2022-07-27 Minutes
22-474
7/27/2022
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
July 27, 2022
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. Christopher M. Winslow, Chair
Mr. James M. Holland, Vice Chair
Mr. James A. Ingle, Jr.
Mr. Kevin P. Carroll
Ms. Tara C. Carroll
Dr. Joseph P. Casey
County Administrator
Mr. Winslow called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved the minutes of May 26, 2022, as submitted.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
2. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE AGENDA ITEMS AND ADDITIONS,
DELETIONS OR CHANGES IN THE ORDER OF PRESENTATION
There were no requests to postpone agenda items and additions,
deletions or changes in the order of presentation.
3. WORK SESSIONS
3.A. EVERYDAY EXCELLENCE – PARKS AND RECREATION ROVER
PROGRAM
Mr. Neil Luther, Director of Parks and Recreation, provided
details relative to his department’s Rover Workgroup, a small
contingent of employees who perform a critical role with the
parks system.
3.B. INTERN RECOGNITION
Ms. Mary Martin Selby, Director of Human Resources, provided
details relative to the county’s internship program. She stated
each summer, the Department of Human Services sponsors the
Chesterfield County college internship program to provide
students an opportunity to gain hands-on experience and a
realistic preview of what it is like to work in local
government. She further stated the county is committed to
administering a successful, efficient and inclusive program
that will allow interns to make a positive contribution to the
community while gaining valuable work experience in their field
of study. She stated during the 10-week program, interns will
experience networking and professional development
opportunities; gain professional experience in their assigned
county department; and learn about the mission and vision of
the county.
Ms. Layla Powell, intern, provided details relative to her
internship experiences.
22-475
7/27/2022
3.C. RECOVERY HIGH SCHOOL UPDATE
Ms. Kelly Fried, Executive Director of Mental Health, provided
details relative to the Chesterfield Recovery Academy. She
stated the academy is a year-round program serving high school
students from central Virginia who are recovering from drug
addiction. She further stated recovery high schools are
designed for students who are in early recovery from substance
use disorders. She stated students will receive the academic,
emotional and social support necessary to complete their high
school education. She further stated the program also provides
flexibility to allow students to participate in internships or
hold a job while enrolled. She stated this structured system
of support and preparation for the future sets students on a
path toward continued success. She further stated in addition
to Chesterfield County Public Schools, the program will receive
assistance from health agencies, local and state government
programs, police, and legal agencies to help students navigate
through recovery while working toward their high school
diploma.
In response to Mr. Winslow’s question, Ms. Fried stated once
enrolled, students may remain in Chesterfield Recovery Academy
through graduation or may return to their home school when they
feel ready to do so. She further stated if the academy reaches
its enrollment limit, applicants will be placed on a waiting
list. She stated admission continues on a rolling basis as
openings become available. She noted to be considered for
enrollment, complete the interest form and a staff member will
contact you for more information.
In response to Mr. Holland’s question, Ms. Fried stated there
are only seven accredited recovery academies across the nation.
Mr. Ingle expressed his appreciation to Ms. Fried for her
support relative to the initiative.
3.D. BOND REFERENDUM UPDATE
Mr. Matt Harris, Deputy County Administrator, provided details
relative to the Community Facilities Bond Plan. He stated
Chesterfield County is requesting a bond referendum (election)
for Tuesday, Nov. 8, 2022. He further stated a bond referendum
is a vital component of the local democratic process in which
citizens vote on the financing of the county’s long range
capital plan. He stated voters will consider one question to
approve key projects for schools, public safety, libraries and
parks. He further stated an affirmative vote grants the county
authority to issue general obligation (GO) bonds to finance a
finite list of projects. He noted the total amount of the bonds
for which voter approval is sought is $540 million, including
$375 million for school facilities and $165 million for other
county facilities (public safety, libraries and parks). He
stated the Board of Supervisors will not pursue meals or other
new taxes to support these planned debt service obligations;
debt service should grow proportionately with budget; and the
county can support ongoing debt service with existing resources
without putting pressure on other priorities. In closing, he
highlighted community engagement and voting information.
Discussion ensued relative to specifics of the upcoming bond
referendum and project criteria.
22-476
7/27/2022
3.E. CONSENT AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS
Mr. Jesse Smith, Deputy County Administrator, updated the Board
on various consent agenda highlights being proposed this
evening which include, resolution of support for funding
considerations through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law; a
$550,000 grant from the Federal Transit Administration through
the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation;
Smart Scale project endorsement for Tri-Cities MPO: Fall Line
Trail (River Road through Virginia State University to Patton
Park and Appomattox River Trail) and Appomattox River Trail
(Route 1 to Colonial Heights and I-95) projects; and
appropriation of funds and authorization to award a
construction contract for the Cogbill Road park and ride lot
and sidewalk project.
4. REPORTS
There were no reports to accept at this time.
5. FIFTEEN-MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
There were no requests to address the Board at this time.
6. CLOSED SESSION
6.A. CLOSED SESSION 1) PURSUANT TO § 2.2-3711(A)(5), CODE
OF VIRGINIA, 1950, AS AMENDED, TO DISCUSS OR CONSIDER
PROSPECTIVE BUSINESSES OR INDUSTRIES OR THE EXPANSION
OF EXISTING BUSINESSES OR INDUSTRIES WHERE NO PREVIOUS
ANNOUNCEMENT HAS BEEN MADE OF THE BUSINESSES’ OR
INDUSTRIES’ INTEREST IN LOCATING OR EXPANDING THEIR
FACILITIES IN THE COMMUNITY, AND 2) PURSUANT TO § 2.2-
3711(A)(3), CODE OF VIRGINIA, 1950, AS AMENDED, TO
DISCUSS THE ACQUISITION BY THE COUNTY OF REAL ESTATE
FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE, AND OF THE DISPOSITION OF
PUBLICLY HELD REAL PROPERTY, WHERE DISCUSSION IN AN
OPEN MEETING WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE BARGAINING
POSITION AND NEGOTIATING STRATEGY OF THE PUBLIC BODY,
AND 3) PURSUANT TO 2.2-3711(A)(1), CODE OF VIRGINIA,
1950, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF THE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Carroll, the Board
went into closed session 1) pursuant to Section 2.2--
3711(a)(5), Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to discuss or
consider prospective businesses or industries or the expansion
of existing businesses or industries where no previous
announcement has been made of the businesses’ or industries’
interest in locating or expanding their facilities in the
community, and 2) pursuant to Section 2.2-3711(a)(3), Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, to discuss the acquisition by the
county of real estate for a public purpose, and of the
disposition of publicly held real property, where discussion
in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining
position and negotiating strategy of the public body, and 3)
pursuant to Section 2.2-3711(a)(1), Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended, relating to the performance of the County
Administrator.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
22-477
7/27/2022
Reconvening:
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day adjourned
into Closed Session in accordance with a formal vote of the
Board and in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia
Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act effective
July 1, 1989 provides for certification that such Closed
Session was conducted in conformity with law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Board of Supervisors
does hereby certify that to the best of each member’s
knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully exempted
from open meeting requirements under the Freedom of Information
Act were discussed in Closed Session to which this
certification applies, and ii) only such business matters were
identified in the motion by which the Closed Session was
convened were heard, discussed or considered by the Board. No
member dissents from this certification.
Mr. Ingle: Aye.
Mr. Carroll: Aye.
Ms. Carroll: Aye.
Mr. Holland: Aye.
Mr. Winslow: Aye.
7. RECESS FOR DINNER WITH CAMP BAKER MANAGEMENT BOARD AT
SOAR365
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
recessed for dinner with the Camp Management Board at SOAR365.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
8. INVOCATION
The Honorable Kevin Carroll, Matoaca District Supervisors,
gave the invocation.
9. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mr. Matt Harris, Deputy County Administrator, led the Pledge
of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America.
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATION UPDATE
10.A. INTRODUCTION OF NEW GENERAL REGISTRAR
Dr. Casey announced the Chesterfield Electoral Board recently
selected Ms. Missy Vera as the county’s new General Registrar
and Director of Elections. He stated she has served in the
General Registrar’s office since 2017 and is highly regarded
for her knowledge and professionalism.
22-478
7/27/2022
10.B. INTRODUCTION OF NEW DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTING
Dr. Casey introduced Ms. Consuela Wilson upon her transition
from assistant director to director of the Accounting
Department. He stated with more than 20 years of experience
with Chesterfield, Ms. Wilson has already had a tremendous
influence on Accounting’s well-documented longtime success.
10.C. NATIONAL NIGHT OUT UPDATE
Dr. Casey announced the county’s Police Chief, Col. Jeffrey
Katz was recently appointed by the governor to serve on the
state’s Criminal Justice Services Board. He stated the Board
advises the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice and
includes leaders from all areas of the criminal justice system.
Col. Katz then provided an update to the Board about planned
National Night Out activities occurring among neighborhoods,
churches, and businesses throughout the county. He also
provided details relative to the success of the Police Teen
Academy and the influence on young people.
10.D. RECOGNITION OF RECENT AWARDS AND EMPLOYEE ACHIEVEMENTS
On behalf of Parks and Recreation, Dr. Casey thanked Ms. Linda
Scott and the rest of the Chesterfield Pickleball Club for
their gift of AED machines, which have recently been installed
at the pickleball courts at CTC Hull and Harry G. Daniel Park
at Iron Bridge.
10.E. OTHER COUNTY ADMINISTRATION UPDATES
Dr. Casey introduced Ms. Brenda White, general manager, with
the Chesterfield County Fair who provided an update and
highlights on the upcoming event, which carries on a long and
very proud tradition in Chesterfield.
Dr. Casey announced this morning Deputy County Administrator
Jesse Smith and himself had the pleasure of accompanying all
five Board members to the Department of Utilities all-staff
meeting. He stated the department typically holds a meeting
twice a year to welcome new employees, celebrate employees’
years of service, and recognize recent retirees.
11. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
Mr. Ingle announced ROAR was recognized by America in Bloom as
an official Growing Vibrant Community. He stated storefront
beautification projects included plantings at BizWorks and
Bill Conley’s State Farm Insurance. He announced he attended
the Chesterfield Drone Facility Dedication on July 7th, which
will be managed by Parks and Recreation. He also announced the
future Enon Library Building will be renamed The Reverend Dr.
Wyatt T. Walker Building.
Mr. Carroll announced the Tri-City Chili Peppers and the
Chesterfield Firefighters Charitable Foundation partnered to
raise money to help support Alicia Monahan’s children on July
13. He announced he was elected as Chairman of the Central
Virginia Transportation Authority at their July 15th meeting.
Other events he attended include speaking with recruits from
the 84th basic class, the NACO conference in Colorado along
with Mr. Holland, and the Moseley Elementary School Ribbon
Cutting. He also provided details relative to Otterdale Road
drainage improvements and Horsepen Creek Crossing.
22-479
7/27/2022
Ms. Carroll announced she attended the Dunkin’ grand opening
on July 16th at 1366 Sycamore Square Drive. She also announced
the Board met with members of the Camp Baker Board and she
provided details relative to the services the organization
provides.
Mr. Holland announced he attended the volunteer recognition
reception on June 30th, as well as the July 4th event at the
county fairgrounds. He also recognized Auxiliary Police
Officer Marilyn Farmer, who recently retired after 22 years of
service, as well as Mr. Gregory Whirley and Mr. Steve Elswick
for their service on the Richmond Metropolitan Transportation
Authority Board of Directors.
