04-09-1986 MinutesApril 9, 1986
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. G. ~. Ap~legate
Mrs. Joan Giron¢
Mr. Jesse J. ~ayes
Mr. Ricz~ar4 L. ~edrick
County Administrator
Supervisors Absent on County
Business:
Garland Dodd, Chairman
Har~y G. Daniet~ Vice Chairman
Staff in Attendance:
Mrs. Doris DeHart~
Legislative
~1~. William Di~, Real
of Parks &Rec.
~uildin~ Official
Mr. Ric{~ard Me,irish,
Mrs. Pauline Mitcnell~
Dir. of
M~. Jeffrey ~uzzy,
fo~ Development
OX Budget & Acctg.
of social ~ervices
Mr. M. D. Stitn, Jr.,
Dir. of Utilities
Mr. Frederick W. Willis,
Mrs. Girone called the meeting to order at ~n~ Co~r~o~se ~t 7:0<
p.m. (H~T).
I, INVOCATION
Mrs. Girone introduced Fat~er Uly ~. ~oec~, Pastor Of St.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO 'l'~= FLAG OF THE URITED STATES OF
AJ4~RICA
America ~as recited.
3. APPRO%-AL OF MINI~ES
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded b~ ~r. Applegate, the Board
approved tn~ m~utes of t~ ~rcn I9, 1986 meeting, as s~mitted.
Ayes: ~4~. Applega%e, Mrs. GJrmue and Mr. Mayes.
Absent: Mr. Dodd and Mr. Daniel.
On ~o~ion Of Mr. ~aye~ sxconded by Mr.
approved t~e minutes of %n~ Marc~ 25~ 1986 meeting~ as submitted.
Ayes: ~. Ap~legatu, ~rs. Girone and ~. Mayes.
~sent: Mr. Dodd and ~. Daniel.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded ~ ~r.
approved the minutes of the March 26, 19~6
Ayes: ~. ADplega%e~ ~fs. Gironu and ~. ~yes.
~sent: Mr. Dodd and ~. Daniel.
4. CO~TY ~MINIST~TOR' S
Mr. He,rick recoqn~ze~ Mr. ~arry M~nkoff w~tn the
who will be taking a n~w position witz~ a newspaper in No,crt
Nsws. ~e related t~t the Public Info,erich Office has
avaiI~le a boo,ark with info~ation regarding th~ nis%o~ of
the coal miner which is on the County Seal.
~. Hedrick displayed a plaque received from t~e Ric~ond Jayceas
for our participation in the Ric~ond Cnris~s Parade ~and noted
that i~ would be ~isplayed in an appropriate place.
Mr. Ricz~ard Puryear was recognized for his selection am cnai~an
of the "Miss Utility" urganlza~ion for C=ntraI Virginia
a ve~ w0r%nwnile ~e~iee.
Mr. Hedrick further related %eat Mr. Jonn Bailey of the Utilities
Depa~n% was ~lected as district dlr~ctur
Virginia Croms Connection Center.
5. BOARD C0~dITTF2~
Mr. Mayes indlcate~ tnat ne atten~e~ a ~eetlng at rue Di~ond
wuere they discussed cooperation among local municipalities and
rue success of %ne Dia~nd witu tee mortgage to bs burned next
Highway Co~isslon
mpecifically to the Route 36 Grade Separation situation in
~ttrick and ~. ApDlegate made a presentation on behalf 0f the
RRPDC. He stated that
ignoring
~s. ~i~une ~tated ~na~ ~ne and ~. Apple~ate attended the Fir~
Forc~ meeting and t~ Highway Co~ission
6, REQUESTS TO POSTPONE ACT~ON~ EMERGENCY ADDITIONS OR C~L%NGR$
IN T~E ORDER OF PRESENTATION
On motion Of Mr. Applegata, ~eccnded b~ FL~. Ma~e~ tee Board
~eleted Item ll.D.].b., Cun~i~eratlen of Condemnation for an
Aviation Easement Acro~ the Property cf A. E. Tare, Jr.~ and
Inez T. Tare and a~ded Item 11.C.6. to ~stmblisn a Public Moating
on Tnroug~z Truck Traffic Restriction on Bridgewood Road and
Tw~lv~ Oaks Road, Item 7.D., a ResolRtiea for ~effrey B. Muzzy,
and Item ll.F. for an Executive Session to discuss With counsel
legal matters regarding ~S vs. be~ pursuant to Section 2.1 ~44
(a) (6) of tee Code of Virginia, 1958, as amended~ and adopted the
Ayes: Mr. Applogate, ~irs. Gircne and Rm.
kbsent: Mr. Dodd and ~r. Daniel.
