07-25-1979 MinutesIII.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
July 25, 1979
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mrs. Joan Gircne, Vice Chairman
Mr. J. Ruffin Appersc~
Mr. C. L. Bookman
Mr. Nicholas M. Meiszer
County Administrator
Supervisors Absent:
Mr. E. Mmrlin O'Neill, Sr., chairman
~{r. R. Garland Dodd
Staff in Attendance:
chief ._Robert L. Eanes, Fire Dept.
Mr. C. G. Manual, Asst. Co. Admin.
Mr. Steve Micas, County Attorney
Mr. Jeffrey Muzzy, Director of
C~mt~nity Developmmnt
Mr, Robert Painter, Utilities Dir.
F~. Lane .Ramsey, Budget Director
Mrs. Girone called the meeting to order at the C. ourthouse .in
the abs~ence of the Chairman at 9:10 a.m. (EDST)
Mr. Apperson gave the invocation.
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
approved the minutes of July 11, 1979, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Painter presented the Board with the sewer and water financial
reports.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute
necessary docmnents for the following water contract:
W79-74CD/6(7)9742 Smoketree, Section "D"
Developer: Midlothian Development Corporation
Contractor: R.M.C. Contractors, Inc.
Estim'a. ted Contract Cost: $57,116.20
Estimated County Cost: $10,109.40 (Refund through
Code: 366-1-11684-7221 Connections)
Vote: 'Unanimous
Mr. Painter stated the Board should award the contract for the
installation of the water line along Route 10 from Wilmoth Road
to the Airport entrance. He added that Stamie E. Lyttle Co., Inc.
was low bid for both asbestos-cement and ductile cast iron water
pipe but the County would be going with asbestos-cement pipe.
He added further the Fire Department would be billed $10,500 for
five fire hydrants. After further discussion of the matter, it
was on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved
that contract W79-17B or 6(7)9177 be awarded to Stamie E. Lyttle
Company, Inc. in the amount of $199,414.50 for the installation
of the water line along Route 10 f. rom Wilmoth Road to the Airport
entrance; that ,g219,355.95 be appropriated from 367 surplus (bond
fund) to 380-1-g9177-4393 (construction contracts) which includes
contractors bid materials furnished by County and contingencies;
that the Fire Department be billed $10,500 for five fire hydrants;
and further that the County Administrator be authorized to execute
any necessary documents for this contract.
Vote: Unanimous
79-34~.
o
o
o
Mr. Meiszer stated the staff had met with the engineers ~r
the installation of water lines for the si:.~ projects the Board
approved.--four of which are for construction of lines. He stated
that there will still be negotiations regarding the fees.
Mrs. Girone inquired if the Board approved the contracts without
the fees~ would negotiations be hindered. Mr. Meiszer stated they
not. He stated they would submit the contracts for the
construction of the pumping station and elevated tanks at the
next meeting. Mr. Apperson inquired about the inspections.
Mr. Meiszer stated the contractors would inspect the lines every
two weeks or as needed and the County will conduct daily inspectic
After further discussion of the matter, it was on motion of
Mr. Apperson, seconded by ~r. Bookman, resolved that the Board
approved the phr~seolo~f of the contract excluding the fees to
be paid and further authorized the County Administrator to
execute the contracts after negotiations of fees so long as the
fees are in an amount not to exceed fees as set out in the
filed copy of the contract.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute
any documents for the following sewer contracts:
1. S79-55CD/7(7)9552 Burger Chef - Route 60
Developer: Harold L. Cole, Jr.
Contractor: Piedmont Construction Company, Inc.
Estimated Contract Cost: $21,623.30
Estimated County Cost: $ 9,338.00 (Refund through Cormecti~m
Code: 573-1-11781-7221
S79-73CD/7(7)9732 Salisbury-Marlborough Downes and portions
of Mount Hill and Hillcrest Sections
Developer: Salisbury Corporation
Contractor: Stamie E. Lyttle Company, Inc.
Estimated Contract Cost: $210,992.75
Estimated County Cost: $ 3,430.00 (Refund throughConnec'
Code: 573-1-11781-7221
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Apperson requested the Board approve an extension to the sew,
project which was approved on June 27, 1979 in the Beechwood
Subdivision. He stated that he would like to have nine houses
added to the contract which would then provide sewer for all home~
in the area except for one section which could later be served by
another line; that there are additional lots on .which homes could
be built and connect; and that this extension would provide
Edgewood with sewer also. Mr. Bookman s:tated he also had problem
in his area and that the Board still had not decided on projects
and distribution of funds, l~r. Apperson suggested that perhaps
the sewer funds could be used like rural addition funds. After
further discussion, it was on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded
by Mr. Bookman, resolved that an extension to serve nine houses
be included in the project approved on June 27, 1979 for the
Beechwood area which cost is estimated to be $20,000.
Vote: Unanimous
It was generally agreed to defer discussion regarding the request
from the developer of the James River West Subdivision until
later in the day.when the developer was present.
It ~,zas generally agreed by the Board to defer indefinitely
discussion regarding voiding and returning contracts for sewer
connections at the $300.00 rate in areas that sewer service is
79-342
o
not presently provided. Mr. Apperson stated that before any
matter of this nature is put on the a~enda, he would like to
be informed first. ~
Mr. Painter stated that he had met with Brandermill representatiw
and the staff is in agreement with their request to reduce the
size of the Bright Hope Pump Station, reduce the width of
the sewer construction easement and relocate a aection of the
permanent sewer easement, as long as everyone is aware that
Brandermill will get the first 301 connections and after that
it will be on a first come, first serve basis, for any other land
in the area. He stated also that this pump station will not
serve the entire drainage area. Mr. Bookman inquired about the
2.17 acres being in the reservoir. Mr. Painter stated that this
will allow the County to use the reservoir in the future, if
needed, without any problems. After further discussion, it was
on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson~ resolved that
the request from Brandermill be approved as follows:
1. For Brandermill's request to reduce the size of the Bright
Hope Pump Station site from 5.86 acres to 3.7 acres, the
Board approved that a 5.86 acre site be dedicated with
3.7 acres being above the 177 foot contour and the remaining
2.6 acres being in the Reservoir. Building setbac1~.s on
the lots adjacent to the pumpin~ facilities must conform to
the State Health Department's requirements.
For Brandermill's request to reduce the width of the sewer
construction easement from 125 feet to 90 feet and 80 feet
along portions of the easement, the Board approved the
construction easement width be maintained but shifted
towards the Reservoir whid~ will accomplish Brandermill's
objectives.
For Brandermill's request to relocate a section of the
permanent trunk sewer easement, the Board approved this
request subject to dedication of the revised easement,
dedication of the Pump Station Site and dedication of the
sewer easement on Brandermill's property for the 48 inch
sewer proposed to cross the reservoir to serve the Pigeon
Hill area.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute
a deed of dedication on behalf of the County for an additional
25 foot right of way adjacent to an existing 25 foot right of
way south of Point of Rocks Road in Bermuda District from
E. L. Chappell et als.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
approved and authorized the Chairman and County Administrator
to execute an Option Agreement with E. I. DuPont de Nemours &
Company for a 30 foot wide easement to be deeded to DuPont
for pipe line in Bermuda District in the amount of $7,380, a
copy of the plat locating the easement is filed with the papers
of this Board.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute a
deed of dedication from James E. Cole and Lois A. Cole for a
50 foot right of way off Bailey Bridge Road at Swift Creek in
79-343
Clover Hill District, accepting it on behalf of the County.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been scheduled to
consider an ordinance vacating a portion of a variable
drainage and utility easement in Spring Run, Section A.
There was no one present to discuss this matter. On motion
of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the following
ordinance was adopted:
An Ordinance to vacate a portion of a variable
width drainage and utilities easement across
Lot 41, Block B in Spring Run, Section A, Dale
Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, as
shown on plat thereof duly recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County in Plat Book 30 at page 83.
Whereas, J. K. Timmons and Associates has petitioned the
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to
vacate a portion of a variable width drainage and utilities
easement across Lot 41, Block B in Spring Run, Section A,
Dale Magisterial District, Chesterfield, Virginia, more
particularly shown on a plat of record in the Clerk's Office
of the Circuit Court of said County in Plat Book 30 at page
83, made by J. K. Timmons and Associates, Consulting Engineers,
dated March 8, 1978. The portion of easement petitioned to
be vacated is more fully described as follows:
A portion of a variable width drainage and
utilities easement across Lot 41, Block B,
of Spring Run, Section A, the location of
which is more fully shown outlined on a
plat made by Raleigh E. Phelps, Certified
Land Surveyor, dated December 7, 1978, a
copy of which is attached hereto and made a
part of this ordinance.