Mr. Winslow announced he attended the 288/Genito Special Focus
Area Community Meeting on July 12th at Clover Hill High School,
a lunch and ride-along with firefighters from Station 20,
Chesterfield After Hours at River City Sportsplex on July 22
and the Eastern Star of Virginia, Prince Hall Affiliation
Banquet on July 26th.
Mr. Holland announced Henrico Deputy County Manager Mr. Anthony
McDowell has been selected to lead the Virginia Opioid
Abatement Authority as its first executive director.
12. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS
12.A. RECOGNIZING CORPORAL WILLIAM S. FRANCIS, III, POLICE
DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT
Colonel Katz introduced Corporal Williams S. Francis, III, who
was present to receive the resolution.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Corporal William S. "Skip" Francis, III will
retire from the Chesterfield County Police Department on July
1, 2022, after providing nearly 32 years of quality service to
the residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Francis started his law-enforcement
career as a Patrol Officer and faithfully served the county as
a Senior Detective, Senior Police Officer, Master Police
Officer, Career Police Officer, and Corporal; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Francis also served during his tenure
as a CAP Officer, Field Training Officer, Aviation Officer,
DARE Officer, School Resource Officer and Desk Officer, and
has served as a member of the Metro Aviation Unit and Special
Response Unit; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Francis was recognized by the Richmond
Police Department with a Unit Citation while serving on the
Metro Aviation Unit for exceptional performance of the unit
that performed in an exemplary manner; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Francis received an Achievement Award
for his actions as he initiated a traffic stop of a stolen vehicle in the parking lot of Manchester High School, while
using extreme caution due to the large number of students
present; and
22-480
7/27/2022
WHEREAS, Corporal Francis was presented with a Chief's
Commendation for his response to an armed robbery call, and due to his keen observation skills, calm demeanor and clear
radio instructions, the suspects, who had committed numerous other crimes, were arrested; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Francis was the recipient of a Life
Saving Award for his actions when he responded to a domestic
violence call where a man was suffering a medical emergency;
Career Officer Francis and his fellow officers were commended
for their quick actions; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Francis was recognized with a Life
Saving Award for his actions while he was off duty and was
commended for his experienced assessment and decisiveness which
saved a man's life; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Francis was consistently recognized by
his supervisors as being a mentor to the newer officers and
frequently sharing his experiences and knowledge with them to
help them better perform their job; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Francis is recognized for his strong
work ethic, his teamwork, and excellent communications and
human relations skills, all of which he has utilized within
the Police Department and in assisting residents of
Chesterfield County during his career; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Francis has received numerous letters
of commendation, thanks and appreciation for services rendered
and has provided the Chesterfield County Police Department with
many years of loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors
will miss Corporal Francis' diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Corporal
William S. "Skip" Francis, III and extends on behalf of its
members and the residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation
for his service to the county, congratulations upon his
retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution
be presented to Corporal Francis, and that this resolution be
permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
Mr. Winslow presented an executed resolution to Corporal
Francis, expressed appreciation for his valuable service and
contributions to the county, and wished him a happy retirement.
Dr. Casey presented Corporal Francis with an engraved brick,
expressed appreciation for his exceptional and faithful
service to the county, and wished him well in his retirement.
Corporal Francis thanked the Board of Supervisors for the
special recognition and kind sentiments.
A standing ovation followed.
22-481
7/27/2022
13. NEW BUSINESS
13.A. APPOINTMENTS
13.A.1. TOWING ADVISORY BOARD
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
nominated/appointed Ms. Rhonda Lee and Ms. Nicole Eagles as
the representatives of licensed towing and recovery operators;
appointed Mr. Mirelys Corsoro as the member of the general
public representative; and appointed Captain Timothy Kehoe and
reappointed Sergeant Lisa Harper as the Chesterfield Police
Department’s representatives on the Towing Advisory Board,
whose terms are effective immediately and will expire on August
31, 2025.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.A.2. COMMITTEE ON THE FUTURE
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
nominated/appointed Ms. Cheryl Jackson-Darden to serve as a
Dale District representative on the Committee on the Future,
at the pleasure of the Board.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B. CONSENT ITEMS
13.B.1. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS
13.B.1.a. RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR FUNDING CONSIDERATIONS
THROUGH THE BIPARTISAN INFRASTRUCTURE LAW
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Law
identifies record investment in the nation’s infrastructure to
support projects throughout the United States; and
WHEREAS, funding opportunities will be directed through
two channels, non-competitive formula funding overseen by the
states and competitive grant funding; and
WHEREAS, when grant applications become available,
Chesterfield will explore opportunities for federal funding
consideration through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law; and
WHEREAS, federal funding could help build and repair
roads, bridges and other infrastructure improvements; and
WHEREAS, infrastructure improvements generally affects
the overall quality of life for Chesterfield citizens and
businesses, but also improves connectivity and is valuable to
promote economic opportunities for Chesterfield County and the
region.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County hereby endorses and
supports application submission to and consideration by the
county’s Congressional delegation and subsequent Congressional
22-482
7/27/2022
Appropriations Subcommittees for federal Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law funding on eligible infrastructure projects
in Chesterfield County.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B.2. REAL PROPERTY REQUESTS
13.B.2.a. ACCEPTANCE OF PARCELS OF LAND
13.B.2.a.1. ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ADJACENT TO
HAMPTON PARK DRIVE FROM COTTAGE COURT L.L.C.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.012
acres adjacent to Hampton Park Drive from Cottage Court L.L.C.
and authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B.2.a.2. ACCEPTANCE OF PARCELS OF LAND ADJACENT TO ROUTE
I FROM CROWN J D HWY HOLDINGS LLC
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
accepted the conveyance of parcels of land containing a total
of 0.218 acres adjacent to Route 1 from Crown J D HWY Holding
LLC and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
deed.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B.2.a.3. ACCEPTANCE OF PARCELS OF LAND ADJACENT TO ROUTE
1 FROM CROWN ENTERPRISES INC.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
accepted the conveyance of parcels of land containing a total
of 0.121 acres adjacent to Route 1 from Crown Enterprises Inc.
and authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B.2.a.4. ACCEPT THE DONATION OF LAND ADJACENT TO HOPKINS
ROAD
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
accepted the conveyance of parcels of land containing a total
of 2.0 acres, more or less, adjacent to Hopkins Road from Earle
Spencer, Jr., Trustee, or Successors in Trust, under the Earle
Spencer, Jr., Living Trust, dates April 30, 2013, and
authorized the County Administrator to execute the real estate
donation contract and deed.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
22-483
7/27/2022
13.B.2.b. CONVEYANCE OF EASEMENTS
13.B.2.b.1. CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO VIRGINIA ELECTRIC
AND POWER COMPANY FOR A VARIABLE WIDTH
UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD EASEMENT ACROSS FALLING
CREEK MIDDLE SCHOOL
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute an agreement with Virginia
Electric and Power Company for a variable width underground
and overhead easement across Falling Creek Middle School.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B.2.c. REQUESTS TO QUITCLAIM
13.B.2.c.1. REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM SEWER EASEMENTS, WATER
EASEMENTS, SWMBMP ACCESS EASEMENTS, SWMBMP
EASEMENTS, SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, AND
DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ACROSS PROPERTIES OWNED BY
THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate
sewer easements, water easements, SWMBMP access easements,
SWMBMP easements, slope and drainage easements, and drainage
easements across properties owned by the Economic Development
Authority of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B.3. ACCEPTANCE OF FY2023 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
(FTA) SECTION 5310 OPERATING AND MOBILITY
MANAGEMENT FUNDING
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
accepted and appropriated FY2023 Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) Section 5310 Operating and Mobility
Management Funding, in the amount of $554,734, from the
Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B.4. FY2023 JAIL MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM CONTINUATION GRANT
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to accept and appropriate
the FY2023 DCJS grant award of $324,073 for continuation of
the Jail Mental Health Program at the Chesterfield County Jail.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
22-484
7/27/2022
13.B.5. AUTHORIZE THE APPROPRIATION OF $299,762 AND THE
CREATION OF 3 TEMPORARY FULL-TIME POSITIONS FOR THE
REGIONAL RECOVERY HIGH SCHOOL PILOT PROGRAM
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Chesterfield Community Services Board to
receive and appropriate $299,762 and create 3 temporary full-
time positions to support behavioral services at the regional
Recovery High School.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B.6. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR COUNTY PROJECT
ADDISON-EVANS WTP RAW WATER INTAKE IMPROVEMENTS
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Director of Procurement to award the
construction contract to Southwood Building Systems, Inc. in
the amount of $865,290 and executed all necessary change orders
up to the full amount budgeted for the Addison-Evans WTP Raw
Water Intake Improvements project.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B.7. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS AND AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD A
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE COGBILL ROAD PARK AND
RIDE LOT AND SIDEWALK PROJECT
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
took the following actions for the Cogbill Road Park and Ride
Lot and Sidewalk project: 1) appropriated $294,500 in
anticipated VDOT reimbursements; and 2) authorized the
Director of Procurement to award a construction contract, upon
authorization from VDOT, in the amount of $1,963,055 to
Dickerson Construction LLC and to execute all necessary change
orders, up to the full amount budgeted, for the project.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B.8. ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE GRANT FUNDS FROM THE FEDERAL
AVIATION ADMINISTRATION(FAA) AND VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION (DOAV) FOR THE
REHABILITATION OF THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AIRPORT
TERMINAL APRON
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved acceptance and appropriation of grant funds from the
Federal Aviation Administration and the Virginia Department of
Aviation for rehabilitation of the Chesterfield County Airport
Terminal Apron.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B.9. SMART SCALE PROJECT ENDORSEMENT FOR TRI-CITIES MPO:
FALL LINE TRAIL (RIVER ROAD THROUGH VIRGINIA STATE
UNIVERSITY TO PATTON PARK AND APPOMATTOX RIVER
TRAIL) AND APPOMATTOX RIVER TRAIL (ROUTE 1 TO
COLONIAL HEIGHTS AND I-95) PROJECTS
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following resolution of support for the Tri-Cities
22-485
7/27/2022
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Smart Scale candidate
projects: Fall Line Trail (River Road through Virginia State
University to Patton Park and Appomattox River Trail), and
Appomattox River Trail (Route 1 to Colonial Heights and I-95).
