06-11-1980 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
June 11, 1980
Supervisors in Att~dance:
Pk~. R. Garlm~d Dodd, Chairmm~
Mr. Harry G. D~niel, Vice Chairman
Mrs. Jomn Girone
Mr. E. Merlin O'Neill, Sr.
Mr. Nicholas M. Meiszer
Co%mty Administrator
Staff in Attendance:
Chief Robert Eanes, Fire Dept.
Mr. Jmm~s Ed~ndson, Director of
Central Acco%rating
Mr. Phil ~ester, Director of
Parks and Recreation
Mr. St~ve Micas, ~o. Attorney
Mr. Jeffrey P~zzy, Director of
Cu,,L~ity Development
~r. Robert Painter, Utilities Dir.
Mr. L~ne P~zsey, Budget Director
Mr. Dodd called the meeting to order at the Chesterfield
County Airport Conference Room at 11:00 a.m. (EDST)
The Board was apprised by the Chairman of an emergency
situation at the Chester Landfill currently being operated
under a contract with Shoosmith Brothers. According to
the information received from the operator, a serious drainage
problem has developed because of improper grading and
compaction over an extended period of time. The remedial
work necessary to correct the situation is beyond the scope
of the contract to operate the landfill on a daily basis. It
was on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, resolved
that the County Administrator be authorized to take such steps
as may be necessary to correct the situation on an emergency
basis and to report back to the Board at the next regular
meeting.
Vote: Unanimous
It was pointed out that both the State Health Department and the
Stare Water Control Board representatives had visited the site
and indicated, in their judgment, a serious problem existed
and needed to be corrected immediately to prevent pollution
of surrounding property by the contaminated surface water.
Mr. Robert Painter, Utilities Director, and the County
Administrator informed the Board of the developments in the
funding process for Phase I and II for the construction of the
3 million gallons per day expansion to the Falling Creek Sewage
Treatment Plant. The County Administrator stated that approval
had been received from EPA to proceed with Phase II, in accordance
with the Nevada Plan, and that assurances were given that all
the funds approved by Congress would be allocated in the last
month of the current fiscal year, September, 1980, or the first
month of the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1980 (FY 1981).
Based on these letters and meetings with the State Water
Control Board, it was on motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by
Mr. Daniel, resolved that the County Administrator be authorized
to issue a start to work order to English Construction
Company, low bidder for the project~ and the contractor with
whom construction contracts had been previously signed.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
went into Executive Session to discuss ~ersonnal matters and
legal ~att~rs as permitted by Section 2~1-344 (1) and (6) of the
Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended~
Vote: Unanimous
Reconvening:
80-283
Dr. Howard O. Sullins, Superintendent of the Chesterfield
County Public School System, was p=esent, He stated that
the proposed bond issue for $45,370,000 should be adequate
through 1985. He stated that the growth in the County and
the growth in the schools had been discussed and reviewed with
the County planning staff. He stated this would be the
first bond issue as far as he knew to upgrade older, existing
schools. Mr. O'Neill joined the meeting. Dr. Sullins stated
that there were other items that could have been included,
but everything could not be accomplished at one time. He
stated they were attempting to have instructional programs
throughout the County uniform, such as art. phyiscal educagion,
music, eno. He outlined some of the inadequate facilities
at some of the various schools and how they could be remedied
with the passage of the proposed bond issue. He stated the
School Board and the School administration would like a
special election on the proposed bond referendum in early
September because the construction of the facilities could
possibly be completed by the following September when schools
opened; that with the inflation spiraling as it is, even 1%
· ncrease in interest could reduce the purchasing power by
$900,000; and that there exists an uncertainty of what the
interest rates may be after the November elecgion.
Mr. Meiszer sgated he hoped the school administration did not thin~
if the bond referendum were passed in September, that the
bonds would be sold and construction begun in the same month
as there were legal time constrainbs involved. Dr. Sullins
stated he was aware of this but the sooner it was voted on,
and if passed, the sooner they could begin.
Mr. Tom Fulghum, Asst. Superintendent. presented the Board
with school projections, school capacity and a list of the
proposed projects for the bond referendum He stated thag
the school children population is declining at the elementary
level but the middle and upper schools are where the most
children are. He staged the rage is declining for school
population and they have taken that into consideration in
what they sro proposing. He stated that projections need to
be made every five years but also need to be updated each year.
Mrs. Girone inquired if the school age population is declining,
would there be empty buildings in 1984 or 1985. Mr. Fulghum
stated that after the 90% capacity level is reached, the school
is almost ag the overcrowded level and that this is projecting
for 100% now which means that they will be adequate in the
future and will not be empty buildings. He stated the use
of the classroom also had a lot to do with the capacity. He
stated that which is proposed will be tight, but they are
looking for a decline in the future.
Mr. Bookman inquired if the school adminisgration was making
it known that if this bond referendum were passed, the citizens
of Chesterfield County can expect an increase in taxes.
Mr. Fulghum seated they have not been leading people go believe
there are any "free lunches" and this will have to cost the
taxpayers money. There was some discussion and explanation
of how much the cost per pupil ~s now and how it would be
increased.
Mr. Dodd stated he was glad that this included the upgrading
of older schools. Mr~ Bookman and Mrs. Girone stated that
this proposal seemed to have something for each districT.
~rs. Maria Kerits~s, representing the Chesgerfield ·
~f P.T.A's staten ~ ...... ~_ ~ ~ -. County Council
asked that ~he Board, when making a decision, consider the wishes
~f the parents in the County.and presented a letter expressing
their support.
~rs. Dottle Armstrong stated that previous bond issues did incl
~g~a~in~ of ol'~er schools but was never acco~lished ....
s n the case since he had been with the
Chesterfield County Public School System.
80-28/
~r. Daniel inquired if a project were earmarked in this
~ond referendum, would it go to that project only. Dr. Sullins
~tated that when the 1975 bond issue was passed, the funds were
tistributed as outlined except for a small addition for the
,aintenance and food service area.
irs. Girone stated she did not feel she had received enough
public input to vote on this matter. Mr. Daniel inquired if
any additions could be added to the resolution and stated he,
too, felt a two week deferral would be in order. Mr. Dodd
stated that if the Board were going to discuss this now and
get into specifics, he felt a vote should be taken afterwards.
Mrs. Girone stated that she felt the next regular general
election date would be best. She stated the September 2, 1980
date is the day sfter Labor Day and people will be on vacation.
