN~0 ~ r ,•1 7+` ~~a y(g~6 2 8i vI Ob~l ~~ ~~' ~~~ ~ . ~~ ~~ ~, ~ ~~~ ~~' ~ ~ ~4 ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ,_ ~~ w y ~. ~~ ' ~ / .xe~ ~' ~R 4 ~ ~U ~~~ ~~ [~1 0 ~ g~ t fl w ~ ~ a~ ~~ ~ ~u~ a ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s~scc `~ ~ .~~t ~g ~~ Q SRO ~~ y~vr O vvw ~vO ~ ~~ t ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ .- ~ ~, ri ~LNE / ~~ ? n, $ .~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ PuTaHOwraa~~caeaoF ~~~E~ ~3 i ~;~F~ ~~~~ ~~ a ~~ ~ a ~ ~ ; , wro ro ee oeo~r~-~a ro ~t-ie ~~~ ~ s ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? s .. oouHrvoFC~st~RAS~o 4 ~~ j~~ ~~~ ~~~ I .. ~"~ N 8 t ~ w-m~c~oo~rmcr ~~ # ~ e~ ~9 '~, ~~ aptc~rrctio eaetn. near«,~ ~ t ~~~J_~J IY1M[: J: ~va~ ~~ a •~~ ~° u ~S ti m ~~~ }V ~ m~ . r ~~~7 b t {~ A ~ ~ ~~ ; Vt~ V~ O p O L"6 I ;~ MZ0'~aciara OM?LI ~~• - S+]~ ~ a ~V~ ~~ n ~~~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ .'~ ~.K Q, ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~' ~~ ~~~ ~f ~~t ~~ 1 ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~a~` ~~ ~~p, . ~ O ~ ~ 0 Q ~~ u $ ~~~ $ ~1 ~~ ~~ ~ _ ~~ O ^' j ~ Y 0 ~ V ~~ vb ~~ ~ o ~ ~~ yti~ I{ 1 ^ 1 ..SZ'6bl ~~'-~ '~ co ip~~ O •~ ae,~0 {y~.{~R y~~~pr \y d O 4 x ~~~ ~ ,~ ~i ~S ~b~ ~J ~~ ~~~ ~~ o,P ti° ~ ~ ~ o i14~ ig'Gelo ~gp O ~ ~ $ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ PLATBHOWIMG2.2~14ACRESOF ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~€ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ LANOTOQEDlOICAtEDTOTHE ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ _ a ° o ~ COUt'FTY OF CHESTERFIELD !!! tp cra N ~ ~ m ~ NIAIOACA1MtllntcT ~gi ~ ~ xv ~ [I!t ~~ ~~ ~ t7 CHEBTEtIFtELO COUM~Y, vINOtN1A ~~®~_~i~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ' `` ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA S h,~,,,,a~, Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.16.h. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along West Hundred Road from Powers and Associates, LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: on Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.0105 acres along West Hundred Road (State Route 10) from Powers & Associates, LLC, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.0105 acres along West Hundred Road from Powers & Associates, LLC. This dedication is for the Gregory Place commercial development. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # 00~~.~~. VICINITY SKETCH Accep#ance of a Parcel of Land Along Wes# Hundred Road from Powers A Associa#es, LLC -c i i i ~1.-, 0.41~~ Acre Dedication Cr S' j; N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities ~i W !~-E S 1 hcl eq~ax5tlb7 f?et oooa_3~ eno~o THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON I MADE AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE PREMISES SHOWN HEREON AND THAT THERE ARE NO EASEMENTS OR ENCROACHMENTS VISIBLE ON THE GROVND OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN HEREON. TH15 PROPERTY IN A H.U.D. DEFINED FLOOD HAZARD AREA, N j 6~~, E 11, 79/, 376. .Ji o Mc~ Zar°np UN time ~~ a~~~. a~-~ O~t~m3 ~2Oo IY0.am 1b ~vARrABf-E I~rpYN lz.o.W•) `G oAD _~-- N~E 5 TCsT~s D R° D R z cH bKGr~ 565'- B~%r,N=91:63, ~{ saoS.94_ a`~~ 5.4 03 Cy~>gr~T`NSGh;~;36~•25 E im r \~ ~c C,0.OI05 AG• o S #I W Z mr .~ I ~I a m nQi - N*C V1m~J Q~~~ ~~~n IIJ .IamJ wr~0o ~.. Q2~m h~0~ ~~ ~f ~ ~~ ~ G \ ~ to r N ~ s o m ,~ u,, ~~ m v , ~ o ro N ~$ ~o 8 ` X3 4 Vm~~. I C! a ti~aA NN ~ v WNr~ e Z V'0 4 a'r~ S ~nW3 ~ ~ N ~l`~3 3:mW N m vvy~. ~inbw d~pM ml~ Ip Q 3~OM ~ o' I ~ ro it m I a Z ~ m + N~ `o( •LL - sa ; ay-.ic N ^~ ~~ I I i w~ 2~ ~~ Ja W~ J~ D~ V ~~ r.. is wm `~ YSV- 2 .L .. ~; a. j j^ :C `. ~ ~ i1 H LT 40~ 0 Qo (rf7~i rYES PA'4/ K0. ~ 08-000¢ Plat Showing a 0.0105 Ac. Dedication along the Northern Line of West Hundred Road (State Route 10) on the property of Powers and Associates, LLC Located in the Bermuda District Chesterfield County, Virginia HARVEY L. R4RKS Z. No. t243 ~ a THE SURVEY IS SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS OF RECORD AND OTHER PERTINENT FACTS WHICH A TITLE SEARCH ~~ MIGHT DISCLOSE. ~~~.~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 s AGENDA S ~I~H1P,d Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.16.i. Subject: Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along Ironbridge Road from Second Baptist Church County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: u Accept the conveyance of two parcels of land containing a total of 0.058 acres along Ironbridge Road from Second Baptist Church, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the county to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of these parcels conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager 000134 VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of Parcels of Land along Ironbridge Road from Second Baptist Church N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities l~ w `~~ J. E s 1lwl egrafc 666bi 4et (~00~_3~ . - ----------- ---- Centerline Westbound Lane - - - _ o ----- - _ - Ironbridge Road Q o Sfate Roufe 10 ~ - - ` ~ Varloble Width R/W ~'_ _ ° -- Centerline Eastbound Lone ----- --o ----- --------- 0.029 Acn o. ozs aar+~ ~ ° to be fo be ~' Dedlcatsd Dsdlcated N VOH ' " N Rod/f N78'29'49"E---- ~' Mon/f 82 12'20 E «. 84. 4' 15.01 ' 84 94' 108.23' ~ Mo/f . 4 ~ ~ ' ' " 25.71 ' 3 } S78 29 49 W '~+ ~ ~ P t 13A o v ~ ~ 00 -.:_ °o w $ ° °~ in o ~ ir) ~ s sr ~ ~ r:4 $ 3 ~ ro z Pt 12A ~ M'i ~ ~ N c .- ~ ^ ap ~ `cgs p C^ ~ N ~ _ :-~ ~ ^ N ~ o ~ li ~ Pt 1 iA ~ r. 1 ~ fXiSfing St ~ o ~, o coo co 3 ~ z ~`' "~ " or B Church nck VdH r ~ ~ Rscp 2 p ~ o c., z LU Mon/f "' °~ ^ ~`~ "Delano Court" Rod/f Pl p~ t B Pt ra 6~ ~~ co .r q p a ook 5, Poge 231 y~ pEi ~0 rn ~ d ,0 S Pt l0A ,~ bb ,~~ ~~` ~ 0 ~a`'' ~ Rod// 3 Pt 13 .l ea' 6~~ Rl~ N $'~~e `der t ~ z ~~ ~ ' .~e~ ob~g t Pt f2 y y Lunnette 0. Goodson ap k~ ~ 785-652-3160-00000 ~ g 08 2316, PG 860 ~ 08 1 5114 W. Hundred Rood , / 0.058 Acre Toto! Pt 11 Dedication Owner: Second Bopfisf Church +« Minnie J. flukes Pt 11A 785-652-2975-00000 784-652-9766-00000 D8 3784, PG 541 Pt 13A 785-652-4384-00000 OB 1146, PG 545 08 1182, PG J8 5 J 1$ W. Hundred Rood 12630 Ironbridge Rood 5104 W. Hundred Road Pt 12 785-652-3867-00000 D8 1913 PG 1214 Pt 13 & 14 785-652-4977-00000 , 5108 W. Hundred Rood DB 9 73, PG 77 5100 W. Hundred Road Pt 12A 785-652-3680-00000 D8 3368, PG 521 5110 N! Hundred Road GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=60' 0 60 120 180 240 ~~~ALTH aF PLAT SHOWING T1I0 0.029 ACRE PARCELS ~~° f~~ OF LAND SITUATED ON THE SOUTH , LINE OF IRONBRIDGE ROAD TO BE DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF C RISTO ER K. BROCK CHESTERFIELD LOCATED IN THE Lic. o. 002493 / 2 ~ BER]IIUDA DISTRICT OF ~ ~°o CHESTERFIELD COi1NTY, VIRGINIA ~ GENE WATSON ~ ASSOCIATES, PC Scole l"=60' 4221 8onniebank Road Dafe: 12-14-2007 Richmond, Virginia 23234 JiV 8417RW Ph 804-271-8038 Fox 804-271-3031 File: CHRW-8137 o~oa_3s CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~'` BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 -- ~~~~ AGENDA <RC]N4a~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.16.j. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Jefferson Davis Highway from See Yuan Chan Investments, LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: yard Action Rec Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.05 acres along Jefferson Davis Highway from See Yuan Chan Investments, LLC, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the county to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ~~~ x.3`7 VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Jefferson Davis Highway from Sce Yuan Chan Investments, LLC N Chesterfield County Department of Utildies W ~~E S I Ucl egraa 665b7 !et V' V®~~~~ ~oQ~ f~ 7~~2 9L101~/.9CQLUWd7 •1M~7 ~M+d MHOY7 1~1 ~~ }~ $Fg~' ~ ~ ~~a~ ~~ $~ A ~~ t~~~ ~~g~ N u ~o~ ~ d- a rn'~ ~g ~~~ ~ ~. ~ 8 ~~ ~ ~~~ ~4~ ~ ~ N~~ Ry ~ d ~ ~ w ~ t ~ ~~ ci ~ ~ ~ l ~ 9896' 1 N« ~w ~ ~ g ~~~~ ~'~ y~~ ~ ~~g~~ ~~ ~Y ~N `~ ~.~ ~R~4 4, ~1~ ___.____--_-1L' - a i S ' ~ ~ ~~ d .°. v ~i$ f, ~ ~~ ~~ a6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~+~r ~ S M M ~ 0 ~~ ~a~ nva ~o`o N .~. I oa T~ ,~ij*j 8 ~ ~' ~ A ~,~ W~ ~ ~ O0 :~ ' ~/ _ A ~nc~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ g~ ~ $~ _ ~~~.. ~g~ ~ ~~~ ~~q~ 6$~E ~'V 0 ~_ 3 _ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 - ~ AGENDA •~~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.16.k. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Cogbill Road from Shiv Traders, Incorporated County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.116 acres .along Cogbill Road from Shiv Traders, Inc., and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the county to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Real Property Manager rro # ODOa.40 VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Coghill Road from Shir Traders, Inc. U~ r m m ~ K ~ a ~ w ~ U C V! J J L ~ cri A a a~atk~ up ~ ~ ~ `~ m t c~ e v ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ 0.116 Acre Dedication i ~ r ~• }-111.1- l ~~A ~~ ~ 9B~ ~ o~ ~~c~c1.~WOau~ N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities i yY i.E S I hci egrax 666b7 tpet oo®a.~~. 3/4' BENT REBAR FOUND se5 23~ 4'w ! .24 0 ('~E TO SENT ~, REBAR FOUND) - ~, N:3889185.0fi2fi E117899fi1,1884 f a Z ~~~ ~~~~ ~p 4th N ~~~~ ~~N m r o n 0 0 CENTERLINE OF COG$ILL RD. ~~ k 00' ~-- ~X w~ o rn~ COGBILL ROAD - VA. RTE. 1633 Y ' N:3689224.'S83t} • 7 t ~ _ VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WA ~- T1 9 ?138.6085 HA~~ pa~BLiG R9A9WA ' - ASp ~.r52 34"E L ' ~~~ I ~, a~ omlc~,~or~ Zoo.ao ~ +~ ~„ 5,044.00 S.F. ` - - 556 AG 0 ~ ~ _ ~ J~ . 5'52'34"W .~ ~ ~~ ~aoaa --- --- APPROX COVTERUNE ac LocATIaN RaLwAY & POh4ER ~ OOA~PANY EASEAENT SANITARY SEWER O•e. 181 PG 143 EASOuIENT APPROx LOCATION D.B. 1024 PG 50 yEppD gA~p,R- D.B. 1203 PG. 514 VARIABLE SMDTii WATER EASI:}~,IENT D.B. 2270 PG 1423 SHIV TRADERS INC. 54b0 JEFFERSON DAMS HIGHWAY D.B. 8009 PG. 350 A.P.N. 79 0-fi 8- 90-8 T -100-000 46,998 S.F OR 1.079 AC. DARIN K. MILLER LicyNo. 837241 8 3/4" BENT REBAR FOUND 1" $ELOW GRADE 585'52 34''N _ ~ ~~ -• 'D3~ LANDS N/F (TIE TO BENT T1RE TOWN, INCORPORATED R613AR FOUND} D.B. 4O7 PG. 96 A.P.N. 7 89- fi 8 - 8 8- 88- 500- 000 VARIABLE WIDTH WATER EASEMENT D.$. 2270 PG. 1423 pC ~ ~l ~\4 a~ D ~ a~5 p = ~~~ ~ x = 1 ~ n~9 a~ S l I p~~ oa~(!N ` ~y 1 ~1 oa I l ~~ r _J 1 ~. S85'S~ 2~ ~- -- ~~` 240'~~RAPHIC SCALE +o a 2a 4a (~~'~') 1 inch 4D ft. PLAT SHOWING 0.100 ACRES OF LAND TO BE DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD BERMUDA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. VIRGINIA COUNTY PROJECT # 08-0127 ~ SITE PLAN # 08PM0298 DATE: APRIL 30, 2008 SHEET 1 OF 1 DRAWN BY: L.A.L. SCALE: 1" = 40' AMT JN: 107-573.001 E CHECKED BY: D.K.M. A~IZ A. MoRTIUN ?-XOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING HNG~VFriRS ronoa~aorrn~x~n~ xrcrrhroNn, va 2s2ss (salz~~r r••Ax.•~aos~2~~~3 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~" ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ~'I 1P Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.0.16.1. Subject: Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along Jefferson Davis Highway from William K. and Lori S. Thibault County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: u Accept the conveyance of two parcels of land containing a total of 0.367 acres along Jefferson Davis Highway from William K. and Lori S. Thibault, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the county to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of these parcels conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager # 000.43 VICINIT'1r SKETCH Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along Jefferson Daris Highway from William K. and Lori S. Thibault N Chesterfield County Department of lJtilities W }~ E S / 1 hcl eq~ax 1,083 J34et Val®~.~ UNE TABLE LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE Lt N 3'46" E 24.57' L2 14'29'45" E 31b.63' L3 14 9'45" 32.65' L4 N 13'5 '41' W 283.37' LS S 8 '14" W 23.05' L6 N 14'4 '17" W 317,35' L7 N 1 1' W 317.38' L8 S 1' w 27.27' ~ HILL HERBERT L. JR. D.B. 2014, PC. 1064 ' D.B. 1630, PG. i644 ~ TAX IDx 800644988900000 14325 JEFFERSON DAMS HIGHWAY , WILLIAM K, do LORI S. THIBAULT ~' z D.B. 1023. PG. 875 PLAT M , D.B. 7120, PG. 875 TAX IOp 801644186900000 ~4' 14401 JEFFERSON DAMS HIGHWAY t , , ~' 16' PERMANENT VARIABLE WIDTH 3 ~ m, WATER EASEMENT DEDICATION 6001 PG D B 50 , 0 o'f ~ , . . . (0.185 ACRES} L2 --- -- -~ ---- ----r------- 1,841't TO\ LEICMWORTH BOULEVARD _ Mqp 8y re ! , ~ r , ! , (+a , (~ ; r ST ,a~oc, 2 r WILLIAM K. 6t LORI S. THIBAULT j Qnc~ ~ 0.8. 1023, PG. 875 PLAT ' ; ''~ ° s ~ 0.8. 7120, PG. 884 a v o TAX iD~ 801644234100000 r ~ ~ v rD 14501 JEFFERSON DAMS HIGHWAY ~ r N~ f r w'° oo ~ 16' PERMANENT N 3644233.66 f i a Ri q_ A 1 WATER EASEMENT E 11$01004.30 ~ y x S5' O.B. 5963, PC. 879 VARIABLE WIDTH J o ~ ~- ~ DEDICATION r w e I L3 4 (0.182 ACRES) ~ v -- ---------- --- 0 1' WATER EASEMENT VARIABLE WIDTH D.B. 907, PG. 169 WATER EASEMENT - ~ D.B. 6161, PG`6 :ENTERLINE ROAD _ _ U.S. ROUTE 301 ]EFFERSON DAMS HIGHWAY VARIABLE WIDTH R/W This survey was prepared wkhout the benefit of a title binder and may therePore not show all existing easements or other pertinent facts which may affect the property. 1~~,yTH oF`~~A W. M. NAULTY ~' Lic. No. 2067 ~Yt.~'d crrvV`G~O o '100 200 SCALE IN FEET PLAT SHOWING A 0.185 ACRES 810.182 ACRES DEDICATION OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ]EFFERSON DAMS HIGHWAY BERMUDA DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA COUNTY SITE PLAN ~08PR0113 COUNTY PRO]ECT #06-0227 Tests OAAYY[NG WIlVARlD Ar TMe 1nn~a~a~ wuAnuoNAUarrmTnaalrr+raAS DATE: MARCH 3 2008 SCALE: 1"=100' X260 OvWngst BMd I O,Yioe GNOrgy VA 23875 T>:Lea.stl.seoo r~lxea.75t.o7ee www.tlmmom.mm REV: APRll21, 2008 ].N.:23375 RW 1 SlteOewlapmant RaBldarRlel InfnstrlleturB ~ TBehnoloyy DRAWN BY: 1NL CHECK BY: WMN TIMMONS GROUP:•':"~ -10' WATER EASEMENT D.B. 929, PG. 173 3644846.17 ooQ~_~~ _ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ""~ ` BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 - ~ AGENDA ~'IgQH~p Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.16.m. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land for the Extension of North Otterdale Road from Twin Creek Development Company County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 3.539 acres for the extension of North Otterdale Road from Twin Creek Development Co., and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 3.539 acres. This dedication is a requirement for the development of Brookcreek Crossing Subdivision. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # oooa.~~s VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of a Parcel of Land for the Extension of North ~tterdale Road from Twin Creek Development Co. ~~ 3.539 acre parcel to be dedicated R N 1. LANCASTER GATE LN 2. LANCASTER GATE DR ~ 3. hERRI COVE CT ~, 4. KERRI COVE WAY N N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities ~~ W '~ ~-E S I hcl eq~ak W2.37 Ret OL®~_~~ ,001 = „ l aI~~S 0 ~~ ~ ~~ o ~~ y I K 4 iZ £ ? ~ W ~~ s ~pGx o ~' W Zs 1 ~N ~~ C IW/1 ~~ os W C(~ 1 ~Y i a= ~~ i ~Q N fn O =X e 1 \ ~~ ~1 \ 1 F ` 71 \t ~ aL\ 1\ 11 \ 1 1 (t m ` a w l\ \ 4 N ~R~ \ ~h~ ~r~h~ ~~~~ v K~. ~ ~: k~o ~^~ ~O, ~~ ~~ ~ - ~~ ~ ~\\. a ~^ ~ \ N 4 k. " ~ ~ ;~ .'h '\' ~'r~ ~~ ~ o~ a~; `.! ! ~~ h ! / ~/. // / / ti I / / i! ,A' „ ~. ! ! /~ A ~ ! / 1~ „h R .` ! ! ~~N P. ~ 2 ! ! ~ h / / ~ a~ d~} ~+/ / / i M Cdy' ~ i i ilI r'I ~ 4 4 V '.l ~` ~~ { tl i Ary rf pp`1 Z ~ A h ~ v i > ^; ~ fi ~~ ~ ~ ~p ~ ~~ti 3~ h; q~~f ;.w5 ~ b ~V 2: I~~~ `Ir +r.~ r! 11 ;~ ~ /, br,/, / ! b~ // / ! ~~~ h~ li ~~ w r~ QQ ,' ~ i / / Y / r ~, I i i ~,e - E ~ ~ )~ ~~ ~ ~ E cry •'A L9t~ Rji I ~a4505 t `IAA ~/// i ~n $O~ I /~~%mx ct„ R~ ~/~ ~Dygy 377~t7dCl1LD 7Y fOft/ f96~:7d CF96d40 OOWO-BfL6-f!!~8/L Nld9 0731lN3LS9ilJ i0 .UAV10J m~~~ ~~~~ ~.~.~ ~'i ~ O ~~OSi ~n0~ (4 N n K .- U ~, 1 ~ f N ' ~ r o ~ N ~W . i ~~^ ~~n x ~~ n L~ U 0 ~ ;; ~ ~ /~bu4L n 1 ~ Q S r I R ~ .~ ,_ ~ / 41 v ( ~ Ik O~ - z ~ , r ~~ : t~ _. , ~~ ~~ {.~ ~` W~ vJ oW n a~ ~ Q ~ 0 ~~! OQ $~ O Q ~ QoW ~ ~~ ~ `€ ' ~ ~ ~~pW ~a a~ o ~ 2~a ~ ~ V~gl~2 ~ ~ ~~ a~.~ ~ QQ~ U $p' ~ ~ W e~R(8 pG~ ~ ~ O C 1 ~ ~ q p y ~ liO ~k P ~4~~~~ ~ a as r ~aa ~/ ~ ~~ !e e ~~ ~~ x ~ ti ti ti 5 i R 7 ' S!t 4~ ~ ~~ e ~n~~ ~~~» ~ ~ gQ ti L 4oa 0 ~ , V ~y~~ ~ ~ r ~'__~ "W z/, g w~ at7FZe 7n'~~~ w{hh ~ !~ a~ ^Q ~+Jt~y~~m~awo~~n~hbtio ~' ~ j V h ~ ~ ~• W~~ 3~ V J J J J J Sao ~ ~ e~ Z w ~ ~^y ~w ~ ,fib ~ ._... Z!i ~, h w`~ ~~hh~i~a~• v, ti .h~. ~~' ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ R F~ J~ ~ , w ~ 1~ ~ ~ n ~ 1 o h ~ l ~ ^'h ^~d~gr^i. !'. ~~ C ~\~ a ~ Ah ~ H '~I9i'S~ iG~S $ ~ 117, o ~ ~~~o vha n~ow$$°~q& , ,~~~a I O b ^ J 'J iw ..1~ p p p. _ hq Ms Q ~ ^ OOH 6 Ow yy8~~~ r`6~ a w qg v-~c ~^_ CW ~~ h~ h~ N tl ^O ~~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ I a ,` ? j y~ v(~c~uc~C+C~'~bGUUVOCaUOO I \y ~ ~ / .._. _ __ . .__ _ w~~~wiv?'M7710tl{4PI.cDMr1f{MP~ip~Mru.~{oa.y 10 vriLTIr0.1{wC(?{d dGVIg07 3'R! UO®~_4~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 ~ AGENDA •.~N . Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.17.a. Subject: Approval of Water Contract for 20630 Bass Street Water Improvements, Contract Number 07-0399 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this contract and authorize the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents. Summary of Information: This project includes an offsite extension of 175 L.F.± of 6" waterlines. In accordance with the ordinance, the Developer is entitled to refunds through connection fees for the construction cost of the off-site improvements. Developer: Ralph Kent and Michaele Shriver Contractor: Gerald K. Moody, Inc. Contract Amount: Estimated County Cost for Off-Site .....................$2,183.50 Estimated Developer Cost ...............................$7,616.50 Estimated Total ........................................$9,800.00 Code: (Refunds thru Connections - Off-Site) 5B-572V0-E4D District: Matoaca Preparers William O. Wrictht Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No 000].49 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY :~-_-a BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 r AGENDA y~Na~ Budget and Management Comments: This agenda item requests that the Board approve the water contract for 20630 Bass Street Water Improvements. The Water Operations Budget appropriates funds, which carry forward from year to year, to refund developers for offsite and/or oversize improvements the county requires or asks them to make during the course of their construction. The refund a developer will receive is dependent on the number and type of improvements the developer completes and is paid out at the end of the contract. Consequently, the $2,183.50 county obligation listed in the agenda item is an estimate. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management (~00,.5~ 2063 Bass Street - Water Improvements County Project # U7-0399 ~ `. ~ 7 ` ``` ~`. ti ~~ . ~~_ .~ ~~ ._ .~ ~._ ~~~ `. ~,, ~~"~. r ~`~ f. Proposed 6" Vi/ater Line ~~:~. County Project ~ 07-0399 ~~, 1 r~ t\' ~ r ~•1 ~~ `t~, ~'i ~~ ~1 Jr~ ~ y~~~~ ! l~ ~ ~ ~ rr ~ ~ r ~ 1 r ~ ~ ter' Kir t ~~ ~/r Y l i t ,i ti ~, ~.' -~ ~ r' r .' ~~ r~ ~ Chesterfield County Department of Utilities w ~~- E _.. s t hcl egrak 13?A5 tat O~U~_ i1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY -,, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA SIN , Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.17.b. Subiect: Approval of Water Contract for Hull Street Road (Rt. 360) Waterline Extension to Magnolia Green, Contract Number 06-0344 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this contract and authorize the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents. Summary of Information: This project includes an extension of 8,620 L.F.± of 30" and 24" oversized waterlines which includes 3,000 L.F. that is subject to offsite refunds. The Developer is required to have a 20" waterline to serve his development. Staff has requested that the waterlines be oversized to provide service to the adjoining properties. In accordance with the ordinance, the Developer is entitled to refunds for the construction cost of the oversized and off-site improvements. Developer: Magnolia Green Development, LLC Contractor: Piedmont Construction Company Contract Amount: Estimated County Cost for Off-Site ...................$180,730.75 Estimated County Cost for Oversizing .................$228,090.00 Estimated Developer Cost ...........................$1,388,179.00 Estimated Total ....................................$1,797,000.00 Code: (Refunds thru Connections - Off-Site) 5B-572V0-E4D (Refunds thru Connections - Oversizing) 5B-572V0-E4C District: Matoaca Preparers William O. Wright Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~_ a.~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 ~~; AGENDA _RCIgVN Budget and Management Comments: This agenda item requests that the Board approve the water contract for Hull Street Road Waterline Extension to Magnolia Green. The Water Operations Budget appropriates funds, which carry forward from year to year, to refund developers for offsite and/or oversize improvements the county requires or asks them to make during the course of their construction. The refund a developer will receive is dependent on the number and type of improvements the developer completes and is paid out at the end of the contract. Consequently, the $408,820.75 county obligation listed in the agenda item is an estimate. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management oQOa.s3 VICINITY SKETCH Hull Street Rd. (Rt. 360) Waterline Extension County Project # 06-0344 t. Xee u 2.Yd~0 YBET 3.F ~Y CT X LIFF CT ~, SLI ~ BILNCX Proposed 24" e Oversized Water Line ` ~ Co. P ro i. # 06-0344 roposed 30" Oversized Water Line o. Proi. # OS-0344 ~.--~ _~•~°`i ~~ N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities w ~1~ e s I IFCI egFak 1,3E0 S3let ooO~~~Z CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.0.18. Subiect: Award of Construction Contract for County Project #06-0005, Replacement of the Existing Sunnybrook Wastewater Pumping Station County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: The Board of Supervisors is requested to award the construction contract to T.A. Sheets Mechanical Contractors, Inc. in the amount of $6,480,000; transfer $7,500,000 from Rate Stabilization to the Sunnybrook Wastewater Pumping Station project account, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Summary of Information: This replacement project consists of the construction of a new wastewater pumping station and force main that currently serves the Sunnybrook wastewater service area. Staff received four (4) bids; the bids ranged from $6,480,000 to $7.,329,232. The lowest bid, in the amount of $6,480,000 was submitted by T.A. Sheets Mechanical Contractors, Inc. The County's engineering consultant, Whitman, Requardt and Associates, LLP, has evaluated the bids and recommends award of the contract to the low bidder. The replacement of the existing Sunnybrook Wastewater Pumping Station is a Rate Stabilization Reserve project. Staff requests $7,500,000 be transferred from the Rate Stabilization Reserve to this project for construction, inspection and construction contingencies. Funds for this project are available in the current Rate Stabilization Reserve. District: Clover Hill Preparers George B. Haves Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # 00~, ~~ • __- CHESTERFIELD COUNTY r~; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 ~~'" AGENDA hRCINIo Budget and Management Comments: The Board of Supervisors is requested to award the construction contract to T.A. Sheets Mechanical Contractors, Inc. in the amount of $6,480,000; transfer $7,500,000 from Rate Stabilization to the Sunnybrook Wastewater Pumping Station project account, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. The Rate Stabilization account has sufficient funding to transfer $7.5 million to the Sunnybrook Wastewater project account, and the transfer is necessary in order to fund the contract amount of $6.48 million. To date, $800,000 has been appropriated for this project, with total expenditures of almost $471,000, most of which was spent on engineering services. This agenda item will move the project to the construction phase. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management 000~_~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~ `'~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~~ AGENDA .~ S ~yg~ PIAC~N~I!g/ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.19.a. Subject: Request to Quitclaim a Variable Width Temporary Reduced Imperviousness Best Management Practice Easement Across the Property of BEP Limited Partnership County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a variable width temporary reduced imperviousness best management practice easement across the property of BEP Limited Partnership. Summary of Information: BEP Limited Partnership has requested approval to vacate a variable width temporary reduced imperviousness best management practice easement across its property as shown on the attached plat. Anew easement has been dedicated and a permanent BMP facility has been constructed. The Environmental Engineering Department has reviewed the request. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager 0007.57 VICINITY SKETCH Request to Quitclaim a Variable lilfidth Temporary Reduced Imperviousness Best Management Practice Easement Across the Property of BEP Limited Partnership "~'t ~~ Temporary Reduced Imperviousness Best Management Practice to be quitclaimed ~~ 0 t~''~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ `~ I ~ ~~ ~~{~ ~~~fiR ~,} ~'T D ~ ~ m ~ ~ Cl V l~W QR -n D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~C ~,~ -~ ~ ~Ng~ ~~~'~~-1lA ! TPK~ L~1~ ~ / N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities 1-. w ?~/~E S I hcl egrak665b7 tet 000~.5~ ~~~~ ~ ~ `» .~'~ ~ 4 r ~~ ~.$ ~ a __ ~~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ;~~ 1 1 r I7' ~r _-~+3r__ =~L _ ~ w ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~tma" ~~~~ ~i as ~h~~q ~ ~ I ~w~3r~ ~t i ~~I C ~ I i 1~'-' ~ i ~~~ L-~M-_ ~...latei=ice ~ -f$Ll~ ~ `~. I. `"I ~. .. 1' ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ s N 0 O J s ~~ ~~ ~~ o ~ ~oa ~ ~~ ~ 8 v ~~ ~~~~ ~~ f~ \ ~ fm~.. . ~ I ~~ ~ .r\.~ \ `~~ -..sue --- ;,,/ ~ ~ , I ~I .. _ , ~ / r' ~ ~' k~~h ~~s~ ~~~" V ~ riwalr7rT~ras~s. ~1 _1 \` /j ` ~ i / f ~ s 1 ~ ! ~ ~ ~ r .~ ~ ~ ~qi~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ e ~ ~``'~ • y., ~~ _ ~~ g ~~ ~~~~ ~ A 7N /11616~~YI !~A"J AAO A A i®/gMRY ! ~ f ~ ~ ~~ ~ 999, ; ~ A~ rI~/I~i~-II, .~, ~~~ ~ ~ ii ~~f ~ ~~~i ~ . ~ ~ ~~ ~o~r~~~l~ 00059 _ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~~ AGENDA S - = ,~ h~tP~~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.19.b. Subject: Request to Quitclaim a Variable Width Storm water Management System/Best Management Practice Easement and Twenty-Foot and Forty-Foot Storm Water Management System/Best Management Practice (SWM/BMP) Access Easements Across the Property of Beulah United Methodist Church County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a variable width SWM/BMP easement and 20' and 40' SWM/BMP access easements across the property of Beulah United Methodist Church. Summary of Information: Beulah United Methodist Church has requested approval to vacate a variable width SWM/BMP easement and 20' and 40' SWM/BMP access easements across its property as shown on the attached plat. The SWM/BMP facility has been relocated. This request has been reviewed by Environmental Engineering. Approval is recommended. DlstrlCt: Dale Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # 000'_64 ~/ICINITY SKETCH Request to Quitclaim a Variable lAlidth S111IMlBMP Easement and 21' and 4t' Storm lAlater Management Systcm/Best Management Practice [SWM/BMP) Access Easements across the Property of Beulah United Methodist Church N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W ~E S I IwY eq~ak 655b7 7ret ~V~~.~~ CUMRIE, CWVRES W. k t1ARY C. w + u u -~ ~~i~~'~ ~ N 0725'37 W+ ~~Q~~~~~~~~ y~m~~~~ ~ w zx.u• B yC$~~ tq~~ >H~7~C~CZD tm~~1~~~yCJ~J••$$$ 6+~ ~ ~otr~tr~~~IIII ~ rt00~]ff~~~~~~ 1•~~4141g0~ ~ N 7xy~ ~ -1 tN~1~11q ppw S O ~ S T ~w~ i .°{,,,~Iy1Z A 1 ~a~ op~ ~, Zt'~~~w3 ~ ypmOCi ~_ 22 ll~~w^jKK ~iw`{~~~a~~ ~ ~~y> fry ~WpON O~ ~~~y~ w O N N~7C ~,w 1 ~~r~ ~ ~'4 ~N so ~ w w • a C y ` ~S~ ~~ g1~ ~~ a; ~ N ,~~ ~§ w N ~ CCC ~ ~n N f ~~ ~ . N r ~ / : ~J '"3.4E,LZSOS .t4'6Qt ~N ~ ~ w N~ NO' $~ 4 f , ~ _~ ~'~~~ J ~ ~ ~ - s ri } o R v ~, o o.oC ~n m ' ~ ~e 0 ~ 4 Z ~ ~"~ Hi p ~ Y ~ N O 00 A u , ~~ N ~ A R ~ ~O N y y Z N ~~ ~ r ~ ~ j > n t n f S ~^ tinny a- m ~efC.rxp ~=~n n n t~mwttTi' oNt~+"4 y4kppk m ~}.~ o~ ao:ia "e~ •wR ~ gh,~T7t R~ ~s~' ~bp O l ONNy~ z k+v aJ z a N gE~ G r a s ~ m " PLAT SHOWING A VARIABLE WIDTH " " ' AUSTIN BROCKENBROUGH °~"".B . ~ "~ 1 °' m .~ SWM/sMP EASEMENT AND A 20 do & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P. ors~cN .ws t.o. 0 40' 'SWM/BI+AP" ACCESS EASEMENT ~ ~ ,t ~ m ACR05S THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS Consulting Engineers s~x.E ~a w o~ BEULAH Ur~ITED METHODIST CHURCH 460o wESr HuNOREO Rao r ' 80' °7-44A Q ' Z DALE DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY P.o. eox 4600 vH. ao4-use-a~4a ~~ lASf RfNSm fTl , CHESTER, VIRgNIA 23631 FX. 801-748-7849 yam, 24, 1955 WY 13, 1545 oooa.s~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~~~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 r AGENDA ~<RGIN~'~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.19.c. Subject: Request to Quitclaim Variable Width Water Easements, a Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement (Private), a Twenty-Foot Storm Water Management System/Best Management Practice (BMP) Access Easement and a Variable Width Storm Water Management System/Best Management Practice (BMP) Easement Across the Property of The Landmark Company, Incorporated County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate variable width water easements, a 16' drainage easement (private), a 20' SWM/BMP access easement and a variable width SWM/BMP easement across the property of The Landmark Company, Inc. Summary of Information: The Landmark Company, Inc. has requested approval to vacate portions of water easements and stormwater easements across its property as shown on the attached plat. The utilities were never installed in these locations and the property is now being developed as Ruffin Mill Center, an office/warehouse development. The Utilities and Environmental Engineering Departments have reviewed the request. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # 000'.03 VICINITY SKETCH Request to Quitclaim Variable lAlidth 1lllater Easements, a ii' Drainage Easement [Prirate),a 2t' Storm Water Management SystemlBest Management Practice (BYP) Access Easement b a Variable lAlidth Storm lAEater Management System/Best Management Practice (BMP) Easement across the Property of The Landmark Company, Inc. '°~R7' R~~~jj ~~ Water easment to be vacated ~l(p~,~jj ~~ Water easment to be vacated It J 1 I ~ ~ ~ `' ~ y I }- ~ ' I ~ 2 SWMBMP Easement along with its ~~~, ~ access easement to be vacated •~ ~ R~ ~~ j ~ `.,: try Q .~` ~ ~ ~. 2W f ---~. ~ Drainage easement (Private) to be vacated U T RUC 9f ST~~~ ~{ d Drainage easement (Private) to be vacated N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities 1. w `~~~~ E S I hcl eq~ak 655b7 tet ~LJ®~~5~ w ~ -+ q ~ ~ RUFF1Af MILL ROAD :.~ STaTF RDUTLr ,/748 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a~8 vaRia~tE wiDm R/w I ~' n°, ~ n? ~ ~~ ^I I ~ 6 III mn nz~ I QQ I F y I I V ~ ~, ~ y 2 ICI ~~ ~ ~ ' I $ ~+ Y ~p~a II m b ~p ~ j~ am `!a ~~ ~~ ~ ~~+ ~ I I ro ~ ~ ao ~ ' +! ' I a? p 'I1 i a p i pg' ~~ x ~1'~ ~~~~~ ~~ I ~~~ R I T . ~ ni I 1 y ` ~ ~ ~~ +r r--a_---------- ~ I ~ ~I~ ~ , I\ j~ I N°~aa°o I ~! »~ vNZ7Ny t ~ il~ r~ i ~~A~y ~ ~ P'~~ ~ I 1~ s ~1 1 1~~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~~ ~~ I I 'll ~) 1_i,~ ~ m ' n 9~ ~; '!~ sw` a~ ~a~ ~ ~ya~, ~~vJ to ~~ ~ n N~~ I m' Ij~ ~ a j ~ lj~^ ~~ ~ I I 1 tissy~ ~ 1 I ~'^ ~ ; N O ^ I'*1 ^ ~ L _ ynz~xc ^ _ r. ~ ~ .~xlar _ _ ~ C$ c / I a~ ~l ~N O~D."8 ~~~ e' I w~~IIIW~D~z ~~~I ~ I r I l j~.~ ~~ ~ m 1 ~ oo N t ~~ ~g~R III ~ ~~ w D ao t I 5 i all y„~~ ~~_y''` N~~ lti' '~ E i I I ~ r9~i•rdE eo.ad ~. fi,~ ~ r~l ~ ~c I ~S+AO. ~ N ~ i ~ `~ a ~ I $ ~ ~ ~s~ z i w ~ I ssnpxt ~i i+ ~ k rr ~ ~ / g ~ I A+sa 1 ~ ~ ~ `s N ~ ~ 1 3 Np'6Td6'W yr ~ ~' ~r ~ + 1 u > I I'= ~l ~NW'46'33'W ~~~ ~,~ ~ tY~ij m: ~~1 ~ oano _~ I '1 ~ wo ~`~ T ~ ~ ~ I i ! ~ ~ m m to ~~ nu6EnulNO p11F, tNC. I ~ ~ ~ ~ t N I (/y b nl V1 ~ '~ 1160 1'OUGISICNE • ~~ I \ n Z 0.6. P66A fA4E X36 r7 ~ I ~ ~ t t I ~ ~ ~ 3 CdAPnfll PUT 91101NNG: w~ a ~ ~ ~ swM/eMP, zo' AOCESS ANb bRAINAGE ~ Draper Aden Associates g EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF ~ ~~~~ Surreyf~s ~ 8tivlronmeslal Srz~vfoa ~ w ~ ' ~ MEALS ON WHEELS OF GREATER ry~~pa, VA YIMIIYup, YA N W - ~ f ~S RICFiMONO. INC. tlY11w~~replw eh~eewwr.vA PS IWMww14 VA~lU1 IIrMM Ilyd~.YA Y BER11uM as1RICf. C3{ESYFRFIFLD CaUNTY. v1l ~ ~'~ IuMp~OuMrr, YC ~-OOa_~i5 . ~ N ~ ~ ~~~ggg RlJFFIN MILL RO/ID o o y N ~"~p~8 V/1R1ABtE 1Mp71y R/W o "i ~ I ~ ~ p 1 n~ A y e , I I I °n y yo ~ r+assR_a°D,r ~ V ~ ~ x ii ~~ N= ~ o~ 1 v ~ ~ m A , I I! ~ v° ~ a D ' I ~s~s£~ Y Q C~ 4 ~I I ~ ~~ ~~~ I 1 Np~~ a ~ ~i $ !f ~~ ~ m m I i ~~~~ r [ ~~ ~ (n nl I 1 D ~ ~ ~' ~ r1J N ~ ~ ~ O !! m ~ ~ ~IJ ~ I ~ ~~~~ m ~ ~ illJ~ ~ i ~ I ~' ~` ~II o ~ v~ ((... 1 I N yyy fa ~p~ ~n ICI m, 1 _ ~; as s 11!96 ~1~2~'E ~75a~ 1 J-"'__--~- IEp~I ~u~~ I y ~~I r n.~~-l YF cn o D c~ ~ ~ «e9ar2x•w I ly ~ w b6 ~ _. + it ~I iy cnw~ $~g°~~' I I I-.- ~ I Ix a cn a r ~ ~ ~ !B , y gg ~ 1!! YI I~ '• ~ ~ rr1 ' ~ , z w8~g ICI ~, I~ ~~ vim ~~ ~ ~ I _ N s~ u NR't~ I ~ I!! I I~ z i #V ~ ~ ~ 1 I!