86-2~8
7, P~SOLUTTONS OF S~ECL~L !~COGNITION
7.A. C~ILD ABUSE P~VENTIO~ MONTH - APRIL, 1986
Mrs. Girone presented Mrs. Jean Smith, Director of
services, with a resolution proclaiming April, 1986 Child Abuse
On motion of :ha Ruard, the following resolution was adopted:
W~=R=A$, C~ild Ab~sa and neglect is a reality that touches
WKER~AS, T~e C~e~terfield County Beard of SuDervisors
that t~e fearers t;~at crea~e child mistreatment can be
W~EP~AS, The community service aqenci~ and pri~ate citizens
nave joined nan, s to ~rengtnen the family's ability to con=inua
f~nctioning az a family; and
~ERPAS, T~e Cnezterfield County Board Of Bupe~vi~or~
recognizes and supports %ne efforts =o rezelve the issue of child
abuse and neglect.
~OW~ TEEREFOP~E BE IT P~ESOLVED that the month of April, 1986
be proclaimed C£~ild Abuse Prevention ~ont~ and that this
resolution be called fo the attention of all
Ayes: Mr. Applegate, MrE~ Girene and Mr.
Absent: ~r. Dodd and Mr. Daniel.
7.B D~CLARING APRIL 20-26, 1986 AB VOLUNTEER WEEK
Mre. DeHart was introduced and made comments concerning the
contributions by ~£~e many volunfeers in various areas of the
County.
On motion of the Board, the following re~olution was adopted:
W~AS, Voluntee~sm nas long been a part of ~erica'~
history; and
~=R=AS, The citizens of Chesterfield County nave given
tirelessly of their %~ and talent~ throughout the years; and
~$~R~AS, Tn~se talents nave contributed significantly to the
g~ality of life in our County, our Cc~onwealtn and in our
nation; and
9~R~A~, These volunteers from every age group and from
~very walk of li~e nave ~nr~cne~ the ~ives of all they s~rve.
NOW, THER~FOK~ BE I$ ~SOLVED by the Board of Supe~isors of
Chesterfield County %nat April 20-26 be declared volunteer Week
in Chesterfield County in hOnOr of t~e invaluable work o~ these
~ine individual~.
Ayes: ~. Applegate, Mrs. Girone and ~. Mayas.
~s~nt: ~. Dodd and Mr. Daniel.
~ mo~ion of =~e Board, =~e following resolution war adopted:
86-259
arm not infringed upon; and
of life; an~
all citizens in our con~nuni%y to join in reaffirming this basic
~reedom.
a~ide this period to ramind ourselve3 that we a~e a free people
endowed wi%~ ~e ~i~t :o ~n real p~oper~y, an4 are ~iven the
reSpon~ibilit~ ~o protect tha~ right.
~sent: Mr. Dod~ and ~x. Daniel.
C~ESTERFIELD COUNTY
Mr. Redrick introduced /~. and Mrs. Muzzy.
Mrs. Girone stated that tz~e County was sad treat Mr. Muzzy was
leaving but was nappy that he would be e~arking on a new
end~avor, relating that ne nad been a very dedicated apd talgn%ed
Assistant County A~inis~rator.
On motion of the Board, ~z~e following resolution was adopted:
~E~AS~ Jeffrey ~. Muzzy nas been a faithful ampl0y~e of
~EREAS, During [~is tenure ~e creatively ~nag~d tz~e
Co,unity Develo~ent Division which is the most challenging and
~=B~AS, ~e has provide~ exemplary leadershi9 in long-range
for years ~o oome~ an6
County's participation in rugionut afiorts of significant b~n~fit
to Chesterfield County and its neigz~boring localities; and
~EREAS, ~. M~zzy nas be~n influ~ntiaI in g~iding and
st~ulating the County's industrial/co~ercial develop~nt e~fort
coordinatinq =onstructlon 0% n~erous projects durinq t~e past
86-260
~{EP~EAS, Tz~rougn ~,i~ tireless ef£er%s Jeffrey B, M~zzy nas
demonstrated excaItenue in executive leadership and manag~ent
which ~as been an inspiration to his colleagues and subordinate~.
N~, THE~FORE, BE IT ~EOL~D treat tn~ Board of
of Chesterfield co~y ~ereby recognizes Jeffrey B. Muzzy for
invalu~le eo~tribu~ion~ an~ wishes n~ uv~ry success in his new
BE IT FURTEER ~SOLVED %nat a copy of [~is resolution
and the citi=ens of Chesterfield County witt~ Our
on their selection of an ou=s~anding lea~er.
Ayes: ~. Appl~gate, Mrs. ~irone and Mr. ~y~s.
~sent: ~, Dodd and M~. Daniel.