Whereas, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-431
of the Code of Virginia, 1950 as amended by advertising;
and '
Whereas, no public necessity exists for the continuance of
the portion of easement sought to be vacated.
Now, Therefore, Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia:
That pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, the aforesaid portion of easement be and
is hereby vacated and no longer necessary for public use.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accord-
ance with Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950,
as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance together
with the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no sooner
than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the
C~it Court of Chesterfield, Virginia pursuant to
Section 15.1-485 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483
is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the
portion of the plat vacated. This Ordinance shall vest fee
simple title of the aforementioned easement in the property
owners of the lot free and clear of any rights of public use.
79-344
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the names of
the County of Chesterfield as grantor and Austin W. West and
Susan T. West (husband and wife), or their successors in
title, as grantees.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been scheduled for
a public hearing to consider an ordinance vacating Chester-
wood, Section B. There was no one present regarding this
matter. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman,
the following ordinance was adopted:
An Ordinance to vacate Chesterwood, Section B,
Dale Magisterial District, Chesterfield County,
as shown on plat thereof duly recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chester-
field County in Plat Book 29 at page 23.
Whereas, Meadowdale Square has petitioned the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to vacate
Chesterwood, Section B, Dale Magisterial District, Chester-
field, Virginia more particularly shown on a plat of record
in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of said County in
Plat Book 29 at page 23, made by Virginia Surveys, dated
June 6, 1977. The subdivision petitioned to be vacated is
more fully described as follows:
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, Block A, Chester-
wood, Section B, in their entirety as shown
outlined in red on a plat made by Virginia Surveys,
dated June 6, 1977, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part of this ordinance.
Whereas, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-431
of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising;
and
Whereas, no public necessity exists for the continuance of
the subdivision sought to be vacated and the vacation will
not abridge the right of any citizen.
Now, Therefore, Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia:
That pursuant to Section 15ol-482(b) of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid subdivision be and
is hereby vacated and no longer necessary for public use.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accord-
ance with Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950,
as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance, together
with the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no sooner
than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of Chesterfield, Virginia, pursuant to Section
15.1-485 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483 is
to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the plat
hereby vacated. This Ordinance shall vest fee simple title
of the aforementioned lots in the property owners free and
clear of any rights of public use.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the names of
the County of Chesterfield as grantor and G. E. Miles, C. F.
Currin, Jr. and R. Garland Dodd, or their successors in
title, as grantees.
Vote: Unanimous
79-345
o
BoA.
3.B.
3.C,
Mr. Painter presented the Board with a list of developer
wate~ and sewer contracts approved by the County Admin-
istrator.
It was generally agreed by the Board to defer consideration
of a request from the developers of Dense Wood Hills to aid
them in acquiring a road right of way along the existing
road known as Womack Road to their property until August 8
1979.
It was generally agreed by the Board to defer consideration
of a resolution authorizing condemnation of road right of
way and a drainage easement across the property of Jimmie A.
McAdams and Leonard I. McAdams located at the intersection
of Ramblewood Road and Parkers Avenue until August 8, 1979.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
amended the minutes of June 27, 1979, by changing condition
#2 for Case #79S089 by eliminating the last sentence which
reads "The location of the access shall be determined at the
time of final site plan review and shall be so as to afford
the best sight distance" to "The access will be at the
discretion of the Highway Department."
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the
Board deferred consideration of a street light request at
1600 Edgewood Drive until August 8, 1979.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the
Board appropriated an additional $1,800 for the Yatesdale
Road turnaround project so that necessary right of way may
be obtained and further approved funds to be expended from
the Dale District 3¢ Road Funds.
Vote: Unanimous
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance
with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon
his examination of Post Horn Drive, Hempwood Place and
Indian Point in Salem Woods, Section B, Dale District.
upOn consideration whereof and on motion of Mr. Apperson,
seconded by Mr. Bookman, it is resolved that Post Horn
Drive, Hempwood Place and Indian Point Road in Salem Woods,
Section B, Dale District, be and they hereby are established
as public roads.
And be it further resolved that the Virginia Department of
Highways and Transportation be and it hereby is requested to
take into the Secondary System, Post Horn Drive beginning at
Centralia Road (State Route 145) and running in a northerly
direction for .19 mile to the intersection of Post Horn
Drive and Hempwood Place, then continuing for .04 mile to
existing Post Horn Drive in Section A, Salem Woods (State
Route 1997); Hempwood Place, beginning at Post Horn Drive
and running westerly for .07 mile to the intersection of
Indian Point and Hempwood Place; Indian Point Road, be~
ginning at intersection of Indian Point Road and Hempwood
Avenue and running northerly for .03 mile to existing Indian
Point Road in Section A, Salem Woods (State Route 1996).
These roads serve 34 lots.
79-346
B.P.
4.A.
And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Highways a 50'
right of way for all of these roads. This section of
Salem Woods is recorded as follows: Section B, Plat Book
29, pages 5 & 6, 6/24/79.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the
Board deferred discussion of Subdivision Bonds until
August 8, 1979.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Muzzy stated the Planning Commission would like to
meet with the Board of Supervisors to discuss growth impacts
on the County. It was generally agreed that the Board would
meet with the P~anning Commission on August 29, 1979 at
6:30 p.m. at the Airport for dinner.
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been scheduled for
a public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to
exemptions for certain agricultural activities from the
County Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. There was no
one present to discuss this matter. On motion of Mr. Bookman,
seconded by Mr. Apperson, the following ordinance was adopted:
An Ordinance to Amend the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, 1978, as Amended,
by Amending and Reenacting Section 7.2-6
Relating Generally to Exemption for Certain
Agricultural Activities from the County Erosion
and Sediment Control Ordinance
Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 7.2-6 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield is amended and reenacted as follows:
Sec. 7.2-6. Exemption for certain agricultural activities.
Any person who owns, occupies, or operates private
agricultural, horticultural or forest lands shall not be
deemed to be in violation of this chapter for land disturbing
activities which result from the tilling, planting or
harvesting of agricultural, horticultural Or forest crops
or products or engineering operations such as the construction
of terraces, terrace outlets, check dams, desilting basins,
floodwater retarding structures, channel improvements, flood-
ways, dikes, ponds, ditches; the utilization of strip
cropping, lister furrowing, contour cultivating and
contour furrowing; land drainage, land irrigation; seeding
and planting of waste, sloping, abandoned, or eroded lands
to water-conserving and erosion-preventing plants, trees
and grasses; forestation and reforestation; rotation of /
crops; soil stabilization with trees, grasses, legumes, and
other thick growing, soil holding crops; retardation of
runoff by increasing absorption of rainfall; and retirement
from cultivation of steep, highly erosive areas and areas
badly gullied or otherwise eroded.
Vote: Unanimous
79 -347
4. B.
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been scheduled for
a public hearing relating to water cross-connection and
backflow prevention. No one was present to discuss this
ordinance. On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson,
the Board adopted the following ordinance:
An Ordinance to Amend Chapter 6 and 20 of the
Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as
Amended, by Repealing Article V Containing
Sections 6-62 through 6-69 and by Adding
Article V to Chapter 20, Containing Sections 20-56
through 20-63 Relating to Water Cross-Connection
and Backflow Prevention and Providing for a
Penalty
Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That sections 6-62, 6-63, 6-64, 6-65 6-66 6-67
6-68 and 6-69 are repealed. ' ' '
(2) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield is
amended by adding sections 20-56, 20-57, 20-58, 20-59, 20-
60, 20-61, 20-62 and 20-63 as follows:
Article V. Cross-Connection and Backflow Prevention.
Sec. 20-56. Definitions.
The following terms, whenever used or referred to in
this article, shall have the respective meanings set forth
below, unless the context clearly requires a contrary
meaning or any such term is expressly defined to the contrary
elsewhere in this article.
Backflow. The flow of water or other liquids, mixtures,
or substances into the distributing pipes of a potable
supply of water from any source or sources other than its
intended source.
Cross-connection. Any physical connection between a
potable water supply and any waste pipe, soil pipe, sewer
drain, or any unapproved source or system. Cross-connection
includes any potable water supply outlet which is submerged
or can be submerged in waste water and any other source of
contamination.
Health hazard. Any condition, devices, or practices in
the water supply system and its operation which create, or,
in the judgment of the director of utilities, may create, a
danger to the health and well being of the water consumer.
Plumbing fixture. Installed receptacles, devices, or
appliances supplied with water or that receive or discharge
liquid borne wastes.
