04-18-77 PacketVTRGINTA. At a regular meeting
o£ the Board o£ Supervisors o£
- Chesterfield County, Yield at the
Courthouse on April 18, 1977, at
1:00 p_m.
Present: Also Present:
Mr. E. Merlin O'Neill, CIIM:L�
Dina . Joan Girona , Vice- a i r**+s*+
Llr. J. ,.ffin Apperson
Mr. C. L. Boo'--- .
Mr. Garland Dodd
Mr. C. G. Mix,-,.,ol, Tnter3m Co.- AAirr,ir.-
Mr. Rayed Birdsong, Engineer
Mrs_ Joan Dolezal-, Secretary
Mice. V:L k llcm e, Secretary
Mr. Stevie Micas , Crnmty Attorney
Mr_ Robert Pairiter, Dir_ of Utilities
Mr_ Willis Pope, Right -of -Way Engineer
Mr _ Charles QLiaif£ , Supt . o£ Accoamts aria
Records
Mr_ Michael Ritz, Dir_ o£ ccxrm3Lmity Devel_
Mr_ David Welchons, Asst_ Dir. o£ Util-itiea
Mr_ W_ Lyraz W{TO£ield, Asst. to Co_ A.aa+l-i .
The meeting is called to order by Mrs- Girona_
Mrs_ Girona welcomes students from VCU's Social Service Class to
the meeting -
Mr_ Welchons states a representative o£ Investment Associates is
present to request County participation in the cost of a sewer
extension to serve Loch Braemar, Section B- There is some discussion
o£ where the line should be installed, where easements curreritly
exist , the cost of such an extension, etc _ Mt-- is on motion o£
Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr- Dodd, resolved that this matter be
deferred until April- 27th to allow Investment Associates and the
County Utility Department to agree on an equitable solution to the
problem of where the line should be laid.
Ayes : Mrs- Girona , Mr _ Bookman and M=. Dodd.
Mr. Covington, representing the Covington Company, is present to
request the Board transfer prepaid sewer connection fees from
Edgehill Townhouses to pay for sewer connection fees in Briarwood
Hearth. After some consideration of this matter, it is on motion
o£ Mrs. Girona, seconded by Mr. Boolxian, resolved that the Covington
Company be and it hereby is allowed to transfer sewer connection
fees prepaid for Edgehill Townhouses to pay for sewer connection fees
in Briarwood Hearth.
Ayes: Mrs- Girona, Mr. Boolazian and Mr_ Dodd.
Mr. Charles Quaif£ presents the Board with the water and sewer
financial statements and answers questions relative to each.
Mt-- is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr- Dodd, resolved that
the following Water Contracts be and they hereby are approved:
1. W77 -21D PQwderham, Section "B" $33,840.00
Contractor: Alpine Construction Co.
Developer: V. Cassell Jr, and Pearl R.
Adamson, Stephen P. and Frances
S. Adamson, Powderham Assoc., a
Va. Ltd. Partnership No. 1 & 2,
Goochland Investments, Inc.
2. W77 -23D Deerfield Estates $32,145.80
Contractor: Fred Barnes Construction Co.
Developer: Zane G. and Carmen G. Davis,
Henry E. and Virginia B. Myers
3. W77 -11D Grindall Creek Park $ 4,696.50
Contractor: Stamie E. Lyttle Co., Inc.
Developer: Eastates Petroleum Co., Inc.
4. W77 -24D South General Boulevard $ 800.00
Contractor: County of Chesterfield
Developer: William Kenneth Lyons
5. W77 -29D Brandermill - Northwich, Section 2 $ 6,489.00
Contractor: R.M.C. Contractors
Developer: Brandermill - A Va. Partnership
Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
It is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that
the request of Mr. John J. Surma, Jr. of 8310 Hull Street Road for a
reduced water connection fee in the amount of $350 be and it hereby
is approved with the connection being made frau the water line on Route 360.
Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
Mr. Harry E. Glover comes before the Board and requests a reduced
water connection fee because his well is located in the area of the
widening,of Robious Road. He adds that he was not aware there was
a water line in front of his home but when his well was installed,
it was placed on the Highway Department property. He inquires how
a building permit, etc. could have been obtained. Mr. Micas,states
that he does not feel this is the responsibility of the County and
suggests Mr. Glover search his records for his title insurance and
seek relief through that method. It is generally agreed that this
matter be deferred to allow Mr. Glover time to search his records,
ascertain what relief can be obtained through his insurance and if
necessary bring the matter back before the Board.
Mrs. Girone states that approximately 98% of the residents in
Carriage Hill and Otterdale Subdivisions signed contracts for
water last year and to insure the same connection fee since the
Board will consider the proposed new sewer and water rates later in
the day she feels this eater line extension should be approved. It
is on her motion, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that the
water line extension for the Carriage Hill and Otterdale Subdivisions
be and it hereby is approved which approval will insure the $350
water connection fee which extension is estimated to cost approximately $128,600,
and said $128,600 is hereby appropriated from 63-230-234.0, Water Imp., Repl. & Ext,
Ayes: T'rs. Mrone, Mor. Bookman and *. Dodd.
Mr. Painter states some property owners in the area may want to partici-
pate in this extension but the Utility Department will investigate
all possibilities and costs prior to taking immediate action on this
project. He adds they have not obtained the easements from these
property owners at this time because they did not want to give ease-
ments across their property without some benefit. It is generally
agreed that Mr. Pope should apprAi.se the Board of the progress on this
project at the Board meeting on April 27th.
There is some discussion of fire protection and sewer connections for
the Airport Industrial Park. Mr. Manuel states that the hydrants and
sewer connections should be installed prior to the paving of the
roads with.the costs being paid from the revenue from the land sales
at the Park. Mr. Ritz states there is an account for the expenditures
of the Park but one for the revenues has not been established.
Mrs. Girone states that this should be done as soon as possible.
There are two alternatives presented to the Board, one in the amount of
$11,400 and the other in the amount of $9,900. Mrs, Girone inquires if it
would not be best to wait until the Water Study is completed. Mr. Painter
states that the Study will be completed in about 2 months. He adds
that as far as the Utility Department is concerned, this matter could
wait but different requirements being placed on builders may deter
land sales until the water problem is solved. It is generally agreed
that this matter be deferred until May 16th,
It is on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved
that the following Sewer Contracts be and they hereby are approved:
1. S76-97CD
Deerfield Estates $130,723.75
Contractor: Fred Barnes Construction Co.
Developer: Zane G. Davis and Henry E. Myers
Cost to developers under Developer Participation
Contract
S76 -2T - $32,046.80 (Estimated).
Code: 77-76.2 Dale Escrow
2. S77 -20D
Northwich - Second Section $ 11,824.50
Contractor: R.M.C. Contractors
Developer: Brandermill, A Va. Joint Venture,
by Sea Pines of Va., A Joint Venture
3. S77 -18D
Village Green - Brandermill $ 16,843.50
Contractor: R.M.C. Contractors, Inc.
Developer: Brandermill, A Va. Joint Venture,
by Sea Pines of Virginia, A Joint Venture
4. S76 -99D
Brookwood Estates, Section B, Phase II $ 37,365.00
Contractor: Central Builders, Inc.
Developer: Brookwood Corporation
5. S77 -19D
Meadwood Subdivision $ 46,456.60
Contractor: Bookman Construction Co.
Developer: Southside Service Corporation
6. S77-14CD Afton Subdivision, Section 1 and Off-site $29,259.50
Contractor: Stamie Lyttle Construction Co.
Developer: Model Development
$10,945.40 - Refund from Connections
Code: 73-330
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Dodd.
It is on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, resolved that
the following Water Contract be and it hereby is approved:
W77 -25D Reams Run, Section "C" $22,869.00
Contractor: Bookman Construction Company
Developer: Reams Run Development
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Dodd.
Mr. Welchons states that Mr. Morris Mason, who is not present and
was not present at the last meeting when this matter was discussed,
has requested a reduction of $639 from the cost of installing sewer
lines on his property at a cost of $5,858. Mr. Welchons states that
Mr. Mason said this reduction would cover clearing, grubbing, seeding,
etc. 213 linear foot of easement. He adds that the Utility Department
recommends denial of this reduction but approval of the contract.
After some discussion of this matter, it is on motion of Mr. Dodd,
seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that this Board approves the
following contract but denies the $639 reduction requested:
S76 -3T-1 Chester, End of Percival Street $5,858.00
Developer: Morris E. Mason &
Edwin L. Shelton
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
It is generally agreed that action on Sewer Contracts S76 -1C,
Divisions A, B and C in Fan Court and 7032-27, Chester Collectors,
be deferred until later this afternoon.
It is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, resolved
that the request of Mr. Harold Foster of 1431 Schloss Road for a
reduced sewer connection fee of $300 be and it hereby is approved
because Mr. Foster did sign the petition which was distributed and
through some misunderstanding never si.gned.a contract.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Booknan and Mr. Dodd.
It is on motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved
that the request of Mr, and Mrs, James E. Huber of 16004 Saramount
Avenue for a reduced sewer connection fee of $300 be and it hereby
is approved because Mr. and Mrs. Huber did sign a petition but did
not receive a copy of the contract.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr, Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
ri
Itis on motion of Mr, Bookman, seconded by Mrs, Girone, resolved that
Mr. W. E. Cumbea of 6708 Elkhardt Road be and he hereby is granted a $300
reduced sewer connection fee because of the hardship involved.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
On recommendation of the Utility Department, it is on motion of
Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that the request of
G. L. Howard, Incorporated for a thirty (30) day extension of time
to May 9, 1977, for Sewer Contract S74 -35T, Johnson's.Creek Trunk,
be and it hereby is approved which delay was caused by the acquiring
of necessary easements.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
On recommendation of the Utility Department, it is on motion of
Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that the request of
G. L. Howard, Incorporated for a twenty (20) day extension of time
for Sewer Contract S76 -16T, State Police Headquarters, be and it here-
by is approved which delay was caused by the acquiring of necessary
easements.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
It is on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that
liquidated damages not be assessed against Roanoke Construction
Company since negotiations with the Railroad Company was the major
cause of the delay and because the line was ready for use when the
County needed it.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
It is on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr, Apperson, resolved that
Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $910 for construction of flow
measuring manhole and exhaust fan, Contract S73 -26T, Redwater
Trunk, be and it hereby is approved.
Ayes:- Mr. 0' Neill , Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
It is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that
the Chairman be and he hereby is authorized to sign an Engineering
Contract Amendment for Federal Grant C-510484-02, Falling Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant, as required by EPA to include provisions
of Appendix C-1 to 40 CFR, Part 35, Subpart E.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookwm and Mr. Dodd.
It is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr, Dodd, resolved that
the Chairman be and he hereby is authorized to sign Grant Amend-
ment Number 1, Subagreements, as required by EPA for Federal Grant
C-51048402, Falling Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
It is on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr, Bookman, resolved that
this Board hereby denies the counter offer from Mr, and Mrs. Ray
Allen of 9400 Telstar Drive in'the amount of $5,000 for property
rights and damages to their property during installation of sewer
under Contract S69 -1C.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
It is on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr, Apperson, resolved that
this Board vacates an easement across the property of Morgan A.
Reynolds and E. J. Reynolds under Sewer Contract 574-35T/M dated
December 11, 1975, and further this Board authorizes the Chairman
and Interim County Administrator to sign the new easement dated
January 31, 1977.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and W. Dodd.
It is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs Girone, resolved that
the County Attorney be and and he is hereby authorized to institute
condemnation proceedings against the property owners listed below
if the amount offered by the County as set out opposite their names
is not accepted. Be it further resolved that the Interim Co. Administrator
notify the said property owners by registered mail on April 20, 1977,
of the intention of the County to enter upon and take the property.
which is to be the subject of said condemnation proceedings. An
emergency existing, this resolution shall be and it hereby is declared
in full force and effect immediately upon passage.
Robert E. Steward and Marion G. Steward 576-1C/47 $111.00
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Boolawn and Mr. Dodd.
It is on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that
the County Attorney be and he is hereby authorized to institute
condemnation proceedings against the property owners listed below
if the amount offered by the County as set out opposite their names
is not accepted. Be it further resolved that the Interim Co. Administrator
notify the said property owners by registered mail on April 20, 1977,
of the intention of the County to enter upon and take the property
which is to be the subject of said condemnation proceedings. An
emergency existing, this resolution shall be and it hereby is declared
in full force and effect immediately upon passage.
James
F. Burke and
Opal
S. Burke
S76 -1C/2
$170.00
Ayes:
Mr. O'Neill,
Mrs.
Girone, Mr.
Apperson, Mr.
Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, it is resolved that the
Chairman and the Interim Co. Administrator be and they hereby are authorized
to sign a deed of dedication to the County of Chesterfield from
George S. and Mary J. Ginger for a road right-of-way located in
Bermuda Ochre.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
It is on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, resolved that
the Chairman and the County Administrator be and they hereby are
authorized to sign easement agreements executed by the following
property owners located in Bermuda District:
1. John Daffron, Jr, and Elizabeth M. Daffron - S76-3T/X
2. Douglas Roberson and Anita S. Roberson - S76-3T/W
3. James Styles Parrish and.Carolyn Overby Parrish - S76 -1C/30
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr, Apperson, Mr, Bookman and Mr, Dodd,
It is on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs, Girone, resolved that
Contract S76 -1C, Division A and B be and they hereby are awarded to
Stamie Lyttle Company in the amount of $744,948.53.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
Mr. Dodd leaves the room because of a possible conflict of interest.
It is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved
that Contract S76 -1C, Division C be and it hereby is awarded to
Hawkins and Dettor in the amount of $146,215.50.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girona, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Bookman.
Mr. Dodd returns to the meeting,
On recommendation of the Engineering Department, it is on motion
of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that the bids
received for the Chester Collectors, Contract 7032-27, be and
they are hereby rejected and further that the Engineering Department
be authorized to readvertise for bids.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs, Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
There is a general discussion concerning the possibility of abolishing
the Ettrick Sanitary District and it is agreed that Mr. Painter
should gather information on what needs to be done, the cost of
improving the system, etc. and Mr. O'Neill will arrange a meeting
with the Ettrick Sanitary Committee after all information has been
gathered.
It is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that
the water line extension for H' ton Park be and it hereby is approved
subject to funding.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
It is on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, resolved that
the Utility Department be authorized to engineer, in house, a sewer line
extension for the Halfway House.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
-7-
It is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, resolved the
water line extension for Dowd Lane in the amount of approximately
$20,000 be and it hereby is appropriated from the Water Improvement,
Replacement Fund, 63-230.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, and Mr. Bookman.
Mr. Bookman leaves the room because of a possible conflict of interest.
Mr. Welchons explains that Mr. Curtis Rudolph would like to receive
$29,085.60 in refunds from connections in lieu of the $13,743.05
provided in Contract S74-29CD. He states that Mr. Rudolph feels
he is eligible for refunds for land which was sold, that he did
have to pump and haul sewage until the lines were ready, etc. It
is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that
this matter be deferred until Mr. Micas and Mr. Welchons can work out
the legality and details.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Dodd.
Mr. Bookman returns to the meeting.
It is generally agreed that this Board recesses for dinner until
7:00 p.m.
Reconvening:
The Chairman calls the meeting to order and states this time and
date had been set for a public hearing on the proposed ordinance to
increase water and sewer rates.
Mr. Steve Micas, County Attorney, states copies of the ordinance
are available and consists of 30-40 pages. He states the main
changes incorporated in this ordinance are:
1. The changing of the service charges for water and sewer and
the connection fee for --sewer installation.
2. Industrial Waste Surcharge.
3. Industrial Cost Recovery.
Mr. Micas adds this ordinance has been properly advertised and the
Board can adopt it tonight, defer the adoption until a later date,
adopt it today but make it effective whenever they see fit or it can
be denied.
The Utility Department presents a movie, "A Silent Toast of Water".
Mr. Quaiff explains the proposed water increases and+states the
water fund will have a deficit of $8,948,000 without a bond sale and
a deficit of $1,897,100 with a bond sale on a five year projection
without the rate increase. He adds with a rate increase as proposed
the deficit after five years as projected will be $6,740,100 without
a bond sale but if there is a bond sale there will be a surplus of
$311,500. He states that this is a minimum that can be done to
accomplish the necessaryrojects in the County. He states further
the sale of $9,000,000 o? water bonds is proposed.
10
1* r `-.
Mr. Quaiff states thei.sewer situation is a little more serious. He
states without a rate increase the deficit in the sewer fund will
be $8,082,700 without a bond sale and a deficit of $4,446,000 with
a bond sale. With the proposed rate increase and sewer connection
fee increase the deficit will amount to $3,599,700 without a bond
sale and a surplus of $37,000 with a bond sale. He adds that, of
course, there are variables which could change these projections but
they should be fairly accurate. The proposed bond sale for sewer will
be $5,000,000.
There is considerable discussion regarding how much the average bills
will increase, how the County receives revenues for each fund, the
County forces reading meters, watersheds, growth of the County,
where sewer lines will be installed, the pros and cons of installing
dry sewer lines, the rising costs of electricity and chemicals, etc.
Mr. Sam Kornblau, representing the Home Builders Association, states
they are in favor of the rate increase in lieu of a mor torium on
building which might have to come if rates are not increased. A
gentleman asks Mr. Quaiff if the public can be assured rates will
remain the same for this five year period. Mr. Quaiff states that
they are relatively sure they will not be raised within that time
period but again refers to variables which could change.the situation.
Another question from the floor relates to consultants being paid
a lot of money to tell the County what they already know, Mr, O'Neill
states that large lenders of money will not take the County's word
for what is known and the consultants have to be hired. There is a
question regarding rates for the citzens on fixed income or handicapped
being lower. Mr. Micas states that the County has to charge everyone
the same rate.
Mr. O'Neill states that the County utilities should be run like a business but
for at least the last six years, it has not because the Board did
not want to hurt the people who were already suffering from inflation,,
etc. He states the time has come now when something must be done. He
states the Board has no control over inflation or requirements of
the government which are placed on the individual jurisdictions.
There being no other questions, it was generally agreed by the Board
that this matter be deferred until April 27th.
On motion of `fir, Apperson, seconded by Pir, Bookman, it is resolved
that this Board adjourns at 9:00 p.m, until 3:00 p.m, on April 20,
1977.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
/►
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APRIL 18, 1977
ITEM NO.
I. Financial Reports - Water and Sewer
II. Approval of Water Contracts:
dvldA. W77 -25D Reams Run, Section "C" $22,869.00
Contractor: Bookman Construction Company
Developer: Reams Run Development
Clover Hill
Recommend Approval
2. W77 -21D Powderham, Section "B" $33,840.00
Contractor: Alpine Construction Company
Developer: V. Cassel Jr. and Pearl R. Admason, Stephen
P. and Frances S. Adamson, Powderham Associates
a Va. Ltd. Partnership No. 1 & 2, Goochland
Investments, Incorporated.
Midlothian
Recommend Approval
3. W77 -23D Deerfield Estates $32,145.80
Contractor: Fred Barnes Construction Company
Developer: Zane G. and Carmen G. Davis, Henry E.
and Virginia B. Myers
Dale
Recommend Approval
4. W77 -11D Grindall Creek Park $4,696.50
Contractor: Stamie E. Lyttle Company, Inc.
Developer: Eastates Petroleum Company, Inc.
Dale
Recommend Approval
5. W77 -24D South General Boulevard $800.00
Contractor: County of Chesterfield
Developer: William Kenneth Lyons
Bermuda
Recommend Approval
6. W77 -29D Brandermill - Northwich, Section "2" $6,489.00
Contractor: R. M. C. Constractor.s
Developer: Brandermill - A Va. Partnership
Clover Hill
Recommend Approval
M
Utilities Department Agenda
Page 2
April 18, 1977
M
Request from John J. Surma, Jr., 8310 Hull Street Road, for
reduced water connection fee.
Recommend Approval Clover Hill
v? Request from Harry E. Glover, 10401 Robious Road, for reduced
water connection fee.
Recommend Denial Midlothian
e
4�
VV. Discuss water service for Carriage Hill Subdivision.' -
Midlothian
VP VI. Discussion of fire protection and sewer connections for Airport
#Ajb Industrial Park.
