10-22-1980 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
OCTOBER 22, 1980
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. R. Garland Dodd, Chai~Tnan
~¢r. Harry G. Daniel, Vice Chairman
Mr. C. L. Bookman
Mrs. Joan Girone
Mr. E. Merlin O'Neill, Sr.
Mr. Nicholas M. Meiszer
County Administrator
Staff in Attendance:
Mr. Dean Ccmbee, Airport Manager
Mr. Steve Micas, County Attorney
Mr. Jeffrey Muzzy, Director of
Ccrauunity Development
Mr. Robert Painter, Utilities Dir.
Mr. Lane Ramsey, Budget Director
It is here noted that a meeting of the Board of Supervisors
scheduled for October 21, 1980 at 1:30 p.m. at the Airport
Conference Room for a briefing on the Airport ~qaster Plan
was not held for lack of a quorum.
Mr. Dodd called the regularly scheduled meeting to order at
the Courthouse at 9:10 a.m. (EDST)
Mr. Bookman gave the invocation.
On' motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
approved the minutes of October 8, 1980, as amended.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
Whereas, Clarence Lee Thorpe retired from the Utilities
Department on September 30, 1980, having been employed
twenty-five years earlier with the County on April 28, 1955; and
Whereas, Mr. Thorpe has been a loyal County employee and
has always performed his duties in an outstanding manner.
Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that this Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County does hereby recognize
Mr. Thorpe's retirement and many years of valued service to
Chesterfield County.
And Be It Further Resolved that this Board will include
this recognition o£ Mr. Thorpe in the Board's minute book
and present a copy of this resolution to Mr. Thorpe.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been advertised for
a public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to interest
payable on unpaid real estate taxes. There was no opposition
present. On motion o£ Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the
Board adopted the following ordinance:
An Ordinance'to Amend and Reenact Section 8-12
of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978,
As Amended, Relating to the.Interest Payable on
Unpaid Real Estate Taxes
Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
80-484
(1) That Section 8-12 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield is amended and reenacted as
Section 8-12. Payment of Real Estate Taxes.
(a) ?he tax levied on real estate situated in the County
shall be due and payable in two equal installments, the first
installment being due and payable on June 5 of each calendar
year and the second installment being due and payable on
December 5 of each calendar year. Any person failing to pay any
such installment of taxes on or before the due date shall incur
a penalty thereof of five per centum, which shall be added to
the amount of taxes or levies due from such taxpayer on such
installment, which, when collected by the treasurer, shall be
accounted for in his settlements.
(b) In addition to the penalty provided for herein, any
such taxes that remain unpaid on the first day of the month
next following the month in which such taxes become due shall be
delinquent and prior to December 1, 1980, interest thereon
of eight percent per annum, and beginning December 1, 1980,
interest thereon of ten percent per annum shall be added to
the amount of taxes or levies due from such taxpayer, wh'ich when.
collected by the treasurer, shall be accounted for in his
settlements.
(c) The treasurer shall give notice a reasonable time
prior to June 5 and December 5 of each calendar year by
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the County
that he is prepared to receive at his office one-half or the
balance due thereon, as the case may be, of the real estate
taxes from any taxpayer charged with payment thereof prior to
June 6 and December 6 of such year, without penalty.
(d) Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this section
shall be construed to'prohibit the payment of the whole of the
taxeS levied On real estate by any taxpayer in one sum at any
time; provided, that any penalty and interest that may have
accrued on the whole or any part thereof at the time of payment
as provided herein be paid therewith.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been advertised for
a public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to the
parking of trucks on residential roads. There was no opposition
present. Mrs. Girone stated she would like to eliminate the
hour restriction on the proposed ordinance which would then
prohibit truck parking at any time. She stated there are some
people who park their trucks during the day in the residential
areas. Mr. Bookman inquired if this ordinance would zffect
pick-up trucks. Mr. Micas stated pick-up trucks were adequately
excluded from this ordinance. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded
by Mr. Daniel, the following ordinance was adopted:
An Ordinance to Amend the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1978, as Amended, by Adding Section
14.1-14.1 Relating to the Parking of Trucks on
Residential Roads and to Provide for a Penalty
Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Chesterfield:
(1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield is amended
by adding Section 14.1-14.1 as follows:
80-485
Sec. 14.1-14.1. Parking o£ trucks on residential roads.
3.C.
No truck having wheels of the dual-tire type in excess
o£ 6,000 pounds and no trailer, semi-trailer; or cab for
such trailer shall be parked on any road in the County
within any residential district.
Ayes: Mr. Hodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone
Absent: Mr. O'Neill. '
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been advertised
for a public hearing to consider an ordinance relating
generally to the definition of "family" and the classification
of boarding or lodging houses. Mr. Jeffrey Muzzy stated
this ordinance was prepared at the request of Mr. O'Neill
who is experiencing some problems with people renting houses
to students in the Ettrick area. Mrs. Girone stated she is
on one of the College's committees and this had'been discussed.
She stated she did not feel the problem was with the 2, 3 or
4 students renting a house but with the larger numbers. She state,
she felt the definition o£ "family" being reduced from 4 to
2 unrelated persons would not solve the problems. She stated
she agreed with the portion relating to the classification
of boarding or lodging houses. There was no one present to
discuss this matter. After further discussion of the matter,
it was on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Bookman,
resolved that further discussion of this ordinance be deferred
until later in the day when Mr. O'Neill would be present.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. Meiszer introduced Ms. Shelly Motley, Associate Regional
Director of the Virginia Lung Association (.VLA) and Dr.
Kevin Cooper, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Pulmonary
Division at MCV. He added they were representatives of the
Clean Air Committee of the VLA and wished to discuss leaf
burning in Chesterfield. Mr. Dodd stated the Board was interested
in what would be presented and would take this matter under
advisement.
Dr~ Cooper stated that leaf smoke is unhealthy, inhaling the
smoke produces symptoms in normal people which consist of
burning eyes, chest tightness, and sore throat; in susceptible
persons symptoms may be severe and result in increased suffering
and medical care; etc. He stated that leaf piek~up in Chesterfie
is an undeveloped and potentially profitable industry as the leave~
could be used for compost or mulch. He stated that the
State law prohibits leaf burning but the individual jurisdictions
can enact ordinances which override the State regulations.
He stated the urban areas o£ Lynchburg, Newport News-Hampton,
Norfolk-Portsmouth, Petersburg-Colonial Heights, City of
Richmond, Roanoke and the National Capital ban leaf burning. He
stated Chesterfield, Hanover and Henrico allow burning.
Mrs. Girone inquired if a presentation would be made in
ttenrico and Hanover. Dr. Cooper stated a presentation was
scheduled to be made in Henrico. Mr. Dodd inquired if there
were any figures available of people who were susceptible to
~smoke from burning. Dr. Cooper stated he felt 4-5% of the
national population suffered from asthma or emphysema or
other similar type diseases. Mrs. Girone inquired what was
being done nation-wide regarding leaf burning. Dr. Cooper
stated that most urban areas prohibit leaf burning. There
were six people present in support of the banning of leaf
burning in Chesterfield. Mr. John Lacy and Mrs. Janie
Morr~son outlined how leaf burning and wood burning stoves
affect their breathing and health.
Mr. Dodd stated the Board was aware this was a problem in
the County and thanked those present for taking the time to
explain the problem in detail.
80-486
On motion of ~4rs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved the following budget changes:
1. Decreased Planned Budget Expenditures:
Bermuda District:
Point o£ Rocks Park
Clover Hill District;
Grange Hall Elementary
Rockwood Park
Providence Jr. High
Clover Hill Contingency
330-1-95401-4393
$ 4,000
Dale District:
Meadowbrook High School
Matoaca District:
Carver Middle
Matoaca Contingency
330-1-95405-4393 420
330-1-95421-4393 1
330-1-95423-4393 360
330-1-95446-4694 6~118
330-1-95443-4393
330-1-95447-4393
330'-1-95446-4695
Midlothian District:
Midlothian Contingency 330-1-95446-4696
TOTAL DECREASE
Increased Planned Budget Expenditures:
Bermuda District:
Ecoff Park 330-1-95417-4393
Bermuda Contingency 330-1-95446-4692
6~899
Clover Hill District;
Chalkley Elementary
Hening Elementary
Dale District:
Dale Contingency
Matoaca District:
Ettrick Park
39
419
19~95
t9~714
Midlothian District:
Robious Complex
Midlothian Annex
Midlothian High
Wa.tkins Elementary
Bon Air Elementary
8~867
$ 39~519
$ 1,328
2~672
4 0~fi~900
330-1-95425-4393 4,754
330-1-95440-4393 2~145
330-1-95446-4693
330-1-95418-4393
6~899
39
19,714
330-1-95407-4393 2,554
330-1-95411-4393 2,866
330-1-954t5-4393 405
330-.1-95432-4393 2~672
330-1-95433-4393 370
8,867
TOTAL INCREASE ~ 39,519
Increased Planned Budget Revenue account 141-1-00012-1046
Talents Unlimited by $8,900 and increased the following
P~anned Budget Expenditure accounts:
Sub-Teachers - Elem. 141-1-22493-1174 $ 1,203
Sub-Teachers - Sec. ~41-1-22493-1173 4,211
FICA 141-1-22493-1311 346
Consultants ~41-1-22493-2~51 700
Travel 141-1-22493-2371 340
Instructional SupPlies 141-1-22493-3402 2~100
Total
$ 8 900
80-487
6.A.
