06-27-1979 MinutesIII.
BOARD OF I SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
June 27, 1979
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr..E. Mmrlin O'Neill, Sr., Chairman
Mrs. 3oan Gircme, Vice fihainnan
Mr. $o Ruffin Appersc~
Mr. C. L. Bocknmn
Mr. R. Garland Dodd
Mr. Nicholas M. Mmiszer
Cotmty Administrator
Staff in Attendance:
Mr. C. G. Man~el, Asst. Co. Admin.
Mr. Steve Micas, Co. Attorney
Mr. Jeffrey Muzzy, Director of
~ity Development
Mr. Lane Rmmsey, Budget Director
Mr. David Welchons, Asst. Director of
Utilities
Mr. O'Neill called the meeting to order at the Courthouse at
9:10 a.m. (EDST).
Mr. Dodd gave the invocation.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved the minutes of June 7 and June 13, 1979, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Welchons presented the Board with the water and sewer
financial reports.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
authorized the Utilities staff to proceed to obtain a cost
estimate to construct ~a road imto Bermuda Ochre Subdivision from
Route 10 which estimate will be taken to the Highway Department
to ascertain the availability of funds and alternative funding mmthods t~
construct this =oad, which request is being made as a result of
a petition from property owners in the Bermuda Ochre Subdivision.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to accept a deed of
dedication on behalf of the County from Walter W. Casen for a
parcel of land 20 feet in width .adjacent to and parallel with the
west right of way line of Courthouse Road, Rt. 653, located in
Clover Hill District, Map Section 49-8.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. O'Neill excused~kimself from the meeting.
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
accepted the counteroffer from Mr. and Mrs. E.~Joseph Hatcher
in the amount of $600.00 for a water line easement across their
property at 7900 Iron Bridge Road in Dale District.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been scheduled for
a public hearing to consider an ordinance vacating a portion of
a plat within the Robertson Subdivision. No one was present in
opposition to this request. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded
by Mr. Dodd, the following resolution was adopted:
79-295
An Ordinance to vacate a portion of a plat within
Robertson Subdivision, Midlothian Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on plat thereof
duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
of Chesterfield County in Deed Book 349 at page 11.
Whereas, John G. Jones has petitioned the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia to vacate a portion of a plat
within Robertson Subdivision, Midlothian Magisterial District,
Chesterfield, Virginia, more particularly shown on a plat of
record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of said County
in Deed Book 349 at page 11, entitled Map of Robertson Subdivision,
dated August, 1947. The portion of the subdivision plat petitioned
to be vacated is more fully described as follows:
A portion of Robertson Subdivision being Lots 10, 11, 12,
13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, ~28
and 29 each in their entirety as shown outlined in red on
a plat entitled Map of Robertson Subdivision dated August,
1947, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of
this ordinance.
Whereas, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-431 of
the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising; and
Whereas, no public necessity exists for continuance of the
portion of the subdivision to be vacated and the vacation will not
abridge the rights of any citizen.
Now, Therefore, Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia:
That pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, the aforesaid street be and is hereby vacated and
no longer necessary for public use.
The County hereby reserves all rights, title and interest in
a sewer easement granted to the County by agreement dated
March 2, 1979, and recorded March 22, 1979, in Deed Book 1382
at page 631.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with Section 15.1-482 (b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950,
as amended, and a certified copy of this ordinance, together with
the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty
days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield, Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483 is to
destroy the force and effect of the recording of the portion of
the plat vacated.
Accordingly, this ordinance shall be indexed in the names of
the County of Chesterfield as grantor and John G. Jones or his
successors in title, as grantees.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been scheduled for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance to vacate a portion of
a plat within Avon Estates. There was no one present in
opposition to this request. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded
by Mr. Bookman, the following resolution was adopted:
An Ordinance to vacate a portion of a plat within Avon
Estates Subdivision, Midlothian Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia, as s~own on plat thereof
duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County in Plat Book 9 at page 7.
79-296
VII.
Whereas, Haverty Furniture Companies, Incorporated has petitioned
the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, to
vacate a portion of a plat within Avon Estates Subdivision,
.~idlothian Magisterial District, Chesterfield, Virginia, more
particularly shown on a plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the
~irc.uit Court of said County in Plat Book 9, at page 7, made by
?hillip H. Brooks, C.L.S., dated November 27, 1950. The portion
~f the subdivision plat petitioned to be vacated is more fully
~escribed as follows:
A portion of Avon Estates more f611y described as follows:
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, excluding the 16' drainage
and utility easement along the western line of lots 1 and
8, as shown outlined in red on a plat made by J. K. Timmons
and Associates, Engineers, Surveyors and Planners, dated
August 29, 1977, and revised December 21, 1977 and
January 12, 1978, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part of this ordinance.
Whereas, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-431 of
~he Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising; and
Whereas, no public necessity exists for the continuance of
~he portion of the subdivision sought to be vacated and the vacation
~ill not abridge the rights of any citizen.
Now, Therefore, Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors of
]hesterfield County, Virginia:
That pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the Code of Virginia,
.950, as amended, the above described portions of Avon Estates
;ubdivision are hereby vacated and are no longer necessary for
,ublic use.
The County hereby reserves all rights, title and interest in
water eas. ement to the County by agreement dated October 26, 1967
Lnd recorded December 20, 1967, in Deed Book 902 at page 351, a
~ater, sewer and drainage easement granted to the County by
~greement dated February 2, 1978, and recorded March 17, 1978,
.n Deed Book 1306 at page 399 and a water and sewer easement granted
~o the County by agreement dated November 16, 1978 and recorded
)ecember 19, 1978, in Deed Book 1365 at page 425.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordance
~ith Section 15.1-482 (b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended
~nd a certified copy of this ordinance, together with the plat
~ttached hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days
~ereafter in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
]hesterfield, Virginia, pursuant to Section 15.1-485 of the Code
~f Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483 is to
lestroy the force and effect of the recording of the portion of
:he plat vacated.
Accordingly, this ordinance shall be indexed in the names of
~he County of Chesterfield as grantor and Haverty Furniture
]ompanies, Incorporated and America Property Investors VIII, A
]alifornia Limited Partnership, or their successors in title, as
rantees.
7ote: Unanimous
Ir. Meiszer stated this time and date had been scheduled for a
~ublic hearing to consider an ordinance vacating a 10 ft. alley
in the Village of Bensley. Mr, Wells, representing Southern Bank,
~as present and stated he and the Fire Department had worked out
:heir concerns regarding this vacation. Mr. Apperson stated he
~as concerned about people who use this alley for in~rass ~nd egress to
kberdeen Road. Mr. Wells assured the Board that the;
79-297
alley would remain open for ingress and egress across the BankLs orooertv
that he would provide the Coul~ty with a legal doctmmnt to that effect.
Mr. Harmon noted that Southern Bank did own the land on both sides
of the alley. There was no one present in opposition to this
request. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the
fo~l'owing ordinance was adopted subject to Southern Bank providing
a legal document to the County that the alley would remain
open for egress and ingress to Aberdeen Road from their property
lines on both sides of the alley:
.~n ~Ordinance to .vacate a portion of an alley in the
Village of Bensley, Bermuda Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia, which portion i,s ten (10)
feet in width and one hundred and fifty (150) feet in
length, as shown on plat thereof duly recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County
in Plat Book 3 at page 192.
Whereas, Southern Bank has petitioned the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia, to vacate a ten foot alley
in the Village of Bensley, Bermuda Magisterial District,
Chesterfield, Virginia, more particularly shown on a plat of
record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of said County
in Plat Book 3 at page 192, made by Paul King, C.E. dated May,
1920. The alley petitioned to be vacated is more fully des'cribed
as follows:
An alley of ten (10) feet in width beginning on the north
line of Aberdeen Road and running in a northerly direction
for a distance of one hundred and fifty (150) feet, the
location of which is more fully shown shaded in red on a
plat made by Robert Lee Hall, Engineer and Surveyor, dated
August 10, 1966, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part of this ordinance.
Whereas, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-431 of
the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising; and
Whereas, no public necessity exists for the continuance of the
alley sought to be vacated.
Now, Therefore, Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia:
That pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, the aforesaid alley be and is hereby vacated and
no longer necessary for public use.
The Grantees hereby reserve unto the Grantors the entire
width and length of the ten (10) foot alley for a water and
sewer easement.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordance
with Section 15.1-482 (b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended, and a certified copy of this ordinance, together with
the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty
days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield, Virginia, pursuant to Section 15.1-485 of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effeco, of this ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483 is
to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the por~Don
of the plat vacated. This ordinance shall vest fee simple title
to the centerline of the aforementioned alley in the property
owners of the abutting lots on the east and west sides of the
portion of the alley hereby vacated free and clear of any rights
of Public use except as stated above.
Accordingly, this ordinance shall be indexed in the names of
the County of Chesterfield as grantor and Southern Bank and
Charter Properties Incorporated, or their successors in title,
as grantees.
79-298
Vote: Unanimous
VIII.
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been scheduled for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance vacating a portion of a
variable width sanitary and drainage easement in the Scottingham
Subdivision. There was no one present in opposition to this
request, On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson,
the following ordinance was adopted:
An ordinance to vacate a portion of a variable width
sanitary and drainage easement across Lot 11, Block L
in Sco.ttingham, Section H, Clover Hill Magisterial
District, Chesterfield County, as ahown on plat
thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court .of Chesterfield County in Plat Book 26 at page 78.
Whereas, Cardinal Realty Corporation has petitioned the
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, to vacate
a variable width sanitary and drainage easement across Lot 11,
Block L, in Scottingham, Section H, Clover Hill Magisterial
District, Chesterfield, Vir,ginia, more particularly shown on a
plat of record in the Clerk s Office of the Circuit Court of
said County in Plat Book 26, at page 78, made by William J.
Schmidt and Associates, dated May 14, 1976. The easement
petitioned to be vacated is more fully described as follows:
A portion of a variable width sanitary and drainage
easement across Lot 11, Block L, Scottingham, Section H,
the location of which is more fully shown outlined in
red on a plat made by J. K. Timmons and Associates,
Engineers, Surveyors and Planners, dated JUne 5,
1979, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a
part of this ordinance.
Whereas, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-431
the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising; and
Whereas, no public necessity exists for the continuance of
the easement sought to be vacated.
Now, Therefore, Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors of
Shesterfield County, Virginia:
That pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, the aforesaid easement be and is hereby
and no longer necessary for public use.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordance
Section 15.1-482 (b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended, and a certified copy of this ordinance, together with
the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no sooner than
thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
of Chesterfield, Virginia, pursuant to Section 15.1-485 of the
Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483 is
to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the portion of
plat vacated. This ordinance shall vest fee simple title
f the aforementioned easement in the property owners of the lot
free and clear of any rights of public use.