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B.10. APPROVE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
TOWING CONTRACT LANGUAGE CHANGES
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved the towing contract language as recommended by the
Chesterfield County Police Department Towing Advisory Board.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B.11. SET A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ABANDONMENT OF
A PORTION OF LEDO ROAD, STATE ROUTE 795
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board set
a public hearing date of September 21, 2022, to consider the
abandonment of a portion of Ledo Road, State Route 795.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B.12. SET A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE AMENDMENT OF A
LEASE OF COUNTY PROPERTY AT LAKE CHESDIN PARK
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board set
a public hearing date of August 24, 2022, to consider amending
a lease with Tower Development Corporation on county property
at Lake Chesdin Park.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B.13. ACCEPTANCE OF STATE ROADS – CORRECTION OF ITEMS
PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets
meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Sections 33.2-705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia,
and the Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
22-486
7/27/2022
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this
resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: Chesdin Landing Section 10 (Corrected)
Type Change to the Secondary System miles of State Highways:
Correction
Reason for Change: New Subdivision Street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Chesdin Landing Drive, State Route Number 5080
From: 0.16 miles southwest of Chesdin Green Way, (Route
4496)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.19 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 224, Page 84
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets
meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Sections 33.2-705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia,
and the Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: Chesdin Landing Section 6 (Corrected)
Type Change to the Secondary System miles of State Highways:
Correction
Reason for Change: New Subdivision Street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Chesdin Landing Drive, State Route Number 5080
From: 0.01 miles southwest of Chesdin Green Way, (Route
4496)
To: 0.16 miles southwest of Chesdin Green Way, (Route
4496) (i.e., to the temporary cul-de-sac), a distance of
0.15 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 115, Page 65
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
22-487
7/27/2022
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets
meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Sections 33.2-705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia,
and the Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this
resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: The Villas at Westerleigh Section 2
(Corrected)
Type Change to the Secondary System miles of State
Highways:Correction
Reason for Change: New Subdivision Street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Kimmeridge Drive, State Route Number 7628
From: 0.01 miles southwest of Cabretta Drive, (Route
7496)
To: 0.05 miles southwest of Cabretta Drive (Route 7496)
(i.e., to the cul-de-sac), a distance of: 0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 217, Page 30
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.B.14. ACCEPTANCE OF STATE ROADS
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets
meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
22-488
7/27/2022
pursuant to Sections 33.2-705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia,
and the Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this
resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: Newmarket Section 3 (Amended)
Type Change to the Secondary System miles of State Highways:
Addition
Reason for Change: New Subdivision Street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Willowvale Drive, State Route Number 8412
From: 0.05 miles west of Otterdale Road, (Route 667)
To: Whirland Drive, (Route 8413), a distance of 0.13
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 56
• Willowvale Drive, State Route Number 8412
From: Otterdale Road, (Route 667)
To: 0.05 miles west of Otterdale Road, (Route 667), a
distance of 0.05 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 56
• Whirland Drive, State Route Number 8413
From: 0.21 miles west of Whirland Court, (Route 8415)
To: Cedarville Drive, (Route 8416), a distance of 0.06
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 56
• Whirland Drive, State Route Number 8413
From: Cedarville Drive, (Route 8416)
To: The end-of-maintenance, a distance of 0.01 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 56
• Whirland Drive, State Route Number 8413
From: Whirland Court, (Route 8415)
To: 0.21 miles west of Whirland Court, (Route 8415), a
distance of 0.21 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 56
• Whirland Drive, State Route Number 8413
From: Whirland Place, (Route 8414)
To: Whirland Court, (Route 8415), a distance of 0.07
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 56
22-489
7/27/2022
• Whirland Drive, State Route Number 8413
From: Willowvale Drive, (Route 8412)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 56
• Whirland Drive, State Route Number 8413
From: Willowvale Drive, (Route 8412)
To: Whirland Place, (Route 8414), a distance of 0.04
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 56
• Whirland Place, State Route Number 8414
From: Whirland Drive, (Route 8413)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.03 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Whirland Court, State Route Number 8415
From: Whirland Drive, (Route 8413)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.03 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Cedarville Drive, State Route Number 8416
From: 0.04 miles west of Otterdale Road, (Route 667)
To: 0.12 miles west of Otterdale Road, (Route 667), a
distance of 0.08 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 56
• Cedarville Drive, State Route Number 8416
From: 0.12 miles west of Otterdale Road, (Route 667)
To: Cedarville Mews, (Route 8417), a distance of 0.07
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 56
• Cedarville Drive, State Route Number 8416
From: Cedarville Court, (Route 8418)
To: Whirland Drive, (Route 8413), a distance of 0.19
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 56
• Cedarville Drive, State Route Number 8416
From: Cedarville Mews, (Route 8417)
To: Cedarville Court, (Route 8418), a distance of 0.09
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 56
• Cedarville Drive, State Route Number 8416
From: Otterdale Road, (Route 667)
To: 0.04 miles west of Otterdale Road, (Route 667), a
distance of 0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 56
22-490
7/27/2022
• Cedarville Drive, State Route Number 8416
From: Whirland Drive, (Route 8413)
To: The end-of-maintenance, a distance of 0.01 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 56
• Cedarville Mews, State Route Number 8417
From: Cedarville Drive, (Route 8416)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.03 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Cedarville Court, State Route Number 8418
From: Cedarville Drive, (Route 8416)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.03 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 267, Page 32
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets
meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Sections 33.2-705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia,
and the Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this
resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: Rountrey Section - 7
Type Change to the Secondary System miles of State Highways:
Addition
Reason for Change: New Subdivision Street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Graythorne Drive, State Route Number 7934
From: Alvecote Drive, (Route 8420)
To: 0.01 miles northwest of Litton Drive, (Route 8141),
a distance of 0.08 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Waverton Drive, State Route Number 8142
From: 0.01 miles north of Waverton Turn, (Route 8147)
To: Alvecote Drive, (Route 8420), a distance of 0.02
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
22-491
7/27/2022
• Waverton Drive, State Route Number 8142
From: Alvecote Drive, (Route 8420)
To: Bellstone Drive, (Route 8419), a distance of 0.14
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Bellstone Drive, State Route Number 8419
From: Barford Drive, (Route 8426)
To: The end-of-maintenance, a distance of 0.01 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Bellstone Drive, State Route Number 8419
From: Camdale Drive, (Route 8422)
To: 0.01 miles west of Camdale Drive, (Route 8422), a
distance of 0.01 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Bellstone Drive, State Route Number 8419
From: Enmore Drive, (Route 8423)
To: Barford Drive, (Route 8426), a distance of 0.04
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Bellstone Drive, State Route Number 8419
From: Enmore Drive, (Route 8423)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.05 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Bellstone Drive, State Route Number 8419
From: Waverton Drive, (Route 8142)
To: 0.01 miles northeast of Waverton Drive, (Route
8142), a distance of 0.01 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Bellstone Drive, State Route Number 8419
From: Waverton Drive, (Route 8142)
To: Camdale Drive, (Route 8422), a distance of 0.04
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Alvecote Drive, State Route Number 8420
From: Alvecote Terrace, (Route 8421)
To: Waverton Drive, (Route 8142), a distance of 0.06
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Alvecote Drive, State Route Number 8420
From: Woolridge Road, (Route 668)
To: Alvecote Terrace, (Route 8421), a distance of 0.05
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 48
22-492
7/27/2022
• Alvecote Terrace, State Route Number 8421
From: Alvecote Drive, (Route 8420)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.11 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Camdale Drive, State Route Number 8422
From: Bellstone Drive, (Route 8419)
To: Enmore Drive, (Route 8423), a distance of 0.05
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Camdale Drive, State Route Number 8422
From: Dordon Lane, (Route 8425)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Camdale Drive, State Route Number 8422
From: Enmore Drive, (Route 8423)
To: Dordon Lane, (Route 8425), a distance of 0.06 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Enmore Drive, State Route Number 8423
From: Camdale Drive, (Route 8422)
To: Enmore Place, (Route 8424), a distance of 0.09
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Enmore Drive, State Route Number 8423
From: Enmore Place, (Route 8424)
To: Bellstone Drive, (Route 8419), a distance of 0.12
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Enmore Place, State Route Number 8424
From: Enmore Drive, (Route 8423)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.03 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Dordon Lane, State Route Number 8425
From: Camdale Drive, (Route 8422)
To: Waverton Drive, (Route 8142), a distance of 0.16
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Barford Drive, State Route Number 8426
From: Bellstone Drive, (Route 8419)
To: The end-of-maintenance, a distance of 0.02 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 75
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
22-493
7/27/2022
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets
meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Sections 33.2-705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia,
and the Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this
resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: Harpers Mill Northeast – Section 9
Type Change to the Secondary System miles of State Highways:
Addition
Reason for Change: New Subdivision Street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Crowden Road, State Route Number 8174
From: 0.03 miles east of Timberstone Drive, (Route
7989)
To: Tallion Way, (Route 8360), a distance of 0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 36
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Crowden Road, State Route Number 8174
From: Tallion Way, (Route 8360)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.10 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 36
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Little Hill Court, State Route Number 8359
From: Hartridge Drive, (Route 7996)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.09 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 36
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Tallion Way, State Route Number 8360
From: Crowden Road, (Route 8174)
To: Tallion Court, (Route 8361), a distance of 0.08
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 36
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
22-494
7/27/2022
• Tallion Way, State Route Number 8360
From: Tallion Court, (Route 8361)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.03 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 36
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Tallion Court, State Route Number 8361
From: Tallion Way, (Route 8360)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.03 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 264, Page 36
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
13.C. APPROVE A GRANT AGREEMENT WITH LAKE ADVENTURES, LLC
Mr. Matt Harris provided an overview of the grant agreement
with Lake Adventures, LLC. He stated Lake Adventures, LLC plans
to cause the development of a mixed-use development on property
located in the county near the intersection of Genito Road and
State Route 288 with such development having a forecasted value
of approximately $323,000,000. He further stated locating a
constructing the project in the county will provide significant
economic benefits to the county in terms of capital investment,
employment and public entertainment opportunities. He stated
the grant wi11 refund 80 percent of the marginal increase in
real estate, sales and occupancy taxes paid by Lake Adventures,
LLC in years 1 through 10 and 60 percent of the marginal
increase in real estate, sales and occupancy taxes in years 11
through 20.
Regarding discussion and questions relative to the
performance-based tax incentive agreement, Mr. Harris
clarified the 36-month timeline would start after the lake is
complete, meaning commercial and entertainment spaces would
begin construction following the completion of the main body
of water.
Mr. Brett Burkart, representing Lake Adventures, LLC, provided
details relative to the project. He stated conversations and
work surrounding the project have been underway for roughly
seven years. He noted it was a year and a half of zoning, three
years of permitting, and then another two years of trying to
acquire credits. He further stated the 13-acre lake will be
built first, followed by approximately 56,000 square feet of
commercial space. He stated a portion of the townhomes planned
for the development will be constructed, followed by additional
square footage of commercial space.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to specifics of the
proposed performance-based grant; mixed use development and
hospitality features; and potential revenues generated by the
development.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
deferred consideration of the approval of a grant agreement
with Lake Adventures, LLC to the Board’s regularly scheduled
meeting in August.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
22-495
7/27/2022
14. FIFTEEN-MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
The following people addressed the Board relative to
revitalizing Southside Speedway and the benefits of the
racetrack, which includes small business support, history,
mental health, community/family activities, and potential STEM
type ventures in collaboration with local schools and colleges:
Ms. Jessica Thomas
Ms. Lauren Edgerton
Ms. Susan Hayes
Mr. Kenny Scott
Ms. Doris Knick expressed concerns relative to utilities smart
metering technology.
15. DEFERRED ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS
There were no deferred items from previous meetings.
16. REQUESTS FOR MANUFACTURED HOME PERMITS AND REZONING
PLACED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA TO BE HEARD IN THE
FOLLOWING ORDER: - WITHDRAWALS/DEFERRALS - CASES WHERE
THE APPLICANT ACCEPTS THE RECOMMENDATION AND THERE IS NO
OPPOSITION - CASES WHERE THE APPLICANT DOES NOT ACCEPT
THE RECOMMENDATION AND/OR THERE IS PUBLIC OPPOSITION
WILL BE HEARD AT SECTION 19
Ms. Sara Hall stated for each case on the consent agenda, staff
has received written confirmation from the applicants that they
agree with the conditions being imposed and all proffers are
offered in compliance with state law.