~ gl I~ ~ ' 1 ~ ~ ~ 69.aa' J~ (C 1 ~ ! ~ Na9S722'M E I i d~ I~~ ~ ~z 'I~ i f ~; I;! 1 d I aM p i~! I N~ I ~ ~I,, ~~ '' ~~~~ I If; 1 g 1 1. I ~~~ I I;. , N~~ ! 1 1 < I 1~ co~~ ~~ ~r~e'3Yw w+.aY ~~ "' f ~ in z r ! a ~~wl C~ ~!! 1 :~ \~ r ~ c ~ I I ! 71Y6ERLANO ENTEf6~pSE5. 1160. I is 9~ ~ I ~v ~ i 1630 TOUOIS ROAD 1 ~~~ai IR I D.6. ;633, G i aE Na 1 1 I 1 OONPtIED PLAT SHOWNC: 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Draper Aden Associates ro ~ ~ 3 ~ 3 ° s WATERLINE EASEMENTS ACROSS TH£ i ~ ~ PROPERTY OF MEALS ON WHEELS ~ E6Sf6arL9g ~ 6arv9yln5 ~ Eavlrenmao4i 6ervka ~^ ~ OF GREATER RICHMOND. INC. 6N~a19McOM gnig699699YAYA 6ER4UDA D15fitICT, GNE51^ERFIFiD OOUNTY, YA. ~~~!~~~~ ~~ LJIJ®~.~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~~ AGENDA h _,N~P~' Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.19.d. Subject: Request to Quitclaim a Variable width Storm Water Management System/Best Management Practice Easement and a Variable Width Storm water Management System/Best Management Practice (SWM/BMP) Access Easement Across the Property of Uphoff Ventures, LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a variable width SWM/BMP easement and SWM/BMP access easement across the property of Uphoff Ventures, LLC Summary of Information: Uphoff Ventures, LLC has requested approval to vacate a variable width SWM/BMP easement and SWM/BMP access easement across its property as shown on the attached plat to accommodate for the development of Commonwealth 300. A new easement will be dedicated for the required SWM/BMP facility. The Environmental Engineering Department has reviewed this request. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ~~ Q~.+6`7 VICINITY SKETCH Request to Quitclaim a Variable Width Storm Water Management System/Best Management Practice Easement and a variable Width Storm Water Management System/Best Management Practice [SWMIBMP) Access Easement across the Property of Uphoff Ventures, LLC ur ~~\ 6. 7 ~, u ~,~~. M ~Y -~~~ SWMBMP Easement to be quitclaimed ~ ~ ~ ~~Q ~ 6 ~ ~ 2 SWrfir c 1. BLUFF WAY 2. CROWN E RI DG E L~~P 3. WYN N LN ~ 4. CENTRAL P(71NTE RD 5. CREEK HEIGHTS DR 5 ~~ 6. CLUB TERRACE LN ~~ 7. RDCKRIDGE RUN LN ~ 8. TERRACE ARBOR CI R 9. TERRACE CREEK BLVD = ~ M Chesterfield County Department of Utildies 1~ W ~~ ~~ E S I Iwl egraY fi66.67 #et oooa_~s I ,/ , ~ , ,/ I / / ~, I .' / ~ / i pc / / ~~ 2 I °ib]:U / i// $ t / . ~ P~ ~ // ~ ~~ m } i a~ ~ r ,' N ~ " a ~ ~ gg ~ /;'J ¢~ 0 q 6 b~ ~ ~J i W 1 ~ ~ u~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,, ~ o inn ~~ ~ ~ ~ .~~/ ~~ - ~ U1 '~ ~': ~ ~~ o ° Q $ ~ "Y' ~ 1~ 1 til "~"' ~~s ~ _~ ~~~ o ~~~ X06 ~,,~g ,/ ,/ d~~ ~ ,/ , ~yq Imp l ~~~ T ~ I Nen`~. i//~ ~ pySti I 33~~ ~ a s9 / ~H.~~ Y i / hf I ~ ~r ti ~ , A ~ ! 1v, ,,I / ~ 1 k'' N y~4 ~' J J ~1~ 1 ~` ~ 9 i~31v1+~ ~ ~ ~ ~it J ~L.l l f ~ I ` ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ V ~ JJ j c 1a ~ ~ a I1 1 / i i W i;: V %/ ` 2 ~ ~' ~ E ~y o ~ 8 Q w 1 r ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~24 w ~ ti.\` ~ l ~ 11 g3~~"~~~7~£Yg~1 ~ r '~ ~ ~~ ~ 11 i . b°c~ y*~ i~ cPu -` ~vo' f~~i C0~ ~ crr • ~ ti A ., J~ o w' `~ ~,rM'~ k ` i2 4 ~~ M e ~~ W ` OP ~~ Yl ppAFq ey $ PLATSNOMfIN6 AYABIABLEri1DTNSIPWBLIP IRHB ~ ~ ^ "" ^ qQ~ L~ WEYEIR MESA iWMNMP ACCEE8 ~6iENT T08E ~~~~Q~ ~~ 9 E~i$il ;~~~ ~~~~ i` x.19 O $ - ~ ~ 6 VAGTID ANDAVA1DAElE WIDTN BWMlE1l EASENdIt ~ ~ ~~~j~ f i i g ~ d r ~ ~ ~ AND 90' i1M111BNP ACCESS EASENEN7 CRDBEIN6 THE ~ ~„ 1~ y ~~ 1 ~ ~ ~ .. N ~ s ~ ~ ,~, LAND1 aP uPNDrPVENroRES u.c, Ta EE DEiDfCATED € [ ~~ r p E AA ~~$ B ~ F ~ ~ Ilak MATOACA CISI WCI a _ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY `°~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~~ AGENDA S - .~~ `IRf~N~p Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.20. Subject: Designation .of Right of Way and Temporary Construction Easement for Ecoff Avenue County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested:' Designate right of way and temporary construction easement for Ecoff Avenue and authorize the County Administrator to execute the declaration. Summary of Information: As a condition of site plan approval for Hillendale Day Care, it is necessary that 0.140 acres of county property be designated as public right of way. This request has been reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Department and the Site Plan Team. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # 000,_'70 VICINITY SKETCH Designation of Right of Way and Temporary Construction Easement for Ecoff Arenue ~,t, ~ _ CHESTER VILLAGE DR ~'A~ 2. FOUNTAIN SQUARE ~ ~cA .FESTIVAL DR 4. RATION AVE ~ 5 AI UAR WAY ~ T VILLA ~ QO t3 p C~ ~ R G~ n j R ~fifi ~ a~ ~ ~ K ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ 5, 5 ~4 m 4.140 Acre Declaration q a ~ ~~ 4j r 1. GRAND GAKS FGREST CIR T 2. GRAND QAKS FGREST CT O,~ ~ ~~~ 3. CHESTER SQUARE AVE ~ y L ~ ~ ~ ~ Q~ 2 T sN Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W i~~ E S I IrcY eq~ak 6b6.67 feet ooo~~~~ \:<-.. 1_ ~L ~~i ~~ C U G L~ c ~~ • n n - 2 ~~ti~ a4~':, a4~T `~ ~ N sv `~^~ u 4`ti'4 < ~,. - .yam ^' ~ r__._^~ I60 r ` QAS(f k M Or 2B{'Ji' ~~*\ ~ ~ ° I , ~ cYdeid k Cr Cow+4 fCOfF AYOWK a+' /+ N ~~~S,iE~S6e 01'E ~ ~ ,`a' ~ i `Y ~I `_ `~ . 7~. ~y 1~1 s`. sue, ~ c . ~ ~G ~°n w ~q ~T .~ /~~ Vi I __ .. y, Ts''~y Y~ `~\ _~~^ 1, ~. ~ i ~ -~ '; tV~~ ~ 4 ~~?• ~ \\~_ 1. 4:n 4~~•wyvy w Z !~ ~1'~ y q~oo \,~ 'a 'e ~ ~W ~ c3 ~. ~f in ~ ~m `'sue. ~ ~ ~~t~ ~ R ~: ~~ ~~ ~ ~ O D ~n ~.. H {N N n A ,nn o' ~to ~~ s ~, i~~~ .. ~~ ~~, ~ ~~~ a ~•~, may.` ~ '~'~ {`~ O ~ ~ ~: .~}S fa~'~at n ~ ~i ~ o ~ ~~ fy~~InOm O~ ~ ° J~y~~~ 4~_ `1 R'6 HAS * '~ i ~ °u~~ ~lat ~------- .. _... -- ti ~~$ ~ ~ t p y~~ 1 ci ~ S ~ j a C: g' ~ ~ o~ c a ~ ... C: `~ :•^i ^ h „~. ~q ., i .~ J 1LS ~• ~~ 4,M Oq n m{ ~ .+ ` ~~ 6 A ~ / gv a4? ~ 0.s q ~s$q $ ,n .~m. _ , a~ u~ ~~ pp H i __'j~ <_ a 1. _ ? p 44 Ci Q _ 5667{ 02 £ J01.81 ' o ~ s ~ \ j I = -- C ~ ~ I .__-- -- ~ ~ nsa~Lo~ • -_ ~+ •1 n b ~ z _ ?9A7T ECOFF AVFIVU£ ro ! ~ ~ ~ ~ m z6s 3B• L=J59 i- To ~4 ~• ~k [''.` ?> ~ ~ .STATE RT. I.'i02 ~ ; ~ ' a e JO R/W ,~ 3 r .G ~• tT '~ ti b a L `t3` '~!~ ~ C l Ca ~ D~r yy `'1 ~ ~~ y O + ~ ~a ~ ~j O Y ~C X' Oil *L Om • j Cl ~, aA ~ m O W ~ 4 ~\ ~ ti rti J• ~ n ~ j ~~ ~ ~' ' v: i PLAT 5HOWIN6 0394 ACHE OF LAND TO Un in ~ ~, "~ ~" ~, fl iG DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY Of CHESTERFIELD, =~1 ~ O ' io ~ ~ AND 0.140 ACAE Of LAND TO 8E DECLARED AS 'n ~~ ~ H Y ~ hi RIGHT Of WAY, LYING NORTH OF SCOFF AVENUE ;7~ ~ 1 w ~- E iiLIiR.S~_•l ~ S ,~.~,.,. ~~~~; ~n~ti~ci ~H~~~ a°a~,.. ~~::~ ~zC~"~ V ~~~ ~~~~~ m~2~o C~a~n'; i~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ h - a 4 '~: CI ~~ 0 `~; ~~, yT O b, g ~u n i~ m U u ~; '• ~ "- i r~ ~'~I U A `~ ~~= 1 ~sii c »3 i i ,- . 000~_'~2 ~ ~` / a o Y 2 .~ 2 g~~ x ~~ i o '~'^` ~ \ ~.r~~iR.i~ ~ , 7.17' ~ ~ ^ v w~ ~ ~,•. ~ "d?,` .. / -~-m nfr7~balr JCSi lo~ \, n/'F' 1 O ~ 71.22' RCIGMF AIpL^' ~ y s~.(~' •B ~.,.,.. ! `~~ V O .', . ' \ y y ^, \ fR e r ~ oil ~J \` N A p rE ^f ^I a1 Y ~aS 2 vwa •,o v ~ to' ~ I I'~: j a$~aaaeu~~ $ _ ~ ~ A~~ l a a ~, [I _ ~1mo ~ r ~ ~,,~~ ~ ~ , I, ~ y H ~, y ~~~' pal ~ ~ ~'~-~ '$i ~o ^~ V 1 g ~~~1_ '' ~Wi ~'i~~yyy V V~A Ste„ ~ $~O" y I ~il~~ 14 ~ ~ _ ~. ~18 ~ ~~~ S°a P. 1 l ~ -~ ~yR ~~ I'll ~~~~ ~~ l R w3~ 4 ~ m5' ~ $ ~ 2 ti ti l Pt.' w~ ~ ~_~ ~_-~. ~ rn~ ~ ii • l l / v~ ~ I~t~ ~~ y ~ ` ~ i ~~~ I .A71.dJ' ~ ( i ~ o _.. ;, _- n~lltitrw ssr. o' - -~- ~ I ~•t I o f __- ~J ~ <toro7l-~~_ Hasrab»7_"-'t~_.._ ~- ~ ~ ~ 1=11593' _-.___.. .~ 79IT7" N66'~_`" .'~~-~~ - N~~ti E~F /~~~ l=1fid]' m u ti h=-1553%' I. ~. 4-?f6_''-~ --~-R-1673.95 77a$ 7s ~ w o `~ SlA7F RT. 7307 ~t 1c AMSk GY1in (kin m w ~ IPIR EID)lr p/lY .. ~ 1r aT 3 " P£rt S~/y1RI7F AgFOEf71fNr m ~nM1 II ~ I f I II ~~ ~^ ~Q ' ~ ~ ~ ~~` ~ ~ 11 ~ age `i4~ ,- g 0 4 ~ ~ m qL7 ~ _ ~ [1 -7 ! r 3.7Af `4 2g4'r a1 0 6 ~~'~ L CI +/~ ~- [=N2* ra f ~~ n~ 1 a ~ ~ g ooMn~mrureNO,MNGAYwgw~rcWwTNSwM1E1AP F F>T F 1 F !i! Et ~ ~ ^ j ~ ~ ~ f* .. ~ EAEE~NT, ^f SYY1b~MV AOLES^ EAEEMENT, 7f WAT^ILL11We ~J t~S ~~ ~ ! ~Q ~~' e ~ ~ 8 ~ O ~ x' ~ EASNSVIT.YAIIWtE WRTN WATEIE[NE EAEEYENr, VARIAEt,$ ~ ~ r #~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 i ~ [n ~ A ~ ~ 3 WO'lIf iEWiN EASEMENT. VMMBLE WIDTN DRArUIEIE 4 jj! EE§ j + y~ g lnw B g ~ - ~ lASE\E[NrMIDYARIASLEVIIOYNI'i/fIrORARYCONSTRUCIN7N .~! ~ t~Ji 8~ ; ~~t ~~ to ~ -+ ° c fA^EYENTE LYING OM TTIE NQpTN UNE OF £COFF AVENUE i ~ ~ q ~ ~ R $ eeRtieun~ oE=TWic r 3 CHEETERFIELO COUNTY, vWGI?JIA 00®~.~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~' ''~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 - ~ ~ AGENDA ~,~,~,~' Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.0.21. Subject: Conveyance of a Variable Width Slope and Drainage Easement to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the Treely Road Turnlane Improvement Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an easement agreement conveying a variable width slope and drainage easement to the Commonwealth of Virginia. Summary of Information: The Virginia Department of Transportation has requested the conveyance of a variable width slope and drainage easement across county property at 15501 Harrowgate Road, Harrowgate Elementary School. These improvements are necessary for the Treely Road Turnlane Improvement Project. The request has been reviewed by Schools and County staff. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager oo0~i.74 VICINITY SKETCH CONVEYANCE OF A YARIABLE IAFIDTH SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO THE COMMONIA~EALTH DF VIRGINIA FOR THE TREELY ROAD TURNLANE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT `~ HARROWGATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL t 15501 H arrowgate Raad .~ i --° L- ~. _'~- N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities w ~#~- e ~~ S 1 ucl egrau ~B9A5 xet ®ooa_~~ a 4 m --.~ u \ ~~.~~ ~, c~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~'~~ ~~ ' ~I~~ ~ ~i ru_ p~ ~ ?` {m .v v }" v ~ $ • ~o x a H~~ w ~ ~ 41 ~ ~;~-----r~._ . . . ~ ~, , Erlatlrp EQfle F ~~' ' c • ~.I'h-~(~:~ `~~~ ~ C'~ - ------------------- ---- -•-__GrnerSh~?ulder.---------- ~ : =~ :. -- ~ ~ •~ 1_ _ ., 1 n ~ 2 ~~/ PERMANENT EAS~~E.../M/JENT • wI1Nn tM braes reps bounder as ore to ur COUNTY 4F CHESTERFIELD Harrowgate Elementary School o~4a-o2o-~ae OOU~_'76 _ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 _ - ~ ~~ AGENDA •<RcIN~!'~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.22.a. Subiect: Request Permission for an Existing Shed to Encroach Within an Eight-Foot Easement Across Lot 8, Block A, Lora Lynn Heights, Section 4 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant Richard A. Hobson and Julie D. Hobson permission for an existing shed to encroach within an 8' easement across Lot 8, Block A, Lora Lynn Heights, Section 4, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Richard A. Hobson and Julie D. Hobson have requested permission for an existing shed to encroach within an 8' easement across Lot 8, Block A, Lora Lynn Heights, Section 4. This request has been reviewed by staff. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # VICIIUITY SKETCH Request Permission for an Existing Shed to Encroach lAlithin an Eight Foot Easement Across Lot i, Block A, Lora Lynn Heights, Section 4 ~ ~ ~~ q' rr~ m i~ Request Permission for an Existing Shed ~ ~~ ` ~~ . T ~ R CR ~. . O q ~~~ ~R w ~ ~ ~ ~ it ~ ~ cn 'A N Chesterfield County Department of Utildies ~_ W i r~~' E S I hcl eq~ak 116b7 tet OOO~_~~ SKETCH SHOWING 14' X 16' SHED ON THE PROPERTY OF RICHARD AND JULIE HOBSON, PIN: ?886486299, 4533 HEMWAY ROAD N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W E S 1 ir1CA pulls ~9. f 7 hil 000,_"9 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~'~'~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~' AGENDA Yf~Ntp~~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.22.b. Subject: Request Permission for a Concrete Driveway to Encroach Within a Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot 7, Baileys Grove, Section A County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant RSC Group, LLC permission for a proposed concrete driveway to encroach within a 16' drainage easement across Lot 7, Baileys Grove, Section A, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: RSC Group, LLC have requested permission fora concrete driveway to encroach within a 16' drainage easement across Lot 7, Baileys Grove, Section A. The Environmental Engineering Department has reviewed this request. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager # oooa.~~ VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission for a Concre#e Driveway to Encroach Within a Sixteen Fvot Drainage Easement Across Lot 7, Baileys Grove, Section A ~~~ Chesterfield County Department of Utilities Wr~~i. E S t Ircl eyrak 5D0het OVo~_~~ Silt Fence os shown is onnraximote and should be adjusted NOTE.• NO TOPO LINES per fie/d conditions or as dirt9cted ~ the County /nspector ON THIS LOT / LOT 14 /I~ 1 I / ~ LIMITS OF 100 YR 64CKWATER = 132.45" ti 4 N/F WHITTlNGTON 16' DRAJNAGE EASEMENT- y ~ ` ~ , ' RSC Group LLC I ~,` ss~.r~'• ` ~- ~ 210(}2 Baileys Grove Ct ~. era ~ ~ DB. 8044 PG. 236 I ~ I ~ ` ~ , ~'"9B3 ~ r _ PIN: 78261295100001}0 I I ~s•~SF ~. I ~FNT. I ~--8' EASEMENT ~~ ~ ~ i~~' ~ ` \ \ ~roPosed 16' \y~ \ - DWe-trn Y DRA/NAGE 9 EASEMENT ~~~` .0• I ~~ AWN ~ \ ~\ S ~\ , °~ I o LOT 6 \~~ `~ ~ / ~_ v $~~,y~ S 0~ p f~ .i ~?• No. 1613 ~ 8/9/2D07 ~ DATE:B/9f2007 SCALE:1 -40" JOB NO: C0710778 RE.• RCS GROUP LLC. ~~ ~\ h ~' ~~~ ~ / I '\ \ \ . \ \ \ \ °^' \\ \\ \\ \\ Lor 13 \ \ N \ \ \ \ ,v~• \ \ `~ LOT 8 \ \ h \ \ \ \ \ \ L/M/TS OF USACO~\ \ JUR/SO/CTIONAL WETLANDS ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ '~ 1 • V 1 1 1~ ~~ENSED AREA 16' ~'~-DRAItJAGE k .L•--EASEMENT f 1 r~ Entrance/ RaSRUV~ ~ • BA/LEYS GROVE couRr 40' R/W Proposed Improvements on LOT 7, SECT/ON "A" 6iA/LEYS GROVE Chesterfie/d County, I/irginia •PLANNHRB•ARCMITECTS•ENOINElR8•SURVEYORS• 001 Mnolnhy 1ro~d. 8Wb too-111ohmend, VMpinf~ $3770• Flq~+~ (004) 7040677 • F~ (004) 704.286 NOTE.• TH/S PLAT /S CDMP/LED FROM PLATS OF RECORD. ~~~rN~LlL~C wcn.ran-a xMa~wow www.~.oa Stone ~ I I MCSE 2" ABOVE +, I I ORIG/NAL GROUND II core 0.778 ACRE ~ \ ~~ MfF~=133.65 III r I I ~ I ~.~ ~ r II I Limits f Si/t I I Clearing \ence I I BLDG • • S ENV. ~f oo®~_~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY `'"~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~~ AGENDA 6p_ ~NiP Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.22.c. Subject: Request Permission for a Proposed Above Ground Swimming Pool to Encroach Within a Ten-Foot Easement Across Lot 29, Antler Ridge, Section 8 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Grant Jesse Thrower and Jacquelyn Thrower permission for a proposed above ground swimming pool to encroach within a 10' easement across Lot 29, Antler Ridge, Section 8, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Jesse Thrower and Jacquelyn Thrower have requested permission for a proposed above ground swimming pool to encroach within a 10' easement across Lot 29, Antler Ridge, Section 8. This request has been reviewed by staff. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # U 0 oa_s3 VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission for a Proposed Abore Ground Swimming Pool to Encroach lA~ithin a Ten Foot Easement Across Lot 2~, Antler Ridge, Section i N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities w %~~-E 5 I hcl egrak ll5bT ket V'U~~_84 h' M1 ,~~~~.t ~~~~~ {, « + t ~• ~~ ~.~ a~,~ ~ ~• ~ ~ $ ~ t~ a ~• ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~~ 5°, a 2a~a 5~ .,' t 1 ~ ~` .. ~ d W A ~~ z~ W ~ ~ a~~ ~Ai ~ n 0 z' ~ ~ 0 o s . o 0 ~ o F" ~a '° a~ o,~~ ~o .. ~ ti ti~A a ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ h~ ~ I ~~ ~~ C a C t c a° ~o -, ~ ~~ 00®~ 8~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ' _ .~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 ofd ~; AGENDA ~~H Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.0.23. Subject: Revisions to School Board FY2008 Operating and Capital Improvement Program Appropriations County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The School Board requests the Board of Supervisors to (1)authorize the County Administrator to reserve and appropriate into FY2009 unspent FY2008 appropriations, contingent upon positive results of operations within individual departments and division wide, as determined by the county's financial audit, as outlined on Attachment A; (2)decrease appropriations to the School Operating fund by $3,738,300 and make appropriation changes among categories consistent with the resolution adopted by the School Board on May 13, 2008 provided at Attachment B; and (3)increase the appropriations in the School Capital Improvements program by $3,558,600 from interest earnings on 2005 and 2006 general obligation debt ($3,072,600) and from a transfer from the School Board Operating Fund ($486,000). Summary of Information: Fuel costs have risen steadily over the past several months leading to a shortfall in the budgeted funding for school bus transportation. It is estimated that an additional $915,000 will be required to fully fund the cost of fuel for the remainder of the school year. Funds are .available in the Instruction category to cover this need. Preparers Marcus J. Newsome, Ed.D. Title: Superintendent Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # 006g~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Actual revenue to be received for the school operating fund for FY2008 will be $3,738,300 less than budgeted. This loss is a combination of state funds, county transfer, and bond proceeds. There are unused appropriations in the Instruction, Administration/Attendance & Health, and Debt Service categories to address this loss. To properly account for these changes, appropriations to the School Operating Fund should be reduced in the following manner: $3,656,900 from the Instruction appropriation category, $400,000 from the Administration/Attendance & Health appropriation category and $596,400 from the Debt Service appropriation category. Appropriations in the School Operating Fund to the Transportation appropriation category should be increased by $915,000. Additional interest earnings from the 2005 and 2006 General Obligation issues, totaling $3,072,600, are available and must be used for debt service, capital expenditures, and/or arbitrage expenses relating to these issues. A portion of these earnings must be retained for future arbitrage expense ($611,700), with the remainder used for budgeted technology projects in the CIP. Using these interest earnings will allow planned CIP Reserve funds to be transferred to major maintenance for other critical needs. In addition, the Facilities Department has plans to replace obsolete HVAC control panels at Bon Air, Crestwood, Davis, and Falling Creek elementary schools as well as Manchester Middle School. In order to properly account for these improvements, funding from the Operating Fund must be transferred to the CIP in the amount of $486,000. ~~~ ~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ' ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 AGENDA ~~~. Budget and Management Comments: The School Board is requesting that the Board of Supervisors: a) Consider decreasing revenue and expenditure appropriations in the School Operating Fund by a net of $3,738,300 (decreasing the Instruction appropriation category by $3,656,900, decreasing the Administration/Attendance & Health category by $400,000, increasing Transportation category by $915,000, and decreasing debt service by $596,400) based on the latest staff projections. b) Approve the reserve of up to $4,916,300 in the School Operating funds and $750,000 for the Appomattox Regional Governor's Schools for re- appropriation into FY2009 in various accounts, contingent on FY2008 positive Results of Operations. c) Increase the appropriations in the School Capital Improvements program by $3,558,600 from interest earnings on 2005 and 2006 general obligation debt ($3,072,600) and from a transfer from the School Board Operating Fund ($486,000). The additional interest earnings and transfer from the School Board Operating Fund appropriation of $3.558 million for the School Capital projects fund will be utilized for technology projects ($2.947M) and future arbitrage payments ($611,700). Schools capital projects general fund transfer dollars already appropriated in technology projects will then be freed up to transfer to fund additional major maintenance projects. Schools staff anticipates having an FY2008 ending fund balance of at least $3.1 million to cover the beginning fund balance reserves already anticipated in the FY2009 school budget recently adopted by the Board of Supervisors ($2.861M). Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management (~~~~_ Attachment A Reserves, Carried Forward and Appropriated in FY2009 Contingent on Individual Item Results of Operations Activity Fund Software Manchester Culinary Arts program Fractal Room at Harrowgate Elementary New middle schools - startup instructional items 0&M special projects Risk Management - Workers comp reserve (FY2007 and FY2008) Demolition of IDC building Textbooks District Emergency Plan Special Education Evaluation Wellness Local Match to Grants State Algebra Readiness funding Total 150,000 47,200 46,500 45,000 989,300 400,000 110,000 90,000 55,000 100,000 118,700 935,700 178,900 $3,266,300 Reserves, Carried Forward and Appropriated into FY2009 Individual Reserves Contingent Upon Positive Results of Operations Utilities 650,000 Central Garage - 0&M 250,000 Central Garage - Transportation 750,000 Total $1,650,000 Other Funds to be Reserved and Carried Forward and Appropriated into FY2009 Appomattox Regional Governor's School $ 750,000 ~® ~:~~:~ Attachment B VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting of the Chesterfield County School Board held Tuesday evening, May 13, 2008, at seven o'clock in the Public Meeting Room of the Chesterfield County Courthouse Complex PRESENT: Dianne E. Pettitt, Chairman Marshall W. Trammell, Jr., Vice-Chairman Patricia M. Carpenter U. Omarh Rajah David S. Wyman RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the ending balance for FY2008, net of reserve needs, is more than sufficient as currently projected to meet the $2,861,700 million requirement for the FY2009 budget; and, WHEREAS, the School Board plans to request re-appropriation of any remaining FY2008 unused general fund transfer in the first quarter of FY2009; and WHEREAS, there is a need to reduce appropriations by $3,738,300 in the FY2008 budget due to a revenue shortfall, and, WHEREAS, there is a need to reserve the funds identified in Attachment A in the School Operating Fund at June 30, 2008; and, WHEREAS, there is a need to revise appropriations as follows: School Operating Fund: Revenue: Local $( 137,500) Federal 57,100 State SOQ ( 638,800) State sales tax (2,363,200) County transfer ( 655,900) Total Revenue Revisions $(3,738,300) Appropriations: Instruction $(3,656,900) Administration/A&H ( 400,000) Pupil Transportation 915,000 Debt Service ( 596,400) Total Appropriation Revisions $(3,738,300) School CIP Fund: Revenue: Interest earnings $3,072,600 School transfer 486,000 Total Revenue Revisions $3,558,600 Appropriations: O & M Major Maintenance $2,946,900 Future Arbitrage Payment 611,700 Total Appropriation Revisions $3,558,600 ~~~~_~~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that on motion of Mr. Trammell, seconded by Mr. Wyman, the School Board hereby requests the Board of Supervisors to approve the appropriation changes shown above, and reserve the funds identified in Attachment A in the School Operating Fund, adjusted according to the county's financial audit. Carol Timpano, Clerk Marcus J. Newsome, Superintendent ~~~~_~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ' $~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 '~ AGENDA :~~- t?gcip~a Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 8.C.24. Subject: Ratify Request to Department of Corrections to Hold Public Hearing on Proposed Lease County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Ratify the request sent to the State Department of Corrections requesting they hold public hearing on a proposed lease at 11310 Business Center Drive for state probation and parole offices. Summary of Information: The state requires local governments to request the state to conduct public hearings on proposed leases. The Department of Corrections is considering leasing property in Chesterfield County at 11310 Business Center Drive for probation and parole offices (see attached map). County staff believes a public hearing on this proposed site would be beneficial to the community and have sent a letter on the Board's behalf, requesting that a public hearing be scheduled. Approval of this item by the Board will be sent to Corrections. The Department of Corrections will be required to advertise this public hearing in accordance with state law. Preparers Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Deputy County Administrator Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #(~®~~_~~ Chesterfield County, Virginia James J. L. Stegmaier, County Administrator 9901 Lori Road - P.O. Box 40 -Chesterfield, VA 23832-0040 Phone: (804) 748-1211 -Fax: (804) 717-6297 -Internet: chesterfield.gov BOARD OP SUPERVISORS ARTHUR S. WARREN, CHAIRMAN cw~R fuu Di.tnct DANIEL A. GECKER, VICE CHAIRMAN MiJlorhian Dixmct DOROTHYjAECKLE 13ermuJa Uixtncr JAMES M. `Jim" HOLLAND Dak Dutri~7 MARLEEN K. DURFEE Mamxa Uistnct May 9, 2008 Mr. James Thurston Manager, General Services Department of Corrections P.O. Box 26963 Richmond, VA 23261-6963 Re: Request for public hearing for proposed lease at 11310 Business Center Drive Dear Mr. Thurston: In accordance with your letter dated May 2, 2008 to Art Warren, Chairman of the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, I, on behalf of the Board, request that the Department of Corrections hold a public hearing regarding a proposed lease at 11310 Business Center Drive for state probation and pazole offices. Please be advised that the appropriate governing body to request a public hearing for this address is Chesterfield County, rather than the City of Richmond as referenced in your letter. The subject property, 11310 Business Center Drive, has a Richmond, VA mailing address, but is in fact located within Chesterfield County. Given the timing of our regularly scheduled Board of Supervisors meetings, I request that this letter serve as the official request to schedule a public hearing; however I intend to ask the Boazd to ratify this request at its Boazd meeting on May 28, 2008. I will ask our Clerk to the Board to forward you the approved Board agenda item after the meeting. Until then, I understand this letter will suffice as a request for a hearing. I assume this hearing will be advertised in accordance with all public hearing notice requirements. I respectfully request that you advise me once a date and location has been determined. Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service May 9, 2008 Page 2 Mr. James Thurston Lastly, there may be alternative locations we can assist you in finding if we know what your requirements aze. As such, I would like to request information relative to your lease requirements including, but not limited to, the lease terms, number of years, squaze footage, and for example, if you are evaluating short term interim leases versus long term leases. Any information you can provide would be helpful. I would be happy to discuss this with you further or put you in touch with our Economic Development Director, Mr. Will Davis. As one would expect, there continues to be quite a bit of community interest around this issue, irrespective of any particular address or azea of the county. You and I both shaze the desire to facilitate a beneficial process for all. Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me at 748-1190 or Becky Dickson at 748-1212 should you have any questions. Sincerely, ,~O ~ _' J es J. L. Stegmai r County Administrator cc: The Honorable M. Kirkland Cox The Honorable Arthur S. Warren Rebecca Dickson, Deputy County Administrator Will Davis, Director, Economic Development Mary Ann Curtin, Intergovernmental Relations Janice Blakley, Clerk to the Boazd 3.~ Z>~ EC~LL O~Call ~...... ~ ~~ U'iLL ~ ~ ~~ ~Z ~ - gy9L4 B~~LI` S~ZBLI ~~~ = ~~ - ~ V ~ - imu~~ aaLL ~ ~~f~ e ppLL LL`` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~'$ ~. gt9ll CLBLL ~ ~ ~~ 30~'J` A ^$ q LI BIL 0`9Ll tt9L tJ ~v 1aN~ 8~ g~ aLalf X1911 $ - ,~ fi } !! ~~ 8 eoei i ,3 ~ R ~' g $ 8.®w. - 1~1 ~ E: ~ i A {G ~g ~.~ - to ~, ~ ~ u _~ e~P lL - e ~ e `~ SgLyl p 7 S~t yS R ~ 11 ~~\(}~+~L~ o ~ ILLLI ~ L`yL ,a y i ~y ~ Y a J ~ . ~V ~~ ~i ~~3~ o~ Lot ~ ~ a ^ ~a ~ ~ :g °- ~ ~5. ~ ~ s i ~. R ~ 9LKL - ~1S~t 41: t aQ'1'1''~ Op,L L _ - s ~ ssecL ~ ~, (J~ ~ ssccl ~~L~ ~ s3 f.a s oseLL Q 8 ~scxL ~ ~a 8 tN acct ~. YOEL1 I~ R ~ ` v`O~ R ' g ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ _ - ~h ': - ~ O ~, ~. ~ ~ - o Z - (D 8 ti = ~ ~ ~ - Z To g g ~ tiw,,*~' ~ - a = s ~ ~ - ~ k b ~, .~ 3 - ffi N = S - 50aL1 ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ EaaLL Q. Q ~ ,ALL e~~ 9 _ _ ~ a n - c -W n ~ A ~ ~ Q ~§~ r~ ~e s `~~ G, Hq^~ ;c a - ~6a _ ~ ~ ~` ~~s 4~ ~ ~, ~ m Gs ~i ~8~. ~ ~ - a °• 8 A ~~ G ~ 3 ~ _ a e ~ °,' r ~A.~ ~~R ~ x p ~ c ~ ~ o v v a~ 0.g~ ' - , a N ~."~ tia -{ a a 5 > ~ ~ ~ ~ s,< ,ro ~ ~ m ;~ , Loe, gb ~~ S6~ ~ y - r~ r~ .~. ~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 AGENDA Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 9.A. Subject: Developer water and Sewer Contracts County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County Administrator to execute water and/or sewer contracts between County and Developer where there are no County funds involved. The report is submitted to Board members as information. Summary of Information: The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County Administrator: 1. Contract Number: 06-0154 Project Name: Salisbury - Lakeside, Section 2 Developer: Peter W. Nash and Barbara Nelson Nash Contractor: Marotta and Sons, LLC Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $2,586.00 Wastewater Improvements - $28,438.00 District: Midlothian Preparers William O. Wright Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # ~G~~ ~~ Agenda Item May 28, 2008 Page 2 2. Contract Number: 06-0182 Project Name: Crescent Park Resubdivision of Lots 18 through 26, Block 16 Developer: Charles R. Primm Contractor: Landmark Excavation Company Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $21,000.00 Wastewater Improvements - $4,500.00 District: Bermuda 3. Contract Number: 06-0231 Project Name: Watkins Centre Outfall Sewer Developer: Zaremba Metropolitan Midlothian LLC Contractor: American Infrastructure Virginia Incorporated Contract Amount: Sewer Improvements - $44,790.00 District: Midlothian 3. Contract Number: 06-0359 Project Name: Meadowbrook, Section A, Lot 2 Block A Sewer Extension Developer: T. J. Construction Company Contractor: R.M.C. Contractors, Incorporated Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $1,500.00 Wastewater Improvements - $11,990.00 District: Dale 4. Contract Number: 07-0018 Project Name: Watermark, Section A Developer: Watermark Partners, LLC Contractor: Castle Equipment Corporation Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $290,282.00 Wastewater Improvements - $320,384.55 District: Dale Agenda Item May ~8, 2`008 Page 3 5. Contract Number: 07-0112 Project Name: Chester Sports Park - Rental Building Developer: Ironbridge Sports Park, LLC Contractor: Shoosmith Brothers Construction Company Inc. Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $26,479.00 District: Dale 6. Contract Number: 08-0057 Project Name: 1032 Adkins Road Sanitary Sewer Extension Developer: Frederick W. Beebe and Bonnie Beebe Contractor: R.M.C. Contractors, Inc. Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $1,500.00 Wastewater Improvements - $4,808.00 District: Midlothian r Y ~!RCENtP CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 9.B. Subject: Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects, District Improvement Funds, and Lease Purchases County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Acceptance of attached report. Summary of Information: Preparers James J. L. Stegmaier Title: County Administrator Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No # ~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL FUND BALANCE May 28, 2008 BOARD MEETING DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 07/01/07 FY2008 Actual Beginning Fund Balance 11/28/07 Schools: Appropriate transfer to Schools for use in ($571,000) FY2008 for trailer purchases 11/28/07 Schools: Designate for non-recurring items in FY2009 ($4,092,800) 11/28/07 County: Appropriate transfer to Parks CIP for ($145,000) FY2008 land purchase BALANCE $65,204,300 $64,633,300 $60,540,500 $60,395,500 11/28/07 County: designate for non-recurring items in FY2009 ($6,900,500) $53,495,000 (~~~~~~ Board Meeting Date CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS May 28, 2008 Description 6/30/2007 FY07 Ending Balance FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2007 4/11/2007 FY08 Budgeted Addition 4/11/2007 FY08 Capital Projects 10/10/2007 Fire Logistics Facility, Phase II 2/13/2008 Web streaming hardware, software, services and support Amount 15,521,300 (14,889,300) (150,000) (72,240) Balance $1,097,798 16,619,098 1,729,798 1,579,798 1,507,558 ®~}~~ ~1. r~ ~n o0 00 00 ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ . u ~ ~" ~ ~. ~ o A A c .~ 0 0 0 0 00 0 ~ ~ a, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~' '--~ ~ o O~ ~ ~ p ~ N M ~ Q1 ,-~ O (~ .