2025-12-17 Minutes BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES DECEMBER 17, 2025
12/17/2025 Page 1 of 131
2 p.m. Work Session - Administration Building, Room 502
A video recording of this meeting may be viewed at
https://www.chesterfield.gov/244/Agendas-and-Minutes.
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. James A. Ingle, Jr., Chair
Dr. Mark S. Miller, Vice Chair
Ms. Jessica L. Schneider
Dr. LeQuan M. Hylton
Mr. Kevin P. Carroll
Dr. Joseph P. Casey
County Administrator
Mr. Ingle called the meeting to order at 2 p.m.
1. Approval of Minutes
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Hylton,
the Board approved the minutes of the November 19,
2025, Board of Supervisors meeting and December 2,
2025, Legislative Reception, as submitted.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
2. Requests to Postpone Agenda Items and Additions, Deletions or Changes in the Order of Presentation
There were no requests to postpone agenda items and
additions, deletions or changes in the order of
presentation.
3. Everyday Excellence - County Attorney's Office
County Attorney Jeff Mincks recognized attorneys Rob
Robinson and Andrew Fulwider and paralegal Kelli
Harmon for their tireless efforts over the last five
years to see the Zoning Ordinance Modernization
(ZOMod) Project through to completion. He commended
them for their work on ZOMod while simultaneously
performing their other job duties.
Board members expressed appreciation to Mr. Robinson,
Mr. Fulwider, and Ms. Harmon for the critical roles
they each played in producing a legally sound zoning
ordinance.
4. Work Sessions
A. Model County Government Day Welcome
Deputy County Administrator James Worsley welcomed
six county high school students, who were a small
sampling of over 60 students participating in Model
County Government Day. Present were Lynn Jones,
Matoaca High School; Maya McGee, Matoaca High School;
12/17/2025 Page 2 of 131
Abigail Willis, Cosby High School; Wesley Cambridge,
Meadowbrook High School; Mackenzie Graham, Cosby High
School; and Mitch Brown, James River High School.
Each student shared their high school, their plans
after graduation, and something they learned during
their job shadowing experience.
Board members wished the students well in their
future endeavors and encouraged them to explore
employment opportunities in local government.
B. Economic Development Annual Update
Director of Economic Development Garrett Hart
introduced guests Angela Martin, Director of
Accounting and People Operations for Super Radiator
Coils; Claire Mansfield, Government and Public
Affairs Manager for LEGO; and Terri Cofer Beirne,
Chair of the Economic Development Authority (EDA).
Each provided the Board with an update on the
activities and initiatives of their respective
organizations. Also present in the audience, but not
speaking, was Jennifer Wakefield, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Greater Richmond Partnership.
Discussion, questions, and comments ensued relative
to the information provided during the presentation.
Board members expressed appreciation for the
businesses who choose to call Chesterfield home and
invest in the local economy and workforce.
C. Chesterfield County Airport Annual Update
Airport Manager Jeremy Wilkinson provided the Board
with an annual update on the activities and
initiatives of the Chesterfield County Airport.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
D. Financial Update
Deputy County Administrator Matt Harris and Director
of Budget and Management Gerard Durkin provided the
Board with a financial update. Topics discussed
included county FY2025 year-end; Schools FY2025 year-
end; tax relief; long-term liabilities - Supplemental
Retirement Plan (SRP); school bus financing; school
capacity snapshot; FY2024 Comparative Report (Auditor
of Public Accounts (APA)); and upcoming items between
December 2025 and April 2026.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
E. Citizen Satisfaction Survey Results
Mr. Harris and Strategy and Performance Coordinator
Tamara Highsmith discussed the results of the recent
Citizen Satisfaction Survey. High points of the 2025
survey results included improvement in 19 measures
since the last survey; improvement in transparency
and openness of government, customer service by
12/17/2025 Page 3 of 131
county employees, and welcoming community
involvement; and concerns with transportation and
traffic flow. Residents' top five priorities for the
future included a safe and secure community, thriving
communities, and a vibrant economy. Ways in which the
county is responding were discussed. It was noted
that Parks and Recreation received the Voice of the
People Award from POLCO for transformation in Parks
and Recreation.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
F. Consent Agenda Highlights
Mr. Harris and Deputy County Administrator Clay
Bowles provided details of various consent agenda
items on the evening agenda.
5. Reports
A. Reports on the Status of District Improvement
Operating and Capital Funds, General Fund Unassigned
Balance and Debt Policy Ratios, and Investments
The Board approved the Reports on the Status of
District Improvement Operating and Capital Funds,
General Fund Unassigned Balance and Debt Policy
Ratios, and Investments.
6. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
There were no speakers on unscheduled matters at this
time.
7. Closed Session
A. Closed Session 1) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(5), Code
of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss or Consider
Prospective Businesses or Industries or the Expansion
of Existing Businesses or Industries Where no
Previous Announcement Has Been Made of the
Businesses’ or Industries’ Interest in Locating or
Expanding Their Facilities in the Community and 2)
Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(3), Code of Virginia, 1950,
as Amended, to Discuss the Acquisition by the County
of Real Estate for a Public Purpose, or the
Disposition of Publicly Held Real Property, Where
Discussion in an Open Meeting Would Adversely Affect
the Bargaining Position and Negotiating Strategy of
the Public Body
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board went into Closed Session 1) Pursuant to §
2.2-3711(A)(5), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended,
to Discuss or Consider Prospective Businesses or
Industries or the Expansion of Existing Businesses or
Industries Where no Previous Announcement Has Been
Made of the Businesses’ or Industries’ Interest in
Locating or Expanding Their Facilities in the
12/17/2025 Page 4 of 131
Community and 2) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(3), Code
of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss the
Acquisition by the County of Real Estate for a Public
Purpose, or the Disposition of Publicly Held Real
Property, Where Discussion in an Open Meeting Would
Adversely Affect the Bargaining Position and
Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Reconvening:
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day
adjourned into Closed Session in accordance with a
formal vote of the Board and in accordance with the
provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information
Act; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act
effective July 1, 1989 provides for certification
that such Closed Session was conducted in conformity
with law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Board of
Supervisors does hereby certify that to the best of
each member’s knowledge, i) only public business
matters lawfully exempted from open meeting
requirements under the Freedom of Information Act
were discussed in Closed Session to which this
certification applies, and ii) only such business
matters were identified in the motion by which the
Closed Session was convened were heard, discussed or
considered by the Board. No member dissents from this
certification.
Ms. Schneider: Aye.
Dr. Hylton: Aye.
Mr. Carroll: Aye.
Dr. Miller: Aye.
Mr. Ingle: Aye.
8. Recess for Dinner
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board recessed for dinner in Room 502.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
6 p.m. Evening Session - Public Meeting Room, 10001 Iron Bridge Road
Reconvening:
9. Invocation by the Honorable Mark S. Miller, Midlothian District Supervisor
The Honorable Mark S. Miller, Midlothian District
Supervisor, gave the invocation.
12/17/2025 Page 5 of 131
10. Pledge of Allegiance Led by Eagle Scout Harrison Quimby, Midlothian District
Eagle Scout Harrison Quimby led the Pledge of
Allegiance.
11. County Administration Update
A. James M. "Jim" Holland Recognition
Mrs. Judith Holland was present to receive several
posthumous recognitions bestowed upon Mr. Holland.
Also present in the audience was Mr. Holland's
daughter, Jessica Tamba.
Delegate Debra Gardner presented a state memorial
resolution which was introduced during the General
Assembly's special session and approved the very same
day.
Dean Lynch, Executive Director of Virginia
Association of Counties (VACo), presented a
resolution honoring Mr. Holland's service and
contributions.
Laura Hite, representing the Chesterfield Education
Foundation, shared details about the scholarship
created in memory of Mr. Holland, explained how
members of the public can contribute, and how
interested students may apply.
Eldon Burton provided details of Virginia State
University's award of a posthumous honorary degree to
Mr. Holland this past weekend during their
commencement.
Lastly, Mrs. Holland was presented with a framed
county flag; a framed Richmond Times-Dispatch article
marking Mr. Holland's passing and highlighting his
lifelong commitment to public service; and a framed
print including photos from all PlanRVA and Crater
Planning District Commission localities, plus a few
other community partners, that lowered their
respective flags on the day of Mr. Holland's
interment as a powerful symbol of solidarity and
respect.
Board members provided additional remarks honoring
Mr. Holland.
Mrs. Holland expressed appreciation for the
recognitions. She stated that it is her continued
prayer that Mr. Holland's legacy will continue to
inspire each of the supervisors to pursue unity,
strive for excellence, and serve the people with an
open heart.
B. Other County Administration Updates
Other County Administration Updates included:
12/17/2025 Page 6 of 131
• A report provided by CCHASM CEO Shelly Marin on
the activities and initiatives of the
organization, including the recent M.A. Weeks
Thanksgiving Meal Bag and Gift Card event;
• A Sports, Visitation, and Entertainment update
provided by Executive Director J.C. Poma; and
• An introduction of new Public Libraries Director
Carolyn Jensen.
12. Board Member Reports
Board members announced and provided details of
several community meetings and county-related events
they attended recently.
13. Resolutions and Special Recognitions
A. Resolution Recognizing Boy Scout Upon Attaining Rank
of Eagle Scout
Director of Constituent and Media Services Dave Goode
introduced Eagle Scout Harrison Quimby, who was
present with members of his family to receive the
resolution.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated
by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was
chartered by Congress in 1916; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to
build character, provide citizenship training and
promote physical fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least 21 merit badges in a
wide variety of skills including leadership, service
and outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in
a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to
their community, being active in the troop,
demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the
Scout Oath and Law, Mr. Harrison Quimby, of Troop
800, sponsored by Bethel Baptist Church, has
accomplished those high standards of commitment and
has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout,
which is received by only four percent of those
individuals entering the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader
in society, Harrison has distinguished himself as a
member of a new generation of prepared young citizens
of whom we can all be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of
December 2025, publicly recognizes Mr. Harrison
12/17/2025 Page 7 of 131
Quimby, extends congratulations on his attainment of
Eagle Scout, and acknowledges the good fortune of the
county to have such an outstanding young man as its
citizen.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Dr. Miller congratulated Mr. Quimby on his
achievement of the Eagle Scout rank.
Mr. Quimby shared details about his Eagle Scout
project, which was building a set of benches with
storage for the playground of his sponsoring
organization, Bethel Baptist Church.
B. Resolution Recognizing Mr. Scott Hall, Utilities
Department, Upon His Retirement
Mr. Scott Hall, accompanied by his wife, was present
to receive the resolution.
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Scott Hall will retire from Chesterfield
County on January 1, 2026, as the Chief Plant
Operator at Proctors Creek Wastewater Treatment
Plant, after providing 43 years of dedicated service
to the residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Hall began his service to the citizens
of Chesterfield County in 1982 as a Plant Operator
Trainee; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Hall demonstrated tremendous work ethic,
high standards and exceptional dedication throughout
his career; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Hall’s extensive knowledge and
experience have made him an indispensable resource
and a valued mentor to staff and colleagues across
the department; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Hall motivated his staff to strive for
excellence, while promoting an environment of
continuous improvement and operator safety; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Hall exhibited tremendous skill in plant
operations and maintenance, and provided enthusiastic
input in planning and implementing capital
improvement projects; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Hall was recognized for earning numerous
awards for Chesterfield County’s wastewater treatment
plants, including the 2024 National Association of
Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) Peak Performance
Platinum Award for excellent treatment with no
violations in the preceding five years; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Hall will be sorely missed by an
appreciative department, which wishes him the best as
he enjoys a well-deserved retirement marked by more
12/17/2025 Page 8 of 131
time spent with family and traveling.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of
December 2025, publicly recognizes Mr. Scott Hall and
extends on behalf of its members and the residents of
Chesterfield County, appreciation for 43 years of
exceptional service to the county.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mr. Hall, and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers
of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Mr. Ingle expressed appreciation for Mr. Hall's
dedicated service.
Assistant Director of Utilities Matt Rembold
expressed gratitude for Mr. Hall's service and
commitment.
Dr. Casey presented Mr. Hall with a replica of the
brick that will be placed in the historic courthouse
walkway in his honor.
Mr. Hall expressed appreciation for the recognition.
C. Resolution Recognizing Mr. Mitchell W. Reed,
Utilities Department, Upon His Retirement
Mr. Mitchell Reed, accompanied by members of
his family, was present to receive the resolution.
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Mitchell W. Reed will retire from
Chesterfield County on January 1, 2026, as the
Wastewater Operations Manager for the Utilities
Department, after providing 42 years of dedicated
service to the residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Reed began his service to the citizens
of Chesterfield County in 1983 as an Equipment
Operator before being promoted to Crew Chief, then
Supervisor, and ultimately Wastewater Operations
Manager in the wastewater collection section; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Reed committed his team towards
continuous improvement by always seeking efficiencies
in all aspects of work; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Reed started numerous programs in the
wastewater collections section, including the
county’s air-release valve maintenance program and
monthly spot checking and cleaning program; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Reed was commended for his efforts in
establishing the Environmental Management System
12/17/2025 Page 9 of 131
(EMS) that remains in use; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Reed established the County’s Capacity,
Management, Operation, and Maintenance (CMOM)
framework that prevents overflows and protects public
health and the environment; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Reed was instrumental in establishing
construction standards that support a high quality of
life through reliable wastewater service as a
dedicated member of the Utilities Department Product
Development Review Committee (PDRC) for over 19
years; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Reed faithfully worked through all
manner of crisis, rendering aid and expertise to
countless departments over his remarkable career.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of
December 2025, publicly recognizes Mr. Mitchell W.
Reed and extends on behalf of its members and the
residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for 42
years of exceptional service to the county.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mr. Reed, and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers
of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Mr. Ingle expressed appreciation for Mr. Reed's
dedicated service.
Assistant Director of Utilities Matt Rembold
expressed gratitude for Mr. Reed's service and
commitment.
Dr. Casey presented Mr. Reed with a replica of the
brick that will be placed in the historic courthouse
walkway in his honor.
Mr. Reed expressed appreciation for the recognition.
14. New Business
A. Approval of the Second Amendment to the Precision
Plastic Manufacturing Program Infrastructure
Improvements Agreement with LEGO and VEDP
Director of Economic Development Garrett Hart
introduced the item.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board approved the Second Amendment to the Precision
Plastic Manufacturing Program Infrastructure
Improvements Agreement with LEGO and the Virginia
Economic Development Partnership (VEDP).
12/17/2025 Page 10 of 131
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
B. Appointments
1. Chesterfield Community Services Board
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board nominated/appointed Tisha Buelto and Brad
Combs and nominated/reappointed Dr. Mary Beth Leon,
Pamela Steele, and Janet Stephens to serve as at-
large members on the Chesterfield Community Services
Board for a term effective January 1, 2026, and
expiring December 31, 2028.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
2. Committee on the Future
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board nominated/appointed Gabriella Waters to
serve as a Dale district representative on the
Committee on the Future for a term effective
immediately and at the pleasure of the Board.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
3. Crater Planning District Commission
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board nominated/appointed Simeon Harris to serve as
an at-large representative on the Crater Planning
District Commission for a term effective December 18,
2025, and expiring December 31, 2027.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
4. Sports Backers Board of Directors
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board nominated/reappointed Supervisor Mark
Miller to serve on the Sports Backers Board of
Directors for a term effective January 1, 2026, and
expiring December 31, 2028.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
5. Tri-Cities Metropolitan Planning Organization
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board nominated/reappointed Supervisor Kevin Carroll
to serve as the Board member representative and
Transportation Department staff member Hongmyung Lim
to serve as the non-voting staff alternate on the
Tri-Cities Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
for a term effective January 1, 2026, and expiring
December 31, 2026.
12/17/2025 Page 11 of 131
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
C. Consent Items (14.C.1. - 14.C.10.)
Mr. Ingle stated the Board was going to remove item
14.C.7, Approval of Appropriation of Funds for and
Purchase of a Parcel of Land at 1101 Otterdale Road,
from the Consent Agenda for Board discussion.
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved the Consent Agenda, as amended.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
1. Adoption of Resolutions
a. Resolution Recognizing Ms. Phyllis D.
Jones, Mental Health Support Services, Upon
Her Retirement
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Ms. Phyllis D. Jones retired from
Chesterfield County Mental Health Support Services on
November 1, 2025, after providing over 30 years of
service; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Jones was hired as a part-time Relief
Counselor on June 6, 1994 and promoted to full-time
Residential Counselor on September 15, 1995; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Jones was promoted to Residential
Supervisor at Best Choice Day Support on March 4,
2000, transferred to Winchester Green Day Program on
November 20, 2024 and then transferred to Residential
Services on May 10, 2025 where she completed her
tenure; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Jones was a certified CPR instructor and
trained numerous staff as well as ensured part-time
staff completed medication certifications; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Jones worked diligently to ensure State
DBHDS Licensure and Medicaid requirements were met;
and
WHEREAS, Ms. Jones participated in DBHDS Waiver
Management System (WaMS) training and used this
knowledge to train staff; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Jones was an active member of several
committees and project teams including the Outcome
Based Survey Committee, Waiver Redesign, Residential
Staff Morale Committee and the MHSS Leadership
Philosophy team; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Jones played a crucial role in the
implementation of a new agency electronic health
record including providing program needs and design
12/17/2025 Page 12 of 131
input, participating in demonstrations, and providing
training to staff; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Jones tirelessly supported individuals
and their families ensuring completion of outcome
surveys used to develop services, assisted with the
production of the “Tid Bits” newsletter and
participated in family meetings and service planning
during the closure of Best Choice; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Jones dedicated her career to providing
life changing services to individuals and their
families as well as supporting and training staff and
will be greatly missed by all.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the
outstanding contributions of Ms. Phyllis D. Jones and
extends appreciation, on behalf of its members and
the employees and citizens of Chesterfield County,
for over 30 years of dedicated service,
congratulations upon her retirement, and best wishes
on her next season of life.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
b. Resolution Recognizing Mr. Norman J.
Campbell, Planning Department, Upon His
Retirement
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Norman J. Campbell retired from the
Chesterfield County Planning Department on July 31,
2025 after providing more than 30 years of quality
planning and customer service for the citizens of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, over his years of service, Mr. Campbell
faithfully served the county as an intern, Planner,
Senior Planner, Principal Planner, and ultimately
Planning Administrator in the Planning Department;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Campbell served as a key member of the
Planning Department’s Customer Assistance Team,
having dutifully served under multiple managers
throughout his time in Chesterfield before taking
over the management of the team and successfully
leading his staff in meeting the customer service
needs of the citizens of the county; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Campbell effectively utilized his
extensive knowledge of the County’s Zoning Ordinance,
Subdivision Ordinance, Comprehensive Plan, and
planning processes to contribute to the development
of a wide range of planning projects; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Campbell served as a leader within the
Planning Department where he worked to integrate
services of the Customer Assistance team with those
12/17/2025 Page 13 of 131
within the department, in particular the Zoning and
Plans Review teams while focusing on continuous
process improvements, prioritizing responsiveness to
citizens, and timeliness for completing written
determinations; and
WHEREAS, during a wonderful career that spans
multiple decades, Mr. Campbell was able to pass along
his wealth of knowledge of the Chesterfield Planning
Department and zoning, such that generations of staff
to come will have the ability to provide thorough,
accurate, and essential customer service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County, the Planning
Department, and the Board of Supervisors will miss
Mr. Campbell’s diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Norman J.
Campbell and extends on behalf of its members and the
residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for
his service to the county, congratulations upon his
retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
c. Resolution Recognizing Corporal Allen D.
Poston, Police Department, Upon His
Retirement
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Corporal Allen D. Poston will retire from
the Chesterfield County Police Department on January
1, 2026, after providing over 29 years of quality
service to the residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Poston began his law-enforcement
career as a recruit in 1996 and continued to
faithfully serve as a Police Officer, Senior Police
Officer, Master Police Officer, Career Police Officer
and Corporal; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Poston also served during his
tenure for 18 years as a School Resource Officer, and
he further served as a Field Training Officer, Desk
Officer, Driving Instructor, Marine Patrol Officer
and Patrol Rifle Operator; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Poston received a Unit Citation in
the School Resource Officer unit for professionalism,
teamwork and dedication exhibited while maintaining a
high volume and quality of work and receiving
accolades from school employees at all levels
including the Superintendent; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Poston was presented with another
Unit Citation as part of the School Resource Unit
during a time of limited staff and funding for
keeping schools safe, mitigating potential risks,
12/17/2025 Page 14 of 131
holding perpetrators accountable and adding value to
the lives of the children; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Poston was recognized a Unit
Citation as a member of the Training Department for
succeeding as a team during the COVID pandemic to
complete all mandatory training for recruits and
current officers as scheduled utilizing innovative
approaches while ensuring that all CDC infection
protection protocols were followed; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Poston received widespread
recognition for his contributions to the STEPP
program which supports rising sixth graders
transitioning from elementary to middle school; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Poston was a mentor to newer
officers and to students during his 18 years as a
School Resource Officer and forged strong
relationships with both the students and the faculty
of the schools where he served; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Poston is recognized for his
impressive teamwork, his strong work ethic and his
communication and human relations skills; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Poston has provided the
Chesterfield County Police Department with many years
of loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Corporal Poston's diligent
service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Corporal Allen
D. Poston and extends on behalf of its members and
the residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation
for his service to the county, congratulations upon
his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
d. Resolution Recognizing Corporal John E.
Rocklein, Police Department, Upon His
Retirement
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Corporal John E. Rocklein will retire from
the Chesterfield County Police Department on January
1, 2026, after providing over 22 years of quality
service to the residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Rocklein began his law-enforcement
career serving nine years with the NYPD where he was
a first responder in Manhattan to the terrorist
attack on 9/11/2001 and joined Chesterfield County as
a Pre-Certified Police Officer in 2003 and continued
to faithfully serve as an Officer First Class, Senior
12/17/2025 Page 15 of 131
Police Officer, Master Police Officer, Career Police
Officer and Corporal; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Rocklein also served during his
tenure as a Campus Resource Officer, School Resource
Officer, Field Training Officer, Patrol Rifle
Operator, Peer Counselor and was a member of the
Special Response Unit; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Rocklein earned a Life-Saving Award
for entering a residence garage with a running
vehicle, finding a semi-conscious female lying next
to the car and immediately removing her to an outside
area and summoning rescue support; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Rocklein received a Unit Citation
as a School Resource Officer team member for
prioritizing safety and security in all county
schools, assessing over 300 school threats,
intervening in over 350 altercations, exposing 200
drug offenses and resolving incidents involving over
70 weapons; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Rocklein was recognized with a
Chief’s Commendation for the diligence and successful
teamwork in the exhaustive investigation resulting in
the identification of suspects who were driving a
stolen van that crashed into the entrance of L. C.