Accordingly, this ordinance shall be indexed in the names of
County of Chesterfield as grantor and Cardinal Realty
Incorporated, or their successors in title, as grantees.
: Unanimous
motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
zed the County Administrator to accept on behalf of the
deeds of dedication conveying a 15 ft. strip of land
79-299
o
XII.
along Beulah Road for the construction of a sidewalk and road
widening from Mason R. and Margaret H. Hayes and C. Douglas
and Virginia F. Spencer.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr, Dodd, the Board approved
the following sewer contract and authorized the County Administrat,
to execute any necess_ary documents:
S79-63CD/7(7)9632 Clarendon - Portion of Sections A, E, & F
Developer: Windsor Industries, Inc,
Contractor: Stamie E. Lyttle Co., Inc.
Estimated Contract Cost: $62,063.75
Estimated County Cost: $1,361.25 (Refund through connections'
Code: 573-1-11781-7221
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Bookman excused himself from the meeting.
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved the following sewer contract and authorized the County
Administrator to execute any necessary documents:
S79-59CD/7(7)9592 Great Oaks, Section 1, Phase 1
Developer: Continental Development Corporation
Contractor: Bookman Construction Company
Estimated Contract Cost: $43,971.00
Estimated County Cost: $650.00 (Cash Refund)
Code: 380-1-79592- 7212
and further the Board appropriated $650.00 from 573 Surplus to
380-1-79592-7212.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Bookman returned to the meeting.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute any
necessary documents for a sewer agreement for developer
participation, Mo. 7(7)9562, with William C. Trueheart for an
off-site sewer line to serve Cameron Run Subdivision and which
agreement provides for Mr. Trueheart to pay the County $10,000
prior to making a connection to or an extension of the sewer line
being installed across his property and that the developers of
Cameron Hill who are extending the sewer line across Mr. Trueheart
property will be refunded $7,000 by the County from the sewer
connection fees collected in Cameron Run.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. O'Neill returned to the meeting.
Mr. Apperson stated he had requested the Utilities staff to
prepare a cost estimate to extend sewer from Garland Heights
to serve sixteen houses and four vacant lots in the Beechwood
Subdivision which estimate was $65,000. He stated part of this
extension would be installed by the developers of the proposed
Edgewood Subdivision, when developed, and the developers would
be eligible for refunds of approximately $38,000. He added the
contractor installing the sewer in Garland Heights will install
this extension at the same prices bid for Garland Heights,
Contract 6511-22. Mr. Welchons stated he did not feel this would
have to be rebid if it were within 25% of the original contract
cost. Mr. Micas stated he would look into the matter and make
79-300
XIII.
XIV.
a determination. Mr. Bookman stated he had 13 subdivisions in
his area which were in dire need of sewer and that he feels the
Board needs to set a special meeting to discuss where the sewer
system is headed. Mrs. Girone indicated she had a few small
projects that needed attention in her area as well. Mr. Dodd
indicated he felt a meeting should be held. Mr. Bookman stated
he felt he could get participation from residents in his district
to help with the sewer line~ costs but he would not give them
hope without having some money in escrow to do the projects.
Mr. O'Neill stated he felt the water and sewer systems were
supposed to pay for themselves. Mr. Bookman again requested that
a work sessi, on to discuss the sewer system and projects be held.
Mr. Apperson stated that the people who would be served with this
line will he in sight distance of the Falling Creek Sewerage
Treatment Plant and will not have sewer.
Mrs. Girone stated she felt her projects could be accomplished
with $200,000. Mr. Bookman stated he would need at least
$1,000,000 but he felt he could get 50-50 participation from
the residents. Mr. Apperson stated the money for this project
would come from his escrow. Mr. W~lchons stated he did not
feel there would be enough to cover the project. Mr. Apperson
stated he felt there would be savings from other projects using
the escrow money. After further discussion of the matter, it was
on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that
this extension of sewer from Garland Heights to serve sixteen
existing homes and four vacant lots in Beechwood Subdivision
at an estimated cost of $65,000 be approved with the funding to
~come from the Dale District Escrow Account and with the County
'Attorney making a determination as to whether or not this
project has ~to be rebid or can be an add on to the original
contract, 6511-22.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Meiszer was asked to arrange a special meeting with the
Board for a work session on the sewer projects.
Mr. Welchons stated the County had received a request from
Hubbard Investment Company, developer of parcel 15-5 and 15-7
on Tax Map 16-12, to be refunded from sanitary sewer connectic~
fees collected from this development for the cost of the off-site
sewer extension which cost is $5,290. He added the amount of
refunds possible f=om connection fees is $2,496. After further
consideration of the matter, it was on motion of Mrs. Girone,
seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that normal policy be followed
which will allow refunds n~.t .to exceed $2,496 to Hubbard Investment
Comp any.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the Board
appropriated $250,000 from 573 Unappropriated Surplus to
573-1-11781-7221 to cover an increase in the refunds through
connections to developers.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded '.by Mrs. Girone, the Board
made the following adjustment, s of appropriations for sewer and
water projects:
A. Appropriation Only:
Fan Court A & B - Appropriated from 377 Bermuda Escrow
$12.00 for right o~.~'way charge to 380-1-76011-4101.
Sloan Drive - Appropriated from 563 Surplus $83.85 for
advertising to 380-1-69111-2213.
79-301
XVI.
Transfer of approprDations and expenses from the General and
Administrative accounts in 573 and 563 to the Capital Projects
Accounts:
Midlothian Fire Station Sewer - Transfer expenses and
appropriations from (1) 573-1-11781-2905 (permits and
licenses) in the amount of $62.50 to 380-1-78371-2905
and (2) from 573-1-11781-2213 (advertising) in the amount
of $62.40 to 380-1-78371-2213.
Walthall Area - Transfer expenses and appropriations
from (1) 573-1-11781-4101 (right of way) in the
amount of $42.00 to 380-1-78322-4101, (2) from
573-1-11781-2141 (technical services) in the amount of
$458.65 to 380-1-78322-2141 and (3) from 573-1-11781-2213
(advertising) in the amount of $73.84 to 380-1-78322-2213
Centralia Road - Transfer expenses and appropriations fro~
563-1-11681-4101 (right of way) in the amount of
$238.00 to 380-1-67771-4101.
Salisbury Road - Transfer expenses and appropriations
from 563-1-11681-2213 (advertising) in the amount of
$69.68 to 380-1-68161-2213.
o
Water Line Extension--Bermuda & Allied Chemical Roads -
Transfer expenses and appropriations from (1)
563-1-11681-4101 (right of way) in the amount of
$380.00 to 380-1-68182-4101 and (2) from 563-1-11681-2905
(permits and licenses) in the amount of $23.50 to
380-1-68182-2905.
Ramblewood Road - Transfer expenses and appropriations
from (1) 563-1-11681-4101 (right of way) in the amount of
$800.00 to 380-1-68702-4101 and (2) from 563-1-11681-2213
(advertising) in the amount of $77.35 to 380-1-68702-2213.
Water line to serve Watkins Elementary - Transfer expenses
and appropriations from (1) 563-1-11681-4101 (right of way]
in the amount of $24.00 to 380-1-69011-4101 and (2) from
563-1-11681-2213 (advertising) in the amount of $83.85
to 380-1-69011-2213.
Land-O-Pines - Transfer expenses and appropriations from
(1) 563-1-11681-2905 (permits and licenses) in the amount
of $584.50 to 380-1-69051-2905 and (2) from 563-1-11681-22
(advertising) in the amount of $86.43 to 380-1-69051-2213.
Sloan Drive,- Transfer expenses and appropriations from
563-1-11681-2905 (permits and licenses) in the amount of
$38.00 to 380-1-69111-2905.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the Board
authorized the County Treasurer to abolish the Meter Deposit
Fund, ~65, and transfer the balance of the account $15 291.34 to
the Water Operating Fund, 561. ' ' '
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Gi~one, the Board
transferred $50,000 from the Meter Installation Fund - 366-1-00201
to 768-1-00201 as a loan because of slow delivery dates which
necessitate the increasing of inventory of certain items and
which loan 'shouId be repaid within 90 days.
Vote: Unanimous
79-302
o
k'VII.
XVI II.
XIX. 1.
XIX. 2.
o
Mr. Bookman excused himself from the meeting.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute
any necessary documents for the following water contracts:
W79-39CD/6(7)9392 Shenandoah Hills, Section B
Developer: Richard M. Nelms, T/A Reams Road Associates
Contractor: E. G. Bowles Company
Estimated Contract Cost: $36,007.20
Estimated County Cost: $ 4,284.00 (ge~xmd through connections
Code: 366-1-11684-7221
W79-40CD/6(7)9402 Great Oaks - Section 1
Developer: Continental Development
Contractor: Bookman Construction Company
Estimated Contract Gost: $23,518.25
Estimated'County Cost: $ 5,906.72 (Refund through connection
Code.: 366-1-11684-7221
Vote: Unanimous
It was generally agreed to defer consideration of water contract
W79-41CD/6(7)9412 Great Oaks - SectiOn 2 as requested by the
developer.
Hr. Bookman returned to the meeting.
Mr. Welchons gave a brief report on the Liability Insurance
.~eserve Fund and Fire Insurance Reserve Fund and stated
~ecommendations would be presented to the Board at the July 11,
19 79 meeting.
~r. Welchons presented the Board with a list of developer
Water and sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator.
(r. Pope stated the staff would like to have discussion regarding
:he purchase of 53.89 acres from Mrs. Mary R. Adcock located south
~f Robioug Road and east of Old Far Road for a park site deferred
antil the July 11, 1979 meeting. It was generally agreed to
~efer this matter to July 11, 1979 and the Board indicated they
~ould prefer this action to be separate from the Utility Agenda
ince it dealt with Parks and Recreation.
n motion of Mrs, Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
~pproved and authorized the County Administrator to execute
~ecessary documents for the following sewer contract:
S79-64GD/7(7)9642 Powderham- Offsite
Developer: ~oochland Investments, Inc.; Powderham Assoc., No.
1 and 11; V. Cassel Adamson, Jr.; Peal R. Adamson;
Stephen P. Adamson; Frances S. Adamson
Contractor: Stamie E. Lyttle Co., Inc.
Estimated Contract Cost: $49,754,60
Estimated County Cost: $18,948.00 (Refund through connection~
Code: 573-1-11781-7221
~ote: Unanimous
Ir. Raymond Hefner, representing the Chesterfield Quarterback
,eague, was present and requested a contribution of $3,000 to
heir organization. He stated the funds would be used towards payin
fficials at the games but would cover appr,-,ximately half of that
ost. He added further that the League consisted of participation
79-303
4.A.
B.A.