Dale
VOVII. Approval of sewer contracts:
1. S76-97CD Deerfield Estates $130,723.75
Contractor: Fred Barnes Construction Company
Developer: Zane G. Davis and Henry E. Myers
Cost to developer under Developer Participation Contract
S76 -2T - $32,046.80 (Estimated)
Code: 77-76.2 Dale Escrow
Dale �
Recommend Approval 7
2. S77 -20D Northwich - Second Section $11,824.50
Contractor: R. M. C. Contractors
Developer: Brandermill, A Virginia Joint Venture,
By Sea Pines of Virginia, A Joint Venturer
Clover Hill
Recommend Approval
3. S77 -18D Village Green - Brandermill $16,843.50
Contractor: R. M. C. Contractors, Inc.
Developer: Brandermill, A Virginia Joint Venture
By Sea Pines of Virginia, A Joint Venturer
Clover Hill
Recommend Approval
4. S76 -99D Brookwood Estates, Section B, Phase II $37,365.00
Contractor: Central Builders, Inc
Developer: Brookwood Corporation
Midlothian
Recommend Approval
Utilities Department Agenda
Page 3
April 18, 1977
5. S77 -19D Meadwood Subdivision $46,456.60
Contractor: Bookman Construction Company
Developer: Southside Service Corporation
Dale
Recommend Approval
VIII. Approval of Sewer Agreement for Developer Participation:
1. S76 -3T-1 Chester, end of Percival Street $5,858.00
Bermuda
g Company prepaid(6o) 5�y�/
� IX. Reconsider request of The Covington Com an to transfer
4 sewer connection fees from Edgehill Townhouses to pay for water
and sewer connection fees in Briarwood Hearth.
Midlothian Sb
X. Award of Sewer Contract S76 -1C, Divisions( B. and C, in Fan
Court, etc. Bids to be received on April 12, 1977 Fund: 77-371
Bermuda
I. -Award of Sewer Contract 7032-27, Chester Collectors. Bids to be
received on April 13, 1977. Fund: 77-371
Bermuda
/ XII. Consideration of request from Harold Foster, 1431 Schloss Road,
for reduced sewer connection fee of $300.00.
Clover Hill
V XIII. Consideration of request from Mr. & Mrs. James E. Huber, 16004
Saramont Avenue, for reduced sewer connection fee of $300.00.
Matoaca
XIV. Reconsider request of W. E. Cumbea, 6708 Elkhardt Road, for
reduced sewer connection fee of $300.00.
Clover Hill
XV. Request from G. L. Howard, Incorporated for thirty (30) days
extension of time to May 9, 1977 for Sewer Contract S74 -35T,
Johnson's Creek Trunk.
Bermuda
Recommend Approval
XVI. Request from G. L. Howard, Incorporated for twenty (20) days
�,. extension of time for Sewer Contract S76 -16T, State Police
Headquarters.
Midlothian
Recommend Approval
Utilities Department Agenda
Page 4
April 18, 1977
v/ XVII. (1) Consideration of liquidated damages against Roanoke C
Construction Company for Sewer Contract S73 -26T, Redwater
Trunk.
Bermuda
Recommend No Assessment
v'(2) Request, approval of Change Order No. 2 in the amount of
$910.00 for construction of flow measuring manhole and
exhaust fan, Contract S73 -26T, Redwater Trunk. Fund:
73-330-324
Bermuda
Recommend Approval
XVIII. Request from Investment Associates for County participation in
a� the cost of sewer extension to serve Loch Braemar, Section B.
�\ Clover Hill
V Recommend Approval
v/XIX. Request from C. L. Rudolph for prepaid connections in Lake Genito
,vu instead of refunds and the amount of refunds allowed be increased.
Clover Hill
3°
V% XX. Resolution authorizing approval of Engineering Contract Amendment
for Federal Grant C-510484-02, Falling Creek Wastewater Treatment
X19. Plant, as required by EPA to include provisions of Appendix C-1
to 40 CFR, Part 35, Subpart E.
✓XXI. Resolution authorizing approval of Grant Amendment Number 1
�• revising the Special Conditions, Number 1, Subagreements, as
required by EPA for Federal Grant C-51048402, Falling Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant.OoP 64,6
v/XXII. Reconsider counter-offer from Mr. & Mrs. Ray Allen, 9400 Telstar
Drive, in the amount of $5,000.00 for property rights and damages 64, A•�q
to property during the installation of sewer under Contract S69 -1C.
Dale
Recommend Denial
✓ XXIII. Resolution vacating easement across property of Morgan A. Reynolds
and E. J. Reynolds under Sewer Contract S74-35T/M.
`��}• Bermuda
�o
yI XXIV. Resolution authorizing condemnation proceedings against Robert E. 'AW.
Steward and Marion G. Steward (husband and wife) for sewer ease- yu�
m.ent under Contract 576-1C/47.
Bermuda
/ Recommend Approval
✓ XXV. Resolution authorizing condemnation proceedings against James F.
114Burke and Opal S. Burke(husband and wife) for sewer easement
r under Contract S76 -1C/2.
Bermuda
Recommend Approval
Utilities Department Agenda
Page 5
April 18, 1977
VXXVI. Acceptance of Deed of Dedication from George S. and Mary J.
gyp;, Ginger, (husband and wife) for road right of way.
Bermuda
/XXVII. Resolution authorizing execution of sewer easement agreements
'gyp: as follows:
1. John Daffron, Jr., and Elizabeth M. Daffron'Project S76-3T/X.
2. Douglas Roberson and Anita S. Roberson, Project S76-3T/W
3. James Styles Parrish and Carolyn Overby Parrish, Project
S76 -1C/30.
Bermuda
/XXVIII. Consideration of abolition of Ettrick Sanitary District.
XXIX. Public hearing for Water and Sewer Rates Ordinance.
7: oap�
Robert A. Painter
Director
April 12, 1977
99
ENGINEERING AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CiESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
DECEMBER 20, 1976
ITEM NO. IV.
Review of unfunded water projects.
1.
Elkhardt Tank
$12,000.00
2.
Pocono Tank
3,000.00
3.
Dutch Gap Tank
3,000.00
4.
Rockwood Park Pump Station
22000.00
5.
.Huguenot Road (Rte. #147)
35,000.00
4- I 77 -6.
Of
.Carriage Hill - Otterdale le.
128 600.00
7.
Jessup Farms - Poindexter Road
4,000.00
8.
Courthouse Rd. South of Chestnut Hills
5,000.00
� 9.
.Woodpecker Road
13,000.00
w/�
�°
�• 1f' 77_10.
. _ a
• Dowd Lane Well System- c,•
20, 000.00
_11.
Hylton Park - Su6P=�" � �`'^'
78,100.00
$303,700.00
Total
Unfunded Projects s
�b 140e `.
STATEMENT OF SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND BALANCE
March 31, 1977
Contracts & Commitments in
Excess of Funds Available ($ 6,934) ($ 448,628) ($ 455,562)
Sewer Imp.
Sewer Bond
Revenue
Fund (73)
Fund (77)
Sharing Total
ASSETS
Fund (12)
a.
Cash
$ 847,394
$2,833,611
$ 28,526 $3,709,531
b.
Accounts Receivable -Federal Projects
224,900
224,900
c.
HUD Grant
53,329
53,329
d.
Federal & State Aid
7,511,630
7,511,630
e.
Developers Contributions
314,730
314,730
Total Funds Available
$8,951,983
$2,833,611
$ 28,526 $11,814,120
CONTRACTS & COMMITMENTS
f.
Federal & State Aid Under Contract
7,491,589
7,491,589
g.
HUD Projects Under Contract or
Committed
97,420
97,420
h.
Revenue Sharing Projects Under
Contract
29,232
28,526 57,758
i.
All Other Projects Under Contract
(Includes Escrowed Projects)
206,965
796,356*
1,003,321
J.
Reserved Dale & Bermuda Districts:
Cash Escrowed per Treasurer $2,788,718
Less Escrowed Projects
under Contract -796,356*
1,992,362
1,992,362
k.
Reserved Midlothian, Clover Hi=,
and Matoaca Districts
363,275
363,275
1.
Reserved for Interest Payable
493,521
493,521
m.
Projects on-site, off-site
21,075
21,075
n.
Loan Payable -Insurance Fund
525,000
525,000
Total Contracts & Commitments
$8,734,556
$3,282,239
$ 28,526 $12,045,321
SUB TOTAL
$ 217,427
($ 448,628)
-0-($ 231,201)
Anticipated Connection Fees
$ 197,453
$ 197,453
Salaries & other fixed costs
($ 421,814)
($ 421,814)
Contracts & Commitments in
Excess of Funds Available ($ 6,934) ($ 448,628) ($ 455,562)
SUMMARY - MAJOR SEWER PROZF.CTS
March 31, 1977
Showing Projects by Classification and Financial
Status
Funds Available 3/31/77 as per Tress, Office
$3,681,005
Reimbursement from Developers
314,73)
Additional. Federal and State Aid Due
7,736,530
HUD Funds Due
53,329
Revenue_ Sharing Funds
28,526
Total Available Funds
$11,814,120
Y11,814,120
FUNDS COYNITTED
- (7')Projects(other than Fed.Aid) under contract
$ 206,965
(X)(*)Federal & State Aid Projects under contract
7,491,589
(=)Projects under contract from Escrow Fund
796,356
(-)Projects Held in Escrow
1,703,537
(***)Projects on-site of=-site
21,075
(HUD)HUD Cont-racts
97,420
(X*)Revenue Sharing Projects
57,758
Pale 14 Additional Projects Authorized
363,275
Difference Amount Escrowed and Cost
288,825
Loan Insurance Fund
525,000
Reserve for Interest Payable
493 5521
7 12,045,321
($ 231,201)
OBLIGATED PROJECTS
7_UT27T_bA HiF sland Creek Trunk from
Bellwood Lagoon to Rt.l
$ 236,337
Colonial Heights Pumping Station
117,000
Petersburg Treatment Plant
125,000
S73-1T Gravel Brook293
775
i�
($1.,003,313)
PROMISED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
` M2_-21-BCrestwood -Farms - 3afinke Place
$ 160,939
160,939
($ 1,164,252)
071HER PROJECTS
-97-3-_WC iake Crystal Tr,,:nk
285,073
Old Tor,,n Trunk ,.est of Matoaca
450,000
Upgrade Lagoons
250,000
S73-20T Trunk on Southside of Reservoir
1,017,809
7032-1C Burrough Street, Bon Air
155,731
Bon Air
278,000
Ruthers Road
33,000
Lake Crystal Farms
262,127
Jessup Farms (Old Coach Hills)
203,472
S73-2T Rock Springs Farts
441,016
Land 0 Pines
649,574
Sherbourne Road
127,200
Indian Sprinc;s
77,835
Victoria Hills - Bruce Farms
671,043
Johnson Creek - Remainder
527,136
W11 tha11
145,191
Fuqua Farms, etc.
248,856
, 82T.M7(2)
TOTAL PROJECTS
$18,801,465
ADDITIOMAL FUNDS NEEDED
($ 6,987,3451
(2) Does not include Falling Creek Treat-ent Plant
Revised Estimated Fed. & State Aid (See attached sheet for details)
Grant Approved Amount Received Balance Due
$ 13,368,130 $ 5,631,600 $ 7,736,530
SM,TARY FEDERAL AND STATE AID - MARCH 31, 1977
FEDERAL AID
Project
Approved Gant
Received
Balance
C510-462 Old Town
Step II
102,300
30,500
71,800
Step III
449,700
359,700
90,000
0510-487 Kingsland (Bellwood Manor)
Step II
85,120
76,400
8,720
C510-466 Proctors
Step II
529,050
390,200
138,850.
Step III
5,336,620
4,269,200
1,067,420
Sub Total
6,502,790
5,126,000
1,376,790
C510-466-03 Proctors.4MGDSTP
Step III
6,217,500
0
6,217,500
C510-484-01 I.& I Falling
Creek
Step I
161,770
91,900
69,870
C510-215 Sec. 206(A)
38,900
38,900
0
C510-350 Sec. 206(A)
58,600
58,600
0
C510-277 Sec. 206(A)
1,600
1,600
0
C510-307 Sec. 206(A)
23,400
23,400
0
C510-255 Sec. 206(A)
24,400
24,400
0
TOTAL FEDERAL AID
13,028,960
5,364,800
7,664,160
STATE AID
C510-462 Old Town
Step II
4,500
2,000
2,500
Step III
29,150
23,300
5,850
C510-487 Kingsland (Bellwood Manor)
Step II
9,420
8,400
1,020
C510-4-66 Proctors
Step II
58,500
43,100
15,400
Step III
237,600
190,000
47,600
TOTAL STATE AID
339,170
266,800
72,370
TOTAL FEDERAL & STATE
$13,368,130
$5,631,600
$7,736,530
vxvx�vz•x• xx c n
v v K• O r•
v � O
n w
r
10=;uMOro cf "cf. n
KC<CL:ro-"0 o O x
O C7rD G?O r+r„n G N O
� v� N ro n� r• 1 �.t n O rt 7
0 r: P, • 70 3: t� a
cn N~ 0. ro m ;4 0 rt O
C :3- P-- GQ+rn xrt rt
J w G O CnK w
P. K Orrt w " !y
A 01. C') < C w "(D N
K 00 m rtrt rt rt
OV rt K r. n r•
: w C4 9 n
n n A C tD
K n
Ci
r) z
rt 0 CL
n n
9 a o t.�i w
` O O rt V N
E N co 0
j rt O Go
I M K
C n
W n
N r•
I d7
r• CN
H N
�( M O r
' r.
m
o d W
Rr z h
n tu rD d
I R N 0 H
d O
w a N
I �r•
o eh n
A O
m N ry
A �
� G
! w
O
I �
K �
A
v. �
n I
K
E
A
a
Im
t �
Ia
rn rn
(b N [^
V 11l N
W O W
LA I O vl
r
w,
w ry
m r
M M
a a
N N
z z
A A
A n
rD a
-fir, w n
CL roa
•H rt
-+no no
C r> '7>
OG m G
r• ri r•
v rrt C r.
r w r•
� O t O
CIO H INH
O O
0 o v m
U V n U n I
N N
G I0 C
rD n
,t S
J O o O I r 0
1;3 Yl NN
r• I
�•v N r N
v�, n wn
v rrJ P PI
;^ N
0 0
O OI
J 0 G% O '
a a
r
00 O
w .�n rtl I
a
M C C
ID
o D rJ ID
O
r• r•
N N
O O
K K
N N
F
Co
^ r
� o
O
n W
0Io
:J
C JP '
a O
r- li
to h
r• O
o �•
O r
�S N
O
M ro
n c,
n�n
N
ro 1
OJ
ru
1
r
'I
L.)
V
y
7•
i
n
J
7
J
-r
r
N
7
S
C
y
1
N �
N
t "+
0
7 y
t••3 Cn
V �
K O �
K^
11 K
� 1
r
r
N
W
3 ro
F
r
CO
N
N
v
IO
F
wr
ID
w
K P n
r
z n
�
7 C r- �
v
wn114 M
w
r,�rw
I
I
zV �O
Vj V V
O,
O
O
O
F
M M
a a
N N
z z
A A
A n
rD a
-fir, w n
CL roa
•H rt
-+no no
C r> '7>
OG m G
r• ri r•
v rrt C r.
r w r•
� O t O
CIO H INH
O O
0 o v m
U V n U n I
N N
G I0 C
rD n
,t S
J O o O I r 0
1;3 Yl NN
r• I
�•v N r N
v�, n wn
v rrJ P PI
;^ N
0 0
O OI
J 0 G% O '
a a
r
00 O
w .�n rtl I
a
M C C
ID
o D rJ ID
O
r• r•
N N
O O
K K
N N
F
Co
^ r
� o
O
n W
0Io
:J
C JP '
a O
r- li
to h
r• O
o �•
O r
�S N
O
M ro
n c,
n�n
N
ro 1
OJ
ru
1
r
'I
L.)
V
y
7•
i
n
J
7
J
-r
r
N
7
S
C
y
i
� +H
N
t "+
7 y
t••3 Cn
C
K O �
K^
11 K
y
[�l
3 ro
C -a
in
<
r•
"• N
a
t7
D
K P n
r
z n
�
7 C r- �
v
wn114 M
w
r,�rw
v l•'' .ro r
zV �O
Vj V V
O,
N
U,
C.3
1 1
1 1
1
1
N
('1
f�
,ice
`•� J
wa
.-��'
(r
:i,
.."CJn
"'Cln
r•
r.
c
x
r..
aw
H..
ax
r..
ax
, ..
a x
r• w
at--
r• w
P.rx
H• '
CL
a
a
(D
CD
(D
H
'i R "7
rt "+1
'T1 .^ b ?1
ro n 'T1
N "1
" ro c n
O O w0
w
O m0 w
O O a,
Co
(D
0
O w
(D
IO
K r
m f/]r
H'
td I-
rt O a✓
nClmCO m r
G C: r
rt 1 r
co—
I
w r•r-
IS 27 Inr
R r
r
O I
In
Vl w N•
G N•
O m cn m C- H.
(D R H.
rt N•
O rt r-
w
O H.
�e r•
o r•
�'
C
Rra
CC
T -CO
G<rt O
0 m R ro70
a'C
NOLO
o
77
cnv, a
R rD n7c
o0
In C-4
KO
ct QO
mC0
rtQ0
Gft'•�
1
rom
GCrn
r•
On�COG
Rr dCC
3n
CDC
00wc
Cn
rtn
O41 i
mn
0c
m
n
b7n
nnC"n
H
G It
N rt
'd ? cn o rl
m It
o n
m ro m n I
O n
w ri
I( n
'
rt
(D
m H• n
mm
0
m 'iy ;.r r• m
m
m
G m
m m
a' G x r,
m� m
- G m
It m
o, (D
Cl m
r• m
P. m
m
O m m
O
y
r•14 m
�-
m
g T.'
rr 0
t t'• m
0 H•CO 7:
7J
O x
0' X'
: O O F
rt x
CVY.
Y
•.,1.
row
oom
w
m
cr•G
(D
a
m
M
:3 w
"� 1
17' cn y
Q. M
:.1' M
S R M
O
N.P. G
O
F A 0 G R rt
If
CQ n
Q0. In n
:: O
G
rt n
w cn
R rt G
o o w
R O
3
m 0
cnr3
m 0
(D
o
w �T'
0.R
O
JOD, C R a:3
7•'
rt r
I
G
n
o (n
R r• H•
t• 0 0
O
- - rr r•
o 0 H. ?` O
ro �,
ra
w O
:� rt
o"
r•
O P.00
(D
0 0 0 7 0 w
rt m
II
rt rt r(
O CD
'<
-
O
0
m
"—
d
M "o
0 to _r
:3,
0 0 0 0. O
O m
O
P. 0 r-
w
W
to
R
rt 0
O c,
K
m
w C.:.
v rt
b R
O
17
O
O 70
0
C
to
rtw
O
n iL
p0
H. ro
(a O
N
0
O
'�O
R
A
m
cn n
ai 0 C,
m In
P.
m
P.
!n (Dw
r
O
H.
Mrt
m O
pOi
rr?
m
a
°(D
m
a r•
O 0 D :3-
0 m
arm (n
C: m
14 .•
N
N flu O In
O r
(n I--'
J
a R
D'o,
i n
tip
n
w
C,
CY N
V
r= O
1
I CII
Co
O
y
O
R
O
O
R O
GOO
o
H.
o
o
w o
I)
O
m
O
0
r0
Il0rn
C)m
]0Mn0mC-)
rt
Crt0 0
0mnHM
O R O
OO
n
0 0
H
ORJIT�nO
R 0 0
R
R
rt
:f
;r77
770
700
Ra'GO0
rtO•QOa
n
w m It
w m rt
w, H n
!'t
:-t
� H ,-t
I(D
rIt
rn
rw"' Imi
.'� rmt
tw•-'
in ,a
�
r
� F-•
W
r � i
ol
41
W
ti0
�C
r
w WW
t• -•I N V' ,O
C'.