She stated that more people vote at the time of a Presidential
election and that if it is approved, taxes will be increased
and the more input the better
Mr. Bookman stated this was the largest bond issue to come
before the County and he would like the public to have more
input. He stated that sc~ne proponents would turn out in
September but felt that if the public wants this, that they
will have the same effect in November as September. He stated
he felt this matter was being pushed too hastily for everyone
to receive the full picture and that it will mean additional
tax dollars for all residents of the County.
Mr. Dodd stated he did not agree with the reascraing about
putting this issue with the Presidential election as the
Governor is not elected at the same time. He stated he felt
this was putting the schools into a political election if
accomflishad in November. He stated he felt people would be
interested and come co vote in September on this important
matter. Mrs. Girone stated she did not mean that she was relating
the Presidential election with this issue, just that she felt
the next regular general election would be best.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, be it
resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia:
1. The County School Board of Chesterfield County, Virginia,
on ~he 28th day of May, 1980, adopted the attached
resolution, requesting this Board of Supervisors to adopt
an initial resolution requesting the Judges of the
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County to order an election
upon the question of the County of Chesterfield
contracting a debt in the amount of Forty-five million
three hundred seventy thousand dollars ($45,370,000) and
issuing general obligation bonds of the County of
Chesterfield in such amount to finance projects for
school purposes as set forth in such amount to finance
projects for school purposes as set forth in such
resolution.
2. It is hereby determined that it is necessary and advisable
to contract a debt on the credit of the County of
Chesterfield to the maximum amount of $45,370,000 for
capital school improvement purposes, acquisition of future
school sites; and such other school construction as may
be required by th~ actual educational needs in
Chesterfield County, Virginia, and to issue general
obligation bonds of the County of Chesterfield in the maximum
amount of $45,370,000 to finance such projects pursuant
to Chapter 5, Article 3, Title 15.1*of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, which said bonds shall bear interest at
a rate not to exceed the maximum rate of interest as may be
permitted by law at the time the bonds are sold shall
mature in such annual or semi-annual installments, ss
may hereafter be determined bY resolution of this Board,
80-285
the last installment of which shall be payable not more
than thirty years from the da~e of such bonds, and
said bonds may be made redeemable before maturity, at the
option of this Board~ such price or orices and under such
terms and conditions as may be fixed-by this Board prior
to the issuance of the bonds. A tax sufficient to pay
the principal and interest of said bonds as the same mature
shall be levied upon all of the property subject to
taxation by said County.
A certified copy of this initial resolution shall be
presented by the Clerk of this Board to the Judges of
the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County and the Judges
of said Court are hereby requested to enter an order
requiring the Judges of Election to open a poll on the
date of the next regular general election and take
the sense of the qualified voters of the County of
Chesterfield on the question of contracting a debt in the
amount of $45,370,000 and issuing general obligation bonds
of the County of Chesterfield in such amount for the
purpose set forth in Paragraph 2 of this resolution.
This resolution shall take effect immediately.
The foregoing resolution was denied by the following vote:
~es: Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
rs: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel and Mr. O'Neill.
lt. Daniel stated the Board of Supervisors recognizes the
.mmediate need for school construction and capital improvements
rue to (1) increase in school age population, (2) educational
~rograms, and (3) general school improvements. He stated he
!elt the earliest possible date would be more appropriate
Ir. Micas Stated a specific date should be specified. Mr. Daniel
tared that he felt the September 2, 1980 would be appropriate
~ecause Dale District needs a school today and the sooner this
latter is settled, the sooner construction could begin and
~y waiting the purchasing power may be decreased.
In motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, be it resolved
~ the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia:
The County School Board of Chesterfield County, Virginia,
ou the 28th day of May, 1980, adopted the attached
resolution, requesting this Board of Supervisors to adopt
an initial resolution requesting the Judges of the Circuzt
Court of Chesterfield County to order an election
upon the question Of the County of Chesterfield
contracting a debt in the amount of Forty-
five million three hundred seventy thousand dollars
($45,370,000) and issuing general obligation bonds of
the County of Chesterfield in such amount ~o finance
projects for school purposes ss 5et forth in such amount
to finance projects for school purposes as set forth in
such resolution.
It is hereby determined that it is necessary and advisable
to contract a debt on the crediu of the County of
Chesterfield =o the maximum amount of S45,370,000 for
capital school i~provemen= purposes, acquisition of
future school sites; and such other school construction
as may be required by the actual educational needs in
Chesterfield Coungy, Virginia, and to issue general
obligation bonds of the County of Chesterfield in the
maximum amount of $45,370,000 to finance such projects
pursuant to Chapter 5, Article 3, Title 15.1 of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, as amended, which said bonds shall bear
interest at a rate not =c exceed the maximum rate of
interest as may be permitted by law at the time the bonds
are sold shall mature in such ~nnual or semi-annual
installments, as m~y hereafter bedetermined by Yesolution
of this Board, the last installment of which shall be payable
80-286
not more than thirty years from the date of such bon~s, and
said bonds may be made redeemable before maturity, at the
option of this Board, such price or prices and under such
terms and conditions as may be fixed by this Board prior
to the issuance of the bonds. A tax sufficient to pay the
principal and interest of said bonds as the same mature
shall be levied upon all of the property subject to
taxation by said County.
A certified copy of this initial resolution shall be
presented by the Clerk of this Board to the Judges of
the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County and the
Judges of said Court are hereby requested to enter an
order requiring the Judges of Election to open a poll
on September 2, 1980 and take the sense of the qualified
voters of the CoUnty of Chesterfield on the question
of contracting a debt in the amount of $45,370,000 and
issuing general obligation bonds of the County of
Chesterfield in such amount for the purpose set forth in
Paragraph 2 of this resolution.
4. This resolution shall take effeot immediately.
5. The foregoing resolution was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel and Mr. O'Neill.
Nays: Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Pn motion of Mr. Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the
ninutes of May 27, May 28 and June 4, 1980 were approved
ss amended.
IIVote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
of Supervisors this day approved all claims presented to the
County for the month of June, 1980, and authorized the
CoUnty Treasurer to issue warrants, a copy of which is filed
in the Treasurer's Office.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr~ Meiszer stated the Management Improvement Corporation of
America had submitted a contingency contract for management
review services~ He added that they would evaluate the
area, work up solutions to save money and actually do the
implementation themselves. He stated that they require a $2,000
annual retainer and the retainer would be applied towards
~heir fee and the County would determine the savings. The
Board stated that they felt this is an open-end contract and
felt if there were a particular area which needed their
services, the Board might consider a contract of that type.