Plumbing system. The water supply and distribution
pipes, plumbing fixtures, and traps; soil, waste, and vent
pipes; building drains and building sewers including their
respective connections, devices, and appurtenances within
the property lines of the premises; and water-treating or
water-using equipment.
Pollution. The presence of any foreign substance
(organic, inorganic, radiological, or biological) in the
water that tends to degrade its quality so as to constitute
a hazard or impair the usefulness of the water.
79-348
Water, potable. Water free from impurities in amounts
sufficient to cause disease or harmful physiological effects.
Its bacteriological and chemical quality shall conform to
the requirements of the Virginia Waterworks Regulations of
the state department of utilities.
Water, nonpotable. Water that is not safe for human
consumption or that is of questionable potability.
Water system. Ail structures, appliances and equipment
owned and operated by the county and used to collect, store,
transport, purify and treat water for drinking or domestic
use and the distribution of water to the public.
Sec. 20-57. Required.
Every building, premises or structure in the county
shall be constructed, equipped and maintained in such a
manner as to prevent the possibility of pollution of the
county water supply by cross-connection or backflow of
liquids.
Sec. 20-58. Cross-connections prohibited.
(a) The county potable water supply system shall be
designed, installed, and maintained in such a manner as to
prevent contamination from nonpotable liquids, solids, or
gases from being introduced into the potable water supply
through cross-connections or any other piping connections to
the system.
(b) Cross-connections between the county potable water
system and other systems or equipment containing water or
other substances of unknown or questionable safety are
prohibited except when and where, as approved by the director
of utilities, suitable protective devices such as the reduced
pressure zone backflow preventer or equal are installed,
tested and maintained to insure proper operation on a
continuing basis.
Sec. 20-59. Backflow and backsiphonage prohibited.
The county potable water system shall be protected
against backflow and backsiphonage by installing and maintaining
at all fixtures, equipment, and outlets, where backflow or
backsiphonage may occur, a suitable backflow preventer as
approved by the director of utilities.
Sec. 20-60. Responsibility of director of utilities.
(a) The director of utilities, or his designated
agent, shall inspect the plumbing in every building or
premises in the county as frequently as in his judgment may
be necessary to ensure that such plumbing has been installed
in such a manner as to prevent the possibility of pollution
of the water supply of the county through the plumbing.
(b) The director of utilities, or his designated
agent, shall have the right of entry into any building,
during reasonable hours, for the purpose of making inspection
of the plumbing systems installed in such building or premises
for cross-connection or backflow problems caused by improper
installation, repair, or maintenance, faulty equipment or
other causes. Upon request, the owner or occupants of
property served by the county water system shall furnish to
the inspection agency pertinent information regarding the
piping system on such property.
79-349
D.A.
5.B.
4.C.
Sec. 20-61. Compliance with applicable rules and regulations.
Any cross-connection or backflow prevention devise or
system shall be designed, installed and maintained in such a
manner as to be in compliance with the Cross-Connection
Control Manual, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Water Programs, Water Supply Division, 1973; the BOCA
Basic Plumbing Code, 1975; Section 6.00 of the Virginia
Waterworks Regulations entitled "Cross Connection and Backflow
Prevention Control in Waterworks;" and the Chesterfield
County Cross-Connection and Backflow Prevention Control
Program, copies of which are on file in the utilities department.
Sec. 20-62. Violations.
The director of utilities shall notify the owner, or
g~horized agent of the owner, of the building or premises in
which there is found a violation of this article, of such
violation. The director of utilities shall set a reasonable
time for the owner to have the violation removed or corrected.
Upon failure of the owner to have the defect corrected by
the end of the specified time interval the director of
utilities may, if in his judgment an imminent health hazard
exists, cause the water service to the building or premises
to be terminated or deny service to such premises.
If it is found that the backflow prevention devise(s)
has been removed or by-passed or if a cross-connection
exists, or if the pressure in the water works is lowered
below 10 psi gauge, the director of utilities shall take
positive action to insure that the waterworks is adequately
protected at all times.
Sec. 20-63. Penalty.
The owner or authorized agent of the owner responsible
for the maintenance of the plumbing systems in the building
who knowingly permits a violation to remain uncorrected
after the expiration of time set by the director of utilities
shall, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction
thereof shall be subject to a fine of not more than one
thousand dollars for each violation. Each day of failure to
comply with the requirements of this article, after the
specified time provided in Section 20-62, shall constitute a
separate violation.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the
Board set August 22, 1979 at 10:30 a.m. for a public hearing
to consider an ordinance amending Sec. 2-6.1 of the County
Code Relating to Joint Purchasing Agreements.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the
Board set August 22, 1979, at 10:15 a.m. for a public hearing
to consider an ordinance amending and reenacting Section
7.1-2 relating to Precinct Boundaries and Polling Places.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been scheduled to
consider an ordinance relating to bingo games and raffles.
There was no one present to discuss this ordinance. On
motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman the following
ordinance was adopted: '
79-350
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS
AMENDED, BY REPEALING SECTION 15.1-6
AND BY ADDING ARTICLE IV TO CHAPTER 4
CONTAINING SECTIONS 4-27 THROUGH 4-36
RELATING TO BINGO GAMES AND RAFFLES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Chesterfield:
(1) That Section 15.1-6 is repealed.
(2) That a new Article IV is added to Chapter 4 containing
sections 4-27 through 4-36 as follows:
Article IV. Bingo and Raffles.
4-27.
4-28.
4-29.
4-30.
4-31.
4-32.
4-33.
4-34.
4-35.
4-36.
Bingo game or raffle, who may conduct.
Application for a permit, application fee, and required
documents.
Issuance of permit.
Permit restrictions.
Other prohibited practices.
Records and reports of gross receipts.
Audit fee.
Revocation of permit.
Penalties.
Injunctive relief.
Sec. 4-27. Bingo game or raffle, who may conduct.
With the exception of the following organizations, it shall
be unlawful for any organization or person to conduct, promote,
set-up or manage a bingo game, including as a part of such bingo
game the playing of "instant bingo" or "bingo in any rotation" or
raffle within the county:
(a) A voluntary fire department, rescue squad, or auxiliary
unit thereof, which is designated in section 16.1 of this Code as
an integral part of the official safety program of the county or
is designated by resolution of the county as being a part of such
safety program.
(b) An organization which is either:
(1) An organization operated exclusively for religious,
charitable, community or educational purposes; or,
(2) An association of war veterans or auxiliary units
thereof organized in the United States or any of its possessions;
or,
system;
(3) A fraternal association operating under the lodge
and which organization
(4) Has always been operated in the past as a non-
profit organization; and,
and,
(5) Operates currently as a nonprofit organization;
(6) Has been in existence and met on a regular basis
within the county continuously for a period of not less than two
years immediately prior tc making application for a permit;
79-351
iprovided, however, that any organization whose gross receipts from
~all bingo operations exceeded in any calendar year prior to the
calendar year for which application is made, or any organization
whose gross receipts from all bingo operations in the calendar
year for which application is made can be expected to exceed Fifty
Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) shall have been previously granted
itax exempt status pursuant to section 501C of the United States
Internal Revenue Code.
Sec. 4-28.
Application for a permit, application fee, and required
documents.
(a) No such volunteer fire department, rescue squad or organ-
ization shall conduct a bingo game or raffle without first having
obtained an annual permit from the county. Application for such
permit shall be submitted to the office of the county administrator
on a form provided by such office. Each application shall be
accompanied by:
(1) A check in the amount of Twenty-Five Dollars ($25.00
payable to the treasurer of the county as an application fee. The
fee shall not be prorated for any portion of the calendar year;
(2) A copy of the organization's current charter, arti-
cles of incorporation, bylaws and other legal documents which spe-
cifically state the purposes for which the organization is char-
tered or organized;
(3) A copy of a resolution of the organization's board
pf directors authorizing the applicant to apPly on behalf of the
organization for a permit; and,
(4) A copy of a letter,~ where applicable, evidencing
tax exempt status granted to the organization pursuant to section
501C of the United States Internal Revenue Code.
(b) Each application and accompanying documents shall be a
hatter of public record.
(c) Each application shall be acted upon by the board of
~upervisors within sixty (60) days after it is filed with the
)ffice of the county administrator.
,;ec. 4-29. Issuance of permit.
(a) Each permit shall be issued by the chairman of the board
)f supervisors upon prior approval of the board. Each permit shall
~e issued on a calendar year basis and shall be valid from the
first day of January until the thirty-first day of December of each
fear. Each permit shall be nontransferable. An organization which
)btains a Permit to conduct a raffle may sell raffle tickets both
~ithin and without the county.