~ ++ O N M O M z ~ ~ ~ ~ •--+ •-~ ~~, ~ ~ w~ o ~ W N . N ~ a ~ ~ a ~ O0 ~ ° o o O O o o ~ ~''~ ~ o ° o 0 0 o ~ O ~ o O ~ ~ N ~ V~ ~n v1 n n ~ F ~ •~ 00 00 00 00 00 N O U ~ U ~ aJ ~ U ~ ~ N ~ N •I A ~ 01 00 M ~ N b A 0 0 ( ~ ~ Q O N ~ ~ ~ , ~"~ ~ ~D v~ l~ r-" ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ 6 7 64 b9 ~ • i. ~ a U b N x ~ : 3 Y ~ o ~' o o ~ ~ ~ A W U A U ~~~~,~~ Prepared by Accounting Department Apri130, 2008 Date Began 04/99 O1/O1 03/03 03/04 10/04 12/04 12/04 OS/OS 05/06 08/07 SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES APPROVED AND EXECUTED Original Description Amount Public Facility Lease -Juvenile Courts Project $16,100,000 Certificates of Participation - Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Certificates of Participation -Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation Certificates of Participation -Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Cloverleaf Mall Redevelopment Project Energy Improvements at County Facilities Energy Improvements at School Facilities Certificates of Participation -Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Certificates of Participation -Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Certificates of Participation -Building Expansion/Renovation, Equipment Acquisition TOTAL APPROVED AND EXECUTED PENDING EXECUTION Description None 13,725,000 6,100,000 21,970,000 9,225,000 1,519,567 427,633 14,495,000 11,960,000 22,220,000 117.742.200 Date Ends 11/19 11/21 11 /23 11 /24 10/08 12/17 12/10 11 /24 11 /24 Outstanding Balance 4/30/08 $9,660,000 8,210,000 4,820,000 18,550,000 9,225,000 1,335,826 265,326 12,435,000 10,350,000 11/27 22,220,000 97,071.152 Approved Amount Q~~k~~~ ;~ , »„~„~~° CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 9.C._ Subject: Roads Accepted into the State Secondary System County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Acceptance of attached report. Summary of Information: Preparers Janice Blakley Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board No # l~+fJ~~,~~ W O O ~ N M ~ M ~ O ~ L m ~ 7 ,r O y L ? Q O O N O O p~j M O .ti, v ~ ~ ~ ~ +.. h ~ 0. ~ 0 0 ~ `ti ~M •~ V '~ `~ O » OV ~ v .~ '~ '~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ 0~ Q ~ _J ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ w ~ o~i ,y O $ ~ ~ ~,TI ." p ''III ~ N '~ "~ o~ Ct w w ~ 4~ h y y O Er 'S ~ ~ Q V U w, cr., ~ eo o ~ ~ w ~ o ~ ~° y paj C V ~ ~ C! til A .0~ W V r.. V \ Cd h ~ N ^r d4 0! •V `~ V ''. d +d O ~ ~ i O ! O N j N O O r O O n ~ N N ~ ~ eN- II •N- ~ !o O ~I O ~ ~ O O N O_ M O n °o r r O O O O N M O n °o 01 r N O O N ~ a J n O i' ~ '' ' rn r ' 'm ~ i a~ ~ U r rn', • Q r , rni ' ~ ~ ~ .moo I ~ Q ~ Q Fo^ _ ~ ~ ~ n', m ~n o ~ ~ ', N ~ N E V ~ U t ml ' w ~ ~ . y ~ ~ ~ I m u Q I ~ o a ° Q a ° ~ ~ o ~ o L C! L V- '~.. ~ LL L Of . ~ t Of . .~ ~ .. d •~ I t ~ .. ~~ ~ ~ ~ .. 'c ~ ~ ~. a a a ~ I a a ' a °~ ' i' a ~ a N ~ p ~ w ~o~ '~ ~ 0 0 0 0 d Q .a ~ c v v .1 a~ h M O b b4 O b a N b b O d r v y V u ~ N M oai a ~ o .~ '~ o .~ C A v . on °r ~ ~ ~ ~ a r `.°~ .. ~ y . t ~L y ~ 0 0 -0~ d y ti ~®~F ~a O O O ~ N ~. M ~ M ~ O ~ L O ~ O ti O L ? w^ ~ ~ O N O O p~j M Q O r„ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ti '~ h ~ O ~ ~ O .~ ~ ~ S ai ~ ~ CS ~ ~ ~ O ~' U h ~ ~~ ~ ~ N '~ ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ "~„ ~~ ~ ~ ;~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ N ~ ~ O w ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ d ,i "'O otii ~ +„ ,~ Ci w ~ ~ rn ~ v ~ h y ~'~' y O h ~ ~ ~ q U V w~ ~ N b4 U ~ o ~ C O ~ ~ ry' U ~ ,s 0) OA y 0~ W r? ~ V ~ V ~ O v ~ ~Q ~i o~ Q O O N M O M O O O N M_ N 0 O O 0 v O O N M O M O O O O N M O O C O O N OO M O O O N M N 0 O O O O N M O M O O O O N M N 0 N N O O O M O M O O O N M N 0 M O I O o v N N ', n O O N M O M O O O O N M N 0 M O O 0 v O O N M O M O O O O N M N 0 r O 0 v O O N O M O O O N ~_ N N_ O 0 v ~n I i+i ~ i v v ~ p L m ~ ~ I c w p > a , O "~ O y L1J N ~ I a C9 ~ ', o- ~ ~ E O ~ U ', ~ ~ m' ~ F W m - H m i ~ '., ~ O ~ '., ~ , N ~. I~ N 'i ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ N a ° ~ C7 ~ a c C7 a ': ~ , C7 , ' 0 ~ ~ ~ ,', m d aTi ~ E d y ! ' ~ ' a~ i ' a~ i ' o 'm > 'm > m > ~ i ip v m v m V m ~ m ~ S ~ [D CD ~ m C m i m E m E d E d E E I S E ~ E > O > O > O > O d O L ~ O L O d O` LL O` LL ~ LL ~ LL t0 LL. , f0 LL lC lL C C7 C7 t7 p ! ~ I a a I ~ G >, a. ~ ' .5 a. ~ ~ a. .. .5 i, .5 ~ ~, ~ >. .5 ~ y , € ~ m € m E m € m € i~ a~ ~ E m ~ ~ ' .~ 'R m ~ A ~' m y ~ R m y ~ I co m a~ ~' R m m ~ ~ ~ m m ~ ~ m -- I ~ ~ ^ '~C c ~ ~ O O O O M N N y w M ' N N N N N N N ~ ~ O ~ ~ O O O O O O O ~ Q O Q y ~ ~ C Z V ~ U ~ ~ .~ d ~+ 4, I. h M O O,p O b O~ b b a DO ~.. r h V ! ~ C~ C N o 'I c «~-, n ~, t O ~ I ~ •~ 'r o y L ~ ~ tl A E , °`' °' °-' °e ~ o r L y h h Q .o'' v h CY~~i4oiJ~ O O ~ N M ~ M ~ O ~ L ~ ~ 7 ,~ O t ? O "'VII N O O ~ M a O w, 0 N rte.. O ~-. O 'S~ d ~~ ~ w h n ~ i 0 ~ ~~ ~ ; ~~ o~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ r~^'~'~ ~1 y { 3 ~~ y o; ~4 y '~ ~ C •y ^C oyi `s w 4« ~ c ~ ~ v ~ r~+ +:; c U V ~~ w ~ ~ s O = 'Zt z O ~ ~ ~i V h s o ~ O O O ~ 'oi ~ N : j N N I N '. O N p N tiA o ';~ o ~o 'o ;~ O O O O p I O ~~ • I p ~ I Oa I W i O O O O ~', O ~ O o ,O~ N N N N ~ N N r N N N O ~ ~ O O O ~ O O y o ~ ;~ ~~ N ~ I OJ OQ o0 O (O ! O N O i O O ~ ~ ~ O O O O '~,,, O O `~ °v i °v i ~ Ov ! °v I °v +~.+ ~ ~ N i ~ ~j ' r. ~ , O M ~ ~ ! ~ ~: N ~ N ', n , o I ~ I ~ I ' v ~ U - c: d ~ I o. ~ rn m ~ i a a l ~ h ~ ~ ~ y y i U fC - i Z ~ , = ~' ~ i o E I V i v~ o 'o i c°n 'I U -°~ ' ' ~ o '' o ' F°- ' ~ N I ~ N ~ N ~ N I ~ N ~ N I ~ n ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ i - .. ~ .. ~ _ a a D ~ o. ~ o. fA N O ~ O N i N ~ -~i (~ C9 -oi ~ w ~ ', a L ~ v f0 ~ rn v N rn ~ .t. ~ v ~ m o i o o ~ a~ R a~ ~a o ~ R o ~ E a E a E a E a E a E o ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o C lL y LL N lL ~ y LL! y lL N LL . ~ ~ ~ . _ m ~ t ~ r ~ L 2 r ~ t ~ ~ N ~ E > > i ~ .. E ... ~~dyy {L ~ ~ I 0 ~ ~ ~"' ~ N ~ i. ~ i Q ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ N ~ i Q ~" ~ ~ ~ O ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ a N O M O M O M O M Q O O O O O O C eo u U o~ ~ 4, M L' C .^! O U C d bD C t~ U z 0 F ~~ ~~~ M O b4 4, O b O~ b b Q 0 ti d 0 .h A d ao C i 0 V 4 e ;~ h O A h a v °o N M Q ~ o .~ V 0 40 ,~ r c A v obi ao O r .~ y. ~L ~ O A ~o'' y ti May 28, 2008 Speaker's List Afternoon Session 1. Mr. George Beadles 2. Mr. Joe Sloan 4. 5. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~~ AGENDA ~~~~~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 14.A. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Mr. Alfred Elko and Mr. Lawrence Hatton for Their Service on the Camp Baker Management Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Camp Baker Management recognize and commend Mr. service to Chesterfield Management Board. Summary of Information: Board has requested that the Board of Supervisors Alfred Elko and Mr. Lawrence Hatton for their County through their work on the Camp Baker The Camp Baker Management Board recommends that Mr. Alfred Elko be recognized by the Board of Supervisors for his efforts to the Camp Baker Management Board. During his tenure, he has participated in the development and implementation of long-term master planning for major capital renovations, and to make the Camp Baker facility barrier free. The Camp Baker Management Board also recommends that Mr. Lawrence Hatton be recognized by the Board of Supervisors for his efforts to the Camp Baker Management Board. During his tenure, he has participated in the planning and implementation of on-going capital renovations for a barrier-free Camp Baker facility. Preparers George E Braunstein Title: Director Dept. of MH/MR/SA Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # C~~K ~~ RECOGNIZING MR. ALFRED ELKO FOR HIS SERVICE ON THE CAMP BAKER MANAGEMENT BOARD WHEREAS, community service is among the greatest traditions for Chesterfield County residents; and WHEREAS, Mr. Alfred Elko has been a valued member and leader of the Camp Baker Management Board for over 20 years, from 1987 until 2008; and WHEREAS, Mr. Elko participated in development and implementation of long-term master planning for major capital renovations to upgrade and make the Camp Baker facility barrier free; and WHEREAS, during his involvement with Camp Baker Services, a program of the Greater Richmond ARC, more than 500 citizens with disabilities annually have been able to access year-round emergency and weekend respite, summer camp, adult day support and after school care. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes and commends Mr. Elko for his devoted service to Chesterfield County and the Camp Baker Management Board. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mr. Elko and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. (~®~~ ~ RECOGNIZING MR. LAWRENCE HATTON FOR HIS SERVICE ON THE CAMP BAKER MANAGEMENT BOARD WHEREAS, community service is among the greatest traditions of Chesterfield County residents; and WHEREAS, Mr. Lawrence Hatton has been a valued and respected member of the Camp Baker Management Board from 1997 until 2008; and WHEREAS, Mr. Hatton participated in service to the Camp Baker facility through the Chester Civitan Club for many years prior to his service on the Camp Baker Management Board; and WHEREAS, Mr. Hatton participated in the planning and implementation of ongoing capital renovations for a barrier-free Camp Baker facility; and WHEREAS, during his involvement with Camp Baker Services, a program of the Greater Richmond ARC, more than 500 citizens with disabilities annually have been able to access year-round emergency and weekend respite, summer camp, adult day support and after school care. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED; that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 28th day of May 2008, publicly recognizes and commends Mr. Lawrence Hatton for his devoted service to Chesterfield County and the Camp Baker Management Board. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mr. Hatton and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. ~~~~~~ a~ _ _w Y~ma~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 14.8. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Mr. Adam Nicholas Hamner and Mr. Ryan Craig Hamner, Both of Troop 810, Sponsored by the Church of the Epiphany, Mr. Jesse Loren Bonovitch, Troop 2874, Sponsored by Saint Luke's United Methodist Church, and Mr. Brent David Michalowski, Troop 860, Sponsored by Woodlake United Methodist Church County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff has received requests for the Board to adopt resolutions recognizing Mr. Adam Nicholas Hamner and Mr. Ryan Craig Hamner, both of Troop 810, Mr. Jesse Loren Bonovitch, Troop 2874, and Mr. Brent David Michalowski, Troop 860, upon attaining the rank of Eagle Scout. They will be present at the meeting, accompanied by members of their families, to accept their resolutions. Preparers Janice Blakley Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board ^ No # ~®D~ ~~ WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated. by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered by Congress in 1916; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build character, provide citizenship training and promote physical fitness; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to their community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law Mr. Adam Nicholas Hamner and Mr. Ryan Craig Hamner, both of Troop 810, sponsored by the Church of the Epiphany, Mr. Jesse Loren Bonovitch, Troop 2874, sponsored by Saint Luke's United Methodist Church, and Mr. Brent David Michalowski, Troop 860, sponsored by Woodlake United Methodist Church, have accomplished those high standards of commitment and have reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by only four percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through their experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and. endeavoring to prepare themselves for roles as leaders in society, Adam, Ryan, Jesse and Brent have distinguished themselves as members of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 28th day of May 2008, hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. Adam Nicholas Hamner, Mr. Ryan Craig Hamner, Mr. Jesse Loren Bonovitch and Mr. Brent David Michalowski, and acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such outstanding young men as its citizens. ~~~~ ~~ May 28, 2008 Speaker's List Evening Session #1 (Following Presentation of Resolutions) 1. Mr. Emmanuel Artis (943-3790 2. Mr. Dave Anderson 3 . - ~ t~ - w 1 ~ ~ 5 ~1 e, t~.l ~ c~ 4. 5. Evening Session #2 (End of the Evening Agenda) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 y AGENDA _ ~ ; y~~x. Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 17.A. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider a Proposed Amendment to the County Code Relating to Creation of the Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) Zoning District, and County-wide Standards for Off-street Parking, Parallel Parking, Tree Planting Within Sidewalk Areas, and Signs Projecting from Buildings, and a Proposed Amendment to the Introduction to the Plan For Chesterfield to Provide for Opportunities for TND Development County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Boa Board of Supervisors hold a public hearing at their May 28, 2008 meeting to consider amendments to the Code of the County of Chesterfield and the Plan For Chesterfield. Summary of Information: Traditional neighborhood development (TND) provides opportunities for creating new mixed-use, pedestrian-oriented, activity centers containing a variety of uses, including, business, retail, residential, cultural, educational, and other public and private uses. Traditional neighborhood development encourages physical community building at the neighborhood scale, while providing a range of housing choice. Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director of Planning NO # t~00,~'~.3 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ' BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA The Board of Supervisors heard this matter on March 12, 2008 and continued the public hearing to May 28, 2008 to allow Board members time to meet with staff to resolve their concerns with the proposed ordinance. Two persons spoke at the public hearing, neither in opposition to the proposal. The proposed ordinance amendment embraces the principles of neotraditional or new urbanism development. Neotraditional development reverses the trend towards sprawl by promoting compact mixed-use neighborhoods that include residential blocks with a variety of densities and housing types within a neighborhood distinguished by many activities within comfortable walking distances of most homes. The proposed ordinance would establish a TND zoning district, development procedures, and unique development standards. The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment would allow designation of TND districts, subject to Board of Supervisors approval, for areas with the following Comprehensive Plan land use designations: Community Mixed Use; Community Mixed Use Center; Community Mixed Use Node; Regional Mixed Use; Regional Mixed Use Center; and Regional Mixed Use Node. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment on January 15, 2008. No citizens spoke in opposition to the proposed amendment during the hearing. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposal. ~~~~~~ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 19-41, 19-301, 19-508.3, 19-509, 19-510, 19-512, 19-518, 19-644 AND 19- 645 AND ADDING SECTIONS 19-200.1 THROUGH 19-200.11, 19-508.4, 19-509.1, AND 19-514.1 TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO CREATION OF THE TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT AND REQUIREMENTS THEREOF BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 19-41, 19-301, 19-508.3, 19-509, 19-510, 19-512, 19-518, 19-644 and 19-645 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted and Sections 19-200.1 through 19-200.11, 19-508.4, 19-509.1 and 19- 514.1 are added and enacted to read as follows: ARTICLE III. DISTRICTS DIVISION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 19-41. Districts enumerated. (a) For the purpose of this chapter the county is hereby divided into districts as follows: 000 TND Traditional Neighborhood Development 000 DIVISION 26: TND TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Section 19-200 1 Purposes and Intent of District (a) The .purpose of the Traditional Neighborhood Development District (TND) is to allow development of mixed-use pedestrian-oriented, actrvrty centers containin a variet of uses includin business retail residential cultural educational and other public and private uses The TND district incorporates publicly accessible communityopen mace areas encoura eg s high quality development and redevelopment that stimulates investment generates fobs increases available housing options, and expands the county's tax base The TND district also permits a compatible mix of uses m a single structure or a roue of structures on a parcel or group of parcels and is intended to discoura a piecemeal development The TND district will facilitate investment by increasing the number of permitted~rincipal and accessory uses in a single district and will encourage high quality redevelopment b~permittin~ greater re~ulatory flexibilit and innovative and creative design. ®~~~~~ 1925:77691.2 (b) This district is meant to allow the optional development and redevelopment of land consistent with the design principles of traditional neighborhoods, which are referred to as neotraditional and new urbanism. Generally, the following design principles are associated with TND development. Compact development patterns that promote efficient use of land and lower costs of providingpublic infrastructure and services; Development is desi¢ned for the human scale such that close attention is maid to walking_ distances the height of buildings and the design of streetlights sidewalks signs and other features; Nonresidential land uses civic and open space are mixed with residential land uses The TND district also~rovides a community center and focus to establish a strong. neighborhood identity. Traditional neighborhood development promotes a mix of housing_ types on varying lot sizes. to i~cHa ~ to ~, f a ~ ,. ~ Ro a~ ~ ~r>- ~ In-fill residential and/or nonresidential development and redevelopment is encouraged. Development incorporates a system of relatively narrow, interconnected streets with sidewalks bikeways and transit that offer multiple routes for motorists pedestrians and bicyclists and provides for the connection of those streets to existingand future developments. The following is an illustrative example only depicting characteristics and elements of a TND devel~ment None o~ the notations shown on this illustration are meant to be regulatory. Open Spaces Larger open spaces at edge Formal open space at Neighborhood Center 1M+ ,,.... +..- Small formal open spaces should be within a 3-minute walk of residences Lots should face formal open spaces Street Pattern Interconnected, walkable streets Cornmunity Cent More intense residential and commercial development, civic sites ve(oprnent Pattenr 1/4 mile radius from Neighkrorhood Center Neiphbor'hood Center Generally, the neighborhood / center should be within a 5- minute walk (1/4 mile) of the edge of the neighborhood Transition to different building types should occur at alley or interior of block, not the corner \~ ~'\ _~~ Service lane (alley) network encouraged Least intense residential should occur at the edge of a neighborhood 1925:77691.2 ~~~~ ~~ 2 Sec. 19-200.2. Uses Permitted By-RiSht The following uses are~ermitted subject to Board of Supervisor approval of a TND district. ~ Access to any land located in an A, O, C, or I district or used for A, O, C, or I pumoses. Automobile self-service stations. ~ Bed and breakfast establishments. ,~ Boarding houses. ~ Catering establishments. ~ Churches and other places of worship. ~ Clubs and lodes: civic fraternal non-profit, private, public, or social. lei Cocktail lounges and nightclubs. Colleges, public or private. Communication antennas integrated into the design of a permitted building. Communication offices studios and stations; not including towers. ,~ Conference centers. ~ Convenience store. ~ Dwellin~s• attached detached live/work multiple-family, single-family, townhouse, two-family. ~ Fire stations and emer>;ency rescue squads, buildings and grounds. ~ Fraternities (in conjunction with school or colle>;e). ~ Funeral homes. ~ Galleries, art. ~s,~ Government buildings. ~ Group homes. 1925:77691.2 ®~'~~~~ 3 ~ Hospitals and other medical facilities. ~ Hotels. ~ Laboratories• dental medical, and optical. ~ Libraries public or private. ~ Meal preparation and delivery services. ~ Messenger services. as Model homes. Mortuaries. cc Museums public or private. Offices• dental general medical propertymanagement temporary real estate. ee Parkir~ lots• commercial non-commercial, park and ride. Personal service establishments. ~gg~ Post offices. Public utility service buildings. ii Recreational establishments, commercial-indoor. ~jj~ Restaurants and cafes• carryout fast food, or sit-down. Retail, general. SchoolsLpublic or private. mm Schools specialty. ~ Sororities (in conjunction with school or college). 0o Telephone exchanges. ~ Theaters (except drive-in theaters). 1925:77691.2 (~Q~~~.~ 4 ~ Utility uses located underground or not requiring a structure ~ The Director of Planning as per Section 19-19 1(a) may approve those uses that are not specifically enumerated in this chapter and that are of the same general character as the specifically enumerated uses allowed in this district. The Director of Planning shall consider among other things the following: the size and~ro~osed configuration of the site• the size height and exterior architectural appearance of andproposed structures noise• light• glare• odors• dust• outdoor activities• traffic• parking• signag_e• and hours of operation. Based on these considerations he shall determine that the proposed use's operatmg characteristics are substantially similar to and its impact on neighboring properties no greater than the operating characteristics and impacts of the specifically enumerated uses allowed in the district. Sec. 19-200.3. Uses Permitted With Certain Restrictions The following uses shall be permitted in the TND District subject to compliance with the following conditions and other applicable standards of this chapter. If these restrictions cannot be met these uses may be allowed by conditional use, subject to Section 19-13. ~ Check cashing incidental subject to the limitations of Section 19-145(h). Christmas tree sales temporary outdoor subject to the limitations of Section 19- 152h. ~ Construction buildings/trailers temp_orar~subject to the limitations of Section 19-131 e . Groff care facilities provided that facilities in excess of 10 000 square feet of floor area shall be limited to the Community Center Group care facilities m the Community Center shall have at least fifty (50) percent of the ground-floor frontage that faces a~oining streets include tenant spaces for commercial uses with~rimary entrances facing the adjoining street. ~ Home occupations subject to the limitations of Section 19-65(e). fL~ Intercoms accessor~to~ermitted uses not audible to any residential use. ~ Motor vehicle rental service and repair subject to the limitations of Section 19- 159 Outside display or storage subject to the limitations of Section 19-159(i). 1925:77691.2 Parking and storage of any commercial truck commercial vehicle, or service vehicle in conjunction with any residential use subject to the limitations of Section 19-65(f). Parks,~public or private not exceeding five acres of active recreational uses. Pet grooming shops subject to the limitations of Section 19-145(d). Plant nurseries not exceeding 10 000 square feet of total floor area. ~ Public address systems (outside) not audible to any residential use. ~ Recreational establishments or facilities outdoor (public private or commercial) not exceeding five acres. ~ Satellite dishes subject to the limitations of Section 19-131(h). ~ Utility uses requiring a structure public or private subject to the limitations of Section 19-1310). ~ Veterinary clinics or offices subject to the limitations of Section 19-131(fl. ~ Warehouses subject to the limitations of Section 19-138(i). Sec 19-200 4 Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures The following accessory uses buildings and structures shall be permitted in the TND district. ~ Boathouses, private. Docks, private. ~ Equipment storage buildin>s. Garages private subject to the provisions of Section 19-66(a). ~ Gardens and garden buildings private subject to the provisions of Section 19- 66 a . ~f Grounds ke~in>; buildings subject to the provisions of Section 19-66(a). ~ Hothouses, residential. In-law dwelling units. 1925:77691.2 Maintenance buildings subject to the provisions of Section 19-66(a). Microbreweries. Piers, private. Plant propagation and cultivation (not for sale)• crop flower, tree, and shrub. ~ Signs. ~ Storag_e buildings private subject to the provisions of Section 19-66(a). ~ Swimmin~,,pools and adjoining deck areas. ~ Tennis courts and similar recreational facilities. ~ Tool buildings private subject to the provisions of Section 19-66(a): (r) Yard sales. (s) Other accessory uses building not otherwise prohibited customarily accessory and incidental to ant permitted use. Sec. 19-200.5. Conditional Uses The following uses may be allowed in the TND district by conditional use subject to the~rovisions of Section 19-13. ~ Communication towers. Halfway houses. ~ Liquor stores. Mini warehouse facilities. Sec 19-200.6. Special Exceptions The followinguses ma be allowed in the TND district by special exception subject to the provisions of Section 19-21. ~ Kennel, private. Yard sales in excess of two (2) days. d~~J~~~1 1925:77691.2 7 Sec. 19-200.7. Application Procedures and Approval Process The TND district becomes part of the zoning map upon approval of an application to rezone property according to specified criteria contained in Section 19-200.98. The process to create a TND district consists of two parts• rezoning the property to TND, and, as part of the rezoning,_process approval of a Master Plan and a Design Guidelines Manual The Master Plan consists of a generalized graphic description of the proiect's proposed mix of land uses densities open space and other amenities according to the provisions of section 19-14(d)(1) The Design Guidelines Manual will govern the site- specific design features associated with the project throughout its development. The standards for development that are submitted by an applicant and approved by the board of supervisors for a particular TND district as well as any other applicable provisions of the Count~Code shall be the standards b~which the project will be developed. Sec 19-200 8 Rezoning Application Requirements; Required Documents and Information The following documents and information shall be submitted to the planning department and any other information recLuired by the director of planning necessary to evaluate a rezoning application and its associated plans for development. ~ Master Plan ~~--~d~ie~r-te--~ ~ +~ ' ° ' "~'"" ` The followinu items shall be shown in the Master Plan in a map and/or textual form. (1) The location of existing property lines watercourses or lakes, wooded areas and existing roads within or adjoining_the property. (2) The conceptual plans describing_ and/or delineating the approximate location for drainage and erosion control transportation improvements including proposed new arterials and.proposed improvements to existing arterial roads serving the TND) water and wastewater service (proposed extension and/or existing major trunk lines to serve the proposed TND), and other public utilities and facilities. ~{~} The maximum residential densities and the maximum number of residential units for individual residential land use categories and mixed- use categories delineating at least two housing types. (~} The maximum non-residential scLuare footage by use type and function. f 4} The amount of land devoted to open mace and amenities including conservation areas or preservation areas, etc. Design Guidelines Manual The design guidelines manual shall address the following components of the built environment within a proposed TND district: 1925:7769].2 ~~~~ ~~ The form, massing, and proportions of structures; Vertical separation between streets and single-family residential uses; Architectural styles; Front porches for single-family residential uses; Materials, colors, and textures; Roof form and pitch; Architectural elements and ornamentation; Facade treatments, including window and door openin>s; Landscape treatments; Sidewalks and pathway treatments and other pedestrian amenities; Preservation of historic structures, sites, and archeological sites identified by the Vir ing is Department of Historic Resources and those designated by the county; Signa~e. Section 19-200.9. Development Plan Review Process: Overall Development Plan Upon approval of the rezoning application the development plan review process for a TND proiect shall include an Overall Development Plan (ODP) that describes, in greater detail the bout uses and other pertinent information for the entire development or for individual tracts of development as may be approved in the Master Plan However for areas within the project that are not ready to be submitted for site plan review the layout of buildin sg_aand parking lots shall not be required to be shown except as required by the director of planning to complete reviews on other development areas Layout of roads shall be shown as required to accomplish road construction per section 200.11(b)(3). The ODP shall be consistent with the Master Plan. Minor alterations of an approved Master Plan may occur if the planning director concludes, after reviewins; written comments from the staff review team that the plan does not si>;nificantly alter the character of land uses or other features or conflict with any conditions placed on the ~proval of rezonin~_plan maybe submitted to the plannin>; department for this purpose in a form sufficient to illustrate the proposed alterations. If the planning director determines that a proposed change would significantly alter the approved master plan, the 1925:77691.2 ~ ~ ~ ~.~ applicant may submit alternative proposed development plans or proceed with amendment of a master~lan in accordance with section 19-200.7. Once an ODP is improved, site plans and/or subdivision plans may be submitted that document the actual construction of the development. ~ An ODP shall be submitted for any TND development. The ODP may be approved administrativel~r bathe planning commission and shall be updated and revised as the project evolves over time, as required by the director of planning. Overall Devel~ment Plans shall include information deemed necessary by the director of planning to insure compliance with zoning conditions and the zoning ordinance's purposes, including but not limited to: The horizontal layout of the project based upon a metes and bounds survey with two points tied to the Virginia State Coordinate S s The designation of public and private roads including alleys; A list of residential and non-residential products and the maximum building he~ht within each block of the TND; A layout of single-family lots in each block; Build to lines establishing required distances between road rights of ways and principal buildings; ~6,~ Densit~y block and overall density; Sidewalk and pedestrian path locations; Areas of common open space that achieve a minimum of 20% common open space within the entire TND project and the spacing requirements specified in section 19-200.11 (e); Conceptual layout of sewer and water service; Conceptual landscaping plans for streets and buffers; (11) A traffic impact analysis if deemed necessary by the director of transportation; and Sign package for community identification and announcements. 1925:77691.2 V' "J v~;s ~ A '0t 10 ~ For the purposes of subsequent site plan and subdivision review, the ODP shall identify the blocks and/or areas, including adjoining roads and common open space areas that shall be reviewed using the site plan or subdivision review process. Determination of which review process shall be used for each block and/or area shall be made by the planning department based upon input from participating review departments. Overall Development Plans shall be reviewed to ensure compliance with TND requirements, zoning conditions, and the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan; to ensure land use compatibility and transition, and to miti atg e any adverse impact on public health, safety and welfare. The planning commission or the director of planning ma~pose conditions to accomplish these purposes. An administrative decision on an ODP maybe appealed in conformity with section 19-268L). The planning commission's decision on an ODP maybe appealed in conformity with section 19-269(e). ~ If the applicant requests administrative review of the ODP, the director of ,plannin sg~ hall post a notice of the ODP submission to adjacent property owners by first class mail as soon after plan submission as practicable, but in no event less than 21 days prior to approval or disapproval of the ODP. The director of planning shall make affidavit that such notice has been sent and shall file the affidavit with the application. ~f If the applicant requests a planning commission review of the ODP, the director of plannin sg hall post a notice of an ODP hearing by the planning commission in accordance with section 19-26(b). ~ Review of the ODP shall be in accordance with section 19-268(c). Section 19-200.10. Site Plan and Subdivision Plans Based upon approval of the Overall Development Plan for the TND project, the applicant may file for site~lan review/approval or subdivision plan review/approval Section 19-200.11. General Design Standards and Guidelines The following design standards and guidelines shall be applicable for all development within the TND district. ~ Minimum Area: A TND project must contain a minimum of sixty (60) acres. For infill and redevelopment projects a minimum of twent~20) acres are allowed if asphere-of-influence is established into existing and/or future neighborhoods and commercial areas equaling sixty (60~ acres at time of rezoning. However, any subsequent TND request to expand a TND or infill TND shall not have a minimum size as long as the area of expansion conforms to the requirements of the original TND it adioins. 