Bird High School causing $300,000 in damage; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Rocklein earned an Achievement
Award for his actions resulting in the capture of two
suspects responsible for breaking and entering into a
neighborhood garage; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Rocklein as a senior officer
consistently took on the responsibility to support
and mentor newer officers; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Rocklein is recognized for his
impressive teamwork, his strong work ethic and his
communication skills; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Rocklein has provided the
Chesterfield County Police Department with many years
of loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Corporal Rocklein's diligent
service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Corporal John
E. Rocklein and extends on behalf of its members and
the residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation
for his service to the county, congratulations upon
his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
12/17/2025 Page 16 of 131
e. Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Julie Jeffers,
Utilities Department, Upon Her Retirement
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mrs. Julie Jeffers retired from the
Chesterfield County Utilities Department on December
31, 2025, after faithfully serving the county and its
citizens for 17 years; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Jeffers began her service to the
citizens of Chesterfield County on December 8, 2008,
as a Principal Account Clerk in the billing and
customer service section of the Utilities Department;
and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Jeffers was promoted to Senior Customer
Service Representative on August 29, 2015; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Jeffers is appreciated for maintaining
meticulous records and documenting changes throughout
billing and customer service; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Jeffers is commended for her teamwork
and devotion to ensuring accurate billing for
Chesterfield County industrial accounts; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Jeffers is commended for her
contributions to streamlining workflow for billing
processes utilizing BEACON reports; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Jeffers is appreciated for her
contributions towards documenting portable meter
processes; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Jeffers received numerous service
awards for her dedication to Chesterfield Utilities
billing and customer service, demonstrated through
excellent customer service, assisting with training,
and working over long holiday weekends to ensure
billing was completed on time with no errors.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the
outstanding contributions of Mrs. Julie Jeffers, and
extends appreciation, on behalf of its members and
the employees and citizens of Chesterfield County,
for 17 years of dedicated service to the county,
congratulations upon her retirement, and best wishes
in her next season of life.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
f. Resolution Recognizing Firefighter Nathan
K. VerLander, Fire and Emergency Medical
Services Department, Upon His Retirement
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Firefighter Nathan K. VerLander retired from
the Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services
12/17/2025 Page 17 of 131
Department on December 1, 2025; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter VerLander completed Recruit
School #32 in 2002 and faithfully served the
residents of Chesterfield County for 23 years in
various assignments as a Firefighter at the
Centralia, Airport, Dale, Courthouse Road, Chester,
Ettrick, Matoaca, and Clover Hill, Fire and EMS
Stations; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter VerLander served as a member of
the Chesterfield Fire and EMS SCUBA Rescue Team from
September 2020 to December 2025; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter VerLander obtained his Advanced
Life Support (ALS) certification in 2006; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter VerLander was awarded an EMS
Unit Citation Award for his involvement in the
successful outcome of a patient who was having an
asthma attack on April 7, 2005; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter VerLander was awarded an EMS
Unit Citation Award for his involvement in the
successful outcome of an unconscious patient on April
26, 2005; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter VerLander was awarded an EMS
Unit Citation Award for his involvement in the
Millhorn Street Structure Fire on April 26, 2005; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter VerLander was awarded an EMS
Lifesave Award for his involvement in the successful
outcome of a burn patient who was rescued from a
structure fire at the Meadowdale Apartments on
September 21, 2007; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter VerLander was awarded an EMS
Unit Citation Award, and an EMS Lifesave Award for
his involvement in the successful outcome of a
patient suffering cardiac arrest on November 9, 2007;
and
WHEREAS, Firefighter VerLander was awarded a Unit
Citation Award, and a Lifesave Award for his
involvement in the successful outcome of a patient
suffering cardiac arrest on May 26, 2019; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter VerLander was awarded a Unit
Lifesave Award for his involvement in the successful
outcome of a patient who was choking and became
unresponsive on June 19, 2021; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter VerLander was awarded a Unit
Lifesave Award for his involvement in the successful
outcome of a patient suffering cardiac distress and
who then suffered cardiac arrest in the ambulance
while enroute to the hospital on August 20, 2021.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the valuable
contributions of Firefighter Nathan K. VerLander, and
12/17/2025 Page 18 of 131
expresses the appreciation of all residents for his
service and dedication to the County, and
congratulations upon his retirement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
g. Resolution Recognizing Lieutenant Colonel
David M. Shand, Police Department, Upon His
Retirement
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Colonel David M. Shand will
retire from the Chesterfield County Police Department
on January 1, 2026, after providing over 28 years of
quality service to the residents of Chesterfield
County; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Colonel Shand began his career
with the Chesterfield Police Department as a Police
Recruit and faithfully served the county as a Police
Officer, Senior Police Officer, Master Police
Officer, Sergeant, Lieutenant, Captain, Major, and
Lieutenant Colonel; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Colonel Shand also served during
his tenure as a Field Training Officer, Evidence
Technician, and a Hostage Negotiator; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Colonel Shand earned two
Meritorious Service Awards for his service on the
Police Emergency Response Team, leading the Special
Weapons and Tactics Team and hostage negotiation
operations, overseeing critical incidents including
armed barricades and high risk apprehensions; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Colonel Shand was presented with
three Chief’s Commendation Awards for his efforts in
evaluating and implementing the body worn camera
program which enhanced transparency and officer
safety and later for his role in the department’s
successful organizational restructure; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Colonel Shand earned an
Achievement Award for his efforts in the
implementation of a 12-hour shift and aligning
policies and procedures with the schedule; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Colonel Shand earned two Unit
Citations as a member of the Police Emergency
Response Team for completing a national level
training program and as a member of the Special
Enforcement Team for outstanding performance,
resulting in 4,071 arrests in one year; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Colonel Shand is recognized for
his leadership in fostering accountability,
professional growth, and collaboration within the
department, and his calm and his approachable
demeanor; and
12/17/2025 Page 19 of 131
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Colonel Shand has provided the
Chesterfield County Police Department with many years
of loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Lieutenant Colonel
Shand’s diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Lieutenant
Colonel David M. Shand and extends on behalf of its
members and the residents of Chesterfield County,
appreciation for his service to the county,
congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes
for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
h. Resolution Recognizing Lieutenant James E.
Henderson, Police Department, Upon His
Retirement
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Lieutenant James E. Henderson will retire
from the Chesterfield County Police Department on
January 1, 2026, after providing 36 years of
outstanding quality service to the residents of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Henderson began his law
enforcement career as a Recruit and continued his
faithful service as a Police Officer, Senior Police
Officer, Master Police Officer, Sergeant and
Lieutenant; and
WHEREAS, during his tenure, Lieutenant Henderson also
served as a Field Training Officer, Evidence
Technician, and Marine Patrol Officer; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Henderson was recognized with a
Unit Citation for the proactive efforts to reduce DUI
related accidents, decrease commercial burglaries and
reduce juvenile crime through more public awareness,
and increased crime prevention training and tactical
planning; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Henderson earned a Unit Citation
as part of the Crime Prevention Unit for his efforts
planning and coordinating National Night Out, an
annual event which is focused on uniting local
communities and law enforcement; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Henderson received special
recognition for his key role in the implementation of
an electronic summons system for which he recommended
the company to provide the service, and worked with
the vendor and county technology divisions to
successfully implement the technology, resulting in
improved efficiency for issuing tickets; and
12/17/2025 Page 20 of 131
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Henderson is recognized for his
strong work ethic, teamwork, and his excellent
communication and human relations skills, all of
which he has utilized within the Police Department
and in assisting residents of Chesterfield County
during his career; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Henderson has received numerous
letters of commendation, thanks and appreciation from
residents for services rendered; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Henderson has provided the
Chesterfield County Police Department with many years
of loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Lieutenant Henderson's diligent
service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Lieutenant
James E. Henderson and extends on behalf of its
members and the citizens of Chesterfield County,
appreciation for his service to the county,
congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes
for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
i. Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Kima Cepeda-
Jirinec, Treasurer's Office, Upon Her
Retirement
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mrs. Kima Cepeda-Jirinec will retire from
Chesterfield County on December 31, 2025, after
providing over 23 years of outstanding service to the
citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Cepeda-Jirinec began as a Part-Time
Customer Service Representative in the Treasurer’s
Office, then through her diligence and persevering
became a Customer Service Supervisor; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Cepeda-Jirinec saw many changes during
her career including working for three different
Treasurer’s, changing from many manual processes to
current automated options, doing away with the
issuance of county decals, the addition of the drive-
up drop box, and new payment options and locations,
adapting to these changes knowing they provided
better service to our citizens; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Cepeda-Jirinec nurtured relationships
with co-workers during her tenure in our office,
promoted teamwork within the department and made a
lasting impression on all she has touched, providing
leadership and mentoring to those she supervised,
always coaching staff and imparting the vast
knowledge of County processes and state code; and
12/17/2025 Page 21 of 131
WHEREAS, Mrs. Cepeda-Jirinec provided a high level of
customer service, developing relationships, showing
continued care and empathy, often going out of her
way to meet a need and consistently exceeding
customer expectations throughout her career where she
on many occasions received compliments from citizens
for going above and beyond to meet their needs; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Cepeda-Jirinec has continuously
demonstrated a positive attitude, fantastic work
ethic, honesty, integrity, thoughtfulness, and a
calmness that will be missed by her co-workers and
our citizens; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Cepeda-Jirinec has demonstrated her
loyalty to Chesterfield County through her dedication
and conscientiousness; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Mrs. Cepeda-Jirinec diligent
service, calm demeanor and unwavering commitment to
customer service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mrs. Kima
Cepeda-Jirinec and extends on behalf of its members
and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation
for her service to the county, congratulations upon
her retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
j. Resolution Authorizing the County to Amend
an Existing Master Lease/Purchase Financing
Program for the Acquisition and
Installation of Vehicles and Other
Equipment for Various Governmental Purposes
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY TO AMEND AN
EXISTING MASTER LEASE/PURCHASE FINANCING PROGRAM TO
PROVIDE FOR UP TO $50,000,000 IN ADDITIONAL PROCEEDS
TO FINANCE THE COSTS OF A MULTI-YEAR PLAN TO ACQUIRE
OR INSTALL VEHICLES AND OTHER EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS
GOVERNMENTAL PURPOSES
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the “Board”) of
Chesterfield County, Virginia (the “County”), desires
to undertake a multi-year plan to acquire or install
vehicles and other equipment for various governmental
purposes (collectively, the “Equipment”) for the
benefit of the County and its residents and to
finance the related costs;
WHEREAS, the County’s administration, in
collaboration with Davenport & Company LLC, the
County’s financial advisor (the “Financial Advisor”),
has solicited proposals from commercial banks and
12/17/2025 Page 22 of 131
leasing entities to enter into a master
lease/purchase financing program with the County for
the acquisition of the Equipment and received eight
bids;
WHEREAS, the County’s administration, in
collaboration with the Financial Advisor, has
reviewed the bids and recommends that the Board
accept the bid of Banc of America Public Capital Corp
(“BAPCC”) as offering the most favorable terms to the
County; and
WHEREAS, the County and BAPCC have already entered
into a Master Equipment Lease/Purchase Agreement
dated as of September 24, 2015 (the “Original Master
Lease”), and desire now to amend the provisions of
the Original Master Lease to provide for up
$50,000,000 in additional proceeds to finance costs
associated with acquiring or installing the
Equipment;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board hereby determines that it is in the
best interests of the County and its residents to
finance the costs associated with acquiring or
installing the Equipment through a master
lease/purchase financing program. Based on the
recommendation presented to the Board from County
administration and the Financial Advisor, the Board
hereby authorizes the County Administrator (such term
as used in this Resolution shall include the County
Administrator and the Deputy County Administrator for
Finance and Administration) to negotiate amendments
to the provisions of the Original Master Lease,
subject to the parameters set forth in Section 3
below.
2. The County Administrator is authorized to
execute an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the
Original Master Lease (as amended, the “Amended
Master Lease”) and to execute from time to time one
or more financing schedules thereunder (each a
“Schedule”), the final forms of which shall be
negotiated and approved by the County
Administrator in consultation with the County
Attorney, the Financial Advisor and the County’s bond
counsel. The execution by the County Administrator
of the Amendment and related Schedules under the
Amended Master Lease and the delivery thereof to
BAPCC, in its capacity as lessor under the Amended
Master Lease (the “Lessor”), shall constitute
conclusive evidence of such officer’s approval of the
final forms thereof. County officers are further
authorized and directed to execute and deliver all
certificates and instruments, including one or more
escrow account and control agreements, and to take
all actions necessary or desirable in connection with
the execution and delivery of the Amendment and
related Schedules.
12/17/2025 Page 23 of 131
3. The County Administrator is authorized to
negotiate with the Lessor the provisions of the
Amendment and all related Schedules and to accept
such financing terms as the County Administrator
shall determine to be in the best interests of the
County; provided however, that (a) the aggregate
amount of principal components of basic rent payable
under the Amended Master Lease and all related
Schedules shall not exceed $50,000,000; (b) the final
payment of basic rent under any Schedule shall be
made no later than December 31, 2050; and (c) the
interest components of basic rent payable under the
Amended Master Lease and related Schedules shall
reflect an interest rate not to exceed 6.00% per year
(exclusive of any interest penalties and subject to
adjustment as set forth in the Amended Master Lease
and related Schedules). The County Administrator is
further authorized to determine the payment dates and
installment amounts of basic rent (comprising both
principal and interest components) due under each
Schedule and the provisions relating to any
prepayment of such basic rent. No further action
shall be required of the Board in connection with the
Amended Master Lease or related Schedules.
4. The County is authorized to grant a security
interest in any or all of the Equipment acquired with
the proceeds derived from the Amended Master Lease
and related Schedules as security for the prompt
payment when due of amounts payable and the
performance by the County of its other obligations
under the Amended Master Lease.
5. The Board hereby determines that the
acquisition and continuing use of the Equipment and
the financing of the same through the Amended Master
Lease are necessary and proper to the efficient
operation of the County.
6. The undertakings by the County to make payments
under the Amended Master Lease and related Schedules
shall be payable solely from funds to be appropriated
by the Board from time to time for such purpose and
shall not constitute a debt of the County within the
meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation
or a pledge of the faith and credit of the County
beyond any fiscal year for which the Board has
lawfully appropriated sufficient funds for such
purpose from time to time. Nothing in this
Resolution or in the Amended Master Lease or any
related Schedules shall be deemed to constitute a
debt of the County within the meaning of any
constitutional or statutory limitation or a pledge of
the faith and credit or taxing power of the County.
7. The Board believes that funds sufficient to
make payment of all amounts due and by the County
payable under the Amended Master Lease and related
Schedules can be obtained. While recognizing that it
is not empowered to make any binding commitment to
make such payments beyond the current fiscal year,
the Board states its intent to make annual
12/17/2025 Page 24 of 131
appropriations for future fiscal years in amounts
sufficient to make all such payments and recommends
that future boards of supervisors do likewise during
the full term of the Amended Master Lease. The Board
directs the County Administrator, or such other
officer as may be charged with the responsibility for
preparing the County’s annual budget, to include in
the budget for each fiscal year during the term of
the Amended Master Lease amounts sufficient to make
all payments due and payable by the County thereunder
during such fiscal year.
8. The County covenants that it will not take or
omit to take any action the taking or omission of
which will cause the Amended Master Lease and any
related Schedules to be considered an “arbitrage
bond” within the meaning of Section 148 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
“Code”), and regulations issued pursuant thereto, or
otherwise cause the interest components of basic rent
payable under the Amended Master Lease to be
includable in the gross income of the Lessor, and its
successors and assigns, under current law. Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, the County
shall comply with any provision of law that may
require the County at any time to rebate to the
United States any part of the earnings derived from
the investment of the gross proceeds derived from the
Amended Master Lease and any related Schedule, unless
the County receives an opinion of nationally
recognized bond counsel that such compliance is not
required to prevent the interest components of basic
rent from being includable in the gross income for
federal income tax purposes of the Lessor, and its
successors and assigns, under existing law.
9. Such officers of the County as may be requested
by the County’s bond counsel are authorized and
directed to execute from time to time appropriate
certificates setting forth (a) the expected use and
investment of the proceeds derived from the Amended
Master Lease and each related Schedule to show that
such expected use and investment will not violate the
provisions of Section 148 of the Code and (b) any
elections such officers deem desirable regarding
rebate of earnings to the United States for purposes
of complying with Section 148 of the Code. Such
certificates shall be prepared in consultation with
the County’s bond counsel, and such elections shall
be made after consultation with such bond counsel.
10. The County covenants that during the term of
the Amended Master Lease it shall not permit the
proceeds derived therefrom or the Equipment to be
used in any manner that would result in (a) 5% or
more of such proceeds or the Equipment being used in
a trade or business carried on by any person, as
provided in Section 141(b) of the Code, or (b) 5% or
more of such proceeds being used directly or
indirectly to make or finance loans to any persons
other than a governmental unit, as provided in
Section 141(c) of the Code; provided, however, that
12/17/2025 Page 25 of 131
if the County receives an opinion of a nationally
recognized bond counsel firm that any such covenants
need not be complied with to prevent the interest
components of basic rent payable under the Amended
Master Lease and any related Schedules from being
includable in the gross income for federal income tax
purposes of the Lessor under existing law, the County
need not comply with such covenants.
11. The County intends that the proceeds of the
Amended Master Lease and related Schedules may be
used to reimburse expenditures for the Equipment made
prior to the date hereof. As such, the County
intends that the adoption of this Resolution confirms
the “official intent” within the meaning of Treasury
Regulations Section 1.150-2 promulgated under the
Code.
12. All other actions of the County in conformity
with the purposes and intent of this Resolution and
in furtherance of entering into the Amended Master
Lease (including the Amendment and related Schedules)
are ratified, approved and confirmed.
13. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in
conflict herewith are repealed.
14. This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
k. Resolution Authorizing the General
Registrar and Director of Elections of
Chesterfield County to File an Application
with the State Board of Elections for a
Waiver to Administer Split Voting Precincts
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE GENERAL REGISTRAR AND
DIRECTOR OF ELECTIONS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY TO FILE
AN APPLICATION WITH THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS FOR
A WAIVER TO ADMINISTER SPLIT VOTING PRECINCTS
WHEREAS, Section 24.2-307 of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, requires each voting precinct in
the County of Chesterfield to be wholly contained
within a single congressional district, Senate
district, House of Delegates district, and
magisterial district;
WHEREAS, Section 24.2-307 of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, further provides that the Board of
Supervisors may request the State Board of Elections
to grant a waiver from the above-stated requirement
if a congressional, Senate, or House of Delegates
district splits a voting precinct and the Board is
unable to establish a precinct containing at least
100 registered voters that is wholly contained within
a single congressional district, Senate district,
House of Delegates district, and magisterial
12/17/2025 Page 26 of 131
district;
WHEREAS, the State’s redistricting of congressional
districts split the following existing voting
precincts in the County:
1) Genito Voting Precinct (402) – split by
Congressional Districts 1 and 4
2) Clover Hill Voting Precinct (412) – split by
Congressional Districts 1 and 4
WHEREAS, the portions of the Genito Voting Precinct
and Clover Hill Voting Precinct that are split by the
State’s congressional redistricting cannot be merged
into adjacent precincts without creating new splits
between election districts; and
WHEREAS, the number of registered voters in the
portions of the Genito Voting Precinct and Clover
Hill Voting Precinct that are split by the State’s
congressional redistricting is less than 100.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board does
hereby authorize the General Registrar and Director
of Elections of Chesterfield County to submit a
request for a waiver from the State Board of
Elections pursuant to Section 24.2-307 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, to administer the split
precincts listed above for all elections held in
2026.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
2. Real Property Requests
a. Acceptance of Parcels of Land
1. Acceptance of a Parcel of Land
Adjacent to Bellwood Road From Talley
Properties Bellwood Road, LLC
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land
containing 0.092 acres/4,015 square feet adjacent to
Bellwood Road from Talley Properties Bellwood Road,
LLC, and authorized the County Administrator to
execute the deed.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
b. Conveyance of Easements
1. Designation of a Temporary
Construction Easement Across Enon
Elementary School for the Rivermont
12/17/2025 Page 27 of 131
Road Sidewalk (Enon Church to Walnut)
Project
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board designated a temporary construction easement
for the Rivermont Road Sidewalk (Enon Church to
Walnut) Project.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
c. Requests to Quitclaim
1. Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a
Sewer Easement Across the Property
Owned by Stanley Martin Homes, LLC
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed to quitclaim a portion of a sewer
easement across the property owned by Stanley Martin
Homes, LLC.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
2. Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a
Water Easement Across the Property
Owned by Cosby Village, LLC
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed to quitclaim a portion of a water
easement across the property owned by Cosby Village,
LLC.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
3. Set Public Hearing for First Regularly Scheduled
Meeting in January 2026
a. To Consider Amendment to the Subdivision
Ordinance (Ch 17.1) relative to Submittal
of Plats
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board set the first regularly scheduled meeting in
January 2026 as the date to hold a public hearing to
consider a code amendment to the Subdivision
Ordinance (Ch. 17.1) relative to Submittal of Plats.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
b. To Consider Amending County Code § 7-3
(Precinct Boundaries and Polling Places) to
Relocate Polling Places for Southside
Voting Precinct (213), LaPrade Voting
12/17/2025 Page 28 of 131
Precinct (405), and Wagstaff Voting
Precinct (410).
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board set the first regularly-scheduled meeting in
January 2026 as the date to hold a public hearing to
consider an ordinance amending County Code § 7-3
(Precinct Boundaries and Polling Places) to relocate
the polling places for Southside Voting Precinct
(213), LaPrade Voting Precinct (405), and Wagstaff
Voting Precinct (410).
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
c. To Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain
for the Duval Road Reconstruction Project
Right-of-Way and Easement Acquisition
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board set the first regularly-scheduled meeting in
January 2026 as the date to hold a public hearing to
consider the exercise of eminent domain for the
acquisition of right-of-way and easements for the
Duval Road Reconstruction Project.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
4. Acceptance of FY2026 Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) Section 5310 Operating and
Mobility Management Funding
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board accepted and appropriated FY2026 Federal
Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5310 Operating
and Mobility Management Funding, in the amount of
$580,000, from the Virginia Department of Rail and
Public Transportation.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
5. Acceptance of State Roads
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the street described below is shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the street meets the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the street described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
12/17/2025 Page 29 of 131
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Roberts Forest Section 1 Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addition Reason for Change: New Street
Street Name and/or Route Number Belspring Road State Route Number 1650
From: 0.06 miles east of Gladehill Road, (Route
1652)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.24 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 305, Page 24
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on the
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Luxe 360 on Centerpointe Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addition Reason for Change: New Street
Street Name and/or Route Number Radian Drive State Route Number: 8660
From: Market Center Drive, (Route 8496)
To: 0.04 miles northwest of Market Center Drive,
(Route 8496), a distance of 0.04 miles
12/17/2025 Page 30 of 131
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 276, Page 55
Right of Way width (feet) = 55
Radian Drive State Route Number: 8660
From: 0.04 miles northwest of Market Center Drive,
(Route 8496)
To: 0.06 miles northwest of Market Center Drive,
(Route 8496), a distance of 0.02 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 55
Right of Way width (feet) = 55
Radian Drive State Route Number: 8660
From: 0.06 miles northwest of Market Center Drive,
(Route 8496)
To: 0.08 miles northwest of Market Center Drive,
(Route 8496), a distance of 0.02 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 55
Right of Way width (feet) = 55
Radian Drive State Route Number: 8660
From: 0.08 miles northwest of Market Center Drive,
(Route 8496)
To: 0.10 miles northwest of Market Center Drive,
(Route 8496), a distance of 0.02 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 55
Right of Way width (feet) = 55
Radian Drive State Route Number: 8660
From: 0.10 miles north of Market Center Drive,
(Route 8496)
To: 0.12 miles north of Market Center Drive, (Route
8496), a distance of 0.02 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 55
Right of Way width (feet) = 55
Radian Drive State Route Number: 8660
From: 0.12 miles north of Market Center Drive,
(Route 8496)
To: 0.14 miles north of Market Center Drive, (Route
8496), a distance of 0.02 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 276, Page 55
Right of Way width (feet) = 55
Radian Drive State Route Number: 8660
From: 0.14 miles north of Market Center Drive,
(Route 8496)
To: 0.16 miles north of Market Center Drive,
(Route 8496), a distance of 0.02 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 276, Page 55
Right of Way width (feet) = 55
Radian Drive State Route Number: 8660
From: 0.16 miles north of Market Center Drive,
(Route 8496)
To: Charter Colony Parkway, (Route 950), a distance
of 0.02 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 276, Page 55
Right of Way width (feet) = 55
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
12/17/2025 Page 31 of 131
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on the
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Coalfield Reserve Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addition Reason for Change: New Street
Street Name and/or Route Number Walmart Way State Route Number: 961
From: 0.38 miles north of Midlothian Turnpike, (Route
60)
To: 0.41 miles north of Midlothian Turnpike, (Route
60), a distance of 0.03 miles
Recordation References: Deed Book 6055, Page 21; Deed
Book 6055, Page 36; Deed Book 6055, Page 41; Deed
Book 6011, Page 737; Deed Book 6011, Page 741; and
Deed Book 6092, Page 422.