(b) Each permit shall be valid only within the county and
)nly at the locations designated in the permit application; pro-
tided, however, that a permit may be issued to an organization
7hich relocates its meeting place on a permanent basis from
Lnother jurisdiction to a location within the county if:
(1) The organization meets the requirements of section
~-27 of this article, excluding subsection 4-27(b) (6); and,
(2) The organization was the holder of a valid permit
!rom the other jurisdiction at the time of relocation.
79-352
Sec. 4-30. Permit restrictions.
The operation and conduct of every bingo game or raffle shall
be subject to reasonable regulation by the board of supervisors
to ensure the public safety in the operation of the bingo game or
raffle and shall be subject to the following additional restric-
tions:
(a) No organization may hold bingo games more frequently
two calendar days in any one calendar week, except that the board
of supervisors may grant an organization a special permit which
would entitle such organization to conduct more frequent operatic
during carnivals, fairs and other similar events held at such
organization's principal meeting place or at any other site selec-
ted by such organization which meeting place or site is located
within ~he county and which organization is not in violation of
the county zoning ordinance.
(b) Bingo games or raffles shall, during all hours of opera-
tion, be open to inspection by appropriate county officials.
(c) During all times when the bingo games or raffles are in
operation, the bingo or raffle permit shall be displayed or shall
be available on the premises for display.
(d) Any organization qualified to conduct bingo games is
authorized to play instant bingo as a part of such bingo game;
provided, however, that:
(1) Instant bingo may be conducted only at such times
a regular bingo game, as defined in section 18.2-340.1(2) of the
Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, is in progress and only at
such locations and at such times as are specified in the bingo
application permit; and
(2) The gross receipts between October 1 and September
30 of the succeeding year attributable to the playing of instant
bingo shall not exceed thirty-three and one-third percentum
(33 1/3%) of the gross receipts of the organization's bingo opera-
tion during the same time period; and
(3) The organization which conducts the playing of
instant bingo shall maintain complete and accurate records of the
date, quantity and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased
as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant
bingo supplies. The organization shall also maintain a written
invoice or receipt from a nonmember of the organization verifying
any information required by this subsection; and
(4) No organization shall sell an instant bingo card to
any individual below sixteen years of age.
Sec. 4-31. Other prohibited practices.
In addition to other practices prohibited by this article and
prohibited by law, the following practices are prohibited:
(a) Except for reasonable and proper operating costs and
prizes, no part of the gross receipts derived by an organization
permitted to conduct bingo games or raffles may be used for any
purpose other than those lawful religious, charitable, community
or educational purposes for which the organization is. specifically
chartered or organized;
(b) No organization shall enter into a contract with, or
otherwise employ for compensation any person, firm, association,
organization, partnership, or corporation of any classification
whatsoever for the purpose of organizing, managing or conducting
bingo games or raffles;
79-353
(c) No person, firm, association, organization, partnership
or corporation shall pay or receive for use of any premises devote(
in whole or in part, to the conduct of bingo games or raffles any
consideration in excess of the current fair market rental value
of such property. For the purposes of this article, no fair marke
rental value consideration shall be based upon or determined by
reference to a percentage of the proceeds derived from the opera-
tion of bingo games or raffles nor shall such consideration be
based upon or determined by any reference to the number of people
in attendance at such bingo games or raffles. Each day in viola-
tion of this subsection shall constitute a separate offense and
shall be punishable either by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars or by confinement in the county jail for not more than
twelve months or both;
(d) No building or other premises shall be utilized in whole
or in part for the purpose of conducting bingo games more frequent~
than two calendar days in any one calendar week; provided, however
that the provisions of this Subsection shall not apply to the play.
ing of bingo pursuant to a special permit issued in accordance wit]
section 4-30(a). Nor shall the provisions of this subsection appl!
to any building or premises owned by an organization which quali-
fies as a tax exempt organization pursuant to section 501C of the
Internal Revenue Code;
(e) No person, except a bona fide member of any such organi-
zation who shall have been a member of such organization for at
least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate ii
the management, operation or conduct of any bingo game or raffle.
No person shall receive any remuneration for participating in the
management, operation or conduct of any such game or raffle, pro-
vided that the spouse of any sUch bona fide member or a firefightel
or rescue squad member employed by a political subdivision with
which the volunteer firefighter or rescue squad member is asso-
ciated may participate in the operation and conduct of a bingo
or raffle if a bona fide member is present;
(f) No organization shall enter into any contract with or
otherwise employ or compensate any member of that organization
regarding the sale of bingo supplies or equipment;
(g) No organization shall award any prize money or any mer-
chandise valued in excess of the following amounts: (i) no door
prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars ($25.00), (ii) no regular
bingo or special bingo game shall exceed one hundred dollars
($100.00) and (iii) no jackpot, of any nature whatsoever, shall
exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). In no event shall any
organization join with any other organization in establishing or
contributing to the maintenance of any jackpot. The award of any
such prize money shall not be deemed to be part of any gaming con-
tract within the purview of section 11-14 of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended; and,
(h) No organization shall place or cause to be placed any
sign or signs advertising any bingo game within one hundred yards
of the exterior of the premises where such bingo game is to be
played.
Sec. 4-32.
Records and reports of gross receipts and disburse
ments.
(a) The organization shall keep complete records of all
bingo and raffle receipts and disbursements which records shall be
filed annually under oath with the county internal auditor on a
form furnished by the auditor. The annual or quarterly financial
report and other items required to be filed pursuant to this sec-
tion shall be a matter of public record. All such reports shall
be submitted to the internal auditor not later than the first day
79-354
of November of each calendar year for which a permit has been
issued. Each report shall include a record of the gross receipts
and disbursements of an organization for the year period which com.
menced on the first day of October of the previous year and ended
on September 30 of the current year. However, any organization
whose gross receipts exceed Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00)
during any calendar quarter shall file with the internal auditor
an additional report of its receipts and disbursements during such
quarter not later than sixty days following the last day of such
calendar quarter. Gross receipts, as used in this section, shall
mean the total amount of money received from bingo and instant
bingo operations before the deduction of expenses or prizes.
(b) Each financial report shall be accompanied by a certifi-
cate, verified under oath, by the board of directors of the organi-
zation to which the permit is issued, that the proceeds of all
bingo games and raffles have been used by those lawful, religious,
charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organl.
zation is specifically chartered or organized and that the opera-
tion of bingo games or raffles has been in accordance with the pro.
visions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8 of Title 18.2 (18.2-340.1 et
seq.) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
(c) The failure to file such financial reports when due shal~
cause the automatic revocation of the permit and no organization
whose permit has been revoked shall conduct any bingo game or
raffle thereafter until a report is properly filed and a new permi~
is issued through the application process described in section 4-2
(d) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section requiring
an annual audit, the provisions of this section shall not be con-
strued so as to prohibit the internal auditor or his designated
representative from performing unannounced audits or restrict any
right of county official to secure any records required to be main-
tained pursuant to the provisions of this article. The internal
auditor and his designated representative shall have the authority
to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a
bingo game or on the premises where bingo records are kept for the
purpose of carrying out the duties imposed by this article. The
application for the bingo permit shall constitute permission from
and authority granted by, such organization to any law-enforcement
officer, the internal auditor or his designated representative to
enter upon such premises.
(e) Every organization authorized to conduct bingo games and
raffles shall maintain a record in writing of the dates on which
bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each date,
and the amount of the receipts and prizes paid on each such day.
The organization shall also maintain a record of the name and
address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or spe-
cial bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of bingo is
awarded, as well as the amount of such award. The organization
playing bingo shall also maintain an itemized record of all recei'
and disbursements; including operating costs and use of proceeds
incurred in operating bingo games. '
Sec. 4-33. Audit fee.
Every organization authorized to conduct bingo games and raf-
fles pursuant to this article shall pay an audit fee equal to one
percentum per annum of the gross receipts resulting from bingo
games and raffles; provided, however, that if the gross receipts
of an organization are less than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00)
for the designated reporting period such audit fee is waived.
Gross receipts, as used in this section, means the total amount of
money received from bingo, instant bingo, and raffle operations
before the deduction of expenses or prizes. Such audit fee shall
be determined by the gross receipts shown on the financial report,
subject to correctness by audit, and shall accompany said report
required to be filed with the internal auditor on or before Novem-
ber 1st of each year, pursuant to section 4-32.
79-355
4.P.
(a) The county board of supervisors may deny, suspend
or revoke the permit of any volunteer fire department,
rescue squad or organization found to be not in strict
compliance with the provisions of this article, or found not
to be in compliance with any provisions of this Code or the
Code of Virginia.
(b) Except for permits automatically revoked pursuant
to section 4-32(c) for failure of an organization to file
financial reports, no permit to conduct bingo games or
raffles shall be denied, suspended or revoked except upon
notice stating the proposed basis for such action and the
time and place for a hearing thereon. After a hearing on
the issues, the county board of supervisors may refuse to
issue or may suspend or revoke any such permit if they
determine that the organization has not complied with the
provisions of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Any
organization aggrieved by the decision of the board of
supervisors or its authorized representative may appeal such
decision to the circuit court.
Sec. 4-35. Penalties.
It shall be unlawful for any person, shareholder,
agent, member or employee of any such volunteer fire department,
rescue squad or organization to violate any provision of
this article. Each violation of any provision shall be
punishable either by a fine oF not more than one thousand
dollars or by confinement in the county jail for not more
than twelve months or both. A violation of section 4-31(a)
by any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of any
such volunteer fire department, rescue squad or organization
shall be punishable by imprisonment of not less than one
year, nor more than five years or by a fine of not more than
one thousand dollars or confinement in the county jail for
not more than twelve months or both.
Sec. 4-36. Injunctive relief.
In the event that an organization violates the provisions
of this article, then the county attorney or commOnwealth's
attorney, in addition to the foregoing penalties, may apply
to the circuit court for an injunction restraining the
continued operation of bingo games raffles or any aspect
thereof. ' '
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Micas stated that he would like to take this opportunity
to thank Mr. Bruce Kimble, Asst. County Attorney, for his
diligent work for the past two and one-half years. He added
Mr. Kimble had collected over $150,000 in deliquent taxes
for the County as well as other duties assigned. On
motion of the Board, Mr. Bruce Kimble was thanked for doing
an outstanding job while employed with the County Attorney's
Office from February, 1977 through August 1, 1979.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been scheduled for
a public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to the
duties of the Director of the Central Accounting Department.
Mr. Apperson inquired why this was necessary. Mr. Micas
stated this was basically a housekeeping action. Mr. Apperson
inquired why this could not be eliminated from the County
Code and written up in the job description of this position.
Mr. Micas stated that he would have to look into this matter ,
to see if this could be done because state law actually sets
the duties of the Director of the Central Accounting Department.
79-356
Mr. Micas added this ordinance could not be eliminated from
the Code at this meeting because of the manner in which it
had been advertised. No one was present to discuss the
proposed ordinance. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by
Mr. Bookman, the following ordinance was adopted:
An Ordinance to Amend the Code of the County
of Chesterfield, 1978, as Amended, by Repealing
Sections 2-25, 2-27 and 2-28, by Amending and
Reenacting Sections 2-19, 2-23 and 2-24 and by
Adding a Section Numbered 2-22.1 Relating Generally
to the Duties of the Director of the Central Accounting
Department.
Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Chesterfield:
(1) That Sections 2-25, 2-27 and 2-28 are repealed.
(2) That Sections 2-19, 2-23 and 2-24 of the Code of
the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, are amended
and reenacted as follows:
Sec. 2-19. Same--Same--Responsibility for financial data.
The director of cental accounting shall be responsible
for the data within his control.
Sec. 2-23.
Same--Same--Maintaining appropriate controls and
Records of financial transactions and other similar
accounting.
The director of central accounting shall have responsibilit'
for the control and administration of the county payroll
system.
Sec. 2-24. Same--Same--Entries into books of account.
The director of central accounting shall not make or
enter into the books of account any cash or appropriation
transfer between departments, bureaus, or agencies except
upon resolution of the board of supervisors or pursuant to
provisions of the budget ordinance.
(3) That Section 2-22.1 is added as follows:
Sec. 2-22.1. Submission of invoices and receiving reports to
department.
(a) Each department head, county official, or other
person responsible shall submit, by time and date prescribed
by the director of central accounting to the office of
central accounting for payment, all invoices or receiving
reports, duly certifying that goods, materials, and supplies
shown on such invoices or receiving reports have been received
or the services have been rendered in order that the director
of central accounting may properly verify such invoice.
(b) If any invoice or voucher provides for a cash
discount or other deduction if paid within a designated
time, the department head, county official, or other person
to whose department the invoice or voucher is chargeable
shall immediately upon receiving the same approve it and
present it to the office of central accounting for payment.
If, for any reason, any invoice which provides for a cash
discount or other deduction paid within the designated time
is not properly approved and presented to the department of
central accounting for payment within such time, the department
head, county official, or other person submitting the same,
shall file therewith a written statement of the reason for
the delay in presenting such invoice for timely payment.
Vote: Unanimous
79-357
It was generally agreed by the Board to recess for 10 minutes.
Reconvening:
4.g.
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date were scheduled for a
public hearing on the County's Community Development Block
Grant first year performance and second year application.
Mr. James Zook and Ms. Linda Grasewicz, Community Development
staff working with the grant, were present. Ms. Grasewicz
reviewed the first year's performance indicating accomplishment
for the water and sewer systems, housing rehabilitation,
recreation, and administration. She stated the second year
application would be $450,000 and would be broken down in
the following segments:
$408,000
30,000
10,000
2,000
Water and Sewer
Housing Rehabilitation
Recreation
Administration
Mrs. Girone asked that staff investigate recreational activitie~
for the elderly as well. Ms. Grasewicz stated they were
coordinating their efforts with the Parks and Recreation
Department to determine the needs for all citizens. There
was no one present to discuss this matter. On motion of Mr.
Apperson seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board authorized the
County Administrator to submit the second year Community
Development Block Grant application to HUD for Ettrick.
Vote: Unanimous
4.F.
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been scheduled for
a public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to
applications for planned use developments. There was no one
present to discuss the proposed ordinance. On motion of Mr.
Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the following ordinance
was adopted:
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact Section 21-34
of the Code of the County of Chesterfield,
Virginia, 1978, as Amended, Relating to
Applications for Planned Use Developments
Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Section 21-34 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield is amended and reenacted as follows:
Division 2. Conditional Uses
Sec. 21-34. Generally.
(h) Planned developments. Planned developments are of
such substantially different character from other conditional
uses that specific and additional standards and exceptions
are hereby established to govern the recommendations of the
planning commission and the action of the board of supervisors.
(1) Use exceptions: In the case of residential,
business or industrial planned developments, the planning
commission may recommend, and the board of supervisors may
authorize, that there be in part of the area of such development
and for the duration of such development, specific uses not
permitted by the use regulations of the district in which
said development is located, provided, that the planning
commission shall find: '
79-358~
a. That the uses permited by such exception
are necessary or desirable and are appropriate with respect
to the primary purpose of the development; and
b. That the uses permitted by such exception
are not of such a nature or so located as to exercise a
detrimental influence on the surrounding neighborhood; and
c. That the total ground area or gross floor
area of such development may be devoted to the uses permitted
by said exception so long as the extent of use is reasonably
needed to appropriately finish the development.
(2) Bulk regulations: In case of any planned
development, the planning commission may recommend and the
board of supervisors may authorize exceptions to the applicable
bulk regulations of this chapter within the boundaries of
such development; provided, that the planning commission
shall find:
a. That such exception shall be solely for
the purpose of promoting an integrated site plan no less
beneficial to the residents or occupants of such development
as well as neighboring property, than would be obtained
under the bulk regulations of this chapter for buildings
developed on separate zoning lots;
b. That the minimum lot requirements of this
chapter may be decreased without limitations; provided, that
permanent open space or land, in an amount equivalent to
that by which each residential lot or building site has been
diminished under this provision, shall be provided in
common recreation area within the development.
(3) The planned development shall conform to the
Chesterfield General Plan as determined by the board of
supervisors.
(4) Procedural requirements: The following
procedure shall be adhered to by the applicant for any
planned development:
a. Application for planned use development.
Every applicant shall submit an application to the director
of community development indicating his intentions to proceed
with a conditional use for a planned development. Such
application, in addition to other requirements, shall indicate
the location, size and general nature of the proposed planned
development. The director of community development may
within thirty days of receipt of such application, instruct
the applicant to provide additional special information
reasonably necessary to review the conditional use application.
An applicant whose planned development is intended to be
constructed in phases shall indicate such phases including
their proposed timing, public improvements, and the impact
of each phase upon the county public utility, school, and
fiscal plans and programs at the same time he makes application
for the conditional use.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the
following resolution was adopted:
Whereas, by resolution dated October 1, 1977, the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors adopted a sick leave plan for
all full-time permanent County employees; and
79-359
Whereas, the County budgeted in a separate sick leave account
for the 1979-80 fiscal year the projected cost to the County
of the payment of sick leave wages; and
Whereas, the Social Security Administration through the
Virginia Supplemental Retirement System requires that the
above two actions be taken by local subdivisions in order
that the Social Security Administration may determine whether
such plan is recognized as a bona fide sick leave plan
rather than a wage continuation plan; and
Whereas, wages paid pursuant to plans recognized by the
Social Security Administration as bona fide sick leave plans
are exempt from the application of FICA taxes;
Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby requests that the Virginia
Supplemental Retirement System recommend to the Social
Security Administration that the Social Security Administration
tare the following actions:
Approve the sick leave plan adopted by the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors on October 1, 1977; and
Approve the creation of a separate sick leave wages
account which account was approved by the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors during the 1979-80 budget
approval process; and
Declare that, effective September 1, 1979, wages paid
by the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors to its
employees under the recognized sick leave plan be
excluded from the application of both the employer's
and employee's share of FICA taxes.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the
Board approved and authorized the County Administrator to
execute an agreement between the County and Shoosmith Brothers,
Inc. for said company to mow grass at the Chesterfield
County Airport, a copy of said agreement is filed with the
papers of this Board meeting.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the
Board approved and authorized the County Administrator to
enter into a lease agreement with the Airport Technical
Associates to lease 800 square feet at the Airport Technical
Building for a period of one year at an annual rate of
$5,400 which space will be used for the County's Department
of Economic Development.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the
Board approved the request from the Chesterfield County Fair
Association for a fireworks display on September 15, 1979,
at 9:30 p.m., subject to the regulations of the Chesterfield
County Fire Department.
Vote: Unanimous
Mrs. Girone stated Mr. Leonard Oboler, developer of the
James River West Subdivision was ~present and the Board could
consider his request at this time. Mr. John Henson, engineer,
was present representing Mr. Oboler. He presentd the Board
with a sample motion which they would like the
79-360
10.
Board to approve regarding the concept and use of a sewage
system for the James River West Development which utilizes
grinder pumps and appropriately sized force mains. Mr.
Bookman stated that the proposed resolution referred to
$2,000 each for each septic tank for the 40 original homes
which he did not feel was adequate. He stated he would
prefer that section state "the total cost of installing a
septic tank for each home" with no figure designated. He
stated perhaps a performance bond could be set up for this
alternative. Mr. Bookman suggested another method by which
the homes could be served with a sewer system but Mr.
Henson stated they had discussed many alternatives and this
was the one they preferred to proceed with. He added the
pumps will be installed and maintained by the developer
until the home owners association is established. Mr. Micas
stated that provisions will be incorporated into the deeds
and contracts that grinder pumps are installed and state who
will be responsible for their maintenance and upkeep. Mrs.
Girone discussed the possibility of installing dry sewers as
a back-up measure. Mr. Henson stated the septic tank
alternative and the developer paying all costs was the back-
up system. There was further discussion regarding past
experience with grinder pumps, whether or not the City would
allow connections and the fact that there would be no rebates
on the pump station if approved. Mr. Painter stated staff
had worked with the developer and he felt their system would
work but he would like a provision included stating the
County is held harmless. He added further that he felt this
would set a precedent for future developments in the surrounding
area and he would prefer dry sewers be installed.
Mr. Bookman stated he could approve the concept if the
developer would agree to a performance bond for the cost of
constructing septic tanks or dry sewers in the development.
After further discussion of the matter, it was on motion of
Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the
Board approve this concept of installing grinder pumps and
appropriately sized force mains for the provision of sewer
service to the James River West Subdivision with the County
staff to work out further details with the developer and
bring back to the Board for final approval on August 22
1979. '
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the
Board approved the following erroneous tax claims for
payment:
Equitable Leasing Corp.
Equitable Leasing Corp.
Equitable Leasing Corp.
Bruce Ruddin
J. D. Denoff
Marvin C. Messer
Hazel S. Brown
Iola Iva Jinkins
J. H. Weeks
Richard L. Ealey
Richard L. Ealey
Richard L. Ealey
Richard L. Ealey
Ruth V. Coon
Iola Iva Jinkins
William J. M. Gilfoyle
Willis H. Thompson
Virginia Leasing Corp.
Iola Iva Jinkins
Robert F. Belcher, Jr.
Mathew W. Burton, Jr.
Willie Boone c/o
Ethel Clarke
William F., Jr. and
Jean E. Blac~
1976 Business Personal Property
1977 Business Personal Property
1978 Business Personal Property
Traffic Ticket Refund
Traffic Ticket Refund
1979 Personal Property
1979 Personal Property
1977 Duplicate Assessment
1979 Reappraisal
1979 Reappraisal
1979 Reappraisal
1979 Reappraisal
1979 Reappraisal
1979 Reappraisal
1976 Duplicate Assessment
1978 Erroneous Assessment
1978 Personal Property
County Vehicle License
1978 Duplicate Assessment-
1979 P~appraisal
1979 Reappraisal
1979 Reappraisal
1979 Personal Property
$326.16
260.64
195.48
5.00
5.00
131.40
88.20
63.62
7.87
2.73
5.98
13.65
27.82
10.50
63 36
360 42
243 72
11 25
31 81
18.90
92 82
33.50
109.20
79-361
11.
12.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Meiszer informed the Board that the State Highway Department
had formally notified the County that the roads in the Lamar
Place Subdivision had been accepted into the State Secondary
System as of July 16, 1979:
Length
Stella Road - Beginning at its intersection
with Belmont Road (State 651) southeast-
erly 0.07 mile to its intersection with
Stella Court.
0.07 mi.
Stella Court - Beginning at its intersection
with Stella Road 0.03 mile southwesterly to a
cul-de-sac.
0.03 mi.
Stella Court - Beginning at its intersection
with Stella Road northeasterly 0.05 mile to a
cul-de-sac.
0.05 mi.
It was generally agreed by the Board to meet with the Mental
Health and Mental Retardation Chapter 10 Board on October
10, 1979 at 5:30 p.m. for dinner and a tour of the new
facility.
It was generally agreed by the Board that they would meet
with the Volunteer District Fire Chiefs for dinner on August
23, 1979 at 6:00 p.m.
Mr. Meiszer presented the Board with a report on gas conservatio~
by which the County fleet is operating. Mr. Apperson
mentioned that the 45 mph may not be appropriate if the
vehicle is blocking traffic and requested that operators of
the vehicles use discretion and either increase their speed
or pull off the road when driving and traffic is not allowed
to flow properly.
It was generally agreed that Mrs. Girone and Mr. Apperson
would attend the State Compensation Board meeting to appeal
the budgets of the Constitutional Officers which meeting
will be held on August 1, 1979 at 9:30 a.m.
It was generally agreed by the Board to adjourn for lunch.
Reconvening:
Chief Eanes was present and stated this time on the Board
agenda had been scheduled by the Fire Department to recognize
citations for outstanding acts of merit and for sustained
performance during 1978. Mrs. Girone and Chief Eanes
presented the following awards:
1. Citation of Merit to Mr. Howard W. Branch, a Civilian;
2. Unit Citation to Company #1, Chester;
3. Unit Citation to Company #3, Bensley;
4. Unit Citation to the Dive Team;
5. Outstanding Volunteer Firefighter, 1978, to Allen
Ritter of Company #5, Midlothian;
6. Outstanding Salaried Firefighter, 1978~ to Sgt. Doug
Malaspino, Company #5, Midlothian; and
7. Most Outstanding Fire Company, 1978 to Company #7,
Clover Hill.
The Board members thanked the firemen on behalf of the
citizens of Chesterfield County for their dedication and
outstanding efforts during 1978 a~ Mr. Branch for his bravery
and concern for his fellowman.
79-362
13. 79Sl15
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Mr. E. Buford Perkins
requested a mobile home pe'rm~t to p~'rk ~ mobile home on
property which he owns. T.M. 116-5 (2) Dalewood Annex, Lot
52 and better known as 3101 Woodside Drive (Sheet 32).
Mrs. Perkins was present. It was generally agreed by the
Board that this case be deferred until August 8, 1979, when
the Supervisor from the district was present to discuss this
matter.
79SR136
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Dalton Ray Garris requested
renewal of a mobile home permit to park a mobile home on
property which he owns. Tax Map 67-3 (1) parcel 12 and
better known as 2679 Drewry's Bluff Road (Sheet 23).
Mrs. Garris was present. There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, this
request was approved for a five year period.
Vote: Unanimous
79SR137
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Sherman Mills requested renewal
of a Mobile Home Permit to park a mobile home on property
which belongs to his wife. Tax Map 115-10 (5) Marquis
Property, Lot 7 and better known as 4816 Shop Street (Sheet
32).
Mr. Mills was present. There was no opposition present. On
motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the Board
approved this request for a period of five years.
Vote: Unanimous
79SR138
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Russel C. Newell requested
a Mobile Home Permit to park a mobile home on property which
he owns. Tax Map 826 (1) parcel 3 and better known as 1801
Willis Road (Sheet 23).
Mr. Newell was present. There was no opposition present. On
motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, this request
was approved for a period of five years.
Vote: Unanimous
79SR139
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Ms. Betty Lewis requested
renewal of a Mobile Home Permit to park a mobile home on
property which belongs to J. Dudley, brother of the applicant.
Tax Map 115-10 (3) Werths Addition, Lots 69A, part of 70 and
71 and better known as 4841 Shop Street (Sheet 32).
Ms. Lewis was present. Mr. Balderson stated that the home
did not have any plumbing and Ms. Lewis was using the
plumbing facilities of an adjacent home. Mr. Micas stated
the Health Department did not give a negative recormnendation
and they are the agency responsible. There was no opposition
79-363
14.
present. On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson,
this request was approved for a period of five years.
Vote: Unanimous
79S140
In Dale Magisterial District, Ms. Amanda O'Brien Pulley
requested a Mobile Home Permit to park a mobile home on
property which she owns. Tax Map 42-14 (4) Falling Creek
and better known as 3000 Falling Creek Avenue (Sheet 16).
Ms. Pulley was present and explained her hardship and the
need for a mobile home. There was no opposition present. On
motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, this
request was approved for a period of five years because of
the hardship involved.
Vote: Unanimous
79Sl10
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Douglas E. Markham
requested a Conditional Use to permit a day care center in
an Agricultural (A) District on a parcel fronting approximately
130 feet on Turner Road and located approximately 1100 feet
north of its intersection with Elkhardt Road. Tax Map 29-5
(1) parcel 5 (Sheet 9).
Mr. Balderson stated the applicant had requested withdrawal
of the application. On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by
Mr. Apperson, the Board accepted the request for withdrawal
of this application.
Vote: Unanimous
79S101
In Dale Magisterial District, Richard M. Allen Kequested a
Conditional Use to permit offices and a day care center in
an Agricultural (A) District on a 5.5 acre parcel fronting
approximately 400 feet on Centralia Road and located approximateI
950 feet east of its intersection with Iron Bridge Road.
Tax Map 96-9 (1) parcel 2 (Sheet 31).
Mr. Balderson stated the applicant had requested a 30 day
deferral. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman,
the Board deferred this case until August 22, 1979 at the
request of the applicant.
Vote: Unanimous
79S105
In Dale Magisterial District, Richard M. Allen requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to General Business (B-3) of
a 2 acre parcel fronting approximately 400 feet on Iron
Bridge Road and located approximately 390 feet north of its
intersection with Quaiff Lane. Tax Map 65-16 (1) part of
parcel 2 (Sheet 22).
Mr. Dick Allen was present. No opposition was present. Mr.
Apperson stated he did not see any value in the requirement
for undisturbed vegetation and stated he would delete that
part of the conditions. After further consideration of the
matter, it was on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr.
Bookman, resolved that this request be approved subject to
the following conditions:
79-364
A fifty (50) foot buffer (required building and
parking setback) shall be maintained along the
east (front) property line. A single access drive
shall be permitted through this buffer. This access
shall be located to the extreme south of the property.
A thirty (30) foot buffer shall be maintained along
the northern property line and a fifteen (15) foot
buffer along the western (rear) property line. These
buffers shall be planted in accordance with the
minimum Guidelines for Landscaped buffers. The 30
foot buffer along the northern property line shall be
eliminated when the adjacent property to the north is
developed commercially.
Vote: Unanimous
79S097
In Bermuda Magisterial District, J. Cyrus Kirkpatrick, Jr.,
Arthur J. and Mable M. Boyd and Burleigh W. Reibsamen requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) and Residential (R-7) to
Residential (R-15) of a 22.71 acre parcel which lies approximate
170 feet off the west line of Merry Drive measured from a
point approximately 700 feet south of its intersection with
Blithe Drive. Tax Map 116-9 (1) parcels 3 and 4 and Tax Map
116-13 (1) parcels 5, 7, and 9 (Sheet 32).
Mr. Reibsamen was present. Mr. Apperson inquired about the
possibility of another road access since there will be over
50 homes planned for the area after the development is
complete development. Mr. Reibsamen stated the residents
currently in the area do not want another access. No
opposition was present. After further consideration of the
request, it was on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr.
Bookman, resolved that this request be approved as recommended
by the Planning Commission.
Vote: Unanimous
79S098
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Wendall Associates requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-25) of a
33.85 acre parcel fronting approximately 770 feet on Graves
Road and located approximately 2620 feet west of its intersectio~
with Firewood Lane. Tax Map 172-9 (1) parcel 1 (Sheet 48).
No opposition was present. On motion of Mr. Apperson,
seconded by Mr. Bookman, this request was approved as recommende¢
by the Planning Commission.
Vote: Unanimous
79S100
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Johnston-Willis Medical
Building Corp. requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to
Office Business (0) of a 4.7 acre parcel which lies approximatel.
350 feet off the north line of Midlothian Turnpike measured
from a point approximately 1500 feet east of its intersection
with Southlake Boulevard. Tax Map 17-6 (1) parcel 7 (Sheet
8).
79-365
.y
A gentleman was present representing the application. Mrs.
Girone stated she felt there might be a drainage problem on
Lotus Drive and cautioned staff to be aware of it. There
was no opposition present. After further discussion of the
matter, it was on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr.
Apperson, resolved that this request be and it hereby is
approved as recommended by the Planning Commission with the
applicant proferring the following:
A buffer having a width of not less than 25 feet shall be
provided adjacent to the eastern property line and more
particularly between the subject p~operty and Lot 34, of
Avon Park. This buffer shall consist of existing vegetation
which shall neither be cut, removed or disturbed other than
by additional landscaping which provides thicker screening
and/or is directed at maintaining the existing vegetation.
No sidewalks, driveways, buildings or other facilities shall
be permitted within this buffer.
Vote: Unanimous
79S102
In Midlothian Magisterial District, The Colebrook Company
requested rezoning from Residential (R-7) to Convenience
Business (B-i) and~a Conditional Use Planned Development on
a 6 acre parcel fronting approximately 600 feet on Westfield
Road and located approximately 235 feet west of its in-
tersection with Crowder Drive. Tax Map 15-12 (2) parcel 2
(Sheet 7).
Mr. Doug Woolfolk was present representing the application.
There was no opposition present. On motion of Mrs. Girone,
seconded by Mr. Bookman, the request was approved as recommended
by the Planning Commission subject to the following conditions:
The plan submitted with the application and prepared by
Charles Shiftlett, dated June, 1979 shall be considered
the Master Plan.
The applicant shall be granted the following exceptions
to the bulk requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
North of building P4, the driveway shall be
allowed to encroach into the fifteen (15)
foot setback five (5) feet.
m o
Building P6 shall be allowed to encroach into
the twenty (20) foot side yard setback ten (10)
feet.
Screening adjacent to the property which is
located to the east and zoned Residential (R-7)
shall not be required.
This Planned Development shall be subject to the following
conditions:
Proposed Sycamore Drive shall be dedicated as a
sixty (60) foot right-of-way for its entire length
from Midlothian Turnpike northward to Westfield Drive.
This dedication shall be accomplished prior to the
release of any building permits.
Sycamore Drive shall align with the proposed roadway
which is to serve Sycamore Mews, the condominium
development to the north.
79-366
Proposed Sycamore Drive shall be constructed to
State standards and taken into the State System
prior to occupancy of more than seventy-five (75)
percent of the gross leaseable area of Phase II.
Prior to the release of any building permits on
Phase II, road plans for Sycamore Square shall be
approved by the Virginia Department of Highways
and Transportation and Environmental Engineering.
Approval of the Master Plan does not obligate the
Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation
to approve the alignment of Sycamore Drive, as shown.
o
At such a time that the Virginia Department of Highways
and Transportation determines that signalization is
necessary at the intersection of Midlothian Turnpike
and Sycamore Drive, the developer shall share in the
cost of installation. The cost of which shall be
based on a pro-rata share of the amount of traffic
generated by this development.
Ail structures to be erected on the parcel shall
be similar in design to those constructed in
Sycamore Square, Phase I.
