Loading...
07-09-75 MinutesPresent: Mr. Irvin G. Horner Chairman Mr. Leo Myers, Vice-Chairman Mr. J. Ruffin Apperson Mr. A. J. Krepela Mr E. Merlin O'Neill Mr, M. W.. Burnett, Co. Admin, The invocation is given by Mr. Apperson, VIRGINIA~ At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County held at the Courthouse on July 9, 1975 at 9:00 a,m. Also Present: Mr~ Lee O. Falwell, Asst. Co. Admin. Mr C, G, Manuel, Asst. Co. Admin. Mr Morris Mason, County Attorney Mr Robert Painter, County Engineer Mr Willis Pope, R/W Engineer Mr William Prosise, Asst, Co. Eng. Mr Charles Quaiff, Sup., Accts. & Rcds. Mr Michael Ritz, Planning Director Mr James Schiavo, Zoning Inspector Mrs. Joan Smith, Secretary Mr. David Welchons~ Asst. Co. Eng. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr, Krepela, it is resolved that the minutes of June 25th be and they hereby are approved, Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Apperson and Mr, Krepela. The Board of Supervisors this day approved all claims presented to the County for the month of June, 1975 and authorized the Treasurer of the County to issue warrants as follows: General Fund Check 021987-105269 Revenue Sharing Check 022077-104744 Library Fund Check 103947-105244 Law Library Fund Check 022080-105162 Airport Administration Check 021987-105236 County Garage Fund Check 021987-105224 Store Room Check 022073-105169 Workmen's Compensation Fund Check 022004-105144 Nursing Home Check 021987-105236 Nursing Home Care Cheek 103994-105186 Sales Tax Check 104169 Payroll Deduction Check 022017-105122 Water Revenue Check 012609 Utilities Sales Tax Check 012490 $5,068,123.83 24,132,30 11,996.99 466.15 21,387,12 41 244.05 2 813,33 2,740.37 31,208.40 28 645.45 179.19 86,406,27 1.70 7.67 Utilities Workmen's Compensati0p. Check 012473-012660 Water Operating Fund Check 012423-012671 Water Improvement Fund Check 012432-012661 Water Meter Check 012468-012503 Water Meter Installation Check 012434-012655 Central Stores $ 329,95 120,204.33 290,489,11 230,00 15,759.48 Check 012418-012667 ii Ettrick Utilities Fund Check 012470-012676 Sewer Operating Fun~ Check 012427-012675 Sewer Improvement Check 012425-012615 Sewer Bond Construction Check 012422-012674 Welfare 35,050,90 15,677,09 90,769,27 20,122,02 1,306,713,44 Check 105046-105087 103620-103622; 104985-104985; 103604-103604; 103605~103606; 103615-103615; 103614-103164; 103623-103920; 104116-104129; 103921-103929; 104986-104991; 105655-105677; 105012-105044; 104114-104115; 103600-103603; 104992-105004; 105678-105766; 103617-103619; 103607-103613; 103616-103616; 105009-105011; 105005-105006~ 105007-105008 84,577,29 On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr, Apperson, it is resolved that the minutes of June 11, 1975, be and they hereby are amended as follows: Ayes: Case 75S128 - omit "subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Department". Case 75Sl15 - add at the end of the motion "with the exception of the first three conditions." Mr. Hornet, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela, Mr. Burnetn states that the Highway Department has formally informed the County that the roads in the following Subdivisions have been accepted into the State Secondary System and also that some abandonments and additions on Routes 10, 616 and 652 have been accepted according to the request of the Board of Supervisors. KIMBERLY ACRES - SECTION 2 Pano Courts From its intersection with Pano Drive easterly 0.02 mile to a cul-de-sac and from its inter- section with Pano Drive westerly 0,03 mile to a cul-de-sac. Shillcutt Road 0,05 mile From its intersection with Route 637 westerly 0o10 mile to its intersection with Pano Drive thence westerly 0.10 mile to its intersection with Cotfield Road thence westerly 0.05 mile to a temporary turnaround. 0.25 mile KIMBERLY ACRES SECTION 2 (CONT'D) Pano Drive From its intersection with Shillcutt Road northerly 0 07 mile to Pano Courts and beginning at its inter.,. section with Shillcutt Road southerly 0,05 mile to a temporary turnaround Cotfield Road From its intersection with Shillcutt Road northerly 0.08 mile to State Maintenance (Route 2427) and from its intersection with Shillcutt Road southerly 0.03 mile to a temporary cuI-de~sac, MEADOWDALE SUBDIVISION SECTION H Claudehart Road 0.12 mile 0,11 mile From its intersection with Bryan Wood Road easterly 0.16 mile to a temporary turnaround. 0 16 mile ROUTE 10 Addit ion Sections 6 and 7 of new connections at Sta, 701+80 and Sta. 740+50, Proj, 0010-020-109, C501. Abandonment Section 5 of old location Route 749 between old and new locations Route 10, Proj, 0010-020-109, C501. ROUTE 616 Addition 0.15 mile 0.04 mile Sections 4, 5 and 8 of new location Routes 616 and 732 between Sta. 45+00 and Sta. 71+50, Project 0616-020-164, C501. Abandonment Sections 3, 6 and 7 of old location Routes 732 and 616 between Sta. 45+00 and Sta, 71+50~ Proj, 0616- 020-164, C501. ROUTE 652 Addition 0.37 mile 0.35 mile Section 4 of new location Route 652 from Sta. 14+50 to Sta, 37+00, Project 0652-020-146, C501. Sections 5 and 6 of new connections Route 607 at Sra. 38+20 and Sta. 55+00, Proj, 0652-020-146, C501, Abandonment Sections 1, 2 and 3 of old location Routes 652 and 607 between Sta. 14+50 and Sta. 59+50, Project 0652-020-146, C501, 0.43 mile 0.20 mile 0.74 mile Mr, Burnett states that the County has received a letter from Mr. Covington regard- ing the park entrances and how they should be handled. He states that it should be at the discretion of the Highway Department and/or the County when the turn lanes should be Constructed and that it will be entirely at the County's expense. There is some discussion of this matter and Mr. Covington states that he does not feel any action is necessary at this time. Mr. Burnett states that he has received a letter from the Highway Department stat- ing that Route 651 (Belmont Road) construction has been delayed until 1977~78. Mrs. James Nelder comes before the BOard and states that since the improvement of Route 10 to a four-lane highway north of Chester and South of the Courthouse traf- fic has increased immensely. She states that the intersections of Jessup Road, Cogbill Road and Rockspring Farms Drive are terrible traffic hazards with the speed as high as it currently exists, Mr. Apperson states that some of these conditions are caused by the construction taking place on Route 1 and when that is completed some of this traffic should reroute itself. ' Mr. Covington states that these intersections do not warrant signals because enough traffic is not generated according to survey tests the Highway Department has made. Mrs, Nelder states that the statistics given her by the Highway Department are un- realistic and invalid. Mr. Apperson states that he feels this is a problem and it is on his motion, seconded by Mr. Krepela, resolved that the Highway Department be requested to consider lowering the speed limit on Route 10 from Canasta to the City line to 45 mph. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Apperson and Mr, Krepela, On motion of Mr. Horner, seconded by Mr~ Apperson, it is resolved that the follow- ing motion be and it hereby is approved~ WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation (VDHT) has submitted their Route 360 - Hull Street Road Redevelopment Study to the County for review and comment; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors accepts the Study with the following comments and conditionsl Ayes: ao VDHT will notify the County in writing prior to actual closing or opening of any crOssovers to permit the County enough time to review and make final comment, The County will review the status of the Clover Hill High School bus drive at the time that Brandermill builds the road between the school and Curtis 1000. Co There is an existing crossover at Bridgewood Road which is not shown. d. The first crossover east of 604 (Genito) should remain, e° The first crossover west of 906 (Suncrest) should remain. f. The crossover at 2584 (Astor) should remain, The first crossover east of 2584 (Astor) should be removed and the second crossover east should remain, When a cloverleaf is built at 150/360, VDHT should relocate Elkhardt to Lacony Drive extended as a part of the project. Mr° Horner, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela, Mr. Burnett states that the County has received the Summary of Allocations for Fis- cal Year 1975-76 for the Primary Road Funds of the Richmond District and. that Ches- terfield County will receive approximately $3,000,000 out of approximately $46,000,000. There is some discussion of this matter with Mr, Covington about the seeming in- equities of distribution. Mr, Krepela states that the staff of the Richmond Regional Planning District Com- mission (RRPDC) will be studying the traffic patterns, etc, of Rt. 147 with the possibility of four~laning the Huguenot Bridge, Mr, Covington states that the Highway Department does not have any plans for this at present but that the City of Richmond would have to initiate the plans, Mr° Krepela inquires if there is any possibility of Powhite extending to Route 60. Mr. Covington states that there are no plans for the immediate future. Upon consideration whereof, it is on motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the Planning Department con- tact the City of Richmond and make recommendations at the Powhite hearing with the possibility of widening the Huguenot Bridge and further that the Highway Department be asked to accelerate the Public Hearing on Powhite Parkway extension. Ay'es: Mr° Horner, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela. Mr° Apperson reqeusts that the Highway Department make a survey and put up stop signs in the Fuqua Farms area and requests further that 25 mph signs be put up in the Beachwood area on the extension of Hopkins Road that becomes Prestwood and Bonniebank. On motion of Mr. Hornet, seconded by Mr° Apperson, it is resolved that because there exists a traffic hazard on the northwest corner of Routes 655 and 621 that the Highway Department be requested to take the necessary action to remove the trees and widen the road at the intersection of Beach and Winterpock Roads, Ayes: Mr. Homer, Mr. Apperson and Mr, Krepela. Mr. Prosise comes before the Board and states that Chief Eanes has requested that two fire hydrants be installed at the County Industrial Park. Upon consideration whereof, it is on motion of Mr° Apperson, seconded by Mr, Krepela, resolved that two fire hydrants be installed on Whitepine Road at an approximate cost of $3,950. Ayes: Mr° Horner, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela° On motion of Mr, Apperson, seconded by Mr, Krepela, it is resolved that the follow ing Water Contracts be approved: 1o W75-10D Planters Wood $25,117,15 Stamie E. Lyttle Co,, Inc. 2. W75-44D Egee Drive 2,998,80 Bookman Construction Company 3, W75-47CD Seaboard Coast Line Industrial Park 12,742,00 F. G, Pruitt (van Doren Bros,) Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr, Apperson and Mr, Krepela, Mr. Painter states that the County has received bids for 2,000 corporation stops. He adds further that Hajoaca, distributor for A, Y, McDonald, was the low bidder but they did have an escalation clause attached to their bid plus the fact that the County did experience some problems with this Company last year. Mr. McNerney~ Vice-President of Sales for A, Y, McDonald, comes before the Board and states that he is present to defend the reputation of his Company because the situation de~ scribed by the Engineering Department was due to a strike that was occurring at the time. He states that they did accept the shipment back, stated that it was bad quality and he came down to speak with Mr. Quaiff to explain all of this. Mr. Quaiff states this is what happened and they have brought merchandise to be inspected to- day. Mr. McNerney states that he is not present to fight for the bid but for the reason as stated previously. Mr. Quaiff states that the reason the County rejected their bid was because the price was not firm. Mr. Myers states that he was not. in~ formed that this problem had occured. Mr, Apperson states that the Board should not be and were not bothered with this trivial matter. Upon consideration whereof, it is on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Krep- ela, resolved that the Engineering Department be and they hereby are authorized to accept the lowest firm bid for 2,000 corporation stops which amount is approximately $6,040. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr, Apperson and Mr, Krepela, Abstention: Mr. Myers. Mr. Martinez comes before the Board again to request sewer in his area. ~ He states that this has been deferred twice before and states that he is experiencing a bad health problem. Mr. Horner inquires if the Sheringham Road area was anticipated in the bond issue. Mr. Welchons states that it was not. Mr. Krepela inquires if the people in the area would participate to a greater extent than what is normal for sewer. Mr. Martinez states that he cannot speak for all the people in the area but that all did sign for sewer on the contracts that were sent. Mr. Myers states that he does not think it is morally right for the areas not in the bond issue to get sewer when those that were in the bond issue will not. Mr. Horner states that some of the areas that were in the bond issue will not get sewer. Mr. Myers states that he does not want to predetermine who will and who will not get sewer from the bond issue. Mr. Krepela suggests that Mr. Martinez ask the residents in the area if they will be willing to invest a greater amount as the cost is estimated to be approximately $40,000. Mr. Myers states that he does not like the way sewer matters are being handled and that if anyone in the County comes up short in sewer money it will not be the area north of Rt. 360. He states that the Board needs to come to grips with sewer problems because the people are not going to stand for it much longer. It is generally agreed that this matter will be discussed on July 23rd and Mr. Martinez is advised to get with Mr, Painter to see if this sewer extension will be economically feasible. Mr. Wagstaff comes before the Board and states that the fees on sewer permits ~have been raised from $5 to $10 and that the Building Inspector is requiring additional work that it is costing the contracts from $75 to $150 extra for each job. He states that he and a group of contractors have gone around the State and Mr. Mc- Bride is the only inspector who is requiring everything that is in the BOCA Code. He adds further that notice should have been given so that the contractors could have finished their commitments prior to the ruling taking effect. Other contrac~ tors in the audience voice their opposition to this strict regulation of the BOCA Code. Mr. Myers states that he would like to meet with the plumbers, contractors and others who are concerned. It is generally agreed that Mr Burnett will arrange a meeting with Mr. Dickie Burke, Mr. McBride, Mr. Wagstaff, Mr. Myers and others interested. Mr. Horner asks that all Board members be notified of the meeting and Mr. Krepela requests an interpretation of the BOCA Code. There is present a delegation from the Wagstaff Circle area requesting a status report because they heard it was to be discussed at this meeting. Mr. Burnett states he is sorry but it is not on the agenda and will