21SN0582
In Dale Magisterial District, April and Derrick Jack request
conditional use to permit a family day care home and amendment
of zoning district map in a Residential (R-7) District on 0.31
acre known as 6406 Bareback Terrace. Density will be controlled
by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive
Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Suburban
Residential II use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax ID 770-
683-0899.
Ms. Hall introduced Case 21SN0582. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Winslow called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board
approved Case 21SN0582, subject to the following conditions:
1. Non-Transferable Ownership. This conditional use approval
shall be granted to and for April and Derrick Jack,
22-496
7/27/2022
exclusively, and shall not be transferable nor run with
the land. (P)
2. Expansion of Use. There shall be no exterior additions or
alterations to the existing structure to accommodate this
use. (P)
3. Signage. There shall be no signs permitted to identify
this use. (P)
4. Number of Children. This conditional use approval shall
be limited to providing care, protection and guidance to
a maximum of twelve (12) children, other than the
applicants’ own children, at any one time. (P)
5. Hours of Operation. Hours and days of operation shall be
limited to Monday through Friday from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.
There shall be no Saturday or Sunday operation of this
use. (P)
6. Fenced Outdoor Play Areas. Any outdoor play area and/or
recreational equipment utilized by the family day-care
home shall be located in the side or rear yard of the
property. The existing perimeter fencing installed around
the equipment or play area shall be retained. Equipment
for outdoor play areas shall be located no closer than
fifteen (15) feet to the side or rear property lines. (P)
7. Employees. No more than one (1) employee shall be
permitted to work on the premises, other than family
member employees that live on the premises. (P)
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
21SN0691
In Matoaca Magisterial District, 360 Solar Center, LLC requests
conditional use to permit a large-scale solar energy facility
plus conditional use planned development to permit exceptions
to ordinance requirements and amendment of zoning district map
in an Agricultural (A) District on 1932.84 acres fronting 2,650
along the west line of Taylor Road, beginning 5,290 feet south
of Beaver Bridge Road. Density will be controlled by zoning
conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Rural
Residential/Agricultural use. Tax IDs 690-658-9035; 690-661-
5639; 692-655-7073; 694-656-6801; 695-651-0988; 695-657-2755
and 697-656-4374.
Ms. Hall introduced Case 21SN0691. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Winslow called for public comment.
Mr. Skylar Zunk, adjacent property owner, urged the Board to
approve the conditional use.
Mr. Will Shewmake, representing the applicant, also urged the
Board to approve the request.
22-497
7/27/2022
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
Mr. Carroll made a motion to approve Case 21SN0691, subject to
the conditions in the staff report and, also, with the
imposition of a new condition No. 14 that will read as follows:
14. Prior to any final site plan approval, the applicant
and/or its assignees shall have executed a siting agreement
pursuant to Va. Code Section 15.2-2316.7 in a form acceptable
to the County Administrator and the County Attorney.
Mr. Ingle seconded the motion.
Mr. Winslow called for a vote on Mr. Carroll’s motion, seconded
by Mr. Ingle, for the Board to approve Case 21SN0691, subject
to the following conditions:
1. Conceptual Plan. The plan titled “Conceptual Site Plan”,
prepared by Sun Tribe Development, and dated April 2022
(Exhibit A) shall be considered the Conceptual Plan for
the proposed development. Development of the Property
shall conform generally to the Conceptual Plan. The final
location of solar equipment within the Project Site shall
be determined at the time of site plan approval. (P)
2. Textual Statement. The Textual Statement dated December
30, 2021, shall be approved relative to flexibility in
the location of required buffers. (P)
3. Access.
a. Any direct vehicular access for the solar facility
to Deer Range Road and Taylor Road shall be limited
to one (1) entrance/exit on each roadway. This
condition shall not prohibit other direct vehicular
access from the Property to Deer Range Road or Taylor
Road which does not serve the solar facility.
b. Any construction traffic associated with the solar
facility accessing Deer Range Road shall be limited
to Tax ID’s 690-661-5639, 690-658-9035, and that
portion of Tax ID 692-655-7073 north of Sappony
Creek.
c. The entrance/exit to Deer Range Road for vehicular
access serving the solar facility shall be a minimum
of 150 feet from Tax ID 692-662-6421 (8720 Deer Range
Road). (T)
4. Right-of-Way Dedications. Prior to any final site plan
approval for the solar facility, the following shall be
dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the benefit
of Chesterfield County measured from the centerline of
that part of the existing road immediately adjacent to
the Property:
a. Forty-five (45) feet of right-of-way along the west
side of Taylor Road; and
b. Forty-five (45) feet of right-of-way along the west
side of Deer Range Road.
c. In the event the Chesterfield County Thoroughfare
Plan is modified to reduce or remove right-of-way
dedications referenced within this Condition, then
those right-of-way dedications shall be reduced or
removed accordingly, as determined by the
Transportation Department. (T)
22-498
7/27/2022
5. Steep Slopes.
a. Within the Project Site, steep slopes equal to or greater
than 20 percent shall remain in their natural, undisturbed
state to the maximum extent practicable, unless otherwise
approved by the Department of Environmental Engineering.
In locations where the disturbance of slopes greater than
20 percent is unavoidable, enhanced erosion and sediment
control measures, such as super silt fence (or alternative
as approved by the Department of Environmental
Engineering) and the application of anionic PAM to denuded
areas during construction and final stabilization, will
be provided as directed by the Department of Environmental
Engineering at the time of site plan review. The
Department of Environmental Engineering shall approve the
exact design and implementation of these standards.
b. No solar panels shall be installed on slopes greater than
or equal to 20 percent. In addition, no stormwater outfall
or sheet flow off any solar arrays shall discharge
directly to an area of steep slopes greater than or equal
to 20 percent. (EE)
6. Landscaping. For any landscaped areas, priority shall be
given to the use of native plant materials as identified
in the Chesterfield County Plant Material List and as
approved by the Planning Department at the time of site
plan approval. Virginia native grasses shall be used for
permanent ground cover and supplemented with
pollinatorfriendly species. (P)
7. Weed Control. No glyphosate-based or 2,4-D herbicides
shall be used for the purpose of weed control for the
solar project. Use of other chemical herbicides shall be
minimized to the extent effective weed control is
maintained. This restriction shall be noted on the
approved landscape plan. (P)
8. Additional Setbacks for Solar Panels from Residentially-
Occupied Properties. A minimum 500 foot setback shall be
provided for solar panels from properties occupied for
residential use at the time of zoning approval as
generally shown on Exhibit A. (P)
9. Limitation on Hours of Tractor Trailer Deliveries. Use of
Deer Range and Taylor Roads for tractor trailer deliveries
associated with the construction of the solar facility
shall be limited so as not to coincide with operational
hours for public school bus stop routes for those roads.
Prior to site plan approval, the operational hours for
school bus stop routes on these roads shall be confirmed
with county school administration. Suppliers for the
construction of the solar facility shall be notified by
the developer of this delivery hour limitation and copies
of this notification shall be filed with the Planning
Department prior to the issuance of building permits for
the solar facility. (P)
10. Pile Driving Activity. In addition to Ordinance
limitations on the days and hours of pile driving
activity, no pile driving shall be permitted on Saturdays.
(P)
22-499
7/27/2022
11. Fencing. Fencing associated with the solar facility shall
be located so as to provide a minimum of three (3) wildlife
corridors through the solar facility project area, which
shall include Sappony Creek. The exact location of the
solar facility fencing shall be determined at the time of
site plan approval. (P)
12. Setback. The solar facility operational area, to include
buildings, structures, equipment, and parking, shall be
setback a minimum of 35 feet from wetlands, 100-year
floodplains and Resource Protection Areas. This condition
would not preclude fencing within this 35-foot setback.
(P)
13. Public Liaison. The applicant will designate a person who
will act as a point of contact between citizens and
construction crews (“Public Liaison”). The contact
information for the Public Liaison will be posted at each
access point, as published on the Project’s website, and
provided to Chesterfield County staff. (P)
And, further, the Board approved the following imposed
condition:
14. Prior to any final site plan approval, the applicant
and/or its assignees shall have executed a siting
agreement pursuant to Va. Code § 15.2-2316. 7 in a form
acceptable to the County Administrator and the County
Attorney. (P)
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
21SN0701
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Chesterfield DD, Inc. (project
commonly known as Greystar Swift Creek) requests amendment of
zoning approval (Cases 13SN0110 and 19SN0581) relative to the
master plan, development standards, access, road cash proffers,
road improvements, dwelling unit phasing, and utilities
contribution and amendment of zoning district map in a
Multifamily Residential (R-MF) District on 84.83 acres fronting
460 feet on the south line of Hull Street Road, across from
Cosby Road. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or
ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for Medium-High Density Residential
(Minimum of 4 to 8 dwellings per acre), Suburban Residential I
(Maximum of 2 dwellings per acre) and Neighborhood Business
uses. Tax IDs 717-669-2537; 717-670-1030, 1751, 2877, and 8050.
Ms. Hall introduced Case 21SN0701. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Winslow called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
22-500
7/27/2022
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved Case 21SN0701, subject to the following proffered
conditions:
The property owner and applicant in this case, pursuant to
Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended,
and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for themselves
and their successors and assigns, proffer that the property
under consideration (“the Property”) will be developed
according to the following proffers if, and only if, the
request submitted herewith is granted with only those
conditions agreed to by the owner and applicant. In the event
this request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed
to by the owner and applicant, the proffers shall immediately
be null and void and of no further force or effect.
These Proffered Conditions include six (6) Exhibits attached
hereto:
Exhibit A: “Swift Creek RPA / Floodplain Delineation”, prepared
by ktgy Architecture + Planning and dated May 31, 2022 (“Tract
A Conceptual Plan”)
Exhibit B: “Swift Creek Schematic Design – Townhome Examples”,
prepared by ktgy Architecture + Planning dated October 28, 2021
(the “Multi-unit Elevations”)
Exhibit C: “Swift Creek Schematic Design – 40’ x 80’ Lot
Examples”, prepared by ktgy Architecture + Planning dated
October 28, 2021 (the “Rear-loaded SFR Elevations”)
Exhibit D: “Swift Creek Schematic Design – 60’ x 100’ Lot
Examples” and “Swift Creek Schematic Design – Single Family
Front Loaded Detached Examples”, each prepared by ktgy
Architecture + Planning dated October 28, 2021 (the
“Frontloaded SFR Elevations”)
Exhibit E: “Swift Creek Schematic Design – Conceptual Street
Plan” and “Swift Creek Schematic Design – Conceptual Massing”,
each prepared by ktgy Architecture + Planning dated October
28, 2021 (the “Streetscape Plan”)
Exhibit F: “Swift Creek Common Area Plan”, prepared by ktgy
Architecture + Planning dated February 14, 2022 (the “Common
Area Plan”)
The Applicant hereby amends Proffered Condition 1 of Case No.