WI T W In
' � .4� O
CO
ti: -i VI r W
ol
Crol 41
LD 10
Nr
CO In
Ol O W W
C7
,OI N -_jJ
` Q.'. ,O W
^
O, V In CO
V, O N
In J C,
C? O F
G7
�V
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
^
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
1
.1
e•
n
n
n
n
n
n
C3
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
n
(D
m
m
m
m
m
m
O
CD
m
Irr DD
m
m
m
m
m
O
I
r _CZ
r
C1
.-7
1
O
1
O
I
O
1
1
1
I
1
I
N
J, r r 4�1 r F r F F w
W
'Tl U N
0 N..•.
'1 m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
t]
fD H-
(D
a<w
<w
aw
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
_O
a.
1
9 • W
!
W
1
^,.> N
1
N
I
N
I
W
1
W
1
N
1
F
1
r
E-
r• CdN
',n N
r• CJ`
l./!
r
/
O
W
r
W
rl
CL y
H
CD. y
H
H
��
H
H
n
n
.,
'00
N H
"w
CU
3,w
cJ:4w
:f; w
:2t to
"wz
w
'Ew
•"w
w
w
n
n
Ay
(D
w (D
w G r.
w (D
w fD
w (D
fD
m
c o'5:
H
:>
Y
Cn
HH
N -3
n r'
n w
V fJ
N
('J (D n fD
V
w W a V
w r•
;o R r•
H.
N rt H.
H W
n n
a 0
S
a 0 D CL
?
r• � Ca :.r
H 3
r• G�
3
C G El
rD X'
0 w
R �^.,
rt
R E 0
G
R
a V R
H V
a ft V
V
a -0
rD fJ
(D !,
O G
O
W T.'
O
to cr N 0
O O'
r• cY
V
Y r• O'
T."
7^. (D
a(Da
rD
,R n
r 1D w O
O
C R a
H w
E G
CO H
R O G
O a n
G
n
O G
N a n
C]
R N
H
R
C) N
n
G N a N
n
`G R n
w `G
1.4`4
(D w <
01-4
O ro
W
N
H
a P.
H
r•N
R
9rt
E-
V
O
C
O O
(D
R rt y
(D
00 fD
N y
m O y
tU
fJ w
n n
7C. a
W
O G
N
O 'ON
fD
C a N
n
a' n
G
N '+7a
a'w
r•0.
I
H
7C r�
M
F
n C
•1 O a
F•
rt .^.
M R
�7 C
O a
R N C
O n a
5
'd
o O 0.
H
fD -
H
a
Ov H0
C'"
6
W
'In
'+J
O 7C
to
w O H
w 7.'
a c' T.
r•
0 Y
`C y
V t
n
y
O r
O
O R
G
r N
G
a
1D rn
r N
E G
9
9
n r
n
O O
C'"
O
N H
O
(D
n H O
O -
'G
r•
w a
G Uv RV
G n
a 0
n
w o
N
`. R
0
a s
a 5T'
O N,
G.
N
O
n
N b
a
a 0
CY3
C 3
R
r•a
M
G
3.
- N
CQ
C1 0 M
C3.
w
a
"O M
n
W a
H. T
w
Y•
V H O
n n
In
a n
' 1 O
N N
n n
'd
"I C
R
r•
N 'C10
C
n
w O
0
7
a
a
HGrt
R
O w
O 3
O
wB
CD.3
M
n a 0
w
H a
O ;v
H 'b
p
a •cy
'rl
H
pq, 11
rl
r
(DD C' r
(
r�
(OD a
R M I,
o
R
CV
1--'
r
I H
0
a
'p
1
O
r
r•
aH.
ov
n
N O
N
(AN
HZ
0%
J
1f
W
v
W
N
r
N
N
F
W
/--'
N
N
O' 1--'
1 co
W
W
f}• n
I n
N
V
r
lJl
1s
r
�!
W
p
O�
I•-'
H O
J
cocn
w
0%
O
N
O
O
O
0
ft 0
O
CD
['7 y
O
O
O
O
Go
O
CD
O
O
O
N
O
O
Cl
O
O
J
O
w 0
1--' O
O
O
O
O
HO(tln
yOnn
HG:TIn
yOt=ln
HOh7n
HOb'n
.OmC-)
HOmC)
y0rlC,
H0t*7 C•]
O rt -1 O
O R a O
O rt a 0
O rt? 0
0 R a O
O rt a O
O R a O
O R a O
O rt a O
O m a O
w O H
w (D N•
f '
f J'0,3
-
:JUV w
ft :J
:70<a
^'(PG a
G (D N
rt a"7 a
w n N
n
C;
rN
rN
rIt
rH
h+H
rn
rn
rN
rn
rn
t-f;o
N :7
H i1
F
W~+
y
r
N
N
lr
T
r
y W
N
U
N
Hn
W
V
N p
W V
I'1 O
W
V
V W NN
.D F V
tJ1p
Ol
O N0�1-+
!`
p0
`D
WAD V
AIn �D
i]W O F
In V1
F'
Nln O
F�W t--'�O
N
V
I Ot
:1
O W
co V O
O�
ID
G,`D
to
~
�D
OGor
1 N V
v O a+r'
V Flr
O%ln W
03N
�,ID �D t-'
C A r N
N
0,00
0.yf-'p'D
rl
n
J
w
O
N
N
H
N
N
co
O
W
1
1
W
1
I
1
I
1
O
I
H
10
O
O
O
O
J
O
O
O
O
w
p
1
1
co
p
�
1
1
1
1
O
1
1
n
n
n
nF3
n
n
n
n
n
'U
E3
I
W
b
b
'L7
'O
'b
•b
w
In
N
(D
1s
O
A
O
O
rD
O
O
O
F
R
rt
r
rt
R
R
R
rt
w
R
fn
O
O
O
(D
(D
0
0
(D
p
0
w
O
O
H
d
W
w
�
W
W
O I
N
N
co
O
w I
O
O
k• CD
0
Q
O
O
Q
o
I
C~
1
W
%r+
r
CD
O
L.
c
n
O
N
O rD c
N F.
(D a
0.
(D CD
R. rw.
O
E:, H
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
r
I
9
1
1
rT1
tr
o
.r
aro y
w 9 ,.
�,
a
I
F n
a -'
n.
cv
v
tJ
d
d
u
w
w
w
w
n "+
w
w
w
wa
lb
wW
rw
H�
rW
rtv
iV
N
ID
(D
r fD
(D ti
r (Dr
(D 1'q
(D
(D ri
(D (D
(D (D
(D m(D
rD^
H'
�
w
w
0
w
wru
:7n•
R
R
R
R
H
0
C-3
r.iy0 (D H
w
1.
ro
1
•bR
7
C G r ;l
ra H.
"'0a
I 1
W r)
W
n(3
o O
w a i O
PUW
O Q
7 n ;�
n
(D
fD rt n
n n
`
W
'p N
ti' N N,
- O W
n rt
H.
Ow
rt W
1
O
H
O
O
'rt
O
r rt
O O
a x rtH
OGIitC0.HG
0 :0
':73 WO•p
PI CL
O
y
G y
w N H. rn
C/1
C7
O
ro
ti
rt
G G
i"
0
W nw
iJn
n [nn
O
1 n0.G
10
O
w
n
rt
tn^xw.1
o n
rron
-
n
on
prtC
n
1
N n
9 (D
O Y• O n
=. C n
r t n
C7
r.
G n
•r1 0.O
>
H
N
(D
(D ID
G O O n
"irr (D
}: w rD
ty
O
rt nxX
'Tf
y
N
H
-
rt Do O
N m
: rD F
u�
O ;o x
O rJ
N
71
W
ti n H.
n H W O
H
O
0 H
r rt H
• H
P. H
(D
In
r r/.
rD rD rcq
;y
n
O
^•7
K
rcJG
w 0 ti
tiC G
n n
O oG
H iID
�n t-:
G
H
r£
'..r.FY•co
w
O
O.,n7OH
O
wn:J
fi
K
rtwW
Grt
rt O
I--• w F
;o w n
(D
N
O In
Y• ra Jo w
fD
n
!7
(D
a
O n G
1 r, H
O
1•t
w. .
O rr
O 3 H
3
N
rt
a•
rt
:J
3 n Y•
"
rt
1'S
ri
CA (D (D ry
rt H
. a (D n
K
? H
v K O
O
O
n (DO
O O
O
fJ
(D
(9 1'f
r• fJ 7
K
m
El
r -'7;'p
3
rr 9
rt i3
7a
ti
rt
(D
rt
W rr
G
D
(D I
Q
rD
H. (D
10
a
in
v
tbill
v
in
ct: o
G r
J0
o
Z
r:03
C r
Lo
N
w
70
no
tnw o
to'd n
O'
Hd
V
F
VI
I r
N n
a. R
rt n Cl.
Nol
co
00
N
O.
H V+
O r
rt n
W V)
H Y
W n
rt N H
W 9
w
H v
rt t11
n
5 O
Ln
F
rt ••
w L.w
R
Y• •r,
Vl
y
:3
Y m O
O m
Fl-
Y• Y• n
O 7 n
rt I
w o
rj (T.
[T7 H
41
lr
o
H w
O"
(D
C:
O C G
C 0a to
O
Ww
A
OO
v
O�
W
(n g n
N
v O
O
N b
b
1
1
•
H O mH
0 m n
H O sl n
H 0 m n
H0 M
H 0 M n
H 0 M n
19 O M r.
O rt z O
rt .^r'M :�1
O rt O O
rt ;T'�V ;J
O R n O
,'r ]V ;J
O rr 0 0
rt :YOV ;1
O rt 0 0
rt ;S )) :J
0 rt IJ O
rt :Y T1 :)
O rt 7 0
r '.•)� ;l
0 rt 7 0
rt :Y;IV
N (D 1'i
r•Y
N ('J 11
Hri
N (D ri
HH'
w ID ry
rn
N (D H
rri
N (D ti
HH
C�� (D ri
Hli
w rD H
rrt
r
(•:
[a 50
r
W
cn 7d
`3 n
v,
r
rn
•z_
O
H I
VI
1
1�:
r
1
ol
tr;
13 n
H
O I
I
W
I W
o
wW.,]J{I
N
W r v
ay �D
H w �.
In
.^ l
L1
a I O�
N
w
m 0
:n
O 1
C'.D 11rr
•. 1.0
O`���vr
^
`O
H
00
I N I
.7.1HVi
1 r cl
V rA aJ
I O i
U N a� l.-
� "il
�lNnw'�
4
I
V
n
F
�
r
VI
I
1
I W1
I
1
J
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
~I
-4
r
y
o
O
o
o
r
O
o
'y
W
. O,
O
w'
a
O
j
00
O
(D
(D
(D -
(D
N
(D
N
N
W
rr
rt
rt W
rt
rt
rt
:7
ON
N
(D
(D
(D V
(D
V
(D
(D
r.
T7
y
1
O
7
i
J
V
W
1
vF
I
1
LA
00
C
d H
1
1
I v W
—W
00
V
i^I
-I
00
-4
41
r
N N N N N r r r r
(D
m c
o
m
m
o m
o m
o
•r. c
1
1
N N•
N
pj
Pl- 41
> I
a
1
��%�]j
9
:S
to
w m
w w
w to
c~r.
rt
rt
rm
rm
rm
_
rt
f?
rmt
CrG'D
nn•
oy
O
11"
n.
rtro
nro
,b-7
nnn c
Owv W
rt
(T
H w
O H
O H
O H
O C H F'
O
Oy
m
R O
w R
R
m r
C) n
n n
R n
11 m m O
O
H
N�
F'• :1
O r
n N• y
O O_
m
x H.
m R
O• rt
(D R
w R x n
y
C�
rt
C
;i O
rt
m 0
w H
O
o m O
_
0 _
O
(�
G
H
n(D
[H-"
O
_
�'
HH
C w n
H G) m
nO
m
(D
N
Ir H
O G
Cn
m x
(D
o C
It
ri
x
m
O
G
m r?
G
to
0
0r rt (yHD
rtw0O
Rrh
rt
m
wa
Hm
�
r• H
R
m
rG
HrV
t.
O
OrnyOOQn
ri
Pi ro
n
O
CLL H
OC
X,
R
N 9
C r• m
7•
7o H
7'
(D
n t"
Z
m
r• Fti
roIQ
7 I't
0, �
rt
00 O
m
n.
w w
p ' 0 'r0 £ R N
C. RO m rG
N ry N N R R O '
w a m
H H rt N a
'O
to
to N o M d 0
1 O
'T7 N
co O
W C
_ m o ro t*01
�
LA
VI r In
O C, :n >
00 c rt r U r - O OD [HTI H `Z ( O "-J
-1 rt O w n 7
O r O� 0 0 0 " v o
-10mC-,HOre, ny0mC, y0mC-) -90m HOtif r-;OCNC�
O R C O O n p O O rt 0 p C R C O O O O O R O OC7 0 " O rt C U
rt 5•DO -I n 700 .i n ;7� a n ;YDy � R ="r'•0 :J 1'r ?P43V N ::j
w m H N m H w m H w m H w m n :v m ri w m H N c;
rri rH rH rH rH rH rH C, y
v fn x a O
w y r7 < O
co N 1 I I r pa I .� N w Fj '00
M O O
V T 00 1 1 I V 1 OCT r O r N C/1
w N In • 1 I 1� N r V �� O O +_Tf CT w y �p ;a
� r r 1 I C 1 O 1 N CT (n (n ~ r l/J VI S V y
� V O� O 1 1 1 O �q �� w 0, 1� Ob w
F N n
F O l00 I
O1 i
1 O
Hc
1 I 1
O rl ~ ti
r o ro
to to >
cn
rN �•
C) 1 ! •=7
0
n r 0 0 0 iz
w o rn 8
ci
D ?J
N rt .,, N fm'f (D r .T1
� R R
>
O I y
I
A v N
CT
4 i lNn
o
Un
s
'Nw
mi
I '
1 N N
W W W N N N
W
s O,
V
v
r
r
V
o
00
F W
1
O
S p
F
..
N
1
l,7
I v
vl
O
v
N
J,j
,
r
v
bo
br to •r
r-1
N (D
K rt
N
H
Pi
w
N
._ .„
W G m H rl%
R
rt
rt
rt rt � ;v G7
1
CH,
7 O
d H
N
O
w O
rt
1
x
'
O o r
<
rOfD.
O
W
ry'
NG
nO
G GNN
RN7,
yHO
N O
OC
O
O
O
wm
H
N
N
t•
O
OGa
(D
(D
NCD
afD
iO.'
O
7
C.
7
7: ;Hj
1'1
C G O
soon
E 0
N
CO
p
z
(D
r"
~j
x
cn
~r0'I
w R
F G
y
R
O
D
Nb
t
rt
n rt
MfD �
QO
W
A
O
<
I- Ip r.•
Inrt
1
0
fD
O
rn
O
K hntd
a 1"1 O
W
W
Mrt
R
R p
N
K
w
w
b7
O
O
fu
0
rt
I'
y
,Oj
n
~ (
0
U b
---
td
7 O
CA Cr
!n ::
C: M
to
V N
V N
H C7
'•J (']
N
r
s
:-j
Y-'
w r
Nw
w r -I
NEI
c In
V
C N SO
A V1
0o
r n
1 r)
O'O
i
a
s H to
l r
F
N rD
W
0
I t+7 H
n cn ro
0
O
W W
0
0
0 0
S o ro
wo
0
o
w 0070
HOMn
R ;7 O
r-3OCn
HO[r]C'
H?'O
TC
O C
7WUQ
O 0
O n 7 0
0 :3 O
O
70 0J
fOOt
OO
[4N'r771
H
N fD H
w N 11
w N Nia a
pp
JN
R0yGCOo
/MJ
r -I K
Nr
r 11
N fJ r1
r--• r-1
N N r1
N ;y
C H
rJ H
H C*1
r13
? O
aro
r
K
°�
w Hn
r�
UOi
NW
W
C'1 O
N
V
00 N
V 0,
s O
N
W 41
r-•
I W
O
b
In co V
NNO'
(T 0,
N
lr
1- W P�
NSD C,
1
s H
1--'
A
OD V N
In VIN
V L
V "
O V' C� X11
'�
N rn
0.—In
O V•
N In
1 0
�p
O O Q
I
�I N 11
�o O J
�n V
1 O
V FC
W
'7
V
1�
00
W
.j
• •�
s
1 1
N
:'�
00
L„
o o
1
1
I
n m
AI
C)
1
1
I
_
H
;
OsoOD
>
Lo
f]
0
b
p
O7
LA)
rn
r
r,
r
o
r
rn
r
.
N r-1
�O
N
N
1'
0
1
v
r
r
00
F
..
1
I v
vl
O
v
N
J,j
,
r
v
rn
l
i�
N N N
F F F
•
�
�I
V v
WW
W
r t
O
0
p
OO
a h-,
H
d
r
N ri
rt W
9
n
C
i
a
• r C)
r
N•
�
O
r
<c�i
l
I
I
In H
d n
'•
W wE
w
M i r•o W w�
o r
r
roro
H. H.
W
fD W 7 H r• rn r•
CQ
r00
X
E-
O Orr
m
rD -4O
OR
GU
•
(D
IW-(
zc
R
xrt• N (D rD
W
fD r
x�
O
y- O
H b
CL
tD
O
W
ro
rt rt
R
y
In
G rnt
R
oaCQ
O
W
O rD
(D
CA
C
C
O. W(D
W
� (�'� H.bO W�
_
:I
y
O
W 3
O
T.'
CQ
hi
;vr•
x
•-
"
.
rO+
'
r
(D
H.
d
b
H.
(D
o
r
nO
�G" '
9M
09
N
y
7hG•'1
H
G
O Cd 0
r n N G
N
0
O M
W
H
n W x
S
O
Cr
7C
G
O W G W
p•
r
O
R.
z
fD O. M
8
r1 N h'I
G1 3
OQ rt
O
b
M R v H. n(D
n
(i
m
r%
W� EJ
7•
VI hW-• n•. 5•W J
0
(D 0
r•
.%
CQ (D
•�
I
N
iC•
O
r•
G
P+
R G
O•
p
C1
R
(GT
�R,
W rt
O
QQ rY
C
O
t1.
O (D
r,
K
H.
O
W O ~
r• O.
I
O
c�
y
(n
W
�+
�F
L o
-n
o
rw
�rt
>O
O
t
. o
O
rn 0
V W
H VI
H
F
O
v
o O
O
v
O
O rt ;7 O
O: O 0
0 ria O
O R O O
co-,
H O tTl H O [Tl r:
H 0 [h c"'IH
O ['+7 ('7
r-7 0 m n
r)
�•W :.i
r 7'DV :�
r a•7u :J
;D'�v 7
O R O O rt :7 O
R ?DQ
O rr 0 0
0 R O 0
0
1
0 rt 7 0
W (D rt
W N rt
W (D n
W (D rl
:7 r QQ :]
W rJ rt W N rt
R :Y 7Q :1
W (D ri
rt 7'Dv
n a
Vi ti
r ht
r K
r M
r rt
r ri h+ K
r K
W (D r4
ID
W rJ ht
'•�^.,
N
'•.'
r-�
r ri
Iy-�
'
v
«
oc
OQ
I
r
H H
.O
O OO rn
N
lr0I r l.. r yr
r W
p
pp
>
O
F %O
N N h
IX N In
U V
N
Z,C
tn
H
�O
V F
1. v Ut
WOO
00 O�
co
oli oc� n�iw
OI
�..wo�
c oo
O� OQ
W OO
CQ
l� V
i
O� pIl
OQ Cl
UI O�
of
co
n
N
O
O
O
O
I
I
1
1
I
I
O
O
rn
�
00
_II
{II
)
n
n
`
`'
II
^
O
R
rt
fD
(D
M
(D
"I
O
(D
fD
IF
C� +
(D
(D
rD
(D
•y
('O
d
:y
1
kA
J
I
II
i
''
MD
of1
vel O
v
N
F
C)
v
� O
O O rt 7 O
CD
C;
:
• y n a•0o O
~
rn
;V
O
[•1 V
• rt w (D ri
o
t� ;n
,0 "I o
C)
1
rH
v:n
v
f7
H
^r7 (Nn
i
r
x
cerci
to
�
w
HO
CH
Oo
( V
�H
on
H
N N
O i col
co
(n (n Lb
xb
O (D 't
(D O 't
K
N 7
O
(D
< rt C~D
CD7rt
x
y
'U<A
0
U3
b W
�•
1-. H.
w
u t
F o CL
O 'O
O C
O rt 0
O N
�7
OG O rt
n
v PT Kd
(7
rt (D
ON•xEl
H
'
w b Cn
rt rr•
y r (D '7
rm r•
/• 1
p
w
0 nm
fD c
Cn 11 c
2
pcD
o<
C,
a- o cn
rt
O r• rt
ortw
ro
!-
bn
to
O O
r'l
O
tv
x
0
K
a
O.