~s. Girone presented Mr. Mn~zy with th~ ~ecuted resolution at
w~icn time Mr. Muzzy indicated to t~e Board that n~ appreciated
Administration an~ ~nat nlm car~r with the County ~aad been a
9, DEFERRED ITEMS
~r. Hedrick stated that t~r~ were nc deferre~ items for
consideration at this ~ime.
lO. P~LIC HEARINGS
10.A. A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE BON AIR PLA~ ~IDLOTtIA~
DISTRICT)
Mr. ~edrick stated this date and ti~e n~d been advertised for a
public nearing to consider land u~e and transportation
improvements in the Ben Air Area of Cnesterfie!d county wnisn
plan, when adopted, will be included as an element of the
C~,est~rfleld County Cempr~nenslve Plan. The area addressed is
bordered by the City of Richmond~ the Sout~ern Ruilroad
~igz~t-of-way and Jimmy Winters Creek.
~l~. zoek presen=ed the reeu~n~datlon of t~e sta~ and ~lanning
Co~u~iuuion for Ben Air indicating that rna process involved a
gr~at deal of ti~e, ~ffort and citizen ~articipation.
Mr. Marling e~Dlained the s~x objsctlves of the Ben Air Plan~
1. To en~,ance the quality of residential life within Ben Air
Village.
2. To provide an attrac=ive commercial center on a scale
appropriate to Bom Air Village and in a manner compatih!~
with adjacent development.
3. To ~intain a safe and adequate transpor=ation system within
4. ~o ereat~ tt,e OppOrtunity for safe, enjoyable pedestrian and
5. TO provide public facili=ies im a manner consistent with
86-2~1
Mr. Marling indicated that the major element of tz~a plan is the
and ~nat the cots not expan~ beyond tne boundaries of the
conditional use planned development process. ~e stated the
specifically tne plan note~ there i~ a 4.~ acre tract on the
the plan reco~ends tha~ particular parcel be developed for
Forest Hill Avenue to be included in the Virginia Depar~mnt of
sidewalks along Bmford Roa~ for future inclusion in tz~e
~ervice improvements are reeo~ended ~o ~ave tn~ Coun{y study
f~ture.
recc~ndatlon to the Buard and the on~ mede by the Planning
nave encouraged resi~entlai conversion to business use and the
appeared similar to the 1979 plan with ~ne exception that Grand
co.on interest and concern and t~at is prese~ing the quality o
life in Ben Air and they unanimously ~pprove the objectives
forth by s~aff and are net opposed to rezoning the two
the study area went Alternative I am they did in 197~ w~ien is
dividing line between commercial and residential areas. Sue
stated that an office park or multi-family endeavor would
encroach into a single r~idential neig~bor~ood diminishing tne
property va~ue~, impacting already overcrowded a~t~rius
p~oblems an~ ~st importantly creating a domino effect for
t~king about unzone4 or even agricultural land instead i= is
xig~ Co develop his land as ~is would altuw nlm to ~u:
on i% using tl~e R-15 restrictions or s~ll %o any buyer willing
meet nis price. Sue s~ated the owner mad~ a deliberate
several years a~o to witnnold t~at land f~om t~e Grand
D~velopment in nop~ of o~tainlng co~rcial pricss for it.
told nlm to l~t them know if t~e deal did no% wQrk Out.
~tated, mo~t importantly 0f all, Alternative I will ~n~ie the
Land Use Plan being a definite policy statement for use by the
~ditorially eudor$~ by one Television station and one
OBrion, circulated flyers~ attended neigz~crnocd meetings and
p~lic me,tings and %~ey feel tz~y nays done everytaing possible
I.
Mrs. Joan Smeltzer Qf 2402 Grand $u~t Court spoke t0 the Board
and p~e~ented a slide presentation to reacquaint %ne Board with
a loyal fondness for this plata with the goal Of %n~ BO~ Air
buing ~nnancemunt of its identity as a historic residential
Vi~gini~ Lan~ark C~isslo~. $~e state~ that tne Bon Air
Virginia Eistoriu Lan~ark by t~e end of tnls year. Sue
s~a~e~ ~nat in regard to ennancing the quality 0f ~e~id=ntiaI
siOewalks along the Buford ~ad will be approved as well as bike
l~De~, a park, hiking anO b~king =rails an4 pedestrian sroD
tights as reco~ended by Dlanning staff, sue Stated that all
made ncc~s~ible to pedestrians. Sue related office and land use
snould be compatible with adjacen~ development and that
co~ercial as boundary buffers are lacking. Sue indicated
single family dwellings, approximately 1750 m~are feet, would
fit nicely into tz~e Bon Air asreage and character and there is a
this order if this plo~ ,of land could remain residentially m0ned.
availabl~ $~ac~ for leas~ w~ic~ sn~ feels is an indication o~ an
ndequate c~erciai center. S~e c0n~luded by reiterating
negatlv~ impact on tne~f co~unlty and ~e supported Alternative
that wnmn Mrs. Girone soug~t t~e revival of the Bon Air Plan
co~ercializa%ion on Forest Nill Avenu~ outside of the co~rcia
village in Bon Air. Sz~e stated tn~t by that time t~sy nad
already b~g~n ~iroula~ing petitions witz~ letter~ and phone ~alls
being ~ade to Mrs. Girone and Prank Cowan opposing
kno~ for the future of Bon Air and the majority of the cltizen~
there do wan~ Alt~rnativ~ I.