13SN0110 to read as follows:
1. Master Plan. The Plan titled “Madison Crossing Master
Plan” prepared by Townes Site Engineering, dated May 3,
2022, the Textual Statement last revised May 17, 2022,
and, with respect to Tract A, the Tract A Conceptual Plan
(Exhibit A), shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
The Applicant hereby deletes Proffered Condition 1 of Case
19SN0581 in its entirety.
The Applicant hereby amends Proffered Condition 2 of Case
19SN0581 to read as follows:
2. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for
each Tract, the Developer shall make payments to
Chesterfield County in the amount of $503.00 per acre of
22-501
7/27/2022
such Tract, adjusted annually for the Marshal Swift Index
as a contribution towards the expansion of the Dry Creek
Wastewater Pump Station. (U)
The Applicant hereby amends Proffered Condition 7 of Case
13SN0110 to read as follows:
3. Access.
A. Direct vehicular access to and from the Property onto
Hull Street Road (Route 360) shall be limited to one
access that aligns with the existing crossover at
Cosby Road. The approved access shall be designed
and constructed to preclude vehicles exiting the
Property from traveling west on Route 360, unless
the Route 360 and Cosby Road intersection is
signalized, as determined by the Transportation
Department.
B. Prior to any site plan approval for Tract B or any
tentative subdivision plat approval for Tract C,
whichever occurs first, an access plan for Ashbrook
Parkway shall be submitted to and approved by the
Transportation Department. Direct vehicular access
from the Property to Ashbrook Parkway shall conform
to the approved access plan. (T)
The Applicant hereby amends Proffered Condition 3 of Case
19SN0581 to read as follows:
4. Road Improvements.
A. With initial development on Tract A or Tract B,
whichever occurs first, the following improvements
shall be completed, as determined by the
Transportation Department:
i. Construction of two lanes of Ashbrook Parkway
to VDOT urban minor arterial standards with a
40 mph design speed, with any modifications
approved by the Transportation Department, from
its terminus approximately 1,000 feet east of
Hampton Park Drive through the Property to the
Resource Protection Area (“RPA”) limits at the
eastern Property line (the “RPA Limits”). The
exact length, location and design of this
improvement shall be approved by the
Transportation Department.
ii. Construction of a sidewalk along the north side
of Ashbrook Parkway from the western Property
line through the Property to the Resource
Protection Area (RPA) limits at the eastern
Property line.
iii. Dedication, free and unrestricted, to and for
the benefit of Chesterfield County, of any
additional right-of-way (or easements) required
for these improvements.
B. With initial development of Tract A, the following
improvements shall also be completed, as determined
by the Transportation Department:
22-502
7/27/2022
i. Construction of an additional lane of pavement
along the eastbound lanes of Route 360 for the
entire Property frontage.
ii. Construction of additional pavement along the
eastbound lanes of Route 360 at the approved
access to provide a separate right turn lane.
iii. Construction of additional pavement along the
westbound lanes of Route 360 to extend the
existing left turn lane to an adequate length,
as determined by the Chesterfield County
Transportation Department.
iv. Construction of a sidewalk along the south side
of Route 360 for the entire Property frontage.
v. Dedication, free and unrestricted, to and for
the benefit of Chesterfield County, of any
additional right-of-way (or easements) required
for these improvements.
C. With development of Tract B or Tract C, the following
improvements shall also be completed, as determined
by the Transportation Department:
i. Construction of left and right turn lanes or
roundabouts along Ashbrook Parkway, as approved
by the Transportation Department, at each
approved access as described in Proffered
Condition 6.B. of Case 13SN0110.
D. Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for any
development within Tract A or prior to issuance of a
cumulative total of more than 300 occupancy permits
within Tracts B and C, as identified in the Master
Plan, construction of two (2) lanes of Ashbrook
Parkway, from the RPA Limits to its terminus at Shady
Banks Drive shall be completed as determined by the
Transportation Department. (T)
The Applicant hereby deletes Proffered Condition 4 of Case No.
19SN0581.
The Applicant hereby proffers the following additional
conditions applicable to Tract A only:
5. Tract A Conceptual Plan. Tract A shall be developed in
general conformance with the Tract A Conceptual Plan
(Exhibit A). The Tract A Conceptual Plan is conceptual in
nature and may vary based on the final site plan depending
on the final soil studies, RPA lines, road design, amenity
locations, building footprints, BMP design and location,
and other design or engineering reasons. Any substantive
changes that do not relate to the prior sentence shall be
approved by the Planning Commission at the time of plans
review. (P)
6. Dwelling Types. All dwellings on Tract A shall be multi-
family dwelling units constructed in one of three building
types:
22-503
7/27/2022
A. Multi-unit Buildings. Units may be contained within
horizontally-oriented, “townhome” style buildings
containing multiple units (“Multi-unit Buildings”),
in general conformance with the Multi-unit
Elevations attached hereto as Exhibit B, or another
architectural appearance if approved by the Planning
Commission at the time of plans review. Subsequent
to plans approval, the owner may also request
approval of another architectural appearance by the
Planning Commission.
B. Single-unit buildings. Units may be contained within
one of two single-unit building types:
i. Rear-loaded single-unit buildings (“Rear-Loaded
SFR”), each situated within an exclusive-use
curtilage measuring approximately forty (40)
feet in width and eighty (80) feet in depth, in
general conformance with the Rear-Loaded SFR
Elevations attached hereto as Exhibit C, or
another architectural appearance if approved by
the Planning Commission at the time of plans
review. Subsequent to plans approval, the owner
may also request approval of another
architectural appearance by the Planning
Commission.
ii. Front-loaded single-unit buildings (“Front-
Loaded SFR”) each situated within an exclusive-
use curtilage measuring approximately sixty
(60) feet in width and one hundred (100) feet
in depth, in general conformance with the Front-
Loaded SFR Elevations attached hereto as
Exhibit D, or another architectural appearance
if approved by the Planning Commission at the
time of plans review. Subsequent to plans
approval, the owner may also request approval
of another architectural appearance by the
Planning Commission. (P)
7. Architecture. All buildings constructed on Tract A will
adhere to the following architectural requirements:
A. Architecture, Generally. All buildings constructed
on Tract A shall be architecturally compatible with
and similar in style and quality to those constructed
in Tract B. Multi-unit Buildings shall be designed
to impart harmonious proportions and avoid
monotonous facades or large bulky masses. Buildings
shall possess architectural variety while at the same
time have an overall cohesive residential character.
Architectural treatment of all buildings shall
utilize a mixture of design features. Design features
shall include a combination of the following so
buildings will have a residential character and the
appearance of several small buildings clustered
together in buildings of large mass: porches and/or
stoops, articulation of doors and windows,
sculptural or textural relief of facades,
architectural ornamentation and varied rooflines.
B. Front Walks. A minimum of a three (3) foot wide front
walkway consisting of concrete, exposed aggregate
22-504
7/27/2022
concrete, concrete pavers, stamped concrete or brick
shall be provided to the front entrance of each
dwelling unit, to connect to driveways, sidewalks or
streets.
C. Foundations. Stepping the siding down below the first
floor level is not permitted on any building
elevation. All foundations shall be faced entirely
of brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer, cultured
stone, and/or other masonry materials (collectively,
“Masonry Materials”). Synthetic or natural stucco
foundations may be permitted for facades constructed
entirely of stucco. There shall be a minimum vertical
height of Twelve (12”) inches of Masonry Materials
above grade utilized on slab-on-grade foundations on
all elevations visible from public or private roads
or streets (but not alleys).
D. Garage Doors. Any garage door visible from public or
private roads (but not alleys) shall use an upgraded
garage door. An “upgraded garage door” is any door
with a minimum of two (2) enhanced features.
“Enhanced features” shall include windows, raised
panels, decorative panels, arches, hinge straps or
other architectural features on the exterior that
enhance the entry (i.e. decorative lintels, shed roof
overhangs, arches, columns, keystones, eyebrows,
etc.) Flat panel garage doors shall be prohibited.
E. Exterior Facades. Acceptable siding materials
include brick or stone masonry, stucco, synthetic
stucco (E.I.F.S), and horizontal lap siding.
Horizontal lap siding shall be manufactured from
natural wood, cement fiber board, or may be premium
quality vinyl siding (up to a maximum of 40% on any
front façade). Plywood and metal siding are not
permitted. Additionally:
i. A variety of facing materials shall be used on
any one façade of any Multi-unit Building. A
maximum of three (3) facing materials may be
used on any one façade of any Multi-unit
Building.
ii. Brick sills shall be projected and brick heads
at openings shall be traditional jack arches,
circular arches, or soldier courses.
iii. Vinyl siding is permitted in traditional wide
beaded styles only with a minimum 6-inch drop.
Premium quality vinyl is defined as vinyl siding
with a minimum wall thickness of .044".
Cementitious siding shall have wood grain and
not have a bead.
iv. Synthetic Stucco (E.I.F.S.) siding shall be
finished in smooth, sand or level texture. Rough
textures are not permitted.
v. Exterior facades which face public or private
roads (but not alleys) shall have a harmonious
arrangement and organization of elements
22-505
7/27/2022
including doors, windows, and trim and may
include porches, columns, cornices and trim.
F. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC)
Units and Generators. HVAC units and generators shall
be screened from view by landscaping or low
maintenance material. If an HVAC unit or generator
is located between two driveways, such HVAC unit or
generator need only be screened on the side that
faces the alley, drive or street that provide access
to the driveways.
G. Direct Vent Fireplace. Direct vent gas fireplace
boxes, which protrude beyond the exterior face of
the unit, are not permitted on front façades. All
the exterior materials and finishes used to enclose
the fireplace box must match the adjacent façade.
H. Roofs.
i. Varied roof designs and materials shall be used
on Multi-unit Building sections across the
front façade of all such Multi-unit Buildings
and rear facades of such Multi-unit Buildings
that face a street; provided that no more than
two (2) different designs and materials shall
be required to be used in any one Multi-unit
Building.
ii. Roofing materials for all buildings shall be
dimensional architectural shingles or standing-
seam metal roofing with a minimum 30 year
warranty. All flashing shall be copper or pre-
finished aluminum (bronze or black). (P)
8. Lighting. All street lights shall use LED bulbs with a
minimum CRI rating of 80, be decorative with a residential
character and a non-glare design. Street lights shall have
a maximum height of 15’. Street lights shall be placed
with an average spacing of 200’ between light poles on
one side of the road using a staggered placement on the
other side of the road so that the result is an average
spacing of 100’ between light poles on alternating sides
of the road. This spacing may be adjusted in order to
avoid conflicts with utilities, landscaping, entrances,
driveway entrances and intersections. (Police and P)
9. Landscaping.
A. Street Trees. Street trees shall be planted along
all public and private interior roads as generally
shown on the Tract A Conceptual Plan and the
Streetscape Plan, with a maximum average spacing of
forty (40) feet on center. In the event of conflicts
with utilities, easements, sightlines, entrances and
other conflicts, the required spacing shall be
increased. Street trees may be located between
interior roads and the sidewalk or in the exclusive-
use curtilage of dwelling units.
B. Supplemental Landscaping. Supplemental landscaping
shall be provided around the perimeter of all
buildings, between buildings and driveways, within
22-506
7/27/2022
medians, and within common areas not occupied by
recreational facilities or other structures. Such
landscaping shall be designed to: minimize the
predominance of building mass and paved areas; define
private spaces; and enhance the residential
character of the development. The Planning
Department, at the time of site plan review, shall
approve the landscaping plan with respect to the
exact numbers, spacing, arrangement and species of
plantings.