not be discussed but re- fers the people to the Engineering Department for the status of sewers in the area~, Mr. Burnett states that this time and datehas been set for the discussion of the proposed massage parlor ordinance, He states that this has been duly advertised at a cost to the County of approximately $3,000. Mr, William Cox, Chairman of the Obscenity Committee, speaks against the massage parlors and for the ordinance and suggests that massage parlors not be allowed to operate between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m, Mr. Mason states that the County cannot legally control the hours of any business and adds that there would be no possible way to control the hours of the outcall services, Rev. Powell comes before the Board and speaks in favor of the massage parlor ordi- nance and states that he feels massage parlors are glorified prostitution houses and would like to see them prohibited completely, Mr. Mason states that massage parlors are classified as a legitimate business and can be regulated. Mr. Cox states that he would like the ordinance to prohibit the doors left open. Mr. Mason states that cannot legally be done. A lady in the audience states that Williamsburg prohibits massage parlors and inquires why it cannot be done in Ches- terfield. Mr. Mason states that it is just a matter of time before the Williams- burg ordinance is contested. Mr. Cox states that they do prohibit massage parlors but their ordinance does regulate the hours, Mr, Mason states that, in his opinion, this is the same as the "no knock" clause that was in the Henrico ordinance which was ruled illegal. Mr. John Ryan of Meadowbrook comes before the Board and speaks of the magazines sold in the County and gifts sold at Spencer's at Cloverleaf Mall. He also is in favor of a very strict massage parlor ordinance, He adds further that in some counties the Commonwealth's Attorney has taken it upon himself to have "X" rated films and books prohibited. He states that he has seen Mr. Rudy and Mr. Rudy has told him to make a complaint and he will handle the matter from there. He states that he feels it should be the Commonwealth's Attorney's responsibility. After considerable discussion concerning the charges for investigation, it is on motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. Krepela, resolved that the following ordinance be and it hereby is adopted and same to be effective August 1, 1975: An Ordinance amending and reordaining the Code of the county of Chesterfield by adding thereto a new chapter, Chapter 6A containing Articles I-IX regulating massage parlors, massage services, bath parlors, health clubs, and similar estab- lishments; providing for licensing of such establishments and certain employees of said establishments; setting standards for the operation of said establishments and providing penalties for violation of any provision of the ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD~ VIRGINIA: 1. That the Code of the County of Chesterfield be, and it is hereby, amended and reordained by adding thereto a new chapter, Chapter 6A containing Articles I-IX as follows: CHAPTER 6A ARTICLE I § 6A-l. Definitions. For purpose of this ordinance, the following phrases and words shall have the meaning assigned below unless the context clearly requires a different meaning. a. "Massage" - shall mean any method of pressure on or friction against, or stroking, kneading, rubbing, tapping, pounding, or stimulating the external parts of the body with the hands or with the aid of any mechanical or electric apparatus or applicances and shall include any physical contact between a massage technician as defined herein and a patron as defined herein in the preparation for giving or drying after a Turkish, Russian, Swedish, vapor, sweat, electric, salt, shower, sponge, or any other kind or character of baths. b. "Massage Establishment" - shall mean any establishment having a fixed place of business where any person, firm, association or corporation engages in, conducts, carries on, or permits to be engaged in, conducted, or carried on any of the activities defined as a massage or the giving of Turkish, Russian, Swedish, vapor, sweat, electric, salt, shower, sponge, or any other kind or char- acter of baths when the patron is assisted by a massage technician. c. "Massage Service" - shall mean the giving, offering, or solliciting, or the performing of massage services from any premises within the County of Ches- terfield of any of the activities defined as a massage or the giving of Turkish, Russian, Swedish, vapor, sweat, electric, salt, shower, sponge, or any other kind or character of baths when the patron is assisted by a massage technician. do "Massage Technician" shall mean any person, male or female, who for any form of consideration gives or administers to a patron a "massage" as defined in this ordinance or who gives or administers a massage to a patron who has paid any form of consideration whatsoever for the massage to a third person. e. "Operating Permit~ - shall mean the permit to operate a massage es- tablishment or service required by this ordinance. f. "Technician Permit" - shall mean the permit to engage in the activi- ties of a massage technician required by this ordinance, g. "Sexual or Genital Parts'~ shall include the genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or anus of any person and the breasts of a female person. h "Patron" - shall mean the person receiving the massage or taking the bath, i. "Person" - shall mean any individual and any partnership, associa- tion, or corporation where the use of the term permits such meaning. ~ 6A-2. Massage Establishment or Service Operating Permit Required: It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in, conduct or carry on or permit to be engaged in, conducted or carried on, in or upon any premises, or from any premises within the County of Chesterfield the operation of a massage esnablishment or service without first obtaining a permit from the Chief of Police of the County of Chesterfield. Any permit issued pursuant to this Article shall be non-transferable either from person to person or from one place of business to another place of business. § 6A-3. Massage Establishment or Service Operating Permit Procedure and Fee~: Any person, partnership or corporation desiring to obtain a permit to operate a massage establishment or service shall make an application to the Chief of Police on a form provided by the Chief of Police, A nonrefundable fee of FIF- TEEN HUNDRED DOLLARS (61,500) shall accompany the submission of each application to defray, in part, the costs of investigation and reports. The fee required here- in shall be in addition to any business license tax or other fee required by law. § 6A-4. Application Contents: The application for a massage establishment or service operating permit under this ordinance shall set forth the proposed place of business and facilities therefore, if any, and the name and address of each applicant. In addition to the foregoing, any applicant for a license shall furnish the following information: a. The previous addresses of applicant, if any, for a period of five (5 years immediately prior to the date of the application and the dates of residence at each. of age. b. Written proof that the applicant is at least eighteen (18) years c~ Applicant's sex, height, weight, color of eyes and hair. d. Three (3) passport size photographs 1" x 1" taken within six (6) months immediately preceding the date of the application, which photographs shall be in color. e. Business, occupation or employment history of the applicant for the five (5) years immediately preceding the date of the application. f. All