[hey stated that they could foresee problems with the contract
ss proposed. Mr. Nezll excused h~mself from the meeting.
~r. Meiszer stated the MICA had proposed this type of contract
)ecause all local governments are leery of consultant contracts,
~hich studies are made and placed on the shelf. He stated he
cas only explaining the proposal and not defending it but it
tlso had a 30 day cancellation clause. After further discussion
Df the matter, it was on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by
{r. Daniel, resolved that this contract as submitted by MICA
~e denied.
~yes: Mr. Daniel~ Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Iays: Mr. Dodd.
Lbsent: Mr. O'Neill.
~r. Bookman statad that if a specific project with a dollar
mmount was submitted, the Board could consider that proposal.
~tated ~his prgposal was toO general. Mr. Dodd stated he was
~tways ~n favo~ of saving money for the County,
80-287
Mr. O'Neill returned to the meeting.
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Daniel,
1.
Vote:
the Board:
Transferred $305,051.25 from the 1978 General Bond
Fund (331) to the County Debt Service Fund (435) to
cover the first interest payment due on the 1978
Bonds.
Transferred $20,000 from the Unappropriated Surplus of
Sewer Improvement, Replacement and Extension Fund
(573-00850-0000) to Planned Budget Expenditure account code
573-1-11781-4394 Other Construction Contracts.
Unanimous
Mr. Jim Zook, Chief of Comprehensive Planning, stated the
printing bids for the Historic Sites Book had be~n received
and the lowest was $8,048,06 over the budgeted amount, On motion
of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board awarded the
printing of the Historic Sites Book to Chesterfield Lithographers/
First Impressions in the amount of $36,438.16 with the understanding
that the additional $8,048.06 difference between the bid and
the budgeted amount be transferred from other accounts within
the 1979-80 Department of Community Development budget.
Vote: Unanimous
~r. Meiszer stated he had received s request from Mr. Lewis
~aden representing the Museum Oommittee to advance said committee
~5,000. Mr O'Neill stated the Museum was scheduled to open
)n July 4th and he thought this was needed for the display eases.
]n motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
appropriated $5,000 from the Unappropriated Surplus of the
3choral Fund to the Museum Committee as an advance.
~r. Jim Edmondson stated that the Central Accounting Department
~ould like to combine some account funds which would reduce
uhe number of funds managed and controlled by the County or
~o reclassify funds to be consistent with the uniform financial
reporting requirements of the Auditor of Public Accounts.
4r. Daniel inquired if the funds were combined, could they
~e separated on occasion to find out the exact amount of money
:aken from or added to one of the accounts. Mr. Meiszer stated
:hat any types of information needed collectively or individually
:ould be easily retrieved the same as it is now but there would
iust be a lesser number of accounts. After further discussion
~f the matter, it was on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by
4r. Bookman, resolved that Central Accounting be authorized to;
[. Combine the following funds into one fund called Sewer
Fund (574):
a. Sewer Revenue Fund (570)
b, Sewer Operating Fund (571)
c. Sewer Debt Fund (572)
d. Sewer Improvement, Replacement and Extension Fund (573)
e. Sewer Bond Construction Fund (377)
~. Combine the School Debt Service Fund (445) with the
County Debt Service Fund (435) =o be called Debt Service
Fund (435).
Combine the Utility Workmen's Compensation Fund (688) with
the CogntF's Workmsn's Compensation Fund (619) tO be
Called Wo~kmen'sCompensation Fund (619) with separate
identification of Utility and County monies.
80-288
Combine the Law Library Fund (614) with the General Fund
(lll) with a separate reserve maintained for the unexpended
Law Library monies.
Combine the Storeroom Fund (71B) with the General Fund (111)
and establish separate responsibility centers for Stores
and Printing within General Services. The fund equity
would be combined with General Fund balance.
Change the name of Fund 220 from Public Service Jobs Fund
to Grants Fund. This fund is to be used to accounu for
grants not accounted for in enterprise funds.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Harry Chambers was present representing the Powhite Defense
Committee. He stated they would like to go on record as
opposing the naming of a toll authority to extend Powhine
Parkway. He stated they were opposed for any extensions along
any of the allegedly studied lines, that it would not solve
any of the worsening traffic problems, that it bisects 17
existing subdivisions in the County, and that it could not
possibly support itself and would need an increase in taxes for
its financial support. He stated they were concerned that
no public input was sought in the early negotiations by the
Board of Supervisors and the Highway Department, that there was
no formal resolution of the Board requesting the General
Assembly to authorize a toll authority, there was no public
input ¢o the General Assembly deliberation on the authorized
bill and up until n~, there has been no public input by the
Board of Supervisors in discussion to name this board. He
presented the Board with a copy of his statement. Mr. O'Neill
~ta~ed that the toll authority would have its own authority
co mssne bonds and there is nothing that obligates the County to
pay for any short fall. Mr. Chambers stated as he understood the
law, that the County would be responsible.
~r. Dodd stated that he would not support the use of
tax money for this roadway extension, that they would proceed
~ithout using the method used for the RMA. Mr. Dodd s~ated he had
peen on the Planning Cormmission for ~hree years, Mr. Bookman for
two and Mr O'Neill is now serving on it, and he feln that
they have heard input from citizens regarding the need for
~oads in the County. Mrs. Girone stated that she was not
~aking the position at this time as to whether or non she would
~se tax dollars to support this road. Mr. Bookman stated he would
like to see the results of the feasibility study before com~nitting
%imself He stated as of today, he would not support the use of
:ax dollars but would like to receive input from the public on
%ow they feel. He stated he felt the Highway Co~m~ission had
%eglected Chesterfield County too long.
