My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-09-75 Minutes
BoardOfSupervisors
>
Agenda, Packets, Minutes
>
1975
>
Minutes
>
07-09-75 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2003 1:33:09 PM
Creation date
4/30/2003 7:34:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Supervisors
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
7/9/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
View images
View plain text
KIMBERLY ACRES SECTION 2 (CONT'D) <br /> <br /> Pano Drive <br /> <br />From its intersection with Shillcutt Road northerly <br />0 07 mile to Pano Courts and beginning at its inter.,. <br />section with Shillcutt Road southerly 0,05 mile to <br />a temporary turnaround <br /> <br />Cotfield Road <br /> <br />From its intersection with Shillcutt Road northerly <br />0.08 mile to State Maintenance (Route 2427) and from <br />its intersection with Shillcutt Road southerly 0.03 <br />mile to a temporary cuI-de~sac, <br /> <br />MEADOWDALE SUBDIVISION SECTION H <br /> <br />Claudehart Road <br /> <br />0.12 mile <br /> <br />0,11 mile <br /> <br />From its intersection with Bryan Wood Road easterly <br />0.16 mile to a temporary turnaround. <br /> <br />0 16 mile <br /> <br />ROUTE 10 <br /> <br />Addit ion <br /> <br />Sections 6 and 7 of new connections at Sta, 701+80 <br />and Sta. 740+50, Proj, 0010-020-109, C501. <br /> <br />Abandonment <br /> <br />Section 5 of old location Route 749 between old and <br />new locations Route 10, Proj, 0010-020-109, C501. <br /> <br />ROUTE 616 <br /> <br />Addition <br /> <br />0.15 mile <br /> <br />0.04 mile <br /> <br />Sections 4, 5 and 8 of new location Routes 616 and <br />732 between Sta. 45+00 and Sta. 71+50, Project <br />0616-020-164, C501. <br /> <br />Abandonment <br /> <br />Sections 3, 6 and 7 of old location Routes 732 and <br />616 between Sta. 45+00 and Sta, 71+50~ Proj, 0616- <br />020-164, C501. <br /> <br />ROUTE 652 <br />Addition <br /> <br />0.37 mile <br /> <br />0.35 mile <br /> <br />Section 4 of new location Route 652 from Sta. 14+50 <br />to Sta, 37+00, Project 0652-020-146, C501. <br /> <br />Sections 5 and 6 of new connections Route 607 at Sra. <br />38+20 and Sta. 55+00, Proj, 0652-020-146, C501, <br /> <br />Abandonment <br /> <br />Sections 1, 2 and 3 of old location Routes 652 and <br />607 between Sta. 14+50 and Sta. 59+50, Project <br />0652-020-146, C501, <br /> <br />0.43 mile <br /> <br />0.20 mile <br /> <br />0.74 mile <br /> <br />Mr, Burnett states that the County has received a letter from Mr. Covington regard- <br />ing the park entrances and how they should be handled. He states that it should <br />be at the discretion of the Highway Department and/or the County when the turn <br />lanes should be Constructed and that it will be entirely at the County's expense. <br />There is some discussion of this matter and Mr. Covington states that he does not <br />feel any action is necessary at this time. <br /> <br />Mr. Burnett states that he has received a letter from the Highway Department stat- <br />ing that Route 651 (Belmont Road) construction has been delayed until 1977~78. <br /> <br />Mrs. James Nelder comes before the BOard and states that since the improvement of <br />Route 10 to a four-lane highway north of Chester and South of the Courthouse traf- <br />fic has increased immensely. She states that the intersections of Jessup Road, <br />Cogbill Road and Rockspring Farms Drive are terrible traffic hazards with the speed <br />as high as it currently exists, Mr. Apperson states that some of these conditions <br />are caused by the construction taking place on Route 1 and when that is completed <br />some of this traffic should reroute itself. ' <br /> <br />Mr. Covington states that these intersections do not warrant signals because enough <br />traffic is not generated according to survey tests the Highway Department has made. <br />Mrs, Nelder states that the statistics given her by the Highway Department are un- <br />realistic and invalid. Mr. Apperson states that he feels this is a problem and it <br />is on his motion, seconded by Mr. Krepela, resolved that the Highway Department be <br />requested to consider lowering the speed limit on Route 10 from Canasta to the City <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).