3.C.
of 18 of the 23 elementary schools in the County, that the only ~
requirement is that those involved are residents of the County,
that the five schools not represented have been told they would
be welcomed into the League, that all the equipment is furnished
the children, there are in excess of 500 unpaid coaches and this
is the longest running activity of this kind in the State. He
added athletic associations are involved and they are working wit
the new schools as well. He stated the five schools not involved
in this League, are not because they are participating with the
Richmond teams which is against their resident requirement or
because they do not wish to. Mr. Bookman inquired if Chesterfiel
Baseball Clubs would be requesting a donation if this was approve
Mr. Hefner stated this grnup was part of their organization and
a request from them would not be forthcoming. Mr. Bookman
congratulated Mr. Hefner on the excellent mervice the League is
providing for the children. Mr. Hefner stated he was glad that
he had been given the opportunity to be heard by the Board but
he felt there may be a time in the near future when he would
like to discuss policy matters as well. After further
consideration of the matter, it was on motion of Mr. Dodd,
seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that $3,000 be appropriated
from the Contingency Account. to the Chesterfield Quarterback
League.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been scheduled for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to Applications
for Planned Use Development. Mr. Micas stated the Planning
Commission at their meeting had deferred consideration of this
matter for 30 days and that until the Planning Commission had
disposed of the matter, the Board could not consider it. After
further discussion of the matter, it was on motion of Mrs. Girone
seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that this matter be deferred until
July 25, 1979 at 10:45 a.m.
Vote: Unanimous
It was generally agreed to table discussions regarding the
contract amendment for the northern area landfill until a later
date.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved a street light request at the intersection of
Schenley'.Drive and Sydelle Drive with any associated costs to
be expended from the Midlothian District Street Light Fund.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
deferred consideration of a street light request on Courthouse
Road until August 22, 1979.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
approved a street light request at the intersection of
McHoward Road and Saldale Drive with any associated costs to be
expended from the Dale District Street Light Funds. (Pole to be
located on the Jennings property).
Vote: Unanimous
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from ttiis Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Greenfield Drive and Red Lion Place in Heritage
79-304
3.m.
3.E.
4.B.
Commons, Section A, Midlothian District,
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mrs. Girone,
seconded by Mr, Bookman, it is resolved that Greenfield Drive
and Red Lion Place in Heritage Con, nons, Section A, Midlothian
District, be and they hereby are established as public roads.
And be it further resolved that the Virginia Department of
Highways and Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to
take into the Secondary SygCe,~., Greenfield Drive, beginning at
intersection with Robious Road, State Route 675, and going .09
mile southerly to intersection with Red Lion Place, thence .11
mile southerly to a temporary turnaround. Red Lion Place, begin-
ning at intersection with Greenfield Drive and going .03 mile
westerly to a dead end, Red Lion Place, beginning at intersectio~
with Greenfield Drive and going .08 mile easterly to a temporary
turnaround. These roads serve 29 lots.
And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Highways a 50' right-
of-way for all of these roads except Greenfield Drive which has
an 80 foot and 60 foot right-of-way. This section of Heritage
Commons is recorded as follows: Section A, Plat Book 29, Pages
39 and 40, August 2, 1977.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. O"Neill, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to enter into a contract
with the Richmond Community Action Program (REAP) to conduct a
short-term improvement program, combining two minor federal
programs involving winterization and home safety repair, in
conjunction with the EttriCk Community Development Block ~mamt.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to submit a draft second year
application in the amount of $450,000 for the Ettrick Community
fo= water and sewer replacement with the understanding that
official Board authorization to apply will be made at the
July 25, 1979 meeting.
Vote; Unanimous
On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
set July 25, 1979 at 10:30 a.m. for a public hearing for the
second year grant application for the Ettrick Con~nunity Develop-
ment Block Grant.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Dodd, secc~ded by Mr. Bookman, the Board authorized
the County Administrator to enter into a contract with A,~stin
Brockenbrough in the amount of $95,199 for construction documents
dra~.nage plans, easement plats, etc. frnm the eastern property
line ~{ Safeway to the James River for the Johnson Creek Drainage
District as amended.
Vnte: l~animous
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been scheduled for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to real estate
tax exemptions for the elderly and the permanently and totally
disabled. Mr. Micas stated that the General Assembly had passed
79-305
limitations of up to $15,000 but it was not effective until
July 1, 1979, and that as of this date the Board can approve
only up to $].2,000 on taxable income~ ?.rs. Girone inquired if
the $4,000 amount for the third person living in the same
dwelling could be raised. Mr. Micas stated it could not,
Mr. Hilton Brooks, an ~elderly resident in Chesterfield County,
stated he would be over the $10,000 allowed by only $120 with
his Social Security raise and asked that the Board please help
the elderly in the County, He stated the improved program would
increase the County's cost by approximately $9,000 for the elderly
Mr. John Smith, a totally disabled resident in the County,
was present. He st~ted the disabled could not p~lan for their
decrease in incom~-~ as the elderly could and asked that the Board
initiate the new program which would include them in real estate
tax relief. After further dis cus~s ion of the matter, it was on
motion of Mr, Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that
the following ordinance be adopted:
An Ordinance to ~nend and Reenact Sections
8-15, 8-16, and 8-17 of the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, Virginia, 1978, As
Amended, and Add Section 8-17.1 Relating to
Real Estate Tax Exemption for the Elderly and
the Permanently and Totally Disabled
Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Sections 8-15 and 8-16 of the Code of the County
of Chesterfield are amended and reenacted as follows:
Sec. 8-15. Restrictions and conditions.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the
dwelling and up to one' acre of land upon which it is. situated
subject to real estate taxation under this chapter may be tem-
porarily exempted from such tax when any such property is owned
by and occupied as the sole~odwelling of a person or persons not
less than sixty-five years of age, or a person who is determined
to be permanently and totally disabled as defined in Section
8-17.1 hereunder subject to the following restrictions and
conditions:
(a) That the total combined income during the preceding
calendar year from all sources of the owners of the dwelling
living therein does not exceed twelve thousand dollars; provided,
that the first four thousand dollars of income of each relative,
other than spouse, of the owner, who is living in the dwelling
shall-not be included in such total.
(b) That the net combined financial worth, including
equitable interests, as of December 31 of the immediately pre-
ceding calendar year, of the owners, and of the spouse of any
owner, excluding the value of the dwelling and one acre of land
upon which it is situated does not exceed forty thousand dollars.
(c) The fact that persons who are otherwise qualified for
tax exemption pursuant to this article are residing in hospitals,
or mental care for extended periods of time shall not be construed
to mean that the real estate for which tax exemption is sought
does not continue to be the sole dwelling of such persons during
such extended periods of other residence so long as much real
estate is not used by or leased to others for consideration.
Sec. 8-16. Schedule of exemptions permitted,
When the total combined income from all sources and the net
combined financial worth of the person or persons qualifying
does not exceed the limits prescribed in section 8-15 the amount
of exemption from real estate taxation for the dwelling and up to
one acre of land upon which it is situated shall be in accordance
79-306
with the following schedule:
Income
0 through $ 8,500
Percentage of Exemption
100%
$ 8,501 through $10,000
5O%
$10,001 through $12,000
25%
Sec. 8-17. Procedure for claiming exemption.
(a) The person or persons claiming such exemption shall file
annually with the commissioner of the revenue of the county, on
forms to be supplied by the county, an affidavit setting forth the
names of the related persons occupying such real estate, the total
combined net worth, including equitable interest, and the combined
income from all sources of the person or persons seeking to quali-
fy. The commissioner of the revenue shall also make such further
inquiry of persons seeking such exemption, requiring answers under
oath, as may be reasonably necessary, including production of
certified tax returns, to determine qualification therefor. Such
affidavit shall be filed not later than March 1 of each year. If
such person is under sixty-five years of age such form shall have
attached thereto a certification by the Social Security Adminis-
tration, the Veteran's Administration, or the Railroad Retirement
Board, or if such person is not eligible for certification by any
of these agencies, a sworn affidavit by two medical doctors
licensed to practice medicine in the Commonwealth, to the effect
that such person is permanently and totally disabled. The affi-
davit of at least one of such doctors shall be based upon a phy-
sical examination of such person by such doctor, The affidavit
of one of such doctors may be based upon medical information
contained in the records of the Civil Service Commission which is
relevant to the standards for determining permanent and total
disability. Such affidavit shall be filed no later than March 1
of each year.
(b) Such exemption may be granted for any year following the
date that the head of the household occupying such dwelling and
owning title or partial title thereto reached the age of sixty-
five years. Changes in respect to income, financial worth,
ownership of property or other factors occurring during the
taxable year for which the affidavit is filed and having the effec
of exceeding or violating the limitations and conditions provided
herein shall nullify any exemption for the then current taxable
year and the taxable year immediately following.
(2) That Section 8-17.1 is added as follows:
Sec. 8-17.1. Definition of permanently and totally disabled.
For the purpose of this article, the term "permanently and
totally disabled" shall mean unable to engage in any substantial
gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical
or mental impairment or deformity which can be expected to result
in death or can be expected to last for the duration of such
person's life. ~
(3) That this ordinance shall be effective for the 1980 tax
year and subsequent tax years.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Brooks and Mr. Smith thanked the Board for the favorable
consideration given this ordinance. Mr. Brooks indicated that
because he was the only one present representing the elderly that
there were others concerned. The Board indicated they had
heard from other elderly people in Chesterfield regarding this
ordinance.
It was generally agreed by the Board to recess for five minutes.
79-307
o
7.A.
7.B
7.C
7.D.
Re convening:
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
deferred discussion regarding Subdivision Bonds until July 25,
1979 and acknowledged receipt of the report prepared by the
County Attorney.
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
set Jhly~25, 1979 at 10:00 a.m, to consider an ordinance
relating generally to Exemption for Certain Agricultural
Activities from the County Erosion and Sediment Control
Ordinance.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
set July 25, 1979 at 10:05 p.m. to consider an ordinance
relating to Water Cross-Connection and Backflow with the
staff to furnish the Board with additional information for
the July 11, 1979 meeting.
Vote: Unanimous
Mrs. Girone asked that she be furnished a copy of the legislation
as.~well as a list of those members of the General Assembly
voting for it. Mr. O'Neill asked that since this is mandated,
he would like a record kept of the cost. to the County.
Mrs. Girone stated she would like to change the rec~mnendation
that the County Attorney issue bingo permits and keep it as it,
currently exists with the Board of Supervisors issuing permits~
but that the other recommendations were okay. After further
discussion of the matter, it was on motion of Mrs. Girone,
seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that an ordinance to amend
and reordain certain sections off,the Code of the County of
Chesterfield relating to Bingo Games and Raffles be advertised
for a public hearing on July 25, 1979 at 10:15 a.m. with the
recommended change regarding the recommendations.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
set July 25, 1979 at 10:25 a.m, to consider an ordinance
relating generally to the Duties of the Director of the Central
Accounting Department.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. O'Neill stated the Board would now consider the awarding
of the cable television franchise for the County. It was
generally agreed by the Board that the floor would not be
open to further discussion by the applicants who submitted
proposals. Mr. O'Neill stated he was dissatisfied with the
consultants who had been employed to evaluate the bids received.
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mrs. Girone, a non-
exclusive franchise for the operation of a cable television
system within Chesterfield County is hereby granted to
Continental Cablevision for a period of fifteen years. The
construction, operation, maintenance and performance of such
system by Continental Cab levis icn shall be in conformance with Chapter 7.
of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended; the
franchise application filed by Continental Cablevision with the
County on March 16, 1979; the franchise agreement to be entered
into within thirty days hereof; and this resolution. It is
anticipated that certain additional terms and conditions shall be
negotiated in the franchise agreement as permitted by the
79-308
~equest for bids relating to, among other matters, coordination
with the Sammons Broadcasting System, line extension policies,
disclosure of ownership interests, a refund policy and legal
separation of certain operations of the franchise. In the event
of any conflict among such documents, the franchise shall be
obligated to comply with terms or conditions most advantageous to
the citizens of Chesterfield County, in the sole judgment of the
Board of Supervisors.
The grant of this franchise shall be effective from the date
of payment of the $15,000 fee by the Franchisee in accordance
with Section 7.1-3 of the County Code and execution of the
franchise document by Continental Cablevision and the County.
Ayes: Mrs. Girone and Mr. Apperson
Nays: Mr. O'Neill, Mr, Bookman and Mr. Dodd
Mr. Dodd stated he felt Storer Broadcasting had the best proposal
to offer the County. Mr. Bookman stated he also felt Storer
offered the best program for the County but he would like a stip-
ulation incorporated into the approval by which Storer could not
raise the cable television subscriber's rate because of any costs
involved with the security portion of their services. Mrs. Girone
expressed concern that the security system did have potential for
rate increases because there was no data to show marketing accept-
ability and front end costs were substantial. Mr. Micas stated th
could be negotiated. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookm
a nonexclusive franchise for the operation of a cable television
system within Chesterfield County is hereby granted to Chesterfiel.
Cablevision, Inc. for a period of fifteen years. The construction
operation, maintenance and performance of such system by Chester-
field Cablevision, Inc. shall be in conformance with Chapter 7.1
of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended; the
franchise application filed by Chesterfield Cablevision, Inc. with
the County on March 16, 1979; the franchise agreement to be entere~
into within thirty days hereof; and this resolution. It is
anticipated that certain additional terms and conditions shall be
negotiated in the franchise agreement as permitted by the request
for bids relating to, among other matters, coordination with the
Sammons Broadcasting System, line extension policies, disclosure
of ownership interests, a refund policy and legal separation of
certain operations of the franchise. In no event shall the rates
of the subscribers to cable television service be in any way
affected by the operating costs, capital costs, other expenses or
revenues of the two-way alarm system. In the event of any conflicl
among such documents, the franchise shall be obligated to comply
with the terms or conditions most advantageous to the citizens of
Chesterfield County, in the sole judgment of the Board of
Supervisors.
The grant of this franchise shall be effective from the date of
payment of the $15,000 fee by the Franchisee in accordance with
Section 7.1-3 of the County Code and execution of the franchise
document by Chesterfield Cablevision, Inc. and the County.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mr. Bookman, Mr. Dodd.
Nays: Mrs. Girone and Mr. Appersono
Mrs. Girone stated she had reservations about Storer because they
are currently involved in two suits involving rate increases. Mr.
Micas stated that the contract would be legally binding as adopted.
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the Board:
I.A. Increased Planned Budget Expense account 111-1-31520-1371
Salary Savings by $150,000.
B. Decreased Planned Budget Expense accounts as follows:
79-309
S
n,
Dep ar tment
Account Code
Amount
County Assessor
Po lice:
Patrol
Investigations
Drainage
Sanitation:
Administration & Collectiom
Chester Landfill
Elections
Buildings & Grounds
Total
111-1-02200-1101
111-1-06150-1101
111-1-06160-1101
111-1-11150-1101
111-1-11220-1101
111-1-11240-1101
111-1-14100-1101
111-1-15100-1101
$ 18,000
45,000
10,000
20,000
10,000
10,000
20,000
17,000
II.A...What the Stub Road Utility Fund (682) be consolidated with
the Stub Road Deposit Fund with reserve accounts designating
the purpose for which the deposits are retained.
B. That the Drainage District 1, Route 147-60 Fund (396) be
consolidated with Drainage District 2, Johns.oh's Creek
Fund (397) with separate reserve accounts designating
the purpose for which the deposits are retained. The
na~e of the fund shall be "Drainage District Fund (396)"
III.
Transfer $25,674 from the Library Operating budget to the
Library Bond Fund and close all accounts in the I,ibrary
Bond Fund as of June 30, 1979,
IV.
Transfer $4,726 from the Contingency account (111-1-31400-
4123) in the General Fund as follows:
Department Account Code Amount
V.A.
Health Dept. Parking Lot
Social Services Building
Tennis Courts
Airport
Total
330-1-92700-0000
330-1-92130-0000
330-1-92410-0000
330-1-92200-0000
Increase Planned Budget Expenditures:
$ 1,408
4,796
(600)
$' 4!878)726
Department
Account Code
Amount
Data Processing
Central Accounting
County Attorney
Purchasing
Circuit Court
JDR Court
Health
111-1-01430-3121
Office Supplies
111-1-01530-3121
Office Supplies
111-1-01700-3121
Office Supplies
111-1-01900-2201
Telephone
111-1-05100-2201
Telephone
111-1-05200-2111
Legal Fees
111-1f09200-3302
Vehicle Operation
Total Expenditure Increases
V.B. Decrease Planned Budget EXpenditures:
Non-Departmental 111-1-31400-8111'
Interest
$ 7,000
8,800
1,400
2,500
2,500
5OO
6,500
$ 30,200
$ 30,200
$ 23,700
79-310
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
.!.n crease Planned Budget Revenues:
State Reimb./Health 111-1-00012-0921
Total Expenditures Decreases and Revenue
Vote: Unanimous
$ 6,500
It was generally agreed to defer consideration of the request
from the Convention and Visitors Bureau of the Metropolitan
Chamber of Commerce for $16,000 until Mr, Dan Bockover was
present and had a definite proposal for Chesterfield.
Mr. Micas stated that federal revisions and some administrative
proeedure revisions necessitate the County Deferred Compensation
Plan to be revised. After further discussion of the matter, it
was on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved
that the Board approved the revised Deferred Compensation Plan,
a copy of which is filed with the papers of this Board, and the
County Administrator is authorized to sign any necessary
documents.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, ~the Board
approved the low bid of $22,499 each from Truxmore Industries
for the purchase of two trash trucks.for the General'.Services
Department.
Vote: Unanimous
There was some discussion of possibly working with trash col. lectors
in the County to have regular pick up for County residents and
charge the residents in some manner, Some Board members indicated
residents were not happy with the once a month pick up which the
County is now providing. Mrs, Girone stated she was not
£nterested in 'this type of service in her area because the
2ollectors were not and if any meetings were held, she did not want
J~em ingolved because they wez'e upset the last time. It was germrally agreed by
3oard that staff should compile information as to what could be
done ~.f trash wer~ picked up more than once a month, the costs,
]istrict plans, various alternatives for the collection, etc.
~ motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, it was resolved
:hat this Board hereby selects and designates the County Attorney
~s the attorney at law who shall examine and approve in writing
:itle to all real estate purchased or acquired by Chesterfield
]ounty for public uses.
Tote: Unanimous
motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
t.ppointed the County Attorney to examine title and
tccepted the title report and deed of dedication for the Midlothian
~.ibrary Site and further authorized the County Administrator to
~ign any necessary documents regarding this matter, a copy of which is
![led with the papers of this Board.
Tote: Unanimous
motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
'ecommended the following names to the Circuit Court Judges for
~ppointment as Chesterfield County Police Officers effective
'uly 23, 1979:
79-311
Le
16.
17.
Vote: Unanimous
Howard L. Hall, III
Ann P. Neal
Richard R. Reid, Jr.
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the Board
approved the following erroneous tax claims for payment:
David W. Hubbard
Terry R. Scalf
Ronald P, Bishop_
Croxton' s, Inc.
Croxtcm' s, Inc.
Croxton's, Inc.
Cotmty Vehicle License
County Vehicle License
County Vehicle License
County Business License-1978
County Business License-19'77
County Business License-1976
$ 15.00
15.00
12.50
126.58
260.32
135.37
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Meiszer informed the Board that the Virginia Department of
Highways and Transportation had formally accepted the following
roads into the Secondary System:
Pleasant Ridge
Length
Reams Court - Beginning at Reams Run (State Route 647)
then north for 0.18 mile.
0.18 mi.
Somerset - Section 1
Somerlane Road - Beginning at intersection with
Harrowgate Road, State Route 144, and going 0.10 mile
southwesterly to its intersection with TriGate Road.
0.10 mi.
TriGate Road - Beginning at intersection with Somerlane
Road and going 0.08 mile northwesterly to intersection
with Stardown Court thence 0.05 mile northwestly to
intersection with Windcry Drive, thence 0.03 mile north-
westerly to a temporary turnaround. 0.16 mi.
Sandwave Road - Beginning at intersection with Windcry
Drive and going 0.03 mile northwesterly to a temporary
turnaround. Beginning at intersection of Windcry Drive
and going 0.14 mile southeasterly to intersection with
Somerlane Circle.
0.17 mi.
Seamist Road - From intersection with Somerlane
Circle and goes 0.07 mile northeasterly to inter-
section with Santana'~ Street, thence 0.11 mile north-
easterly to intersection with Somerlane Road.
0.18 mi.
Windcry Drive - Beginning at intersection with TriGate
Road and going 0.19 mile southwesterly to inter-
section with Sandwave Road.
0.19 mi.
Santana Street - Beginning at intersection with Seamist
Road and going 0.05 mile norhtwesterly to intersection
with Seasigh Court, thence 0.07 mile northwesterly to
a cul-de-sac.
0.12 mi.
Stardown Court - Beginning at intersection with
TriGate Road and going 0.07 mile northeasterly to a
cul-de-sac.
0.07 mi.
Somerlane Circle - Beginning at intersection with Sand-
wave Road and going 0,03 mile southwesterly to a cul-
de-sac.
0.03 mi.
79-312
Somerset,. Section 1 (continued)
Length
Seasigh Court - Beginning at intersection with
Santana Street and going 0.10 mile northeasterly
to a cul-de-sac.
0.10 mi.
Archbrooke, Sections 1~ 2,and 3
Sonnet Hill Court - Beginning at intersection with
Sonnet Hill Drive 0.05 mile easterly to a cul-de-sac. 0.05 mi.
Sonnet Hill Drive - Beginning at intersection with
Wadsworth Drive (State Route 2251) southeasterly
0.14 mile thence northerly 0.10 mile to intersection
with Wadsworth Drive (State Route 2251).
0.24 mi.
Lyric Court - Beginning at its intersection with
Wadsworth Drive westerly 0.06 mile to a cul-de-sac.
0.06 mi.
Wadsworth Drive - Beginning at the end of state
maintenance (State Route 2251) norhherly 0.06 mile.
0.06 mi.
Glen Wood, Section A
Wedgemere Road - Beginning at Newby's Bridge Road
(State Route 649), thence easterly 0.12 mile to
Cordova Lane thence easterly and southerly 0.12
mile to a temporary turnaround.
0.24 mi.
Millvale Road - Beginning at Newby's Bridge Road
(State Route 649)~ thence easterly 0.07 mile to
Millvale Court thence easterly 0.07 mile to Cordova
Lane thence easterly 0.04 mile to a dead end.
0.18 mi.
Millvale Court - Beginning at Millvale Road thence
southerly 0.05 mile to a cul-de-sac.
0.05 mi.
Cordova Lane - Beginning at Millvale Road thence
northerly 0.04 mile to a cul-de-sac. Beginning at
Millvale Road thence southerly 0.09 mile to Wedgemere
Road.
0.13 mi.
Settlers Landing, Section A-3
White Rabbit Road - Beginning at end of State
maintenance (State Route 2555) northeasterly to
a temporary turnaround.
0.18 mi.
Meadwood Subdivision
Jonlow Circle - Beginning at Meadwood Circle thence
east 0.05 mile to a cul-de-sac.
0.05 mi.
Cathlow Circle - Beginning at Meadwood Circle thence
east 0.05 mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.05 mi.
Scotlow Circle - Beginning at Meadwood Circle thence
east 0.05 mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.05 mi.
Coldstream Drive - Extension of Coldstream Drive
(State Route 2207) 0.02 mile to Meadwood Circle.
0.02 mi.
Meadwood Circle - Beginning at Little Creek Lane
(State Route 639) thence north 0.10 mile to Jonlow
Circle thence north 0.05 mile to Cathlow Circle
thence north 0.05 mile to Scotlow Circle thence north
0.03 mile to Coldstream Drive thence north and east
0.06 mile to a cul-de-sac.
0.29 mi.
79-313
18.
Mr. ~iszer distributed a copy of the Preliminary Report of an
Archeological Study of the Point of Rocks Park and information
for the Local Government Officials' Conference. He also advised
the Board of appointments which were needed.
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs, Girone, the Board
appointed Miss Leslie Piercy from Midlothian District as the
at-large member to the Youth Services Commission.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Apperson asked that the replacement for Mr. David M. White
on the Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Board of Social Services
be deferred indefinitely. Mrs. Girone stated she had someone in
mind for the appointment to the Citizens Advisory Transportation
Conmittee.
On motion of ~r. Dodd~ seconded by Mr. Bookman, The Suburban Bank
selected by the County Treasurer, was approved as a depository
for funds received by him for the County of Chesterfield. Said
selection and approval being in accordance '.with Section 58-943
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
declared a bookmobile as surplus which has been removed from
the County bookmobile service and authorized the County
Administrator to negotiate the best possible price for its
s ale.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
requested that the Virginia Department of Highways and
Transportation install traffic lights at the following inter-
sections due to the danger and congestion which exists at each:
1. Lori Road, Beach Road and Route 10,
2. Route 10 and Cogbill Road, and
Laurel Road, Chesterfield Avenue, River Road and East
River Road.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board went
into Executive Session to discuss personnel and legal matters.
Vote: Unanimous
Reconvening:
79SRlll
In Bermuda District, Clinton R. Saunders requested renewal of
a Mobile Home Permit to park a mobile home on property which he
owns. Tax Map 81-16 (5) Central Park, Lots 35, 36 and 37
and better known as 10014 Beaumont Avenue (Sheet 23).'
Mr. Saunders was present~ Mr. Dodd inquired why four of
79-314
the adjacent property owners had not signed the application.
Mr. Saunders stated several live out of town and the other
said he would sign if Mr. Saunders would sell him a lot. There
was no opposition present. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by
Mr. Apperson, this request was approved for a period of five
years.
Vote: Unanimous
79SRl12
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Ms. Cora M, Shook requested
renewal of a Mobile Home Permit to park a mobile home on
property which she owns. Tax Map 97-4 (2) Central Park, Lots
25-32, Block 15 and better known as 10220 Brightwood Avenue
(Sheet 32).
Mr. Dodd excused himself from the meeting because of a possible
conflict of interest. Ms. Shook was present,
There was no opposition present. On motion of Mr. Apperson,
seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board approved this request for
a period of five years.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Dodd returned to the meeting.
79SRl13
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Mr. Kenneth R. Snodgrass
requested renewal of a Mobile Home Permit to park a mobile home
on property which is owned by O..C, Lucas, a friend of the
applicant. Tax Map 81-3 (1) lot 11 and better known as
2900 Kings land Road (Sheet 23).
Mr. Snodgrass was present, There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the Board
approved this request for a period of five years.
Vote: Unanimous
79SRl14
In Midlothian District, Ms, Erie L. Roberts requested renewal
of a Mobile Home Permit to park a mobile home on property
which she owns. Tax Map 17-8 (1) parcel 16 and better known
as 1139 Bon Air Road (Sheet 8).
Ms. Roberts was present. There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mrs.~ Girone, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the Board
approved this request for a period of five years.
Vote: Unanimous
79Sl15
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Mr. E. Buford Perkins requested
a Mobile Home Permit to park a mobile home on property which
he owns. Tax Map 116-5 (2) Dalewood Annex, Lot 52 and better
known as 3101 Woodside Drive (Sheet 32).
Mr. Perkins was present, and stated he owns the land but he cannot
build a home on it because it is not on a state road, Mr. Dodd
stated he had received a petition signed by 16 people opposing
this request and he added he did not feel this was the right lo-
cati°r~ for a mobile home. He stated the County did not have the
funds to build the road up to state standards. Mr. Perkins'
employer was present and stated he would lend his motorgrad~r
79-315
19.
so that Mr. Perkins could fix the roadway~ He stated nothing
has been done in this area in the past 38 years and he would
give the County a statement that a house would be under construc
one year after the roadway was constructed. Mr. Dodd stated he
could not approve a mobile home in this area as it would not
be consistent with the area or blend in. After further
discussion of the matter, it was on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded
by Mr. Bookman, resolved that this request be deferred until
July 25, 1979 to allow Mr. Dodd to meet with the applicant.
Vote: Unanimous
79S061 :. .'
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, N. Leslie Saunders, Jr. and
Robert F. Pannell requested rezoning from A~ricultural (A) to
Office Business (0) of a 5.34 acre parcel fronting approximately
270 feet on Turner Road and located approximately 1750 feet north
of its intersection with ~ell Drive, Tax Map 29-13 (1) parcels
1-1 and 1-2 (Sheet 9).
Mr. Balderson stated the applicants had requested withdrawal of
the application, It was generally agreed by the Board that
this request for withdrawal be accepted, No one was present to
discuss the matter.
79S083
In Dale Magisterial District, Nicholas W. deKraft requested
rezoning from Residential (R-7) to Agricultural (A)with a
Conditional Use for a hair care center on a parcel fronting
approximately 150 feet on Hopkins Road and located approximately
200 feet south of its intersection with Little Creek Lane. Tax
Map 52-16 (1) parcels 12 and 13-4 (Sheet 15).
Mr. Balderson stated the applicant had requested withdrawal of
this application. It was generally agreed by the Board that
this request for withdrawal be accepted. No one was present to
discuss the matter.
79S066
In Midlothian Magisterial District, E. M, Ciejek requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Light Industrial (M-l) and a
Conditional Use Planned Development of a 176 acre parcel fronting
approximately 2100 feet on Route 60 and located approximately
600 feet west of its intersection with Huguenot Spring Road.
Tax Map 14 (1) parcels 5 and 6 (Sheet 5/6).
Mr. Balderson stated the applicant had requested a deferral
until December 12, 1979. There was. no one present to discuss this
mattter:, It was generally agreed by the Board that this request
for deferral until December 12, 1979 be approved.
79S040 an'd' 79S082
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Taylor-Parker Co. requested
rezoning from General Business (B-3) to Light Industrial (M-l)
of 5.25 acres plus a Conditional Use for Planned Development to
permit reduction of the required 100 foot setback adjacent to
Residential (R-7) Districts on a parcel fronting approximately
235 feet on Jefferson Davis Highway and located approximately 190
feet north of its intersection with Drewry's Bluff Road. Tax Map
67-3 (1) parcels 22 and 24 (Sheet 23).
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Taylor-Parker Company requested
rezoning from General Business (B-3) to Light Industrial (M-l)
with a Conditional Use Planned Development of a parcel fronting
approximately 140 feet on Jefferson Davis Highway and located
approximately 430 feet north of its intersection with Drewry.'s
Bluff Road. Tax Map 67-3 (1) parcel 24-1 (Sheet 23).
79-316
Mr. O'Neill excused himself from the meeting.
Mr. Bob Roop, representing Taylor-Parker Co., was present.
There was no opposition present. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded
by Mr. Bookman, the Board approved this request aS recommended
by the Planning Con~nission subject to the following conditions:
The site plan submitted on May 8, 1979, and attached hereto,
shall be considered the Master Plan. The northern most
entrance shall be designated as one-way in and the center
entrance shall be designated as one-way out.
Upon approval of this request, the following exceptions to
the bulk requirements shall be granted:
Reduction of the northern and southern setbacks
adjacent to General Business (B-3) zoning to five
(5) feet.
Reduction of the western (rear) and southern (adjacent
to Residential (R-7) zoning) to fifteen (15) feet.
Within the fifteen (15) foot setbacks adjacent to Residential
(R-7) zoning, the facades of the buildings shall incorporate
a tan aggregate and be similar in architectural style to
the renderings submitted with the application and attached
hereto. Within the area between the building and the
property line, there shall be installed evergreens and
ornamental trees spaced no more than ten (10) feet apart.
These plants shall have an initial height of six (6) feet.
Ail parking and driveways shall be paved.
Upon approval of this request, the Commission-shall grant
schematic approval of the plan attached hereto.
Vote: Unanimous
78S225
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Imogene Purdy requested an
amendment to a Conditional Use (Case #77S144) to include a
motorcycle sales and service shop in an Agricultural (A) District
on a ·7 acre parcel fronting approximately 125 feet on
Midlothian Turnpike located approximately 1380 feet west of its
intersection with Robious Road. Tax Map 17-7 (1) parcel 18
(Sheet 8).
Mr, James Hubbard was present representing the applicant. There
was no one present in opposition, Mr. Hubbard stated the
conditions were agreeable with the exception that the parking and
entrances be completed by August .!~ 1979 and he would like that
to be amended to read September 1, 1979. On motion of Mrs. Girone
seconded by Mr. Bookman, this request was approved subject to
the following conditions:
This Conditional Use shall be limited to operation of a
motorcycle sales, service and repair business.
There shall be no outside storage of vehicles for sale or
awaiting repair.
°
Ail activity associated with this business shall be
conducted within the existing structure.
A minimum of ten. (10) parking spaces shall be provided. These
spaces shall serve the 4 x 4 Store as well as the motorcycle
bus ines s.
5. A thirty-five (35) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
northern property line, Cleared areas of 200 square feet or
79-317
greater shall be planted with evergreens, having an initial
height of four (4) feet. A landscaping plan depicting this
re~luirement shall be submitted to the Division of Development
Review for approval and in conjunction with final site plan
review. This planting shall be accomplished no later than
August 1, 1979. (NOTE: This requirement was imposed on the
previously granted conditional use, but never implemented by
the owners.)
The above noted conditions notwithstanding all bulk requiremen
of the Convenience Business (B-l) District shall be applicable
The above noted conditions notwithstanding, the site plan
submitted with the application prepared by Bodie, Taylor and
Puryear dated April 23, 1979, shall be considered the plan
of development. The parking and entrances shall be completed
by September 1, 1979.
Vote: Unanimous
79S062
In Dale Magisterial District, Tri-Investment Partnership requested
rezoning from Residential (R-7) to Office Business (O) and
Community Business (B-2) of a 1. 825 acre parcel fronting approxi-
mately 200 feet on Hopkins Road and located approximately 220 feet
south of its intersection with Meadowdale Boulevard. Tax Map
52-12 Parcel 8 (Sheet 15).
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission had recommended
denial of this application but since that time the applicant has
asked that the Community Business (B-2)'i request be changed to
Convenience Business (B-l). Mr. Jerry Campbell was prement and
read a list of proffered conditions. Mr, Dewey Litton, President
of the Fuqua Farms Subdivision stated they did not want a fence
along the property which adjoined the residential property.
Mr. Louie Burkett stated he would like a buffer along his property
line to be 20 feet, because of the nuisance behind this building
which might develoo.
Mr. Campbell stated I~%r. iqegsian would be frequenting this operation
often and that he could check to see if the area was being
abused. Mr. Apperson stated that this lot would lose ..about an
area 20'x 20' and asked if that could also remain as a buffer.
Mr. Campbell stated that would be ~reeable. Another adjacent
property owner stated he would like his area buffered from this
parcel by 20' as well, Mr. Apperson inquired if Mr. Campbell woul¢
reverse the 10' and 20' in his conditions which would provide 20' for
residences (west side) an~ ~the southern property line with the
10' buffer. Mr. Campbell stated he would do this. After further
discussion of the matter, it was on motion of Mr. Apperson,
seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that this amended request for
Convenience Business (B-l) and Office Business (O) be approved
with ~the applicant proffering the following conditions:
Use of the B-1 parcel would be restricted to a savings and
loan association and/or office buildings.
o
Ail buildings constructed on the property to be of colonial
style architecture.
3. Access to Hopkins Road to be limited to one driveway.
A six foot wooden fence is to be erected along the eastern
property line with a 20' buffer to re,hain on the west side of
the fence.
~ i0 foot buffer sc~{~- will be provided alonz the southern property line.
This area will remain in its natural state with the existing
hedgerow with evergreen planting to serve as a screen.
Vote: Unanimous
79-318
Mr. O'Neill returned to the meeting.
79S078
In Midlothian Magisterial District, James F. Hubbard requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) and Residential (R-7) to Office
Business (0) with a Conditional Use Planned Development on a
parcel fronting approximately 880 feet on Old Buckingham Road
and located approximately 1300 feet northwest of its intersection
with Huguenot Road. Tax Map 16~8 (1) parcels 5 5-1 and 20
(Sheet 7)~ ' ' '
Mr, James Hubbard was present, There was no opposition present.
Mr. Hubbard stated he would like to withdraw consideration of
parcel 5, the northern most propecty. He stated the rezoning
and Conditional Use is now being requested on only parcels 5-1
and 20. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Apperson,
the requested rezoning and Conditional Use Planned Development
were approved for parcels 5-1 and 20 subject to the followin~
con~i-tions:
The below stated conditions notwithstanding, the Master Plan
dated 4/26/79 prepared by $. K. Timmons & Associates, shall
be considered the plan of development.
The developer shall provide an accurate account of the
drainage sit'uation showing existing drainage and the impact
this project will have on the site and surrounding area.
The developer shall submit a plan to Environmental Engineering
which will provide for on and off-site drainage control. The
plan shall explain the method and show the facilities to be
utilized in the hydraulic engineering of this project, This
plan shall be approved by Environmental Engineering prior to
the issuance of any building permit and implemented prior to
the issuance of any occupancy permit.
The developer shall submit a plan for erosion and sediment
control to Environmental Engineering. Such a plan is to be
comprised of vegetative and engineering practices (as outlined
in the Erosion and Sediment Control Technical Handbook publiah
ed by the James River Soil and Water Conservation District) to
be utilized as erosion and sediment control measures for
the project. The plan shall be approved prior to any clear-
ing, grading or otherwise disturbance of the soil, terrain,
or existing vegetation.
Utility (water and sewer) plans shall be submitted to and
approved by the Utilities Department prior to the issuance
of any building permit. All necessary water, sewer and drain-
age easements, as may be determined by the County Right-of-
Way Engineer, shall be granted to and for the County of
Chesterfield free and unrestricted prior to the issuance of
any building permit.
Thirty (30) feet of right-of-way measured from the center-
line of Old Buckingham Road for the entire length of parcels
5-1 and 20 shall be dedicated to and for the County of
Chesterfield, free and unrestricted. This dedication shall
be accomplished prior to the release of any building permits.
The internal southeast/northwest road, designated aa "Road
A" on the Master Plan, shall be extended through Parcel 5-1 an
Stubbed into the adjacent property. This road shall have a
minimum right-of-way width of sixty (60) feet.
Ail internal public roads shall be dedicated by subdivision
plat and recorded prior to the issuance of any building
permit, These roads shall be constructed to State standards
and taken into the State system,
79-319
10.
11.
12.
13,
14.
Note:
A thirty (30) foot buffer shall be provided along the north
property line adjacent to Old Buckingham Road, There shall
be no buildirmis,~ parking or other facilities permitted in this
buffer, A single access drive, specifically the extension of
Alverser Drive, shall be permitted through this buffer. This
buffer shall be appropriately landscaped with ground cover,
shrubs and ornamental trees, A landscaping plan depicting
this requirement shall be submitted in conjunction with each si~
plan for property which fronts this buffer.
Ail utility lines shall be provided with underground distribu.
tion. ·
No structure shall exceed two stories in height.
Ail private drives and entrances shall be paved to a width
of not less than twenty-five (25) feet utilizing curb and
'gutter.
A thirty (30) foot buffer shall be maintained along the north-
western property line, This buffer shall be landscaped in
accordance with the minimum "Guidelines for Landscaped
Buffers," A landscaping plan depicting this requirement
shall be submitted in conjunction with the first site plan
submitted for approval. There shall not be permitted any
buildings, parking, driveways or other facilities in this
buffer. The extension of "Road A" shall be permitted through
this buffer, however,
A fifty (50) foot radius shall be provided at the terminus
of all stubl roads.
The above noted conditions notwithstanding, all bulk require-
ments of the Office Business (0) District shall be applicable.
Prior to obtaining a building permit, the applicants and/
or developers must submit sChematic plans for each individua
building for Planning Commission approval.
Vote: Unanimous
79S053
In Matoaca Magisterial District, M. Dean Whittington requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7) of a .66 acre
parcel fronting approximately 129 feet on Winfree Avenue and
located approximately 1086 feet north of its intersection with
River Road. Tax Map 181~15 (2) W. E, Gill Estate, Lots 40A and
40B (Sheet 53/54).
Mr,. Whittington was present, There was no opposition. On motion
of Mr. O~Neill, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the Board approved this
request as recommended by the Planning Commission,
Vote: Unanimous
79S080
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Leonard E. Phillips and
Wilford K. Edmonds, Jr. requested a Conditional Use for a real
estate sales office in an Agricultural (A) District on a .6 acre
IIParcel fronting approximately 80 feet on Route 360 and located
lapproximmtely 120 feet east of its intersection with Suncrest Drive
land better known as 10310 Hull Street Road. Tax Map 49-7 (1)
Iparcel 11-1 (Sheet 14).
IIMrPhillips was present, There was no ooposition, Mr, Phillips
Istated he Would like condition f~3 amended~ so that his sign could
Ibe luminous or illuminated, On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded
by Mr. Apperson, this request was approved subject to the followi~
conditions:
1. The uses permitted shall be limited to a real estate office.
2, The hours of operation shall be limited from 8:00 a.m. and
9:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday.
3. One sign not to exceed four by four feet in area shall be
permitted,
Any exterior lighting shall be lo~ profile and shall be so
designed as~not to project light ~nto adjacent properties.
The above noted conditions notwithstanding, all bulk require-
ments of the Office Business (O) District shall be applicable.
The above noted conditions notwithStanding, the site plan
submitted with the application and attached hereto, shall be
considered the plan of development.
Vote: Unanimous
79S081
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Short Stop Food Stores, Inc.
requested rezoning from Community Business (B-2) to General
Business (B-3) of a . 745 acre parcel fronting approximately
200 feet on Turner Road also fronting approximately 150 feet on
Belmont Road and located in the northwest quadrant of the inter-
section of these roads and better known as 6100 Belmont Road.
Tax Map 40-15 (2) Belmont Farms, Lot 1-D (Sheet 15).
Mr. Kenneth Barton was present representing the Short Stop Food Stores, Inc. an
amended the request for rezoning to Agricultural (A) with a Conditional Use.
He stated he would like the first conditic~ regarding the buffer to be changed
from 8 feet to 6 feet. Mr. Bookman stated approval of this request is not to
be a precedent and because of in~rovements that would be made to the property,
affirmative action would be just{fied. There was no opposition present.
motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dodd, .the Board approved the armnded
request for Agricultural (A) with a Conditional Use subject to the follc~ing
ccmditions:
A six (6) foot buffer shall be maintained along the northern
property line. This buffer shall be landscaped in accord-
ance with the minimum requirements for "Landscaped Buffers."
A fifteen (15) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
eastern property line adjacent to Turner Road. Access througk
this buffer shall be limited to a single access which shall no
be more than 50 feet in width and placed not closer than
twelve and one-half (12~) feet from the north property line.