criminal convictions, criminal charges to which a plea of nolo contendere was accepted or criminal charges for which a bond forfeiture was made, if any, except traffic offenses, with a full explanation of the circumstances therefor. Police. g. Fingerprints of the applicant as may be required by the Chief of h. Such other identification and information as the Chief of Police may require in order to discover the truth of the matters hereinabove specified as required to be set forth in the application. i. If the applicant is a corporation, the name of the corporation shall be set forth exactly as shown in its Articles of Incorporation, together with the names and residence addresses of each of its officers, directors, and each stock- holder holding more than five percent (5%) of the stock of the corporation. If the applicant is a partnership, the application shall set forth the name and resi- dence address of each of the partners, including limited partners. If one or more of the partners is a corporation, the provision of this section pertaining to a corporate applicant shall apply. If the applicant is a corporation or partnership, the president of the corporation or the principal partner shall furnish the infor- mation required by paragraphs "a" through "h" of this section. ~ 6A-5. Renewal of Operating Permit: The operating permit issued pursuant to this ordinance shall last for one year's duration and must be renewed at the expiration of each year by follow- ing the same procedure set forth in this Article. A nonrefundable fee of seventy- five dollars ($75) shall accompany each application for renewal of an operating permit. ~ ~ 6A-6. Issuance of Operating Permit: The Chief'of Police shall issue the massage establishment operating per- mit when the applicant has fully complied with the requirements of this Article and Article V and shall issue the massage service operating/technicians permit when the applicant has fully complied with the requirements of this Article and Article I unless: a. The applicant knowingly made a material misstatment in the applica- tion for a license, or b. The applicant has, within five (5) years immediately preceding the date of the filing of the application, been convicted of or pleaded nolo contendere to or forfeited bond on any felonious criminal charge or any misdemeanor criminal charge involving theft of property, assault or battery, drugs, or violations of Article I of Chapter 4 of Title 18.1 of the Code of Virginia. If the applicant is a corporation or a parnnership, this provision shall apply to each 'stockholder or partner owning or having in excess of 5% interest of said corporation or partqer- ship, or c, The Chief of Police determines from existing facts that the applicant has previously engaged in unlawful felonious activities or other activities speci- fied in Section 6A-6 (b) which make the issuance of the permit injurious to the public health, safety, or welfare, The Chief of Police shall not refuse to issue an operating permit unless he first states the reason in writing: ARTICLE III ~ 6A-7. Massage Technician's Permit Requir~: It shall be unlawful for any person to act as massage technician in or upon any premises within the County of Chesterfield without first obtaining a per- mit from the Chief of Police. The permit shall designate the massage establish- ment at which the technician shall work and the technician shall not work at any other establishment under that permit without first obtaining the approval of the Chief of Police, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. § 6A-8. Massage Technician Permit Procedures and Fees~ Any person desiring to obtain a permit to act as a massage technician shall make an applicaiton to the Chief of Police on a form provided by the Chief of Police. A nonrefundable fee of FIFTEEN HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1,500) shall accompany the submission of each application to defray, in part the costs of investigation and report. ' § 6A~9. Application Contents: a. The applicant for a permit shall furnish all of the information required by paragraphs "a" through "h" of Section 4 of Article II of this ordi- nance. b. The applicant shall furnish a certificate from a medical doctor, licensed to practice in the Commonwealth of Virginia, stating that the applicant has, within fourteen (14) days immediately preceding the date of application, been examined and found to be free of any contagious or communicable disease including tuberculosis, syphillis, gonorrhea, and skin fungus or infections but excluding the common cold and closely related ailments. § 6A-10. Renewal of Technician Permit and Health Certificate: a, The technician permit issued pursuant to this ordinance shall last for twelve (12) months duration and must be renewed by following the same procedure set forth in this Article. A nonrefundable fee of FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500) shall accompany each application for renewal of a permit. b. Each six (6) months following the issuance of the initial permit, the massage technician must furnish a medical examination certificate required by Section 6A-9 (b). § 6A-11. Issuance of Technician Permit: The Chief of Police shall issue the permit when the applicant has fully complied with the requirements of Article III unless: a. The applicant knowingly made a material misstatement in the appli- cation for a permit, or b. The applicant has, within five (5) years immediately preceding the date of the filing of the application, been convicted of or pleaded nolo contendere to or forfeited bond on any felonious criminal charge or any misdemeanor criminal charge involving theft or property, assault or battery, drugs, or violations of Article I of Chapter 4 of Title 18.1 of the Code of Virginia. c. The Chief of Police determines from existing facts that the appli- cant has previously engaged in unlawful felonious activities or other activities specified in Section 6A-11 (b) which make the issuance of the permit injurious to the public health, safety, or welfare, The Chief of Police shall not refuse to issue a permit unless he first states the reason in writing. ARTICLE IV ~ 6A-12. Unlawful Acts by Massage Technicians or Patrons~ a. It shall be unlawful for any person, in a massage establishment, to place his or her hand or hands upon, to touch with any part of his or her body, to fondle in any manner, or to massage, a sexual or genital part of any other person. b. It shall be unlawful for any person, in a massage establishment, to expose his or her sexual or genital parts, or any portion thereof, to any other person. It shall also be unlawful for any person, in a massage establishment, to expose the sexual or genital parts~ or any portion thereof, of any other person, c~ It shall be unlawful for any person~ while in the presence of any other person in a massage establishment, to fail to conceal with fully opaque covering, the sexual or genital parts of his or her body. § 6A-13~ Unlawful Acts ~y Massage Establishment Owners and Massage Service Operatorsl ~ a, It shall be unlawful for any person owning, operating, or managing a massage establishment or service, knowingly or having knowledge of such facts as are sufficient to give him constructive knowledge, to cause, allow, or permit in or about such massage establishment or place of service, any agent, employee, or any other person under his control or supervision to perform such acts prohibited in Section 1 of this Article. b. It shall be unlawful for any person owning, operating, or managing a massage service, to perform, offer, give~ or perform such services at, in or upon the premises designated in the application as a base of