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Walmart Way State Route Number: 961
From: 0.41 miles north of Midlothian Turnpike
(Route 60)
To: 0.47 miles north of Midlothian Turnpike, (Route
60), a distance of 0.06 miles
Recordation References: Deed Book 6055, Page 21;
Deed Book 6055, Page 36; Deed Book 6055, Page 41;
Deed Book 6011, Page 737; Deed Book 6011, Page 741
and Deed Book 6092, Page 422.
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Walmart Way State Route Number: 961
From: 0.47 miles north of Midlothian Turnpike,
(Route 60)
To: 0.52 miles north of Midlothian Turnpike, (Route
60), a distance of 0.03 miles
Recordation References: Deed Book 6055, Page 21; Deed
Book 6055, Page 36; Deed Book 6055, Page 41; Deed
Book 6011, Page 737; Deed Book 6011, Page 741 and
12/17/2025 Page 32 of 131
Deed Book 6092, Page 422.
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Walmart Way State Route Number: 961
From: 0.52 miles north of Midlothian Turnpike,
(Route 60)
To: 0.54 miles north of Midlothian Turnpike, (Route
60), a distance of 0.02 miles
Recordation References: Deed Book 6055, Page 21; Deed
Book 6055, Page 36; Deed Book 6055, Page 41; Deed
Book 6011, Page 737; Deed Book 6011, Page 741 and
Deed Book 6092, Page 422.
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Walmart Way State Route Number: 961
From: 0.54 miles north of Midlothian Turnpike,
(Route 60)
To: 0.59 miles north of Midlothian Turnpike, (Route
60), a distance of 0.05 miles
Recordation References: Deed Book 6055, Page 21; Deed
Book 6055, Page 36; Deed Book 6055, Page 41; Deed
Book 6011, Page 737, Deed Book 6011, Page 741 and
Deed Book 6092, Page 422.
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Walmart Way State Route Number: 961
From: 0.24 miles north of Midlothian Turnpike,
(Route 60)
To: 0.31 miles north of Midlothian Turnpike, (Route
60), a distance of 0.07 miles (west side)
Recordation References: Deed Book 6055, Page 21; Deed
Book 6055, Page 36; Deed Book 6055, Page 41; Deed
Book 6011, Page 737; Deed Book 6011, Page 741 and
Deed Book 6092, Page 422.
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Walmart Way State Route Number: 961
From: 0.31 miles north of Midlothian Turnpike,
(Route 60)
To: 0.38 miles north of Midlothian Turnpike (Route
60), a distance of 0.07 miles (west side)
Recordation References: Deed Book 6055, Page 21; Deed
Book 6055, Page 36; Deed Book 6055, Page 41; Deed
Book 6011, Page 737; Deed Book 6011, Page 741 and
Deed Book 6092, Page 422.
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
6. Approval of Amendment to 2025 Holiday Schedule
and Standard Holiday Schedule
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board approved an amendment to the 2025 holiday
schedule to include December 26, 2025, the Friday
after Christmas Day.
And, further, the Board approved an amendment to the
standard holiday schedule to address future Christmas
Day holidays that fall on Thursdays, by designating
the following Friday, respectively, as an additional
holiday.
12/17/2025 Page 33 of 131
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
7. Approval of Appropriation of Funds for and
Purchase of a Parcel of Land at 1101 Otterdale
Road
(It is noted the Board removed this item from the
Consent Agenda for Board discussion.)
8. Approval of Community Development Block Grant
Optional Relocation Assistance Policy
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board approved the Chesterfield County Optional
Relocation Assistance Policy, a copy of which is on
file with the papers of this Board.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
9. Approval of Reserve Designations of the FY2025
Results of Operations and To Consider Proposed
FY2026 Budget Amendments
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board approved Reserve Designations of the FY2025
Results of Operations and approved Proposed FY2026
Budget Amendments.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
10. Authorization and Resolution of Support for FRA
FSP-National Grant for Curtis Street and West
Street Rail Crossing Improvements
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board authorized staff to submit a grant request to
the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for Curtis
Street and West Street Rail Crossing Improvements
Project Development.
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution of support:
WHEREAS, the Federal-State Partnership for Intercity
Passenger Rail Program’s purpose is to improve
passenger rail assets, including enhancing safety
with grade crossing improvement projects; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation
has identified the Curtis Street crossing as the
second priority in the Commonwealth; and
WHEREAS, the Southeast High Speed Rail Tier II
Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Final
Decision calls for grade separating the crossing of
Curtis Street and closing the West Street crossing to
vehicular traffic, with a grade-separated crossing
for pedestrians and cyclists; and
WHEREAS, FSP-National grant funds are available for
12/17/2025 Page 34 of 131
project development of crossing improvement projects.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County requests FSP-
National project development funding for the Curtis
Street and West Street Rail Crossing Improvement
project.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby
agrees to pay 20% of the total estimated cost for
project development of the Curtis Street and West
Street Rail Crossing Improvements project.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
14.C.7. Approval of Appropriation of Funds for and Purchase of a Parcel of Land at 1101 Otterdale Road
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board deferred item 14.C.7., Approval of
Appropriation of Funds for and Purchase of a Parcel
of Land at 1101 Otterdale Road, to its regularly-
scheduled meeting in January 2026.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
15. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
Dean Francis addressed the Board relative to the
dangers of kratom use and urged the Board to contact
state legislators for either a complete ban or more
regulatory control.
Celina Thompson addressed the Board relative to
spending too much, growing government too fast, and
pushing the cost onto taxpayers.
James Brennan asked the Board to direct staff, as a
part of the FY2027 budget process, to limit general
fund spending and tax revenue to 2.8 percent.
Jerry Turner expressed concerns relative to the
installation of stoplights on the Powhite Parkway
extension. He also expressed concerns relative to the
Board approving zoning cases without sufficient
infrastructure to support the additional traffic.
Janice Caldwell expressed concerns relative to trees
that were clear-cut along Route 288 between
Powhite/Old Hundred and Hull Street and inquired if
fine money could be used for replanting.
16. Deferred Items from Previous Meetings
There were no deferred items from previous meetings.
17. Zoning Requests
A. 24SN1159 - Woods Edge Road Rezoning — Bermuda
12/17/2025 Page 35 of 131
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Woods Edge Road
Rezoning is a request to rezone from Agricultural (A)
to General Industrial (I-2) and amendment of zoning
district map on 63.41 acres located approximately
1,100 feet off the south side of Old Bermuda Hundred
Road, 275 west of Old Stage Road. The Comprehensive
Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Manufacturing & Processing uses as a master
planned/land aggregation area. Tax ID 803-646-1696.
If approved, effective January 1, 2026, the zoning
district is Employment General (EG).
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board approved Case 24SN1159, subject to the
following conditions:
Proffered Conditions
1. Conceptual Plan. A conceptual layout of the
Property, dated April 10, 2025, is attached hereto as
Exhibit A (Conceptual Plan), with respect to the
general layout and location of roads and buffers. The
Conceptual Plan is conceptual in nature and may vary
based on the final site plan depending on the final
soil studies, grading, RPA lines, building
footprints, other engineering reasons or as otherwise
approved at the time of plan review. (P)
2. Uses. All permitted and restricted uses in the
General Industrial (I-2) District shall be permitted
with the exception of a data center. (P)
3. Tree Retention Area. The applicant shall
maintain in a natural state the Tree Retention Area
adjacent to Interstate 95 as shown on the Conceptual
Plan. Only dead or diseased trees may be removed. At
the time of site plan approval utilities may be
placed within the tree retention area in a manner
approved by the Director of Planning. (P)
4. Tree Preservation within the RPA. Construction
and installation of utilities shall adhere to the
Zoning Ordinance, including, to the degree possible,
the location of such utilities and facilities should
be outside resource protection areas. In the event
encroachments into resource protection areas do
occur, as approved by the Department of Environmental
Engineering, the square footage of existing
vegetation that must be removed for the permanent
easement(s) shall be preserved in an area outside the
resource protection area adjacent to such
encroachment. (P and EE)
12/17/2025 Page 36 of 131
5. Security.
a. Owner/Operator shall, prior to any
certificate(s) of occupancy being issued on the
Property, coordinate emergency vehicle and building
access with The Chesterfield County Police
Department’s CPTED Planner, The Chesterfield County
Fire Department’s Deputy Fire Marshal (for site plan
review), and the Chesterfield County Emergency
Communications Center (ECC) Operations Manager.
b. Labeled PDF building floor plans shall
be provided to the Chesterfield County ECC Operations
Manager prior to the certificate(s) of occupancy
being issued. (Police and Fire)
6. Utilities.
a. Public water and wastewater shall be
used.
b. Prior to any tentative subdivision plan
or site plan approval, whichever occurs first, an
“Overall Water and Wastewater Plan” (the Plan) for
the Property shall be submitted to and approved by
the Utilities Department.
c. Utilities for this development, and
phasing thereof, shall conform to the approved Plan
or as otherwise approved by the Utilities
Department.
d. The Plan shall include the following
components: i. Any off-site water and/or wastewater
improvements (including new lines and associated
appurtenances and/or upgrades to existing lines and
facilities) as needed to provide the volume of water
delivery and/or wastewater conveyance required for
the development of the Property.
e. Following the approval of the Plan,
upon request of the County, both access to the
property and easements shall be provided. Easements
shall be provided at no cost on standard County
documents, in the location of improvements shown on
the Plan, for the construction of public water and/or
wastewater lines independent of the timing of this
development.
f. Extensions of water and wastewater
line(s) (size to be determine during Plan
development) with a 16’ permanent easement and with
terminal manholes and waterline stubs at the property
line shall be provided to the adjacent properties as
follows:
i. 2101 Old Bermuda Hundred Rd, GPIN
803-648-1499
ii. 2201 Old Bermuda Hundred Rd, GPIN
802-648-7047
g. The developer shall submit a wastewater
system hydraulic analysis to verify downstream
capacity to the Utilities Department for review and
approval. The analysis shall be submitted prior to or
in conjunction with the first site or construction
plan submittal. Any capacity related improvements
necessary to support the wastewater demands of this
development shall be the responsibility of the
developer and shall be reflected on the site or
construction plan. (U)
12/17/2025 Page 37 of 131
7. North/South Arterial Road Dedication.
a. Prior to any final site plan approval,
or within ninety (90) days from a written request by
the Transportation Department, whichever occurs
first, dedication of a seventy (70) foot wide right
of way for the proposed North/South Major Arterial
Road (the “North/South Road”) based on VDOT Urban
Minor Arterial Standards (45 MPH), with modifications
approved by the Transportation Department, free and
unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield
County, from the southern property line, through the
property to the northern property line. If requested
by the owner/developer and accepted by the
Transportation Department, the above right-of-way
dedication may be phased in accordance with an
approved phasing plan.
b. In the event the Chesterfield County
Thoroughfare Plan is modified to reduce or remove the
right-of-way dedication specified above, then the
right-of-way dedication shall be reduced or removed
accordingly, as determined by the Transportation
Department. (T)
8. Northern Property Line Buffer. A one hundred
(100) foot buffer shall be provided along the
northern property line, as depicted on the Conceptual
Plan. (P)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
B. 25SN1127 - Perrymont Road Business Park Rezoning -
Bermuda
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Perrymont Road
Business Park Rezoning is a request to rezone from
Residential (R-7) & Community Business (C-3) to
General Business (C-5) and conditional use planned
development to permit exceptions to ordinance
requirements and amendment of zoning district map on
6.17 acres known as 8610 Perrymont Road. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Office, Light Production & Assembly
uses. Tax IDs 791-672-5388 and 9074. If approved,
effective January 1, 2026, the zoning district is
Warehouse and Distribution (WD).
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Before opening the public hearing, Mr. Ingle stated
he would preside over the public hearing, but he
recused himself from discussion of and voting on the
matter. He then called for public comment.
Renae Eldred spoke in favor of the new development.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Hylton, the
Board approved Case 25SN1127, subject to the
12/17/2025 Page 38 of 131
following conditions:
Proffered Conditions
The Applicant in this case, 8610 Perrymont Road, LLC,
(the “Applicant’) pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of
the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning
Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for itself and its
successors or assigns, proffers that the use of the
property under consideration in this case (the
“Property”) will be according to the following
conditions if, and only if, the request submitted
herewith is granted with only those conditions agreed
to by the Applicant. In the event this request is
denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by
the Applicant, the proffer conditions shall
immediately be null and void and of no further force
or effect.
1. Master Plan. The Master Plan for the
Development of the Property shall consist of the
following:
a. The Textual Statement dated November 4,
2025.
b. The conceptual layout last revised
November 3, 2025, entitled, “8610 PERRYMONT ROAD
CONCEPT PLAN, BERMUDA DISTRICT, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY,
VIRGINIA” prepared by Highmark Engineering (referred
to herein as the “Concept Plan”), which Concept Plan
is attached hereto as EXHIBIT A. The Property shall
be designed and developed as generally depicted on
the Concept Plan noted above or another concept plan
that is approved by the Planning Director at the time
of site plan approval. Whichever concept plan
referenced above is selected by the Applicant shall
be referred to as the “Selected Concept Plan,” and
the exact location of the lots, buildings, parking,
public road accesses, shared accesses, common areas,
and other improvements may be modified provided that
the general intent of the Selected Concept Plan is
maintained, as approved by the Planning and
Transportation Departments. (P)
2. Dedication. Prior to final site plan approval
or within sixty (60) days of a written request by the
County, whichever occurs first, forty-five feet (45’)
of right of way along Perrymont Road, measured from
the centerline of the road, immediately adjacent to
the property shall be dedicated, free and
unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield
County. (T)
3. Connection to County Water/Sewer. The
Applicant shall connect the Property to County water
and sewer at time of construction. A 16’ permanent
water line and a 10’ temporary construction easement
for future extension of water line shall be provided
to the adjacent property GPIN 791-672-6563 at a
location acceptable to the Utilities
Department. Exact location and layout shall be
coordinated and determined during site plan review
and approval. (U)
12/17/2025 Page 39 of 131
4. Architectural/Design Elements. All
architectural/design elements below are considered
minimum standards for the development of the
Property.
a. Style and Form.
i. Buildings shall have an
architectural treatment and materials generally
consistent with those depicted in the conceptual
elevations submitted herewith as EXHIBIT B, but
variation from the conceptual elevations shall be
permitted as approved by the Planning Department at
time of site plan review. (P)
5. Uses Prohibited on the Property. The following
uses shall be prohibited on the Property:
a. Alcoholic beverage store;
b. Automobile rental;
c. Automobile repair specific to body,
major engine or transmission;
d. Automobile sales;
e. Automobile self service station;
f. Automobile self service station,
unmanned;
g. Automobile service station;
h. Automobile wash;
i. Automobile tow lot;
j. Automobile storage lot;
k. Crematorium;
l. Cocktail lounge;
m. Data center;
n. Daycare, adult or child;
o. Funeral home;
p. Group care facility;
q. Kennel, commercial or private;
r. Mini-storage facility;
s. Motor vehicle sales;
t. Motor vehicle self service station,
unmanned;
u. Motor vehicle storage lot;
v. Motor vehicle tow lot;
w. Moving company;
x. Nightclub;
y. Shed building sales;
z. Tire sales, service, or installation.
(P)
Ayes: Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
C. 25SN1147 - Duval Road Residential Cluster Rezoning -
Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Duval Road
Residential Cluster Rezoning is a request to rezone
from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12) with
conditional use to permit recreational neighborhood
facilities plus conditional use planned development
to permit exceptions to ordinance requirements, and
amendment of zoning district map on property known as
18301 Duval Road. The 54-acre property is proposed
for a maximum development of 108 dwelling units. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Residential Neighborhood 2 (2 units
12/17/2025 Page 40 of 131
per acre or less). Tax IDs 700-676-1841, 5173, 5229;
701-675-0876 and 701-676-1540. If approved, effective
January 1, 2026, the zoning district is Semi-Urban
Neighborhood (SU).
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
Jerry Turner spoke against the case, stating the
Board is building too many houses too fast and the
infrastructure of the county is not what it is
supposed to be.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
Mr. Carroll provided additional details about the
case. He then made a motion, seconded by Dr. Hylton,
for the Board to approve Case 25SN1147, subject to
the conditions in the staff report.
Discussion ensued relative to the case.
Mr. Ingle called for a vote on Mr. Carroll's motion,
seconded by Dr. Hylton, for the Board to approve Case
25SN1147, subject to the following conditions:
Proffered Conditions
The property owners and applicant in this rezoning
case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of
Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance
of Chesterfield County (the “Zoning Ordinance”), for
themselves and their successors or assigns, proffer
that the property under consideration (the
“Property”) will be developed according to the
following proffers if, and only if, the rezoning
request submitted herewith is granted with only those
conditions agreed to by the owners and applicant. In
the event this request is denied or approved with
conditions not agreed to by the owners and applicant,
the proffer shall immediately be null and void and of
no further force or effect.
These Proffered Conditions include three (3) exhibits
attached hereto:
Exhibit A: “Duval Road West – Preliminary Layout
Exhibit” prepared by Hewitt Solutions, dated October
22, 2025 (“Conceptual Plan”).
Exhibit B: Single Family Detached Elevations
Exhibit C: Conceptual Options for Strategic Common
Space next to BMP 1
1. Master Plan. The Textual Statement dated
October 22, 2025, shall be considered the Master
Plan. (P)
12/17/2025 Page 41 of 131
2. Conceptual Plan. The Property shall be
developed in general conformance with the Conceptual
Plan. The Conceptual Plan is conceptual in nature
and may vary based on the final approved subdivision
plans or site plan, as applicable, depending on the
final soil studies, RPA lines, road design, lot
locations, lot line locations, amenity locations,
VDOT requirements, BMP design and location,
pedestrian way design and location, and other design
or engineering reasons. Any substantive changes that
do not relate to the prior sentence shall be approved
by the Planning Director at the time of plans
review. In the event of any conflict between
information shown on the Conceptual Plan and these
Proffered Conditions, these Proffered Conditions
shall control. (P)
3. Residential Density. The total number of
residential dwelling units on the Property shall not
exceed 108 units. (P)
4. Amenities.
a. The portion of the Property identified
as “Strategic Common Area” next to BMP 1, as
identified on the Conceptual Layout, shall be
improved with a pavilion in a manner generally
consistent with one or more of the inspiration
pictures on Exhibit C, unless alternative
improvements are approved for this area at plans
review. The final location, design and improvements
to be used shall be submitted by the owner and
approved at the time of plans review or a separate
landscape plan submittal.
b. The other areas identified as “Strategic
Common Area” on the Conceptual Layout shall be a
focal point for the community, and shall be created
with: (i) landscaping and (ii) a minimum of two
benches with hardscape below each bench (the
hardscape area shall be two times the sitting area of
the bench), unless alternative improvements are
approved for these areas at plans review. The final
location, design and improvements to be used shall be
submitted by the owner and approved at the time of
plans review or a separate landscape plan submittal.
c. Pedestrian paths will be provided within
the Property as generally shown on the Conceptual
Layout. In all Common Areas, pedestrian paths shall
be hard surface. In Resource Protection Areas,
pedestrian paths may be located in a meandering
manner through the Resource Protection Areas in
accordance with the Department of Environmental
Quality’s Riparian Buffers Modification and
Mitigation Guidance Manual, with the final location,
design and material to be approved by the Director of
Environmental Engineering at the time of plans review
and approval.
d. Benches and a hardscaped area shall be
provided in the strategic amenity space between lots
12/17/2025 Page 42 of 131
9&10. (P)
5. Utilities.
a. Public water and wastewater shall be
used.
b. The owner/developer shall provide a
wastewater line extension with a terminal manhole in
the public right of way in the general location of
the southern side of Road C’s intersection with Duval
Road, as such intersection is illustrated on the
Conceptual Layout.
c. The applicant shall provide an oversized
waterline through the development from the connection
to Duval East to a 16” water line under design on
Duval Rd as generally shown on the Utilities
Exhibit. The size shall be as determined by
Utilities during site plan review.
d. The applicant shall provide an 8”
waterline through the development from the
intersection of Roads C and F to a 16” water line
under design on Duval Rd as generally shown on the
Utilities Exhibit. (U)
6. Environmental Engineering.
a. Super Silt Fence, or an alternative as
approved by the Department of Environmental
Engineering, shall be provided as a perimeter control
in locations where standard silt fence would have
been required.
b. Sediment traps and sediment basins sized
at least 25% larger than the minimum Virginia
Stormwater Management Handbook’s standard shall be
provided.
c. Anionic PAM, Flexible Growth Medium
and/or a County-approved equivalent shall be applied
to denuded areas (areas that have been cleared of
vegetative cover) during construction and at final
stabilization in the locations shown on plans
approved by Environmental Engineering at the time of
plans review.
d. The maximum post-development discharge
rate for the 100-year storm shall be based on the
maximum capacity of the existing facilities
downstream, and shall not increase the recorded and
/or established 100-year backwater and /or
floodplain. On-Site detention of the post-
development 100-year discharge rate to below the pre-
development 100-year discharge rate may be provided
to satisfy this requirement. (EE)
7. Police Lighting. For cluster mailbox units
(CBUs) located outside, full cut-off, photocell-
activated, minimum 70 CRI-rated LED luminaires shall
illuminate areas within 20 feet of the CBUs with a
minimum maintained illumination level of 0.5 foot-
candles, as measured at grade, but this requirement
may be reduced and modified to meet VDOT
requirements. (Police)
8. Right-of-Way Dedication. In conjunction with
recordation of the initial subdivision plat, or
within sixty (60) days from a written request by the
12/17/2025 Page 43 of 131
Transportation Department, whichever occurs first,
fifty-five (55) feet of right-of-way along the south
side of Duval Road, measured from the centerline of
that part of Duval Road immediately adjacent to the
Property, shall be dedicated, free and unrestricted,
to and for the benefit of Chesterfield County. (T)
9. Access. Direct vehicular access from the
Property to Duval Road and “Duval Road Connector”
shall be limited to two (2) public roads, as
generally shown on Exhibit A, with the exact location
of each access to be approved by the Transportation
Department. Unless otherwise approved at time of
plans review by the Transportation Department,
vehicular access to “Duval Road Connector” shall be
limited to right-in/right-out access. (T, P)
10. Internal Sidewalks. Sidewalks shall be
provided on both sides of all roads within dedicated
right-of-way, unless otherwise approved by the
Planning and Transportation Departments or as
required by VDOT for road acceptance. (P)
11. Internal Roads. Internal roads shall be
constructed with roll-faced curb and the width of the
internal roads shall be 32’ from back of roll-faced
curb to back of roll-faced curb. (P)
12. Road Improvements. The following road
improvements shall be completed by the owner of the
Property or by others. Any modification to the
alignment, design and length shown on the Conceptual
Plan and/or specified below shall be approved by the
Chesterfield County Transportation Department. If
any of the road improvements identified below are
provided by others, as determined by the
Transportation Department, then the specific road
improvement shall no longer be required. The timing
for the provision of these improvements may be
adjusted by a phasing plan approved by the
Transportation Department at the time of plans
review.
a. Construction of additional pavement
along Duval Road at the approved access to provide
left and right turn lanes.
b. Construction of additional pavement
along “Duval Road Connector” at the approved access
to provide a separate right turn lane.
c. Construction of a raised median at the
“Duval Road Connector” access to limit vehicular
access to right-in/right-out movements. Final design
to be determined at time of plans review. Raised
median within the proposed access may be required or
another type of design may be required by VDOT.
d. Construction of a VDOT standard shared
use path along Duval Road from the eastern property
line to the Duval Road (Reconstruction)/Duval Road
(Realigned) intersection; provided, however, the
owner/developer shall not be obligated to construct
any portion of this shared use path that is off-site
if the applicable owner has not dedicated sufficient
right-of-way for the installation of the off-site
12/17/2025 Page 44 of 131
portion of this shared use path prior to approval of
construction plans for this shared use path.
e. Dedication to the County or VDOT, as
applicable, free and unrestricted, of any additional
right-of-way or easements required for the
improvements identified above. In the event the
developer is unable to acquire any “off-site” right-
of-way that is necessary for the road improvements
described in this proffered condition, the developer
may request, in writing, that the County acquire such
right-of-way as a public road improvement. All costs
associated with the acquisition of the right-of-way
shall be approved and borne by the developer. In the
event the County chooses not to assist the developer
in acquisition of the “off-site” right-of-way, the
developer shall be relieved of the obligation to
acquire the “off-site” right-of-way and shall provide
the road improvements within available right-of-way
as determined by the Transportation Department and
the road improvements provided within available right
of way shall be deemed to satisfy the applicable
requirement in this proffered condition. (T)
13. Road Cash Proffers. The applicant/sub-divider,
or assignee(s) (“Developer”) shall pay $9,400 for
each dwelling unit to Chesterfield County for road
improvements within the service district for the
Property (“Road Cash Proffer Payment”). Each Road
Cash Proffer Payment shall be made prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a dwelling
unit unless state law modifies the timing of the
payment. Should Chesterfield County impose impact
fees at any time during the life of the development
that are applicable to the Property, the amount paid
in cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited
toward such fees in a manner determined by
Chesterfield County. (Budget and T)
14. Development Phasing. There shall be no
residential building permits issued on the property
until the “Duval Road Reconstruction (Site Plan Case
LIN25-0007)” and the “Western Area Infrastructure
Improvements (County Contract ADMN24000380)” projects
have been completed, as determined by the
Transportation Department. (P)
15. Foundations. There shall be a minimum
vertical height of eighteen (18) inches of brick,
stone or stone veneer above grade utilized on slab-
on-grade foundations on all front, side, and rear
elevations. All other foundations shall be faced
entirely of brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer,
cultured stone, and/or other masonry
materials. Synthetic or natural stucco foundations
may be permitted for facades constructed entirely of
stucco. (P)
16. Street Trees. Street trees shall be planted
along both sides of public roads on the basis of one
(1) tree per lot. In the event of conflicts with
utilities, easements, sightlines, entrances and other
conflicts, the required spacing shall be
12/17/2025 Page 45 of 131
increased. Street trees may be located between the
road and the sidewalk or in a lot adjacent to the
sidewalk. (P)
17. Planting Beds. Foundation planting beds shall
be provided along the front façades of dwelling
units. Foundation planting beds shall be a minimum
of four (4) feet wide as measured from the
foundation. Planting beds shall be defined with a
trenched edge or suitable landscape edging
material. Planting beds shall include medium shrubs
spaced a maximum of four (4) feet apart. Corners
shall be visually softened with vertical accent
shrubs (2-4’ in height) or small evergreen trees (5-
7’ in height) at the time of planting. (P)
18. Driveways/Front Walks.
a. All private driveways shall be
hardscaped (concrete, asphalt, pavers or other
material approved by the Planning Director at the
time of plans review).
b. Front walks shall be provided from the
driveway or sidewalk to the front entrance of a
dwelling. All front walks shall be a minimum of
three (3) feet in width and hardscaped (concrete,
asphalt, pavers or other material approved by the
Planning Director at the time of plans review).
c. One (1) lamp post shall be provided in
the front yard of each dwelling unit. The design of
such lamp posts shall be consistent throughout the
Property. (P)
19. Porches and Stoops. Front stoops and porches
shall be constructed with continuous foundation walls
or masonry piers to match the foundation of the home.