Nr. Earl ~aker, 8401 Mccaw D~ive, spoke to =ne Board in
opposition of co~rcial~atio~ of BO~ Air s~a~ing teat ne
realized now dif~icult it nas been with C~esterfield changing
C~esterfie!d County as i~ will elimi~a=e the pelling an~ tugging
and prejudice towards co~ercial development at tz~e exp~nse of
wna~ Cn~terflel~ nas besn traditionally. ~e ~tat~d tna~ ~ne Bon
Ai~ Plan i~ an ext~sion of development and if i% nad been
planned like ~rande~ill, ~tc., ~ere would no~ nave been any
co~ercial development, particularly of tee kind tn~t is n~
being p~omoted by s~e. He stated t~at there are peopl~ wno want
living in plac=s where there ar~ restrictive c~enants and tn~y
taxes nave gone ~p for a good purpose and Bon Air will ncc
supporte~ the CoHn~y and believe i= is necessary for
s~ould be, not in and ~oag t~emselves. He stated t~at proud
neignbornoodu and good homes nay= gone d~nnill in
a co~erc~al ar~a ~ ~ev~loD~d but ~f it ~ in tn~ middl~ 0f a
residential area, the ~urge ~radually s~sides and actually tner~
is a loss tc tn~ =o~unity in t~es as the r~i~e~tial arean
do~. He Concluded that you cannot co~ingle good grain and bad
grain and co~ up with an improved product. ~e State~ t~at
~on Air Co~unity supports tax~, etc, and n~ i$ asking for
support wi~. ~ne Bon Air 91an, Alternative I, and tee ~ral
~. Hal Hayes ~poke t0 the Hoard o~ Supervisors indicating it
his zoning case 5ringing the citizens here. ~e stated that
Alternative II, according to staff's reco~endation, would allew
a d~nsi=y of four to sev~n units per acre on a 4.2 acre project
townnou~e~ on that s~lI parcel in that 10catio~ ~kes i~
impossible for anyone to undertake that kind of development and
make i= suocessful. ~ furt~er stated, in 1961 or 1962 when
S~ Wagstaff built ~is nome at S~28 Foruut Hill Avenue and
i~ouse next door to it, =~e certainly ~ad no idea t~at ~is nome and
t~,e house next door ~uld eventually b~ an office and wi~n the
stated tnmt if Alternative I is adop%ed~ and %ne staff's study
indicates tna~ no residential house nas been constructed frontinc
on Forest Hill Avenue for a per,on to reside in since 1965 but
Alternativ~ I is adopted and tna~ land is forced to re, in in a
~ingle f~ily post~r~, gore~% Hill Avenue will ~v~nt~ally be
widened a~d we eau alt fae~ that reality. ~e stated that
development can take place by silly c~tting fiv~ 1Ot~ with
s~dlvision approval, fronting right out 0n Forest Hill Avenue,
no ~ainaqe control~ no urcnitecturul control and there will b~
tn~y will b~ cna~g~ to uffl¢~ u$~ becau$~ of SQ~ con~itiona~
u~e with limited office capacit~ and what we will nave is, in
fact, an office park On the 4.2 acres but it will b~ unplanned
into office space. He state~ the Planning Department is ~akinq
sometimes ~,a$ to make dlffluult cnoiees and ne urged the Board to
~ne Bon Air Plan with t~e inclusion of Alternative Iv which is a
1~ density office us~ as a ersn~i%ion from the co~rciml
the residential.
Mr. Trio, s Va~uken of 9635 Ir~d~ll Road in~i~nted that ne
disliked op~sing a project of ~. ~ayes but for over seven
a~ they ar~ afraid it will unzip Forest Hill Avenue ~d they do
Alternative I.
MS. Ann Aldridge of 2224 Burroug~s Streat~ WhO operates %n~ Bon
Air Inn, stated one of the f~ustra~ions of ~avlag move~ =o this
c~unity im that there ~s not local ho~ control as t~ere is in
~uts Forest ~ill Avenue, stated that ne fell kn~ Beard warn in
ver~ awkward pomition because if t~e 4.2 acre parcel is zoned
co~rcial, it will es~lisn a value for %be mell~r and it would
raise the value ~f the co~ercial properky and dekra~% from
increas~ the value of ~. Jurg~n'~ lend and would proniblt
regimen=ia! use and if ~ne possibility of that rezonlng exists,
would be willing ko pay $150,000 %o $200,000 fur a hOUSe if
lmft the ar~a residential and it could b% done ta~kmfully.