00.
O
O
01.4
x O
N
w
o
to
ox
rt CL
0.��
��
0-4
< (D�t
H w
d
'=1 x0
~
C] 9
m 0.r•
FHy
N
O
:3
p,
co
m
rt 1--•
O nw
Y n
cn
n H
c�
F
tv
x ✓yi
o
r (7
r+ CL
G'1 .-•
x >
•j
L4 w V
r •0
a
r
• C) H O [*1 r,
C)
fn 0
CD
O O rt 7 O
CD
C;
:
• y n a•0o O
~
rn
;V
H O t'7
0
• rt w (D ri
o
t� ;n
,0 "I o
rH
v:n
v
H
r
r
W
C" 21
to
�
w
HO
CH
Oo
( V
�H
r
N N
O i col
co
xb
C��fW
C> CD
K
x
w
r
o
0
�
CD
CD
F
F
~
rn
o
0
V
o
CD
O
O
N
F
r
W
W
r
�
�
I P-
N
F O O
W V v
W W ' co
in O v O
w '. ID
co
r
m
N N
00 m
%D
IP
x
W
r
V
V
V
V
O
V
O
V
O
O V
W O
V
O
V V
O O
p
�•
1 1
1
1
C�
'I
0.
Cn
H
^7H n
dA•
H
O
N G
A
O
r n
n
w
O
O
r n
m
y
w
� 0
W
n
EE
t'.
G w
O
p a a
x0
0
o°
1
CL
a
1
y
ro
R
C
N
d
rt
r?
"7
':1
'T1
tit 0
0.
0
r
0
w
w
°'
°
<
o
0 m
a
a
ya
p rrr
m
�'
w
r r•
r•
co
n
t'
rt
V n
r•
m
ryi
n0
rn
Z
A 3
r
n
nr
G
x
rt
rA
r
0
n
m
I
Mo
C/) y
r
1H+ O
A
N
`o
r
w
o
v
✓O
H y
O
r
O,
Co
O
O
U
oro
O
oro
00
p
O
t -I H
CD
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C0
O
O
O
O
O
HO[rIA
130m0
HO t*1A
HO :A
HOMO
HOC+IA
H0mn
H 0 m n ("7
O rt? O
O R O O
O R O O
O R .^. O
O R O O
O rt 00
O rt 0 0
O R 7 0 O•
rt 7•c"j 0
whin•
rt 7'oc
w ron
rt •700
moro n•
R �::
rt r-••� '�"
R 7'C'7 '.%
R ^'CO
o
rt �'CG a
rn
rn
rn
r un•
wmn
mom n
mo 11
wmn N
rn
rn
rn
rn
rn y1 -y
H Z
r
� H
H A
V
N
r
N
r r
r
N
N
r m N
�
I rrn
V
rr
rn l.n
V
ro.
rrv,
00
rao y
Vl
1 F F
1 In
N r F
aGI D7
r �O o
w F r
r W N
mo o
�D
1 00
1 FO
NO,O
NF�r
rWV
Corm
VO«^
0�0
I OO
i FC
�[j
t�O
l.n
mop r
OL f rn
^0,O
« V 10
F- FtnO
«^{
1
(r.11�0
wwV
rI-n
rnrnA
oo co—1
n
N
r
cn r
O
00
rn
w
W
O
00
W
A N
o
O O
O
O n
1,3
C>
0
N
W
W
V
I 1
1
t.l1 N
rt
N
n
r-4
O
R
A A
A
A
ty
0
O 0
0
b
a.
O
O
I
ro- 14I
r r
r
1
00
0
m m
m
N
W
O
10
QO F
rr r
N
ID
M
ro
r
F
OH
d
y
x•
W
N
r
..
10
V
l!1
p�
00
I °0
I n
O
O
�/ O
v
ov'
a
r
W
N
O
O
w
r
N
W
-W
v,0
IF00
--4
O O
1 1
O In
I
N
%D
IP
x
W
r
V
V
r N
O N W N N N ... N N N
O
V
W�u
fo
Cl U1 0
... C1
1
I
.c
n
r
9 LO
NW Hc.+
N
W
N
A A
�'
A A
A
cn r+ •-
x
S
x x
x a
cn r:
-�
� H
d
w
o
n
M
N
K
n
m
o
cn
r0f
<
ti
rt
C
N
tK+
m.
O
N
b
7'
m
1
M
G
p�G
A
<
N
o
H
to
r
K
U
y
w
m
n
9
rn
tD
'ID
Oy
o
ryry
W
7°
>
t'
z
Qo
O
9
1
N
r
to
tv
w
1
n
O
K
O
y
0
cl
O
O
r
A
R
O
o
�
w
w
x
m
r
t
td
N
N O
r
Na
rr^ O
W
co
hf H
V
O
0
0
0
nO
CO;
MOK
MH C
n'trHo
niH
o r
n.-3
O7(p
AO
OKM
RrHN
RNKO
O
O rt 0 O
'7rt7'CGR0O
O rt 0
ORO OR
O rt 0
0" 7 OCG
NKOR
?7
rt a'00
O�
fN .fD OKG O
QM
.�J
rtNy
CG
Aw
rON-3
NHO�rtNOi
rw'3fK09 KM
KM•C
KM
(KOD
�-t-7
rDR
(OIt K
KM
tOD
r
K(oD
rIHL
rK
1-'K
rK
r+ry
M'zf
co y
W
H M
41
r�
5y
Q�
N N
I V
l.f N N
1 Q�
VI
lJl R pry
1 0 4
In
N
1
1
I
I w
I
N N �C
1 N 1--•
I.
M O
N
W
W W F
1 0
O
�
t
V O f.
I N
a
WFC
1 0 0
H
W
VON
1 0
Vwov
I OOa
oFC
OLS
I N
OGO
I V
NW`
1 00
N
'1
WO
A
O�
�cc
41N
W
7
y
w
1
>
NOl
CD
c
Hyr+
C
LA 41
rn 41
0
o
ri
ad
oG
1
w
N
r
M
O
V
V
V
ci
d
M
W
N
N
O
v
o
y
9
H
d
N
O
C>
r
O
[*1
t -f
C)
y
,f
M
N
X
v
H
A
41
O
o.
N
N
^
n W
(>+
a
O
v
v
I
v
1W+v �j
v
v
0o
O
'
W
O
O
N
C W O C/:
o o cn
C7 to
to
tVa C 1.
W W
r• V
-,� tr V
y
..
-
to W 9
N N
VH
1•+
tan (7
�O H N
M G
H H
9
n
�3
•
b
w
to
m N�r
m
to
m
W to
m
Cti
to
b
t7
H
In In
'i rt
tS
li K
m
1-(
pi
H
Iw-+
Iw"'
J H
m
m
m
<
MC7•
O H
G
w r
r
`10
1-4
;
•
8
W
0
n
0
N 'G w
'D A)
::j
.m
rt
m :r
rt a
c:
w rt"
1-t
ID r• m
m
wrn
a rt H. 0
0
n :j ri
r•
C) rA
G G
w
H 0
0"MO�o�
R
w
n0
ymtj
rM
m m
m
o
o Cl.
�.
0
-
m
-m
c w
Oo
ro n
w
y
r
rt H
H
m
m m
y
m K
rt
C 1~-•
�vl
o
9
rt
0 n
1rt4n
0
L
t"
m
O O
I
1+ Al C
G:
CA n
•
It li
tv m
n
m
rt rt
mto
wF
�
O rt
n
rt K
f."
Z
o rn
w
N t,
O
CQ
R
N.
'I
N
m
rf
p N
m C
M
0
m
K
N
I(D
M O
to
H d
�D F
le
O,
C,41L,
A
t7
cc
cc
oN
r OD
.~o
o
v
y
w
�O O
W
coO
N
M H
W F
W tJl1
131
O
O
C.O
V
O
Q
O
N In
'10 M n
H O M nI
H O M n
HO t*1 n
H0:-1.^-
HOMM
30Mn
H0 Nn
H0m(�
O rt 0 0
0 rt B O
O rt :3 O
O rt� O
O r, :3 ^
O rt 7 O
O rt� C
O rt :j0
O rr 0 0
n
rt :rm �:,
rt O'00 y
m 7'00
rt :Y(nm
rt :;.Cl a
rt a'00 7
rt 5011
N m �1 •
N m li •
N m M
N m r'{
N m H
N m li
N m K
N m H•
U m 1't
v: ,V
lD W
H ri
r li
r-• r{
rH
r+ rl
r rl
H I -S
r'i
r•• Ii
y ;o
f p
H
V O
Np
I NO
F --
Incc
N V
0.0.0.111 V
y
W
I W
I -
V /•-�
WN
I W
1 �0
F�-1 al
1 00
I NO
� I OHO
1 0
1 01
I F
1 0
N W
�O F
I F N
Jll t "0
N
H
1 l.11F
1 V O
N
W
oc
O
VI
41
VI
L,C>�O
W NON'
p
OD
H
v''
In
W O
O
W
p
OD V
.ti.
>
O
o
O
0
O
O
O
n
H
%0�
V
O O
Oo
O
1•-' h'-'
O
7
n.
M
'
N
H
O
O
O
W N
M
V
O
WH
C.
V V
H W
H00
N
Gj
td
O
vl
W
00
10
W
p�
vl LA
OD
M
I••'
N
00 W
V V V
O
10 V
W
ro
1
v
v00
w O`
o cc
Ol N
vl
>
H
r
�
v
N
O
H
Is
�.n
N
N
t
F
F
41
X
I
I
vl II
vl I�
y
�
W
v
I
v
~'
H
N
w 1J
W
H
F
W
V
t-•
rnCcIn
i
tr
r v
w 1,y,11
r
..
_
•
�� (N
In
V
w
W O�
v V
N
O
O
OD
O
OD
N
- ``. i -- --... __.
►-I N N N f- r r 1- r p...
N U t.(I
r
N
CA
1
O
VCl
C7%
1
I
I
W
N
iI
1
W
1
I-
V
V
Y
t•'� 'O'.
I
W
W
1
r
v
o
41•0
1
1
1
n 5
1Ll •t
I j
a
„
<
D)
H to
ID
tT
ry 0
n
CL
CL 11
y
w x
n
7
ro
to
i
to
•
7.
N
O
rt F•
O
rt
rt
w
N
rt
w
O
7
C
K •C
h -'(f0
ry
O
rt
tv
ht
n
O
w
O
w F
to
O (�
0O
a
a
r
n
O
`�' N
Y
rl
rt N
O
H
H
H
wrLIi
9D
O
N
m O
m
n
K
N
H
(D
CY
H
(D
w C 1
w
1
w
n
b00
F ry
H
fnD
N
°o
o
x
o°o
w
(D
:
rt H
°m
w
rt
rnw
r
rt
1
p
chi
Cl
M
tv
fD
m O
En
H d
F7.
a0_
7.
'Z
r
H
—o
O
H. O
O
O
r
ry O
v
j
- W
m
1*1
m
W
N
~
v
N
HOmr.
HOmn
13 0 m ni
0 m n
130m0
'A 0 m n
H O m n'
-30 -us
yO m C
Homn'
30mn
OrtO 0
SCQ :3
0 rt O 0
0rt0
m
o rt O 0
0 rtC0 0
0 rt OOC
SCOrtSCSrt7rt
rt '1 O
O rt 7 0
0R7RMrtCO
0 rt O 0
orrOoortno
C,
m (-:ft
w N
w (D rl
w (D K
N .
N m
N
D
D
D
r'K
rK
1 --•ht
r'K
r'K
h'K
HK
h'K
h'K
h'K
e -+K
HA
H M
F
V O
I-1
n
1-•
H
m n
O
rF
ivY'
rF
o
VWO�
NU,
•
V1
OO
NV
Nut
U1
O
"O•
O
O W
1N
'
FN' Wr
FOOD1O
OHF
r O
O
O
I IOU,(31
10
�VN1--'
1Mo
T
ODW..
(X ut NI -V
W OO
NCTV
r
F
o
O
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
•I.
O
O
O
c
O
O
cO
r3
O
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5'J
>
J
r
Lo
n
w
O
H
F
O
C)
to
H
C)
n
A
n
n
n
n
n
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
FI
9
9
5
8
8
8
8
r
v
o
v
n
v
o
v
M
m
F
O
rt
- rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
i
O
(D
m
N
N
(D
(D
(D
(D
H
t7
O
V+
H
O
C
O
C
M
,J
F
H
V
O
r
v,
n
r
H
>
x
1
1
1
1
1
(
C
0
W
rJ
I
0
I
0
1
i
0
1
0
1
1
1
O
F
v
1
1
r
N
I__ -\■/ ..../
H
r�
H rn
K
O Cl l7 V7
n 7• r• v
/r V
ref V1 h7
N V
V
V
O�
7. Ci
m C w
9w
n rnn
�w
w
o
�,
c o
w
H
m H W
N
00 >
W
N
W
n
f7
y
ld Y
o.
H '
ti N
OyO
�R1•
i H
Ci
H
to
n)
(D
tz
y
P
(D
w
n
t"
O
O
r,
m
O
y
(D y
lb
ro rtO
9
A
O
p
n
n'•
owo
m
r
w
A.
w
x
C)
e ro
m
r
o
n
`NCG
a
O
N
>
H
y
H
H
O
Ch
W
Q
G
N
v
It
�
H
N
N
pj
v
O
CL
ho
H7.
Ho
Y
�
10
M� �
H f
i
H O [�7 CO"
O 11 9
H Cjf C]
0 7 O
H O C+7 CO,
O rt 7
H [�7 C)
O O O
H [�T7 C')
OO [T7•
.
n 740 7
"00 7"
7V 7
" QO 7
O O
rt 00 •�
l O O
7' :j 7
O n 7 O
0 7.00 7
moron•
mon•
wr,n•
w n•
mon•
Mn•
wm.t•
n
H rT:
�n
N
r
y •'
H
Y
F,ow
N
00
H
r�
H rn
K
m
r..% 16
BALANCE DUE ON MUM'
PARTICIPATION
FOR
OVERSIZE $ OFF-SITE
AS
OF AUGUST 15,
1975
Contract Location
No. -
S74-29CD Lake Genito
Phase I
S75-21CD John Tyler
Towne
S75-37CD Lake Genito
Section C
Developer
C. L. Rudolph
John Tyler
C. L. Rudolph
Refund
$11,493.00 Cash.
3,500.00 (Est.) Ca
6,082.60 Cash
$21,075.60
REIMBURSEMENT FROM DEVELOPERS (Obligated)
March 31, 1977
S72-54CD-3 Roxshire Land Investment
S73 -25T
Ashton Creek
87,500
(1) Allen & Company
20,921
(2) W. Spilman Short
S74 -30T
Jewett & Latrane
S74 -35T
Portion Brickhouse
7,025
(Mr. Porter)
S75-45CD
Kendale Acres
12,204
(Miles & Spinner)
S76-4CD
Gam Hong Woo
(2 equal payments)
S72-28CD
G. M. Development Corp.
S73-IOCD
Bailey Bridge
17
$ 30,000 Prepaid Conn.
37,500
Prepaid Conn.
87,500
Prepaid Conn.
20,921
Developers Share
75,000
Prepaid Conn.
4,000
Developers Share
7,025
Developers Share
11,624
Developers Share
12,204
Approx. Int.
y.4v.J, f I-+
1 1 N
v�o Ool oor
tltNW rr ra`
V rwlow m
�^
wOMNI 44 LJ 41
OGDw OM 1 Ole
10 t.•ODI 1- ON %o V
w 00 0►'1 N 1 1 V N
_ ..
y IDm
a
mm
0 N
f•
N N
m N
7 ^.J
t t 1 t t t w
N �O OD ►•• Y /Jt N F
0
to
W F %O V O L
• cr trty
100
7
A
W U to c7
ISD
A
A fnD
C OrtD
O
MM 10
.
'9
m
a
c rt
n
ac r
O
m
G
o�
a w w
w
ty
I(o
rt
nr
I<D
O
n o m
w 7 °w m m w
O
-0
A
N N Ci
H N
Ci
01 rt ID
O
o
r-
m {T tt
K
rt
rtm
m
WTI
90
n
p m
N A
x
rt
n
ro
c
rt d b
n
M rt K N
M ID
rt
�
W
r�"
K
RJ N
rt
1 1 N
v�o Ool oor
tltNW rr ra`
V rwlow m
�^
wOMNI 44 LJ 41
OGDw OM 1 Ole
10 t.•ODI 1- ON %o V
w 00 0►'1 N 1 1 V N
_ ..
~
t t 1 t t t w
N �O OD ►•• Y /Jt N F
CT• rt
n H
W F %O V O L
K W
W U to c7
rt
O O
r m N m O O
nOQ
a n
O
6 rt PV
w
rt FH N rt ID £
rt
w 7 °w m m w
o°
-0
A G1 H
m {T tt
d
0
th
W (�
m
rt d b
n
M rt K N
W
m m K d
v
Vf M a rt
rt
rt C1• N (/1
W
CL y w
�
In
rf
m < oib
a
0
a
H
N
O n
W r N 1O
OD F N OD W In qo
H O
Y•
M
O O w O W O+ m cm
aW
0 0 ta, 0 0 o t-•0
a m
y
t, O o 0 0 o t- O
m n
M
O O O O O o W O
r rt
O
N
aH�77
La
OD A N co W tr .ro
fD
a
O O w 0 w of c,
p.
y
O O tT O O O r N
(D rt
M
to
O O O O O O r 0
CL
n
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w
m
x 0 O O W O>
~
p
08
y
�
�o
V
'd � x
�
�
V
�
r O
s w r
tD
y
CL
R
o
pa
G
W M O
1-4
N
N
.4 C n
N
N rt w
O
M
7
y
0
N
O
M
C
OOOp
O O O O O
@0
6 9 9 O s o
C
O a
r
m
tD
tt
CN
F
N
fD
r o
w v w
ag
•
yn r
w
w O
N O N
L1Q
OD tT O
•
1 1 i I 1
r?
O O O O O O N O
1 1 1 1 1 O N O
N
fA
�o
r v
w r to
o w
N
tr o.
o f N oD o yr
r•, m
t•-
V
O O 4% O N O
r
n m
rn
w
w w
o o a o C) o v o 0
o a
W
r V
O O O O O N v+ O
n
r
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-1
O
N co
0 0 0 0 0 0 Qt U
m
n
rt
M
M
CHESTERFIELD CENTRAL ACCOUNTING
STATEMENT•OF WATER CONSTRUCTION FUND BALANCES
March 31, 1977
Assets:
Cas
$ 603,324
Total Assets
V .603,324
Liabilities:
Projects under Contract
$ 92,168
Refunds due Developers for Oversize Mains
75,739
Total Liabilities
167,907
Cash Available
$ . 435,417
Anticipated Income 4/1/77 - 6/30/77
From Revenue Fund $137,980
From Connection Fees . .6-0,419
$ 198,339
Anticipated Expenses 4/1/77 - 6/30/77
Salaries and -Other Fixed Costs
$ 569,114
Total Salaries & Fixed Costs
_ 569,114
1
Anticipated Surplus (Deficit) 6-30-77
$ 64,642 **
* Same as Engineering Report
** Cash
Plus Anticipated Revenue
Less Anticipated Expenses
Surplus (Deficit)
$435,417
198,339
569,114
M
0
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD Or SUPERVISORS
April 18, 1977
Item No. II (1)
Contract No. W77 -25D - Reams Run -Section "C"
Developer: Reams Run Development
Contractor: Bookman Construction Corporation
Amount: $22,869.00
District: Clover Hill
'te% 'i�,,,
144M%, M% @vu
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APRIL 18, 1977
Item No. II (2)
Contract number: W77 -21D Location Powderham Sec. "B"
District: Midlothian Code: None
Contractor: Alpine Construction Corp.