(P)
20. Direct Vent Fireplaces. Direct vent gas
fireplace boxes which protrude beyond the exterior
plane of the unit, are not permitted on front
facades. (P)
21. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning
(HVAC) Units and Generators. HVAC units and
generators installed as fixtures shall be screened
initially from view of roads by landscaping or low
maintenance material, as approved by the Planning
Department. (P)
22. Front-Facing Garage Doors. If a home has a
front-facing garage door in front of, or on the same
building elevation plane, as the primary front
elevation plane (i.e. the portion of the building
front elevation with the largest width), then the
home shall include a covered porch or a covered stoop
and the building elevation plane with the garage door
shall not extend more than six (6) feet from the
nearest portion of the covered porch or covered stoop
incorporated into the home. This proffer shall not
apply to front-facing garage doors located behind the
primary front elevation plane. (P)
12/17/2025 Page 46 of 131
23. Garage Doors. Any front-loaded garage door
shall use an upgraded garage door. An upgraded
garage door is any door that meets one of the
following two (2) requirements:
a. A minimum of three (3) enhanced features
are provided on the garage door. Enhanced features
shall include windows, raised panels, decorative
panels, arches, hinge straps or other architectural
features on the exterior that enhance the entry (i.e.
decorative lintels, shed roof overhangs arches,
columns, keystones, eyebrows, etc.) Flat panel
garage doors shall be prohibited.
b. The garage door provides an enhanced
architectural style that relates to the architecture
of the dwelling the garage serves. Enhanced
architectural style shall mean the use of color,
panels and/or windows to reflect an architectural
style such as contemporary, modern, modern farmhouse,
mediterranean, colonial, and tudor. The architectural
style may be evidenced by manufacturer printed
material. (P)
24. Architecture. Development of single family
detached dwellings shall be in general conformance
with the illustrative elevations in Exhibit B or
another architectural appearance approved by the
Planning Director at the time of plans
review. Subsequent to plans approval, the owner may
also request approval of another architectural
appearance by the Planning Director. The
illustrative elevations are conceptual in nature and
may vary at the time of plans review. For example,
the location of materials, types of material, use of
stoops, use of covered porches, and other
architectural detailing may change and may vary from
home to home. (P)
25. Variation in Front Elevations. Buildings with
the same front elevation may not be located next to
each other or across a street from each
other. Variation in the front elevation may not be
achieved by simply mirroring the façade, but may be
accomplished by providing at least three (3) of the
following architectural changes:
a. Adding masonry elements above the
masonry required for the foundation.
b. Changing the location of roof type, roof
line, front facing gable(s) and/or dormers.
c. Changing the style of roof type, roof
line, front facing gable(s) and/or dormers.
d. Providing varied siding application
using horizontal siding, shake siding or board and
batten siding.
e. Providing varied color application.
f. Adding or removing a porch.
g. Adding or removing a covered stoop.
h. Adding projections such as bay/box
windows, second floor balconies, or accent roofs.
i. Changing the home width.
j. Changing the home height.
k. Using a third (3rd) enhanced feature on
a garage door.
12/17/2025 Page 47 of 131
l. Any other element of architectural
variation as approved by the Director of Planning.
(P)
26. Exterior Materials.
a. At least 50% (5 in 10) dwelling units
constructed shall have brick, stone or masonry fronts
that cover a minimum of 20% of the front façade
(which façade shall exclude gables, windows, trim,
and doors). Other acceptable siding materials
include brick, stone, masonry, fiber cement siding,
engineered wood siding or high-grade vinyl (a minimum
of .044” nominal thickness as evidenced by
manufacturer’s printed literature). Dutch lap,
plywood, and metal siding are not permitted. Other
materials may be used for parapets, cornices,
surrounds, soffits, trim, architectural decorations,
and design elements.
b. Slanted roofing material shall be
dimensional architectural shingles with a minimum
thirty (30) year warranty or standing seam metal. Any
other roofing material used shall be of comparable
quality to thirty (30) year warranty shingles. (P)
Ayes: Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: Ingle.
D. 25SN1215 - Wilson Accessory Building Exception -
Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Wilson Accessory
Building Exception is a request for conditional use
planned development to permit exceptions to ordinance
requirements and amendment of zoning district map on
2.63 acres in a Residential (R-25) District known as
12401 Spring Run Road. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Residential
Agricultural use. Tax ID 739-663-3653.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board approved Case 25SN1215, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Total Gross Square Footage for Accessory
Buildings. The cumulative gross square footage of all
accessory structures on the Property shall not exceed
3,500 square feet. (P)
2. Proposed Accessory Building Location and
Height. The following limitations shall apply to the
detached garage, labeled as the “Proposed Garage”, on
Exhibit A:
a. The “Proposed Garage” shall be located
12/17/2025 Page 48 of 131
on the Property as generally depicted on Exhibit A.
b. The “Proposed Garage” shall not exceed
twenty (20) feet in total height. (P)
3. Carport Removal. The two existing (2) carports,
shown on Exhibit A, shall be removed prior to the
certificate of occupancy being issued for the
“Proposed Garage” structure. (P)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
E. 25SN1216 - 360 West Shopping Center Sign - Midlothian
In Midlothian Magisterial District, 360 West Shopping
Center Sign is a request for conditional use planned
development for exceptions to ordinance requirements
relative to signage setbacks and amendment of zoning
district map in a General Business (C-5) District on
11.08 acres known as 7200 Hull Street Road. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Community Mixed Use. Tax ID 765-697-
2123.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
Jerry Turner encouraged citizens to participate in
virtual meetings.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 25SN1216, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Sign Setback Reduction. One (1) freestanding
sign may be set back a minimum of four (4) feet from
the property located at 7100 Hull Street Road (GPIN:
765-697-5827), as shown in Exhibit A. (P)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
F. 25SN1217 - Bare Two Family Dwelling - Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Bare Two Family
Dwelling is a request for conditional use to permit a
two family dwelling and amendment of zoning district
map in an Agricultural (A) District known as 10361
Spring Run Road. The 0.89 acre property is developed
with one existing single family dwelling and this
request proposes one second dwelling. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Residential Agricultural use. Tax ID
746-659-0211.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
12/17/2025 Page 49 of 131
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Hylton, the
Board approved Case 25SN1217, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Occupancy. Occupancy of the addition containing
the second dwelling shall be limited to the occupants
of the principal dwelling unit, individuals related
to them by blood, marriage, adoption, or
guardianship, foster children, personal guests, or
household employees. (P)
2. Deed Restriction. For the purpose of providing
record notice within thirty (30) days of zoning
approval a deed restriction shall be recorded setting
forth the limitation in Condition 1. The deed book
and page number of this restriction and a copy of the
restriction as recorded shall be submitted to the
Planning Department. (P)
3. Building Permit. Within thirty (30) days of
zoning approval, a building permit shall be filed for
review of the construction of the existing second
dwelling unit. (P)
4. Two Family Dwelling Location, Size, and
Construction Limitations. The following limitations
shall apply to the portion of the primary dwelling
containing the second dwelling on the Property:
a. The second dwelling shall be located on
the Property as generally depicted in Exhibit A.
b. The second dwelling shall be no larger
than 1,400 square feet.
c. A manufactured home shall not be
permitted on the Property. (P)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
G. 25SN1219 - Spring Run Communications Tower - Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Spring Run
Communications Tower is a request for conditional use
to permit a communications tower facility and
amendment of zoning district map in an Agricultural
(A) District on 0.74 acre known as 12520 Spring Run
Road. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Residential Neighborhood 4 (4 units
per acre or less). Tax ID 738-664-Part of 1115.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
12/17/2025 Page 50 of 131
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Hylton, the
Board approved Case 25SN1219, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Co-Location. The tower shall be designed and
constructed to support the antennas and related
equipment of at least three (3) carriers, including
the Applicant’s initial sector array. (P)
2. Site Plan. The tower and access road shall be
sited on the property in the location shown on the
plans prepared by NB+C Engineering Services, LLC,
entitled “Site Plan”, last revised on October 22,
2025, and attached as Exhibit B. (P)
3. Signs. There shall be no signs permitted to
identify this use except those required by FCC or
other regulatory body. (P)
4. Fencing. The base of the tower shall be
enclosed by a minimum six (6) foot high fence,
designed to preclude trespassing.
a. The fence shall provide a privacy screen
(vinyl slats, mesh tarp, or windscreen) as part of
this fence segment. The exact design shall be
approved at the time of site plan review. Such
privacy screen shall be earth tone in color, such as
black, dark green or dark brown. Any portion of such
fence with the privacy screen shall also be an earth
tone color, such as black, dark green or dark brown
to match the privacy screen. Such fence and privacy
screen shall be maintained in good visual condition.
(P)
5. Buffer. A thirty (30) foot buffer shall be
maintained around the tower compound, as shown on
Exhibit B. No trees may be removed from this buffer
area except (i) to the extent such trees are dead,
diseased or dying, or (ii) in connection with the
removal of the communication tower. (P)
6. Tower Design. The color, design and lighting
system for the tower shall be as follows:
a. The tower shall be gray or other neutral
color.
b. The tower shall not be lighted.
c. The tower shall be a monopole structure.
d. Any satellite dish and microwave dish
antennas attached to the telecommunications tower
shall not exceed six (6) feet in diameter and shall
be of a neutral color with no logos.
e. Cables shall be run within the interior
of the tower to the extent technically practicable.
12/17/2025 Page 51 of 131
(P)
7. Screening. Any building or mechanical equipment
shall comply with the Zoning Ordinance relative to
architectural treatment of building exteriors and
screening of mechanical equipment in O, C and I
Districts. (P)
(NOTE: The Zoning Ordinance requires the screening of
mechanical equipment located on the building or
ground from adjacent properties and public rights of
way. Screening would not be required for the tower or
tower-mounted equipment.)
8. Structural Integrity. Prior to use of this
telecommunications tower, the owner of the tower
shall obtain approval of the structural integrity by
a registered professional engineer licensed in
Virginia and a copy of the report filed with the
Planning Department. (P)
9. Height. The tower shall not exceed a height of
199 feet. (P)
10. Dismantling and Decommissioning. At such time
that the telecommunications tower ceases to be used
for communications purposes for a period exceeding
twelve (12) consecutive months, the property owner(s)
and/or cell tower owner(s) and/or lessee(s) shall
dismantle and remove the tower and all associated
equipment from the property. (P)
11. Setback to Dwelling on Adjoining Property. The
tower shall be setback a minimum of 330 feet from the
dwelling on the adjoining property, known as 12500
Spring Run Road (GPIN: 738-664-5327). (P)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
H. 25SN1226 - Stanford Fence Height Exception -
Midlothian
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Stanford Fence
Height Exception is a request for conditional use
planned development to permit exceptions to ordinance
requirements for a fence and amendment of zoning
district map in a Residential (R-7) District known as
400 Walton Park Road. The 0.26 acre property is
developed with one single family dwelling. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Residential Neighborhood 4 (4 units
per acre or less). Tax ID 732-704-8528.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
12/17/2025 Page 52 of 131
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board approved Case 25SN1226, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Fence Location and Height. The fence shall be
maintained in the same general location on the
Property as depicted in Exhibit A, with a maximum
height of six (6) feet. In addition to general
maintenance, the fence may be replaced as needed, but
shall not be expanded or enlarged or substantially
deviate from the location depicted in Exhibit A. (P)
2. Decorative Feature. The fence shall incorporate
at least one (1) decorative feature, such as a shadow
box, scallops or another design as approved by
Director of Planning. (P)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
I. 25SN1263 - Woodpecker Road Solar Facilities Amendment
& Expansion - Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Woodpecker Road
Solar Facilities Amendment & Expansion is a request
to amend zoning approval (Case 23SN0095) on 124.52
acres to modify the conceptual plan for a large-scale
solar energy facility, rezoning from Agricultural (A)
to Agricultural (A) on 30.09 acres, conditional use
to permit a large-scale solar energy facility on
67.97 acres plus conditional use planned development
to permit exceptions to ordinance requirements on
67.97 acres and amendment of zoning district map for
property fronting approximately 50 feet on the west
line of Woodpecker Road, 425 feet south of Ettrick
Landing Drive. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for Residential Neighborhood
4 (4 units per acre or less). Tax IDs 789-619-4223;
790-616-9556; 790-618-0133, 9437; 791-616-5494; 791-
617-8164; and 792-616-8597.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board approved Case 25SN1263, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
The following condition shall apply to Requests I, II and III.
Condition 2 of Case 23SN0095 shall be amended as
follows:
12/17/2025 Page 53 of 131
1. Conceptual Plan. Development of the Property
shall generally conform to the Conceptual Plan
(Exhibit A), titled “Woodpecker Road Solar Facility -
Conceptual Plan”, prepared by VHB last revised
September 9, 2025, with respect to the general layout
of access points, anticipated location of
transmission lines and other utility connections,
general location of solar equipment and supplementary
facilities to be placed on site, and buffers. The
layout on the Conceptual Plan is conceptual in nature
and may vary based on the site plan depending on
final engineering and environmental studies or as
otherwise approved by the Planning Director at the
time of plans review. (P)
Staff Note: All other conditions previously approved in Zoning Case 23SN0095 will remain in force and effect, where applicable. The following conditions shall apply to Requests II & III only.
2. Uses. Uses permitted on the Property shall be
those uses permitted by-right or with restrictions in
the Agricultural District. In addition, a large scale
solar facility may also be permitted subject to the
following conditions of this zoning request. (P)
3. Gravel Access Drives. The surface treatment for
access drives shall be either asphalt or gravel. Any
gravel drive shall be well-graded crushed run
aggregate (21B or equivalent) in lieu of pavement.
All drives shall be designed to meet minimum access
requirements for emergency equipment. (P & F)
4. Public Liaison. The applicant will designate a
person who will act as a point of contact between
citizens and construction crews (“Public Liaison”).
The contact information for the Public Liaison will
be posted at each access point, as published on the
Project’s website, and provided to Chesterfield
County staff. (P)
5. Landscaping. For any landscaped areas, priority
shall be given to the use of native plant materials
as identified in the Chesterfield County Plant
Material List and as approved by the Planning
Department at the time of site plan approval.
Virginia native grasses shall be used for permanent
ground cover and supplemented with pollinator-
friendly species. (P)
6. Access. There shall be no direct vehicular
access to/from Hickory Branch Drive and Oldtown Creek
Drive. (T)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
J. 24SN1334 - Winterpock Meadows Rezoning - Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Winterpock Meadows
Rezoning is a request to rezone from Agricultural (A)
12/17/2025 Page 54 of 131
to Residential (R-12), conditional use to permit
recreational neighborhood facilities, conditional use
planned development to permit exceptions to ordinance
requirements plus a waiver to connectivity and
amendment of zoning district map on property known as
10601 Winterpock Road. The 31.58 acre property is
proposed for a maximum development of 79 dwelling
units. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property
is appropriate for Light Business, Residential
Neighborhood 2 (2 units per acre or less), and
Residential Neighborhood 4 (4 units per acre or
less). Tax IDs 721-656-7492 and 722-657-0569. If
approved, effective January 1, 2026 the zoning
district is Semi-Urban Neighborhood (SU).
Planning Administrator Harold Ellis introduced the
case. He stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of Requests I and II, but staff recommended
denial of Requests I and II.
Mike Lang, representing the applicant, provided
additional details about the case.
Kim Lacy, also representing the applicant, provided
additional details about the case.
Discussion ensued relative to the information
provided.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
Jerry Turner spoke in opposition to the case, stating
nothing can ever be done with the Beach
Road/Winterpock Road intersection if the case is
approved.
Shawn Sellars spoke in favor of the case, stating the
project gives older residents a chance to downsize
and stay in the area.
Vickie Stitzer spoke in support of the case, stating
the project addresses a growing need in western
Matoaca, which is housing options for older adults
who want to downsize and stay in the area.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
Ms. Lacy provided a rebuttal to comments provided by
the citizen speakers.
Mr. Carroll provided additional details about the
case. He then made a motion, seconded by Dr. Hylton,
for the Board to approve Request I of Case 24SN1334,
subject to the following conditions and imposed
condition:
Proffered Conditions
The Owner-Applicant in this rezoning Case 24SN1334
pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia
(1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of
Chesterfield County, Virginia (“County”), for itself
12/17/2025 Page 55 of 131
and its successor or assigns, proffers that the
development of the approximately 31.58 acres with
County Tax Identification Numbers 722657056900000
(14.3 acres) and 721656749200000 (17.28 acres)
(collectively, the “Property”) under consideration
will be developed as set forth below; however, in the
event the request is denied or approved with
conditions not agreed to by the Owner-Applicant,
these proffers shall be immediately null and void and
of no further force or effect.
The Applicant hereby proffers the following
conditions, applicable to the Property:
1. Master Plan. The Master Plan for the Property
shall consist of the following:
a. The Textual Statement dated October 21,
2025.
b. Development of the Property shall
generally conform to the Conceptual Plan (Exhibit A),
titled “Winterpock Meadows” prepared by Townes Site
Engineering last revised November 7, 2025 with
respect to the general layout of roads, lots, common
area, and open space. The layout on the Conceptual
Plan is conceptual in nature and may vary based on
the final subdivision/site plan depending on final
engineering and environmental studies or as otherwise
approved by the Planning Director, or assignee, at
the time of plans review.
c. Conceptual Elevations (Exhibit B) dated
August 14, 2025. (P)
2. Utilities.
a. Public water and wastewater shall be
used.
b. The developer shall submit to the
Utilities Department for review and approval a
wastewater system hydraulic analysis to verify
downstream capacity, prior to or in conjunction with
the site or construction plan submittal. Any
capacity-related improvements necessary to support
the wastewater demands of this development shall be
the responsibility of the developer and shall be
reflected on the site or construction plan.
c. The on-site wastewater system shall be
designed, and access past paved improvements provided
up to and including a wastewater line extension with
terminal manhole, within a public wastewater
easement, shall be provided to the property line for
GPIN: 7216568320 & 7216564435. (U)
3. Residential Density. The maximum residential
dwelling density on the Property shall be 79 dwelling
units. (P)
4. Age Restriction. All dwelling units on the
Property shall be age-restricted. Except as otherwise
prohibited by the Virginia Fair Housing Law, the
Federal Fair Housing Act, and such other applicable
federal, state or local legal requirements, the age-
restricted residential dwelling units shall be
restricted to “housing for older persons” as defined
12/17/2025 Page 56 of 131
in the Virginia Fair Housing Law and no persons under
19 years of age shall reside therein for more than
120 days consecutive. (P)
5. Access. Direct vehicular access to/from the
Property to Winterpock Road shall be limited to one
(1) entrance/exit with the location to be approved by
the Transportation Department. (T)
6. Open Space, Amenity Areas, and Pedestrian
Areas.
a. The common areas shown on the Concept
Plan (Exhibit A) shall be provided and shall include
at a minimum the following: a clubhouse, swimming
pool, pocket parks, walking trails, and other
pedestrian-friendly or community amenity features
approved by the Planning Director at the time of
plans review.
b. A minimum of 1.02 acres shall be
provided within this property as the focal point(s),
as generally shown on Exhibit A. Part of the focal
point(s) shall be hardscaped and have benches and
other amenities that accommodate and facilitate
gatherings.
c. The recreational neighborhood facilities
described above shall be developed concurrently with
the phase of development that the amenities are
located. The exact design, location and size of all
recreational facilities shall be reviewed and
approved during plans review. (P)
7. Right of Way Dedication. Prior to any site plan
approval, in conjunction with the recordation of the
initial subdivision plat, or within sixty (60) days
of a written request by the Transportation
Department, whichever occurs first, sixty (60) feet
of right-of-way on Winterpock Road measured from the
centerline of that part of the road immediately
adjacent to the Property shall be dedicated, free and
unrestricted, to and for the benefit of the County.
(T)
8. Cash Proffer. For each residential dwelling
unit constructed on the Property, the
Owner/Developer/Applicant shall pay to the County
$4,324 per age-restricted detached dwelling unit for
road improvements within the service district for the
Property (“Road Cash Proffer”). Each payment shall be
made prior to the issuance of a final certificate of
occupancy for such dwelling unit unless state law
modifies the timing of the payment. Should the County
impose impact fees at any time during the life of the
development that are applicable to the Property, the
amount paid in Road Cash Proffers shall be in lieu of
or credited toward, but not be in addition to, any
impact fees, in a manner determined by the County. At
the option of the Transportation Department, cash
proffer payments may be reduced for the cost of road
improvements provided by the
Owner/Developer/Applicant, other than those
improvements identified in the Transportation
Improvements Proffered Condition, as determined by
12/17/2025 Page 57 of 131
the Transportation Department. (Budget & T)
9. Transportation Improvements. Prior to the
issuance of an occupancy permit, the following shall
be completed, as determined by the Transportation
Department:
a. Widening/improving the entirety of the
property frontage - along Winterpock Road to a eleven
(11) foot wide travel lane, measured from the
centerline of the existing pavement, with an
additional five (5) foot wide paved shoulder plus a
three (3) foot wide unpaved shoulder and overlaying
the full width of the road with a minimum of one and
one-half (1.5) inches of surface asphalt, with
modifications approved by the Transportation
Department.
b. Construction of additional pavement
along Winterpock Road to provide right and left turn
lanes at the approved access.
c. Construction of a VDOT standard shared
use path along the property’s frontage to Winterpock
Road, or an alternative pedestrian accommodation if
supported by the county’s Comprehensive Plan, as
determined by the Transportation Department.
d. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free
and unrestricted, of any additional right-of-way
(and/or easements) required for the improvements
identified above. (T)
10. Internal Public Road Typical Section.
a. Road Width. The internal roads shall
have a minimum width of thirty-two (32) measured from
face-of-curb to face-of-curb.
b. Sidewalks. VDOT standard sidewalks shall
be provided on both sides of public road within
public right-of-way, unless otherwise approved by the
Director of Planning. (T)
11. Environmental Engineering.
a. Super Silt Fence, or an alternative as
approved by the Department of Environmental
Engineering, shall be provided as perimeter control
in locations where standard silt fence would have
been required.
b. Sediment traps and sediment basins sized
at least 25% larger than the minimum required in the
Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook standard
shall be provided.
c. Anionic PAM, Flexible Growth Medium
and/or a County-approved equivalent shall be applied
to denuded areas during construction and at final
stabilization in the locations shown on the plans.
d. The maximum post-development discharge
rate or the 100-year storm shall be based on the
maximum capacity of the existing facilities
downstream and shall not increase the recorded and/or
established 100-year backwater and/or floodplain.
(EE)
Subdivision Design Elements
12. Streetscape. Street trees shall be installed
along both sides of internal public roads. Unless
12/17/2025 Page 58 of 131
otherwise permitted during plans review, street trees
shall be large deciduous trees spaced generally 40
feet on center, except where there is conflict with
utilities (above and underground), sightlines,
easements and/or driveway areas. Tree species shall
be those species designated for use as a street tree
in the Chesterfield County Plant Materials List. (P)
13. Driveways. All private driveways serving
single-family residential uses shall be brushed
concrete, stamped concrete, exposed aggregate
concrete, decorative pavers, or asphalt. (P)
14. Front walks. A minimum of three (3) foot wide
concrete front walks shall be provided to each
dwelling unit to connect drives, sidewalks, and/or
streets. (P)
15. Front Foundation Planting Beds. Foundation
planting is required along the entire front and
corner side façade(s) of all dwelling units.
Foundation planting beds shall be a minimum of four
(4) feet wide from the unit foundation. Planting beds
shall include medium shrubs spaced a maximum of four
(4) feet apart. The plant materials used should
visually soften the unit corners and complement the
architecture of the home at their mature sizes. (P)
16. Architecture. Development of dwellings shall
be consistent (incorporating similar, but not
necessarily identical design elements, style, and
materials) with the conceptual elevations in Exhibit
B or another architectural appearance approved by the
Director of Planning at the time of plans review. (P)
17. Exterior Facades.
a. Acceptable siding materials include
brick, stone, masonry, fiber cement siding (such as
HardiePlank, HardieShingle, and HardieTrim),
engineered wood siding (such as LP SmartSide), or
high-grade vinyl (a minimum of .044” nominal
thickness as evidenced by manufacturer’s printed
literature). Dutch lap, plywood, and metal siding
are not permitted. Other materials may be used for
parapets, cornices, surrounds, trim, architectural
decorations, and design elements.
b. If the dwelling is constructed on a
slab, brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer, or
other masonry material shall be employed around the
base of the dwelling - a minimum of eighteen (18)
inches above grade so as to give the appearance of a
foundation. If not constructed on slab, all exposed
portion of the foundation of each dwelling shall be
faced with brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer,
or other masonry material.
c. Stepping the siding down below the first
floor shall only be permitted in circumstances of
unique topographical conditions. For dwelling units
stepping the siding down below the first floor shall
be permitted on the side and rear elevations that do
not front on a street, with a maximum of two (2)
steps permitted on any elevation. A minimum of
eighteen (18) increase of exposed brick or stone
12/17/2025 Page 59 of 131
shall be required, unless a lesser amount is approved
the Planning Department at the time of plan review
due to unique circumstances.
d. Roof materials on pitched roofs shall be
thirty (30) year minimum architectural / dimensional
asphalt composition shingle or standing seam metal.
Any other roofing material used shall be of
comparable quality to thirty (30) year warranty
shingles. Each dwelling shall have a minimum of one
(1) enhanced rooftop feature, such as a varied
roofline, dormer(s), gable(s), or another
architectural feature as approved by the Planning
Department during plans review. (P)
18. Elevation Repetition. The same dwelling unit
elevations shall not be located adjacent or directly
across from each other along the same road. This
requirement does not apply to units on different
streets backing up to each other. Variation in the
front elevation shall not be achieved by simply
mirroring the façade but may be accomplished by
providing at least three (3) of the following
architectural changes.
i. Adding or removing a front porch or
covered entry or increasing or decreasing the length
of the porch or entry;
ii. Adding masonry on the front façade
elevation of the first floor;
iii. Varying the location and/or style of
the roof type, roof line, front facing gable(s), and
/or dormers;
iv. Providing varied siding application
using horizontal siding, shake siding, an/or board
and batten siding;
v. Adding projections such as bay windows,
second floor balconies, and accent roofs;
vi. Alternating the location of a garage,
if provided;
vii. Providing a different architectural
style;
viii. Any other element of architectural
variation as provided by the Director of
Planning. (P)
19. Porches and Stoops. Front stoops and porches
shall be constructed with continuous foundation walls
or with masonry piers to match the foundation of the
home. Extended front porches shall be a minimum of
five (5) feet deep. Handrails and railings, when
required by the building code, shall be finished
painted wood, vinyl rails or metal rail systems with
vertical pickets, sawn balusters, or other products
of equal quality. Pickets shall be supported on top
and bottom rails that span between columns. (P)
20. Garages. If garages are provided, the
following shall be required:
a. Front loaded attached garages shall be
permitted to extend as far forward from the front
line of the main dwelling as the front line of the
front porch provided that the rooflines of the porch
and garage are contiguous. Where the rooflines are
12/17/2025 Page 60 of 131
not contiguous, garages shall be permitted to project
a maximum of four (4) feet forward of the front line
of the main dwelling, provided however, a maximum of
twenty five percent (25%) of homes may have a garage
that projects up to eight (8) feet from main
dwelling.
b. Front loaded, and corner side loaded
garages shall use an upgraded garage door. An
upgraded garage door is any door with a minimum of
three (3) enhanced features. Enhanced features shall
include windows, raised panels, decorative panels,
arches, ornamental hardware, or other architectural
features on the exterior that enhanced the entry
(i.e., decorative lintels, shed roof overhangs,
arches, columns, keystones, eyebrows, etc.) Flat
panel garage doors are prohibited. (P)
21. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditions (HVAC)
Units and Whole House Generators. Units shall
initially be screened from view of roads by
landscaping or low maintenance materials, as approved
by the Planning Department. (P)
22. Fireplaces, Chimneys and Flues. If provided,
the following shall be required:
a. Masonry fireplace chimney chases shall
be constructed of brick or stone. The width and depth
of chimneys shall be appropriately sized in portion
to the size and height of the unit.
b. Direct vent gas fireplace boxes, which
protrude beyond the exterior face of the unit, are
not permitted on front facades. All the exterior
materials and finishes used to enclose the fireplace
box must match the adjacent façade. (P)
23. Buffers and Landscaping. A minimum of a
twenty-five (25) foot buffer shall be provided along
the eastern boundary from lots 26-36 and 47-53, a
minimum of a twenty (20) foot buffer shall be
provided along the eastern boundary from lots 54-58,
a minimum of twenty (20) foot buffer boundaries shall
be provided along the north, west and south
boundaries as shown on Exhibit A. (P)
24. Entry Monument. An entry monument with signage
shall be provided at the entrance of the development
from Winterpock Road. The exact design, location and
size of the monument shall be reviewed by the
Planning Department during plans review. (P)
25. Pedestrian Trails. Pedestrian trails shall be
provided throughout the development to provide
interconnectivity between uses, open space, and
common area. The exact location of any pedestrian
trail may be determined by the Owner in connection
with plans review. The exact design, material, and
location of pedestrian trails shall be approved by
the Planning Director or designee in connection with
plan approval. Surface trails or impervious materials
may be constructed and maintained, together with
clearing immediately adjacent thereto, in resource
protection areas in such location and configurations
as proved by the Environmental Engineering Director
12/17/2025 Page 61 of 131
or designee. (P & EE)
ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS AND TEXTUAL
STATEMENT ITEMS, EXCEPT FOR THE LOT WIDTH REQUIREMENT
IN ITEM 2 OF THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT (SHOWN BELOW),
WITH AN IMPOSED CONDITION RELATIVE TO MINIMUM LOT
WIDTH.
IMPOSED CONDITION 1: The minimum lot width shall be
fifty-five (55) feet. (P)
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Mr. Carroll then made a motion, seconded by Dr.
Hylton, for the Board to approve Request II, Waiver
to street connectivity requirements for a connection
to Crump Store Drive as well as providing a future
stub road connection to the western property line.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
K. 25SN1050 - Courthouse Road Rezoning — Clover Hill
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Courthouse Road
Rezoning and Exceptions is a request to rezone from
Agricultural (A) and Residential (R-7) to Residential
Townhouse (R-TH) plus conditional use planned
development to permit exceptions to ordinance
requirements and amendment to the zoning district map
fronting approximately 1,200 feet on the north side
of North Courthouse Road, 250 feet northwest of
Keithwood Parkway. The 26.44 property is proposed for
a maximum development of 149 dwelling units. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Residential Neighborhood 8 (8 units
per acre or less). Tax IDs 743-704-2997, 9398; 743-
705-3917, 7032, 8216, and Part of 8844; 744-704-0082,
1556, and Part of 1563. If approved, effective
January 1, 2026 the zoning district is Transition
Residential (TR).
Principal Planner Betsy Hatch introduced the case.
She stated the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval, subject to the conditions in
the staff report.
Questions ensued relative to the information
provided.
Anne Miller, representing the applicant, provided
additional details about the case.
Additional questions and discussion ensued relative
to the information provided.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
Vickie Stitzer spoke in favor of the case, stating it
provides much needed housing supply, aligns with the
Comprehensive Plan, and supports businesses connected
to construction and housing.
12/17/2025 Page 62 of 131
Jerry Turner expressed concerns about the $1 million
proffer in the case, stating it has the appearance of
a bribe. He also expressed concerns relative to
favoritism when the Board determines which cases must
provide road connections.
Catherine Coffey spoke in opposition to the case,
expressing concerns about preserving the community
the way it looks now, maintaining traffic on
Courthouse Road where there is speeding and racing,
traffic concerns, and listening to the community.
Carl Smith expressed similar concerns as Ms. Coffey.
David Stritzinger expressed concerns about the $1
million proffer.
Grant Hayes expressed concerns about the absence of a
traffic signal requirement.
Renae Eldred encouraged the Board to stop listening
to accusations of bribery and stated she was glad the
Board is considering removal of the $1 million
proffer. She inquired about the parking agreement
between the developer and the church.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
Ms. Miller provided a rebuttal to comments provided
by the citizen speakers. She stated the applicant
understood the concerns about the $1 million proffer,
and should the Board remove it, the applicant would
move forward with the contribution through a private
agreement.
Dr. Hylton commended Ms. Schneider for her work on
affordable housing and encouraged her to continue to
fight.
In response to Dr. Miller's question about the price
of the properties, Ms. Miller stated a builder has
not been chosen, but in talking with developers, the
starting price might be $350,000 to $400,000.
Ms. Schneider provided additional commentary about
the case. She then made a motion, seconded by Dr.
Hylton, for the Board to approve Case 25SN1050,
subject to the conditions in the staff report, except
for Proffered Condition 24, Attainable Contribution.
Mr. Carroll provided commentary about the case and
the $1 million proffer.
In response to Mr. Ingle's question relative to the
origin of the $1 million proffer, Ms. Miller stated
the applicant wanted to do it on its own.
Mr. Ingle stated he wanted to make it clear that the
applicant was already working on this outside of the
county, with no influence from the county on whether
12/17/2025 Page 63 of 131
or not it wanted to do this. He further stated the
case would need to stand on its own without the
donation, and his vote would be based on the
information he received outside the $1 million
proffer. He then called for a vote on Ms. Schneider's
motion, seconded by Dr. Hylton, for the Board to
approve Case 25SN1050, subject to the following
conditions and the removal of Proffered Condition 24,
Attainable Contribution:
Proffered Conditions
The applicant hereby offers the following proffered
conditions:
1. Master Plan. The Master Plan for the Property
shall consist of the following:
a. The Textual Statement last revised
November 6, 2025.
b. Development of the Property shall
generally conform to the Conceptual Plan (Exhibit A),
titled “Courthouse Road Residential” prepared by
Balzer and Associates, last revised October 20, 2025,
with respect to general layout of roads, lots, unit
type location, common area, and open space. The
layout is conceptual in nature and may vary based on
the final subdivision/site plan depending on final
engineering and environmental studies or as otherwise
approved by the Planning Director, or assignee, at
the time of plans review.
c. Conceptual Elevations (Exhibit B) dated
October 16, 2025. (P)
2. Utilities.
a. The public water and wastewater systems
shall be used.
b. The developer shall submit to the
Utilities Department for review and approval a
wastewater system hydraulic analysis to verify
downstream capacity, prior to or in conjunction with
the first site or construction plan submittal. Any
capacity-related improvements necessary to support
the wastewater demands of this development shall be
the responsibility of the developer and shall be
reflected on the site or construction plan. (U)
3. Density. The maximum density shall not exceed
149 units. A minimum of fifty (50) of these units
shall be located within buildings that contain only
two (2) separated dwelling units, divided by a solid
common wall, on adjacent abutting lots (“Two-Unit
Townhomes”). (P)
4. Access. Direct vehicular access from the
Property to North Courthouse Road shall be limited to
two (2) entrances/exits with the exact location of
each access approved by the Transportation
12/17/2025 Page 64 of 131
Department. (T)
5. Road Improvements. Unless otherwise noted
below, the following road improvements shall be
completed with initial development, as determined by
the Transportation Department. The Transportation
Department shall approve the exact design, length, or
other modifications of the improvements.
a. Construction of additional pavement
along North Courthouse Road at each approved access
to provide a separate right turn lane. Each
improvement shall be completed in conjunction with
the corresponding approved access.
b. Construction of a VDOT standard sidewalk
along North Courthouse Road for the entire property
frontage.
c. Construction of a VDOT standard sidewalk
along North Courthouse Road from Keithwood Parkway to
the eastern Property line (approximately 220 feet)
within existing right-of-way. If determined at the
time of plans review this improvement cannot be
accommodated within existing right-of-way, then the
Transportation Department shall relieve the
owner/developer of the improvement.
d. Off-Site: Construction of a Restricted
Crossing U-Turn (RCUT) at the existing crossover
across from Ashford Hill Loop along North Courthouse
Road within existing right-of-way to prohibit left-
out movements as approved by the Transportation
Department (“Off-Site Improvement”). Off-site
Improvement shall be completed in conjunction with
the approved access at the existing crossover.
e. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free
and unrestricted, of any additional right of way (or
easements) required for the improvements identified
above. (T)
6. Internal Public Road Typical Section.
a. Public roads shall have a minimum width
of thirty-two feet (32’) from face-of-curb to face-
of-curb.
b. VDOT standard sidewalks shall generally
be provided on both sides of internal public roads in
public right-of-way, unless otherwise approved by the
Director of Planning. (T)
7. Road Cash Proffers.
a. The applicant, sub-divider, or
assignee(s) (“Developer”) shall pay $5,922 for each
dwelling unit to Chesterfield County for road
improvements within the service district for the
property (the “Cash Proffer Payments”). At such time
a construction plan is approved with vehicular access
at the North Courthouse Road/Ashford Hill Loop
12/17/2025 Page 65 of 131
crossover providing the Off-Site Improvement, as
defined in the Road Improvements Proffered Condition,
the Developer Road Cash Proffer Payments shall be
reduced to $4,828 for each dwelling unit to
Chesterfield County for road improvements within the
service district for the property.
b. Each payment shall be made prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a dwelling
unit unless state law modifies the timing of the
payment. Should Chesterfield County impose impact
fees at any time during the life of the development
that are applicable to the property, the amount paid
in cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited
toward, but not in addition to any impact fees, in a
manner determined by the county.
c. At the option of the Transportation
Department, Cash Proffer Payments may be reduced for
the cost of transportation improvements, other than
those improvements identified in the Road
Improvements Proffered Condition, provided by the
Developer, as determined by the Transportation
Department. (T and Budget)
8. Drainage. The drainage system shall be designed
in a manner that water shall be retained onsite and
released at such a rate that:
a. Development of the Property shall not
increase the post-development peak discharge above
the pre-development peak discharge to the existing
pond located on the northern side of Courthouse Road,
on parcels identified as GPIN 743-705-3543and GPIN
743-706-6711.
b. No impervious areas shall sheet flow
through the adjacent properties to the west or within
the Hylton Park subdivision.
c. The 100-year post-development peak
discharge rate shall not exceed the 100-year pre-
development peak discharge rate. (EE)
9. Stormwater Management. The SWM/BMP facilities
located along internal public roadways shall include
enhanced landscaping, which must be approved by the
Department of Environmental Engineering during plans
review. In addition, any wet ponds provided on-site
shall include a fountain or other comparable aeration
feature, subject to review and approval by the
Department of Environmental Engineering during plans
review. (EE)
10. Lighting. Pole-mounted or building-mounted and
bollard lights, full cut-off, photocell-activated,
minimum 70 CRI-rated LED luminaires shall illuminate
the proposed parking lot with a minimum maintained
illumination level of 1.0 foot-candle, as measured at
grade, unless otherwise prohibited by a local or
state department. However, to meet lighting standards
at the entrance, light levels will need to be reduced
12/17/2025 Page 66 of 131
below 1.0 foot-candle at the right-of-way (ROW). The
exact design, location and type of lighting shall be
reviewed and approved during plans review. (Police)
Subdivision Design Elements
11. Driveways. All private driveways serving
residential units shall be brushed concrete, stamped
concrete, exposed aggregate concrete, decorative
pavers, or asphalt. Driveway parking spaces shall be
at least 9 feet wide by 20 feet deep (one-space
driveway), which shall count as 1.0 spaces towards
the required parking. For the end units and the Two-
Unit Townhomes, the driveways shall be at least 18
feet wide (two-space driveway), which shall count as
2.0 spaces towards the required parking. (P)
12. Front Walks. A minimum of three (3) foot wide
concrete front walks shall be provided to each
dwelling unit to connect drives, sidewalks, and/or
streets. (P)
13. Front Foundation Planting Beds. Foundation
planting is required along the entire front and
corner side façade(s) of all dwelling units.
Foundation planting beds shall be a minimum of four
(4) feet wide from the unit foundation. Planting beds
shall include medium shrubs spaced a maximum of four
(4) feet apart. The plant materials used should
visually soften the unit corners and complement the
architecture of the home at their mature sizes. (P)
14. Architecture. Development of dwellings shall
be generally consistent (incorporating similar, but
not necessarily identical design elements, stye and
materials) with the conceptual elevations in Exhibit
B or another architectural appearance approved by the
Director of Planning at the time of plans review. (P)
15. Exterior Facades.
a. Acceptable siding materials include
brick, stone, masonry, fiber cement siding (such as
HardiPlank, HardieShingle, and HardieTrim), or
engineered wood siding (such as LP SmartSiding),
premium quality vinyl siding with a minimum thickness
of 0.044 inches or other comparable material as
approved by the Planning Department at time of plans
review. Plywood and metal siding are not permitted.
Other materials may be used for trim, architectural
decorations, or design elements provided they blend
with the architecture of the dwelling unit. Where a
dwelling borders more than one street, all street-
facing facades shall be finished in the same
materials.
b. If the dwelling is constructed on a
slab, brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer, or
other masonry material shall be employed around the
base of the dwelling a minimum of eighteen (18)
inches above grade so as to give the appearance of a
foundation. If not constructed on slab, all exposed
12/17/2025 Page 67 of 131
portions of the foundation of each dwelling shall be
faced with brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer,
or other masonry material.
c. Stepping the siding down below the
first floor shall only be permitted in circumstances
of unique topographical conditions. For dwelling
units stepping the siding down below the first floor
shall be permitted on the side and rear elevations
that do not front on a street, with a maximum of two
(2) steps permitted on any elevation. A minimum of
eighteen (18) inches of exposed brick or stone shall
be required, unless a lesser amount is approved by
the Planning Department at the time of plan review
due to unique design circumstances.
d. Roof materials on pitched roofs shall
be thirty (30) year minimum architectural /
dimensional asphalt composition shingle or standing
seam metal.
e. Any rear or side elevation adjacent to
North Courthouse Road or adjacent to the central
common/recreational area shall be constructed with
similar architectural details to those on the front
elevation of the residential unit. If a shutter
treatment is provided on the front elevation, single
windows on the rear elevation shall have the same
shutter treatment. In addition, a minimum of two (2)
dwelling units in a group shall incorporate a masonry
(brick or stone) façade treatment from the foundation
to the top of the first floor. The units with a
masonry (brick or stone) façade shall not be required
to incorporate decorative siding treatment above the
brick or stone. (P)
16. Variation. Townhouse units within the same
building with the same front elevation may not be
attached to each other. Variation in the front
elevation may not be achieved by simply mirroring the
façade, but may be accomplished by providing at least
three (3) of the following architectural changes:
a. Adding masonry elements above the
masonry required for the foundation.
b. Changing the location of roof type,
roof line, front facing gable(s) and/or dormers.
c. Changing the style of roof type, roof
line, front facing gable(s) and/or dormers.
d. Providing varied siding application
using horizontal siding, shake siding or board and
batten siding.
e. Providing varied color applications.
f. Adding or removing a porch.
g. Adding projections such as bay/box
windows, second floor balconies, or accent roofs.
h. Changing the unit width.
i. Changing the unit height (to not
exceed the maximum allowable height).
j. Adding a fourth (4th) enhanced feature
to a front load garage door.
k. Any other element of architectural
variation as approved by the Director of Planning.
12/17/2025 Page 68 of 131
(P)
In addition, this variation obligation may be
achieved on a building by building basis only if
approved by the Director of Planning at the time of
plans review and approval.
17. Front Enty (Porches & Stoops). Each dwelling
unit shall include a front entry or stoop, measuring
a minimum of four (4) feet in depth, featuring either
a roof or a recessed entrance. Where columns are used
to support a roof, the columns shall be constructed
of rot-proof material such as MiraTEK. Where stoops
are used, stoop floors shall be constructed of
concrete. If a front porch is provided, it shall be
constructed with continuous foundation walls or
masonry piers to match the foundation of the home.
(P)
18. Garages.
a. Each unit shall include, at a minimum, a
one-car garage with interior garage dimensions of at
least ten (10) feet wide by nineteen (19) feet deep
cleared vehicle area (exclusive of obstructions such
as stairs, landings, or door swings) with a minimum
eight (8) foot wide garage door.
b. Each garage space shall count as 0.5
spaces towards the required parking.
c. Front loaded, and corner side loaded
garages shall use an upgraded garage door. An
upgraded garage door is any door with a minimum of
three (3) enhanced features. Enhanced features shall
include windows, raised panels, decorative panels,
arches, ornamental hardware, colors, or other
architectural features on the exterior that enhance
the entry (i.e., decorative lintels, shed roof
overhangs, arches, columns, keystones, eyebrows,
etc.) Flat panel garage doors are prohibited.
d. For the Two-Unit Townhomes, the total
garage door width as a percentage of total building
row length shall not exceed 75%. (P)
19. Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning
(HVAC) Units and Whole House Generators. Units shall
initially be screened from view of roads by
landscaping or low maintenance material, as approved
by the Planning Department. (P)
20. Pedestrian Lighting. Each townhouse unit shall
either have a post light in the front yard, or a
decorative light fixture placed above the garage. (P)
21. Buffers.
a. All buffers shall be recorded within
common area or open space.
b. A variable width buffer shall be
12/17/2025 Page 69 of 131
provided along the subject property line adjacent to
GPIN 743-705-3543, excluding adjacent to the proposed
parking lot and public road, as generally shown on
Exhibit A.
c. A minimum 75-foot buffer shall be
provided along North Courthouse Road in accordance
with buffer treatment requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance for 50-foot buffers adjacent to roads for
lot subdivisions. In areas of the buffer that does
not contain existing, mature vegetation, treatment
shall follow the requirements of 19.1-263.A.2.b. (P)
22. Fencing. If fencing is provided in the rear
yards of residential lots that are adjacent to the
central common/recreational area, such fencing shall
be uniform in material, height, color, and design.
The final fencing design shall be subject to review
and approval by the homeowner’s association to ensure
visual consistency along the common/recreational
area. Any future modifications or replacements of the
fencing must conform to the approved design to
maintain uniformity. (P)
23. Building Height. Maximum building height for
the Two-Unit Townhomes shall be 30 feet. (P)
24. Removed
25. Recreational Facilities. The exact design,
location, size, and layout of all recreational
facilities, entry features, seating areas, and
landscaping described below shall be determined
during final design and shall be subject to review
and approval by the Planning Department during plans
review.
a. A pavilion and walking trails, as
generally shown on Exhibit A, shall be provided as
recreational facilities. In addition, two or more of
the following amenities shall be provided within
common areas: a grill area, tot lot, fire pit area,
dog park, community garden, or similar amenity.
b. At a minimum, the Applicant shall
provide an entry feature within the common area near
the southernmost entrance to the Property, and
seating intended to facilitate gatherings within the
common area near the northernmost entrance.
c. Landscaping shall be provided at trail
entrance locations to enhance visibility and
aesthetics. Landscaping may include a combination of
plantings, signage, wayfinding features, or similar
elements, with type, quantity, and placement
determined at final design.
d. All recreational facilities shall be
developed concurrently with the phase of development
in which they are located. (P)
12/17/2025 Page 70 of 131
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
L. 25SN1055 - Reymet Road Rezoning - Bermuda
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Reymet Road Rezoning
is a request to rezone from Agricultural (A) to Heavy
Industrial (I-3) and amendment of zoning district map
on 64.68 acres located in the northwest corner of
Reymet and Coach Roads. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for
Manufacturing & Processing uses. Tax ID 797-668-9087.
If approved, effective January 1, 2026, the zoning
classification shall be Employment General (EG).
Mr. Ingle stated he would preside over the public
hearing, but he recused himself from discussion and
voting on the matter.
Assistant Director of Planning Stephen Donohoe
introduced the case. He stated the Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval, subject to
the conditions in the staff report.
Discussion ensued relative to the information
provided.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
Renae Eldred stated she was glad to see the use
restrictions.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Hylton, the
Board approved Case 25SN1055, subject to the
following conditions:
Proffered Conditions
1. Uses. All permitted and restricted uses in the
I-3 District shall be permitted with the exception of
the following uses: Slaughterhouse, Meat
Manufacturing, Automobile Manufacturing, Automobile
Storage Lot, Blast Furnace, Chemical and Allied
Products Manufacturing, Crematorium, Data Center,
Electric Power Transforming Station, Foundry (non-
ferrous)/other primary metal industry, Fuel Storage
and Distribution, Gas Production Plant, Gas Storage
and Distribution, Iron Foundry, Leather Tanning, Mass
Transportation Station/Terminal, Petroleum refining
and allied industries, Coal Products Manufacturing,
Electric power plant producing electricity for
others, and Seafood canning and preserving, to
include product preparation and packaging. (P)
2. Jean Court Subdivision Buffer. A 200-foot
buffer shall be provided on the Property where
adjacent to any lot in the Jean Court Subdivision.
(P)
3. Police.
12/17/2025 Page 71 of 131
a. Gate. If the main vehicular property
entrance is gated, an electronic pushbutton keypad
shall be installed for emergency police access.
Owner/Operator shall contact the Chesterfield County
Emergency Communications Center (ECC) Operations
Manager to establish a unique, four-digit, CCPD-only
access code to prior to the certificate of occupancy
being issued.
b. Exterior Door. Exterior pedestrian
building doors shall be numbered with minimum 10-
inch-tall numerals of a contrasting color to the
façade on which they are attached. Numerals shall be
located above the building doors, inside and out.
c. Lighting. Full cut-off, photocell-
activated, pole-mounted, minimum seventy (70) color
rendering index (CRI) rated, LED luminaires shall
illuminate sidewalks and parking with a minimum
maintained illumination level of 1.5 foot-candles, as
measured at grade.
Light poles shall not be located within 20’ of large
maturing shade trees.
d. Landscaping. Unless taller plantings are
required by Chesterfield County Planning, building
foundation plantings shall not have natural, mature
growth habits that exceed three (3) feet in height.
(Police)
4. Dedication. Prior to final site plan approval
or within sixty (60) days from a written request by
the Transportation Department, whichever occurs
first, the owner/developer shall dedicate forty-five
feet (45’) of right-of-way along the north side of
Reymet Road and the west side of Coach Road, free and
unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield
County measured from the centerline of that part of
the roadway immediately adjacent to the Property. (T)
5. Access. There shall be no access to Riverside
Drive/Jean Court. (T)
6. Transportation Improvements. Prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the
owner/developer shall widen/improve the north side of
Reymet Road to a twelve (12) foot wide travel lane,
measured from the centerline of the existing
pavement, with an additional four (4) foot wide paved
shoulder and overlaying the full width of the road
with one and a half (1.5) inch of surface asphalt,
with any modifications approved by the Transportation
Department, for the entire property frontage and
dedicate any additional right-of-way and/or easements
required for the improvements identified above. (T)
7. Utilities. Public water and wastewater shall be
used. (U)
8. Wastewater System Hydraulic Analysis. The
developer shall submit to the Utilities Department
for review and approval a wastewater system hydraulic
analysis to verify downstream capacity, prior to or
in conjunction with the first site or construction
plan submittal. Any capacity related improvements
12/17/2025 Page 72 of 131
necessary to support the wastewater demands of this
development shall be the responsibility of the
developer and shall be reflected on the site or
construction plan. (U)
Ayes: Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
18. Public Hearings
A. To Consider Amendment to County Code Chapter 19.2
Relative to Auto Sales, Utility Connections, and Site
Plans
Zoning Administrator Thomas Jenkins introduced the
public hearing.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
Renae Eldred stated she was glad to see the change
relative to used car lot sales.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board adopted the following ordinance:
SEE ATTACHMENTS A, B, AND C TO THESE MINUTES.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
B. To Consider a Request to Vacate a Portion of a
Variable Width Drainage Easement Across the Property
Owned by Courthouse Landing Va, LLC within Courthouse
Road Extended And Dedication of Variable Width
Drainage Easement - Dale District
Real Property Manager Lynn Snow introduced the public
hearing.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE whereby the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
VIRGINIA ("GRANTOR") vacates to COURTHOUSE
LANDING VA, LLC, a Florida limited liability
company ("GRANTEE") a variable width drainage
easement across 9301 Spencer Creek Place, 6500
Courthouse Landing Lane, 6501 Courthouse Landing
Lane, 6601 Courthouse Landing Lane, 6631
Courthouse Landing Lane and 9751 Courthouse Road
within Courthouse Road Extended And Dedication of
Variable Width Drainage Easement, DALE
Magisterial District, Chesterfield County,
Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof duly
12/17/2025 Page 73 of 131
recorded in the Clerk's Office, Circuit Court,
Chesterfield County, Virginia in Plat Book 47, at
Page 17.
WHEREAS, COURTHOUSE LANDING VA, LLC, a Florida
limited liability company petitioned the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to
vacate a portion of a 60’ drainage easement within
Courthouse Road Extended And Dedication of Variable
Width Drainage Easement, DALE Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia more particularly shown
on a plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of said County in Plat Book 47, Page
17, by YOUNGBLOOD, TYLER & ASSOCIATES, dated AUGUST
16, 1984. The portion of easement petitioned to be
vacated is more fully described as follows:
A portion of a 60’ drainage easement within
Courthouse Road Extended And Dedication of
Variable Width Drainage Easement, the location of
which is more fully shown on a plat by TOWNES
SITE ENGINEERING, dated OCTOBER 8, 2025, a copy
of which is attached hereto and made a part of
this Ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section
15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended,
by advertising; and,
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the
continuance of the portion of easement sought to be
vacated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid portion of
easement be and is hereby vacated.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a certified copy of
this Ordinance, together with the plat attached
hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days
hereafter in the Clerk's Office, Circuit Court,
Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant to Section
15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section
15.2-2274 is to destroy the force and effect of the
recording of the portion of the plat vacated. This
Ordinance shall vest fee simple title to the portion
of easement hereby vacated in the underlying
landowners within Courthouse Road Extended And
Dedication of Variable Width Drainage Easement, free
and clear of any rights of public use.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the
names of the GRANTOR and GRANTEE, or their successors
in title.
12/17/2025 Page 74 of 131
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
C. To Consider the Vacation of an 8’ Easement Across Lot
1 Hallsley Section 21 A Resubdivision of Lots 5 & 6
and Open Space B --Midlothian District
Ms. Snow introduced the public hearing.
Mr. Ingle called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE whereby the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
VIRGINIA ("GRANTOR") vacates to JAMES B.
BURKHOLDER and MARINA B. BURKHOLDER (spouses)
("GRANTEE") an 8’ easement across Lot 1, Hallsley
Section 21 A Resubdivision of Lots 5 & 6 And Open
Space B, MIDLOTHIAN Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on a plat
thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's Office,
Circuit Court, Chesterfield County, Virginia in
Plat Book 247, at Pages 99 and 100.
WHEREAS, JAMES BURKHOLDER petitioned the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to
vacate an 8’ easement across Lot 1, Hallsley Section
21 A Resubdivision of Lots 5 & 6 And Open Space B,
MIDLOTHIAN Magisterial District, Chesterfield County,
Virginia more particularly shown on a plat of record
in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of said
County in Plat Book 247, Pages 99 and 100, by BALZER
& ASSOCIATES, dated MAY 17, 2017. The easement
petitioned to be vacated is more fully described as
follows:
An 8’ easement across Lot 1, Hallsley Section 21
A Resubdivision of Lots 5 & 6 And Open Space B,
the location of which is more fully shown on a
plat by BRUCE ROBERTSON LAND SURVEYING, P.C.,
dated SEPTEMBER 19, 2025, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part of this
Ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section
15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended,
by advertising; and,
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the
continuance of the easement sought to be vacated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid easement be
and is hereby vacated.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
12/17/2025 Page 75 of 131
accordance with Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a certified copy of
this Ordinance, together with the plat attached
hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days
hereafter in the Clerk's Office, Circuit Court,
Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant to Section
15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section
15.2-2274 is to destroy the force and effect of the
recording of the portion of the plat vacated. This
Ordinance shall vest fee simple title to the easement
hereby vacated in the underlying landowner of Lot 1,
within Hallsley Section 21 A Resubdivision of Lots 5
& 6 And Open Space B, free and clear of any rights of
public use.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the
names of the GRANTOR and GRANTEES, or their
successors in title.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
19. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
There were no speakers on unscheduled matters at this
time.
20. Adjournment
A. Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of
the Board of Supervisors
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adjourned at 10:54 p.m. to its Board of
Supervisors' Organizational Meeting on January 7,
2026, at 6 p.m. in the Public Meeting Room at 10001
Iron Bridge Road.
Ayes: Ingle, Miller, Schneider, Hylton and Carroll.
Nays: None.
__________________________ ___________________________
Joseph P. Casey Mark S. Miller
County Administrator Chairman
12/17/2025 Page 76 of 131
Citizen Comments Received Through the Comment Portal December 17, 2025, Board of Supervisors Meeting
Comment Type Comment Name District
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
Lynn Kinsel Clover Hill
12/17/2025 Page 77 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
Eric Wiseman Clover Hill
12/17/2025 Page 78 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
Brian Taylor Midlothian
12/17/2025 Page 79 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
Eric Drum Midlothian
12/17/2025 Page 80 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
Joshua
Martin
Matoaca
12/17/2025 Page 81 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
Andrew
Blazar
Midlothian
12/17/2025 Page 82 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
12/17/2025 Page 83 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs. Our community is facing
a housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community. This proposal
aligns with the County’s
Comprehensive Plan, which
designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well. Finally, the site
represents a strong infill
location—well served by
existing roads, public
services, amenities, and
employment centers. It allows
future residents to live close
to the places they rely on
most, reducing commute times
and optimizing use of existing
infrastructure. For these
reasons, I respectfully urge
your support of Case 25SN1050.
It exemplifies the kind of
smart, balanced growth that
will help meet Chesterfield
County’s housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality. Thank you
for your consideration and for
Trevor Davis Bermuda
12/17/2025 Page 84 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
your continued service to the
County.
24SN1334 -
Winterpock
Meadows
Rezoning
Hi - I live off Winterpock Rd
about 2 miles south of the
Winterpock and Beach
intersection. I see in the
current case (24SN1334 -
Winterpock Meadows) that they
are attempting to remove the
connector road between Beach
and Winterpock, I believe that
with the amount of traffic
already at the
Beach/Winterpock intersection,
it would be a mistake to
remove this connectivity,
especially as additional homes
seem to be coming to the area
and it's already a very busy
and backed up intersection at
certain times. I have no other
issues with the rezoning.
Thank you for your
consideration.
Eric Wirt Matoaca
24SN1334 -
Winterpock
Meadows
Rezoning
I live 1.2 miles south of
Beach Rd on Winterpock Rd at
11712 Winterpock Rd. There is
a good amount of traffic at
the intersection of Beach and
Winterpock. While it is busy,
it works fairly well. I
understand there is not many
options to improve this
intersection in the future
since it has Crumps Store, the
Church, and a cemetery with no
setback from the intersection.
I was surprised to find out
that the Planning commission
has recommended to delete an
important connection from
Beach to Winterpock. I believe
it is important to keep the
future right of way and road
improvements for the Beach Rd
west to Winterpock north
connection to allow much of
the traffic to bypass this
intersection. The community
would be negatively impacted
if this connection is deleted
in the Winterpock Meadows
case. There are many more
homes coming to this area and
the county needs this
connection. I have no other
issues with this case.
Vernon
McClure
Matoaca
12/17/2025 Page 85 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
Brian
Burnette
Dale
12/17/2025 Page 86 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
Starell Cox Clover Hill
12/17/2025 Page 87 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
Jason Brown Not
provided
12/17/2025 Page 88 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Ashley
Cunningham
Matoaca
12/17/2025 Page 89 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
Cheryl
Chaney
Dale
12/17/2025 Page 90 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
Richard
Cunningham
III
Not
provided
12/17/2025 Page 91 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs. Our community is facing
Josh Madison Dale
12/17/2025 Page 92 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
a housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community. This proposal
aligns with the County’s
Comprehensive Plan, which
designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well. Finally, the site
represents a strong infill
location—well served by
existing roads, public
services, amenities, and
employment centers. It allows
future residents to live close
to the places they rely on
most, reducing commute times
and optimizing use of existing
infrastructure. For these
reasons, I respectfully urge
your support of Case 25SN1050.
It exemplifies the kind of
smart, balanced growth that
will help meet Chesterfield
County’s housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality. Thank you
for your consideration and for
your continued service to the
County.
12/17/2025 Page 93 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
Erin Madison Dale
12/17/2025 Page 94 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs. Our community is facing
a housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community. This proposal
aligns with the County’s
Comprehensive Plan, which
designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well. Finally, the site
represents a strong infill
location—well served by
existing roads, public
services, amenities, and
employment centers. It allows
future residents to live close
to the places they rely on
most, reducing commute times
and optimizing use of existing
infrastructure. For these
Kelley Davis Bermuda
12/17/2025 Page 95 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
reasons, I respectfully urge
your support of Case 25SN1050.
It exemplifies the kind of
smart, balanced growth that
will help meet Chesterfield
County’s housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality. Thank you
for your consideration and for
your continued service to the
County.
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
Arnold
Castellanos
Dale
12/17/2025 Page 96 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
Mike Chaney Dale
12/17/2025 Page 97 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
Erin Madison Not
provided
12/17/2025 Page 98 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
25SN1050 -
Courthouse
Road
Rezoning and
Exceptions
I live in the Villas at
Ashford Hill directly across
from the proposed townhouse
development. There are many
issues I’m concerned about,
including changing the look of
the neighborhood, more cars,
more traffic, and definitely
becoming more dangerous,
especially getting out of our
community. I’m terrified
they’ll be a fatal accident
once this is completed.
If this development is
approved, I ask that you
please create a R-cut, or
something similar, that won’t
send cars into our
neighborhood to make U-turns.
Delivery vehicles, buses, and
trucks are already doing that,
and the space between the
medians is quite large.
Obviously, we don’t want cars
coming into our neighborhood
Susan ‘Suzy’
Rekowski
Clover Hill
12/17/2025 Page 99 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
making U-turns. But the lack
of oversight and inspection by
Chesterfield County allowed
Stylecraft to build
substandard roads and curbs
that were DEFINITELY not built
to VDOT standards as promised.
We’re a private community, so
maintenance of the roads and
sidewalks is paid by the
residents. They’re already
cracking/crumbling and we’ve
had to make multiple repairs.
Any additional traffic will
make it worse!
It would also help if you can
time the lights at Reams Road
and Edenberry Drive, so
there’s more time for people
to make U-turns or get out of
our neighborhood.
We thought we were moving into
a residential area of single-
family homes. Now there may be
three story townhouses, which
will not only look awful, but
create a different dynamic in
our neighborhood. I wish
Chesterfield County would take
more time to consider what
these developments do to the
community, environment,
schools, traffic and safety in
general. Thank you.
25SN1216 -
360 West
Shopping
Center Sign
Could they ask them to build a
sidewalk along the edge of
this shopping center for Route
60.
Carl
Schwendeman
Midlothian
25SN1050 -
Courthouse
Road
Rezoning and
Exceptions
Could they ask the developer
to proffer building the 500
foot missing section of
sidewalk in front of the
Village Church so it links up
the 600 foot section of
sidewalk that already exists
along Courthouse Road. Also
could they ask them to proffer
500 foot section of missing
sidewalk along Courthouse Road
to the small sidewalk by Reams
Road.
Carl
Schwendeman
Midlothian
Unscheduled
matter
Could they put a million to
two million of Chesterfield
County's budget Surplus to to
the Community Sidewalk
Connectivity Fund to fund the
sidewalk projects that were
canceled when the fund's
budget was cut in 2025.
Carl
Schwendeman
Midlothian
12/17/2025 Page 100 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
25SN1050 –
Courthouse
Road
I am writing to express my
strong support for the zoning
case currently under
consideration, Case 25SN1050.
This proposal represents the
kind of thoughtful, community-
aligned development that
Chesterfield County urgently
needs.
Our community is facing a
housing shortage that
continues to drive up prices
and make homeownership
increasingly out of reach for
many residents. Expanding
housing supply is not only an
economic imperative—it is
essential to the County’s
long-term sustainability.
Adding well-planned homes in
appropriate locations is one
of the most effective ways to
help balance housing costs and
maintain a thriving, inclusive
community.
This proposal aligns with the
County’s Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the site for
Medium-High Density
Residential use. Concentrating
growth where it is planned and
supported by existing
infrastructure helps reduce
pressure on less suitable
areas, preserves open space
elsewhere, and makes efficient
use of public resources.
Equally important, the plan
provides a mix of housing
types designed to expand
access across a range of
income levels. That level of
housing diversity fosters a
more inclusive community and
ensures that people who work
in Chesterfield have the
opportunity to live here as
well.
Finally, the site represents a
strong infill location—well
served by existing roads,
public services, amenities,
and employment centers. It
allows future residents to
live close to the places they
rely on most, reducing commute
times and optimizing use of
existing infrastructure.
For these reasons, I
respectfully urge your support
of Case 25SN1050. It
exemplifies the kind of smart,
Rodney and
Robin Word
Midlothian
12/17/2025 Page 101 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
balanced growth that will help
meet Chesterfield County’s
housing needs while
strengthening our community’s
long-term vitality.
Thank you for your
consideration and for your
continued service to the
County.
24SN1334 -
Winterpock
Meadows
Rezoning
Good evening Chairman Ingle,
Members of the Board, and
County Staff,
My name is Vicki Stitzer, and
I’m a business owner here in
Chesterfield County. I’m here
tonight to respectfully ask
for your support of rezoning
case 24SN1334, Winterpock
Meadows.
This proposal for 79 single-
family, detached, age-
restricted homes addresses a
real and growing need in the
Western Matoaca area. As many
of you know, we have a
shortage of housing options
for older adults who want to
remain in our community—close
to family, friends, and the
resources they rely on. Age-
restricted homes like these,
provide an important form of
housing diversity, allowing
longtime residents to downsize
without leaving the county
they helped build.
As a business owner, the
benefits extend even further.
My employees—many of whom also
live in Chesterfield—rely on a
healthy, stable development
and the construction industry.
Projects like Winterpock
Meadows create opportunities
for them to keep working,
earning a steady income, and
supporting their families.
When housing supply increases,
especially in targeted areas
where demand is high, it
sustains not only builders and
tradespeople, but the network
of local businesses that
depend on that economic
activity.
This case offers responsible
growth and a thoughtful land
use solution. It brings much-
needed housing to a part of
the county that has clearly
demonstrated demand, and it
does so with a product
Vicki
Stitzer
Matoaca
12/17/2025 Page 102 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
specifically designed for a
population that is too often
underserved in our current
housing landscape.
For these reasons—supporting
housing diversity, addressing
community need, and sustaining
local jobs—I respectfully urge
you to approve rezoning case
24SN1334, Winterpock Meadows.
Thank you for your time and
for the work you do for the
residents and businesses of
Chesterfield County.
25SN1050 -
Courthouse
Road
Rezoning and
Exceptions
Good evening Chairman Ingle,
Members of the Board, and
County Staff,
My name is Vicki Stitzer, and
I’ve been a resident of
Chesterfield County for 38
years. I’m a local business
owner whose livelihood depends
directly on the strength and
stability of Chesterfield’s
development and home-building
industry. Thank you for the
opportunity to speak tonight
in support of rezoning case
25SN1050. From my perspective,
as someone who works closely
with builders, suppliers, and
tradespeople every day, I see
firsthand how critical it is
for our county to foster
responsible, well-planned
growth. This rezoning request
does exactly that. This
project helps address one of
our county’s most pressing
needs: additional housing
supply. The demand for housing
continues to outpace what’s
available, which drives up
prices and makes it harder for
working families—including
many of my employees—to find
homes in the county they
serve. Projects like this help
relieve that pressure. It also
aligns with Chesterfield
County’s Comprehensive Plan—
our community’s roadmap for
thoughtful, balanced
development. The Plan calls
for growth in areas where
infrastructure already exists,
and this site is a textbook
example of that principle in
action. The Courthouse Road
rezoning is an infill
development, not an expansion
into undeveloped or unserved
areas. The property is
surrounded by existing roads,
utilities, public services,
Vicki
Stitzer
Matoaca
12/17/2025 Page 103 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
and amenities. It makes smart
use of the investments
Chesterfield taxpayers have
already made, and represents
the most efficient use of
public resources, because they
leverage existing
infrastructure rather than
requiring extensive new
systems to be built in other
areas of the County. The
site’s proximity to employment
centers and services creates a
logical and sustainable
pattern of growth. When people
live close to where they work,
shop, and learn, our County
benefits—from reduced travel
times and traffic impacts to
stronger local commerce and
community engagement. As a
business owner who depends on
the health of the construction
and housing sectors, I can
confidently say that projects
like 25SN1050 support not only
my business, but hundreds of
others connected to this
industry—suppliers,
contractors, tradespeople,
transportation companies, and
more. But beyond the business
benefits, this is simply good
planning. It’s responsible,
efficient, and responsive to
the needs of Chesterfield
residents. For these reasons,
I respectfully ask you to
approve rezoning case
25SN1050.