~. Applegate in,ired of mtaff if Alternative I were adopted,
indicated thee if R-I5 sorting remained, %ne churc~ could be built
t~ere. Mr. Ap9l~gate ~ta~ed that multi-family or condo
development adjacent to R-15 s~divisions does no% offer
pro,er buffer and n~ docs not t~zink this would b~ appropriate
zoning. ~. Applegate stated rna% once AlternatiV~ I9, or
co~roializa~ion is allowed, ~z;e nex~ tning will be the nome
co~ercial strip all the way %o %~ City Limits. ~e stated ~at
n~ coul~ not support Alternative IV and pre,ers ~ternative I.
~. ~yes indicated that ne was very impressed with the Bon Air
~lan and inquired if d~rln~ the dev$1o~nt of t~is plan the
citizen participation.
Mrs. Girone stared that containing c~ercial development ~n
Bun Ai~ co~uni~y is a prime objective ~ad the Bon Air Plan is
in t~e plan.
Mrs. Girone indicatsd that ncr motion would be to contain the
co~ercial gr~tn in t~e villag~ with C~octaw drawing t~ line
and no~ nave any eo~rcial development beyond that and would
like to re~cn a compromise witz~ t~m%. Sz~m indicated that if
~rom Tnurloe R-15, that t~e development co~unlty would continue
~tandpoint, those two parcels are r~ady for some n~gner us~ and
R6r265
if we do not speak to that in Lnis plan, wa will be confronted
wit~ applications ~or commercial development on tn¢~e parcels.
Nra. Giron~ race--ended t~ tnt Board %nat Alternative II modified
be approved to allow a conditional u~e planned develo~ent
%o~no~e, cluster or co~do~i~i~ development o~ an architectural
~yte Similar in exterior appearance to tz~e old ~on Air Hotel
~everal of t~e larger =~istoric r~siden~e~ in tnt study
and in tn~ long term would be a plan tnt citizens would find
moat work~le~ eliminating tnt constant requests to rezone
Tnt issue was discussed with Mr. Applegate expressing concern
relatin~ to multi-family dwellings on tl~e 4.2 acre parcel of land
and Mrs. Giro~e re-empz~asi=ing %nat tnt two parcels in question
nad not been developed at R-15 zoning as it ~ould ncc b~
!acre%ire venture for developers due %0 ~,e cost of drainaqe,
~ motion of ~. Girone, seconded by Nr. May~ tnt Beard
adopted Alternative I of C~e Ben Air Plan w/tn tnt following
Cnanqe %o second strategy under Objective I:
along major road corridors, eRcept where such conversions are
specifically identified in this plan.
confusion about tn~ specifiu location of ~ne subject site:
~tention of tnt ~sidential s=ru==ure and adaptive reuse
for business activity of tnt property on the north co~ner of
Conditional Use Planned Development procedure.
Change to tnt second action under tnt ~irst strate~ under
Objective III to
Sidewalks along Bufurd aced should be studied for inclusion
in tnt County's Capital Improvement~ Program.
Ay=s: Mr. Applugatu~ ~u. Gironu and Mr. ~yes.
~sent~ ~. Dodd and ~. Daniel.
10.B.& C.AN~DNi~NT~ TO TH~ SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RELATIVE TO
BONDING OF PUBLIC IMPROVeMeNTS (SECTION 18-32~ AND
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERS~ITS (SECTION 18-6).
NLr. Hedri~k s%at~ tni~ date and tim~ nad been advertlse~ for a
public near~ng to consider amendments to tnt subdivision
ordinance relative to bending of p~bli~ improvements (Section
18-32) and issuance of building permits {Section 18-6). There
was no one present to discuss t~e matter.
On motion of ~_r. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayas, t~e Eoard
adopted tnt following ordinance:
An Ordinance to Amend tnt Code of tnt County of
Chesterfield, I97S, as ameAdad, by a~ending Section
B~ IT ORDAINED by tnt Board Of Supervisors of Chesterfield
¢cuncy~
That Section 18-32 of the Code of tnt County of
Cneet~fi~td~ 197~, as amended, is amended and reenacted as
follows=
~-266
Sec. 18-32. Dedication of land for public use.
(a) W~,en a final pl~t o£ a subdivision nas been approved
~nd all other required approval~ are obtained and ~ plat
recorded, suc~ recordation snail constltute accept~c~ for
purpose designated on t~e plat of all lundu sn~n on %n~ plat
d~dicated to ~ne public u~e, including any right of way
within an~ ~ubdivi~io~ whlcl~ &~as constructed therein, or proposed
to be constructed therein, any street, curb, gutt~r~
bicycle trail, drainage or s~w~rage system o~ other improvement
dedicated for p~lic usu, and main=alnud by t~.e locality.
otb.er ~ite-relat~d ~mprovementa re~uir~ by local or~inance~
struct~re~ n~ce~arI to in~ure atability of critical slopes, and
in whole or in part by private funds only if the ~er or
developer {1) certifies to h~e Board of Supe~isors ~at
facilities, ur (2} furnis~s to tn~ Board of Supervisors a
like sure~y, in like amount and so conditioned; or (3)
~nit prices for new p~lic or private sector conEtr~ction
locality and a reasonable alI~ance for estimated cost of
da~ge to existing roads or utilities. Partial releases may be
made of $u~ certified c~eck, cash e~crow, bon~ or letter of
credit in a c~ulative ~ount of no more than eighty percent of
facilities completed and approved by the Beard of Supervisors,
local administrative agency or state agency having jurisdiction.