C. Foundation Planting Bed. Foundation planting beds
shall be required along the entire façade of
buildings which face public or private roads (but
not alleys), excluding steps and garages, and shall
contain a minimum of fifty (50) percent evergreen
material and have one shrub per four (4) linear feet
of foundation planting bed, and shall have a minimum
depth of four (4) feet. (P)
10. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures. In addition
to any other requirements under applicable law, the
following erosion and sedimentation control measures will
be undertaken in connection with development of Tract A:
A. Super Silt Fence, or an alternative as approved by
the Department of Environmental Engineering, shall
be provided as a perimeter control in locations where
standard silt fence would have been required;
B. Sediment traps and basins sized no less than 25%
larger than the minimum Virginia Erosion and Sediment
Control Handbook’s standard shall be provided,
unless otherwise approved by the Department of
Environmental Engineering at the time of plans
review; and
C. Anionic PAM, Flexible Growth Medium and/or a County-
approved equivalent shall be applied to denuded areas
during construction and at final stabilization in
the locations shown on plans approved by
Environmental Engineering at the time of plans
review. (EE)
11. Recreational Amenities. Recreational neighborhood
facilities accessory to residential uses will be located
on the Property as generally shown on the Tract A
Conceptual Plan and on the Common Area Plan. A clubhouse
with a pool, park areas, and walking trails shall be
provided as generally shown on the Tract A Conceptual
Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, walking trails and park
areas on Tract B shall be available for use to residents
of Tract A, and vice-versa. In all common areas,
pedestrian paths may be natural, hard surface, or a
combination of the two. In Resource Protection Areas,
pedestrian paths may be located in a meandering manner
through the Resource Protection Areas in accordance with
the Department of Conservation and Recreation’s Riparian
Buffers Modification and Mitigation Guidance Manual, with
the final location, design and material to be approved by
the Director of Environmental Engineering at the time of
plans review and approval. The clubhouse and pool shall
22-507
7/27/2022
be constructed with the first phase of the Multi-unit
Buildings. (P & EE)
12. Protective Covenants. Prior to or concurrent with the
final approval of the initial plan for the Property, a
document setting forth covenants (the “Covenants”) shall
be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County, Virginia, setting forth controls on
the maintenance of the Property. The Covenants shall
require the property owner and/or property manager to
maintain high standards of uniform maintenance of
individual sites (to include all dwellings, buildings,
and common area structures), common areas, open space,
landscaping and private streets, in accordance with
industry standards for similar communities in the greater
Chesterfield County area, as determined in the reasonable
discretion of the Director of Planning at the time of plan
review. Any maintenance provision in the Covenants shall
not be deleted or modified without the written consent of
the Director of Planning. (P)
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
22SN0013
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Calley Seibert and Renee Wiest
request conditional use to permit a two-family dwelling and
amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R-15)
District on 1.2 acres known as 10511 Christina Road. Density
will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards.
The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate
for Residential Agricultural use. Tax ID 741-657-9587.
Ms. Hall introduced Case 22SN0013. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Winslow called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved Case 22SN0013, subject to the following conditions:
1. Occupancy of the second dwelling unit shall be limited
to: the occupants of the principal dwelling unit,
individuals related to them by blood, marriage, adoption
or guardianship, foster children, guests and any domestic
servants. (P)
2. For the purpose of providing record notice, or prior to
the issuance of a building permit for the proposed
addition a deed restriction shall be recorded setting
forth the limitation in Condition 2. The deed book and
page number of such restriction and a copy of the
restriction as recorded shall be submitted to the Planning
Department. (P)
22-508
7/27/2022
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
22SN0031
In Matoaca Magisterial District, David and Alexandra Prevost
request conditional use planned development to permit
exceptions to ordinance requirements and amendment of zoning
district map in a Residential (R-88) District on 1.71 acres
known as 13424 Chesdin Landing Drive. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Residential Agricultural use. Tax ID 732-623-4103.
Ms. Hall introduced Case 22SN0031. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Winslow called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved Case 22SN0031, subject to the following conditions:
1. Corner Side Yard Setback. The corner side yard setback
along Chesdin Green Way shall be a minimum of sixty-nine
(69) feet, as shown on Exhibit A. (P)
2. Tree Preservation. A tree preservation area of a minimum
of fifteen (15) feet shall be maintained on the property
along Chesdin Green Way. (P)
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
22SN0037
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Kathryn Prunkl and Charles
Prunkl request conditional use to permit a two-family dwelling
and amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R-15)
District on 1.04 acres known as 13009 Deerpark Drive. Density
will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards.
The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate
for Suburban Residential II use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre).
Tax ID 734-666-1817.
Ms. Hall introduced Case 22SN0037. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Winslow called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Carroll, the Board
approved Case 22SN0037, subject to the following conditions:
22-509
7/27/2022
1. Occupancy Limitations: Occupancy of the second dwelling
unit shall be limited to: the occupants of the principal
dwelling unit, individuals related to them by blood,
marriage, adoption or guardianship, foster children,
guests, and any domestic servants. (P)
2. Deed Restriction: For the purpose of providing record
notice, prior to the issuance of a building permit for
the second dwelling unit, a deed restriction shall be
recorded setting forth the limitation in Condition 1. The
deed book and page number of such restriction and a copy
of the restriction as recorded shall be submitted to the
Planning Department. (P)
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
22SN0039
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Matt Grosso requests
conditional use to permit a tattoo parlor and amendment of
zoning district map in a General Business (C-5) District on
2.88 acres known as 11800 Hull Street Road. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Corporate Office/Research & Development/Light Industrial use.
Tax ID 740-682-5969.
Ms. Hall introduced Case 22SN0039. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Winslow called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved Case 22SN0039, subject to the following conditions:
1. Non-Transferable Ownership. This conditional use approval
shall be granted to and for Matt Grosso, exclusively, and
shall not be transferable nor run with the land. (P)
2. Use. This conditional use shall be for the operation of a
tattoo parlor. (P)
3. Hours of Operation. Hours of operation shall be limited
to 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Tuesday through Saturday. (P)
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
22SN0040
In Matoaca Magisterial District, The Chesdin Company, LLC
requests amendment of zoning approval (Case 19SN0552) to modify
development standards and amendment of zoning district map in
Residential (R-25) District on 56.3 acres consisting of 47
22-510
7/27/2022
recorded lots along the south line of Lake Chesdin Parkway at
the intersection of Drake Mallard Drive (known as Chesdin
Landing Section 11). Density will be controlled by zoning
conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Residential
Agricultural use. Tax IDs 732-625-3580, 6085, 7395; 732-626-
3321, 4431, 5734, 6840, 7945, 8178, 8401, 8950, 9506; 733-626-
0254, 0511, 1064, 1675, 1717, 2385, 3023, 4134, 4746, 5455,
6068, 7174, 8182, 9189; 733-627-2529, 3771, 4193, 4205, 4559,
5112, 5149, 5739, 6529, 7218, 7795, 8280, 8870, 9459; 733-628-
5227, 5909; 734-626-0699, 734-627-0049, 1036, 1616, and 3811.
Ms. Hall introduced Case 22SN0040. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Winslow called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved Case 22SN0040, subject to the following proffered
conditions:
The Applicant hereby amends Proffered Condition 6.c.iii of Case
19SN0552 to read as follows:
1. Exterior Façades. Acceptable siding materials include
brick, stone, masonry, stucco, synthetic stucco
(E.I.F.S.), and approved horizontal lap siding. Siding
may be manufactured from cement fiber board, including,
but not limited to, hardiplank, or may be premium quality
vinyl siding with a minimum wall thickness of 0.044
inches. Metal siding is not permitted. Synthetic stucco
(E.I.F.S.) siding shall be finished in smooth, sand or
level texture. Rough textures are not permitted. Where a
dwelling borders more than one street, all street-facing
facades shall be finished in the same materials. (P)
The Applicant hereby amends Proffered Condition 6.c.v of Case
19SN00552 to read as follows:
2. Step Down Siding. Stepping the siding down below the first
floor shall not be permitted. (P)
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
22SN0046
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Stephen and Tammy Connor
request conditional use to permit a second dwelling and
amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R-88)
District on 3.96 acres known as 6400 Ivory Bill Court. Density
will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards.
The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate
for Low Density Residential use (Maximum of 1 dwelling per
acre). Tax ID 782-628-2249.
22-511
7/27/2022
Ms. Hall introduced Case 22SN0046. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Winslow called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board
approved Case 22SN0046, subject to the following conditions:
1. Occupancy Limitations: Occupancy of the second dwelling
unit shall be limited to: the occupants of the principal
dwelling unit, individuals related to them by blood,
marriage, adoption or guardianship, foster children,
guests, and any domestic servants. (P)
2. Deed Restriction: For the purpose of providing record
notice, prior to the issuance of a building permit for
the second dwelling unit, a deed restriction shall be
recorded setting forth the limitation in Condition 1. The
deed book and page number of such restriction and a copy
of the restriction as recorded shall be submitted to the
Planning Department. (P)
3. Water Connection: Should the property be legally
subdivided in the future, the owner shall establish
separate water connection to each dwelling unit, subject
to the review and approval of the Utilities Department.
The owner shall be responsible for all costs to establish
the new water connection, including the payment of
connection fees in effect at the time service is
initiated. (U)
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
22SN0071
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Chesterfield County Planning
Commission (project commonly known as Winchester Forest)
requests amendment of zoning approval (Case 19SN0566) relative
to building materials and amendment of zoning district map in
a Multifamily Residential (R-MF) District on 16.71 acres
fronting approximately 1,020 feet on the south line of Drewrys
Bluff Road, 1,175 feet west of Route 1. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Residential Mixed use. Tax IDs 789-680-1113 and 5808.
Ms. Hall introduced Case 22SN0071. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Winslow called for public comment.
Ms. Renee Eldred urged the Board to approve the request.
22-512
7/27/2022
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Carroll, the Board
approved Case 22SN0071, subject to the following condition:
Proffered Condition 6 of Case 19SN0566 shall be amended to read
as follows:
1. Building Facades and Foundations – Exterior building
facades shall be a minimum of fifty (50) percent brick
with the remaining façade treatment to be cementitious
board siding. Building foundations shall be brick. (P and
BI)
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
22SN0058
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Lisa and John Bebbs request
conditional use to permit a second dwelling and amendment of
zoning district map in a Residential (R-15) District on 2.5
acres known as 6120 Glebe Point Road. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Low Density Residential use (Maximum of 1 dwelling per acre).
Tax ID 780-640-1230.
Ms. Hall introduced Case 22SN0058. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Winslow called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
Mr. Ingle clarified the conditions relative to the allowance
of a second dwelling unit.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Carroll, the Board
approved Case 22SN0058, subject to the following conditions:
1. Occupancy Limitations: Occupancy of the second dwelling
unit shall be limited to: the occupants of the principal
dwelling unit, individuals related to them by blood,
marriage, adoption or guardianship, foster children,
guests, and any domestic servants. (P)
2. Deed Restriction: For the purpose of providing record
notice, prior to the issuance of a building permit for
the second dwelling unit, a deed restriction shall be
recorded setting forth the limitation in Condition 1. The
deed book and page number of such restriction and a copy
of the restriction as recorded shall be submitted to the
Planning Department. (P)
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
22-513
7/27/2022
21SN0682
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Josh Thigpen requests
amendment of zoning approval (Case 07SN0385) relative to cash
proffers, density, and modify development standards and
amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R-12)
District on 8.2 acres fronting approximately 275 feet on the
east line of Winterpock Road, 700 feet north of Springford
Parkway, and also fronting 125 feet on the west line of
Summercreek Drive, across from Summercreek Place. Density will
be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Suburban Residential I (Maximum of 2 dwellings per acre) and
Suburban Residential II uses (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax
ID 722-661-8707.