2. Decreased Planned Budget Expenditure account 111-1-31400-4123
Contingency by $12,845 and increased Planned Budget
Expenditure account 330-1-92135-4393 Data Processing
Uninterruptible Power Source by $12,845.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
authorized the County Treasurer to change the name of the
Petty Cash Custodian for General Services from C. G. Manuel
to William Howell or Carol Wade with the amount of $200.00 to
remain the same.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by ~r. Daniel, the Board
approved the request for a bingo and/or raffle permit from
J. B. Watkins P.T.O. for calendar year 1980.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to enter into a contract with
L. L. Cashion who submitted the low bid of $13,250 for
off-site drainage work to be performed in the Enon Elementary
School-Heather Hill Subdivision area and further the Board
transferred $13,250 from the undesignated capital improvements
pro3ects, 330-1-92610-4393, for this contract.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
set November 12, 1980 at 2:00 p.m. for public hearings to
consider an Ordinance relating to the regulation of dealers in
precious metals and to consider citizen comments on the County's
HUD Community Development Small Cities Block Grant Preapplication
and Imminent Threat Application for the Ettrick Community.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
Whereas, The Congress of the United States is considering
legislation which will extend the General Revenue Sharing Program;
and
Whereas, the program, which expired on September 30, 1980,
must be reauthorized during the lame duck session beginning
November 12; and
Whereas, S.2574 and H.R.7112 call for this reauthorization
and the President has indicated support for the program's
continuation; and
Whereas, the General Revenue Sharing Program has the
lowest administrative costs of any of the federal assistance
programs, is distributed on a fair and equitable basis, and
provides recipient jurisdictions much needed flexibility in
delivering locally determined services and programs; and
80-488
Whereas, Chesterfield County received $1,541,000 during
FY 1979-80 and anticipates receiving $1,559,450 for FY 1980-81.
Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved by the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors that it strongly urges the
Congress to take up and pa~s, and the President to sign,
legislation reauthorizing the General Revenue Sharing Program.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
It was generally agreed to defer discussion of road matters
in eaCh magisterial district until the representative from
the Highway Department would be present.
It was generally agreed to de£er discussion of the Deerfield
drainage situation until Mr. Jeffrey Muzzy, Director of
Community Development, would be present.
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
approved the installation of a street light at 6609 Walmsley
Boulevard with any associated costs to be expended from the
Clover Hill District Street Light Funds.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
deferred consideration of a street light request at Sheldeb Court
and Sheldeb Drive until November 26, 1980.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
approved the request from Meadowdale Townhouse Park Association
to change /he following street lights from mercury vapor lumen
to high pressure sodium vapor which cost is estimated to be
$289.00 and will be expended from the Dale District Street Light
Funds:
1. XB 93 at Keydet Court
2. VA 559 at Luckylee Cresent
3. WA 17 at Hokie Court
4. UA 96 at Dalebrook Drive and Meadowdale Boulevard
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. Meiszer stated the next item on the agenda was consideration
of retaining or refunding Stub Road and Utility Funds. He
stated staff felt the funds should be retained which was the
reasoning behind the initial establishment of such funds. Mr.
Bookman stated he felt the funds held in escrow were only a
token amount, that they could never pay for a road at today's
cost. Mr. Dodd stated staff also suggested if any funds
were retained, it be limited to those funds for stubs which
abut adjacent property which has been developed without a
connection required to the subject stub. Mrs. Girone questioned
what amount of funds were involved and inquired how many of
these roads exist. After further consideration, it was on
motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, resolved that
this matter be deferred Until November 12, 1980 so that
additional information could be presented.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
80-489
8.D
Mr. Meiszer stated that the staff had completed the A .' '
Operation and Procedure~ ~ ..... ~ ~ ..... dmln~strativ
' -~ ......~ ,or the planning and c, onstructJon
of County facilities and improvements. Itc stated the manual
identifies responsibilities and details the sequence o1'
events which occur from inception to completion of County
projects. }te stated that all departments involved in the
proc, edure were consulted and their comments incorporated
into the, document, l'te added that copies of the manual were
available. Mr. Bookman inquired if the fees £or school
projects were to be waived and were included in the manual.
Mr. Ramsey stated the school system was included in the
manual, On motion of Mrs. Girone seconded by Mr. Daniel
the Board: ' ,
Ayes:
Absent:
Authorized all application fees for County projects to be
waived. Permits and approvals (i-.e., building, zoning,
erosion control, etc.) will still be required but fees
will be waived on overall rather than individual basis. (3.6
Authorized the County Administrator to approve change
orders not to exceed 5% (of the total cost of any project)
or $10,000 whichever is greater. Change orders exceeding
the established percentage or project category fund will
require prior Board approval. Al~ change orders approved
will be reported to the Board. (4.3,11 & 4.4.12)
Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone. Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. W. C. Newcomb, Assistant Resident Engineer with the
Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation, was present.
Mr. Bookman inquired if and when the Wagstaff Circle area would
be tarred and graveled. Mr. Newcomb stated the area was schedul~
for improvements in the near future.
Mr. Bookman stated he had discussed Dakins and Adkins Roads with
Mr. Covington who informed him this area would be asphalted next
year.
Mr. Bookman inquired when the intersection of Route 60 and
Providence Road would be completed, Mr. Newcomb stated it
was scheduled for completion in November but there were some
problems With utilities causing delays and, hopefully, it would
be completed this year.
Mrs, Girone inquired when the drainage situation at the
intersection of Buford Road and Forest Hill would be remedied.
Mr. Newcomb stated that the system is £unctioning at this time,
but he will check.on this matter further and inform her of any
findings within two weeks.
Mrs. Girone inquired about the resurfacing o£ Anwell Drive. She
stated she had discussed this with various members of the
Highway Department staff since October, 1979 and still it has
not been accomplished. Mr. Newcomb stated he would check on
this matter and inform her of the project status.
Mrs. Girone inquired if Mr. Covington had obtained a radar
sign for Pinetta Drive, Mr. Newcomb stated he understood
Mr. Covington had investigated this possibility and that
the signs are only placed at State lines. Mrs. Girone
inquired if this was State policy. Mr. Newcomb stated he
understood it was. Mrs. Girone stated she felt this situation
at Pinetta would be helped by a sign indicating radar was used
in the area. Mr. Daniel inquired if this would set a precedent
so that any subdivision requesting such a sign would also receive
one. Mrs. Girone stated she did not feel any subdivision
had radar as frequently as the Pinetta area. Mrs. Girone
asked that Mr. Covington call her regarding this matter.
80-490
9
I.
Mr. Daniel stated he was concerned with the installation
time needed for traffic signal lights. He stated that the
lights approved for Route l0 and Beach, Route 10 and Cogbill
and Route l0 and Jessup had been approved approximately a
year ago and still none have been installed. Mr. Newcomb
stated that the equipment had to be ordered.
Mrs. Girone stated she had inquiries as to why the Highway
Department did not set the traffic lights to handle peak
hour traffic. Mr. Newcomb stated that most of the equipment
in the County is older and as it is replaced, more
sophisticated equipment which would operate in this manner will
be installed.
Mr. Dodd thanked the Highway Department for the paving of
Osborne Road, for the trees being taken down at the entrance
to Gay Farms and for the installation of 45 mph signs on
Route 10 at Old Stage, east bound.
Mr. Dodd presented the Highway Department with a petition
submitted regarding a drainage problem on Osborne Road.
Mr. Dodd asked the Highway Department to install "No Parking"
signs on Purlock. He asked~that the Highway Department
also remove weeds at the intersection of South Chester Road
and Curtis Street as they are causing a sight problem.
Mr. Newcomb informed the Board that ROute 628, Hickory Road,
had been reopened for traffic this date.
Mr. Painter presented the Board with the sewer and water
financial reports.
Mr. Charles Quaiff, Superintendent of Accounts and Records,
reviewed the water and sewer revenue and operating results
since the last rate increase which was in July l, 1977. He
stated the following should be noted:
1. New rates were effective July l, 1977, resulting in
less revenue than projected by the consultant for
the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1977.
2. Water and Sewer Bonds were not sold in accordance
with the projected schedule of R. W. Beck & Assoc.
which resulted in a lower total Debt Service for
the projection period.
3. A faster growth rate has been experienced during the
projection period which resulted in gross revenue
exceeding the projections even though the rates did
not become effective until July l, 1977.
4. An inflation factor of 5% per year was used by the
consultant in projecting operating expenses, the
excessive inflation for the past 2 years resulted
in a considerably higher actaal expense than was projected.
He added there was one year remaining within the 5 year projection
period. If the rate of growth declines and inflation continues at
a double digit rate, both utilities may need to have rate
adjustments in order to meet the operating and debt requirements.
He distributed charts on both water and sewer revenues and
expenses.
He stated at this time the staff recommended that the water
service charge be maintained at the same rate structure as it
relates to meter size to determine capacity charge~ retain the fir
three rate increments 70~ through 509, and revise the last three
rates slightly. He stated they also suggested that a connection
80-491
fee for instances where the property owner wishes to meter
outside use of water separately from household use. tie stated
this would provide a means by which the use of water for lawn
sprinkling and watering of shrubs, etc. could be metered. He
stated they did suggest $250.00 for 5/8" meter with all
rules and regulations which apply to connections, disconnections
minimum charges and reconnection charges applying to all
meters installed in this category.