P~riodic partial releases may not occur b~fore t~e completion
at least thirty percent of tl~e facilities covered by any bond,
after completion of more than eighty percent of said facilities.
T~e Board of ~upgrvi~ors or a~ini~rarive agenGy $&~all not
any twelve month 9eriod. Upon final completion and acceptance of
agency s~all release ~y r~alnlng bond, escrow~ lett~r o~ credit
is responsible for maintaining and for operating suc~ facility
Ayes: Mr. Applegate, ~s. Girone and Mr. Mayes.
adopted t~e following ordinance:
86-267
18-6 relating to issuance of building permits
County:
Sec. 18-6. Building permits not t~ be ~n~ued.
I. No building permit shall be isgu~d fO= tns cons~ction
(~-26-72, Sec. 612-2.)
a. If the lot is created or established in violation of
d. At %ne option Of %n~ developer of any subdivision,
complied witn~ the County will r~lease buildinq p~rmits in e~c~s~
~nall be nard surfaced within one year of receipt of 60%, or
grsater, of %z~e building pmrmits in any section of a subdivision
fo= accsptance into t~e Stat9 highway system within :we years of
receipt of 80%, or qreater, of t~e building pe~its in any
August 1, 1986.
Ayes: Mr. Applegate, ~s. Girone and Mr. ~yes.
11. NEW BUSINESS
Il,A. WAIVE REQUIREMENTS I~ DIAMOND INDE~TUR~ OP TRUST TO .p~R~
ACCEPTANCE OF $27,00,? FRO~ VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH
UNI1~RSIT¥
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
waived the requiremen~ of =~e indenture of ~ru~t in order to
p~rmit tn~ Ric~ond Metropolitan Authority to accept a $27,00
denation in a contractual arrang~enh fo~ the u~e of tn~ Di~ond
from Virginia Co~onwealt~ University and use it to ~k~ note
Ayes: ~. Appl~gate, Mrs. Girone and ~. ~y~$.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayas, t~ Board
approved the Iow base bid from W. E. Duke Company for $42,000 fo~
construction of ~n~ mu~ifi~ld area a~ ~or~on ~lemen~ary $~oo1.
The funds for tnls project nave been approprlatud from the 1985
Bond Fund.
Ayes~ Mr. Apple~ate~ Mrs. Girone and Mr. Mayas.
Absent: Mr. Dodd and Mr. Daniel.
ll.B.2. SET DATE FOR PUbLiC EEA~ING TO CONSIDER THE CONVEYANCE
OF LEASES OF 'REAL PROPERTY AT VARIOUS PARE SITES TO
On motion of ~ir. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Applegate, tz~e Board set
a public nearing date of ~ay I4~ 198~ to ccnsld~r t~c coRveya~oe
of leases of real property at various park sites to operate food
Ayas~ Mr. Applegat~, Mrs. ~iroac and Mr. Mayas.
Absent: Mr. Dodd and Mr. Daniel.
I1.B.3. REQUEST FOR ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT BY BENSLE¥-BEPJ~UDA
VOLUKTEER RESCUE SQUAD
On motion of Mr, Applegate, s~c0nded by Mr. Mayas, tz:a Board
approved ~ request by tnt Bensley-Bern~ada V~lun~e~r ~scu~ ~qu~d
~e hold a three-ring circus in t~ Courthouse Stadium wlt~
entertainment to be provided by Alla~ C. ~ill Entertainment
Corporation provided t~at Sensley-Bermuda pay ~or any County
I. Inspection of tent, equipment, and promises wi~z~ approval by
2. Two police officer~ m~t be preempt beginning a% 4~00 p.m. to.
obtained to direct traffic and parking.
5. Clean-up snell be to tnt County's satisfaction. Any clean-~
Bensley-Bermuda wi:nih 24 naurs or Bensle¥-~ermuda wil~ pay
be located wz~ere directed by tnt County.
8. Certificates of insurance naming t£:e County as an additional
provided.
9. Tnt prcmice$, aDimal eeg~$, an~ any rides musu be inspected
inspector.
10. Final parking arrangements must be approved by County's
General Services uepartment, particularly errangement~ to
~alocate County venicles.
11. Tnt snow is subject to cancellation if, in tt~u opinion of
c0mpli~d wltn which would endanger tnt w~lfare and safety
Ayes: Mr. Applegate, ~r~. Gtrene and Mr. May~.
interest pursuant %0 tnt Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of
86-269
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by ~r. ADple~ete, t~Le Board
approved rna following street iig~t installation costs with funds
I. Cl~arlake Road and Marblerldg9 Road - $799 - Clover Hill
District Str~6~ Lig~t Funds
2. Loch Bra~mar Driv~ eno W. Providence Road - ~205 - Clover
Hill District Stree~ Lig~t Funds
Ayes: Mr. A~legate~ Mrs. Giron~ and Mr. ~yes.