Developer: Cassel & Pearl R. Adamson, Stephan P & Frances S Adamso
Powderham Associates, A VA Ltd. Partnership No. 1 & 2
Cost: $33,840.00 Goochland Investments Inc
VICINITY SKETCH
t
i�
Po WD Z"R
S �
C. T/O/\/ l�
h
FUTILITIES DEPARTMENT sm�
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE :MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APRIL 18, 1977
Item No. II (3)
Contract number: W77 -23D Location Deerfield Estates
District: Dale
Code: None
Contractor:
Fred
Barnes Construction
Corp.
Developer:
Zane
G. Davis & Carmen G.
Davis, Henry E. & Vir inia B.M efs
Cost: $32,145.80
VICINITY SKETCH
� I
V
PHASE I—•-
i
ALL\ ei'
lofnILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APRIL 18, 1977
Item No. , (4)
Contract nuniber: W77 -11D Location Grindall Creek Park
District: Dale Code: None
Contractor: Stamie E. Lyttle Co., Inc.
Developer: Eastates Petroleum Company, Inc.
Cost: $4,696.50
C�, 6�
a
VICINITY SKETCH
CITY 4�;r
17ew - ee-.+
D -
ILITIES DEPARTMENT sw�
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APRIL 18, 1977
Item No. II (5)
Contract number: W77 -24D Location So. General Blvd.
District: Bermuda Code: None
Contractor: County of Chesterfield
Developer: William Kenneth Lyons
Cost: $800.00
Q
JA
v
lYo 6
! Dq SG7 f
VICINITY SKETCH
o�
— Exp
w�L
1�
►c+osF� n,�,¢�
fir+ swn
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APRIL 18, 1977
Item No. II (6)
Brandermill -
Contract number: W77 -29D Location Northwich Section 2
District: Clover Hill Code: None
Contractor: R.M.C. Contractors
Developer: Brandermill - A VA Partnership
Cost: $6,489.00
VICINITY SKETCH
Q•Uc�
r 4
\P
D
n
Qe, von r
U01zrww'C-"
T►v5 F�Qject'
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APRIL 18, 1977
Item No. III
The consideration of a reduced water connection fee for Mr. John
J. Surma, Jr. of 8310 Hull Street Road.
Mr. Surma wants the connection made from Route 360 rather than
from the new line on Hicks Road.
CJI^L/5
SWIVr Z4
w/`
&x 0.-i-. 8" WA
m
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
.COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APRIL 18, 1977
ITEM NO. IV.
Contract Number: W76-63CD Location: 10401 Robious Road
District: Midlothian
Contractor:
Code:
Developer: _ va nont eE-.N ShWays and Iranspnrtnti nn
Cost:
Mr. Harry E. Glover requests a reduced water connection fee
because his well is in the area of widening of Robious Rd.. -o'
b
VICINITY SKETCH 'Q
QC
Nk
E:�]
1040/
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
'AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APRIL 18, 1977
ITEM NO: V
Consideration of water line to serve Carriage Hill -and.
Otterdale Subdivisions.
ESTIMATED COST: $128$600.00
District: Midlothian
I
VICINITY SKETCH
x
M
M
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
April 18, 1977
Item No. VI
Discu-ssion of fire protection and sewer connections for Airport
Industrial Park.
District: Dale
lo
�� � -/w � y. _--- � --� � •fin+-.� �-� r� � -` _ / - $ ._ w �.\
717
c
I x ..
i
n
FUSE'--
» r
PROPosED FIRL- HYDRANT'
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
E. MERLIN O'NEILL. CHAIRMAN
MATOACA OISTRICT
JOAN GIRONE. VICE CHAIRMAN
MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
C. L. BOOKMAN
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
J. RUFFIN APPERSON
DALE DISTRICT
GARLAND DODD
BERMUDA DISTRICT
0
n
ADMINISTRATION
C. G MANUEL
INTERIM COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
C O U NTY OF C H E S T E R F I ELD
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832
April 6, 1977
Mr. Raymond D. Birdsong
Engineering and Utilities
County of Chesterfield
Dear Raymond:
Reference is made to the attached map which was supplied
by your department to enable us to make additional reco-
mmendations for fire hydrants on the Airport Industrial Road
(Whitepine Road). Please provide us a price of installing
four additional hydrants as noted on the map. Also, give,us
an alternate price with following:
Installation of one hydrant on the same
side of the road as the existing water
line and stubbing a water main across
the road at three points where I am
recommending three new hydrants.
The hydrant in the curve is needed right away as construction
is under way on a structure at that point and the state will
be applying plant mix on Whitepine Road in the near future
and we won't want to cut that for water connections.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Robert L. Eanes
Chief of Department
CHESTERFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
cc: Robert A. Painter
C. G. Manuel
Dennis C. Turlington
sr
C o��Q
ttEstEo0
PpR��. o
In
e-
MEMROANDUM 14�
DATE: April 6, 1977
W1A- .t; ti La L"i
TO: C. G. Manuel Ir��terim County Administrator
FROM: M. C. Ritz�� erector, Department of Community Development
SUBJECT: Airport Industrial Park Water
This office has been dealing with Mr. Samuel Johnson, President of
Cavalier Printing Ink Company, since last October in an attempt
to find a suitable site for the relocation of his company. Of the 14
sites we suggested to him, the County's Industrial Park seemed most
satisfactory. On April 5th, Mr. Johnson advised us that he could not
relocate to the Industrial Park since there was not enough water
pressure to handle a sprinkler system.
Raymond Birdsong indicates that $115,000-$120,000+ would be needed to
correct the deficiency. Would you please ask the Board to authorize
this expenditure and for Utilities to contract for the work?
cc: erector of Utilities
Fire Chief
MCR/j p
M
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
(For Intracounty Correspondence)
TO: Mr. R. A. Painter DATE: April 11, 1977
FROM: Mr. Gerald C. Alley/
SUBJECT: Installation cost of Fire Hydrants on Chesterfield
County Airport Industrial Road
The following costs were approximated from a similar
installation in August, 1975 and from current costs.
1 - tapping of 16" water main and installation
of fire hydrant on same side of road = $ 2,400
2 - tapping of 16" water main, installation of
approximately 60' of 6" pipe across road
and setting of fire hydrant 3 ea. @ $3000 = 91000
Total = $ 11,400
Alternate Price
1- tapping of 16" water main and installation
of fire hydrant on same side of road = $ 2,400
2- tapping of 16" water main and stubbing
approximately 60' of 6" pipe across road
3 each @ $ 2500 = 7,500
Total = $ 9,900
NOTE: Field conditions at the Airport Industrial
Park may require additional costs.
GCA/jss
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APRIL 18, 1977
Item No. VII (1)
Contract No. S76-97CD - Deerfield Estates
Developer: Zane G. Davis & Henry E. Myers
Contractor: Fred Barnes Consturction Company
Amount: $130,732.75
Developer Participation cost towards the construction of sewers under.
County Contract No. S76 -2T - Amount: $32,046.80 (Estimated)
Fund -Code: 77-76.2 Dale Escrow
District: Dale
M
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
April 18, 1977
Item No. VII (2)
Contract No. S77 -20D - Northwich -Second Section
Developer: Brandermill
Contractor: R.M.C. Contractors, Inc.
Amount: $11,824.50
District: Clover Hill
1 wv ` 4d
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
April 18,1977
Item No. VII. (3)
Contract No. S77 -18D - Village Green -Brandermi11
Developer: Brandermill
Contractor: R.M.C. Contractors, Inc.
Amount: $16,843.50
District: Clover Hill
swi �r cr?��k
OA
\ Tf-// s
P,Q c /E G 7-
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
April 18, 1977
Item No. VII (4)
Contract No. - S76 -99D - Brookwood Estates -Section B -Phase II
Developer: Brookwood Corporation
Contractor: Central Builders, Inc.
Amount: $37,365.00
District: Midlothian
BROOKWOO D
ESTATES
SEG• B
PHASE
i
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
April 18, 1977
ITEM NO: VII (5)
S77 -19D - Meadwood Subdivision
Developer: Southside Service Corporation
Contractor: Bookman Construction Co.
Amount: $46,456.60
District: Dale
415 PROJECT
.A
M
M
ENGINEERING AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE FETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MARCH 21, 1977
DEFERRED TO APRIL 18, 1977
ITEM NO. III - F --VIII
Contract: S76 -3T-1 - Chester, End of Percival'Street
Developer: Morris E. Mason & Edwin L. Shelton
Amount: $5,858.00
District: Bermuda
This is a Sewer.Agreement providing for the Developer
to pay the additional cost of installing.the sewer
to serve his property above the cost of the sewers as
originally designed to serve the area. This is a cash
contribution and the Developer is not due any refunds.
10
Mr. Mason is requesting the Board to reconsider his amount
of payment and to reduce the $5,858.00 by an amount of
$639.00 for clearing, grubbing, seeding, 213 L.F. of easement.
I have discussed this with Mr. Mason and am unable to explain
to you the reas6n for his request.
Z/ 2119
O
i 2 c}r�sti..
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
.AGENDA FOR THE ;SETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MARCH 21, 1977
DEFERRED TO APRIL 18, 1977
ITEM NO. XIV - IX
S71-9CD - Edgehill Townhouse Apartments
Developer: The Covington Company
District: Midlothian
Request from Mr. Covington to transfer prepaid sewer
connection fees from Edgehill Toernhouses to pay for
water and sewer connection fees in Briarwood Hearth.
Mr. Covington is requesting that 60 of the prepaid
connection fees in Edgehill Townhouses be used to pay
for 25 sewer connections in Briarwood Hearth, and
the remaining amount be used to pay for water connection
fees in Briarwood Hearth. ($18,000 - $7,500 = $10,500)
Mr. Covington by letter of March 2, 1977 is requesting
that he be allowed to appear before the Board to present
his request as the Board denied this request on February 17,
1977.
Reconsidered at March 21, 1977 meeting and was deferred
until April 18, 1977.
M
n
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGEIMA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
_April 18, 1977
ITEM NO: g
Contract S76 -1C , Div. A. B & C - Fan Court, etc., Collectors
Fund : 77-371
District: Bermuda
Bids to be received on this project on 4/12/77
Recommendation on award of contract will be submitted
on 4/18/77
n
CEJ
UTILITIES DEPAR7111 ENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
April 18, 1977
ITEM NO: XI
Contract No. 703227 - Chester Collectors
Fund: 77-371
District: Bermuda
Bids to be received on this project on 4-13-77.
Recommendation on awarding of contract will be submitted
on April 18, 1977.
Ar kh r l
cy
.ti
oti /
M
0
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
April 18, 1977
ITEM NO: XII
Mr. Harold Foster, 1431 Schloss Road is requesting that
he be allowed a $300.00 sewer connection fee for his
property.
District: Clover Hill
Mr. Foster states: Approximately ten years ago I was
contacted about the sewer connection, at which time I
signed for it. Since that time I have signed a petition
requesting the sewer and was visited by a member of the
Engineering Department, to whom I stated that I wanted
the sewer connection.
Your Department has a record of the petition that I signed
but there is some question about a contract, of which,
neither my wife nor myself can remember receiving.
Since I have requested the connection each time I was
contacted, I feel I should not have to pay the present
$600.00 fee, but should pay the $300.00 fee which was
relevent at the times I requested the connection..
Mr. Welchons has given me a time extension on this matter
until a decision can be reached. I request that you bring
this matter before the Board of Supervisors - at your earliest
convenience.
M
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
April 18, 1977
ITEM NO: XIII
Mr. & Mrs. James E. Huber, 16004 Saramont Avenue requests
a $300.00 connection fee for their property.
District: Matoaca
Mrs. Huber states that they did not receive contracts
to sign for $300.00 and that they have had trouble with
their septic tank for seven (7) years.
As you know, contracts were delivered by some of the
residents of the area and when these contracts were
turned in, the County mailed contracts to the home
owners that had not signed contracts.
ENGINEERING AND UTILITIES DEPART14ENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE 19:ETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MARCH 21, 1977
APRIL 18, 1977
ITEM NO. VIII (XIV.)
Request from Mr. W. E. Cumbea of 6708 Elkhardt Road for
a $300.00 sewer connection fee. Mr. Cumbea signed the
card survey in 1970, did not.sign the petition in 1970 and
we have no record.of his signing the contract. Mr. Cumbea
states that he had filled out the form and forgot to put it
in the mailbox and requests that he be allowed to apply at
the $300.00 rate.
District:' Clover Hille
Recommend Denial
This request was denied by the Board on March 21, 1977 and
was placed on the Board agenda for April 18, 1977 at the
request of Mr. C. ]�. Bookman.
M
n
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
April 18, 1977
ITEM NO. XV.
Contract S74 -35T —Johnson Creek Trunk
Contractor: G. L. Howard, Inc.
District: Bermuda
The contractor is requesting an extension of time on this
project of 30 days making the completion date May 9, 1977.
The request is being made because of delays in acquiring
easements, the last being obtained as late as March 21,
1977.
Our consultants have reviewed the request and feel the
contractor should be granted the extension.
Recommend Approval.
n
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
April 18, 1977
ITEM NO. XVI
Contract No. S76 -16T - State Police Headquarters
Contractor: G. L. Howard, Inc.
District: Midlothian
The contractor is requesting an extension of time of
20 days on this project. Letter of request and engineers
recommendation attached.
Since this request will not conflict with the State
Police time table, we recommend approval.
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD
April 18, 1977
ITEM NO: XVII (1) and (2)
0
OF SUPERVISORS
Contract No. S73 -26T - Redwater Trunk Sewer
Contractor: Roanoke Construction Company
District: Bermuda
1. Recommendation from our consultants that liquidated damages
not be assessed on this project. Their comments are as
follows:
The time limit for this contract including a sixty day
extension was September 7, 1976. Roanoke finished laying
pipe on October 15, 1976. A final inspection was completed
on October 29, 1976. Prior to this time, the 48" line up
Proctor's Creek had been inspected and in use to provide
service to the temporary plant at Proctor's Creek. By
October 29, the Ashton pump station has been finished and
a pump test had.been completed but it had not begun operations.
By the time the station was in use and upstream sewers finished,
the Redwater Creek trunk was ready to receive flow. The month
delay in completing the project was mainly due to the delays
in obtaining the permit from the railroad on the two bore
crossings. Roanoke had started the job with two crews although
the delays with the boring permits made it impracticable to
fully utilize both crews since the remaining pipe lay between
the two railroad crossings. Because of this one crew was
pulled off the job.
Since each section of the line was ready for use when the
County needed it and since the major cause of the delay
stemmed from the holdup dealing with the Railroad, we feel
that no penalties be charged to Roanoke Construction Company.
We concur with the consultants recommendations.
2. Request approval of change order #2 in the.amount of $910.00.
a. Additional cost of constructing the flow measuring
manhole at a location.to provide better access,
$460.00.
b. Additional cost of constructing the exhaust fan
because of delays resulting from inability of
VEPCO to acquire an easement for power service
and the resulting delay imposed by the County -
$450.00.
Total r $910.00 - Fund 73-330-324
0
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
April 18, 1977
ITEM NO: XVIII
S77-24CD - Loch Braemar - Section B
Developer: Investment Associates
District: Clover Hill
The Developer requests that the County participate in
the cost of extending`sanitary sewer lines through his
property because the Board of Supervisors approved on
3-27-74 that we provide off-site sewers to Loch Braemar
Section A which was developed by Braemar Company_- A.
Partnership.
We recommend that the cost of approximately 172 L.F. of__.
sewers be refunded through connection fees.
The above request and recommendations will be supplemented
with cost estimates and additional information to be
supplied by the Developer later.
3.;;i,•.£: •.;ZSR__ -'-
ITEM NO:
E5
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
April 18, 1977
XIX
Contract S74-29CD
Location: Lake Genito District: Clover Hill
Developer: Mr. C. L. Rudolph
Contractor: Rudolph Construction Company
At a previous Board of Supervisors meeting, the Board
modified the above contract to provide for refunds in
the amount of $13,743.05 ($7,061.05 cash & $6,682.00
from connections).
Mr. Rudolph is requesting the amount eligible for refund
be increased to $29,085.60.
Amount previously approved $13,743.05
Two crossings of Falling Creek 10,342.55
Morris Mason Letter 5,000.00
$ 29,085.60
See Attached Letter
The previously approved refund included $2,000.00 for the
Falling Creek crossing therefore the $29,085.60 should be
reduced to $27,085.60.
Mr. Rudolph is further requesting that instead of refunds
he be allowed $300.00 prepaid connections. Mr. Micas
has indicated that this would be contrary to the sewer
ordinance.
N
EJ
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
March 21, 1977
ITEM NO. XXII
Subject: Consideration of a counter-offer from Mr. & Mrs. Ray
Allen in the amount of $5,000.00 for property rights and damages
to their property at 9400 Telstar Drive during installation of
sewer under Contract S69 -1C in Dale District.
Since the developer of the adjacent property was unsuccessful
in obtaining a drainage easement across the property of Mr. & Mrs.
Allen because we had never settled for the sewer easementlon.
January 12, 1977, I wrote to Mr. & Mrs. Allen and asked if they
would be willing to accept a settlement.
I received the attached letter in response to my letter,
including a counter-offer of $5,000.00 for property rights and
damages to the property.
Our original offer of $25.00 was made on March 20, 1969.
I recommend denial of this counter-offer.
Ty�,?/K4T4� l9.e
K
AW
M
n
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APRIL 18, 1977
ITEM NO: XXIII
SUBJECT: Vacation of easement across the property of
MORG,N A. REYNOLDS AND E. J. REYNOLDS: CONTRACT NO. S74-35T/M;
BERMUDA DISTRICT.
Previously there was executed by MORGAN A. & E. J. REYNOLDS
an easement agreement, dated December 11, 1977 that contained
a plat which was inaccurate. Since that time Mr. & Mrs. Reynolds
have executed a new agreement, dated January 31, 1977 containing
a condition that the Board would vacate the previously dedicated
easement. We are requesting a resolution to vacate the easement
of December 11,-1975, and authorizing the new easement to be
signed by E. Merlin O'Neill, Sr., Chairman of the Board, and
C. G. Manuel, Interim County Administrator, to affirm same.
w�sT
A
t � �
� B�rt�vOrq
O
2
rs
b
% cw
r
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
April 18, 1977
ITEM NO. XXIV
Subject: Authorization for condemnation of a Sewer
Easement across Robert E. Steward & Marion G. Steward,(husband
and wife), Contract #576-1C/47 - Bermuda District.
An offer has been made to and refused by the Steward's
in the amount of $111.00 for use of their land at 11301 Canterbury
Road, Chester, Va. to construct a sewer line. We are requesting
a resolution authorizing condemnation to prevent delay to the
Contractor in constructing this project. Payment for property
rights and trees to be made from Bermuda Escrow Account-. If approved,
notification from Mr. C. G. Manuel, Interim County Administrator will
be made by Registered mail on April 20, '1977.
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
April 18, 1977
ITEM NO. XXV
Subject: Authorization for condemnation of a Sewer Easement
across James F. Burke & Opal S. Burke, (husband and wife), Contract
# S76 -1C/2 - Bermuda District.
An offer has been made to and refused by the Burke's in the amount
of $170.00 for use of their land at 3522 W. Hundred Road to construct
a sewer line. We are requesting a resolution authorizing condemnation
to prevent delay to the Contractor in constructing this project.
Payment for property rights and trees to be made from Bermuda Escrow
Account. If approved, notification from Mr. C. G. Manuel, Interim
County Administrator will be made by Registered mail on April 20, 1977.
3
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
April 18, 1977
ITEM NO. xxpi
Acceptance of the Deed of Dedication to the County of
Chesterfield from GEORGE S. & MARY J. GINGER (husband and wife)
in Bermuda District for Road right-of-way.
M
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
April 18, 1977
ITEM NO. XXVII
A resolution authorizing signatures of Mr. E. Merlin O'Neill,
Sr., and C. G. Manuel, Interim County Administrator on easement
agreements executed by the following property owners located in Bermuda
District.
1. John Daffron, Jr., & Elizabeth M. Daff ron -Project S76-3T/X
2. Douglas Roberson & Anita S. Roberson - Project No.S76-3T/W
3. James Styles Parrish & Carolyn Overby Parrish-Proj.S76-1C/30
Since it was necessary to change the Location of the proposed
sewer across the above named properties; each of these-'o_F,nera---Ave
signed new easement agreements dedicating the easements in the
proper locations. Since these new easement agreementscontaining a
condition that the previously dedicated easement will be vacated,
it is necessary that the Board pass a resolution vacating the prev-
iously dedicated easement. and show evidence of the vacation by the
signatures of Mr. O'Neill and C. G. Manuel, Interim County Administrator;
to these new agreements.
los
9Dwe6�
ate+ ' - 4� ��,,•. ' y� D 46
� 4
4t -f
Sy
N
W
43
O�
W W
I Q
T
o
e.