Mr. Harold Ellis presented a summary of Case 21SN0682. He
stated a single-family residential subdivision was approved
for the subject property with zoning case 07SN0385. He further
stated the original zoning was approved for a development with
a maximum of eight dwelling units and density of 1.02 dwelling
units per acre, and a minimum lot size of 34,425 square feet.
He stated with the requested amendment, the applicant is
requesting to reduce road cash proffer, increase the density
by two units, and reduce lot width. He further stated following
the June 29, 2022 Board of Supervisors meeting, the applicant
has submitted revised proffers. He noted the revised proffers
address two concerns raised at the public hearing, including
stormwater runoff and related environmental engineering
concerns, as well as screening for the adjacent church.
Mr. John Castello, representing the applicant, reviewed the
proposal of the request and outlined the revised proffers. He
stated if a fence or hedgerow is installed on the property,
then is would be the same height, design and material, unless
the Summerford homeowner’s association requires a different
style, height or material for the fence. He noted the final
design and location of the fence would be determined at plans
review.
Mr. Winslow called for public comment.
In response to Mr. Carroll’s question, Mr. Castello stated the
church is requesting a fence instead of the proposed hedgerow
suggested by the Summerford homeowner’s association.
Mr. Rewars Hanua, representing the adjacent church, expressed
concerns relative to privacy and the importance of a safety
barrier for members of the church.
Mr. Thomas Brittle, Summerford resident, inquired about the
retention basin located behind his residence.
Mr. George Asaad, representing the adjacent church, expressed
concerns relative to privacy and the importance of a safety
barrier for members of the church.
Mr. Mima Bshay, representing the adjacent church, urged the
Board to approve the consideration of a privacy fence for the
benefit of the church.
Mr. Walt Kenfler, Summerford resident, expressed concerns
relative to the proposed condition relative to a fence. He
urged the Board to approve the option of a hedgerow.
22-514
7/27/2022
Mr. Rick Offerman, representing the Summerford HOA, he stated
the HOA prohibits any vinyl fencing on residential properties
and urged the Board to approve the option of a natural barrier
to keep in character with the neighborhood.
Mr. Dan Dennis, representing the Summerford HOA, he stated the
HOA prohibits any vinyl fencing on residential properties and
urged the Board to approve the option of a natural barrier.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the conceptual
plan, aesthetic and privacy concerns specifically screening
for the adjacent church (fencing versus shrubbery).
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
voted to defer Case 21SN0682 to the Board’s regularly scheduled
August 24, 2022, meeting.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
20SN0576
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, C. James Williams III
requests conditional use to permit a restaurant and outside
public address system, plus conditional use planned
development for exceptions to ordinance requirements and/or
development standards and amendment of zoning district map in
an Agricultural (A) District on 3.7 acres located at the
southwest corner of Genito Road and Woolridge Road. Density
will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards.
The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate
for Suburban Residential I use (Maximum of 2 dwellings per
acre). Tax ID 718-685-8949.
Mr. Ellis presented a summary of Case 20SN0576. He stated the
applicant is proposing to develop a 6,000 square foot
restaurant with outdoor seating on the 3.7-acre parcel. He
further stated the restaurant will feature an outdoor seating
area which is being designed to take advantage of Swift Creek
Reservoir. He stated an outdoor public address system is also
requested. He noted exceptions to ordinance requirements
include setbacks from Genito and Woolridge Roads.
Mr. William Shewmake, representing the applicant, stated the
restaurant will feature an outdoor seating area which is being
designed to take advantage of Swift Creek Reservoir. He further
stated enhanced site landscaping is also proposed and outdoor
seating bench areas and trails provide patrons waiting to be
seated outdoor areas to wait for restaurant seating or explore
the property. He stated site access is planned from a single
right-in, right-out access point along Woolridge Road. He noted
as conditioned, public address systems shall be operated so as
not to generate noise levels above 50 dba, as measured at the
boundary of any property used for residential purposes. He
stated to ensure compatibility with surrounding residential
properties, conditions of approval are recommended which
address building size, architecture, outdoor address system,
landscaping, hours of operation, and outdoor music.
Mr. Winslow called for public comment.
22-515
7/27/2022
Ms. Renee Eldred suggested sending adjacent neighborhoods
notices regarding the proposed development and potential noise
levels.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to potential noise
levels generated by the restaurant.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Ms. Carroll, for the
Board to approve Case 20SN0576, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Textual Statement. The Textual Statement last revised May
26, 2022 shall be considered the Conceptual Plan. (P)
2. Conditional Use. Zone the Property from Agricultural to
Agricultural with a Conditional Use and a Conditional Use
Planned Development (“CUPD”) to permit a restaurant
without drive thru and accessory uses to include a public
address system, and with standard exceptions as described
herein and as provided in the proffered conditions.
Subject to modifications required by environmental
features, transportation, and the Utilities Department,
the development of the Property will be generally
consistent with the Conceptual Plan defined and identified
below. (P)
3. Conceptual Plan. Development shall generally conform to
the Conceptual Plan titled “Swift Creek Reservoir Overall
Site Plan”, prepared by 3NORTH and dated April 28, 2020
(Exhibit A) with respect to the general location of the
building and parking improvements, and their relationship
to Genito and Woolridge Roads, and the Reservoir. (P)
4. Elevations. Buildings shall be in general conformance with
the elevations titled Perspectives, prepared by 3NORTH
dated April 2020 and July 2020 (Exhibit B) unless
otherwise approved by the Planning Commission as set forth
in the Textual Statement. (P)
5. Utilities. Public water and wastewater systems shall be
used. (U)
6. Access.
A. Direct vehicular access from the Property to
Woolridge Road shall be limited to one (1)
entrance/exit with the exact location of this access
approved by the Transportation Department. Access
may permit left-in and/or left-out access if approved
by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT).
B. Any direct vehicular access from the Property to
Genito Road shall be subject to Planning Commission
approval. Any such access shall be limited to one
(1) right in/right-out entrance/exit with the exact
location of this access approved by the
Transportation Department. (T)
22-516
7/27/2022
7. Transportation Improvements. To provide an adequate
roadway system, the Developer/Applicant shall be
responsible for the following road improvements and shall
be completed, as determined by the Transportation
Department, prior to the issuance of any certificate of
occupancy. The exact design and length of these road
improvements shall be approved by the Transportation
Department. If any of the road improvements identified
below are provided by others, as determined by the
Transportation Department, then the specific road
improvement shall no longer be required.
A. Construction of additional pavement along the
southbound lanes of Woolridge Road to provide a
separate right turn lane at the approved access.
B. If VDOT approves left-in and/or left-out access,
removal of part of Woolridge Road raised median
across from the approved access and construction of
additional pavement along the northbound lanes of
Woolridge Road to provide for an adequate left turn
lane, if approved by VDOT.
C. Should access to Genito Road be approved by the
Planning Commission, the Transportation Department
and VDOT then the following improvements shall be
made:
i. construction of additional pavement along the
eastbound lane of Genito Road to provide a
separate right turn lane at the approved access.
ii. construction of a raised median along Genito
Road and/or within the approved access to
prohibit left-in and left-out movements as
approved by the Transportation Department and
VDOT.
D. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free and
unrestricted, of any additional right-of-way (or
easements) required for the improvements identified
above. In the event the Developer/Applicant is unable
to acquire the “off-site” right-of-way that is
necessary for the road improvements described above,
the Developer/Applicant may request, in writing,
that Chesterfield County acquire such right-of-way
as a public road improvement. All costs associated
with the acquisition of the right-of-way shall be
borne by the Developer/Applicant. In the event
Chesterfield County chooses not to assist the
Developer/Applicant in acquisition of the “off-site”
right-of-way, the Developer/Applicant shall be
relieved of the obligation to acquire the “off-site”
right-of-way and shall provide the road improvements
to the extent they can be constructed within
available right-of-way, as determined by the
Transportation Department. (T)
8. Environmental Standards. The following environmental
standards shall be provided. The Department of
Environmental Engineering shall approve the exact design
and implementation of these standards.
22-517
7/27/2022
A. Super silt fence, or an alternative as approved by
the Department of Environmental Engineering, shall
be provided as a perimeter control.
B. Sediment traps and basins sized at least 25 percent
larger than the minimum Virginia Erosion and Sediment
Control Handbook’s standard.
C. Anionic PAM, Flexible Growth Medium and /or a County-
approved equivalent shall be applied to denuded areas
during construction and at final stabilization in
locations shown on plans approved by Environmental
Engineering at the time of plans review. (EE)
9. Gross Floor Area. The maximum gross square footage of a
restaurant shall be 6,000 square feet, and there shall be
a maximum of one restaurant on the Property. (P)
10. Architecture. The restaurant building shall be one story
but may have a rooftop or elevated bar and/or deck and
outdoor sections. The external walls shall be primarily
constructed of stone, wood, metal and glass, with no
vinyl, and the building shall have a vaulted ceiling. The
architecture shall be consistent with the elevations
attached as Exhibit B, unless otherwise approved by the
Planning Commission. Any significant modifications to
these elevations may be approved by the Planning
Commission upon its determination that such modified
elevations represent comparable quality in materials and
design. (P)
11. Decks and Dock. Subject to approval of applicable
Chesterfield County Departments and the landowner(s), the
Property may include outdoor decks, walkways, and dock.
(P)
12. Public Address System. Public address systems shall be
permitted as accessory to the permitted restaurant use,
provided that such systems shall be operated so as not to
generate noise levels above 50 dba, as measured at the
boundary of any property used for residential purposes.
Sound levels generated by live entertainment shall be
monitored and controlled to comply with the decibel
limitation. (P)
13. Landscaping.
A. Landscaping shall generally comply with the plan
titled “Swift Creek Reservoir-Restaurant Landscape
Plan”, prepared by Balzer & Associates, and revised
January 20, 2022 (Exhibit C), including “Optional
Outdoor Viewing Area” and “Optional Photo
Opportunity Area with Seating”, subject to
Environmental Engineering approval.
B. Within the twenty-five (25) foot setback along Genito
Road and Woolridge Road, existing trees shall be
preserved as site development allows, with
supplementation to effectively work with the multi-
use path, minimize views of parking area from these
corridors, and promote building visibility.
22-518
7/27/2022
C. Landscaping within the parking area’s central space
shall be consistent with stormwater management
facility use.
D. Clearing for the installation of landscaped areas
shall not encroach into the Resource Protection Area
(RPA) or the 100-year FEMA floodplain unless
otherwise authorized by Environmental Engineering.
The area labeled as “Optional Outdoor Viewing Area”
on the landscape plan shall be installed subject to
and to the extent of approval by Environmental
Engineering.
E. A detailed landscape plan for the entire site shall
be submitted for review and approval by the Planning
Department at the time of site plan review. (P)
14. Hours of Operation and Outdoor Music.
A. The restaurant shall not be open to the public before
10:00 a.m. and seating shall end by 11:00 p.m. at
which time the restaurant doors shall be closed to
the public.
B. Outdoor music shall be operated no later than 10:00
p.m. on Mondays through Thursdays, 11:00 p.m. on
Fridays and Saturdays, and 9:00 p.m. on Sundays. (P)
17. PUBLIC HEARINGS
17.A. PUBLIC HEARING TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS AND GRANT
AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED FOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS
Mr. Brent Epps state this date and time has been advertised
for a public hearing for the Board to appropriate funds and
grant authorization to proceed for transportation projects.
Mr. Winslow called for public comment.
Ms. Renee Eldred urged the Board to approve the request.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
Mr. Carroll clarified the specifics of federal, state, regional
and local funding that has been obtained to advance new and
existing projects and to use as leveraging for Smart Scale
funding requests.
On motion of, seconded by, the Board took the following
actions:
1. Appropriated funds as shown in Attachment A:
a. $18,701,756 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements; and
b. $80,361,198 in anticipated CVTA reimbursements.
2. Transferred $625,604 in local funds as shown in Attachment
A.
3. For Route 288 Northbound Flyover to Bailey Bridge Connector
and Chippenham Parkway/Route 60 Interchange Improvement
22-519
7/27/2022
Preliminary-Engineering projects, and the Woolridge Road
(Route 288 - Old Hundred Road) Extension authorized the County
Administrator to enter into a CVTA/county agreement,
acceptable to the County Attorney.
4. For Bessie Lane Reconstruction, Rivermont Road (Enon Church
Road - Walnut Drive) Sidewalk, Route 360 at Courthouse Road
Pedestrian Improvement, Courthouse Road (Route 10 - Fallow
Drive) Trail and Route 1 (Falling Creek Avenue - Food Lion)
Bike and Pedestrian Improvement:
a. Authorized the County Administrator to enter into
VDOT/county agreements/contracts, permits/mitigation
agreements and surety agreements, acceptable to the County
Attorney;
b. Authorized the County Administrator to proceed with the
design and right-of-way acquisitions, including advertisement
of eminent domain public hearings if necessary, and to accept
the conveyance of right-of-way and easements that are acquired;
c. Authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and
County Administrator to execute easement agreements for
relocation of utilities; and Authorized the Procurement
Director to proceed with the advertisements of construction
contracts for the projects.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll
Nays: None.
17.B. PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM THE RIGHT OF WAY
OF CORPORATE VILLAGE PARKWAY
Mr. Dean Sasek stated this date and time has been advertised
for a public hearing for the Board to request to quitclaim the
right of way of Corporate Village Parkway.
Mr. Winslow called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to quitclaim
the right of way of Corporate Village Parkway.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
17.C. TO CONSIDER CODE AMENDMENT RELATIVE TO OUTDOOR
ADVERTISING SIGNS
Mr. Andy Gillies stated this date and time has been advertised
for a public hearing for the Board to consider code amendment
relative to outdoor advertising signs.
Mr. Winslow called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
22-520
7/27/2022
Discussion ensued relative to the Zoning Ordinance provides
that outdoor advertising signs be modernized and improved
through standards which enhance the overall attractiveness of
signage in the county.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Carroll, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING
SECTION 19.1 – 279 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATIVE TO
OUTDOOR ADVERTISING SIGNS AND ORDINANCE SUBJECT TO
EXPIRATION
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 19.1 – 279 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is
amended and re-enacted, to read as follows:
Chapter 19.1
ZONING
Sec. 19.1-279. Outdoor Advertising Signs
A. Nonconformity. Existing legally nonconforming outdoor advertising signs in
existence prior to July 24, 2019, remain nonconforming under this ordinance and
are subject to the nonconformity provisions under this chapter and the Code of
Virginia. However, an outdoor advertising sign located within a designated Sign
Modernization Area (SMA) shall be considered to be conforming provided that
such sign complies with this chapter.
B. Limitation on Number of Outdoor Advertising Signs. The total number of
outdoor advertising sign structures permitted under this ordinance shall be 81
determined by the number of such signs existing as of July 24, 2019. The number
of outdoor advertising signs shall in no case exceed this cap. The director of
planning shall maintain a database of all outdoor advertising signs including the
owners of such signs. The intention of this section is to encourage owners to
demolish existing nonconforming outdoor advertising signs and construct new,
modern outdoor advertising signs, in designated SMAs, which will result in more
attractive signage throughout the County.
C. Sign Modernization Areas. An SMA includes any parcel of real property that is
zoned C-3, C-4, C-5, I-1, I-2, or I-3, and is located along and visible from the main
traveled way of designated roads, or portion thereof, as provided in table 19.1-
279.C. Any designated SMA shall be identified on the zoning map and such area
shall allow for new outdoor advertising signs and for existing outdoor advertising
signs to become conforming in accordance with this chapter. Each SMA is based
upon the designated road the sign would face and from which it is intended to be
viewed and the boundaries established along such road within which signs are to
be located.
D. Ordinance Subject to Expiration. In additions to the provisions of 19.1-270, it
is the intention of this section that outdoor advertising signs be modernized and
improved through provided standards to enhance overall attractiveness of signage
in the county. To that end the provisions of this section shall no longer be effective,
and outdoor advertising signs no longer permitted, unless a minimum of 25
outdoor advertising signs located in SMAs on Route 1,10,60 and 360 are
22-521
7/27/2022
modernized, demolished, or replaced to be in compliance with this section prior to
July 24, 2026. Any sign modernized, demolished, or new sign installed, in
accordance with this section shall be considered legally conforming and continue
to be subject to its provisions, legally nonconforming signs in existence prior to
adoption of this ordinance remain subject to the nonconformity provisions under
this chapter and the Code of Virginia.
Table 19.1-279.C. Sign Modernization Areas.
Road Sign Facing
SMA Boundary
Maximum
Number of Signs
per SMA[1]
1. Rt. 150 a. Midlothian Tnpk. To Rt. 360 2
b. Rt. 1 to I-95 2
2. Rt. 60
a. Rt. 150 to Providence Rd. 5
b. Providence Rd. to Rt. 76 5
c. Rt. 76 to Courthouse Rd. 5
3. Rt. 360
a. Rt. 150 to Turner Rd. 5
b. Pocoshock Creek to Oxbridge Rd 3
c. Courthouse Rd. to Price Club Blvd. 1
d. Price Club Blvd. to Rt. 288. 5
e. Skinquarter Rd to Magnolia Green Parkway 1
f. Magnolia Green Parkway to Amelia County line 5
4. River Road/Chesterfield Ave. a. Granger St to Hickory Rd 2
5. Route 1
a. Richmond City line to Bellwood Rd 4
b. Willis Road to Rt. 288 4
c. Weir Rd. to Old Bermuda Hundred Rd. 2
d. Ashton Creek to Colonial Heights City line 8
6. Route 10 a. Rt. 1 to Ware Bottom Spring Rd. 4
b. I-295 to Hopewell City Line 6
7. Route 288 a. Hull Street Road to Rt. 76 1
b. I-95 to Chester Rd. 1
8. Interstate 95 a. Richmond City line to Colonial Heights City line 20
9. Interstate 295 a. South from Meadowville Rd. interchange to Enon
Church Road 2
Total Potential Locations -- 93 [2]
[1] [1] Number shown is the maximum number of signs permitted in the SMA.
[2] [2] The overall total for signs permitted within designated areas exceeds that permitted for outdoor advertising signs
within the county, this is intended to permit flexibility in relocation of current sign inventory but does not increase
number of such signs to be permitted in the county. In no case shall the provided number of signs per SMA or the
overall density cap of 81 outdoor advertising signs countywide be exceeded.
E. Outdoor Advertising Signs Generally. A new outdoor advertising sign shall not
be permitted except as follows:
1. Sign is located within a SMA;
2. Sign is freestanding and additionally not located on a wall or fence;
3. The sign is not a double-stacked sign, a side by sign, or abut another sign.
However, nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit a double-faced sign,
meaning sign faces may be generally back-to-back and parallel to each other.
The director of planning may approve a double-faced sign to be constructed at
an angle so as to allow visibility of the sign face from the main traveled way of
the road,
4. Excluding Rt. 150 and Interstates 95 and 295, sign complies with freestanding
sign design requirements and shall be constructed either as a monument sign or
cladded pole sign and further complies with other specific sign design provisions
of area in which located. Sign facing Rt 150, and Interstates 95 and 295 not
complying with freestanding sign design requirements shall be a monopole steel
structure.
5. Any new outdoor advertising sign is the result of the owner of such sign
demolishing one existing outdoor sign and the placement of the new sign in a
22-522
7/27/2022
permitted location within a SMA. Existing sign located within a designated
SMA may be modified provided that it complies with this section.
6. Sign is setback as follows:
a. 300 feet from property zoned for single family or townhouse use along
same side of road;
b. 500 feet from Special Design District boundaries, County owned or
operated parks or schools and any entrances to R, R-TH, R-MF and MH
Districts along same side of road;
c. 100 feet from exit or entrance ramp of a limited access road or interstate;
d. 1000 feet from any other outdoor advertising sign along the same side
with the exception that along Rt. 150 and Interstates 95 and 295 such
separation may be 500 feet;
e. Except along Interstates 95 and 295, maximum of 100 feet from roadway
which it faces and from which it is designed to be legible. For interstates
95 and 295 the maximum setback shall be 150 feet.
7. Sign does not overhang any right-of-way, property line, building or structure
other than a fence where permitted through permit review;
8. Sign structure along Interstates 95 and 295 shall not exceed 40 feet in height.
Sign structures along any other public road shall not exceed 25 feet in height.
The director of planning may approve an increase in height of not more than 10
feet to avoid conflict with existing signage;
9. Notwithstanding the requirements for freestanding signs outlined in Table 19.1-
276 B.1, the size of any outdoor advertising sign face shall not exceed the
following:
a. 672 square feet along Route 150 and Interstates 95 and 295.
b. 400 square feet along Route 60, 288 and 360.
c. 300 square feet along other roads.
10. Artistic embellishments may be added to a conforming outdoor advertising sign
provided such embellishments do not exceed 10 percent of the permitted sign
area and do not extend further than 5 feet from sign structure.
11. Sign shall be considered an on-premises sign and subject to applicable
regulations if located on same property as the specific use or activity advertised.
12. The owner of any EMC outdoor advertising sign shall provide to Chesterfield
County a 10 second message per minute on such sign.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately after adoption.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll.
Nays: None.
18. REMAINING MANUFACTURED HOME PERMITS AND ZONING REQUESTS
There were no remaining manufactured home permits and zoning
requests.
19. FIFTEEN-MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
There were no requests to address the Board at this time.
Mr. Holland requested information relative to the Southside
Speedway’s business model before the track closed.
22-523
7/27/2022
20. ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board
adjourned at 9:07 p.m. until August 24, 2022, at 2:00 p.m. for
a work session to be held in the Public Meeting Room.
Ayes: Winslow, Holland, Ingle, K. Carroll, T. Carroll
Nays: None.
__________________________ ___________________________
Joseph P. Casey Christopher M. Winslow
County Administrator Chairman
22-524
7/27/2022