Ail utility lines shall be provided with underground
distribution.
Pedestrian walkways shall be provided, marked and shown
on all schematic plans. These walkways shall be placed
at appropriate locations, as deemed so by the staff
and the Planning Commission upon schematic approval.
10.
An additional fifteen (15) feet of right-of-way
measured from the existing right-of-way of Westfield
Drive shall be dedicated to and for the County of
Chesterfield, free and unrestricted, for the entire
length of the property. This dedication shall be
accomplished prior to the release of any building
permits.
11.
The above noted conditions notwithstanding all bulk
requirements of the Convenience Business (B-l) District
shall be applicable.
NOTE:
Schematic approval must be obtained in conjunction
with final site plan approval for each separate
building and prior to the release of any building
permits.
Vote: Unanimous
79S103
In Midlothian Magisterial District, George W. Gray requested
rezoning from Residential (R-15) to Community Business (B-2)
of an irregular parcel fronting approximately 25 feet on
Buford Road and located approximately 400 feet south of its
intersection with Forest Hill Avenue. Tax Map 10-6 (2) Bon
Air.Plat, Block 63, part of Lot 29 (Sheet 3).
Mr. Gray was present. No opposition was present. Mr. Gray
stated he planned to extend the road island fifteen feet.
After further consideration of the matter, it was on motion
of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that this
request be approved subject to the following conditions:
79-367
A fifteen (15) foot buffer shall be maintained
along Buford Road. The curb and gutter along
Buford Road shall be extended for a length of
twenty-five (25) feet southward from the
shopping center. Access through this buffer
shall be prohibited.
~ fifteen foot buffer shall also be mm~nta~_ned along McRae
Street (the western property line). Within this buffer, there shall
be installed a 6 foot high solid board fence that will also ru~
the entire length of the property in order to screen from view the
adjacent P~sidential (R-15) property. All parking areas are to be
paved. Vehicular access through this buffer shall be prohibited:
however, it shall be permissible to have a pedestrian gatev~y
allowing pedestrians access through the buffer.
Vote: UnanLn~s
79S124
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Bruce R. Anderson
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Light Industrial
(M-l) with a Conditional Use Planned Development of a 2.42
acre parcel fronting approximately 180 feet on Ruthers Road
and located approximately 450 feet north of its intersection
with Provincetown Drive and better known as 214 Ruthers
Road. Tax Map 28-4 (1) parcel 29 (Sheet 8).
Mr. Anderson was present. There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, this
request was approved subject to the following conditions:
The site plan submitted with the application and
attached hereto shall be considered the Master Plan.
Approval of the Master Plan shall also mean approval
of reduction of the side yard setback to seven (7)
feet.
The uses permitted shall be limited to a machine shop.
The entire operation shall be confined to the interior
of the existing shop and the proposed structure.
(Note: The Zoning Ordinance prohibits outside storage
of materials, equipment, supplies or parts).
The hours of operation shall be limited from 8 a.m.
to 9 p.m., Monday through Saturday. No Sunday
operations shall be permitted.
The exterior facade of the proposed addition shall
employ subdued earth tones (gray, greens or browns).
The exact color shall be approved by the Division of
Development Review in conjunction with final site
plan review.
o
o
One parking space for each employee shall be provided.
These spaces shall either be paved or graveled.
One sign not to exceed four (4) square feet in area
shall be permitted. This sign shall not be luminous
nor illuminated. Prior to the erection of the sign,
a rendering shall be submitted to the Division of
Development Review for approval.
Prior to the release of a building permit, thirty (30)
feet of right-of-way measured from the centerline
of Ruthers Road shall be dedicated to and for the
County of Chesterfield, free and unrestricted.
Upon approval of this request, the Commission shall
grant schematic approval of the plan attached hereto.
Vote: Unanimous
79-368
79S141
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Herman L. and Fay K. Wells
requested an amendment to a previously granted Conditional
Use request (77S164) to delete the five (5) year time limitatior
for the operation of an automotive and small truck repair
and body shop in an Agricultural (A) District on a parcel
fronting approximately 400 feet on Graves Road and located
approximately 7000 feet east of its intersection with River
Road. Tax Map 172-9 (1) parcel 52 (Sheet 48).
Mr. Wells was present. There was no opposition present. On
motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
approved the request for an amendment to a previously granted
Conditional Use request, Case #77S164, approved February 22,
1978, which eliminates conditions #1 and #3 deleting the
five year time period and allowing this special exception to
run with the land.
Vote: Unanimous
79S106
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Hechinger Company
requested an amendment to a previously granted zoning request
(Case #73S129) to permit the elimination of a buffer requiremen
on a parcel fronting approximately 710 feet on Midlothian
Turnpike and located approximately 180 feet west of its
intersection with Paramont Drive. Tax Map 28-3 (1) part of
parcel 6-1 (Sheet 8).
Mr. Bill Walsh representing the Hechinger Company stated he
had agreed to several conditions which Mr. P. F. Couch, an
adjacent landowner, had requested. There was no opposition
present. On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson,
this request to delete the twenty~five foot (25') buffer was
approved subject to thefollowingconditionsand the above agreemmnt:
1. The applicant shall construct along the subject
parcel and parcel 23, T. M. 28-2, an eight foot
high chain link fence with wooden slats. That
fence will be located inside the Hechinger boundary
line, but the distance between such boundary line
and the fence shall be determined by the applicant;
provided, however, that the grade of the area between
the fence and the common boundary line shall not
change from the present grade of that property.
2. The fence shall be constructed within thirty days
after the hedgerow, located along the common
boundary line, is removed.
A six (6) foot high chain link fence with wooden
slats shall also be installed along the eastern
property line. This fence shall be placed five (5)
feet off the property line. Between the fence and
the property line, there shall be installed evergreens
and poplars. The fence location and planting shall be
more specifically in accordance with the plan dated
6/7/79, noted as Scheme ~12 and submitted with the
application.
Vote: Unanimous
79-369
79S107
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Donald B. Heslep
requested a Conditional Use for Planned Development in a
Light Industrial (M-l) District on a .3' acre parcel fronting
approximately 400 feet on Turner Road and located approximately
400 feet north of its intersection with Walmsley Boulevard.
Tax Map 40-2 (1) part of parcel 11 (Sheet 15).
Mr. Heslep was present. There was no opposition present. On
motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the Board
approved this request as recommended by the Planning
Commission subject to the following conditions:
The plan submitted with the application shall be
considered the Master Plan.
The area shall be secured by a chain link fence
which shall be located along the west, north and
south property lines.
The structure shall be similar in design to
the warehouses located on property to the west.
4. Ail driveways and parking areas shall be paved.
Drainage shall be provided for each building so
footings and foundations can be provided with
artificial drainage.
Prior to the release of any building permits, all
necessary sewer connection fees shall be paid.
The Commission shall grant schematic approval of the
plan attached hereto.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the
Board requested the Planning Commission to consider the
deletion of the vegetative requirements within the
50 foot buffer imposed on property which was rezoned on
August 23, 1978, Case #78S109.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the
Board went into Executive Session to discuss legal matters
with the County Attorney.
Vote: Unanimous
Reconvening:
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the
Board accepted the offer of Daffron and Company to lease the
Airport Restaurant effective upon eviction or voluntary
evacuation of the current tenant with lease agreement to
be approved at a later date.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of the Board, %he Board publiclM expressed their
appreciation and gratitude to Colonel Herbert W. Ogelsby
for the time and effort he spent as a member of the Airport
Advisory Board.
Vote: Unanimous
79-370
Mrs. Girone indicated that at the Evergreen study session,
the Planning Commission indicated the need for additional
information to evaluate and project county needs. The
County Administrator indicated that what the Board was
describing was a computer model of the County services and
needs. He stated this could begin with the utilities department,
which would involve water and sewer information. Mrs.
Girone indicated the School System would benefit greatly
from this information and Mr. Apperson added the Planning
Department as well could utilize this information. Mr.
Bookman inquired if this information could be gathered in
time to be used for planning Evergreen or the Charter
Colony. Mr. Meiszer stated that County staff would not have
sufficient time to prepare for these two projects. After
further discussion of the matter, it was on motion of Mr.
Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that the County
Administrator and staff be authorized to develop a comuter
based information system beginning with the Utilities
Department (water and sewer information) to evaluate and
project the County needs.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, the
Board adjourned at 4:00 p.m.
Vote: Unanimous
Nid~olas M. Meisze~ ~?
County Adminis trator/~/
E. Merlin O Neill, Sr. ~' '
Chairman
79-371