24SN1334 -
Winterpock
Meadows
Rezoning
Good evening Chairman Ingle,
Members of the Board, and
County Staff,
My name is Shawn Sellers, and
I run a local business here in
Chesterfield County. I’m here
tonight to voice my support
for rezoning case 24SN1334,
Winterpock Meadows.
What stands out to me about
this proposal is how directly
it responds to a need we hear
about constantly, especially
in Western Matoaca—the lack of
housing choices for older
residents who want to stay in
the community. The plan for 79
single-family, detached, age-
restricted homes offers an
option that is currently in
short supply. It gives long-
time Chesterfield residents a
chance to downsize comfortably
while remaining close to the
people and places that matter
most to them.
As a business owner, I also
Shawn
Sellars
Midlothian
12/17/2025 Page 104 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
see the broader economic value
in a project like this. Many
of my employees rely on the
steady work that responsible
development brings. These are
people who live here, raise
families here, and contribute
every day to the county’s
economy. Projects like
Winterpock Meadows help ensure
that they can continue earning
a reliable income and keep
food on the table. When
housing supply grows in a
thoughtful, planned way, it
supports not only the
construction industry, but the
many local businesses—mine
included—that depend on a
strong workforce and a healthy
market.
Winterpock Meadows represents
the kind of balanced growth
that benefits the community on
multiple levels. It meets a
genuine housing need, creates
economic opportunity, and
strengthens the fabric of the
local workforce.
For these reasons, I
respectfully ask that you
approve rezoning case
24SN1334.
Thank you for your time and
for your continued commitment
to the people and businesses
of Chesterfield County.
25SN1050 -
Courthouse
Road
Rezoning and
Exceptions
Good evening Chairman Ingle,
Members of the Board, and
County Staff,
My name is Shawn Sellers, and
I own a business here in
Chesterfield that works
closely with companies in the
building and development
sector. I appreciate the
opportunity to share my
perspective in support of
rezoning case 25SN1050.
From where I stand, this
request represents the type of
growth that strengthens our
local economy and supports
long-term community goals.
What strikes me most about
this case is how well it
reflects the direction laid
out in Chesterfield’s
Comprehensive Plan. The
proposal places new housing
exactly where the County has
already determined growth is
most appropriate—within an
area that has the
infrastructure and services to
support it.
One of the challenges we face
Shawn
Sellars
Midlothian
12/17/2025 Page 105 of 131
Comment Type Comment Name District
right now, both as business
owners and as residents, is
the shortage of available
housing. That shortage affects
every part of our local
economy. Have you ever stopped
to think about the number of
businesses located here in
Chesterfield County that are
directly liked to residential
construction? There are in
fact hundreds of them. We need
homes to house these employees
and we need new housing to
keep their jobs employed. When
workers, young families, and
even long-time residents
struggle to find homes in
Chesterfield, it impacts the
businesses that rely on them.
By adding new housing in a
location already supported by
roads, utilities, and public
services, this project helps
address that need in a
thoughtful and efficient way.
Instead of pushing development
farther out and requiring new
infrastructure investments,
this project makes smart use
of what the County has already
built. It fills in a gap
within an established area—
exactly the type of project
that allows Chesterfield to
grow responsibly without
overextending public
resources.
This location also places
future residents close to
jobs, shopping, schools, and
community services. That type
of connectivity strengthens
both the workforce and the
businesses that depend on it.
As someone whose business is
directly tied to the success
of the home-building industry,
I can say that supporting
well-planned projects like
this benefits not just my
company, but the broader
network of local suppliers,
tradespeople, and service
providers who keep this
County’s economy moving.
For these reasons, I
respectfully encourage you to
approve rezoning case
25SN1050. It’s a sensible,
strategic step forward for
Chesterfield.
12/17/2025 Page 106 of 131
December 14, 2025
Via E-mail (CarrollKevin@chesterfield.gov)
Mr. Kevin Carroll, Matoaca District
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
Post Office Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
Via E-mail (EllisH@chesterfield.gov)
Mr. Harold Ellis, Planning and Special Projects Administrator
Case Manager - Case No. 24SN1334
Chesterfield County Planning Department
Post Office Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
Re: Neighbor Support Letter
Case No. 24SN1334 – Winterpock Meadows
Dear Mr. Carroll and Mr. Ellis:
My name is Mary E Brenner, and I own and live in the house at 12101 Longtown Dr,
Chesterfield. My house is adjacent to the proposed site for Winterpock Meadows. I have had
multiple conversations with the developer’s representative Matt Glover, who has provided me
with the information I requested and answered all of my questions about the project. I have
reviewed the information provided to me and I am in full support of the development and the
rezoning request.
I support the Winterpock Meadows project and the rezoning because I believe it will enhance
my property value and provide a good transition between my neighborhood and others.
In addition, I am adamantly opposed to the construction of the proposed Chesterfield County
right-of-way, Crump Store Drive, behind my home.
Please include this letter of support among the materials provided to the Planning
Commissioners and the Board of Supervisors. You may contact me
at mbbrenner.pt@gmail.com if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Mary E Brenner
12/17/2025 Page 107 of 131
December 12, 2025
Via E-mail (CarrollKevin@chesterfield.gov)
Mr. Kevin Carroll, Matoaca District
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
Post Office Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
Via E-mail (EllisH@chesterfield.gov)
Mr. Harold Ellis, Planning and Special Projects Administrator
Case Manager - Case No. 24SN1334
Chesterfield County Planning Department
Post Office Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
Re: Neighbor Support Letter
Case No. 24SN1334 – Winterpock Meadows
Dear Mr. Owens and Mr. Ellis:
My name is __Bradley Justus__ and I own and live in the house at _12001 Longtown Dr.
Chesterfield VA, 23832_. My house is adjacent to the proposed site for Winterpock Meadows. I
have had multiple conversations with the developer’s representative Matt Glover, who has
provided me with the information I requested and answered all of my questions about the project.
I have reviewed the information provided to me and I am in full support of the development and
the rezoning request.
I support the Winterpock Meadows project and the rezoning because I believe it will
enhance my property value and provide a good transition between my neighborhood. I also do not
support the construction of the proposed Chesterfield County right-of-way, Crump Store Drive,
behind my home.
Please include this letter of support among the materials provided to the Planning
Commissioners and the Board of Supervisors. You may contact me at __bmjustus4@gmail.com_
if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
_Bradley Justus_
12/17/2025 Page 108 of 131
December 9, 2025
Via E-mail (CarrollKevin@chesterfield.gov)
Mr. Kevin Carroll, Matoaca District
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
Post Office Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
Via E-mail (EllisH@chesterfield.gov)
Mr. Harold Ellis, Planning and Special Projects Administrator
Case Manager - Case No. 24SN1334
Chesterfield County Planning Department
Post Office Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
Re: Neighbor Support Letter
Case No. 24SN1334 – Winterpock Meadows
Dear Mr. Carroll and Mr. Ellis:
My name is Wanda Norwood and I own and live in the house at 12107 Longtown Drive,
Chesterfield, VA 23832. My house is adjacent to the proposed site for Winterpock Meadows. I
have had multiple conversations with the developer’s representative Matt Glover, who has
provided me with the information I requested and answered all of my questions about the project.
I have reviewed the information provided to me and I am in full support of the development and
the rezoning request.
I support the Winterpock Meadows project and the rezoning because I believe it will
enhance my property value and provide a good transition between my neighborhood. I also do
NOT support the construction of the proposed Chesterfield County right-of-way, Crump Store
Drive, behind my home.
Please include this letter of support among the materials provided to the Planning
Commissioners and the Board of Supervisors. You may contact me at norwoodwf@gmail.com if
you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Wanda Norwood
12/17/2025 Page 109 of 131
12/17/2025 Page 110 of 131
12/17/2025 Page 111 of 131
ATTACHMENT A
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
REENACTING SECTIONS 19.2-8, 19.2-9, 19.2-10, 19.2-11, 19.2-12
AND 19.2-72 RELATIVE TO ZONING DISTRICTS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 19.2-8, 19.2-9, 19.2-10, 19.2-11, 19.2-12 and 19.2-72 of the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted, to read as follows:
Chapter 19.2
OOO
ARTICLE 2 ZONING DISTRICTS
Division 2 Residential Districts
OOO
19.2-8 Agricultural (A)
Purpose. The Agricultural (A) District provides land areas for large lot single-family dwellings as
well as forest and farmland including agricultural and silvicultural operations and ancillary uses
that contribute to and complement the natural environment and rural character. The role of
this district is to preserve natural areas, water resources, wildlife habitat, and open spaces while
protecting the rural economy of the County and preventing the encroachment of premature
and incompatible land uses.
• Applicability. The A District should be used to implement the areas shown in the
Comprehensive Plan as Rural Residential/Agricultural (maximum 0.2 dwelling units per
acre) or Residential Agricultural (maximum 0.5 dwelling units per acre). Displayed in
Figure 19.2-8.2, Illustrated Renderings, are graphic depictions of the lot and building
standards. The standards in Table 19.2-8.1, Agricultural (A) Lot and Building Standards,
reflect a base development pattern and one non-residential option with private well and
septic systems:
o Base Pattern. The base pattern provides for rural residential development on five acre
or larger parcels. Standards are included to accommodate parcels that were approved
before the effective date of this Chapter.
o Option 1. This option allows for non-residential development that serves the needs of
the County's agricultural community and rural residents.
• Land Uses. The uses available in this district are listed in Sec. 19.2-29, Principal Use
Matrix, and Sec 19.2-31, Accessory Use Matrix.
• Dimensional Standards.
Table 19.2-8.1, Agricultural (A) Lot and Building Standards
ac = acre du = dwelling unit sf. = square feet ' = feet
Key Development Base Option 1
Neighborhood Type
Lots recorded: Non-
Residential After 02.27.01 05.26.88
thru 02.27.01
Before
05.26.88
Lot Standards
A Lot Area (min) [1] [2] 5.0 ac 1.0 ac 15,000 sf. 1.0 ac
B Lot Width (min) [3] 150' 150' 100' 150'
C Road Frontage (min) [4] [5] 250' 50' 50' 50'
D Building Coverage (max) 20% 20% 30% 20%
Building Standards
Principal Building Placement [6] [7]
12/17/2025 Page 112 of 131
Table 19.2-8.1, Agricultural (A) Lot and Building Standards
ac = acre du = dwelling unit sf. = square feet ' = feet
Key Development Base Option 1
Neighborhood Type
Lots recorded: Non-
Residential After 02.27.01 05.26.88
thru 02.27.01
Before
05.26.88
E Front Setback (min) 150' 150' [8] 100' [9] [13]
F Side Setback (min) 40' 40' 15'
/10' [10] [13]
G
Corner Side Setback (min)
- Through Lot back-to-back with
another corner lot or backing to open
space or common areas
- Other
40'
75'
40'
75'
20'
35' [11]
[13]
[13]
H
Rear Setback (min)
- Non-Through Lot
- Through Lot
50'
150'
50'
150' [7]
25'
100' [8] [13] [13]
Accessory Building Placement
I Front Setback (min) Lesser of 1/2 the average depth of the lot or 80'
J Side Setback (min) 40' 40' 15' [13]
K
Corner Side Setback (min)
- Buildings Less Than 15'
in Height
- Buildings 15' or
Greater in Height
150'
150'
150'
150'
[12]
[12] [13]
L
Rear Setback (min)
- Standard Lot
- Through Lot
25'
30'
25'
30'
12.5'
30' [13]
Accessory Building Placement for Structures under 15' in height
Front Setback (min) Lesser of 1/2 the average depth of the lot or 80'
Side Setback (min) 20' 20' 7.5' [13]
Corner Side Setback (min) 150' 150' [12] [13]
Rear Setback (min)
- Standard Lot
- Through Lot
10'
30'
10'
30'
10'
30' [13]
Building Height
M
Principal Building height (max) 45' 45' 45' 45'
Farm Structure Height, Village Overlay
(max)
Farm Structure Height, Other Areas
(max)
45'
50'
45'
50'
45'
50'
45'
50'
Parking
N Parking Lot Setback -- -- -- 50'
Utilities
--
Use of Public Water and/or Wastewater
Systems for Development Approved
after January 1, 2026.
Not Required,
unless required
by County
Code Sec. 18-
60.
Not Required,
unless required
by County
Code Sec. 18-
60.
Not
Required,
unless
required
by County
Code 18-
60.
Not Required,
unless required
by County
Code 18-60.
OOO
19.2-9 Rural Community (RC)
Purpose. The Rural Community (RC) District provides for residential development on minimum
five acre lots. The role of the RC District is to provide a large lot subdivision development option
served by new or existing public roads in the rural areas of the County with limited agricultural
related uses.
12/17/2025 Page 113 of 131
• Applicability. The RC district should be used to implement the areas shown in the
Comprehensive Plan as Rural Residential / Agricultural (maximum 0.2 dwelling units per
acre) or Residential Agricultural (maximum 0.5 dwelling units per acre). The standards in
Table 19.2-9, RC Lot and Building Standards, reflect a minimum five-acre lot served by
private well and septic systems. Displayed in Figure 19.2-9.2, RC Illustrated Renderings,
are graphic depictions of the lot and building standards.
• Land Uses. The uses available in this district are listed in Sec. 19.2-29, Principal Use
Matrix and Sec. 19.2-31, Accessory Use Matrix.
• Dimensional Standards.
Table 19.2-9.1, Rural Community (RC) Lot and Building Standards
ac = acre du = dwelling unit sf. = square feet ' = feet
Key Development Base
Neighborhood Type Single-Family
-- Amenity Space (min) --
Lot Standards
A Lot Area (min) 5.0 ac
B Lot Width (min) 150'
C Road Frontage (min) 250' [1]
D Building Coverage (max) 20%
Building Standards
Principal Building Placement [2]
E Front Setback (min) 150'
F Side Setback (min) 40'
G
Corner Side Setback (min)
- Through Lot, Lot Back-to-Back, or Lot Backing to Amenity Space
- Other
40'
75'
H
Rear Setback (min)
- Non-Through Lot
- Through Lot
50'
150'
Accessory Building Placement
I Front Setback (min) 100'
J Side Setback (min) 40'
K Corner Side Setback (min) 150'
Rear Setback (min)
- Standard Lot, 15' or Greater in Height
- Through Lot, 15' or Greater in Height
25'30'
L Accessory Building Placement for Structures Under 15' in Height
Front Setback (min) 100'
Side Setback (min) 20'
Corner Side Setback (min) 150'
Rear Setback
- Standard Lot
- Through Lot
10'
30'
Principal & Accessory Building Height
M Height (max) 45'
Utilities
Use of Public Water and/or Wastewater Systems for Development
Approved after January 1, 2026.
Not required, unless
required by County
Code Sec. 18-60.
OOO
19.2-10. Semi-Rural Neighborhood (SR)
12/17/2025 Page 114 of 131
Purpose. The Semi-Rural Neighborhood (SR) District provides for residential development on
larger lot sizes ranging from two acres to half-acre. The role of the SR District is to transition
from the rural areas to developing areas of the County by encouraging developments that
incorporate environmental features and green areas as key components.
• Applicability. The SR District should be used to implement the areas shown in the
Comprehensive Plan as Residential Agricultural (maximum 0.5 dwelling units per acre) and
Residential Neighborhood 1 (maximum of 1.0 dwelling unit per acre), typically located in
the southernmost part of the County. Displayed in Figure 19.2-10.2, SR Illustrated
Renderings, are graphic depictions of the lot and building standards. The standards in Table
19.2-10.1, SR Lot and Building Standards, reflect a base development pattern and two
options for single-family development:
o Base Pattern. The base pattern provides for estate-sized lots of at least two acres served
by water and private septic systems.
o Option 1. This option provides for one acre lots served by public water and private
septic.
o Option 2. This option provides for half-acre lots served by both public water and
wastewater.
• Land Uses. The uses available in this district are listed in Sec. 19.2-29, Principal Use
Matrix, and Sec. 19.2-31, Accessory Use Matrix.
• Dimensional Standards.
Table 19.2-10.1, Semi-Rural Neighborhood (SR) Lot and Building Standards
ac = acre du = dwelling unit sf = square feet ' = feet
Key Development Base Option 1 Option 2
Neighborhood Type Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family
-- Amenity Space (min) -- -- --
Lot Standards
A Lot Area (min) [1] 87,120 sf. 40,000 sf. 21,780 sf.
B Lot Width (min) 150' 150' 120'
C
Road Frontage (min)
- Cul-de-sac or Loop Road
- Other Road
30'
50'
30'
50'
30'
50'
D Building Coverage (max) 20% 20% 25%
Building Standards
Principal Building Placement [2]
E
Front Setback (min) [3]
- Street
- Cul-de-sac
75'
25'
60'
25'
50'
25'
F Side Setback (min) 30' 20' 15'
G
Corner Side Setback (min)
- Through Lot, Lot Back-to-Back
or Lot Backing to Amenity Space
- Other
30'
75'
30'
55'
25'
45'
H
Rear Setback (min)
- Non-Through Lot
- Through Lot
50'
75'
50'
60'
40'
50'
Accessory Building Placement for Structures 15' in Height or Greater, Not to Exceed 30' in Height
I Front Setback (min) Lesser of half the average depth of the lot or 80'
J Side Setback (min) Same as side setback of the principal building placement
K Corner Side Setback (min) Same as front setback of the principal building placement
L Rear Setback (min) Half of the rear setback of the principal building placement
Accessory Building Placement for Structures Under 15' in Height
M Front Setback (min) Lesser of half the average depth of the lot or 80'
N Side Setback (min) Half of the side setback of the principal building placement
O Corner Side Setback (min) Same as front setback of the principal building placement
P
Rear Setback (min)
- Non-through Lot
- Through Lot
10'
30'
Principal Building Height
12/17/2025 Page 115 of 131
Table 19.2-10.1, Semi-Rural Neighborhood (SR) Lot and Building Standards
ac = acre du = dwelling unit sf = square feet ' = feet
Key Development Base Option 1 Option 2
Neighborhood Type Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family
Q Height (max) 45' 45' 45'
Utilities
Use of Public Water and/or
Wastewater Systems for
Development Approved after
January 1, 2026.
Permitted only if
approved by the
Director of Utilities
Water
Required unless
approved for an
exception by County
Code Sec. 18-61;
Wastewater Not
Required, unless
required by County
Code Sec. 18-60.
Required, unless
approved for an
exception by County
Code Sec. 18-61.
Notes:
[1] Lot area requirements may be affected by the availability of on-site sewage disposal or septic systems as provided in
Chapter 12, Health and Sanitation, of the County Code.
[2] Setbacks may be impacted by Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas, or Upper Swift Creek Watershed
regulations.
[3] Minimum setbacks shall be increased, where necessary, to obtain the required width at the front building line.
OOO
19.2-11 Suburban Community (SC)
Purpose. The Suburban Community (SC) District provides for quality single-family
neighborhoods in the developing areas of the County and as infill opportunities within established
areas of the County. Developments in the SC District should feature connectivity to employment
centers, services, amenities, and other neighborhoods.
• Applicability. The SC District should be used to implement the areas shown in the
Comprehensive Plan as Residential Neighborhood 2 (2.0 dwelling units per acre or
less), Phased Residential (2.0 dwelling units per acre or less) or Residential Neighborhood
4 (4.0 dwelling units per acre or less). Displayed in Figure 19.2-11.1, SC Illustrated
Renderings, are graphic depictions of the lot and building standards. The standards in Table
19.2-11.1, SC Lot and Building Standards, reflect a single-family base development pattern
and two single-family options served by public water and wastewater:
o Base Pattern. The base pattern provides for large lot residences on third-
acre (14,500 sf.) lots.
o Option 1. This option provides for quarter-acre (11,000 sf.) lots.
o Option 2. This option provides for fifth-acre (8,000 sf.) lots with amenity space.
• Land Uses. The uses available in this district are listed in Sec. 19.2-29, Principal Use
Matrix, and Sec. 19.2-31, Accessory Use Matrix.
• Dimensional Standards.
Table 19.2-11.1, Suburban Community (SC) Lot and Building Standards
ac = acre sf. = square feet ' = feet
Key Development Base Option 1 Option 2
Neighborhood Type Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family
-- Amenity Space (min) 0% 7.5% 10%
Strategic Amenity Space (min) -- 0.01 ac/du 0.01 ac/du
Lot Standards
A Lot Area (min) 14,500 sf. 11,000 sf. 8,000 sf.
B Lot Width (min) 100' 90' 75'
C
Road Frontage (min)
- Cul-de-sac or Loop Road
- Other Road
30'
50'
30'
50'
30'
50'
D Building Coverage (max) 25% 35% 40%
Building Standards
Principal Building Placement [1]
12/17/2025 Page 116 of 131
Table 19.2-11.1, Suburban Community (SC) Lot and Building Standards
ac = acre sf. = square feet ' = feet
Key Development Base Option 1 Option 2
Neighborhood Type Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family
E
Front Setback (min) [2]
- Street
- Cul-de-sac
30'
25'
30'
25'
30'
25'
F Side Setback (min) 15' [3] 10' 7.5'
G
Corner Side Setback (min)
- Through Lot, Lot Back-to-Back
or Lot Backing to Amenity Space
- Other
20'
35'
20'
30'
15'
25'
H
Rear Setback (min)
- Non-through Lot
- Through Lot
25''
40'
25'
30'
25'
30'
Accessory Building Placement for Structures 15' in Height or Greater, Not to Exceed 30'
I Front Setback (min) Lesser of half the average depth of the lot or 80'
J Side Setback (min) Same as side setback of the principal building placement
K Corner Side Setback (min) Same as front setback of the principal building placement
L Rear Setback (min) Half of the rear setback of the principal building placement
Accessory Building Placement for Structures Under 15' in Height
M Front Setback (min) Lesser of half the average depth of the lot or 80'
N Side Setback (min) Half of the side setback of the principal building placement
O Corner Side Setback (min) Same as front setback of the principal building placement
P
Rear Setback (min)
- Non-through lot
- Through lot
10'
30'
Principal Building Height
Q Height (max) 45' 45' 45'
Utilities
--
Use of Public Water and/or
Wastewater Systems for
Development Approved after
January 1, 2026.
Required, unless
approved for an
exception by County
Code Sec. 18-61.
Required, unless
approved for an
exception by County
Code Sec. 18-61.
Required, unless
approved for an
exception by County
Code Sec. 18-61.
Notes:
[4] Setbacks may be impacted by Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas, or Upper Swift Creek Watershed
regulations.
[5] Minimum setbacks shall be increased, where necessary, to obtain the required width at the front building line.
[6] Lots recorded on or before 12/11/1945, may have an interior side yard of 10 feet.
D. Family Subdivision. Lots created through the family subdivision process identified in Sec.
17.1-42 shall meet the bulk standards for the Base Pattern of this Section. Utility connection
requirements may be administratively waived for a family subdivision.
E. Properties not subdivided before January 1, 2026. Property zoned R-15, R-12, or R-9
and not subdivided prior to January 1, 2026, shall be controlled by 19.2-72.C.
OOO
19.2-12 Semi-Urban Neighborhood (SU)
Purpose. The Semi-Urban Neighborhood (SU) District provides for single-family dwellings on
smaller lots. The role of the SU District is to provide a transition from corridors and more
intensely developed areas to single-family neighborhoods and may be appropriate in areas where
environmental constraints make achieving Comprehensive Plan densities difficult. Developments
in the SU District are encouraged to integrate affordable housing with market-rate development
where appropriate.