1
W
to
F Z
RT
_—
Z W
tr►�L
_
�a
m
Cj
a
a 1;Ld
mLU
h N
C
m
a Q
a c
m u
rt ^
r a
'n w
^= N V7
W
C U Z
1
O =
m❑ Q
n r
m
Q
W
W a
F- >
❑ 0 2
❑
LJ m a
J
Q
Q
a
m
U
w z
I w
F O O
d m r
W to
F
c0 Z
IL
f-
w Q
oza
°
w
r^{
^+c gnrxt 1�r rnt aT Y.,.
(+J
r1
iIU
m
cl
r
44
ILI
4
H W
U
N
m N
rc Z
W F
p
!tt
2
p
a
.
S,
N
a
_C
U
w
a u
U
O
Q
�
L[j
>
� a
F
Q z
Z ❑
py n• i 'w..
i l; @
. M .. x
p
-- d
Zv
1•%v
j Q
N
J A
'.
I
•"^"RY'„ j
0O
�•i
A
O
❑ N
r z
U
f.
1 1 a „T- , r • it +t
-yam)
y I
F Q
•.
M I
O
cc
h1
J)C
Q)•f
__)
ui I
UI Q
w m
Z
. fi r
I
o
n
CC)Ll
a
Q
41
e,,.Y
Q
C
<
a 7
K LL
Z
Ll -
Ll
S3NI7 I
m m
U W t
a
�iCi.R.,,..tx:'Y.ri7?xx «.ro.`N � �. !ti ! l"F-..+ r�.i..+i.4
;�..;:IM�:� ✓:%« M°.:t../! .1'1lwyg4 w�...+ ......!'
1 +.., .... `� 4 � �
.:.ntS; ".; iw d ,../.:.. ,....'R .. y,'.::,, +,.,�.,I;�.F 4r' , . r.., . , - , .. F. '
v
is
V —00- 4095��w
los
9Dwe6�
ate+ ' - 4� ��,,•. ' y� D 46
MA
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
E. MERLIN O'NEILL. CHAIRMAN
MATOACA DISTRICT
JOAN GIRONE. VICE CHAIRMAN
MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
C. L. BOOKMAN
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
J. RUFFIN APPERSON
DALE DISTRICT
GARLAND DODD
BERMUDA DISTRICT
hoz; I )
i
ADMINISTRATION
C.G MAN UEL
INTERIM COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832
March 22, 1977
MEMORANDUM TO: Richmond News Leader
FROM: Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
SUBJECT: Meetings
Coming Events
One (1)
time,
Monday,
April
4,
1977
One (1)
time,
Monday,
April
11,
1977
Please confirm by calling the County Administrator's Office
at 748-1211.
jsd
Attachment
Manuel
Interim County Administrator
1,1111io/
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
E. MERLIN O'NEILL, CHAIRMAN
MATOACA DISTRICT
JOAN GIRONE. VICE CHAIRMAN
MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
C. L. BOOKMAN
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
J. RUFFIN APPERSON
DALE DISTRICT
GARLAND DODO
BERMUDA DISTRICT
In
ADMINISTRATION
C. G MANUEL
INTERIM COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
COUNTY
time,
Monday,
April
4,
1977,
OF CHESTERFIELD
time,
Monday,
April
11,
1977.
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832
March 22, 1977
MEMORANDUM TO: Progress -Index
FROM: Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
SUBJECT: Meetings
Coming Events
One (1)
time,
Monday,
April
4,
1977,
One (1)
time,
Monday,
April
11,
1977.
Please confirm by calling the County Administrator's Office
at 748-1211.
j sd
Attachment
C. G, Manue
Interim County Administrator
TAKE NOTICE
That the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chester-
field will on Monday, April 18, 1977, beginning at 7:00 P.M.
at Chesterfield Courthouse, Virginia, hold a public hearing
to consider adoption of an ordinance to repeal Chapter 20 of
the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, as amended and
to add a new Chapter 20A relating generally to sewer and
water rates, industrial cost recovery and user charges for
the County sewer and water system. The County's information
on the proposed ordinance is on file in the County Adminis-
trator's Office, Office Building, Chesterfield Courthouse,
Chesterfield, Virginia, for public examination between the
hours of 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. of each regular business
day. All persons interested in this matter are invited to
appear at the time and place herein stated.
RICHMOND NE%SPAPERS, INC.
Publisher of
THE RICHMOND NEWLEADER
l•
Richmond. Va ...AW1.1.187.7...........
pyo � ..
This is to certify that the attached.,.. tE�tL.0 9111;
was published in The Richmond Newe'L'eiikler, a newspaper pub-
lished in the City of Richmond, State of Vargini8__
APR ¢ -
............
The first insertion being given ..............
!R
FStatwo to a R csi Iore me j I -y . .
Notary Publicu'i�3ta�i@�"t""e of Virginia, City of Rich mond: fur yl90 ,
My commission expires 12/26/80„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
TITLE
J ;I
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING 9§20-9.1,
20-18.1, 20-21.1, and §20-33 THROUGH 2O-55, AMENDING
§§20-4, AND 20-5, 20-10, 20-13, 20-15, 20-19, 20-26
AND 20-27 AND REPEALING §§20-9, 20-20 AND 20-21 RE-
LATING GENE RNLLY TO SEWER AND WATER RATES, INDUSTRIAL
WASTE DISCHARGES, INDUSTRIAL COST RECOVERY AND INDUS-
TRIAL USER CHARGES AND PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, as
amended, is amended by adding §520-9.1, 20-18.1, 20-21.1 and
20-33 through 20-55 as follows:
Section 20-9.1. Water Rates.
In all cases not covered by,,contract made by the Board of
Supervisors prior to the effective date of this ordinance, in-
cluding the Ettrick Sanitary District, the monthly rate for
consumption of water to be paid by the owner shall include a
minimum monthly service charge based on the meter site serving
the premise and a volume charge, in accordance with the follow-
ing schedule:
a. Minimum Service Charge Per Premise:
Water Meter
Monthly
Size (Inches)
Amount
5/8 or 3/4 ....................$
4.00
1
7.50
...............................
11.00
1-1/4 ...........................
1-1/2
14.00
...........................
2
19.00
...............................
37.00
3 ...............................
62.00
4 ...............................
1_25.00
6 ...............................
225.00
8 ...............................
b. Volume Charge:
First 400 cu. ft. for Capacity Charge
Next 9,600 cu. ft . .............70(� per 100 cu. ft.
Next 20,000 cu. ft. per 100 cu. ft.
Next 200,000 cu. ft. ...........50(� per 100 cu. ft.
Next 200,000 cu. ft. ...........40(,% per 100 cu. ft.
Next 300,000 cu. ft. ...........30G per 100 cu. ft.
All in excess of 730,000 cu. ft.
28(� per 100 cu. ft.
C. Multiple Unit Residence Charge:
The minimum monthly charge shall be applicable to all
apartments, condominiums, duplexes, mobile homes and
other premises wherein more than one living unit is
served by one service connection. The servicc c1-:argc
shall be the service charge for a 5/8 -inch or 3/4 -inch
meter plus $4.00 per living unit for each unit in
excess of one. The amount of water included in the
service charge shall be determined by multiplying the
total number of living units by 400 cjbic feet. The
volume charge shall be the same as for all other
classes of customers for all water in excess of the
product of the total number of units times 400 cubic
feet.
%0 sa�
Section 20-18.1. Use of water system upon certain conditions.
If the director of utilities determines that a proposed
industrial, commercial or domestic use of the County water sys-
tem is reasonably likely to cause damage or constitute a hazard
to the water system, the director of utilities may impose reason
able conditions upon the applicant asking for water service
regarding type and. manner of use which are designed to minimize
danger to the County water system.
Section 20-21.1. Same - Sewer user charge service rates.
All owners of premises who have contracted to connect, who
have connected or who shall hereafter connect the sewerage
facilities of such premises to the County sewer_ system shall be
required to pay a monthly user charge composed of a meter size
minimum service charge and a volume charge to recover the opera-
tion and maintenance expenses of the sewer system in accordance
with the following schedule:
a. Service Charge Per Premise (Minimum Charge):
Water Meter
Size (Inches)
Month ly
Amount
5/8 or 3/4 ..................$ 5.00
11.00
1-1/4 17.00
b. In those instances where residential premises are con-
nected. to the sewer system but not to the County water system,
the user shall pay $11.50 per month.
C. In those instances where a residential unit for which
a connection fee has been paid, but sewer has not been connecter
the user shall pay $5.00 per month.
d. In addition, a volume charge as measured by the water
meter per 100 cubic feet shall be made in accordance with the
.following schedule:
Residential...............$0.57 per 100 cubic feet
Commercial................$0.57 per 100 cubic feet
e. The Multiple -unit Residence Charge shall be applicable
to all apartments, condominiums, duplexes, mobile homes and
other premises wherein more than one living unit is served by
one service connection. The service charge will be the service
charge for a 5/8 -inch or 3/4 -inch meter plus $5.00 per living
unit for each unit in excess of one.
f. Where applicable, those users of the County sewer sys-
tem -shall, in addition to the basic user. charge provided forherein, pay a surcharge covering the cost of treating excessive
strength waste or pollutants as provided in Article III herein-
after, and a surcharge covering the industrial share of capital
improvements for wastewater treatment as defined by applicable
federal regulations and as provided in Article IV hereafter.
.........................
22.00
1-1/2 .........................
30.00
2 .............................
65.00
3 .............................
100.00
4 .............................
200.00
6 .............................
375.00
8 .............................
d. In addition, a volume charge as measured by the water
meter per 100 cubic feet shall be made in accordance with the
.following schedule:
Residential...............$0.57 per 100 cubic feet
Commercial................$0.57 per 100 cubic feet
e. The Multiple -unit Residence Charge shall be applicable
to all apartments, condominiums, duplexes, mobile homes and
other premises wherein more than one living unit is served by
one service connection. The service charge will be the service
charge for a 5/8 -inch or 3/4 -inch meter plus $5.00 per living
unit for each unit in excess of one.
f. Where applicable, those users of the County sewer sys-
tem -shall, in addition to the basic user. charge provided forherein, pay a surcharge covering the cost of treating excessive
strength waste or pollutants as provided in Article III herein-
after, and a surcharge covering the industrial share of capital
improvements for wastewater treatment as defined by applicable
federal regulations and as provided in Article IV hereafter.
P1
In
g. The owner of the premises where the sewerage facilities
of the county have been contracted for shall be liable for the
payment of all charges made for service rendered to such pre-
mises until such owner makes application for discontinuance of
service on forms furnished by the county. If water and/or sewer
charges are not paid for a period of thirty days, then the count,
may discontinue water and sewer service.
ARTICLE III
INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE
Section 20-33. Definitions.
As used in this Article the following words and prhases
shall have the meanings hereinafter ascribed to them, unless
otherwise clearly required by the context:
a. "B.O.D." or "biochemical oxygen demand" shall mean the
quantity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation of
organic matter, under standard laboratory procedure, in five
days at 20°C, expressed in parts per million. The laboratory
determination shall be made in accordance with the procedures
set forth in "Standard Methods".
b. "Building sewage drain" shall mean that part of the
lowest horizontal piping of a sewage system which receives the
discharge from the sanitary sewer inside the walls of the build-
ing and conveys it to the building sewer beginning three feet
outside the inner face of the building wall.
C. "Building sewer" shall mean the extension from the
building sewage drain to the public sewer or other place for
disposal.
d. "Domestic sewage" shall mean waterborne wastes normally
discharging .from the sanitary conveniences of dwellings (includ-
ing apartment houses and hotels) , office buildings, factories
and institutions, free from storm surface water and industrial
wastes.
e. "Garbage" shall mean solid wastes and residue from the
preparation, cooking and dispensing of food, and from the han-
dling, storage and sale of food products and produce.
f. "Industrial wastes" shall mean all waterborne solids,
liquids or gaseous wastes resulting from any industrial manu-
facturing, trade, business or food processing operation or pro-
cess, or from the development of any natural resource, or any
mixture of these with water or domestic sewage as distinct from
normal domestic sewage.
g. Natural outlet" shall mean any outlet into a water-
course, pond, ditch, lace or other body of surface or ground-
water.
round-
water.
h. "Normal domestic sewage shall mean sewage in which
concentration of suspended materials and five day 20°C B.O.D.
is established at 240 parts per million each, by weight, on the
-basis of the normal daily contribution of twenty hundredths
pounds per capita, per 100 gallons.
i. Parts per million" shall mean a weight to weight ratic
the parts per million value multiplied by the factor 8.345 steal:
be equivalent to pounds per million gallons of water.
M
R
j. "Persons" shall mean any and all persons, natural or
artificial, including any individual, .firm, company, industry,
municipal or private corporation.
k. "pH" shall mean the logarithm (base 10) of the recip-
rocal of the hydrogen ion concentration of a solution. It
shall be determined by one of the procedures outlined in "Stan-
dard Methods".
1. "Point of discharge" shall mean the point at which
waste is discharged to the Chesterfield County sewers.
M. "Properly shredded garbage" shall mean wastes from the
preparation, cooking and didpensing of food which have been
shredded to such a degree that all particles will be carried
under the flow conditions normally prevailing in the city sani-
tary sewer system., with no particle greater than one-half inch
in any dimension.
n. "Sanitary sewer" shall mean a sewer which carries sewa
and to which storm, surface and groundwaters are not intention--
ally
ntention-ally admitted.
o. "Sewage" shall mean a combination of water -carried
waste from residential, commercial, institutional and industrial
establishments, together with such ground, surface and storm
waters as may be present.
p. "Sewage treatment plant" shall mean any arrangement
of devices and structures used for treating sewage.
q. "Sewer" shall mean a pipe or conduit used to collect
and carry away sewage or storm water run off from the generat-
ing source to treatment sewage plants or receiving streams.
r. "Sewerage" shall mean the system of sewers and appur-
tenances for the collection, transportation, pumping and treat-
ment of sewage and industrial wastes.
S. "Sewer service charge" shall mean the charge levied by
§20-21.1 on all users of the county sanitary sewerage system,
whose wastes do not exceed in strength the concentration values
established as representative of normal domestic sewage.
t. "Slug" shall mean any discharge of water, sewage or .
indsutrial waste which, in concentration of any given constit-
uent, or in quantity of flow, exceeds for any period of dura-
tion longer than fifteen minutes more than five times the aver-
age twenty-four hour concentration or flows during the normal
operation.
U. "Standard Methods" shall mean the examination and anal•
ytical procedures set forth in the latest edition, at the time
of analysis, of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water
and Wastewater as prepared, approved and published jointly by
the American Public Health Association, the American Water
Works Association and the Water Pollution Control Federation.
V. "Storm sewer or storm drain" shall mean a sewer which
carries storm and surface waters and unpolluted drainage but
excludes sewage and industrial wastes.
W. "Storm water run-off" shall mean that portion of the
rainfall that is drained into the storm sewers.
$Noi 114d
X. "Suspended solids" shall mean solids that either float
on the surface of, or are in suspension in, water, sewage, or
other liquids, and which are removable by laboratory filtering.
Quantitative determination of suspended solids shall be made in
accordance with procedures set forth in "Standard Methods".
y. "Unpolluted water or waste" shall mean any water or
waste containing none of the following: Free or emulsified
grease or oil, acid or alkali, phenols, or other substances
imparting taste and odor in receiving water; toxic or poisonous
substances in suspension, colloidal state or solution; and
noxious or odorous gases. It shall contain not more than ten
parts per million each of suspended solids and B.O.D. The
color shall not exceed 75 Color Units.
Section 20-34. Restriction on usage of sanitary sewers.
The discharge of industrial waste into the County sanitary
sewer system shall be permitted provided that:
a. Sewer capacity is available on a basis compatible with
the '.gest overall use of the sewer.
b. The waste to be discharged is amenable to treatment by
the processes employed in the waste treatment plants of Chester-
field County.
c. The waste to be discharged will not cause damage or
constitute a hazard to the sanitary sewer system_or waste treat-
ment facilities and will not constitute a hazard to humans or
animals, nor be capable of creating a public nuisance.
d. The concentration of substances, compounds, and ele-
ments in the waste being discharged or proposed to be discharge
do not exceed the limits established by this article.
e. All other requirements of this article are complied
with, including the obtaining of a permit as required by §20-40
Section 20-35. Substances not to be deposited in sanitary sewe
system.
No person shall cause to be discharged or deposited any of
the following into any sewer forming a part of the sanitary
sewer system of the county:
a. Any waste, liquid, or vapor having a temperature highe
than 150 degrees Farenheit.
b. Any water or waste containing more than 100 parts per
million of .fat, oil, or grease, exclusive of soap.
C. Any gasoline, benzene, naphtha or other hydrocarbon
solvents or oils, or other flammable or explosive liquids,
solids or gases.
d. Any solid waste in excess of concentrations present in
normal domestic sewage that has not been properly shredded.
e. Any ashes, cinders, sand, mud, straw, shavings, lint,
glass, rags, metals, feathers, tar, plastics, wood, paunch
manure, insulation materials, fibers of any kind, stock or poul-
try feeds, processed grains, viscera or other fleshy particles
from processing or packing plants, or any other solid or viscous
substance in excess of concentrations present in normal domestic
sewage capable of casuing obstruction to flow in sewers or
interference with proper operation of waste treatment facilities
f. Any waters or wastes having a stabilized pH lower than
6.0 or higher than 9.0 or having properties capable of either
causing damage to structures and equipment of the sanitary sewer
system or sewage treatment plants or creating a hazard to per-
sonnel engaged in operation and maintenance of such facilities.
g. Any waters or wastes having objectionable color which
is not removable by the existing waste treatment plant processes
h. Any waters or wastes containing contaminants of such
character or in such quantity as will not be amenable to the
waste treatment processes, or will injure or interfere with the
waste treatment processes, or will constitute a hazard to humans,
or animals, or will create a hazard in the stream or water-
course receiving the effluent from the waste treatment plant.
i. Any noxious or malodorous gas, or any substance which,
when introduced into a reducing environment, could cause the
evolution of a noxious or malodorous gas.
j. Any storm water, surface water, groundwater, roof run-
off, subsurface drainage, uncontaminated cooling water, or un-
polluted industrial process waters.
k. Any radioactive isotope in concentration greater than
that permitted by applicable federal regulations.
1. Any ceramic glazing waste in excess of concentrations
present in normal domestic sewage.
M. Any lime, calcium sulphate or other similar sludges
in excess of concentrations present in normal domestic sewage.
n. Any other waters or wastes containing suspended solids
of such character or quantity that unusual attention or expense
would be required in the handling of such waste materials at
the waste treatment plant.
Sectio!: 20-36. Conditions on discharge of certain types of
wastes.
No person shall discharge any of the following types of
wastes into the sanitary sewer system without having fulfilled
the conditions hereinafter stated in each instance: (i
a. Packinghouse waste: All hair, bristles, hides or I
parts of hides, bones, animal parts, paunch manure, and viscera,)
stock feeds, grit, sand and straw in excess of concentrations
present in normal domestic sewage, and all grease in excess of
100 parts per million shall be removed prior to discharge.
i
b. Poultry processing waste: All feathers, parts of birds,
bones, grit, sand, poultry feeds, and viscera in excess of con-!
centrations present in normal domestic sewage, and all grease
in excess of 100 parts per million shall be removed prior to
!j discharge. Materials used in construction of waste lines from
EI poultry processing establishment to connection with the sanitary
sewer system shall be of a type which is not likely to induce
the formation and growth of bacterial protein masses.
C. Textile wastes: All lint, thread, pieces of cloth, and
yarn in excess of concentrations present in normal domestic
sewage shall be removed prior to discharge. Kiering and acid
boiling wastes shall be cooled, neutralized and stabilized with
in the limits specified in 520-35. Bleachery waste shall be
cooled, neutralized and stabilized within the limits specified
in 520-35. Sulfur dyeing wastes shall not be admitted to the
sanitary sewer system.