)n motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
luthorized the County Attorney to withdraw the condemnation
~ase for 92 acres for the Warbro Road landfill site and further
~uthorized the Chairman and County Administrator to enter into
~ purchase option for 12 acres eastwardly for approximately
~100,000 from J. M. Wilkinson and Anna L. Wilkinson with the
mderstanding ~his landfill would be operated under the operation
~anual prepared by the engineers and the permit from the State
{ealth Department.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Bookman stated that he would also like the citizens
review corm~ittee also to be a condition of operation. Mr. Micas
stated that should not be a part of the operations manual for
the landfill but part of the administrative policy adopted by
the Board of Supervisors. Mr. O'Neill stated he did not
feel there was a need for this committee unless the supervisor
of the area wanted to meet wigh this corm~ittee. Mrs. Girone
stated the people did want an avenue to share their ideas'with
the Board. On motiou~of Mr. B~okman, seconded by Mrs.
girone, the Board approVedthe operations manual of the consulting
~ngineers and agreed to ~s~ablish a Citizens Review Committee
80-289
13.
for the life of the landfill which shall monitor the construction,
)peration, and development of the landfill. The Committee
¢ill meet periodically and written minutes shall be kept of
their deliberations. Annually, the Committee shall submit a
report with any recon~nendations concerning the operation of
the landfill to the Board of Supervisors. The Cormmittee
shall consist of three (3) citizens, one staff representative
from the County, the elected Board of Supervisors member
from the district involved and any consultant retained by
the County to prepare an annual report.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. O'Neill, secondgd by Mrs. Girone, the Board
appointed Mr. Harry G. Daniel ~l~the Advisory Committee of
the Virginia Center for the Performing Arts.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Bookman excused himself from the meeting.
It was generally agreed to defer consideration of appointments
to the Toll Road Authority until all Board members were present.
On motion of Mr. Daniel seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
approved s fireworks display request from the Brandermill
Community Association to be held on July 4, 1980 at Harbour
Points subject to the requirements of the Chesterfield
County Fire Department.
Ryes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel. Mrs. Girone and Mr. O'Neill.
kbssnt: Mr. Bookman.
Dn motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
muthorized the sale of a surplus paper cutter. A~ Model 155,
co the City of Colonial Heights in the amoun~ of $75.00 which
is the value of the machine as quoted by the manufacnurer.
iyes: Mr Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mrs. Girone and Mr. O'Neill.
~bsent: Mr. Bookman.
]n motion of Mr. Daniel., seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
authorized the Chesterfield County Airport to write off the
account of Joe Mende$ in the amount of 857.32 as an uncollectable
accounts receivable.
%yes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mrs. Girone and Mr. O'Neill.
%bsent: Mr. Bookman.
In motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
Whereas, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors have
~eceived complaints regarding the truck traffic on Werth Street
Route 1523; and
Whereas, The Board of Supervisors is always concerned
for the health, safety and welfare of all its citizens.
Be It Resolved. the Board of Supervisors supports the closing
of Werth Street ~o truck traffic.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mrs. Girone and Mr, O'Neill.
Absent: Mr. Bookman.
80~290
14.A. Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been scheduled for
a public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to profane
swearing, public drtrnkennes and transportation of public
inebriates. No one was present to discuss this matter. On
motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the following
ordinance was adopted:
An Ordinance to Amend the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1978, as Amended, by Adding a
Section Numbered 15.1-21.1 Relating to Profane
Swearing, Public Drunkenness and Transportation
of Public Inebriates, and to Provide for a Penalty
Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield is
amended by adding Section 15.1-21.1 as follows:
Sec.. 15.1-21.1. Profane swearing and drunkenness; transportation
of public inebriates to detoxification center.
If any person profanely curse or swear or be drunk in public
he shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine
of nog more than S100. The judge of the general district court
may, by written order, authorize the transportation, by police
or otherwise, of public inebriates to an appropriate
detoxification center; provided, however, that no person shall
be involuntarily detained in such center.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mrs. Girone and Mr. O'Neill.
Absent: Mr. Bookman.
14.B.
Mr. Meiszer stated this date and time had been scheduled for
a public hearing to consider an ordinance relating To a
bank franchise tax. There was no one present to discuss this
matter, On motion of Mrs. Girone seconded by Mr. O'Neill,
the following ordinance was adopted:
An Ordinance to Amend the Code of the Counny of
Chesterfield, 1978. as Amended, By Adding
Sections 8-28.1 through 8-28.4 and Repealing
Sections 8-28 and 8-29 Relating to a Bank Franchise
Tax and Providing for a Penalty
Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors of the County
f Chesterfield:
(1) That the Code of the Counny of Chesterfield, 1978, as
amended, is amended by adding the following sections:
Bec 8-28.1. Definitions.
For the purposes of this article, the following words shall
~ave the meanings ascribed ro them by this section:
(a) "Bank" shall be as defined in Section 58-485.01 of the
~ode of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
(b) "Net Capital" shall mean a bank's net capital computed
~ursuant to Section 58-485.07 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
~mended.
;ec. 8-28.2. Imposition of Bank Franchise Tax.
(a) Pursuant no the provisions of Chapter 10.01 of
Title 58 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, there is
~ereby imposed upon each bank located within the boundaries of
~he county ~ Tax on net capital equalling 8~ ~f the state rate
~f franchis~ tax set forth in Section 58-485.06 of the Code of
Virginia.
80-291
14.C.
(b) In the event that any bank located within the county
is not the principal office of such bank but is a branch extension
or affiliate of the principal office, the tax upon such branch
shall be apportioned as provided by Section 58-485.012 of the
Code of Virginia.
Sec. 8-28.3. Filin~ of Return and Payment of Tax.
(a) On or after the first day of January of each year, but
not later than March 1 of any such year, all banks whose
principal offices are located within the county shall prepare and
file with the commissioner of the revenue a return as provided
by Section 58-485.013 of the Code of Virginia in duplicate which
shall set forth the tax on net capital computed pursuant to
Chapter 10.01 of Title 58 of the Code of Virginia. The commissione
of the revenue shall certify a copy of such filing of the bank's
return and schedule and shall forthwith transmit such certified
copy to the State Department of Taxation.
(b) In the event that the principal office of a bank is
located outside the boundaries of the county and such bank
has branch offices located within the county, in addition to the
filing requirements set forth in Section (a) hereof, any bank
conducting such branch business shall file with the commissioner
of the revenue a copy of the real estate deduction schedule,
apportionment and other items which are required by Sections
58-485.012, 58-485.013 and 58-485.014 of the Code of Virginia.
(c) Each bank, on or before the first day of June of each
~ear, shall pay into the treasurer's office all taxes imposed
pursuant to this article.
Sec. 8-24. Penalty for Failure to Comply with Article.
Any bank which shall fail or neglect to comply with any
provision of this article shall be fined not less than one hundred
nor more than five hundred dollars, which fine shall be recovered
upon motion, after five days' notice in the circuit court of this
county. The motion shall be in the name of the Co~m~onwealth and
shall be presented by the attorney for the Cormmonwealth.
(2) That Sections 8-28 and 8-29 of the Code of the County
of Chesterfield are hereby repealed.
(3) That this ordinance shall be effective upon passage
for the taxable year beginning January 1, 1980.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mrs. Girone and Mr. O'Neill.
Absent: Mr. Bookman.
Mr. Meiszer stated this date and time had been scheduled for
a public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to the
definition of subdivision, approval of subdivision plats and
the requirement of public road frontage on nonsubdivision roads°
Mr. O'Neill stated he had received several calls on this matter°
Mr. Muzzy stated he had received one and explained what was
meant by the ordinance and the caller did non have any objection.
There was no one present to discuss this matter. Mr~ Micas stated
he had sent copies to the nwo home builders associations. On
motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr~ Daniel the following
ordinance was adopted:
Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Sections 18-2, 18-18 and 21-26 of the Code of
the Counny of Chesterfield are amended and reenacted as follows:
Sec. 18-2. Definitions.
Subdivision. The division of a parcel of land into three
or more lots or parcels for the purpose, whether immediate or
at soma future time, of th& transfer of ownership or residential
building development, and inolnding any parcel previously separate~
80-292
by the then owner or prior owner of such land for such purposes
subsequent to January 1, 1980. The term subdivision shall include
resubdivision. . . . ,, of any parcel or lot previously subdivided. However
subdzv~slon shall not include a single division of land into
parcels where such division is for the purpose of a sale or gift
to a member of the immediate family of the property o~er. Only
one such subdivision shall be allowed per family member and
shall not be for the purpose of circumventing this chapter. For
the purposes of this subsection, a member of the immediate family
shall be defined as any person who is a natural or legally
defined offspring, spouse or parent of the owner.
In addition, "subdivision" shall include any division of
land into parcels where such division meets c~e or more of
the following four criteria:
(a) Creates parcels with an area less than thirty
thousand square feet and with a width less than one hundred
fifty feet measured seventy-five feet from the street
centerline and which creates parcels which front on a public
street for less than one hundred twenty-five feet; or
(b) Requires the opening of a new street or extension
of an old street or the use of any new easement of access; or
(c) Obstructs or is likely to obstruct natural drainage; or
(d) Fails to front on an existing State highway with
right-of-way, measured from the centerline, equal to one-half
of the right-of-way shown on the General Plan, but in no case
less than twenty-five feet from the centerline.
Sec. 18-18. Procedure for Subdivision approval.
(a) Tentative Plats. The subdivider shall prepare a
proposed tentative plat in accordance with the provisions of
division 2 of this article, including a proposal for the
installation of improvements and intended dedication or
reservation of public lands. The subdivider shall then file
a letter of transmittance of the proposed tentative plat with the
planning commission along with such tentative plat. Upon receipt ~
of such proposed plat, the planning con~nission shall obtain the I
required recommendations from the department of community development
ane other public agencies. After receipt of such recommendations,]
the planning commission shall either (1) approve such tentative ~
plan, if such plat is in conformity with the provisions of this
chapter, or (2) approve the plat subject to m~dification or
(3) reject the tentative plat. Written findings giving specific
reasons for disapproval shall be reported to the subdivider within
sixty.days after receipt of such tentative plat. Such reasons
shall relate in general terms such modifications or corrections
as will permit approval of the plat. The planning commission
reserves the right to review the tentative plat at any time and
tentative approval of the plat shall expire twelve months from
the date of approval.
For the resubdivision of lots within existing subdivisions
for the purpose of adjusting lot lines, when there is no increase
in the number of lots and no change in the existing road layout,
the director of community development is authorized to approve
and sign the plat administratively for the planning commission.
~hereafter the director of community development shall present a
list of those plats administratively reviewed to the planning
commission indicating action taken. In the event a plat is
disapproved by the director of community development, such
application shall be considered by the planning commission at thei~
next appropriate meeting.
Sec. 21-26. Street Frontage Required.
(a) Unless otherWise ~pecif~ed and e~cept for farm buildings
80-293
15.
16.
20.
no lot outside a subdivision as defined in Section 18-2 shall be
used in whole or in part for dwelling purposes unless such lot
abuts for at least fifty feet upon a street as herein defined.
No lot or parcel of land abutting the terminus of a public street
shall be deemed, by virtue of such abutment to have its
principal frontage on a puSlic street, unless such lot fronts for
at least thirty feet on an approved permanent cul-de-sac.
(b) No permit for the erection, moving or conversion of
any building on a parcel outside a'subdivision as defined in
Section 18-2 shall be issued unless the street, highway or road
adjoining the land on which such building is to be created, moved
or converted is: (1) a part of the state highway system, primary
or secondary; or (2) such street, highway or road has been
suitably improved to the satisfaction of the director of
community development as adequate to provide a satisfactory means
of ingress and egress for the public. This provision shall not
apply to farm buildings, or structures not designed for human
habitation.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mrs. Girone and Mr. O'Neill.
Absent: Mr. Bookman.
Mr. Bookman returned to the meeting.
Mr. Micas stated that he had been asked to prepare an ordinance
relating to exempting certain solar equipment from real estate
taxes. He stated this exemption would be for five years.
Mr. Meiszer stated that passive equipment will not be considered,
only active solar equipment. Mrs. Girone stated the Board will
be asked in the near future to consider zaning for apartments
using solar equipment. Mr. Dodd stated this type of equipment
would save people money and the Board may have to look at this
carefully. Mr. Daniel stated he felt the energy situation was
a national problem and he endorses any alternate sources of
energy. There was some discussion as to who would endorse
and certify various equipment and that perhaps this could be
done during the building inspection stages. After further
discussion of the matter, it was on motion of Mrs. Girone,
seconded by Mr. Daniel, resolved that the date of July 9,
1980 at 2:00 p.m. be set for a public hearing to consider an
ordinance amending the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978,
ss amended, by adding Sections 8-33 through 8-36 in order to
designate certain solar energy equipment facilities or devices
exempt from taxation.
Vote: Unanimous
Dn motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
Whereas, Mr. Frank Cervarich has served as a member of
the John Tyler Community College Local Board representing
Shesterfield County; and
Whereas, Mr. Cervarich's term will expire on June 30,
1980, representing his service to the County in this important
capacity for a period of ten years; and
Whereas, Mr. Cervarich is not eligible for reappointment; and
Whereas, the Board appreciates and acknowledges the time
and effort of Mr. Cervarich in attendance at meetings and
representation for the County.
Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors publicly expresses their appreciation to
Sr. Frank Cervarich for his dedication and loyalty to the County
~s a member of the John Tyley Community College Local Board.
~ote: Unanimous
3n motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by }~. Dodd, the Board appointed
Sr. William VanArnam to the~John Tyler CommUnity College Local
Board effective July 1, 1980 u~n~ti~l~June 30, 1984, representing
17,A,
17.B,
17.C.
17.D.
Chesterfield County.
Vote! Unanimous
Mr. Phil Hester stated bids had been re~^;-^~ = ..... I
.... range nazi mtementary School and Reams Road School. Mr. DanielI
iinquired what type of wiring was to be used. Mr. Heater stated
copper wire with concrete poles. On motion of Mr. Bookman, ~
seconded by Mr. O'Neill, the Board awarded the bid for the lighting
at Grange Hall Elementary and Reams Road Schools to Associated
Electrical Service who submitted the low bid in the amount
of $79,295 and further the Board authorized the County
Administrator to execute any necessary documents for these
contracts and reduced planned budget expenditure account
330-1-95446-4694 Clover Hill Contingency by $60.000 and
increased planned budget expenditure account 330-1-95405-
4393 Grange Hall Construction contracts by $60,000.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
awarded the contract for development of two soccer fields,
a football field and walkways for Monacan High School to P.
E. Eubank and Company who submitted the low bid of $55,585
and further authorized the County Administrator to execute
any necessary documents for this contract.
Vote: Unanimous
Hr. Hester stated that his department would be meeting with
the Highway Department the following day to discuss the
Rockwood Park access.
)n motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, the Board
approved =he change order for security lights at Bird School
Athletic Complex in the amount of $18,324 for W. B. Matthews
Construction, authorized the CountyAdministrator to execute
any necessary documents and further reduced planned budget
expenditure account 330-1-95446-4693 Dale Contingency by
$18,000 and increased planned budget expenditure account
330-1-95402-4393 Bird Park construction contracts by $18,000.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Hester stated =he low bid for the sign boards and symbols
for the eight entrance signs for County parks had been received
Mrs. Girone inquired why her account was the only one being
charged. Mr. Hester stated Midlothian District did not
have funds budgeted to cover this expense and the funds
indicated were to pay for the Midlothia~ sign only and not
for any of the other park symbols and szgn boards. On
notion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
swarded the contract for the sign boards and symbols to
rally Neon who submitted the low bid of $8,466.93, authorized
~he County Administrator to execute any necessary documents
for this contract, and further rsduced planned budget expenditure
~ccoUnt 330-1-95446-4696 Midlothian Contingency by $1,060
~nd increased planned budget expenditure account 330-1-
)5407-4393 Robious Complex Construction Contracts by $1,060.
fore: Unanimous
I~r. O'Neill inquired if the Mataoea park projects were
progressing as scheduled. Mr. Hester stated the Matoaoa
District projects were on schedule for July 10, 1980.
Mr. O'Neill excused himself from the meeting.
80-295
18.A.
18.B.
18.D.
18 .E.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Bookman. the Board
awarded the contract for the construction of Reycan Road
to J. H. Martin and Sons, Inc. who submitted the low bid of
$219,489.98 for approximately 4,000+ feet in length which sum
does not include culverts which is ~stimated to be $15,000,
and cost overruns of approximately $15,000, and further the
County Administrator was authorized to execute any necessary
documents for this contract and related work, and-further
the Board appropriated $249,489.98 from the monies received
from the sale of land at the Airport Industrial Park and
reduced the same amount from the 1980-81 capital budget
which was appropriated for this purpose.
Ryes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs Girone.
~bsant: Mr. O'Neill. '
)n motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
~uthorized the County Attorney's office to proceed with
legal action against the developer of Walton Park, Sections
~ian~ D, to have the roads completed in accordance with the
~ rgznia Department of Highways and Transportation requirements
for acceptance into the State Secondary System.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr, Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
Dn request of Mr. Dodd, it was generally agreed that the Board
~ould defer consideration of street light requests on
Percival Street, Harvette Drive and at the intersection of
Rushton Road and Ashwood Road until June 25, 1980.
)n motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
~anied the requests for street light installation at Brentwood
]ircle and at the intersection of Walworth Drive and Cumbermeade
{oad because they did not meet the established criteria.
~yes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
~bsent: Mr. O'Neill.
In motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by }ir. Daniel, the Board
[pproved the installation of a street light at the junction
,f Mayflower Drive and Shasta Road with any associated cost
o be expended from the Midlothian Distriet Street Light Funds.
yes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
bsent: Mr. O'Neill.
n motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
dopted the following resolution:
Whereas, a pre-allocation hearing was held by the
~irginia Department of Highways and Transportation on March 17
~980, for the Fiscal Year 1980-81 Richmond District Interstate
rimary and Urban Construction Funds; and
Whereas, the statement by Chesterfield County at the
~forementioned hearing cited the Route 10 and 150 interchange
~nd the widening of the remaining ortion of '
!arkway as the County's top priority; and Chzppenham
Whereas, the tentative allocation for the Richmond District
nterstate Primary and Urban Construction Funds includes funding
or Chippenham Parkway.
Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved, ~hat the Chesterfield
~n~a~C~i~p~rvi~or~ rec?mmend? Chat the Virginia Highwa
~ ~ommn~ss~on aoopt the tentative allocation Y
the Fiscal Year 1980-81 Richmond District Interstate, Primary
~d Urban Construction Funds as the final allocation, and
Further, Be It Resolved that the Chesterfield County Board
Supervisors requests that the aforementioned widening of
~ippanham to four lanes and the Route 10 and 150 interchange
80-296
18.F.
19.
I,
19.
II.
be initiated during tile 1980 construction season.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill. '
Mr. Muzzy informed the Board that the Hickory Road Bridge
project and the Route 360 and Genito Road intersection project
had been approved.by the Highway Department.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the following
resolution was adopted:
Whereas, the Virginia Department of Highways and
Transportation has been a provider of commuter parking facilities
in those counties where they maintain the highway system; and
Whereas, the Virginia Department of Highways and
Transportation has been unable to develop a co~muter parking
facility in the vicinity of Route 60, Midlothian Turnpike,
and Route 147, Huguenot Road; and
Whereas, negotiations for a lease agreement between
Chesterfield County and Chesterfield Mall are proceeding for
the establishment of a commuter parking lot for the
patrons of the County's buspool program.
Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of
Highways and Transportation to participate with the County
in a joint effort to develop plans for a Commuter parking
facility at Chesterfield Mall; and
Further, Be It Resolved that the Chesterfield County Board
of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Highways and
Transportation to construct the Chesterfield Mall commuter
parking facilities at County expense pending a lease agreement
between Chesterfield Mall and the County and to maintain these
commuter parking facilities until the termination of the
aforementioned lease agreement.
Ayes: Fir. Dodd, Mr, Daniel, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. Daniel excused himself from the meeting.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the following
resolution was adopted:
Be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Chesterfield in regular meeting assembled that the Chairman
of said Board, be and he hereby is. authorized to enter into
an agreement with the Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, and
to sign same on behalf of said County whereby said Railroad
Company grants unto Said County the right or license to install
and maintain for the purpose of a water main, a line of 12 inch
(I.D.) ductile iron pipe across the right-of-way and under tracks
of said Railroad Company, and including the right and privilege
to abandon, but retain in place for future emergency use,
an existing 8 inch water main crossing of said County, at or
near Ettrick, Virginia; as particularly described in said
agreement which agreement is da~ed May 1, 1980, a copy of which
agreement is filed with this Board of Supervisors.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Book/nan and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel and Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. Daniel and Mr~ O'Neill returned to the meeting.
Hr. Painter stated that the Fire Department had requested that
fire hydrants be ins~ailed on the wa{er bond projects from the
80,297
III.
19.
V.
19.
V~. 1.
Appomattox River Water Authority to the Chesterfield Courthouse
and the water line on River Road west of Matoaca. He stated
that the Fire Department had originally agreed to install 12
fire hydrants on this water line at a cost of approximately
$6,000 each. He stated the Utilities Department will install fire
hydrants at points where the four inch blow-offs would be
installed on these water lines if the Fire Department will
pay $1,000 each for 20 additional hydrants. Mrs. Girone stated
she felt the cost of fire hydrants should come from the Utilities
Department budget. Mr. Daniel stated he felt it should be
decided which department would pay for hydrants and that funds be
included in their budget. Mr. Meiszer stated the Fire Department
does have funds budgeted for hydrant installation but not as much
as is requested for this project. After further discussion of
the matter, it was on motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by
Mr. Daniel, resolved that the Utilities Department install
20 additional fire hydrants where four inch blow-offs would be
installed on the above described water lines and that the
$20,000 be appropriated from the Unappropriated Surplus of the
General Fund for this installation.
Chief Eanes stated he, Mr. Painter and Mr. Edmondson had been
discussing from wbich department funds for installation of
fire hydrants should come and they will have a report for
the Board in the near future.
On motion of Mr. Bookman~ seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
approved the following adjustment of appropriations for
sewer projects:
1. Drewry's Bluff Sewer - S78-19C. Appropriated from 573
Surplus $1,600.00 to 380-1-78191-2101. This represents
the audit fee from Ernst & ~rminney for the Drewry'$
Bluff Project.
2. Sewer on Daniel & Harrowgate Streets - S79-t08C. Transferred
appropriations of $42?.94 from 380-1-7908A-4393 and
appropriated $18.00 from 377 Bermuda Escrow for a total
of $445.94 to 380-1-79571-4393 (Halfway House Heights
Sewer), Per Board action of October 10, 1979, any
remaining Bermuda Escrow money would be used for the
Halfway House Heights Projects.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Dodd stated he was concerned about the business area on
Pinebark Road not having public sewer. He stated it was his
understanding that the Kel-Win company may move their plant
and not expand if public sewer service is not extended in the
area. Mrs. Girone stated she felt this was a private business
Mr. Dodd asked that staff investigate what is best and most
economical for the area for sewer service and that they
contact the businesses in the area to determine what participation
could be expected and bring back a definte recormnendation
for the Board.
Mr. Painter presented the Board with a list of developer water
and sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator.
Mr. Meiszer stated this time and date had been scheduled to
consider an ordinance vacating a portion of a plat within
Salisbury, Section A. There was no one present to discuss this
matter. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded By Mr. Bookman, the
following ordinance was adopted:
An Ordinance to vacate a portion of a plat within
Salisbury, SectionA, Midlothian Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on plat thereof
duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
of Chesterfield County in Plat Book 12 at page 55.
80-298
19.
VI. 2.
Whereas, Salisbury Presbyterian Church has petitioned
the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to
vacate a portion of a plat within Salisbury, Section A,
Midlothian Magisterial District, Chesterfield, Virginie more
particularly shown on a plat of record in the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court of said County in Plat Book 12 at page 55,
made by J. K. Timmons, Civil Engineer, dated June 8, 1961.
The portion of the subdivision plat petitioned to be vacated is
more fully described as follows:
A portion of Salisbury, Section A more fully
described as follows: Lots 1 and 2, Block K, as
shown outlined in red on a plat made by J. K.
Timmons, Civil Engineer, dated June 8, 1961, a copy
of which is attached hereto and made a part of this
ordinance.
k~ereas, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-431
of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising; and
Whereas, no public necessity exists for the continuance
of the portion of subdivision sought to be vacated and the
vacation will not abridge the rights of any citizen.
! Now, Therefore, Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisers
!of Chesterfield County, Virginia:
That pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the above described portions of
Salisbury, Section A, are hereby vacated and are no longer
necessary for public use.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with Section 15.1-482 (b) of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance,
together with the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no sooner
than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield, Virginia, pursuant to Section 15.1-485
of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483
is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the
~ortion of the plat vacated.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the names
Df the County of Chesterfield as grantor and Salisbury Presbyteria~
Church or its successors in title, as granteesl
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Meiszer stated this date and time had been scheduled for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance vacating a portion
of a plat within Salisbury, Section D. There was no one present
to discuss this matter. On motion of Mrs. Girone, secondmd b~
Mr. Bookman, the following ordinace was adopted:
An Ordinance to vacate a portion of a plat within
Salisbury, Section D, Midtothian Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on plat thereof
duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County in Plat Book 15 at page 39.
~ereas, iSalisbury Presbyterian Church has petitioned the
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County to vacate a portion
of a plat within Salisbury, Section D, Midlothian Magisterial
District, Chesterfield, Virginia, more particularly shown on a
plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
said County in Plat Bock 15 at page 39, mede by J. K. Timmons
& Associates, Consulting E~gineers~ dated Jlme 23, 1966.
The portion of the Subd~visi6n plat petitioned to be vacated
is more fully described as follows:
19.
VI.3.
19.
19.
VII.2.
A portion of Salisbury, Section D, more fully described
as follows: Lots 17, 18 and 19, Block K, as shown outlined
in red on a plat made by J. K. Timmons and Associates,
Consulting Engineers, dated June 23, 1966, a copy
of which is attached hereto and made a part of this
ordinance.
Whereas, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-431
of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising; and
Whereas, no public necessity exists for the continuance
of the portion of subdivision sought to be vacated and the
vacation will not abridge the rights of any citizen.
Now, Therefore, Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia:
That pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the above described portions of
Salisbury, Section D, are hereby vacated and are no longer
necessary for public use.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and affect in
accordance with Section 15.1-482 (b) of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance,
together with the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no
sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of Chesterfield, Virginia pursuant to Section
15.1-485 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483
is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the
portion of the plat vacated.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the names
of the County of Chesterfield as grantor and Salisbury
Presbyterian Church or its successors in title, as grantees.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
approved a counteroffer from Carrel A. and David D. Roberson
in the amount of $25,000 for the purchase of 1.8 acres plus or
minus for a water tank site, north of Graves Road and east of
River Road. It is noted that the appraisal for the property
was $17,500.
Vote: Unanimous
It was on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, re~olved
that consideration of condemnation of a drainage easement
across the property of Mr. and Mrs. Curtis Blaine at 2715
Kingsdale Road be deferred until June 25, 1980.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Bookman. the Board
authorized the County Attorney to institute condemnation
proceedings against the property owners listed below if the
amount as set opposite their names is not accepted. Be it
further resolved that the County Administrator notify the said
property o%n/ers by registered mail of the intention of the County
to enter upon and take the property which is to be the subject
of said condemnation proceadings. An emergency existing, this
resolution shall be and it hereby is declared in full force
and effect innnediately upon passage.
3ames W. Mayfield, Sr. and James W.
Mayfield, Jr. Lot 17, Block D
Dupuy Court, Drainage
Easement
80-300
$30.00
19.
VII. 3.
19.
11.
12.
Vote: Unanimous
It was generally agreed to defer consideration of acceptance
of deeds of dedication for rights-of-way in Bermuda Ochre
Subdivision until June 25, 1980.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
accepted the counteroffer in the amount of $12,000 from
Mr. David L. McKenney for the purchase of 0.70 acres north of
Robious Road and adjacent to Greenfield School, Midlothian
District, which land will be used in conjunction with another
parcel for a park site.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to submit a grant application
and accept, if approved, for the Chesterfield County Fire
Department as wall as any understandings and assurances contained
therein for participation in Field Testing of U. S. Fire
Administration developed firefighting protective clothing, with
the understanding that there will be no cost to the County
other than funds previously budgeted for protective clothing.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
approved payment of a livestock claim submitted by Mr. Joseph
A. Pitts, Jr. of 9900 Beaver Bridge Road, in the amount of
$835~00 as recommended by the V.P.I. Extension Agent for the
destruction of 37 game hens and roosters.
Mr. Bookman stated Mrs. Ella J. Adkins had presented a claim
in the amount of $150 for the destruction of two doors by
a wild dog. Mr. Micas stated that neither the County Code
nor the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, provided for
the payment of such damage by a dog. Mr. Bookman inquired
if County forces could be sent to try and repair the damage.
Mr. O'Neill stated he did not feel that would be proper as
the County would be called on to repair other damages done
by dogs. It was on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs.
Girone, resolved that this matter be deferred until June
25, 1980.
Vote: Unanimous
Mrs. Girone made a motion that the Board defer appointments
to the Toll Road Authority for six months or until the
feasibility study was received from the Highway Department
whichever was the sooner. Mr. Daniel stated he could not
support a motion that indefinite. After further consideration
of the matter, ~{rs. Girone amended her motion deferring the
appointment of the Toll Road Authority until June 25, 1980.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
authorized the County Attorney's Office to proceed with
legal action against the developer of Searcy, Sections 2 and
5, to have the roads completed satisfactorily for acceptance
into the State Secondary System.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Muzzy stated that 90% of the work has been completed by
the developer in Searey, Sections 2 and 5, but they have
been working with the developer for years trying to have
the roads accepted.
802301
20.
$n motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
requested that the Highway Department repave the intersection
of Route 10 and Lewis Road in a manner that will not allow
the deterioration of the paving by heavt~ trucks and to eliminate
the bouncing effect that exists at this location.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. O'Neill stated he had received a request that the benches
and columns at the Old Courthouse be repaired where necessary
and also rDpainted.
Mr. Bookman stated he felt the entrance work being done at
the Airport is unsatisfactory and rough looking. Mr. Daniel
stated that the Cogbill and Route 10 work also was rough on
the sides and that the markings are worn and need repainting
at the intersection of Route 10 and Lori Road~
Mr. O'Neill stated he would like to see some progress on the
Ettrick grant survey at the next meeting.
iMf. Dodd appointed Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone to a Courts
i Building Cormnittee, with ~. Bookman serving as Chairman.
iHe also stated he had inadvertently forgotten to appoint
i Mr. O'Neill as Chairman of the Police Liaison Conmlittee at the
ilast meeting and did so.
i Mr. Bookman was given a petition from the Chairman who received
it, from residents in Clover Hill who were in favor of Route 288
being built.
Mr. Meiszer stated that there would be a demonstration of the
new circulation system at the Central Library following the
meeting if anyone were interested in attending.
Mr. Meiszer distributed a report on the impact of the proposed
bond sale. He advised the Board of outstanding appointments
as well.
Mr. Meiszer stated the County had formally been notified that
the roads in the Briarcliff Su'odivision, Section I, had
been accepted into the State System effective June 3, 1980:
Length
Marblethorpe Road - Beginning at its intersection
with Stroud Lane, extending southwest 0.13 mile
to a temporary turnaround. 0.13 mi.
Marbleridge Road - Beginning at its intersection
with existing Marbleridge Road, Route 1825, and
Brickland Road, Route 1826, extending south 0.07
mile to the intersection of Stroud Lane, then
south 0.09 mile to a temporary turnaround. 0.16 mi.
Stroud Lane - Beginning at its intersection with
Marbleridge Road, extending southeast 0.06 mile
to the intersection of Marblethorpe Road, then
southeast 0.09 mile to a temporary turnaround. 0.15 mi.
Monath Road - Beginning at its intersection with
Reams Road, Route 647, extending south 0.17 mile to
a temporary turnaround. 0.17 mi.
On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by l~rs. Cirone, the Board
adjourned at 5:15 p.m.
Vote: Unanimous
Nicholas M. Meiszer //
County Administrator/
Chairman