• Applicability. The SU District should be used to implement the areas shown in the
Comprehensive Plan as Residential Neighborhood 4 (4.0 dwelling units per acre or less)
and Residential Neighborhood 8 (8.0 dwelling units per acre or less). These areas
are located along arterial roads and are used to transition higher and lower intensity land
12/17/2025 Page 117 of 131
uses. Displayed in Figure 19.2-12.1, SU Illustrated Renderings, are graphic depictions of
the lot and building standards. The standards in Table 19.2-12.1, SU Lot and Building
Standards, reflect a base development pattern and two options all requiring connection to
public water and wastewater systems:
o Base Pattern. The base pattern provides for single-family uses on 7,500 square foot lots
with amenity space.
o Option 1. This option provides for single-family uses on 6,000 square foot lots with
amenity space.
o Option 2. This option provides for single-family uses on 4,500 square foot lots with
amenity space.
• Land Uses. The uses available in this district are listed in Sec. 19.2-29, Principal Use
Matrix, and Sec. 19.2-31, Accessory Use Matrix.
• Dimensional Standards.
Table 19.2-12.1, Semi-Urban Neighborhood (SU) Lot and Building Standards
ac = acre du = dwelling unit sf. = square feet ' = feet
Development Base Option 1 Option 2
Key Neighborhood Type Single-Family Single-
Family
Single-
Family
-- Amenity Space (min) [1] 10% 12.5% 15%
Strategic Amenity Space (min) 0.01 ac/du 0.01 ac/du 0.01
ac/du
Lot Standards
A Lot Area (min) 7,500 sf. 6,000 sf. 4,500 sf.
B Lot Width (min) 75' 60' 45'
C
Road Frontage (min) [2]
- Cul-de-sac or loop road
- Other road
25'
50'
25'
40'
25'
25'
D Building coverage (max) [1] 40% 50% 60%
Building Standards
Principal Building Placement [3]
E
Front Setback (min) [1]
- Street
- Cul-de-sac
25'
25'
25'
25'
25'
25'
F Side Setback (min) 7.5' 5' 5'
G
Corner Side Setback (min)
- Through Lot, Lot Back-to-Back or
Lot Backing to Amenity Space
- Other
15'
25'
10'
20'
10'
20'
H
Rear Setback (min)
- Non-through lot
- Through lot
25'
30'
20'
25'
15'
20'
Accessory Building Placement for Structures 15' in Height or greater, not to exceed 30' in height
I Front Setback (min) Lesser of half the average depth of the lot or 80'
J Side Setback (min) Same as side setback of the primary building placement
K Corner Side Setback (min) Same as the front setback of the primary building placement
L Rear Setback (min) Half of the rear setback of the primary building placement
Accessory Building Placement for Structures under 15' in height
M Front Setback (min) Lesser of half the average depth of the lot or 80'
N Side Setback (min) 3.75'
O Corner Side Setback (min) Same as front setback of the primary building placement
P
Rear Setback (min)
- Non-through lot
- Through lot
5'
30
Building Height
Q Height (max) 45' 45' 45'
Access and Parking [4]
12/17/2025 Page 118 of 131
Table 19.2-12.1, Semi-Urban Neighborhood (SU) Lot and Building Standards
ac = acre du = dwelling unit sf. = square feet ' = feet
Development Base Option 1 Option 2
Key Neighborhood Type Single-Family Single-
Family
Single-
Family
R Parking Location On-street or on-site On-street, on-
site
On-
street, or
on-site
Utilities
--
Use of Public Water and/or
Wastewater Systems for
Development Approved after January
1, 2026.
Required, unless approved for an
exception by County Code Sec. 18-61.
Required,
unless
approved for
an exception
by County
Code Sec. 18-
61.
Required,
unless
approved
for an
exception
by
County
Code
Sec. 18-
61.
Notes:
[7] Where lots back up to an alley and parking is provided in the rear, amenity space may be reduced to 5%
in the Base and Option 1, and 7.5% in Option 2. Building coverage may be increased to 50% in Base, 60%
in Option 1, and 70% in Option 2. Front setbacks may be reduced to 15'.
[8] A cul-de-sac lot shall have 60% of the required minimum frontage on the radius of the cul-de-sac and
100% of the required frontage at the required front setback line.
[9] Setbacks may be impacted by Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas, or Upper Swift Creek
Watershed regulations.
[10] All roads shall have concrete curb and gutter. On-street parking is subject to Sec. 19.2-42.
OOO
ARTICLE 6 NONCONFORMITIES
OOO
19.2-72 Development Under Prior Zoning Ordinances
A. Applicability. This Section applies to lots recorded prior to the adoption of this Chapter.
B. Residential Lots. A recorded lot as of January 1, 2026, may use the least stringent bulk
standards of the zoning district, unless otherwise specified by conditions of zoning. Lots and
dimensional standards developed pursuant to this Section are considered conforming to this
Chapter and are not considered nonconforming. Existing recorded residential lots within
subdivisions shall not be further subdivided unless approved through a zoning process.
C. Properties within a Residential District.
1. SR, SC, and SU Districts. Properties zoned R-88, R-40, R-25, R-15, R-12, R-9, R-7 but
not subdivided prior to January 1, 2026 shall be required to use the following bulk
standards, unless otherwise specified through a zoning approval or use permit.
i. R-88: SR Base
ii. R-40: SR Option 1
iii. R-25: SR Option 2
iv. R-15: SC Base
v. R-12: SC Option 1
vi. R-9: SC Option 2
vii. R-7: SU Base
2. TR and AR Districts. Properties zoned R-TH, R-MF, MH-1, MH-2, or MH-3 prior to
the January 1, 2026, are capped at a density of 10 units per acre unless otherwise
specified through a zoning approval or use permit.
D. Utilities. None of the following shall be required by this Chapter to connect to public water
and/or public wastewater, unless County Code Sec. 18-60, a previously approved zoning
condition, or proffer requires such connection.
12/17/2025 Page 119 of 131
1. Unimproved property within a subdivision recorded prior to 1/1/26.
2. Expansion or replacement of a dwelling within a subdivision recorded prior to 1/1/26.
3. Unimproved property with a valid site plan approved prior to 1/1/26.
4. Minor expansion of a nonresidential use, or change of nonresidential use, provided that
the continued use and/or expansion of the private water and/or wastewater systems is
approved by the Health Department.
E. Temporary Continuation of Uses for Former C-5, I-1, I-2, and I-3 Properties.
1. Until January 1, 2031, any use permitted by right or with restrictions in the former C-5,
I-1, I-2, and I-3 districts designated in Chapter 19.1 is permitted by right or with
restrictions, even if that use is not a permitted use in the corresponding district
established in Chapter 19.2. The following uses are not included:
i. automobile sales excluding consignment lot;
ii. data center;
iii. motor vehicle sales;
iv. motor vehicle rental;
v. truck rental;
2. The use permission established by Subsection 1 does not apply if the use is prohibited
by a condition of zoning.
3. The use permission established by Subsection 1 applies only to uses and not
development standards. All uses are subject to all development standards of Chapter
19.2
4. Uses established by Subsection 1 shall be considered conforming to this Chapter and are
not considered nonconforming until the expiration of the five year period. Upon such
expiration, all established uses shall be considered nonconforming and subject to the
restrictions applicable to nonconforming uses in Article 6 and state law.
5. Conditional uses and applications for conditional use for those projects not meeting any
requirement for a restricted use in Chapter 19.1 are not eligible for this continuation.
OOO
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective January 1, 2026.
12/17/2025 Page 120 of 131
ATTACHMENT B
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
REENACTING SECTIONS 19.2-29 AND 19.2-30-10 RELATIVE TO USES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 19.2-29 and 19.2-30-10 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997,
as amended, are amended and re-enacted, to read as follows:
Chapter 19.2
OOO
ARTICLE 3 USES
OOO
19.2-29 Principal Use Matrix
Table 19.2-29.1 Principal Use Matrix
Note: P = Permitted By Right | R = Permitted with Restrictions | C = Conditional
C* = Conditional with Additional Guidance in Use Restrictions
S = Special Exception | blank cell = Not Permitted
Districts ->
Uses A RC SR SC SU TR UR AR NB MU CC EC EG WD
Residential
Household Living
Dwelling, Duplex C C P P P C
Dwelling, Live/Work C P P P
Manufactured Home (on a single lot) R R
Manufactured Home, Temporary S S S S S S S S S
Manufactured Home Park P
Dwelling, Multi-Family P P P P R
Dwelling, Mansion Style Multi-Family P P P P C
Dwelling, Single-Family Detached P P P P P P P P R P R R
Dwelling, Townhouse P P P P R
Transitional Housing C C C C
Group Living and Care
Adult Day Care Center C C C C C C C C P P P
Assisted Living Facility (ALF) P P C P P P
Child Day Care Center C C C C C C C C P P P
Continuing Care Retirement
Community (CCRC) P P C P P P
12/17/2025 Page 121 of 131
Table 19.2-29.1 Principal Use Matrix
Note: P = Permitted By Right | R = Permitted with Restrictions | C = Conditional
C* = Conditional with Additional Guidance in Use Restrictions
S = Special Exception | blank cell = Not Permitted
Districts ->
Uses A RC SR SC SU TR UR AR NB MU CC EC EG WD
Group Care Facility C C C C C C C C
Halfway House C C C
Institutional Care C P P P C
Nursing Home P P C P P P C
Recovery Residence C C C C C C
Residential Care Home P P P P P P P P P
Commercial and Office
Animal Care Facilities and Services
Animal Shelter R P P
Kennel, Commercial R P P
Veterinary Clinic/Hospital R P P P P
Entertainment Facility, Indoor
Adult Business C* C*
Club or Lodge C P P P
Commercial Amusement, Indoor C C P P P C
Gun Range, Indoor C C C C
Health and Fitness Club C P P P P
Nightclub, Bar, or Lounge P P
Off-Site Betting Facility C C
Skill Games C C
Theater C P P P P
Entertainment Facility, Outdoor
Amphitheater C R R R R R R R R
Commercial Amusement, Outdoor C C C
Golf Course P C* C C C C C
Gun Range, Outdoor C
Park R R R R R R R R R R R R R R
Theater, Drive-In C C C
Stadium or Arena C C R C
12/17/2025 Page 122 of 131
Table 19.2-29.1 Principal Use Matrix
Note: P = Permitted By Right | R = Permitted with Restrictions | C = Conditional
C* = Conditional with Additional Guidance in Use Restrictions
S = Special Exception | blank cell = Not Permitted
Districts ->
Uses A RC SR SC SU TR UR AR NB MU CC EC EG WD
Food and Beverage Sales and Service
Artisan Food and Beverage Production C R P P P P P P
Catering Service or Facility C R P P P P P
Microbrewery/Microdistillery/Microwinery/
Micromeadery C R C P P P P P
Restaurant C R P P P
Heavy Commercial
Commercial Contractors/Services C C P P P P
Commercial Contractors/Services, with
outside storage and/or fleet parking C C C P P
Laundry and Dry Cleaning Plant C P P
Heavy Equipment Sales, Service and Repair C C P P
Outdoor Sales C* C* P
Plant Nursery or Greenhouse, Wholesale R R R R
Overnight Accommodations
Bed and Breakfast Inn R C C C C P P P
Campground C
Hotel C P P P C C
Motel C C C
Resort C C P C
Professional Office
Alternative Financial Institution C*
Financial Institution R P P P P
Office R P P P P P P
Retail Sales and Services
Business Services R P P P P
Consumer and Repair Services R P P P
Convenience Store C R P P P C P P
Donation Center C R R R R P
Farmers’ Market P R R R R R R R P R P R
12/17/2025 Page 123 of 131
Table 19.2-29.1 Principal Use Matrix
Note: P = Permitted By Right | R = Permitted with Restrictions | C = Conditional
C* = Conditional with Additional Guidance in Use Restrictions
S = Special Exception | blank cell = Not Permitted
Districts ->
Uses A RC SR SC SU TR UR AR NB MU CC EC EG WD
Flea Market C C
Fortune Teller C
Lumber Yard C P P
Massage Clinic R P P P
Pawn Shop C
Plant Nursery, Garden Center or
Greenhouse, Commercial C P P P
Retail Sales, Large Scale R R
Recreational Substances, Retail, Off-Site
Use C*
Recreational Substances, On-Site Use C*
Retail Sales and Personal Services, General P P P P
Precious Metals Dealer C C C C
Temporary Sales
Agricultural Farmstand R R
Mobile Food Vending R R R R R R R R R R R R R R
Seasonal Sales R R R R
Vehicle Sales and Service
Automobile Sales, Rental, and Leasing C* C* C*
Automobile Consignment C
Car Wash or Auto Detailing R P
Fueling Facility C R R
Gas Station C C C R R R
Automobile Repair R P
Motor Vehicle Sales, Repair, Rental, and
Leasing C C
Motor Vehicle Storage Lot P
Public, Civic, and Institutional
Assembly:
Conference Center C P P P C C
12/17/2025 Page 124 of 131
Table 19.2-29.1 Principal Use Matrix
Note: P = Permitted By Right | R = Permitted with Restrictions | C = Conditional
C* = Conditional with Additional Guidance in Use Restrictions
S = Special Exception | blank cell = Not Permitted
Districts ->
Uses A RC SR SC SU TR UR AR NB MU CC EC EG WD
Museum/Gallery C P P P P
Event Center C* C C* C* C* R C C
Religious Institution P P P P P P P P P P P C C C
Education
Business or Vocational School C R R R R P P
College, University, Seminary, and Other
Institutions of Higher Education C P P P
Private School C C C C C C C C P P P C
Government
Correctional Facility C C
Government Building or Facility P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Rescue Services, Private C C C C C C C C C P P P C C
Death Care Services
Cemetery, Mausoleum or Columbarium C
Family Graveyard P
Crematorium C C
Funeral Home or Mortuary C P P P
Health Care and Social Services
Day Labor Facility P P
Hospital P P P C
Laboratory P P P P P
Medical Clinic or Office C P P P P P
Medication Assisted Treatment C* C*
Community Care Facility C C P C P
Employment and Industrial Services
Research and Development
Data Center C C
Research and Development R R P P P
Multimedia Production P P P P P P
12/17/2025 Page 125 of 131
Table 19.2-29.1 Principal Use Matrix
Note: P = Permitted By Right | R = Permitted with Restrictions | C = Conditional
C* = Conditional with Additional Guidance in Use Restrictions
S = Special Exception | blank cell = Not Permitted
Districts ->
Uses A RC SR SC SU TR UR AR NB MU CC EC EG WD
Manufacturing and Industrial
Apparel Manufacturing P P P
Artisan Studio Workshop P R P P P P P
Battery Manufacturing C
Beverage Manufacturing P P P
Chemical Manufacturing P
Computer and Electronic Product
Manufacturing P P P
Cutlery and Handtool Manufacturing P P P
Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and
Component Manufacturing P P P
Electroplating, Plating, Polishing,
Anodizing, and Coloring C P
Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing R
Food Manufacturing P P P
Furniture and Related
Product Manufacturing P P P
Hardware Manufacturing P P P
Leather and Allied Product Manufacturing P P P
Leather and Hide Tanning and Finishing P
Machine Shop; Turned Product; and Screw,
Nut, and Bolt Manufacturing P P P
Machinery Manufacturing C P C
Miscellaneous Manufacturing P P P
Nonmetallic Mineral
Product Manufacturing C P C
Paper Manufacturing C P
Petroleum and Coal Products
Manufacturing C
Pharmaceutical and Medicine
Manufacturing P P P
Plastics Product Manufacturing P P P
12/17/2025 Page 126 of 131
Table 19.2-29.1 Principal Use Matrix
Note: P = Permitted By Right | R = Permitted with Restrictions | C = Conditional
C* = Conditional with Additional Guidance in Use Restrictions
S = Special Exception | blank cell = Not Permitted
Districts ->
Uses A RC SR SC SU TR UR AR NB MU CC EC EG WD
Primary Metal Manufacturing P
Printing and Publishing Related Support
Activities P P P
Rubber Product Manufacturing P
Sawmills and Wood Preservation C C
Seafood Product Preparation and Packaging C C
Spring and Wire Product Manufacturing P P P
Textile Mill P P P
Textile Product Mill P P P
Tobacco Manufacturing P
Transportation Equipment Manufacturing C P P
Urethane and Other Foam Product
Manufacturing C
Wood Products Manufacturing C P C
Warehousing, Storage and Distribution
Self-Storage R P
Discarded Material Storage C
Distribution Center C C P
Fuel Storage and Distribution P C
Motor Vehicle Tow Lot C
Storage, Outside P
Warehouse C C C P
Wholesale Trade C P P
Transportation
Airport C C C
Airstrip, Private C C C C
Fleet Terminal C C C P
Heliport C R R R R R
Marina C C C C
Parking Lot or Structure, Commercial R R R P
12/17/2025 Page 127 of 131
Table 19.2-29.1 Principal Use Matrix
Note: P = Permitted By Right | R = Permitted with Restrictions | C = Conditional
C* = Conditional with Additional Guidance in Use Restrictions
S = Special Exception | blank cell = Not Permitted
Districts ->
Uses A RC SR SC SU TR UR AR NB MU CC EC EG WD
Port P P
Railway Freight Station C C
Recreational Equipment Sales, Rental, and
Repair C C P
Recreational Equipment and Trailer
Parking and Storage C P
Tractor Trailer Sales, Repair, Rental, and
Leasing C C C
Transit Station or Terminal C P P P P P
Tractor Trailer Parking and Storage C C P
Truck Stop C
Utility Trailer Sales, Repair, Rental, and
Leasing C C P
Vertiport C C C C C C C
Recycling and Waste Management
Hazardous Waste Facility C
Junkyard C C
Landfill, Solid Waste C
Landfill, Construction/Demolition/Debris C*
Recycling Treatment and Processing
Facility C C
Transfer Station C C C
Infrastructure and Utilities
Telecommunication Tower R R R R R R R R R R R R P P
Electric Power Wind Energy System (WES) P P C
Energy Storage Facility C C
Power Generating Facility C C
Utility Service Building or Facility C C C C C C C C C C C C P P
Solar Energy Facility, Utility-Scale C*
Utility Substation C C C C C C C C C C C P P P
Agriculture
12/17/2025 Page 128 of 131
Table 19.2-29.1 Principal Use Matrix
Note: P = Permitted By Right | R = Permitted with Restrictions | C = Conditional
C* = Conditional with Additional Guidance in Use Restrictions
S = Special Exception | blank cell = Not Permitted
Districts ->
Uses A RC SR SC SU TR UR AR NB MU CC EC EG WD
Farm R R R R R R
Post-Harvest Crop Activities C P P
Agritourism R R
Brewery/Distillery/Winery, Farm R
Commercial Stables R R
Community Garden P P P P P P P P
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation
(CAFO) C
Mining/Quarrying C C
Animal Slaughtering and Processing C C
12/17/2025 Page 129 of 131
OOO
19.2-30 Principal Use Restrictions
• Applicability. This Section applies to any automobile sales, rental, and leasing use
designated as a restricted use and a conditional use with additional guidance in the
Principal Use Matrix (Sec. 19.2-29). [Note: automobile sales, rental, and leasing is
designated as a conditional use with additional guidance in the CC, MU, and WD Districts.]
• Location. The use is not located in:
o The VO District; or
o Within a shopping center unless it was within the center prior to May 26, 2004.
• Activities.
o Elevated display of automobiles does not occur.
o Repair services occur only as accessory to the use and repair does not include body
repair.
o Except for minimal repairs necessary to allow a vehicle to be moved into the service
area, either repair activities and storage of new or replaced repair materials occur inside
a building, or the repair area is screened from view of:
Adjacent Residential District, NB, or MU properties;
Adjacent external roads; or
Adjacent A property shown in the Comprehensive Plan for residential use.
o Automobiles for sale must be able to pass state vehicle inspection requirements.
• Setbacks. The use is setback 100 feet from:
o Adjacent Residential District, NB, or MU property, or
o A property shown in the Comprehensive Plan for residential or Corporate Office,
Research and Development/Light Industrial uses.
o The setback is landscaped at a density of 2.5 times Perimeter Landscaping C (see Sec.
19.2-41);
OOO
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective January 1, 2026.
12/17/2025 Page 130 of 131
ATTACHMENT C
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
REENACTING SECTION 19.2-47 RELATIVE TO GENERAL
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 19.2-47 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended
and re-enacted, to read as follows:
Chapter 19.2
OOO
ARTICLE 5 PROCEDURES AND FEES
Division 1 General Procedural Requirements
OOO
19.2-47 General Procedural Requirements & Authority
• Applicability. This Article describes the procedural elements common to all applications,
including submittal requirements and fees.
• Outstanding Charges. Prior to the initiation of an application by the owner of the subject
property, the owner’s agent, or any entity in which the owner holds an ownership interest
greater than 50%, for a special exception, conditional use, use permit, variance, rezoning or
other land disturbing permit, including building permits and erosion and sediment control
permits, or prior to the issuance of final approval the applicant shall produce satisfactory
evidence that any delinquent real estate taxes, nuisance charges, stormwater management
utility fees, and any other charges that constitute a lien on the subject property, have been
paid, unless otherwise authorized by the County Treasurer.
• Preliminary Meetings. This process provides an opportunity for a free informal and non-
binding evaluation of a proposal ahead of a formal application submission. A pre-application
meeting is encouraged for any process to aid the potential applicant in identifying potential
issues and concerns.
o Pre-application for zoning approval processes
o Pre-submittal inquiry meeting for site plan processes
• Applications. Applications shall be submitted through the Planning Department’s web page
and/or on forms prescribed by the Director of Planning. Applications shall be accompanied
by materials and information as necessary to comprehensively review the request as may be
determined by the Director of Planning. The Director of Planning may waive any application
requirement, other than filing fees, when deemed to be unnecessary to evaluate the
application. Applications shall not be deemed complete until all submittal requirements have
been met and any required fees have been paid.
o Zoning Applications Pending at Effective Date of this Chapter. Any application for
zoning approval pending under Chapter 19.1 that has not been acted on by the Board of
Supervisors as of January 1, 2026 shall, at the option of the applicant, be converted by
the applicant to a 19.2 application, or, notwithstanding Sec. 19.2-86 (Repeal of Prior
Ordinances), may continue to be processed under 19.1. Any such converted application
must conform to the requirements of Chapter 19.2, but there shall not be an additional
fee unless additional acreage is added to the application. If the Chapter 19.1 application
has been acted on by the Planning Commission prior to January 1, 2026 but not acted on
by the Board of Supervisors, the application will be heard by the Board of Supervisors
under Chapter 19.1 unless the applicant decides to convert the application to Chapter
19.2, in which case a new public hearing before the Planning Commission on the
converted Chapter 19.2 application is necessary. All pending applications under
Chapter 19.1 shall be converted by the applicant to an application under Chapter
19.2 within 180 days of January 1, 2026 or, after an additional 60 day period and notice
12/17/2025 Page 131 of 131
from the Planning Department, the application shall be deemed to have been withdrawn
and no further action shall be taken on the application. For zoning cases processed under
Chapter 19.1 after September 17, 2026 staff shall provide to the Planning Commission
and the Board of Supervisors staff's recommendation as to what 19.2 zoning
classification the property would convert to as of January 1, 2026 and such
recommendation shall become part of the action taken by the Board of Supervisors for
each such zoning case approved by the Board of Supervisors unless the Board of
Supervisors indicates otherwise.
o Site Plan Applications Pending at Effective Date of this Chapter. Notwithstanding
any other provision of this Chapter, any complete site plan application under Chapter
19.1 submitted prior to January 1, 2026 may continue to be reviewed and approved under
the development standards of Chapter 19.1 until January 1, 2027, notwithstanding Sec.
19.2-85 (Repeal of Prior Ordinances). Uses shall be governed by Chapter 19.2. Any
such application may, at the option of the applicant, be converted by the applicant to a
Chapter 19.2 application. Any converted application must conform to the requirements
of Chapter 19.2, but there shall not be an additional fee unless additional acreage is added
to the application.
o Concept Plans. Submittal of a concept plan for all zoning applications is recommended;
however, a concept plan shall be required for any zoning approval that contains a mix of
residential and non-residential uses, a mix of unit types, or a mix of lot sizes. In addition,
all requests for a Conditional Use Planned Development (CUPD) shall require a concept
plan. Concept plans assist staff, the Commission, and the Board in evaluating and
reviewing an application.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective January 1, 2026.