operation, ARTICLE V ~ 6A-14. Massage Establishment Facilities: No permit to conduct a massage establishment shall be issued unless an inspection by the County Office of Building Construction and Inspections and the Department of Public Health reveals that the establishment complies with each of the following minimum requirements: a. The building in which the establishment is located is in Compliance with all existing building and related codes, provided, however, that this sub- section shall not be applicable to any establishment lawfully doing business at the designated location prior to the effective date of this ordinance, b. The establishment is located in excess of three hundred (300) feet from any residentially zoned property or residence unless the establishment was lawfully doing business at the designated location prior to the effective date of this ordinance. c. A light level of no less than ten (10) foot candles at any point within the room shall be maintained in each room or enclosure where massage ser- vices are performed on patrons. d. A minimum on one (1) tub or ~hower, and one (1) toilet and wash basin shall be provided in every massage establishment; provided, however, that if male and female patrons are to be served simultaneously at said establishment, a separate massage room, or rooms, separate dressing facilities, separate tub~ shower and bathing facilities, and separate toilet facilities shall be provided for male and female patrons. Further~ in those establishments where steam rooms or sauna baths are provided, if male and female patrons are to be served simultan- eously, separate steam rooms or sauna rooms shall be provided for male and female patrons. Sauna baths and electrical equipment must be tested for safety by Under- writers Laboratories and currently listed by Underwriters Laboratories. e. Cabinets shall be provided for the storage of clean linen. Approved receptables shall be provided for the storage of all soiled linen and paper towels. f. Minimum ventilation shall be provided in accordance with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code., g. All building, plumbing and electrical installations shall be in- stalled under permit and inspection of the County Building Inspections Office, and such installation shall be installed in accordance with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. All massage equipment electrically operated must be listed by Underwriters Laboratories and maintained in a safe condition, and must be grounded and bonded properly as ~equired by the National Electric Code. h. The walls in all rooms where water or steam baths are given shall be painted with a washable, mold-resistant paint of light color. i. All lavatories or wash basins shall be provided with hot and cold running water, soap and single-service towels in wall-mounted dispensers. j. Security deposit facilities capable of being locked by the patron shall be available for the protection of the valuables of the patrons. § 6A-15. Massage Establishment Operating Requirements: a. Every portion of a massage establishment, including appliances, ap- paratus and personnel, shall be kept cleaned and operated in a sanitary condition. b. All massage establishments shall be provided with clean and sanitary towels, sheets and linens in sufficient quantity. Towels sheets and linens shall not be used by more than one (1) person unless the same has first been laundered. Heavy white paper may be substituted for sheets provided that such paper is used once for each person and then discarded into a sanitary receptable. c. Ail walls, ceilings, floors, pools, showers, bathtubs, steam rooms, and all other physical facilities for the establishment must be in good repair and maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, Wet and dry heat rooms, steam or vapor rooms, or steam or vapor cabinets~ shower compartments, and toilet rooms, shall be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected with a disinfectant approved by the County Health Department each day the business is in operation, Bathtubs shall be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected with a disinfectant approved by the Depart- ment of Public Health after each use, d. Disinfecting agents and sterilizing equipment approved by the County Health Department shall be provided for any instruments used in performing acts of massage and such instruments shall be disinfected after being used upon each patron. e. Pads used on massage tables shall be covered in a workmanlike manner with durable, washable plastic or other acceptable waterproof material. f. No massage may be given within any cubicle, room, booth, or any area within a massage establishment which is fitted with a door capable of being locked. g. The main entrance to the massage establishment may not be locked dur- ing business hours and no passage way doors shall be locked during business hours. § 6A-16. Unlawful Acts: It shall be unlawful for any person to conduct, operate or carry on the operation of a massage establishment or service in violation of any of the provi- sions of this Article. It shall be unlawful for any massage technician to give massages in any establishment which operates in violation of any provision of this Article. § 6A-17. Effective Date of Sections of Article V: The provisions of Section 6A-14 of this Article shall immediately apply to all massage establishments which are initially opened after the effective date of this ordinance or moved to different locations after the effective date of this ordinance or which make physical improvements to its place of business after the effective date of this ordinance. The provisions of Section 6A-14 shall apply to all other establishments six (6) months and thereafter from the effective date of this ordinance. The provisions of Section 6A-15 of this Article shall apply to all establishments from the effective date of this ordinance. ARTICLE VI § 6A-18. Display of Permits and Licenses: The owner or operator of a massage establishment shall display the mas- sage establishment operating permit and the technician permit of each and every massage technician employed in the establishment in an open and conspicuous place on the premises. The owner or operator of a massage service shall display the massage service operating/technician permit in an open and conspicuous place on the premises. § 6A-19. Right of Entry: For purposes of conducting routine inspections, officials of the County Building Inspector's Office and the County Health Department shall have the right of entry into the premises of any massage establishment during the hours such massage establishment is open for business. It shall be unlawful for any person to hinder, delay, prevent, or refuse to permit any lawful inspection or investi- gation of a massage establishment by any such officer. § 6A-20o Suspension or Revocation of Operating Permit or Technician Permit: In the event that any person holding an operating permit or a technician permit issued pursuant to this ordinance shall violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of this ordinance, or any provision of any other ordinance or law relating to or regulating said business or occupation, or shall conduct or carry on such business or occupation in an unlawful manner, the Chief of Police may, in addition to other penalties provided by ordinance or State law, suspend or revoke the permit after the permittee has been given the opportunity for a hearing. A hearing shall not be required where the Chief of Police deter~ mines a suspension is required to protect the County from immediate danger, and said suspension does not last for over three (3) days, For the purpose