(NOTE: All other existing entrances shall be eliminated. A
deceleration lane shall be constructed to the north property
line. )
A fifteen (15) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
southern property line adjacent to Belmont Road. A single
access not to exceed fifty (50) feet shall be permitted.
The conditions noted herein notwithstanding the site plan
prepared by Barton, Corso and Associates and dated
May 14, 1979, shall be considered the Plan of Development
for the parcel in question.
The conditions noted herein notwithstanding development of
this parcel shall comply with the bulk requirements of the
Community Business (B-2) zone,
79-321
o
The building and all structures located on the parcel shall
have exterior colors which are of subdued earth tones.
Ail exterior lighting whether free standing or attached to the
building shall be low-level and arranged so as not to project
into adjacent property, lighting facilities shall not exceed
a ~eight g~eater than fifteen (15) feet.
Hours of operation for the car wash shall be restricted to
between 7 a.m. and 9 p.m,.
No more than three (3) car wash bays shall be permitted.
This site shall be maintained in an orderly fashion. No
trash, litter or other debris shall be permitted. Car wash
bays shall be cleaned daily,
Vote: Unanimous
79S084
In Bermuda Magisterial District, James W. Adams requested
rezoning from Residential (R-7) to Agricultural (A) with a
Condition-al Use for an office on a parcel fronting approximately
200 feet on Lee Street and located approximately 650 feet north of
its intersection with Route 10. Tax Map 115-6 (1) parcel D-1
(Sheet 32).
Mr. James Adams was present and stated the conditions were
agreeable. There was no opposition oresent. On motion of
Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, t~e Board approved this
request as'~recommended~.by the Planning Commission subject to
the ~following cbnditions:
1. The uses permitted shall be limited to professional offices.
Ail parking shall be located to the rear of the existing
structure.
Access shall be confined to the unnamed dedicated road which
runs parallel and adjacent to the northeast property line.
Vehicular access to Lee Street shall be prohibited.
One sign not to exceed four (4) square feet in area shall
be permitted. This sign shall not be luminous nor
illuminated. The sign shall employ earth tones. Prior to
erection of the sign, a rendering shall be submitted to the
Division of Development Review for approval.
There shall not be permitted any additions or alterations
to the existing structure, other than normal maintenance.
The above noted conditions, notwithstanding all bulk
requirements of the Office Business (0) District shall be
app 1 i cab le.
Vote: Unanimous
79S086
In Midlothian Magisterial District, D. Sam Perry, Jr. requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Office BusineSs (0) of a .491
acre parcel fronting approximately 120 feet on Old Buckingham
Road and located approximately 400 feet northeast of its
intersection with Huguenot Road. Tax Map 16-8 (1) part of parcel
12 (Sheet 7).
Mr. Sam Perry was present and stated the conditions were agreeable
There was no opposition present. On motion of Mrs. Girone,
79-322
seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board approved this request as
recommended by the Planning Commission with the applicant
proffering the following conditions:
A fifteen (15) foot buffer (required parking setba~)
shall be maintained along Huguenot Road, Old Buckingham
Road and proposed relocated Buckingham Road. A single
access shall be permitted through the buffer adjacent
to Old Buckingham Road, as shown on the plat prepared
by James A. McAllister, dated April, 1979.
These buffers shall be landscaped with appropriate ground
cover, ornamental trees and shrubs, A landscaping plan
depicting ~hi$ ~requirement shall be submitted to the
Division of Development Revie~z for approval in conjunction
wCth this final site plan.
The structure to be erected on the parcel shall be similar
in architectural style to the renderings submitted with the
applicat.~c~and prepared by James A. McAllister, dated
April, 1979.
Vote: Unanimous
79S087
In Midlothian Magisterial District, The Covington Co. requested
a Conditional Use for multi-family dwellings (59 units)
in a Residential ?ownhouse-For-Sale District on a parcel fronting
approximately 280 feet on W. Salisbury Road and also fronting
approximately 900 feet on Pagehurst Drive c~md locat6d in the
northeast quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map
7 (1) part of parcel 10 (Sheet 2),
Mr. Jim Covington was present. Mrs. Girone stated that she
would like to see areas included in this plan for recreational
facilities for children. Mr. Covington stated that this develop-
ment should not attract people with children because the units
will have only one or two bedrooms. He stated that they
promise to put in these types of facilities for children if
and when the first child under five years old becomes a occupant
of any of these units. There was no opposition present. On
m0tion Of 'Mrs. Gir~e,--Se0onded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approved this request
a~ reccrmmnded by the Planning Conmissi~ subject to the following conditions:
An overall site and landscaping plan shall be prepared in
accordance with ChaPter 21, Article III, Division 12 of the
Chesterfield County Code and approved by the Department of
Community Development prior to .the issuance of any building
permit.
2. The developer shall provide an accurate account of the
drainage situation, showing existing drainage and the impact
this. project will have on the site and the surrounding area.
The developer shall submit a plan to the County ~Engineering
Department which will provide for an off-site drainage control
The plan shall exRlain the method and show the facilities
to be utilized in the hydraulic engineering of this project.
This plan shall be approved by Environmental Engineering prior
to the issuance of any building permit or clearing of land and
implemented prior to the issuance of any occu~nancy permit.
3. The developer shall submit a plan for erosion and sediment
control to Environmental Engineering. Such a plan shall be
comprised of vegetative and engineering practices (as outlined
in the "Erosion and Sediment Control Technical Handbook"
published by the James River Soil and Water Conservation
District) to be utilized as erosion and sediment control
79-323
.1.
£2.
measures for the project, The plan shall be approved by
Environmental Engineering prior to the issuance of any buildin
permit and implemented prior to clearing any land.
Public water and sewer shall be used and the developer shall
submit water and sewer plans for approval to the County Utiliti
Department prior to the issuance of any building permit. Ail
necessary water and sewer and drainage easements as may be
determined by the County Right-of-Way Engineer, shall be
granted to the County of Chesterfield prior to the issuance~
of any building permit,
The number of units permitted sha]~l not exceed fifty-nine (59).
The total number of dwelling units in any one building or
structure shall not exceed ten and no structure shall exceed
a length of 200 feet.
Thirty (30) feet of right-of-way measured from the centerline
of West Salisbury Road shall be dedicated to and for the
County of Chesterfield free and unrestricted, This dedication
shall be accomplished prior to the release of any building
permits ·
A minimum of thirty (30) feet of pavement width shall be
provided on all access roads leading from public roads and
twenty-four (24) feet on all other private streets and
driveways. As used herein, "access roads" shall be those
roads designated as such by the Department of Community
Development.
Ail roads and driveways shall be paved, curbed and guttered
where it is determined that curb and gutter~is necessary for
drainage.
A twenty-five (25) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
northwest and northeast property lines,' A thirty (30) foot
buffer shall be maintained along the southwest and south
property lines. There shall be no buildings, structures or
other facilities permitted in these buffers. The parking, as
shown on the plan prepared by J. K. Timmons and Associates
dated March 27, 1979, shall be permitted to encroach into
these buffers. No other parking areas, however, shall be
permitted to encroach into these buffers,
Ail structures shall be a minimum of fifteen (15) feet from
any parking space.
Sidewalks shall be provided and shown on the plan at the
discretion df the Department of Community Development. Such
sidewalks shall have a width of four feet as deemed necessary
by the Department of Community Development.
Parking spaces shall be provided at a ratio of two (2) spaces
per dwelling unit. A centrally located storage area for
boats, campers, travel and utility trailers shall be provided,
the total of which may be subtracted from the total number of
required spaces or the parking of boats, campers, travel and
utility trailers shall' be prohibited by deed restriction.
There shall be two (2) independent and physically remote
exitwavs from each dwellinz unit so as to afford reasonable
fire safety to occupants.
Where the roof surfaces of adjacent townhouse units are not
in the same plane, there shall be a..~minimum distance of eight
inches between the planes of the roof surfaces. Fire retardant
material shall be used for the decking and supporting members
on both roofs within four feet of the centerline of the
party wall, where the roof surfaces are between eight inches an
two feet eight inches apart and the party wall may terminate
79-324
17.
under the deck of the higher roof,
The developer shall provide fire hydrants. The required
number(s) and location(s) shall be in accordance with
nationally recognized standards. A plan for the provision
of fire hydrants and main sizes shall be submitted to and
approved by the Chesterfield Fire and Utilities Departments.
An all weather fire lanK, in accordance with the Chesterfield
Fire Prevention Code, shall be provided to afford access to
each building for fire fighting activities and equipment or a
horizontal dry standpipe shall be provided to the rear of all
units.
Ail structures shall be separated by a minimum of twenty (20)
feet. (Note: Reduction of separation from thirty (30)
to twenty (20) feet may require a higher water pressure for
fire fighting purposes).
[9.
Automatic sprinklers, fed by domestic water syS~tem and equipped
with flow alarm switches tied into a building fire alarm
bell, shall be provided in Mechanical Equipment rooms, laun-
dries, repair shops, and rooms or spaces used for storage of
combustible supplies and equipment,
Project owner and/or manager shall provide and approve fire
extinguisher in each cooking area of kitchen.
21.
Ail roof covering shall be Class C, or better, as "defined
by the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code.
An indepth plans review shall be conducted prior to the
issuance of building permitm. Plans review shall cover items
such as, but not limited to, height and area computations,
means of egress, fire protection, light and ventilation and
mechanical systems.
A pre-occupancy inspection shall be conducted by the Fire
Prevention Bureau in cooperation with the Building Inspector's
Office prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit.
The developer shall provide an adequate number of trash
containers, the number of which shall be determined by the
County Health Department. Ail outdoor trash receptacles shall
be screened from view by a solid board fence or evergreen
planting. Trash collection shall be on a regular basis in
order to prevent any health problems.
All build~.ngs shall have a Colonial Williamsburg design,
similar to that depicted in the renderings prepared by
Charles Shiflett and dated April 2, 1979.
The above noted conditions notwithstanding, the site plan
prepared by J.K. Timmons dated March 27, 1979, shall be
considered the plan of development.
rote: Unanimous
t9S088
in Midlothian ~agisterial District, Southeastern Associates, Inc.
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Community Business
(B-2) of a 9 acre parcel and a Conditional Use on a portion of the
~ acre parcel for an indoor recreational facility on a parcel which
lies approximately 425 feet off the east line of Huguenot Road
neasured from a point approximately 800 feet north of its inter-
~ection with Midlothian Turnpike, Tax Map 17-5 (1) part of parcel
and parcel 6 (Sheet 8).
79-325
Mr. Fred Gray was present representing the apolicant. There
was no opposition present. Mr. Gray stated the conditions
were agreeable. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by
Mr, Bookman, this request was approved as recommended by the
Planning Commission subject to the following conditions:
A fifty (50) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
northwest property line of parcel 5. This buffer shall
be planted in accordance with the minimum requirements
established by "Landscaped Buffer Guidelines" (This
condition refers to the Community Business (Bi2) zoning).