1925:77691.2 0+®'~ ~ ~ i 11 Mix of Uses in Proiect Desi;rn • To achieve the compact design necessary to make the TND full pedestrian oriented residential and non-residential land uses must be sufficiently mixed horizontally across the project and vertically within buildings The non-residential development serving the TND shall progress with the residential development The ~roiect should be organized so that higher density residential blocks are located within one-quarter ('/4) mile of the community center Lower density residential blocks may be located beyond one- quarter mile from the community center Because existing uses surround an in- fill TND project lower residential densities adjacent to the community center should be evaluated at time of zoning with regards to transition of uses. Within a TND project a minimum of thirty (30) percent of the acreage shall be used for non-residential development and at least 40 percent of the total square footage of ground floor non-residential development shall have over shop housing The ~ercenta eg_of project acreage for non- residential buildings shall include the buildings and all parking, sidewalks, streets and open space directly associated with these buildings. Within an infill TND project including the area within its designated sphere of influence a minimum of thirty (30~percent of the acreage shall be used for non-residential devel~ment. This may include existing and/or proposed retail development within the TND sphere of influence as long as pedestrian pathway and streets are provided to the proposed infill TND area At least 40 percent of the total square footage of ,;round floor non-residential development shall have over shop housing. This may be reduced to the extent that existing non-residential development exceeds the remaining 60~ercent of ground floor non-residential square footage. Within a TND project no more than 40 percent of residential building permits in residential areas shall be released until 75 percent of all public and private roads serving_ non-residential development are constructed. No more than 75 percent of residential building_permits shall be released until buildingpermits are released and uses are under construction for at least 40 percent of the land area designated for non-residential development The board of supervisors ma~pprove alternate phasing at time of zoning. TND and in-fill TND proiects should incorporate as many categories of residential uses as_possible but at least three categories of residential uses shall be included Infill TND proiects may include existing residential use categories that exist within the sphere of influence to achieve at least three categories of residential use categories. ~ Residential Uses The following residential categories are allowed within the residential areas of a TND into the maximum density levels established below. 1925:77691.2 ~~~~ ~~ 12 Density for each residential category shall be calculated based upon the developable acreage identified within each block in the overall development plan. Single-family detached dwellings - Up to eight (8) dwelling units per acre. A maximum of sixty (60) percent of the residential development area may be used for single-family detached dwellings. Sin l~e_~amily attached dwellings - Up to sixteen (16) dwelling units per acre A maximum of fort~40) percent of the residential development area may be used for single-family attached dwellings. Live/work units - Up to sixteen (16) dwelling upper acre. No more than ten (10) percent of the residential development area shall be used for live/work^dwellings and these units shall be located within the same block or across the street from non-residential development areas. Multi- amily dwellings - Up to 25 dwellingLunits per acre. No more than twenty (20~percent of the residential development area shall be used for multi-family dwellings Multi-family dwellings incorporated into upper stories of non-residential buildings may exceed 25 dwelling units per acre as long as parking requirements for additional dwellings are provided through multi-stor py, arking facilities (parking garages). Community Center The community center of a TND proiect shall consist of a mix of office commercial residential civic or institutional and open space uses as identified below. ~, Office and Commercial uses in the community center. Except as may be approved at time of zoning or for government buildings, no individual building shall exceed 10 000 square feet in ground floor area until buildings are under construction for the minimum percentage of ground floor buildin_g_ square footage with overshop housing. For each story of overshop housing the 10 000 ware feet ground floor area limit may be increased by ri hg t b~ fifty (SOSpercent above the base limit. Once buildira construction has started for the minimum area of buildings with overshop housings individual buildings may increase in ground floor area to a maximum of 30,000 square feet. Residential uses in the community center: The following residential uses are permitted in the community center: a. Residential dwellings as over shop housing- may exceed 25 dwelling units per acre as long as parking requirements for dwellings beyond 25 units per acre are provided through multi- storyparki>~ facilities (parking,_garages). 1925:77691.2 ~~~~ ~ ~ 13 b. Senior apartments assisted living facilities and nursing homes as long as each use is designed within a single building with a minimum of three stories and the area for all of these uses does not exceed 25 percent of the total acreage in the community center. c. Work/live units -Community center may include up to ten percent of the developable area of the entire community center with work/live units. Civic or institutional uses in the community center: The community center shall provide locations that serve as focal points for civic, religious, and/or institutional uses. These focal points shall be at ends of sight lines such as may occur at a tee intersection of two streets, at a sudden road bend or at one end of a central commons area and these buildings shall be designed with a strong architectural appearance in character with the proiect's theme Such uses include but are not limited to the following: a. Municipal offices fire stations libraries, museums, community meeting facilities, and post offices; b. Places of worship; c. Public schools. Common open space uses in the community center: Common open space is a significant part of the design of a traditional neighborhood development Formal and informal non-linear spaces are required with a formally designed central square or commons of 40,000 square feet minimum established as the primary common open space near the center of the community center A smaller informally designed common open space area shall serve as a children's park of 20 000 square feet minimum and shall be located within two blocks of the community center and adjacent to a primary pedestrian~ath or sidewalk. This park shall be furnished with a variety of children's play equipment and with seating areas for adults. (e) Common Omen Space • At least 20 percent of the gross acreage of the entire TND project shall consist of common open space for the common use and enjoyment of residents visitors and employees within the TND and shall be clearly delineated in the overall development plan A minimum of 85 percent of the residential units within the TND project devoted to residential uses shall be within 1/4 mile of an improved common open space area such as a park or plaza having a minimum area of 20 000 square feet that includes, at a minimum improvements such as benches activity areas and landscaping. Internal bikeways and pedestrian walkways shall connect between all improved common open space areas Within an infill TND the percentage of 1925:77691.2 ~®~R ~ ~ 14 common open space the distance to common open space areas, and the connectivity between common open space areas for infill TND proiects may be modified by the director of planning based upon available common open space and pathways within the sphere of influence and the amount of land available within the infill TND. ~f' Building He~ht• Within a TND project building height shall not exceed four (4) stories or fifty (50) feet whichever is less, except within the community center where building height shall not exceed ei hg t (8) stories or one hundred (100) feet, whichever is less However within any block, no structures shall exceed a height of twent -fy lye (25) feet taller than any other adjacent buildings within the same block. ~ Minimum Lot Requirements and Block Standards: There shall be no minimum lot area or ,yard (front rear and side) requirements except as defined in the Overall Development Plan for the project. A build-to-line along the street front of each block shall be established that defines the maximum distance between the street right-of--way and the face of the principal building on each lot. Motor Vehicle Circulation: Motor vehicle circulation shall be designed to promote pedestrian and bicycle activity. Streets within the TND shall include traffic calming elements to encourage slow traffic speeds such as "queuing streets" curb extensions traffic circles parallel and angled on-street parking and medians as determined by the directors of planning and transportation. All roads that accommodate general traffic circulation as determined by the director of transportation shall be constructed to state standards and accepted for maintenance by the Virginia Department of Transportation. Street Layout Devel~ment in the TND district shall maintain a street grid pattern of generally parallel interconnecting streets with no cul-de-sacs except as may be approved during the review of the Overall Development Plan due to topographic or site design constraints Each proposal's t~ographic and other physical site impacts will be considered regarding this standard. Intersections should be at ri hg t angles whenever possible. (2) Curb cuts for driveways to individual residential lots shall be prohibited along all roads identified on the county's Thoroughfare Plan. Modi acations o fire~revention code During the design of TND developments, all structures are rewired to meet the provisions of the Statewide Fire Prevention Code as amended by Chesterfield County. Modification of the fire prevention code as permitted by the Statewide Fire Prevention Code will be considered by the fire code official upon request by the designer or developer when there are practical difficulties involved in meetingthe provisions of this code. 1925:77691.2 ~~~~~~ 15 Parking spaces required: Parking within TND districts shall be in accordance with Sections 19-509 through 19-514. Landscaping and Buffering: Landscaping within TND districts shall be in accordance with Sections 19-516 through 19-519. ~ Exterior L$hting• Exterior lighting. general requirements for TND districts shall be in accordance with section 19-508.3. ~ Exterior Lighting within a TND: Exterior lighting requirements for TND districts shall be in accordance with 19-508.4. ~ Off- Street Parkin~• Off street parking requirements for TND districts shall be in accordance with section 19-509. ~ On -Street Parking in a TND: On- street parking requirements for TND districts shall be in accordance with section 19-509.1. ~ Restrictions and Limitations: Agricultural residential, residential townhouse, multi-family residential manufactured homes. Restrictions and limitations applicable to TND districts shall be in accordance with section 19-510. ~ Interpretation of Specific requirements: Interpretation of certain specific requirements for TND districts shall be in accordance with section 19-512. ~ Design Standards for Parallel Parking: Design standards for parallel parking in TND districts shall be in accordance with section 19-514.1. ~ Plant Material Speci~cations• Plant material specifications for TND districts shall be in accordance with section 19-518. ~ Other Restrictions for Building Mounted Suns: Restrictions for building mounted signs in TND districts shall be in accordance with 19-644. ~ Freestanding Sign Des~n• Free standing sign design in TND districts shall be in accordance with section 19-645. 000 Section 19-301. Definitions For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings: 000 1925:77691.2 ~~~~~ 16 Acreage developable• The total land area within a zoning lot; or within a block for a TND~roiect minus areas that are not developable including but not limited to resource protection areas wetlands perennial stream protection areas, lakes, railroad rights of ways and cemeteries Within a TND common open space as approved in the overall development~lan shall be included as developable acreage within each block. The total land area within a zoning lot or a block shall be measured from existing public rights of way from the center of proposed street rights of way and from the edge of any land or water area not developable. 000 Infill TND pro~ect• The intent of the in-fill TND project is to establish a complete TND with a blend of residential types and densities that relate to a commercial community center and that is interconnected with streets for vehicular access and with pedestrian pathways and common open mace By inserting residential or commercial components of a TND project that are missing in an area with existing development or redevelopment an infill TND project begins establishing a network of pedestrian pathways with areas of common open mace and opportunities for economic development within walking distance of existing neighborhoods. The extent that an in-fill TND, combined with other properties within its sphere of influence to equal 60 acres minimum, accomplishes the general characteristics of a TND project shall be established at time of zoning. 000 Live/Work Units • A building, or a unit space within a portion of a building, that combines a commercial use allowed in the zoning district with a residential living space for the owner of the business or the owner's employee and that person's household. The residence occurs on upper floors and the business occurs on the first floor. Live/work units shall be located only in residential areas of a TND. Architecture generally emphasizes a residential townhome character but the first floor for the business shall be on grade with the ad~joinina street and shall have a minimum of a 12 feet high ceiling. A business in a live/work unit shall not be open to the public between the hours of 9 pm and 7 am. 000 Open space common ~ Any area within the TND project area as shown on the overall Development Plan (section 19-200 9) that may be used by residents and the g_enera~ublic that is maintained for any of the following purposes: as natural vegetation or landscaped areas- aesthetic and accessible ponds and BMPs• active or passive recreational uses including but not limited to sidewalks walking and biking paths, playgrounds swimmin~,_pools and tennis courts• outside public gathering areas set aside for temporary activities and events such as but not limited to, art shows, annual celebrations and special outings that sport the recreational nature of open space; and related parking lots and buildings accessory to any of these uses. Resource protection areas wetlands perennial stream~rotection areas and storm water management and 1925:77691.2 ~o~~~~ 17 "best mana eg ment practices" BMP) areas are excluded from minimum common open space area requirements except for those areas used as a design feature or recreational amenity or greenway. 000 Over shy housing Residential units in upper stories of commercial and office development. 000 Personal service establishments: Primarily non-industrial establishments which provide various service functions to residents and businesses, including; banks; barber shops• beauty shops• brokerages- child care centers• clinics (massage, medical or optical); credit unions- day care (family day care homes day care centers, adult or child); dress making_ shops dry cleaning (pick-up drop-off coin-operated)- laundries and Laundromats (not including dry cleaning_plants)• locksmith operations; mailing services; printing shops photography studios- rental establishments (small home hardware, tools and equipment health and party equipments repair services- sewing machine sales service and instruction- savings and loans institutions; shoe repair; tailoring; telegraph services- travel agencies- tutoring centers• and other uses of similar intensity and nature as determined the director of planning: 000 Recreational establishments commercial indoor: Primarily non-industrial establishments which provide commercial indoor recreational services, including: billiard parlors- dance studios- exercise studios- fitness centers• health clubs- martial arts studios; pool halls- and other uses of similar intensity and nature as determined by the director of planning. 000 Retail general ~ Non-industrial establishments characterized by the offering for sale of goods and related services to the eg neral public including: antiques (not including pawnbrokers flea markets or second-hand stores)- appliances; artist materials and supplies- bakery goods- beer and wine- bicycles- books- cameras, candy, clothing; consignment stores (excluding_ motor vehicles)- curios- department stores; home electronics- eye wear- drug stores- flowers food (prepared)- fruit; furniture; gasoline; groceries- gifts- hardware- hobby supplies- home entertainment items; iewelry; maQazines• meat- motor vehicle accessories- musical products and instruments; newspapers- office supplies- packaging- paint- pets- pharmacies- seafood- shopping centers• sporting_goods• stationary- telephones- toys- videos (rental and sales)- vegetables; wallpaper- and other uses of similar intensity and nature as determined by the director of planning. 000 School specialty • Educational facilities offering specialized instruction for art, business- commerce- dance- music- trades- training_purposes• or vocational education; 1925:77691.2 ~~®~ ~~ 18 and other uses of similar intensity and nature as determined by the director of planning. This definition includes kindergarten and nursery schools. 000 where o~influence• The sphere of influence of an in-fill TND project includes the developed and/or undeveloped areas outside of and adjacent to the boundaries of the in-fill TND that physically connect with the infill TND via streets, bicycle paths, and pedestrian paths and sidewalks in order to establish a larger TND community area of at least 60 acres Streets bicycle paths and pedestrian paths and sidewalks shall extend and connect from the proposed TND project to access locations in a~oining developments as required by the board of supervisors at time of zoning. 000 Work/live units: A building or a unit space within a portion of a building, that combines a commercial use allowed in the zoning district with a residential living space for the owner of the business or the owner's employee and tha~erson's household. The residence occurs on upper floors and the business occurs on the first floor. Work/live units shall be located only in the community center of a TND. Architecture generally emphasizes the commercial character of the TND community center, and the first floor for the business shall be on-grade with the adjoining street and shall have a minimum of a 12 feet high ceiling There is no limit to the hours that the business use may be open to the public. 000 Sec. 19-508.3. Exterior lighting. With the exception of single family residential uses, all exterior lights shall be arranged and installed so that the direct or reflected illumination does not exceed five- tenths foot candle above background, measured at the lot line of any adjoining A, R, R- TH, MH, TND, or R-MF district. Except in village and TND districts where light standards may be required to be compatible with unique architectural styles or developments having ornamental pedestrian style lighting, lighting standards shall be of a directional type capable of shielding the light source from direct view from any adjoining A, R, R-TH, MH, TND, or R-MF district or public right-of way. 000 Sec. 19-508.4. Exterior lighting within a TND nroiect. Within a TND pedestrian environments require lighting to provide visibility and safetylong streets and within public~arking areas while minimizing the effects of lighting on residential uses. 1925:77691.2 19 ~'~~~~ ~ Lighting Level Standards. (~ Streets with on-street parking and all sidewalks within public rights-of--way shall maintain a minimum illumination level of 0.5- foot candle. Parking areas for all uses other than single-family residential uses shall maintain a minimum illumination level of 1.0 foot-candle. However, adjacent to single-family residential uses, parkin lg of or business security lighting shall not exceed the 1.0 foot-candle illumination level beyond the property line. ~b,~ ~ht Fixture Mounting Heights. ~1,~ Street lighting shall not exceed a mounting height of twenty-five (25) feet above the closest street rg ade. Parkin area lighting, whether pole or building mounted, shall not exceed a height of twent~20) feet above the grade of the parking area closest to the light source. 000 Sec. 19-509. Off-street parking. 000 ~c) For residential uses, parking within a garage or an enclosed or covered space may be counted toward meeting parking requirements. Conversion of such a garage or enclosure to another use is prohibited unless sufficient off-street parkin is provided. (d) Within the community center of a TND project, public parking facilities may be constructed to provide sufficient required parking for uses within 1000 feet of the facility. However, parking decks shall be screened from view from public and private roads by locating other buildings around their perimeter. Sec. 19-509.1. On-street parking in a TND. Except along roads identified on the county's Thoroughfare Plan, improved, designated parking spaces in a public right-of--way may be counted toward the required number of parking spaces for each use within a TND District when more than one-half of each such space resides in front of the use. However, parking spaces in a public right-of-wad not be designated in any way for a use. On-street parking spaces not in front of a use may be counted toward the required number of parking spaces within an overall block. 1925:77691.2 ~~~~~~ 20 000 Sec. 19-510. Restrictions and limitations-Agricultural, residential, residential townhouse, multi-family residential, manufactured homes. (a) Parking and storing recreational equipment in R, R-TH, MH, TND and R- MF Districts: 000 (3) In R-TH, ,ate R-MF, and TND Districts, parking and storing recreational equipment shall be prohibited unless a common storage area(s) is (are) provided for the parking. Parking spaces for recreational equipment and/or vehicles shall be in addition to that required for parking private vehicles. The storage area(s) shall be effectively screened from view. 000 Sec. 19-512. Interpretation of specific requirements. 000 (c) Within a TND district, the minimum requirements for on and off-street parking spaces for each use shall be calculated based on the lesser of either section 19- 513 or four (4) parking spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area. Required parking for live/work units shall be based on the residential use and parking for work/live units shall be based upon the commercial use. (~}~ When fractional space results, the required number of parking spaces shall be rounded to the next highest whole number. 000 Sec. 19-514.1. Design standards for parallel parking. Parallel parking may be used for required parking off-street, and on-street in village districts and the TND zoning district. Spaces shall be legibly striped to be seven (7) feet wide and twent~22) feet long with 4 inch white lines perpendicular to the curb or edge of pavement. Sec. 19-518. Plant material specifications. 000 (b) Minimum size standards: 1925:77691.2 f~~®~ ~~ 21 000 (2) Large deciduous trees: Large deciduous trees shall be of a species that reach a minimum crown spread of greater than 30 feet within 20 years. At a time of planting, a minimum caliper of at least two and one-half inches shall be required except for street trees within a TND^project when three and one-half inches shall be required. If a native species is selected from the Chesterfield County Plant Materials List, the minimum caliper shall be reduced +° *~T~° ~~°''°~ by a half inch. Multi-stem plants shall be minimum of 10 feet tall except that lame deciduous street trees in a TND~roject shall not be allowed to be multi-stem. 000 (h) Street trees: During the site and subdivision construction plan review processes, and for a TND project during the overall development plan review rocess, required street trees shall be shown ;,~~ u ~'°~ ~''°«~~~~- +''° ~ a + ' +' including species and caliper, and submitted to and approved by the director of planning and VDOT. Unless otherwise approved by the director_of planning and VDOT durin the review of the overall development plan for a TNDproject all public and private streets except alleys shall be planted with large maturin street trees on an average of forty (40) feet on center within the street ri hg t=of- way of each block, either within a sidewalk area or within a planting strip between the curb and sidewalk having a minimum width of six (6 feet. When small maturing ornamental street trees are proposed spacing avera e twent -five 25) feet on center. Within a TND project, the minimum clear zone shall be established for proposed trees within the public street right-of-wa~y using six (6) inch vertical curbin fg or all public streets. ~3,~ Within a TND project, plantin strips within a street right-of--way shall be planted with turf grasses or other low rg owing~lants as approved by VDOT. For all trees planted in tree wells in a sidewalk area within or adiacent to a public or private street, a minimum of seventy-five 75) square feet by three (3 feet deep beneath the sidewalk shall contain an uncompacted soil mix favorable to healthy tree growth, irrigation, and a subdrain tied to the storm drain s,, s {~}~ Unless otherwise required during subdivision review, trees shall be lp anted at a maximum spacing of 40 feet on center and °'~~"''°'°°°+°a no 1925:77691.2 22 greater more than fives feet outside of the right-of--way in an easement granted to the homeowners association or within the right-of--way if approved by VDOT. For single trunk trees the minimum allowable caliper measured four feet above grade shall be two and one half inches. Multistem trees shall have a minimum of three canes and be a minimum of ten feet in height. Species selected for planting shall be suitable for growing in this vegetative zone and shall be drought tolerant. ~}~ The subdivider or developer shall at their expense install all required street trees identified on the approved plans prior to recordation or surety shall be provided in the amount approved by the director of planning and in a form accepted by the county attorney's office, sufficient to guarantee installation. Any surety shall be held by the director of planning. Installation within a subdivision shall be completed prior to state acceptance of the subdivision's streets. {~}~ Required street trees shall be guaranteed by the installer for a period of not less than one year. Replacement of dead trees is required in accordance with section 19-518(d). Maintenance responsibilities of the required street trees within a subdivision shall be specified on the final check plan and record plat to be the responsibility of the homeowners association. Street trees shall not be removed during or after residences are constructed. Trees removed shall be replaced with a like species and in a size comparable to the original planting. 000 19-644. Other restrictions for building mounted signs. 000 (b) Signs may be mounted perpendicular to a building provided that no sign shall project more than 36 inches from the building, roof or canopy, exceed a face to face thickness of eight inches or exceed the height of the fascia or parapet wall. All projecting sins shall maintain a minimum clearance of eight (8) feet above grade below the sign. Within a Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND), building signs projectin o sidewalk may extend up to eight (8) feet from the buildin ag s long as the sign is no closer than four (4) feet from the face of curb at the street. 000 Sec. 19-645. Freestanding sign design. (b) Any freestanding sign in an TND, O-1 or C-1 District shall conform to village district standards, with the exception that uses in a TND District that front on a 1925:77691.2 ~~~ 23 major arterial outside of a village district may use countywide size restrictions for area and height for signs located on the major arterial. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1925:77691.2 Q'®~~sii 24 NEIGHBORHOODS , Neighborhoods are the building blocks of Chesterfield County and the County's quality of life is determined by their livability and character. The Plan for Chesterfield works toward assisting the County's established neighborhoods and commercial areas to remain healthy or regain lost health by: Raising citizen awareness of critical issues facing their neighborhoods. Assisting .neighborhoods to become proactive in their efforts to keep their neighborhoods healthy. Recommending actions that stabilize and improve the vitality and health of established communities. Affordable housing opportunities for homeowners and renters should be available to all who live and work in Chesteriield County. There should be an opportunity for people of various income levels to live in economically integrated neighborhoods. Affordable housing may be integrated into high density and mixed-use development projects and should be encouraged through more flexible zoning wherever possible. including. business. retail. residential. cultural. educational and other aublic and .. _.. _..~.... ._1~. _.-.-._ T._-.-~.LI-_- _ . . 1 • • • . . housing choice. TND districts maybe aaaroariate subject to Board of Supervisors aaaroval. for_areas with the following Comprehensive Plan land use ds?sianations: ~~ • Community Mixed Use • Community Mixed Use Center • Communihr Mixed Use Node • Re_aiona! Mixed Use Reaiona! Mixed Use Center • Recrional Mixed Use Node ~~~~~~ e;e ~e ~ serer Your Cnmmunrty Newspaper Since 1995 P.O. Aox 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 231 I3 • Phonc: (804) X45-75(X) Fax: (804) 744-326) • Finail: news@chesterfieldohserveccom • Intcmet: www.chesterfieldoburveccom ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Chesterfield County LN: TND 5-14, 21 1/2P + 1 in. $725.00 Board of Supervisors The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Twlrc~ NO~~ Chesterfield Observer in the count of Chesterfield, state of Vir lnia on Take notice that the Boazd of Supervisors bf y g. ~ Chesterfield County, vtrginia, at a regular the following date(s): 05/14/2008 & 05/21/2008 scheduled meeting on May 28, 2008, at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building ~ L Rt. 10 and. Lori Road, Chesterfield, /J Virginia, will hold a public heazing where Swom to and subscribed before me this ~~ ~ day of persons affected may appear and present their views to consider: Amendments to the Count}~s 2008. Comprehensive PlanandZoningordinanEe , that would establish a Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) zoning district and which will provide standazds for the TND district as well as a number of design standards that will be applicable County-wide. No,property will be rezoned by these amendments but, if adopted by the Board of suppe~,r~~~v~isors the-TND district Leg t~ffiant J s ,Grooms Jr., Not Public would be avaiKdl't. to landowners and the County for possible. future rezoning actions. The proposed amendments are described below: My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 (SEA~~ „~,,,,~, ,,~`''~ G R L ~'' . ~• ~'Ei ~ ,~ ~•. ,'?.~ o~ ~ .~tr~.... 4 : cs ~-~a-~2 ~ . ~ ~ +~11i209'==• i~ a,,yjTq RY aV ~~~,,. THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. -~_~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~ _ ,~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 S ~ AGENDA ~~fRCINN~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 17.6. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 10 Fire Protection of the County Code County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to conduct a public hearing and adopt the attached ordinance. Summary of Information: Due to changes which the State Department of Housing and Community Development recently made to the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code (VSFPC), it is necessary for the County to modify its amendments to the VSFPC to reflect the changes. The proposed amendments are contained in the attached ordinance. These amendments are being made to reflect the changes in the VSFPC, which went into effect on May 1. The changes are not substantive in nature, but involve renumbering references to the VFSPC. Preparers Paul W. Mauger Title: Fire Chief Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No ~~~'~ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 10-3 RELATING TO AMENDMENTS TO THE FIRE PREVENTION CODE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 10-3 of the Code of the County o Chesterfield 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 10-3. Fire prevention code--Amendments, additions and deletions. The Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code is hereby amended and changed pursuant to Code of Virginia, § 27-97, in the following respects: 000 Chapter 3. General Precautions Against Fire 307.1 Title and Purpose. Delete and substitute section 307.1 as follows: This article shall be known as the Chesterfield County Ordinance for the Regulation of Open Burning. The purpose of this article is to protect public health, safety, and welfare by regulating open burning within Chesterfield County to achieve and maintain, to the greatest extent practicable, a level of air quality that will provide comfort and convenience while promoting economic and social development. This article is intended to supplement the applicable regulations promulgated by the State Air Pollution Control Board and other applicable regulations and laws. 3~~ 307.1.1 Definitions. Delete and substitute section ~~ 307.1.1 as follows: For the purpose of this article and subsequent amendments or any orders issued by Chesterfield County, the words or phrases shall have the meaning given them in this section. A. "Automobile graveyard" means any lot or place which is exposed to the weather and upon which more than five motor vehicles of any kind, incapable of being operated, and which it would not be economically practical to make operative, are placed, located or found. B. "Bonfire" means an outdoor fire utilized for ceremonial purposes. C. "Clean burning waste" means waste which does not produce dense smoke when burned and is not prohibited to be burned under this ordinance. D. "Construction waste" means solid waste which is produced or generated during construction of structures. Construction waste consists of lumber, wire, sheetrock, broken brick, shingles, glass, pipes, concrete, and metal and plastics if the metal or plastics are a part of the materials of construction or empty containers for such materials. Paints, coatings, solvents, asbestos, any liquid, compressed gases or semi-liquids, and garbage are not construction wastes and the disposal of such materials must be in accordance with the regulations of the Virginia Waste Management Board. 2~z3~os>:~~aoa.i i pgJ'~~~~.. E. "Debris waste" means stumps, wood, and brush, ~r~' ~°~-•°~ from property maintenance and/or land clearing operations. F. "Demolition waste" means that solid waste which is produced by the destruction of structures and their foundations and includes the same materials as construction waste. G. "Garbage" means rotting animal and vegetable matter accumulated by a household in the course of ordinary day to day living. H. "Hazardous waste" means refuse or combinations of refuse which, because of its quantity, concentration or physical, chemical or infectious characteristics may: 1. Cause or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible or incapacitating illness; or 2. Pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, disposed, or otherwise managed. I. "Household refuse" means waste material and trash normally accumulated by a household in the course of ordinary day to day living. J. "Industrial waste" means all waste generated on the premises of manufacturing and industrial operations such as, but not limited to, those carried on in factories, processing plants, refineries, slaughterhouses, and steel mills. K. "Junkyard" means an establishment or place of business which is maintained, operated, or used for storing, keeping, buying, or selling junk, or for the maintenance or operation of an automobile graveyard, and the term shall include garbage dumps and sanitary landfills. L. "Landfill" means a sanitary landfill, an industrial waste landfill, or a construction/demolition/debris landfill. See solid waste management regulations for further definitions of these terms. M. "Local landfill" means any landfill located within the jurisdiction of a local government. N. "Occupied building" means any structure occupied or intended for supporting or sheltering any occupancy. O. "Open burning" means the burning of any matter in such a manner that the products resulting from combustion are emitted directly into the atmosphere without passing through a stack, duct or chimney. P. "Open pit incinerator" means a device used to burn waste for the primary purpose of reducing the volume by removing combustible matter. Such devices function by directing a curtain of air at an angle across the top of a trench or similarly enclosed space, thus reducing the amount of combustion by-products emitted into the atmosphere. The term also includes trench burners, air curtain destructors and overdraft incinerators. a~23~os~:~~202. i a l)E~Q ~~? Q. "Refuse" means trash, rubbish, garbage and other forms of solid or liquid waste, including, but not limited to, wastes resulting from residential, agricultural, commercial, industrial, institutional, trade, construction, land clearing, forest management and emergency operations. R. "Salvage operation" means any operation consisting of a business, trade or industry participating in salvaging or reclaiming any product or material, such as, but not limited to, reprocessing of used motor oils, metals, chemicals, shipping containers or drums, and specifically including automobile graveyards and junkyards. S. "Sanitary landfill" means an engineered land burial facility for the disposal of household waste which is so located, designed, constructed, and operated to contain and isolate the waste so that it does not pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment. A sanitary landfill also may receive other types of solid wastes, such as commercial solid waste, nonhazardous sludge, hazardous waste from conditionally exempt small quantity generators, and nonhazardous industrial solid waste. See solid waste management regulations for further definitions of these terms. T. "Smoke" means small gas-borne particulate matter consisting mostly, but not exclusively, of carbon, ash and other material in concentrations sufficient to form a visible plume. U. "Special incineration device" means a pit incinerator, conical or tepee burner, or any other device specifically designed to provide good combustion performance. 307.2 Open Burning Regulations. Delete and substitute Section ~~ 307.2 as follows: A. No owner or other person shall cause or permit open burning or the use of a special incineration device for disposal of refuse except as provided in this ordinance. B. No owner or other person shall cause or permit open burning or the use of a special incineration device for disposal of household refuse or garbage. C. No owner or other person shall cause or permit open burning or the use of a special incineration device for disposal of rubber tires, asphaltic materials, crankcase oil, impregnated wood or other rubber or petroleum based materials except when conducting bona fide fire fighting instruction at fire fighting training schools having permanent facilities. D. No owner or other person shall cause or permit open burning or the use of a special incineration device for disposal of hazardous waste or containers for such materials. E. No owner or other person shall cause or permit open burning or the use of a special incineration device for the purpose of a salvage operation or for the disposal of commercial/industrial waste. F. Open burning or the use of special incineration devices permitted under the provisions of this ordinance does not exempt or excuse any owner or other person from the consequences, liability, damages or injuries which may result from such conduct; nor does it excuse or exempt any owner or other person from complying with other applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and orders of the governmental entities having 2723(05):77202.1 3 ~~~~~ jurisdiction, even though the open burning is conducted in compliance with this ordinance. In this regard special attention should be directed to Code of Virginia, § 10.1- 1142, of the Forest Fire Law of Virginia, the regulations of the Virginia Waste Management Board, and the State Air Pollution Control Board's Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air Pollution. G. Upon declaration of an alert, warning or emergency stage of an air pollution episode as described in part VII of the Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air Pollution or when deemed advisable by the state air pollution control board to prevent a hazard to, or an unreasonable burden upon, public health or welfare, no owner or other person shall cause or permit open burning or use of a special incineration device, and any in process burning or use of special incineration devices shall be immediately terminated in the designated air quality control region. ~ 307.2.1 Exemptions. Delete and substitute subsection ~n~ 307.2.1 as follows: The following activities are exempted from the above prohibitions to the extent covered by the State Air Pollution Control Board's Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air Pollution: A. Open burning for training and instruction of government and public fire fighters under the supervision of the designated official and industrial in-house fire fighting personnel; B. Open burning for camp fires or other fires that are used solely for recreational purposes, for ceremonial occasions, for outdoor noncommercial preparation of food, and for warming of outdoor workers; C. Open burning for the destruction of any combustible liquid or gaseous material by burning in a flare or flare stack; D. Open burning for forest management and agriculture practices approved by the state air pollution control board; and E. Open burning for the destruction of classified military documents. Zn~ 307.2.2 Permissible open burning. Add subsection ~n~ 307.2.2 as follows: A. Open burning is permitted for the disposal of tree trimmings and garden trimmings located on the premises of private property, provided that the following conditions are met: 1. A written permit, valid for 30 days, must be obtained from the Chesterfield Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division. Application for permit shall include: completed information form, the name, address and telephone number of the occupant and, if different, owner of the property on which the burn is conducted and of any other entity conducting or responsible for the burn. Application shall be submitted to the Fire and Life Safety Division at least 15 days before the desired burn; 2. A copy of the burn permit shall be maintained at the site of the burn, shall be available for review at all times during the burn, shall be displayed so as to be visible from a public roadway and shall be maintained in a manner that protects it from deterioration by weather; a~ a~a3~os>:~~2o2.i 4 (~~~~ ~~ 3. The burning shall take place on the premises of the private property from which the trimmings were taken; and all reasonable effort shall be made to minimize the amount of material burned, with the number and size of the piles approved by Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division; a~ 4. The location of the burning shall be a minimum of 300 feet from any occupied building unless the occupants have given prior written permission, other than buildings located on the property on which the burning is conducted. If the Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division determines that it is necessary to protect public health and welfare, it may direct that the above cited distances be increased; a~ 5. All fires must be at least 50 feet from any structure; a~ 6. Permitted fires shall be constantly attended by a competent person until they are extinguished. The attendee shall have fire extinguishing equipment readily available for use as deemed necessary by the code official; a~ 7. No regularly scheduled public or private collection service for such trimmings is available at the adjacent street or public road; i and 8. Permits for burning tree trimmings and/or garden trimmings shall be limited to two per site per year. B. Open burning is permitted for disposal of debris waste resulting from property maintenance, from the development or modification of roads and highways, parking areas, railroad tracks, pipelines, power and communication lines, buildings or building areas, sanitary landfills, or from any other designated local clearing operations which may be approved by Chesterfield Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division, provided the following conditions are met: 1. A written permit, valid for 90 days, must be obtained from the Chesterfield Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division. Application for permit shall include: Fee for permit, completed information form, site plan drawing of burn site, proof of liability insurance for party performing burn, and the name, address and telephone number of the owner and, if different, developer of the property on which the burn is conducted and of any other entity conducting or responsible for the burn. Application shall be submitted to the Fire and Life Safety Division at least 15 days before the desired burn.- i 2. A copy of the burn permit shall be maintained at the site of the burn, shall be available for review at all times during the burn, shall be displayed so as to be visible from a public roadway and shall be maintained in a manner that protects it from deterioration by weather; 3. The burning shall take place on the site from which the debris waste was generated. All reasonable effort shall be made to minimize the amount of material burned, with the number and size of the debris piles approved by Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division; 4. The material to be burned shall consist of brush, stumps and similar debris waste and shall not include demolition material; 2723(05):77202.1 5 ~~ ~,~~`~,~y 5. The location of the burning shall be a minimum of 500 feet from any occupied building unless the occupants have given prior written permission, other than buildings located on the property on which the burning is conducted. If the Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division determines that it is necessary to protect public health and welfare, it may direct that the above cited distances be increased; a~ 6. The burning shall be conducted at the greatest distance practicable from highways and airfields; 7. Permitted fires shall be constantly attended by a competent person until they are extinguished and conducted to ensure the best possible combustion with a minimum of smoke being produced. The attendee shall have fire extinguishing equipment readily available for use as deemed necessary by the code official; 8. The burning shall not be allowed to smolder beyond the minimum period of time necessary for the destruction of the materials; 9. The burning shall be conducted only when the prevailing winds are away from any city, town or built-up area.- ;and 10. The permit holder must maintain liability insurance in the minimum amount of $1,000,000.00 general liability coverage at all times while burning is taking place. At the time of permit application, a certificate of insurance coverage shall be submitted to the fire marshals C. Open burning is permitted for disposal of debris on the site of local landfills provided that the burning does not take place on land that has been filled and covered so as to present an underground fire hazard due to the presence of methane gas, provided that the following conditions are met: 1. A written permit, valid for 90 days, must be obtained from the Chesterfield Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division. Application for permit shall include: fee for permit, completed information form, site plan drawing of burn site, proof of liability insurance for party performing burn; 2. The burning shall take place on the premises of a local sanitary landfill which meets the provisions of the regulations of the Virginia Waste Management Board; 3. Permitted fires shall be constantly attended by a competent person until they are extinguished and conducted to ensure the best possible combustion with a minimum of smoke being produced. The attendee shall have fire extinguishing equipment readily available for use as deemed necessary by the code official; 4. The material to be burned shall consist only of brush, tree trimmings, yard and garden trimmings, clean burning debris waste, or clean burning demolition waste; 5. All reasonable effort shall be made to minimize the amount of material that is burned; with the number and size of the debris piles approved by Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division; 6. The location of the burning shall be a minimum of 500 feet from any occupied building unless the occupants have given prior written permission, other than 2723(05):77202.1 6 ~~~~ ~~~ buildings located on the property on which the burning is conducted. If the Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division determines that it is necessary to protect public health and welfare, it may direct that the above cited distances be increased; 7. No materials may be burned in violation of the regulations of the Virginia Waste Management Board or the State Air Pollution Control Board. The exact site of the burning on a local landfill shall be established in coordination with the regional director and Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division; no other site shall be used without the approval of these officials. Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division shall be notified of the days during which the burning will occur: ;and 8. The permit holder must maintain liability insurance in the minimum amount of $1,000,000.00 general liability coverage at all times while burning is taking place. At the time of permit application, a certificate of insurance coverage shall be submitted to the fire marshal. D. Sections A through C above notwithstanding, no owner or other person shall cause or permit open burning or the use of a special incineration device during the months of May, June, July, er August, or September. ~-~ 307.2.3 Permits. Add subsection ~ 307.2.3 as follows: A. When open burning of debris waste or open burning of debris on the site of a local landfill is to occur within Chesterfield County, the person responsible for the burning shall obtain a permit from Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division prior to the burning. Such a permit may be granted only after confirmation by Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division that the burning can and will comply with the provisions of this ordinance and any other conditions which are deemed necessary to ensure that the burning will not endanger the public health and welfare or to ensure compliance with any applicable provisions of the State Air Pollution Control Board's Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air Pollution. The permit may be issued for each occasion of burning or for a specific period of time deemed appropriate by Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division. B. Prior to the initial installation (or reinstallation, in cases of relocation) and operation of special incineration devices, the person responsible for the burning shall obtain a permit from Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division, such permits to be granted only after confirmation by Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division that the burning can and will comply with applicable provisions in Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air Pollution .and that any conditions are met which are deemed necessary by Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division to ensure that the operation of the devices will not endanger the public health and welfare. Permits granted for the use of special incineration devices shall at a minimum contain the following conditions: 1. All reasonable effort shall be made to minimize the amount of material that is burned. Such efforts shall include, but are not limited to, the removal of pulpwood, sawlogs and firewood. 2. The material to be burned shall consist of brush, stumps and similar debris waste and shall not include demolition material. 3. The location of the burning shall be a minimum of 500 feet from any occupied building unless the occupants have given prior permission, other than buildings located on the property on which the burning is conducted; burning shall be conducted at the greatest distance practicable from highways and air fields. If the Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division determines that it is necessary to protect public health and welfare, he may direct that the above cited distances be increased. 4. The burning shall be attended at all times and conducted to ensure the best possible combustion with a minimum of smoke being produced. Under no circumstances should the burning be allowed to smolder beyond the minimum period of time necessary for the destruction of the materials. 5. The burning shall be conducted only when the prevailing winds are away from any city, town or built-up area. 6. The use of special incineration devices shall be allowed only for the disposal of debris waste, clean burning construction waste, and clean burning demolition waste. 7. Permits issued under this subsection shall be limited to a specific period of time deemed appropriate by Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division. any 307.2.4 Attendance at Open Fires. Add subsection ~n~ 307.2.4 as follows: Permitted fires shall be constantly attended by a competent person until they are extinguished. The attendee shall have fire extinguishing equipment readily available for use as deemed necessary by the code official. any 307.2.5 Endangering Other Property. Add subsection ~n~ 307.2.5 as follows: No person shall kindle or authorize to be kindled or maintain any permitted fire in such a manner that it will endanger the property of another. any 307.2.6 Revocation of Permits. Add subsection ~n~ 307.2.6: If any permit holder violates any provision of this ordinance or if any permit holder makes a material misrepresentation on a permit application, The Fire Marshal may require the extinguishments of the fire and the burn permit shall be subject to revocation; 307.4 Fees. Delete and substitute section 307.4 as follows: 1. There shall be no fees for the permit required by Section 307.3.2(A). 2. Fees for permits required by section 307.3.2(B) and (C) and shall be ... $400.00 307.5 Attendance. Delete the words "Open burning". 308.3.1. Add the following sentences to the end of the opening paragraph of section 308.3.1, prior to the Exceptions, as follows:- 2723(os~:7~202. i s ~ ~, ~ ~ ~~ The owner or manager of any occupancy in Use Group R shall notify their tenants in writing of this code requirement at the time the tenants initially occupy the apartment and annually thereafter. A copy of this written notification shall be available for review by the code official. 308.3.1. Delete exception 2. 308.5.3 Sweating Joints. Add section 308.5.3 as follows: Any person using a torch or other flame-producing device for sweating pipe joints in any building or structure shall have available in the immediate vicinity, one approved fire extinguisher or water hose connected to a water supply. Combustible material in the close proximity of the work shall be protected against ignition by shielding, wetting, or other approved means. In all cases, the person performing the work shall remain in the vicinity of the sweating operation for one-half hour after the torch or flame-producing device has been used. 315.4 Materials Storage Regulation. Add subsection 315.4 as follows: No person shall store any combustible packing cases, boxes, barrels or similar containers or rubber tires, baled cotton, rubber, cork or other similarly combustible materials of a gross volume of greater than 2,500 cubic feet (70 m3) in any structure or on any premises, except under conditions approved by the code official. 31 S. S Storage, Park or Repair. Add subsection 315.5 as follows: No person shall store, park or repair any vehicle, tool or equipment that has a fuel tank that contains a flammable or combustible liquid or liquefied petroleum gas as a source of fuel within or on any occupancy in Use Group R, or part thereof, unless such building or structure is built for the purpose of such storage, parking or repairing in accordance with all requirements of the Uniform Statewide Building Code and this code. The owner or manager of any occupancy in Use Group R shall notify their tenants in writing of this code requirement at the time the tenants initially occupy the apartment and annually thereafter. A copy of this written notification shall be available for review by the code official. This section shall not apply to detached one- and two- family dwellings unless such storage, parking or repairing is conducted as a business. Such businesses must then comply with all applicable provisions of the Uniform Statewide Building Code and the Chesterfield County Code. Chapter 5. Fire Service Features 502.1. General Definitions. Delete and substitute the following definition: Fire Lane. An area designated by clearly visible signs and/or markings in which parking shall be prohibited, whether on public or private property, to ensure ready access for and to fire fighting equipment and facilities. ~8 503.7 Illegal Use. Add subsection ~8 503.7 as follows: 1. No person shall park or leave an unattended vehicle in or otherwise obstruct with a vehicle any designated or marked fire lane. 2. No person shall place or locate any equipment, materials, or any other object in or otherwise obstruct any designated or marked fire lane. 3. The penalty for violation of section 503.8(1) shall be the same as outlined for other parking violations in the Chesterfield County Code. The penalty for 2723(05):77202.1 9 ®~~~;, violation of section 503.8(2) shall be the same as for all other violations of this chapter. Chapter 9 Fire Protection Systems 901.5.2 Altering or Changing Supervisory Services. Add subsection 901.5.2 as follows: The code official shall be notified prior to any alterations to the supervisory service equipment or if the agent providing supervisory service changes for any required fire protection system. Functional testing shall be conducted prior to the system being returned to service. The level of testing will be determined by the code official. All testing shall be conducted in the presence of the code official and appropriate documentation shall be provided to the code official to verify that the system is being supervised as designed and in accordance with the building code in effect at the time of installation. 901.6.1.1 Limited Area Sprinkler Systems. Add subsection 901.6.1.1 as follows: All limited area sprinkler systems shall be inspected annually and maintained according to NFPA 25 and in accordance with the following standards: The sprinkler control valve shall be permanently marked with a sign stating "Sprinkler Control Valve." Markings made with embossed plastic tape, pencil, ink, crayon, or similar materials shall not be considered permanent. The sign shall be secured with noncorrosive wire, chain, or other means. 2. Markings shall be provided in a conspicuous place at the sprinkler control valve and shall state: "Notify the Fire Department (748-6240) before closing valve." 3. Valves connecting the limited area sprinkler system to the domestic water supply shall be locked open in an approved manner. 901.6.3 Reporting Results of Periodic Tests. Add subsection 901.6.3 as follows: The individual or company performing any test or inspection required under this article shall provide the code official with a complete written record of the test or inspection within 15 days after it is conducted. Such written record shall note plainly which standard, as referenced by this code, was used for the test or inspection. 904.11.6.1 Ventilation System. Delete and substitute subsection 904.11.6.1 as follows: The ventilation system in connection with hoods shall be operated at the required rate of air movement, and classified grease filters shall be in place when equipment under a kitchen grease hood is used. Cooking appliances, which require a commercial kitchen exhaust hood system, shall not be operated while the fire suppression system or kitchen exhaust system is non- operational or otherwise impaired. 904.11.6.6 Manual Operations. Add subsection 904.11.6.6 as follows: Instructions for manually operating the fire suppression system for the commercial kitchen exhaust system shall be posted conspicuously in the kitchen and shall be reviewed periodically with employees by the management. 907.21 Nuisance Alarm Activations. Add section 907.21 as follows: 2723(05):77202.1 10 ~,~~~ ~~ The owner and/or the occupant of any structure served by a fire protection system which has activated on two or more occasions when no fire, unsafe condition or other hazard has occurred, shall repair the system or correct conditions which are causing the system to activate. Chapter 10. Means of Egress 4~g 1027.22 Marking Means of Egress. Add subsection i n~ 1027.22 as follows: The code official may require the means of egress through storage areas to be marked, and the owner or his agent shall be responsible for marking and maintaining such aisles as required. Chapter 27. Hazardous Materials -General Provisions 2702.1 Definitions. Delete and substitute the following definition: Hazardous Materials. Those chemicals or substances which are physical hazards or health hazards as defined and classified in this Chapter-~8, whether the materials are in usable or waste condition, including flammable and combustible liquids. Chapter 33. Explosives and Fireworks 3301.1.3.1 Fireworks Prohibited. Add subsection 3301.1.3.1 as follows: Permissible fireworks, as defined in the Statewide Fire Prevention Code, shall not be possessed, stored, sold, used or handled in Chesterfield County. 3308.1 General. Add the following text to 3308.1: A permit shall be required for the display of fireworks and pyrotechnic special effect materials. 3308.2 Permit Application. Add the following text to 3308.2: Application for permits shall be made in writing at least 60 days in advance of the date of the display or discharge of fireworks or pyrotechnic special effect materials. The sale, possession, discharge and distribution of fireworks or pyrotechnic special effect materials for display shall be lawful only under the terms and conditions, and for the purpose set forth in the permit. A permit shall not be transferable, and shall not extend beyond the dates set forth in the permit. ??~-'~ 3308.11 Violations. nab-subseetie~3~~ Delete and substitute 3308.11 as follows: No person shall store, possess, offer for sale, expose for sale, sell at retail or use or explode any fireworks or pyrotechnic special effect materials, except as provided in the rules and regulations issued by the code official for the granting of permits for supervised displays of fireworks or pyrotechnic special effect materials. Chapter 34. Flammable and Combustible Liquids 3404.1.1 Prohibited Storage. Add subsection 3404.1.1 as follows: The storage of flammable and combustible liquid shall be prohibited in occupancies of Use Group A, R-1, R-2, and in rental storage facilities. 3406.5.1.6 Fire Protection. Delete and substitute 3406.5.1.6 as follows: Whenever tank vehicles are automatically loaded with flammable liquids at bulk storage terminals without an employee in attendance, the loading rack area shall be protected by a a~a3~os>:~~aoa.l ii ~~+~`~ i~ completely automatic fire suppression system approved by the code official. The system shall be designed to provide fire protection to both the loading rack and tank vehicles and shall be supervised by an accredited central station facility. Chapter 38. L-~ri€red Liquefied Petroleum Gases 3801.4 Emergency Services. Add subsection 24~ 3801.4 as follows: Anyone who supplies liquefied petroleum gas service shall have a qualified maintenance person available at all times to assist fire department personnel with emergency incidents involving the service. 3809.13. Delete and substitute section 3809.13 as follows: Protection of Containers. Containers shall be placed in a suitable enclosure or otherwise protected against tampering. The enclosure shall be secured to the sidewalk, concrete pad, or building to avoid tipping or movement of the enclosure. The servicing company's name and 24- hour phone number and "NO SMOKING" signs shall be provided and maintained on the enclosure. Vehicular protection shall be provided as required by the fire official. APPENDICES The following appendices of the International Fire Code, 2003 Edition shall be an enforceable part of this code: Appendix B -Fire-flow Requirements for Buildings ui nc ~ ~.,,.o,.+;,,,, r~oio+o „„a ~„i.~+;+, + +t, ~ ii S +• + c +• u i nc ~ e ~ ((~~(~~~~} ' 'ltl'.j~ . ~-T i~.T~y-/~~~e'Y-YYt1,~lYYte +i,.,., i cnn ,~„ii„~~ „ „+o ti'e~C~t~F.tC: Yif~~'~S~i4: ~ •• ~l 1, 11 + 1. 1 J Appendix C -Fire Hydrant Locations and Distribution Appendix D -Fire Apparatus Access Roads Exception: Section D106 and Section D107 shall not be included in this code. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 2723(05):77202.1 12 ~ (~ ~ ~j`~ ti t ~ ~ ~ Your Cnmmunit ~ News ~a er Since 1995 e se ~ y / n P.O. Rox 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 23l l3 • Phone: (R04) j45-75(M) • Fax: (8O4) 7•l4-x269 • Rmail: news@chesterfieldobserveccom • Internet: www.ehestertieldobserver.com ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Chesterfield County LN: Fire Codes 5-14, 21 1 col x 5 in. $248.50 Board of Supervisors The Observer, Inc. ~~~ Publisher of Take aotiae that the Board of Sugervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at an adjourned meeting on Wednesday, May CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER 28, 2008 at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration liuikling, Route to and Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia, will hold This is to certif that the attached le al notice was ublished b Y g p Y apublicheazingwherepersonsmayappeaz Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on and present their views concerning: the following date(s): 05/14/2008 & 05/21/2008 An ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield. 1997, as amended, by amending and re-enacting Section 10- 3 to conform the county ordinance with ~ revisions to the Vnginia Statewide Fire day of Sworn to and subscribed before me this Prevention Code, .including expanding the no-burn months to include May and September and renumbering the state fire d f 2008 co e section re erences. . ~ A copy of the full text of the ordinance is on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Boazd of SupervisorsandtheCountyAdministrator's Office, Room 504, 9901 Lori Road, Chesterfield County, V' a and may be i d b ll _ exam ne y a interested persons between the hours of 8:30 a m to 5:00 m Mond bli . . p. ., ay c Legal Affiant J ,Grooms Jr., Not Pu through Friday. If further- information is desired, please contact Battalion Chief James Dawson, Fire Marshal, at 717-6838, between the hours of 8:30 a.m: to 5:00 p.m. MondaythronghFriday. My commission expires: February 29, 2012 The hearing is held at a public facility Commission I.D. 7182093 designed to be accessible to persons wi disabilities. Anypersoaswithquestionson (SEAL the accessibility of the facility or the need n~~~ ~~~~~i~rhi `+ ~' for reasonable accommodations should ~~+` '•, G (; Q ' ~' contact Janice Blakley> Clerk to the Board, ~.`` t ~~~..•+..0+~ + at 748-1200. Peraoru needing interpreter services for the deaf must n the Clerk , s ~ ~ ,~~ib ~ r .~.$' to the Board ri<o later than Friday May 23, 0 _ ~ : ~r ~~_ ~: 2 08. ~ iT ~ ~ v EZ'~t!'~ ~ . %,.~f~ RY'oV ,~~'~ _..,~ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. c p ~~~IN1P,~" Meeting Date: Subject: Page 1 of 3 Item Number: 17.C. 2008 Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance Dividing Chippenham, Dutch Gap and Wells Voting Precincts and Changing the Polling Places for Beach, Enon, Matoaca and Meadowbrook Voting Precincts County Administrator's Comments• County Administrator: Acti The Board is requested to adopt the attached ordinance. Summary of Information: As a result of the long lines, parking and other problems experienced during the February presidential primary, the Registrar and Chesterfield Electoral Board are proposing to split Chippenham Voting Precinct in the Dale Magisterial District and Dutch Gap and Wells Voting Precincts in the Bermuda Magisterial District as follows: 1. The Southern portion of Chippenham Voting Precinct would be split off to form a new voting precinct called Southside Voting Precinct. (See Attached Map). The polling place for Southside Voting Precinct would be Southside Baptist Church. The polling place for Chippenham Voting Precinct would remain at J. G. Hening Elementary School. Preparers Steven L. Micas Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Title: County Attorney 0505(00):78457.2(78446.1) CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA 2. The Northern portion of Dutch Gap Voting Precinct would be split off to form a new voting precinct called Elizabeth Scott Voting Precinct. (See Attached Map). The polling place for Elizabeth Scott Voting Precinct would be Elizabeth Scott Elementary School. The polling place for Dutch Gap Voting Precinct would remain at Marguerite Christian Elementary School. 3. The Western portion of Wells Voting Precinct would be split off to form a new voting precinct called Carver Voting Precinct. (See Attached Map). The polling place for Carver Voting Precinct would be Carver Middle School. The polling place for Wells Voting Precinct would remain at C. C. Wells Elementary School. In addition to these proposed precinct splits, the Registrar and Chesterfield Electoral Board are also proposing to move the polling places for four voting precincts. The proposed polling place changes are: 1. Moving the polling place for Enon Voting Precinct in the Bermuda Magisterial District from Enon Fire Department to the new Elizabeth Davis Middle School, which is not yet open but will be open before the general election in November. This move will provide more parking and more space for voters and poll workers. A map showing the location of the old and new polling places is attached. 2. Moving the polling place for Meadowbrook Voting Precinct in the Dale Magisterial District from New Covenant Presbyterian Church to Meadowbrook High School. Meadowbrook was one of the Voting Precincts that experienced parking and overcrowding problems during the February primary. This proposed change should alleviate those problems since Meadowbrook High School will afford both more parking and more space for voters and poll workers. A map showing the location of the old and new polling places is attached. 3. Moving the polling place for Matoaca Voting Precinct in the Matoaca Magisterial District from Matoaca Elementary School to Matoaca Middle School East (the former Matoaca High School). This move will provide more parking, more space and better accessibility for voters and poll workers. A map showing the location of the old and new polling places is attached. 4. Moving the polling place for Beach Voting Precinct in the Matoaca Magisterial District from the Beach Community Grange Building to Second Branch Baptist Church. This move will provide more parking and better accessibility for voters and poll workers. A map showing the location of the ~J4 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 AGENDA old and new polling places is attached. If the Board approves these changes, they must be submitted to the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) for pre-clearance before they can be implemented. DOJ has a period of sixty days in which to act on the pre- clearance submission. Staff anticipates that all of these changes would be implemented before the general election this November. 0505(00):78457.2(78446.1) 00®~.~ i AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 7-3 RELATING TO PRECINCT BOUNDARIES AND POLLING PLACES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 7-3 of the Code oFthe County of Chesterfield 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 7-3. Precinct boundaries and polling places. The following shall be the precinct boundaries and polling places for magisterial districts in the county: Enon Voting Precinct (103): Beginning at the point where the center line of U.S. Interstate 295 intersects the boundary line between Henrico County and Chesterfield County; thence South along the center line of U. S. Interstate 295 to its intersection with the Seaboard Coast Line right-of--way; thence westward along said right-of--way to its intersection with Ramblewood Drive (State Route 617); thence southeastwardly along the center line of Ramblewood Drive (State Route 617) to its intersection with Rebel Ridge Road (State Route 1093); thence westward along the center line of Rebel Ridge Road (State Route 1093) to its intersection with Walthall Drive (State Route 1090); thence southeastwardly along the center line of Walthall Drive (State Route 1090) to its intersection with Ruffin Mill Road (State Route 746); thence southwestwardly along the center line of Ruffin Mill Road (State Route 746) to its intersection with Ashton Creek; thence along the center line of Ashton Creek as it meanders westward to its intersection with U.S. Interstate 95 (Richmond-Petersburg Turnpike); thence southwardly along the center line of U.S. Interstate 95 (Richmond-Petersburg Turnpike) to its intersection with Swift Creek, which acts as the boundary line between Chesterfield County and the City of Colonial Heights; thence along said boundary as it meanders eastwardly to its intersection with the boundary between Chesterfield County and Prince George County; thence along the boundary lines between Chesterfield County and Prince George County, the City of Hopewell and Charles City County as it meanders to the intersection with the boundary lines between Chesterfield County and Henrico County; thence along said boundary line as it meanders northwestward with the James River to the point where it intersects with the center line of U.S. Interstate 295, the point and place of beginning. The voting place for Enon Voting Precinct shall be €~en--F~e~ep~e~~-T°~'L9 . Elizabeth Davis Middle School, 601 Bus Loop Court. 0505:78446.1 1 Q Q Q ~,~~ Wells Voting Precinct (107): Beginning at the point where the center line of the CSX Railroad right-of--way intersects the center line of Ruffin Mill Road; thence northward along the center line of said right- of-way to its intersection with Ashton Creek; thence westward along the center line of Ashton Creek to its intersection with Harrowgate Road (State Route 144); thence southward along the center line of Harrowgate Road to its intersection with Happy ill Road; thence southeastward along the center line of Happy Hill Road to its intersection with U. S. 1/301 (Jefferson Davis Highway; . '~ ~L; ., l .,,, ~ rl, o .. o„•o.. 1; ., o ., ~ T' L, r ~ tc~s-~~--its-~-irtE'fS 2f~tFli~-'F~`YtYt~~o~» !17 ~ r FF ~~~~ Da.'" u;,.t,~..~.,'; thence northward along the center line of U. S. 1/301 (Jefferson Davis Highway) to its intersection with Ruffin Mill Road; thence eastward along the center line of Ruffin Mill Road to its intersection with the CSX Railroad right-of--way the point and place of beginning. The voting place for Wells Voting Precinct shall be C.C. Wells Elementary School, 13101 South Chester Road. Carver Voting Precinct (112) Be~innin~ at the point where Harrow ate Road intersects with Happy Hill Road• thence westward along the center line of Haply Hill Road to its intersection with Old Happy Hill Road; thence northwestward along the center line of Old Happy Hill Road to its intersection with Branders Bride Road (State Route 625)• thence southward along the center line of Branders Bride Road to its intersection with Tinsberrv Creek• thence southeastward along the center line of Tinsberrv Creek to its intersection with U S 1/301 (Jefferson Davis Hiahwav~; thence northward along the center line of U S 1/301 (Jefferson Davis Hi hwav) to its intersection with Happy Hill Road• thence northwestward along the center line of Happy Hill Road to its intersection with Harrowaate Road, the point and place of be inning The voting place for Carver Voting Precinct shall be Carver Middle School 3800 Cou ar Trail. Dutch Gap Voting Precinct (110): ~_:__:_~ _..~_ __ _... ~o.o .tie ~e_.e. ,:_e _~ n___.__~ ,.___,. .~- ~----'-- L - ----- 0505:78446.1 2 ., ~ ~ ^ ~ \ t" '+ + Pf~}Ai3-- FFzil~-~hA~ C~ 6ur`~ n • 7 a-Trxr-art~c 64~~ Beginning at `tLhe point where Rebel Ridge Drive intersects with Ramblewood Drive (State Route 617);~enEe~~i~th Aart.,y1 '~~ ~ +~^ + ~• F D L1 ~ ,-, > a ., • ;thence westward along the center line of Rebel Ridge Road (State Route 1093) to its intersection with Walthall Drive (State Route 1090); thence southwardly along the center line of Walthall Drive (State Route 1090), through the dividing line between Ruffin Mill Lot 5 and Walthall Ridge Lot 029 to its intersection with Ruffin Mill Road (State Route 746); thence southeastwardly along the center line of Ruffin Mill Road (State Route 746) to its intersection with Ashton Creek; thence along the center line of Ashton Creek as it meanders westward to its intersection with U.S. Interstate 95 (Richmond-Petersburg Turnpike); thence northwardly along the center line of U.S. Interstate 95 (Richmond-Petersburg Turnpike) to its intersection with West Hundred Road• thence eastward along the center line of West Hundred Road to its intersection with Ware Bottom Springs Road• thence southwestward along the center line of Ware Bottom Springs Road to its intersection with Ramblewood Drive (State Route 6171• thence southeastward alone the center line of Ramblewood Drive to its intersection with Rebel Ridge Drive, Prn^+„ !'«oel~. +t, ..u~t.. «al 1 +t, , • r n -- the point and place of beginning. The voting place for Dutch Gap Voting precinct shall be Marguerite Christian Elementary School, 14801 Woods Edge Road. Elizabeth Scott Voting Precinct (109 Beginning at the point where Rebel Ridge Drive intersects with Ramblewood Drive (State Route 617); thence northwestwards along the center line of Ramblewood Drive (State Route 617) to its intersection with Ware Bottom S rings Drive• thence northeastward along the center line of Ware Bottom Springs Drive to its intersection with West Hundred Road; thence westward along the center line of West Hundred Road to its intersection with U.S. Interstate 95 (Richmond-Petersburg Turnpike)• thence northward along the center line of U.S. Interstate 95 (Richmond-Petersburg Turnpike to its intersection with Proctors Creek at the point where the center line of Proctors Creek intersects the boundarv line between Henrico County and Chesterfield County thence along said boundarv line as it meanders eastwardly with the James River to the point where U.S. Interstate 295 intersects the boundarv line between Henrico County and Chesterfield County; thence southward along the center line of U S Interstate 295 to its intersection with the Seaboard Air Line right-of-way• thence northwardly and westward 0505:78446.1 3 ~ ~ ~ ~~~ along the center line of said right-of-way to its intersection with the Seaboard Coast Line r~ht-of-way; thence westward along the center line of said right of way to its intersection with Ramblewood Drive (State Route 617)• thence southeastwardl along the center line of Ramblewood Drive to its intersection with Rebel Rid e Drive the oint and place of be inning_ The votins place for Elizabeth Scott Voting precinct shall be Elizabeth Scott Elementary School, 813 Beginners Trail Loop Chester VA 23836 Chippenham Voting Precinct (207): Beginning at the point where the boundary line between the County of Chesterfield and the City of Richmond intersects the center line of Iron Bridge Road (State Route 10); thence southwardly along the center line of Iron Bridge Road (State Route 10) to its intersection with Jessup Road; thence westward along the center line of Jessup Road to its intersection with Turner Road• thence northward along the center line of Turner Road to rts intersection with Belmont Road• ; thence, northeastwardly along the center line of Belmont Road (State Route 651) to its intersection with the boundary line between Chesterfield County and the City of Richmond; thence nouheastwardly along said boundary line to its intersection with Iron Bridge Road (State Route 10), the point and place of beginning. The voting place for Chippenham Voting Precinct shall be J.G. Hening Elementary School, 5230 Chicora Drive. Southside Voting Precinct (213 Beginning at the point where Iron Bridge Road intersects Jessup Road• thence southwardly along the center line of Iron Bridge Road (State Route 10) to its intersection with Kingsland Creek• thence northwestwardl~ long the center line of Kingsland Creek through Cosby's Lake as it meanders toward Co~bill Road (State Route 638 • thence southwestwardly along the center line of Coghill Road (State Route 638) to its intersection with Belmont Road (State Route 651)• thence northeastwardly along the center line of Belmont Road (State Route 651) to its intersection with Turner Road• Thence southward along the center line of Turner Road to its intersection with Jessup_ Road; thence eastward along the center line of Jessup Road to its intersection with Iron Bridge Road, the point and place of be inning 0505:78446.1 4 ~~~~ ~~ The voting place for Southside Voting Precinct shall be Southside Baptist Church 6000 Iron Bride Road. Meadowbrook Voting Precinct (208): Beginning at the point where the center line of Iron Bridge Road (State Route 10) intersects the center line of Chippenham Parkway (State Route 150); thence southeastwardly along the center line of Chippenham Parkway (State Route 150) to its intersection with Hopkins Road (State Route 637); thence southwardly along the center line of Hopkins Road (State Route 637) to its intersection with Beulah Road (State Route 641); thence southwestwardly along the center line of Beulah Road (State Route 641) to its intersection with Kingsland Creek; thence westward along the center line of said creek to its intersection with Iron Bridge Road (State Route 10); thence northwardly along the center line of Iron Bridge Road (State Route 10) to its intersection with Chippenham Parkway (State Route 150), the point and place of beginning. The voting place for Meadowbrook Voting Precinct shall be INS::r C'c:~e~ert P. '- •* ' ~~~'«zR~Z ~~..,..,,~. ten, c T..,,,, ~.,~° n • Meadowbrook High School, 4901 Coghill Road Matoaca Voting Precinct (303): Beginning at the point where the center line of the Appomattox River intersects the center line of the Virginia Power Company easement; thence northwardly along said easement to its intersection with Oldtown Creek; thence northeastwardly along the center line of Oldtown Creek to its intersection with Hickory Road (State Route 628); thence westward along the center line of Hickory Road (State Route 628) to its intersection with Graves Road (State Route 630); thence southwestwardly along the center line of Graves Road (State Route 630) to its intersection with River Road (State Route 602); thence southward on River Road to the southeastern boundary line of census block 1007034006; thence southwest along the said census block boundary to the boundary line between the County of Chesterfield and the County of Dinwiddie; thence eastwardly along said boundary line as it follows the Appomattox River to its intersection with the Virginia Power Company easement, the point and place of beginning. The voting place for Matoaca Voting Precinct shall be Matoaca ~~°~°r*~~~ c~~°°~ ~~~~ Middle School East, 6001 Hickory Road. Beach Voting Precinct (305): Beginning at the point where the center line of Nash Road (State Route 655) intersects the center line of Woodpecker Road (State Route 626); thence southwardly along the 0505:78446.1 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ center line of Nash Road (State Route 636) to its intersection with a creek known as Second Branch; thence westward along the center line of Second Branch as it meanders to its intersection with Second Branch Road (State Route 653); thence northwardly along the center line of Second Branch Road (State Route 653) to its intersection with Beach Road (State Route 655); thence eastwardly along the center line of Beach Road (State Route 655) to its intersection with Qualla Road (State Route 653); thence northwardly along the center line of Qualla Road (State Route 653) to its intersection with Swift Creek; thence meandering eastwardly along the center line of Swift Creek to its intersection with the eastern boundary line of Pocahontas State Park thence southward along the eastern boundary line of Pocahontas State Park to its intersection with Woodpecker Road; then eastward along the center line of Woodpecker Road to its intersection with Nash Road, the point and place of beginning. The voting place for Beach Voting Precinct shall be ;?e,:.:,1~ C~~m~~~~*-~ ~'~~~~-° r~„:,a:~,. „nn, u,,,,,,~° v,.,,a w,,,,+° ticn~. Second Branch Baptist Church, 12217 Second Branch Road. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0505:78446.1 6 ~®~~ ~g ~llzapetri Jcott ~ llutch Uap (i1o) Voting Precincts ~! ~i ', I ~~ J > r~~"~ ter' ,-~ -~, - __ -~- - j .. io9 1 :~.~, .--_,\ `~; .. . ~_ _ ~ ~~ Fdvulreth Elementun ~ ..,. ` .School. _.._ /_ , . Ili -, `~~ ~~ - -~ ~~ Christian ; "~, _:' Elementary• ' ~ School ' .. s ~ . / 3 ~/ \ o.. Wells (10~) & Carver (ii2) Voting Precincts ~ ;, ~~ C.C«SA~1S ».,.+d"f a ~ ~,.~~.,~ a ~ a ~y°° ~~ ~~ 9 o`'~'G.~oo~, ,~,.~P,~.~~. Q,, t °pMeraou n g}6 8 uao+"0oon ~. R , ~ foy xi0. E ,p~ ar ~ w~ ~ ~' ownrora. °"`°nwao u"sve' ~ ~~~ gg i_._ p~n~, x' x F ~,e \,./ ~b~ ~~\ r d g°d J %o.ow, ~ ~ wccc~ g 6 xwn 'b i x~.w ~ k ennra°°o~ae ~ ~G 9 'b fyt~ y.i'~a ~ .tY ~ c ~ A ~ ~`a@r dqq ~~.~~ ~ w w..r .o ._ \ a rr i 1. ~ e..x«°`° i me'K ~ d 4~~C o ~ I ~' 8 w° ~' ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~yx ~ V^p~ .x~\ c c ,~ao by " ~I ono ~ ~ C 'a 2~ ~ ^?4.\ t^' wr'vo n fi n 112 ' w £ ' o~~ l er.. Efi s o c, a p4 °~Awore `o~W° # R 8 ~c w ~ \ ~~ 8' 1 Y ~p ` o s 1\ oo~.on ° a R~ :eye„ r9 ~ ~J oW \ d "°ooon I e ro` \ 2` xooa w. V m ~ a ~~ ~~x~. - ~$ a V 'b ~ ~ ~" ~` .Ex ~ E,~° sta. '4. `_° - s '~ ,~,.. ,~ a „„~..w~r .. ~ ~„ ~ - ----- - // r a si°" 6~Cpw Y x oa _.\ \`'~L ~ 'A '+'d~Ad \\ ~ r-/ '$~`q * 1ypd Qp~w ufpb nE a~ \ ,~ ~p ~\ \~ J xca ~ 4 `} ~ C' F ~ c ~ woa.e~ ~.AO.~~ ~ .w,a,~4 s~r c f ~ raw ~ .~P, r,»ox~,, x9 ~ Caner ,~~` ~ , ~ 1``® ~,~ U fr ~ Middle ~ ,~~'"°~ € ~ ~~.~w^~ 9 School e~ ,~,,,~,x... ~ 1 ,~~s` ,~ 1.750 875 0 1,750 Feet ~6, a _. i 1~ I ,~ °~ .~ , ° ~~`^~ ` 1 co~.gms mae cn.mnwa cw~n N £ ~ d"'~~ ,p4 ~ av ®~~ ~~ Chi enham (207) tS~ Southside (213) Votin Precincts ~, . . -1t PF .^ h ~3~ .hen °' '~" e s /k.6 . °` - ~ ~ " a o x ~ d _:~ ~ ) ,.. " ' E ~ ° s f ` R •o ~. , •~... -__Y ` . ~ ~ ' ~ nnw° "~ w I ,.r' L ~ « ~ Z* \ 0. ~ ~~'~~J ~ 4 .,..... y aj ~ ' y ~ d F L u y~n" e. 3 d^ < = ~ % ""fino M1 e2g Nn~ ~ wenuu \~ ~ ~ eem. b€ S~ N~ J`"~" ..~ / ~ JJ ~ .Y - z i g } A „ L n c=n \l n.. 5 °<~ * % ~ n yF k~ d Oi ~'c r" C ~ 1 ..s ~ ~ F "+s. ed nm. T v bon I .yi £ 92 ~ d 1~ 4 4 a ~ 'guy d f : x< f1 E E °* n~ ~ u R ' 0 ~r 5 s r Y q i ` A ~"e 9 ~ 99 y 4R e``g 1! I ,... n" ' n 4 ~ 9u o M .. . ~ nwn `d w1 m ~~. ~• \ w.n aR ~F ? L5 ~<Fa~rur , . j f 9' \ € "b ~5 3dd NOn ` _ ~ ; ~ 4 ,..o..o ~ " s' Hen~1(; e ... Q w ~ .~o~w '~„'"°9.b ~s a n „<~ ~~yq, ~ ~ s ,. ~.~. .,.. ~ i / 207 Seb nl W<s <`~ l ~ . ~ ~ Y ~ n ~ <d ' rv afi~p A ~.~ ~.PNSw +<n .° to d a ~ ~* L yv~ d ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ r .~`~Fb u n "+~ e~ A t ~ c c y 4 rA.o ~n wm ~ ,® '" L~` ~ ~ s a A ors ^ ... c" ~ 9 e ~ p ~ o ~ e 4 ~ e ,.,.,. t / fi I "y. !' a~ 4 8 w d" 3~A {, P P `~° `~ ' uon „ ~ 10 .~ t ~' S m " i u ~ ~ a x ~ m 2 I ./ • € C„ m~ ' ~ ~ ~. t~ <° Pr . d < ~__ _ '] I 1° . ~ I a ~ w q~ ~ ~ °.o.o ~, ,Q,"y '°~/ ~a °°n' , "~ ~4. A ~ .~ ~ ' ,~~' k ~X .y wucw~ ^ ~ ~ ~ I W ronie.w } e ~ t _ ``a. C ~ S nn l j f . ,.. ....m e A S d ~.~ ~w.. ~ 7•% i c <rwd°`q. gmn• w.uj g t ,n :ef ~ ~ „ 3 j \ w a. - d ~ Y~6~ Nov F~4 3 ~ *„ 1 `k ~1 ~ ~~= ' } u 8 J~ w •~` w ~ a ~~o ~ ~...au / H~.w d N . h. ~• t S k ~ / d p ~ e i xC~f P ~ ,~ ..,. s eno.. g y '€' ' i ?' i ~ Fr ` ~' .a r ~ .r' X } B2~7Y19 ~ fY 'O a ~"~ a. 3 M e rye 1 :~ ,ir.`F'. ~ i~ 4 fin, 0 ~ r"'¢. ~ / ~ a „ / q~s _ ' •~+r~ w ~ 2 4 n~ $ , ~ ~ `^ `~, N " a.,~~ G13 p c w ` R F~'i14 ~"~roy a Yd t~ i $ 9 of ' xyb •w w .a. R a a" ~t I \/ °'cw LLmm°°n '~4 ~a / 8 g a ~a~3 f ~ df r yM ,b r J S~ ~,FU ~ eeTT ~ ~ a. A w I £ ' " I S ~A ~ p C O Y~~ 8 \Rm ^ on ~Y ~ ~ y 4 ; F ~ r..~SD a ~ • . ..,.N '~ i< ""~ ' t'~ `' an w° s ~ sy ~ ,3 ~.n. ~' 1 ~~, ~ ~ ` @ 'va-«" .,~w... ~ 4a ~ ^ ~~<.°~ ~ ~ / , . ,~`.... ~ / / "~#9 ~ R' 9 w ~ A L w " z ~ " n~o. <.,. xw~uw ~+ _. m .. ~4 n, q.o.AU... e I /~~ o I ^ ~~[° 4 `~ -ti emu d I q n.._.~s k ., ? ~ r ` N __ cew+xoxmwrv ~. ~ i t m'f `s ~ < n .''~ B d ~ s a .. ,w o ~ ' ~ 2,200 1.100 0 .<,~a.. ..~ ~~ '„<„ ~; 2,200 Feet <. ~ •' q ; d uarroM :'zone cn.n«u~a c~~n N ~b^ "•es `~ . ill V ~ ~ ~~ W P~ 4~\~G Gl ~y P~' s aJM ,~'' Nd O p_ EgLVD < T 36 'ROLLING 60 J oP ~b6M W a 6 O ~ J 3 J7 OAKS ~ PO Gt REE1, KS gLVO ~ o !DW 5 p O W oe u OJ W /J b i s p 7 ~ D OHO Z Y U g\,ACKJACK 2~ S t GS Gp Fo )b 1J Q, PNER b1Sb MEPO < r OPK SJ oAK J EyOE Oy dJJ ~J Rb7n3gs Wm a Z W LN ; \E O~ Gt ~ `J P 5t\O P S ~ O ~ ° NG S M ~ O 4. OS a' NbO E ~ z 0? G GS W W NOD PEEN 5~ W P ~ W O T p v O r Oy R y+i NO c ~ S WREte J G y O O P ° `~ a D ~ '~ w o m Dh r ~° 1 bow `J OO OA`EgRpOKOR w o ; j U ¢ ~ ~ Oy Ovy 'rQ' Jblg/~-4'bO YY~~bb LL ~" f~ ~ w - Oy, d oW 00 ,~ rc J O yJ ~ GUN,gERME HOKIE O~ ~9 ;d O' ~'J o' O OE RD O }~ m ° ~NNO 1 ~bs ~~ ~ 0 M 3 R o O 0 ~~~OyO ~ `~ 9 ¢ b~, Gt ?o gpttLEW 00 R m 00 ORO ?o Mya/)J e rc ~WOD O ~ PogE V,P 1iy M D0. ~ w RO y'f MEPDpWB Rp00PH\L o a m ; U b 3 9P bJ/ pOOM t F ~ 37 3 Y oy V ~ W PN\LBROpK RD CIR ~ Oo ¢ U e aab w r OOJ O OOKSH\RE OR ~ ¢ 2 O PONCE DE ~ ¢ Y < O gR LEON RD O ~ NT °O ~. 2 ~ IIDONtl211 ; ~, d ~ K FUQUA AVE W g GpUNTERY LN VE ~ m 3 dp VYtMG N12138WD1S g ~ <p p~Jy OE A ~\,N LO N~G tlp J 3 Y ~ O RD EX` V HOPKINS U O ~ p NI AtlMON1S3 J< ~ U O Z , a° o M J< ~ NOPK\NS RD am Z Y ~ T = GOTFIELD \ O Rp p p a 3 O J~p ~ ~ O y VEV DR O d H 1j ~P P O Z K o T dd. O ~ p i JJO ¢ O , O ~ 2 O y dp py' _r u = g Wb~ o0 O iP p r = D'NO m ~ Q M R P d u a o ` 0 l w PO of VOHtllD38 Z O 't'oy y Nl '`~' A NO w WS D ~1 w GNESTERWOOD DR ~ a ~, o A ~ ~ K Y` BO SM/' i GW~~ t ~ J~ O / W 3Atl 000 Npy53ad S Q3'O YO ~ K ~ O O z P$ LN ~ $ WA 6t 6 3.. w U Y G~ SJ ~ S` d J p O AVE ` PN~L H ~J w N r yp fj O W J1 § OR Z, p Jl J Y J r Gt Y 0 y y ` ;o N RUGEW~O NOr y~3 ~ ~ ~ O a ~ 4 6 d l r~J i )J` ;iJ `~ s ~J ~ d 4 1KP DR 11- m' D Oy y gEN J YJ V p ~J BRIME~ p EE Z 0. ~ 1 2 N U 76 O 1j 6 ND 3ltl0 NOS m ,` g 6 A O U Z p < Y d ~ ~, 'A <z OZ oC~~ z~1 ` fiJ N ~ ~ < ~ a\' NO SDOOMNOStlW 3 P NyN' ~ '~43oN y ~ O J~7 1 O d ~ oyl SoNE yy~ D YJ'O d'Oj. 1~ !"J bS AVA13tl0 N P` d~! ~ u ~ ~ = J , ~ UPP ST JJ\d0'S P~0 ; ."~i ~ OM ~W~ ~OO7yybJ 3 BRYA OEVI DR sNb< O)diy)3 / , W ~o1 s < `- ]~ d~ bOZ ~` 0 7 d ~ L U m ~ N i a b i ~ ~ ON HOLLOWO MAS D 6 W y 3 g y6J0 y/00 dg o ~1 R\T AN P s~ m • ~ ,y v BS ON A~ O L 0 e ~ D/ W SNOB WW N`ANB ~ IRONGATEOR RU ` y< S p 2 Z ~ w 1 KEDLE b0 3tl W3M WM yd ~ Nl Ab ~ ° w ¢ : C/J l3 b O O y V M 1 Jy N ~ W> ~i y ylbN ~ ~+ <U ~ W' K y ° 5 5 7 6 ~ CT ~ O~W ~F W ~ ~ m a WK G Fi D td ~f ~ Ei ~7 OMJONDN ~ CT w ~T m • ` < VyV ~~ R N p. yIQ' Q= '° V' ~' ~j i ~ ~ ~ S. Q wU y0 }+ ifOdb3 PO ) JL Q-Y5 V\ '~ o p ~i9„ DR '~ 10 O yy H ~~ T U • o . ~ OT d~ Nh, AU ~WEL~ rv `b Y t d y U \I! J`J:tlOdaR1 ~ O Q SPRINGC x U gGby OJIHO Ob 3001N8 NOtlI ~ ,~, K PL ~,~, '~J OP ~ J ~ 'V a F T OJ O ~ 05 Z r pr 3 O a o a 03NaOR2131b W DS ~ h 'W' M< 316'ONpyl o O OMP GT O ~ 0 ~ WP z ~ m 2 3 O O ~ t Z A ~ W ~ KpVPAXO ~~ d NILMAR DR ~ L O ~ JbON P ro Q O K Y ~ R ~ 0 3 aNJ poJ PL d eP0 yy0 /yy0 O O G ~- W P Y ~ W O J O ~J9 OEO J~ 11 Od, O -\ O~ ~ ~P 'NPy p ~ b~ `v w 2 1: 3 ~ R\0 mU V' ~ K 6Q O ,~4.P G O O O 00 '9 CT 0 bO ~,.{f `/~V~ Z i a ./ 0. J 2 w i c O~J 5 ~ ~ p\R Z od, ti0 o, ~ oV\~ '~ .y ~ )''h~ ~ ~ m 1j~VJ MERtRF o 1J m ~ JON ~ SV i7 ~ u 3g 73K' ~ SUM go)D g, ~ ~ S GARTHDA" S MELBEGK RO y31 ~J3g D 732y 3' BONBON R ~ RD VICTO0.\P AVM Jklya R p0 ~ _ ~ ~ PARK TE SE RD bly0l Ol 1,OR ~ K o oa P yo/ , ¢ N ? z o w go . p 1 e G/y)IM u ~ MEAOOWAV RD TER N J O c~ K CT ~ ez ~2pN BRIDGE RD ~/c5 JESSUP MEADOWS Y NO °N bM N oV 8 ~ z m gARNWOOD ;~ o w y313 N t J ° Oy )~N E OR ~y\byf M o 0 ~ p <, i o O r OR \RONST J O K NO y) 3 zZ\ON N ORIOGT NE001 P 1g7 )/N O 3 N O? UtE ON Oa HOMiHO IIIH NOIZ bh O7p GPN W Ut 5~O K 210 N 2 U OWVO y p W 2 p Q > lu tpT\lP ~ Y ~ J a o 0213173AV1 Gt j O O SYO O Y b0 Z 6 w Od ~ ~ m 10 ~ 1135 O F y l ~ QY ~< °O p O ~ w O o 'n W WrOP R O W m ~ ~ x m pT p in m PW 021 a3Ni1171 OZ ~ m O O o ~ ~ P P5p O ~ 0 a z ~ ~' ¢ ~ w Q N\LES R 1J OVE ~ KINGS GRO` a VRUS S 0P ~ rc rc ¢ ~ w ~ GR Z > EY RO a JW OR m OR j N C FOR O y ~ a _ _ O O j ~ z x ~ O p pG~ r w J W fl ~ W? r X00 je 1J u ~ 't' Z w ? ~ J p a g o Y = Nl TANDEM P = OP Ot ° o? sJ\ ~ H ~ ~ ¢ ~ w mw Z p u E PGKNE D > S3NId Hltld R N N z~ ,FOP lG > GT a !J h h 9 0a' J 1 ye m y ,\ =_ x 4 4 a i m - ~ a m m n m ,~\ Y J O `', `~ ~V~.y i~-I ~U a .~ U ^~ W .. ~ ° o v ~ a ~.. w ..~ ; ..,,. (~ LL ~ .., .. o ~" ~. .,,. _ ~ R .. i N ~ -~ s U y :Y ...,,. :~ .~,.,..o .,.. 1. 0 ~ + . ~.. .*ob' ~ rah. i c, a « ..... .... ~~ ~yy ~ ...,, ~ „ N ';~ o'' ',. w,..~ a w J ~ ~ e• '"e x. ~ ° ., .....,„, ~ ' ~ `~ ~ „o ~a.o .~ ..... ~ e.,.., ~ ~ ,. ~ .,.._, ,..a ~~e ~ ' ~, .. ~ ,....o,.. ~~~ ~~ ~~~ S"~ •~ ,'~ 4~ ,,....~ ~' ~ J; 1 ~ y sue. ca,C V] CQ CQ U r, ~~~~~ YnurCornmunit News a erSira•e1995 Y A P - - --- P.O. Aox 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 23113 • Phone: (R(l~) j45-75(H) • Fax: (8(kl) 7•l4-3269 • F,mail: news@chcstcrfieldobserver.com • Internet: www.chesterfieldobscrver.com ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost er issued Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors - TAKE NtYi'ICE TakNnotlce that the Board of Supervisors of Qu~rfidd County, Virginla, at an adjourned meeting on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Bull ' Route. 10 and Lori Road Chesterfielirginia, will hold a public hearing where persons may appear and present their views concerning: An ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, by amendingg and re-enacting Section 7- 3 to divide Chippenham, Dutch.Gap and Wells voting precincts and change the polling places for Beach, Enon, Matoaca and Meadowbrook voting precincts. A copy of the full text of the ordinance is on 5k in the Office of the Clerk to the Boazd of Supervisors and the County AdministratiWi C~ce, 'Rocrna 504, 9901 sea LEGALS, page 24 from LEGALS, page 23 Lori Road, Chesterfield County, Virginia and may be ezatnined by all interested persons between the hours of 8:30 a:m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, If further information is desired, please contact Mr. Lawrence Haake, III, Registraz, at 748-1471, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday thmugh Friday. ns uestt the accessibility of~the facility or the need for reasonable accommodations should contact Janice Blakky, faerk to the Boazd, at 748-1200. Pettoss needing interpreter services fix the dew must notify the Clerk to the Beard no Ltet than Friday May 23, 2008. LN: Polling precincts 5-14, 1 col x 4.5 in. 21 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER $223.50 This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 05/14/2008 & 05/21/2008 Sworn to and subscribed before me this 2008. day of Legal A fiant J e T, Grooms Jr., No ary Public My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 The hearing is held at a public facility des~'gned to be accessible to persons with disabilities. An with 'ons on arsf (SEAL ~,t~,~~~,~:f~~~ ~`r s ' w'; ~. ~•~Fta ~;ii .e+ ± of Et ' ++ ; ~ • ~ ca-3a-~t ; . si '•.~~ ~~ N~r•'~c, ~~, T~ R Y '~ ~~~`~ rpo'+~ -rt trtt t t tt ttN~ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. ~'?~~N,~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 4 Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 17.D. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Adjustments to Planning Department Fees County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Hold a public hearing for proposed adjustments to Planning Department fees. Summary of Information: Each year, as part of its annual budget review process, Planning Department staff prepares an analysis of its development review related fees compared to the cost to the Department of undertaking those reviews. It has been the Board of Supervisors' policy since 2002 to reco the Planning Department's development review cos Department's development review related fees. Fi cost recovery rate, subsequent adjustments made in FY03 and FY04 lowered the cost recovery tar activities. For FY09, Planning Department staf proposal, aligned with the Board's policy, to associated with selected residential reviews associated with selected commercial reviews. Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Attachments: ^ Yes ver a targeted percentage of ~s through adjustments in the rst targeted at an 80 percent by the Board of Supervisors get for selected commercial f prepared a fee adjustment recover 80 percent of costs and 65 percent of costs Title: Director of Planning ^ No # 0002Qi9 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 4 AGENDA For FY09, staff is proposing adjustments to various rezoning and site plan related fees, as staff projections for FY09 identify a significant gap between revenues and costs for these types of reviews. Fees for site plan and rezoning reviews have not been adjusted since FY04. Staff does not recommend any adjustments to subdivision review related fees, as the Board of Supervisors adjusted these last fall for FY08. (Staff is projecting a 73 percent recovery rate in FY 09.) Staff is recommending minor adjustments to fees associated with variance, special exception and mobile home related fees to simplify the fee structure, as individuals normally pay these "mom and pop" fees on a one-time basis. As is shown in Attachment A, since the comprehensive adjustments made by the Board of Supervisors to Planning Department fees in FY03 and FY04, about 30 percent of the Planning Department's operating budget has been covered by its development review related fee revenue. That share is projected to drop to 20 percent for FY 08. Projections for FY09 (with and without the proposed adjustment) include part of the cost for new Planning Department positions approved by the Board of Supervisors as part of the County's FY09 budget. As shown in Attachment B, staff is proposing adjustments that are projected to generate an additional $163,300 in site plan fee revenue and $340,100 in rezoning fee revenue in FY09. Staff's analysis of costs associated with these proposed fee adjustments reflect only Planning Department costs, and not the related development review costs of other departments, such as Transportation, Utilities and Environmental Engineering. Attachment C compares proposed fee adjustments for two application examples with fees charged by other Virginia localities. Development review cost recovery goals vary in Virginia localities. An informal survey indicates Arlington County, Loudoun County and Stafford County have goals to recover 100 percent of their development review costs. Fairfax County's fees are generally set to recover 50 percent of its Zoning Evaluation Division's costs. Prince William County adjusted their fees in 2007 based on inflation and increases in personnel/technology costs. Henrico County has not adjusted their planning application fees since February 2004. Attachment D is a draft ordinance outlining staff recommended changes. At their April 15, 2008 public hearing, the Chesterfield County Planning Commission recommended denial of staff recommended fee adjustments and the accompanying ordinance for the following reasons: ~~~~ ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 4 AGENDA • The Commission was concerned about how much of the Planning Department's operating costs should be recovered by fees. They felt this was a legislative decision best addressed by the Board of Supervisors. • Referring to the proposed 80 percent residential and 65 percent commercial cost recovery goal, the Commission was concerned about the degree that development review costs should be recovered from one type of activity verses another. They also felt this was a legislative decision best addressed by the Board of Supervisors. • The Commission was concerned about the significant percentage increase in proposed fee adjustments over one year. ~r ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 4 of 4 Budget and Management Comments: This agenda item requests that the Board hold a public hearing on May 28, 2008 to consider proposed changes to Planning Department fees. It is projected that the Planning Department staff's proposed adjustments to site plan fees and rezoning fees would generate an additional $163,300 and $340,100, respectively, in FY2009. These estimates factor in the costs associated with 3 new full-time Planning Department positions approved by the Board with the adoption of the FY2009 Budget. Funding for the new positions is dependent on the fee increase as the FY2009 budget was adopted with revenues reflective of the fee proposal. Planning Department staff's fee proposal adheres to the Board's policy of capturing 80 percent of the costs related to residential reviews and 65 percent of the costs related to commercial reviews. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management 0~€~~ '~~ Q s a +~+ NN~ L.L. 3 d ~, NN~ as LPL f+ ~ C a~ O i ~ ~ > a O it C d a °' ~ °' D ~ c }' 0 'c ~- = o ~ r.+ a~ L o ~ ~, °' °' o o U NV N I.f. ~ ~.+ C V L a M 0 [r N \° O N M 0 O M 0 N _~ M 0 N 0 M N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ~ O ~ O ~ O to O ~ M M N N ~ ~ 0 0 a~i .. c rn c O ooa~ o ~ o E ci N L N O ~ 'p d 7 d S~ Q N S Q O O O ~ O ~ Z ~ ~ .O '~ N LL O ~ O a O U ~ O a` 0 7 U Q (~ O } LL f0 a 0 ~o 7 U Q 0 a ~ ~ U ~ .~ Q ~ C f4 M a, LL ~ (0 O ~ U U -~ Q ~ N N O y U (6 N 7 w Q T m N f0 Q d Rl ®iJ r~,+ ~4i 0 0 N O M w O M Q m ~ •+ 1 d ~ Z Q' ~ ° 0 0 0 0 C y 'p~ d j O H O O ~m cTi c aonc~~ ~ p d ~ r ~ ~ o ~ a ~ > a ~ 0 ° 0 0 0 0 ~ ~~ ~ ~co,~ooo c N ~ ~ c M fD ~ O ~ 9'y °yUC7 M N h ~ y o N U Efl EA b9 b9 di Z -p o 0 0 0 0 0 ~ off oV a0o~n W ~ a c9 a ~, °0000 Y ° 0 0 0 0 CD M ~ ~ O ~ to W O) U G ~ M~ N W N O r U d9 EA EA d9 Efl y~ °0000 c o m M CO M O B c~ U 3 r M d' ~~ d :~ ~ d F U H C N O O O O O N r N y U M M O O R~ ~ y to (DNaDM ' ~ v VtVN M ~ ' U _ ~ ~ C ~ E e~~vaE»E» o o . U o ~ U O O O O O N ` y. MMOCO t OF o Y a W O~ r N ~j O ~ O 0 p U t N ~ r N O N ~ rN+ LL V) U9 ER Efl ffl p d U ~ ~ 00000 N 'p d ~ 00000 'j ~ o c d M N~ O O ~ N d > ~ M ~ O ~ N N 7 7 } LL ffl fA fR d9 d9 C~ ~ C• w o ~ ~~~ U = y 7 w ~ ~ ~ N O. V1 ~ •~ o ~ c~~ N U ~ C ~' N • d Q G ~ ~ y. y ~ ~ CJ O . . d N . . f0 ~ N U 3 (\ fn W ~ ~ ~ N ~ U N d o a~i .~ ~ y -o a ci ~ aiU~ cp y C R' N '~ V .N 07 N m 7 C d ~ f0 .C U U C a C C .S C O M (/~ (n ~ ~ « ~` r Op ~ 8 ~ ~Z$ ~ _ a~ ~ ~ o09 C Z~ U fl. f6 ~ U C7 ~ O 6Z m W ~ N i+ ' ~ 3 d U 'C v ~ a / ~ ~ ~ ~~6~ ` ~j o a ~~ ~ Q O , C ' ~ y Opp c Sy$ N ~ N V O fl. ~ ~ m O C oos's ~ .o V ~ ~ sE 3 N ~ y ~ a~ ~a£ 82 g rn ~ C ~ ~, ~ d V .^ O Op 3 M1 > 'O~b a~ a $ c ooh 8~ O } 'y ~ -p m LL ~ o es ,o ~$ ~ d W 0 r L L ° v~ ° ° o ° ~ o o o o o O O O O O O N O ~ ~ ~ NfA 6 9 6 9 a d O C .~ c m a c 0 U N a~ N N L U a~ L F T CO V N f6 Q N a 0 v 0 ti Q io h O W 0 r:+ a '- c " d J U ~ d d ^~ L Q r ~ LL Q = a° ~ ,w ~ R ~ ~ C O c U a U O ~ ~ O M m r M fa ~ ER EA w ~ ~ ~ N ~ M ~ f~ O ~ U ~ ~ C A O C M ti O ~ a ~ ~ o ~n co o U J ~ ~ ,~ "~' M ~ ~ U N M ~ ~ a ~ •~ c 0 ~ 0 o ~ Q N ~ = U ~ ~ > ~ ~ rn w o ~ 3 ~ o U ~ = ~ ~ a ~ ~ o M 0 00 N O O P ~ ~ N ~ O L L L U a ~ ~ ++ U ~ ~ U fq ~ >+ N F- O Q O ~ p ~ N ~a . ~ N ~ _ H ~ fB .` c ~ rn ~ m U ~ 0 a N U_ Q ~ ~ C c~ ~ a N ~ ~ ~ ;~ C N f0 Q O N m .~ (A C L ~- ~ ' m~ U ~ f0 ~ N ti ~°o ~o No ~~ O ~ N N N ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ N Q Q ~ x °' o ~n 7 O ~- y N N a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ .O ~ N ~ O = U ~ ~y ~ 0 0 m c °o rn ~ O (fl d U Efl b9 a ~ ~ °o °o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ °o U C7 ~ ~ a `~ `n ~ ONO O O ~ M t ~ U ER EA ~ N U ~ U ~ >+ N O Q H ~ O O ~ N m N N ~ _ ~ ~ (0 .` c ~ ~ rn ~ .~ U +`r O fl- ~ U d Q ~ c m ~~ a N :~ Q' f4 N m a~ w v N N O ~. N .N 3 0 w _U N .~ .~ 0 w N .y T f0 C Q Q N O C C C a c 7 O U -o a~ m H L U ai 7 O Attachment D AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 19-25 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 19-25 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 19-25. Fees. In addition to any other fees required by the county, fees shall be payable to the county treasurer and submitted to the planning department upon filing the following applications: cro" ", crcv°i-crn;nrvvi-ccr'rciviro-r-pruixixccrcc°c o c°xvPirr ~ ~~~Sr ~ « v~ n Tu v r,r>r~ ~~9~~c-L}S2~ Q~~onn nn ~ zA~„~~~+F «n i„«r, o Qi nnnnn > > r°7 ~'Pea~t~9-b g,~2,~}S-j~2F'-§--t~'-z ~ ... Q ~ ~~nn nn !1 \ A 1. ,:l,a;...t ..o,...-.:+ .. ..1:,..,r:,,.~ f~« ~ o ,.lo f~....:1.. ,J.,,`11.:;5 : ; F « l~J ~aGri--csrxrt-6rc'H~2'ol^7?~6~rij=-i vv21•li~ic" .~vv ~ s ~ T ..., o...~.:+~orl I.... !; l n X21 ~L.«,.,.,.L. 1; 1D ~cn z-m--vsn~TSrgrro--cvr-w'arrctt-va-iiarrrb-p tS-a~~E`~L~@ cv~rxc~rrcro 1 e ~a ...~. „~ ,.~„«0!1 L,~,mv .tee«....:+~. ....,.... ,,.,..... 1..,.....,,, !l l Tit., ,~ ,.+„ erl L,., :rte ~ Tr eccn nn 1923:78360.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ,,,~ . • • Q~cn nn D Tu D :•"• D ^ ~ ~~~~~I-e~~ 6~$SSf~E '1~e~3 ~'~ g ~ ~ i ~cv 8 , t . . ~~rS~ii}g , , 6~uSS~~EE,~~6~3-~~ ~ X71/;+I,,. ,• .~ ..1., ; F' _ ..+: . ~7 > > > ~liS~ PE`E' " ... Qn c fln `'', n ~., ' ~ ~," n r r s - = Q~ tin nn ac~ C~7 z-n-r~-i ccj cc c-rcn--oTBr c ... , Dl„ e r n nn r-ra ~ .. Q~c~'~n~n~n~n~ > > > .. D~s-~e~-EEe~e-€e~t-ke-~rE'~>Z'iA(~-aE~° ^ ... e n c n n rD-rcrs=p2E'-t2C-E(i9~E`E-i~-&E~eS ..--yr~~ > > ' ' D ~ ~EO-~-icS~ z i 8A-&EE'~5 8 -E36E r - rcrr~-p2E c-- vf - iD--carp pc raEFGiv~2E~~-$E~l'~' ...r~~ n .r ,7'+' f' 1 ,7 ,7° °1,,,. °..+ r., ..l„rl° .,,r:~: ,.~ ~ i~r fr. r n. r r T.rCG 7ECaifr-JC[[CCTi7 GTI~N°iCT"'171~C'["f1 + f:~ ~T ~ ~ ~ P ~' u .," n ° Ci7 rnrTicc~ac cTVr S ~ ~ c t ., . . . .. c c r~ m-r~t E1~-E~ 16 ~3G~G@ 6i Q~nn n " ~ n r: r *~ "n r r "~° - ... Qi nnnnn f }}~ rmTi 2~E2 ~ 5•c-r"r°;T°r ~9~r~i ~ ... ~6rrt~E~C w . , ... e2~n nn 1923:78360.2 2 ®~'~~ (~ ^ t >~ n-,j=-regl~est~i~D~ 'T~~~ ~4~~e~4-t~s°~ ... Q~~~nn nn ~uS~-p2~-EIG~~~T~ ~ rr~o.vv zD--trcrs-p2~-ftfi~2-~:~ LT7 + F~« IJ 1? TLS D Cn .,+ .,F ~~~~~~~~°~ ~ , ~~ > > . . . > > >~ >~ ~~zrn ~.ruv ~cc"~ircc ai-scvc,•« rn 1r- , wii i-icivirc'~:-te r °, ^.,::~:'..:..»~ .~.,.. } 8 > > ... > >~ } X3& 89 > > ... > > 8- > } > > > ... ~~ > > 1923:78360.2 3 a®~~~~ ~esa~e~e lei=e~e~~e~t-~a~~a~-~r~a~~rs°~ .,,...°.,l ao,.;~;~ r rL. 1. ,J F..,,„:„,~ ., °.,1~ ~ ...1..„„:„,~ ,...,,..,,,~~...,. .....~.., Y......,. ^~,-,~--~e~~-R, I~ T-m~-~4~,~1~e~-Pr-t{se~ ... e 1 cn nn i~ r^n,7--icgcics n, ic-vTVri~~S2S ... Q-~vQ ~ _._ r~ ~_ ___ e e _ - a ~ ~v uvv 1 ,7 r ~ rL..,r rl,° ° ~r : ,. 1: ~ `"v ° .:rl, r4,° c °L,° ..1~ v ~: cvr~rcxv...,l ° .,1., °~a~i °l ~' -pex~ > > ~: Tl" ~ r' F rl, rrutl~6~T r 7 n L.°« 21 7n1 A o TI,°_~ ..r;,.« F « rL.° \117.,1rL..,11 m ~ r ~ _ _ _ e .e___._ {~-~ ... ~} ~reE]~#effrc-n~r~-9~-~3s°cT... Q-~~v ~~--a~rg-aid-~esse~y-uses- : $-3A9 rAri-vt-~2ec-c~^ve~ire~35... Q ~ ~ c n n 1923:78360.2 4 ~~~~~~ f}3 (~} as~ e~s-peg ~e~ ~es~~er~~~a ~e , °ra r, p2~EZ6~2~9~t~ G~FS~-~-R6~fc. ~.~s~nv-.na v n~ ~_p~. v .. cn aEreS ..~z ~vv YY r c vE-~ +• i ~ t 'a 2i~~i,~--LAS ° ... Q i Qn „ . ... . n nn ... ... .. Drrc rrpcc-E~'~9r+m v'---~ic~~$-kEf@" ... Q ;fin n n Di- i-a T, pC~=-El6~e--9~F2 ~-aE-F°c~ ...~ v~v ~ ~ - - a .~~ ~~~~~ ~~~o ~es+~e~rse ~.r,. ~ ..o~:ao~+:..i , e ... pee- r~~---CAB rrw• a a i.~e~Cr2i~-F ",2~c~ vRriccar~~ e~~'esl-F~i~t~ „~ eon nn E X99:99 ~ ... no~;ae.,+;.,i , o ... Qon n[1 ' ri .. u~-pet ~ rrt ' a a >,~r-rc~c u~i~t~R~s~r rrcc ^~ Q n Q n n n YY r ~ r ni - ~ € t ~ t e~-~-~9-~6~1i~ Q~c nn ~ ~9~t- E- e~ eE e , ~ ra ~ ~ Q~nn nn ....,...,.. ~ .~ .~r-rrori-rca . . T C j ....y ~ v J 7'l7r'rG~TITGTfCICCri ....... ] 923:78360.2 5 ®d~~c~~ C'~7 T A t ~ ' ~ r v i E ~t t , ~e ~ ..~--~ `moo ~~ ,,,t ... Q~cn nn ~xl>1 11 r' 'r ~ro,J .;+1, rl,o ~r o o r F ,. rl,o ' ' L: „,. „~ „.,~..o„..o,. , ol,:..lo~ „f ~ :„o.l r„ rL.o 1:..;„.. o „f ., b~ ~;ot t;„„ et nnn nn ~lll•. L' ,.r:. F„.,~~ .;r..., e„..o« ..r ,oL.:..l o,t . o~ ,;tl, ±L.e «o „r ,. „4:„ oar ..~ o.t r., ~..o r ..t.. rl,.o 1;. F « rt,~ .... ... ,:„..., o „f ~ b e l~l ~ Ty~.r ~t~~ mTt~e ~'' .. e~n n nn &6~?-v vr Tr~i~6~.r ~e~e ~~e~' .. - . Q ~- r~o-vv t ~' ~ ~ ~ z ~~~ ~~- 9~~ 6~&S~~~ E~tei Q ~ t nn nn {~ z:: :~cvi:::: ~ ~~ ~ , (~ ~~ g~eii-l-tl g-~~e~ ~G~ SS-1~tG ~e„ Q t c n n nn ~~ ~~ee ~eEt~e ~-e~-s ~s eet-~e~~e ~e"' ... Q nnn nn ~- ,~ ~ ~~ "~`~ " 8 ~ 6e-8 e6~ 6i3-6~S~F~$e E~~643- i4cr~e~ ~T^vf~3 /!L1 Cpl ~7.,,.;~ „,.o~ ~.~t.. „:„;ter«.,r; .,o; ~~ ~~ce- ~ee~e ~r-e~s trb~ es~re~r~e ~-€~e~ Q ~nn nn ~ ~1-A~8 ~~ 8 ~~ ~~e ~~ e~re~-strb~e e~~e~-- r~t•~ea -€~e~ (2l y Ott n .,rL.o«: lTf ~ ~ ~ ' D c ii n ^ 1~ TRLI ,.« A e ~C -i ~ r-EH~ i~ r '~'r c- t-z z . ~ Yr 1923:78360.2 6 00~~~. ir-t~6rc'~i-rrs~.~vvt36~$~S~F~Se6t-cvir-v~m-rcc -- c6i3l- ,,.,., e i nn nn ~ c,,..., , n r ,. r >> (~ i~~-e~rice-seEt~e~-e~~~sest-~e~~e~e~r $HA~99 ai i°c_a ~~,.„ Q i nn nn ;,Ttet~et~tfe" ...~.~ T-rcrn~cc~cvricrrcrorc£n--ci~c-fna~icizccrcr ..^~"~~: ~e~e~~~g-te ~~ ~'~~ ~1~-~Iu ,.,. n ~., n Qnn nn c ~ c ~ c ~ ri-vr~-r-oTUS.~ii~~'Et'1~6~3 ~oov vv D'~--peg-ae-~e-€e~-t~c~-€t~s~9A-~e~es ..~~o naS~eF-c~6~'c-^=Poi-~~~6~'2S ... Qnc nn ncavmr,~ ce no,Te~C-}~S~i~tC~°" Q ~ ~ n n n nn D'rc~~,-~SCr-ae-~e~er-t-~e-i~~Z 88-ae~es ..~v~v ~'~T, Pe~c~c~-e~er~A~~E~~ . Q-~o ~eze~g-~e~' ~~c;~c '~'~~c ~~~`'~~ ~ Qc~i nn nn ni o ~ ,. +~o ~;,.~~ inn ,, enc nn ., ... w ., .., ., ~,~%~._.encnn ~~ Q~ can nn Drius~2~ft~E-Pe~6~t~3('-~c~ri~-c'~E~°c=-.. Q ~ n: n n rD-~raT,-pe~E~'{i6'b`e~e-EeS ..--Q~z~.vw 1923:78360.2 i ~~Q~ ~~ Fee Based On Application Type Residential Office, ' Commercial, and Uses Industrial Uses 1. Amend condition(s) of zoning (including conditions of rezoning, conditional use, conditional use planned $5,300 $4,100 develo ment and textual statement 2. A eal to board of zonin a eals er 19-21 1 200 1 200 3. Building permit review, for a new single family dwelling or for each unit of a new two-family 25 Not Applicable dwellin 4. Conditional use famil da care homes 300 Not A licable 5. Conditional use, all others $5,300 $4,100 a. Plus er acre 90 $80 6. Conditional use Tanned develo ment 5300 4 100 a. Plus er acre $90 $80 7. Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors case 1 000 " " 1 000 " " d f l h li b (Includes A (Includes A erra requests cant, per request: e y t e app uses uses 8. Board of Zoning Appeals case deferral requests by the a licant er re uest: 130 130 9. Manufactured home ermits new 550 550 10. Manufactured home ermits renewal $250 250 11. Modifications to development standards and re uirements $400 $300 12. Plan transfer to electronic format er 19-264 130 $130 13. Resource protection area exceptions per § 19- 235(bZ2) for one lot or parcel used or intended to be $300 Not Applicable used for a sin le famil dwellin and accesso uses 14. Resource protection area exceptions per § 19- 235 b 2 all others $1,500 $1,500 15 Remand requests to the planning commission by the 50 percent of 50 percent of original case fee , . plicant er re uest a original case fee " " p , p q (includes "A" uses (includes A uses 1923:78360.2 (D®®~~~ 16. Rezonin $5,300 $4,100 a. Plus er acre 90 80 17. Rezonin with conditional use - - a. Base fee for rezonin 5 300 4 100 i. Plus er acre 90 $80 b. Base fee for conditional use 5 300 4 100 i. Plus er acre 90 80 18. Rezonin with conditional use Tanned develo ment - a. Base fee for rezonin 5 300 $4,100 i. Plus er acre $90 $80 b. Base fee for conditional use planned develo ment $5,300 $4,100 i. Plus er acre 90 80 19. Rezoning with conditional use and conditional use Tanned develo ment - a. Base fee for rezonin $5,300 4 100 i. Plus er acre $90 $80 b. Base fee for conditional use $5,300 4 100 i. Plus er acre 90 80 c. Base fee for conditional use planned develo ment $5,300 $4,100 i. Plus er acre $90 80 20. Simon Permits temporary signs as permitted by § 19- 100 $100 631 throu h 19-650 21. Sign Permits all other signs for which building ermits are re uired 130 $130 22. Site plan overall development plan and schematic plan reviews: original submittal, including up to two $2,000 $1,200 resubmittals a. Plus er acre 90 $80 23. Site plan overall development plan and schematic plan reviews: third and subsecLuent resubmittals, per submittal $400 $350 1923:78360.2 y 24. Site plan, overall development plan and schematic plan reviews: adjustment to approved site plan or amendment to approved schematic plan, per submittal or resubmittal $400 350 25. Site plan review: appeal of decision of director of Tannin $400 $350 26. Special exceptions, temporary manufactured home new $550 $550 27. Special exceptions, temporary manufactured home renewal 250 $250 28. S ecial exce tions all others 1 000 $1,000 29. Special exceptions, amend conditions of special exce tion 600 600 30. Substantial accord determinations 5 300 $4,100 31. Variances, administrative 200 $200 32. Variances, all other $300 300 33. Verification of non-conformin use written $75 $75 34. Zonin certificate 75 $75 35. Zonin inter retation written 75 $75 (b) Enterprise zone or subzone fee exemptions. (1) For any office, commercial or industrial use within an enterprise zone or subzone desi nag_ ted by the Commonwealth of Virginia, no application fee shall be required for the following actions, provided the director of planning determines that the request is in compliance with the comprehensive plan: a. Amend a condition of zoning b. Conditional use or planned development c. Deferral d. Rezoning e. Site plan review, resubmittal of site plan, or adjustment to an approved site plan £ Substantial accord determination This exemption shall continue for the life of the enterprise zone or subzone. (c) For an~pplication containing a mix of residential and non-residential uses, the fee shall be based upon the residential uses category. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.. 1923:78360.2 10 Potential Planning Department FY 09 Fee Adjustment Options As Advertised For May 28 Public Potential Fee Hearing Option Proposed Fee Based On 80 Potential Fee Percent/65 Percent Cost Recovery Based on 70 Cost For Selected Residential and Recovery For Commercial Reviews Selected Reviews Office, Commercial, Residential Uses and Industrial All Uses Uses 1. Amend condition(s) of zoning (including conditions of rezoning, conditional use, conditional use $5,300 $4,100 $4,600 planned development, and textual statement) A ppeal to board of zoning appeals per 2 $1,200 $1,200 $1,200 § 19-21 3. Building permit review, for a new ~ single family dwelling or for each unit $25 Not Applicable $25 of a new two-famil dwellin 4. Conditional use, family day care $300 Not Applicable $300 homes 5. Conditional use, all others $5,300 $4,100 $4,600 I a. Plus er acre $90 $80 $80 6. Conditional use planned development $5300 $4,100 $4,600 a. Plus er acre $90 $80 $80 7. Planning Commission and Board of $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 Supervisors case deferral requests by (Includes "A" (Includes "A" (Includes "A" the a licant, er re uest: uses) uses) uses) ~ 8. Board of Zoning Appeals case deferral $130 $130 $130 re uests b the a licant, er re uest: 9. Manufactured home ermits, new $550 $550 $550 10. Manufactured home ermits, renewal $250 $250 $250 11. Modifications to development $400 $300 $400 standards and re uirements 12. Plan transfer to electronic format per § $130 $130 $130 ~~~ 19-264(f) Prepared By The Chesterfield County 1 As of May 28, 2008 Planning Dept. 13 Resource protection area exceptions per § 19-235(b)(2) for one lot or parcel used or intended to be used for a single family dwelling and accessory uses $300 Not Applicable $300 14. Resource protection area exceptions er § 19-235(b)(2), all others $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 15. Remand re uests to the Tannin q p g commission, by the applicant, per request 50 ercent of p original case fee « (includes A uses) 50 percent of original case fee includes "A„ ( uses) 50 percent of original case fee (includes "A" uses) ezonin $5,300 $4,100 $4,600 _a. Plus er acre $90 $80 $80 17. Rezoning with conditional use _ _ a. Base fee for rezonin $5,300 $4,100 $4,600 i. Plus er acre $90 $80 $80 b. Base fee for conditional use $5,300 $4,100 $4,600 i. Plus per acre $90 $80 $80 18. Rezoning with conditional use Manned develo ment - - - a. Base fee for rezonin $5,300 $4,100 $4,600 i. Plus per acre $90 $80 $80 b. Base fee for conditional use Tanned develo ment $5,300 $4,100 $4,600 i. Plus er acre 19. Rezoning with conditional use and $90 $80 $80 conditional use Tanned develo ment - - a. Base fee for rezonin $5,300 $4,100 $4,600 i. Plus er acre $90 $80 $80 b. Base fee for conditional use $5,300 $4,100 $4,600 i. Plus er acre $90 $80 $80 c. Base fee for conditional use Tanned develo ment $5,300 $4,100 $4,600 i. Plus er acre $90 $80 $80 20. Si Permits, tem or si s as $100 $100 $100 Prepared By The Chesterfield County 2 As of May 28, 2008 Planning Dept. permitted by § 19-631 through § 19- 650 21. Sign Permits, all other signs for which buildin ermits are re uired $130 $130 $130 22. Site plan, overall development plan and schematic plan reviews: original submittal, including up to two $2,000 $1,200 $1,600 resubmittals a. Plus er acre $90 $80 $80 23. Site plan, overall development plan and schematic plan reviews: third and subsequent resubmittals, per submittal $400 $350 $350 24. Site plan, overall development plan and schematic plan reviews: adjustment to approved site plan or $400 $350 $350 amendment to approved schematic lan, er submittal or resubmittal 25. Site plan review: appeal of decision of director of lannin $400 $350 $350 26. Special exceptions, temporary manufactured home (new) $550 $550 $550 27. Special exceptions, temporary manufactured home (renewal) $250 $250 $250 28. S ecial exce tions, all others $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 29. Special exceptions, amend conditions of special exception $600 $600 $600 30. Substantial accord determinations $5,300 $4,100 $4,600 31. Variances, administrative $200 $200 $200 32. Variances, all other $300 $300 $300 33. Verification ofnon-conforming use (written) $75 $75 $75 34. Zonin certificate $75 $75 $75 35. Zonin inte retation (written) $75 $75 $75 (b) Enterprise zone or subzone fee exemptions. Prepared By The Chesterfield County 3 As of May 28, 2008 Planning Dept. (1) For any office, commercial or industrial use within an enterprise zone or subzone designated by the Commonwealth of Virginia, no application fee shall be required ~r the following actions, provided the director of planning determines that the request is in compliance with the comprehensive plan: a. Amend a condition of zoning b. Conditional use or planned development c. Deferral d. Rezoning e. Site plan review, resubmittal of site plan, or adjustment to an approved site plan f. Substantial accord determination This exemption shall continue for the life of the enterprise zone or subzone. (c) For any application containing a mix of residential and non-residential uses, the fee shall be based upon the residential uses category. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.. Prepared By The Chesterfield County 4 As of May 28, 2008 Planning Dept. n ~ ~ ~~~ ~e _~ " ~ ~~~~~ Your Comrnunit • N • v _ y c r spaper Since 1995 P.O. Aox 16I6,.Midlothian, Virginia 2311.3 • Phone: (804) i45-"1100 • Fax: (8(k3) 744-3269 • Ernail: news(~chest~rGeldohservrr_~•~,~„ . L,r~,~,,,•r u,..,,.,,.ti..~•~...r;,,ra,.>,...._.,.._......- ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client _ Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Chesterfield County LN: Planning Fees 5-14, 21 Board of Supervisors 2.SP + 1 in. $2,825.00 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 05/14/2008 & 05/21/2008 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~~ day of ATTACH , 2008. AD HERE Legal Affiant Jame Grooms Jr., Notary blic My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 (SEAL) ~~,,, r r.,.,,,,^ ..~` 6 R 0 p ~''•~ ,~.~ t ..,~...,,, ,y :~,,.r .~ titi `-/ ~r.•` ~ i •.....• y"a-©T~1 RY av ~~`~ ~hbitHN1N~~ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. • _ $~ Y ~. %,r;,,n~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Subject: Page 1 of ~ Item Number: 17.E. Public Hearing to Review the Cash Proffer Calculations and Consider a Maximum Cash Proffer Amount Per Dwelling Unit for FY2009 and Cash Proffer Policy Changes County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: i Action ReQUe~d: Hold a public hearing for May 28, 2008 to review the cash proffer calculations and consider a maximum cash proffer amount per dwelling unit for FY2009 and changes to the cash proffer policy. Summary of Information: Staff annually calculates the per residential dwelling unit impact of development on select capital facilities and evaluates the Board's cash proffer policy for possible amendments. These findings are reviewed with the Board and the Board establishes a maximum per dwelling unit cash proffer amount for the coming fiscal year. Since inception of the legislated authority to accept cash proffers, the Board has from time to time amended its policy and revised its maximum per dwelling unit cash proffer amount that can be accepted from applicants seeking to rezone property. This date and time has been scheduled to hold a public hearing to review the cash proffer calculations and consider a maximum cash proffer amount per dwelling unit for FY2009 and cash proffer policy changes. The current maximum cash proffer, last established in October 2005 for FY2006, is $15,600 per dwelling unit. The FY2007 (May 2006) calculated impact based on Preparers Allan M. Carmod Title: Director, Budget & Management Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ()~+~~ ~6 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY . BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Summary of Information (continued) the historical method of using the average students per all households was $19,808, reflective of 0.52 students per household. The Board elected not to increase the maximum cash proffer amount that can be accepted from zoning applicants to mitigate the impact of residential development on capital facilities for FY2007. The calculated impact for FY2008 (May 2007) is $23,072. Staff will provide this year's impact figure prior to the meeting. The Board could adopt a maximum acceptable cash proffer amount up to the May 2007 calculated costs of $23,072 per dwelling unit for new cases to be effective in FY2009. Furthermore, staff recommends that the Board allow approved cases to be adjusted by up to 15.90 to reflect increases in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index since the $15,600 maximum proffer has not been adjusted since FY2006 (May 2005) . Adjusting the three year old $15,600 cash proffer maximum amount by the 15.90 change in the Marshall and Swift Index would equate to $18,080 per dwelling unit for previously approved cases. Staff further recommends that the cash proffer policy be amended with respect to what maximum cash proffer amount pending cases are evaluated under when a case is still under consideration after the maximum cash proffer amount is updated. Currently, policy specifies that a pending case will be subject to one change in the maximum cash proffer amount. Staff recommends that a pending case shall be subjected to only one revision in the maximum amount, such revision being the first revision following the application date, provided the case is approved within two years of the application date. After such time, unless the case is deferred by the Board of Supervisors, staff recommends that the development proposal's impact shall be subject to the maximum cash proffer in place at the time of the Board's hearing on the case. A second. policy amendment emphasizes terms for accepting improvements in lieu of cash payments as a means for zoning applicants to address their impact on capital facilities. Staff recommends also a change in the cash proffer policy to include language that addresses revitalization proposals. ~®®~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 AGENDA Summary of Information (continued) The final recommendation is that the cash proffer policy be amended to automatically increase cash proffer amounts in previously approved cases by the increase in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index effective July 1 of each year. Previously, cash proffer amounts in approved cases were adjusted based on the change in the Marshall and Swift Index only when the Board of Supervisors acted to allow the adjustment. t~OC)~ c~8 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA CASH PROFFER POLICY A. General Guidelines The Board will accept cash proffers for rezoning requests that permit residential uses in accordance with this policy. However, the Board may also accept cash, land or in- kind improvements for the capital facilities included in the County's cash proffer calculation in accordance with county and state law. Land or in-kind improvements may be accepted in addition to or in lieu of cash payments. The Board will consider providing a credit for dedications of land and in-kind improvements, such credit being applied to the specific capital facility category for which the dedication or in-kind improvement is proffered. In its review of zoning requests, the Board will consider health, safety and welfare issues and measures taken by the zoning applicants to address their impacts on capital facilities in accordance with this policy. An application containing proffers that satisfactorily mitigate the impact on capital facilities does not necessarily satisfy all health, safety and welfare issues. 2. Pursuant to this policy, staff will (i) calculate the annual net cost of public facilities, (ii) calculate the fiscal impact of a rezoning request that permits residential uses and (iii) administer the collection and expenditure of proffered funds. Transportation proffers for non-residential rezonings shall be computed by the Transportation Department on the same basis utilized prior to July, 1989, and at the Board's option, may include cash instead of improvements. 3. Any cash proffer policy must meet a "reasonableness" or "rough proportionality" test, which requires the Board to determine in each zoning case whether the amount proffered is related both in nature and extent to the projected impact of the proposed development on public facilities. Through this policy, staff will be able to recommend a maximum proffer in each case that meets this test of reasonableness. 4. Staff determines the cost of public facilities generated by new growth by relying on the assumption that any revenue derived from growth (residential and commercial real estate taxes, sales taxes, fees, etc.) will pay all the normal operating costs for services to residents of new developments with no funds remaining to pay for the cost of public facilities needed to serve these residents. State and county laws permit the Board to accept cash proffers to fund the public facility needs generated by any new residential development. 5. In determining the net cost per dwelling unit of a public facility, staff relies on countywide averages, where possible. In addition, staff will consider the five 1 components described below, as well as any other unique circumstances of which staff is aware, related to an individual zoning case. 6. To determine how and where a proffer will be spent, the County is divided into geographic or service districts. For facilities which have a Countywide service district (parks, libraries, and fire stations), the proffer may be spent Countywide. For roads and schools, the proffer will be spent within smaller service districts as described below. 7. The following public facilities will be funded by cash proffers: schools, roads, parks, libraries, and fire stations. The County does not currently accept cash proffers to fund public facilities such as jails, landfills and other government facilities. 8. A development proposal's impact on capital facilities will be evaluated based on the gross number of proposed dwelling units. When calculating the gross number of dwelling units, staff will: a.) use the lesser of average actual recorded lot yields and the number of dwelling units proffered by the applicant and, b.) not give credits for those dwelling units permitted under existing conditions of zoning or agricultural lots, and will not consider the transferring of allowable units from other properties. The Board may consider development proposals that include substantial upgrades to current design/development standards and ordinance requirements as justification for accepting reduced cash proffer payments for the pre-existing lot yields provided the applicant has not otherwise submitted documentation indicating higher lot yields in conformance with existing ordinances and reflective of site-specific physical features. 9. A development proposal's fiscal impact on capital facilities shall be established under the Board of Supervisors' cash proffer policy that is in effect at the time the case is being heard; however, if the Board of Supervisors changes the maximum cash proffer amount while the development proposal is still pending, the revised maximum cash proffer amount shall be applied. A pending development proposal shall be subjected to only one revision in the maximum cash proffer amount, such revision being the first revision following the application date, provided the case is approved within two years of the application date, excluding any time the case was deferred at the Board's request, but a development proposal not decided within this time frame will be evaluated in accordance with the maximum cash proffer in place at the time the case is heard. 2 ()®~~~~ B. Methodology and Policy Terms 1. There are five "components" involved in calculating what a new dwelling unit will cost the County in terms of providing public facilities. The components are as follows: a. Demand generators -Staff uses the weighted average of single family and multi- family persons per household (2.72 for FY06) and an average number of students per household (0.53 for FY06) to calculate demand generators (number of people and number of students) associated with a new dwelling unit. b. Service levels -Staff calculates existing service levels for each type of facility for which a cash proffer will be accepted. Examples of service levels are: 5.53 acres of park land per 1,000 people, 2.341ibrary books per person, and 99 square feet of space per elementary school child. (Service levels are calculated annually) c. Gross cost of public facilities -Staff calculates the gross cost of public facilities. The gross cost is used because a credit (described in (d) below) for anticipated future revenues from a new dwelling unit will be applied against the gross cost. For example, to calculate the gross cost of park facilities, multiply the average persons per dwelling unit by the cost per acre of park land plus improvement cost per acre of park land times the acres per capita. d. Credits -Staff calculates a credit to apply against the gross cost for each public facility. Chesterfield has issued and plans to continue to issue general obligation bonds to finance the construction of public facilities. Residents of new developments will pay real estate taxes to the County and a portion of these taxes will go to help retire this debt. So that new dwelling units are not paying twice (once through payment of a cash proffer and again through real estate taxes) a credit is computed. e. Net cost -Staff calculates the net cost per public facility or maximum cash proffer. This is the gross cost [(B)(1)(c)] per public facility minus the applicable credit [(B)(1)(d)] per public facility. 