On motion Of Mr. Ma~e~, seconded by ~. Applegate, tne Board
~pproved %z~e installation of street lights at %ne following
locations with fund~ to be expended from the District Street
1. Intersection of Butler Court and Butler L~e, ~toaca
2. Intersection of Rockcrest Road and Larkspur Road, Midlotnian
Diztric~
Ayes~ ~. Ap~legate, ~s. Giron~ and Mr.
~sent: ~. Dodd and ~. Daniel.
11.C.3. S~T ~UBLIC KE~IN~ DAT~ FOR T~ROUGH TRUCK T~FIC
RESTRICTION ON N~E'A~ENUE
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. ~ye~, ~e Board
~t~li~n~d May 14, 1986 as ~ public nearing date to consider
authorized advertisement for ~ p~lic nearing.
Ayes: ~. Appi~gate, ~s. Girone and ~. Hayes,
~sent: Mr. Dodd and ~. Daniel,
1I.c.4. P~NNING DEP~T~NT ~AGE~NT AUDIT
On motion of Mr. Applegat~, s~cond~d by Mr. ~yes, the Board
authorized t*~ County k~inistrator to enter into a contrac~ wi~
Psat, ~rwick and MitcneI1 in the ~ount of $28,200 for the
Planning Depar~n~ Manag~men= ~udit, also authorizing the Count'
A~inistrator to expand the con~ract to include additional
semites, if necessary, not to exceed tne budgeted amount 0f
Ayes: Mr. Applegatu, ~s. Qiron~ and Mr. Hayes.
~sent: ~r. Dodd an~ M~. Daniel.
11. C. 5. STATE RO~ ACCEPTANCE
Tn~s day tr~e County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
examination o~ ~dbridge Road, Re,ridge Terrace and ~ridge
Circle in Shenandoah Hills, Section C-2, Clever ~ill Dis%riot.
Upon considers%ion whereof, and on motlun of ~.
s~conded by Mrs. Girone, it fs r~solv~d that ~ridge Road,
Ra~ridg~ Turzac~ and R~zidge Cirule in Shenandoah Hills,
S~ction C-2, Clov~r Hill District, b~ and they hereby are
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Departmen~ of
Highways and Tr~sportation~ be and it hereby is requested to
~intenance %nds, Redbridge Road, State Route 2100, and going
0.06 mile easterly =o =ne in=ersection wi~ ~rid~e Terrace,
then continuing 0.07 mile easterly to ~ne intersection
R~ridg~ Circle, tnen continuing 0.05 mile easterly to a
intersection with Re,ridge Road and going 0.07 mile
northwesterly ~oa cul-de-sac; and ~dbridgx Circle; beginning
86-270
the intersection with Re,bridge Road and going 0.~4 ~ortnerly tc
& cul-de-sac.
This r~quest is inclusive o~ the adjacent ~lope, site dlstan=e
and designated Virginia Department of Highways drainage
T~ese roads serve 38 lots.
~d be it further resolved, that t~e Board Of Supervisors
~arantees %o the Virginia Depar~ent of ~ignwaym a 40'
a~ a 68' right-of-way.
This s~ction of ShenandOah ~i115 i~ r~=or~e~ as follows:
Section C-2. Plat ~ook 47~ ~ages 34 and 35, Augumt 21, 1984.
Ayes: ~. Appl~gate, ~s. Girone and ~r. ~yes.
~sent~ ~, Dodd and Mr. Daniel.
II.C.6. S~T PUBLIC EEARING DATE FOR THROUGH TRUCK T~PFIC
R~T~!CT~O~ 0M ~RIDG~WO@D EOAD A~D TWEL%q~ OAKS ROAD
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by ~r. ~a~es, the Boar~
estublis£,ed May 14, 1986 as a public nearin~ date to consider the
through truck traffic pro~ibition un ~ridgewood and ~elve Oaks
~ads and authorized advertisement for the public ~earing.
Ayes: ~. Applegate, Mrs. Girone and Mr. ~ye$.
~ment: ~. Dodd and ~. Daniel.
ll.D. UTILITIES DEPART~NT ITEMS
AND TO $~T DAT=$ FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. kpplagate, the Hoard set
a work session for 2~0 p.m., May 14, 1986 On tt~e Wat=r System
Master Plan; a work session for 3:00 p.m., ~ay 14, 19~6 on
Water and Sewer Capital Improvements Program; a work session May
14, 1986 at 3~30 p.m. on Amendments to Water and Sewer Ordinance
~egar~ing Rates and CouneCtion Fees; ~et a Public Hearing for Ma
28, 1986 at 9:0o a.m. for t~e Adoption el the Water and Sewer
Capital ImproYement Progra/n and Approval of the 1986-87 Capital
Eudget and a Public Hearing for ~:00 a.m., ~ay 28, 1986 to
consider Adoption of the AI~endments to Water and Sswer Ordinanc~
Regarding t~ates an~ Cunnectlon
Ayes: Mr. ApDlegate, ~rs. Girone and Mr. Mayes.