M
n
d. Metal Salts (Iron, Copper, Zinc, Nickel, Chromium,
Cadmiun, Lead, Etc.): Salts of iron, copper, zinc, nickel,
chromium, lead or other heavy metals in excess of concentra-
tions present in normal domestic sewage shall be precipitated
and removed from waste flow prior to discharge to the sanitary
sewer system. Waste containing hexavalent chromium shall have
chromium reduced to the tri -valent state, precipitated and
removed from the waste flow prior to discharge to the sanitary
sewer system.
e. Cyanides: Cyanides in the waste flow shall be com-
pletely reduced to carbon dioxide and. nitrogen prior to dis-
charge to the sanitary sewer system.
f. Phenol: Wastes containing phenol may be Oischarged to
the sanitary sewer system only with a permit issued pursuant to
520-35. Before granting such permission the director of utili-
ties shall require the person proposing to make such discharge
to enter into an agreement with the county, whereby such person
shall regulate, vary or maintain, the discharge or concentration
of phenol in accordance with the requirements of the county.
Section 20-37. Limitations on discharge of concentrated wastes.
a. No person shall discharge wastes having a B.O.D. or
suspended solids concentration in excess of 240 parts per mil-
lion, defined as industrial wastes by §24-33(.f), into the sani-
tary sewer system without having first obtained a permit for.
such discharge as provided in 920-40.
b. Discharge of wastes having a B.O.D. or suspended solids'
concentration in excess of 500 parts per million shall be per-
mitted by the director of utilities only after review and
a-proval by him with respect to the point of discharge into the
sanitary sewer system and the dilution afforded by other waste
flows occurring in the system at such point.
C. Discharge of wastes having a B.O.D. concentration in
excess of 800 parts per million or a suspended. solids concen-
tration in excess of 700 parts per million shall not be per-
mitted, and is hereby prohibited.
Section 20-38. Permits and agreements for non -conforming
discharges.
Notwithstanding the provisions of §520-34 through 20-37
any person may apply to the director of utilities for a permit
under 520-40 to discharge waste into the sanitary sewer system,
which is of an unusual or otherwise prohibited strength or
character. Such permit shall be granted by the director only
upon execution by such person of an agreement, setting forth
the conditions, pretreatment or other limitations required to
enable such wastes to be safely accepted into the system.
Section 20-39. Rate and volume of discharge of industrial
waste.
Slug discharge or batch dumping of industrial waste is pro-
hibited. Any person now discharging or proposing to discharge II
industrial waste into the sanitary sewer system shall provide,
at his own expense, a holding tank or holding tanks from which
such waste shall be discharged at a uniform rate of flow over a
twenty-four hour period. The requirement for a holding tank
shall be waived by the director of utilities provided that:
(1) the total daily waste flow from the establishment of such
person does not exceed 50,000 gallons and the maximum rate of
discharge is not greater than 1/3 of the capacity (::ith respect
to rate -of -flow) of the sewer receiving the waste, and provided
further that the receiving sewer has capacity for handling the
S
maximum rate of industrial waste discharge from the establish-
ment plus the maximum rate of waste flow from other contributors
in the area tributary to the receiving sewer; or (2) the maximum
rate of discharge from the establishment does not exceed 2.75
times the average rate of discharge as if taken over a twenty-
four hour period., and such maximum rate of discharge is not
greater than 1/3 of the capacity (with respect to rate -of -flow)
of the sewer receiving the waste, and provided further that the
receiving sewer has capacity for handling the maximum rate of
industrial waste discharge from the establishment plus the max-
imum rate of waste flow from other contributors in the area,
tributary to the receiving sewer; and in addition (3) the char-
acter of the waste is such that pretreatment with attendant
safety holding facilities is not required, and (4) in all other
respects, the discharge of such waste is in full compliance with
this article.
Section 20-40 Permits for discharges; pretreatment; restric-
tions.
a. Any person now discharging, or desiring to discharge,
industrial waste or pollutants into the sanitary sewer system
shall make application for a permit to the Department of Util-
ities. Such application shall include a complete chemical anal-
ysis of the waste being discharged or proposed to be discharged,
including concentration of B.O.D. and suspended solids contained
therein. Such application shall also contain pertinent flow
data, including rates and duration, a detailed description of
the operation, and any other relevant information requested by
the director of utilities.
b. Notwithstanding the provisions of §20-36 and 20-40,
should the waste or pollutants from such person's operation be
found to be inadmissable into the sanitary sewer system because
of objectionable character as defined by this article, because
of concentration of elements or substances in excess of the
limits established by this article, or because of flow charac-
teristics incompatible with the best use of the receiving sewer,
as set forth in this article, the director of utilities shall
not approve a discharge of such waste or pollutants into the
sanitary sewer system until such person has employed, at his
own expense, such methods and processes of pretreatment and
requlation of flow as will render the waste or pollutants ad-
missable to the sanitary sewer system in accordance with this
article.
C. The methods and procedures of any pretreatment of in-
dustrial waste or pollutants to be employed shall be reviewed
and approved under the same procedure as stipulated for original
application.
d. The Department of Utilities will not specify, suggest,
or recommend specific equipment, structures, or arrangements
comprising any pretreatment processes, but will review any such
plans on request of the applicant.
e. Approval of discharge of industrial waste or pollutants
by any person will be _given only on the basis of proven per-
formance of pretreatment processes (if pretreatment should be
required) .
f. Approval given to any person for the discharge of in-
dustrial waste or pollutants, whether pretreated or not, into
the sanitary sewer system shall in on way relieve such person
of the responsibility of full compliance with this article,
within the limits established by such permit.
9M
R
Section 20-41. Procedures for applications.
a. Any person now discharging industrial waste or pollu-
tants into the sanitary sewer system shall have 60 days from
the effective date of adoption of this ordinance to submit an
application for a permit as provided in §20-40. Thereafter,
any person desiring to discharge industrial waste or pollutants
into the sanitary sewer system shall, 60 days prior to any such
discharge, submit such an application.
b. Every application shall be reviewed by the director of
utilities or his designee for approval or disapproval within
30 days of receipt.
C. Upon notice of final disapproval of any permit applica-
tion or upon notice of modification of any permit, any person
now discharging or desiring to discharge, industrial waste or
pollutants into the sanitary sewer system shall submit a
schedule for compliance with this article. Such schedule for
compliance will be reviewed by the director of utilities; and
approval thereof will be determined based on the reasonableness
of such schedule with regard to the relative cost, the degree
of hazard to the integrity of the sanitary sewer system, and
the public safety. In no case will the required time for full
compliance with this article exceed three years. The director
may require full compliance with this article before the appli-
cant may begin to discharge or continue to discharge any indus-
trial waste or pollutants into the sanitary sewer system when-
ever the Department of Utilities finds that such discharge is
likely to pose an immediate danger to the sanitary sewer system
of the County or the health, safety and general welfare of the
public.
d. Upon final approval of an application for a permit to
discharge industrial waste or pollutants into the sanitary
sewer system the director of utilities shall issue such permit.
Section 20-42. Measurement of volume of industrial waste.
The volume of industrial waste discharged by any person
into the sanitary sewer system shall be measured by one or more
of the following methods:
a. If the volume of waste water produced by any person in
his industrial or process operations is substantially the same
as the volume of water purchased from the county, then the
volume of water purchased shall be considered to be the volume
of waste discharged.
b. If, in the establishment of any person discharging in-
dustrial waste into the sanitary sewer system, a substantial
portion of the water purchased from the county is used for
purposes resulting in normal domestic sewage, for cooling
purposes, or for purposes that do not require the discharge of
such used water to the sanitary sewer system, such person shall,
at his own expense, either (1) install a meter of design approved
by the director of utilities or his designee on the water supply
line to his industrial process operations or (2) install a mete.
of design approved by the director of utilities or his designee
on the waste line from such industrial process operations. The
volume of water or waste flow, respectively, as measured
through such meter shall be considered to be the volume of in-
dustrial waste discharged into the sanitary sewer system i
M
C. If any person now discharging or proposing to discharge
industrial waste into the sanitary sewer system does not secure
his entire water source from the county such person shall, at
his own expense, install a meter of design approved by the dir-
ector or his designee on the waste line from his industrial
process operations. The volume of waste flow, as measured
through such meter shall be considered to be the volume of waste
discharged to the sanitary sewer system.
Stiction 20-43. Access for measurements.
a. Any person now discharging or proposing to discharge
any industrial waste into the sanitary sewer system shall con-
struct, at his own expense, a control manhole on the waste line
from his industrial and process operations for the purpose of
facilitating observations, measurements, and sampling of the
industrial waste discharge from such person's establishment.
The control manhole shall be constructed in a suitable and
satisfactory location downstream from any pretreatment facili-
ties, holding tanks, or other approved works, and ahead of the
point of discharge of such waste into the sanitary sewer system.
The design of the control manhole shall be in accordance with
the requirements established by the director of utilities or
his designee. The control manhole shall be maintained by such
person so as to be safe, accessible, and in proper operating
condition at all times.
b. Such requirement for a control manhole shall be waived
by the director provided that: (1) the total daily waste flow
from the establishment of such person does not exceed 50,000
gallons; and (2) the maximum rate of such discharge from' said
establishment does not exceed 100 gallons per minute; and
(3) access, means, and facilities are provided within such
establishment for the purpose of observing, measuring, and
sampling the waste flow from such establishment; and (4) the
discharge of all waste from such establishment, is in all other
respects, in full compliance with this article.
Section 20-44. Determination of character and concentration
of waste.
a. The Department of Utilities shall make a periodic
determination of the character and concentration of industrial
waste or pollutants.
b. Location and design of sampling sites for a periodic
determination of the character and concentration of industrial
waste or pollutants discharged into the sanitary sewer system
shall be approved by the director of utilities.
C. Samples of industrial waste or pollutants discharged
into the sewer system shall be collected in such a manner as ma
be deemed necessary by the director of utilities, and analyzed
for compliance with this article. The laboratory methods used
in the examination of said waste waters shall be those set fort
in the latest edition of "Standard Methods".
d. Such determination of the character and concentration
of the industrial waste or pollutants discharged into the sani-
tary sewer system shall be binding as a basis for surcharges on
those persons discharging industrial waste or pollutants into
the system.
e. Costs incident to sampling and analyzing of waste or
pollutants that are applicable to surcharges shall be included
in the surcharges made to all persons discharging industrial
waste or pollutants into the county's sanitary sewers.
Section 20-45. Cost recove
for treatment of industrial wastes;
I
In addition to the charges provided for in 5520-21.1 and
20-50, a strong waste surcharge for the higher cost of treating
excessive strength waste or pollutants shall be rendered to any
person discharging industrial waste or pollutants in accordance
with the following formula:
62.4 V
Surcharge = ((BOD -240) + (SS -240)) (1,000,000) ($0.04)
BOD = Biochemical oxygen demand in parts per million of
the industrial waste.
SS = Suspended solids in parts per million of the indus-
trial waste.
V = Volume of the industrial waste in cubic feet.
Such surcharges shall be shown separately on the regular
bill rendered to the proper person by the director of utilities.
Th- dischargers shall pay the surcharges in accordance with
Practices existing for payment of regular sewer charges.
Section 20-46. Enforcement.
a. In the event the director of utilities determines that
a person required to obtain a permit for industrial waste dis-
charge under the provisions of this article has failed to apply
for such a permit, or that a person holding such a permit has
violated the terms of his permit, or that any person has vio-
lated or is violating any provisions of this article, he
shall issue a compliance order requiring such person to abate
such violation within thirty days of the date of the order.
Such order shall be sent to such person at the address used for
his utility bills by"certified mail, return receipt requested.
In the event such person fails to comply with such order within
the prescirbed time period, the director shall suspend any dis-
charge permit issued to such person, and shall terminate county
water service to such person.
b. Any person objecting to an order issued by the direc-
tor of utilities under subsection (a) of this section shall have
the right to appeal the same to a review committee comprised of
three members of the Board of Supervisors appointed by the
Chairman. notice of intention to exercise such right to appeal
shall be filed in writing with the Clerk of the Board of Super-
visors within the time specified for compliance in the direc-
tor's order. Failure to file such notice within such time
limit shall be deemed a waiver of the right to appeal.
C. The review committee shall meet within thirty days of i
receipt of the notice of appeal and shall conduct a hearing on
the objections raised by the appellant to the director's order.
The appellant and the director shall each be afforded the oppor
tunity to present evidence and to cross examine the other's
witnesses. The committee shall review the order of the direc-
tor, with due regard for the reasonableness of the same, the
degree of hazard to the integrity of the sanitary sewer system,
the immediacy of the threat to the public health and safety,
and the possibility of long-term damage to the environment I
posed by such violation. Based upon such criteria the committe
may affirm, modify, or vacate the director's order; provided
that no such decision of the committee shall permit the continu-
ance of a sewage discharge which does not conform to the stan-
dards of this article without requiring full compliance with
such standards within three years, as required by §24-31.
d. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a) and
(b) of this section, whenever the director determines that a
person is discharging substances into the sanitary sewer system
which pose a clear and present danger to life or property, the
director shall immediately suspend any discharge permit issued
to such person and shall discontinue county water service to
such person.
ARTICLE IV
INDUSTRIAL COST RECOVERY
Section 20-47. Definitions.
As used -in this article the following words and phrases
shall have the meanings hereinafter ascribed to them, unless
otherwise clearly required by the context:
a. BOD or biochemical oxygen demand - shall mean the
quantity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation of
organic matter under standard laboratory procedure in five (5)
days at 20°C, expressed in parts per million. The laboratory
determination shall be made in accordance with the procedures
set forth in "Standard Methods".
b. Domestic Sewage - shall mean waterborne wastes normally
discharging from the sanitary conveniences of dwellings (includ-
ing apartment houses and hotels), office buildings, factories
and institutions, free from storm surface water and industrial
wastes.
C. Industrial Cost Recovery Period - That period during
which the Federal grant amount allocable to the treatment of
wastes from industrial users of the system, a period of thirty
years for each such grant assisted treatment works.
d. Industrial User - Any non-governmental user of the
sewer system, as defined in 40 CFR 35.905-8 (a.) , (b) , (c) , (d)
and (e) which discharge primarily domestic wastes or wastes fro
sanitary conveniences, as identified in the Standard Industrial
Classification Manual, 1972, United States Office of Management
and Budget, as amended and supplemented, under the following
division:: (1) Division A: Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing
(2) Division B: Mining; (3) Division D: Manufacturing; (4)
Division E: iTransportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, and
Sanitary Services; and (5) Division I: Services.
e. Industrial Wastes shall mean all waterborne solids,
liquids or gaseous wastes resulting from any industrial, manu-
facturing or food processing operation or process, or from the
development of any natural resource, or any mixture of these
with water or domestic sewage as distinct from normal domestic
sewage.
f. Infiltration shall mean the water entering a sewer
system, including sewer service connections, from the ground,
through such means as, but not limited to, defective pipes,
pipe joints, connections, or manhole walls. Infiltration does
not include, and is distinguished from, inflow.
g. Inflow shall mean the water discharged into a sewer i
system, including service connections from such sources as,
but not limited to, roof leaders, cellar, yard, and area drains,
foundation drains, cooling water discharges, drains from springs'
and swampy areas, manhole covers, cross connections from storm
sewers and combined sewers, catch basins, storm waters, surface
run-off, street wash waters, or drainage. Inflow does not in-
clude, and is distinguished from, infiltration.
h. Major Industrial User shall mean an industrial user
whose flow exceeds 50,000 gallons per day or whose known five-
day biochemical oxygen demand or concentration of suspended
solids exceeds 240 milligrams per liter of effluent discharged
by such user into the sewer system.
i. Major industrial User shall mean an industrial user
which is not a major industrial user.
j. Normal Domestic Sewage shall mean sewage in which con-
centrations of suspended solids and .five (5) -day 20°C BOD do
not exceed 240 parts per million each by weight.
k. Sewage shall mean a combination of water -carried waste
from residences, business buildings, institutions, and indus-
trial establishments, together with such ground, surface and
storm waters as may be present.
1. Sewer shall mean a pipe or conduit used to collect and
carry away sewage or storm water run off from the generating
source to treatment sewage plants or receiving streams.
M. Standard Methods shall mean the examination and analy-
tical procedures set forth in the lastes edition, at the time of
analysis, of "Standard Methods' for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater" as prepared, approved, and published jointly by the
A.W.W.A., W.P.C.F. and the American Public Health Association.
n. Suspended Solids shall mean solids that either float
on the surface of, or are in suspension in,water, sewage, or
other liquids, and which are removable by laboratory filtering.
Quantitative determination or suspended solids shall be made
in accordance with procedures set forth in "Standard Methods".
Section 20-48. Exclusions_
a. An industrial user who would otherwise be subject to
Industrial cost recovery shall be excluded from this article to
the extent that such user introduces primarily segregated dom-
estic wastes into the County sewage system.
b. Those industrial users which have reserved a portion of
an existing treatment works under contract or agreement executed
prior to March 1, 1973 and which have paid a reasonable portion
of the capital costs associated with that reserved capacity, as
determined by the Regional Administrator of the United States
Environmental Protection Agency, shall be excluded from parti-
cipation in Industrial cost recovery, to the extent of the capa-
city so reserved.
Section 20-49. Reserved
acity Agreements After March 1, 1973
a. Reserved capacity agreements entered into after March
1, 1973 shall not exclude the industrial user from participa-
tion in industrial cost recovery. The industrial user shall
pay the full industrial cost recovery payments allocable to
the capacity reserved, and, in the event that such an industrial
user exceeds its reserved capacity, its full use shall be sub-
ject to this article, unless otherwise excluded.
b. Provided, however that, if the treatment works are
expanded in the future with federal grant assistance, an in-
dustrial user who has executed a reserved capacity agreement
and has made industrial cost recovery payments based upon
reserved capacity, will not incur additional industrial cost
recovery charges associated with the cost of expansion until
the industrial user's actual use of the _-atment works exceeds
its reserved *t�pacity. NONO
C, Such industrial users shall, however, be required to
pay any additional industrial cost recovery charges associated
with the cost of upgrading a treatment works.
Section 20-50. Computation of Industrial Cost Recovery Payments
a. During the industrial cost recovery period, each indus-
trial user shall pay its share of the total amount of Federal
grant funds, including amendments to grants, which are alloca-
ble to capacity used or committed for use in the treatment of
wastes from industrial users. The payment for each industrial
user shall be computed in accordance with the following formula
which takes flow, five-day biochemical oxygen demand and the
concentration of suspended. solids into account as the primary
factors which influence the cost of treatment works construc-
tion:
Industrial Cost Recovery Formula
(Q) (BOD-BODD) (SS -SSD)
ICR = [(—(Q -I*) ) + ( (BOD*) x CBOD*) + ( SS* x CSS*) l
P
X R
Where
ICR = Cost to be recovered from an industrial user
0 = Average daily wastewater flow contributed by the user duringi
the billing period (gallons per day)
Q = Average daily wastewater flow contributed by the user
D during the billing period (gallons per day)
Q* = The average of the sum of certified hydraulic capacity
existing in all grant assisted treatment works in the HRSD
system during the billing period (gallons per day)
I* = The sum of hydraulic capacities existing in grant assisted
HRSD treatment plants that is allocable to design year in-
filtration and inflow, as determined from grant documents
(gallons per day)
CQ -I* = The average of the sum of the Federal grant costs
allocable to the non-infiltration/inflow component of
hydraulic capacity in all HRSD treatment works during
the billing period (dollars)
BOD = The average daily poundage of five day biochemical oxygen
demand contributed by a user during the billing period,.
calculated as
Q x SBOD5 x 8.34, where
S= Most recent available BOD5 concentration of a user's
BOD5 total waste stream as determined in conformance with
Section 9 (parts per million)
SBOD5D
The average daily poundage of five-day biochemical oxygen`
demand contributed by the primarily segregated domestic
waste component of a user's waste stream during the bil-
ling period, calculated as
QD x SBOD x 8.34, where
5D
Most recent available BOD concentration of the domestic
component of a. user's wase stream as determined in
conformance with Sections 4 and 9 (parts per million) }
BOD* = The average of the sum of grant assisted design influent
BOD 5 capacity in all HRSD treatment works during the
billing period (pounds per day,)
n
CBOD* = The average of the sum of Federal grant costs allocable
to BOD5 removal during the billing period (dollars)
SS = The average daily poundage of suspended solids contributed
by a user during the billing period, calculated as
Q x SSS x 8.34, where
S = Most recent available suspended solids concentration of a
SS user's total waste stream as determined in conformance
with Section 9 (parts per million)
S;SD = The average daily poundage of suspended solids contributed!
by the primarily segregated domestic waste component of a
user's waste stream during the billing period, calculated
as
Q x SSS x 8.34, where
D
SSS = Most recent available suspended solids concentration of
D the domestic component of a user's waste stream as deter-
mined in conformance with Sections 4 and 9
SS* = The average of the sum of grant assisted design influent
suspended solids capacity in all HRSD treatment works
during the billing period (pounds per day)
CSS* = The average of the sum of Federal grant costs allocable
to suspendes solids removal during the billing period
(dollars)
P = Length of the billing period (in days)
R = Length of the cost recovery period (in days)
b. Any industrial user which discharges into the County
system of wastewater treatment works shall be subject to this
article, unless excluded, as provided above, and the industrial
cost recovery charges for such user shall accrue from the date
of the user's initial discharge into the County system or the
effective date of this ordinance, whichever is later, and shall
continue to accrue for the unexpired portion of the industrial
cost recovery period or until the user ceases to use the County
system, whichever occurs first. If an industrial user terminate
with the consent of the County, any agreement for reserved capa-
city which was executed after March 1, 1973, its payment for
industrial cost recovery shall cease, to the extent of the
reserved capacity so terminated.