~nd subject to the conditions as follows regarding the
Conditional Use for a indoor recreational facility:
The uses permitted shall be limited to a twelve (12) court
indoor racquetball facility.
o
A minimum of four parking spaces shall be provided for
each court.
The location of the facility shall be as shown on the plat
dated March 26, 1979, prepared by Austin Brockenbrough &
Associates. (That area shown as 136 feet by 280 feet.)
The above noted conditions notwithstanding, the site plan
prepared by J. K. Timmons & Associates, Inc., dated
· April 16, 1979, shall be considered the plan of development.
Vo t e: Un an imo us
Mr. Bookman excused himself from the meeting.
79S089
In Clover Hill ~fagisterial District, Surreywood Land Corporation
requested rezoning from Residential (R-7) tm Convenience Business
(B-l) of a 4.1 acre parcel fronting approximately 480 feet on
Hull Steeet Road also fronting approximately 490 feet on
Pocoshock Boulevard and located in the northeast quadrant of the
intersection of these roads. Tax Map 40-5 (2) Pocoshock Hills,
Lots 1, 2 and 3 a~d Tax Ma.o 40-5 (1) parcel 5 (Sheet 15).
Mr. Janes Capel was present reoresenting Surreywood Land Coroora-
r~on and stated he would like the -first condition amended so that the 'access
would be at the discretion of the Highway Dept. No opposition was present. Cn
motion of ~s. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, this req~st was appro"~d subject
to the following ccr~ditions:
A fifty (50) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
southern property line. (NOTE: Fifty (50) feet is the
required building and parking setback.) The access will
be at the discretion of the Highway Department.
A fifteen (15) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
western property line adjacent to Pocoshock Boulevard.
(NOTE: Thirty (30) feet is the required parking setback).
A single access shall be permitted through this buffer.
The access will be at the discretion of the Highway
Department.
A ten (10) foot buffer shall be maintained along the northern
and eastern property lines adjacent to residential (R-7)
zoning. These buffers shall be landscaped ~n accordance
with the minimum requirements setforth by "Guidelines for
Landscaped Buffers." At the time that the property to the
north and east develops or is zoned commercially, these
buffer requirements shall be lifted,
79-326
20.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Bookman returned to the meeting.
On motion of Mrs, Girone, seconded by Mr~ Dodd, the Board
approved an increase df the Sheriff's salary to $25,832
effective July 1, 1979.
Vote: Un animof~s
On motion of Mrs, Girone, seconded by Mr, Apperson, the Board
approved the hiring of a Superintendent of Parks and Recreation
at a salary of $17,256,
Vote: Unanimous
'On motion of Mr,~Apperson, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
hired James Edmondson as Director of Central Accounting
with a beginning salary of $23,016 effective July I, 1979.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr, O'Neill, seconded by }~r. Apperson, the Board
authorized the advertising o.f Case 77S164, Herman and Kay Wells
for a ccmditicmal use to operate a small auto repair and body shop
in Matoaca Dfstriet~which case was heard on February 22, 1978~
be advertised to be reheard on July 25, 1979.
Vote: Unanimous
The Board r~cessed for ~dinner.
Reconvening:
Mr. O'Neill called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. He stated
the purpose of this meeting was to hold a public hearing to
discuss the Bon Air Community Plan.
Mr. Muzzy stated the planning for the Bon Air area began ,when
funds were made available from the Metropolitan Planning
Organization to study Fores't Hill Avenue~with re~ard
to planning the roadway for the future. He stated before doing
that a decision on the land use had to be made to determine what
type of increase in vehicles, would be exoected which led to
the Bon Air Community Plan. He stated t~e objectives of the
plan are:
1. To enhance the quality of life within Bon Air's neighborhoods;
2. To preserve the historic nature of the B6n~Air Community;
3. To strengthen co~ner~ial and office development within the
existing center at the intersection of Buford Road and Forest
Hi 11 Avenue;
4. To ensure that roadway and transportation service improvements
are appropriate for the community's needs; and
5. To ensure that the Bon Air Community Scale Plan continues
to accurately reflect the central community goal,
~r. Muzzy statical this was just a plan--it could be followed but it
dOes ~ot have to be followed because it is not set in concrete.
The staff presented a slide show summarizing the plan.
Mr. Troy Taylor s,tated he was in support of Alternative 1 of the
Plan because it would do the most to minimize impacts in the area,.
that it would establish commer~ial development in established
centers~ that it reflects the concern df the citizens in the
area and it reflects a progressive refinement of development.
Mr. Stuart Packer stated he was in favor of Alternative 1 of the
plan because adequate sewer and water is not available and
79-327
this provides for an alternative transportation method which
would keep the the roadway within the 60' right-of-way.
Mr. Earl Baker stated that he represents most of the homeowners
in the Bon Air area and they are also in favor of Alternative
1 because there will be excessive noise and people traveling
through residential areas finding short cuts. He stated the
trafffc is bad and additional commerci, al zoning would make it
much worse. He submitted a pe~iti, on, which with others, totals
1,034 people from the Bon Air area who have signed iL'favor of
Commercial containment with Alternative 1~
Mrs. Jean ~fann, Messrs. Charles Gurley and Art Richardson also
stated the~ were in favor of Alternate 1 which would contain
commercial development, that enough commercial development
has been zoned in the area, that most people are in the upper
income level and are Proud oft~their homes and would like to
remain that way, that p~eople have been attracted to the Bon
Air Area because of the peacefulness and tranquility that
exists there, and that the area has become a permanent and
stable area. Approximately 100 people were present in favor
of the Bon Air Plan, Alternative 1,
Mr. David Meade White, Rudy Woodell, Mr. John Finch, Mr. Charles
Toliver, Mrs. Barbara Alteresio amd Nick Agliano stated they were
in favor of commercial development in the area and supported
Alternative ~ of the Plan. They cited reasons such as there
mr~ not historical si~es on Forest Hill Avenue, people should
have a right to sell their property, that streets should be
~rid~nad to handle the traffic flow, that increased traffic and
utility useage will ndt ~be §enerated by commercial development.
'A slide show was presented on the area as prepared by
M~. Richard Carpenter in favor of Alternative 2,1
Mr. Yates, whose land was adjacent to a parcel under considera-
tion for co~m~ercial zoning last year, inquired where all the
residents of the Bon Air area were last year when this zozinz was
approved. He stated that he did not feel the Board should be
able to put restrictions on what people can do with their land
because if someone offered him $100,000 for a small portion of
his la_nd he would have to consider selling it.
Mr. White stated that if Alternative 1 was in effect from the
beginning of time the area would not have been developed at all.
He stated that if Alternative 1 is adooted then the Board will
no longer have their right to decide what is right for' the area,
that Forest Hill Avenue will be widened and that any road' ha~zimg
as many as 20,000 vehicles per day, as is estimated for that
area, is not developed residential.
Mrs. Elsie Elmore stated that she felt there were too many
misconceptions regarding the plan and that this matter should be
investigated and reviewed further.
Mrs. Kathleen Miller, President of the League of Women Voters,
Chesterfield Chapter, complimented ~he County for getting the
citizens involved in this matter.
Messrs. Earl Baker, Preston Dowdy, Thomas VanAuken, Rod Brown
and Mrs.Catherine Goodwin and Mrs. Franklin spoke in favor of
Alternative 1, the containment of commercial development. They
stated reasons of historical preservation, traffic volume
increasing and the community pride in their area as reasons for
their position,
Mr, Bookman stated he felt the people did not understand the
difference between land use planning and zoning, Mr. Apperson
inquired what the difference was of what exists now and what
Alternative 1 would provide~ Mrs. Girone explained the differenc~
between land use planning and zoning and stated the community
got involved in this matter when the road decision had to be
79-328
i!I ·
made for the area. She stated that they are discussing
approximately one ~quare mile of which 95% is already developed,
5% is undeveloped and only 2~% can be developed,
Mrs. Girone stated she was proud of how the community had
responded to this Plan and gotten involved in the meetings.
she stated that even though there are over 20,000 vehicles per
day on Huguenot Road, new homes are still being constructed
· ~hich could happen on Forest Hill Avenue. She gave a brief
history of the area and what has been done since General Plan
2000 had been adopted. She stated that Alternative 2 had draw
backs which were: utilities were not adequate, additional widen-
ing of the road than what was planned in Alternative 1 would
be overdeslgned, too ~expensive and disruptive in the community;
and this is not a change from what was planned in the General
Plan 2000 two years ago.
Mr. Dodd stated that he felt the time and staff utilized for th-~s plan
had been excessive and that the County did not have the money
to do this for every coL~m~unity plan that might be studied,
that Alternative 2 did not address the entire area, that Alter-
native 1 wo~ld not stop a person from applying for rezoning
but they would probably not receive approval of it and
he felt more discussion at the Planning Commission level shouId
be done.
Mr. Apperson stated that the plan is for four-laning the road-
way but if the Larus Tract develops additional lanes, for example
turning lanes, etc., might be needed. Mr. Dexter Williams,
Chief of Comprehensive Planning, stated they felt four lanes
would be adequate.
Mr. Bookman stated he felt the speakers for Alternative 1 thought
this was a plan for no further commercial development which it
is not. He suggested that perhaps further clarification needed
to be made as to what exactly this alternative would provide.
Mr. O'Neill stated he felt Alternative I did not allow people
to even ask for rezoning and this Re was against. He stated
Alter-oative 1 being discussed is the same as what exists at this
time and that this has been an exercise in futility. He stated
this plan b'egan with Forest Hill Avenue and has moved to
the Old Bon Air Area and Buford Road. He suggested the Forest
Hill Avenue area be studied and not spend any further money and
time on-the plan under discussion tonight.
Mr. Bookman stated he felt Alternate I allowed fo= very little
or no allowance for change. Mr. O'Neill stated he did not
agree with this olan because some areas are transitional and
change might come and people have the right to ask that their
property be rezoned. He stated they have the right to ask but
with this plan, the request would probably not be granted.
Mrs, Girone inquired how the Board felt about proceeding with
this matter. Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd indicated they could
conmider this further if restrictions were taken away as well
as flexibility included in the plan.
It was generally agreed by the Board to have a five minute recess
Re convening:
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that
this matter be deferred indefinitely.
Vote: Unanimous
Mrs. Girone again thanked those residents present for the interes
and concern for the area, She stated she would be talking to
them in the future to decide where to proneed from here and to
ascertain the community's interest in pu~sui~g~{e ~atter further.
79-329
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
adjourned at 11:00 p.,m. to 11:30 a.m. on July 11, 1979.
Vote: Unanimous
N£cholas M, Meisz~r-?~
County Adminis trato~
E. Merlin O'Neill, Sr.
Ch airman
79-330