Absent= Mr, Dodd and F~r, Daniel,
ll.D.l.b. A~PROV~L OF A CONTRACT WIT~ ~WFW, INC. TO P~OR~ A
MANAGEMENT ANA3~YSIB OF THE UTILITIES DEPART~LENT
On ~otion of Mr+ Applegate, seconded by Mr. ~ayes, the Board
autnorize~ the County Administrator to execute an agreement wltn
LWFW~ Inc. to perform the Utilities Department management
analysis noting that the funding is included in
operating budget.
Ayes: Mr. Applegatu~ 5Lrm. Gircne and Mr. Mayer.
Abs~nE: Mr. Dodd and ~_r. Daniel.
ll.D.l.c. REQUEST FRO~ RE$IDE~7~$ IN ~YLTD~ PARK (~ORTIO~ OF)
AND ~IN-REY SUBDIVI~IONS FOR PUBLIC SEWER S~RV~C~
On motion of Mr. App!eg~te, seconded by W_r. Mayes, the Board
approved ~e design cf public sewer service for residents in
Kylton Park end Kin-Rey S~bdivision~ wit:, Construction to
commence after July t~ 1986 and further approved t~e design fee,
estimate4 to be appr0~i~ately $20,000 be appropriateO from
bon~ Droce~ds ~o ~-~217-640R, wi%n all cozts of ~ne proj~c~
being allocated to the FY 86-87 Capital Budget, ~xtensions To
Existing ~ubd~vision~ Fun~, after July l, t986.
Ayes: Mr. Applegate, ~rs. Girone and ~, Mayuu.
~sent: Mr. Dodd and Mr.
I1.D.2.a. CO~D~ATION OF EA~T$ F0~ F~LING C~K FORCE ~IN
tl.D.2.a.1. H, O, L~E, III AND GEORG~NA M.
On motion of Mr. ~y~s, seconded by ~. ~pplegate, t~e
resolved t~at the County A~inistrator notify said property o~er
by registered ~il on April 10~ 198~ of t~e Connty's intention
~nter upon and take ~e proper~y wnic~; iu =o be t~e subject o~
said condemnation p~0ceedings. This action is on an
basis and the County int~nd~ ~o exercise i~edlate right of ~ntry
pursuant to Section 15.1-238.1 of the Code of Virginia.
~. O., III and G~orgiana M. Lyne Falling Creek Forc~ }~in $92~
Ayes= Mr, Apptegate~ ~. Qiron~ and ~.
ll.D.2.a.2. DAVID L. ~D S~t~EY T. LILLY
On motion of ~. Mayes~ seconded by ~. Applegate, the Board
proceedings against tn~ following p~uperty o~er if the ~cunt
resolved that tne County A~inistrator notify ~ald property
by r~gi$=ered mai! un April 10, 19~6 o~ the County'a intention tc
e~ter ~po~ ~d take t~= property which is to be the subject Of
said condonation proceedings. This action is on an e~rg~ncy
basis a~d th~ County intends to exercise ~ediate right of entr~
pursuan~ to Section 15.1-238.1 of tn~ Co~e of Vlrg~nfa.
David L. and Snirley T. L~lly Falling Creek Force Main $192.00
Ayes: ~r. Appl~gats, ~s. Girone and Mr.
~ent: ~. Dodd and Nr. Daniel.
ll.D.2.a.3, JULI~ W. ~D LOIS H.
0n motion of ~r. Mayes, sec0~dud by Mr. Applegate, fas Board
rejeoted the ~0unteroffer of $7500.D0 and authorized %ne County
Attorney to instit~t~ condemnation proceedings against
A~inlstrator notify said proparty o~er by registered ~il on
April %0, 1986 of the County's intention to enter upon and take
the peOperty which is to be t~e s~ject of said conde~a~i0n
Julian W. an~ Lois ~. ~cGae ~alling Creek Force Main
Ayes: ~. Appleqate, ~s. ~irone and ~. ~yes.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, s~c~nded by ~r. A~plegate~ the Board
rejected t~=e counteroff%r of $200.00 and authorized the C0u~ty
Attorney ~o institute condonation proc==dings against the
following p~operty o~er if tn~ ~o~nt ~ Se= opposite their n~m
is not accel=ed. ~d b= i= ~urtner resolved that the County
Administrator notify ~aid prOp~r%y O~er by regista=ed mall on
A~ril lO, I]~5 uftne Coun=y's intention to enter upon and take
t~e property which is to ~e the =~ject of said