Mr. Quai£f stated that the sewer system operating expenses
have increased dramatically during the past two years. He
stated this increase~ coupled with the possible decrease in
new connections, makes it necessary to increase service
charges in the very near future. He stated staff recommended
a 20% overall increase in service charges including the capacity
charge and volume charge effective by January 1, 1981. He state~
they proposed an overall connection fee schedule as follows:
Existing Connection Fees Proposed
Single Family:
A. 1. Existing residences, already having
septic tank system when application is
made within time allocated by County after
notice that sewer service is
available: $ 750.00 $1,200
Thereafter: 1,200.00 1,500
2. New residences whose service later
is connected to sewer installed by
developer: $ 700.00 800
3. New residences whose service later is
connected to sewer not installed by
developer: $1,200.00 1,500
B. Duplexes: Same as single family residences
for each unit in duplex.
C. Mobile homes not located in a mobile home
park or subdivision: Same as single family.
D. Churches: Same as single family residence
when churches are used for schools, kinder-
gartens, etc. Charges shall be based on
equivalent single family units.
E. Apartments, Condominiums and Townhouses,
mobile home parks and mobile homes:
1. Existing. When application is made within
time allotted by County after notice is given
that sewer service is available: $ 750,00
Thereafter: 1,200.00
2. New: $700.00
A. Per unit, onlines installed by developer
B. Per unit, lines installed by County
$1,200.00
F. Travel trailer camps, hotels and motels
Same as single
family for each
unit.
Same as single
family.
Same as single
family.
$1,200
1,500
8O0
1,500
1. Existing: When application is made within
time allotted by County after notice is given
that service is available: $200.00 per unit $ 350
Thereafter: 400.00 per unit 500
2. New: 400.00 per unit 500
80-492
Existing Connection Fees Proposed
G. Commercial, industrial and institutional
1. Existing: When application is made within
time allocated by County after notice is given
that sewer service is available: $1,200/acre $1,900
Minimum Charge for each establishment: $600 1,000
Thereafter: $1,750/acre 2,200
Minimum charge for each establishment: $1,200 1,500
2. New: When a sewer extension is made by
the developer. $1,200 per acre $1,400
Minimum Charge: 600 per acre 700
3. New commercial connection to sewer not
installed by developers: $1,750 per acre 2,200
Minimum Charge: 1,200 per acre 1,500
H. Hospitals, nursing homes or homes for adults:
1. Hospitals $300.00 per bed $ 480
2. Nur. Home $200.00 per bed 320
3. Homes for adults as defined in Section
63.1-172, Code of Virginia: $100 per bed $ 160
or same as single family residence whichever
is greater.
Mr. Quaiff stated that the water system absorbed two rate
increases from the Appomattox River Water Authority in the
present budget. He stated that the water system is maintaining
itself. He stated the increase to the average sewer bill
will be approximately $27.05 a year, as proposed.
Mrs. Girone inquired about the separate meter for the lawns.
Mr. Quaiff stated that there would be two meters, one for the
home and one for the lawn. He stated the monthly bill proposed
for the lawn would be $4.00, it would cost $250 to connect and
$10 to disconnect.
Mr. Daniel and Mr. Bookman stated they felt the increase to
the existing home for sewer connection being increased to
$1,200 was too high and suggested $1,000. Mr. Quaiff stated
that the County will finance this payment over a 20 month
period for those who request such financing. Mr. Bookman
suggested the new residence fee be raised and reduce the
existing residence connection fee.
Mr. Dodd and Mr. Bookman expressed the need for a review of
this nature more often than once every six years. Mr. Dodd
stated a 5% increase once-a year for a couple of years might be
better than 20% in one year. Mr. Quaiff stated they will be
reviewing this every 12-18 months in the future.
It was generally agreed to change the proposal as follows:
Single Family:
A.2. New residence whose service is later connected to
sewer installed by developer to $900. (from $800)
A.3. New residence whose service is connected to sewer
not installed by developer. (deleting word "later" after "is'
E. Apartments, condominium and townhouses, mobile home
parks and mobile homes:
2. New:
A. Per unit, onlines installed by developer to $900 (from $
It was generally agreed that a public hearing would be held
to consider an ordinance regarding rate increases for sewer and
water as amended and outlined above on December 10, 1980 at
7:00 p.m.
The Board requested that staff prepare a one page summary
showing the changes proposed.
Mr. Bookman excused himself from the meeting.
80-493
~00
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
approved the fo]lowing water contracts and authorized the
County Administrator to execute any necessary documents:
1. WS0-106CD/6!8)0065 Woodbridge Square
Developer: Co]onia~ Equity
Contractor: JaBar Construction Company
Subcontractor: Virginia Backhoe and Trenching Company
Estimated Contract Cost: $16,417.18
Estimated County Cost: $ 3,500.00 (Cash refund)
Code: 380-1-60065-7212
and further the Board appropriated $3,500 from 563 Surplus
to 380-1-60065-7212 ...
2. WS0-108CD/6(8)0085 William Gwyn Estates, Section D
Developer: Phase I, Inc.
Contractor: Bookman Construction Company
Estimated Contract Cost: $16,670.00
Estimated County Cost: 1,444.80 (refund through connecti
Code: .366-1-I1684-7221
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Bookman and Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. Bookman returned to the meeting.
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
authorized the extension of water service to serve residents
on Cozy Lane and Tacony Drive which is approximately 1,500
feet of 6" line and is estimated to cost $15,000, as shown
on the plat filed with the papers of this Board.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. Painter stated the County had received a request from
Mr. Thomas L. Daniel for a water line extension from
Tacony Drive along Route 360 to serve his proprty at the
intersection of Route 360 and Dyer Lane. Mr. Bookman stated
he did not feel easements should be required in the motion
to approve this extension but he would work to obtain the
easements for the County. He stated he felt this project
and the previous project should be bid at the same time to obtain
the best price. On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by
Mrs. Girone, the Board authorized the extension of a 16
inch water line approximately 760 feet from Tacony Drive
along Route 360 to serve Mr. Daniel's property at the interseciio~
of Dyer Lane and Route 360 with the understanding that Mr.
Thomas Daniel pay $10,000 towards the cost of the project which
will not be refundable, said project estimated to cost $30,000.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone
Absent: ~r. O'Neill.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute
any necessary documents for the following sewer contracts:
S8.0-104CD/7(8)0045 Morrisdale-Resubdivision of Lots 51 & 52
Developer: George Angone
Contractor: William M. Harman
Estimated Contract Cost: $5,362.24
Estimated County Cost: $ 322.75 (Refund through connection
Code: 574-1-11781-7221
80-494
VIII.
S79-109CD/7(7)9095 Heather Hill
Developer: Vernon E. LaPrade, Jr., & Francis Beers
Contractor: Piedmont Construction Co., Inc.
Estimated Contract Cost: $25,534.80
Estimated County Cost: $ 9,194.85 (Refund through connecti
Code: 574-1-11781-7221
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute
any necessary documents for the following sewer contract:
S80-70CD/7)8)0702 Rockwood Green Office Park, Off-site
Developer: Vernon E. LaPrade, Jr. & Harley S. Hammond
Contractor: Stamie E. Lyttle Co., Inc.
Estimated Contract Cost: $31,485.00
Estimated County Cost: $27,793.00 (refund through connections
Code: 574-1-11781-7221
And further the Board approved the developer being allowed
refunds from the properties listed below, less any refunds to
these properties for off-site sewers, up to the cost of the off-s
improvements. The refund provision is valid for a period of
five years from the date of the contract with the developer
being responsible for notifying the County of these refunds:
Tax Map 49-7, parcels 7 and 8
Tax Map 49-8, parcels 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 26
Tax Map 49-12, parcels 12, 35, 36, 37 and 39
Ayes; Mr. DOdd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'NeiI1.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
awarded contract S80-47C/7(8)0471, installation of sewer lines
to serve homes along Gill and Oakland Streets, to
Southern Construction Company who submitted the low bid of
$55,432.75, the County Administrator was authorized to execute
any necessary documents and the Board appropriated $60,976.03
($55,432.75 + 10% contingency) from 574 Surplus to
380-1-70471-4393.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, ~4r. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
awarded Contract S79-89C/7(7)9891, Bright Hope Sewage Pumping
Station to Southwood Builders, Inc. who submitted the iow bid
of $200,341 and Contract S80-117CD/7(8)0175 with Brandermill
in the amount of $96,451 with a cash refund of $48,524 for the
construction of the force main and gravity outfall; that the
County Administrator is authorized to execute any necessary
contracts and further the Board appropriated $70,000 from
573 Surplus to 380-t-79891-4393 and transferred $108,865 from
380-1-70881-4393 as follows:
1. $60,341 - 380-1-79891-4393
2. $48,524 - 380-1-70175-7212
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. Daniel stated he had received a petition for sewer from 20 of
22 residents of Willesden Road and Dulwich Drive in Falling Creek
Court. He stated that the cost is estimated to be $40,000
for the sewer to be extended. After further consideration
of the matter, it was on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by
80-495
,ns ]
te
;he
Mr. Bookman, resolved that the Utilities Department is
authorized to mail survey contracts to the homeowners of
Falling Creek Court and to proceed with the design o£ the
sewer extension provided 70% of the homeowners sign contracts.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. Painter stated with the improvements at Route l0 and
Chippenham Parkway, a new road is being cut in from Cascade
Street to the Dale Ruritan Property. He stated this road must
be built in order £or the temporary bypass to be constructed
between Route 10 and Chippenham Parkway. He stated it was felt
that it would be best if the sewer line were installed prior
to paving. After further discussion of the matter, it was
on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved
that the Utilities Department negotiate with Richard L. Crowder
Construction Co., Inc. for the construction o£ the sewer
line in this new road so that sewer installation can be made
prior to the paving of the new road and further the County
Administrator was authorized to execute any necessary documents
for this project.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Gir0ne.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded'by Mr. Bookman, the Board
made the following adjustment of appropriations for the
following sewer projects:
S79-19CD - Heather Ridge, Section 1 - Unappropriated
£rom 380-1-79192-7212, $1,031.18 to 574 Fund Balance.