C. If there is a substantial change in the strength,
volume, or delivery flow rate characteristics introduced into
the treatment works by an industrial user, such user's share
shall be adjusted accordingly, when the County has made such a
determination.
d. If there is an expansion or upgrading of the treatment
works, each existing industrial user's share shall be adjusted
accordingly except that the expansion of capacity resulting
from the correction or reduction of inflow and/or infiltration,
shall not affect the user's industrial cost recovery share.
e. An industrial user's share shall not include any portio
of the grant amount allocable to capacity not used or reserved
by such user.
If. An industrial user's share shall not include an interes
component.
M
1E
Section 20-51 Industrial Cost Recovery Billing.
a. The first industrial cost recovery bills shall be
issued to industrial users no later than ten (10) months from
the effective date of this Ordinance. Thereafter, all indus-
trial users shall be billed on their normal wastewater user
charge billing dates at a constant charge per billing unless
the amount is increased or decreased in accordance with this
article.
b. An industry may fulfill its cost recover obligation
by making a lump sum payment for its entire share of the
Federal grant. Such payments shall either be processed as a
normal Industrial cost recovery payment or set aside in a sep-
arate account to be drawn on annually for the remainder of the
cost recovery period. Lump sum payments will not relieve an
industry from the obligation of making additional future pay-
ments should its waste flow or load increase. Discounts from
the total cost recovery requirement will not be given to indus-
tries making advanced Industrial cost recovery payments.
Section 20-52. Disposition of Industrial Cost Recovery Revenue.
a. All funds recovered during the annual accounting period
with the exception of the discretionary portion, shall be depos-
ited in interest-bearing accounts which are fully collateralized
by obligations of the United States Government or by obligations
fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United
States Government or any agency thereof.
b. Within one year of the effective date of this Ordinance]
and thereafter at least annually and within four months after
the close of the County's fiscal year, the County shall transfer
by check payable to the United States Environmental Protection
Agency fifty percent (500) of all industrial cost recovery
revenues collected during such fiscal year and any interest
earned thereon. Forty percent (40%) of any industrial costs
recovered and all interest which has accrued on the said
forty percent (40%) shall be placed in an industrial cost re-
covery account entitled "Expansion and Upgrading Account Fund
in this Expansion and Upgrading Account shall be expended only
for replacement or expansion of grant -assisted treatment works
and shall not be spent without prior written approval of the
Environmental Protection Agency's Regional Administrator. The
remaining ten percent (100) industrial cost recovery revenues.
shall be used to administer this Ordinance and for such other
uses as the County shall deem proper, except for the construc-
tion of industrial pre-treatment facilities or rebates to indus-
trial users' cost incurred by such users in complying with
Federal user charges or industrial cost recovery requirements.
C. Prior to committing any of the funds retained for the
construction of treatment works, the County shall obtain the
approval of the Regional Administrator, which will be based upor
a determination that the proposed use of the funds would be for
eligible costs of a project for expansion and reconstruction of
treatment works within the County's jurisdiction. The County
shall provide a preliminary engineering report sufficiently
detailed so as to permit a determination of eligibility, and an
estimate of eligible costs.
Section 20-53. Monitoring.
a. All major industrial users shall be monitored at such
times as the HRSD may deem necessary, but at least annually.
b. All minor industrial users, as defined herein, shall
be monitored on a random basis, by Standard Industrial Classi-
fication categories, as set forth in the Standard Industrial
Classification Manual, 1972, United States Office of Manage-
ment and Budget, as amended and supplemented. The wastewater
characteristics of each such category shall be reviewed not
less frequently than annually. In the event that actual data
is not feasibly available for a particular category, values of
250 milligrams per liter of five-day biochemical oxygen demand
and 250 milligrams per liter of suspendes solids shall be assign d
to such category and the industrial users therein until actual
date to the contrary is obtained.
Section 20-54. Appeals.
a. An industrial user or other aggrieved party may appeal
to AHearing Officer, who shall be appointed by the Director of
Utilities, who may be an employee of the County, on the issues
of (1) exclusion from the industrial cost recovery plan by rea-
son of contract or the discharge of primarily segregated domes-
tic wastes and./or (2) on the issue of the amount of the indus-
trial cost recovery assessment with particular regard to flow,
five-day biochemical oxygen demand, and the concentration of
suspended solids.
b. Any existing industrial user may apply within one year
of the effective date of this article for exclusion from par-
ticipation in the ICR plan on the bases provided above. New
industrial users (those who connect to the County service sys-
tem after the effective date of this Plan) shall have one year
from the date of their initial connection in which to apply for
exclusion. An Application for Exclusion shall include a sche-
matic diagram of the user's production processes, waste pretreat-
ment and a conveyance systems, and a series of waste strength
tests in conformance with County accepted procedures and guide-
lines which shall be available on request, all such diagrams
shall be certified as accurate by an entity licensed in this
state. All such test results shall be certified as having been
performed in accordance with County accented procedures and
their accuracy shall be certified by a qualified chemist or
laboratory located within the Commonwealth of Virginia.
C. within 30 days after the mailing date of each indus-
trial cost recovery bill, an industrial user who is included
within this Plan may .file an Application for Exclusion or an
Application for Redetermination of Assessment with the Hearing
Officer, but only in the event of a substantial change in qual-
ity of quantity of effluent discharge by such user arising sub-
sequent to the last redetermination. Such changes shall be
certified by a qualified chemist or laboratory as having occur-
red and such a chemist or laboratory shall also certify that
tests indicating the substantial changes aforesaid were con-
ducted in accordance with County accepted procedures.
d. All applications shall set forth the industrial user's
name, and address along with a brief statement of the reasons
it is petitioning and the factual basis for the Application.
Applications shall set forth the names of the officers, attor-
neys, employees, and witnesses who will be appearing before the
Hearing Officer. Applications shall be filed with three copies
and gent by registered mail to the Hearing Officer at the place
.for which payment of charges is specified in the industrial
cost recovery bill from which the appeal is taken.
e. Procedure. The Hearing Officer shall notify the Appli-
cant by mail of the time and place for hearing, such notice to
be given within 30 days after receipt of any application. The
hearing shall be conducted on the Application not less than 10
days after mailing of such notice. The hearing shall be held
as an informal consultation and conference at which the Appli-
cant, in person or by counsel, shall present his argument, evi-
dence, data, and proof in connection with the issues submitted.
A representative from the County may then present its factual
basis for the exclusion or assessment under consideration. The
Hearing Officer shall not be bound by the usual rules of evidenc
but may conduct the hearing in such a manner as in his judgment
will expeditiously and accurately determine the substantial
rights of the industrial user and the County. All hearings may
be stenographically or electronically recorded. The Hearing
Officer shall make findings of fact and recommendations which
shall be submitted to the director of utilities for his deci-
sion, the results of which shall be made known to the Applicant.
f. No hearing shall be held and no decision shall be ren-
dered by the County with respect to exclusions sought on the
basis of reserved capacity contract executed prior to March 1,
1973. Upon receipt of an Application for Exclusion from indus-
trial cost recovery on this ground., the County shall forward
the request and appropriate documentation to the Regional Ad-
ministrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
within thirty (30) days. The Regional Administrator will make
his determination and the Petitioner will be nofif_ied by the
11 RS D.
Section 20-55. Penalties.
a. Any person, firm or corporation who shall violate any
provisions of this Ordinance or who shall fail to comply with
any provision hereof shall be guilty or a misdemeanor and, upon
conviction, shall be subject to a fine not to exceed $1,000.
b. Failure to pay the ICR share for industrial waste dis-
charges when due shall be sufficient cause to disconnect any
and all services to the sewer mains of the County, and the same
penalties and charges, now or hereafter provided for by the
Ordinances of the County for failure to pay the bill for utility
service when due, shall be applicable in like manner for failure
to pay the ICR share.
(2) That §§20-4, 20-5, 20-10, 20-13, 20-15, 20-19, 20-26
and 20-27 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield are amended
and reenacted as follows:
Section 20-4. Same --County utilities department to supervise.
The eetInty--health utilities department shall have the
general supervision over treatment of the public water supply
with fluoride provided, however,
that the utilities department is directed to furnish to the
health department copies of records specified under section 2.0-3
at such intervals as may be required
by the county health department.
Section 20-5. Same --Health department to make periodic reports
to board of supervisors.
The county health department may
make peried4:e reports to the board of supervisors on the fluori-
dation of the public water supply and to seek the cooperation of
educational and scientific institutions to conduct surveys and
research as to the beneficial effectx i+-anyx of the program
ae1-peeet on the citizens of this the county.
M
M
Section 20-10. Water line extension requirements; costs,
-' reimbursements.
The board of supervisors will authorize the installation ofl
water extensions to extend the county's water system at the
expense of developers and refund to developers the total cost or
part thereof, to the extent permitted by this section, out of
connection charges made on said lines in accordance with the
following policy:
a. The county shall determine the feasibility of all
requests for water extensions, and no extensionwill be made
unless such extension is determined to be in the best interests
of the county utility system and the health, safety and welfare
of County residents.
b. No water line extensions or installations shall be
made without a contract with the county. Every such contract
shall provide for the developer depositing the estimated cost
of such extension with the county or supply the county with a
copy of an accepted executed contract with an approved licensed
utility contractor; the furnishing of all necessary rights of
way by developer; title of such extension to vest in the county
upon completion of the construction; and refund provisions to
be null and void and of no effect if the county is prohibited
from collecting connection charges and any such refund provi-
sions provided shall be deemed separable from the remaining
covenants, obligations and agreements and shall in no way affect
the validity of the other provisions of the agreement. The
county shall approve the size, type, location and material of
all water mains and other facilities, and they shall be installe
in accordance with county standards and specifications. All
contractors installing such facilities shall be approved by the
county. If private contractors install such facilities, cost of
such installation shall, within thirty days of completion, be
filed with the county.
C. The entire cost, including the actual cost incurred
and paid out by the county, plus a fixed overhead charge of
fifteen percent of extending water mains shall be paid for by
the person or persons making the extension when work is per-
formed by county forces. When contract work is performed by an
approved contractor, an inspection fee of two percent will be
charged based on final actual cost. The estimated amount of
such fee shall be deposited at the time the contract is executed',
The county will pay the difference in cost between an eight inch'
main and a larger size main installed, except when it is deter-
mined that a larger size main is needed to serve the property
being developed. The difference in cost between the eight inch
main and the larger main installed shall be the difference in
material and labor cost, as determined by the county.
A separate service shall be required for each house, each
unit of duplex homes or separate business establishments. Where
one meter serves a trailer court, apartment or other property
approved by the board, the county shall require a minimum water
service charge for each unit served on said property. No more
than one dwelling unit or business establishment may be connecte
to a service line except those approved by the board upon proper
application.
�6i
d. When water lines are installed at developer's cost, a
reduction of two hundred fifty dollars for each service connec-
tion made within the subdivision shall be allowed. The reduction,
of two hundred fifty dollars for each service connection shall bE
allowed when application is made for service. The reduction
shall apply to any person making application to connect property
located within the boundaries of said property covered by the
extension contract. In a new subdivision, the developer shall
have water lines, meter yokes and meter boxes installed in all
new subdivision streets after the road is constructed to sub -
grade and prior to the base course being placed. The developer
shall pay one hundred dollars for each connection at the time
application is made for the service lines. When the meter is
applied for, the balance due shall be paid in accordance with
the county ordinance. When required, sewers shall be installed
prior to the installation of water mains and service lines.
e. Reimbursement of one hundred and fifty dollars for
each service connection within the property being developed
shall be made for water line extensions outside the development
when the extension will also serve property between developer
and source of water. This refund of one hundred and fifty
dollars will apply to larqe size mains, over eight inches in s12
installed within or without the developer's property when the
county requires a larger main and does not have the capital to
install the larger size main and the developer_ wishes to financE
the installation thereof. This cost shall be as determined by
the county. No refund will be made for an extension of two
hundred feet or less. When a refund is requested on an exten-
sion, the developer shall furnish a plat of the tract of land
to be developed showing boundaries, title to the property and
such other information required by the county. The area to be
covered in the refund must be appre�ee�-by-t�Ce-beard-ef-saper-
visers contiguous to the water extension line and reasonably
related to the proposed development of the area. In addition,
the board of supervisors must approve the area to be _covered in
the refund.
f . Fdl�ert-baster-iir�es-aye-irsstaiiee�-vaitl�-eettrtty-€anus ; -tl�e
eer�aeetien-el�arge-fen-e�isti�g-l�e�es-wi��-lie-ree�t�eee�-ley-eae
�it�r�e�reel-€i€ty-e1e�}ars-�€-tke-ee�ceeetiea-is-afl}� iiee�-fen-vaitl�ie
thirty-elaps-e€ter-water-ser�iee-heeees-arai}a�ie- A developer
may be permitted to install all water service laterals in a
subdivision for which he has deposited 100.00 for each lateral
if:
(1) The developer furnishes all equipment and labor
for the installation of the service laterals, including cor-
poration stops, copper Lubinq, meter yokes, meter_ boxes,
couplings and any other supplemental material necessary to
gleet County specifications. All materials shall be furnis
r� t-bpCounty at the County Shop and Storage yard.
ed
(2) The County will pay the developer $40.00 for the
installation of each service lateral. The developer shall
render the County a bill upon completion of installation. The
additional connection fee shall be payable to the County when
the developer requests installation.
(3) The developer shall install service laterals for
all lots on both sides of the street within the development.
g. Reimbursement to developers under all existing exten-
sion policy contracts shall continue in effect and the reim-
bursements to be paid as provided herein shall only apply to
extensions made subsequent to Arrii-1;-J946 February 17, 1977-
h. The developer shall be required to cut all streets
and install water lines in all streets within a subdivision,
unless specifically exempted by the county.
M
M
i. All reimbursements due as provided in subsection (e)
of this section shall be paid periodically to those entitled to
be reimbursed in accordance with the provisions herein.
j. The county will ordinarily install the service connec-
tion and the meter at the same time, except as provided in
subsection (d) of this section. Location of grades for top of
meter box shall be furnished by applicant; it is agreed that if
raising or lowering of meter is necessary after initial instal-
lation, a charge of ten dollars will be paid. When it is neces-
sary to raise or lower the water service, this work will be done
at cost plus fifteen percent.
Section 20-13. Termination of service for nonpayment of water
charge; additional charges.
If the bill for water charge shall remain unpaid for fif-
teen days after becoming delinquent and written notice has been
given to the user that water supply at the premises shall be
discontinued, the supply of water to the premises shall be
discontinued and such water supply shall not be restored until
the delinquent account and a charge of five ten dollars for
reconnecting the service has been paid in full to the treasurer
of the county.
Section 20-15. Water emerqency--Authority of water committee.
The water committee of the board of supervisors of the
county is hereby authorized to declare emergencies in the county
affecting the use of water in any area of the county during any
period in which there is a water shortage and to control and
restrict the use of water during an emergency 1n the County
caused by a water shortage or other cause.
Section 20-19. Compliance with article.
No person shall instal]_, alter or repair any connection
intended to connect the sewerage facilities of any premises in
the county with a system operated by the county until such per-
son complies with the terms of this article. This-artiele
el -f all -net -ffupersede-enp-eentraeteai-agreeme�rts-v�itl�-risers-ef
tl�e-sewerage-system-mae�e-Briar-te-Rprii-�8; -i9 bA-
Section 20-26. Sewer connections --Ownership; responsibility.
The ownership of connections between premises and main
sewers, including those portions located within the rights of
way of public or private streets, shall be vested in the owners
of such premises. The county shall not be
responsible for the operation and maintenance of such connec-
tions. The -beard-et-stire rvisers-skaii-net -be -respensibie-fer
tl�e-repair-ef-anp-eanneetien-eniess-tl�e-�reeessitp-fer-stzel�
repair-ean-be-preVen-te-be-eat�see�-by-er-te-�Ca�e-been-eatisPd
bp-tl�e-impreger-fenetiening-ef-tl�e-xtain-sewer-tQ-�l�iel�-it-is
eenneete8
Section 20-27. Same--Charqes--Generally.
Connection charges for sewage treatment in the county
including the Ettrick Sanitary District shall be as follows:
'%wV
(a) Single family.
(1) Existing residence, already having septic tank
system when application is made within time allotted by county
after notice that sewer service is available, six seven hundred
and fifty dollars.; thereafter, twelve hundred dollars.
(2) New residence whose service lateral is connected
to sewer installed by developer, six seven hundred and fifty
dollars.
(3) New residence whose service lateral is connected
to sewer not installed by developer, twelve hundred dollars.
(b) Duplexes. Same as single family residence for each
unit in the duplex.
(c) Mobile homes not located in a mobile home park or
subdivision. Same as =9 eiTc
(d) Churches. Same as single family residence. When
churches are used for schools, kindergartens, etc., charges
shall be based on equivalent single family units.
(e) Apartments, condominiums and townhouses, mobile home
parks and mobile home subdivisions.
(1) Existing. When application is made within time
allotted by county after notice is given that sewer service is
available, six seven hundred and fifty dollars per unit; there-
after, twelve hundred dollars per unit.
(2) New. Six Seven
installed by developer; twelve
with county funds.
hundred dollars per unit on linesi
hundred dollars on lines installed
(f) Travel trailer camps, hotels and motels.
(1) Existing. When application is made within time
allotted by county after notice is given that sewer service is
available, two hundred dollars per unit; thereafter, four
hundred dollars per unit.
(g)
(2) New. Four hundred dollars.
rnmmPrrial. industrial and institutional.
(1) Existing. When application is made within time
allotted by the county after notice is given that sewer service
is available, twelve hundred dollars per acre with a minimum
charge of six hundred dollars for each such establishment;
thereafter, seventeen hundred fifty dollars per acre with a
minimum charge of twelve hundred dollars for each such estab-
lishment.
(2) New. When sewer extension is made by developer,
twelve hundred dollars per acre with a minimum charge of six
hundred dollars for each such establishment.
(3) New commercial connected to sewer not installed
by the developer. Seventeen hundred fifty dollars per acre
with a minimum charge of twelve hundred dollars.
(h) Hospitals, nursing homes, or homes for adults.
(1) Hospitals, three hundred dollars per bed.
(2) Nursing homes, two hundred dollars per bed.
(3) Homes for adults as defined in Section 63.1-172
of the Code of Virginia, boarding houses and rooming houses,
one hundred dollars per bed. or the same as a single family
residence; whichever is greater.
�r}--mincell a.neeas---Any -eeaditiee-r et-eevereel- abeae-er-sap
9peeis�-ee�elitie�-ska��-be-neget�ateel-
(3) That 5§20-9, 20-20 and 20-21 are hereby repealed.
(4) That this article shall be effective on and after
, 1977.