2. There must be a relationship between the rezoning itself and the need for a public facility. In order to ensure that money proffered by an applicant is used to fund the public facilities necessitated by the development, geographic service areas or districts are established across the County. a. Since parks, libraries, and fire stations serve the entire County, the geographic service districts for these facilities are determined to be countywide. Rezoning 3 ~~~~ ~~ requests can be analyzed on a countywide basis to determine their impact on these facilities and proffers may be spent to fund these facilities countywide. b. Rezoning requests can be analyzed on a countywide basis to determine their impact on schools. In order to ensure that money proffered by an applicant is used to fund the public facilities necessitated by the development, the county is divided into three geographic service districts corresponding to the attendance zones of grouped high schools. District one corresponds to the combined attendance zones for James River, Midlothian and Monacan High Schools, District two corresponds to the combined attendance zones for Clover Hill, Cosby, Manchester and Matoaca High Schools and District three corresponds to the combined attendance zones for Meadowbrook, Bird and Thomas Dale High Schools. Funds collected from a development within a District will be spent on school improvements within that District or for any school improvement that provides relief for the District the development is in. c. With respect to roads, rezoning requests are analyzed based on two geographic service districts, one north of Route 360 and one south of Route 360, to determine costs and impact. These service districts are used to calculate a road cost per dwelling unit. The Transportation Department has identified 19 traffic sheds across the County and money collected from a development within a particular shed will be spent on road improvements within that shed or on roads that provide relief to that shed. 3. The Board may prefer that a rezoning applicant mitigate the development's calculated impact on public facilities by dedicating property or doing in-kind improvements in lieu of all or a portion of the cash proffer. For property designated for dedication (excluding roads) staff will follow the County's procedure for "Acquisition of Private Property for Public Use". The value of donated land generally will be based on the current assessed value of the property, not to exceed the cost per acre used in the calculation of the proffer. The value of improvements shall be the estimated cost as determined by the County and calculated as if constructed by a governmental entity. If the dedication or in-kind improvement does not fully mitigate the development's calculated impact on public facilities, then the dedication and/or improvement's value may be applied as a credit against the development's calculated impact on the applicable public facility. The credit cannot exceed the development's calculated impact on the applicable public facility. If the value of the dedication or improvement is more than the calculated impact for the applicable public facility, the County may pay the difference. Credit for roads may be allowed for off-site land dedication or improvements, as recommended by the Transportation Department. 4 ~~~'~ ~~ 4. The County will continue to consider any unique circumstances about a proposed development that: (i) mitigate the development's projected impact on public facilities; and (ii) create a demonstrable reduction in capital facility needs. Unique circumstances may include, but not be limited to, participation in regional road projects and age-restricted housing projects. The County, the zoning applicant or any other person may identify such mitigating circumstances. 5. The County will consider unique circumstances for revitalization projects when a) the development proposal is on property in the county's enterprise zone or areas in the county that are determined to be blighted and b) when the development proposal includes commercial uses in addition to housing unless incompatible with the Comprehensive Plan. If warranted, the County may consider a reduction to an applicant's cash proffer for such revitalization projects that provide an economic benefit to the County. 6. Payment of the cash proffer for residential development must occur prior to release of a building permit. Timing for dedication of property or in-kind improvements should be specified in the proffer. Cash proffers, property dedications and in-kind improvements must be used for projects identified in the Capital Improvement Program. The Capital Improvement Program is based in part on the County's Public Facilities Plan, which projects long-term facility needs. 7. Cash proffer payments shall be used to fund schools, roads, parks, libraries and fire station capital facilities. Payments shall be expended in accordance with state law. 8. Adjustments in the cash proffer amount may be considered every fiscal year. Staff will recompute net costs based on the current methodology and recommend adjustments. Any adjustments to the maximum cash proffer amount would be effective upon adoption, but no sooner than July 1 of the new fiscal year. 9. The maximum cash proffer for cases heard by the Board July 1, 2008 and thereafter for residential rezoning applicants is $ per dwelling unit. 10. For cases already approved, the maximum cash proffer amount shall be automatically adjusted by the percent increase in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index July 1 of each year. Revised: May 28, 2008 Effective: July 1, 2008 5 (~®~~ ~~ a~ +~ r~ n L L a ro U c c a cI') L 0 .~ Q y-- O 0 m o~o~~~ N ~ i o ~ 0 N ~ (n ~ L ~ L cv CL y,_ .-~ O ~" ~ ~ L O ~ Q 0 ~ `~ U -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ :~' U .. ~ a~ '~'~ O a-' ~ .~ L ~ ~ .._ ~ ~, ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ O V O ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ o ~. ~ ~ U U = O Q cn ~, ~ - O O O O ~ ._ .- ,J J .- - o0 o ._ ._ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w O d- N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M d- M u~ ~ ;tt. ~~::r.: (~~~ ~~ L L _~ V O O O ^~ V N O U ra c c Q N Y L ^~ L.L \ N L fn O ~ N t ~_ O U J ~ fn o ^ ^ ~' O ~~I ~~ III ' !~ I' i 0 ~I '~ 'I ', ' j, oI'~~ OBI 'I ~ 0 II o 'i [V '~ 'I ti O N O O N O N 0 N M O O N O N M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O d~} O O O O O O O O O w w w w w w w w w 0~ 00 I` t0 to '~ M N ~ E~ Eft ~ E~ EA' EA fA 6g 6A' ~~~~ ~~ c 0 ca ~L Q 0 L Q Q Q L..7 0 U n 0 M N ,--~ .d 0 0 rn a~ r~ v ~ .~ ~ L ~ 0 a o a V Q ^ ^ 0 s O ~c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1~ M 01 LA rl rl rl fA- ~ iA- **,- ~ ~ U -~ 0 Q 0 -~ U c (~~~ c 0 r~ ~L Q L Q Q Q C 6J N 0 U n (!) rl M N ra D 0 0 a~ U ~ .~ ~ L ~ fl. ~ O fl. ~a ~ ^ a .~ a~ L LL a 0 0 0 0 0 ~ M N rl ~ ~' a V 0 a 0 -~ V C i--i ~~~F ~~ fp L.L a--+ ~Q V ~ ~ O ,-~ a 0 N a..+ N o ~ o ~ N fl- ~L ~~ L~ 0 U 0 ~ ' ~ °' 0 ~ ~ a~ a~ ~, ~ ° a o U O O ~ N ~O ~o ~~ Q o (~€~ n L Q~ L C Q~ V L L c .~ ro a V) .~.~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O ti O O N t0 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N M O O N N O O N to 00 ct' O ~ N 00 O ' O M M ~ ~ CD ~ w Cfl ,^ V / M W .A Y / ,^ V t t0 ~ N DO O 00 00 O O N ~ ~ O ~ O O ° O I~ C~ M ~ t` 00 CO R'j ~ N G7 ~ Ef} ~ r ~ 6F} ~} O O M ~ O M 1` O \° ° O CO ~ M ~ ~ O Cfl ( ^ ~+ ~ ~ 00 ~ Eli, -~ ~ N ~ w M N ~ ~ d4 E~} L ~ L X ~ ~ L O O U ~L ~ o o ~ ~ ~ O N N 'L ~ ~ N J Q ~ O U (a ~ ~ ~ O ~ i O C ~ o~~~ +~ c a~ E .~ a .~ L ~ K ~ ~ dam' ~ M O N ~ ~ ~ Cfl ~ O ~ 00 d~} Q ~ N 00 ~ ~ O _ O ~ M CO M ~ ~ t O ~ X ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ .X L C ~ O ~ N +r L ~ a~ ~ a O 'i . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y ~ N ~ N ~ i O ~ _ ~~~ ~° to L ~ ~ O 0 V Q ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ Q ~ V V ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ f0 ~ (/) ~ Q ~3 ~ Q ~ ~ ,o V OZS ~ (~ L N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ca cv ~ o~ ~'~~ o~ L -~ ~ ~O Q O 0 ~~~~~~ ^- V cn ~ Q ~ ca ~ ~ V ~ V ~ ~ O ~ ~- N ~ O DC Q W V ~ ~ .~ > -~ o ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ •- ~ ~ ~ O •- ~ a--~ ~ (n (a L ~..~..~ ~~ ^~ W ~~ '~1 .~ ,~ V / ~~ W V _ a~ - •~ r~ o ~ ~ ~ O ~ ._ a--' V ~ •- N ~ •- ~ a.-~ •~ O Q ,--t ~~~ r a--~ V Q a~ a~ a~ ca U ._ a ._ a--~ W ~ _ •^ ~. ._ ._ a~ V cQ D .O V ~. ~. ~~ 0 0 ^~ ~V a a N ~~~ ~~ i V ~~ ~ ^ W ~ O .. ~--~ E--~ V ~ o Q ~ cn ~ ~ ~ t!1 ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ '~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ .V ~ ~. ~ - O ~ , W ~, V O O .~ 0 ~~ O .~ /~ ~ V ._ ~V _~ V ._ ~. c~ 0 a--~ .~ r~ (~ n~ i U ~~ ^~ W Cn ca .~ (~ to V 0 a~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O • f~ ^~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ i O O a~ .N c~ V i V / M W O ~~ ~J .O ~~ • ~~ ^~ W a--~ • - ~ ~ ~ V ~ .~ O ~ (~ cn ~ '~ ~ can O -~ ~ ._ ~ o ~ - V ~ ~ •~ V ~ ~ V ._ Q a~ o ~ L .,~ i ~ 4~ ~ ° ~~ ~ 4~ a ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ V .o ~ ~ 4~ .~ ~ cn .N ~ ~ ~ .~ 4~ ~ > ~~-~ DC > o ~ ~ O V ca ~ ~~ ., oC '~ .--i o~~ ~~~ i ~1 I ~"~~ O O 00 ~ O ` O N ~ pp ,--~ ,-~ ifs- ~ ~--' 00 0 d- N Q~ O O 0 ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '-~ ,--~ N ~ I. L ~ ~- ~}- _ Q Q O ~ '~ ~ O O M 00 V ~ o ~ ~ a, ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ - ~ ra -~-~ ~ ~o °o o ~ (!1 ~ ~ °o ~ `°o ~ N L.f) Ln Ilj U LL ~ ~ -~- ~ .. ~ ~ ~ O . r~ ~' - - o ~ y Q ~ ~ ra O Q ~ U U 0~3~~~ Chesterfield County, Virginia James J. L. Stegmaier, County Administrator 9901 Lori Road - P.O. Box 40 -Chesterfield, VA 23832-0040 Phone: (804) 748-1211 -Fax: (804) 717-G297 -Internet: chester6eld.gov BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ARTHUR S. WARREN, CHAIRMAN Clover 1h0 Uistnet DANIEL A. GECKER, VICE CHAIRMAN Mxibthiwn Uutnct DOROTHYJAECKLE 13~mmud~ District JAMES M. `Jim" HOLLAND Dale Darner MARLEEN K. DURFEE Munan pistrict MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable M hers of the Board of Supervisors FROM: James J. L. Ste 'e ,County Administrator DATE: May 23, 2008 SUBJECT: Cash Proffers Attached please find additional information for your May 28, 2008 board meeting including the May 2008 cash proffer calculation and ablack-line copy of the policy. This year's calculation is $23,959, an increase of $887 over last years. Your board package on page 287 referenced that you would be provided this information in advance of the meeting. Staff will be making a presentation on cash proffers immediately prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions please call me or Allan Carmody at 748-1600. Thank you. Attachment C: Allan M. Carmody, Director of Budget & Management Providing a FIRST CI-IOICE community through excellence in public service c a~ L a..i 0 U ~.+ N Z N ~ O ~' O ~' O d ' ~ O M CO M ~ Cn ~C O ~ CO a!! ~ ~ Et? ~ r- ~ E~ ~- N 00 O GO 00 O \° 0 ti _ CO M d0' ti 000 O COO ~ ~ N C7 ~ ~ ~ r r r ESI 69 O O M ~ M ~ 07 ti O CO e- M ~ ~ O CO O ~ ~ r- N M t,C) ~ 6F} r- N ~ ER bF} O ~ M ~ ~ f~ ~ ~ ~ N l1~ 00 Q! t0 00 ~- M M ~ Et} ~ N O -~ N '~ 0- N O U cn N O a _N N .L ~ J ~ ~ ~ ii. O O ~ J Q O I- °- Q ~ O m ~ •~ O ~ O N C s U L O ~ ~. ,. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA CASH PROFFER POLICY A. General Guidelines 1. ~-The Boazd will accept cash proffers for rezoning requests that permit residential uses in accordance with this policy. However, the Boazd may also accept cash land or in- kind improvements for the capital facilities included in the County's cash proffer calculation in accordance with county and state law. Land or in-kind improvements may be accepted in addition to or in lieu of cash payments. The Boazd will consider providing a credit for dedications of land and in-kind improvements, such credit being applied to the specific capital facility category for which the dedication or in-kind improvement is proffered. In its review of zonin requests, the Board will consider health, safety and welfaze issues and measures taken by the zoning applicants to address their impacts on capital facilities in accordance with this policy. An application containing_proffers that satisfactorily mitigate the impact on capital facilities does not necessarily satisfy all health, safety and welfare issues. 2_Pursuant to this policy, staff will (i) calculate the annual net cost of public facilities, (ii) calculate the fiscal impact of a rezoning request that permits residential uses and (iii} administer the collection and expenditure of proffered funds. T''° ~°°••a ••~~" Transportation proffers for non-residential rezonings shall be computed by the Transportation Department on the same basis utilized prior to July, 1989, and at the Board's option, may include cash instead of improvements. 3_~-Any cash proffer policy must meet a ""reasonableness"" or "rough proportionality" test, which requires the Boazd to determine in each zoning case whether the amount proffered is related both in nature and extent to the projected impact of the proposed development on public facilities. Through this policy, staff will be able to recommend a maximum proffer in each case that meets this test of reasonableness. 4_3-Staff determines the cost of public facilities generated by new growth by relying on the assumption that any revenue derived from growth (residential and commercial real estate taxes, sales taxes, fees, etc.) will pay all the normal operating costs for services to residents of new developments with no funds remaining to pay for the cost of public facilities needed to serve these residents. State and county laws permit the Board to accept cash proffers to fund the public facility needs generated by any new residential development. 1 5_4.-In determining the net cost per dwelling unit of a public facility, staff relies on countywide averages, where possible. In addition, staff will consider the five components described below, as well as any other unique circumstances of which staff is awaze, related to an individual zoning case. 6_~-To determine how and where a proffer will be spent, the County is divided into geographic or service districts. For facilities which have a Countywide service district; (pazks, libraries, and fire stations), the proffer maybe spent Countywide. For roads and schools, the proffer will be spent within smaller service districts as described below. 7_~:-The following public facilities will be funded by cash proffers: schools, roads, parks, libraries, and fire stations.- The County does not currently accept cash proffers to fund public facilities such as jails, landfills and other government facilities. 8_~A development proposal's impact on capital facilities will be evaluated based on the gross number of proposed dwelling units. When calculating the gross number of dwelling units, staff will: a.) use the lesser of average actual recorded lot yields and the number of dwelling units proffered by the applicant and, b.) not give credits for those dwelling units permitted under existing conditions of zoning or agricultural lots, and will not consider the transferring of allowable units from other properties. The Board may consider development proposals that include substantial upgrades to current design/development standards and ordinance requirements as justification for accepting reduced cash proffer payments for the pre-existing lot yield.-~-~t~--let s provided the applicant has not otherwise submitted documentation indicating higher lot yields in conformance with existing ordinances and reflective of site-=specific physical features. 9_8-A development proposal's fiscal impact on capital facilities shall be established under the Board of Supervisors' cash proffer policy that is in effect at the time the l~iee~isrr-case is ~tedbeing heard; however, if the Board of Supervisors changes the maximum cash proffer yamount while the ~p~lie-atie~development rp oposal is still pending, the revised maximum cash proffer pelfamount shall be applied A pending development proposal shall be 2 subjected to only one revision in the maximum cash proffer amount, such revision being the first revision following the s~alb~~issie~application date, provided the case is approved within two years of the application-£~ses date, excludingany time the case was deferred at the Board's request but a development proposal not decided ~'^.,..:..b ~'e~i$s}e~~ie~-to-~zT--zoo-~~~~~e~within this ses~ie~time frame will be evaluated in accordance with the maximum cash proffer in place at the time the case is heazd. B. Methodology and Policy Terms 1. _There aze five "components" involved in calculating what a new dwelling unit will cost the County in terms of providing public facilities. The components are as follows: a_a--Demand generators -Staff uses the weighted average of single family and multi-family persons per household (2.972 for 1~~49FY06 and an average number of students per household (0.53 for ~-99FY06 to calculate demand generators (number of people and number of students) associated with a new dwelling unit. b_~--Service levels -Staff calculates existing service levels for each type of facility for which a cash proffer will be accepted. Examples of service levels are: 5.53 acres of pazk land per 1,000 people, 2.34 library books per person, and 99 square feet of space per elementary school child. (Service levels aze calculated annually) c_e ;moss cost of public facilities--= Staff calculates the gross cost of public facilities. The terx~gross cost is used because a credit (described in (d) below) for anticipated future revenues from a new dwelling unit will be applied against the gross cost. For example, to calculate the gross cost of pazk facilities, multiply the average persons per dwelling unit by the cost per acre of park land plus improvement cost per acre of park land times the acres ,per capita. d- ~--Credits =Staff calculates a credit to apply against the gross cost for each public facility. Chesterfield has issued and plans to continue to issue general obligation bonds to finance the construction of public facilities. Residents of new developments will pay real estate taxes to the County and a portion of these taxes will go to help retire this debt. So that new dwelling units are not paying twice (once through payment of a cash proffer and again through real estate taxes) a credit is computed. 3 e_a--Net cost _ Staff calculates the net cost per public facility or maximum cash proffer. This is the gross cost [(B)(1)(c)] per public facility minus the applicable credit [(B)(1)(d)] per public facility. 2.-_There must be a relationship between the rezoning itself and the need for a public facility. In order to ensure that money proffered by an applicant is used to fund the public facilities necessitated by the development, geographic service areas or districts are established across the County. a. Since parks, libraries, and fire stations serve the entire County, the geographic service districts for these facilities aze determined to be .countywide. Rezoning requests can be analyzed on a countywide basis to determine their impact on these facilities and proffers may be spent to fund these facilities oun , ide. b. Rezoning requests can be analyzed on a countywide basis to determine their impact on schools. In order to ensure that money proffered by an applicant is used to fund the public facilities necessitated by the development, the county is divided into three geographic service districts corresponding to the attendance zones of grouped high schools. District one corresponds to the combined attendance zones for James River, Midlothian and Monacan High Schools, District two corresponds to the combined attendance zones for Clover Hill, Cosby, Manchester and Matoaca High Schools; and District three corresponds to the combined attendance zones for Meadowbrook, Bird and Thomas Dale High Schools. Funds collected from a development within a District will be spent on school improvements within that District or for any school improvement that provides relief for the District the development is in. c. With respect to roads, rezoning requests aze analyzed based on two geographic service districts, one north of Route 360 and one south of Route 360, to determine costs and impact. These service districts are used to calculate a road cost per dwelling unit. The Transportation Department has identified 19 traffic sheds across the County and money collected from a development within a pazticulaz shed will be spent on road improvements within that shed or on roads that provide relief to that shed. 3 I„ ~~-~° ~~~*~„°°~,The Board may prefer that a rezoning applicant mitigate the development's calculated impact on public facilities by dedicating property or doing in-kind improvements in lieu of all or a portion of the cash proffer. For property designated for dedication (excluding roads) staff will follow the County's "lkeee~eprocedure for "Acquisition of Private Property for Public Use". The value of donated land generally will be based on the current assessed 4 value of the property, not to exceed the cost per acre used in the calculation of the proffer. The value of improvements shall be the estimated cost as determined by the County and calculated as if constructed by a governmental entity. If the dedication or in-kind improvement does not fully mitigate the development's calculated impact on public facilities, then the dedication and/or improvement's value may be applied as a credit against the development's calculated impact on the applicable public facility. The credit cannot exceed the development's calculated impact on the applicable public facility. If the value of the dedication or improvement is more than the calculated impact for the applicable public facilit ,the County may pay the difference. Credit for roads may be allowed for off-site land dedication or improvements, as recommended by the Transportation Department. 4. The County will continue to consider any unique circumstances about a proposed development that: (i) mitigate the development's projected impact on public facilities; and (ii) create a demonstrable reduction in capital facility needs. Unique circumstances may include, but not be limited to, participation in regional road projects and age-restricted housing projects. ~ke~-tl~e-ES~yThe County, the zoning applicant or any other person may identify such mitigating circumstances. 5. The County will consider unique circumstances for revitalization projects when a) the development proposal is on property in the county's enterprise zone or areas in the county that are determined to be blighted and b) when the development proposal includes commercial uses in addition to housing unless incompatible with the Comprehensive Plan. If warranted, the County may consider a reduction to an applicant's cash proffer for such revitalization projects that provide an economic benefit to the Countv. 6. Payment of the cash proffer for residential development must occur prior to release of a building permit. Timing for dedication of property or in-kind improvements should be specified in the proffer. Cash proffers, property dedications and in-kind improvements must be used for projects identified in the Capital Improvement Program. The Capital Improvement Program is based in part on the County's Public Facilities Plan, which projects long-term facility needs. 67. Cash proffer payments shall be used to fund schools, roads, parks, libraries and fire station capital facilities. Payments shall be expended in accordance with state law. 5 ~8. Adjustments in the cash proffer amount maybe considered every fiscal year. Staff will recompute net costs based on the current methodology and recommend adjustments. Any adjustments to the maximum cash proffer amount would be effective upon adoption, but no sooner than July 1 of the new fiscal yeaz. s9. The maximum cash proffer for cases heazd by the Board ••~~" °°°°--~ ~~-~TUI~ 1, 2008 and thereafter for residential rezoning applicants is $ per dwelling unit 10. For cases already approved, the maximum cash proffer amount shall be automatically adjusted by the percent increase in the Mazshall and Swift Building Cost Index July 1 of each yeaz. Revised: ~a~~~, ~^^~ May 28, 2008 Effective: July 1, 2008 6 _. ~s~~ '~ ~ Your Comrnunity Newspaper Since 1995 ~er~r~ -a --- -- - vn R„x t~ I~ Midlothian. Vireinia 23 L 13 • Phone: (R04) 545-75(x) • Fax: (8(kl) 7~i4-3269 • F,mail: news@chesterheldobserveeeom • Internet: www.chesterfieldobscrver.aim ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Chesterfield County LN: Proffer Amounts 5-21 1 col 3.5 in. $173.50 Board of Supervisors The Observer, Inc. Publisher of Take notice tha the BOa~r~ :gupervisors of Chesterfield Cotmty, iFttginia, at an 28j 2008 atr 6 3pg p m. win~th County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Buildin Route 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield, ~nginia, will hold a public hearing where persons may appeaz and present their views concerning: Ma~nrr-urn cash Proffer amounts pper dwbllir-g unit. for FY2009 and cash proffer . Perry changes. ff further ir-formation is desired, please contact Mr. Allan Carmody, Director of Budget and Management, at 748-1548, between the hours of 8;30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. The hearing is held at a public facility desig$nned to be accessible to persons with disabilities. Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or the need for reasonable accommodations should contact Janice Blakley, Clerk to the Boazd, at 748-1200. Persons needing interpreter services for the deaf must notify the Clerk to the Boazd no later than Friday, May 23, zoos. - CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 05/21/2008 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~1 S ` day of 2008. Legal Affiant J s T, Grooms Jr., N any Public My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 (SEAL) ., ~ ~~ ~ lr' EXIiRFS ~:~ ~ ~v i2_ti~•1'1 ~. ~!' :~ ;1T;iLG9' '%~4RY~~~~~•'''~~~ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. _ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA `I . IN~P Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 17.F. Subiect: PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of a Sixty-Foot Unimproved County Right of Way Known as Cross Street Within Seaboard Coast Line Industrial Park County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adopt an ordinance to vacate a portion of a 60' unimproved county right of way known as Cross Street within Seaboard Coast Line Industrial Park. Summary of Information: Cross Street Property LLC has submitted an application requesting the vacation a portion of a 60' unimproved county right of way known as Cross Street within Seaboard Coast Line Industrial Park for the renovation of the existing warehouse at 1911 Cross Street. This request has been reviewed by Staff . Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager 00349 VICINITY SKETCH PUBLIC HEARING: Grdinance to Vacate a Portion of a Sixty Foot Unimproved County Right of Way Known as Cross Street Within Seaboard Coast Line Industrial Park Portion of Cross Street being Vacated ~~ N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W ~~E S I hcl eq~ak BB6b7 fret ~ ~ ~~' ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~' ~ y a I _ _ _ - g i ~ I i ~ 9~ ~ I 1 ~h ~ j ~tl ~~g~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~A a ~ a ±~~ ~_ S t ~ I ~~$ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~~° ' ~x ~ ~ ~~ ~ s W Y ~e - ~. Sll ~~ -ri~F~ - ~ 3.N~Y+6tN "~~ ~ c ~j~q ~4~5 .t g 3.u~JHM ~~ 1..~ ~t ~ _.~~~ - _ .~ y ~^ - ,,~ • 3,ll,lfliN 9 ~ ~ ~~g« 9 ~y ~:~ ~_ L~ _. W s I ~6 s I ~~RRb~ $$ ~_• ~ ~ a~i a~ I ~ O ~_a$~~ I w, ~ - ~ lr la - ~ ~ ~ ci ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~S6~~b &56;~~ 1~ /, / ~ /~ , ~~~ i i \` ,~~ppp , ~QG Y 8~ 3~~~ ~ ~~~ ~wf~ s~~ ~ ~y 1111` ~ ~~a ' N , O..~JC C Oy VA i0Y!'Od I~~ ~ I~ t ~R~~~~ ~~ II ~~a aa§ 1 ~ ~~0.~~0 ~~ ``µl ~~P' ~ F Ct ^~ 3 ~ ~ f ~i'•i~ m~~~~ ~! ~~~ ~~~ C~I~~~~~~1 _ Y ur f r xih tiro tt rf r S r a / __- ~s~~~r PI).Nox Ihlh kLall thi"m. zVrt una?zll?•Phrrnr:flS}SI ~iS-?tit%I•far:{St}{tia-t~?3f~9•Emvimw>Nicln ~0. rGJdoh+ cr..cm 1 rcmar. u~u h urrN~-1d bK.r u.nm ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT I)escri tiolt Cyst er issue C lient__. Ad Size - _ _ tL LN: Gross Street 5-14, 21 1 col x 3 in. St~O-DO Chesterfield ('ounty Right of Way The Obst;rvcr, Inc. Publisher of CIiF.STFRFIF.I.D OBSERVER -Phis is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by TAKENOTIGE Chcsterlicld Observer in the county of Chesterfield, st<ste of Virginia, an 'itrat on Ma Z8. 2008, n 6.30 p.m. or ax the following date(s): OS/14/2008 & OS/Zt/2008 span thereafter ax n+sy be hcanl, the ilCrard of Supervisors of Chesterfield County at its regular meeting place in tht public vfeehng s f Room of C;ha:sterfield County, ti°Irginra. ~~ d'dy Or wilt consider th< foBnwing nrdmance for Sµ•olTl tt) and St1bS(.'rlbed bCl'UiC 171C Ihls CCV// _ w_ adoptlan: AN C)RUINAttCE to vacate a portttnt of an ununproved right of way known as Crosa ~/J~,(/~ ~ ~nn,~, Stttet within 5sabasrd Coastline lndustnal _.,-.." _. _... _.._-.--_,'_^.`-'/_/¢ Park, ax spawn an a p]u by Bathe. Mills, Taylor and Puxyrar, tnc., dated August 1, 197f, [n the Clark`s t]ITiee. Cireutt Caurt, Chcataniield C:ouoty, Virgimo, in phtt Book 29, at Pagan 38 ar5d 39. - tt,tramptttttcxtaftheprop darsBnance Legal Affiant Ja e T, Grncsrns .1 r.. No ry Public ix on file to thr atrtce M ttu Right of Way Manager in Chesterfield Claunry, v[rginia, and may be examtntd by aB tntetYated pantes between the hats of 8:3G a.m, xnd 5;03p.m.,Mandaythrtrughpridalt. '~Iycomtnissionexpires: Fehruary29,2(112 Conuttissian I.I). 71$24')3 ~,~ °~ G R G ~'~ ~,,. :may ~p~.~tE1~l~,•., ~= •a tv 4Y•29.12 '~' sltt~(~' TIIi5 iS >tOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FRONT I\VUICE. 'I'IIAVIC YOU. _ _ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 - ~ i AGENDA ~~,~ Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 17.G. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of Spring Lake Road Within Dog Run Subdivision County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adopt an ordinance to vacate a portion of Spring Lake Road within Dog Run Subdivision. Summary of Information: Linda M. Bunch and Dennis R. Clark have submitted an application requesting the vacation of a portion of Spring Lake Road within Dog Run Subdivision. This portion of right of way is not needed. The right of way will vest in the adjoining property owners upon adoption. This request has been reviewed by the Virginia Department of Transportation and county staff. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager VICINITY SKETCH PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of Spring Lake Road within Dog Run Subdivision PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of Spring Lake Rd across Lots 1 ,2 and 3, Dog Run Subdivision ~i PIC RD Bq N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities w !~~,.E s I hcY egYak tl6bi fret ~~~~~~ ;. NOTF• TH/S PLAT WAS PREPAREp W/THOUT THE BENEF/T OF A T/TLE REPORT AND /S SUBJECT TO /NFORMATION WHICH MAY BE D/SCL05E0 BY SUCH. NOT ALL EASEMENT' AND NO /MPROVEM£NT5 SHOWN. i wl0 B3 SHARON STAPLEFORD HODGE GP/N 762-714-5317-00000 "S04 26'S6~ ---~ --- ---12L Qi ~ g ~~~~ sMf~ g '~~ ~~~ ~~ ti^ 2 ,Na. f0.A0' LOT 1 1,026 Si7 F7 0.014 ACRE I DOUGLAS T. SHOWALTFR GP/N 762--713-5795-00000 1.. --- -_~~12__ e~ 8' EASEMENT ~~^ PB.• 156, PG.• 47 ~ ~ ~~ ~ PB.• 156, PG.• 47 LOT 2 ` ~ 4 ~ OVF7PA[1 AIPEA R7 ~ BE VAGTED ~ p ,, 3. QT3 SO fT 0.070 ACRE ~ 1,005 SO 0.0?3 ACRE 1 1 'iY 139.91 L/NE TABLE UNE BEAR/NG LENGTH L 1 N00'50 04'x' 11. 7' L2 S04 24 56 ~ 11. ' LOT 3 1,002 SO f7 O.O?3 ACRES 0 ~~ ~x2,379 SO fT S~R/P 10.071. N05.15'05"W 161.51' 193'1 TO SPRING LAKE ROAD 1HE N/L OF JAHNKE STATE ROUTE ,1756 RO,gD I/AR/ABLE W/DTH R/W CURVE TABLE LENGTH R4D/US TANGENT CHORD BEAR/NG CHORD DELTA C1 1791' 7,3"1.84' 8.96' 15'4202'tiN 17.91' 1' 4'06" C2 1 1.84' 50.31' N1104' '1~V 1dQ38' T5153" C3 100. O' 7 50.18" N03'1 '44'tiY 100.12' T50 41 " C4 100.20' 7 1. 8' N03'1070'yY 1 .12' T57'13" C5 100.47' 7 1. 32' N1108'1 "W 1 .39' T58 29 " C6 17.15' 7 1. 4' 8' N15'48'17"IY 17.15' 121 41 " ~S~ysa p!, of 50 0 50 100 150 ~`"~~'~ ~ Scale 1 " - 50' Birk B. Heap ~ No. 1813 o2/2z/2oo6 ''I'd 3ult`1$' PLAT SHOWING A PORTION OF A STRIP OF N LAND DEDICATED TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, TO BE VACATED LYING EAST 01= oAr~:02/22~2006 " ' SPRING LAKE ROAD SCALE:1 -=50 ,,,~ w ,moo. JOB NO: 00820039 MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT [~#Y ,Ng CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~' ~ • PLANNERS • ARCHITECTS • EN~i1NEERS • SURYEYORS• towow~eow V sot snnonw~y Ewa • sulU t oo • Rknmone, nroau. ~a • rnon. soy ~w-os~t • ~.i (ao.) ~w.aeas www.b.lz.r.oc piesterfield Observer Y>urr [urz,rirrti p~ ~\ c . ~; n!prr Srr c <~ ; lei? Pt).Boa16111,hfidlothl.r.'~5rgnrrr2?X13.1'hnn.,iNi17r4{,i.Ti~3)•Rrx:tl'sIN173A•ii!>tJ•Entail:n~av.(~:hantdrneWoh«re~emni Loitm~t:u ~e,h~»~;n.ld::bun~~~ru.m ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Chent_ _,.._. ~__ __ ~_..,w _,____L)escri~tion Ad Size C'nst (tier issue) ('hesterfield ('nunty Right of 1h'ay I.N: Sprine Lake 5-14.21 I col x ;3 in. 51 ~0.t)ll °fhe Observer. Cnc. Publisher of CHESTERF'[ELU 013SERVELt TAKE AIOTtCE '[hat onMay 211. 2068, at b:30 p.m. or as xaon therrakrr as may be head, the Hoard of Supenixon of ChcrterfieW County at itx regular meeting place in the Ptd>>tc Meeting Room of ChexlarfieLl County, Virginia, will catuider the foHawi»g ordinancr for adoption: AN ORDlhIANCE to vacate a portion of .lprir~ La1oe Road within Dog Au» Su ian, as Shawn on a plat by Baker and A.taociates, In<., dated Prbruary 4, 2005, recorded ptly 29, 2005. in the (:ler{tx Offiu, Circuit Court, Cheatertield C:aunty, virgitt]a, in Plat Souk 156, at Pagr A7_ Thr caatpMte teatafthe proposed ordinaracr is on file in the atfue of the 4tight of Way Manager inChettarrAetd Cnttnty, virgfnia. and may bt taamtned by aB interested partues between the hour of 8:?0 a.m.. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county rJCChestcrfield, state of Virginia, on the following datc(s}: 05/14/2008 & 05/22/2008 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~' S" day of 2()t)~S. Legal Aftiaru Jatu rooms Jr., No , ry Pilblic NIy commission expires: Fcbnlary 29, 201? Commission LD_ 7182093 {S1=AL} :•~`7.i~~1~~~~ J•yIs , '° ":fir _ t7112G3' ARY TIIiS IS N07' A RILL.,. PLEASE P AY C`I2OM INVOICE. THANK YUU. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 28, 2008 Item Number: 20. Subject: Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting Supervisors County Administrator's Comments: of the Board of County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Motion of adjournment and notice of the Board of Supervisors meeting to be held on June 25, 2008 at 3:00 p.m. in the Public Meeting Room. Preparers Janice Blakley Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board ^ No # 00®~