The actual cost of the project was less than the
estimated cost.
2. S79-50CD - Oakland Avenue/Dupuy Road - Unappropriated
from 380-1-79502-4393, $2,288.06 to 574 Fund Balance.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs.' Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
XII.
Mr. Painter presented the Board with a list of developer water
and sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator.
Mr. John Harmon stated Mr. and Mrs. William W. Pritchett, Jr.
of 8400 River Road had refused the County's offer of $729 to
purchase the necessary easement required to install the 16
inch water main along River Road. He stated that they
have made a counteroffer of $2,500 which the staff felt was
too high. On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone,
the Board refused the counteroffer of $2,500 and authorized the
County Attorney to institute condemnation proceedings against
the following property owners if the amount as set opposite
their names is not accepted. Be it further resolved that
the County Administrator notify said property owners by
registered mail of the intentio~ of the County to enter upon
and take the property which is to be the subject o£ said
condemnation proceedings. An emergency existing, this resolution
shall be and it hereby is declared in full force and effect
immediately upon passage.
Mr. & Mrs. William W. Pritchett, Jr. W79-22B $729.00
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
XIiI .2.
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
accepted the counteroffer from Mr. and Mrs. Noble E. Tripp
80-496
XIII.3.
XIII .4.
in the ali~otmt, of $500 I'or a 5 ft. permanent, and a. 5 I't[
temporary construction easement across their property aloug
Sandyford Road, W79-23B/60. the County's original offer being
$233.20.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
deferred consideration of a request from Fralin & Waldron, Inc.
to aid them in acquiring a sewer easement across property of
Linmar Company adjacent to Chinaberry Road until their plans
have been considered by the Planning Commission through the
subdivision review process.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been advertised to
consider an ordinance vacating a portion of a 20 ft. right-
of-way known as Railroad Avenue in the Winterfield Subdivision.
Mr. Dodd stated he was concerned that the Board was vacating
a lot of land in the County and that the easements within that
land might be needed in the future. Mrs. Girone stated that in
this case Mr. Woolfolk will have a 20 ft. parcel vacated but
he will be dedicating a 60 ft. parcel to the County to replace
it. There was no opposition present. On motion of Mrs. Girone,
seconded by Mr. Bookman, the following ordinance was adopted:
An Ordinance to vacate a portion of a twenty (20) foot
right-of-way known as Railroad Avenue in Winterfield
Subdivision, Midlothian Magisterial District,
Chesterfield, Virginia which portion is twenty (20)
feet in width, as shown on plat thereof duly recorded
in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County in Plat Book 1 at page 27.
Whereas, The Colebrook Company has petitioned the Board of
SupervisOrs of Chesterfield County, Virginia, to vacate a
twenty (20) foot right-of-way known as Railroad Avenue in
Winterfield Subdivision, Midlothian Magisterial District,
Chesterfield, Virginia, more particularly shown on a plat of
record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
said County in Plat Book 1, at page 27, made by J. E. LaPrade,
C. C. Surveyor, dated July 1, 1873. The right-of-way petitioned
to be vacated is more fully described as follows:
A portion of right-of-way known as Railroad Avenue
twenty (20) feet in width beginning on the south
line of Westfield Road, running in a southerly
direction and containing 0.255 acres, the location
of which is more fully shown shaded in red on a plat
made by J. K. Timmons and Associates, Incorporated,
dated July 24, 1980, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part of this ordinance.
Whereas, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-431
of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising; and
Whereas, no public necessity exists for the continuance
of the right-of-way sought to be vacated.
Now, Therefore, Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia:
That pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid right-of-way be and
is hereby vacated and no longer necessary for public use. This
Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordance with
Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as-amended,
and a certified copy of this ordinance, together with the plat
80-497
XlII.5.
attach(~d hereto shall be recorded nc) sooner than 'thirty days
hereal'Ler in th~ Clerk's Office <~[' the Circuit Court o/:
Chesterfield, Virginia, pursuant to Section 15.1-485 of the
Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483
is to destroy the force and effect of the recording 0f the
portion of the plat vacated. This ordinance shall vest fee
simple title to the centerline of the aforementioned right-of-
way in the property owners of the abutting lots free and clear
of any rights of public use.
Accordingly, this ordinance shall be indexed in the names
of the County of Chesterfield as grantor and The Colebrook
Company and Chesterfield County School Board, or their
successors in title, as grantees.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been advertised
to consider an ordinance vacating a sixteen foot easement
in the resubdivision of lots l, 2 and 3, Section 1 of
Walthallmill. There was no opposition present. On motion of
Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the following ordinance was
adopted:
An Ordinance to vacate a sixteen (16) foot easement
in the Resubdivision of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block C,
Section 1 - Walthallmill, Bermuda Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia, which portion is
sixteen (16) feet in width and four hundred ninety-
three and forty-four hundredths (493.44) feet in
length, as shown on plat thereof duly recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield
County in Plat Book 32 at page 17.
Whereas, American Engineers has petitioned the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, to vacate a
sixteen (16) foot easement in the Resubdivision of Lots l, 2
and 3, Block C, Section 1 - Walthallmilt, Bermuda Magisterial
District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, more particularly shown
on a plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of said County in Plat Book 32, at page 17, made by
American Engineers, dated June 20, 1978, and revised July 18,
1978, and September 8, 1978.. The easement petitioned to be
vacated is more fully described as follows:
An easement sixteen (16) feet in width and four
hundred ninety-three and forty-four hundredths (493.44)
feet in length across Lots 1 and 2, Block C, of the
Resubdivision of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block C, Section 1 -
Walthaltmill, the location of which is more £ully shown
on a plat made by American Engineers, dated July 2,
1980, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a
part of this ordinance.
Whereas, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-431
of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising; and
Whereas, no public necessity exists for the continuance of
the easement sought to be vacated.
Now, Therefore, Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia:
That pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the a£oresaid easement be and is
hereby vacated and no longer necessary for public use.
80-498
XIV. 1.
The County hereby reserves all rights, title and interest
in a drainage easement granted to the County by agreement dated
July 21, 1980, and recorded SePtember 30, 1980, in Deed Book
1496, page 572, and a drainage easement granted to the County
by agreement dated July 18, 1980, and recorded September 16,
1980, in Deed Book 1496, page 572 and a drainage easement granted
to the County by agreement dated July 18, 1980, and recorded
September 16, 1980, in Deed Book 1492, page 816. This ordinance
shall be in full force and effect in accordance with Section
15.1-482(b) o£ the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a
certified copy of this ordinance, together with the plat
attached hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days
hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield, Virginia, pursuant to Section 15.1-485 of the
Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483
is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the
portion of the plat vacated. This ordinance shall vest fee
simple title of the aforementioned easement in the property
owners of the lots free and clear of any rights of public use.
Accordingly, this ordinance shall be indexed in the names
of the County of Chesterfield as grantor and Ursula A.
Schindler, Wolfgang A. Schindler and Myra C Schindler (husband
and wife), and J. K. R. Incorporated or their successors in
title, as grantees.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. Meiszer stated this date and time had been advertised to
consider an ordinance vacating a 30 ft. right-of-way known
as Parkers Avenue in Seaboard Small Farms. Mr. Dodd inquired if
the staff were certain there would not be any need for a drainage
easement in this right-of-way. Mr. Harmon stated there would not
any need now or in the future. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded
by Mr. Bookman, the Board adopted the following ordinance:
An Ordinance to vacate a portion of a thirty (30)
foot right-of-way known as Parkers Avenue in
Seaboard Small Farms, Bermuda Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia, which portion is
thirty (30) feet in width as shown on plat
thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in Plat
Book 7 at pages 80 and 81.
Whereas, A. B. C. Building Supply Company, Incorporated
has petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia, to vacate a thirty (30) foot right-of-way known as
Parkers Avenue in Seaboard Small Farms, Bermuda Magisterial
District, Chesterfield, Virginia, more particularly Shown on
a plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
of said County in Plat Book 7, at pages 80 and 81, made by
J. W. Pugh, Engineer, dated September, 1931. The right-of-
way petitioned to be vacated is more fully described as follows:
A right-of-way known as Parkers Avenue, thirty
(30) feet in width beginning ten (10) feet east of
the east tine of Ramblewood Drive and running in an
eastwardly direction to the west line of the
Seaboard Coastline Railroad right-of-way, the
location of which is more fully shown shaded
in green on a plat made by Virginia Surveys,
dated March 15, 1973, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part of this ordinance.
Whereas, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-43t
of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising; and
80-499
b~
Whereas, no public necessity exists for the continuance
of the right-of-way sought to be vacated.