of this section, a criminal court conviction shall not be required to support a finding of a violation of any law. § 6A-21. Appeal of Decision of the Chief of Police: In the event that the Chief of Police shall refuse to issue an operating permit pursuant to Section 6A-6 or a massage technician permit pursuant to Section 6A-11, the applicant shall have a right of appeal to the County Board of Super- visors who shall determine the correctness of the action of the Chief of Police and whose decision shall be the final administrative decision. § 6A-22. Exemptions: ARTICLE VII This ordinance shall not apply to the following classes of individuals while engaged in the performance of the duties of 'their respective professions as long as such duties are not performed on patrons in massage establishments: a. Physicians, surgeons~ chiropractors, osteopaths, or physical thera- pists who are duly licenses to practice their respective professions in the Common- wealth of Virginia and employees of nursing homes and hospitals which are duly licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia, b. Nurses who are registered under the laws of this Commonwealth, c. Trainers of any amateur~ semiprofessional or professional athlete or athletic team. d. Barbers and beauticians who are duly licensed under the laws of this Commonwealth, ARTICLE VIII ~ 6A-23. Severabilit¥: If any section, subsection or portion of this ordinance is declared in- valid by a court of competent jurisdiction for any reason, such section, subsection or portion shall be severable and the remaining sections and provisions shall con- tinue in full force and effect, § 6A-24. Effective Date: ARTICLE IX This ordinance shall become effective on and after August 1, 1975. The Board being polled: Ayes: Mr.Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr, Apperson and Mr. Krepela. Absent: Mr, O'Neill. Mr. Burnett states that he has received a letter from Mr. W, W. Gordon resigning from the Library Board effective no later than August 8, 1975, Upon consideration whereof, it is on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr, Myers. resolved that Mr. Gordon's resignation be and it hereby is accepted with regrets, Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr, Krepela. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that this Board adjourns into Executive Session for lunch to discuss matters under litigation. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela, Reconvening: 75S127 In Bermuda Magisterial District, Kenneth Pratt requests a Variance to use a parcel of land which has no public road frontage for dwelling purposes. This parcel lies 540 ft. off the northeast line of Happy Hill Road, measured from a point 500 ft. southeast of its intersection with Sunset Avenue. Refer to Part of Lot 2, Forest Heights Subdivision (Sheet 41). Mr. Pratt comes before the Board and states that the landowners in the area do not want this road made public and no one will grant any further right-of-way. Upon consideration whereof, it is on motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. Apperson. resolved that this request for a Variance be and it hereby is approved subject to a 25' right-of-way dedicated from Point "A" to Point "B" on a plat filed with the papers of this Board. Ayes: Mr. Myers, Mr, Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr, O'Neill. 75S105 In Matoaca Magisterial District, William H. Smith requests a Variance to use a parcel of land which has no public road frontage for dwelling purposes. This par- cel lies 1,500 ft. off the south line of Reedy Branch Road measured from a point approximately 3,600 ft. east of its intersection with Nash Road. T. M. Sec. 145 (1) Parcel 11-2 (Sheet 39). Mr. Schiavo states that the applicant has followed the proper procedures and has asked for a 30 day deferral. Upon consideration whereof, it is on motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that this request be and it hereby is deferred for 30 days. Ayes: Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr, O'Neill. 75S130 In Dale Magisterial District, Silas O. Swenson requests a Variance to use three parcels of land which have no public road frontage for dwelling purposes. When created, these parcels will lie from 0 to 823 ft, off the east line of Hopkins Road, measured from a point 130 ft. north of the Hopkins Road Falling Creek over- pass. T, M. 42-9 (1) parcels 15 & 16 (Sheet 16)~ Mr. Schiavo states that this case was deferred until flood plain information was available for this area. Mr, Swenson states that there is no opposition to this request. He shows the Board a more accurate flood plain line as prepared by the Corps of Engineers, Upon consideration whereof, it is on motion of Mr, Apperson, seconded by Mr, Krep- ela, resolved that this reqnest for a Variance be and it hereby is approved sub- j ect to the conditions recommended by the Planning Department with an additional condition that his road plan be submitted to the Engineering Department for erosion and alignment ocntrol approval for the private road prior to building permits being issued. It is further noted that if the Corps of Engineers produces a better plan for the lot designation, Mr, Swenson will be allowed to follow that plan, Ayes: Mr. Myers, Mr, Apperson, Mr, Krepela and Mr, O'Neill, 75S133 In Clover Hill Magisterial District Glenn M. Hill requests a Variance to use a parcel of land which has no public ~oad frontage for dwelling purposes. This par~ cel lies approximately 200 ft, south of the southern terminus of Loch Braemer Drive. T~ M. Sec. 39-13 (1) part of parcel 3 & 4 (Sheet 14). Upon consideration whereof, it is on motion of Mr. Horner, seconded by Mr. Apper- son, resolved that this Variance be and it hereby is approved subject to the con- ditions recommended by the Planning Department, Ayes: Mr Horner, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela. 75S149 In Bermuda Magisterial District, David B. King requests a Variance to use a lot which fronts along an unimproved public road for dwelling purposes. This lot lies in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Taw Street (unimproved) and Botone Avenue (unimproved). Refer to Rayon Park, Blk. D, Lots 31-41 (Sheet 23). Mr, King inquires if the road will have to meet State standards~ Mr. Ritz states that this is a County-owned right,of-way and that he will have to coordinate all improvements with the County Engineer on Taw Street because the County is respon- sible for the drainage, etc There being no opposition, it is on motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved subject to the condition that Mr. King coordinate all improvements of Taw Street with the County Engineer. Ayes: Mr. Hornet, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr, Krepela and Mr. O'Neill, 75SR134 Mr. Richard Phillips comes before the Board to request renewal of a mobile home permit to park a mobile home on property which belongs to E. Phillips, wife of the applicant. Refer to Quail Oaks, Sec. 2, Blk. 4, Lot 8 and better known as 2634 Perlick Road (Sheet 23). Upon consideration whereof, it is on motion of Mr Myers, seconded by Mr, Krepela, resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved for a period of two years. Ayes: Mr.. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr, O'Neill. 75SR135 Mr. Albert F. Baker, Jr, comes before the Board requesting a renewal of a mobile home permit to parl a mobile home on property which belongs to R, Riley, Jr,, father of the applicant, Refer to Central Park, Blk. 16, lots 12 through 15 and better known as 10225 Brightwood Avenue (Sheet 32). Upon consideration whereof and there being no opposition, it is on motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved for a period of two years, Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. 