Now, Therefore, Be Il Ordained by the Board o£ Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia:
That pursuant to Section 15.1-452(b) of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid right-of-way be and is
hereby vacated and no longer necessary for public use. This
ordinance shall be in full force and e££ect in accordance
with Section 15.1-482(b) o£ the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amende
and a certi£ied copy of this ordinance, together with the plat
attached hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days
hereafter in the Clerk's Office o£ the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield, Virginia, pursuant to Section 15.1-485 of the
Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483
to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the portion
of the plat vacated. This ordinance shall vest £ee simple
title of the aforementioned right-of-way in the property owners
o£ the abutting lots free and clear o£ any rights of public
use.
Accordingly, this ordinance shall be indexed in the names of
the County of Chesterfield as grantor and A. B. C. Building
Supply Company, Incorporated, or its successors in title as
grantees. ~
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. Daniel stated that he was concerned with the traffic
on Route 10 and the speed limit which remains 55 mph
on some portions. On motion of the Board, the following
resolution was adopted:
Be It Resolved thai the Chesterfield County Board
of Supervisors hereby requests the Virginia Department of
Highways and Transportation to conduct a traffic engineering
study to determine the necessity to reduce the speed limit
from 55 mph to 45 mph on Iron Bridge Road, Route 10, between
the existing 45 mph speed limit posted south of Cogbilt Road
Route 638, and north of Lori Road, Route 655.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone
Absent: ~r O'Neill.
Mr. Bookman stated that he was concerned with the speed limit
on courthouse Road which still remains 55 mph. On motion of
the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
Be It Resolved that the Chester£ield County Board of
Supervisors hereby requests the Virginia Department of
Highways and ?ransportation to conduct a traffic engineering
study to determine the necessity to lower the speed limit
from 55 mph to 45 mph on Courthouse Road, Route 604, from
Genito Road, Route 604, to Iron Bridge Road, Route 10.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone
Absent: Mr. O'Neill. '
Mrs. Girone stated she had been told on several occasions that
the 45 mph speed limit on Route 60 would be expanded west to
Winterfield Road and it has not yet been done. On motion of
the Board, the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation
is hereby requested to relocate the 45 mph sign in ~lidlothian
Village on Route 60 in the east bound lane, west to the
overpass of the Southern Railroad.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: ~r 0' ' ' · Nezll.
80-500
On motion of the.Board, the £ollowing resolution was adopted:
Be it resolved that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors hereby requests the Virginia Department o£
.Highways and Transportation to construct a left turn lane
on Route 10, West Hundred Road, at the intersection with Parker
Lane, Route 810, to prevent unnecessary traffic delays for
westbound traffic on Route 10 at the aforementioned intersection.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. Jeffrey Muzzy stated that, after repeated negotiations
between the developer of Deerfield Estates and Mrs. Theodore
Cogbill, it is obvious that they will not settle on an agreement
to solve the drainage problem. He stated thai since an off-site
easement cannot be obtained to allow the existing storm sewer
system to function and since the developer cannot be forced to
fund or construct a new sewer system, the only feasible
alternative to solve the flooding problem is to construct a
pump system which would cost approximately $12,000. He stated
that this system will remove the water from Pampus Drive but
will not be a permanent solution nor will it solve the drainage
problem in the entire area. Mr. Dodd inquired how much the
pump system would cost to maintain each year. Mr. Muzzy
stated he felt it would cost approximately $500 a year.
Mrs. Girone inquired what the original solution to this drainage
problem was. Mr. Muzzy stated that it was basically what exists
howe(the underground drainage system) but the developer
cannot obtain the necessary easement so that when the water
does come out of the underground system that it can be directed
to a natural water course. Mr. Muzzy stated the developer will
dedicate to the County that portion of Pampus Drive which is
not in the State secondary system. Mrs. Girone and Mr.' Bookman
stated.they did not feel taxpayers money should be spent on
a temporary solution.
Mr. Oliver Rudy, attorney for Mrs. Cogbill, stated that there
had always been County participation involved in any solution
suggested. Mrs. Girone stated that was true £or the temporary
solution but not for a permanent solution. She stated the
policy and principle were involved here. Mr. Bookman stated
also that the pump would not be very reliable in adverse
weather conditions.
Mr. Daniel stated he did not feel the County could acquire
the easement through condemnation. He stated that it might
mean going through the courts which would take a lot of time
and he would like to see this long standing problem eliminated
as quickly as possible. He stated that they have discussed
this, reviewed every possibility and this temporary solution
seems to be the only one available at this time. He stated
he felt the health, safety and welfare of the community
warranted the expenditure of funds for this solution.
Mr. Rudy stated he did not feel it proper for the Board to
consider condemnation as it would only be enhancing the value
of a private individual's property and damaging Mrs. Cogbill's.
Mr. Daniel made a motion that the Board approve the temporary
pumping system to eliminate the water standing on Pampus Drive
and that $12,000 be appropriated from the General Fund Contingency
to cover the cost to design and install the system.
Mr. Rudy stated that the only final solution to this drainage
problem would be when Mrs. Cogbill develops her property. There
was some discussion regarding the County's policy regarding
save-harmless agreements and off-site easements. Mr. Micas
stated this was an historical problem which does affect the
residents of the area. Mr. Bookman suggested this matter be
discussed in Executive Session. After further discussion
80-501
Mr. Daniel withdrew his motion to approve the project. On
motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
went into Executive Session to confer with legal counsel as
permitted by Section 2.1-344(a)(6) of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. 6irone.
Absent: Ur. O'Neill.
Reconvening:
Mrs. Girone asked that the new information relating to the
road situation be addressed. Mr. Muzzy stated that the
developer of Deerfield intends to deed to the County that
portion of Pampus Drive which is not in the State system. He
stated the County will own the land outright and be able to
install the pump system without having to acquire any
easements. He stated the developer has indicated he will
close the road which would be undesirable for movement
throughout the subdivision unless the County accepts it. He
stated that the County could keep the road open although it
would not be in the state system. He stated that this
portion of the road is not acceptable for state acceptance
with the pump system. There was some discussion regarding
the variances previously approved and lots that would be
undevelopable until this total drainage situation was solved
permanently. Mrs. Girone inquired if building permits could
be held for the variances. Mr. Micas stated the County
could attempt to hold up the building permits but added the
13 other lots would not be approved under the existing
temporary solution. Mrs. Girone stated that this entire
matter is increasing continuously as far as the responsibility
of the County. She stated now, besides purchasing the pump and
maintaining it, the County will have to accept responsibility
for the road. Mr. Muzzy stated the road has been paved but
it is s~arting to deteriorate in some places. Mrs. Girone
inquired how long this portion of the road was. Mr. Muzzy
stated about 900 ft. Mrs. Girone stated she did not feel
this action was in keeping with sound policy and felt the
Board should condemn the necessary off-site easement to
eliminate the problem. Mr. Daniel stated he was concerned
with the community and the health and welfare of the residents
and it was on his motion that the Board appropriated
$12,000 from the General Fund Contingency to cover the cost
to design and install a pump station and authorized the
County Administrator to accept a deed a dedication from Zane
Davis, developer of Deerfield, for an approximate 900 ft.
along Pampus Drive and a portion of Amsden Drive.
Ayes:
Nays:
Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Bookman.
Mrs. Girone because she felt it was not in keeping
with sound County policy to spend taxpayers money on a
temporary solution to a problem, that she did not feel
the County should be responsible for maintaining the pump
and the road, the developer should, and this actien was
setting an unwise precedent and that the proper action
would be to condemn for the necessary off-site
drainage easement.
Absent: ~{r. O'Neill.
Mr. Bookman stated he voted in favor of this motion because
he was concerned with the health, safety and welfare of the
residents involved and not to aid the developer. He
stated that according to the County Attorney there are no
other alternatives. Mr. Dodd stated he did not particularly
like ~he solution, but he felt this was a 15 year old
problem and for the residents' welfare, he would support action
necessary to improve the situation. Mrs. Girone stated there
were a lot of long standing drainage problems in the County and
she hoped the Board would be as understanding in those cases.
10. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
80-502
reappointed Rev. Clarence Jackson to the Youth Services
Commission representing Dale District whose term is effective
immediately and will expire on October ll, 1983.
Ayes:-Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill. '
Mr. Bookman stated he was interested in appointing a
representative to the Community Corrections Resources Board.
Mr. Meiszer advised the Board of other outstanding appointments.
Mr. Meiszer advised the Board that the Highway Department had
formally notified the County that the roads in the following
subdivisions had been accepted into the State System, effective
October 10, 1980:
Brandermill - Seven Oaks
Seven Oaks Terrace - Beginning at intersection with
Seven Oaks Road and going 0.03 mile northerly to a
cul-de-sac.
Seven Oaks Road - Beginning at intersection with
Brandermill Parkway, Route t921, and going 0.08
mile northerly to intersection with Seven Oaks
Court, then going 0.05 mile northerly to
intersection with itself, then going northerly
and westerly to intersection with Seven Oaks Terrace,
a distance of 0.18 mile then 0.10 mile southeasterly
to intersection with itself.
Seven Oaks Court - Beginning at intersection with
Seven Oaks Road and going 0.04 mile westerly to a
cul-de-sac.
Shenandoah Hills - Section A
Redbridge Road - Beginning at its intersection with
Reams Road, Route 647, extending northeast 0.08 mile
to Redbridge Court, then northeast 0.24 mile to a
temporary turnaround.
Redbridge Court - Beginning at its intersection with
Redbridge Road, extending southeast 0.06 mile to a
cul-de-sac.
Brandermill - Walker's Ferry
Walker's Ferry Court - Beginning at intersection with
Walker's Ferry Road and going 0.12 mile northeasterly
to a cul-de-sac.
Walker's Ferry Road - Beginning at intersection with
Brandermill Parkway, Route 1921, and going westerly
and southerly to intersection with Walker's Ferry
Court, then going 0.07 mile southerly to a cul-
de-sac.
Acres
Length
0.03 mi.
0.41 mi.
0.04 mi.
0.32 mi.
0.06 mi.
O. 12 mi.
0.25 mi.
Gary Avenue - Beginning at intersection with South
Street, Route 1141, and going northerly 0.21 mile
to intersection with LaLonde Drive then continuing
0.10 mile northerly, then westerly 0.07 mile to a
cul-de-sac.
Archbrooke - Sections 4 and 5
Archangle Court - Beginning at its intersection with.
Pepperidge Road, extending south 0.06 mile to a
culbde-sac.
O. 38 mi.
0.06 mi.
80-503
Archbrooke - Sections 4 and 5 (continued)
Cauthan Court - Beginning at its intersection with
Pepperidge Road, extending south 0.05 mile to a
cul-de-sac.
Pepperidge Road - Beginning at its intersection
with Laureate Lane, extending east 0.10 mile to the
intersection of Cauthan Court, then east 0.07 mile to
the intersection of Archangle Court, then east 0.07
mile to a temporary' turnaround.
Laureate Lane - Beginning at its intersection with
Wadsworth Drive, Route 2251, extending southeast
0.08 mile to the intersection of Pepperidge Road,
then southeast 0.09 mile to a temporary turnaround.
Brandermill - Riverbirch Trace
Riverbirch Trace Road - Beginning at intersection
with Brandermill Parkway, Route 1921, and going 0.04
mile southwesterly to interseCtion, with Riverbirch
Trace Court then going 0.17 mile southwesterly to a
cul-de-sac.
Riverbirch Trace Court - Beginning at intersection
with Riverbirch Trace Road and going 0.04 mile
westerly to a cul-de-sac.
0.05 mi.
0.24 mi.
0.17 mi.
0.21 mi.
0.04 mi.
Mr. Dodd presented a letter from the County of Prince
George regarding Chesterfield's support of the Temple Avenue
Extension Project. It was generally agreed that consideration
of this matter be deferred at this time.
Mr. Meiszer stated the developer of Grayson Estates failed
to properly complete road and drainage improvements in the
subdivision. He stated although the County has filed a
judgment against the developer, he is without any assets and it
is extremely unlikely the County will receive any funds to
complete the necessary improvements. He stated First Colonial has
foreclosed on several loans and now owns a number of lots in
the subdivision and has agreed to expend $6,000 to pay for a
portion of the needed improvements which amounts to approximately
$14,000. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Bookman,
the Board appropriated an amount not to exceed $8,000 from
the Matoaca District 3~ Road Funds to complete the required
road and drainage improvements contingent on the bank
contributing $6,000 and all necessary work being performed by
County crews and further the Board requested that the Highway
Department perform any necessary work which might be requested
to be performed by the Department forces.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
authorized the payment of monthly utility bills for the
County Museum from the current budget for General Services.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
went into Executive Session to confer with legal counsel
as'permitted by Section 2.1-344(a)(6) of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone
Absent: Mr. O'Neill. '
80-504
12.
ng:
~0Sl19
In Mid]othian Magisterial District, Vincent P. and Doug]as
Whirr requested a Conditional Use 'to permit a child care
in an Agricultural (A) District on a 7 acre parcel
ng approximately 800 feet on the north line of Jahnke
and located approximately 250 feet east of its intersection
Aldwell Drive. Tax Map 19-1 (1) parcel 7 (Sheet 9).
Balderson stated the applicant had requested a 30 day deferral
was no one present to discuss this matter. On motion
Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board deferred
~tion of this request until November 26, 1980.
res: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone. : Mr. O'Neill,
~0S133
Clover Hill Magisterial District, H. L. Mathews and W. E.
requested a Conditional Use to permit a professional
in an Agricultural (A) District on a 6 acre parcel fronting
~proximately 550 feet on the southwest line of Turner Road
located approximately 1660 feet southeast of its intersection
Elkhardt Road. Tax Map 29-9 (1) parcels 13 and 47 (Sheet
Balderson stated the applicant had requested withdrawal.
motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
accepted the request for withdrawal.
~es: Mr.. Dodd, Mr. Daniel~ Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Mr. O'Neill.
80S104
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Duke Investment Company
requested renewal of a Conditional Use (Case 77A076) to
~ermit a landfill on a parcel fronting along the east line. of
on Davis Highway and located approximately 600 feet south
of its intersection with Osborne Road. Tax Map 98-14 (1) parcel
6 (Sheet 32).
No one was present representing the applicant. Mr. Dodd asked
staff to notify the applicant that he should be present at
the meeting when this case is discussed. On motion of Mr.
Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board deferred consideration
of this request until November 26, 1980.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
80Sl13
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, C.P.I. Associates requested
an amendment to Case #79S180 relative to the provision of a
retaining wall on a parcel fronting approximately 190 feet on the
south line of Midlothian Turnpike and located approximately
50 feet west of its intersection with Paramont Drive and better
known as 8401Midlothian Turnpike. Tax Map 28-3 (1) parcels 7
and 40 (Sheet 8).
Mr. Morris Mason, attorney representing the applicant, was
present. Mr. Mason stated that the applicant would like to
construct the wall as designed for a distance of lO0 ft. rather
than the entire length of the building with the height beginning
at 5 ft. and gradually reducing to 4 ft. and then to 3 ft. He
stated if a problem did exist, then the applicant would extend
80-505
the 3' ft. wall the remainder of the distance. He stated that
the wall wound also be angled 5 degrees because of the greater
strength that could be obtained.
Mr. C.. C. Ramsey stated that the applicant has been told on
numerous occasions how to remedy the situation and to comply
w~th the.requirements which he has .never done. Other residents
from the neighborhood were present and opposed to this request.
Mr. Bookman briefly stated the history involving this case,
indicating that there was a 50 ft. buffer, the building was
built too low for the drainage to flow properly and a bulldozer wen
in and tore down trees. He stated the applicant was then told
to build a berm and plant trees and they do not want.to
build the berm the entire distance. He stated that he felt
there was a need for the wall because if any erosion takes
place, additional trees will be lost. After further consideration
of the matter, it was on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by
Mrs. Girone, resolved that this request be denied and that the
applicant be required to build the retaining wall the entire
length of the building with the height to be determined
by engineers as to whether the wall should be 5 ft., 4 ft. or
3 ft. and that the trees be replaced, all of which shall be
accomplished prior to December 30, 1980.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
80S120
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Calcourt Properties, Inc.
requested a Conditional Use to permit a private landfill in a
Residential (R-9) District on a 6.15 acre parcel which lies
approximately 200 feet off the east line of Mt. Pisgah Drive
at its intersection with Oak Lane. Tax Map 16-9 (1) part of
parcel 12 (Sheet 7).
Mr. Calvin Seaton was present. Mrs. Girone stated she .and
members of the Church were concerned that the applicant not
enter this parcel by way of Mt. Pisgah Drive or Oak Lane. Mr.
Seaton stated that they did plan to enter through one of these
roadways but that they had not heard of any opposition t'o this.
There was no opposition present. Mrs. Girone inquired if the
applicant would experience any difficulty if this matter
were deferred 30 days in order that they might meet to discuss
the access. Mr. Seaton stated a deferral would be acceptable.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, this
request was deferred until November 26, 1980.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
80S121
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Latane T. Jenkins
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) and Residential (R-
7) to Residential (R-9) of a 28.4 acre parcel fronting
.approximately 600 feet on the west line of Alberta Road and
located approximately 1050 feet north of its intersection
with Family Lane. Tax Map 63-10 (1) parcel 1 (Sheet 21).
Mr. Jim Hayes was present representing the applicant. There
was no opposition present. On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded
by Mr. Daniel, the Board approved the request as recommended
by the Planning Commission.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
80-506
80S123
In Matoaca Magisterial District, The Chester Corporation
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12)
of a 19.t4 acre parcel fronting approximately 750 feet on
the south line of River Road and located approximately 1350
feet west of its intersection with Eanes Road. Tax Map 179-14
(1) parcel 1 (Sheet 52).
Mr. Bob Schrum, representing the applicant, was present. There
was no opposition present. Mr. Schrum stated that they were
concerned with stub roads in the subdivision but that would
be addressed in subdivision review. On motion of Mr. Daniel,
seconded by Mr. Bookman, this' request was approved as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
80S124
In Dale Magisterial District, G. T. Simmons requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential Townhouse-For-
Sale (R-TH) of a 20.87 acre parcel fronting approximately
1000 feet on the northeast line of Lori Road and located
approximately 700 feet southeast of its intersection with Iron
Bridge Road. Tax Map 95-3 (1) parcel 8 and Tax Map 95-8 (1)
parcel i (Sheet 3t).
Mr. Jim Hayes was present representing the applicant. He
stated that the applicant was combining two ten acre tracts
of land so that the area would be large enough to support an
association for the maintenance of the development. He stated
they have also proffered a 50 ft. buffer, to limit access of
individual lots to Lori Road, that the architectural style
wilt be similar to that of Providence Green Townhouses and that
they would also provide sewer and water lines to Mrs. Smith's
property so that she could connect if she so desired.
Mrs. Alma Smith, adjacent property owner, stated that she
felt there were too many houses for this area and that she had
lived in the area since 1944 and planned to continue to do
so. She stated that she was interested in sewer and water
to her property if this request was approved. Mr. Daniel stated
the details would be worked out during subdivision review.
Mr. Daniel stated he felt an of£ice use for this parcel was
not needed and that this is a good use for this land.
After further discussion of the matter, it was on motion of
Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that this request
be denied and the Board approved Residential Townhouse-for-Sale
(R-TH) zoning with a conditional use planned development
and accepted the £ollowing conditions which were proffered
by the applicant:
A fifty (50) foot buffer shall be maintained along Lori
Road. This £ifty (50) foot buffer shall be maintained
as open space with no building, parking, lots or other
facilities permitted to encroach into the buffer area.
Two (2) public roads shall be maintained as open space
with no building, parking, lots or other facilities
permitted to encroach into the buffer area. Two (2)
public roads shall be permitted to transverse the
buffer for the purpose of providing access to Lori
Road. No individual lot access shall be permitted to
Lori Road. This buffer shall be landscaped with
evergreens and ornamental trees. A landscaping plan
depicting this requirement shall be submitted for approval
in conjunction with schematic (tentative subdivision)
plan review.
Thirty (30) feet o~ right-of-way measured from the center-
line o2 Lori Road shall be dedicated to and for the County
of Chesterfield, free and unrestricted. This dedication
80-507
shall be accomplished prior to the release of any building
permits.
The structures to be erected on the parcel shall be
similar in size and architectural design as the
Providence Green Townhouses. In conjunction with
schematic plan review renderings shall be submitted for
approval. '
The above stated conditions, notwithstanding~ the plan
titled, "Proposed Lori Road Townhouses" shall be
considered the plan of development. This plan may
hoWever be modified at the time of schematic plan
(subdivision) review and approval.
The applicant shall Submit a plan for drainage prior to
building permits being issued.
The applicant shall provide water and sewer to the contiguous
property owner for connection to the public water and
sewer system.
Ayes:
Absent:
Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Mr. O'Neill.
80S125
In Midlothian 'Magisterial District, C. B. Fraley and F. G.
COffield requested rezoning from General Business (B-3) to Light
Industrial (M-I) of a 4.183 acre parcel fronting approximately
80 feet on the north line of Midlothian Turnpike and located
approximately 400 feet east of its intersection with Wadsworth
Drive. Tax Map 28-2 (1) part of parcel 3 (Sheet 8).
Mr. Coffield was present. There was no opposition present. On
motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, this request
was approved as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
80S126 (Amended)
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Bermuda Industrial Associates
of Colonial Heights requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to
Light Industrial (M-i) and General Industrial (M-2) of a 19.75
acre parcel fronting approximately 1250 feet on the east line
of Lawing Drive and located approximately 390 feet south of its
intersection with Old Bermuda Hundred Road. Tax Map 134-1 (1)
parcel 14 (Sheet 42).
Mr. Sam Barker was present representing the applicant. He
stated that he did not understand the discussion in the staff
report regarding drainage. Mr. Balderson stated that was
just a note, and not a condition, but that at some future time
a drainage system would be needed and based on a pro-rata
share, he and other landowners might be required to contribute.
Mr. Dodd stated that also a culvert might have to be placed under
the railroad bed. There was no opposition present. On motion
of Mr. Dodd,. seconded by Mr. Daniel, this request was approved
as recommended by the Planning Commission subject to the following
condition:
A 75 foot buffer shall be maintained along the north-
eastern property line adjacent to Ramblewood Drive
and along the southern property line. Access through
these buffers shall be prohibited. No buildings or
other facilities shall be permitted within these buffers,
with the exception of parking which shall be permitted
in the first fifty (50) feet of the buffers. At the
time of development these buffers shall be landscaped
so as to screen the use from adjacent property.
(NOTE: The Zoning Ordinance requires a 100 foot setback and
buffer from the adjacently zoned Residential (R-7) property to
the east.)
80-508
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. G~rone.
Absent: ~Ir. O'Neill.
80S127
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Jimmie A. McAdams requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) and Cormnunity BusineSs (B-2) to
General Industrial (M-2) of a 34 acre parcel fronting
approximately 350 feet on the west line of Jefferson Davis
Highway and located approximately 2100 feet south of its inter-
section with Mid-City Road. Tax ~ap 133-11 (1) parcel 8
(Sheet 41).
Mr. McAdams was present. He stated it was recommended that
public water and sewer be used in this development but he
would prefer to be able to use private w~lls and septic tanks
if it were feasible. Mr. Dodd stated he felt the private
septic tanks Would be satisfactory but he felt public water
was needed. Mr. Balderson indicated this would be discussed
in site plan review. Mr. Dodd requested that his comment
be noted when site plan review was considered.
There was no opposition present. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded
by Mr. Bookman, this request was approved subject to the
following condition as recommended by the Planning Commission:
The boundaries of the Ashton Creek Flood Plain shall
be maintained as a natural buffer with no clearing
or grading permitted in this area. No parking,
buildings or other facilities shall be permitted
within this buffer area with the exception of a
single access drive which shall be permitted to
transverse the buffer.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr~ O'Neill.
Mr. O'Neill joined the meeting.
80S128
In Midlothian Magisterial District, S.P.B. Associates, Inc.
requested an amendment to a previously granted Conditional
Use Planned Development (Case #79S211) on a 10.5 acre parcel
fronting approximately 400 feet on Midlothian Turnpike also
fronting approximately 850 feet on Coalfield Road and located
in the southeast quadrant of the intersection o£ these roads.
Tax Map 15-12 (1) parcel 39 (Sheet 7).
Mr. Fred Gray was present representing the applicant. He
stated the applicant is seeking to modify his original
proffered condition requiring construction of an additional
twenty-four (24) £eet of pavement along both Coalfield Road
and Midlothian Turnpike. Mr. Balderson stated the Planning
Commission recommended that twenty-four (24) feet of pavement
along Coalfield Road be constructed for the length of the
property abutting Coalfield Road and to allow construction of
twelve (12) £eet of pavement along Midlothian Turnpike
with construction of o££-site taper lanes to the east and
west to provide transition to the additional lane of pavement,
all of which are reflected on a plat filed with the papers of
this Board. Mr. Gray stated that they have a letter to submit
stating they will dedicate the right-of-way and will build when-
ever it is needed as long as it is within a reasonable time.
Mr. Steve Harris, representing the Winfree Memorial Church,
stated the Church also owns property across the street, they
are concerned with the development o£ the area itsel£ and how
this widening will affect the landscaping of the Church area
80-509
as well as the traffic flow. He stated the Church is an
historical site and they are expanding now and, hopefully, they
will exist at this location another 50-100 years. He stated
they are concerned there are no concrete plans for the area,
that traffic patterns and plans have not been addressed, and
that it seems this is a piecemeal effort. He stated the
Highway Department has now submitted a recommendation but
he feels it has come too late to be adequately reviewed,
etc. He stated they are concerned that if two full lanes
are constructed on Coalfield Road, trees at the Church will
be destroyed. He stated they would prefer the construction
be postponed to allow additional shrubs, etc. to be planted
and to mature before the lanes are added and the existing
trees destroyed. He stated the Church did not agree with
the plans of the Highway Department because it encroaches on
the ChUrch property and suggested the Board keep to the
original recommendation of the Planning Commission.
Mr. Dodd ihquired what the Church's main concern was. Mr.
Harris stated they are reacting to the development in the
area, that a master plan is needed for the future. Mrs.
Girone stated that the County has 53 years of road work that
needs to be done today but there are no funds. She stated
the County is requiring developers, when legally possible,
to plan for growth and roads~ such as Evergreen and Charter
Colony. She stated that she did not think any of this
planned for Coalfield would encroach on the Church property
or perhaps only a very small amount. Mr. McCracken with the
Virginia Department of Highways stated that they will work
within the.existing right-of-way at the intersection to obtain
the best radius and they will try to stay off the Church property.
Mr. Harris stated he felt the Church might have considered
dedicating right-of-way if there had been a plan but this is
their reaction because there is not. Mrs. Girone stated
that a lot of zoning cases are submitted and not all are
approved and the Highway Department cannot prepare plans for
all of them when they might not be approved.
Mr. Gray stated the Highway Department would rather have 12 ft.
than 24 ft. on Route 60 with tapers and added this would be
curbed and guttered.
Mr. John Smith presented a petition signed by 325 people that
the applicant comply with the zoning and agreement dated
November 27, 1978. He stated the people are either homeowners or
shoppers in the area and that they are concerned with the
preservation of the. trees and they feel the traffic will bottlene(
at the intersection and people will go through the shopping
center to avoid the light.
Mrs. Girone stated she was concerned with the trees but felt
a berm and planting would be attractive. She stated Coalfield nee
to be four laned but she is concerned with doing part now and
part later. After further consideration, it was on motion of
Mrs. Girone, seconded by 5{r. Bookman, resolved that this
request to modify the original proffered condition requiring
construction of an additional twenty-four (24) feet of pavement
along both Coalfield Road and Midlothian Turnpike be approved
with the condition amended as follows: The twenty-four (24)
feet of pavement Coalfield Road be constructed for the
length of the property abutting Coalfield Road and to allow
construction of twelve (12) feet of pavement along Midlothian
Turnpike with construction of off-site taper lanes to the
east and west to provide transition to the additional lane
of pavement as per the plat filed with the papers of this
Board. The tapers are in lieu of the additional 12 ft. on
Route 60 so it will be one full lane and tapers. The tapers
will be in existing right-of-way and not encroach on the
Church property.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. O'Neill excused himself from the meeting.
80-510
805130
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Gulf Oil Company, U.S.
requested a Conditional Use Planned Development to permit a car
wash in a Community Business (B-2) District on a parcel fronting
approximately 70 feet on Midlothian Turnpike also fronting
approximately 200 feet on Courthouse Road and located in the
southeast quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax
Map 16-12 (1) parcel 15 (Sheet 7).
Mr. Jim Hayes was present representing the applicant and stated
the conditions were agreeable. There was no opposition
present. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman,
this request was approved subject to the following conditions
as recommended by the Planning Commission:
Only one access shall be permitted to Courthouse Road to
serve both the service station and car wash. The location
of this access shall be determined at the time of site
plan approval.
2. Final site plans shall show adequate on-site traffic
storage for the car wash.
In conjunction with approval of this request, the
Cormmission shall grant a six (6) foot exception to the
thirty (30) foot rear yard setback for a storage building.
The above comments notwithstanding, the site plan prepared
by J. K. Timmons & Associates, Inc., dated 1-26-76 and revised
8-4-80, submitted with the application shall be considered
the plan of development.
5. In conjunotion with approval of this request, the Commission
shall grant schematic approval of the site plan.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman-and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: ~r. O'Neill.
80S135
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Glen Roy Corporation, et al.
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) and Residential (R-7) to
Residential (R-9) of a 31.5 acre parcel which lies at the
southern terminus of Watch Hill Road. Tax Map 25-8 (1) part
of parcel 8 (Sheet 7).
Mr. Jim Hayes was present representing the appiicant. There
was no opposition present. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded
by Mr. Bookman, this request was approved as recommended by
the Planning Commission.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd,.Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
80S132'
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Phillip H. and Sarah C.
Madison requested a Conditional Use to permit a child day care
center in a Residential (R-7) District on a .94 acre parcel
fronting approximately 130 feet on the north line of Walmsley
Boulevard and located approximately 140 feet east of its inter-
section with Goode's Bridge Road. Tax Map 40-6 (1) parcel 7
(Sheet 15).
No one was present to discuss this matter. On motion Of Mr.
Bookman, seconded by Mr. Daniel, this request was denied as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
80-511
3.Co
Ayes:
Absent:
Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs Giron~.
O'Neill. ·
Mr. O'Neill returned to the meeting.
80S144
In Matoaca Magisterial District, General Services (County of
Chesterfield) requested a Conditional Use Planned Development
in an Agricultural (A) District on a parcel fronting approximatel
330 feet on Harrowgate Road also fronting approximately 620 feet
on Louise Drive and located in the southeast quadrant of the
intersection of these roads. Tax Map 149-9 (1) parcels 10,
46 and part of parcel 11 (Sheet 41).
Mr. William Howell, Acting Director of General Services, was
present. He stated that there would be seven sites in the
County for towers but this is the only new construction
site. He stated others would be at school sites, water'
towers, the Courthouse, etc. Mr. O'Neill inquired where the
exact location for this tower would be. Mr. Howell stated
the exact location for the 300 ft. tower had not yet been
determined. Mr. O'Neill stated he did not want the location
to in any way adversely affect the residential community.
After further consideration of the matter, it was on motion
of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Daniel, resolved that this
request be approved as recon~nended by the Planning Commission
subject to the following conditions:
l. The tower foundation and block building shall be set back
a minimum of 100 feet from the edges of the wooded area
and within the wooded portion of this parcel. The area
within this 100 foot setback shall be maintained as a
natural wooded buffer in which no cutting, clearing, or
grading shall occur with the exception of an area which
may be cleared for construction of an access road. If it
is determined that this construction will adversely affect
the rssidential community in any way, this request will
be forwarded back to the Board of Supervisors for
further consideration~
2. 'A chain-link fence, having a minimum height of eight (8)
feet shall enclose the tower base and block building.
3. In conjunction with approval of this request, a 200 foot
exception to the 100 foot height limitation for the tower
shall be granted.
4. In conjunction with the approval of this request, the
Planning Commission shall grant schematic plan approval
of the plan attached hereto.
Vote:. Unanimous
Mr. Meiszer stated an ordinance relating to the definition of
"family" and the classification of boarding or lodging houses had
been deferred from earlier in the day. Mrs. Girone stated
she did not feel reducing the number of people in the
definition of "family" would eliminate the problem for which the
ordinance had been proposed and suggested elimination Of any chan
in this definition. After further discussion of the matter,
it was on motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mrs. Girone,
resolved that the following ordinance be adopted:
An Ordinance to Amend the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1978, as Amended, by Amending
Sections 21-3, 21-80 and 21-81 relating Generally
to the Classification of Boarding or Lodging Houses
Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
80-512
(1) That Sections 21-3, 21-80 and 21-81 of the Code of
the County of Chesterfield are amended and reenacted ~s follows'
Sec. 21-3. Definitions.
Boarding or lodg.ing house. A structure otherwise
permitted in the district in which it is situated where meals
and/or lodging are provided for compensation for three or more,
but not exceeding nine, guests who are not transients.
Sec. 21-80. Same--Conditional use~.
The following uses may b'e allowed by conditional use subject
to the provisions of section 21-34:
(m) Boarding or lodging houses.
Sec. 21-81. Same--Special exceptions.
The following uses may be allowed by special exception,
subject to the provisions of section 21-15:
(c) Nonprofit civic, social and fraternal clubs and
lodges; nothing in this subsection shall be construed to include
Greek-letter fraternities or sororities operating in conjunction
with any college, uhiversity, or community college.
Vote: Unanimous.
Messrs. Larry Downing.and Merland Otto with Ralph Burke
Associates, consultants 'for the Airport Master Plan Study, were
present. They stated their study revealed the Airport should be
expanded in three phases. The first phase involving land
acquisition, widening of the 3600' taxiway by 10-50 ft.,
extending and widening runway 15-33 to 100 x 5500 ft.,
extending parallel taxiway and connecting taxiway, equip
runway with CAT I ILS, expand operations apron 47,700 SF,
construct 40 hangar units, acquire Massey hangar, expand tie
down apron 22,900 SF, expand auto parking 73 spaces, clear
building Area 14A, and develop corporate hangar Area 1. He
stated this phase should cost approximately $4,522,926 with
only $1,523,725 County funds and the remainder to be funded
by FAA or VA/DOA. Mr. Otto stated the second phase should
involve expanding operations apron 53,600 SF, construct
aircraft maintenance hangar by at least 10,000 SF, construct
airport maintenance facility 5,000 SF, expand tie down
apron 49,t00 SF, expand administration building 2,8400 SF,
extend access road 800 ft. and install security gate, construct
west taxiway 40 x 1280 ft., construct 45 hangar units,
expand auto parking 51 spaces and develop corporate hangar
areas I and II. He stated this should cost approximately
$2,889,100 of which $2,153,344 would be County funds and
the additional FAA or VA/DOA. He stated that the County should
in phase iii construct 75 x 3000 ft. runway, construct
3,000 ft. parallel taxiway and connecting taxiways, expand
operations apron 95,000 SF, expand tie down apron 49,100 SF,
expand administration building 1370 SF, extend access road
850 ft. and install security gate, construct maintenance
hangar 15,800 SF, expand airport maintenance facility 5,000
SF, construct 76 hangar units, expand auto parking 103
spaces and develop corporate hangar area II. He stated that
this would cost approximately $5,841,900 of which $3,058,210
would be County funds and the remainder from FAA and VA/DOA.
He stated phase I should be 1980-83, phase II 1984-1988 and
phase III 1989-1998. He stated that there was some concern
re~arding a crosswind runway but they did not receive any
support for this.
80-513
Mr. Meiszer stated that FAA is now requiring an Environmental
Impact Statement for this work. Mr. Otto stated that
the Board should accept the study, send a letter indicating the
County would like to proceed with Phase I and the Environmental
Impact Statement. He stated that even if there are no funds
available, this would be funded 90-5-5 and the County would
be reimbursed 95%. Mr. Meiszer stated there will be
a public meeting on this plan tonight at 7:00 p.m.
The Board authorized the County Administrator to attend a meeting
at the General Assembly Building with Mr. George Jones regarding
the management plan of the Highway Department and a bill Mr. Jones
plans to submit regarding the funding for roads. Staff was
also authorized to monitor a hearing on October 24, 1980 also
regarding the management plan of the Highway Department.
Mr. Mesizer stated no action had been taken by the School Board
regarding the vehicle policy at this time. He stated that
they planned to discuss it further but there were some
indications they might not adopt this policy until January,
1981.
Mr. Meiszer stated the operators of the Airport Restaurant-
were interested in placing a lighted sign on Route 10. It
was generally agreed that this should be handled through the
Department of Community Development with the necessary
application filed for review.
Mr. Meiszer informed the Board that Mrs. Sallye Anthony,
Internal Auditor, had resigned effective November 16, 1980.
He stated she had accepted a position with the State Department
of Industrial Development.
On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by ~r. Daniel, the Board
went into Executive Session to discuss personnel matters as
permitted by Section 2.1-344(a)(1) of the Code of Virginia
1950, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
Reconvening:
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
adjourned at 6:00 p.m. until November 12, 1980 at t1:00 a.m.
Vote: Unanimous
Nicholas ~. Meiszer~ //
County Administrator~/
R. ~r 1 and D~Q~kL_..~
Chairman
8&<1514