75SR136 Mr. Howard L. Wade comes before the Board requesting renewal of a mobile home per- mit to park a mobile home on property which he owns. Refer to Chesterfield Manor, Blk~ 1, Lot 5 and better known as 15431 Appomatox Street (Sheet 43/44). Upon consideration whereof and there being no opposition, it is on motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. Krepela, resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved for a period of two years, Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr, Myers, Mr, Apperson, Mr, Krepela and Mr, O'Neill, On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that the Judges of the Circuit Court be and they hereby are requested to appoint Mr. Everett Edward Whitlock as a Police Officer effective August 1~ 1975, and Mr. Donald Lee Rose as a Dog Warden effective July 16, 1975, for the County of Chesterfield Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr, Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr, O'Neill, Mr. Burnett states that the County has received a request for $4,520 for Fiscal Year 1975-76 from the Capital Area Comprehensive Health Planning Council, Inc. He states that he also received a notice from the Richmond Regional Planning Dis- trict Commission stating that this Agency will be dissolving and being taken over by a larger agency. He suggests that the County find out what is happening and how these assets can be transferred, if they can be transferred. Upon considera- tion whereof, it is on motion of Mr, Krepela, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the County Administrator investigate the matter further. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr~ O'Neill On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr, Krepela, it is resolved that the County appropriate $994.40 from the Unappropriated Surplus of the General Fund to pay for the County's pro-rata share as a member of the RRPDC for the remainder of Fis- cal Year 1974-75. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr, O'Neill. Mr. Floyd Gibbs along with Mr, Horace Little and Mr, Gill Percy, come before the Board to discuss the contract for rates to be charged for Chesterfield. Mr. Gibbs states that the Carriers' Report did not have any conflict with the rates which Vepco has proposed for Chesterfield or any other County but dealt mainly with 'jurisdictional customers. He states that the report of the Committee was silent on governmental agencies. Mr. Gibbs states that the meeting of the Counties and Cities to which Chesterfield paid part of the expense went along with the proposed rates and all other governmental entities have signed with the exception of Ches- terfield and five others. Mr. Mason states that there are only two alternatives and they are: 1. Sign the contract at the rate negotiated, or 2. Go with the rate sen by the State Corporation Commission. Upon considera[ion whereof, it is on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr, Krepela, resolved that this Board accepts the contract payment schedule proposed by Vepco and the Chairman is hereby authorized to sign same. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill Mr. Burnett states that he has been invited to speak on a panel to give his ideas on the Vepco rates for municipalities. He states that he will speak on the points that Vepco should be allowed to void longstanding contracts~ that Vepco should not pay a gross receipts tax on the fuel adjustment amounts and that if the muni- cipalities are obligated to pay such high rates, that public service corporations should be assessed by localities equitably along with other industries. Mr. Falwell comes before the Board and states that the consulting firm of Cresap, McCormick and Paget have prepared the first phase of the study and introduces Mr. Lou Knapp. Mr. Knapp states that Phase I of the report is in an outline form. He states that they have looked at the factual data on the County and the Police Department; had interviews with the Police Department, the staff and most Board members and states that they are progressing faster than anticipated due to the cooperation of all concerned. He states that Phase I of the report is in six parts and gives the highlights of the report. He states that the report concludes that the Patrol Section is understaffed, the Dispatchers' Section is understaffed, the 1975-76 Budget included additional manpower but no equipment, the personnel management needs upgrading, as density increases in the County so do the needs of the Police Department, physical facilities are inadequate, the Dispatchers' area is a mess, the take home car plan is a good idea but the County is not re- ceiving any benefits since the cars are unmarked, information on the Police De- partment is not available to the public, etc. He states that Phase II should be completed by October, 1975, and in the meantime they will be working on improving some of the things mentioned for Phase I. Mr O'Neill states that he feels the sirens on some of the patrol cars are not adequate because they cannot be heard coming down the road. It is generally agreed that the Police Department's re- quest should be amended to include penetrators for approximately 33 cars in the amount of $6,105. Mr. Falwell states that representatives of Cresap, McCormick and Paget will be able to attend the meeting on the 16th of July, It is generally agreed that the consultants should attend, On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that the Engi- neering Department be and they hereby are authorized to seek bids on the water pumps for the pumping station at the Pocono tank, Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela. It is generally agreed than the discussion regarding the requirements of Water. works Regulations concerning cross connection and backflow prevention control be deferred for further consideration. It is generally agreed that the request from Landmark Builders, Inc, for 130 Water and sewer connections for a parcel of land fronting on Beulah Road and bordering on Kingsland Creek be investigated to a greater degree. On motion of Mr, Myers, seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that the following Sewer Contracts be and they hereby are approved; 1. S75-20D Ayes: 2.~ S75-32CD Reynolds Metals ~ Hickory Plant Van Doren Brothers, Inc~ Egee Drive Bookman Construction Company Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr, Apperson and Mr, Krepela. $5,094~00 4,965.00 On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr~ Krepela, it is resolved that Sewer Con- tracts S75-43CD, S75-44CD and S75-45CD be and they hereby are approved. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr, Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr, Krepela, On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr, Krepela, it is resolved that Sewer Con- tract S75-41CD be and it hereby is approved with the understanding that Matoaca Middle School is the primary concern here. Ayes: Mr. Hornet, Mr, Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr, Krepela and Mr, O'Neill. On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that Sewer Con- tract S74-37T be and it hereby is awarded to Richard L. Crowder in the amount of $100,597 which is the base bid plus approximately $5,861 if boring is necessary and if~ the sewer line is extended to the Matoaca High School. Ayes: Mr. Homer, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. Mr. Painter states that he has received a letter from EPA concerning requests for funds for improvements to the Ettrick Sanitary District sewer. It is generally agreed that Mr. Painter should follow up on this letter, On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr, Krepela, it is resolved that the exten- sion of storm sewer from Chesterfield Avenue for a distance of 730 ft. at an esti- mated cost of $12,045 be paid for with $6,022.50 from the drainage fund and $6,022.50 from the 3¢ Road Funds. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr, Krepela and Mr, O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr, Apperson, it is resolved that Sewer Con- tract 7032-2 be and it hereby is awarded to S. O. Jennings in the amount of $171,492 92 Ayes: Mr. Homer, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr. Apperson it is resolved that Vepco be allowed to connect sanitary wastes from the Chesterfield Power Station to the Proctor's Interim Plant with the stipulation that they pay any extra expense. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr, Myers, Mr~ Apperson and Mr, Krepela. On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that uncollect- ible accounts be and they hereby are charged off as uncollectible with the under- standing that if further negotiations can be made for payment, it be done. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr, Krepela. On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that the Engineer- ing Department be and they hereby are authorized to hire a Clerk-Stenographer I, at a salary of $5,544 to work with Mr. Quaiff. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela. Mr. Homer states that the County has been notified that it will receive $604,500 for Old Town Creek trunks and $6,000,000 for trunk lines to the Proctor's Creek Plant. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr, Krepela, it is resolved that the Plan- ning Department proceed with the HUD "701" Grant by putting out bids, Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr, Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr, Myers, it is resolved that this Board appropriates funds totaling $98,034,487.00 for the 1975-76 Budget as follows Fund Number 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 22 41 48 6O 61 62 63 64 66 69 70 71 72 73 77 Ayes: Name General Fund Revenue Sharing Fund Library Law Library Roads Airport Garage Welfare Nursing Home School School Bond Anticipation Water Revenue Water Operating Water Debt Water Improvement Water Construction Water Meter Installation Ettrick Utility Fund Sewer Revenue Sewer Operating Sewer Debt Sewer Improvement Sewer Bond Construction Amount $30,059,837.00 2,250,700 00 1,514,270 00 4,000 00 30.000 00 287,453 00 312,988 00 1,746,732 00 1,868,536.00 34,074,083.00 7,000,000.00 1,762,000 00 1,422,85100 565,568 00 1,112~755 00 275~000 00 1,771,000 00 35,589 00 1.263,000 00 851,576 00 1,931,700 00 1,043,200.00 6,851,649.00 Grand Total $98,034,487.00 Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. Mr. Burnett states that the junk cars are being taken care of at this time in phases. Mr. Manuel states that Mr. Knight has been given approximately 100 cars to begin this project. Mr. Myers inquires how this project will be promoted, Mr. Manuel states that the Health Department and the Police Department will do most of this promoting. Mr. Burnett states that the State has appropriated $50,000 more to the building proposed for Mental Health/Mental Retardation, He states that the total grant when matched by the County will be $326,660,00 which will pay for the building and fur- nishings. Preliminary plans will be presented to the Board as soon as possible. Mr. Burnett states that the County has received a Citation from the City of Rich- ~!mond for the help of the Chesterfield County Fire Department under the direction of the Chief of the Fire Department during the emergency on June 26, 1975, caused by the Little Oil Company fire. ~On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that the Police Department's triple wide trailer be and it hereby is awarded to Aluminum Construc- tion Company which submitted the low bid of $30,890. Ayes: Mr. Hornet, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that this Board appropriates $445 to the Capital Area Agency on Aging for Chesterfield's pro-rata share for Fiscal Year 1975, 'Ayes: Mr. Hornet, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr, Apperson, seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that Hopkins Athletic Association be and they hereby are given permission to conduct Bingo games .and/or Raffles for a period of one year. iAyes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr. Myers:, it is resolved that the Chairman 'of the Board be and he hereby is authorized to sign a lease for ~27 acres of land .owned by the Continental Can Company for radio directional signals location for the airport and the lease will run for 30 years at a cost of $1 per year Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. ~On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that the follow- ing erroneous tax claims be and they hereby are approved for payment: iClyde Lo Turner 1974 Co. Contractor License $ 14.00 Madeline S. & James E, Bower 1975 Co. Retail Merchant License 100.00 ~Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill !On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, it is resolved that the County ~tdministrator be and he hereby is authorized to initial a change in ~the Transpor-~ :tation contract with the RRPDC because the County will not have to pay for services since it is now a member. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr~ Myers, it is resolved that the Chair- man and the Clerk be and they hereby are authorized to sign a contract for trans- portation planning with the Crater Planning District Commission, Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr~ Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr, Krepela~ it is resolved that the Com- monwealth's Attorney's request for an amendment to his budget be and it hereby is approved which request increases the salary of some of his personnel as follows: Linda K. Brugnoli Debra C. Fountain Herbert Gill From $6,820 to $7,492 From $7,920 to $8,000 From $14,942 to $15,240 Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. There is some discussion of the park sites in the Enon area. Mr, Ritz states that the negotiations have failed because the owner is not willing to sell for $1,500 per acre and states that he has been offered $3,000 per acre. It is on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Myers, resolved that an independent' ap- praisal be gotten for the land proposed for the Enon park. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr, Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that the claim of David Hamlin be and it hereby is authorized for payment in the amount of $2,195 which claim is the result of a malfunction of the sewer system in Ettrick. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill, On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that the County Attorney be instructed to start abandonment proceedings on Rathmore between Bensley and Dundas Road Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr, Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. It i~ generally agreed that the matter of appointing members to the RRPDC be de- ferred until the next meeting, On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that the County Attorney settle the condemnation cases against two property owners at the Swift Creek Reservoir. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr, Myers, it is resolved that this Board adjourns at 7:35 p.m. until 5:00 on Sunday, July 13, 1975, Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill.